Transcripts 2010
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:03 amJan. 4, 2010 (#484)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 4, 2010:
A Rose is Still a Rose -- Anti-Communist Prose:
"The Last Few Freedoms are Under Attack
By the Internationalists Behind Barack,
Naming those who Believe in the Constitution
As Obsolete Extremists Bent on Revolution,
While U.S. Communists, with Total Makeover,
Use the Same Old Plans to Control and Takeover,
Science of Confusion Makes Wrong Seem Right,
How Dare Lovers of Country Declare they'll Fight,
Everyone Should be Happy in the 'No Rights Prison,'
With the Equality of Poverty Called Communism"
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 4th 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down, see all the other sites I have up there, bookmark them for future use because when the big sites go down as they have in the past, you can always get the latest shows if you have these other sites bookmarked. These are the official sites: [listed above]. As always, in starting off the New Year with the right foot of course, I always tell the people the TRUTH right off the bat, that you are the audience that brings me to you. No one sponsors me here. I’m not fronting for any company that sells stuff. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN for their air time and for broadcasting this particular program. It pays for their bills and their board men, their operators and all the rest of it. So it’s up to you to keep me going by buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or donating to me. You can find out how to do it on the web sites. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those that get the disks burned and passed to them and listen to the talks at meetings and so on, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
It’s amazing as times goes on, you’d often think that you won’t be around in the next year or 10 or 20 years and these years do roll along. Here we are, 2010. At one time, especially when you are small and silly and naïve you kind of look forward to the new year but now, after experiencing all the things that are happening and you know the agenda, you tend to cringe and say oh no, roll it back because you know darn well the next year is going to be worse than the last one since there is a big agenda. Still, we’ve got to be stalwart and face up to it and face up to the awful people with their combinations and monopolies that are all working together to bring in this brave new world scenario through perpetual war. That’s what it is, perpetual war. No one put it better than Professor Carroll Quigley who was the historian for this particular world group, the Council on Foreign Relations. He said that basically corporations will bring in a new feudal system with the CEOs being the new feudal overlords… and we’re really here, private/public partnerships. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. 2010, I think the US government and the Canadian government and the Mexican government all sign the last part of the agreement for TOTAL MERGER. I do believe this was the last year for it so that will happen some time in the summer. Once everything is on the books they will implement more and more phases of total integration, through catastrophes of course, like financial meltdowns, terrorism and all this stuff to make it happen and seem kind of plausible to the non-thinkers out there and that’s about 87%. It’s interesting that marketers did that study back in World War I and it’s pretty well still the same today. 87% OF THE PUBLIC WILL BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE TOLD AND GO ALONG WITH ANYTHING. Sad but true. That’s why they like democracy. See, they understood that when they gave us democracy. It’s so easy to guide them.
Perpetual war. We saw it with the Bush regime and now it’s into the Obama regime. It’s the same regime as far as I’m concerned with the same people behind the front men going on with the same world agenda, perpetual warfare. We found that from the mentor of Rumsfeld and Cheney and these guys who talked about perpetual war and how it was so necessary to keep the people in obedience basically, a man who taught at MIT. MIT is a very important place for all of this stuff. It’s the equivalent of Tavistock you might say for the US. Leo Strauss was the guy who taught the different Bush regime and this present bunch, THAT PERPETUAL WAR WAS NEEDED TO GET TO THE END OF THE AGENDA. YOU COULDN’T GIVE THE PUBLIC A BREATHING SPACE AT ALL.
If you notice since 9/11 happened, it’s been one crisis after another. Again, that ties in with a study done from World War I. They realized that most folk can handle one or two main crisis or fear, or fears within their heads at the same time. It’s kind of like a computer; you get overloaded with a third terror, fear, whatever it happens to be, financial chaos so you have to make room for one, so you throw one of them out of your head to make room for the new one. You make space for it basically, like hard disk space. THAT’S WHY THEY ADAPT SO QUICKLY TO EACH NEW CRISIS THAT COMES ALONG. That’s all they talk about. They forget they just got over the last one, or nothing happened. We are run by people who understand us. What I’m saying here is baby language to them basically. Methods and science and technique run the world. They know exactly where they are going and they know exactly how the vast numbers of the populace will accept and adapt to ANYTHING they are told to adapt to.
It’s interesting, I keep thinking of 1984. It was so well done when Orwell said, when they changed their gun sights from one country to another, the people down below could be so easily convinced that they had ALWAYS been fighting the NEW enemy and they would forget all about the old enemy. I gave an example of this many times, the same example. When after the inquiry into 9/11 and what happened after it in the Iraqi war, George Bush was on worldwide television saying that he’d never claimed that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks. He’s an utter liar of course because he had said it when he was drumming up the war drums for it. But a study was done in Canada on the US. Remember, they first attacked Afghanistan. That’s where supposedly the caveman was hiding that did all of this. Then they swung their guns to Iraq. The Canadian studies showed that the US press had, within a few months, convinced the majority of the American public that it had ALWAYS been Iraq that was the problem and not Afghanistan. In fact Afghanistan was out of their memory… that fast… just with repetition and propaganda from the mainstream.
Techniques are used all the time on the public and they don’t KNOW it’s even happening to them. They all adapt to the new stories, the new crisis at the same time. They’re all FED the same crisis at the same time. As I say, they throw out the old crisis because they can’t handle too many in their heads at once. This is exactly what Strauss was advocating with perpetual warfare and CHANGE. Remember what Quigley said too, you can change so much; you can get more done in 5 years of warfare than you can in 50 years of peace on a SOCIAL change level and with adding more and more governmental departments OVER society.
We’ve all heard this farce of this lone man who was going to blow up the airliner on Christmas day with his Calvin Klein underwear, whatever he was using. Utter nonsense of course; the whole thing stinks. As we all know, anyone who thinks at all knows it stinks completely to high heaven with all the security that’s out there, never mind all the strange surrounding circumstances BUT remember, they always say, who benefits? Who benefits? Well, immediately Brown and all the rest of the characters are in to we’ve got bring in these full body scanners. That’s one. WHO owns these scanners? Go and check them out. Find out who the owners are. It’s fascinating to find that most of the cameras in Britain and elsewhere and these body scanners are all made by the same companies… who are always lobbying government for more and more sales. Apart from that, IT DEHUMANIZES US. Each time that we bend over to get prodded, you are being dehumanized. When you hold up your pants because you have to take your belt off, you are being dehumanized. You are being TAUGHT to be subservient to your master, like any slave. Now of course, they can see you FULLY NUDE, frontal, back, whatever. That’s another sign of the same thing. How far will it go? As far as you can bend… before breaking your back. It’s up to you in other words.
It’s so wonderful when you read the systems and the techniques that Carroll Quigley pointed out in his book, Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment, the companion to it. He was showing you that they always use a crisis to their advantage. In fact, they need the crisis to happen which obviously makes you think, well obviously they needed this to happen so did they actually make sure it did happen? I prefer to believe that. I don’t believe in the ACCIDENTAL VIEW OF HISTORY. These guys would have to win the lotto every month. They always get what they want through crisis… always. See that’s impossible by the laws of averages. It’s impossible to always get what you want.
From the Raw Story; Raw Story is quite a good web site. I’ll put these links up on by site at the end of the show.
9/11 commission chairman says would-be plane bomber ‘did us a favor’
By John Byrne / Monday, January 4th, 2010
(Alan: This is what I’m saying about how they always turn it to their advantage.)
The Republican chairman of the Bush Administration's 9/11 Commission declared Sunday that the would-be-terrorist who tried to blow up a plane en route to Detroit "probably did us a favor."
The GOP chairman's quote raised eyebrows; by his logic, the Sept. 11, 2001 attackers may also have "done us a favor" by drawing US attention to extremism in Afghanistan.
Thomas Kean, a former governor of New Jersey, made the remarks on CNN's State of the Union Sunday talk show.
The onetime governor said Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, the 23-year-old Nigerian who failed to detonate an incendiary device on a passenger plane, probably did us a favor.
We had an administration which was not focused, as it should be, on terrorism and that’s understandable, Kean told CNN. They were focused on health care and global warming and the economy. That’s very understandable.
"Secondly, we weren’t really focused on Yemen and the terrible things that are happening there," Kean added. (A: So, they weren’t really focused on Yemen, like they didn’t notice it right? Utter liars these guys are. Utter liars. Mind you, you’ll see the photograph there and you’ll see something above his head that is his master. This is the master of this character in the photograph. You can look for yourself. He’s an utter liar because on the BBC news, they talked about this on the 24th of December BEFORE the bomber was caught.)
Yemen: New frontier in US 'war on terror'
By Humphrey Hawksley / BBC News / Thursday, 24 December 2009
The increased violence in Yemen is a clear indication that military campaigns to crush al-Qaeda-inspired violence extend far beyond the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It also shows up hostile fault-lines within the Middle East, pitting mainly Shia Iran against Sunni Saudi Arabia, who condemn each other for taking sides in Yemen's long-running civil war. (A: This is what Kean said they missed. They didn’t NOTICE what was happening here right?)
Yemen is one of the poorest countries in the Arab world with almost half its 24 million people living below the poverty line and an authoritarian government that has failed to win the trust of a substantive part of its own population. (A: So they’re building up the reasons for attacking. It also says here that… )
The US has invested some $70m (£40m) in military aid in Yemen (A: The one that Kean said they hadn’t really noticed what was happening there. Utter liars… I love the jokes they give us in the news; it’s a good tickle, as they say… it’s a good tickle.)
It’s a good tickle. It really is as we go into this incredible farce, this farce, this communistic worldwide, sovietized FARCE that we go through and it was a farce during the Soviet era if you lived in those countries. You had to say that black was white and blue was brown and whatever they told you to say; you had to say it and pretend to mean it. You couldn’t even write poems without going up in front of the Politburo for micro-examination to see if you were trying to get a message across to the people covertly. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. They are really hyping up… They keep telling you that this is not a war on Islam, which is rubbish. You see, there really ARE organizations out there that DO work with 50 year, 100 year plans, 150 year plans, TO TAKE DOWN EXISTING STRUCTURES IN ORDER TO DOMINATE THEM. They did promise to take down existing structures that held society together no matter what people thought of those structures, be they good or bad.
They simply demolished Christianity in the West; incredible war against Christianity. Again, it’s inevitable because any organized group that has a tiered structure where people give allegiance to humans above them, instead of their deity, are going to be taken over and led astray, obviously, and used for other purposes. Just like Bush put millions of dollars out to get what they called the Fundamental Christians on their side for the war. So that’s a problem with any big group. As Bernays said, the first thing you do when you want to alter society, is you get the phone book and you look for existing societies that are already there to be used.
Now they’re after Islam, as I say. There’s no doubt about it, they are STANDARDIZING the world… in order to dominate the world. It is a war on Islam. Unfortunately, like every other target down through history, they’ve studied their enemy well and they know how to get the different groups of Muslims FIGHTING EACH OTHER. They never learn. Lawrence of Arabia talked about it too, how they used the same tricks back then in his day to split them up and get them fighting so that Britain could come in and take over, which they did.
Here is a General on Fox News.
US general urges strip search of Muslim men
Sun, 3 Jan 2010
Lt. General Thomas McInerney spokes to Fox News about what he called pending terror attacks on US airliners.
A retired US general and member of Iran Policy Committee (IPC) (A: These are the guys who obviously are all helping work toward demolishing Iran.) says all 18 to 28 years old Muslim men should be strip searched at airports as "one of these bombers" will explode an airliner in the coming days. (A: In the coming days, mind you. I wonder if this is the same guy that said there was a nuke that was going to go off in New York harbor after 9/11? I wonder.)
Thomas McInerney, a retired Lt. General with the US Air Force, told Fox News television on Saturday that within the next 30 to 120 days, "there is a danger of high probability" (A: Danger of high probability… that’s beautiful…) awaiting US airliners.
"If you are an 18 to 28-year-old Muslim man then you should be strip searched. And if we don't do that there's a very high probability we're going to lose an airline," he said. (A: I guess he meant an aircraft.)
The retired general went on to say that US officials should profile all Muslims. (A: Whenever they say something and target a group, you know they mean to spread it across the whole population, as they already did with 9/11. After 9/11 there were grey-haired, blue-eyed old ladies getting stopped, immediately, at crossings and airliners and stuff. Hardly a target that you’d expect would you, coming from a Middle Eastern or Asian nation.) "We have to use profiling. And I mean be very serious and harsh about the profiling."
Asked if such a racial approach would not "generate more hatred and violence towards the West," McInerney said he did not want "a racial profile." (A: Of course it will, but they WANT this, you see. They want hatred generated toward the West because they want to keep this going on as long as they can. You see, if they don’t get a backlash from people, and young people will, they will backlash, there’s no doubt about it. If they don’t get the backlashes, it’s all one sided, the US and Britain and so on are ‘over there’ occupying their countries. So they’ve got to get the public to forget they are ‘over there’ as an invasive force and make it seem all one sided that there’s all these aliens attacking you from ‘out there.’ Forget about the fact you’ve got armies in their countries occupying them.)
"I want to profile on that group that we have enough evidence from 9/11, and other [high-profile] cases that we know what we are looking at," he said.
The suggestions made by the US retired general comes on the heels of a purported bomb attack on a US transatlantic airliner on Christmas Day by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian who allegedly received al-Qaeda training in Yemen. (A: See how they tie it all in? How fortunate they could tie it all in when they’ve just spent $70 million fomenting trouble in Yemen by the US. [Alan laughing.])
Lawmakers and congressional leaders in the US have echoed similar sentiments by urging President Obama abandon or suspend his plan to shutter the Guantanamo Bay Prison.
Around half of the remaining Gitmo detainees are from Yemen, and of those, about 40 have been cleared for release. (A: The rest of them probably will be too, because we hear that they’re just doing mass grabs of people and pulling them in. If you’re just in the wrong place at the wrong time, it’s just tough luck for you.)
As I say, this new Sovietized system, people forget… and most folk have forgotten what communism was. Towards the end of the Cold War, most folk didn’t really know what communism was, just THEM with THEIR SYSTEM. That’s how it was given to us, them with their system and it was bad, we were told and that was ALL that we were told. I’ll go on about this when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how if you study communism you realize that they were to take over power by all means and every means possible and to lie and lie and lie to get everything that they wanted done to achieve their goals. In fact, they had a disdain for the ordinary people because they were so easily talked into anything and led along by the nose.
Communism was a system run by elitists, not by working people. In fact NONE of them involved with the revolution - even in the Soviet Union - had probably ever lifted a spade in their life and dug a hole. Even for the people they had assassinated, they had other folk dig the holes for them. The INTELLIGENTSIA were the ones behind it. They believed in Darwinism and they often put Darwin’s portrait alongside that of Lenin. They believed that Darwinism gave validity to the whole idea of Marxist ideals and communism. They taught in all their books and all their lectures to lie and lie and lie and here we are going through this farcical global warming nonsense, as Europe is frozen to a standstill with the LOWEST temperatures in Britain for 25 years and a massive thickening of the Arctic ice and the Antarctic. In Canada here, it was literally about minus 40 yesterday and the last 2 or 3 days with the wind as well. So it’s an utter farce but lies are okay because it’s to take over the world and its resources, and to take all your rights and freedoms from YOU, and to get you subservient to THEIR system. We see the redistribution of wealth coming through it as well. So they get what they wanted by lying.
It’s hitting different countries in different ways. Here’s an article from Australia. After this I’ll go to the callers. This is from ABC News, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Hundreds rally for hunger-striking farmer
Jan 4, 2010 / ABC News : Vivienne Nunis
Rally: Farmers are calling for a Royal Commission (A: Good luck to them. These things last for years.) into vegetation laws. (A: What are the vegetation laws?)
More than 300 people have rallied outside Parliament House in Canberra in support of hunger-striking New South Wales farmer Peter Spencer.
Mr Spencer has spent 43 days without food on top of a tower on his property at Shannons Flat near Cooma, in protest against state laws which stop him from clearing vegetation on his land. (A: In the US, they are so used to having the greenies - that are all paid for and given salaries and pension plans by the big foundations - going on land and saying that they’ve got a spotted owl and so on. In fact, they are told to do this and to lie and lie and lie. Then folk have land they can’t use anymore by order of the government. In Australia, they are saying to the farmers, you can’t take the weeds out because they are acting as CARBON sinks. This is the farce they are using there to put the farmers under. Remember, in this brave new world, it’s to be the big, international corporate farmers only.)
He wants the Commonwealth to compensate farmers whose land has been used as 'carbon sinks'.
Mr Spencer's daughter, Sarah Spencer, told the rally her father will not give up his hunger strike until he meets with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
"He has strong resolve. He will hold true to his word," she said.
"He's short of energy, he hasn't got as much energy as he normally has and things like that," he said.
"But he appears to be hanging in there."
(A: It goes down and down and down and it says…) Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce also addressed the crowd, calling for a Royal Commission into vegetation laws.
He says the state laws have robbed farmers across Australia of their assets. (A: It’s true. Here you are, owning all this land, you’ve got to pay taxes on it but you can’t grow and you can’t weed the thing.)
"It might have been legally possible but it was totally unjust," he said.
Senator Joyce says Mr Spencer should cease his hunger strike but the fight for justice should continue.
"This is obscene," he said.
(A: Now listen to this… somebody’s actually got it here… which gives me hope. Somebody actually has got it.)
"The Government became the thief of an asset and when the Government becomes a thief of an asset - when the individual is divested of an asset without payment - there is a word for that and unfortunately without being too dramatic the word is communism."
That’s it! That’s it. So here’s a Senator who actually understands what’s happening. Under all the farce of greening and carbon offsets and global warming and ya-da ya, it’s COMMUNISM because WHAT do they do under all this? They TAKE all your property from you. And what did communism do when they took over the Soviet Union? They STARVED MILLIONS of people because they killed off most of the small farmers. They always do that. They did the same thing in the Ukraine; millions of them starved to death BY LAW. They couldn’t even keep enough seed to feed themselves… BY LAW. China did it too. They killed off millions of their own, starved them to death… BY LAW. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, YEP, it’s the same darn duck. It doesn’t matter what they want to call it, global warming, climate change, carbon footprint; it’s the same lying rubbish that they’ve been using for 100 years. What did they achieve? Look in there. Look at the Communist Manifesto. Look at the planks of the Communist Manifesto. They have achieved almost all of them, including the destruction of the family unit thanks to their big culture creators in Hollywood.
I’ll go to the phones now and there’s Lucas in Vancouver. Are you there Lucas?
Lucas: How you doing Alan? I just wanted to thank you actually for bringing attention to the Lenin/Mao statue that was put up in my home town of Richmond which is a suburb of Vancouver.
Alan: So you and your tax money will to be paying for it.
Lucas: Yep. You know, there’s never, ever been any sort of outlet, public outlets for the arts in Richmond. It’s just funny that this is the first art, the first thing that Richmond has to do with art ever and it’s not even Canadian artists. They are going to bring in another statue by the Gao brothers that’s Mao’s jacket.
Alan: Oh really?
Lucas: I don’t know where they are going to put that one up.
Alan: It’s disgusting. They’ve got them in Toronto too. They’ve had them in Toronto for years. I’ve seen some in the parks there. You just stumble across them and you say what’s this doing here?
Lucas: Right! The one in Richmond is hidden out of the way. Incidentally, it’s on the same plot of land as the ICBC building which is the Insurance Company of British Columbia. There’s a little hint for you. I also wanted to let you know that public reaction was pretty good. I went down there and I talked to teenagers, a teenage kid who was working at Tim Horton’s. When I was there taking pictures, a car with 2 older gentlemen stopped. They stopped traffic just gawking at this thing in disbelief. Let me tell you, they weren’t happy about it. People don’t… people aren’t happy about it.
Alan: Well at least, obviously, it means that some people have an understanding of what it means.
Lucas: Yeah. I was pleasantly surprised. The young man that I spoke to in Tim Hortons, I was asking for directions and he told me that he knew, he knew it was Lenin and that it scared him. I said, good boy because it scares me too.
Alan: Yes. Darn right. Absolutely right. What gets me too is that there is hardly a so-called – and I call it a so-called – artist, being a novelist or a scriptwriter for CBC or a sculptor that doesn’t live on grants from the federal government. It’s disgusting.
Lucas: Yep. Well, I’ll hand your show back to you Alan and thanks for talking to me.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
As I say, it’s just astonishing what’s really happening and how people don’t even know what they are seeing or looking at anymore. They are so brainwashed by the adaptation into ever increasing modernity of culture, as they tend to call it; they can change it every week in fact, up the spokes, push the envelope until you are into a NEW era of culture creation and we adapt and adapt and adapt.
Here is what they’ve put out from Southern Poverty Law Center, which was labeled a communist group recently, you know, not so long ago. It always was, always pretending to stand up for some minority. That’s what is taught to communists; always find a minority that you can stand up for to get them on board. Once you’ve got 1000 groups of minorities, you now have a big massive group to demand what YOU want, not what the minorities want. That’s what the Southern Poverty Law Center was all about, well funded by the big foundations too. This article is from The Telegraph.
America's armed militia on the rise
Extremist "patriot" groups and other armed militias have undergone a dramatic resurgence in America, their numbers more than doubling in the past year amid growing Right-wing fears over expanding federal power and gun control.
By Tom Leonard in New York / 31 Dec 2009
(A: Now they release this every year and this is just a release to the media.)
Such groups – a mix of libertarians, gun rights advocates and survivalists – appeared to be in terminal decline before the election of Barack Obama, according to monitoring bodies. (A: Monitoring bodies… they call the communist groups.)
The Southern Poverty Law Centre, which tracks extremist organisations, says it has so far counted more than 300 patriot groups this year, at least double last year's total of 150. The real total will be much higher as many groups do not go out of their way to publicise their existence.
A similar wave of anti-government groups, (A: Anti-government groups… now that’s the term that the Soviets used on anyone who complained about any of the policies of their government. It’s also the same term that the communized Economic Union Parliament is using, anti-government. That must mean that every opposition party is anti-government since they do the most complaining about whoever is the majority.) some of whose members dress in camouflage gear and conduct military training at weekends, sprung up during the Clinton administration.
However, SPLC researchers said there was a new race factor reflecting President Obama's ethnicity and immigration fears. (A: Utter rubbish. Utter rubbish.)
(A: There’s an article again in the Telegraph.
Those Evil Right Wing Extremists who would DESTROY America
By James Delingpole / April 15th, 2009 / telegraph.co.uk
I’ll put that link up as well to show you how this guy tears apart this whole farce of a handout – and this is a handout – to this particular newspaper. He actually tears it apart and shows you how farcical all of this is. How farcical it all is. But in the same article here it says…)
One of the new patriot groups is called Oath Keepers. Its members, like those in other groups, look for guidance from America's Founding Fathers.
Formed last spring, Oath Keepers' members – limited to current or former servicemen and police – swear to obey the US constitution rather than politicians. (A: Aaaah, ooohhhh!)
Stewart Rhodes, the founder, told The Daily Telegraph that the situation was a "potential powder keg".
He said: "The one thing that would probably lead [groups] to armed resistance is if the government did try to confiscate weapons, but that was what finally led to fighting in the American Revolution".
Mike Vanderboegh, a former militia leader and founder of a vociferous gun rights group called the Three Percenters, pointed to a huge increase in sales of ammunition, many of it to new gun owners.
"This is far larger than Obama. It speaks to an existential fear of societal collapse," he said.
He said group members were looking for "practical self-defence", whether from "predatory government or street-level crime".
If the government carried out "another Waco" – the 1993 storming of a cult's (A: They keep calling it a cult; it was a church, one sect of many Christian churches.) Texas ranch, in which 76 occupants died (A: Were burned to death by the government) – "you'd see a reaction bloody beyond belief", he added.
Heidi Beirich, a co-author of the SPLC's militia research, said the groups were characterised by "a lot of conspiracy mongering, gun nuttery and fear of a new world order that they think is controlling the US". (A: No kidding. [Alan laughing] I love how they call anybody who still believes in a country and a nation a ‘right wing extremist.’ That’s standard communist prattle, STANDARD COMMUNIST PRATTLE… and the folk can’t recognize it anymore. Why? Because they’ve been trained they need the media to tell them so. If the media tells them so, they’ll suddenly get it. But the media is not there to tell them. The media is there to SERVE THE WORLD STATE. It’s an ESSENTIAL ARM of government.)
Many people have talked about the effects of Wi-Fi and microwave radiation. There’s actually a syndrome now to do with excessive radiation from cell phone towers and all those relay towers across cities that are everywhere you look. They’ve had articles on television in Canada showing you the spiky waves these things give off. Incredible bursts of energy to all the passers-by down below. People have gone through all different means to prevent them from being attacked by it. I’ve always said what you really need is a faraday cage. A faraday cage works very much like your microwave oven, if you have one. You can see through the door in the microwave through these little holes. Well, they are spaced the exact size that will stop that particular frequency of microwave from coming through. So rather that have something that’s a complete solid piece of lead or something, they can actually use wire, hexagonal-shaped wires, just like honeycombs in a bee hive. Here’s a great thing here that’s come out. It’s a Wall Street Journal article. It says…
Culprit in Wi-Fi Failures: Chicken Wire
DECEMBER 31, 2009 / Bay Life / By GEOFFREY A. FOWLER
(A: Chicken wire… very cheap too.)
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA - Two things beloved by San Francisco resident Galen Pewtherer just couldn't get along: his Edwardian-style house and wireless Internet access.
In 2008, Mr. Pewtherer tried to replace his old-fashioned cable Internet connection with a Wi-Fi network that he could share with other tenants in his building. "It turned out to be impossible," says the 38-year-old program manager at Cisco Systems Inc. "We couldn't get signal in or out of one room." (A: Due to chicken wire that stopped the signals. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning that chicken wire there that stops the microwave and the Wi-Fi stuff coming through. That’s from the Wall Street Journal. I’ll put that link up too and you can read it for yourself. Now we’ll go to the phones again and there’s Sam from Sydney there. Are you there Sam?
Sam: Hi Alan. Happy New Year.
Alan: The same to you.
Sam: I was just calling up about the article you were reading about earlier, about the farmer Peter Spencer. It’s amazing the way the Australians…. People should actually go and have a look at this guy. There’s a video out by an ABC program called The Australian Story on a guy called Peter Andrews. This farmer’s been fighting the Australian bureaucracy for decades now. What he’s actually done was a way to rehydrate the land basically by using natural practices, basically by planting native plants, looking how the land retains the water. One of the biggest problems we have in Australia is basically water. The land… it’s the way that common practices are practiced here. The land doesn’t retain water and basically the soil just tends to die. You should have seen the dust storms here in the last 20 years. In Sydney, I don’t know if it’s been in the international press, but basically they were predicting the end of the world for us, you know, it’s just red, all the red soil. Now, [inaudible] claim that it’s global warming, which is absolute rubbish. It’s basically due to the fact that we have the worst farming practices, enforced by the government.
Alan: That’s what happens.
Sam: So it’s amazing.
Alan: They cause the problem and then they come down on the farmers and they say now you can’t cut your weeds or anything because it’s a CO2 sink. Well it’s the same con in Canada and the States. Oh, we’ve found a spotted owl that might be here on your land and you can’t use it from then on by law. You can’t use your land. It’s the same trick. Thanks for calling.
Sam: Thank you.
Alan: There’s Steve from Colorado there. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Yes. Hello Alan. I wanted to point out that you and I have talked before about your knowing the Olympians, the highest level of the secret society and they have just opened Monday, in Dubai, the Dubai Towers which is a spiral motif building very much like the Tower of Babel. I believe it is their new Mount Olympus. I believe that’s going to be the headquarters for anyone who wants to participate and live there at the New World Order Mount Olympus. What are your thoughts?
Alan: It’s very possible. They’ve actually got 3 major cities on the go right now with the same structures. In fact, not only that, Maurice Strong has his own spiraled tower down at the Baca Grande Ranch in the US. He’s got all the new agers there and different priests and monk sects and all the rest of it. They do their walk up the helter-skelter. Of course that’s what helter-skelter really means in the pop music industry. Sure, they love these towers and the cycle of reincarnation and life and all the rest of it that supposedly make them superior people, and that’s what part of it symbolizes.
