Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:55 am

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 8th of January 2009.

For newcomers: look into the website www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you'll find hundreds of hours of talks I've given, over the years, that go into the big-big picture, trying to tie history together with the present and showing you where it's all tied together and going forward, in a directed plan. How it's organised, something the average person doesn't even realise, that there are big powerful Foundations and organisations, working together, to bring in a particular type of future and we're all kept entertained and in confusion when all of this is happening.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can download written transcripts of these talks and they're written in the various languages of Europe.

Last night, I talked about the effects of what I call the System, the system being an economic system, primarily, which gives rise to a hierarchy which dominates it and, really, I think even Marx said the same thing that every system that's ever existed, as far as we know in the history we're given, has been based on economics. Economics takes priority over every thing and everyone underneath it; and, it's always ruled by potentates, either kings or queens. Today, we have governments, some will have monarchies and governments combined, such as the British system; and, nothing really has changed. The trick is though, of course, is getting the public, whom they view as a big herd of animals, at the bottom, to go along with this agenda and the way they do it is by never having them know or understand what's really ever going on, or where they're going to end up. They like us to think we know where we're going to end up, that's why people vote: they vote for promises; promises always work with most people. Even though politics today is a farce, because most people can get into office and then renege on their promises and say there's not enough money in the kitty, that happens very commonly today; and, that's good enough for the people. They go 'Aww shucks' and sit back, waiting for the next thing to happen. Nothing is happenstance at all, as I say, even to do with the economic system we're in today and all the tragedy it's caused down through the ages to people as it rampaged ahead, building up empires, moving its headquarters from empires, from place to place, as it grew in prosperity and power. You can watch it hop down from ancient times, from the Middle East and, eventually, into Rome; and, from Rome it went on to other places and set up its capitals down through the ages. Money, money, money, power and trade all combined together; and, even previous to Rome, we find the Minoans, the Minoans lived around the Aegean Sea, we find that they lived a very high lifestyle. They've actually chipped away some of the old volcanic rock that covered much of their territory, on some of the islands that are left, and we find in places like Thera for instance, they lived an incredible lifestyle. These people lived on an island, or a big island, at the time, the middle went down, that was a volcano that left the periphery islands, they're being excavated today and they had hot and cold running water, they lived in a beautiful climate, they had frescoes painted in every room, and even the walkways, their little shopping markets were all painted (hand-painted) and fantastic art, thousands of years ago; very high lifestyle. Back with more, after these messages.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing how an elite have existed in all ages, who lived at the top of even today's society, some of them, some people today across the planet don't have hot and cold running water, they live in squalor and poverty, while we find that these people who ran the ancient trade routes and the shipping and the commerce and the money-lending and all that went with it, in the Minoan Islands, lived a life of incredible luxury, even by today's standards, in a beautiful climate, as I say, very picturesque. They even have found lists of inventories of their boats and ships and all their trade routes and the incredible wealth they'd amassed at that time. Even they were based on similar technique, a technique that Phoenicians eventually used and that was they made towns like slave towns that made their pottery, that made the artefacts to sell elsewhere. They also used money and introduced money into peoples who never used it before. Once it was accepted, they loaned it out and then created debt and then people found themselves literally in slavery, as a form of factory towns across the Mediterranean.

With money, comes rise to a leisure class, a leisure class then that can be devoted (at least some of them) to the intellectual pursuits, as they call them. They used to call them The Philosophies; in fact, the word 'school' comes from a Greek word which meant leisure; only the leisure class could go. School, in ancient times, even in ancient Greece, was not mandatory but those particular ones, the Professors you might call them, the philosophers, who taught, could pick up budding students, some of them were very secretive. We know for a fact, that if you go into the writings of Plato and Socrates etc, we find the precursors of them had basically been burned out for trying to start revolutions. They'd all studied in Egypt, Egypt almost exported revolutions, by the disciples that they sent out into the world. We find this with Pythagoras for instance, who had set up, I think in Crotona, because at that time, what was Italy was actually a province of Greece, and his school was burned down, for, again, fomenting revolution amongst the youth, for rebellion and revolution.

We find, later on, the same thing happened to Socrates; most of the writing on Socrates comes from one of his students who was Plato. Plato himself had scampered off during that purge, to escape being implicated and came back many years later, to teach his own school. We find that Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth; what they meant by that was he was recruiting them along the Pythagorean system, where the brightest students were taught to, basically, undermine the present culture system and power authority and have a revolution and take it over. There were different methods, direct methods of physical warfare, but they preferred the slow, we'd call it today the Fabian technique. He also trained female students in intellectual pursuits, that made them very appealing as wives to make up much of the nobility and he'd arrange marriages for them and they hoped to subvert the culture that way as well.

These movements, as I say, have come down through the ages, under many guises, and really when you look at them, they're all much the same. We know that Pythagoras had a few years of silence for his students; it was like a monastery almost, where they couldn't speak, they listened, they watched, they obeyed. We find the later monks of the Catholic Church, many of the monasteries had their vows of silence too, based on the same kind of system and they had their own special things to do within the church, their own special area; and, out of that, we know, whether it was copied or not, came other movements, the Jesuits for instance. Something that's never been explained to the public, because the founder of the Jesuits, Loyola, Ignatius Loyola, was himself a member of the Alumbrados of Spain and that was the Illuminati of Spain; they were left over, a Spanish branch of the Knights Templar. He, initially, was caught by guards of the Catholic Church, they had their own armies at that time, and imprisoned, and was given an opportunity to see the Pope. That in itself is highly unusual and when he came out he was the first Black Pope, as they call it; he was authorised, what happened we'll never know, between the Pope and himself.

Since then, many Orders have been founded, that have copied the techniques of the Jesuit system. The Jesuit System is probably the most advanced system in understanding psychology of individuals and the mass of this period; and, it did not simply come out during the lifetime of its founder, its founder obviously was taught this kind of science, from the organisations that he'd been brought up in himself; ancient wisdom.

Getting back to last night's show, talking about how the system comes down through the ages and conquers people, gets wars started, because war is intended to change the cultures on both sides, then you have a treaty and often an amalgamation. In fact, that's why, that's the reason given, officially, for the setting up of the process and bureaucracy that amalgamated Europe, was to prevent more wars; they had to get wars going for that to happen. We know that Hitler wanted a united Europe; we know, from the personal secretary of Winston Churchill that he wanted a united Europe. We know that, at the end of World War Two, the United States made conditions on the lend-lease programme that some of its money would go towards the unification of Europe.

We also know that towards the end of the 1990s, for the first time, once it was complete and up and running and the European Parliament was there, it was disclosed in the newspapers how long they'd been at this programme, through deception. They were told; they said that the public must never know the truth, until this project was completed. We are run by stealth; most people never really know the real reasons behind it or where it's going; and, nothing has changed, because the world is the whole target and the techniques are the same as have been used by big, heavily-funded secret societies down through the ages and through stealth and deception. Even those who are called the "willing fools", the hardened types of left wing and right wing, who are steeped in their own dogma and doctrine, never figure out where it's really-really going.

The Soviet system was set up by the West, there is no doubt on that, there's too much documentation on it. We find Professor Sutton, Anthony Sutton, of Harvard, wrote a series of books on who financed Hitler and who financed the Bolsheviks in Russia and we find the same big banks and big foundations in the Western Countries set them up, both of them, which became big problems, we think, we thought at the time, to the average person who lived in every other country, never suspecting that this was all part of the Dialectic technique, to get people battling on two sides, at least two sides; you must create utter believers.

The system always has enemies, an enemy is someone who won't give in to the system and bend the knee and be a slave. I've mentioned before how, even in ancient times, the economic system rolled ahead with power and weaponry and, yes, there were armaments factories even thousands of years ago, that churned out all the chariots and weapons and armour and so on, for all the big armies. They would go and conquer people and often move them off the land, if they thought they couldn't be assimilated or forced to work for them, they'd literally move whole populations to other lands. Deculturalisation and genocide is nothing new. If every peoples of the world were to go through their history, following the economic system, you’d find there should, basically, be a holocaust museum for every people, because everyone's had their turn at it; and, some are still getting their turn at it.

Last night, I mentioned the fact that those who won't succumb and join and work for this system and produce and consume are called ‘a problem’. All through the records of the British Home Office, you'll find them in histories, in the documentation and the writings of the big-wigs who served as colonial officers for Britain and the British Empire; you'll find them using the word 'problem'. They had the Palestinian 'problem' that's still there today, it's called the Palestinian problem, they won't cave in. We've had the Iraqi problem, the Iran problem, we had the Irish problem, we had the Highlander, the Scottish problem, you have the African problem; and, what happens to those people who won't adapt into the system that in Darwinian's own language, what happens to them? They're pretty well destroyed, or killed off by disease and poverty, it's adapt or die, according to Darwin. I'll be back with more of this, after this break.

=== BREAK===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, trying to give you a long overview picture, down through the ages of this system, which leap-frogs around from empire to empire and it's no accident that the United States was built up, very quickly, by people who knew the direction of the United States and what it was really built for. Look at all of the logos and emblems and so on that they use, they were all Freemasons, the Founding Fathers, and that's pretty well common knowledge and it's written about in their own writings in fact. What were the Freemasons? Well, they were, basically, Deists, as they call them, a Deist is often referred to as someone who believes in a higher power, but, does not believe that this God or Deity is necessarily concerned with the affairs of man. And, from that doctrine, came the fact that man himself had the right to direct the planet the way he saw fit; but, not just man, the intelligentsia, particularly the ones that Jefferson referred to as the 'natural aristocracy'.

Some people, in the past, like Bill Cooper, who really loved his country, and perhaps couldn't get over some of this because he had to go into all of this himself and find out that his beloved country was founded by Freemasons, that he thought he was exposing at the time, and he came to the conclusion, sort of half-way acceptance measure, that they'd given the people a chance, this is what he said:

"To be free and to hold onto that freedom or you go down in slavery"

Those were the two choices. Personally, I don't agree with that, because most people coming to the Americas had no idea about Freemasonry; you can only watch and guard over something if you know what's going on, if you don't have the information, you're not on guard. When you read the writings of other members of the Founding Fathers, and especially people like Franklin, who, in his own writings, his own diary said that he hoped that the foundation or this confederation of states, would lead to a federation of the world; and, he said run by 12 wise men.

The idea of democracy didn't exist really, in many of these men's minds. They also chose, interestingly enough, a system to based theirs on and that was that of ancient Rome. Ancient Rome had a system which was run, primarily, by a few nobles and thousands of slaves. It was just like Greece, Greece collapsed, to an extent, at the end, because they had more slaves running around in the cities working than people who owned them; and, Rome became pretty-well the same. That's why the US also adopted the Senate, the Senate is word that comes from Egypt, ancient Egypt, and it was their name for a game that could be the precursor of the chess board; and, we know that Masons love the tessellated floor of the Lodge, which is the chessboard.

A plan was hatched a long time ago, to bring in a world system; and, Britain led that system, there's no doubt whatsoever, for an awful long time. They built up an Empire, it's never been explained to the public why one tiny little island could amass such wealth in the hands of a few, and a massive navy running the seas, and became the money-lender for the world, in its day, from the banks of London. It's never been explained to the public; and, we know too, from the writings of people like Rudyard Kipling, who himself, again, was another Freemason, wrote a poem about the White Man's Burden and he came over and read it in the US Senate and he said we pass the torch on to you. Britain was exhausted, they couldn't tax the people anymore at that time, they had massive war debts, after hundreds of years of wars; and, the idea was the US would take over and finance it and become the policemen of the world and finish off the job of unification. Now the United States itself is going under in debt, as I said it would be, because I didn't guess this myself, I read the writings of Arnold Toynbee and others, who predicted the US would be heavily involved in wars, around the year 2000 and on, they'd begin to falter, they'd rally a bit and seem to be winning and fall, mainly due to economic reasons at home.

We find Kissinger giving out talks today, about how the US will have to sit back a little bit and allow other powers to come to the fore and to share this power but America will not be in the lead anymore. We see a man put in by his controllers, to take over and push this final part of the agenda of which is total globalisation for America itself. I always said if America has pushed and made war on the rest of the world, to bring in a New World Order, then they're finishing it off, they'll pull the rug at home and the US will be submerged into the very system which it helped to create. I'll continue on this theme, after the following break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, trying to cram a lot into an hour, as usual, there's not a lot of time in an hour to go into things in great detail. It's essential that people grasp the fact that we're not simply evolving willy-nilly, by happenstance and from crisis after crisis that just come out of nowhere. We're living to a plan, including the economic plan, that was set up by the Bretton Woods Agreement Part One and now we're going to part two, because the founder himself, who was a member of the Fabian Society, those big eugenicists that loved socialism, in fact they were behind socialism. John Maynard Keynes said that they'd have to do a part two and he probably wouldn't see it in his lifetime, the outcome but they want to bring in a world of service to the World State. A World State, where did he get that from? Well, we know that Cecil Rhodes and the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, that was given Royal assent to exist, had two missions to accomplish primarily: (1) Was to take over the world's resources, by all and every means possible; and, they fomented wars and blamed their enemies for starting the wars and they'd bring in British troops, to deal with them, so the Empire got involved and took over countries that way. And, they took over the gold and the diamond mines and the mineral content for a good part of Africa and elsewhere; and then Cecil Rhodes, his Foundation, massively wealthy, evolved into the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with again a Royal Charter to exist, on behalf of the British Elite, to further this whole plan and use their doctrine in other ways, not just necessarily warfare. We do find that the Royal Institute of International Affairs and its American branch the Council on Foreign Relations, were all for Vietnam and then all their members were against Vietnam later on, but they wanted that war to happen; why? Why was that? The same reason they were all for the creation of the Soviet Union, that's why.

The Soviet Union accomplished many tasks: out of dozens of small countries, with different languages, different cultural morals and so on, religions, you were left in a very short time with a standardised bureaucratic governmental educational system. It could have taken 150 years - 200 years of straight warfare to achieve that any other way. The same thing was true for Vietnam: Vietnam had hundreds of tribes fighting each other and had been forever, all with their own ideas of how things should be and the fastest way to unite them was to create one party and then get a foreign people, the most foreign the better, the white man to go in and invade him and that made the Communist Party the only opposition and they were united by force, through massive warfare.

Warfare accomplishes many things; the man carrying the gun is the last one to realise what he's really there for, or what's to come out of it, just like the troops of today. It's very Machiavellian and government is always Machiavellian, they're never honest to the public, every report that comes out of a politician's mouth is generally a handout to the press, written by the scriptwriters. Everything has its public relations department, even your local police board has a public relations department; everything is P.R today, perception, altered perception.

Going back to the old mysteries of ancient times: you find the Romans, whenever they invaded a country, a nation, even like Britain, they would always call them 'barbarians' and they were off to civilise the barbarians and they had eugenics in action back then too, with the same racist comments, slurs, the dominant ones always have over they are robbing from and subduing. That's been used down through the ages; the churches have done it too. In fact, churches have been an essential arm of government, down through the ages; often the churches have nothing to do with the founder, or at least the one they supposedly take their religion after, certainly not by their dogma or their actions.

Eugenics is part of a commercialised economic system that runs on efficiency and we know that Malthus, Thomas Malthus, and many others, who wrote on behalf of the British Government, because he was an economist for the big systems, the East India Company and the other companies, international companies that were owned by the Crown Corporations of England, they knew that certain types, along with people like other economists like John Stuart Mill and his son, of the same name, they'd already written up the list of peoples who had to be, basically, extirpated, exterminated and they said that those who wouldn't join them, the economic system, or who were unfit would have to die off because they'd be a burden on society. That has been used over and over again, because we have eugenics completely intertwined with an economic system, completely intertwined. We have people like Lord Bertrand Russell, who called those who couldn't work, or who had no work, or who had work which was now obsolete (trades which were gone etc) he called "useless eaters" and he said that the world that's coming in cannot tolerate useless eaters.

We find in the writings and the Bills put out by Kissinger, to do with the enemy of the State, in the '70s, where he declared that the greatest threat to the State was overpopulation. What he really meant was population of the wrong kinds, which is standard eugenics; and, out of that came a list and he wrote up the list of the countries that would be too overpopulated and those are the countries today where you have wars going on. He said they'd really have to have this in effect and working, at least underway by the year 2000; well, we've seen it, we've seen AIDS & HIV flood across Africa, that was on his list, and the other countries too they're on his list, they're the ones that are at war, or having wars put upon them.

We are here, according to those who rule the system, to serve the economy. When I was looking through the Think Tanks that work for the military, or at least advise the military, they all said that the next system coming in must continue to use the present economy. Economy, once again, is number one, not human lives, not human happiness or welfare, but the economy must still be used, even though we're going under, financially, the economy, this system of profit and loss, would be maintained, at all costs. Why is that? Why has the economy never been there to serve the people? Well, for the same reasons as governments have never been there to serve the people, it's a front. If you go into the dialectical system of the Cold War, and as I say, the necessary component called the Sovietised or communist system they set up, in order to create the dialectic: thesis, antitheses, synthesis. Remember, synthesis always comes out of it and we found out that synthesis had already become out of it, it was already working, the amalgamation of the two systems, when Norman Dodd and the Reece Commission did his investigation into the power and influence of the great Foundations. That's the book to read: Foundations, their power and influence. Get a hold of it, because there's never been a truer time when that's so true today. They run everything, everything, they're all the fronts in the world, across the world, in the universities they control the universities, they decide what's taught in the universities; and, using this combination of the Sovietised system and the Western, so-called democratic system, the blend of the two, they bypass the older generations. It's a standard soviet technique, communist technique and go right for the young, especially those who will be involved in working in governments and bureaucracies and become the C.E.Os of corporations and they'll be in marketing, they'll be in culture-creation industries and so on, they go straight for them. That's why the universities across the world have massive funding, from all the big Foundations, with stipulations on what to teach; and every professor, who smells the wind and knows what's expected of him, will be well taken care of, if he promotes this new Third Way, or Third Wave, as it's sometimes called.

What is the Third Wave? It's taken after dropping a stone in a pond and watching the ripple; it’s the effect of the third wave that's important, if you observe it. They've done stage one, the first stage was the Capitalist system; Stage Two was the Communist System; the Third Wave is pushing the entire planet, in a planned society, bringing with it eugenics and it's all out in the open today, there is no conspiracy. You can't pick up a newspaper article or a magazine, or turn on a television set without a panel of experts and it’s bioethicists or eugenicists talking about the coming future and what it will entail; or other experts coming in saying they are going into the womb to rectify defective genes, in children they suspect will have criminal tendencies or a host of other things. It's all over the place. World society, global, global, global.

And, as I say, they put their man in at the end, Mr. Obama, because he's agreed - and that was his job - that's why they put him in this time, to push forward all of the Treaties the United States had not signed but had helped force upon the rest of the world, because the US financed the Kyoto, the US financed every UN agenda there is. Now, they have to sign it and succumb to it, which really is the complete end of sovereignty for the United States of America. And, what will come out of that will be massive tax increases, never mind the bailouts for the big banking boys, who's bail out part one, part two's to come. It also means that you'll be heavily taxed for everything. If you understand that the food for instance in Europe is three to four times what you're paying in the United States, we're looking at really-really tough times ahead because this is the agenda and, as Kissinger said: the US must learn to sit back and maybe even take a back seat at times.

Everything is planned this way, there's not a Foundation out there, out of the thousands of Foundations, which are all fronts, which promote the thousands of Non-Governmental Organisations, there's not one of them goes a different road from the others, they're all politically correct on all the same topics as every other one, they’re like clones of each other. That doesn't happen by accident. That's called massive organisation and some of these Foundations have one job and that's to get consensus on the same topics with all the rest. There is no democracy involved in this whatsoever; the public are generally in complete ignorance of what is running and shaping their future. It's not intended that they know. The media's job is not to let you know what's going on, it's to distract you and entertain you and download you, indoctrinate you. When you think of millions of people tuning into the same TV stations every night, getting the same download, you wonder why they all look the same, talk about the same things, have the same opinions. They've never reasoned anything through for themselves.

Remember, behind these Foundations and the ones who started them up, is the Eugenics Society; it's got many names today, including Bioethics. Specialists above us are deciding the fate and the shape, literally, of the humans of the future. Not the people, we have no say in it whatsoever. It's taught all through universities and it has different departments, such as I say, Neuroscience, which is going into the ethics of what they can do with the brain. Not what we say they should do with the brain, or not do with the brain, but what they're going to do with the brain, the human brain. That won't be mentioned either in any parliament, or congress, on the planet, it's all bypassed and it's done mainly through universities.

There's a book put out by Dr. David C. Reardon, the book was in progress, at least I don't know if it's finished yet, but he does have some of his pages up on a site and it's called:

The Eugenics Connection: Shapers of Humanity.

Good title Shapers of Humanity. He started this in 2006 and in Chapter 5 he goes on to tell you some of the history of the Eugenics Movements and Neo-Malthusianism, as it's called. He says:

During the 1930s

This is under the title

From Promises to Disillusionments.

During the early 1930s, eugenics reached the height of its popularity in Pre World War II America. It was during this period, when their political power was greatest, that eugenicists and Neo- Malthusians became increasingly radical in their demands to eliminate the "unfit",

This is in America and I've talked before about the history of the Rockefellers who were at the top of this movement, funding it all.

whom they called a "race of chronic paupers,

There's your poverty gene.

a race parasitic upon the community" The eugenic weapons to be used in this "war between races"

I've already talked about how they eliminated many of the Indians; thousand of them were slaughtered, by disease and so on, in terrible conditions.

were increasingly coercive and destructive. In 1932, at the Third International Congress of Eugenics held in New York City.

New York City.

proposals were made to prevent the "further dilution of the American gene pool" by those who possessed "inferior genes" through segregation, sterilisation, birth control, abortion and even infanticide.

They wanted to kill the children. We have that today now, we have partial birth abortion. See, all of these goals have been reached. All of these goals have been reached and called different things. Back, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, an hour is so short, you can't really tie everything you'd like to say together, it's a very-very short time to unfold so much history, but the main points I bring up, as best I can, because I don't plan my shows. The main points I bring up, I try to show you how this great New World Order was planned a long time ago and that it's not going to be the nice fairy tale utopia for the general public who will mainly be unemployed by the time it's finished, and classified as 'useless eaters'. They will not be tolerated by those who rule it.

Continuing with this article, it says here:

Supporting infanticide of the "unfit"

This is from the 1930s but it ties in with the '70s.

Dr. Lena K. Sadler, urged her fellow physicians to stop trying "to save every weak child that is born into the world" and urged the medical community to cease free treatment of "the unfit baby in our welfare stations, dispensaries and clinics". For those children who survived post-natal neglect, and for those whose parents refused to accept the logical practicality of allowing their "unfit offspring" to die in infancy,

I've read articles where that's been allowed to happen now, especially from the ones who they've tried to abort, but they were born anyway, they were told to leave them to try and die, this is happening here.

she urged the old standby of forced sterilisation. It should be noted that Sadler's call for selective infanticide was not directed at children with measurable disabilities alone, but included every "weak child" - particularly those born to parents of the "unfit class".

At the same conference, Dr. Russell Robie called for the compulsory sterilisation of a minimum of 14 million Americans whom he defined as possessing subhuman intelligence. Robie's speech is particularly notable in its similarities to the rhetoric of the 1970s population control zealots.

You see, it never changes, it's always the same rhetoric.

...our population has already attained a greater number that is necessary for the efficient functioning of the race

Now, they mean the system again, this economic system.

as a whole. Certainly our present picture of millions of unemployed [the year remember is 1932

We hear the same hype down through the ages.

- the worst period of the Great Depression] would point to the belief that this suggestion [of 14 million forced sterilisations] is not an unreasonable one. It would undoubtedly be found, if such research was possible, that a major portion of this vast army of unemployed are socially inadequates, and in many cases mental defectives, who might have been spared the misery they are now facing if they'd never been born.

Now, remember: most of those people, in the '20s and '30s were kicked off their lands and their farms, by the banks, with the backup of the governments and the henchmen, to kick them off, the bailiffs, and here they are all classed as "mentally defective". You see, under this system, with its little secret beliefs at the top, if you were not, if you were kicked off your land then you had to be poor, otherwise you had plenty of money, you'd have seen your way through it. Those who couldn't see their way through it were therefore inferior and they wanted them to wipe them all off and that's coming, with all the unemployed, it will be here shortly, as this system goes down the tubes. You'd better understand that now.

Well, that's it for tonight, so from Hamish and myself in Ontario Canada, it’s goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:55 am

Now, this morning, after getting up, after a night in fact where once again it plunged around 40 below Fahrenheit, which is the same Centigrade I think, I sat at the kitchen table and looked south, as always and it was a clear morning and there's the planes going back and forth, back and forth just spraying and spraying and spraying until you end up with this incredible mush over your head and people are all sniffing and their sinuses are blocked and that's what happens as we get sprayed and I thought you know if we can't get people or any organisation or any government to talk about this and come out say what's really going on with it, because this the 10th year that it's been obvious in Ontario and it's been pretty-well continuous types of spraying. I sat there and looked at it and I thought that I'd noticed before when they sprayed it often raised the temperature and I went to the store today and the woman said "well, it's supposed to get warmer later on" and sure enough, it has with all the spraying there. So, I guess they're busy trying to get global warming back on the burner; but, you know, we'll never know what all the effects of the spraying is all about, they will never tell us. You can guarantee it because it's having physical fall-outs on lots of people and they'd have to answer to that, therefore they cannot come out and tell us now. Its one thing being discovered, before they do it, it's another thing to be doing it and then be discovered, they can't come out and tell you what's happened, because the consequences, physical consequences, to answer to and it's obviously a must-be because no one will talk about it in government. If we can't get to the bottom of that, how on earth can we get to the bottom of anything really? It's so hard to get the facts on anything, in this day and age.

I was thinking too about all the different links I get coming in to the different media and you wonder even how much of that is put out there for us all to talk about. Yesterday I mentioned all the wars and policing actions, as they've been called by the UN, that I've seen growing up and living and it used to astound me why the United Nation would send troops into one country and just sit back and tsk tsk when another country did the same thing. It's above our heads, because we're not even in the picture, we're not allowed to know. I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. This past week, I've been doing shows on how we're controlled by media and entertainment and even by the massive marketing companies really that started it all off and getting us to buy their products. They did it by studying us, in so many different ways, we had no idea we were even being studied. This, eventually, was incorporated into government and all government now uses what they call P.R., which is really the same techniques of psychological manipulation of masses and I've given some of the history of that, some of those involved in it, like Bernays and others and quite a few people before him in fact too. He didn't dream up this whole science by himself.

Power over the masses has always been of critical importance, to those who already rule and to those who would like to get up there and rule. Last night I talked about the Frankfurt School, very important school, because many of its members, and those who were taught by those who came over, went right into the music business and into writing novels and writing movies, with a particular twist, to get you to think along a certain direction, which they wanted you to think along. It's kind of different than passing out pamphlets and asking people to read it, to create social awareness. This is actually manipulation through your emotions and through those things which you like; it's a very clever technique. This is the technique that Lord Bertrand Russell talked about, when he said we have to get Madison Avenue, meaning the big marketing companies, those who understood mass psychology, on board, to create this New Order of things.

I'm going to continue with this report on the Frankfurt School tonight; and, here's an unfortunate thing, for those really who want the usual kind of show, I have decided I have to go higher, to help those who want to understand. Many people don't want to understand the truth, they already believe they have it all, they're in their pigeon holes, they've taken their stances, they're in their sides and they see their enemies and they'll probably stay there forever and they attack anyone who doesn't go along with them and that's just too bad. If you understand the kind of material I'm giving out, you'll understand how it's all done and how even your enemies are given to you. It says:

The work of the Frankfurt School provided what Paul Lazarsfeld (1942), one of the originators of modern communications studies,

"modern communications studies". That wasn't how to use a radio, that was how you get thoughts and ideas across to people.

called a critical approach, which he distinguished from the "administrative research." The positions of Adorno, Lowenthal, and other members of the inner circle of the Institute for Social Research were contested by Walter Benjamin, an idiosyncratic theorist loosely affiliated with the Institute. Benjamin, writing in Paris during the 1930s, discerned progressive aspects in new technologies of cultural production

"cultural production" – right?

such as photography, film, and radio.

It's amazing to have single shots of people or events that are put on mainstream magazines can have such an impact on us.

In "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (1969), Benjamin noted how new mass media were supplanting older forms of culture whereby the mass reproduction of photography, film, recordings, and publications replaced the emphasis on the originality and "aura" of the work of art in an earlier era. Freed from the mystification of high culture, Benjamin believed that media culture could cultivate more critical individuals able to judge and analyze their culture, just as sports fans could dissect and evaluate athletic activities. In addition, processing the rush of images of cinema created, Benjamin believed, subjectivities better able to parry and comprehend the flux and turbulence of experience in industrialized, urbanized societies.

You have to bear with me as we go through this, because they're telling you really how it works.

Himself a collaborator of the prolific German artist Bertolt Brecht, Benjamin worked with Brecht on films, created radio plays, and attempted to utilize the media as organs of social progress. In the essay "The Artist as Producer" (1999 [1934]), Benjamin argued that progressive cultural creators

This is what they call them.

progressive cultural creators should "refunction" the apparatus of cultural production, turning theater and film, for instance, into a forum of political enlightenment

Now, that can also be said be propaganda.

and discussion rather than a medium of "culinary" audience pleasure. Both Brecht and Benjamin wrote radio plays and were interested in film as an instrument of progressive social change. In an essay on radio theory, Brecht anticipated the Internet in his call for reconstructing the apparatus of broadcasting from one-way transmission to a more interactive form of two-way, or multiple, communication (in Silberman 2000: 41ff.)-- a form first realized in CB radio and then electronically-mediated computer communication.

These guys were way ahead on what was coming up. Were they just good guessers, or did they have such fantastic faith in the progress of science? Remember: Arthur C. Clarke, another sci-fi writer, was way ahead too, where did he get his knowledge? He got a Nobel Prize for predicting that satellites would revolve around the Earth and be used for incredible communication devices; but he was in on the big institutes, which were way ahead already on a lot of this science, that's how it's done.

