Links
Malieveld's manifestation for 'Love, freedom, no censorship' was peaceful until ..
During a sunny afternoon, an estimated 5,000 people gather on the Malieveld in The Hague. Stages have been banned by the regime during demonstrations for several months, but the participants have come up with wonderful alternatives. It will be an afternoon of two extremes. The first part is peaceful and cozy, like a beautiful party against the horrible corona measures. The second part is clinging to blood that flows at the hands of sadists. In this section we limit ourselves to the contribution of the participants. In part two, the Mobile Unit plays the leading role.
Start with 200
The mayor allowed the event to be attended by only a few hundred people. He thought the 70,000 square meters of the Malieveld were not big enough. Despite the confusion caused by the police, they all manage to reach the enormous lawn later.
The Malieveld also appears to have been cordoned off with ribbons and police. Rutte regime must be very afraid of this dissent so close to the parliamentary elections.
First, the police sends the protesters to a square to escort them back to Malieveld. This is all very peaceful. People have become used to this kind of antics of the Dutch ME in the recent period.
At one point about five thousand people have gathered on the field. Here they make clear what they stand for: Freedom.
Party
It is precisely what the regime forbids the population for obscure reasons that takes place on the Malieveld. People have fun together. They dance, sing and talk to each other like normal people without muzzles and other so-called protective devices. They are just happy to meet as social creatures, without acting like trained dogs.
It's about ten degrees. The sun is shining. All kinds of circles are formed of people on the grass and in the meantime music is constantly playing.
Despite the peacefulness, a mass of riot police suddenly appear on the horizon with batons and combat equipment.
They start to act unkind and push people away. This police action is superfluous because there is a peaceful atmosphere. With half an hour to go it is four o'clock.
The dog brigade also comes into the picture. There are also people walking off the Malieveld who are intimidated. However, a large group of about fifteen hundred people has sat down in the middle of the field. They don't want to budge.
Broadcaster
The police are calling for people to leave the field. Some of them listen, others are left behind.
Someone rightly points out that it is strange that you can no longer stand on a field in freedom.
The entire large group of brave people stood or sat in the middle of the Malieveld behind a banner tens of meters long, which reads Love, freedom, not dictatorship . Chants such as 'Here the citizen speaks' (in response to Here the police speak) and 'Love, freedom, no dictatorship' blare across the lawn of several hectares.
The thousand refuse to leave. "We are the people, join us," they shout firmly.
Despite the rising ME, with dogs and horses, they stand still, as they say for their freedom. ME is slowly closing in the group.
Apparently this does not impress those who stayed there. The general feeling is that they are in their right.
Meanwhile, the police threatens to use violence if people don't leave on their own. That is what they use to threaten the people through the loudspeaker. The time when the protesters meekly followed orders like this is definitely over. That happened regularly last year, but not anymore.
Love
"We are peaceful, what are you." it sounds from more than a thousand throats to the advancing police. The atmosphere is fine, even touchingly beautiful. The mayor still has to leave the last ten minutes before 4 pm, but they refuse to do so. They encourage each other to all sit down.
In the distance even a water cannon looms (which cannot drive across the field, otherwise it will sink).
The riot police forcefully removes the huge banner. With a lot of equipment, dogs and agents they threaten the large group of freedom defenders, who do not budge. All the display of power makes little impression. The people just sit there. Love, freedom, not dictatorship, it rings incessantly towards the violent arm of the regime. The police are somewhat indecisive before the peaceful masses.
Police on horses storm past the seated group. They also fail to impress. Meanwhile, the secret police officers, the romeos, are secretly taking people away. That is part of Rutte's new normal.
Aggression
The police are still with aggressive intentions in front of the sitting people, who keep shouting 'love, freedom ...'
At the last minute, the riot police still briefly deploy the water cannon to spray the people equipped with rain suits and umbrellas. They defy their jets of water in unison.
They warm themselves to their slogans. In the meantime, protesters are also trying to return to the field.
It has now become five minutes to four.
The group is surrounded by the riot police, but there is a status quo.
Finally, they sing to the police: "Shame on you, shame on you."
Four o'clock
Then there is clapping and booing. The people get up at exactly 4 pm. That is the time when they had indicated in advance that they would stop their action.
They can proudly walk past the rioters that Rutte has sent to the freedom-loving fellow countrymen. The police, the regime, were cracking down today. The Netherlands embraces freedom. It will touch more and more hearts like wildfire.