Steve: I hear the music. I think at 2600 plus feet in height, I believe that is the new Mount Olympus. Thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
They do love their symbology and in my first book I showed you the photograph of one of the oldest spiral ones and it’s in Iraq actually and they are copying that one across the world; a very old, old, ancient religion. And sure enough, it’s the old Babylonian Tower concept.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Republican GOP Chairman declares Alleged Christmas Terrorist Probably did us a Favour
Yemen New Frontier for "War on Terror"
Strip Search Muslims-US General States
Hundreds Rally to Support Hunger Strike Farmer
Obama's Pasting of Critics as Right Wing Extremists
More on Obama's Scapegoating on Right Wing Extremists
Barrier to Wifi Signals-Chicken Wire
Transcribed by Diana
Jan. 4, 2010 (#484)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 4, 2010:
A Rose is Still a Rose -- Anti-Communist Prose:
"The Last Few Freedoms are Under Attack
By the Internationalists Behind Barack,
Naming those who Believe in the Constitution
As Obsolete Extremists Bent on Revolution,
While U.S. Communists, with Total Makeover,
Use the Same Old Plans to Control and Takeover,
Science of Confusion Makes Wrong Seem Right,
How Dare Lovers of Country Declare they'll Fight,
Everyone Should be Happy in the 'No Rights Prison,'
With the Equality of Poverty Called Communism"
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 4th 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down, see all the other sites I have up there, bookmark them for future use because when the big sites go down as they have in the past, you can always get the latest shows if you have these other sites bookmarked. These are the official sites: [listed above]. As always, in starting off the New Year with the right foot of course, I always tell the people the TRUTH right off the bat, that you are the audience that brings me to you. No one sponsors me here. I’m not fronting for any company that sells stuff. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN for their air time and for broadcasting this particular program. It pays for their bills and their board men, their operators and all the rest of it. So it’s up to you to keep me going by buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or donating to me. You can find out how to do it on the web sites. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those that get the disks burned and passed to them and listen to the talks at meetings and so on, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
It’s amazing as times goes on, you’d often think that you won’t be around in the next year or 10 or 20 years and these years do roll along. Here we are, 2010. At one time, especially when you are small and silly and naïve you kind of look forward to the new year but now, after experiencing all the things that are happening and you know the agenda, you tend to cringe and say oh no, roll it back because you know darn well the next year is going to be worse than the last one since there is a big agenda. Still, we’ve got to be stalwart and face up to it and face up to the awful people with their combinations and monopolies that are all working together to bring in this brave new world scenario through perpetual war. That’s what it is, perpetual war. No one put it better than Professor Carroll Quigley who was the historian for this particular world group, the Council on Foreign Relations. He said that basically corporations will bring in a new feudal system with the CEOs being the new feudal overlords… and we’re really here, private/public partnerships. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. 2010, I think the US government and the Canadian government and the Mexican government all sign the last part of the agreement for TOTAL MERGER. I do believe this was the last year for it so that will happen some time in the summer. Once everything is on the books they will implement more and more phases of total integration, through catastrophes of course, like financial meltdowns, terrorism and all this stuff to make it happen and seem kind of plausible to the non-thinkers out there and that’s about 87%. It’s interesting that marketers did that study back in World War I and it’s pretty well still the same today. 87% OF THE PUBLIC WILL BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE TOLD AND GO ALONG WITH ANYTHING. Sad but true. That’s why they like democracy. See, they understood that when they gave us democracy. It’s so easy to guide them.
Perpetual war. We saw it with the Bush regime and now it’s into the Obama regime. It’s the same regime as far as I’m concerned with the same people behind the front men going on with the same world agenda, perpetual warfare. We found that from the mentor of Rumsfeld and Cheney and these guys who talked about perpetual war and how it was so necessary to keep the people in obedience basically, a man who taught at MIT. MIT is a very important place for all of this stuff. It’s the equivalent of Tavistock you might say for the US. Leo Strauss was the guy who taught the different Bush regime and this present bunch, THAT PERPETUAL WAR WAS NEEDED TO GET TO THE END OF THE AGENDA. YOU COULDN’T GIVE THE PUBLIC A BREATHING SPACE AT ALL.
If you notice since 9/11 happened, it’s been one crisis after another. Again, that ties in with a study done from World War I. They realized that most folk can handle one or two main crisis or fear, or fears within their heads at the same time. It’s kind of like a computer; you get overloaded with a third terror, fear, whatever it happens to be, financial chaos so you have to make room for one, so you throw one of them out of your head to make room for the new one. You make space for it basically, like hard disk space. THAT’S WHY THEY ADAPT SO QUICKLY TO EACH NEW CRISIS THAT COMES ALONG. That’s all they talk about. They forget they just got over the last one, or nothing happened. We are run by people who understand us. What I’m saying here is baby language to them basically. Methods and science and technique run the world. They know exactly where they are going and they know exactly how the vast numbers of the populace will accept and adapt to ANYTHING they are told to adapt to.
It’s interesting, I keep thinking of 1984. It was so well done when Orwell said, when they changed their gun sights from one country to another, the people down below could be so easily convinced that they had ALWAYS been fighting the NEW enemy and they would forget all about the old enemy. I gave an example of this many times, the same example. When after the inquiry into 9/11 and what happened after it in the Iraqi war, George Bush was on worldwide television saying that he’d never claimed that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks. He’s an utter liar of course because he had said it when he was drumming up the war drums for it. But a study was done in Canada on the US. Remember, they first attacked Afghanistan. That’s where supposedly the caveman was hiding that did all of this. Then they swung their guns to Iraq. The Canadian studies showed that the US press had, within a few months, convinced the majority of the American public that it had ALWAYS been Iraq that was the problem and not Afghanistan. In fact Afghanistan was out of their memory… that fast… just with repetition and propaganda from the mainstream.
Techniques are used all the time on the public and they don’t KNOW it’s even happening to them. They all adapt to the new stories, the new crisis at the same time. They’re all FED the same crisis at the same time. As I say, they throw out the old crisis because they can’t handle too many in their heads at once. This is exactly what Strauss was advocating with perpetual warfare and CHANGE. Remember what Quigley said too, you can change so much; you can get more done in 5 years of warfare than you can in 50 years of peace on a SOCIAL change level and with adding more and more governmental departments OVER society.
We’ve all heard this farce of this lone man who was going to blow up the airliner on Christmas day with his Calvin Klein underwear, whatever he was using. Utter nonsense of course; the whole thing stinks. As we all know, anyone who thinks at all knows it stinks completely to high heaven with all the security that’s out there, never mind all the strange surrounding circumstances BUT remember, they always say, who benefits? Who benefits? Well, immediately Brown and all the rest of the characters are in to we’ve got bring in these full body scanners. That’s one. WHO owns these scanners? Go and check them out. Find out who the owners are. It’s fascinating to find that most of the cameras in Britain and elsewhere and these body scanners are all made by the same companies… who are always lobbying government for more and more sales. Apart from that, IT DEHUMANIZES US. Each time that we bend over to get prodded, you are being dehumanized. When you hold up your pants because you have to take your belt off, you are being dehumanized. You are being TAUGHT to be subservient to your master, like any slave. Now of course, they can see you FULLY NUDE, frontal, back, whatever. That’s another sign of the same thing. How far will it go? As far as you can bend… before breaking your back. It’s up to you in other words.
It’s so wonderful when you read the systems and the techniques that Carroll Quigley pointed out in his book, Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment, the companion to it. He was showing you that they always use a crisis to their advantage. In fact, they need the crisis to happen which obviously makes you think, well obviously they needed this to happen so did they actually make sure it did happen? I prefer to believe that. I don’t believe in the ACCIDENTAL VIEW OF HISTORY. These guys would have to win the lotto every month. They always get what they want through crisis… always. See that’s impossible by the laws of averages. It’s impossible to always get what you want.
From the Raw Story; Raw Story is quite a good web site. I’ll put these links up on by site at the end of the show.
9/11 commission chairman says would-be plane bomber ‘did us a favor’
By John Byrne / Monday, January 4th, 2010
(Alan: This is what I’m saying about how they always turn it to their advantage.)
The Republican chairman of the Bush Administration's 9/11 Commission declared Sunday that the would-be-terrorist who tried to blow up a plane en route to Detroit "probably did us a favor."
The GOP chairman's quote raised eyebrows; by his logic, the Sept. 11, 2001 attackers may also have "done us a favor" by drawing US attention to extremism in Afghanistan.
Thomas Kean, a former governor of New Jersey, made the remarks on CNN's State of the Union Sunday talk show.
The onetime governor said Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, the 23-year-old Nigerian who failed to detonate an incendiary device on a passenger plane, probably did us a favor.
We had an administration which was not focused, as it should be, on terrorism and that’s understandable, Kean told CNN. They were focused on health care and global warming and the economy. That’s very understandable.
"Secondly, we weren’t really focused on Yemen and the terrible things that are happening there," Kean added. (A: So, they weren’t really focused on Yemen, like they didn’t notice it right? Utter liars these guys are. Utter liars. Mind you, you’ll see the photograph there and you’ll see something above his head that is his master. This is the master of this character in the photograph. You can look for yourself. He’s an utter liar because on the BBC news, they talked about this on the 24th of December BEFORE the bomber was caught.)
Yemen: New frontier in US 'war on terror'
By Humphrey Hawksley / BBC News / Thursday, 24 December 2009
The increased violence in Yemen is a clear indication that military campaigns to crush al-Qaeda-inspired violence extend far beyond the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
It also shows up hostile fault-lines within the Middle East, pitting mainly Shia Iran against Sunni Saudi Arabia, who condemn each other for taking sides in Yemen's long-running civil war. (A: This is what Kean said they missed. They didn’t NOTICE what was happening here right?)
Yemen is one of the poorest countries in the Arab world with almost half its 24 million people living below the poverty line and an authoritarian government that has failed to win the trust of a substantive part of its own population. (A: So they’re building up the reasons for attacking. It also says here that… )
The US has invested some $70m (£40m) in military aid in Yemen (A: The one that Kean said they hadn’t really noticed what was happening there. Utter liars… I love the jokes they give us in the news; it’s a good tickle, as they say… it’s a good tickle.)
It’s a good tickle. It really is as we go into this incredible farce, this farce, this communistic worldwide, sovietized FARCE that we go through and it was a farce during the Soviet era if you lived in those countries. You had to say that black was white and blue was brown and whatever they told you to say; you had to say it and pretend to mean it. You couldn’t even write poems without going up in front of the Politburo for micro-examination to see if you were trying to get a message across to the people covertly. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. They are really hyping up… They keep telling you that this is not a war on Islam, which is rubbish. You see, there really ARE organizations out there that DO work with 50 year, 100 year plans, 150 year plans, TO TAKE DOWN EXISTING STRUCTURES IN ORDER TO DOMINATE THEM. They did promise to take down existing structures that held society together no matter what people thought of those structures, be they good or bad.
They simply demolished Christianity in the West; incredible war against Christianity. Again, it’s inevitable because any organized group that has a tiered structure where people give allegiance to humans above them, instead of their deity, are going to be taken over and led astray, obviously, and used for other purposes. Just like Bush put millions of dollars out to get what they called the Fundamental Christians on their side for the war. So that’s a problem with any big group. As Bernays said, the first thing you do when you want to alter society, is you get the phone book and you look for existing societies that are already there to be used.
Now they’re after Islam, as I say. There’s no doubt about it, they are STANDARDIZING the world… in order to dominate the world. It is a war on Islam. Unfortunately, like every other target down through history, they’ve studied their enemy well and they know how to get the different groups of Muslims FIGHTING EACH OTHER. They never learn. Lawrence of Arabia talked about it too, how they used the same tricks back then in his day to split them up and get them fighting so that Britain could come in and take over, which they did.
Here is a General on Fox News.
US general urges strip search of Muslim men
Sun, 3 Jan 2010
Lt. General Thomas McInerney spokes to Fox News about what he called pending terror attacks on US airliners.
A retired US general and member of Iran Policy Committee (IPC) (A: These are the guys who obviously are all helping work toward demolishing Iran.) says all 18 to 28 years old Muslim men should be strip searched at airports as "one of these bombers" will explode an airliner in the coming days. (A: In the coming days, mind you. I wonder if this is the same guy that said there was a nuke that was going to go off in New York harbor after 9/11? I wonder.)
Thomas McInerney, a retired Lt. General with the US Air Force, told Fox News television on Saturday that within the next 30 to 120 days, "there is a danger of high probability" (A: Danger of high probability… that’s beautiful…) awaiting US airliners.
"If you are an 18 to 28-year-old Muslim man then you should be strip searched. And if we don't do that there's a very high probability we're going to lose an airline," he said. (A: I guess he meant an aircraft.)
The retired general went on to say that US officials should profile all Muslims. (A: Whenever they say something and target a group, you know they mean to spread it across the whole population, as they already did with 9/11. After 9/11 there were grey-haired, blue-eyed old ladies getting stopped, immediately, at crossings and airliners and stuff. Hardly a target that you’d expect would you, coming from a Middle Eastern or Asian nation.) "We have to use profiling. And I mean be very serious and harsh about the profiling."
Asked if such a racial approach would not "generate more hatred and violence towards the West," McInerney said he did not want "a racial profile." (A: Of course it will, but they WANT this, you see. They want hatred generated toward the West because they want to keep this going on as long as they can. You see, if they don’t get a backlash from people, and young people will, they will backlash, there’s no doubt about it. If they don’t get the backlashes, it’s all one sided, the US and Britain and so on are ‘over there’ occupying their countries. So they’ve got to get the public to forget they are ‘over there’ as an invasive force and make it seem all one sided that there’s all these aliens attacking you from ‘out there.’ Forget about the fact you’ve got armies in their countries occupying them.)
"I want to profile on that group that we have enough evidence from 9/11, and other [high-profile] cases that we know what we are looking at," he said.
The suggestions made by the US retired general comes on the heels of a purported bomb attack on a US transatlantic airliner on Christmas Day by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian who allegedly received al-Qaeda training in Yemen. (A: See how they tie it all in? How fortunate they could tie it all in when they’ve just spent $70 million fomenting trouble in Yemen by the US. [Alan laughing.])
Lawmakers and congressional leaders in the US have echoed similar sentiments by urging President Obama abandon or suspend his plan to shutter the Guantanamo Bay Prison.
Around half of the remaining Gitmo detainees are from Yemen, and of those, about 40 have been cleared for release. (A: The rest of them probably will be too, because we hear that they’re just doing mass grabs of people and pulling them in. If you’re just in the wrong place at the wrong time, it’s just tough luck for you.)
As I say, this new Sovietized system, people forget… and most folk have forgotten what communism was. Towards the end of the Cold War, most folk didn’t really know what communism was, just THEM with THEIR SYSTEM. That’s how it was given to us, them with their system and it was bad, we were told and that was ALL that we were told. I’ll go on about this when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how if you study communism you realize that they were to take over power by all means and every means possible and to lie and lie and lie to get everything that they wanted done to achieve their goals. In fact, they had a disdain for the ordinary people because they were so easily talked into anything and led along by the nose.
Communism was a system run by elitists, not by working people. In fact NONE of them involved with the revolution - even in the Soviet Union - had probably ever lifted a spade in their life and dug a hole. Even for the people they had assassinated, they had other folk dig the holes for them. The INTELLIGENTSIA were the ones behind it. They believed in Darwinism and they often put Darwin’s portrait alongside that of Lenin. They believed that Darwinism gave validity to the whole idea of Marxist ideals and communism. They taught in all their books and all their lectures to lie and lie and lie and here we are going through this farcical global warming nonsense, as Europe is frozen to a standstill with the LOWEST temperatures in Britain for 25 years and a massive thickening of the Arctic ice and the Antarctic. In Canada here, it was literally about minus 40 yesterday and the last 2 or 3 days with the wind as well. So it’s an utter farce but lies are okay because it’s to take over the world and its resources, and to take all your rights and freedoms from YOU, and to get you subservient to THEIR system. We see the redistribution of wealth coming through it as well. So they get what they wanted by lying.
It’s hitting different countries in different ways. Here’s an article from Australia. After this I’ll go to the callers. This is from ABC News, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Hundreds rally for hunger-striking farmer
Jan 4, 2010 / ABC News : Vivienne Nunis
Rally: Farmers are calling for a Royal Commission (A: Good luck to them. These things last for years.) into vegetation laws. (A: What are the vegetation laws?)
More than 300 people have rallied outside Parliament House in Canberra in support of hunger-striking New South Wales farmer Peter Spencer.
Mr Spencer has spent 43 days without food on top of a tower on his property at Shannons Flat near Cooma, in protest against state laws which stop him from clearing vegetation on his land. (A: In the US, they are so used to having the greenies - that are all paid for and given salaries and pension plans by the big foundations - going on land and saying that they’ve got a spotted owl and so on. In fact, they are told to do this and to lie and lie and lie. Then folk have land they can’t use anymore by order of the government. In Australia, they are saying to the farmers, you can’t take the weeds out because they are acting as CARBON sinks. This is the farce they are using there to put the farmers under. Remember, in this brave new world, it’s to be the big, international corporate farmers only.)
He wants the Commonwealth to compensate farmers whose land has been used as 'carbon sinks'.
Mr Spencer's daughter, Sarah Spencer, told the rally her father will not give up his hunger strike until he meets with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
"He has strong resolve. He will hold true to his word," she said.
"He's short of energy, he hasn't got as much energy as he normally has and things like that," he said.
"But he appears to be hanging in there."
(A: It goes down and down and down and it says…) Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce also addressed the crowd, calling for a Royal Commission into vegetation laws.
He says the state laws have robbed farmers across Australia of their assets. (A: It’s true. Here you are, owning all this land, you’ve got to pay taxes on it but you can’t grow and you can’t weed the thing.)
"It might have been legally possible but it was totally unjust," he said.
Senator Joyce says Mr Spencer should cease his hunger strike but the fight for justice should continue.
"This is obscene," he said.
(A: Now listen to this… somebody’s actually got it here… which gives me hope. Somebody actually has got it.)
"The Government became the thief of an asset and when the Government becomes a thief of an asset - when the individual is divested of an asset without payment - there is a word for that and unfortunately without being too dramatic the word is communism."
That’s it! That’s it. So here’s a Senator who actually understands what’s happening. Under all the farce of greening and carbon offsets and global warming and ya-da ya, it’s COMMUNISM because WHAT do they do under all this? They TAKE all your property from you. And what did communism do when they took over the Soviet Union? They STARVED MILLIONS of people because they killed off most of the small farmers. They always do that. They did the same thing in the Ukraine; millions of them starved to death BY LAW. They couldn’t even keep enough seed to feed themselves… BY LAW. China did it too. They killed off millions of their own, starved them to death… BY LAW. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, YEP, it’s the same darn duck. It doesn’t matter what they want to call it, global warming, climate change, carbon footprint; it’s the same lying rubbish that they’ve been using for 100 years. What did they achieve? Look in there. Look at the Communist Manifesto. Look at the planks of the Communist Manifesto. They have achieved almost all of them, including the destruction of the family unit thanks to their big culture creators in Hollywood.
I’ll go to the phones now and there’s Lucas in Vancouver. Are you there Lucas?
Lucas: How you doing Alan? I just wanted to thank you actually for bringing attention to the Lenin/Mao statue that was put up in my home town of Richmond which is a suburb of Vancouver.
Alan: So you and your tax money will to be paying for it.
Lucas: Yep. You know, there’s never, ever been any sort of outlet, public outlets for the arts in Richmond. It’s just funny that this is the first art, the first thing that Richmond has to do with art ever and it’s not even Canadian artists. They are going to bring in another statue by the Gao brothers that’s Mao’s jacket.
Alan: Oh really?
Lucas: I don’t know where they are going to put that one up.
Alan: It’s disgusting. They’ve got them in Toronto too. They’ve had them in Toronto for years. I’ve seen some in the parks there. You just stumble across them and you say what’s this doing here?
Lucas: Right! The one in Richmond is hidden out of the way. Incidentally, it’s on the same plot of land as the ICBC building which is the Insurance Company of British Columbia. There’s a little hint for you. I also wanted to let you know that public reaction was pretty good. I went down there and I talked to teenagers, a teenage kid who was working at Tim Horton’s. When I was there taking pictures, a car with 2 older gentlemen stopped. They stopped traffic just gawking at this thing in disbelief. Let me tell you, they weren’t happy about it. People don’t… people aren’t happy about it.
Alan: Well at least, obviously, it means that some people have an understanding of what it means.
Lucas: Yeah. I was pleasantly surprised. The young man that I spoke to in Tim Hortons, I was asking for directions and he told me that he knew, he knew it was Lenin and that it scared him. I said, good boy because it scares me too.
Alan: Yes. Darn right. Absolutely right. What gets me too is that there is hardly a so-called – and I call it a so-called – artist, being a novelist or a scriptwriter for CBC or a sculptor that doesn’t live on grants from the federal government. It’s disgusting.
Lucas: Yep. Well, I’ll hand your show back to you Alan and thanks for talking to me.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
As I say, it’s just astonishing what’s really happening and how people don’t even know what they are seeing or looking at anymore. They are so brainwashed by the adaptation into ever increasing modernity of culture, as they tend to call it; they can change it every week in fact, up the spokes, push the envelope until you are into a NEW era of culture creation and we adapt and adapt and adapt.
Here is what they’ve put out from Southern Poverty Law Center, which was labeled a communist group recently, you know, not so long ago. It always was, always pretending to stand up for some minority. That’s what is taught to communists; always find a minority that you can stand up for to get them on board. Once you’ve got 1000 groups of minorities, you now have a big massive group to demand what YOU want, not what the minorities want. That’s what the Southern Poverty Law Center was all about, well funded by the big foundations too. This article is from The Telegraph.
America's armed militia on the rise
Extremist "patriot" groups and other armed militias have undergone a dramatic resurgence in America, their numbers more than doubling in the past year amid growing Right-wing fears over expanding federal power and gun control.
By Tom Leonard in New York / 31 Dec 2009
(A: Now they release this every year and this is just a release to the media.)
Such groups – a mix of libertarians, gun rights advocates and survivalists – appeared to be in terminal decline before the election of Barack Obama, according to monitoring bodies. (A: Monitoring bodies… they call the communist groups.)
The Southern Poverty Law Centre, which tracks extremist organisations, says it has so far counted more than 300 patriot groups this year, at least double last year's total of 150. The real total will be much higher as many groups do not go out of their way to publicise their existence.
A similar wave of anti-government groups, (A: Anti-government groups… now that’s the term that the Soviets used on anyone who complained about any of the policies of their government. It’s also the same term that the communized Economic Union Parliament is using, anti-government. That must mean that every opposition party is anti-government since they do the most complaining about whoever is the majority.) some of whose members dress in camouflage gear and conduct military training at weekends, sprung up during the Clinton administration.
However, SPLC researchers said there was a new race factor reflecting President Obama's ethnicity and immigration fears. (A: Utter rubbish. Utter rubbish.)
(A: There’s an article again in the Telegraph.
Those Evil Right Wing Extremists who would DESTROY America
By James Delingpole / April 15th, 2009 / telegraph.co.uk
I’ll put that link up as well to show you how this guy tears apart this whole farce of a handout – and this is a handout – to this particular newspaper. He actually tears it apart and shows you how farcical all of this is. How farcical it all is. But in the same article here it says…)
One of the new patriot groups is called Oath Keepers. Its members, like those in other groups, look for guidance from America's Founding Fathers.
Formed last spring, Oath Keepers' members – limited to current or former servicemen and police – swear to obey the US constitution rather than politicians. (A: Aaaah, ooohhhh!)
Stewart Rhodes, the founder, told The Daily Telegraph that the situation was a "potential powder keg".
He said: "The one thing that would probably lead [groups] to armed resistance is if the government did try to confiscate weapons, but that was what finally led to fighting in the American Revolution".
Mike Vanderboegh, a former militia leader and founder of a vociferous gun rights group called the Three Percenters, pointed to a huge increase in sales of ammunition, many of it to new gun owners.
"This is far larger than Obama. It speaks to an existential fear of societal collapse," he said.
He said group members were looking for "practical self-defence", whether from "predatory government or street-level crime".
If the government carried out "another Waco" – the 1993 storming of a cult's (A: They keep calling it a cult; it was a church, one sect of many Christian churches.) Texas ranch, in which 76 occupants died (A: Were burned to death by the government) – "you'd see a reaction bloody beyond belief", he added.
Heidi Beirich, a co-author of the SPLC's militia research, said the groups were characterised by "a lot of conspiracy mongering, gun nuttery and fear of a new world order that they think is controlling the US". (A: No kidding. [Alan laughing] I love how they call anybody who still believes in a country and a nation a ‘right wing extremist.’ That’s standard communist prattle, STANDARD COMMUNIST PRATTLE… and the folk can’t recognize it anymore. Why? Because they’ve been trained they need the media to tell them so. If the media tells them so, they’ll suddenly get it. But the media is not there to tell them. The media is there to SERVE THE WORLD STATE. It’s an ESSENTIAL ARM of government.)
Many people have talked about the effects of Wi-Fi and microwave radiation. There’s actually a syndrome now to do with excessive radiation from cell phone towers and all those relay towers across cities that are everywhere you look. They’ve had articles on television in Canada showing you the spiky waves these things give off. Incredible bursts of energy to all the passers-by down below. People have gone through all different means to prevent them from being attacked by it. I’ve always said what you really need is a faraday cage. A faraday cage works very much like your microwave oven, if you have one. You can see through the door in the microwave through these little holes. Well, they are spaced the exact size that will stop that particular frequency of microwave from coming through. So rather that have something that’s a complete solid piece of lead or something, they can actually use wire, hexagonal-shaped wires, just like honeycombs in a bee hive. Here’s a great thing here that’s come out. It’s a Wall Street Journal article. It says…
Culprit in Wi-Fi Failures: Chicken Wire
DECEMBER 31, 2009 / Bay Life / By GEOFFREY A. FOWLER
(A: Chicken wire… very cheap too.)
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA - Two things beloved by San Francisco resident Galen Pewtherer just couldn't get along: his Edwardian-style house and wireless Internet access.
In 2008, Mr. Pewtherer tried to replace his old-fashioned cable Internet connection with a Wi-Fi network that he could share with other tenants in his building. "It turned out to be impossible," says the 38-year-old program manager at Cisco Systems Inc. "We couldn't get signal in or out of one room." (A: Due to chicken wire that stopped the signals. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning that chicken wire there that stops the microwave and the Wi-Fi stuff coming through. That’s from the Wall Street Journal. I’ll put that link up too and you can read it for yourself. Now we’ll go to the phones again and there’s Sam from Sydney there. Are you there Sam?
Sam: Hi Alan. Happy New Year.
Alan: The same to you.
Sam: I was just calling up about the article you were reading about earlier, about the farmer Peter Spencer. It’s amazing the way the Australians…. People should actually go and have a look at this guy. There’s a video out by an ABC program called The Australian Story on a guy called Peter Andrews. This farmer’s been fighting the Australian bureaucracy for decades now. What he’s actually done was a way to rehydrate the land basically by using natural practices, basically by planting native plants, looking how the land retains the water. One of the biggest problems we have in Australia is basically water. The land… it’s the way that common practices are practiced here. The land doesn’t retain water and basically the soil just tends to die. You should have seen the dust storms here in the last 20 years. In Sydney, I don’t know if it’s been in the international press, but basically they were predicting the end of the world for us, you know, it’s just red, all the red soil. Now, [inaudible] claim that it’s global warming, which is absolute rubbish. It’s basically due to the fact that we have the worst farming practices, enforced by the government.
Alan: That’s what happens.
Sam: So it’s amazing.
Alan: They cause the problem and then they come down on the farmers and they say now you can’t cut your weeds or anything because it’s a CO2 sink. Well it’s the same con in Canada and the States. Oh, we’ve found a spotted owl that might be here on your land and you can’t use it from then on by law. You can’t use your land. It’s the same trick. Thanks for calling.
Sam: Thank you.
Alan: There’s Steve from Colorado there. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Yes. Hello Alan. I wanted to point out that you and I have talked before about your knowing the Olympians, the highest level of the secret society and they have just opened Monday, in Dubai, the Dubai Towers which is a spiral motif building very much like the Tower of Babel. I believe it is their new Mount Olympus. I believe that’s going to be the headquarters for anyone who wants to participate and live there at the New World Order Mount Olympus. What are your thoughts?