Moreover, Benjamin wished to promote a radical cultural and media politics concerned with the creation of alternative oppositional cultures. Yet he recognized that media such as film could have conservative effects. While he thought it was progressive that mass-produced works were losing their "aura," their magical force, and were opening cultural artefacts for more critical and political discussion, he recognized that film could create a new kind of ideological magic through the cult of celebrity

See, they dreamed up the cult of celebrity.

and techniques like the close-up that fetishized certain stars or images via the technology of the cinema.

They realised they could create stars, in other words, that people would follow; but, the idea too was to use these stars to promote the new culture, a political culture and that's what you have today too, you'll often see stars getting pulled out to give their opinions on something, but, as others have noted, can a star have any more insight into the politics than your average plumber? We don't think of it that way, we just think if they're famous, they're well-known, they must be brighter than we are, because they're up there and, therefore, whatever they say must be better than our own theories, so we adopt their theory.

Benjamin was thus one of the first radical cultural critics to look carefully at the form and technology of media culture in appraising its complex nature and effects.

What do we have today? It doesn't matter what paper you look at, what newspaper, or you can watch the TV news, or even Google or Yahoo or whatever, you're going to get all the boob babes and their fall-outs and their romances etc, as they come and go, and come and go and come and go forever. That's all due to these guys from the Frankfurt School; and, using Bernays' techniques, they mixed this in with regular media.

Moreover, he developed a unique approach to cultural history that is one of his most enduring legacies, constituting a micrological history of Paris in the 18th century, an uncompleted project that contains a wealth of material for study and reflection (see Benjamin 2000 and the study in Buck-Morss 1989).

Max Horkheimer and T.W. Adorno answered Benjamin's optimism in a highly influential analysis of the culture industry published in their book Dialectic of Enlightenment, which first appeared in 1948 and was translated into English in 1972. They argued that the system of cultural production dominated by film, radio broadcasting, newspapers, and magazines,

That included music and everything.

was controlled by advertising and commercial imperatives, and served to create subservience to the system of consumer capitalism. While later critics pronounced their approach too manipulative, reductive, and elitist, it provides an important corrective to more populist approaches to media culture that downplay the way the media industries exert power over audiences and help produce thought and behavior that conforms to the existing society.

That was, initially, the conflict, as I say: you've got the power established that already is and you have a culture that's come out through consumerism that's altered behaviour. As I've said before, if you want to alter behaviour, you alter something in the environment of the subject and that's what you buy, that's what you put in your home, that’s that little box you turn on and stare at and get hypnotised by, for instance. And, here's this other group that came in who were Trotskyite in thought, the Dispossessed, they had no country they said, no country left; and, they had an agenda, to take over this industry and use it for even further political Trotskyite purposes. Now, Trotsky, as I've said before, believed in this Marxism that was to do with evolution, it was coupled with Darwinism. Remember that Darwin himself had the offer, from Karl Marx, or Karl Marx wanted to put him in his book, to thank him, because he had validated his communist belief by giving out his theories on evolution. After all, the whole idea before this, society prior to that, was due to, it was a very fixed society, you had a sort of religious overtone, in every country, with a head of that country who was the head of the religion and in comes Darwinism and threw it all out the window. I'll back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, bringing through what most folks would see as very boring material; but, it's in this kind of material where you find how, not just us, just we, but those before us, were manipulated by organised groups, well-funded groups and finding the funding of these groups is almost impossible. They certainly were incredibly well-funded and they were pushed to the top in all Western countries, mainly the US and Britain. Many of them also worked during World War II, with the O.S.S. and some of them even wrote books, novels; the idea being that, through novels, you could change the thinking of people. If you gave them a straight non-fictional work, they might be too prejudiced to go through it with preconditioned prejudices; but, if you write something in a novel form, your mind can be altered, as you get caught up in the story and taken through the process and that's sometimes what they call it in these novels, it's a process, it's a mind-altering process where you'll actually be down-loaded with things that you previously would have rejected, on a cultural basis, or a personal basis, or a racial or ethnic basis or anything else.

The Frankfurt School also provide useful historical perspectives on the transition from traditional culture and modernism in the arts to a mass-produced media and consumer society. In his path-breaking book The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Jurgen Habermas further historicizes Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis of the culture industry.

I keep harping on this and it's right in here, "The culture industry". We've been brought up to think it's an entertainment industry there to amuse us and it's got nothing to do with amusing us, that's a secondary effect. It's to alter your thoughts and the way you see things and think about things and the conclusions you'll come to are all in the movies. They know which conclusions you will come to.

Providing historical background to the triumph of the culture industry, Habermas notes how bourgeois

That's middle class.

society in the late 18th and 19th century was distinguished by the rise of a public sphere that stood between civil society and the state and which mediated between public and private interests. For the first time in history, individuals and groups could shape public opinion, giving direct expression to their needs and interests while influencing political practice. The bourgeois public sphere made it possible to form a realm of public opinion that opposed state power and the powerful interests that were coming to shape bourgeois society.

Only by understanding how all this came about, as I say, wading through it, will you understand what's happening today, because these same forces and same groups and those who believe in these particular, I wouldn't call them philosophies, some of these people do, but they knew where they were going and they're still going there. That's what New World Order is all about, that's what Norman Dodd was talking about when he met the heads of the Ford Foundation and other Foundations, who told him they were mixing the Sovietised system with the Capitalist West and they'd blend the two cultures together seamlessly; and, that's what we see today, it's here. It's been done and funded by the big Foundations, these charitable organisations, as we think of them. The same Foundations that sponsor and pay thousands of NGO groups to push for laws and changes in society and they have lobby groups, professional lobby groups that get the ear of government at any times they wish, while Joe Average, who thinks he's in a democracy, simply can't.

Habermas notes a transition from the liberal public sphere which originated in the Enlightenment and the American and French Revolution to a media-dominated public sphere in the current stage of what he calls "welfare state capitalism and mass democracy." This historical transformation is grounded in Horkheimer and Adorno's analysis of the culture industry, in which giant corporations have taken over the public sphere and transformed it from a site of rational debate into one of manipulative consumption and passivity.

That was the system that Bernays and his friends had given the West.

giant corporations have taken over the public sphere and transformed it from a site of rational debate into one of manipulative consumption and passivity.

Passivity, through consumption.

In this transformation, "public opinion" shifts from rational consensus emerging from debate, discussion, and reflection to the manufactured opinion of polls or media experts. For Habermas, the interconnection between the sphere of public debate and individual participation has thus been fractured and transmuted into that of a realm of political manipulation and spectacle, in which citizen-consumers ingest and absorb passively entertainment and information.

"passively entertainment and information". What was it that Russell and Huxley talked about? Giving us trivia and Huxley talked about giving the people very base, simple comedies and things like that.

...In Habermas's words: "Inasmuch as the mass media today strip away the literary husks from the kind of bourgeois self-interpretation and utilize them as marketable forms for the public services provided in a culture of consumers, the original meaning is reversed" (1989: 171).

I'll be back with more of this dry stuff, but very important stuff, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, going through the Frankfurt School, a very important organisation, because it merged with the Bernays Society, the society that Bernays and his friends had pretty-well created, through mass consumerism, and they merged together and that's what became of the two systems. We have a sort of socialist system today, with a corporate elite at the top and, I've said for years, that to understand the system we live under, it's essentially Sovietised, from the upper middle class down, with masses of bureaucrats and government officials and departments running our whole lives for us and it's getting worse, of course and it's planned to get worse. That's their perfect society where everyone is observed and organised and followed right through your entire life; but, at the top of it, like Carroll Quigley said: you have this, really a fascist-type system, he didn't use the word fascist, he said it would be a new feudal system where the corporate overlords, the C.E.O. overlords of the corporations, they'll be the new feudal overlords of society. That's exactly what we have. If we look at the bail-outs now, to all of these big giants, even the motor corporations, the manufacturers of cars and the banks etc, that's corporate welfare. Yet they've had society through their manipulations in the media for years, getting angry with the welfare people at the bottom level strata of society, where what's spent on them is virtually pennies, compared to the billions they're dishing out to their corporate boys at the top. However, they don't call it welfare, but they certainly are cash gifts; they’re gifts, not loans (and that's been happening for years). It says here, going back to this article:

Yet Habermas is right that in the period of the democratic revolutions

When you actually had revolutions right afterwards.

a public sphere emerged in which for the first time in history

The first time in history, people forget that it's not long ago.

ordinary citizens could participate in political discussion and debate, organize, and struggle against unjust authority. Habermas's account also points to the increasingly important role of the media in politics and everyday life and the ways that corporate interests have colonized this sphere,

They've taken over as they merged.

using the media and culture to promote their own interests.

People really think that, we're taught that, in fact, what's good for the corporations is good for the country. The corporations have no loyalty to any country, haven't we noticed, they're international. They pulled up, lock, stock and barrel, from the West when they would get cheap labour in China and zoomed off there, without a care what happened to all the unemployed left back home.

The culture industry thesis described both the production of massified cultural products and homogenized subjectivities. Mass culture for the Frankfurt School produced desires, dreams, hopes, fears, and longings, as well as unending desire for consumer products. The culture industry produced cultural consumers who would consume its products and conform to the dictates and the behaviors of the existing society.

That's what the Frankfurt School were brought in to do, was to gradually alter that, to bring in this synthesis of the two systems together, for the future, the future is now, it's here.

And yet, as Walter Benjamin pointed out (1969), the culture industry also produces rational and critical consumers able to dissect and discriminate among cultural texts and performances, much as sports fans learn to analyze and criticize sports events.

In retrospect, one can see the Frankfurt school work as articulation of a theory of the stage of state and monopoly capitalism that became dominant during the 1930s. This was an era of large organizations, theorized earlier by Austro-Marxist Rudolf Hilferding as ‘organized capitalism’ (1980 [1910]), in which the state and giant corporations managed the economy and in which individuals submitted to state and corporate control. This period is often described as ‘Fordism’ to designate the system of mass production and the homogenizing regime of capital which wanted to produce mass desires, tastes, and behavior.

Most folk would never think about that, you know, if we're all buying the same things, wearing the same things, walking around with i-pods and listening to the same things, our behaviour is being altered and we're all becoming rather passive and conforming to what's been designed for us to conform to.

It was thus an era of mass production and consumption characterized by uniformity

That's what it created, it was uniformity.

and homogeneity of needs, thought, and behavior producing a mass society and what the Frankfurt school described as ‘the end of the individual.’

You can't be an individual if you're the same as everyone else, but governments love that, they love to have everyone the same. Individuals tend to be problems. The mass will go along at a meeting, when they've been brought to a conclusion, by someone in the Delphi Technique; if there's one individual there that's got a different point of view, comes out of left field with that idea, there can be chaos in that room, even for the one controlling the technique. Therefore, the individual's a problem.

No longer was individual thought and action the motor of social and cultural progress; instead giant organizations and institutions overpowered individuals.

“Organisations, giant organizations and institutions overpowered individuals”: that's getting right back to what I'm trying to say. We don't have democracy; we haven't had it for an awful long time. The massive foundations, that were put into being by those who already owned the giant industries, like the Rockefellers, like the Fords and Carnegies, then funded all the NGO groups, giant groups, organisations and institutions and that overpowers the individuals, it overpowers the individual’s ability to have a voice. They only listen to big groups and the big groups are well-funded. If you notice who really funds most of the environmental groups, they come from these same institutions. The same institutions will have shares in lumbering companies. You find who owns much of the animal activists, who runs and funds them and the money's filtered down through the very organisations that own the laboratories where they test the animals. It's a dialectic.

The era corresponds to the staid, conformist, and conservative world of corporate capitalism that was dominant in the 1950s with its organization men and women, its mass consumption, and its mass culture.

During this period, mass culture and communication were instrumental in generating the modes of thought and behavior appropriate to a highly organized and massified social order. Thus, the Frankfurt school theory of the culture industry articulates a major historical shift to an era in which mass consumption and culture was indispensable to producing a consumer society based on homogeneous needs and desires for mass-produced products and a mass society based on social organization and homogeneity. It is culturally the era of highly controlled network radio and television, insipid top forty pop music,

Now, it's rock and rap and so on.

glossy Hollywood films, national magazines, and other mass-produced cultural artifacts.

Of course, media culture was never as massified and homogeneous as in the Frankfurt school model and one could argue that the model was flawed even during its time of origin and influence and that other models were preferable, such as those of Walter Benjamin, Siegfried Kracauer, Ernst Bloch, and others of the Weimar generation and, later, British cultural studies. Yet the original Frankfurt school model of the culture industry did articulate the important social roles of media culture during a specific regime of capital and provided a model, still of use, of a highly commercial and technologically advanced culture that serves the needs of dominant corporate interests, plays a major role in ideological reproduction, and in enculturating individuals into the dominant system of needs, thought, and behavior.

Now, when you go into the beginnings of the Frankfurt School, where did they get all their theories from? All these theories really originated within Germany, very important place because it was the pinnacle, in the 1800s and the early 1900s, of science and all the studies of science. Before the scientists took over with all their theories, they were like the other countries where religion really dominated because religion itself is a controlling factor to get a passive population to go along together on the same path, so it's very-very important. These guys had studied the likes of Hegel and Nietzsche and all the rest of them; and the world they wanted to bring in would be really a Godless world, they wanted to bring in the rational man but they also understood that most people out there were not, to their way of thinking, rational at all. They were well aware of Bernays' studies and they knew that to get ideas across for a political system, to transform society from 'working your way up' type society, as it was always pushed before, standing on your own two feet, to a socialised society, which was controlled and manipulated by those who knew better, they'd have to accept the fact, for a while, that people would still be into religions and so on.

I mentioned last night the movie Hollywoodism, which is worth looking into, because they tell you in the movie, from the very voices of many of the top producers of movies, how it's been used all along, to shape our thoughts and feelings about the past. And, feelings, I stress, because feelings are very important, even though the rationalists that control us are maybe psychopathic themselves in nature and they truly do believe they have the right to direct society and make us conform into a new system which they have planned. They do realise that they have to do it, through our emotions, like Bernays said.

You go into any store and just look at the way it's laid out, everything is psychologically laid out, for the man, the woman and the child. The children's stuff, generally, is all at the checkout counter, because that's when their parents want to get through, they're frustrated, they're annoyed, they've got all those bags to carry at the end of it and the child will take some of the candy, they're right at his level and the hope is, because most mums and dads will, just to get out of the line, with all those people behind them, they'll pay that 'oh well, throw that in too'. This is psychology, that's why it's right there; every store is the same. Many of the big chain stores now are identical in layout, regardless of which one you go into, because they're psychologically set up that way.

In the big department stores, they're all using strange colours, these high purples and so on, to attract the eye and the eye is distracted to them but it's what's next to it that's important, it's almost the same colour, because that's the product you're going to end up buying.

We have been studied like ants in a colony, for many, many, many centuries, maybe thousands of years, and they know how to manipulate us at the top. In the Vance Packard book, I read from a couple of nights ago, he talked about all the studies and there's even videos out there are on them, where you'll see them in action, where they were studying the eyes of the consumers and what they could tell just by the blinking, the dilation of pupils, or the lack of blinking. They knew exactly if the person wanted this product or not, or would buy it.

When I was young, I used to wonder why governments were spending so much money sending people into other cultures, to study what they called ‘primitive tribes’. I know now why they did it, because they want to find what all of humanity has in common, because everything that's in common can therefore be manipulated in the same way. You don't have to alter your techniques of manipulation for it not to work on another people, if you understand the things which are all the same. It's very much like Albert Pike, who definitely understood a lot of these sciences, in the 1800s, where he said that we have to understand and look at man and woman, the world over, he was talking of them as targets, to bring them into the societies, he says and not look at their culture, it doesn't matter about their culture, about the cultural differences. If the right things are presented in the same way, going to the common things we all share, through emotion, that's what he meant, he didn't say emotion, but he meant through emotion, then they could bring them into these societies. He was talking about a greater world of fraternities, bringing them all in on the same path.

The goal of World government is very old, very-very old. Bankers talked about world government, centuries ago, and they said it was inevitable because they were funding the wars that created the big empires. Out of wars come the treaties; wars change the sides of all opposing actions, that's what Carroll Quigley said, that's one of its main functions. Wars aid governments to get bigger and bigger and bigger. That was the fear of top psychologists, 80 years ago, the ones who led their field like Carl Jung. Carl Jung saw that through the use of wars and the effects on all combatants, all the sides, his greatest fear that government would be stifling. He said that he wasn't worried about an iron curtain across the world; he saw this curtain wrapping round the whole world, regulations and bureaucracy.

I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and I've gone through some very dry stuff, it's not the usual kind of talk show thing where we get things in bits and bites and we discuss what the media have given us to discuss. It's to try to show you, for those that are interested, and there's a lot out there who are interested, in the forces that help bring us to where we are and that are still action today. That is why, as I've said, regardless of the party that you vote in, or you think you voting in, or whatever, the agenda, this world agenda, this global agenda, of a planned society, initially run on, or primarily run on socialist type issues, steamrolls ahead. It doesn't matter who's in, because the main politicians are bypassed anyway, they're kind of like puppets at a show for you to focus on. The bureaucracies behind them are trained in the kind of stuff that I've just been talking about and they have their mandates, they've had mandates since the League of Nations; and, men and women have worked their whole lives and retired and new ones come in and that's why Foundations and government can predict the kind of society they want to bring in a hundred years and carry it through. The bureaucracies themselves have mandates and they work hand-in-glove with the big Foundations.

I was reading a book recently, where Mr. Rockefeller, during the Cold War, was so involved with the spooks or spies that they'd often go to him, if they couldn't get Black Budget money and he'd pull out his cheque book and ask them how much they wanted. Who was running what back in the Cold War when that kind of thing could happen? Rockefeller is the man who is still running ahead today, talking about a global society, with a vastly-reduced population "There's too many people" he keeps saying, who funds most universities and who attends all kinds of world conferences, who started up the World Council of Churches and everything else that could help unify everything together.

The approach they take is the academic approach, where rather than sit and argue over emotional debates, and fight each other and maybe even strangle each other, they sit and use reason. You look for those things which you have in common, rather than focus on your differences and that's how the world is run; and, for those who really want to know what's going on, look at how many world meetings are on right now. Look up the universities, look up, across the world, look up universities and see what kind they're organising now, you'll find they're all the same, on board, on track with the same topics. Working and bringing in a pre-planned directed future. Most folk will drift into it and think it's all quite natural, they won't even ask the question how did all this come about? Powerful forces at work, powerful forces which are well-funded, they work with all the foundations, they work with all the governments, they get the red carpet treatment with governments and we are in big-big trouble and we have been, all our lives, most just didn't know it. That's where the confusion comes in, we don't know the facts and I'm trying to give them to you.

For those who like more, just look at my website, donate to me and it keeps me going; and, from Hamish and myself, Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article (continued): "The Frankfurt School" by Professor Douglas Kellner (ucla.edu).)

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:56 am

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 12th of January 2009.

For the newcomers: look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the website there you can download lots of talks I've given in the past, where I try to tie a lot of things together, to show you the big picture of what really runs the world, where it's going and how most people really are manipulated into working along this agenda which they're entirely oblivious of. Generally, out of good intentions, they work the agenda into being for people they'll never meet, for an agenda, the true agenda they'll never ever understand, even when it hits them; and, they will indeed be in shock.  I think it's over 600 talks I've given, which you can download for free.

Also, look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can download written transcripts of these talks and they're written in the various languages of Europe.

For those who don't have my books yet, you can order them from www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can also donate and that keeps me going and I know things are getting tight out there because I've talked to a lot of people from all over and people are becoming worried about the economy and they have a right to be worried about it because it doesn't look so good after all. There's a second bail-out package to come and how many after that I wonder? Until everyone's going to end up in utter slavery to the World Bank, by the looks of it, because government doesn't have money, it takes money from taxpayers to pay all these bail-outs that they're handing out. As I say, there's more to come and inflation will go rampant and so on; and, for those who follow this particular station and others, they'll know all of this, they’ll know the scenario, they know the cons that are going on and they know we're in for a rough ride. We have to hang on and come through it because, after all, we didn’t plan it; it certainly was planned though and it was helped along and manipulated into existence.

It makes you wonder why they hire all these great economists, why would you hire economists if things like this happen? Why on earth would you do it, if it's supposed to be a form of a science, what kind of science is this? And then we have the bottom economists, always writing for newspapers and they're never right, on anything. It's quite something, the age in which we live.

Over the weekend, I tried to watch a couple of videos, I tried to, because I use satellite, for uploading and downloading, and you never get the speed of course that you pay for and especially since the military-industrial complex owns the satellite, I guess we're sharing it with the military and they get priority, so I kind of watch some of the videos in little bits and bites, as it stops and starts and so on and I get the gist of things mainly and that's about it.  I was watching one by Brian Gerrish, who lives in England and who started a little movement up to fight and expose a massive organisation called Common Purpose; and, as I was watching this video, he was going through the fact that this organisation was already so enormous. It had basically got members in the military, at the top in the military, members in top police departments, city councils and it's all through Britain; and, what struck me, was how quickly these things spread, because they're so well-funded and organised.  I'm going to go into this, after the following break, because it's very interesting what I was thinking about.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing a video I watched at the weekend, made by Brian Gerrish of England, who is an ex submarine hunter, he was on some kind of frigate that chased the submarines during the Cold War; and, he is now campaigning and talking in groups around the country, to try to get people interested in combating an organisation that has taken off like wildfire and yet it's so secretive as to its intentions, its motives and so on. He goes through the funding this organisation gets and the techniques they use and the techniques, really, are very similar, if not the same as that of Chatham House and Chatham House is the head for the Royal Institute for International Affairs, where they're allowed, sometimes, they're told what they can tell the public, they're also told not to mention to the public who said what and what kind of discussion that takes place within the House. I know in the old books of Chatham House, and I have some of them, they used to print the members who attended and you can often tie in who said what, by where they came from. And, this Common Purpose, as I say, gets money from the C.F.R. and different big organisations already; and, because it seems to have got such leeway to penetrate into even local government and major government, the federal governments, it has to be related, I think, in some way, with intelligence service at the top. And just as the RIIA is also integrated with the intelligence service, in fact, Chatham House was the headquarters, during World War II, for the British and American O.S.S.

When I was watching the video, - apart from all the discoveries this particular man had found about the organisation and its networking and its incredible funding, incredible funding - was that by the time the public ever find out about anything that's really important that's going to affect your lives, especially things which are outside of democracy, it's always, we've been run over already, it's like a stampede that’s coming your way and you're in the desert and you see the sandstorm coming and so on and, by the time you even know what's happening, it's disappearing over the other horizon. That's how most of these things work, they're so incredibly secretive, they're so heavily-financed into existence that they almost can't lose and part of the purpose of Common Purpose, it seems, is to go for the youth in schools, they recruit teachers as well, who then recruit the children and that reminded me right off the bat of the techniques used by the Cecil Rhodes Foundation and, eventually the Lord Milner Group amalgamated with it. They called the youngsters who were being trained at Kindergarten, Milner's Kindergarten.

They're going to create new future leaders in all aspects of society, that seems to be their role; and, as I say, it's outside of any democratic control. In fact, it's penetrated all of the democratic control. And, I'm not surprised, because we're seeing in a New World Order, that's what's coming in, we're living through it; and, Gorbachev and others have discussed this many-many times, this coming transitional century, this is the century of change. It means it's the century to bring in this global society and not just the society where we can continue as we have before being good consumers and producers and so on, but, a controlled society, right down to population control, it's in partnership with the old soviet system, in fact they brought many of the soviet experts on board, to amalgamate the two systems; and, again, Professor Carroll Quigley talked about that and so did Norman Dodd of the Reece Commission.

That's what we're living through today. It's to be a heavily-controlled society, which, of course, must portray itself as something completely different. Whenever anything is sold to the public in politics or in a political fashion, you'll never get truth because power is power, I don't care who is bringing in the power, who wants the power, power is power and they never tell the public their ultimate goals; and, I think that's true in all administrations probably down through the centuries. Francis Bacon said it's best the public never really know the true machinations of government, the true reasons that they do things.

I was also thinking about how on earth did we get here? Studying history gives you an idea and even history is heavily spun. Ancient history can give us a lot, although it's mixed with mythology, because that's how ancient history was written. History used to be written, generally, on command of a king or a potentate and therefore the historian had to be politically correct, as he wrote the history, he always had to glorify the king or his lineage, or whatever, so you never get a true picture of history. Even ancient Pharaohs were known to have lost battles and to have completely lied about the outcomes of the battles and then reversed the reality.

This takes me on to culture really and culture creation and control. We always think that, sometime in the past, and that's what the media often plays on when they give us, especially your mainstream CBC / BBC type plays that they put on. They always give you some sort of glorified past and they love, I don't know why they love just the pre-Victorian age or the Victorian age, the costumery and so on; but, they always pick the wealthy classes and give you the stories and so on and that doesn't tell you any of the truth whatsoever because the majority of the people did not live like that. They give us always a nice past, to look back on, a fake one; at least, for most people it was fake.  Why did they do that? Why do they always do that? They're catering to human stress and emotion, because we all want some kind of security and continuity and purpose for living in fact; and, culture generally gives to people, whole tribes and nations, clans, whatever, a reason for being. That is why Darwin himself, when he came out with his Origin of Species, he said that a ‘superior’ culture, with technology etc, and what they called "civilisation" comes in and occupies a country of inferior type, meaning those who are, he calls them "fixed" societies, those who have not progressed, they're "arrested development" you might say (that's what they often call it too), then those people will lose whatever culture or reason for being that they had and will often disintegrate or perish, through self-abuse. And, we do certainly see this, with some peoples who go into alcoholism, in Africa there's a lot of drugs in some areas too; but, it’s a form of wiping oneself off the face of the map, it's self-destructive, because the ideals and principles, which can also be very basic, are being taken from them; and, again, reinforced by the predominating new cultures coming in, they'll often try and wipe out the old culture, which further disintegrates the people, if they can't adapt, as they say in Darwinian terminology.

We are much the same too, even in our own cultures, because, when you read the communist philosophies, or science as they call it, it's now included in the system of the West that brought them together a long time ago, because they knew exactly where they were going a long time ago. That came out in the Reece Commission - with Norman Dodd - that they knew this back in the 1950s. Then people who are older today will have a hard time adapting to the changes that are coming; and, that's why they concentrate primarily on the youth, that's a normal strategy of Sovietisation. The older ones are called "contaminated", they have false ideas of past etc, false morality, outdated, antiquated and antique, obsolete and you must go for the youth, who will be the new ones who'll come up. In other words: you can brainwash them perfectly, that's what that simply means, brainwashing. Children will believe whatever they're told by the superiors who manage them and every tyrant in history has used the same techniques of going after the youth.

This brings me into something of the techniques that are used, because, again, I watched another, in broken pieces anyway, video (via satellite, starts and stops), by Adam Curtis. Adam Curtis has done documentaries for quite a few years and then he was absorbed by the BBC; but, during his sort of free-lancing time, he churned out documentaries, using archived footage, which the BBC and other countries had, to do with the 20th century primarily; and, the wars and how, even after World War II, at the Nuremburg Trials. The Nuremberg Trials were opened off by, I think, a six-hour movie, which had been put together by Hollywood, splicing bits of the Nazi propaganda together, all spliced, to ensure that those people on trial were portrayed in the worst light possible. Even that was set off with the fiction involved, I mean it was not all fiction but when you take anything out of context, you can certainly make a different story, once you patch it all together. And we're into the field here of mind control and psychiatry, because this was used to project onto the masses, who must believe the official story. I'll be back with more, after this message.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing techniques really, techniques of managing the masses and giving them perceptions, the authorised perceptions; and, I mentioned this man called Adam Curtis who studied at Oxford University, who was into the various sciences, behavioural sciences and so on, so he understood, obviously, these techniques and, perhaps, that's why he made different documentaries on them, using archived information which wasn't shown to the public before, but there it was, they had it at places like the BBC.

In the Nuremburg Trials, they were set to try and prove to the public this was a just war, a just war and they tried, and I'll leave the links at the end of the show. They tried to get Göring to admit he was guilty; and, of course, Göring had psychopathic qualities, he didn't see right and wrong the same way as anyone else, he saw whatever was functional for the period. However, the whole idea was to try and get him to admit that, through coercion and lies and deceit, they basically usurped government for their own ends, by using a totalitarian form of government over the people and Göring didn't deny that, he just didn't see anything wrong with it. He said it was the only thing that would work at that time; and, of course, remember the whole drive for a long-long time, pre-World War II, was to create the system of democracy.

This takes me into the second series, another series that Adam Curtis did, on this very topic of democracy but it's called Century of the Self; and, it's fascinating really, remember too, that with all exposés, there's a lot omitted. For instance, he never goes into the fact that, down through the last 100 years, there have been big organisations like the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the C.F.R. and a host of other and you've got the Trilaterals and many-many other organisations, all working together, to bring in their particular global system; and, they still use the term 'democracy' but it's so secretive and so all-infiltrating, through all systems of government, that it's just too big for the average person to manage, even in their head, so huge, because they're heavily funded, have hundred of departments working on special projects and so on.

It's still worth watching Adam Curtis's series of videos here, going through the techniques that they used. Now, they used, at the end of World War I, Edward Bernays, everyone's heard his name. He was the nephew of Freud and, supposedly, we're told, he used Freud's techniques of understanding this vast sea of the unconscious that's in everyone, the vast sea of emotions and thoughts and symbols and so on, to use that on the people, to create a form of democracy and he was hired by President Wilson, when he was only about 24 apparently, so we're told, but I think there is lot more to this man myself. But, to go over to set up the League of Nations and went over to France and they had this amazing big parades and all the rest of it, really promoting the birth of a New Order, World Order, even back then, and to bring in democracy.

Edward Bernays, the nephew of Freud, was heavily-involved in the setting up of the techniques that would be used for propaganda purposes; and, he was open about the term initially, called propaganda, he wrote a book called Propaganda, it's worth reading, on how to manipulate the masses. Bernays went on to have an amazing career and he ended up being a very-very old man, they live to a long age these guys who have no particular scruples. While he was doing all this kind of stuff, the daughter of Freud had basically taken over the budding Institute Of Psychiatry, in fact, she was the head person for the world's institute or institutes of psychiatry and her word was law. Whatever she said became law, basically, in psychiatry and their whole opinion, in psychiatry, at the end of World War I, between the two wars, was that the general person within the population, the average person, couldn't be trusted to, literally, make rational decisions on anything. They saw the people as a big mob, basically, the vast mob who simply reacted on whimsical emotions that all came out of this great Unconscious that Freud called it; and, this stuff was taken seriously by governments, who are always wary of people they rule over.