Today was a day where the heroism of these people was paramount. There were casualties from the police violence. The meaninglessness of their actions speaks volumes. It was nothing but powerlessness. The Netherlands showed Heart for Freedom and balls this afternoon on the field in The Hague!
For the first time in my life I am really proud of my fellow countrymen.
Mission to the police: protesters are viruses that you have to fight
The Outside Parliamentary Investigation Commission (BPOC) has received dozens of statements from police officers. These provide a clear explanation for the orgy of ME violence on Sunday March 14 and many demos before that against the corona measures. They reveal how the safety triangle instructs the police on how to treat citizens who have a different opinion. The triangle consists of the mayor, the Public Prosecution Service and Justice.
Mind you, it is politics that is responsible for police brutality. It is the government that indicates how the police should deal with demonstrations. The same government that most voters are allowed to continue their violent work thanks to the last parliamentary elections.
Violence
The first four statements show that the police have orders to pursue a policy other than normal against people who demonstrate against or do not cooperate with the corona policy. They must use force almost immediately. That is the approach.
These people who do not cooperate or oppose the police refer to as 'mindless wappies', 'viruses that you have to fight', 'undercuts where you have to set the bar' and 'scum'. By dehumanizing the opponents in this way, so no longer presenting them as human beings, the police can more easily use violence against them.
And that turns out to work fine in practice. Just look at the result where a man lies on the ground and the riot riot ruthlessly hits him in the head. The police dog is also ordered to mainly injure the man by almost biting his leg off.
Escalation
During demonstrations, the Mobile Unit's arrest unit, the Romeos, is constantly on the lookout to escalate the demo. This allows the riot police to 'wipe things clean' afterwards.
So here too they no longer talk about sending people away, but about sweeping it clean, as if you were sweeping up dirt with a dustpan and brush and putting it in a garbage bag. So they don't work with people, but with dirt!
Here as an illustration the Romeos in action. Life threatening and criminal.
The use of force is deliberate to intimidate the protesters.
Oppression
Another officer states that the police no longer serve society, but 'a policy of oppression and violence'. There is no longer any restraint in the use of force. "Colleagues literally hate the protesters."
Violence has become no exception, but the rule.
Positive
Fortunately, there are many police officers who disapprove of this policy, according to the officer. Many 'colleagues do not feel good about this situation'.
"I did not join the riot police to assault innocent protesters and that is exactly what is happening now."
Former soldiers, healthcare personnel and others demonstrate shoulder-to-shoulder on Museumplein
It is a happy day. On Saturday, March 20, something very unusual is happening in our extremely individualistic country. The world-wide march for freedom also takes place here. In response to the unbridled police violence last Sunday at the Malieveld in The Hague, all kinds of groups have put their heads together. They decide to protect each other! The first real step towards liberation from the yoke of the outgoing Rutte regime is a fact. Enjoy how this day unfolds.
Unclear
Beforehand there was uncertainty about the starting time, but also about the place where this day would be demonstrated. The municipality of Amsterdam did not want to participate in a demo beforehand. The election results are already evident here. Whether the elections have been faked or not the result is in any case that the outgoing rulers see it as a boost for even more repression.
At half past eleven that morning, a few thousand people gathered on the Museumplein. First there is a group of veteran soldiers standing at attention in front of the muzzled ME, behind them are nurses and doctors. Even though the old media, led by the NOS, tries to send the lie to the world that these are not carers but 'dressed up people' people. A fresh lie in a long line of deceit.
Stalemate
The protesters sit and stand behind the doctors. For a moment there is an impasse. The Mobile Force, ready to cut down on the defenseless brave, appears to be hesitant. Yet they are once again ready to strike down completely nonviolent and defenseless people.
After fifteen minutes of armistice, a water cannon starts a water ballet. The veterans and the doctors are soaking wet, with just behind the demonstrating civilians hiding behind their tarpaulins and rain suits.
Suddenly, the front ranks realize that at the back of the square, where there is no protection by the former military, the first people are arrested. Then suddenly they all decide to start their march through the city. A march for love, freedom and no dictatorship.
Procession
The enormous procession that starts from the Museumplein is quickly cut in two. The front part is locked in by the police and the back part scares the rioters apart. That will be around 2 pm. Fortunately the sun is shining. The mood is great among the enclosed freedom fighters. They are not upset by the umpteenth example of oppression by Rutte.