Alan: It’s very possible. They’ve actually got 3 major cities on the go right now with the same structures. In fact, not only that, Maurice Strong has his own spiraled tower down at the Baca Grande Ranch in the US. He’s got all the new agers there and different priests and monk sects and all the rest of it. They do their walk up the helter-skelter. Of course that’s what helter-skelter really means in the pop music industry. Sure, they love these towers and the cycle of reincarnation and life and all the rest of it that supposedly make them superior people, and that’s what part of it symbolizes.
Steve: I hear the music. I think at 2600 plus feet in height, I believe that is the new Mount Olympus. Thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
They do love their symbology and in my first book I showed you the photograph of one of the oldest spiral ones and it’s in Iraq actually and they are copying that one across the world; a very old, old, ancient religion. And sure enough, it’s the old Babylonian Tower concept.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Republican GOP Chairman declares Alleged Christmas Terrorist Probably did us a Favour
Yemen New Frontier for "War on Terror"
Strip Search Muslims-US General States
Hundreds Rally to Support Hunger Strike Farmer
Obama's Pasting of Critics as Right Wing Extremists
More on Obama's Scapegoating on Right Wing Extremists
Barrier to Wifi Signals-Chicken Wire
Transcribed by Diana
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:03 amHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 18th 2010. For newcomers to the show, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Bookmark all the sites I have up there for future use because sometimes the main site goes down. The official sites are: [listed above]. As always, at the start of the show I mention that you bring me to you… YOU are the listeners, you the audience. I’m not backed by any big foundation or any big company that’s selling products and so on. The ads on the show that you hear are paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN. That pays for the air time, their staff and equipment and their bills. So it’s up to you as the listeners to keep me going. You can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, see the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale or you can donate to me. You’ll find out how to do it on the web sites. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of the shows I do and passed to them to play on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. So that’s my tin can moment, as I rattle the tin can for the pennies.
I often don’t really pick the topics of the night’s show until the last moment because there is so much to choose from. So much of it too, really, in a sense, is trivia or irrelevant or it will simply get phased out by tomorrow’s news. We are dished out so much news today you can’t keep up with it and that’s part of the technique of data overload, as they call it. With data overloads, it’s hard to retain what’s relevant and hard to even remember what to toss OUT of your mind. Your mind can only hold so much and it gets mixed with trivia and fiction until it’s all a fantasy. Some people like the fantasy, they call them conspiracy theorists. That’s the term that the intelligence services decided to GIVE the people at the bottom to use upon themselves and a lot of them will do that. They’ll say, yep, I’m a conspiracy theorist and they sound like a nutcase right away. The key is, you don’t have to guess about things, as to where the world is going. You don’t have to guess about why things are happening. You just have to read the old books because they TOLD you where it was going a long time ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s hard to choose topics to talk about today because we are bombarded with them. Funny to think that in the 1960s, some of the big players who are still going today, are still alive today and working very hard at this emerging world society, although I think it’s long, long past here already, they talked about this phase that we’d go through where we’d become involved in a sort of world communication society. In other words, they were talking about the internet that they were going to give us way back then, before most of us had even tried a computer ourselves, or they had one for sale and even universities were limited on the types that they had. But they knew they were going to bring this in because they had got so advanced during the whole Cold War with computers that they knew they could bring it in and make A COLLECTIVE SOCIETY. They also knew that people would become more ALIENATED FROM EACH other during this particular phase as well. We could all be on the NET so to speak, and yet we’d eventually be trained to talk to voiceless entities across the world somewhere and never really meet people. They thought that eventually we might not need the ability, we’d lose the ability to actually communicate directly with other people.
When you think about the effects of television, a lot of that was accomplished even then when whole families would sit and stare at the google box and they wouldn’t talk to each other. They were losing the ability to communicate and interact with each other even then. Then back in the 70s and 80s as more cash through credit cards was available, different members of the family would go off into their own rooms to watch their own television set. That further estranged them as well. The computer is doing much the same kind of thing. As I say, it was all predicted an awful long time ago, before a lot of people were born and long before they came up and told us that they were going to give us this thing called the internet.
What I’m truly saying is that we are living through an agenda. The world is simply an agenda. It’s so interesting too, to read the big boys like Brzezinski in his book, Between Two Ages, where he puts out the format to the public, the reader, in the way that I call the ACCIDENTAL VIEW OF HISTORY. Trends just appear, the way the RAND Corporation tends to do its announcements in magazines. Trends appear and according to the trends, they predict that we will be doing down the road and we’ll be doing this by the year so and so and so and so. That’s the way that Brzezinski presented his information and YET Brzezinski and the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission had been working their whole lives, and people before they were born too, were at it DIRECTING THE COURSE of the world and the course of the cultures and the course of technology. So it’s so interesting to see him give you the accidental view but never mention the fact that there were big, big players and powerful organizations SHAPING the direction in which we were told to go. Quite fascinating really.
WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE IN THE ACCIDENTAL VIEW. Things just happen by accident, governments get up and try and fix things on the spur of the moment and that’s why it’s so chaotic and that’s why they make mistakes, we’re told. Again, there is nothing further from the truth. The further back you go, reading the books written by the big players, the more evident it becomes that everything that you’ve lived through was predicted by them because they were making it all happen throughout your whole life and where it’s supposed to go, up to the year 2050 and beyond.
Sometimes they will call them futurists as well, the futurists who predict trends. Like any world where they’ve trained, or any reality where they’ve trained the public to follow EXPERTS – as Bertrand Russell said they would and they have – they pick the supposed TOP futurists, the ones who will predict the winning trends. They are the winners, they’re always right. Well, it’s not because they’ve got good crystal balls or because they’ve got more of an acute mental range or something. It’s because they are IN on the big plan, the big agenda. There is an old saying they used to use in different religions and they’d say, ‘make it so.’ Freemasonry still says that. Even Wicca, they say, ‘so mote it be.’ If you put up the experts there who are putting out the trends, it becomes that way because they’ve said it’s going to become that way. The big businesses listen them and they get on board and they actually MAKE it happen. That’s how you direct society. Plus big money is always available to make sure it goes off in that direction.
In the process, we go through many cons and scams to guide us into the new society of a depopulated planet where children are not only irrelevant almost, they really don’t want them. They really, really don’t like children and they especially don’t like children from the middle and lower classes anymore. Both classes have to go. The world that has been decided that’s to come in eventually is for an elite with a technotronic class, the crème-de-la-crème of the technotronic era will work for them and things will be robotic and eventually even computers will be running operations for them in hospitals and things like that. But they don’t need the massive manpower anymore. They’re looking towards the future where sustainability, as they call it, really, since these guys at the top are always terrified that they’ll die off themselves if there is not enough food to go around, they plan to take down the population first – take out your enemy instead – and make it safe for themselves. In the meantime, WE MUST BE TAUGHT THAT WE ARE THE PROBLEM.
WE are the problem. WE are the consumers, WE are the problem. Well, nothing is further from the truth. The same guys – as I say, many of them are still alive today – promoted the consumer age. They promoted it because they needed a strong West. They needed a strong United States of America because they were supplying the tax money and the military force to go across the whole world as the global policeman. Now that the job is coming to a halt - they are right now attacking the last few countries left to be dominated and to be standardized into this system - they will run out of enemies and they won’t need the big military forces. They also know they are going to take down the Western world at the same time as they are finishing off the Middle East and Asia. That’s why the next part of the plan is to bring the military home, a good part of it, integrate it completely and manage the herd as we gradually get taken down the path to annihilation so the elite might survive.
There’s an old saying that used to be said, and still is said actually in some religions. It said that the few must perish for the sake of the many. In this case, it’s the many that must perish for the sake of the few. That’s the big agenda. I’m not kidding about it. They are very strong about this. They are teaching children in school that children, their own offspring, will be unnecessary. There are already volunteers coming out after massive indoctrination at school, scientific indoctrination, and asking for sterilization. That is part of the agenda.
All meat is to be eliminated, meat consumption. Alvin Toffler, another big futurist there, well funded by the big boys, wrote in his book The Third Wave, that the future will be a vegetarian society and it must be so, he said. He didn’t say why it must be so; he just said it must be so. Now we’re getting articles in the media, from the top again, about the need to stop eating all meat because they say it’s too energy consumptive and they want to give you their GMO foods instead… which are full of toxins and poisons and pesticides. That is not what the elites eat of course. We’ll never get access to their stuff. You could never afford it even if you were given the card to get access.
As everything happens there is always another reason for things happening, never the way we are told. This odd thing with Haiti, people forget that the UN has been in that country for years. Canada and the States and other countries have been sending policemen in, with the blue berets for the United Nations. The RCMP goes in there, from Canada, with blue berets. They just never quite seem to get the Haitians to give up all their rights and be dominated and allow all their resources – and there are resources around there, still to be plundered – to give it all away to the big boys. So bang, along comes the earthquake and do they send in massive relief with all the organizations which they have up? No. What they do is they send in the military, masses of military because they have announced that FIRST AND FOREMOST that area of the Caribbean is necessary for the defense of the United States of America, to have hegemony over it. That’s why they’re sending all the troops in.
This article is from Global Research.
The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti:
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
By Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research, January 15, 2010
Haiti has a longstanding history of US military intervention and occupation going back to the beginning of the 20th Century. US interventionism has contributed to the destruction of Haiti's national economy and the impoverishment of its population.
The devastating earthquake is presented to World public opinion as the sole cause of the country's predicament.
A country has been destroyed, its infrastructure demolished. Its people precipitated into abysmal poverty and despair.
Haiti's history, its colonial past have been erased.
The US military has come to the rescue of an impoverished Nation. What is its Mandate?
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
The main actors in America's "humanitarian operation" are the Department of Defense, the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). (See USAID Speeches: On-The-Record Briefing on the Situation in Haiti, 01/13/10). USAID has also been entrusted in channelling food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program. (See USAID Press Release: USAID to Provide Emergency Food Aid for Haiti Earthquake Victims, January 13, 2010) (Alan: I’m going to talk more about the World Food Program when I come back from this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from Global Research to do with Haiti and the emergency aid that’s supposedly going in there right now. It’s a massive military invasion when you look at it from another point of view. It talks about how the USAID has been entrusted to channel food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program.
The World Food Program is a very interesting program to go into. It’s tied in with the World Agricultural agency at the United Nations because in their mandate when they set up the different parts of the UN, they were set up to be eventually parts of a global structure. That department for agriculture was to be responsible, down the road – which might not be too far – to distribute ALL food to ALL regions; they’ve got the world broken up into regions and that includes the Americas as well, one day. They said at the time, when they set it up, that they will give a set amount of food to every region and you must keep your population down below a certain level because they won’t increase the food. So it’s interesting to see TRAIL runs, in a sense, always being used by the United Nations. That’s what they are, trial runs.
The military component of the US mission, however, tends to overshadow the civilian functions of rescuing a desperate and impoverished population. The overall humanitarian operation is not being led by civilian governmental agencies such as FEMA or USAID, but by the Pentagon.
The dominant decision making role has been entrusted to US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).
A massive deployment of military hardware and personnel is contemplated. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has confirmed that the US will be sending nine to ten thousand troops to Haiti, including 2000 marines. (American Forces Press Service, January 14, 2010)
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships has already arrived in Port au Prince. (January 15, 2010). The 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit as well as and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division "are trained in a wide variety of missions including security and riot-control in addition to humanitarian tasks." (A: Do you ever get the impression it’s going to come back home eventually? That’s what it is. It’s a training exercise too.)
In contrast to rescue and relief teams dispatched by various civilian organizations, the humanitarian mandate of the US military is not clearly defined:
“Marines are definitely warriors first, and that is what the world knows the Marines for,... [but] we’re equally as compassionate when we need to be, and this is a role that we’d like to show -- that compassionate warrior, (A: That’s kind of contradictory.) reaching out with a helping hand for those who need it. We are very excited about this.” (Marines' Spokesman, (A: Remember, that’s Public Relations when you have a spokesman.) Marines Embark on Haiti Response Mission, Army Forces Press Services, January 14, 2010)
While presidents Obama and Préval spoke on the phone, there were no reports of negotiations between the two governments regarding the entry and deployment of US troops on Haitian soil. The decision was taken and imposed unilaterally by Washington. The total lack of a functioning government in Haiti was used to legitimize, on humanitarian grounds, the sending in of a powerful military force, which has de facto taken over several governmental functions. (A: Then it goes on with the different ships that are in the area.)
TABLE 1
US Military Assets to be Sent to Haiti. (according to official announcements)
The amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) and amphibious dock landing ships USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) and USS Carter Hall (LSD 50).
A 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division. 900 soldiers are slated to arrive in Haiti by January 15th.
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships. (arrived in Port au Prince on January 15, 2010): USS Carl Vinson CVN 70
The hospital ship USNS Comfort (A: ONE hospital ship.)
Several U.S. Coast Guard vessels and helicopters (A: And on and on it goes. It’s like an invasion.)
But what makes you feel better too, it’s like after the big tsunami, remember a few years ago, where they said that every country would match, every government would match every charity dollar with a dollar of tax money for the relief funds. Billions were collected. Billions of dollars were collected and then after it was all in they announced that they’d put Bill Clinton and George Bush Sr in charge of the fund and that’s the last you heard of it. I said that at the time too, that will be the last you hear of it because those poor guys over there where the tsunami hit will be gathering up bits of tin and wood and knocking back some shacks together again without any aid at all arriving, and that pretty well is what happened. Well, they put the same two boys in charge of the fund for Haiti so we feel much better now, as two men you can truly trust right?
This is the farce that we’re living through. It’s geopolitics. Remember what these guys say at the top too, even though they can certainly cause earthquakes; that was even questioned at one point with a ship, a submarine in the area of the last tsunami, because they have submarines which can actually lay bombs, drill them into the fault lines and explode them, going back as far as the 1960s. Regardless of that, the CFR and the Trilateral Commission and all of its members always say they can take some catastrophe and turn it to their advantage, for the geopolitical agenda. That will be done with Haiti regardless of what caused it, natural or otherwise.
It’s quite funny to watch the farce between Google… Now Google is one of the top players in collecting all data across the planet for those who rule us. They keep it forever, all data, all kinds of data. I’ve read articles from some of their bosses in fact admitting to all of this. They’re going through this spat with China over censorship because up until now…
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Google and its spat with China over censorship. It’s kind of like the pot calling the kettle black. Here’s Google gathering data for security services across the planet on EVERY single person on the planet and they’ve been cooperating with China up until recently, supposedly, and censoring their own dissidents. A dissident in China is someone who questions anything in the regime, something that’s going to happen here too; ACTUALLY IT ALREADY IS HAPPENING HERE. This is from V3.co.uk.
Google to end censorship of Chinese searches
Company threatens to pull out of China after human rights hacking
Iain Thomson in San Francisco, V3.co.uk 13 Jan 2010
Google has issued a shock announcement that it is to end censoring the results of its Google.cn search engine, after a series of hacking attacks that it says was aimed at human rights activists. (A: Now did anybody ask us about did we mind getting our material kept and snaggled by Google for all the top guys? No. They didn’t ask us, for the top boys to listen to it. But here they are making a pretense of standing up for the human rights activists in China. [Alan laughing.])
The company said in a posting on its corporate blog that Google and at least 20 other companies had been the target of a hacking attack in December.
Google claims to have seen evidence that the attacks were aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.
"These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered, combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web, have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China," wrote David Drummond, chief legal officer at Google.
"We have decided that we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all.
"We recognise that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China." (A: Well we’ll see what happens there. As I say, what a farce. Here they are making a big deal about China when Google admits it’s been collecting data since it set itself up. It’s collecting data on all of us with everything FOR the security intelligence agencies. Such a farce isn’t it.)
The BBC has the MET Office, that’s their weather office, a big, big organization for the BBC. It’s totally on board of course with the new world order because the BBC works FOR the British government. It’s paid for by the tax money and it has political agendas, always has had. It was set up in fact, to be the propaganda arm of the British parliamentary system… and nothing has changed. This article is from the BBC to do with its weather department that’s all for the global warming; it’s a rah-rah team for global warming and all that stuff.
Met Office rethink on forecasts
By Roger Harrabin / Environment analyst, BBC News
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather. (A: These are the guys who are the experts, right, that are all on board with global warming. They failed to predict the extreme weather that Britain and Europe is going through right now.)
Some experts say the Met Office should stop longer-term (A: …statistical projections…) forecasting because it damages the organisation's reputation. (A: Why? Because they are always wrong. They are ALWAYS wrong.)
Others maintain that communication of the forecasts must be improved.
The Met Office has been criticised for failing to predict in its seasonal forecasts the UK would suffer this cold winter or the last three wet summers. (A: They didn’t predict any of them.)
After being rapped for its now notorious "barbecue summer" (A: That never happened right, they got pouring rain.) press release, the winter forecast was expressed in probabilistic terms, (A: And what they told the public was…) with a 66% likelihood that the winter would be warmer than average (A: Here they are with the worst freezing snow in 20 years.) and a one in seven chance that it would be colder.
The Met Office has now admitted to BBC News that its annual global mean forecast predicted temperatures higher than actual temperatures for nine years out of the last 10. (A: 9 out of 10 wrong… [Alan laughing])
This "warming bias" is very small (A: This is their excuse.)- just 0.05C. And the Met Office points out that the variance between the forecast and the actual temperature is within its own stated margins of error. (A: So they can police themselves and pop it within its own margins of error.)
We live through incredible farces don’t we? That’s what I was saying about what do you pick to read on a show like this when there is so much farce out there, except more farce. Here’s another farce here. See, we’re getting steamrolled over, or railroaded I should really say. It’s railroaded and stampeded into crisis after crisis after crisis, all planned that way mind you, because we adapt quickly in crisis to any crazy change. Any new way of living, we adapt so fast… and they know this too from all their social engineering experts at the top. People have already forgotten that we’ve had a monetary crash supposedly and that they bailed out the banks with billions and billions, maybe trillions of dollars… across the world. They said it would make banking more honest and all the rest of that nonsense, at the time when they were dishing out the tax money to the banks. Well, this is the Sunday Times.
Wall Street giants pay staff $100bn (A: This is for bonuses.)
From The Sunday Times January 17, 2010 / Iain Dey
Four of Wall Street’s biggest banks will this week reveal plans to pay their staff a total of close to $100 billion (£62 billion), reigniting the row over bankers’ bonuses. (A: Well no kidding. Here’s the big boys too, the guys that started it all…)
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America Merrill Lynch are all expected to announce bumper pay awards for staff alongside full-year results.
Wall Street’s big payouts come as the remuneration committee at Royal Bank of Scotland prepares to meet this week to determine the size of its bonus pot.
RBS — 84%-owned by British (A: The British government, by the way.) taxpayers — has indicated it wants to pay its investment bankers about £1.5 billion in bonuses, even though it will make a loss this year at group level. The figure could creep higher if it attempts to shelter its bankers from the impact of Alistair Darling’s 50% tax on bonuses.
Lord Myners, the City minister, has called a meeting of global finance ministers and regulators in Downing Street this month to discuss other levies that could be introduced to prevent future crises. (A: Here they are dishing out $100 billion bucks or something to each other and meanwhile the government is meeting to get a bigger pot to STAVE off really, or cushion the NEXT future crisis. Isn’t there something stinking here? Something awfully rotten? Hmm? You know something, there are no laws to stop these guys from doing what they do. It’s the same when Rothschild’s conned the British people into the Bank of England take over by telling them that Napoleon had won. Nothing has been put in place to stop these sharks from ever doing this again. Nothing. Nope. No one goes to jail for it. You see, it’s legal robbery. They run the legal system too. This is called LEGAL ROBBERY. It’s their due… and we can’t say hoot about it.) George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said this weekend he would support calls for a new global charge on banks.
America’s bonus payouts come days after President Barack Obama revealed plans for a windfall tax on banks in an effort to curb the “obscene” bonus culture.
Anger over the huge payments will be heightened by the fact that many of the banks are not profitable. (A: Here they are, they’re not profitable but they’re dishing out millions of bucks in bonuses to the top sharks.)
Of the four due to report figures this week only Goldman is expected to post a profit at the net income level, according to a consensus of analyst forecasts. The losses blow a hole in the argument that the bonuses represent pay for performance. (A: Well that’s for sure. [Alan laughing.])
However, all the banks are expected to show large gains in their investment banking divisions, which have been boosted by financial stimulus operations orchestrated by governments around the world. (A: And the tax payers paid for it all. Isn’t that just hunky-dory. It makes you feel better doesn’t it?)
As we’re being DEGRADED and we’re being dehumanized since 2001 with all the security checks and bend-overs and all the rest of it at airports, and now you get x-rayed and they can look through your clothing and have a good laugh at you. It is admitted now too that they can SAVE that – it is saved – and they can transmit it wirelessly elsewhere. Here’s the next step of it and it’s being tested out in Holland. I’ve got two articles actually on it. This one is from Liberty Forest. The other one I have is from a Dutch newspaper – but it’s in Dutch – but it confirms it.
(Holland) Dutch police develop mobile body scans
Rotterdam police are trying to develop a portable scanner which will allow them to see through people's clothing and look for concealed weapons, (A: This is the excuse, for concealed weapons.) the NRC reports on Friday.
The force has been given a €500,000 government grant to develop the mobile weapons detector, which would use similar technology to the scanners being introduced at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, the paper says.
The aim is to develop a prototype ready for production within three years.
The paper bases its claim on a confidential document which suggests the scanner could first be used as an alternative to random body searches in high risk areas. The mobile detector would enable the search to be carried out more quickly and would only be used on people suspected of carrying concealed weapons, (A: Well you know that’s a lie. It’s going to be used on streets of people as you pass by. That’s obvious.) police spokesman Paul De Kruijf told the paper.
The document also mentions the possibility of carrying out long-distance scans and mass scans on crowds at events such as football matches. (A: That’s soccer matches over there.) In addition, the scan (A: I call it scam…) could be combined with a sniffer detector which would analyse an 'air sample' from a suspect for traces of drugs or explosives, the paper says.
Giampiero Gerini, a professor at Eindhoven University of Technology told the paper the technology to develop such scans is now mature. 'The biggest challenge is making it portable and ensuring it can carry out a scan in seconds,' the NRC quotes him as saying.
What does it take for people to stand up and resist this?
You know what it takes folks? It would take them cutting off your electricity so you can’t watch TV or play games on the internet… and starvation, pretty well. That’s what it would take before you do anything. Unfortunately, the big boys know that too… they know that too. THEY’VE DONE STUDY AFTER STUDY ON UPRISINGS AND REVOLUTIONS. THEY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU GO TO THE WALL BEFORE PEOPLE RETALIATE AND SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
This article here is kind of related to what I mentioned earlier about the wonderful vegetarian society that MUST be brought in, apparently, by all the big players. All they’ll have access to, eventually for us, is the GMO food. Now, I don’t care what they’ve said about the GMO, you don’t mix hundreds of foreign genes together into a single organism… to produce a better carrot. You don’t put animal and insect and maybe even human genes in there as well… to get a better potato. There is something else here. They have admitted themselves that some of the top BIOWEAPON specialists worked on all these projects to do with food. BIOWEAPONS, what do you think bioweapons happens to be? Remember, the oldest and BEST drugs still around today COME FROM PLANTS. Plants can produce drugs. What do they want to have in the very near future? They want a very PASSIVE society… while they go through these massive changes.
Again, read the Technotronic Era; read Bertrand Russell’s various books on HOW they were going to drug and dumb down and keep happy the population, rather then have mass rioting going on. IT’S THROUGH THE FOOD. They discussed the food. They also discussed injections. I’ve given the quotes many times on this particular show in fact, from the big players themselves. This article is Yahoo News. It’s also the Huffington Post.
Monsanto's GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals
Tue Jan 12 / Yahoo News
In a study released by the International Journal of Biological Sciences, analyzing the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers found that agricultural giant Monsanto's GM corn is linked to organ damage in rats.
According to the study, which was summarized by Adam Shake at Twilight Earth, "Three varieties of Monsanto's GM corn - Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup herbicide-absorbing NK 603 - were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities." (A: We’ve gone through the different agencies before and the people who are on the boards of them, they’ve all worked for Monsanto before. So Monsanto puts them IN to these agencies so that they can pass them.)
Monsanto gathered its own crude statistical data after conducting a 90-day study, even though chronic problems can rarely be found after 90 days, and concluded that the corn was safe for consumption. The stamp of approval may have been premature, however.
In the conclusion of the IJBS study, researchers wrote:
"Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity.... (A: That’s your liver and kidneys.) These substances have never before been an integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently unknown." (A: This doesn’t surprise me because after all, we were not living on pesticide-soaked foods before. This stuff is SOAKED, DOUSED in the heaviest of pesticides. Of course, you have to buy their particular Monsanto pesticide to go with the seeds when you buy the seeds. It kills everything else off except their particular plant. Well, guess what? The plants soak the stuff up as well, in its cellular structure and you are eating it. But that ties right in with the depopulation agenda as well, of course. There are all kinds of cancers that have broken out in the last 20-odd years and 30 years and getting higher all the time. And it’s NOT a crisis, so it’s planned that way. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, so much is presented to the public in a farcical manner – and I mean farcical. When you wake up you start to realize that most of the news is literally farcical the way it’s presented to us and we are never really told the big reasons why anything every really happens. We are given a truth that might be or a reason but never the real reason… never the real reason, never the real truth.
I’ve quoted some of the top players of the day, one by like Mandell House who advised, actually he RAN President Wilson’s administration behind the scenes. He said, for everything that happens in politics, there is always a good reason and then there is the real reason. So the good reason, the semi-plausible reason is always given to the public. Even if there is only 5 percent plausibility in their story, we’ll take that rather than go the whole way and say my God, what’s the real story? We don’t want the shock of the truth. Strange isn’t it, how we work as human beings. We really don’t want the shock of the truth. We don’t want to think that the world is a big cruel place out there, even when we’ve watched the machinations of teams of US, British and Canadian and other sources going out to torture people across the world on a war on terror, we’re told, and snatching folk at airports in their own countries and pulling them off to some other country where they can be tortured. This is the real world.
We know that they are trying to centralize all military actions WITH police across the Western hemisphere, actually all the way to Australia really. It’s worldwide, this whole regime, this world society that’s coming in. This article is from Global Research.
Obama Calls for the Integration of State and Federal Military Forces
Executive Order Seeks to "Synchronize and Integrate"
By Tom Burghardt / Global Research, January 17, 2010
In the wake of the Flight 253 provocation, over-hyped terrorism panics, and last year's Big Pharma and media-engineered hysteria over the H1N1 flu pandemic, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13528 on January 11. (A: I read that on the air last week but this is another take on it.)
Among other things, the Executive Order (EO) established a Council of Governors, an "advisory panel" chosen by the President that will rubber-stamp long-sought-after Pentagon contingency plans to seize control of state National Guard forces in the event of a "national emergency." (A: I talked last week about the CENTRALIZATION OF GOVERNMENT, a main plank of the Communist Manifesto. Think about that.)
According to the White House press release, the ten member, bipartisan Council was created "to strengthen further the partnership (A: Partnership… here we go. Why didn’t they use ‘harmonization,’ that’s a better word, right?) between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards."
"When appointed" the announcement continues, "the Council will be reviewing such matters as involving the National Guard of the various States; homeland defense; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities."
Clearly designed to weaken the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which bars the use of the military for civilian law enforcement, EO 13528 is the latest in a series of maneuvers by previous administrations to wrest control of armed forces (A: under a central command.) historically under the democratic control of elected state officials, and a modicum of public accountability.
You can see where it’s all going and you can see what’s coming by all the things that are happening right now. It’s not a pretty sight but you’ve got to stand up and fight it.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
US has Priority Military Role in Haiti
UK Met Weather Office Wrong Again
Wall Street-100 Billion Dollars for Bankers' Bonuses
Dutch Police Trial Mobile X-Ray Scanners
Monsanto Corn and Organ Failure
US-Total Integration of Military for Home Use
Transcribed by Diana
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 18th 2010. For newcomers to the show, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Bookmark all the sites I have up there for future use because sometimes the main site goes down. The official sites are: [listed above]. As always, at the start of the show I mention that you bring me to you… YOU are the listeners, you the audience. I’m not backed by any big foundation or any big company that’s selling products and so on. The ads on the show that you hear are paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN. That pays for the air time, their staff and equipment and their bills. So it’s up to you as the listeners to keep me going. You can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, see the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale or you can donate to me. You’ll find out how to do it on the web sites. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of the shows I do and passed to them to play on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. So that’s my tin can moment, as I rattle the tin can for the pennies.