Edward Bernays went on to have a career helping politicians make policies etc. How to market ideas to the public, using Freud's techniques but I think it's beyond Freud, to be honest, I think this man was trained in a much greater depth of understanding because, as I say, he appears at 24, knowing all this stuff and, supposedly, in his own words, he just read a book by his uncle, I don't believe that at all. I think he was specially trained for his role.

Psychiatry became a very powerful tool in helping governments manage its peoples and get policies across. He also went into marketing, at the same time, working for big private clients and big banks like Lehman Brothers; and, I'll be back with more of this story after the following break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing some videos made by Adam Curtis on The Century of Self, as they call it, where he talks about Edward Bernays, this incredible man who was the supposed genius behind mass marketing and then individual, actually categorising different types of people, according to what you could basically sell them, by understanding their psychology. He also was an advisor to Presidents and yet he was also working at the same time with big banking institutions and Lehman Brothers were developing big chains of clothing and appliance outlets, across the country. They brought him in, to try and find ways to convince the public to stop buying things because they would last long and they were good quality etc but to make them want things by using these inhibited or suppressed emotions, so these would fulfil maybe a temporary ‘fill’ for these suppressed emotions. Again, Edward Bernays, we're told, had this great ability to understand the problem right away and make it work, to find ways around it.

He also, at one point, had a client who ran the whole of Guatemala, at one point, and it was a big / massive company, a fruit company, mainly bananas, and everybody worked on banana plantations and his client in the US was upset because a new President had been elected who was not communist by the way, he was socialist in the extent that he wanted to share the wealth of the people, and, so, the company, based in the States, asked him to 'fix it' in some way or another. So, Bernays went into action, he went to see Eisenhower and, between them, they conspired to convince the public that this man, this President that was elected was a communist, which they knew that he wasn't. They even set up a movie company to churn out news, fake newsreels on this man, to show you that he was red menace living next door. And, the US taxpayers funded a war with Guatemala; and, they went in there and bombed the bejesus out of Guatemala and then, at the end of it, the US put in their own puppet regime, the company paid Mr. Bernays very well, for restoring their big massive fruit plantations; and so on; and the US taxpayer funded the war.

We're not dealing here with just little conmen, we're dealing with people who have the psychopathic abilities, who are up at the top, but they also have some kind of knowledge of the sciences of real psychology, motivational behaviour and so on. At that time, in that period, people were used to, as I say, buying things to last for a long time and he worked on the way to get people to buy the cheaper shoddy goods and get used to the idea that something that was older was somehow no use. Something that was new was always better, and he was very-very efficient at doing that too. So, he was the father, really of marketing, he was the guru of marketing; and, his techniques were swallowed up by all the marketing companies that blossomed throughout not only the States, but all through Europe as well and they're still used today to run our mind. There isn't a single project put out by any government that doesn't have to go through marketing companies, so that they can sell the idea to the public. Now, remember, the idea is never to tell you the truth, but to sell you the idea, because we fall for ideas, we like to hear things that elevate us into some great wonderful future or whatever. We like the terms they use and they're deliberately picked and chosen for us; and, they truly do have society down to a very fine art, because, from Bernays too, they came out with focus groups, where they would bring people in to test products, a bunch of observers would stand behind two-way mirrors and watch and record the reactions of people to different products.

They targeted, initially, women, with fashion, in fact they brought in the mini skirt; this is long before the '60s, because they tried it in the '20s too. They got women to smoke, to make it seem that this was a power symbol, having a cigarette was a power symbol; and, so they hired top people, at a particular show in New York, I think it was, to suddenly start smoking and made it very daring to do and that was picked up immediately by women who saw this and they started smoking. They did the same thing with getting women to drink different kinds of alcohol.

To Bernays, the average person was completely malleable - if you simply observe an individual for long enough, you can find his weak spots, or her weak spots, and you can exploit it - and that's the whole process of this, is exploitation, all marketing is exploitation. They're trying to sell you something or make you do something, or even change your lifestyle from government wanting you to behave in a different way; this is all done through specific marketing.

Then in the 1960s, there was a sudden change, they say, and, again, it's in this series (that I'm going to put the links up for at the end of the show), where the youth was so sick of the mass marketing culture and this caused a problem for those at the top, the big salesmen, the economists: how do we get this group to buy products? How do we turn them into, from hippies to people who will actually buy products? Therefore, they studied them, like any group, you study them and, eventually, they realised that there was a change going on, the people wanted more individuality, to be recognised really as individuals. At the same time, entrepreneurs came out, using the same psychological marketing techniques, Delphi techniques and so on, and started teaching groups in motivational behaviour therapy; all psychology and psychiatry combined and that took off like a rocket, with people who were technically unhappy with their lifestyles, unhappy with life in general and they wanted to change themselves. So, once again, change is good, as they say.

The C.I.A., of course, was involved heavily in the studies to do with any kind of behaviour modification, which comes under mind control. In the videos (as I say the links I'll put up) you'll see that there was the Esalen Institute, on of the first biggies that tried to alter different people's behaviour, they tried to alter black people's behaviour in the States, by some forms of encounter groups and they weren't too successful. So they tried it on a convent in Los Angeles and, within, a few weeks, they had literally (and this they'll tell you on the video), by altering their inhibitions and their common sense on anything, the convent stopped, it just closed its doors after about six weeks, because the nuns had all abandoned everything, they'd been told that everything they had was suppressed emotion, let it go; and, they all became lesbians.

This is the power of this motivational-type behaviour modification, that people generally pay to get done to them; and, those who remember that time, remember the Rolfing and all the other techniques that they used; and, in the video, you'll see people writhing about, you'll see them on the floor, you'll see them kicking their heels on the floor, putting their legs up and down, as they're sitting on chairs in rapid motions. These are the same techniques you'll see in what they call the Toronto Blessing, where these con men Christians pretend that the Holy Ghost is coming into people but you'll see the exact same movements and the writhing and screams and so on that's used in these motivational behaviour therapy lessons.  I'm tying the same technique together, even through certain religions and TV evangelists that do this kind of stuff. I could go into the whole techniques of why it works and how it works but we don't have time on tonight's show.

As I say, that was the promotion of the self at that time, trying to create the self and that's when everything started to come out in the '70s and '80s as your personal, whatever it was they was selling, it was a personal item. If you were buying something electronic, it was your personal radio or it was, even your personal photocopier. Now, it's personal computer, that's where all that came from, because the big marketers, with their experts, were studying segments, vast segments of society; and that's why they want data on every single person, so they can market right to you and make you buy something you hadn't thought of. And, governments - again - are completely interwoven now, with these same behaviour modification specialists called marketers. Marketers work for governments, they work in campaigns, for elections, they work and they study all opposition by the way, through their polls and find ways to overcome that. It's quite fascinating how they do it; but, what it shows you is that so many people, so many people, in today's society are malleable.

Now, let's go back to the initial concept of this: at the end of World War I; now, let's remember World War I was not created by just ordinary people; it was the heads of governments who declared war on each other. The heads of governments were interwoven at that time with empire-building; and, you had three main people competing for empire although Britain had the largest, you also had France and Germany, prior to World War I, trying to build up empires, which also meant it was a lucrative business, for materials and resources, for big corporation owners who became fabulously rich, through the wars. However, at the end of World War I, here's the mind-bender: because, as I say, all the psychiatrists and the Freudian psychiatrists came out blamed the ordinary people for the wars; and that fixation, that it was all the fault of the common man and woman, has stayed with psychiatry ever since. Charles Galton Darwin and others came out and said that psychiatry and psychiatrists should be on the board of every government, to ensure that the politicians were all perfectly sane. Now, what makes the psychiatrists think they're any better or more reasonable, or rational for that matter?  This philosophy held true for a long-long time but, as I said, mainly the psychiatrists, what you've got is the next best thing, you have the Bernays types, the marketer types, working with government, to get them into government, to get parties in and to manage the people throughout, through perception alteration or distortion. Not to give truth to the public, but to distort your perceptions on things on events.

The marketers, in another series done by Adam Curtis too, he shows you these guys working with big politicians: Margaret Thatcher, Bill Clinton and others; and, you'll even hear it said that they had no intention, really, of fulfilling any promises, they just wanted the public to believe that they were changing and going off in a different direction. You'll hear it said, by those involved.

Life is a stage isn't it? The world's a stage and these guys are always playing to the public, but it's never for the public's benefit; but they’re still under the same impression, the general public cannot be trusted. If you wonder why, we’re going into this century, with massive observation on every individual, with incredible data-keeping on everything that the individual does. With cameras everywhere, IDs being shown / ID cards being shown across Europe and the States and different places; and, we know it's not the end of it; the Chip is still to come. It's all from this initial idea of those who ruled, in the early 20th Century, that the people were unstable, irrational and could not be counted on to make rational decisions. As I say, they were told by people like Freud that the average person would just act out unconscious desires and never know why.

This tied in, of course, because psychiatry, from its very inception, was completely tied in with eugenics, utterly; and, in fact, there's other videos out there to do with the psychiatrists in Germany, Nazi Germany and how almost every psychiatrist in Germany became a Nazi party member, because the philosophies that Adolf Hitler was pushing were so pretty well identical with their own. The idea being, coupled with Darwinism and Freudism that, in survival of the fittest, that there were inferior types in society and it also bolstered the ruling elite of the day, because they believed themselves we must be the most evolved species at the top because we are at the top. And, because we have this power and because we have amassed vast fortunes and held on to it through generations, we're obviously the elite, while those below are almost a separate species. That's when it all started, psychiatry gave credence to this, they backed it up; and, there was a fight on for psychiatrists to get placed on the boards of all governments of the world. The League of Nations advocated it, on various occasions; the United Nations has advocated it at certain times. If you wonder why you see this massive campaign for mental health, where they want everyone to be monitored, from birth onwards, throughout life but they're starting with the children, not to spook the adults. It's all to do with this one same single agenda, that those at the top came to the conclusions a long time ago, that you cannot make a rational decision, you are a potential criminal, you've the potential to be a criminal, you've the potential to be maladjusted; they will tell you what adjusted means. It's to bring in this Sovietised system that was experimented on in the Soviet Union, and it's been perfected in the West, that's where it's all coming from.

As I say, Adam Curtis does one fatal thing and he omits through all of this: how come the agenda towards the world governmental system has gone on unimpeded, regardless of what party was ever voted in, in any country? He doesn't go into the mandates of the bureaucrats and their polices. I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing just a little bit about the marketing techniques that have been used for a 100 years to alter and shape culture. I said, a long time ago, that you have to find who you are, the hardest thing is to find who you are in this day and age, because we tend to be composites of all our indoctrinations; a lot of which we're completely oblivious that we've even had, because culture is controlled and created and updated. Not by chance and not just for profit; profit is a big thing but it's also done because there is a parallel government that wants to control everyone and they're bringing us through part of the transition phase and they have a whole bunch of transition phases, as they phase out the old man through Transhumanism and bring out the new. They must sell that idea, which they're doing very well to be people; there's a lot of people email me thinking that they deserve to be part Cyborg or have longevity and I always refer back to Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley, who mentioned that there are a lot of people who think they will deserve it but they're not even in the running.

Getting back to Bernays: it's astonishing, here's the nephew of Freud, whose daughter Anna, ends up being the head for many years, most of her life, of the World Psychiatric Federation. Even the patients she treated (you'll hear this on the video) personally, generally committed suicide, so it shows you the great job on them; but, it didn't matter, because the propaganda of making her famous because you make 'stars' including 'stars' in psychiatry and 'stars' in politics and 'stars' anywhere else, they are made by the same industry, the marketing industry. Then you go down through these particular videos and you'll also see, I think, it's the great-grandson of Freud, who's married to the daughter of Rupert Murdock and his big conglomerate chain and how they changed the media, using this younger Freud, using his ideas, he owned a massive marketing company and how they blended in news with advertising in the actual stories themselves; you don't realise that. He also came up with the idea of putting brand name products in the big-big movies etc and having famous stars mentioning these products at least twice in every interview.

Everything is a show and it's also marketing and selling, everything. There's nothing real on the big screen or the TV screen, it's all strategy so that you will perceive things in a certain way; and, they also understand what we go through, our milestones, as a young man or a woman, from childhood and they segregate it all up and market right to you, even bypassing the parents. How to bypass parents and make the child get what they want, without the parents even being aware that they've given in to the child's demands; incredible psychology is at play. By using these techniques, they hope to control a world society; but, as we go through the initial changes, into the world system we have to go through the totalitarian system and get used to that as well, because that's all part of the training. Every camera on the road is meant to create fear within you, there's always another reason for what you see around you.

That's it for tonight, I can hear the music coming in; and, it's a very short hour because there's so much to say about this, I'll probably say more tomorrow. So, from Hamish and myself, it's goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Topics from the show covered in following video links:

VIDEO: "Common Purpose N.W.O Fifth Column Brian Gerrish".

VIDEO: "The Living Dead" 1995 by Adam Curtis (video.google.com).

Episode 1 - On the Desperate Edge of Now

Episode 2 - You Have Used Me as a Fish Long Enough

Episode 3 - The Attic

VIDEO: "The Century Of The Self" by Adam Curtis. Part 1 - 4

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:57 am

Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#237)

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 19, 2009:

The CIA's Dream Machine – Still Dreamin':

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January the 19th 2009.

For the newcomers: look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and, on that website, you'll see hundreds of talks I've given over the years, which go into the big system in which we live. The system, I hope, that, at least I hope to get across, that those big players in the system, behind the scenes, are coming out into the open with their agenda right now in fact and it's so clear. I try to you a bit of a history of it, to promote understanding. We don't just end up at a place in time and history, with a system that emerged by itself, it takes planning and organisation to bring a new system into being and that's what most of the talks are about, as I try to fill it in.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts, which you can download, print up and they're of the audio talks, but you can print them up and they're done in the various languages of Europe, pass them round to your friends. Some people do prefer to read and it's been almost a dying art, because so many people now are just watching videos and I'm sure those at the top are well into that field, to make sure they get most of the videos out for us to watch.

We're being led a merry dance for so long and it's on-going. Last week I went into some of the techniques that have been used on the public, the form of mind control and I've given a lot of links to various exposés, from professional people, who have gone into the histories of these particular techniques, how they've been put across on the public and how it affected the public; and, you can't help but watch all of these particular video series without coming to the conclusion that we are so easily led. We are so easily led, that's the frightening part of it; it's easy when you're young to be led, because we don't know, we don't have the wisdom that comes through experience, we don't have the memory of something in the past where we've see the cons played before, the same types of cons and we don't have that to fall back on. Today, we don't have the inter-generational network to pass on this kind of knowledge to the young; in fact, a very good job has been done at separating the generations, so they don't really communicate to each other. And, for the young, there's a whole specialised profession dealing with giving them their thoughts. The whole idea is so we never arrive at any concrete kind of proof, or evidence, people are 'all over the map' with what they think is going on. So, you have confusion: when people are in massive confusion, they cannot get organised; and, if they can't get organised, then they are dominated. That's well understood at the top, and part of tonight's talk will be going into this organisational process that's being used by professionals. We saw it in the Cold War, where the Communist system was really at the cutting edge of organisational abilities. This was also adopted by the C.I.A. and MI6 in the West, primarily, when they merged together, those two organisations, the latter two, to supposedly combat the Communist threat.

It's interesting, as I say, when you go even further back, to find out the big players, even within what was called the O.S.S. and eventually the CIA, they belonged to the international groups that wanted world government, like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Tonight, I'm going to give some excerpts from a book which goes into this and it's very interesting. Back, after the following messages.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and before I go into this, I'll just remind the people that I am brought to you by you, the listeners; and, you can buy what's offered on my website www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com or you can donate or do both and that's what keeps me going. I don't ask any of the stations I'm on, any of the shows I've been on, for money. It's up to you to keep it going, if you like what you're hearing. I try not to go into the daily news so much, because I think that's evident for us all to see that big things are happening, as we move into the next transition phase, a phase that was planned long ago, where the whole world is to be brought into a new economy and a new regimented way of living, from birth to death: watched, to the grave by cameras, all your information collected, electronic information and stored in databanks. They've announced I think in Britain that they'll keep all information, all telephone calls, everything up to 10 years or more; and, that will happen elsewhere, if it's not already been done, most of this stuff has already been done anyway.

Getting back to this book, and I'll mention the name of it, near the end of the show, otherwise you'll be running off to look it up on the internet and you won't hear what I have to say.  I'm giving you a shortcut to the book, so just listen and it's quite interesting.

The O.S.S. was the precursor of the CIA, it was set during World War II as a combination of Britain's Secret Service and the United States' new Secret Service. They worked out of Chatham House, which is the head office, that’s the main quarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, another private organisation, so we're told. Personally, I don't think so, the evidence points to the fact that the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the CFR are, basically a secret service unto themselves, working for the Establishment and this book actually goes into some of this and, if you can actually read it, and show the names of the people who belong to it, it'll give credence to what I'm talking about. It says here:

Governed by legislation which prohibited little and countenanced virtually anything, OSS-ers or OZZers 

Sometimes they call themselves in the Wizard of Oz.

found themselves roving wartime Europe, like latter-day proconsuls, the first OSS man to reach Bucharest, after the German withdrawal in Autumn 1944, became a regular guest at meetings of the Rumanian Cabinet and boasted to his colleagues: before they vote on anything, they ask me what I think. They pass all my laws unanimously, I never thought running a country was so easy but running a country was precisely which OSS-ers were brought up to do. Recruiting from the heart of America's corporate political academic and cultural establishment, Donovan had assembled an elite core which hailed from America's most powerful institutions and families. Member of the Mellon family held espionage posts in Madrid, London, Geneva, Paris. Paul Mellon worked for the special operations executive in London; his sister Ailsa, once known as the world's richest woman was married to his commanding officer, chief of OSS London, David Bruce, son of a US Senator and a millionaire in his own right. JP Morgan's sons were both in the OSS. The families Vanderbilt, DuPont, Archibold, Standard Oil, Ryan he was also in Ecuador Life Insurance, … Macy’s Department store, Whitney, were all represented in the ranks of Donovan's secret army. 

Far from having risked their future status, the period in the OSS enhanced the reputations and offered another network to combine with the old school tie that had brought them together in the first place. 

There were also personal ambitions involved too.

This and their initiation into the illegality and unorthodoxy was to provide a rich resource for the CIA,  

Because the OSS transformed into the CIA, in fact the OSS was disbanded by President Truman, who said he didn't want another Gestapo running the United States of America. To continue here, it says:

it was this historic elite, the Ivy Leaguers who cast their influence over America's boardrooms, academic institutions, major newspapers and media, law firms and government, who now stepped forward to fill the ranks of the fledgling agency. Many of them hailed from a concentration in Washington, of a hundred or so wealthy families, known as the ‘Cave Dwellers’ who stood for the preservation of the Episcopalian and Presbyterian values that had guided their ancestors. Skilled in the principles of robust intellect, athletic prowess … and solid Christian ethics, they took their example from men like the Reverend Endicott Peabody whose Groton School run along the lines of Eton, Harrow and Winchester was the alma mater of so many national leaders, trained in the Christian virtues and the duties of privilege they emerged believing in democracy but wary of unchecked egalitarianism, reversing Willy Brant's celebrated declaration ‘we are the elected of the people, not the elect’, this was the elect who had not been elected. 

Then on page 96, of this particular book; and, this goes into culture, because this is what it was all about, most of the Cold War had nothing to do with espionage, as we think of it, it was to do with a battle for people's minds. Both the Soviets, or the Soviet elite and the elite of the US and Britain, and other countries in Europe, were more afraid of the minds of the public being stolen by the winners and therefore all propaganda that came out, on all sides, was aimed to direct the mind-set of the general public, who hadn't a clue but that's what it was all about. It says here:

William Colby, a future CIA Director, reached the same conclusion that Communists made no secret of their belief in what they called ‘The Organisational Weapon’ 

I started off the show talking about the fact the people down below, the masses who are probably the most enlightened slaves there's ever existed, with more information, but there's no organisation amongst them. It says:

The Communists made no secret of their belief in what they called ‘The Organisational Weapon’, organise the party is the key to man troop but then organise all the other fronts. The Women's groups, the cultural groups, the Trade Unions, the Farmer groups, the Co-operatives, a whole panoply of organisations so that you can include as many of the people in the country as possible within those groups and thereby under, basically communist leadership and even discipline. 

While the US and its Think Tanks, and it mentions in here the CFR too, being one of them, realised that they would have to outsmart the Communists - at least that's what they tell us - remember the whole project, if you go further back in history, was to get the dialectic going between two sides, with the East and the West, it was very clear-cut, and, out of the end of it, according to the foundations. A good book to read is Foundations: their power and influence, from the Reece Commission, it was done in the 1950s, with Senator Dodd, who had to investigate how the big foundations and why the big foundations seemed to be sponsoring what seemed to be the most fervent Communist Groups, because the CIA it seems did create some of the most Left Wing groups of all, therefore those who were inclined to go Left Wing would join their groups instead.

That's quite the plan; and, they came up with the idea of promoting what the Soviet system hated and called the Americans promoting what they called Decadence, through the arts. That was the visual arts, drama, music, painting, altering the culture completely - and also through the novels that would get churned out like crazy - which they did; it definitely did affect everyone who grew in the so-called Cold War. Remember, in the Cold War too, the people weren't taking it seriously enough in a lot of the countries. It was Bernays who came up with the idea, Bernays that I mentioned last week, he came up with the idea of training the children to get under their tables in the classroom, to get it home to them that this was real, to make them afraid. It says here:

The Director concluded that practical and ideological considerations both impel us to the conclusion that we have no choice but to demonstrate the superiority of the idea of freedom, by its constructive application. Truth also needs propaganda, the philosopher Carl Jasper said, recently declared, he was the mandate which authorised America's Cold Warriors to take constructive measures, to ensure that the truth triumphed over deceit. The budgetary provisions set out by NSC-68 revealed the importance now given to the task. In the next two years, the $34 million spent on psychological warfare in 1950 was to be quadrupled. 

That's when they really took over the entire Culture Industry of the West and they set up branches in every country throughout Europe and Scandinavia and ran them, they ran the cultures. It says here:

In the contest for men's minds, truth can be peculiarly the American weapon, the Secretary of State Edward Barrett announced. It cannot be an isolated weapon, because the propaganda of truth is powerful only when linked with concrete actions and policies. A highly skilful and substantial campaign of truth is an indispensable as an air force. 

He meant propaganda though.

and, truth, like the century, was to belong to America 

That's what they called it: ‘The New American Century’.

if deceit needed to be used to promote the truth, then so be it. 

That's what Arthur Koestler called: "fighting against a total lie in the name of a half truth"

The purpose of the IOD said Braden was to unite intellectuals against what was being offered in the Soviet Union.  

I'll go into this, because it's very interesting, it's quite a deep book and there are lots of facts in it. Back, in a few minutes.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we're discussing the techniques used during the Cold War; and, we've got to keep in mind that if the CIA was running the Cultural Industry, right up until the Berlin Wall fell down, they would never give it up afterwards. In other words: they're still running it. The author of this particular book did a lot of research and she tried to get information from the CIA, under the Freedom of Information Act. She was told that even the few questions she'd asked and the access to some documents would cost up to $30,000, so she had to go into private archives, from people who had been in the CIA and get access to this kind of data.

As I say: remember, this book pertains also to not only to where we are today, how we got here but where they're going because this the most powerful tool ever; you are, in a sense, your culture. Whatever culture is give to you, you are it; you are in it, you dress like it, you sing the songs of it, you talk about the novels that are churned out, you talk about all the different things that captivate your mind, like everyone else around you. It's all churned out by the Culture Industry, because it's a battle, as I say, for the mind. You control people through the information, through the data you give to them. Remember what Brzezinski said:

The public will shortly be unable to think for themselves.

He said that in the 1970s. That's what's happened, they feed us the data, we parrot it to each other, we all think we're normal because we're all talking about the same things, all the time. They have specific areas and different age groups they target; they have one for every age group. It says here:

The purpose of the IOD, said Braden, was to unite intellectuals against what was being offered in the Soviet Union. The idea that the world would succumb to a kind of Fascist or Stalinist concept of art and literature and music, was a horrifying prospect. We wanted to unite all the people who were artists, who were writers, who were musicians and all the people who followed those people, to demonstrate that the West and the United States was devoted to freedom of expression and to intellectual achievement without any rigid barriers as to what you must write and what you must say and what you must do and what you must paint, which was what was going in the Soviet Union. "I think we did it damn well", said Braden.  

At that time, when the world was being turned upside-down, all this weird artwork came out and people would think it was all the left-wingers that were doing it, it wasn't. It was the CIA teams that were doing this, they hired novelists; and, it says in the book too that many of whom would never have made it on their own, an artist that had been starving because no one would buy their art, they made them famous; and, they promoted nihilism. Nihilism: tie that in with what Bertrand Russell said, who was also part of all this group as well, he said to control people you must create a form of apathy and that's what nihilistic art is designed to do. It says here:

They use certain agencies too; it was to provide independent support for the American Foreign Policy objectives which sought to promote a united Europe 

That was their policy: a united Europe. That was also part of the deal with the Lend-Lease Programme, at the end of World War II; Eisenhower said that most of this money would have to go towards the working set up of a united Europe. Here we are today. Folk lived through that whole period until not too long ago, they admitted now had a European Parliament; yet, for years they denied they were working towards that, it was just to do with trade, they said.

of NATO and the European movements, the latter being substantially endowed by the CIA  

They paid for all that, the US taxpayer paid for all that, and didn't know, which included a reunified Germany, that's happened now too.

that was to act as an emissary for the achievements of American culture and to work to undermine the negative stereotypes prevalent in Europe, especially France, about America's perceived cultural barrenness. It was to respond to negative criticism of other aspects of American democracy, including its civil rights records.  

On page 119, it goes into the degeneracy of it. It says:

The art and sculpture exhibition 

This is an exhibition they put on in Europe, it says:

was curated by James Johnson-Sweeny, art critic and former Director of New York's Museum of Modern Art, which contracted to organise the show. Works by Matisse, Derain, Cézanne, Seurat, Chagall, Kandinskyand others, masters of early 20th Century modernism were culled from American collections and shipped to Europe on the 18th of April the appropriately named S.S. Liberty. Sweeney's press release made no bones about the propaganda value of the show. As the works were created in many lands, under free conditions, they would speak for themselves of the desirability for contemporary artists of living and working in an atmosphere of freedom. On display will be masterpieces that could not have been created nor whose exhibition would be allowed by such totalitarian regimes as Nazi Germany or present-day Soviet Russia and her satellites, as has been evidenced by those governments labelling as degenerate or bourgeois of many of the paintings and sculptures included.  

It's not long ago, I read an article about the corpses they now have hanging, as we become more and more dehumanised, hanging in museums and art galleries. Back in a moment; after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and Cutting Through The Matrix, going through a book called the Cultural Cold War, which is a good book for the time, I'm sure that's all we'll be allowed to know, because this woman has done her research and I'm sure too that she probably was told just how far she could go in bringing out this kind of information. Remember: we're always dished out information about 40 or 30 years after the events, that's pretty well standard. As I say, keep in mind that an organisation, which was running the cultural industry for the whole of Europe and America, would not give it up at the end of the Cold War, or when the Berlin Wall went down, there was too much involved, because they still had the masses to deal with and they would not allow the masses to go off in different directions, when they already had them on the same path and that's what had happened by then. As I say: they were putting on these massive shows, these art shows across the world, all funded by the tax-payers. Art that you probably would never have bought yourself, art that many of the painters, as I say, had they tried to sell it, would have died and been destitute because no one wanted it. The big foundations were involved, because they were promoting this art as being the in thing. All the big magazines, of that period, were promoting this nihilistic art and they were saying that Mrs. Rockefeller was buying it, lots of it; it's the in-thing; and, that's how people are, they want to copy: if this is in, I want it too.  It was all nihilism basically; but, they did the same with the music and various other techniques as well and churned out novels after novels by third-rate writers, made them popular. Going on to 132, page 132, it says:

The fund-raising arm of the Free Europe Committee was a Crusade for Freedom, which a young actor names Ronald Reagan, was a leading spokesman and publicist. The Crusade for Freedom was used to launder money to support a Crusade for Freedom, to support a programme run by Bill Casey, a future CIA director, called the International Refugee Committee in New York, which, allegedly, coordinated the exfiltration of Nazis from Germany into the States, where they were expected to assist the Government in its struggle against Communism.  

There's a lot of this stuff just coming out in Britain now about Britain bringing in lots of these ex-Nazis too; it was kept very quiet there. Dulles, this is the Dulles family:

Dulles kept a firm grip on the committee by replacing CIA officers in key positions. If a problem arose which needed to be resolved out of channels, Dulles would simply call up a meeting with the committee's principles in a New York club of hotel, top secret documents record a series of such meetings, convened by Dulles at the Knickerbocker Club and the Drake Hotel, in this case, in a bedroom booked for the occasion. How many Cold War campaigns were arranged from a hotel bedrooms, other meetings were held in Allen Dulles or Frank Wisner's offices at CIA Headquarters. The USA was a big operation, very big, said the narrator of Humboldt's Gift, commenting on the dedication of America's elite as they manned this private tier, Henry Kissinger wrote "It is to the lasting credit of that generation of Americans that they assumed these responsibilities with energy, imagination and skill. By helping Europe rebuild, encouraging European unity, shaping the institutions of economic cooperation and extending the protection of our alliances, they saved the possibility of freedom. 

This is the same man now that's still trotting around the Globe, pushing the same thing for this new order of things. He's all over the TVs in different countries, talking about it. He's the man behind, one of the men behind this incoming president.

This burst of creativity is one of the glorious moments of American history, Henry Breck, a CIA case officer and alumni’s of Groton School, expressed it another way: "Of course, if you're in a real war, you must fight hard and the upper classes fight the hardest; they have the most to lose". When they were not huddled together in clubs or hotel rooms, Breck's upper classes applied themselves with equal commitment to the business of entertaining. Lively, self-confident, voluble, Wisner and his colleagues were driven to enjoy a good party, just as they were driven to save the world from Communism. Wisner loved to dance, he loved to do a dance called the Crab Communism or Crab Walk; Angleton, legendary consumer of martinis and sometimes of anything he could get hold of, used to dance free-form to Elvis Presley tunes at parties weaving enthusiastically and often by himself.  