On the Leidsekade in front of the 1,500 people who were enclosed, countless protesters with heart signs, singing and shouting. They once again show the solidarity that this day is full of. Moments later, the 'brave' ME intervenes and chases them away with a lot of aggression and violence. We know from statements by agents at the BPOC why they respond in this way to fellow country nationals. They express an opinion that the Rutte regime forbids. Who is against the corona measures must be suppressed by force .
Over the course of hours, the trapped crowd slowly thins out. People are constantly being transported by buses to an unknown destination. Nobody knows where they will be dropped.
Some of these people have to stand here for five hours. Fortunately, they keep themselves warm with music, dancing and singing. There are bystanders secretly bringing them food until the riot police sees it. They also receive bottles of warm water from local residents which they can use to warm themselves.
When it comes down to it, the Dutch take good care of each other. But apparently they first have to lose the most essential after food and oxygen, namely their freedom.
No leaders
Around 7 pm, the riot police will load the last demonstrators into waiting buses and hand out masks to them. Which may or may not be accepted with much chuckling. Early in the afternoon people arranged transport for the people who were thrown off the bus here and there, to take them back home or to their car in Amsterdam. Awesome. No leader is needed for that. Nor that leaders are needed to bring together all kinds of groups of citizens who decide to stand up for each other against the regime's goons.
That should worry junta Rutte. Thousands of people come together without appointing leaders or organizers. When it comes down to it, they each take their responsibility to take care of each other. A day for freedom and love cannot end better!
Rob Vellekoop, March 21, 2021
member
Bol bans all of Robin de Ruiter's books - the writer responds
“More than forty publications by Robin de Ruiter have been notified by Bol without the publisher being informed. com, in consultation with the government, removed from the book supply. ” "These books have been sold by Bol for more than ten years." "There was no reason to ban them," De Ruiter writes at our request for comment.
Do you have any idea why Bol is discontinuing the sale of your books?
On the removal of books, Bol's website states that some publications can be controversial and / or hurt people: We believe it is important to be careful with the freedom of expression. However, we never support any form of possible deception, discrimination or hateful information. That is why we have made calls to several specialized parties, including the government, to help us properly assess these books.
Bol's decision to ban my books raises questions. Who are these specialized parties? What is the role of the government in this?
Governments around the world are working with WHO, the European Union, health authorities and technology companies to address disinformation on specific topics. They receive help from Facebook, Google, Twitter, Youtube and Mozilla / Firefox. All these companies have signed the 'Code of Practice on Disinformation' of the 'European Commission'.
The government has transformed itself into a digital authority that since the corona crisis not only literally directs citizens in their freedom of movement, their personal life and freedom of expression, but also tells them what to think and believe.
Disinformation and 'conspiracy theories' can easily arise when an opinion is inconsistent with the 'new normal' and the presumed attendant mindset. Even conspiracies, which do exist, are nowadays dismissed as 'conspiracy theory'.
Initially I was of the opinion that my books on Bol were removed as 'conspiracy theory'. However, that cannot be the true motive. Certain publications that can clearly be classified as conspiracy stories have not been removed by Bol.
Apparently there is another problem with my publications. Certain stakeholders are probably bothered by what is described in my books. Or maybe it's our latest release COVID-19. This book is based on policies of the European Union and our government. It describes how power in the European Union was seized by a small group of people and how they arranged the Maastricht Treaty on their own initiative. These policy documents show that the current European government has no legal basis whatsoever. Politicians will have to scratch their heads.
The sources in this book consist exclusively of official policy documents. Despite this, it has been removed from their website by Bol. I would like to emphasize that no conspiracy theories are used in this book or in any of my other books. My books describe events and abuses on the basis of reflection and proven facts. In my foreign publications I often write from a theological perspective on certain events. In doing so, I extend the lines from historical events to the future. As a result, it is regularly necessary to deviate from the usual opinion.
The person who expresses an alternative opinion must provide evidence. And you will not find that on the internet. To estimate whether certain information is correct, you need to know how reliable the source is. For more than 30 years, I have worked with honest scientists, historians, trusted politicians, ambassadors and former heads of state, including Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa (raised in part by my father-in-law). With their advice and information they have made an enormous contribution to my publications
Over the years, you have seen your books banned or even banned several times. Can you give us some examples of this? What title was it and what was the reason?