I often don’t really pick the topics of the night’s show until the last moment because there is so much to choose from. So much of it too, really, in a sense, is trivia or irrelevant or it will simply get phased out by tomorrow’s news. We are dished out so much news today you can’t keep up with it and that’s part of the technique of data overload, as they call it. With data overloads, it’s hard to retain what’s relevant and hard to even remember what to toss OUT of your mind. Your mind can only hold so much and it gets mixed with trivia and fiction until it’s all a fantasy. Some people like the fantasy, they call them conspiracy theorists. That’s the term that the intelligence services decided to GIVE the people at the bottom to use upon themselves and a lot of them will do that. They’ll say, yep, I’m a conspiracy theorist and they sound like a nutcase right away. The key is, you don’t have to guess about things, as to where the world is going. You don’t have to guess about why things are happening. You just have to read the old books because they TOLD you where it was going a long time ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s hard to choose topics to talk about today because we are bombarded with them. Funny to think that in the 1960s, some of the big players who are still going today, are still alive today and working very hard at this emerging world society, although I think it’s long, long past here already, they talked about this phase that we’d go through where we’d become involved in a sort of world communication society. In other words, they were talking about the internet that they were going to give us way back then, before most of us had even tried a computer ourselves, or they had one for sale and even universities were limited on the types that they had. But they knew they were going to bring this in because they had got so advanced during the whole Cold War with computers that they knew they could bring it in and make A COLLECTIVE SOCIETY. They also knew that people would become more ALIENATED FROM EACH other during this particular phase as well. We could all be on the NET so to speak, and yet we’d eventually be trained to talk to voiceless entities across the world somewhere and never really meet people. They thought that eventually we might not need the ability, we’d lose the ability to actually communicate directly with other people.
When you think about the effects of television, a lot of that was accomplished even then when whole families would sit and stare at the google box and they wouldn’t talk to each other. They were losing the ability to communicate and interact with each other even then. Then back in the 70s and 80s as more cash through credit cards was available, different members of the family would go off into their own rooms to watch their own television set. That further estranged them as well. The computer is doing much the same kind of thing. As I say, it was all predicted an awful long time ago, before a lot of people were born and long before they came up and told us that they were going to give us this thing called the internet.
What I’m truly saying is that we are living through an agenda. The world is simply an agenda. It’s so interesting too, to read the big boys like Brzezinski in his book, Between Two Ages, where he puts out the format to the public, the reader, in the way that I call the ACCIDENTAL VIEW OF HISTORY. Trends just appear, the way the RAND Corporation tends to do its announcements in magazines. Trends appear and according to the trends, they predict that we will be doing down the road and we’ll be doing this by the year so and so and so and so. That’s the way that Brzezinski presented his information and YET Brzezinski and the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission had been working their whole lives, and people before they were born too, were at it DIRECTING THE COURSE of the world and the course of the cultures and the course of technology. So it’s so interesting to see him give you the accidental view but never mention the fact that there were big, big players and powerful organizations SHAPING the direction in which we were told to go. Quite fascinating really.
WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE IN THE ACCIDENTAL VIEW. Things just happen by accident, governments get up and try and fix things on the spur of the moment and that’s why it’s so chaotic and that’s why they make mistakes, we’re told. Again, there is nothing further from the truth. The further back you go, reading the books written by the big players, the more evident it becomes that everything that you’ve lived through was predicted by them because they were making it all happen throughout your whole life and where it’s supposed to go, up to the year 2050 and beyond.
Sometimes they will call them futurists as well, the futurists who predict trends. Like any world where they’ve trained, or any reality where they’ve trained the public to follow EXPERTS – as Bertrand Russell said they would and they have – they pick the supposed TOP futurists, the ones who will predict the winning trends. They are the winners, they’re always right. Well, it’s not because they’ve got good crystal balls or because they’ve got more of an acute mental range or something. It’s because they are IN on the big plan, the big agenda. There is an old saying they used to use in different religions and they’d say, ‘make it so.’ Freemasonry still says that. Even Wicca, they say, ‘so mote it be.’ If you put up the experts there who are putting out the trends, it becomes that way because they’ve said it’s going to become that way. The big businesses listen them and they get on board and they actually MAKE it happen. That’s how you direct society. Plus big money is always available to make sure it goes off in that direction.
In the process, we go through many cons and scams to guide us into the new society of a depopulated planet where children are not only irrelevant almost, they really don’t want them. They really, really don’t like children and they especially don’t like children from the middle and lower classes anymore. Both classes have to go. The world that has been decided that’s to come in eventually is for an elite with a technotronic class, the crème-de-la-crème of the technotronic era will work for them and things will be robotic and eventually even computers will be running operations for them in hospitals and things like that. But they don’t need the massive manpower anymore. They’re looking towards the future where sustainability, as they call it, really, since these guys at the top are always terrified that they’ll die off themselves if there is not enough food to go around, they plan to take down the population first – take out your enemy instead – and make it safe for themselves. In the meantime, WE MUST BE TAUGHT THAT WE ARE THE PROBLEM.
WE are the problem. WE are the consumers, WE are the problem. Well, nothing is further from the truth. The same guys – as I say, many of them are still alive today – promoted the consumer age. They promoted it because they needed a strong West. They needed a strong United States of America because they were supplying the tax money and the military force to go across the whole world as the global policeman. Now that the job is coming to a halt - they are right now attacking the last few countries left to be dominated and to be standardized into this system - they will run out of enemies and they won’t need the big military forces. They also know they are going to take down the Western world at the same time as they are finishing off the Middle East and Asia. That’s why the next part of the plan is to bring the military home, a good part of it, integrate it completely and manage the herd as we gradually get taken down the path to annihilation so the elite might survive.
There’s an old saying that used to be said, and still is said actually in some religions. It said that the few must perish for the sake of the many. In this case, it’s the many that must perish for the sake of the few. That’s the big agenda. I’m not kidding about it. They are very strong about this. They are teaching children in school that children, their own offspring, will be unnecessary. There are already volunteers coming out after massive indoctrination at school, scientific indoctrination, and asking for sterilization. That is part of the agenda.
All meat is to be eliminated, meat consumption. Alvin Toffler, another big futurist there, well funded by the big boys, wrote in his book The Third Wave, that the future will be a vegetarian society and it must be so, he said. He didn’t say why it must be so; he just said it must be so. Now we’re getting articles in the media, from the top again, about the need to stop eating all meat because they say it’s too energy consumptive and they want to give you their GMO foods instead… which are full of toxins and poisons and pesticides. That is not what the elites eat of course. We’ll never get access to their stuff. You could never afford it even if you were given the card to get access.
As everything happens there is always another reason for things happening, never the way we are told. This odd thing with Haiti, people forget that the UN has been in that country for years. Canada and the States and other countries have been sending policemen in, with the blue berets for the United Nations. The RCMP goes in there, from Canada, with blue berets. They just never quite seem to get the Haitians to give up all their rights and be dominated and allow all their resources – and there are resources around there, still to be plundered – to give it all away to the big boys. So bang, along comes the earthquake and do they send in massive relief with all the organizations which they have up? No. What they do is they send in the military, masses of military because they have announced that FIRST AND FOREMOST that area of the Caribbean is necessary for the defense of the United States of America, to have hegemony over it. That’s why they’re sending all the troops in.
This article is from Global Research.
The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti:
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
By Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research, January 15, 2010
Haiti has a longstanding history of US military intervention and occupation going back to the beginning of the 20th Century. US interventionism has contributed to the destruction of Haiti's national economy and the impoverishment of its population.
The devastating earthquake is presented to World public opinion as the sole cause of the country's predicament.
A country has been destroyed, its infrastructure demolished. Its people precipitated into abysmal poverty and despair.
Haiti's history, its colonial past have been erased.
The US military has come to the rescue of an impoverished Nation. What is its Mandate?
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
The main actors in America's "humanitarian operation" are the Department of Defense, the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). (See USAID Speeches: On-The-Record Briefing on the Situation in Haiti, 01/13/10). USAID has also been entrusted in channelling food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program. (See USAID Press Release: USAID to Provide Emergency Food Aid for Haiti Earthquake Victims, January 13, 2010) (Alan: I’m going to talk more about the World Food Program when I come back from this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from Global Research to do with Haiti and the emergency aid that’s supposedly going in there right now. It’s a massive military invasion when you look at it from another point of view. It talks about how the USAID has been entrusted to channel food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program.
The World Food Program is a very interesting program to go into. It’s tied in with the World Agricultural agency at the United Nations because in their mandate when they set up the different parts of the UN, they were set up to be eventually parts of a global structure. That department for agriculture was to be responsible, down the road – which might not be too far – to distribute ALL food to ALL regions; they’ve got the world broken up into regions and that includes the Americas as well, one day. They said at the time, when they set it up, that they will give a set amount of food to every region and you must keep your population down below a certain level because they won’t increase the food. So it’s interesting to see TRAIL runs, in a sense, always being used by the United Nations. That’s what they are, trial runs.
The military component of the US mission, however, tends to overshadow the civilian functions of rescuing a desperate and impoverished population. The overall humanitarian operation is not being led by civilian governmental agencies such as FEMA or USAID, but by the Pentagon.
The dominant decision making role has been entrusted to US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).
A massive deployment of military hardware and personnel is contemplated. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has confirmed that the US will be sending nine to ten thousand troops to Haiti, including 2000 marines. (American Forces Press Service, January 14, 2010)
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships has already arrived in Port au Prince. (January 15, 2010). The 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit as well as and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division "are trained in a wide variety of missions including security and riot-control in addition to humanitarian tasks." (A: Do you ever get the impression it’s going to come back home eventually? That’s what it is. It’s a training exercise too.)
In contrast to rescue and relief teams dispatched by various civilian organizations, the humanitarian mandate of the US military is not clearly defined:
“Marines are definitely warriors first, and that is what the world knows the Marines for,... [but] we’re equally as compassionate when we need to be, and this is a role that we’d like to show -- that compassionate warrior, (A: That’s kind of contradictory.) reaching out with a helping hand for those who need it. We are very excited about this.” (Marines' Spokesman, (A: Remember, that’s Public Relations when you have a spokesman.) Marines Embark on Haiti Response Mission, Army Forces Press Services, January 14, 2010)
While presidents Obama and Préval spoke on the phone, there were no reports of negotiations between the two governments regarding the entry and deployment of US troops on Haitian soil. The decision was taken and imposed unilaterally by Washington. The total lack of a functioning government in Haiti was used to legitimize, on humanitarian grounds, the sending in of a powerful military force, which has de facto taken over several governmental functions. (A: Then it goes on with the different ships that are in the area.)
TABLE 1
US Military Assets to be Sent to Haiti. (according to official announcements)
The amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) and amphibious dock landing ships USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) and USS Carter Hall (LSD 50).
A 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division. 900 soldiers are slated to arrive in Haiti by January 15th.
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships. (arrived in Port au Prince on January 15, 2010): USS Carl Vinson CVN 70
The hospital ship USNS Comfort (A: ONE hospital ship.)
Several U.S. Coast Guard vessels and helicopters (A: And on and on it goes. It’s like an invasion.)
But what makes you feel better too, it’s like after the big tsunami, remember a few years ago, where they said that every country would match, every government would match every charity dollar with a dollar of tax money for the relief funds. Billions were collected. Billions of dollars were collected and then after it was all in they announced that they’d put Bill Clinton and George Bush Sr in charge of the fund and that’s the last you heard of it. I said that at the time too, that will be the last you hear of it because those poor guys over there where the tsunami hit will be gathering up bits of tin and wood and knocking back some shacks together again without any aid at all arriving, and that pretty well is what happened. Well, they put the same two boys in charge of the fund for Haiti so we feel much better now, as two men you can truly trust right?
This is the farce that we’re living through. It’s geopolitics. Remember what these guys say at the top too, even though they can certainly cause earthquakes; that was even questioned at one point with a ship, a submarine in the area of the last tsunami, because they have submarines which can actually lay bombs, drill them into the fault lines and explode them, going back as far as the 1960s. Regardless of that, the CFR and the Trilateral Commission and all of its members always say they can take some catastrophe and turn it to their advantage, for the geopolitical agenda. That will be done with Haiti regardless of what caused it, natural or otherwise.
It’s quite funny to watch the farce between Google… Now Google is one of the top players in collecting all data across the planet for those who rule us. They keep it forever, all data, all kinds of data. I’ve read articles from some of their bosses in fact admitting to all of this. They’re going through this spat with China over censorship because up until now…
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Google and its spat with China over censorship. It’s kind of like the pot calling the kettle black. Here’s Google gathering data for security services across the planet on EVERY single person on the planet and they’ve been cooperating with China up until recently, supposedly, and censoring their own dissidents. A dissident in China is someone who questions anything in the regime, something that’s going to happen here too; ACTUALLY IT ALREADY IS HAPPENING HERE. This is from V3.co.uk.
Google to end censorship of Chinese searches
Company threatens to pull out of China after human rights hacking
Iain Thomson in San Francisco, V3.co.uk 13 Jan 2010
Google has issued a shock announcement that it is to end censoring the results of its Google.cn search engine, after a series of hacking attacks that it says was aimed at human rights activists. (A: Now did anybody ask us about did we mind getting our material kept and snaggled by Google for all the top guys? No. They didn’t ask us, for the top boys to listen to it. But here they are making a pretense of standing up for the human rights activists in China. [Alan laughing.])
The company said in a posting on its corporate blog that Google and at least 20 other companies had been the target of a hacking attack in December.
Google claims to have seen evidence that the attacks were aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.
"These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered, combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web, have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China," wrote David Drummond, chief legal officer at Google.
"We have decided that we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all.
"We recognise that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China." (A: Well we’ll see what happens there. As I say, what a farce. Here they are making a big deal about China when Google admits it’s been collecting data since it set itself up. It’s collecting data on all of us with everything FOR the security intelligence agencies. Such a farce isn’t it.)
The BBC has the MET Office, that’s their weather office, a big, big organization for the BBC. It’s totally on board of course with the new world order because the BBC works FOR the British government. It’s paid for by the tax money and it has political agendas, always has had. It was set up in fact, to be the propaganda arm of the British parliamentary system… and nothing has changed. This article is from the BBC to do with its weather department that’s all for the global warming; it’s a rah-rah team for global warming and all that stuff.
Met Office rethink on forecasts
By Roger Harrabin / Environment analyst, BBC News
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather. (A: These are the guys who are the experts, right, that are all on board with global warming. They failed to predict the extreme weather that Britain and Europe is going through right now.)
Some experts say the Met Office should stop longer-term (A: …statistical projections…) forecasting because it damages the organisation's reputation. (A: Why? Because they are always wrong. They are ALWAYS wrong.)
Others maintain that communication of the forecasts must be improved.
The Met Office has been criticised for failing to predict in its seasonal forecasts the UK would suffer this cold winter or the last three wet summers. (A: They didn’t predict any of them.)
After being rapped for its now notorious "barbecue summer" (A: That never happened right, they got pouring rain.) press release, the winter forecast was expressed in probabilistic terms, (A: And what they told the public was…) with a 66% likelihood that the winter would be warmer than average (A: Here they are with the worst freezing snow in 20 years.) and a one in seven chance that it would be colder.
The Met Office has now admitted to BBC News that its annual global mean forecast predicted temperatures higher than actual temperatures for nine years out of the last 10. (A: 9 out of 10 wrong… [Alan laughing])
This "warming bias" is very small (A: This is their excuse.)- just 0.05C. And the Met Office points out that the variance between the forecast and the actual temperature is within its own stated margins of error. (A: So they can police themselves and pop it within its own margins of error.)
We live through incredible farces don’t we? That’s what I was saying about what do you pick to read on a show like this when there is so much farce out there, except more farce. Here’s another farce here. See, we’re getting steamrolled over, or railroaded I should really say. It’s railroaded and stampeded into crisis after crisis after crisis, all planned that way mind you, because we adapt quickly in crisis to any crazy change. Any new way of living, we adapt so fast… and they know this too from all their social engineering experts at the top. People have already forgotten that we’ve had a monetary crash supposedly and that they bailed out the banks with billions and billions, maybe trillions of dollars… across the world. They said it would make banking more honest and all the rest of that nonsense, at the time when they were dishing out the tax money to the banks. Well, this is the Sunday Times.
Wall Street giants pay staff $100bn (A: This is for bonuses.)
From The Sunday Times January 17, 2010 / Iain Dey
Four of Wall Street’s biggest banks will this week reveal plans to pay their staff a total of close to $100 billion (£62 billion), reigniting the row over bankers’ bonuses. (A: Well no kidding. Here’s the big boys too, the guys that started it all…)
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America Merrill Lynch are all expected to announce bumper pay awards for staff alongside full-year results.
Wall Street’s big payouts come as the remuneration committee at Royal Bank of Scotland prepares to meet this week to determine the size of its bonus pot.
RBS — 84%-owned by British (A: The British government, by the way.) taxpayers — has indicated it wants to pay its investment bankers about £1.5 billion in bonuses, even though it will make a loss this year at group level. The figure could creep higher if it attempts to shelter its bankers from the impact of Alistair Darling’s 50% tax on bonuses.
Lord Myners, the City minister, has called a meeting of global finance ministers and regulators in Downing Street this month to discuss other levies that could be introduced to prevent future crises. (A: Here they are dishing out $100 billion bucks or something to each other and meanwhile the government is meeting to get a bigger pot to STAVE off really, or cushion the NEXT future crisis. Isn’t there something stinking here? Something awfully rotten? Hmm? You know something, there are no laws to stop these guys from doing what they do. It’s the same when Rothschild’s conned the British people into the Bank of England take over by telling them that Napoleon had won. Nothing has been put in place to stop these sharks from ever doing this again. Nothing. Nope. No one goes to jail for it. You see, it’s legal robbery. They run the legal system too. This is called LEGAL ROBBERY. It’s their due… and we can’t say hoot about it.) George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said this weekend he would support calls for a new global charge on banks.
America’s bonus payouts come days after President Barack Obama revealed plans for a windfall tax on banks in an effort to curb the “obscene” bonus culture.
Anger over the huge payments will be heightened by the fact that many of the banks are not profitable. (A: Here they are, they’re not profitable but they’re dishing out millions of bucks in bonuses to the top sharks.)
Of the four due to report figures this week only Goldman is expected to post a profit at the net income level, according to a consensus of analyst forecasts. The losses blow a hole in the argument that the bonuses represent pay for performance. (A: Well that’s for sure. [Alan laughing.])
However, all the banks are expected to show large gains in their investment banking divisions, which have been boosted by financial stimulus operations orchestrated by governments around the world. (A: And the tax payers paid for it all. Isn’t that just hunky-dory. It makes you feel better doesn’t it?)
As we’re being DEGRADED and we’re being dehumanized since 2001 with all the security checks and bend-overs and all the rest of it at airports, and now you get x-rayed and they can look through your clothing and have a good laugh at you. It is admitted now too that they can SAVE that – it is saved – and they can transmit it wirelessly elsewhere. Here’s the next step of it and it’s being tested out in Holland. I’ve got two articles actually on it. This one is from Liberty Forest. The other one I have is from a Dutch newspaper – but it’s in Dutch – but it confirms it.
(Holland) Dutch police develop mobile body scans
Rotterdam police are trying to develop a portable scanner which will allow them to see through people's clothing and look for concealed weapons, (A: This is the excuse, for concealed weapons.) the NRC reports on Friday.
The force has been given a €500,000 government grant to develop the mobile weapons detector, which would use similar technology to the scanners being introduced at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, the paper says.
The aim is to develop a prototype ready for production within three years.
The paper bases its claim on a confidential document which suggests the scanner could first be used as an alternative to random body searches in high risk areas. The mobile detector would enable the search to be carried out more quickly and would only be used on people suspected of carrying concealed weapons, (A: Well you know that’s a lie. It’s going to be used on streets of people as you pass by. That’s obvious.) police spokesman Paul De Kruijf told the paper.
The document also mentions the possibility of carrying out long-distance scans and mass scans on crowds at events such as football matches. (A: That’s soccer matches over there.) In addition, the scan (A: I call it scam…) could be combined with a sniffer detector which would analyse an 'air sample' from a suspect for traces of drugs or explosives, the paper says.
Giampiero Gerini, a professor at Eindhoven University of Technology told the paper the technology to develop such scans is now mature. 'The biggest challenge is making it portable and ensuring it can carry out a scan in seconds,' the NRC quotes him as saying.
What does it take for people to stand up and resist this?
You know what it takes folks? It would take them cutting off your electricity so you can’t watch TV or play games on the internet… and starvation, pretty well. That’s what it would take before you do anything. Unfortunately, the big boys know that too… they know that too. THEY’VE DONE STUDY AFTER STUDY ON UPRISINGS AND REVOLUTIONS. THEY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU GO TO THE WALL BEFORE PEOPLE RETALIATE AND SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
This article here is kind of related to what I mentioned earlier about the wonderful vegetarian society that MUST be brought in, apparently, by all the big players. All they’ll have access to, eventually for us, is the GMO food. Now, I don’t care what they’ve said about the GMO, you don’t mix hundreds of foreign genes together into a single organism… to produce a better carrot. You don’t put animal and insect and maybe even human genes in there as well… to get a better potato. There is something else here. They have admitted themselves that some of the top BIOWEAPON specialists worked on all these projects to do with food. BIOWEAPONS, what do you think bioweapons happens to be? Remember, the oldest and BEST drugs still around today COME FROM PLANTS. Plants can produce drugs. What do they want to have in the very near future? They want a very PASSIVE society… while they go through these massive changes.
Again, read the Technotronic Era; read Bertrand Russell’s various books on HOW they were going to drug and dumb down and keep happy the population, rather then have mass rioting going on. IT’S THROUGH THE FOOD. They discussed the food. They also discussed injections. I’ve given the quotes many times on this particular show in fact, from the big players themselves. This article is Yahoo News. It’s also the Huffington Post.
Monsanto's GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals
Tue Jan 12 / Yahoo News
In a study released by the International Journal of Biological Sciences, analyzing the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers found that agricultural giant Monsanto's GM corn is linked to organ damage in rats.
According to the study, which was summarized by Adam Shake at Twilight Earth, "Three varieties of Monsanto's GM corn - Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup herbicide-absorbing NK 603 - were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities." (A: We’ve gone through the different agencies before and the people who are on the boards of them, they’ve all worked for Monsanto before. So Monsanto puts them IN to these agencies so that they can pass them.)
Monsanto gathered its own crude statistical data after conducting a 90-day study, even though chronic problems can rarely be found after 90 days, and concluded that the corn was safe for consumption. The stamp of approval may have been premature, however.
In the conclusion of the IJBS study, researchers wrote:
"Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity.... (A: That’s your liver and kidneys.) These substances have never before been an integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently unknown." (A: This doesn’t surprise me because after all, we were not living on pesticide-soaked foods before. This stuff is SOAKED, DOUSED in the heaviest of pesticides. Of course, you have to buy their particular Monsanto pesticide to go with the seeds when you buy the seeds. It kills everything else off except their particular plant. Well, guess what? The plants soak the stuff up as well, in its cellular structure and you are eating it. But that ties right in with the depopulation agenda as well, of course. There are all kinds of cancers that have broken out in the last 20-odd years and 30 years and getting higher all the time. And it’s NOT a crisis, so it’s planned that way. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, so much is presented to the public in a farcical manner – and I mean farcical. When you wake up you start to realize that most of the news is literally farcical the way it’s presented to us and we are never really told the big reasons why anything every really happens. We are given a truth that might be or a reason but never the real reason… never the real reason, never the real truth.
I’ve quoted some of the top players of the day, one by like Mandell House who advised, actually he RAN President Wilson’s administration behind the scenes. He said, for everything that happens in politics, there is always a good reason and then there is the real reason. So the good reason, the semi-plausible reason is always given to the public. Even if there is only 5 percent plausibility in their story, we’ll take that rather than go the whole way and say my God, what’s the real story? We don’t want the shock of the truth. Strange isn’t it, how we work as human beings. We really don’t want the shock of the truth. We don’t want to think that the world is a big cruel place out there, even when we’ve watched the machinations of teams of US, British and Canadian and other sources going out to torture people across the world on a war on terror, we’re told, and snatching folk at airports in their own countries and pulling them off to some other country where they can be tortured. This is the real world.
We know that they are trying to centralize all military actions WITH police across the Western hemisphere, actually all the way to Australia really. It’s worldwide, this whole regime, this world society that’s coming in. This article is from Global Research.
Obama Calls for the Integration of State and Federal Military Forces
Executive Order Seeks to "Synchronize and Integrate"
By Tom Burghardt / Global Research, January 17, 2010
In the wake of the Flight 253 provocation, over-hyped terrorism panics, and last year's Big Pharma and media-engineered hysteria over the H1N1 flu pandemic, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13528 on January 11. (A: I read that on the air last week but this is another take on it.)
Among other things, the Executive Order (EO) established a Council of Governors, an "advisory panel" chosen by the President that will rubber-stamp long-sought-after Pentagon contingency plans to seize control of state National Guard forces in the event of a "national emergency." (A: I talked last week about the CENTRALIZATION OF GOVERNMENT, a main plank of the Communist Manifesto. Think about that.)
According to the White House press release, the ten member, bipartisan Council was created "to strengthen further the partnership (A: Partnership… here we go. Why didn’t they use ‘harmonization,’ that’s a better word, right?) between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards."
"When appointed" the announcement continues, "the Council will be reviewing such matters as involving the National Guard of the various States; homeland defense; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities."
Clearly designed to weaken the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which bars the use of the military for civilian law enforcement, EO 13528 is the latest in a series of maneuvers by previous administrations to wrest control of armed forces (A: under a central command.) historically under the democratic control of elected state officials, and a modicum of public accountability.
You can see where it’s all going and you can see what’s coming by all the things that are happening right now. It’s not a pretty sight but you’ve got to stand up and fight it.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
US has Priority Military Role in Haiti
UK Met Weather Office Wrong Again
Wall Street-100 Billion Dollars for Bankers' Bonuses
Dutch Police Trial Mobile X-Ray Scanners
Monsanto Corn and Organ Failure
US-Total Integration of Military for Home Use
Transcribed by Diana
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:04 amHi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix on Thursday 4th March 2010.
For the newcomers out there, look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. Scroll down and you’ll see all the other official sites listed. Bookmark them for future use because sometimes the main ‘com’ site goes down. The ‘tin can’ moment comes right after this because I shake the tin can. It’s quiet because there’s nothing much in it and it’s up to you to keep me going because this is one of the, maybe the only show out there where I don’t get paid by the advertisers.
I could if I wanted to but then I’d have to bring people on as guests and so on and you’d be listening to maybe an ad for a whole hour without realising it but I’ve decided to go the other way. The ads you here on this show are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the airtime. That pays their staff and their bills and equipment and all the other stuff that we hate doing ourselves.
So you can keep me going by going to www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, see what I have for sale, the discs, the books, and so on and you can pay from the US to Canada with personal cheque. You can also use an International Postal Money Order from your Post Office if you wish, and I stress ‘International’. I don’t want you to walk out with the green one. That’s internal only. You can also use Paypal for purchasing or donating. If you want to purchase send a separate email to me with your order along with the Paypal donation. You can use cash. That gets through as well and there’s Moneygram and Western Union. Outside the Americas, same deal, Western Union, Moneygram, cash or you can send a Paypal donation/order. It’s up to you. For those who get the discs burned and passed to them to play on their CD players, they don’t like computers, which I still think are a fairly temporary thing, at least as far as freedom of speech goes, you can get in touch with me [listed above].
And that will get to me.