Then it goes on to tell you that all these guys, because they came from elite families, were also making a killing off this Cold War, privately, because all their companies and corporations were involved in the Cold War. It was a great party time, it was a great, big-big joke for them in fact, to be honest with you. That's on page 133. And, how did they organise? What did they use to organise? They used the very institutions that were already set up for world organisation. On page 134, it says:

The use of Philanthropic Foundations was the most convenient way to pass large sums of money to agency projects, without alerting the recipients to their source. By the mid 1950s, the CIA's intrusion into the Foundations field was massive, although figures are not available for this period, the General Council of 1952 Congress Committee, appointed to investigate US Foundations,  

That's the Reece Commission.

concluded that an unparalleled amount of power is concentrated increasingly in the hands of an interlocking and self-perpetuating group. Unlike the power of corporate management, it is unchecked by stockholders; unlike the power of government, it is unchecked by the people; unlike the power of the churches, it is unchecked by any firmly-established canons of value. In 1976, a select committee appointed to investigate US Intelligence activities, reported on the CIA's penetration of the Foundations field by the mid 1960s. 

Now, I've been talking about these Foundations for ages and how it's all part, they're all interwoven, in this massive system, that's bringing in the New World Order, under the guise of charity / charitable foundations and they keep adding more and more to them, all the time like the Bill Gates’ Foundation. It's all part of intelligence networks, they create the powerful men; they bring them up and make them powerful. Many of the big technological companies are CIA-owned. You couldn't let technology get out of hand, or out of your hands into the publics hands unless you pass it as ok. You couldn't have free enterprise in technology, when they said themselves that technology and those who can create more of it will win the Cold War and the future. Whatever we're given at the bottom is authorised to be given to us. It says here:

In 1976, a select committee appointed to investigate the use of intelligence activities, reported the CIA's penetration of the Foundation field by the mid '60s. During '63 to '66, of the 700 grants, over $10,000 given by 164 Foundations, at least 108 involved partial or complete CIA funding. More importantly: CIA funding was involved in nearly half of the grants made by these 164 Foundations in the field of international activities, during the same period. Bona fide foundations such as Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie were considered the best and most plausible kind of funding cover. A CIA study of 1966, argued that this technique was particularly effective for democratically-run membership organisations which need to assure their own unwitting members and collaborators, as well as their hostile critics, that they have genuine respectable private sources of income. It certainly allowed the CIA to fund a seemingly limitless range of covert actions programmes affecting youth groups, labour unions, universities, publishing houses and other private institutions, from the early 1950s. There was a cover branch at CIA whose job it was to help provide cover like the foundations were used for operations, Reagan explained. I paid no attention to the details, the finance department would handle it and talk to the cover officer, it was just a mechanism which she used. The Farfield Foundation was one of them, I don't know the names of all of them, I can't remember but it was a criss-cross of money, there was never any danger of the CIA running out of money. The criss-cross of money filtered its way through a raft of host Foundations. 

See how it works? Remember that 1000 points of light that Bush Senior talked about when he gave his New World Order speech? He was talking about the Foundations and the NGOs they control, the Non-Governmental Organisations. At the beginning of the talk, I talked about how the Soviets had one thing and that was the perfection of the ability of organisation, they could organise and the CIA were doing exactly the same thing, using those same techniques. This goes on to say here:

The criss-cross of money filtered its way through a raft of host Foundations, some acting as fronts, some as conduits. Known to have wittingly to have facilitated CIA funding passes, over 170 Foundations, including the Hoblitzelle Foundation, which is a pass-through for the Farfield; the Littauer Foundation, a donor to the Farfield; the Miami District Fund (another donor to the Farfield); the Price Fund, which was a CIA dummy; the Rabb Charitable Foundation, which received CIA money from the phoney Price Fund and passed it to the Farfield; the Vernon Fund, like the Farfield, a CIA dummy front, with a rubber stamp board of directors; and, the Whitney Trust. On their Boards, sat the cream of America's social, financial and political establishment; not for nothing did these Foundations announce themselves as private. Bitter the joke was that if any American philanthropic or cultural organisation carried the words "free" or "private" in its literature, it must be a CIA front. This was the consortium at work, calling in favours across the old school tie network, the OSS network, and the boardrooms of America. The Board of the Farfield Foundation alone, provides a fascinating map of these intricate linkages; 'Junkie' Fleischmann, as president was a contract consultant for Wisner's OPC and thereafter a witting CIA cover for the Congress for Cultural Freedom.  

That's what they called this whole organisation, a Congress for Cultural Freedom, created and funded by the CIA; but, they also brought on board all the big marketers as well, the same ones who were already controlling the culture of America, mainly for profit, at that time. They had to bring them on board and guide them. She says:

cousin Jay Holmes was president of the Holmes Foundation, incorporated in 1953 in New York, Holmes began making a small contribution to the Congress for Cultural Freedom in 1957; from '62 the Holmes Foundation acted formally as a pass-through for CIA money to the Congress. The Fleischmann Foundation of which 'Junkie' was President was also listed as a donor to the Farfield Foundation. Also on the board of this Fleischmann Foundation was Charles Fleischmann; Junkie's nephew was brought onto the Farfield as a Director in the early 1960s.  

You see, it's all the old school tie, all of it.

Another Farfield Trustee was Cass Canfield, one of the most distinguished of American publishers, 

They had all the people on board, the publishing companies too.

he was a Director of Grosset & Dunlap, Bamtam books and Director and Chairman of the Editorial Board of Harper Brothers. Canfield was the American publisher of The God That Failed, he enjoyed prolific links to the world of Intelligence, both as a former psychological warfare officer 

A psychological warfare officer owns big publishing companies; think about it.

as a close personal friend of Allen Dulles, whose memoirs The Craft of Intelligence, he published in 1963. Canfield had also been an activist and fund-raiser for the United World Federalists in the late 1940s. 

United World Federalists, do you think it was the Communists that were trying to take over the world?

It's then president was Cord Meyer, Peter Tom Braden's deputy, who revealed that one technique that was used was to encourage those of the members who had an influential positions in professional organisations, trade associations or labour unions, to lobby for passage at their annual conventions of resolutions favourable to a cause. 

I've always mentioned how you've got to be careful of groups and associations that you join; and, even when you start your own group up or association, it will be infiltrated, it will be; and, eventually, someone will rise to the top, that you'll all like, that will lead you off into the same direction that we're supposed to go in; and that's where we're supposed to go, the United Nations, where we debate everything there and put it on the table.

In 1954, Canfield headed up the Democratic Committee on the Arts, he was later one of the founding members of A.N.T.A. (American National Theatre Academy), reactivated in '45 as the equivalent of the Foreign Affairs Branch of the America Theatre, alongside Jock Whitney, another partner of the CIA's Quiet Childs. Canfield was a friend of Frank Platt, also a Farfield Director and a CIA agent. In the late '60s, Platt helped Michael Josselson 

He's quite the character; it goes right through his whole personality in this book.

get a job with Canfield at Harpers. Canfield was also a trustee of the France America Society, alongside C.D. Jackson; Grayson Kirk, President of Columbia University; David Rockefeller and William Burdon, who was its president. William Armistead Moal Burden, as well as being president of the France America Society, was a director of the Farfield. A great-great grandson of Commander Vanderbilt, Burdon was key presence in the American Establishment, he was a member and director of the Council on Foreign Relations 

Remember, the Council on Foreign Relations is a branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and its goal, and its mandate was to set up world government. It says here:

A private Think Tank made up of America's corporate and social elites which as a kind of shadow foreign policy-making unit. Other members included Allen Dulles, John McCloy and David Rockefeller. During the war, he worked for Nelson Rockefeller's intelligence outfit and sat as chairman of an advisory committee of the Museum of Modern Art in New York. In 1956, he became president of the museum, in that year; he also sat on the State Department's Books Abroad Advisory Committee 

Did they say they weren’t censoring books? In a sense that was true, they were deluging the market with lots of other kind of books that was to bring down the whole culture of people, across the planet. It says here:

Formerly the Assistant secretary of state for air, finance, with a special interest in financing.

Back in a moment, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, we're actually rushing through a book here and this book is called CIA And The World Of Arts And Letters: The Cultural Cold Wars by Frances Stonor Saunders and I'll try to get in this last little page here. Page 144:

The Rockefeller Foundation, no less than the Ford, was an integral component of America's Cold War machinery. Incorporated in 1913, its principle donor was the legendary John Dee Rockefeller III, its assets exceeded $500 million, not including an additional $150 million, in the Rockefeller's Brothers Fund Inc. A major Think Tank which was incorporated, in New York in 1940. In '57, the Fund brought together the most influential minds of the period, under a special studies project whose task was to attempt a definition of American Foreign Policy. Sub panel 2 was designated to the study of international objectives and strategy. 

Now, remember too, they're also talking, when they say "international objectives" and the security objectives, they're talking about they're own wealth, taking over the resources of the planet, that should be rather self-evident. It says here:

and its members included Henry Booth Luce; Laurence Rockefeller; Townshend Hoops, representing Jock Whitney's company; Nelson Rockefeller; Henry Kissinger; Frank Lindsay and William Bundy of the CIA. The convergence between the Rockefeller billions and the US Government exceeded even that of the Ford Foundation. John Foster Dulles, and later Dean Rusk, both went from the Presidency of the Rockefeller Foundation to become secretaries of State. 

They were all in the CIA and in these Foundations, at the same time. They still are, by the way, their descendents.

Other Cold War heavies, such as John J. McCloy and Robert A Lovett featured prominently as Rockefeller trustees. Nelson Rockefeller's central position on his Foundation guaranteed a close relationship with US Intelligence circles. He'd been in charge of all Intelligence in Latin America, during the Second World War; later, his associate in Brazil, Colonel J. C King, became CIA Chief of Clandestine Activities in the Western Hemisphere. When Nelson Rockefeller was appointed by Eisenhower to the National Security Council in '54, his job was to approve various covert operations. If he needed any extra information on CIA activities, he would simply ask his old friend Allen Dulles for a direct briefing. 

It actually says in here too: when they needed to get anyone on board anywhere, they'd just look up the membership list of the Council on Foreign Relations and bring them right in to it, they were already passed as being safe. Page 145:

As important as Nelson Rockefeller was, so was his brother David, he controlled the donations committee of the Chase Manhattan Bank Foundation, was Vice President, then President of the Bank itself, a Trustee on the Council on Foreign Relations, Chairman of the Executive Committee for International House and a close personal friend of Allen Dulles and Tom Braden. "I often brief David semi-officially, and with Allen's permission, on what we were doing" recalled Braden, "who was the same mind as us and very approving of everything we were doing, in the sense that I did that the way to win the Cold War was our way, sometimes David would give me money to do things which weren't in our budget". 

Here are the Rockefellers literally paying the agents to do operations which were Black Ops, outside their budget. The Cultural Cold War by Frances Stonor Saunders, excellent book to show you how it's done; and, by the way, is still being done.

That's the end of the show for tonight, so I am Alan Watt and so, from Hamish and myself, Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recommended Read: "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters" by Frances Stonor Saunders.)

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:57 am

Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#239)

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 21, 2009:

Machinations of Council on Foreign Relations:

"We Live Under a System, of which Few Men Talk,
Where Academia, Bankers, Politicians Interlock,
With an Important History, for He Who Remembers,
For Those Who Shaped History are All Members,
Weaving Through Time, Goal Always in Sight
Of a New World Order, Oh So Happy and Bright,
At Least for Followers, That's One of Their Goals,
But the True Secret's Held in Inner All Souls,
Through Intrigue and Conflict, Destroy All Nations,
With Academic Technique Give Indoctrinations,
Till the Masses Believe Imperative Sustainability
And Serve Their Masters with Perfect Docility"

Wednesday 21st January 2009

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, on the 21st of January 2009.

For the newcomers: I always suggest you look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and, on that website, you'll find hundreds of hours of talks I've given, over the years, where I've tried to piece together a system, a system that's run the past, and a system that's running the present and a system that knows exactly where it's taking us all. It's a very old plan, it's a very powerful institution that runs the world; it's been behind most of the wars that we've gone through, because out of conflict you get treaties signed and you get people to their knees; you bring them to their knees through war and conflict, until they'll agree for peace. Everyone wants peace but, of course, those at the top have a different agenda and they're run by very-very rich people, at the top, they're all pretty well involved.

I try to piece it together for people, by using history. Orwell warned people that those who that control the past, control the future and so on. Most people today, have been told that the past is irrelevant, that's deliberate, so that you don't know what's really happening today; you'll react to what you're given to react about, today, without knowing the whys or wherefores or what's really behind it.

Also, look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can download transcripts of these talks and they're written in the various languages of Europe.

For those that want to keep me going, you can donate to my show and you'll find out how to do it on www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, you can also buy the items I have for sale; and, that keeps me going. I don't ask for money from any of the shows I'm on; the advertising that you hear, pays the station, it pays the people who work, the engineers and so on, to keep going. That's how everything works in this system, at the present time; although, gradually, we'll see the whole system, world-wide, changing, as we go into a new economic system of service to a world government.

I have watched some of the videos and listened to some of the audios of Mr. Rockefeller, who travels around the world talking about what's wrong with it, in his opinion; and, it isn't just his opinion, it's the big society that he belongs to (in fact his family was set up by this society, to be very-very rich and powerful), to fund many different organisations, including the educational systems, across a good part of the world, to make sure they're all teaching the same this in the correct way; to shape the minds of millions of people who go through their entire lives never knowing that everything they know and think about and thought about was guided by very manipulative people, who knew the sciences of a form of mind control. What you're taught will actually bring about reactions from you.

Young people who were recruited into societies in elite universities in the past, worked towards a global agenda, from Oxford, and they really believed in it, many of them really believed they could being civilisation, as they called it, to the world, based on a British system. Of course, those at the top had other ideas; that's how the whole system is run. Idealism is a fantastic weapon, idealism sends missionaries across the whole planet and the ones who are running the world are a form of missionary, with a plan. Back in a moment; after the following messages.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. The past few talks that I've given have been on a variety of subjects but they're all interconnected, in fact, they're really all one, because I've gone into the connections of the CIA, MI6, that came out of the OSS, and how the OSS really came out of what was called the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations. In fact, the OSS headquarters was Chatham House, in England, which was the headquarters of the RIIA. It was well-known, in the 1800s, that Britain had a very good secret service, which it drew upon, at least it got its members from, the Ivy League schools - they call them ‘granite stone’ over there - as opposed to the ‘red brick’ universities of the ordinary people.

In the late 1800s, there was a vision to use the British system, which was supposed to be the most advanced, according to those who led Britain, who owned Britain to an extent, and they wanted to push that across the world. They also wanted to take over the world's resources and there was a lecturer at Oxford University who got novices in, young idealists, and Cecil Rhodes was one of them. Cecil Rhodes began what was called the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, which set up Round Table Societies, to try to get different segments of society together and to debate certain problems and find ways to implement the solutions throughout society. Eventually, this blossomed into, or at least merged with another institution called the Lord Alfred Milner Group; and, the two of them together actually caused the Boer War. They had a group to raid South Africa and they had reporters on the spot that would lie and say that the Boers had attacked British Settlers; and, of course, Britain just sat and waited and they had no option but to come in with the troops and take over South Africa.

That's how they played the game and Professor Carroll Quigley talks about this kind of stuff in Tragedy & Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment. He was the Historian for the Council on Foreign Relations. It's interesting too that, I think it was Macmillan, bought over the plates which they used for making the book, for printing and they were apparently destroyed, he'd let too much out of the bag, I suppose, because, as he says in his own book Tragedy & Hope, he said it is a secret or semi-secret society that likes to keep its head down. However, he does admit in the book too, it's been behind most of the major events that happened, world-wide, in the 20th Century; this society, as I say, created a front organisation.

I'm going to read some more of this particular book because if you can't understand the past, as Mr. Rockefeller says, you'll never catch on; you'll never catch on to what's happening today. These are the groups that created the divisions across the Middle East, they drew the lines in the sand and said 'you're now this country' and 'you're the other country'. They take accountability for that, they accept that. They accept the fact that they drew the boundary for Ireland, how many of the Irish know that?  To go into some of the history of it, as I say, it's totally interwoven with what you think of as MI6 and the CIA, in fact, many of the members, if not most, are members of both.

There has been no democracy, because the elite decided long ago they wouldn't allow the public to have democracy. The book The Cultural Cold War, it's called in the US edition, it's called a different name in Britain, for those in Britain who want to get a hold of it, it's called Who Paid The Piper: CIA and the Cultural Cold War, by Francis Stonor Saunders. The American edition is called the Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the world of arts and letters. It's astonishing that we do have facts out there and yet people don't put it all together. If people do try to put it together, they put it with a slant, the right-wing against the left and the left against the right and yet Professor Carroll Quigley said himself, he says:

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network, because I have studied it for twenty years 

Twenty years he studied it.

and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. 

In the same book, Tragedy & Hope, he goes through the system and The Anglo-American Establishment, his other book, he goes through this whole organisation and how it is a parallel government. To be honest with you, it's really the real government, because every president and prime minister takes their orders from it. They advise all the top governments of the Western World; and, they have the money to back it up, because the bankers are all in on it, as this book will tell you. It says here, going back into the last century again, because you must do it, to understand what even happened in the 20th Century, he says:

By 1915 Round Table groups existed in seven countries, 

Now, they're still on the go, this is not old stuff, they’re still working today.

including England, South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, and a rather loosely organized group in the United States (George Louis Beer, Walter Lippmann, Frank Aydelotte, Whitney Shepardson, Thomas W. Lamont, Jerome D. Greene, 

Very interesting guy.

Erwin D. Canham of the Christian Science Monitor, and others). The attitudes of the various groups were coordinated by frequent visits and discussions and by a well informed and totally anonymous quarterly magazine, The Round Table, 

Today, you can get Foreign Affairs Magazine, that will tell you what's coming up in the world. It says here:

The leaders of this group were: Milner, 

That’s Lord Alfred Milner.

until his death in 1925, followed by Curtis (1872-1955), 

Very important person, he was like a Kissinger in his time, all over the planet.

Robert H, (Lord) Brand (brother-in-law of Lady Astor) 

The Astors, by the way, were part of this group, and, at the same time, they were funding and starting up the Fabian Society, for what people think was the Socialist Movement. These were all Lords and Bankers and so on.

until his death in 1963, and now Adam D. Marris, son of Sir William and Brand's successor as managing director of Lazard Brothers bank. 

That's who helped fund them as well, the Lazard Brothers.

The original intention had been to have collegial leadership, but Milner was too secretive and headstrong to share the role. He did so only in the period 1913-1919 when he held regular meetings with some of his closest friends to coordinate their activities as a pressure group in the struggle with Wilhelmine Germany. 

What they used to do too, was train people right out from university, pick them and choose the ones with most fervour, that they could actually use as, basically, disciples, devotees; they called them the Kindergarten, they still do it at university today, and, as you well know, the CIA and MI6 recruit right of there too. It's one and the same thing.

...Money for the widely ramified activities of this organization came originally from the associates and followers of Cecil Rhodes, chiefly from the Rhodes Trust itself, and from wealthy associates such as the Beit brothers, from Sir Abe Bailey, and (after 1915) from the Astor family. Since 1925 there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals 

You better believe it!

and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking fraternity, especially the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, and other organizations associated with J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families, and the associates of Lazard Brothers and of Morgan, Grenfell, and Company. 

You should look into the Reece Commission, and I'll put a link up tonight where Norman Dodd talks about it, when he was told face-to-face by some of these bankers. In fact, I think it was the Morgan Bank he was talking to; and, they told him that the bankers had changed their role and had become a form of Institution, because, in society, there were too many conflicting interests to be left up to sort of formulate themselves, therefore the banks would be a form of social control. Very interesting thing to say, because that's almost exactly what the Club of Rome said, when they chose the collectivist idea, they said there were too many conflicting parties in the world for peace and so they would choose collectivism, that's what's being pushed on us now and that's what this present President of the United States is being put in for; he won't do it, he's just an actor, like they all are, but he'll sign all the different treaties and so on, that the US has so far refused to sign. That's his job, to bring all of this in. It says:

The chief backbone of this organization grew up along the already existing financial cooperation running from the Morgan Bank in New York to a group of international financiers in London led by Lazard Brothers. Milner himself in 1901 had refused a fabulous offer, worth up to $100,000 a year, 

That was a lot of money then.

to become one of the three partners of the Morgan Bank in London, in succession to the younger J. P. Morgan who moved from London to join his father in New York (eventually the vacancy went to E. C. Grenfell, so that the London affiliate of Morgan became known as Morgan, Grenfell, and Company). Instead, Milner became director of a number of public banks, 

A number of public banks!

chiefly the London Joint Stock Bank, corporate precursor of the Midland Bank.

It transformed into the Midland Bank.

He became one of the greatest political and financial powers in England, with his disciples strategically placed throughout England in significant places, such as the editorship of The Times, the editorship of The Observer, the managing directorship of Lazard Brothers, 

Quite the character and it's still the same today, back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and, as I say, to understand the present and where we're going, and very rapidly, into this new future, you have to go into the past to understand and it truly is a massive organisation world-wide that runs pretty-well every side of every conflict, because conflict is a way to get to your goal. At the end of conflicts, you have agreements, you have take-overs, they used to call them empire-building and we're going into the world empire. There's only a few countries to be flattened, before it's complete; and, those ones who get flattened, are the ones they decided a long time ago couldn't fit in to this new economic civilised society, as they put it themselves.

I was reading about Milner, a very important person, that helped set up part of this group, a big part of this group and it says here,

his disciples became the editor ... of The Times, the editorship of The Observer, the managing directorship of Lazard Brothers, 

Which is banking, international.

various administrative posts, and even Cabinet positions. 

That's politicians. They had politicians in every country.

Ramifications were established in politics, high finance, Oxford and London universities, periodicals, 

That's magazines.

the civil service, 

That's your bureaucracy.

and tax-exempt foundations. 

That was their method of transferring money, just as it was from that book The Cultural Cold War (also called Who Paid the Piper) and they still use the Foundations today. There are thousands of them and many of them are fronts and dummies that simply transfer money from one to the other and they also are in the field of depopulating the planet, if you look to where the money is all going.

At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended. 

Now, they had a plan to unite Europe, they had a plan to unite the Americas, in fact, in 2005, on the Canadian television, the CFR came out as the CFR, with Mr Manning on it, I think it was Manley; and, he'd been high up in politics in the Canadian Federal Government and he spoke about having drafted up the agreements that the presidents and prime ministers were signing, for the further integration of the Americas. They drafted up all of that; and, I bet you anything too, because many of the members mentioned in this book, were working on a united Europe, they drafted up all of that as well. They also had a far-ranging plan, a 100 years’ plan for the Far East, using Australia and New Zealand as their bases, to bring all of that together, they were working in China and Japan. Remember what Karl Marx said? There'd be three major trading blocs under a world government. He said that in the 1800s as well. It says here:

Once again the task was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, 

That's each part of the Commonwealth countries.

a front organization

Remember what Cecil Rhodes said: they'd base their organisation on the Jesuits; the Jesuits were famous for setting up front organisations, having people fight each other, while they remained unscathed, at the back, out of sight.

a front organization in each country was to be set up to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization, called the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 

It's a front organisation.

had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group. 

It's much bigger now of course.

The American organizers were dominated by the large number of Morgan "experts," including Lamont and Beer, who had gone to the Paris Peace Conference and there became close friends with the similar group of English "experts" which had been recruited by the Milner group. In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris. The Council of the RIIA (which, by Curtis's energy came to be housed in Chatham House, across St. James's Square from the Astors, 

From the Astor family, who was helping fund it too.

and was soon known by the name of this headquarters) and the board of the Council on Foreign Relations have carried ever since the marks of their origin. Until 1960 the council at Chatham House was dominated by the dwindling group of Milner's associates, while the paid staff members were largely the agents of Lionel Curtis. The Round Table for years (until 1961) was edited from the back door of Chatham House grounds in Ormond Yard, and its telephone came through the Chatham House switchboard. 

The New York branch was dominated by the associates of the Morgan Bank. 

Then he goes into all the different characters involved in running that system from and out of the Morgan Bank, over many-many years. He names all the different big family names, which are very well known.

The academic figures have been those linked to Morgan, such as James T. Shotwell, Charles Seymour, Joseph P. Chamberlain, Philip Jessup, Isaiah Bowman and, more recently, Philip Moseley, Grayson L. Kirk, and Henry M. Wriston. The Wall Street contacts with these were created originally from Morgan's influence in handling large academic endowments.  

You see, if you want to shape the world, you must make sure that what's being taught in the universities is your version of history and you also teach it through the Humanities why you must change the future, by giving a particular slant on history. Very famous for creating very strong slants on history, to influence the future. It says here:

Closely allied with this Morgan influence were a small group of Wall Street law firms, whose chief figures were Elihu Root, John W. Davis, Paul D. Cravath, Russell Leffingwell, the Dulles brothers ... 

The Dulles brothers were in and out of the CIA for their whole lives long. I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, putting together some of the events that happened in the 20th Century and showing you the reasons, or at least the big institutions behind them, this parallel government, as it's also called. I call it the true government, because they advise everyone else as to what to do and they're one of the premier Think Tanks that advise on all kinds of foreign policy etc.  I'm reading from Tragedy & Hope, from the guy who was the historian for this particular group and got a hold of all the records and who believed in their cause too, by the way, and reading from his book Tragedy & Hope, on page 953, he says:

On this basis, which was originally financial and goes back to George Peabody, 

A very important person again.

there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. 

This is what they call, in Britain and MI6, and Margaret Thatcher used it all the time, "Our special relationship with the United States". Our special relationship was never elaborated upon; but, that's what she was talking about.

In England the center was the Round Table Group, while in the United States it was J. P. Morgan and Company or its local branches in Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland. Some rather incidental examples of the operations of this structure are very revealing, just because they are incidental. For example, it set up in Princeton a reasonable copy of the Round Table Group's chief Oxford headquarters, All Souls College. 

They made a duplicate in the United States, that's where the real, the guys who are in on the real big picture, are allowed into: All Souls College. The copy they set up in the US was called:

The Institute for Advanced Study, 

If you look into the Institute for Advanced Study, and it’s still there today, because it spearheads most of the social studies that are taught across the planet.  Einstein stayed there, until his death, as a faculty member there, in '55; and you find too that Robert Oppenheimer, of the Manhattan Project, also was there. Many big people were there, because that really set the tone for all the other universities. They were the ones who also came up with all the programming, the languages for the computer systems we're using now. They are way ahead of everything, but they’re right into social studies, what I would call social engineering. That's the real goal, have a look into their site, it's up on the web. So, that's a copy of All Souls College,

This copy, called the Institute for Advanced Study, and best known, perhaps, as the refuge of Einstein, Oppenheimer, John von Neumann, and George F. Kennan, was organized by Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller's General Education Board after he had experienced the delights of All Souls while serving as Rhodes Memorial Lecturer at Oxford. The plans were largely drawn by Tom Jones, one of the Round Table's most active intriguers and foundation administrators. 

Learn what the word 'Intrigue means', it's very important in the way they operate the world.

The American branch of this "English Establishment" exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and the lamented Boston Evening Transcript). In fact, the editor of the Christian Science Monitor was the chief American correspondent (anonymously) of The Round Table, and Lord Lothian, the original editor of The Round Table and later secretary of the Rhodes Trust (1925-1939) and ambassador to Washington, was a frequent writer in the Monitor. It might be mentioned that the existence of this Wall Street, Anglo-American axis is quite obvious once it is pointed out. It is reflected in the fact that such Wall Street luminaries as John W. Davis, Lewis Douglas, Jock Whitney, and Douglas Dillon were appointed to be American ambassadors in London. 

It then goes on to talk about the different countries and how they set it up. The different blocs, including the Far East, Australia, New Zealand and Canada as well, and how they've basically run the countries ever since. It says:

The financing came from the same international banking groups 

For Canada, Australia and it says:

In England, Chatham House was financed for both networks by the contributions of Sir Abe Bailey, the Astor family, and additional funds largely acquired by the persuasive powers of Lionel Curtis. The financial difficulties of the IPR 

The Institute for Pacific Relations, that's what they called the Australian branch, at one point, it was a front group, as they say, a dummy group for the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It says:

Councils in the British Dominions in the depression of 1929-1935 resulted in a very revealing effort to save money, when the local Institute of International Affairs absorbed the local Pacific Council, both of which were, in a way, expensive and needless fronts for the local Round Table groups. 

The chief aims of this elaborate, semi-secret organization were largely commendable 

Now, remember, Quigley was all for this whole movement.

to coordinate the international activities and outlooks of all the English-speaking world into one (which would largely, it is true, be that of the London group); to work to maintain the peace 

They had their own version of peace, remember, they started wars out, like the Boer War.

to help backward, colonial, and underdeveloped areas to advance toward stability, law and order, and prosperity along lines somewhat similar to those taught at Oxford and the University of London (especially the School of Economics 

Everyone who studied the London School of Economics gets an idea of the revolutionary aspects that comes out of it.

and the Schools of African and Oriental Studies). These organizations and their financial backers were in no sense reactionary or Fascistic persons, as Communist propaganda would like to depict them. Quite the contrary. They were gracious 

This was Quigley's view of it, because he belongs to that type of elite himself.

They were gracious and cultured gentlemen of somewhat limited social experience who were much concerned with the freedom of expression of minorities and the rule of law for all, 

These are all big bankers and their children here; they're really concerned about freedom of expression and justice for everybody. He says:

who constantly thought in terms of Anglo-American solidarity, of political partition and federation, and who were convinced that they could 

Listen to this:

convinced that they could gracefully civilize the Boers of South Africa, the Irish, the Arabs, 

If you wonder what's happening in the Middle East right now, you have to go into history.

and the Hindus, and who are largely responsible for the partitions of Ireland, 

This is on page 954.

Palestine, and India, as well as the federations of South Africa, Central Africa, and the West Indies.  