A good example is the acquisition of my first publisher Editorial Camino in Mexico. This was a Catholic publisher led by a priest friend, adherent of "liberation theology." My friend, along with my books, published several publications on Freemasonry. So that was a big mistake. Mexico is the only country in the world where Freemasonry with a political party is part of the government. They also play an important role within the Catholic Church. My friend the priest was exiled to Africa for two years by a bishop; the publishing house closed and all books destroyed.
I remember one of your books has been banned in France. Which was that and do you know why this happened?
That was the book Livre Jaune No. 7. A translation of the book The 13 satanic bloodlines. This book has been translated into French and published without my permission. I discovered the book by accident in a bookshop in Northern France. That happens more often, by the way. Likewise, the same book has been published in Turkish, Serbian, Hungarian and in Romania and Colombia without my permission.
The reason that the French edition was banned by the "European Court" in Strasbourg was due to criticism of the Zionist movement in Israel. All ideologies, opinions and ideas may be tested, analyzed and criticized in public. We can criticize the Christian faith or Islam to our heart's content. But there remains an ultimate exception. Freedom of expression is absolutely not valid for one theme: Zionism. This political movement does not like to be exposed to criticism and therefore hardly ever goes public. If there is any criticism of Zionism, the response is contradictory and hostile. The subject of Zionism has almost become a taboo.
Do you expect censorship to increase? If so, how will we notice this further? How far do you think the government will go in this regard?
As stated above, disinformation and "conspiracy theories" are prone to emerge when an opinion is inconsistent with the "new normal" and the presumed attendant mindset. Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the 'European Commission' warned of misinformation and conspiracy theories as follows:
“ We all have a role to play. The tech companies, the media, civil society and the politicians. We have to do this together. ”
Now this is the approach in a paragraph. There is one opinion and that is theirs. That is to say 'what' the governments say with the cooperation of the mainstream media (politically correct).
We are expected to trust these individuals in their blue eyes.
During a lecture on January 18, 2021, Deputy Prime Minister Kajsa Ollongren said the following:
“The fight against disinformation is a test of the strength of our democracy. Success depends on the commitment of all of us. From legislators and social media companies, from scientists and journalists and everyone else in society. ”
Disinformation and conspiracy theories are seen by the government as a threat to our rule of law. They do not seem to understand that they themselves are the root cause of the problem. Conspiracy thinking, suspicion and doubt arise because it increasingly appears that we cannot just trust our politicians on their word. The basis of trust is regularly undermined by political debacles, corruption and cover-ups, misleading information that is deliberately disseminated for political or financial purposes, as well as abuses, such as the benefits affair at the Tax and Customs Administration.
Moreover, often no openness is given about certain political matters. Public and private law interests are intertwined. Secret contracts (state secrets) are signed and are not public (thus lack democratic control). The statements of the official bodies are more than ever under discussion. Since the corona crisis, mistrust has only increased. Citizens have not forgotten the strategy and misleading reporting by the World Health Organization and political authorities about the so-called bird and swine flu. Everyone sees that the same strategies are now being followed and given a new look for COVID-19.
All of this has led to hundreds of social media groups. On the internet today you end up in a dangerous cocktail of truth and lies. All kinds of dubious sites contain misleading information, fake news and conspiracy theories.
Credibility and reliability are essential for political leaders.
Without truth there is no trust. With reliable politicians one removes the oxygen for misinformation and conspiracy theories, so that they no longer pose a threat to the rule of law.
Sadly a foolish thought, too good to be true. Censorship and the hunt for dissenters will only increase.
We are dealing with enormous transformation processes that must lead to the end of our individual right to self-determination. The corona pandemic and global lockdowns play an important role in this. They are part of a complex step-by-step plan that should ultimately lead to the introduction of a 'technocratic world dictatorship'.
The more fear of the coronavirus, diseases, political tensions, economic crisis, racial discrimination and wars, the faster the collective humanity is approaching the point where it will accept a New World Order that will end people's suffering with an iron fist.
Bol stops selling your books, do you think more bookstores will follow?
Only if they are forced by the government. They will certainly not do this voluntarily. In these times of crisis, they are happy with every book that is sold. Bookstores in the Netherlands are experiencing exceptionally difficult times. The consequences of the corona measures have ensured that one in three bookstores is in the danger zone. The fact that my books are banned by Bol has to do with the purpose - and that is not profit motive - why Bol was founded.
Bol is not about profit. It is about market conquest; dependence on the customer and the disappearance of the middle class. So also more influence on the supply, what is and what is not. So indirect censorship.