I’m always talking about reality. It’s something that people think they’re in but seldom are and even people who should know better often fall back into the red herrings that are put out there for them to chase after. You know, 10 years ago, or 15 years ago, people in the US especially who were rather vigilant, a lot of people were still vigilant whilst the rest were sleeping and consuming, they had so many ways to keep in touch with each other. Today the ‘patriot’ community would hang out the white flags if the Internet went down. I’m not kidding you. They don’t need anything else happening, just the Internet going down and out comes the white flags outside their windows. It’s all over for them. Astonishing, astonishing how we adapt until we’re utterly helpless and we can’t think of anything else to do. We forget all the other ways of communications that have been around for such an awful long time and yet people are going frantic when they read things like ‘Obama can shut down the Internet in a national emergency’.
Well, so what?
If you’re so dependent on the Internet, and you think that is freedom, then you’re already gone. You’re already gone. The Internet is out there for the elite to serve themselves, not to serve you.
Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix just reminding people to use their heads and not to be run by fear. There’s an old saying. “If you can’t handle the truth, don’t look for it’ and it’s very, very true because the truth can be rather harsh and if you allow yourself to be afraid of it then it’ll floor you. It’ll put you into a neurosis or a static state where you’re sitting shivering under the kitchen table and that’s not where you want to be. Don’t let yourself be sidetracked by people who just scare the bejesus out of you and leave it at that.
Handle the truth, handle the truth and if no-one’s sitting outside your door right now in some black government truck or whatever ready to blast you to smithereens, then don’t worry about it. You’ve been living this long and this New World Order has been going on before you were born. It was happening before your parents were born. Every part and every stage is just a part to the next phase; all pre-planned of course, including the takedown. But you’ve got to be able to handle the bad news and you don’t panic at the first headlines that come out there that Obama can shut down the Internet and then you hang out the white flags in front of your apartments or your houses because it’s suddenly all over because you can’t type to someone anymore. What a shame, I wonder what your predecessors would have done? There’s no Plan B, C, D or E.
It’s just astonishing how people have become addicted to the Internet and they can’t figure out any other way to communicate to each other if anything should happen; astonishing. To me that’s astonishing. Bad news will always come along, always come along and the most you can do is take what’s relevant, what isn’t so relevant to you and prepare day by day, week by week and so on for yourself and those that you love basically to get through bad, bad times. That’s the best you can honestly do because we’re up against the most organised system that’s ever existed on planet earth, totally integrated with each other through academia, through countless think tanks, foundations and organisations, all cooperating with the governments and we don’t put the government officials into power, the big boys do.
See, ‘democracy’ never ever existed. It was a great con while it lasted and democracy to an extent can give you, while they’re using you of course, because people are always used, and Charles Galton Darwin was quite right when he said in his own book that “people have always been slaves in one form or another and we’re simply creating a more sophisticated form of slavery”. That was democracy with its taxation and during a productive period where you’ve go to build up the economy, use your tax money for projects abroad, or wars as they take over the planet, they allow you to drive old ‘junker’ cars with rust on it and so on. The cops stay off your back during that period. You get your cheap cigarettes and your cheap booze and you get your cheap entertainment. No-one bothers you. You can live in an old shack somewhere and there’s no official coming up to measure it and saying : “You can’t live there. It’s not good for the local surrounding area and the plants and the wildlife.”
You didn’t get that then. It’s only after your usefulness is over for that part, and they’ve completed their mission, they’ve taken all your industry from you, they don’t need you anymore and that’s when they say: “My goodness, we’re pulling your old junker off the road because there’s a hole there and carbon monoxide might get through.” And here you are talking to a cop through your open window. What’s that space there that you’re talking through?
And then they crush your car and all the rest of it. Then up go your smokes because they don’t want you to smoke anymore and so on and so on.
If you notice, China’s going through their industrial phase and the peasantry there, just like the peasantry everywhere else, is allowed cheap smokes and lots of fun and that kind of stuff too and they can drive their old junkers without being annoyed by squads of cops on the roads.
This is a system we live through, a system, and believe you me, a lot of people do crack up with the information that’s thrown out there and they cannot discern what is real, what is fake or what’s meant to immobilise you with fear and terror. They can’t distinguish eventually.
I read an article just a few days ago where a couple with two children had committed suicide and killed one of their children and shot the other one two or three times but it survived, the baby, because they believed the mainstream media that was telling them it was going to be a hopeless future of global warming and desert, desertification, no forests and all that kind of stuff. That’s what drove them to that, listening to that stuff. They were right into environmentalism but they believed every bit of propaganda that was pumped into them.
It’s the same thing too when you get into trying to fight the evil that’s all around the world. You’ve got to discern what’s real, what isn’t, what you can do about something, what you can’t and you don’t allow yourself to be crushed and panicked by the stuff that’s thrown out to you on a daily basis. Remember now, our perception of things have changed drastically, drastically since they gave us the Internet, again mainly to monitor us and classify all of us with our daily activities. We must be predictable in a totalitarian society, that’s why we’ve got it.
It also gives you news from all over the planet and the world isn’t changing. You might hear about a tsunami here or an earthquake there but that has always happened down through history, but when you hear this stuff coming out you think; ‘oh my God, the world’s collapsing, it’s caving in on itself. Everything’s going crazy. Blah, blah blah, blah, blah because you’ve got access to more data and information than you ever, ever had before.
If you were in the Middle Ages it wouldn’t matter if there were 10 volcanoes going up and 15 Pacific islands sunk under them, you’d never have heard about them so you wouldn’t have been worried about it.
The media makes a great deal about this kind of stuff trying to scare the bejesus out of you and for a lot of people it works.
I’ve gone through, as best I can, a lot of this agenda by giving you the official documents from the official people who were helping working it into being and you know, most people would rather look at something else than look and study the dry material that comes from governments, or it comes from their main helpers and think tanks, that outline their whole agenda in phases; 5, 10, 15, 50 year plans, a 100 year plan. I give you all these links and so on for the PDFs that they churn out of the think tanks for the governments. We see how it’s being implemented stage by stage by stage. We’ve gone through this. I went through this, years ago, and I keep doing it up to the present, but people are so easily sidetracked by really, really, purposefully put out there, trivia that sidelines you off into ‘terrorland’.
Now government has counterintelligence out there. They have their teams that will hack your computers and so on but most of their job is in counterintelligence and they will leak stuff out there to the public. I read about it before about the budget for some of the military colleges and so on that are dealing with this and their budgets, are putting out false information and they’ll put them out under different names, different organisations that don’t even exist and then it’s repeated off in mainstream news or patriot news and people prattle it and before you know it’s blown out of all proportion and it’s working very well. Everyone’s mind is collapsing with it and they’re crippled with terror and fear.
Always be wary of the data that you allow to come into your brain. You are the guardian of your own brain, no-one else is and believe you me the brain is such an important thing. Governments have put billions of dollars of research into how to control your brain, from basic psychology, basic through psychic driving and repetition of terror, over and over and over again, using slogans of terror. And they’ve also used the electromagnetic fields and things like that.
I’ve read the books by Brzezinski that he churned out in the ‘70s on the ‘technotronic era’ and how they would try and control whole continents with their emotions or their behaviour by the use of technotronic techniques. These are the things that have been put out from the top that are real because your money, your tax money went into it.
Here’s an article here. Now I mentioned this years ago about television, just basic televisions to show you that right from the very beginning they knew about what they could do to your mind, apart from all the rubbish they put on there. Here’s a patent here, a US patent. This one here is January 14th, 2003. It’s one of many I’m sure and it’s one of the more recent and I’m sure there’re much, much older ones in the same area.
“Nervous system can be manipulated by electromagnet fields”
(A: From monitors)
“Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.”
(A: That’s one of many of the things that governments have been working on for an awful, awful long time and you’re all stuck staring at that screen all day long and you wonder why you’re getting terrified.)
I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
That patent I just read was actually applied for in 2001. As I say, whatever’s applied for through the patent office, to me, is generally obsolete because the big boys at the top, much higher up than the military-industrial complex, believe you me, already have that stuff working very effectively.
It’s interesting too with the articles I’ve read in the past, to do with Microsoft even, with their helmets and their computer interfaces where these helmets with their little sensors can manipulate or just basically probe your brain at the cortex of your brain and work in conjunction with your thoughts. Supposedly that’s what they’re working on and at the same time Microsoft in one of its own little releases admitted they were using some laptops for instance or working on laptops that had the same kind of technology built into the frame around the screen so you wouldn’t need the helmet.
So this stuff is old, but apart from that, about 2 years ago I think it was I read an article from the Pentagon on its weaponised forms of killer viruses. Not to kill the computer, although they can certainly ‘fry’ it, but to actually work the signals of your body in such a way that your blood vessels could narrow so quickly because they understand the language of what turns on and off your system via the eyes; just the eyes themselves even and they can actually cause a stroke. That was a Pentagon paper release.
So be careful with all of this stuff. Be careful too on how much time you spend in front of the box there, whether it’s the TV or the computer.
When you see teachers across the US manipulating the laptops that are given to the children, because they’re free; they’re free and everybody grabs them. You know if there was cyanide dressed up as a new age bon bon, a sugar bon bon candy and they said it was free, everybody would take it. That’s how far gone the public are.
A mouse has got more caution approaching a trap trying to get the cheese than we have anymore. Just say it’s free and we run like a herd, gone. Next thing you know, the teachers are looking into the children, watching them at home. How long has that been going on for? How long has that been going on for? Do you think that government doesn’t do the same thing through your computers?
Apart from the stuff they have admitted to, the screeds of stuff I’ve talked about on the radio from their own findings from universities that are given access to your computer data amongst the various intelligence agencies that are given complete access to all your data on a daily basis as they study you.
That’s just that. They’re doing other things as well obviously. Technotronic warfare, it was called ‘technotronic’ and now it’s under the field of neuroscience.
I’ll put this patent link up for you to look at yourself after the show. All these articles I always put up on my site when Xplornet, the satellite upload characters, allow me twice dial-up speed for high speed. That’s what they call high speed and if you use too much of it, what they claim is too much, they put you right down until you’re below dial-up speed. That’s the wonders of modern technology but it’s also the wonders of what they can do to you if they don’t like you very much.
Now, we’re run by think tanks. Governments don’t come to the public to see what the public want. That’s an idea that we’re given with democracy, they somehow come to ask us what we want. I don’t think that ever really happens except when governments allow NGOs in that work for the foundations that demand things and get what they want. They’re allowed inside it but we are run by think tanks and special think tanks on a very high level staffed with academics that are pulled out often out of a university before they even qualify because they’re brighter than the rest in their particular area and particular speciality.
An example is the ‘Foresight’; another one that advises the governments, including Britain, and they’ve just released their report, the Foresight’s Report and the site here says:
“Foresight’s role is to help government think systematically about the future.”
(A: Did you know that? Did these characters come forward and say “vote Labour” or “vote Liberal, and you’ll also get Foresight and get Rand along with them?” They never mention that do they? Why don’t they go up for election? You see, democracy’s a farce. Politics is a complete farce. So here’s one of them, one of the many governments are working with.
“Foresight’s role is to help government think systematically about the future. We use the latest scientific and other evidence combined with futures analysis to tackle complex issues and help policymakers make decisions affecting our future.
Our work makes a critical contribution to meeting important challenges of the 21st century...”
(A: And here they go)
“...such as food security...”
(A: Because there’s going to be rationing coming down the road)
“ flooding...”
(A: That’s another thing)
“...and obesity.”
(A: Obesity comes in with this and of course they won’t tell you why that’s lumped in with this and then they have their toolkits there and the networks. The links are here. You can look into them. But you look down, you scroll down just to see what they’re really up to. They did...)
“...a two-year study involving over 300 experts in subjects ranging from ecology, economics, planning and geography, outlines that a new approach to managing the UK’s land will be vital to meet the challenges of the 21st century.”
(A: There’re a whole bunch of things down here from land use, global food and farming measures, global environmental migration, because they expect people to start moving out if they start to think there’s going to be a...All they have to say is “it’s going to be dry for the next 20 years in a country”. That’s all they have to say. Hype it up, they’ll make them believe anything and mass migration will occur. That’s how stupid the people are.)
Back with more after these massages.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, bringing some reality back into life by showing the simplicity of the techniques that are really used because most things are really pretty simple. There are sciences which deal with managing ‘the masses’ as they call them, the great masses and then categories of different people within the masses, their own ‘sub-masses’ and so on. These are old, old sciences, well understood and taught in academia.
They’ve always said, you see, in a true democracy it would always be hard for a true democracy to stand for any length of time because countries that are not democratic can put things into gear very quickly and get a whole nation mobilised into whatever they want them to do, very quickly, because they’re obedient in that totalitarian society, whereas a democracy has to coerce and cajole and humour the public to go along and they need a lot of propaganda over a long period of time to make it happen.
That’s why the Club of Rome in their book, ‘The First Global Revolution’ said that of all the systems they looked at, Communism, Socialism - which is really Communism or Collectivism – and so on, the most they favoured was Collectivism for the future and that is what we’re going under now. They said the world would be ‘post democratic’ and we are.
That’s when you must get in the heavy hand of government because people will obey and that’s why they chose a war scenario. A ‘war on terror’ fitted the bill and a ‘war of man against nature and the environment’ was the reason for it as well. That would also fit the bill. They said that themselves in their own book and I’ve quoted it so many times and I’m pretty well sick of it, but we are easily managed.
Getting back to the totalitarian systems, it’s far easier for them. That’s why the UN picked China for the model state for the world to emulate, not just with their one child per family policy, mandatory abortion and all the rest of it, far more, but their whole way of living over in China. They’re a ‘mass man’ in China; ‘mass people’ and in totalitarian regimes you must give them an exciting future. It’s always something in the distant future but you’re all working together towards it. That’s exactly what they’ve brought in to us in the West now. We’re all in a warfare scenario. We’ve all to pull together. We’re all one working towards a common cause and we must all sacrifice. That’s what totalitarianism lives on, feeds on. That’s its modus operandi.
This article here shows how they can do things much quicker in China because remember, they’re still technically Communist.
This is February 24th 2010. It’s the women’s page from ‘Spotlight China’ newspaper.
“The ACWF Advocates A Low Carbon Life among Women”
(A: And it says. Now here you go. It’s so socialistic the terminology they use. You have to read it for yourself to see how they phrase things. Remember that Lenin himself said that “we shall win by the use of slogans”, the repetition of slogans, psychic driving. It says:)
“The All-China Women's Federation, the Civilization Office of the Central Communist Party Committee, and the National Development and Reform Commission have jointly pushed for Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Community Action by carrying out a "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" activity this year.”
(A: "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" is a slogan which they use over there. It’s in quotation marks. Listen to all the organisations. The National Development and Reform Commission, the Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Community Action and societies and so on “by carrying out a "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" activity this year.” Slogans, slogans, slogans gets them right into action.)
“Activities are to be held by women and within households nationwide to promote a low-carbon lifestyle, to spread low-carbon awareness, and to encourage families to live a green life of low energy, low emission, low expense and low cost. Each household is encouraged to live a green life...”
(A: Oh, so they’re going from red to green, which is the sacred colour of Communism. Red is for the revolutionary part.)
“...so as to form a life style and a consumption pattern that conserves energy and protects the environment. Families are to contribute their efforts to the development of an economy based on green energy, low-carbon output, and recycling.
The activity is to be carried out in China's 31 provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities, and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.”
(A: I don’t know what that is – “and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.”
“Launching ceremonies will be held at the capital of each local administrative region.”
(A: You realise that all this is synchronised together. Just do this and it’s done. You just shout from the top and they all just run into action.)
“The launching ceremony in Beijing will indicate the start of the activity. The activity will make an appeal to all families to live a low-carbon lifestyle. Posters will be put up. Banners will be hung high. Leaflets will be distributed among the participants.”
They’re also pushing for a low-meat diet and to grow more veggies, which of course is the agenda here as well, GMO of course, GMO of course. But it’s got all the different tips at the bottom what the women have to do. It’s great too how they split. You see the societies which are totalitarian need to split the men and the women up. They split them up and they create an organisation out of one and an organisation out of the other. They also split the children from the parents psychologically and through their education, they sever the ties and they get the more upgraded education/indoctrination and they’re also separate with their own mandate to follow out.
That’s the beauty of having a totalitarian regime. It’s so quick and easy to do. Here we’ve to live in the West with lies and politicians that pretend to shout to each other or at each other and all the rest of it and go through the motions. Then the representatives that you think you elected come back and tell you that they can’t do much because they must vote with the party and all that stuff.
We go through these silly, ridiculous routines all the time. Meanwhile the bureaucracies are running the countries as they always have and the politicians come and go, come and go and come and go and they sign whatever’s put in front of them. “Sign this” – “Right ok.”
That’s real life. That’s what life is really all about. We’re cajoled and conned and humoured.
Now, the International Monetary Fund, I’ve said this so many times again too, was set up, along with the United Nations, to become a global power. Everything was to be centralised, first through nations under the communistic techniques, centralise all power, centralise all money power and then between the countries you make treaties. You centralise them into regions and then you centralise them into the United Nations. That’s what the whole deal was if you read your books about the founding, the setting up and the purpose of the United Nations with all of its many branches.
“IMF chief pushes for more power, new global currency”
That was Saturday, February 27th, 2010 from Raw Story.
“The International Monetary Fund wants more power to police the global financial system and a bigger role in emergency financing, managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said Friday.
In a speech to the Bretton Woods Committee, a finance reform think tank in Washington, D.C...”.
(A: There’s another private think tank.)
“...he claimed that a stronger IMF also warrants a new global reserve currency that would serve as an alternative to the U.S. Dollar.”
(A: They keep repeating this and they’ll get what they want.)
"Strauss-Kahn said such an asset could be similar to but distinctly different from the IMF's special drawing rights, or SDRs...”
(A: As they call them, Special Drawing Rights
“...the accounting unit that countries use to hold funds within the IMF," ABC News reported. "It is based on a basket of major currencies."
"One day, the Fund might even be called upon to provide a globally issued reserve asset, similar to -- but in important respects different from -- the SDR," he said.
Strauss-Kahn added that "having several suppliers of reserve assets would limit the extent to which the international monetary system as a whole depends on the policies and conditions of a single, albeit dominant, country."
(A: And he goes on and on and on with more and more and more.)
“Both China and Moscow support such a plan, but U.S. leaders have vehemently insisted that empowering the IMF's special drawing rights, or establishing another fund with a global pull similar to the Dollar, is not necessary.”
Well, they have to say that to keep the pundits in the US voting, you know, and that’s the reality of it too. Centralisation’s the key to all totalitarianism and the worst totalitarianism is global; global. When you’re all global and living under a tyranny, you have no other country to compare yourself with, you understand that?
In the past people knew how bad it was in different countries and you could always say, “My goodness, we don’t want to end up like them.” So you had something to give you an example. Once you’re all global, you have no examples left. You’ll think that anything is normal, anything at all. We already do.
Look at all the things that have been crammed down our throats since 2001 for the new century. That’s why they picked 2001, the new century. The century of change they called it for 50 years in academia before 2001, the coming century of change. “Change is good, change is good, quack quack, vote for me.”
People don’t even know what they’re living through.
Now, totalitarianism is the new method you see, under Collectivism or Communism or Socialism, you call it what you want. It’s all the same thing really and you find here that the head of the economic union, the president they’ve just put in there, that the people didn’t put in, in fact he’s selected secretly apparently, like everything else they do there, in this beautiful new Sovietised European Union, this region, he’s now fining people who criticise him.
When politicians can’t criticise and put a show on to each other, as they criticise each other, without getting fined then you know you’re under a straight-faced totalitarian regime.
This article is from the ‘European Voice’ 2nd March 2010.
Farage fined €3,000 for 'insulting' Van Rompuy
“European Parliament President Jerzy Buzek has fined Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party MEPs, €3,000...”
(A: €3,000 is not to be sniffed at.)
“...as punishment for “un-parliamentary and insulting” comments he made about Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council.”
(A: This is the same council by the way where one of the top guys said about a year ago, a year and a half ago, he said that if you criticise the EU, if any citizen criticises the Economic Union and the Parliament that was akin to heresy. Heresy was the word they used in the newspapers. It says;)
“Buzek's office confirmed that the president had fined Farage the maximum he could by withholding ten days worth of daily attendance allowances at €300 a day under the Parliament's code of conduct rules.”
(A: Gee, that’s not bad eh. €3,000. Now you know why they don’t do much in that parliament.)
“The fine was imposed hours after Farage refused to apologise formally for his comments, which have been heavily criticised by other MEPs. This was despite a direct request to do so by Buzek.
The outspoken British MEP described Van Rompuy to his face as having “the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk,”
(A: Which is true, which is true, that’s what he looks like. He’s got about as much charisma as H.G. Wells did. H.G. Wells when he talked to the Fabian Club he used to get laughed at by the people there. Mind you, the Webbs were even worse, Sidney and Beatrice Webb. You should see who their offspring are by the way. It would surprise you, but that’s another story. It says;)
“The remarks that Buzek said violated the Parliament's rules of conduct. Farage also labelled Belgium “pretty much a non-country”.
“I cannot accept this sort of behaviour in the European Parliament,” Buzek said, adding that he was “disappointed” by Farage's conduct and his refusal to apologise.
(A: Well as I say, when politicians can’t say what they want, because that was standard fare for the circus for the public in Britain and here’s a British member of the European Parliament over there doing what you normally do in Britain but it’s ‘verboten’ because you’re in a new system now, a totalitarian system. The members of the European Parliament have no powers anyway. They can’t even vote on laws or anything. They’re there for show. It’s worked out that they get an average I think it was of 20 minutes per year each to speak. That’s the farce to keep the public happy. Your politician might get 20 minutes out of the whole year to say something after blowing his nose and so on.)
Now things are getting so bad now and it’s so beautiful too that they know how far gone we are at the top psychologically as opposed to people 50 years ago when it came to common sense and stuff, to do with perception management, that as we go down the tubes, the shops close down and this kind of thing is happening all over the Western world, what are they doing to pretend that things are still ok?
This is from the Mail Online. It says;
“The deli that’s for window shoppers only: Fake shopfronts built to cover up High St stores that have closed down”
4th March 2010.
“As High Streets are decimated by the recession – fake business facades have been installed to create the illusion that shops are still occupied.
North Tyneside Council is trialling the new window treatment that at first glance gives the impression that units are occupied.
The crumbling facade of a vacant clothing store in the centre of Whitley Bay has made way for a smart shop front with the question ‘Delicatessen?’ and close by ‘This retail space could be yours...’
The same approach is being considered for empty premises in North Shields and Wallsend.”
(A: So that’s Britain’s answer to depression and bankruptcy, is to con the public by making things appear normal so that you’ll feel better because you see, we’ve been taught to be consumers. If it still appears like things aren’t run down and things are still moving then we’ll feel ok. This is way beyond Pavlov. I hope you understand the minds that are dreaming all this stuff up for us. And if they fool you with that and treat you like children, they know they can fool people and that’s why they’re doing it. We become children. What else is an illusion? It says;)
“We need to ensure that the remaining businesses continue to survive and that means ensuring our High Streets look as attractive as possible to both shoppers and potential business investors.
This is a simple and cost effective approach that keeps the retail unit available for potential new uses and in the meantime also contributes to the street scene.”
(A: Ain’t that wonderful eh? Ain’t that wonderful? And here we are watching and living through all this farce and people are worried as I say about the Internet going down. What will they do? The world has come to an end, a complete and utter end. Makes you wonder eh?)
Now, a totalitarian regime, and the one we’re in is definitely totalitarian with all its Communist rules, what to say, what to think, what not to think, with even the techniques they use to inhibit you from thinking about certain things. They put ‘fail-safes’ in the mind. This is how they describe it in psychology, how they can condition people. They’ve got a fail-safe there. They actually used techniques that they’d studied by people who were deeply religious. Someone who is deeply religious who was going into an area of thought that could potentially be a sin, they veered away from it. The same techniques are now used about what’s politically correct and that’s what they’re using and I’ll explain this after I come back from this break.
I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about how Socialism, Communism, whatever you want to call it, works or any totalitarian movement really, how it really works on a mass level and indoctrination is very important and they know exactly how to bring in new ideas, how to promote new ideas until we ‘parrot’ them all and the media’s always on board with them at all steps of the upgrading and that’s what they’re doing. They’re upgrading you all the time right down to what you think, what you say. You’re not allowed to discover anything for yourself and formulate your own opinion anymore. That’s ‘verboten’. We’re all standardised. We’re all the same. It’s like that China article I read recently. That’s what we are.
We’re all the same and here’s where it’s going now with their indoctrination and their inability to allow individuality or self-expression to come out at all. This again is where the whole world is going because Britain is the flagship for this.
Mail Online, 4th March 2010.
“Heads will be forced to list children as young as five on school ‘hate registers’ over everyday playground insults.
Even minor incidents must be recorded as examples of serious bullying and details kept on a database until the pupil leaves secondary school.”
(A: That’ll never leave the database.)
“Teachers are to be told...”
(A: These are the same teachers in Britain who are so happy to drug the children. Now not all teachers are bad, especially the older ones that lived through and saw this stuff coming in, but a lot of the young ones are all ‘gung ho’ because they’ve been brought up thinking it’s quite normal to drug children.)
“Teachers are to be told that even if a primary school child uses homophobic or racist words without knowing their meaning,...
(A: ...“without knowing their meaning...” Now, these children are watching movies and stuff all the time and if you want to hear stuff you get it all through the movies and so on and they parrot them, all the swear words and even all the sexual stuff. So if they parrot this stuff “without knowing their meaning...)
“...simply teaching them such words are hurtful and inappropriate is not enough.
Instead the incident has to be recorded and his or her behaviour monitored for future signs of ‘hate’ bullying.
The accusations will also be recorded in databases held by councils and made available to Whitehall and ministers to help them devise future anti-bullying campaigns.”
(A: So just saying something is now considered bullying.)
“The scale of the effort to stop children using homophobic or racist language was revealed after the parents of a ten-year-old primary school pupil
(A: They always give you one example that’s blown out of proportion.)
“...in Sommerset, Peter Drury, were told that his name would be put on a register and his behaviour monitored while he remained at school.
The boy was reported after he called a friend ‘gay boy’. His parents fear the record of homophobic bullying will count against him throughout his school career and even into adulthood.
In another incident last year, a six-year-old girl Sharona Gower, was reported for ‘racist bulling’ at her school in Tunbridge Wells in Kent.”
It’s such a farcical thing because, you see, every nationality that comes into this school, there’re enough of them, from enough places, they all form their own cliques right away, their own little gangs, that’s what they do but you’re not allowed to speak about it and you’re not supposed to have any opinions for yourself. You’re supposed to take the standard politically correct opinion for everything.
That’s the world we’re into – Totalitarianism – brought by the leading country for world democracy; Great Britain.
Now I don’t know if there’re any callers because my page didn’t go up tonight to see but I’ll be back tomorrow night again, so from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, and before I say this, before I say “it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods, go with you” I should also say, take the data, be empowered by the data, overcome your fear and you’ll feel much stronger.
Back tomorrow night.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Manipulation of Nervous System by Pulses from TV or Computer Monitors
The Foresight Report on Food, Land Use, Obesity etc.
China's Communist Conservation Agenda-Same as Western Communist "Conservation" Agenda
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)IMF Push to be Top Dog Managing Global Currency
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)EU President Fines Politicians for "Insults"
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)Perception becomes Reality--fake Shopfronts to Hide Business Devastation
UK--"Hate" Register for Children in Schools-5yrs. old and Up
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix on Thursday 4th March 2010.
For the newcomers out there, look into http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. Scroll down and you’ll see all the other official sites listed. Bookmark them for future use because sometimes the main ‘com’ site goes down. The ‘tin can’ moment comes right after this because I shake the tin can. It’s quiet because there’s nothing much in it and it’s up to you to keep me going because this is one of the, maybe the only show out there where I don’t get paid by the advertisers.
I could if I wanted to but then I’d have to bring people on as guests and so on and you’d be listening to maybe an ad for a whole hour without realising it but I’ve decided to go the other way. The ads you here on this show are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the airtime. That pays their staff and their bills and equipment and all the other stuff that we hate doing ourselves.