If you want to find out who set Israel up in the first place, go into your history books, read the memoirs of Sir Ronald Storrs. He was a High Commissioner for Palestine, before World War II. Read his book called Orientations as well, because they were setting up an advanced post for the future, they knew that the last places to come down would be the Arabian countries. They needed an advanced post and he gives you the whole story, in his own books, Sir Ronald Storrs: Memoirs and his other book called Orientations. You have to understand what's happening too in the Middle East, was decided long before they set up Israel. People have probably seen the movie, rather than read the book, of Lawrence, often called Lawrence of Arabia who didn't get on too well with his bosses, because they'd already decided that the Arab countries could never be civilised as such; and, remember, I talked about the lists of Peoples they had set up for - really - elimination: those who could not be absorbed into the new civilisation.

That's why the Royal Institute of International Affairs was involved with Ireland as well. H.G. Wells, another member, had a whole list of Peoples who would have to be eliminated, because they wouldn't fit in; and, long before him, you had top economists like John Stuart Mill, and his son, with the same name, giving out the same lists of people. They knew long ago who would come through into the Brave New World; and, they also knew who would give them trouble.  If you don't know what happened in the past, you won't understand a thing that's happening today. And remember: this group has hidden behind every other group and the other groups have fronted for them, often unwittingly; and they take the heat, they take the heat.

They set up divisions across the Middle East, very good ones and that's why they're all warring since and then they'd funded each side, to go at it. That's what you saw with Iran and Iraq, for years and years and years. They drew the lines on the maps, they even put in the governments and implemented them and then they help to make sure they can go at it until we're all sick of watching war. It says here:

It must be recognized that the power that these energetic Left-wingers 

Because they funded all of them too.

exercised was never their own power or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie, 

The Bankers, the bankers ruled and ran and financed all what you thought was the communists.

and, once the anger and suspicions of the American people were aroused, as they were by 1950, it was a fairly simple matter to get rid of the Red sympathizers. 

They took the fall, they were the scapegoats for it all; but it still hid the Council on Foreign Relations who were behind it.

Before this could be done, however, a congressional committee, 

That's the Reece Commission

following backward to their source 

Finding out where all the funding was getting targeted, where was this funding coming from that was funding all of these Communist fronts?

a congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, 

Who helped draft up the UN Charter by the way, along with the Canadian from Toronto.

and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. 

Now, that's very important, how we can skip over something. The "Interlocking tax-exempt foundation" It's all one massive network.

The Eighty-third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman. It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far 

Well, you'd bet they would be.

and that the "most respected" newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any revelations to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions. An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of the interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece committee's general counsel, René A. Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called Foundations: Their Power and Influence.  

It had been toned right down and still kept the public in the dark as to who really funded all these left wing movements that seemed to be Communist.

One of the most interesting members of this Anglo-American power structure was Jerome D. Greene. 

He goes through his whole history, again another Kissinger type who's all over the Globe.

assistant to John D. Rockefeller in philanthropic work for two years, then trustee to the Rockefeller Institute, to the Rockefeller Foundation, and to the Rockefeller General Education Board until 1939. For fifteen years (1917-1932) he was with the Boston investment banking firm of Lee, Higginson, and Company, most of the period as its chief officer, as well as with its London branch. 

You see how all the top characters are all massive international bankers here, who want to bring us all world peace, who fund left wing and right wing organisations. He says:

As an investment banker, 

We know how they've done recently.

Greene is chiefly remembered for his sales of millions of dollars of the fraudulent securities of the Swedish match king, Ivar Kreuger. That Greene offered these to the American investing public in good faith is evident from the fact 

He's covering up for that fact that this guy sold a lot of dud stock to the American people. Which always takes me back to something that Albert Pike talked about in Morals and Dogma, when he said that we shall have to, basically, climb to the top, by every means possible, by their wit and courage and by even using the Stock Market, he said, to gain incredible wealth, until we become the masters over the masters of the world. Of course, he was talking about world revolutionary movements and, when you tie this in with Tragedy & Hope and what these boys have been up to for over a hundred years, you start to get a kind of connection somewhere, don't you? It says:

...founding by David Davies in 1919, in spite of the fact that Davies, who was made a peer

He was knighted.

in 1932, had broken with the Round Table because of its subversion of the League of Nations and European collective security. 

Other people were looking into them too, people that had been set up by them, were now looking into them.

Jerome Greene is a symbol of much more than the Wall Street influence in the IPR. He is also a symbol of the relationship between the financial circles of London and those of the eastern United States which reflects one of the most powerful influences in twentieth-century American and world history. The two ends of this English-speaking axis have sometimes been called, perhaps facetiously, the English and American Establishments. There is, however, a considerable degree of truth behind the joke, a truth which reflects a very real power structure. It is this power structure which the Radical Right in the United States has been attacking for years in the belief that they are attacking the Communists. This is particularly true when these attacks are directed, as they so frequently are at "Harvard Socialism," 

As it's called.

or at "Left-wing newspapers" like The New York Times and the Washington Post, or at foundations and their dependent establishments, such as the Institute of International Education. 

See, they run all of these associations.

These misdirected attacks by the Radical Right did much to confuse the American people in the period 1948-1955, 

It still does.

and left consequences which were still significant a decade later. By the end of 1953, most of these attacks had run their course. The American people, thoroughly bewildered at widespread charges of twenty years of treason and subversion, had rejected the Democrats and put into the White House the Republican Party's traditional favorite, a war hero Dwight D. Eisenhower. 

It's interesting too, as I say, how Dwight D. Eisenhower was taking advice from advisors from the very same group; and, also, they brought on board already and had brought on board all of the same characters that were into culture creation. They were taking on Bernays and all those people too; because, after all, if you want to take over a world, you have to mould the minds of your victims, so that they'll comply quite happily, without knowing where they're going, but thinking that they do. It's very important you think you do. I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just digging up some of the past, which still exists in the present, in fact more so than ever and it's much-much larger and it's spread across pretty well every country on the planet. An organisation that's worked with religious zeal (definitely a religious zeal), to bring in a type of world system; but, let's not forget, that behind it all, it was started by people who were into Darwinism. They were into superior and inferior types of people. They've used anthropology down through the years; still do lead the fields of that, at some of their top universities, which they run, since they set the curriculums.

And, they have an ideal society, to come out in the future. They're the ones who also came up with the global warming idea too: man needs an enemy for a global society, if there's no more countries to point to and say 'look we're better than they are', that's how it works, then you have to find an enemy within and - of course - the enemy is man himself, according to the Club of Rome, one of the foundations that’s just a part of this inter-locking foundation network, that Mr. Quigley talks about here.

Our minds are entirely-controlled and have been since we were born; because, I say, they set up the educational systems, they decided what you'd be taught, what spins you'd have, which would make sure that for the rest of your life, you would always go back to that teaching, to try to draw reasonable conclusions. Well, if it's a warped theory to begin with, your reasoning will always be warped.

Remember, as I say, that Cecil Rhodes said they'd set up, copied, basically copied the Jesuit system. The Jesuits were famous for setting up front groups and having intrigue, intrigue also meant having wars, so that the combatants would go at it together, never realising there was another element behind it, that would stay safe and out of sight and never take the blame for it. That's been their technique down through the years. I have many of their books, printed by the CFR, and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and the minutes of their meetings. I scoured old book stores, getting hold of some of them that obviously had been owned by previous members; and, they had everyone in it, the tops of all the labour unions, all the top journalists across the planet, the Editors attending world meetings, discussing wars like World War II, before it even happened. Even mentioning the fact that Japan would come in and that would bring America into it; in 1938 they wrote that one.

They were absolutely certain of a post-war world that they would set up. In fact, the war didn't even faze them, this coming war; they didn’t even consider they might lose, because they were on both sides of everything. They'd even been involved with Adolf Hitler. Many of the big members and bankers had set up IG Farben that gave Adolf Hitler his war machine. Look at the book Trials of IG Farben, The Trials and Punishment, I think it's called, of IG Farben. Look at the amount of lawyers sent over to the Nuremberg Trials, to try and cover the coat-tails of IG Farben and get them out of it, squeaky-clean, at least as much as possible; same CFR members too, and Rockefeller boys etc.

Thanks for listening, it's goodnight from Hamish and myself, from Canada and may your god - or your gods - go with you.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Book: (continued) "Tragedy and Hope" by Carroll Quigley.

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

VIDEO: "Norman Dodd on Reece Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations (Congressional Inquiry)" [Interview between Norman Dodd and G. Edward Griffin, 1982].

All Souls College, Oxford University (all-souls.ox.ac.uk).

Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton University (ias.edu).

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:58 am

Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#256)

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 13, 2009:

No Steps Forward, All Steps Back:

"THX 1138 is a Movie, Predicted
Agitation on Camera will Have You Convicted,
Should You Miss Your Soma Pills, Happy Effect,
Mandatory for Masses, Not for the Elect,
Now Here in Reality, the Cameras are There
Watching Your Actions, Gauging Your Stare,
Analyzing Your Voice for Aggressive Inflection
And Signs of Other Psychic Infection,
What of the People as They Lose All Liberty?
Chasing Ghosts and Trivia, Signs of Debility,
Constitutions are Ripped All Asunder,
As Rich Men Drool Over a World of Plunder,
What of the Songs that Nations Once Sang?
As Man Goes Out with a Whimper, Never a Bang"

Friday February 13th 2009

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, this is Cutting Through The Matrix on Friday the 13th of February 2009.

I always ask the newcomers to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as many of the previous talks I've given as they wish, where I try to go into some of the histories of this very complex system that's now forging ahead, pretty-well openly. And: showing you how it's done, the foundations behind it, the organisations; and it really is a very ancient system indeed, even though I've only given you a couple of hundred years of it, because it goes much-much further back than that. Knowledge is never discarded; it's always kept in archives, for future use, especially when it's to do with understanding human behaviour.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can download, print up and they're written in the various languages of Europe.

For those who listen to these shows: I always ask, in the beginning, that you go into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and you can see what's for sale there. That keeps me going, there's not much; and you can also donate to me, that keeps things just ticking along here. And I know it's bad in these times of economic depression, and that's what we're truly in, planned economic depression, but we have to struggle through it some way or another.

It's fascinating, as I say: when you've read so many books and you've lived long enough to see many of the things that were written about come to pass. Not because people had crystal balls just to gaze into, or because they read the stars, it's because, literally, we live through a plan, an agenda. They can never rush ahead too quickly because it's incremental, it goes inter-generationally. We, as human beings, like things to be familiar to us. At one time, things didn't change much between grandparents to the children, life was always much the same and steady; well, that's all been destroyed, intentionally so, because once you destroy it - and there's no past to fall back on that's familiar to you - you're now in flux, you're in a state of change; and those who control the direction of change can bring it on all the quicker.

That is what we're living through today: all the past has gone; education, much of it, has gone down the memory whole, as far as history goes. Therefore, those who are alive today, who kind of float through life, getting fed trivia, by the media; and, interspersed between the trivia, they get little bits of what's happening, but never the real reasons behind it and, definitely, never the fact that it's part of an agenda. You have to go into the books written by the big players themselves, down through the years, and they do publish them. However, it's dry reading; and, generally, not always, but generally, they never meet the best seller’s book club of the year list. They're put out really for people who are into organising people, organising nations, the controllers; and that's who reads these books, primarily. They do tend to put them into libraries, for those who ask for them; but even that's falling away today: many of the books are simply disappearing. The ones that go up on e-books, you know on the electronic book stores, often have chunks of them omitted completely; so those who are alive today will never really know the whole story, unless they have the original books.

That's how history is controlled, it's a very powerful thing, history, all knowledge is power and we have people who are always in charge of it, to ensure they stay in power. And I'm going to read a couple of articles, after this break; and then continue with the latter part of Hope of the Wicked, to show you how things were incrementally put in.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning the fact that history is guided, in fact, it's called historical necessity, as far as the big parts of the implementation go; and we're going through the period of crisis now that was planned to go into a new economic system. It's interesting too, that as we become, supposedly, more free and equal and all minorities get rights etc., that we're all going under more surveillance than ever before, why is that? Why is that? How can we be more and more free and yet the governments can't trust any of us, world-wide? And the answer is, you see, this is going into a world government, a planned system that none of us are going to like. It doesn't matter which group or ethnic group you belong to, or anything else, none of us will actually like it, because it'll end up being, eventually, a world where you serve the controllers and those who decided that they are the wise men.

This is a typical article that we're seeing all over the world, and have been for some time. This is from the BBC; and it's from the 13th of February, today:

CCTV cameras 'listen for trouble' 

By Kenneth Macdonald, BBC Scotland Special Correspondent.

Security cameras have long been a fact of Scottish life, viewed with relief by many communities and with suspicion by civil libertarians. But what if they were listening to you as well? 

Now, that really isn't news to me, because I know that they were putting in boom microphones in London City, along with the cameras a long time ago. This is to get them familiar, because, somehow, we acquiesce to everything that they put in front of us, like this article here. We say nothing about it; therefore, legally, down the road, that's ok.  It says:

But what if they were listening to you as well?  It has already happened in Glasgow. A Dutch company called Sound Intelligence carried out a two week long trial in a busy city centre street. They stress that their system, called Sigard, does not record conversations. It listens not to what is being said but how it is being said. 

I don't know if you looked into the Hate Laws, because they have cases - in Canada for instance - where it wasn't really a matter of who you beat up, it was what were you thinking when you were beating them up. That was actually asked in court, to get the real intent behind it. So, this new security system:

It listens not what is being said but how it is being said. At the company's headquarters in the Dutch city of Amersfoort, Bram Kuipers explained that Sigard was listening for the changes that affect the human voice in an aggressive situation.  

I think it was in the 1970s, and I've gone through some of the articles before, from the American Psychological Association, where they stated, quite categorically, they were going to push to have cameras in everybody's homes, watching them, for aggressive responses, actions, gestures, or even movements of the face, so they could intervene before problems started. Well, you see, that's all coming, because with everyone hooked up to a computer and with, basically, many laptops, for instance, having the cameras already built in, people are being watched all the time. Eventually, it'll come to the stage where you'll be told, from your own screen, to go and take a certain pill from the cabinet; and they'll watch you as you do it, as you take it, that's coming down the road, that's so obvious. They're putting in cameras that are designed to watch your behaviour, basically, your movements and they're programmed in such as way as to detect them. Supposedly, it's fairly accurate, so they say. You're not allowed to show any anger, or even frustration anymore. It probably will be dangerous down the road to appear upset, or annoyed even, about something. That's what's coming.

Here's from Canada, this is happening all over the world, as I say. All newspapers now are interchangeable, as far as their news items, because they're all using the same techniques, from the top down.  This is from the Globe and Mail. February the 12th:

New law to give police access to online exchanges, Canadians will be under surveillance, critics charge

by Bill Curry 

It says here:

The Conservative government is preparing sweeping new eavesdropping legislation that will force Internet service providers to let police tap exchanges on their systems - but will likely reignite fear that Big Brother will be monitoring the private conversations of Canadians.  

You know: a few years ago, in all the papers, they showed us banks of police all sitting at computers, scouring the internet, so they were already doing it. Does that mean they were doing it illegally before? or now they're giving themselves legal permission to do it? That's up in the air, we don't know but they have been doing it all along, because it's been in the newspapers. It says:

The goal of the move, which would require police to obtain court approval, is to close what has been described as digital "safe havens" for criminals, 

It's always the same thing.

paedophiles and terrorists because current eavesdropping laws were written in a time before text messages, Facebook and voice-over-Internet phone lines. 

In other words: we've all to get watched, because of a few criminals that will always be there; and the criminals always get round the laws, that's why they're criminals. It says:

The change is certain to please the RCMP and other police forces, who have sought it for some time. But it is expected to face resistance from industry players concerned about the cost and civil libertarians who warn the powers will effectively place Canadians under constant surveillance.  

Well, of course, that's the intention of it; but what's the kicker? What can we do about it? That's always what we ask: what can we do about it? Because, it's all coming from the top down, like some big Nero just making decrees and putting it into law. The public have no input into this whatsoever. Since when do police forces demand anything? They're supposed to do what they're told, on behalf of the people; but they demand legislation now, like a Non-Governmental Organisation. This is the kind of world we're going into, it's not a world that any of us would choose, I'm sure, unless you're a masochist.

I've been going on about the lead-up to the state we're in today, by going through a book called Hope of the Wicked, by Ted Flynn; and he has it in good order, how different parts have been implemented of this whole system, year by year and the various publications and books put out and the laws put out, year by year up to the present and I finished yesterday in 1985. The sad thing is, a lot of people will hear this stuff today and it will mean nothing to them, because you see, each generation is so altered from the previous generation, they'll say "so what?" Everything seems normal to you, in your lifetime, it seems normal. You're not in touch with the previous generation that would see any abnormality. Every child that's born thinks the system they're born into is normal; and if we're born into a system of total surveillance, like many of them have been already, they're growing up now thinking everything is quite normal. They think that having no privacy is normal; they don't know that wars were fought in the past to obtain privacy.

To continue with some of this, it's:

1987: The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. 

Well, who else?

Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:

"...a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States...the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education...people are told what to think about...the old order is crumbling... 

I've already gone through the system they used with the Bernays techniques that create the new American culture, destroy the old in the process and elevate government to the top.

Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease... 

That's what it said.

A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions...a new Constitution is necessary."   

That was sponsored, in part, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. You should get a hold of it, it's an interesting read.

1988: Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24th interview in the New York Times says:

"The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other deliberately... 

That was true.

If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something useful...Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis."  

That's where we are today.

1988: In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus:

"World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order." 

1989: President Bush... Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M, says Mr. Bush states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union "back into the world order." 

I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. There's a couple of callers there, so I'll take Mike from Ontario, are you there Mike?

Mike: Hi Alan.

Alan: Hello.

Mike: Mike, a few hundred miles south of you here.

Alan: You are?

Mike: Yeah, I saw your place once there when I was going to Iroquois Falls, I'm sure you know where that is?

Alan: Yes, I do.

Mike: Anyway, what I'm really wondering about is that all I hear on this news and everything: do I really know who to believe?

Alan: On the news?

Mike: It comes from one side; it comes from the other side. I mean, I remember being in the '80s with the Cold War, that was clear cut, what's going on now?

Alan: Well, even during the whole time, I mean, that was proven by the Reece Commission in the '50s that the Cold War was a scam. I mean, the Commission, from the US Congress, went into all the foundations, to find out that they were funding all the NGOs back home, to help bring the Soviet system into the West, to unite it. Literally, the Cold War was a set-up, as they say; and there's many people who worked for MI5 and MI6 who've come out, even during that term and let the cat out of the bag. I think Peter Wright was one of them (he wrote Spycatcher), and he said the same thing, he says how come the top people who are running the security systems of Britain, meaning his superiors, were in league with the superiors in the Soviet system and they couldn't keep anything secret. They were passing information at the very-very top. The guys at the bottom, the little spies were nothing at all. The guys in charge were actually in collusion with each other on both sides. It's the Hegelian Dialectic: to change the world, you've got to have an enemy. So, right after Adolf Hitler was out the way, Uncle Joe Stalin, and that's what he was called during World War II, he was the good guy, suddenly became the bad guy, the Bad Bear; and he was the good enemy for enough time until both sides, both cultures, were transformed by the Cold War and you bring in Unification. Because this was all planned that way and that's how, literally, it is done; that's how it's done, you can plan the whole century ahead and these guys do.

Mike: Sir, did you not have the feeling that life was more secure in the '80s?

Alan: Not really, no, because I did a lot of travelling, in Europe, and I was struck immediately by every little country in Europe seemed to be a little scientific project. I saw a socialist-type system that did benefit the people at the time, say in Norway. I'd go to Holland and find a different system, where they were literally paying men to stay at home and raise the children and paying the women to go out to work. So, there was experimentation going on and I thought, well, someone's in charge of all this experimentation; and, eventually, of course, what they've done is recombined all those experiments into the one world system that we're living through today. Things were really happening at that time and I also knew that the same laws, by travelling from country to country, laws were being declared on the media, in each country, as though it was their own. They wouldn't say this was being implemented in France and Britain at the same time, but they all were getting the same laws passed, at the same time, in every country, which meant there was already a controlling factor.

Mike: OK sir, thank you very much for your opinion.

Alan: Thanks for calling. Yes, it's confusing, because the media's not there to tell you the real purpose of everything, it's meant to either scare you, or make you think that you are getting the ultimate news. They never tell you the real purposes behind it. The person that was in charge, put in charge of the British security services during the Cold War, was Lord Victor Rothschild, he was in charge of all the British security systems and yet Peter Wright and others wrote books about it and claimed he was the main spy and he was, he was passing stuff to the guys in Russia. They didn't want accidents happening, so the guys at the top were in collusion, they made sure there were no accidents going to happen; no real bombs going to go off. There's a book called The Fifth Man, people should get a hold of it, it's well-documented, by a person who's used de-classified information, from government itself. It tells you all about Rothschild, he was put in charge of that, prior to that, he’d worked for the Military, during World War II; he was eventually put in charge of Porton Downs Bacterial Warfare Laboratory; and then he went back to the banking, for a while and his family, and then he was made Chief over all the security systems in Britain for the rest of the Cold War.

There's also Rico from Ontario on the line, are you there Rico?

Rico: Yes, I am, how are you Alan?

Alan: Yes.

Rico: Good, I have a quick question for you, if you could break something down for me. I'm like of Haitian background.  You know, I was very proud of the fact that, you know, we had a 20 year Civil War for independence and everything like that and finally got it in 1804. You know, I've always been very proud of that; and I'm sure you're familiar, you know, Aristide was brought back and now the UN is there and they basically won't leave. So, I just wanted you to, if you could, because I've heard you talk before about Haiti, like just quickly, I wanted an actual like maybe breakdown and analysis, your opinion about that whole thing.

Alan: Again, it's one of the first places to ever truly organise itself and rebel against slavery and I often wonder if that's one of the reasons they've never forgiven it, to be honest with you.  The UN has been in and out of there forever; and it looks like they’re never were going to let it go. For strategic points and purposes, it must be of tremendous value. Back - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix; and, just before we go back to the book, we'll try Derek, if he's still on the line from Pennsylvania?

Derek: Hi, can you hear me Alan?

Alan: Yes.

Derek: Hi, actually someone's beeping me on my phone right now, can you hear me fine? Sorry.

Alan: Yes.

Derek: I wanted to ask about Jordan Maxwell, are you familiar with him?

Alan: I've seen his older stuff; I don't know what he's doing now.

Derek: Well, I recently looked into him on the Alex Jones show, I think it was last week and he was talking, he’s a real, in my opinion, he's a big con man and he's actually a Hollywood guy, admittedly, he hangs out with all these Hollywood cool people, right! But, he's pitching this movie to Alex Jones and it just seems like he's taking what you say, maybe not specifically you, but it certainly is a lot of your types of, it's hard to even put my finger on it exactly, just the way you put things, I don't know, it's kind of shameful and, this beeping is really terrible, can I call you back?

Alan: You can try and call back into the show, sure.

I'll just read this part, from this book, as he's making the call; but, again, this is from Hope of the Wicked and it says:

1989: Carl Bernstein's - of Watergate, Woodward and Bernstein book Loyalties: A Son's Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein's father tells his son about the book:

"You're going to prove Sen. Joseph McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right...I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right...I agree that the Party was a force in the country."  

Well, there was no doubt the Party, the Communist Party, was a force in the country; as I say, often it used to astonish me and other people, in Europe, as to why the US was fighting abroad so much, against communism, when you could actually see it being taken over from within, it was very evident when you read the media. And who was funding it all? Remember Carroll Quigley said that that which the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations, was doing was often mistaken to be the Communist Party, because, really, it's the same agenda; and not just the same agenda, the CFR and the big banks and bankers, who run the CFR, and the Royal Institute of International Affairs were funding the Soviet Union too, all through its existence.

It's interesting because even the term Communist in a sense was a front, to hide the CFR. The whole agenda we're seeing today, with the new economic system, they talk about a world where we'll serve the world state. This is all from the CFR's guidelines and I don't know if people truly understand that yet, it's maybe too hard a concept for them to understand, they cannot believe their lives will be changed so drastically, while the guys that own the money power can do as they wish because they are the money power and we're all dangling on their strings. That's the sad truth of it.

1990: President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. 

Remember again, the CFR always look at every disaster and call it an 'opportunity'.

In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:

"The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times... a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony.... Today the new world is struggling to be born." 

A new world is struggling to be born. Who designed this baby?

1990: In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq's invasion of Kuwait as "an act of terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order." On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.  

And it certainly has, it's been on a roller coaster ever since. As I say, now we're all under observation; all of us, and it's going to get worse. Remember again, that under this group who runs this world, we are all mentally-ill, everyone's mentally-ill, except themselves. They have reason, we don't have reason; they don't believe in superstition, some of us have superstition as they call it, meaning religion. So, they're going to rectify that, using psychiatry.

1990: In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the:

"...collective strength of the world community expressed by the U.N....an historic movement towards a new world order... a new partnership of nations... a time when humankind came into its own... to bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a... new age."  

He's got everything in there: the new age, the whole thing.

1991: Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School In Context. She promotes the use of "change agents" as "self-acknowledged revolutionaries" and "co-conspirators." 

Look at all these organisations, as I say, see who funds them, it’s the same bunch.  People cannot get their heads round why would the rich people in the world fund what seems to be a left-wing organisation, or all left-wing organisations. Why would they do that? Sutton, Antony Sutton, came to the conclusion that they prefer a global society with centralised government, all under one world government, because, then they can lend to all nations and they're guaranteed payment from the governments. It's far easier than going door-to-door, collecting money from people who owe them, when they can get it guaranteed by governments.

1991: President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:

"What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea - a new world order... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind... based on shared principles and the rule of law.... The illumination of a thousand points of light 

You've heard that before.

.... The winds of change are with us now."  

1991: President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York:

"My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function."  

1991: The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America's Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor, academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries. Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other world leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of their respective governments. 

See, we've never had what we thought was democracy; and even the Republic of the US was completely walked right round, ignored. A republic was meant to contain the powers, the US was not meant to be a democratic system as such. It had a form of democracy, for voting etc., but no one was allowed to overthrow the Constitution, that was treason. Well, that's all been done, it's all been done.  Plato himself said that a democracy leads to communism, which always leads to dictatorship. It's been done many times in the past.

1991: David Rockefeller, speaking at the Bilderberger meeting, in Baden Baden Germany, also attended by then Governor Bill Clinton, states: "We're grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. 

Meaning: they've kept their silence, they haven't talked about the meetings, they didn't tell the public what was going on. They go on to explain:

It would have been impossible to develop our plan for the world, 

Did you vote Rockefeller in? Did any of us vote him in, or any of his cohorts? No.

if we'd been subject to the lights and publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries".

An intellectual elite and world bankers, they're the ones who now rule you, as I was saying before.

Now, I've got Dale from Michigan on the line, are you there Dale? Hello? Hello Dale?

Dale: Hello. I have the words of a song and a big subject for you to tackle, maybe in a future programme. The man who wrote the words to the music of the Wizard of Oz. Some of the lyrics were: "Once I built a railroad, made it run" yada-yada. Then another line is "Once I built a tower to the sun, brick and mortar and lime, once I built the tower, now it's done, brother can you spare a dime?" and I kept thinking paradigm, I know paradigm is in there somewhere and it's S. Paradigm [?] which are the paradigm shifts you're talking about.

Alan: Yes and the dime also had the symbol of the Fasces on it as well, we mustn't forget that.

Dale: Really? Yeah, the back of it; another thing is you talked about the people with fair skin that thanked god that they had fair skin and dark hair and then there were the blonde and red-haired and a big subject on the net now is the RH Negative and I've traced it and all the people that separate themselves from others, the Basques, the Berbers, the Amish in the United States, they were 25% RH negative, which if you know anything about the recessive nature of RH Negative blood, there shouldn't be any anymore, because if people truly bred freely, being the recessive nature, there wouldn't be any more, so they realised and that's why I believe they keep all the genetic records going all the way back.

Alan: It's incredible isn't it? When you realise they've taking the samples for years, not telling the public, and even at the Human Genome Project, was on the go for so long before we'd even heard the term, so they understood what they were looking for and, even yet, they've never disclosed to the public exactly what they were looking for.

Dale: Yeah, and the Mormons have all these people that are building Ziggurat-shaped monuments and everything that have you know one man will have 24 wives and I'm sure that if you got into their background. But, I've been researching a lot of this stuff that you usually find that these people are RH Negative and they're trying to maintain that blood line. They're also implicated in all kinds of sex crimes against children and, you know, marry their cousins, nieces and everything. But, another fascinating aspect is people that claim that they've been visited by aliens are RH Negative and women have written in to these blogs saying that my mother is A negative, my father is B Positive and I have AB Negative blood but the doctor tells me that's entirely possible, that my father is my father! Do you know anything about blood types, like, ‘OK honey: who are you going to believe, me, or your lying eyes? you know. And I believe that's part of the mind control programmes that they use, you find that the highest level military officers and political figures and everything are using military bases to sexually abuse children and everything and I think its part of breeding programmes.

Alan: I'll tell you where the main breeding programmes were. They were done under the guise of Christian communities, in the 1800s, and it was a perfect cover, no one would come in and touch them or even think about it. Because, if you look at the Oneida Community in New York, which has been documented, although they burned a lot of the records in the 1940s, and H.G Wells even came over and visited them and they were in touch with different luminaries of that period, across the world. They were a breeding programme where they actually introduced the children into active sexual participation, at a very early age. They were not allowed to marry but the elders decided who could procreate with whom, for offspring, and they did keep incredible records of this. It was the most extensive breeding programme, well-protected too, by very rich people, in New York State, from the top, to even get away with that, in that era; and when you go into what they were up to, it's astonishing really that they managed to get away with so much. They were heavily protected from the top of the State, to do that.

Dale: Another thing that struck me is that people that are minorities and are persecuted and these people really aren't much persecuted because they keep themselves out of the spotlight and their practices out of the spotlight, but they claim that they're more intelligent, that they have higher IQs, you know, but what they really have is a very difficult time breeding because you know if they combine RH Positive and Negative, and a person can be half and half, if you know how both the negative and the positive antigens, you know, in their genetic code.