So you can keep me going by going to http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, see what I have for sale, the discs, the books, and so on and you can pay from the US to Canada with personal cheque. You can also use an International Postal Money Order from your Post Office if you wish, and I stress ‘International’. I don’t want you to walk out with the green one. That’s internal only. You can also use Paypal for purchasing or donating. If you want to purchase send a separate email to me with your order along with the Paypal donation. You can use cash. That gets through as well and there’s Moneygram and Western Union. Outside the Americas, same deal, Western Union, Moneygram, cash or you can send a Paypal donation/order. It’s up to you. For those who get the discs burned and passed to them to play on their CD players, they don’t like computers, which I still think are a fairly temporary thing, at least as far as freedom of speech goes, you can get in touch with me [listed above].
And that will get to me.
I’m always talking about reality. It’s something that people think they’re in but seldom are and even people who should know better often fall back into the red herrings that are put out there for them to chase after. You know, 10 years ago, or 15 years ago, people in the US especially who were rather vigilant, a lot of people were still vigilant whilst the rest were sleeping and consuming, they had so many ways to keep in touch with each other. Today the ‘patriot’ community would hang out the white flags if the Internet went down. I’m not kidding you. They don’t need anything else happening, just the Internet going down and out comes the white flags outside their windows. It’s all over for them. Astonishing, astonishing how we adapt until we’re utterly helpless and we can’t think of anything else to do. We forget all the other ways of communications that have been around for such an awful long time and yet people are going frantic when they read things like ‘Obama can shut down the Internet in a national emergency’.
Well, so what?
If you’re so dependent on the Internet, and you think that is freedom, then you’re already gone. You’re already gone. The Internet is out there for the elite to serve themselves, not to serve you.
Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix just reminding people to use their heads and not to be run by fear. There’s an old saying. “If you can’t handle the truth, don’t look for it’ and it’s very, very true because the truth can be rather harsh and if you allow yourself to be afraid of it then it’ll floor you. It’ll put you into a neurosis or a static state where you’re sitting shivering under the kitchen table and that’s not where you want to be. Don’t let yourself be sidetracked by people who just scare the bejesus out of you and leave it at that.
Handle the truth, handle the truth and if no-one’s sitting outside your door right now in some black government truck or whatever ready to blast you to smithereens, then don’t worry about it. You’ve been living this long and this New World Order has been going on before you were born. It was happening before your parents were born. Every part and every stage is just a part to the next phase; all pre-planned of course, including the takedown. But you’ve got to be able to handle the bad news and you don’t panic at the first headlines that come out there that Obama can shut down the Internet and then you hang out the white flags in front of your apartments or your houses because it’s suddenly all over because you can’t type to someone anymore. What a shame, I wonder what your predecessors would have done? There’s no Plan B, C, D or E.
It’s just astonishing how people have become addicted to the Internet and they can’t figure out any other way to communicate to each other if anything should happen; astonishing. To me that’s astonishing. Bad news will always come along, always come along and the most you can do is take what’s relevant, what isn’t so relevant to you and prepare day by day, week by week and so on for yourself and those that you love basically to get through bad, bad times. That’s the best you can honestly do because we’re up against the most organised system that’s ever existed on planet earth, totally integrated with each other through academia, through countless think tanks, foundations and organisations, all cooperating with the governments and we don’t put the government officials into power, the big boys do.
See, ‘democracy’ never ever existed. It was a great con while it lasted and democracy to an extent can give you, while they’re using you of course, because people are always used, and Charles Galton Darwin was quite right when he said in his own book that “people have always been slaves in one form or another and we’re simply creating a more sophisticated form of slavery”. That was democracy with its taxation and during a productive period where you’ve go to build up the economy, use your tax money for projects abroad, or wars as they take over the planet, they allow you to drive old ‘junker’ cars with rust on it and so on. The cops stay off your back during that period. You get your cheap cigarettes and your cheap booze and you get your cheap entertainment. No-one bothers you. You can live in an old shack somewhere and there’s no official coming up to measure it and saying : “You can’t live there. It’s not good for the local surrounding area and the plants and the wildlife.”
You didn’t get that then. It’s only after your usefulness is over for that part, and they’ve completed their mission, they’ve taken all your industry from you, they don’t need you anymore and that’s when they say: “My goodness, we’re pulling your old junker off the road because there’s a hole there and carbon monoxide might get through.” And here you are talking to a cop through your open window. What’s that space there that you’re talking through?
And then they crush your car and all the rest of it. Then up go your smokes because they don’t want you to smoke anymore and so on and so on.
If you notice, China’s going through their industrial phase and the peasantry there, just like the peasantry everywhere else, is allowed cheap smokes and lots of fun and that kind of stuff too and they can drive their old junkers without being annoyed by squads of cops on the roads.
This is a system we live through, a system, and believe you me, a lot of people do crack up with the information that’s thrown out there and they cannot discern what is real, what is fake or what’s meant to immobilise you with fear and terror. They can’t distinguish eventually.
I read an article just a few days ago where a couple with two children had committed suicide and killed one of their children and shot the other one two or three times but it survived, the baby, because they believed the mainstream media that was telling them it was going to be a hopeless future of global warming and desert, desertification, no forests and all that kind of stuff. That’s what drove them to that, listening to that stuff. They were right into environmentalism but they believed every bit of propaganda that was pumped into them.
It’s the same thing too when you get into trying to fight the evil that’s all around the world. You’ve got to discern what’s real, what isn’t, what you can do about something, what you can’t and you don’t allow yourself to be crushed and panicked by the stuff that’s thrown out to you on a daily basis. Remember now, our perception of things have changed drastically, drastically since they gave us the Internet, again mainly to monitor us and classify all of us with our daily activities. We must be predictable in a totalitarian society, that’s why we’ve got it.
It also gives you news from all over the planet and the world isn’t changing. You might hear about a tsunami here or an earthquake there but that has always happened down through history, but when you hear this stuff coming out you think; ‘oh my God, the world’s collapsing, it’s caving in on itself. Everything’s going crazy. Blah, blah blah, blah, blah because you’ve got access to more data and information than you ever, ever had before.
If you were in the Middle Ages it wouldn’t matter if there were 10 volcanoes going up and 15 Pacific islands sunk under them, you’d never have heard about them so you wouldn’t have been worried about it.
The media makes a great deal about this kind of stuff trying to scare the bejesus out of you and for a lot of people it works.
I’ve gone through, as best I can, a lot of this agenda by giving you the official documents from the official people who were helping working it into being and you know, most people would rather look at something else than look and study the dry material that comes from governments, or it comes from their main helpers and think tanks, that outline their whole agenda in phases; 5, 10, 15, 50 year plans, a 100 year plan. I give you all these links and so on for the PDFs that they churn out of the think tanks for the governments. We see how it’s being implemented stage by stage by stage. We’ve gone through this. I went through this, years ago, and I keep doing it up to the present, but people are so easily sidetracked by really, really, purposefully put out there, trivia that sidelines you off into ‘terrorland’.
Now government has counterintelligence out there. They have their teams that will hack your computers and so on but most of their job is in counterintelligence and they will leak stuff out there to the public. I read about it before about the budget for some of the military colleges and so on that are dealing with this and their budgets, are putting out false information and they’ll put them out under different names, different organisations that don’t even exist and then it’s repeated off in mainstream news or patriot news and people prattle it and before you know it’s blown out of all proportion and it’s working very well. Everyone’s mind is collapsing with it and they’re crippled with terror and fear.
Always be wary of the data that you allow to come into your brain. You are the guardian of your own brain, no-one else is and believe you me the brain is such an important thing. Governments have put billions of dollars of research into how to control your brain, from basic psychology, basic through psychic driving and repetition of terror, over and over and over again, using slogans of terror. And they’ve also used the electromagnetic fields and things like that.
I’ve read the books by Brzezinski that he churned out in the ‘70s on the ‘technotronic era’ and how they would try and control whole continents with their emotions or their behaviour by the use of technotronic techniques. These are the things that have been put out from the top that are real because your money, your tax money went into it.
Here’s an article here. Now I mentioned this years ago about television, just basic televisions to show you that right from the very beginning they knew about what they could do to your mind, apart from all the rubbish they put on there. Here’s a patent here, a US patent. This one here is January 14th, 2003. It’s one of many I’m sure and it’s one of the more recent and I’m sure there’re much, much older ones in the same area.
“Nervous system can be manipulated by electromagnet fields”
(A: From monitors)
“Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.”
(A: That’s one of many of the things that governments have been working on for an awful, awful long time and you’re all stuck staring at that screen all day long and you wonder why you’re getting terrified.)
I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
That patent I just read was actually applied for in 2001. As I say, whatever’s applied for through the patent office, to me, is generally obsolete because the big boys at the top, much higher up than the military-industrial complex, believe you me, already have that stuff working very effectively.
It’s interesting too with the articles I’ve read in the past, to do with Microsoft even, with their helmets and their computer interfaces where these helmets with their little sensors can manipulate or just basically probe your brain at the cortex of your brain and work in conjunction with your thoughts. Supposedly that’s what they’re working on and at the same time Microsoft in one of its own little releases admitted they were using some laptops for instance or working on laptops that had the same kind of technology built into the frame around the screen so you wouldn’t need the helmet.
So this stuff is old, but apart from that, about 2 years ago I think it was I read an article from the Pentagon on its weaponised forms of killer viruses. Not to kill the computer, although they can certainly ‘fry’ it, but to actually work the signals of your body in such a way that your blood vessels could narrow so quickly because they understand the language of what turns on and off your system via the eyes; just the eyes themselves even and they can actually cause a stroke. That was a Pentagon paper release.
So be careful with all of this stuff. Be careful too on how much time you spend in front of the box there, whether it’s the TV or the computer.
When you see teachers across the US manipulating the laptops that are given to the children, because they’re free; they’re free and everybody grabs them. You know if there was cyanide dressed up as a new age bon bon, a sugar bon bon candy and they said it was free, everybody would take it. That’s how far gone the public are.
A mouse has got more caution approaching a trap trying to get the cheese than we have anymore. Just say it’s free and we run like a herd, gone. Next thing you know, the teachers are looking into the children, watching them at home. How long has that been going on for? How long has that been going on for? Do you think that government doesn’t do the same thing through your computers?
Apart from the stuff they have admitted to, the screeds of stuff I’ve talked about on the radio from their own findings from universities that are given access to your computer data amongst the various intelligence agencies that are given complete access to all your data on a daily basis as they study you.
That’s just that. They’re doing other things as well obviously. Technotronic warfare, it was called ‘technotronic’ and now it’s under the field of neuroscience.
I’ll put this patent link up for you to look at yourself after the show. All these articles I always put up on my site when Xplornet, the satellite upload characters, allow me twice dial-up speed for high speed. That’s what they call high speed and if you use too much of it, what they claim is too much, they put you right down until you’re below dial-up speed. That’s the wonders of modern technology but it’s also the wonders of what they can do to you if they don’t like you very much.
Now, we’re run by think tanks. Governments don’t come to the public to see what the public want. That’s an idea that we’re given with democracy, they somehow come to ask us what we want. I don’t think that ever really happens except when governments allow NGOs in that work for the foundations that demand things and get what they want. They’re allowed inside it but we are run by think tanks and special think tanks on a very high level staffed with academics that are pulled out often out of a university before they even qualify because they’re brighter than the rest in their particular area and particular speciality.
An example is the ‘Foresight’; another one that advises the governments, including Britain, and they’ve just released their report, the Foresight’s Report and the site here says:
“Foresight’s role is to help government think systematically about the future.”
(A: Did you know that? Did these characters come forward and say “vote Labour” or “vote Liberal, and you’ll also get Foresight and get Rand along with them?” They never mention that do they? Why don’t they go up for election? You see, democracy’s a farce. Politics is a complete farce. So here’s one of them, one of the many governments are working with.
“Foresight’s role is to help government think systematically about the future. We use the latest scientific and other evidence combined with futures analysis to tackle complex issues and help policymakers make decisions affecting our future.
Our work makes a critical contribution to meeting important challenges of the 21st century...”
(A: And here they go)
“...such as food security...”
(A: Because there’s going to be rationing coming down the road)
“ flooding...”
(A: That’s another thing)
“...and obesity.”
(A: Obesity comes in with this and of course they won’t tell you why that’s lumped in with this and then they have their toolkits there and the networks. The links are here. You can look into them. But you look down, you scroll down just to see what they’re really up to. They did...)
“...a two-year study involving over 300 experts in subjects ranging from ecology, economics, planning and geography, outlines that a new approach to managing the UK’s land will be vital to meet the challenges of the 21st century.”
(A: There’re a whole bunch of things down here from land use, global food and farming measures, global environmental migration, because they expect people to start moving out if they start to think there’s going to be a...All they have to say is “it’s going to be dry for the next 20 years in a country”. That’s all they have to say. Hype it up, they’ll make them believe anything and mass migration will occur. That’s how stupid the people are.)
Back with more after these massages.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, bringing some reality back into life by showing the simplicity of the techniques that are really used because most things are really pretty simple. There are sciences which deal with managing ‘the masses’ as they call them, the great masses and then categories of different people within the masses, their own ‘sub-masses’ and so on. These are old, old sciences, well understood and taught in academia.
They’ve always said, you see, in a true democracy it would always be hard for a true democracy to stand for any length of time because countries that are not democratic can put things into gear very quickly and get a whole nation mobilised into whatever they want them to do, very quickly, because they’re obedient in that totalitarian society, whereas a democracy has to coerce and cajole and humour the public to go along and they need a lot of propaganda over a long period of time to make it happen.
That’s why the Club of Rome in their book, ‘The First Global Revolution’ said that of all the systems they looked at, Communism, Socialism - which is really Communism or Collectivism – and so on, the most they favoured was Collectivism for the future and that is what we’re going under now. They said the world would be ‘post democratic’ and we are.
That’s when you must get in the heavy hand of government because people will obey and that’s why they chose a war scenario. A ‘war on terror’ fitted the bill and a ‘war of man against nature and the environment’ was the reason for it as well. That would also fit the bill. They said that themselves in their own book and I’ve quoted it so many times and I’m pretty well sick of it, but we are easily managed.
Getting back to the totalitarian systems, it’s far easier for them. That’s why the UN picked China for the model state for the world to emulate, not just with their one child per family policy, mandatory abortion and all the rest of it, far more, but their whole way of living over in China. They’re a ‘mass man’ in China; ‘mass people’ and in totalitarian regimes you must give them an exciting future. It’s always something in the distant future but you’re all working together towards it. That’s exactly what they’ve brought in to us in the West now. We’re all in a warfare scenario. We’ve all to pull together. We’re all one working towards a common cause and we must all sacrifice. That’s what totalitarianism lives on, feeds on. That’s its modus operandi.
This article here shows how they can do things much quicker in China because remember, they’re still technically Communist.
This is February 24th 2010. It’s the women’s page from ‘Spotlight China’ newspaper.
“The ACWF Advocates A Low Carbon Life among Women”
(A: And it says. Now here you go. It’s so socialistic the terminology they use. You have to read it for yourself to see how they phrase things. Remember that Lenin himself said that “we shall win by the use of slogans”, the repetition of slogans, psychic driving. It says:)
“The All-China Women's Federation, the Civilization Office of the Central Communist Party Committee, and the National Development and Reform Commission have jointly pushed for Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Community Action by carrying out a "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" activity this year.”
(A: "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" is a slogan which they use over there. It’s in quotation marks. Listen to all the organisations. The National Development and Reform Commission, the Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Community Action and societies and so on “by carrying out a "Low Carbon Family and Fashionable Life" activity this year.” Slogans, slogans, slogans gets them right into action.)
“Activities are to be held by women and within households nationwide to promote a low-carbon lifestyle, to spread low-carbon awareness, and to encourage families to live a green life of low energy, low emission, low expense and low cost. Each household is encouraged to live a green life...”
(A: Oh, so they’re going from red to green, which is the sacred colour of Communism. Red is for the revolutionary part.)
“...so as to form a life style and a consumption pattern that conserves energy and protects the environment. Families are to contribute their efforts to the development of an economy based on green energy, low-carbon output, and recycling.
The activity is to be carried out in China's 31 provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities, and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.”
(A: I don’t know what that is – “and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.”
“Launching ceremonies will be held at the capital of each local administrative region.”
(A: You realise that all this is synchronised together. Just do this and it’s done. You just shout from the top and they all just run into action.)
“The launching ceremony in Beijing will indicate the start of the activity. The activity will make an appeal to all families to live a low-carbon lifestyle. Posters will be put up. Banners will be hung high. Leaflets will be distributed among the participants.”
They’re also pushing for a low-meat diet and to grow more veggies, which of course is the agenda here as well, GMO of course, GMO of course. But it’s got all the different tips at the bottom what the women have to do. It’s great too how they split. You see the societies which are totalitarian need to split the men and the women up. They split them up and they create an organisation out of one and an organisation out of the other. They also split the children from the parents psychologically and through their education, they sever the ties and they get the more upgraded education/indoctrination and they’re also separate with their own mandate to follow out.
That’s the beauty of having a totalitarian regime. It’s so quick and easy to do. Here we’ve to live in the West with lies and politicians that pretend to shout to each other or at each other and all the rest of it and go through the motions. Then the representatives that you think you elected come back and tell you that they can’t do much because they must vote with the party and all that stuff.
We go through these silly, ridiculous routines all the time. Meanwhile the bureaucracies are running the countries as they always have and the politicians come and go, come and go and come and go and they sign whatever’s put in front of them. “Sign this” – “Right ok.”
That’s real life. That’s what life is really all about. We’re cajoled and conned and humoured.
Now, the International Monetary Fund, I’ve said this so many times again too, was set up, along with the United Nations, to become a global power. Everything was to be centralised, first through nations under the communistic techniques, centralise all power, centralise all money power and then between the countries you make treaties. You centralise them into regions and then you centralise them into the United Nations. That’s what the whole deal was if you read your books about the founding, the setting up and the purpose of the United Nations with all of its many branches.
“IMF chief pushes for more power, new global currency”
That was Saturday, February 27th, 2010 from Raw Story.
“The International Monetary Fund wants more power to police the global financial system and a bigger role in emergency financing, managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said Friday.
In a speech to the Bretton Woods Committee, a finance reform think tank in Washington, D.C...”.
(A: There’s another private think tank.)
“...he claimed that a stronger IMF also warrants a new global reserve currency that would serve as an alternative to the U.S. Dollar.”
(A: They keep repeating this and they’ll get what they want.)
"Strauss-Kahn said such an asset could be similar to but distinctly different from the IMF's special drawing rights, or SDRs...”
(A: As they call them, Special Drawing Rights
“...the accounting unit that countries use to hold funds within the IMF," ABC News reported. "It is based on a basket of major currencies."
"One day, the Fund might even be called upon to provide a globally issued reserve asset, similar to -- but in important respects different from -- the SDR," he said.
Strauss-Kahn added that "having several suppliers of reserve assets would limit the extent to which the international monetary system as a whole depends on the policies and conditions of a single, albeit dominant, country."
(A: And he goes on and on and on with more and more and more.)
“Both China and Moscow support such a plan, but U.S. leaders have vehemently insisted that empowering the IMF's special drawing rights, or establishing another fund with a global pull similar to the Dollar, is not necessary.”
Well, they have to say that to keep the pundits in the US voting, you know, and that’s the reality of it too. Centralisation’s the key to all totalitarianism and the worst totalitarianism is global; global. When you’re all global and living under a tyranny, you have no other country to compare yourself with, you understand that?
In the past people knew how bad it was in different countries and you could always say, “My goodness, we don’t want to end up like them.” So you had something to give you an example. Once you’re all global, you have no examples left. You’ll think that anything is normal, anything at all. We already do.
Look at all the things that have been crammed down our throats since 2001 for the new century. That’s why they picked 2001, the new century. The century of change they called it for 50 years in academia before 2001, the coming century of change. “Change is good, change is good, quack quack, vote for me.”
People don’t even know what they’re living through.
Now, totalitarianism is the new method you see, under Collectivism or Communism or Socialism, you call it what you want. It’s all the same thing really and you find here that the head of the economic union, the president they’ve just put in there, that the people didn’t put in, in fact he’s selected secretly apparently, like everything else they do there, in this beautiful new Sovietised European Union, this region, he’s now fining people who criticise him.
When politicians can’t criticise and put a show on to each other, as they criticise each other, without getting fined then you know you’re under a straight-faced totalitarian regime.
This article is from the ‘European Voice’ 2nd March 2010.
Farage fined €3,000 for 'insulting' Van Rompuy
“European Parliament President Jerzy Buzek has fined Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party MEPs, €3,000...”
(A: €3,000 is not to be sniffed at.)
“...as punishment for “un-parliamentary and insulting” comments he made about Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council.”
(A: This is the same council by the way where one of the top guys said about a year ago, a year and a half ago, he said that if you criticise the EU, if any citizen criticises the Economic Union and the Parliament that was akin to heresy. Heresy was the word they used in the newspapers. It says;)
“Buzek's office confirmed that the president had fined Farage the maximum he could by withholding ten days worth of daily attendance allowances at €300 a day under the Parliament's code of conduct rules.”
(A: Gee, that’s not bad eh. €3,000. Now you know why they don’t do much in that parliament.)
“The fine was imposed hours after Farage refused to apologise formally for his comments, which have been heavily criticised by other MEPs. This was despite a direct request to do so by Buzek.
The outspoken British MEP described Van Rompuy to his face as having “the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk,”
(A: Which is true, which is true, that’s what he looks like. He’s got about as much charisma as H.G. Wells did. H.G. Wells when he talked to the Fabian Club he used to get laughed at by the people there. Mind you, the Webbs were even worse, Sidney and Beatrice Webb. You should see who their offspring are by the way. It would surprise you, but that’s another story. It says;)
“The remarks that Buzek said violated the Parliament's rules of conduct. Farage also labelled Belgium “pretty much a non-country”.
“I cannot accept this sort of behaviour in the European Parliament,” Buzek said, adding that he was “disappointed” by Farage's conduct and his refusal to apologise.
(A: Well as I say, when politicians can’t say what they want, because that was standard fare for the circus for the public in Britain and here’s a British member of the European Parliament over there doing what you normally do in Britain but it’s ‘verboten’ because you’re in a new system now, a totalitarian system. The members of the European Parliament have no powers anyway. They can’t even vote on laws or anything. They’re there for show. It’s worked out that they get an average I think it was of 20 minutes per year each to speak. That’s the farce to keep the public happy. Your politician might get 20 minutes out of the whole year to say something after blowing his nose and so on.)
Now things are getting so bad now and it’s so beautiful too that they know how far gone we are at the top psychologically as opposed to people 50 years ago when it came to common sense and stuff, to do with perception management, that as we go down the tubes, the shops close down and this kind of thing is happening all over the Western world, what are they doing to pretend that things are still ok?
This is from the Mail Online. It says;
“The deli that’s for window shoppers only: Fake shopfronts built to cover up High St stores that have closed down”
4th March 2010.
“As High Streets are decimated by the recession – fake business facades have been installed to create the illusion that shops are still occupied.
North Tyneside Council is trialling the new window treatment that at first glance gives the impression that units are occupied.
The crumbling facade of a vacant clothing store in the centre of Whitley Bay has made way for a smart shop front with the question ‘Delicatessen?’ and close by ‘This retail space could be yours...’
The same approach is being considered for empty premises in North Shields and Wallsend.”
(A: So that’s Britain’s answer to depression and bankruptcy, is to con the public by making things appear normal so that you’ll feel better because you see, we’ve been taught to be consumers. If it still appears like things aren’t run down and things are still moving then we’ll feel ok. This is way beyond Pavlov. I hope you understand the minds that are dreaming all this stuff up for us. And if they fool you with that and treat you like children, they know they can fool people and that’s why they’re doing it. We become children. What else is an illusion? It says;)
“We need to ensure that the remaining businesses continue to survive and that means ensuring our High Streets look as attractive as possible to both shoppers and potential business investors.
This is a simple and cost effective approach that keeps the retail unit available for potential new uses and in the meantime also contributes to the street scene.”
(A: Ain’t that wonderful eh? Ain’t that wonderful? And here we are watching and living through all this farce and people are worried as I say about the Internet going down. What will they do? The world has come to an end, a complete and utter end. Makes you wonder eh?)
Now, a totalitarian regime, and the one we’re in is definitely totalitarian with all its Communist rules, what to say, what to think, what not to think, with even the techniques they use to inhibit you from thinking about certain things. They put ‘fail-safes’ in the mind. This is how they describe it in psychology, how they can condition people. They’ve got a fail-safe there. They actually used techniques that they’d studied by people who were deeply religious. Someone who is deeply religious who was going into an area of thought that could potentially be a sin, they veered away from it. The same techniques are now used about what’s politically correct and that’s what they’re using and I’ll explain this after I come back from this break.
I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about how Socialism, Communism, whatever you want to call it, works or any totalitarian movement really, how it really works on a mass level and indoctrination is very important and they know exactly how to bring in new ideas, how to promote new ideas until we ‘parrot’ them all and the media’s always on board with them at all steps of the upgrading and that’s what they’re doing. They’re upgrading you all the time right down to what you think, what you say. You’re not allowed to discover anything for yourself and formulate your own opinion anymore. That’s ‘verboten’. We’re all standardised. We’re all the same. It’s like that China article I read recently. That’s what we are.
We’re all the same and here’s where it’s going now with their indoctrination and their inability to allow individuality or self-expression to come out at all. This again is where the whole world is going because Britain is the flagship for this.
Mail Online, 4th March 2010.
“Heads will be forced to list children as young as five on school ‘hate registers’ over everyday playground insults.
Even minor incidents must be recorded as examples of serious bullying and details kept on a database until the pupil leaves secondary school.”
(A: That’ll never leave the database.)
“Teachers are to be told...”
(A: These are the same teachers in Britain who are so happy to drug the children. Now not all teachers are bad, especially the older ones that lived through and saw this stuff coming in, but a lot of the young ones are all ‘gung ho’ because they’ve been brought up thinking it’s quite normal to drug children.)
“Teachers are to be told that even if a primary school child uses homophobic or racist words without knowing their meaning,...
(A: ...“without knowing their meaning...” Now, these children are watching movies and stuff all the time and if you want to hear stuff you get it all through the movies and so on and they parrot them, all the swear words and even all the sexual stuff. So if they parrot this stuff “without knowing their meaning...)
“...simply teaching them such words are hurtful and inappropriate is not enough.
Instead the incident has to be recorded and his or her behaviour monitored for future signs of ‘hate’ bullying.
The accusations will also be recorded in databases held by councils and made available to Whitehall and ministers to help them devise future anti-bullying campaigns.”
(A: So just saying something is now considered bullying.)
“The scale of the effort to stop children using homophobic or racist language was revealed after the parents of a ten-year-old primary school pupil
(A: They always give you one example that’s blown out of proportion.)
“...in Sommerset, Peter Drury, were told that his name would be put on a register and his behaviour monitored while he remained at school.
The boy was reported after he called a friend ‘gay boy’. His parents fear the record of homophobic bullying will count against him throughout his school career and even into adulthood.
In another incident last year, a six-year-old girl Sharona Gower, was reported for ‘racist bulling’ at her school in Tunbridge Wells in Kent.”
It’s such a farcical thing because, you see, every nationality that comes into this school, there’re enough of them, from enough places, they all form their own cliques right away, their own little gangs, that’s what they do but you’re not allowed to speak about it and you’re not supposed to have any opinions for yourself. You’re supposed to take the standard politically correct opinion for everything.
That’s the world we’re into – Totalitarianism – brought by the leading country for world democracy; Great Britain.
Now I don’t know if there’re any callers because my page didn’t go up tonight to see but I’ll be back tomorrow night again, so from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, and before I say this, before I say “it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods, go with you” I should also say, take the data, be empowered by the data, overcome your fear and you’ll feel much stronger.
Back tomorrow night.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Manipulation of Nervous System by Pulses from TV or Computer Monitors
The Foresight Report on Food, Land Use, Obesity etc.
China's Communist Conservation Agenda-Same as Western Communist "Conservation" Agenda
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)
IMF Push to be Top Dog Managing Global Currency
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)
EU President Fines Politicians for "Insults"
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)
Perception becomes Reality--fake Shopfronts to Hide Business Devastation
UK--"Hate" Register for Children in Schools-5yrs. old and Up
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:04 amHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 9th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have listed there for future use because once in a while the big ones go down. I had two go down last night and I haven’t figured out why yet. This happens once in a while so if you have the other sites bookmarked you can always download the latest shows and listen to them for free. [Official sites listed above.] Remember too, that you are the audience who bring me to you. I don’t get paid directly by advertisers like most hosts do; that’s how they get their money. This way I don’t have to bring people on the show as guests who will inform you of certain things but at the same time the selling technique and that’s all fair and well in this system. But I’ve got a free hand this way. The ads you hear on this show are paid directly by the advertisers directly to the station RBN for them to broadcast their air time and for their equipment, staff and their bills, and everyone has got bills. So you’ve got to keep me going by buying the things I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or you can donate to me. There are the books, CDs and DVDs; some of the disks have 50 shows on them, going way back. The books are different. They are written in a non-linear fashion to try and break through the conditioning of the system which indoctrinates us from school onwards. And we do, we’re actually very predictable in the way that we think, through our logic. Just like a computer with their programs and their language, it’s a science. So I try to break through that by showing you how it’s done, in the book form. [Ordering and donation option listed above.] I do depend upon you to keep me going and to get through these times. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
We find that we are going through such massive changes right now. I don’t know how many people really are suffering or feeling the affects of them. Even the ones who are feeling the pinch as money is devalued, and they call it inflation, they still survive, still play, they still surf the net and do whatever they do to pass the time. In other words, their routines aren’t disrupted enough to make them really sit up and take notice. I wonder how many really know what’s really happening in the world. Even the things I talk about here, by showing you the big plans, the agenda and the organizations, by USING their own information to inform you, I wonder how real it is to most people out there? How REAL it is? I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning before the break there, that even though we go over this stuff, to a lot of people it’s still pretty remote. They don’t see their lives changing so drastically. What it is, is they are ADAPTING WITH THE INCREMENTAL CHANGES that are coming along, albeit those changes are faster than they used to be. At one time it would take maybe a few years before the next big jump in taxation or globalization or things like that so they don’t really notice. For those who sometimes email me and say well, this will never happen and that could never happen, don’t forget you all slept through the giving away of all the industries of your country and the whole of Western Europe to China, and adapted to that without a single problem, most of you out there, except for the people who used to work in the factories over in the West. So you can adapt, really, to anything.
Most folk still think that there is a big hierarchy up there where somehow there is an altruistic force at work where people that you’ll never meet but you hear about sometimes in the newspapers are out there for your own good. They are out there to really take CARE of you and make sure that you can continue to play and do the things that you like to do. But I try to get through to the ones who’ve got more savvy and more understanding and who know that this is really REAL. They understand the implications of what’s happening. They understand that there truly are dastardly people out there who have very ominous and dark plans for the whole planet. That’s what I try to put it out here too; it’s to show you how real this is. Not to petrify you and put you into a state of immobility, but to get you to make some changes in your life so that you can at least hopefully come through the worst of it, at least in your own lifetime. What happens after we are gone, who knows.
We know where they want to take the world, the massive depopulation. We know they don’t want children born, especially of the working class type people. They will keep that going in China for quite sometime maybe, because they’ve got plenty of people to choose from. As we are TAUGHT in the West to consume less and less and less, and forced to as well, by the way - force is coming along very shortly - then they will need less workers in China too. That ties in perfectly with the plan that goes up to 2050 where they actually say at world meetings that the population of China will drastically, drastically drop to 2050 and beyond. Right now it’s actually dropping because there are fewer people having children and there are way more men than there are women because of their policies on abortion, etc. So that’s already leveling out. Once 2 parents produce just 1 child, you are literally halving the population in a generation. That’s the whole idea of it.
It’s not because the world isn’t big enough. It’s not that there are too many people either. It’s that those who rule the world BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION and they believe that all those who are dependent, who have been MADE to be dependent I should say, upon the state, especially over the last 50-60-70 years, are really now OBSOLETE. We are post-industrial. They also say we are post-democratic… so they don’t even bother to give us much of an idea of democracy anymore, now that we are all, really, under a form of martial law under the guise of a war on terror. Of course, THE WAR ON TERROR WAS INTENDED FROM THE OUTSET TO GIVE THIS GLOBAL ALLIANCE THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT THEY ARE DOING RIGHT NOW. It also is designed to teach the public to adapt to a war type scenario, where you don’t have the rights that you used to have, even the right to complain.
At least we used to bitch to each other once in a while when things were bad. Most folk don’t even do that any more. I can remember when people would start complaining to each other about the price of gasoline at the pumps and stuff like that. Now it can go up 20 cents and no one says a thing, or for anything else that mattered that you buy at the stores. Everything is going up and up and up… so we adapt very, very well, all through SCIENCES, all understood at the top, and the public at the bottom generally haven’t a clue. The unfortunate thing about us too, is that we’ve lost contact with our continuity of where we came from, where we are, and where we are going. We don’t really care what happens to the next generation down the road. That’s how selfish everyone has been taught to be.
Remember, that’s exactly what some of the big players that helped devise this system a long time ago wrote about, like Lord Bertrand Russell. He said, we shall encourage egocentric behavior, egosyntonic behavior, selfishness and hedonistic behavior. That splits up the connectiveness between people and generations and families and friends and all the rest of it. That has happened already. We even see that in the movies that they churn out because we adapt to what we see in the movies. We copy it. We mimic it in fact. There are hardly any characters in there that anybody could possibly bond with. They are all, we used to call them hard men, guys who were just the big muscle men, the hard men. Everyone is into themselves. That’s really how it’s even portrayed in movies today. THE OLD WAY IS OUT; THE NEW WAY IS IN. WE COPY WHAT WE SEE LIKE MONKEYS.
The media itself is, of course, is probably to blame, from our point of view, but on the other hand, it’s only if you believe that the media is really there to inform you as to what is really going on in the world. I was thinking about it the other night, where I was thinking about all the big world meetings that have been held and how we can get access to their documents that they turn out after the meetings to do with integration, globalization, the transfer of wealth, the transfer of labor between countries, migration, all that kind of stuff, Agenda 21. You can see how it actually works and you live through it working, in fact, and even then a lot of people are oblivious to it or they don’t really care as long as they can play. That’s really what I mean, it truly is play.
People don’t want the bad news. They hope to get through this life without anybody touching THEM. They hope to get to a pensionable age, retire, go fishing - if they are allowed to with a permit - and then die quietly in their sleep. That’s what most folk truly, truly hope for. The young don’t thing about that at all. They think they will live forever; we all do when we’re a certain age. That’s what the military depends upon. So everybody and every generation in turn is actually worked upon in their kind and targeted by media and propaganda. As I say, the media’s job is not to inform you. The media is there to give you trivia really and to give you a very VAGUE outline of the world meetings and what they are all about, they say. And yet you can still go into these world meetings from their own sites and find out what they are really about and you say, my God, are these journalists just illiterate or what or do they read this stuff? Well of course they read it but their job is NOT to get you worried about anything. You’re not supposed to worry about anything. If you worry, you might get active and do something about it and complain and all that kind of stuff. So they give you very vague outlines about what’s really going on.
They also want to make you think that everything is JUST being debated in your lifetime, right now. Whereas, these big meetings are just SHOWS for the media and the public themselves. All the organization, all the drafting up of agendas, all the signing of them is done YEARS before they have the actual show meetings for all their NGO groupies. I’ve got to laugh, too, at the media and how they turn out trivia, utter trivia and diversions and nonsense, as though we had no brain at all. Perhaps, unfortunately, a lot of folk have no brain.
Remember too, that Russell and all these boys said that they would train the public that they couldn’t think for themselves; they’d HAVE to go and ask the experts how everything is done. That HAPPENED in so many areas that it’s just astonishing. That folk are so stupid they ask the experts; they believe them. All you have to say is ‘expert’ now, ‘an expert says’ and you don’t even need the name of the expert. It doesn’t matter; it’s like priesthood.
Here is a beauty right here, as though it’s something brand new.
Teenage boys watching hours of internet pornography every week are treating their girlfriends like sex objects
(Alan: Well, WOW, who’d have thunk? Who would have thunk about that? Thank goodness we’ve got the media to tell us, which should be rather obvious to everybody who’s alive right now, EVERYBODY who is alive right now.)
By Penny Marshall / 8th March 2010 / Mail Online
The English verb to chaperone comes from the French noun 'chaperon' - protector - and it is first recorded in Jane Austen's novel Sense And Sensibility, published in 1811. (A: So someone is writing a little treatise here, some novice, I guess.)
Then, the reputation of a young woman was considered so precious that she was protected at all times if in male company by the presence of another woman: a chaperone.
In Jane Austen's world, a young woman and a young man were rarely, if ever, left alone together.
Two hundred years later, with sexual and feminist revolutions behind us, (A: All promoted from the top.) we're in a world where there are few, if any, boundaries in place to 'protect' a woman's honour. (A: This is how they start off this spiel here.)
Women are free to behave as they wish, sleep with whomever they wish, and the vast amounts of sexual content on TV and in films attests to that. (A: Actually, they COPY what they see on TV and they attest to what they see.)
In fact, many women would argue that the very idea of being 'chaperoned' is restrictive and demeaning.
And yet among today's teenage girls, the chaperone has made a surprising and - as we shall come to see - disturbing comeback.
Today's chaperone is called, in teenspeak, a 'third wheel'. And she is not being forced on girls by concerned or controlling adults worried about honour and etiquette.
The third wheel (the verb is 'to third wheel') has been re-invented by the girls themselves because they want protection from the sexual demands of their boyfriends. (A: The offshoot of it is, is that the boys are wanting them to do the same things that they see on the porno movies, you see; let’s cut to the chase here. However, I’ve got to mention too, that this is media. Media is show business. I hope you understand that. ALL media is show business, including what you think is your news. I’ll explain about this article and how it’s show business. I'll be back with more after this break.)
I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how trivia is put out there for us to swallow, as though we’ve no brain to think for ourselves or to use our own observations but unfortunately, a lot of folk can’t actually and they do swallow up this trivia.
This article I’m reading here is about young guys who want their girlfriends to do all the same things that they see on the porno – whatever you call them; I don’t call them ‘stars’ – and they want the same things going on in their sexual encounters that they see. But the woman who does it is Dr Linda Papadopoulos, one of these TV psychologists. I lump them in with the psychics and all the rest of it. In other words they make their money off show business. They probably have a big following. They’ve got to have something that grabs you and sex always grabs people. But it doesn’t take someone with half a brain to understand what’s been happening, who have lived long enough to actually live through a lot of the things and see what’s going on. Of course, EVERYONE COPIES WHAT’S IN THE MEDIA. Their topics are what have been on yesterday’s news, on the trivia section, or the Hollywood star section or whatever. They can’t think for themselves. They are GIVEN their topics to think about, so even when they expose something, which should be obvious, there is generally another reason behind it too.
It isn’t going to stop because that was one of the big tenets of the new world order boys from the 1930, 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s was DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY UNIT, THE PROMOTION OF SEXUAL PROMISCUITY, EVEN STARTING WITH PRE-PUBERTAL SEX. I’ve read articles from the media; it’s being taught in schools now, getting younger and younger all the time. So it’s WELL on track. As I say, these articles are just scratching the surface and titillating a few pervert senses. That’s all they are really there for.
Meanwhile, as we are overwhelmed with immigrants, we find that there are quite a few articles in the papers today about the immigration in different countries. Everybody has been screaming for years about immigration and yet again, one of the main reasons for immigration, massive immigration that’s been foisted upon the free trade negotiation teams across the world for globalization, was that it would DESTROY EXISTING CULTURES OF THE WEST. That was one of the main reasons for it, in fact. The other reason they give the general public is that they need immigration because your own population is dying off, they are not producing children. They are busy getting their girlfriends to copy porno, but they are not having any children, apparently, so they need all the immigration coming in all the time in order to pay off the national debts of countries. That’s the excuses, the official excuses we are given for it.
At the same time, remember that free trade is not free. It’s really SELECTIVE international corporations and FREE MOVEMENTS of labor that goes with the same charter for globalization. The GATT Treaty is not the free mobilization, either, of immigrants. It is SELECTIVE immigrants, those, gradually, who will be needed by international corporations ONLY. The rest of us will all be stuck within our safe and secure borders, patrolled by guys in black outfits and machine guns watching over us and we won’t be able to move from where we are. That’s what’s coming down the pike.
Here is an article from the Globe and Mail.
As countries shut out migrants, Canada warned it will become the new safe harbour (A: for immigrants.)
As jobs disappear, host countries are lowering immigration quotas to trim welfare rolls and quell potential anti-immigrant feeling.
(A: This is on Reuters as well as in the Nation, from the Globe and Mail.)
By JOE FRIESEN / December 16, 2009 / From Wednesday's Globe and Mail
The worst recession in a generation has already played havoc with the job market, housing prices and the banking system. Now it's doing the same with something else: the worldwide movement of people.
The world's wealthiest nations, from Japan to Spain to Australia, are cutting immigration targets to protect fragile labour markets and encouraging itinerant workers to leave. Only Canada has refused to adjust immigration levels in response to the downturn. (A: I love the terminology, a downturn, it’s a darn disaster for the public but it’s a win, win, win for the globalists because this is what they planned a long time ago. They knew that before they signed the GATT Treaty. Well, if all the factories leave, what will happen to the workers? Let me think now… let’s get another panel to work on that one.)
This outlier status has led to concern among border officials that the country's sympathetic refugee system and generous social programs will make it a prime target for migrants rejected elsewhere. (A: It already has been for years.)
A government intelligence document described as sensitive and not for public distribution (A: I love how governments are there, you know, for open democracies…) warns that more migrants from Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America could opt to come to Canada rather than Western Europe or the United States. The report refers to both legal applicants and those who try to enter illegally.
"We're planning for the economic recovery. (A: What… ‘We’re planning for the economic recovery’… I can’t believe what I’m reading.) Cutting immigration levels is a short-term measure," said Alykhan Velshi, spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney. At the same time, Mr. Velshi said, Canada must guard against those who would try to enter illegally. (A: We say a lot of things in Canada.)
Asylum claims in Canada increased dramatically in 2008, and were on pace for another increase in 2009 until visa restrictions were slapped on travellers from Mexico and the Czech Republic, he said.
"Individuals who may not be fleeing persecution are drawn to Canada because of our overly generous asylum system," (A: ‘Asylum’ used to be a mental place, where you went when you were crazy. Now, apparently, it’s for refugees.) Mr. Velshi said. Human trafficking rings in Canada and the Czech Republic, for example, were encouraging people to make refugee claims in Canada, he added. (A: I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just reading about immigration and how they’re starting to talk about it for the first time. Before, nothing was apparently a problem. Suddenly it’s a problem. Of course, it’s all part of the big ID thing that’s coming up for everyone, that’s really what’s behind a lot of this of this stuff. This article is still about immigration but it’s about Australia this time. It says…
Six out of ten Australians don't want more people - poll
Australian News.Net / Monday 1st March, 2010 (ANI)
Melbourne, Mar. 1 (ANI): More than 60 percent of Australians participating in a poll have said that the federal government should not go ahead with plans to increase the country's population from 22 million to 35 million by 2050, largely through immigration.
According to AAP, a majority of the 1000 people surveyed by Essential Research late last month thought the environment was too fragile to cope with more people, and there was not enough space for them. (A: So I guess they are catching on. They’ve got to use the ‘environment’ to get something through.)
The government wants to boost the population because it means more young taxpayers to pay for the high costs of an ageing population. (A: The same old rubbish they’ve been foisting on the public across Europe for about the last 20-30 years.)
The public, however, aren't buying the economic argument either. Just over half of those surveyed thought more people would not help the economy.
The poll also found that just over half the respondents - 51 per cent - approved of the government's plan to means test the rebate for private health cover. A third of respondents opposed the plan.
Everybody who set up these national health services across the world, through the British Commonwealth system, they were never set up, number one, to cope with the people they have today, the amount of people they have. They definitely are not meant to cope with the amounts of immigrants who also come straight in, often with extended families and they go straight for treatment. Not only that, when you have a government health system, you also have massive cutbacks and where do they cut back first? It’s in the health care system. Of course they always scream they never have enough money because they’ve always got other wars to go and fight and steal oil and stuff. So you could never, ever get anything back from the government; they give you a token, eventually, of health care. That’s what, of course, they’re going to bring to the US as well.
Where is it all going, with this sudden, sudden noticing of immigration by government? This is from the Wall Street Journal.com.
ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan
By LAURA MECKLER / MARCH 8, 2010 / Wall Street Journal
Lawmakers working to craft a new comprehensive immigration bill have settled on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card (A: Then it goes on to say the little bit that’s all important…) all American workers would eventually be required to obtain. (A: I love that. 3 words there, snuck in there, that’s all-important.)
Under the potentially controversial plan still taking shape in the Senate, all legal U.S. workers, including citizens and immigrants, would be issued an ID card with embedded information, such as fingerprints, to tie the card to the worker.
The ID card plan is one of several steps advocates of an immigration overhaul are taking to address concerns that have defeated similar bills in the past. (A: Now, they’ve tried to get the ID card bill through under a hundred different guises, so this is the latest one.)
The uphill effort to pass a bill is being led by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), who plan to meet with President Barack Obama as soon as this week to update him on their work. An administration official said the White House had no position on the biometric card. [Alan laughing.] (A: Oh, boy… don’t you love show business? Show business is wonderful, with these characters that rule us.)
"It's the nub of solving the immigration dilemma politically speaking," Mr. Schumer said in an interview. The card, he said, would directly answer concerns that after legislation is signed, another wave of illegal immigrants would arrive. "If you say they can't get a job when they come here, you'll stop it."
The biggest objections to the biometric cards may come from privacy advocates, who fear they would become de facto national ID cards (A: So someone is still thinking, thank goodness.) that enable the government to track citizens.
"It is fundamentally a massive invasion of people's privacy," (A: Well, what’s left to invade folks? What’s left to invade? As I say, we adapt and we adapt to every totalitarian part of this big agenda that is rammed down our throats. Most folk sleepwalk right through it. I’ve read article after article after article about them going into all of your data on your computers, legally. It doesn’t matter if it’s legal or not legal; whatever they do is legal, as far as the government is concerned, their agencies. When they first gave you computers, they made sure there were backdoor entries through all the windows programs and so on. They are for that very purpose. It was not so you could just go and play. It was definitely to put you into a vague state of mind, but it wasn’t for your own good. It was to make it easier for them to watch every single person, in a totalitarian society. Any change in your behavior, a sudden change in what you are viewing is of interest to those who manage you and rule you. They want you to be predictable. Everyone must be predictable, in a totalitarian society. So this goes on here…) said Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "We're not only talking about fingerprinting every American, treating ordinary Americans like criminals in order to work. We're also talking about a card that would quickly spread from work to voting to travel to pretty much every aspect of American life that requires identification."
Mr. Graham says he respects those concerns (A: Yeah, right!) but disagrees. "We've all got Social Security cards," he said. "They're just easily tampered with. Make them tamper-proof. That's all I'm saying." (A: Which is all rubbish too because you know darn well that there are countries in the world that can copy any darn thing that’s made… anything at all. Anything.)
U.S. employers now have the option of using an online system called E-Verify to check whether potential employees are in the U.S. legally. Many Republicans have pressed to make the system mandatory. But others, including Mr. Schumer, complain that the existing system is ineffective.
Last year, White House aides said they expected to push immigration legislation in 2010. But with health care and unemployment dominating his attention, the president has given little indication the issue is a priority.
Rather, Mr. Obama has said he wanted to see bipartisan support in Congress first. So far, Mr. Graham is the only Republican to voice interest publicly, and he wants at least one other GOP co-sponsor to launch the effort.
So here you go. As I say, they are on a roll now to mention immigration but won’t stop or slow immigration. It’s really to get everybody ID’d. That’s the real thing about it. Eventually the ID card will be like the Soviet Union, or Nazi Germany. YOU’LL HAVE TO SHOW YOUR PASS AT DIFFERENT PLACES, CHECKPOINTS TO GO ANYWHERE OUTSIDE YOUR DESIGNATED AREA. That is the world that’s coming down the pike. Most folk won’t mind, they will adapt to it. They’ll have a bar there and they’ll have their little strip joints there. Most folk live in the cities now and shortly everyone will live in the cities because that is the agenda. They are already going in to demolish all the old factory towns, the suburbs, and turn them back into wilderness areas. That means that everyone else must move into the already overcrowded cities.
There is so much, so much that’s going on, as I say, that sometimes you almost despair of it all. But at the same time, this has been going on all your life. Even our behavior is modified as we go along. PEOPLE DON’T EVEN KNOW THAT MOST OF THE THINGS THEY DO THEMSELVES HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED AND PROMOTED FROM THE TOP, EVEN THEIR HOBBIES. I can remember when they brought yoga in. I can remember when the whole new age thing was being pushed, from the top down, not from the bottom up. It was promoted through music, definitely to get the young in to it. That’s what you always do; you get the next generation, the ones that really matter, indoctrinated and going along with the new way. It doesn’t matter about the old folk; they will die off. That’s what they’ve done every 20 years or so, again, go for the youth for the next phase, the next phase, and the next phase.
The new age came in and I can remember when the Maharishi was doing his rounds all over Europe… and raking in the cash. Again, promoted and getting lots of air time on TV and the BBC and all the big boys. That, obviously, is something which is a mandate. You just don’t get all that promotion. If they want to ignore you, they will ignore you. Eventually there were objections because people realized he was pushing a RELIGION. It was Hinduism under the meditation and the yoga and all the rest of it. So then they came back eventually after a couple of years and introduced new scientific techniques for reducing stress and stuff like that. Now of course, I think half the world’s population goes to yoga classes and they don’t realize its all part of a religion. Our behavior is constantly modified but it’s by design. They had to destroy all the old religions to bring in this new one and including all the promiscuity and all the rest of the stuff that goes with it. No one bonds in a promiscuous society except for a few minutes and that’s it.
Also, you’ve got to always remember too, how we are managed and manipulated. A good example is China. China never really has been a country acknowledged for its individualists. It’s not an individualistic type country. It’s a place where the GROUP, the people are the ones that matter. In fact, you can hide in the group. You can lose yourself in the group. You have no real responsibility except TO the group and the group will make sure that it will handle problems around you, for you… in a sense, the trade-off is you lose yourself in a group. It is the same in the military; it’s all the same techniques that are used.
There is an article here about how they are now creating on the internet and being allowed to by China’s government, which means it’s mandated by the government, A FORM OF HARASSING people who put up certain types of videos on the internet which really upsets anybody in any country. They give you an example here, to get it all going, about a woman who has got a video up and actually kills a kitten with her high heel shoe. They show you how the people are now searching for the person, they find her, she loses her job and so on. However, they are encouraging more and more of this.
Remember, I’ve talked before about the technique of SOCIAL APPROVAL and SOCIAL DISAPPROVAL that was first perfected by the guys at the United Nations and used in China. At one time they used to, for instance, have to send the militia out to grab a woman who was having a second child. That was illegal. They would drag her off to the abortion clinic. They don’t have to do that now and I’ve read the articles from the Chinese papers. The local people will actually do it for you. Your neighbors will take off the woman; they will drag her to the abortion clinic, because she is ANTISOCIAL. That’s the creation of APPROVAL and DISAPPROVAL in psychological indoctrination terminology. So this is part of it too because if they can use this technique on the public to get them to harass people on the internet, they will eventually use the same technique – it is the same technique actually – they can use it for any POLITICAL DISSIDENT as well. That will come… someone who is described as antisocial, doing antisocial acts or whatever. I’ll put this link up on my site at the end of the show.
China’s Cyberposse
By TOM DOWNEY / March 7, 2010 / New York Times
It’s from the New York Times about human flesh search engines in China. That’s what they are calling them, where they hunt people down on the internet, like massive posses, and really go at them. Of course, they give them something viable at first to get it all going, something that we’d all object to, but really, it’s a big experiment to see if they can now use this kind of thing on the internet, to target dissident people. That’s really what it’s for. The folk who are following all this and into it, the MOB always have no brain of their own; they don’t realize they are being used. The MOB never does. The mob, mind you, never, ever benefits from anything, but the mob never knows that. They are always used… ALWAYS, ALWAYS USED.
Part of the big Agenda 21 agreement, many parts of it have already been implemented, that’s the Agenda for the 21st century that all countries signed on to under the United Nations. It was for not only massive depopulation but also massive deindustrialization, the returning of urban areas back to the so-called wilderness. The remaining people, as the population is reduced, going into the cities which will be gradually, again, destroyed and the outskirts will get smaller and smaller up to the year 2050 when they get their ideal population left, I suppose; that’s what they’re all about. Part of it, too, is to start getting us trained not to have the energy that we’ve got now, the energy supplies, or electricity, people’s businesses, and all the rest of it as well. Britain of course, being the flagship for a lot of this stuff that’s going on in the world, we’ve all to copy Britain. There is an article on part of it. It’s from the Telegraph.
How will David Cameron keep the lights on?
Neither of the main parties seems to have any idea how we are to meet the looming shortfall in power, warns Christopher Booker.
By Christopher Booker / 6 Mar 2010 / telegraph.co.uk
As the election approaches, two issues should transcend all others.
One, obviously, is what the parties propose to do about the £178 billion deficit in government spending. (A: Well, I won’t go there.) But another, equally terrifying – as this column has warned for years – is what is to be done to avert the fast-looming crisis in Britain’s electricity supplies. With 40 per cent of our generating capacity due to disappear in the next few years, (A: 40% of their generating capacity… you thought it was all about carbon output and all that nonsense. No, THEY TRAIN YOU INTO POVERTY. That’s what it’s for.) as 14 of our major nuclear and coal-fired power stations are forced to close, (A: They are forcing them all to close down.) how do the parties propose to keep Britain’s lights on and our computer-dependent economy functioning? (A: That’s already happening in Canada too. They had a Pickering power plant in Ontario and they said they were not going to upgrade it or keep it going, which means we are going to get less and less power, as we get trained and trained and trained. That’s what the Smart Meters are for too, eventually as a quota system on the Smart Meter that will cut you off when you go over your allocated quota. Who put that into being? Who was the guy who started it, kicked it off for Canada? Mr Maurice Strong… at the United Nations. They brought him in FROM the United Nations into Ontario. He was put at the head of the project to privatize all our systems, which we paid for by all our tax money, and of course his pals got the present for peanuts. Also it was to start brining down our consumption of energy, as they called it, to TRAIN us into austerity. That was 20 years ago.)
The energy policy of the Conservative Party appears to rest on four main pillars. The first is that electricity companies should not be allowed to replace those coal-fired power stations which help provide us with 35 per cent of our electricity unless new ones are fitted with a system to pipe off their CO2 emissions and bury them under the North Sea. (A: Can you believe this nonsense?) The Government has allocated some £4 billion for four new plants to pioneer this unproven technology (A: I love this. There will be quite the bubbles under the sea.) (to be paid for by all of us through electricity bills), but the Tories say that no new plants should be permitted unless carbon capture is already in place.
The only problem is that two recent studies have shown why carbon capture and storage on this scale is simply not physically possible. Two academic petroleum experts in Texas, Michael and Christine Economides, have shown that it is impossible to inject such huge quantities of CO2 into underground aquifers – 20,000 tons a day for a 1 gigawatt power station – without fracturing the surrounding rock, making further injection impossible. (A: Well, if you put gas into something it’s going to blow it up.) This finding is confirmed in a study by the Grantham Institute at Imperial College. (A: It’s beautiful isn’t it? Simple physics, but they spend millions improving it. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ll go to the phones now and there is Dave from Arizona there. Are you there Dave?
Dave: How are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Dave: You know, it’s funny, the Agenda 21 thing, it kind of goes along with the housing market crash, bad economics and so forth. If you think about it, now people are going to be so burned by the experience of owning a house that they probably won’t want to own one.
Alan: Well, the agenda is eventually that all private property as we know it, with the small landlords and so forth, will all be abolished. It’s to be the big, multi chain landlords ONLY; big corporations that will be in bed with government, these public/private partnerships and that’s what’s to rule our lives so that you can never have property again. They have said in their manifestos, the communists, and of course the United Nations a well, the same thing actually. THE ABOLITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY IS A MAIN TENET OF THEIR ORGANIZATION because it gives you… People fight for property; they’ll fight for the land; they will fight for their home. But when you don’t own anything, there is less impetus or reason to fight for it. You’re quite right.