Alan: They're also so far ahead of this; and the key is too, and I'm certain of this, they were into genetic alterations, literally, long before Watson came along, with his double helix and all the rest of it. I'm pretty certain of that, and so even those problems they got ironed out, through science. They were definitely studying genes, as I say, from records, such as from the top mathematicians in the 1920s, who were working on projects to do with genes. Now you wouldn't need a mathematician like Rutherford unless you actually could see the genes and - supposedly - they weren't discovered till much later. However, his own autobiography says that he worked on a project where it was to do with the genes. So, I think they were into this a long time ago, so any problems that they've had within breeding have been overcome and who knows how long they've been into artificial insemination and the altering of the sperm. I don't know if people know this, but even Victor Rothschild I mentioned earlier, his main project at University, when he was at Cambridge was on spermatozoa and that's what you want to alter, if you want to alter certain traits in the offspring. They're all into the same things you know.

Dale: They're so into breeding, breeding animals, breeding humans.

Alan: If you go back to Plato, and you go back into Plato's Republic, and he talks about the standard way to breed them was like domesticated animals, until you get the perfect pair, which you just keep inbreeding from then on.  This has been an agenda for an awful long time and we also know too, that, from the Project Paperclip, where they brought so many Nazi scientists in from Germany to Britain and the US, a lot of those guys, I think were interbred as well; and their offspring as well. Some of their offspring went to special schools, just for them.

Dale: Well and they’ve mentioned that the head of NASA, I forget his name, but he was brought over, but he had married his niece I believe; but another interesting.

Alan: We'll have to go now, there's the music coming in. I'll be back after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and we've got Derek back on the line from Philly, are you there Derek?

Derek: Yes, yes I'm here, I'm back now, thank you Alan. OK, well, before I was cut off, I was speaking about Jordan Maxwell; and, in particular, I wanted to comment on him, not really to you, but more for your listeners, because they might not see it as easily. If anyone listens to that Alex Jones show, he was actually going on and on, just alluding to things and never actually going into any concrete details or anything and he talks about all the right things, you know, he says the nice things for people who might be on the path, treading the path, that they might be attracted to, but I don't like him personally. So, I just wanted to say that and thank you, Alan, you're great; you're the real deal.

Alan: Thanks for calling.  I've never listened to Jordan for, I saw his early tapes and I know he was on Bill Cooper but Bill Cooper eventually denounced him for, apparently, putting most of his efforts into destroying Christianity.  It was odd, at that time, to think Jordan was sponsored by a group that called themselves some kind of humanist society and that was at the end of his tapes that he was selling, at that time. You always have to ask yourself who sponsors whom etc., and why.  People should go into depth of their doctrine, if they can go into depth with it, and at least explain how they see the world and really where it's going. If we start just chasing space aliens and all that, well good luck if you ever capture one and get them to admit it, because, until you do, you're left in la-la land and imagination; and you leave the big organisations, which you can approach, alone. You don't go after them, you don't go after the NGOs; you don't bother exposing the ones who are actually openly doing what they're doing to the world and to your life right now, when you're chasing all these illusions. That is a strategy as well, if you want to get people off your back, just say it's the aliens and people will run around in circles forever, works very-very well. Sad thing but true.

What I've noticed as well: a lot, an awful lot of the old books that were published in the 1800s, by the Freemasonic Associations, which are full of a lot of nonsense, to with mysticism etc., put out there on purpose to attract members in, are now being republished again as though what they were saying was actual truth, by certain authors. It's just rehashing of the same old stuff and when you have the old books, you can recognise them right away, it's just the same stuff they're copying into new books and pushing out there again and people gobble the stuff up, they gobble up the fantasy. Remember what Weishaupt said: the greatest way to get people into this organisation is to present them with a great mystery; a great mystery, and you can dangle them for years as they go through degrees and do hoola hoops and do cartwheels and do whatever you want with them and they'll never learn what the secrets are - because he says there are no secrets at the top. Meanwhile, they're happy, obedient workers for your agenda.

Ever wonder why Freemasonry, this charitable organisation, are the main ones behind chipping the children? Look at their websites; they proudly sponsor this, these events, chipping the children. High technology, tracking and chasing children, which will end up being throughout your whole life remember, you turn into an adult eventually, with the same fingerprints and the same chip.

Well, that's the music coming in. So, from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada: it's goodnight and may your God, or your gods, go with you.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Book: (continued)"Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World" by Ted Flynn

Articles:

"CCTV cameras 'listen for trouble' " by Kenneth Macdonald (news.bbc.co.uk) - Feb. 13, 2009.)

"New law to give police access to online exchanges" by Bill Curry (theglobeandmail.com) - Feb. 12, 2009.)

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:59 am

Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#260)

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 19, 2009:

Mental Disorder of New World Order:

"More Bull from Mr. James Lovelock,
Who Coined 'Gaia Theory' and Poppycock,
Future Visions Calamity, All Things Sordid,
For Creating Terror, was Well Rewarded,
From Stella Rimington, Queen of Spies,
Warns Politicos to Open Eyes,
Tyrannical Government is In Error
In Bringing Down a Reign of Terror,
World Economic Forum in Davos Met,
With Summit on Global Agenda, Plans They Set,
To Regulate Every Individual's Life
From Cradle to Grave, in World of Strife,
Look at Who Sponsors WEF's Foundation,
Same Names Who Wish to End all Nations"

Thursday February 19th 2009

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 19th of February 2009.

Newcomers: look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as many of the previous talks I've given as you wish. I try to give you shortcuts to understanding the big picture of those that control the world, the big pattern, and actually where it's going as well. These guys at the top, love to write dusty old books, at least they end up gathering dust in libraries; and they tell you where they're taking us and it's all done by subversion, subterfuge and, basically, bypassing all democratic institutions. In fact, they run the democratic institutions. We're not supposed to know where we're being taken, because we wouldn't like it you see; and that's why they don't tell the children the scary stuff. We, of course, are the children, according to those at the top; we're just too dumb and immature to understand what's in our own best interests, basically. That's what they tell you, if you talk to them face-to-face.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of the talks I've given in the past; you can print them up; and they're written in the various languages of Europe.

You can also buy what I have for sale on my site www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com that keeps me going and you can donate as well; as I say, I don't ask for payment for any of the work that I do from any of the shows that I'm on.

I was thinking today of a magazine that used to be out, it was called MAD Magazine, where they lampooned politicians and events of their time, in a sort of cartoonish way and it was very-very funny and, apparently, when they packed in / they stopped publishing their magazine, it was because life was becoming so ridiculous that it was very hard to lampoon it any more. And things have gotten that way, things are so incredibly politically correct that's it's double-think, double-speak time that we're living in and nothing makes much sense to us. The most crazy, ridiculous things are becoming law, passed into law for us all to follow, like global warming and things like this. We're to run our whole lives, apparently, on how much carbon we use up in our lifetime. It's a big stick, it's a big idea, as they call it, they give us ideas for every age; and a myth-making machine. They always give you a massive myth for the age to believe in. That was the whole policy that Leo Strauss ran the Neo-Conservatives on. He taught many of the members of that club - The Americans for the New American Century - the policy club that they had. He said we have to create a myth for the public to believe in; in other words: for what they call positive liberty - it's a form of Sovietisation or Nazism, where the whole country has to be involved as one, against something. Therefore, they gave you a war on terror, that was the myth; and in such a positive liberty scenario, you lose all your freedoms and rights, all for the “greater good”, as they say. The positive freedom and negative freedom philosophy came out of Isaiah Berlin, at Oxford University. He was a philosopher and this was his idea for running the century as well.  You have all these philosophers at the top that are training these people, who then come into the workforce, they're given steps up to the top and they end up running our lives for us, with all these crazy ideas. However, they're not so crazy, when you boil it down, because tyranny is tyranny, regardless of the camouflage they put upon it.

Before I continue tonight, I'd like to mention about Chemtrails and a newspaper that'll publish them; and I'll give you the name of this paper, after I come back from this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix.  One British paper has started to put out photographs of the Chemtrails; you can send yours to them, if you have any, I'm sure, well, I know you will have them because I get hundreds sent to me alone, from all over the world. Something that no one wants to talk about, that shows you how little we truly know of the real world, we're never let it on what's truly happening to us; and they can't tell us about the Chemtrails, because, I'm sure, it's very detrimental just the physical fall-out itself on the public.  This is the UK Column and you can get that at www.ukcolumn.org and they do, in the January edition, they have photographs of Chemtrails on the back page there. At least some people are trying to get it out into the public that which should be talked about.

That brings me onto, as I say, the farces we live under, these great myths that they create, to control us. We truly are treated with scorn, utter contempt and scorn at the bottom. We're just too uneducated, you see, to understand the big picture and we're too child-like to go along with it, even if we did understand it; we're just children, therefore we're run by deception, as I say. A very old plan, a very old agenda; and it's not so complex, even though there's hundreds and hundreds of Non-Governmental Organisations running our lives. It's not so complex, because you have a handful of bankers, with their Foundations funding it all; and the NGOs simply are lobby groups. They also use Think-Tanks as well, funded by the same Foundations, to advise governments on various policies, which, of course, these Foundations dream up themselves. And it's really just the eugenics policies, under disguise, that's always been their mantra: depopulate the world, there are too many 'useless eaters'; let's save the good types, those who have proven that they have a right to continue, by the acquisition of wealth and their selective marriages, where they marry. Really, power marries power and that, in itself, shows you that they have the 'right stuff' to go on. They've gained lots of money and wealth over the centuries, they haven't lost it, and because of their specific breeding, they can pass these genes on to their own generations, that's what they truly believe.

In the meantime too, as I say, they're killing off the rest of the public; I say that without a problem, I believe it absolutely, because I watch and I study the medical data going back for fifty and a hundred years. And to see the rise in cancers, for instance, all the kinds of cancers that have happened, especially in the last fifty years, is just astonishing. This should be a crisis but it's not a crisis; why is not? It's because it's the agenda. The sperm count too has been falling for fifty years; why is that not a crisis? Because it's the agenda; it's very simple, when you understand the agenda.

Here's the farce, as I say, that's supposed to control our lives: the threat of annihilation, through global warming and excess carbon in the atmosphere.

Now, here's an article here from the New Scientist 23rd of January 2009 and it's from one of their clones, I call these people ‘clones’ because they're interchangeable with their mantras about the global warming. They've really fed themselves very-very well and lucratively by pushing these mantras on society and they're interchangeable because they all give the same spiel, the same spiel on any topic, they're all identical with what they see and what they say, regardless of where they're born or what country they're in.

This is from James Lovelock, this is the guy who dreamed up the Gaia Theory, at least he's given the credit for it; and he's made his living on this whole thing - and no doubt - he's being pushed by the big Foundations, the same old boys, you know who they are. It says here:

With his 90th birthday in July, 

I bet he's not eating GMO food.

a trip into space scheduled for later in the year and a new book out next month, 

Probably ghost written.

2009 promises to be an exciting time for James Lovelock. But the originator of the Gaia theory, which describes Earth as a self-regulating planet, has a stark view of the future of humanity. He tells Gaia Vince

Who's Gaia Vince? Gaia Vince eh?!

we have one last chance to save ourselves - and it has nothing to do with nuclear power. 

It says here:

Your work on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons led eventually to a global CFC ban that saved us from ozone-layer depletion. 

Now, that was utter nonsense to start with. DuPont got the contract with the new stuff they use in refrigerators, because the old stuff you see was heavy, heavier than air. It stayed at the earth, it didn't go up into the Ozone Layer; but that was the con that they pulled at the time; and this guy was well-rewarded for pushing this nonsense. It says:

Do we have time to do a similar thing with carbon emissions to save ourselves from climate change? 

This is what this guy says, who's a true believer, remember, he's a eugenicist, he believes in the survival of the fittest and the elites; and the killing off of the lessers, as you'll see later, in this article. He says:

Not a hope in hell.  

This is his answer.

Most of the "green" stuff is verging on a gigantic scam. 

He's admitting that, that the whole greening thing is a scam.

Carbon trading, with its huge government subsidies, is just what finance and industry wanted. It's not going to do a damn thing about climate change, but it'll make a lot of money for a lot of people and postpone the moment of reckoning. I am not against renewable energy, but to spoil all the decent countryside in the UK with wind farms is driving me mad. It's absolutely unnecessary, and it takes 2500 square kilometres to produce a gigawatt - that's an awful lot of countryside. 

Then he's asked:

What about work to sequester carbon dioxide? 

That is a waste of time. It's a crazy idea - and dangerous. It would take so long and use so much energy that it will not be done. 

He's asked for his ideas on nuclear power and would that solve the problem? He says:

It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction measures. 

Then he's asked if we're doomed? He says:

There is one way we could save ourselves and that is through the massive burial of charcoal.  

This is his latest fad; they go through fads these guys. He says:

It would mean farmers turning all their agricultural waste - which contains carbon that the plants have spent the summer sequestering - into non-biodegradable charcoal, and burying it in the soil. Then you can start shifting really hefty quantities of carbon out of the system and pull the CO2 down quite fast. 

Then he says "Would it make enough of difference? He says:

Yes. The biosphere 

Now, listen to this: this is their estimates (the biosphere itself, being all the plants and nature and so on, excluding humans):

The biosphere pumps out 550 gigatonnes of carbon yearly; 

That's without our help. He says we, the humans:

put in only 30 gigatonnes. Ninety-nine per cent of the carbon that is fixed by plants is released back into the atmosphere within a year or so by consumers like bacteria, nematodes and worms. What we can do is cheat those consumers by getting farmers to burn their crop waste at very low oxygen levels to turn it into charcoal, which the farmer then ploughs into the field. 

This is his latest scheme for it. These schemes, mind you, means that they're well-rewarded and the crazier they are the better; it seems to be that way, it's like lies, people like the big lies. They'll swallow that but they won't fall for the small lies. It's the same with these schemes they dream up. He says "Do you think we'll survive? He says:

I'm an optimistic pessimist. I think it's wrong to assume we'll survive 2°C of warming: 

Now here it comes you see:

there are already too many people on Earth. 

You see, here's the old eugenics thing again.

At 4°C we could not survive with even one-tenth of our current population. The reason is we would not find enough food, 

You've been wondering what all this hype about food is as they start tightening the reins on the food? It's all tying in together you see. He says

unless we synthesised it. Because of this, the cull 

The cull.

the cull during this century is going to be huge, up to 90 per cent. 

Well, he's right on target with Jacques Cousteau and all the other big boys. 90%, that's what they want, so that they can survive, supposedly, you know, the elites like themselves. He says:

The number of people remaining at the end of the century will probably be a billion or less. It has happened before: between the ice ages there were bottlenecks when there were only 

I love how they dream up these figures; they're talking about, you know, thousands and billions of years ago.

2000 people left.  

How would he know? Then he says:

It's happening again. I don't think humans react fast enough or are clever enough to handle what's coming up. Kyoto was 11 years ago. Virtually nothing's been done except endless talk and meetings. I don't think we can react fast enough or are clever enough to handle what's coming up.

There you go, this is your standard character who's spent his life making a career for himself, by putting out all this nonsense that's politically correct, because it goes along with the agenda of the Club of Rome and all the other organisations that plan to use the scam of blaming mankind for global warming. Even though it's a lot of BS to begin with; but that won't change it, facts won't change what's happening, at all.

Now, everyone knows that the World Economic Forum was on in January and the papers made sure we knew that much, that every prime minister and president attended it; and, of course, we the average person, thinks, and they all told us too, out of this is coming a new economic system, a new economic system and, once again, we yawn because we're not told very much and we think 'well that's it, it's to do with money' and we know it's the redistribution of wealth and so on.  What was it really-really about? Because if you go in to what happened at the World Economic Forum and what they also called it, amongst themselves, ‘Summit on the Global Agenda’. The Summit on the Global Agenda, Global agenda you see. Look up ‘agenda’ in the dictionary. Back with more; after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I've talked on about these big Foundations with their thousands of NGOs, meeting across the world, over many-many years, planning our future, according to a pre-written agenda, in fact; and finding ways to implement all the different parts of the agenda into society, through media, entertainment etc, etc.  Whenever you hear of these big meetings across the world, look into them, because you'll often find there's more to it than meets the eye, an awful lot more to it, because, as I say, at the World Economic Forum, much more was discussed than basic economics. Very-very misleading, of course, because that's the way they operate, they do it under cover, everything's done under cover, because the public's not supposed to know where we're going, or why we're going there in fact, or who attends even. And they always have them in these places for the United Nations, like Davos, Switzerland, like this one was held, that most people can't just jet off to and get a ticket to get in. But all the NGO leaders can get there and wine and dine and live on the best food and so on; and I don't think they were kidding about their carbon output during that time or cutting back on the supplies of food they were all consuming or the types either. You go into their agenda and they actually called it, at the World Economic Forum, Summit on the Global Agenda and you can look up Summit on the Global Agenda reports, to see what they were going into; because it's every facet, every facet of life, for every gender, for every age group, from birth to death, including employment and everything else. Here's what it started with:

• Economic Development and Growth 

That sounds all right.

• Environment and Sustainability

That's coupled together now, with economic development and growth. You can't have both coexisting properly, unless you bring down the population, obviously, the big mantra of reducing the population.

• Finance and Business

Fair enough.

• Geopolitics and Global Governance 

Global Governance.

• Health 
• Regions 

They call it 'Regions' across the world, under the United Nations.

• Society and Values

They talking about cultures here: your culture; and it's not talking just about them, it's how to create new values for the culture, for creating a new culture; they have special departments that do that, that work with all entertainment industries and media.

• Technology and Innovation
• Global Issue Profiles
• Alternative Energies
• Benchmarking Progress in Society 
• Challenges of Gerontology 

That's the elderly, too many of them, they claim.

• Challenges of Nanotechnology. 

They're so excited about Nanotechnology and what it's going to do.

• Chronic Diseases and Malnutrition 
• Climate Change 

This is at the World Economic Forum.

• Corporate Governance 

"Corporate' Governance", what does "Corporate Governance" mean? Look it up.

• Corruption
• Demographic Shifts
• Design
• Diversity
• Economic Growth and Development  
• Economic Imbalances 

That's redistribution of wealth; and for all those in the Western world who are losing their homes, because they can’t pay the rent or the mortgage, you're supposedly the wealthy, they must distribute your wealth to the Third World countries.

• Ecosystems and Biodiversity Loss
• Emerging Multinationals 
• Empowering Youth 

‘Empowering youth’ means really the creation of mass organisations that will be used politically to, again, enforce certain laws and rules and regulations that will come down the pike, down the future.

• Energy Security
• Entrepreneurship 
• Faith 

Religions too, your religions is all part of this discussion at the World Economic Forum.

• Financial Empowerment
• Financial Market Development
• Food Security
• Fragile States
• Future of Africa 
• Future of Australia 

Very interesting: the future of Australia, you should read this, all you Aussies down there.

• Future of China  
• Future of Entertainment 

This is all at the World Economic Forum. Each one is a big area in itself. ‘The Future of Entertainment’ is going further and using entertainment, basically, to be used as propaganda tools, to give you certain opinions. That's what it's to be used for.  You should go into this, have a really good read at it, because it's fascinating to see what was really discussed at the World Economic Forum, or, as they like to call it themselves, "The Summit on the Global Agenda". For those who still think that they have nations, the global agenda. And thank you again for the media, for keeping all the truth of it really-really out of the papers, as Mr. Rockefeller has said before, on previous occasions.

Here's an article here too and it's from The Guardian, Thursday 19th of February. It says:

Rimington is right. This is a recipe for creating terrorists - by Seumas Milne

This journalist says:

I never imagined I would say this, but Stella Rimington is right. The former head of MI5 who made her career running the security service's dirtiest operations in the 1980s, against the miners' union and the IRA, 

And that's true: they set up a whole bunch of dirty tricks to destroy the Miners' unions. Maggie Thatcher, in fact, imported Polish coal, so that she could put the miners out of business in Britain and she was very successful. Poland, by the way, was part of the communist conglomerate, at that time, but she had no problem trading with them. Back with more - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from The Guardian, where the former head of MI5 has a lot to say on what's happening in Britain and the world today. And she says here:

…that the government has given terrorists the chance to find "greater justification" by making people feel they "live in fear and under a police state". Naturally, ministers described her remarks as nonsense and accused her of playing "into the hands of our enemies". But the damage is done. To have the woman once hailed as Britain's Queen of Spies accusing the government of recklessly counter-productive authoritarianism carries a special weight - and incidentally turns the traditional relationship between Labour and the secret state 

I like that "secret state" part.

on its head. Rimington went further, denouncing the US for Guantánamo and torture, but reverted to type by insisting MI5 "doesn't do that".  

No, as we now know, it contracts out that job to others, while its officers stand by promising to arrange "more lenient treatment" if the victim co-operates.

In case after case, British collaboration, in the hidden crimes of the war on terror has now been laid bare. But none more so than in the seven-year ordeal of Binyam Mohamed, the last British resident in Guantánamo, the details of whose CIA kidnapping and US-orchestrated torture across four countries the foreign secretary, David Miliband, has twisted and turned to prevent being made public. 

Britain's very good at that, they keep behind other countries.

As it now turns out, the US letter warning that intelligence-sharing with Britain would be damaged if the torture evidence was published 

They're terrified to publish it.

 - used to strong-arm the high court into suppressing it - was in fact issued at the request of the Foreign Office itself. Perhaps that's hardly surprising, when the court has already heard that MI5 officers questioned the freshly tortured Mohamed in illegal Pakistani detention under government guidelines and fed questions to CIA interrogators as he was secretly "rendered" from Pakistan to Afghanistan to Morocco. 

This is what they did to these guys:

Mohamed was hung from leather straps and beaten in Pakistan, 

Now, we'd better get that through our thick skulls you know, this is what's coming down the pike across the western world, to the people within those countries, that you means you and I, everyone, that's what this means. We always think it's 'over there' somewhere, it’s some other sap that's getting it, he doesn't look like me, so I'm ok. Don't you ever kid yourself. This says:

Mohamed was hung from leather straps and beaten in Pakistan, and had his genitals slashed in Morocco, while other British terror suspects questioned by MI5 had their fingernails ripped out. 

They ripped out their fingernails.

Mohamed ended up confessing under torture to a fantasy "dirty bomb" plot, though all charges have been dropped and he is finally due to be returned to Britain any day now.  

This is what they've been doing to these guys across the world, as we sit by and watch junk on television and fantasy and trivia and sports. It says:

But New Labour's sins in the war on terror are catching up with it. And it's not only officials, but politicians, up to and including Tony Blair, who could be in the legal frame as a result of British collusion with torture, "extraordinary rendition" - illegal abductions to third countries - and "ghost" prisons. 

By the way, this turns in with extradition that's been made legal now. Countries are now extraditing people from all other countries, across the world, for other kinds of new crimes, like speech crimes and things like that. That's happening right now. It says:

No doubt a battery of state powers and immunities will be deployed to head off such humiliation. But as this week's chilling International Commission of Jurists' report on the counter-terrorist free-for-all put it: "The framework of international law is being undermined ... the US and UK have led that undermining."  

Now, this also comes under, what I mentioned earlier, and that's this concept by Isaiah Berlin, of Oxford University, he's dead now, who came up with positive freedom. Positive freedom is a technique where the people are goaded into action, becoming all as one towards some great threat, but it really is a guise, as he knew himself and stated so, for authoritarianism and totalitarianism by tyranny, to control the people; and that's what this terrorism BS is all about, because politicians were terrified that they were going to lose it over the public. The public were so disgusted at the corruption within politics, over the last 20-30 years, they knew they were losing it; they were losing control over the people and they were terrified of that, so they invented terrorism, simple as that. That was the new myth for the age, as Leo Strauss designed it.

Now, I'll go to callers now and I've got Rick from California there, are you there Rick?

Rick: Yes, am I getting through, Alan?

Alan: You are.

Rick: Oh, hi, how are you doing?

Alan: Not so bad.

Rick: Yeah, I was coming out of the grocery store today and I was approached by this pretty Asian woman who was very young, who was very active, she was very young and idealistic and said she was from the League of California Conservation Voters; and then we got to talking and then she started going into this diatribe about this Republican who voted against all these environmental clean air, clean bill, clean energy things and she said "Do you want to go for the 100% guy or do you want to go for the 6% guy?" And I said to her: "Well, suppose I'm a legislator, put me in the place of a legislator for a minute and across my desk comes this Bill, you know, with conservation measures that sound really good and clean; but, then attached to it is some kind of clause that denies elderly people their health care. Do you think I'm going to vote for that?" Of course not and I said: "That's how it works in Washington. And she said: "I know; politics is very dirty." I was thinking about that Bill you were reading last night about how they're going to deny elderly people their care.

Alan: Yes, there's no doubt about it. Again, under the United Nations definition of a "good world citizen" - that's the term that Obama kept using during his campaign - for all the thick skulls out there that never caught it, never heard him, or ignored it, he kept on about World Citizenship. Well, a good world citizen, according to the UN, is a good producer and consumer; when you stop producing and you retire, you're now a consumer only, you're a bad citizen; and what do they do with bad citizens? Well, they'd rather you were dead.

Rick: You know that's terrible.

Alan: That's what it is, this is the value of life because it's all coming down to your value to society, that was always it - in a world state, where you serve the world state - it all depends on your value to the society and if they declare that you have no more value to them, then you're a useless eater and they must dispose of you. That's coming in folks and I kid you not.

Rick: I also told her about how a lot of the global warming is also fuelling this push for nuclear energy and I said to her, I don't know if you know about this, but Africa is being ravaged right now by the extraction of nuclear uranium that's poisoning the people all across in Malawi and Mali and all these different places. And so, I have a question I wanted to ask you Alan: some Christian websites maintain that Aleister Crowley believed in reducing / killing off what he called the inferior races, in favour of a superman, did Aleister Crowley believe this or did he say this?

Alan: I haven't, myself, come across him saying that, in any of the books, but I wouldn't be surprised; he belonged to the right class in that society and he did believe in superior and inferior types but I don't know if he ever advocated killing them off.

Rick: OK. It was when they said, it was in the context of his visitation by the spirit in Egypt in 1904 that he claims to have had.  Alright, well thank you very much Alan for answering my question.

Alan: Thanks for calling. Crowley was quite an amazing character; and, once again, we find out, years later that he worked for MI5 and MI6 during World War II and was sent out to set up the O.T.O. (Ordo Templi Orientis) and get a whole bunch of youth all ready for the 1960s, basically, because all the big pop stars, at the time, joined the O.T.O.

Now we'll go to, we've got Leo in Massachusetts, are you there Leo?

Leo: Hi, thank you for taking my call. I heard you today earlier on Alex and I realised that I needed to call you because I've been hearing all these quotations, Alex talks about quotations of the NWO, as he gets them from their own documents. Is there a URL anywhere, or do you have one on your site somewhere, something to the title of 'in their own words, the NWO exposed', so that all of their quotes are together, with links to show where the quotes are.

Alan: Well, I'll tell you I've been reading a book, last week there, it's called Hope of the Wicked and it's by Ted Flynn; and the guy - literally - has done a great work, by putting all of these quotes and who said it and what organisations, foundations, NGOs etc that they belong to and it's primarily the Council on Foreign Relations in the US and the British version of the same organisation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs in Britain. You'll find that pretty-well all of the organisations across the world belong to these two groups today, and all the NGOs come under them as well. That's where you'll find all of these main quotes and these are definite quotes, from their own writings.

Leo: Hope for the Wicked is the book?

Alan: Yes, it's called Hope for the Wicked: the master plan to rule the world, by Ted Flynn.

Leo: Yeah, well in my miscellaneous meanderings on the internet yesterday, I came upon this rather interesting concept; and I'm wondering why it's not getting more play and what it basically is, this is: within the black rap world, there have been some interesting murders going down. Evidently there was a group of Masonic Blacks called Boule, have you checked into that at all?

Alan: No, but I do know there are Masonic affiliations within all the music industry and the Black one too.

Leo: I think it's a really good point to bring out and research because you wonder why people are so quiet and I think this is one of the little key factors of controlled opposition.

Alan: Well, I actually had a pile of stuff sent to me, by someone whose brother is an instructor at the FBI Academy and it was to with gangs across the United States; and it was about all their logos and what was surprising was that so many of them were Occultic / Freemasonic logos these young guys could not have dreamed up themselves.  There was that odd connection there too; but you also find if you look at most of the album covers, going back from the 1960's onwards, right up to the present time, you'll see them flashing the signs, the Masonic signs on their covers, standing on the square and so on. You'll see it through them all; it's just all over the place.

Leo: Well, I think that these issues need a broader spectrum analysis, because I think as long as there are little quiet things on YouTube that nobody looks at, then, in fact if you just put in the search box Boule and you'll find stuff. There's one person, I think it's Steve Croft, he really went into it and there's a lot of good Black people out there fighting the fight but it would be nice for us to.

Alan: As I say, it's a huge subject and it's every area of the arts as well; and it's all through Hollywood as well, actors and so on. You've got to understand that Freemasonry is the religion of the world, it's across the entire planet; and even when the churches go down, no one thinks about these little temples standing in their local village. They're everywhere and they have been used right down to the present times, to further this agenda. It's the same with the Bohemian Grove, all the big, I don't call them captains of industry, these guys are actually the pirates of industry and they're all Freemasons, to get into that club, to begin with. You can't go into it unless you're a Freemason.

Leo: And I was in a Masonic Hall for a friend's recital and I looked up on the wall and they cited all the different charities that they support; among them was the Salvation Army, how interesting!

Alan: Well they do now, because the Salvation Army caved in a few years ago and they took their tax break status, and along with it came the rules of things they could not preach anymore, to their followers; and they went along with that, so now they're ok, as far as Freemasonry's concerned.

Leo: Well, what did they have to drop?

Alan: Any references to alternative lifestyles, put it that way.

Leo: Do you mean like putting down the alternative homosexual lifestyle?

Alan: Even mentioning it, that's out; they can't do that anymore, it's a whole bunch. Whenever you take that tax break, that 501c3 or something, whatever they call it, you get a list from the government of things you cannot mention anymore to your congregations.

Leo: The benefit comes with the really incredible caveat and that's what I think is the problem, nowadays, the black ministry has been, basically, silenced, cockled, whatever adjective you choose to use, into this abhorrent silence. Even before Obama, now they're probably going to be silenced because of Obama.

Alan: Yes, I know, every trick that can be played will be played now, as we go through the biggest changes the world has ever seen. They're telling us the truth when they tell us they're bringing a completely new world system and a new way of living; and that means everything that you do in life is going to be turned upside down.  Thanks for calling; I have to go onto the next caller.

Leo: OK, thank you.

Alan: And there's also Phil, from Florida, here. Are you there Phil? Hello? I can't hear you.

[Caller has bad connection.]

Alan: OK, well, I was going to read something else here anyway, because I was sent this article from 2007, which gives you an idea that the whole idea coming into this great depression we're into, was already known a few years ago; and the big boys were making arrangements to sell off their top shares, quietly, before they spooked the public. This is from the Telegraph, the 25th of June 2007, by Ambrose Evans- Pritchard and it says here:

BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree. 

That's the Bank for International Settlements at the top, basically, the United Nations. It says here:

The Bank for International Settlements, the world's most prestigious financial body, has warned that years of loose monetary policy has fuelled a dangerous credit bubble, leaving the global economy more vulnerable to another 1930s-style slump than generally understood. 

I'll read a bit more of this afterwards; it's interesting what they say. Back, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from The Telegraph and this was back in 2007, 25th of June, where they go through the fact that there was a Depression coming up and you should read through this article, I'll leave the link at the end of the show.  This ties in with the WiseUp Journal that also did an even deeper exposé into this particular article from that newspaper and this, I'll put this link up as well. He says here:

Irish Stock Market Crash & Global Depression 

Did you know the Irish stock market (ISEQ) has crashed and lost over 40 billion Euro in one year?  

This is back, again in 2007, the 30th of December 2007. It says:

If you're not one of the few stock investors in Ireland then your answer will probably be no. Not surprising since you’re not really being told.  

Then he does a very-very good exposé, into the fact it wasn't just Ireland, it was world-wide at the time.  What they did: they gave time for all the biggest investors to get their money out and sell off their shares; and, in this article here, they tell you how it was done. You see, there are no surprises at the top: they know what's coming; they always save their boys at the top. It's the ones down below who lose their shirts, never the boys at the top, never ever the boys at the top.  Also, I'm going to put a link up from the Telegraph, it was one of the photographs of the year, it got an award and what it is, it's:

A picture of an armed sheriff moving through an American home after an eviction due to a mortgage foreclosure won the top prize in the World Press Photo competition. 

It's like a guy going through a building in the Middle East, caught with his gun ready to shoot the owner, I guess; and there's boxes all over the floor, I guess they were trying to get their stuff out of the way before the eviction.  This is how they're treating people now if they can't pay their mortgages; and this photograph gets an award and here's this goon, this shaven-headed goon, ready to shoot the owner, if he doesn't get out. It's disgusting, disgusting what we're seeing today, what's happening, incredible. Also, I'm putting a link up to show you how they're going to turn us all back into serfs; and this is a BBC news item that came out on the 19th February 2009:

Land freed for 1,000 allotments

They're going to give people little allotments, to get them growing their own food again. This also comes under Communitarianism, if you wondered what that phrase really meant, Communitarianism. You see, there's going to be a massive food shortage, they’re going to make it happen; but they'll have all these little people growing in their little plots, like the serfs did in the Middle Ages, and the nobles will come along, no doubt, and take a good share of what you grow. That's how they did it in the past time, I think they took 60% of what you produced, in the Medieval Times, the lords did that and left you with 40%, to feed your family and any help that you had around the farm.

Here, they're going to give you, they're getting you back to your little plot on the land, to feed yourself. People have no idea what's planned, no idea whatsoever what's coming down the pike; and I really mean it when I say there's a brand new way of living and your duty will be to serve the World State. They mean that when they say that. The first person who put it out there was Cecil Rhodes; he wanted a British-style system across the entire planet. Although he said that the US, or another country, could take up the standard and carry on when Britain couldn't afford it. Well, the US did take it over and now they've been the policeman of the world for a long time, they must go under, and China will arrive as the policeman of the world. In the meantime, we’ll all become peasants again.

Well, that's it for tonight; I hear the music coming in. So, from Hamish and myself, Ontario Canada, it's goodnight - and may your God, or your gods - go with you.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Topics of show covered in following links:

[Send Chemtrail Photos to UK Column] ukcolumn.org.

"One last chance to save mankind" [James Lovelock interviewed] by Gaia Vince (newscientist.com) - Jan. 23, 2009.

"World Economic Forum: Summit on the Global Agenda" [PDF file] (weforum.org).

"Rimington is right. This is a recipe for creating terrorists" by Seumas Milne (guardian.co.uk) - Feb. 19, 2009.

"BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree" by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (telegraph.co.uk) - Jun. 25, 2007.

"Irish Stock Market Crash & Global Depression" (wiseupjournal.com) - Dec. 30, 2007.

"2008 World Press Photo of the Year contest" [Armed sheriff raid for mortgage foreclosure eviction] (telegraph.co.uk).

"Land freed for 1,000 allotments" (news.bbc.co.uk) - Feb. 19, 2009.

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 7:59 am

Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#267)

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Mar. 2, 2009:

Underway, The Great Revolution or Planned Destitution:

"Declared On High, from Military Sage,
We're in for Summer of 'Malcontent' Rage,
A Slogan Term, Seems a Dead Ringer,
From Quote by Brzezinski, Wagging the Finger,
Who Warned of Rage Within Youthful Masses
Merging with Dispossessed Middle Classes,
Chaos Spontaneous to Casual Observer,
But Planned by Conjurers, Warring Minerva,
Order from Chaos, Fat Old Men Jibber,
Looking for Portents from Oxen Liver,
And Rich Men Conspire Against the People,
Emasculated, Poisoned, Bodies So Feeble,
A War Waged on Them from So Long Ago,
National Security Kept Them Out of the Know,
The Great Transition War is About to Begin,
Outcome's Planned Yet Not Certain, Answer's Within"

Monday March 2^nd 2009

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Mar. 2, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March the 2nd 2009.

I always advise newcomers to go into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and you can download lots of the previous talks I've given, which cover a broad range of topics to deal with the big system, which really runs the world and it's a very old system of networking you might call it, on one level. They plan the future, they always plan the future, like a big business plan, that's what governments really do, that's what the bureaucracies are really there for, regardless of the political parties that come in for their 15 minutes in the sun. So, I try to give you shortcuts to understanding, because we're into the next phase, the next phase that's coming up of this Brave New World scenario. This New World Order that's been talked about without ever being explained to the public by the people involved sometimes, like Bush Senior; and it's not going to be a pleasant transformation, as they say, although they're telling is that change is good. Mind you, it's a planned change.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks I do, which you can download for print up and pass them around to your friends. They're written in the various languages of Europe.

You can also buy the articles I have for sale, on my website, that keeps me going and there's quite a bit of expense here too, even just with the satellite uploads etc; never mind all the time that goes into it. And you can also donate as well.

As I say: we're going into one of the biggest changes in history, a planned change, a change that was mentioned by Technocrats years ago, like Brzezinski and Kissinger, that type of character, the ones who really wield power behind the scenes, as Carroll Quigley said, while the politicians just are there to take the heat and get seats on directors boards, once they retire. The change, as I say, is in all the movies you've been watching for years, because Hollywood is all part of the predictive programming. We see scenarios of a future that's rather bleak, with lots of people living in crumbling cities, all the way from the old movie Soylent Green right up to the present time, where they're churning out one disaster movie after another, there's always the mob, the people at the bottom with nothing and this very well-equipped army (black clad, of course) to deal with it all. And I understand that there are seven releases from Hollywood right now on this very topic, they always give us these movies long before the event, to make the event seem quite natural when it actually happens. We don't think through things consciously, we're programmed to go along.

Isn't it amazing, absolutely amazing that the think-tanks that advise the military, the big top strategists for NATO, published the reports a couple of years ago, to do with the up-coming riots - on-going for thirty years. That was followed by the US Military's think-tanks publishing theirs, which was pretty-well identical; and now the media is going into overdrive with up-coming riots, "a summer of riots" is what they're calling it. As I say, this was planned and there will definitely be riots. It'll be led, in fact, by the ones that are paid from the top, because they always have their provocateurs, they have very good speakers too, in different movements that are funded by the big think-tanks, to get the thing going.  I’m going to talk about that tonight; so, I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how we're programmed in advance of events by movies that are quite something. You wonder if some big joker, at the top, is playing tricks on us and, of course, they do have their jokers, because we had the funny coincidence with Mr. Madoff, which is the pun of the day, where he made off with the loot. Someone sent me an amazing photograph, from a newspaper, of the Treasury's Neil Kashkari. Where can you get a name Kashkari? –Who heads the office to set up and carry out the $700 billion rescue package by Congress. Here he is with his shaven head and all the rest of it; he looks like something out of the Mummy movie, the Mummy Returns or The Scorpion King, this is the guy Mr. Kashkari, who could dream this kind of stuff up? He's going to dish out the dough, quite something.

That's the world we live in; they love their big jokes at the top and why not? They've had it all their way right up to the present time. They're talking about the "summer of rage" that's coming in, to kick off the events; and out of this "summer of rage" you see, which will spread around the world (it's already happening in some countries), they will use this, for their advantage and those are the words that will be used in the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) to further cement the deal between Canada, the US and Mexico and completely integrate them. That's what they'll tell us, they'll tell us this is the only way out of our predicament with the banks and so on, because, you see, they brought the whole movement on in the first place. They could have kept the whole house of cards going for as long as they wanted, with the Stock Market, because it was always based on bubbles, lots of losers and a few winners; that's what casinos are all about.

The US Treasury, for instance, and other treasuries too, have been pumping billions of the tax payers' dollars into keeping certain big US companies up to scratch with the Stock Market at the end of every week, to keep the market up, they've been doing that for over 20 years. When Paulson said he wasn't doing it this time, I knew darn well, well here we go, this is the start, this is the signal for the banks to go down; and it was, all on cue. As I say, let's refer back to the documents they put out, I have them on my website, in the archive section, the audio archives, with the links to the British Government's think-tank for the Military and the one for the US Military, both talking about years and years of rioting; and, at that time, everyone would say well why would they be rioting, things are pretty bad but not that bad? Well, then the banks go under, everyone's losing their homes across the world; and there you go, right on cue. Planned that way you see; how would they get their 30 years of riots, unless they start it off? Quite simple.

This is from the Daily Express and its Sunday March the 1st 2009 by Geraint Jones.

MI5 ALERT ON BANK RIOTS. 

It says:

Top secret contingency plans have been drawn up to counter the threat posed by a “summer of discontent” in Britain.  

They're also calling it a "summer of rage", that'll become very popular.

The “double-whammy” of the worst economic crisis in living memory and a motley crew 

Listen to this:

of political extremists determined to stir up civil disorder has led to the ­extraordinary step of the Army being put on ­standby. 

The army has been put on standby, this is all through the UK; it'll be the same, I guarantee you, in Canada and all the British Commonwealth countries and in the US, as well. Actually I have more on that because they've already set up an organisation years ago to deal with it; and if I have time tonight, I'll talk about it. It says here:

MI5 

Which is Britain's FBI.

and Special Branch are targeting activists they fear could inflame anger over job losses and payouts to failed bankers.  

"Failed bankers" Let's stop right there and say this: if someone built you a house that fell down, a month after you moved in, would you call them an expert? Now, would you expect the government to disqualify such people from having licences to do it again? Of course the government would step in. Why would the government step in here to help the top experts we're told in banking and in the Stock Market industry, the most respectable people, it has been drummed into us for years, because wealth is respectability, are the experts and they've completely failed miserably by looting the public. Why would you reward them for doing so? You see, that's why people are getting rather angry, when they see what the system truly is and it's not there to serve them; but it never was, it never ever was. Getting back to the article:

One of the most notorious anarchist websites, Class War, asks: “How to keep warm ­during the credit crunch? Burn a banker.” Such remarks have rung alarm bells in Scotland Yard and the Ministry of Defence. Intelligence sources said the police, backed by MI5, are determined to stay on top of a situation that could spiral out of control as the recession bites deep.  

You see, we've got a long way to go into it, because they're going to keep bailing them out, the money is going to keep going into other accounts overseas and getting lost etc. Then they'll say well we're so broke now, as tax payers, that we're totally / utterly bankrupt. That's what they're doing right now. So, it is going to get worse, it's going to spiral out of control, it's meant to - rather than just locking up the bankers and finding someone else to do the job, with oversight. Old Stonewall Jackson had the right idea: he, literally, went against the Second American Bank, that was a private bank that ran the Government, to destroy it, he wanted to destroy it; and he also said there should be no life-long politicians. He wanted oversight committees, drawn from society, to watch over the bankers and the money and all the rest of it, you would take it in sort of rotation, two or three years at a time each. That's the only way you could watch these guys and see all their con tricks and so on; but it's too late for that, it's way past that. Getting back to the article here, it says here:

The chilling prospect of soldiers being drafted on to the streets has not been discounted, 

Well, of course it's not, because, you see, they planned for this, back in the '80s, that’s how far back you can trace it; and I'll go into that if I have time tonight. It says here:

although it is regarded as a last resort. What worries emergency planners most is that the middle classes, now struggling to cope with unemployment and repossessions, 

That means losing all their homes.

may take to the streets with the disenfranchised. The source said “this potent cocktail is reminiscent of the poll tax riots 

That's the head counts; you were taxed just for having a head. In other words: if you existed you were taxed under Thatcher.

which fatally wounded Margaret Thatcher’s government in 1990”.  

They used to come into your house and just count you, how many people were registered on the poll.

Last night Scotland Yard vowed it was ready to face any threat. A source said: “We do have a policing plan in place and we have riot police officers trained for such measures.” But other senior police leaders fear the force will be unable to cope. Were that to be the case, the ­Government has a contingency plan to deploy troops on the streets of Britain’s major cities. 

That will be all over Europe anyway.

A senior source said: “This is a very real, and very serious, problem. “I can tell you there have been crisis talks in Whitehall about this.  

Well, of course they are, there are a lot of angry people that have been looted; and they watch the crooks being rewarded.

“Half the senior officers in Britain have been warning the Home Secretary about the dangerous effects that reducing police manpower may have this summer, especially in the industrial heartlands.  

Where most of the unemployment, of course, is.

“We are not just talking about the problems of immigration and British jobs for British worker. We are also talking about mass unemployment.  

It goes on and on anyway and says here:

“Others are keeping it quiet, but you can be sure they are trying to make the Home Secretary listen, ­before it’s too late.” The “protest season” is due to ­begin on April 1 with the G20 Summit in London next month, 

I mean, you see, you couldn't plan this; they could take this to any other city. In fact, they love to take these things off to nice faraway sunny climes. Why are they putting it in London, where most of the anger will be? And it's very accessible you see, for people to travel in, to demonstrate. Because it's set up that way, that's why they picked it. It says here:

followed by the 60th anniversary of NATO in Strasbourg a few days later.  

Oh boy, isn't that a coincidence, NATO meeting in Strasbourg.

May Day is also ­potentially a flashpoint.  

And they're talking about flash-mobs remember.

Ministers cannot afford to allow ­latent public anger at Government policy to get out of hand if they are to maintain credibility through what promises to be ­Gordon Brown’s most testing period as Prime Minister. The Stop the War coalition, orchestrating the G20 protest, said: “The first week of April could be a week of world leaders will never forget.” The British authorities want to avoid a repeat of the rioting that scarred British cities in the 1980s. Then, as now, the country was in recession 

Recession? It's a Depression.

with rising unemployment and deep public hostility to perceived social divisions.  

Oh! It's just “perceived”, it's your perceptions that are off you see!

Today that anger is focused on the banks, with their bonus culture surviving despite billions being paid in taxpayer bail-outs.  

The tax-payers' are losing their homes, they're losing their homes eh? And they ask why they're angry. And the ones who are profiting and who have profited are being rewarded, by their pals in government. You see, that's how it's perceived, it's perceived that way because it's the truth.

I'll be back with more - after the following messages.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and if you want to look at the reports from the think-tanks for NATO, and the one for the US Army Military, look into my archive section, my audio archives for 21st November 2008 and you'll find the links that'll take you right there.

I've got one more article to read and then we'll go to a caller. This is from WiseUp journal and it's from today, 02.03.09. It's quite interesting, it says:

Irish Police Protest -  

The Police in Ireland are protesting.

And Call The Government A Criminal Accessory

To the pillaging that's been done by the banks. And they had a huge demonstration by the police; they call it the Gardaí in Ireland. They also have a video and the link is here too; and I'll have it on my site. It says:

Last week (Feb 25th) the Gardaí, Irish Police force, protested by the thousands and We The People Of Eire interviewed the Gardaí Representative Association. In this video, posted [on the site here], you can hear Deputy General Secretary of the Gardaí Representative Association, Mr. John Healy 

This is equivalent to the Deputy General of the RCMP in Canada coming out and saying this, that's what it would be here. This is the top guy, from the cops.

say the government has “sat around while our banks have been raided by private individuals for their personal profit” where “43 billion has been made in the last three years of the Celtic Tiger while 1% of the population has profited. They paid no taxes, bankers that have switch their accounts from account to account. 

Trying to find where the money went as they do this hopscotch from bank to bank to bank.

And individuals who have directly and openly manipulated share value. In any other country that would be illegal, but for the members of Gardaí Siochana the only thing that’s legal in this country is picking their [Gardaí] pockets.” 

That's the top guy for the police, for the country, saying, basically, that the Government sat around and did nothing while these characters looted, looted the country of 43 billion. Why don't we hear that in the other countries? Are they simply too well paid at the top? Is that why they're not saying what's happening? Because they know too, we all know, everyone knows we've been suckered again, everybody knows.

Now, there's a call from Jordan, from Reduan, are you there Reduan?

Reduan: Hello.

Alan: Yes, how are you?

Reduan: Yeah, I'm OK, it's a long time since I called in.  First of all I wanted to apologise for not donating to you, me, myself and family were trying just to survive.

Alan: Yes, I know.

Reduan: So, first of all, my sincere apologies for this. I've been listening to you since two years now; and, first of all, I wanted to ask you something that has to do, it's not off topic it has to do with a matter of today, about the rioting in Europe, so my question is: what ethnic group do you think will come first, as soon as the mob will be rioting and then, of course, looking for a black sheep to fight before they will fight the government or any police.

Alan: I think it'll start, basically, with organised protest but they'll probably have these agitators inside the crowds, as they have had before. You see, they want the rioting to start but if they go by the thirty-year plan of rioting, which is from the think-tanks at the top, that I've been talking about from the Military, eventually it'll turn inwards. They hope to turn it inwards and have ethnic groups fighting ethnic groups as well.  The whole of Europe's been set up in such a way that they've encouraged massive immigration, from different countries, to settle in the same little areas and cities. It's set up just like Constantinople was, a long time ago, with different areas for different people. And they've told them all to keep their culture, they've put an awful lot on welfare in certain countries; and all you have to do, all they have to do at the top, is cut off the welfare for a week or two, to start the riots going.

You see, there's so many ways they can trigger this off; but what they hope to do is to change the causes of the rioting, from what they are today, into an inter-ethnic conflict group, until, eventually that's what we'll think and how we'll see it really. That's why, really, they've set up this strategy for many-many years. They had this plan made before I was born, before I was born; and you'll see that, all these different tactics being used. They tried it before, in different parts of England, for instance, and there was one riot that happened, in the late '70s, I think it was, and it was coordinated riots, because the leaders of the riots were driving about in jeeps with loudspeakers and it was mainly in the black areas that it started.  Who were these professional guys in jeeps, were they military that were actually organising this and keeping it going? It's never been answered but it was definitely an organised event for something for the future. Hold and I'll be back after this break.

=== BREAK ===

I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Is Reduan still on the phone?

Reduan: Yes, ok.

Alan: Have you any other questions?

Reduan: Yeah, I still cannot see it out with the wars between the New World Order because obviously they have more agendas in the higher echelons, you have the New World Order of the Illuminati and then you have the Zionists, I don’t call them Jews, actually the Zionists that are actually planning for a greater Israel by confiscating land in the Middle East, so what is the connection between these two plannings?

Alan: It's always been part of a very old tradition to set up Israel as a capital of the world; and it's strange that because I was reading just recently on the book put out by Jacques Attali, the last book he put out. Now, he's a big member of the think-tanks at the United Nations, a top adviser to different presidents in the past of France. He spearheaded the European Union; but, he said in the book, he says is it possible that Israel will become this sort of economic and perhaps spiritual capital of the world in the future? He's looking way down the road and that's also been the hope, supposedly of various other religions as well. So, who knows? Who knows how that's going to play out there but there's no doubt about it that Israel has been well-funded from its inception, first of all by Britain and then it was taken over by the United States of America. And pretty-well all of their armaments that come in and were used in Gaza in fact, I think it's Amnesty International and other organisations that are complaining that all of these high tech weaponry that was found and used on Gaza, were all made in the United States and given to Israel, by the US.

So, it's an extension of a long-term policy plan by the Anglo-American Establishment, to say the least; and they set up, as I say, if you understand the history of Ireland, they set up a similar one in Armagh, in Ireland, with foreigners there, to keep that going for centuries and they've done the same thing with the Middle East. However, it's a long-term goal for it and I think that is part of term, their goal is to eventually make it some kind of a Capital.

Reduan: Ok thank you. Next time I would like to comment on something, I will call back another time.

Alan: Yes, or you could call me even off air sometimes as well.

Reduan: How could I do that?

Alan: I've still got your email address, if it's the same one and I can easily email you my phone number.

Reduan: Yes, it’s the same one. OK. All right then, thanks for your time.

Alan: Take care.

Getting back to the contingency plans for Europe. Back in the '80s, some of us heard about the Multi-Jurisdictional Task Force (MJTF), they called it, a kind of 'hush hush’ organisation of rapid deployment and rapid responses, that would be used within the Americas and the idea was that Military and Special Police would train, with the military in fact, and they would be used in live situational wars, to gain experience of what they'd have to do in the future back home. And they denied that for many years and lo and behold, a year or so ago, I mentioned it at the time, on the radio, the CBC did a little piece on the news; and they just happened to mention that these guys with the military outfits were actually police, from Canada, who were knocking down doors and smashing them down and putting people out with guns at their heads and all the rest of it. These were Canadian policemen, getting training to come back into Canada. Well, they have these organisations set up for the Americas and for Europe. Now, when the UN was talking about rapid deployment forces for what was to come, maybe ten years ago, that's what they were referring to. It was nothing to do with getting them overseas to some hot spot; it was to deal within Europe and within the Americas. One of the organisations they set up for Europe is called Eurogendfor, or the European Gendarmerie force, and it was set up quite a few years ago. It says:

EUROGENDFOR is an initiative of five European countries  

There's more involved now, because this was from a year ago, or two years ago.

(Portugal, Spain, France, Italy and the Netherlands), all having security forces with military status, aiming to contribute to the development of the European Security and Defence policy and to endow Europe with a greater capacity to conduct all police missions in crisis management operations.

This is from their own website.

Inspired by such an object, the cited countries, strengthening the overall value of their Security Forces with military status, decided to establish a Force which would be multinational, operational, pre-structured, robust and rapidly deployable to assure all police missions within the compass of civil crisis management, having signed the “Declaration of Intent”, in Noordwijk (the Netherlands), on 17 September 2004. 

EUROGENDFOR is an operational, (modular) pre-organised, robust and rapidly deployable Force (800 elements 

Whatever that means.

within 30 days), endowed with high levels of flexibility and interoperability and particularly capable of conducting substitution, strengthening and humanitarian police missions within the ambit of civil crisis management. 

Civil crisis management.

For planning purposes, based on the contributions put at our disposal by the participating countries, we believe that the five Forces involved will engage an estimated 

Here's what they're forecast is, an estimated:

2,300 military elements in EUROGENDFOR missions.  

It goes on to say:

Put under either civilian authority 

That's your government.

or military command, EUROGENDFOR Forces will be capable of acting throughout all crisis response phases, anywhere from the military intervention to the transfer of responsibility to the local civilian authority 

That's right down to your local township.

or to an international organisation. 

By the way, they say here they also work with the United Nations and NATO.  I'll put this link up on my site as well, at the end of the show, to show you one organisation they've been working with, for years, to set up for what's coming along the pike right now. And it's the same in Canada, this is the rapid deployment forces and they'll be working right down to your local level, taking over all the functions of civilians at the very bottom, including managing local councils in your towns and all the rest of it.  It's quite an interesting article, to see just how in tight they are with the United Nations, all the Ministers of Defence of Europe and, as I say, even though there's five countries signed it, they can be used anywhere within the European Union. Nothing happens by chance, there's nothing at all happens by chance, you've got to hand it to them how they plan every part of the event; and, as I say, how could they kick off their 30 years of riots without something happening to cause it?

Isn't it amazing, they always get what they want? They wanted to get the anti-terrorism bills pushed through, before 2001; they tried to get the ID cards pushed out in the UK in the late '90s and no one wanted them. They said no, what's happening, the Cold War's over, everything's peaceful, what's the problem? So, they backed off. Bill Clinton tried to push it through in the United States and the Congress said "No"; and that very weekend, they had the Oklahoma City bombing; boom, it was passed the following Monday. They get what they want, because they make it happen, very simple; and, believe you me, remember, what I said before the Council on Foreign Relations / Royal Institute of International Affairs was started off by group who said that their mandate was that the end justified the means. Whatever means necessary, to obtain their objective; killing people is nothing, at all. In fact at the very foundation of the Cecil Rhodes Society, they started the South African War, the Boer War and lots of people were slaughtered in that war. So, the end justifies the means; and blowing up a couple of towers in New York is nothing to their big-big plans at all, nothing, it's trivia to their big plans. They need these things to happen, to get them through. How could you get Bush Senior giving New World Order speeches in '90, Sept the 11th 1990; and then, the following year, Sept 11th 1991, without 2001 September the 11th happening? How could that happen? It's impossible.  "A New World Order coming into view". CFR / Trilateral Commission, he knew what the whole agenda was.

It's not going to be a nice unified world at the end of it all, it's eugenics and depopulation and birth only by authorisation. In fact, it'll be the manufacturing of the brand new man, to serve them better. Interesting, going back into those reports, again, the think-tanks for the military, they said that the most dangerous element in society right now is the young male. That's enemy number one: the young male; and I've given lots and lots of talks about the oestrogen levels in males today, where they find they're basically sterile. I've gone back to Julian Huxley and Bertrand Russell who both advocated, and so did Charles Galton Darwin, especially, in his own book The Next Million Years: he said it would be a nice way to introduce hormones into the food supply or something, to target the males. Well, they've done all that, they've done it all, because they have their big agenda and the public know nothing about it, nothing at all.

The media portrays things as though it's just one incredible coincidental happening after another, that's how it's given to the public; and the media is an essential arm of government. Here's an article here, it says here, I'll have to get it back up here, I might lose it, we'll see. It was to do actually with a report that came in that Tamiflu had been tested on various people who've had the flu, this new flu that's come along; and it doesn't work. Isn't it amazing, again, you tie this in with the big-boys and how they profit off everything and everybody; and it ends up the government's buying stock piles of this stuff, millions of dollars worth of this stuff, from a private company. By the way, Rumsfeld used to be the C.E.O. of the company. He's the guy who pushed it forward and then we find out it's useless, isn't that something? We never seem to learn, do we? We really never seem to learn, as they rip us off time and time again; but, of course, they've got to get their "summer of rage" going, or nothing truly would happen.

It's astonishing too, out of Baxter Laboratories in, where was it now? It’s across in Europe; Baxter Laboratories, by the way, were part of the big I.G. Farben Corporation, in World War II; and they're still working hard today on the flu virus. They always get it wrong, they always get last year's flu or the wrong flu or the wrong mix or whatever, and they always tell us this in about March or April, yeah, we got it all wrong. Every year they tell us; mind you, every November they're pushing for us all to get it, but it's always the wrong one that we get.  Astonishingly, something amazing happened with this particular outfit, Baxter’s, to do with the flu. It says here:

Baxter admits flu product contained live bird flu virus. 

Now, this is supposed to be a mistake, right. And if this thing stops loading, I can read it for you, generally my computer crashes about this time, for some weird reason. It's from February 27th 2009, The Canadian Press:

The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses.  

You wonder how they're going to get it into the population? Do you wonder?

The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses. And an official of the World Health Organization's European operation said the body is closely monitoring the investigation into the events that took place at Baxter International's research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria. "At this juncture we are confident in saying that public health and occupational risk is minimal

It’s “minimal”!

at present," medical officer Roberta Andraghetti said from Copenhagen, Denmark.  

"But what remains unanswered are the circumstances surrounding the incident in the Baxter facility in Orth-Donau." The contaminated product, a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses and unlabelled H5N1 viruses, was supplied to an Austrian research company. The Austrian firm, Avir Green Hills Biotechnology, then sent portions of it to sub-contractors in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany. The contamination incident, which is being investigated by the four European countries, came to light when the subcontractor in the Czech Republic inoculated ferrets 

That's like little weasels.

with the product and they died. Ferrets shouldn't die from exposure to human H3N2 flu viruses.  

They died of the bird flu.

Public health authorities concerned about what has been described as a "serious error" on Baxter's part have assumed the death of the ferrets meant the H5N1 virus in the product was live. But the company, Baxter International Inc., has been parsimonious about the amount of information it has released about the event. On Friday, the company's director of global bioscience communications confirmed what scientists have suspected. "It was live," Christopher Bona said in an email.

The contaminated product, which Baxter calls "experimental virus material," was made at the Orth-Donau research facility. Baxter makes its flu vaccine -- including a human H5N1 vaccine for which a licence is expected shortly -- at a facility in the Czech Republic. People familiar with bio security rules are dismayed by evidence that human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses somehow co-mingled in the Orth-Donau facility. That is a dangerous practice that should not be allowed to happen, a number of experts insisted.  

Because the two you see can mutate and become one, become the killer flu.

Back with more - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we've got Charlie from Denver on the line, are you there Charlie?

Charlie: Hi Alan.

Alan: Hi.

Charlie: My wife listened to you all the time and she's one of your biggest fans I think in the United States and has actually gotten people to translate the blurbs into other languages for you.

Alan: Yes, that's great.

Charlie:  I was just wondering if there's one place that would be a good place to live in this world right now the way things are going.

Alan: Any country at all you mean?

Charlie: Any country at all, I mean, we went to Transylvania and we thought that might be a kind of out of the way place.

Alan: It will be, I'll tell you, I even know people who are moving out to remote places in Russia, where they can certainly feed themselves and it's remote and they can care for themselves. There are people on the move, there have been for the last couple of years and it's pretty well time now for most of us to do what we have to do. It's either sit here and get arrested. Part of the think-tank studies I was reading said that they're going to pre-arrest on anyone who can vocalise this kind of stuff to the public and cause agitation, that's what they're saying. They're going to swoop in eventually and start just grabbing people and detain them, without arrest indefinitely; and that's in the military guidelines.

Charlie:  The best thing probably would be to go back to some kind of a primitive lifestyle in a more out of the way place.

Alan: It wouldn't bother me at all, I'll tell you; I can do without knowing about Einstein or what's happening in the latest scientific circles. I don't need that kind of stuff, that's not what life's all about anyway. We've been given artificial concepts and it's been drummed into us. Living entails far more than just what the media is there to tell you or education. Living is a different thing altogether; you're quite right.

Charlie: It was very nice talking to you and my wife is listening here.

Alan: Well, you take care, both of you.

Charlie: Bye.

Alan: Bye now.

And just to finish off tonight, there's an article here from the BBC. 2nd March.

Designer baby row over US clinic  

A US clinic has sparked controversy by offering would-be parents the chance to select traits like the eye and hair colour of their offspring. The LA Fertility Institutes run by Dr Jeff Steinberg, a pioneer of IVF in the 1970s, expects a trait-selected baby to be born next year. His clinic also offers sex selection.  

Now you know darn well this is not just to do with the colour of your eyes and your hair and all the rest of it; and the people who go for this, don't know this either. The ones at the top who are doing this do know this, they're going to alter the genetic makeup, to try and create the perfect docile human worker bee. That's what it's really all about. It's all eugenics and this is the start to get it into the minds of the public where you can choose what you want. While you might choose the exterior, believe you me, you're not going to choose the interior, that's done by the top scientists and they will be studying your offspring, right through their lives, to see if they've got it right.

They're also talking about removing genes that'll cause problems down the road. They're calling them “rogue genes” by the way, a term borrowed from the United Nations, any county who breaks the treaty and is really ticked off and walks off from the UN is called a rogue state. Well, you see if you have perhaps this ability to riot perhaps or stand up for yourself, you're going to have a rogue gene and this is how they're going to say it in the media. That's what they want to eradicate down the road, before they bring in their wonderful utopia, for themselves, they've got to get the perfect worker bee, nice, docile and happy.

That's it for tonight. So, from Hamish and myself, in Ontario Canada: it's goodnight and may your God - or your gods - go with you.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Topics of show covered in following links:

"MI5 Alert on Bank Riots" by Geraint Jones (express.co.uk) - March 1, 2009.

"Irish Police Protest And Call The Government A Criminal Accessory (video)" We the people of Eire / Youtube (wiseupjournal.com) - March 2, 2009.

"The European Gendarmerie Force (EUROGENDFOR)".

"European Gendarmerie Force Official Website" (eurogendfor.org).

"Resistance to flu drug widespread in U.S." by Maggie Fox (reuters.com) - March 2, 2009.

"Baxter admits flu product contained live bird flu virus" The Canadian Press (ctv.ca) - Feb. 27, 2009.

"Designer baby row over US clinic" (news.bbc.co.uk) - March 2, 2009.

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:01 am

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on April the 22nd 2009.

I always suggest that newcomers look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website where you can download hundreds of talks I've given in the past, where I try to go through the histories of the big power movement that rules the world, basically, and how they got us to where we are today and where it's supposed to go from here. And we truly are, if you've studied the books written by 'the experts', those at the very top, that belong to this big global society, they really are on target and they know where they're going and they've almost pulled off this particular part of it. They train the public generationally to accept the next part and the next part, until it all seems kind of normal, as we go through it all in fugueish entertained state.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can download, print up and they're written in the various languages of Europe.

For those who like what they're hearing and it makes sense to them, they can help support me, by going into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, buying that for which I have for sale there and it's different from what you'll generally get handed to you. I try to show you how everything is used, including your language; and all languages really have the same science to use within them. Those who understand our minds, understand how to put terms across to us, how to phrase things, they understand the logic and how we use that language, just like a computer and we come to the desired conclusions, not by ourselves, we've actually no option but to go there if we simply stick into the language that we're given, we're guaranteed to come to the conclusions that are presented to us.

You can also donate as well by using PayPal or personal cheque in the US and Canada at www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, you'll find the buttons; or, for those who - and there's lots, there's hundreds of discs get passed around to people who don't use computers, they play them in players, CDs, they can get in touch with me by writing [listed above].

And, hopefully, that will keep me ticking over. If not, then I'll be off to do other things, simple as that, because time is really flying and people are moving out across the world who are in touch with me, who really know that anything that was to fight for has almost pretty well been destroyed. Not only that, they can't get cooperation from people to stand up for basic rights, even their own rights. They can't even find people who will be indignant about things, unless they're hit in the pocket personally but then they just bitch to each other.

A long time ago, I read different books on the air by some of the earlier people to come forward who were chosen at childhood to be authors. I've mentioned in the book Cultural Wars (or America's Cultural War), how they say in there that novels are just as important, perhaps more important than non-fictional works and you’ll often find some of these big players like HG Wells that we've had in the past, other ones, the Huxleys, were presented with information and their job was to write stories around that information for predictive programming purposes, because you're persuaded through fiction, which is coupled with emotion, and movies in fact are very good, rather than non-fiction, it works very well. That's why the culture industry guides us into a predicted future.

Back with more - after these messages.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing how reality is given to the people. You'll find the big Foundations that I talked about, were already on the go, under different names. Carroll Quigley talks about this, in Tragedy & Hope, that even up until World War II many of the top politicians in Britain didn't know the real names of a Society that had already been running their system as a parallel government since the 1800s. It blossomed into the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations. It also has another arm, it has many arms in fact, one of them is the Trilateral Commission. They also set up the Institute for Pacific Relations and the Institute for Pacific Studies, which were really just another CFR part to amalgamate the Far East and they started that up before World War II.

It was the same boys who have taken credit for drafting up the concept for an amalgamated united Europe and they came out on television in Canada, with an ex assistant Prime Minister as their spokesman, saying that they drafted up the same one for the Americas and that we should go into it feet first.

As I say, it goes way back into the 1800s, and to a very select society, it goes much-much further back in fact; but, within them, they had created a society, their own financial moguls that became international bankers, long before that, because that was one step in taking over, a world society, and running it the way they thought it should be run, not in an untidy self-directed way that it had been up until then and that is exactly what Mr. Rockefeller said at the Rockefeller Foundation, after one of the big meetings that he had too. He said that it was far better that an elite intelligentsia and bankers should rule and guide the world, rather than leave it to different countries, individual auto-determinations.

In the 1800s, they literally picked, they created special schools and picked students who were hungry for attention basically and who were hungry to get up into an upper class, like H.G Wells. They gave them certain training, they told them the whole social agenda that they would participate in and how they would use the power of words and fiction and non-fiction simultaneously, to shape more movements that they would again set up, to prepare the minds for up-and-coming young people. The whole idea being that democracy, you see, was just a ruse, that would be used for a while, by the same group, to take power across the world, take over countries, under the guise of democracy. In ancient times, remember, Rome plundered through a good part of the world, saying they were bringing civilisation to it; that's the type of thing that was used with the British Empire too.

Today, it's globalisation and standardisation, which was always really the objective. UNESCO, the whole United Nations complex and idea was born out of this group, it's a front for them in fact. Remember, the United Nations is not a democratic institution and yet every law, every law, social and legal and even building codes comes from the United Nations and has for most of your life; and it's signed into law by all the countries that have signed on in their treaties to the United Nations. That's why they have to get UNESCO in, to give a global standardised indoctrination, which is another term for education. After all, if everyone's going to live in the same Plato's Cave, they've got to make it look the same everywhere you go.

The idea of global governance is an authoritarian system that Bertrand Russell, Lord Bertrand Russell, who belonged to this group and many others associated with it, because it has many-many branches, specialised branches. He said we're raising up people to be guided by experts, until the average person can't do anything for themselves without the advice of an expert. That was part, a big part of the agenda. He also termed it, he said, if this is going to be a world dictatorship of a kind, he would far rather it be a scientific dictatorship. And that's exactly what's been used on the public across the whole planet, scientific dictatorships, where academia and the prostitutes, and there's lots of prostitutes in academia, after all, if you want political correctness and you want to get up the ladder, you've got to really smell which way the wind's going in academia, to get all the big grants. And you get professors on board and they become the experts and they get their faces in the papers and we're taught, trained from birth, to believe whatever gobbledegook we're told. Remember: we're never ever told the real reason, the real reason for any major thing, never, ever, that's a standard, a standard, for the last few hundred years, never ever told the real reasons for any major thing that happens in your life.

The advisor to President Wilson, Mandell House (they called him Colonel but it's an honouree title he just borrowed), who was go-between for the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the US and told Wilson what to do, he said the same thing. He said there's always, for everything that happens, a very good reason, and then there's the real reason. Well, the real reason is never given to the public; it's very much like Freemasonry and Albert Pike said about the degrees and initiations and the oaths, he said it's not necessary that the candidates understand the symbols or the terms, it's only necessary that they think they understand the symbols and the terms. That's how the world is truly run.

Since everything that's happening today with globalisation, sustainability and the war against overpopulation, which again is conjured up and goes back to the days of Malthus, where, in a Malthusian economical system, on behalf of those who rule, they should only breed up the public as far as the public's usefulness to the system is concerned and cull them down when they don't need so many people. In other words: they've already judged the reason for living, for existing. The only defence, ironically enough, that people had before that was religion itself that gave special rights, unassailable rights, to human life, at one point, even though they went round it and royalty could have their henchmen and chop their heads off and all of that, they had to give some kind of lip service to even the peasant at times. And all that's gone now, because they don't need that cover anymore.

They're training people across the world in the same system - that we're just freaks of nature, of countless evolutions, spontaneous evolutions; and that some evolutions are more advanced than others in the human gene pool. Of course, those at the top, they believe they have the right therefore to rule us; and they've been training us to believe this too. We’re the only species on the planet where you have to train the victim to acquiesce to his own destruction and demise, until you'll beg them to put you out your misery and you'll ask for forgiveness for destroying the planet and breathing the air. George Orwell put that in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four, he said it's not enough that you'll come to love Big Brother, you'll believe it, you'll really-really believe it. He said then, once you believe it, then we'll kill you. You see, that's total power, conquering to the very end.

I've gone through talks before where they said a hundred years ago or more when they said they would use every tactic at their disposal to bring this agenda, this globalisation, of a planned society, run the proper way you see, the proper way, the way it should obviously be run, by those at the top, where we just do what we're told, let the peasants do what they're told. They wrote extensively about the different phases they'd have to go through, they had fifty-year plans for one part; a hundred-year plans for another. Look into the United Nations, you'll still see different on-going hundred year plans and fifty and ten and five year plans. I've talked about food and how they'd use food as a weapon and I'll leave some links at the end of my show on my site; and this is by, appropriately, John Rockefeller:

The Disappearance of Food: The Next Global Wild Card? 

This is from, guess what? The Futurist, you see they run the Futurist societies, where they pick the hack authors and say 'build a story round this, these are the items to put in the story; give them a hero or something, so they can follow it and make it interesting; and a few chases in there and some sex'. They write all your novels but they also write the predictions of what they’re going to make happen and they will make it happen because, you see, Five Agri-businesses that belong to this society, own the world's food supply pretty well today. They own all your governments as well, so:

The Disappearance of Food: The Next Global Wild Card? 

By John Rockefeller 

The term “food security” is still an abstraction for many of us living in modern market economies. 

This is from Vol. 43, No. 3, 2009. He says:

In these countries, consumers’ food costs have been driven down by efficient, centralized production and distribution.  

Then he goes on to say what's going to happen. I'll be back with more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, going through an article written by a Mr Rockefeller for the Futurist magazine, where, again, they give you predictive programming and they get all the greenies on board with what's to come, always thinking it's for a different reason etc and through crisis management etc. We're living, you see, in the age of crisis creation and the power of nightmares, they create the nightmares and all these nightmare scenarios that could possibly hit humanity. They have to have a war, and enemies you see, to control the whole planet, that's what governments have always used in the past; and for the reasons for taxing you and for the reasons of building up massive armies that they'll turn on you, always, down through history, under the guise of protecting you from some other enemy you see. And now, like King Lear, they're driving back the sea, you know, with his sword and his staff and his sceptre, with all kinds of imaginable and unimaginable scenarios that they're going to defend us from, all the experts you see and they've got a scientist for everything, on the payroll, who looks into his crystal ball and invents brand new terms and then it's repeated and repeated and repeated ad nauseam until, like Lenin said, we learn by the use of slogans and we just parrot them off and it becomes a reality to us.

If you'd asked a person in the middle ages what would happen if you kept walking across the flat earth, they'd say eventually you'd fall off, because that was the experts' opinion in those days and they always give us the proper things to believe in, we get trained properly to believe properly and it works. It is science that runs the world, all kinds of sciences, interdisciplinary sciences, they even have Foundations, many Foundations, all stemming from, really, a handful of the main Foundations that fund all of them. They run all the social systems of the world and economics of the world too; and academia, and branches of academia. They even have Foundations that do nothing but makes sure that every other branch of science is on board; in, as they call it; interdisciplinary sciences. They have a social-political agenda; and then how can you ever have a truthful argument or a display to the public on anything, if there's already a pre-existing social political agenda? You can't. So, be careful what you allow into your mind, you guard, you are the guardian of your own mind; no one else is.

Getting back to this Futurist piece of predictability here; because, really, it's just a reiteration of the Royal Institute of International Affairs sections, massive section they have on the coming food shortages, because, you see, the UN said, when it was set up, that the Department of Agriculture at the United Nations, would eventually rule all the food supplies of the planet and be responsible for dishing out your quota, to keep the populations down, you understand. Rather than go through the whole pabulum that this guy is spouting out, as I say: it's just a copy of the RIIA's site, because they have a whole section and god knows how many hundreds of people just working on that part alone, that part alone. I'll put this link up on the site, to let you see how it's done, through repetition, you see, repetition, like they say, is essential, until it becomes fact, at least in our minds.

When we go back to Malthus, Malthus was the first guy, an economist, on behalf of the British corporate system, to come up with graphs. Graphs were very-very impressive; and according to him, in about one hundred years, from the time that he wrote his Malthusian gloom and doom of overpopulation of the peasantry, they would have all been living five stacked on top of each other. It never happened but it was great-looking on graphs because people can't understand graphs; that's why they keep using them. Few people will do the math even given in a graph, to see if it's even true, just the logic itself that they're using, to see if it's true. Here, it's from the BBC, Britain is the master par excellence of propaganda, has been for hundreds of years, hundreds of years.

BBC News Wednesday 22nd of April 2009 

'Deeper' recession ahead says IMF  

You're going to hear the term International Monetary Fund daily now, because after all, it was set up at the end of World War II, to, eventually, be the distributor of all monies across the world; but also the ones who will tell every country how much to tax the people, how much to produce, how much to cut back etc. That's what it does; and they've decided, since they created the last crash, to bring it up you see, that was the whole purpose of the crash, to bring in this century of change, this new era of them handling the money supply of the planet. It really is social engineering, because everything is economics in your life, everything, it is all you've been given. If you control the money of the whole planet and the distribution of it, and what taxes where, from one country to the next, by the way and you own the world. The same group, as I say, through the UN Agriculture Department, own the food of the world and they're after the water supply of the world. Do you understand this is war? So, there's a wonderful graph, I'll put this link up too and it says

The economy is about to decline by 1.3% in 2009. First recession since World War II, the IMF says. 

Back with more - after these messages.

=== BREAK ===

I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, going through the pabulum, as the predictive programming that is dished out to us from every direction, all from international quarters mind you, to get us used to the idea of globalism, globalism and the planned society and sustainability etc etc. All the stuff that was written about, hundred of years ago, that they’d do. We're living through a script you see, that's all it is, one script for this century for change but they never explained to the public, although they would explain to academia what the changes would be, it is the total transformation of society across the world, with purpose in society etc, being decided by those who the best mental prospects of finding one. And it goes on to say here that:

In January, the International Monetary Fund 

As I say: you're going to hear this term more and more and more. You know with the United Nations, you've hardly heard of them, you didn't hear much about them before Bosnia; and when Bosnia broke out, I said to people at the time: you're going to start to hear the United Nations almost daily now and NATO daily and sure enough we did. That's how, through repetition, something is built up in our minds, that we don't even realise it's happening, we don't think through it or reason through it or ask the why's, it's repetition, it's a technique that's used that becomes like gravity, you think it's always been there, it's a natural thing in the natural order of things. Same with the IMF and you’re going to start hearing them dictate more and more to you, because that's what it was set up to do in the first place and, believe you me, the IMF has sunk more Third World countries than battle ships have fought at sea and sunk each other, by its tactics. Because, it's not there to help you, it's there to conquer, as part of the warfare strategy. It says:

In January, the IMF had predicted world output would increase by 0.5% in 2009.  

That's when they were being built-up as the good guys; but now that they are the authorised good guys, it says:

It now projects that the UK will see its economy shrink by 4.1% in 2009, and by a further 0.4% in 2010.  

They're wonderful with the points here, eh? The guys who can't get anything right, since they keep changing their minds every three months, these experts.

But other major economies are predicted to shrink even more, with Germany declining by 5.6%, Japan by 6.2%, and Italy by 4.4% in 2009.  

The prospects for the advanced economies are not much brighter in 2010, with an overall forecast of zero growth.  

Here's the holy of holies: Mr. Olivier Blanchard, the IMF chief economist, he says:

Some countries face serious balance of payment problems. 

No kidding? No kidding? Everybody's up in hock - to the World Bank, their Big Brother. Then they go on to give you what could be the bright light that saves us all, maybe, possibly, which falls in exactly with the books that Brzezinski and Kissinger and all the rest of them were pushing out last year and discussing on major world media.

Only a recovery in developing and emerging market countries will propel the world economy back into positive growth in 2010, albeit at a relatively weak level of 1.9%.  

Once again, these guys, the technocrats, that were born long before us, they're still going yet, across the planet, Brzezinski's, Kissinger's and all that, tell us a year or two years ahead of time, so this guy's now telling you now, see how it's repetition. This tells you there's a plan already made, obviously, since the Kissinger's / the Brzezinski's are always right. Then you couple this with another BBC one about the US that comes out at the same time, and it's quite interesting what they say there:

UK government borrowing at ... 

This is about the UK actually; they go into the US as well.

UK government borrowing at £90bn  

Then it goes on:

The recession and financial crisis pushed UK government borrowing to a record £90bn in the last financial year, official figures have shown.  

It says:

It's more than all the governments combined in Britain for the last 300 years. 

That's what they're telling us; and then we have the one as well from Bernanke, the guy in charge of the US Federal Reserve right now, who's also got an article out. They're talking about the US is partly to blame for it all etc etc and another great chart he's got as well, to show you the future of the US system; but he also mentions too that the US, even though it's going down the tubes, it'll have to throw a lot of its tax money at other countries, these emerging nations. It ties in with this other one that I just read there; this is on-going propaganda, all working together across the world. When you see coordination like this, don't you realise there's a plan here working? When different financial institutions, supposedly, in different countries, plus the IMF, for the whole world, all say the same things at the same time, they're all on-board, as they say; consensus management. Once again, getting back to the Foundations, do you know they actually have consensus-managing and building Foundations, that's all they do; go round and build consensus, so as they're all on board with the same agenda. Full-time, hundreds of staff, some of them have got thousands of staff, full-time employees for each Foundation, for each part of their world agenda, Parallel Government. No one votes them in, yet they have members in politics, in every country, in the bureaucracies in every country; and have members at the heads, the CEOs of all the international corporations and the military-industrial complex. The planned society; planned society.

Before I look into the callers, I've got to read this article here, to show you, because I've gone into how generation by generation, they give you the appropriate culture for the purpose of the generation.

In my grandfather's era, and into my father's era even, the only entertainment people had at the bottom level, no TV or radio, maybe a bit of radio, was brass bands, militarised bands that played in parks, because, you see, Britain was falling away from, this was the end of the open, the open / forcible, aggressive type of Empire rulership. Now, they're into the more manipulative system and using money management etc and their own Foundations, to do the same job. So, they raised many-many generations that were poor and who would see these smart men in military uniforms playing, marching bands, marching sounds and tunes. That was their reality; and guess where a lot of them went? There was never a shortage to become smartly-dressed like those guys and get a pay cheque and have some respect for the first time in your life.

Then, after that era, as they pretended they were bringing in a world democracy, a world democracy, a fairer, juster system, they gave us the opposite. Peace came in, peace and love, peace and love, along with another social agenda of the total destruction of the family, which HG Wells had written about in the late 1800s they'd do, in his book about free love, financed by the Milner Foundation at that time; and financed too by the Astors, from their big Foundation they ran, the Fabian Society. All planned-out; and here we are, living through the last part, as they debase society to the very last step because they're an international society and I've read articles before, from the Royal Institute of International Affairs and from their own magazine, Foreign Affairs, saying their big problem is how you get police and military to be loyal to their employers in an international system, where the old tribal flags etc are gone and where even the coherence of a society is gone. They were been working on that for a long time, so they gave a debased culture and lots and lots of entertainment, where the only guys who win are a brotherhood who wear black outfits, military outfits and carry big weapons and have lots of backing by the legal system, therefore they join it, so they give us those guys for this time in history.

The Mail online, someone's saying something that really matters and this one here is from Lauren Booth 19th of April 2009:

Wake up and smell the pepper spray. These 3,609 new laws are to control us, not protect us. 

I was outside the Bank of England during the G20 protest, not far from where passer-by Ian Tomlinson died after being assaulted by a police officer. The police presence was as excessive as it was provocative. The Metropolitan Police's Territorial Support Group (TSG) are the aggressive offspring of the disgraced Special Patrol Group of the Eighties. 

See: everybody wants to be 'special' forces today. These guys who wear the uniforms, grew up playing video games where you just kill, wearing these outfits; now they get to wear the outfits and kill.

When policing events, they are issued with ‘Nato’ helmets, 

NATO, that's part of the UN you see, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which has a camouflaged swastika if you look at it, very stylised.

flame-retardant overalls, stab vests, gloves, balaclavas and boots. All carry the standard batons, pepper spray and cuffs. 

Now let’s try to remember the last full-on riot in Britain that resulted from a political rally? Ah yes, the Poll Tax riots almost 20 years ago. 

That's when Thatcher was in.

But the police are still authorised to use Tasers and firearm-trained TSG officers carry pistols or sub-machine guns. My God, when did we accept that armoured cars, special snatch squads 

That come and kidnap you.

and armed police were the right level of policing for protests against Government policy?

How did we sleepwalk into a situation where our movements, all of our electronic data, even our DNA, is stored on a massive central database?  

In fact, it was easy for Blairites to con us into accepting the 3,609 new offences they have created since 1997. They tapped into our fears and prejudices so we simply ignored the repeal of our rights.  

That's true, it was so simple.

Anti-terror legislation was not too subtly as being aimed at evil, dastardly Jihadi-types - not ‘us’. 

Presumably this legislation was intended, then, for people such as my friend Farukh. Farukh is as Brummie as Spaghetti Junction and Tony Hancock. The only difference is that he is a Muslim. I was on the Viva Palestina convoy with him as he delivered aid directly to grieving, injured, homeless families in the Gaza Strip. In Britain, he is a care worker who helps to rehabilitate young offenders back into society. On his return from Palestine, Farukh was held for six hours at a UK airport. Ever since, his work place, bank manager and other work contacts have received regular visits from Special Branch officers asking about his political beliefs and lifestyle. Last week he told me: “They’re putting untold pressure on me and it just won’t stop.”

I have been shoved and filmed time and again by aggressive police officers for attending meetings such as the alternative Labour Party conference in Manchester in 2006, organised by Stop The War.   But for Muslim Britons who go on marches, raise money for Palestinian charities or dare to express political views of any kind, the consequences are far more serious. They are monitored, put under pressure, harassed at airports and overtly threatened. I am not likely to suffer the horrors of extraordinary rendition, but Farukh is.  

Then she goes on again to talk about the fact that these laws are affecting everybody and everyone has slept through them as every right you ever had was taken from you and now you're in a police state; very simple, you're in a police state. This ties in with an article here from the Guardian, by Ken Macdonald Friday 17 April 2009. He says:

We need to be on the same side as the police, and they need to be on the same side as the law. 

We always thought that policing by consent was the British way. Our constables were simply citizens in uniform. Not for us the weapons, masks and boots of the continental riot police and their political masters. If you wanted a difference between us and the rest, this was it: no policeman in Britain would ever go about his business with his face covered. This was a style of policing that minimised the risk of violence and abuse. It was a philosophy that, to this day, keeps the majority of our officers from bearing firearms. It is an approach that has overwhelming public support. 

It is also an approach that has sometimes been undermined in practice. Yet the disgraceful conduct of the Special Patrol Group in Southall in 1979, those out-of-area officers waving their £20 notes in mining villages in the early 1980s, even the scandalous organised perjury of the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad could not completely destroy a bond between people and law enforcement in this country.  

Then he goes into what it's come to now, where the cops have even had their lockers checked and their lockers have included stashes of:

... illegal weapons, including coshes and knives, 

And so on, because they all think they are Special Forces now and the public are fair game. Where did they get that notion from? From their governments, that's where they get it from; and this is a society that was deliberately created and the generations that they would take these particular guys from, to recruit from, because this is the last push for a controlled world society and all force, any force, will be used to accomplish it. See: we're being taught now to simply jump and obey, that's the message; you obey the experts, you do what you're told. If you notice, they've used democracy for a hundred years to get what they wanted at the top, including the right to take over other countries that did not have those systems of governments. Now the word "democracy" is gradually filtering away and you're being trained to jump and obey the masters. That's the planned scientific dictatorship; you know, the way it ought to have been, fixing nature, as they'd say in the high organisations. That's what it's about and it's going to get a lot-lot worse.

There's so many articles, as I say, on these particular topics that I could go on forever but there's no point, you get the message, you get the message; you know where it's all going.

Now, I'll jump to the callers now and try and get some in; and there's Kyle from Connecticut there. Are you there Kyle?

Kyle: Hi Alan.

Alan: Hello.

Kyle: How you doin'?

Alan: I'm hanging on here!

Kyle: Yeah, I mean, its continuous rain where I'm at.

Alan: Same here; same here: spray / rain, spray / rain.

Kyle: Just like Blade Runner!

Alan: Yes, isn't it, that's why it was in that movie, I think every scene you saw it was raining all the time.

Kyle: I mean, you really can't grow anything when everything's soggy wet or bone-dry.

Alan: Hang-on, because that's a good topic for food management and control isn’t it! We'll talk again, when we come back from this break.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to Kyle, from Connecticut there. You remember last year too, June and July, every single day, there was two months, they would spray in the morning, the morning would start off nice and almost normal and then they would spray like crazy; you would have rain from 2PM right through to 6 or 7PM at night and again every single day, the whole of June and July, like clockwork. And I think they're going to give us a repeat of it this year too.

Kyle: Yes, it's like they can turn it on and off within an hour. Rain, sun, whatever and that's their goal, it's to control everything.

Alan: It's control, in fact, if you go over the history over the last 10-15 years of the farming in Canada and the breadbasket of the US as well, they were either getting flooded at the same time every year; or, they were getting nothing but drought every year; because they can also make clouds disperse, I've watched them do that too. You'd swear there was a storm coming and then you're hear the jets and before you knew it, they were spraying their stuff and the clouds would disperse, they can do either. However, if you want to control society, you do it again through food and weather warfare is ideal, it's an ideal weapon!

Kyle: They're tying to pass this Bill where they'll control every food service in the US.

Alan: That's right, that's right; and again it was a guy from Monsanto that pushed it through, because they will be authorised eventually, one day, to be in control, on behalf of the UN, of the entire food supply of the planet.

Kyle: I mean, so we won't even be able to eat what we want, we'll be eating each other, like in Soylent Green.

Alan: That will no doubt come, I mean, that guy who wrote Soylent Green worked for the Futurist Society; he was given the story to write and the name of the book was Make Room, Make Room. It was actually a warning against overpopulation in the future!

Kyle: Yeah, like their term cradle to cradle. It's just like ashes to ashes, dust to dust.

Alan: Yes and that's how they see us all.

Kyle: Yeah, survive on each other. And I was listening to your blurb from the 27^th: I would encourage everybody to listen to that on your site. Hamish's birthday is coming up. He’s going to be 17!

Alan: Yes, that's right. I'll have to have a do for that one! I'll have to put a tent up to keep it dry! But thanks for calling.

Kyle: Thanks Alan.

Alan: There's Matt from Chicago, are you there Matt?

Matt: Good evening Alan, happy Earth-day.

Alan: How you doin'?

Matt: OK, how are you?

Alan: Again, I'm shrinking with the rain!

Matt: Last week we exchanged emails back and forth with regards to a book you recommended in your Cutting Through series, the Will Durant series, Historic Civilisation. You mentioned how the Rockefeller's funded him and weaved in his social conclusions, which is what you said. Could elaborate on that?

Alan: That's right. What they did was put massive money out to different authors to write slants on history, to guide the people to think they were evolving in a specific direction; that was the whole point of it. And at the end, Durant was found dead in his hotel room with his wife and you can find the letters out there, I have copy of it because he sent that letter to the Prime Minister of Britain, the president of the US, one to the President of the Soviet Union, saying he was terrified of what he'd done, because the way he'd written it was to give people no hope for the future, to make them absolutely apathetic for the future; and that's how they found him and his wife dead in the hotel room. Whether they were killed, I don't know but they did get the letters out, that's official. But thanks for calling. That's the end of the show and there's the music; so, from Hamish and myself, from a very wet Ontario Canada, it's goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Links to articles covered in the show:-

"The Disappearance of Food: The Next Global Wild Card?" [Also look into Chatham House (RIIA / CFR)] by John Rockefeller (wfs.org) - The Futurist, May-June 2009 Vol. 43, No. 3.

" 'Deeper' recession ahead says IMF" (news.bbc.co.uk) - April 22, 2009.

"UK government borrowing at £90bn" (news.bbc.co.uk) - April 22, 2009.

"LAUREN BOOTH: Wake up and smell the pepper spray. These 3,609 new laws are to control us, not protect us" by Lauren Booth (dailymail.co.uk) - April 19, 2009.

"Cops and citizens" by Ken Macdonald (guardian.co.uk) - April 17, 2009.