Dave: Kind of like the vision that you get from reading 1984. It’s like a small dumpy apartment. It’s like a dirty, toxic city. It’s like one screen constantly on.
Alan: Yes. And you will be watched wherever you go. You’ll see Big Brother’s face on a screen when you walk in the lobby. You’ll come up to your apartment and he’ll be at the top of the stairs. He’ll be in your room. This is all part of the techniques that totalitarian regimes have always used.
Dave: One more thing, it’s kind of an ode to the Western male. It’s kind of like, I think the average… the first marriage/divorce rate is around 45%.
Alan: It’s probably even higher. I know that promiscuity, even in marriage... and why should they stop being promiscuous when they are married. See, it doesn’t stop there. Not when they’ve been conditioned to, it’s no big deal; as is often said today. Dropping your pants is no big deal; both women and men say it today. So, why should they stop when they are married? It doesn’t stop now. In fact, that was also part of what Wells hoped would happen and he knew it would happen. He said, if we could encourage most of the women to go into the work force and they will spend most of their day with other males and only maybe a couple of hours at night with their own husband. So that would help to abolish marriage.
Dave: Right. Especially when you look at the role models for women.
Alan: Yes. I know.
Dave: You know they’re all sluts.
Alan: Well, that’s it. Someone sent me some of the Grammy Awards for the best female ones. They were all dressed like prostitutes. What was interesting too, is they all had storm trooper guys dancing around them, with a SWAT team and stuff. So it’s like it’s very COOL now to be under martial law. It’s sexy, I guess; that’s the whole thing. And a lot of Masonic imagery too flashed in front of your face, through all the stuff, to get the youth really fascinated. That’s what it’s all for, the occult, it’s to fascinate the youth. It intrigues them. Sex and violence now in totalitarianism, apparently, is very sexy and you can get awards. It’s also part of the destruction of the age groups. The communists said they’d have to abolish the bonding and transmission of ideas between old and young and the best way to do it was to create a young generation, a youth image. That’s what we have now. Now people are terrified to get old. They will spend fortunes to look young. Anyone who is older is obsolete. You don’t get listened to; you have nothing to say to the public. You’re out of the picture. That’s the message we’ve got today.
Dave: They miss out on the wisdom of the older people.
Alan: Absolutely. And you don’t learn anything that way, when no wisdom is transmitted. Easy to manage.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Effects of Pornography on Boys--Their Relationships with Girls
Overburdened Countries shut out Migrants-Canada to be next Haven
Australian Government Wishes to Increase Immigrant Population -Poll Says Australians Opposed
Biometric ID Workers Card-Starting with Immigrants
China's Mass Manipulation-Social Approval-Disapproval Technique
Take Down of Energy for Control through Rationing
Transcribed by Diana
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 9th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have listed there for future use because once in a while the big ones go down. I had two go down last night and I haven’t figured out why yet. This happens once in a while so if you have the other sites bookmarked you can always download the latest shows and listen to them for free. [Official sites listed above.] Remember too, that you are the audience who bring me to you. I don’t get paid directly by advertisers like most hosts do; that’s how they get their money. This way I don’t have to bring people on the show as guests who will inform you of certain things but at the same time the selling technique and that’s all fair and well in this system. But I’ve got a free hand this way. The ads you hear on this show are paid directly by the advertisers directly to the station RBN for them to broadcast their air time and for their equipment, staff and their bills, and everyone has got bills. So you’ve got to keep me going by buying the things I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or you can donate to me. There are the books, CDs and DVDs; some of the disks have 50 shows on them, going way back. The books are different. They are written in a non-linear fashion to try and break through the conditioning of the system which indoctrinates us from school onwards. And we do, we’re actually very predictable in the way that we think, through our logic. Just like a computer with their programs and their language, it’s a science. So I try to break through that by showing you how it’s done, in the book form. [Ordering and donation option listed above.] I do depend upon you to keep me going and to get through these times. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
We find that we are going through such massive changes right now. I don’t know how many people really are suffering or feeling the affects of them. Even the ones who are feeling the pinch as money is devalued, and they call it inflation, they still survive, still play, they still surf the net and do whatever they do to pass the time. In other words, their routines aren’t disrupted enough to make them really sit up and take notice. I wonder how many really know what’s really happening in the world. Even the things I talk about here, by showing you the big plans, the agenda and the organizations, by USING their own information to inform you, I wonder how real it is to most people out there? How REAL it is? I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning before the break there, that even though we go over this stuff, to a lot of people it’s still pretty remote. They don’t see their lives changing so drastically. What it is, is they are ADAPTING WITH THE INCREMENTAL CHANGES that are coming along, albeit those changes are faster than they used to be. At one time it would take maybe a few years before the next big jump in taxation or globalization or things like that so they don’t really notice. For those who sometimes email me and say well, this will never happen and that could never happen, don’t forget you all slept through the giving away of all the industries of your country and the whole of Western Europe to China, and adapted to that without a single problem, most of you out there, except for the people who used to work in the factories over in the West. So you can adapt, really, to anything.
Most folk still think that there is a big hierarchy up there where somehow there is an altruistic force at work where people that you’ll never meet but you hear about sometimes in the newspapers are out there for your own good. They are out there to really take CARE of you and make sure that you can continue to play and do the things that you like to do. But I try to get through to the ones who’ve got more savvy and more understanding and who know that this is really REAL. They understand the implications of what’s happening. They understand that there truly are dastardly people out there who have very ominous and dark plans for the whole planet. That’s what I try to put it out here too; it’s to show you how real this is. Not to petrify you and put you into a state of immobility, but to get you to make some changes in your life so that you can at least hopefully come through the worst of it, at least in your own lifetime. What happens after we are gone, who knows.
We know where they want to take the world, the massive depopulation. We know they don’t want children born, especially of the working class type people. They will keep that going in China for quite sometime maybe, because they’ve got plenty of people to choose from. As we are TAUGHT in the West to consume less and less and less, and forced to as well, by the way - force is coming along very shortly - then they will need less workers in China too. That ties in perfectly with the plan that goes up to 2050 where they actually say at world meetings that the population of China will drastically, drastically drop to 2050 and beyond. Right now it’s actually dropping because there are fewer people having children and there are way more men than there are women because of their policies on abortion, etc. So that’s already leveling out. Once 2 parents produce just 1 child, you are literally halving the population in a generation. That’s the whole idea of it.
It’s not because the world isn’t big enough. It’s not that there are too many people either. It’s that those who rule the world BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION and they believe that all those who are dependent, who have been MADE to be dependent I should say, upon the state, especially over the last 50-60-70 years, are really now OBSOLETE. We are post-industrial. They also say we are post-democratic… so they don’t even bother to give us much of an idea of democracy anymore, now that we are all, really, under a form of martial law under the guise of a war on terror. Of course, THE WAR ON TERROR WAS INTENDED FROM THE OUTSET TO GIVE THIS GLOBAL ALLIANCE THE RIGHT TO DO WHAT THEY ARE DOING RIGHT NOW. It also is designed to teach the public to adapt to a war type scenario, where you don’t have the rights that you used to have, even the right to complain.
At least we used to bitch to each other once in a while when things were bad. Most folk don’t even do that any more. I can remember when people would start complaining to each other about the price of gasoline at the pumps and stuff like that. Now it can go up 20 cents and no one says a thing, or for anything else that mattered that you buy at the stores. Everything is going up and up and up… so we adapt very, very well, all through SCIENCES, all understood at the top, and the public at the bottom generally haven’t a clue. The unfortunate thing about us too, is that we’ve lost contact with our continuity of where we came from, where we are, and where we are going. We don’t really care what happens to the next generation down the road. That’s how selfish everyone has been taught to be.
Remember, that’s exactly what some of the big players that helped devise this system a long time ago wrote about, like Lord Bertrand Russell. He said, we shall encourage egocentric behavior, egosyntonic behavior, selfishness and hedonistic behavior. That splits up the connectiveness between people and generations and families and friends and all the rest of it. That has happened already. We even see that in the movies that they churn out because we adapt to what we see in the movies. We copy it. We mimic it in fact. There are hardly any characters in there that anybody could possibly bond with. They are all, we used to call them hard men, guys who were just the big muscle men, the hard men. Everyone is into themselves. That’s really how it’s even portrayed in movies today. THE OLD WAY IS OUT; THE NEW WAY IS IN. WE COPY WHAT WE SEE LIKE MONKEYS.
The media itself is, of course, is probably to blame, from our point of view, but on the other hand, it’s only if you believe that the media is really there to inform you as to what is really going on in the world. I was thinking about it the other night, where I was thinking about all the big world meetings that have been held and how we can get access to their documents that they turn out after the meetings to do with integration, globalization, the transfer of wealth, the transfer of labor between countries, migration, all that kind of stuff, Agenda 21. You can see how it actually works and you live through it working, in fact, and even then a lot of people are oblivious to it or they don’t really care as long as they can play. That’s really what I mean, it truly is play.
People don’t want the bad news. They hope to get through this life without anybody touching THEM. They hope to get to a pensionable age, retire, go fishing - if they are allowed to with a permit - and then die quietly in their sleep. That’s what most folk truly, truly hope for. The young don’t thing about that at all. They think they will live forever; we all do when we’re a certain age. That’s what the military depends upon. So everybody and every generation in turn is actually worked upon in their kind and targeted by media and propaganda. As I say, the media’s job is not to inform you. The media is there to give you trivia really and to give you a very VAGUE outline of the world meetings and what they are all about, they say. And yet you can still go into these world meetings from their own sites and find out what they are really about and you say, my God, are these journalists just illiterate or what or do they read this stuff? Well of course they read it but their job is NOT to get you worried about anything. You’re not supposed to worry about anything. If you worry, you might get active and do something about it and complain and all that kind of stuff. So they give you very vague outlines about what’s really going on.
They also want to make you think that everything is JUST being debated in your lifetime, right now. Whereas, these big meetings are just SHOWS for the media and the public themselves. All the organization, all the drafting up of agendas, all the signing of them is done YEARS before they have the actual show meetings for all their NGO groupies. I’ve got to laugh, too, at the media and how they turn out trivia, utter trivia and diversions and nonsense, as though we had no brain at all. Perhaps, unfortunately, a lot of folk have no brain.
Remember too, that Russell and all these boys said that they would train the public that they couldn’t think for themselves; they’d HAVE to go and ask the experts how everything is done. That HAPPENED in so many areas that it’s just astonishing. That folk are so stupid they ask the experts; they believe them. All you have to say is ‘expert’ now, ‘an expert says’ and you don’t even need the name of the expert. It doesn’t matter; it’s like priesthood.
Here is a beauty right here, as though it’s something brand new.
Teenage boys watching hours of internet pornography every week are treating their girlfriends like sex objects
(Alan: Well, WOW, who’d have thunk? Who would have thunk about that? Thank goodness we’ve got the media to tell us, which should be rather obvious to everybody who’s alive right now, EVERYBODY who is alive right now.)
By Penny Marshall / 8th March 2010 / Mail Online
The English verb to chaperone comes from the French noun 'chaperon' - protector - and it is first recorded in Jane Austen's novel Sense And Sensibility, published in 1811. (A: So someone is writing a little treatise here, some novice, I guess.)
Then, the reputation of a young woman was considered so precious that she was protected at all times if in male company by the presence of another woman: a chaperone.
In Jane Austen's world, a young woman and a young man were rarely, if ever, left alone together.
Two hundred years later, with sexual and feminist revolutions behind us, (A: All promoted from the top.) we're in a world where there are few, if any, boundaries in place to 'protect' a woman's honour. (A: This is how they start off this spiel here.)
Women are free to behave as they wish, sleep with whomever they wish, and the vast amounts of sexual content on TV and in films attests to that. (A: Actually, they COPY what they see on TV and they attest to what they see.)
In fact, many women would argue that the very idea of being 'chaperoned' is restrictive and demeaning.
And yet among today's teenage girls, the chaperone has made a surprising and - as we shall come to see - disturbing comeback.
Today's chaperone is called, in teenspeak, a 'third wheel'. And she is not being forced on girls by concerned or controlling adults worried about honour and etiquette.
The third wheel (the verb is 'to third wheel') has been re-invented by the girls themselves because they want protection from the sexual demands of their boyfriends. (A: The offshoot of it is, is that the boys are wanting them to do the same things that they see on the porno movies, you see; let’s cut to the chase here. However, I’ve got to mention too, that this is media. Media is show business. I hope you understand that. ALL media is show business, including what you think is your news. I’ll explain about this article and how it’s show business. I'll be back with more after this break.)
I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how trivia is put out there for us to swallow, as though we’ve no brain to think for ourselves or to use our own observations but unfortunately, a lot of folk can’t actually and they do swallow up this trivia.
This article I’m reading here is about young guys who want their girlfriends to do all the same things that they see on the porno – whatever you call them; I don’t call them ‘stars’ – and they want the same things going on in their sexual encounters that they see. But the woman who does it is Dr Linda Papadopoulos, one of these TV psychologists. I lump them in with the psychics and all the rest of it. In other words they make their money off show business. They probably have a big following. They’ve got to have something that grabs you and sex always grabs people. But it doesn’t take someone with half a brain to understand what’s been happening, who have lived long enough to actually live through a lot of the things and see what’s going on. Of course, EVERYONE COPIES WHAT’S IN THE MEDIA. Their topics are what have been on yesterday’s news, on the trivia section, or the Hollywood star section or whatever. They can’t think for themselves. They are GIVEN their topics to think about, so even when they expose something, which should be obvious, there is generally another reason behind it too.
It isn’t going to stop because that was one of the big tenets of the new world order boys from the 1930, 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s was DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY UNIT, THE PROMOTION OF SEXUAL PROMISCUITY, EVEN STARTING WITH PRE-PUBERTAL SEX. I’ve read articles from the media; it’s being taught in schools now, getting younger and younger all the time. So it’s WELL on track. As I say, these articles are just scratching the surface and titillating a few pervert senses. That’s all they are really there for.
Meanwhile, as we are overwhelmed with immigrants, we find that there are quite a few articles in the papers today about the immigration in different countries. Everybody has been screaming for years about immigration and yet again, one of the main reasons for immigration, massive immigration that’s been foisted upon the free trade negotiation teams across the world for globalization, was that it would DESTROY EXISTING CULTURES OF THE WEST. That was one of the main reasons for it, in fact. The other reason they give the general public is that they need immigration because your own population is dying off, they are not producing children. They are busy getting their girlfriends to copy porno, but they are not having any children, apparently, so they need all the immigration coming in all the time in order to pay off the national debts of countries. That’s the excuses, the official excuses we are given for it.
At the same time, remember that free trade is not free. It’s really SELECTIVE international corporations and FREE MOVEMENTS of labor that goes with the same charter for globalization. The GATT Treaty is not the free mobilization, either, of immigrants. It is SELECTIVE immigrants, those, gradually, who will be needed by international corporations ONLY. The rest of us will all be stuck within our safe and secure borders, patrolled by guys in black outfits and machine guns watching over us and we won’t be able to move from where we are. That’s what’s coming down the pike.
Here is an article from the Globe and Mail.
As countries shut out migrants, Canada warned it will become the new safe harbour (A: for immigrants.)
As jobs disappear, host countries are lowering immigration quotas to trim welfare rolls and quell potential anti-immigrant feeling.
(A: This is on Reuters as well as in the Nation, from the Globe and Mail.)
By JOE FRIESEN / December 16, 2009 / From Wednesday's Globe and Mail
The worst recession in a generation has already played havoc with the job market, housing prices and the banking system. Now it's doing the same with something else: the worldwide movement of people.
The world's wealthiest nations, from Japan to Spain to Australia, are cutting immigration targets to protect fragile labour markets and encouraging itinerant workers to leave. Only Canada has refused to adjust immigration levels in response to the downturn. (A: I love the terminology, a downturn, it’s a darn disaster for the public but it’s a win, win, win for the globalists because this is what they planned a long time ago. They knew that before they signed the GATT Treaty. Well, if all the factories leave, what will happen to the workers? Let me think now… let’s get another panel to work on that one.)
This outlier status has led to concern among border officials that the country's sympathetic refugee system and generous social programs will make it a prime target for migrants rejected elsewhere. (A: It already has been for years.)
A government intelligence document described as sensitive and not for public distribution (A: I love how governments are there, you know, for open democracies…) warns that more migrants from Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America could opt to come to Canada rather than Western Europe or the United States. The report refers to both legal applicants and those who try to enter illegally.
"We're planning for the economic recovery. (A: What… ‘We’re planning for the economic recovery’… I can’t believe what I’m reading.) Cutting immigration levels is a short-term measure," said Alykhan Velshi, spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney. At the same time, Mr. Velshi said, Canada must guard against those who would try to enter illegally. (A: We say a lot of things in Canada.)
Asylum claims in Canada increased dramatically in 2008, and were on pace for another increase in 2009 until visa restrictions were slapped on travellers from Mexico and the Czech Republic, he said.
"Individuals who may not be fleeing persecution are drawn to Canada because of our overly generous asylum system," (A: ‘Asylum’ used to be a mental place, where you went when you were crazy. Now, apparently, it’s for refugees.) Mr. Velshi said. Human trafficking rings in Canada and the Czech Republic, for example, were encouraging people to make refugee claims in Canada, he added. (A: I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just reading about immigration and how they’re starting to talk about it for the first time. Before, nothing was apparently a problem. Suddenly it’s a problem. Of course, it’s all part of the big ID thing that’s coming up for everyone, that’s really what’s behind a lot of this of this stuff. This article is still about immigration but it’s about Australia this time. It says…
Six out of ten Australians don't want more people - poll
Australian News.Net / Monday 1st March, 2010 (ANI)
Melbourne, Mar. 1 (ANI): More than 60 percent of Australians participating in a poll have said that the federal government should not go ahead with plans to increase the country's population from 22 million to 35 million by 2050, largely through immigration.
According to AAP, a majority of the 1000 people surveyed by Essential Research late last month thought the environment was too fragile to cope with more people, and there was not enough space for them. (A: So I guess they are catching on. They’ve got to use the ‘environment’ to get something through.)
The government wants to boost the population because it means more young taxpayers to pay for the high costs of an ageing population. (A: The same old rubbish they’ve been foisting on the public across Europe for about the last 20-30 years.)
The public, however, aren't buying the economic argument either. Just over half of those surveyed thought more people would not help the economy.
The poll also found that just over half the respondents - 51 per cent - approved of the government's plan to means test the rebate for private health cover. A third of respondents opposed the plan.
Everybody who set up these national health services across the world, through the British Commonwealth system, they were never set up, number one, to cope with the people they have today, the amount of people they have. They definitely are not meant to cope with the amounts of immigrants who also come straight in, often with extended families and they go straight for treatment. Not only that, when you have a government health system, you also have massive cutbacks and where do they cut back first? It’s in the health care system. Of course they always scream they never have enough money because they’ve always got other wars to go and fight and steal oil and stuff. So you could never, ever get anything back from the government; they give you a token, eventually, of health care. That’s what, of course, they’re going to bring to the US as well.
Where is it all going, with this sudden, sudden noticing of immigration by government? This is from the Wall Street Journal.com.
ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan
By LAURA MECKLER / MARCH 8, 2010 / Wall Street Journal
Lawmakers working to craft a new comprehensive immigration bill have settled on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card (A: Then it goes on to say the little bit that’s all important…) all American workers would eventually be required to obtain. (A: I love that. 3 words there, snuck in there, that’s all-important.)
Under the potentially controversial plan still taking shape in the Senate, all legal U.S. workers, including citizens and immigrants, would be issued an ID card with embedded information, such as fingerprints, to tie the card to the worker.
The ID card plan is one of several steps advocates of an immigration overhaul are taking to address concerns that have defeated similar bills in the past. (A: Now, they’ve tried to get the ID card bill through under a hundred different guises, so this is the latest one.)
The uphill effort to pass a bill is being led by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), who plan to meet with President Barack Obama as soon as this week to update him on their work. An administration official said the White House had no position on the biometric card. [Alan laughing.] (A: Oh, boy… don’t you love show business? Show business is wonderful, with these characters that rule us.)
"It's the nub of solving the immigration dilemma politically speaking," Mr. Schumer said in an interview. The card, he said, would directly answer concerns that after legislation is signed, another wave of illegal immigrants would arrive. "If you say they can't get a job when they come here, you'll stop it."
The biggest objections to the biometric cards may come from privacy advocates, who fear they would become de facto national ID cards (A: So someone is still thinking, thank goodness.) that enable the government to track citizens.
"It is fundamentally a massive invasion of people's privacy," (A: Well, what’s left to invade folks? What’s left to invade? As I say, we adapt and we adapt to every totalitarian part of this big agenda that is rammed down our throats. Most folk sleepwalk right through it. I’ve read article after article after article about them going into all of your data on your computers, legally. It doesn’t matter if it’s legal or not legal; whatever they do is legal, as far as the government is concerned, their agencies. When they first gave you computers, they made sure there were backdoor entries through all the windows programs and so on. They are for that very purpose. It was not so you could just go and play. It was definitely to put you into a vague state of mind, but it wasn’t for your own good. It was to make it easier for them to watch every single person, in a totalitarian society. Any change in your behavior, a sudden change in what you are viewing is of interest to those who manage you and rule you. They want you to be predictable. Everyone must be predictable, in a totalitarian society. So this goes on here…) said Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "We're not only talking about fingerprinting every American, treating ordinary Americans like criminals in order to work. We're also talking about a card that would quickly spread from work to voting to travel to pretty much every aspect of American life that requires identification."
Mr. Graham says he respects those concerns (A: Yeah, right!) but disagrees. "We've all got Social Security cards," he said. "They're just easily tampered with. Make them tamper-proof. That's all I'm saying." (A: Which is all rubbish too because you know darn well that there are countries in the world that can copy any darn thing that’s made… anything at all. Anything.)
U.S. employers now have the option of using an online system called E-Verify to check whether potential employees are in the U.S. legally. Many Republicans have pressed to make the system mandatory. But others, including Mr. Schumer, complain that the existing system is ineffective.
Last year, White House aides said they expected to push immigration legislation in 2010. But with health care and unemployment dominating his attention, the president has given little indication the issue is a priority.
Rather, Mr. Obama has said he wanted to see bipartisan support in Congress first. So far, Mr. Graham is the only Republican to voice interest publicly, and he wants at least one other GOP co-sponsor to launch the effort.
So here you go. As I say, they are on a roll now to mention immigration but won’t stop or slow immigration. It’s really to get everybody ID’d. That’s the real thing about it. Eventually the ID card will be like the Soviet Union, or Nazi Germany. YOU’LL HAVE TO SHOW YOUR PASS AT DIFFERENT PLACES, CHECKPOINTS TO GO ANYWHERE OUTSIDE YOUR DESIGNATED AREA. That is the world that’s coming down the pike. Most folk won’t mind, they will adapt to it. They’ll have a bar there and they’ll have their little strip joints there. Most folk live in the cities now and shortly everyone will live in the cities because that is the agenda. They are already going in to demolish all the old factory towns, the suburbs, and turn them back into wilderness areas. That means that everyone else must move into the already overcrowded cities.
There is so much, so much that’s going on, as I say, that sometimes you almost despair of it all. But at the same time, this has been going on all your life. Even our behavior is modified as we go along. PEOPLE DON’T EVEN KNOW THAT MOST OF THE THINGS THEY DO THEMSELVES HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED AND PROMOTED FROM THE TOP, EVEN THEIR HOBBIES. I can remember when they brought yoga in. I can remember when the whole new age thing was being pushed, from the top down, not from the bottom up. It was promoted through music, definitely to get the young in to it. That’s what you always do; you get the next generation, the ones that really matter, indoctrinated and going along with the new way. It doesn’t matter about the old folk; they will die off. That’s what they’ve done every 20 years or so, again, go for the youth for the next phase, the next phase, and the next phase.
The new age came in and I can remember when the Maharishi was doing his rounds all over Europe… and raking in the cash. Again, promoted and getting lots of air time on TV and the BBC and all the big boys. That, obviously, is something which is a mandate. You just don’t get all that promotion. If they want to ignore you, they will ignore you. Eventually there were objections because people realized he was pushing a RELIGION. It was Hinduism under the meditation and the yoga and all the rest of it. So then they came back eventually after a couple of years and introduced new scientific techniques for reducing stress and stuff like that. Now of course, I think half the world’s population goes to yoga classes and they don’t realize its all part of a religion. Our behavior is constantly modified but it’s by design. They had to destroy all the old religions to bring in this new one and including all the promiscuity and all the rest of the stuff that goes with it. No one bonds in a promiscuous society except for a few minutes and that’s it.
Also, you’ve got to always remember too, how we are managed and manipulated. A good example is China. China never really has been a country acknowledged for its individualists. It’s not an individualistic type country. It’s a place where the GROUP, the people are the ones that matter. In fact, you can hide in the group. You can lose yourself in the group. You have no real responsibility except TO the group and the group will make sure that it will handle problems around you, for you… in a sense, the trade-off is you lose yourself in a group. It is the same in the military; it’s all the same techniques that are used.
There is an article here about how they are now creating on the internet and being allowed to by China’s government, which means it’s mandated by the government, A FORM OF HARASSING people who put up certain types of videos on the internet which really upsets anybody in any country. They give you an example here, to get it all going, about a woman who has got a video up and actually kills a kitten with her high heel shoe. They show you how the people are now searching for the person, they find her, she loses her job and so on. However, they are encouraging more and more of this.
Remember, I’ve talked before about the technique of SOCIAL APPROVAL and SOCIAL DISAPPROVAL that was first perfected by the guys at the United Nations and used in China. At one time they used to, for instance, have to send the militia out to grab a woman who was having a second child. That was illegal. They would drag her off to the abortion clinic. They don’t have to do that now and I’ve read the articles from the Chinese papers. The local people will actually do it for you. Your neighbors will take off the woman; they will drag her to the abortion clinic, because she is ANTISOCIAL. That’s the creation of APPROVAL and DISAPPROVAL in psychological indoctrination terminology. So this is part of it too because if they can use this technique on the public to get them to harass people on the internet, they will eventually use the same technique – it is the same technique actually – they can use it for any POLITICAL DISSIDENT as well. That will come… someone who is described as antisocial, doing antisocial acts or whatever. I’ll put this link up on my site at the end of the show.
China’s Cyberposse
By TOM DOWNEY / March 7, 2010 / New York Times
It’s from the New York Times about human flesh search engines in China. That’s what they are calling them, where they hunt people down on the internet, like massive posses, and really go at them. Of course, they give them something viable at first to get it all going, something that we’d all object to, but really, it’s a big experiment to see if they can now use this kind of thing on the internet, to target dissident people. That’s really what it’s for. The folk who are following all this and into it, the MOB always have no brain of their own; they don’t realize they are being used. The MOB never does. The mob, mind you, never, ever benefits from anything, but the mob never knows that. They are always used… ALWAYS, ALWAYS USED.
Part of the big Agenda 21 agreement, many parts of it have already been implemented, that’s the Agenda for the 21st century that all countries signed on to under the United Nations. It was for not only massive depopulation but also massive deindustrialization, the returning of urban areas back to the so-called wilderness. The remaining people, as the population is reduced, going into the cities which will be gradually, again, destroyed and the outskirts will get smaller and smaller up to the year 2050 when they get their ideal population left, I suppose; that’s what they’re all about. Part of it, too, is to start getting us trained not to have the energy that we’ve got now, the energy supplies, or electricity, people’s businesses, and all the rest of it as well. Britain of course, being the flagship for a lot of this stuff that’s going on in the world, we’ve all to copy Britain. There is an article on part of it. It’s from the Telegraph.
How will David Cameron keep the lights on?
Neither of the main parties seems to have any idea how we are to meet the looming shortfall in power, warns Christopher Booker.
By Christopher Booker / 6 Mar 2010 / telegraph.co.uk
As the election approaches, two issues should transcend all others.
One, obviously, is what the parties propose to do about the £178 billion deficit in government spending. (A: Well, I won’t go there.) But another, equally terrifying – as this column has warned for years – is what is to be done to avert the fast-looming crisis in Britain’s electricity supplies. With 40 per cent of our generating capacity due to disappear in the next few years, (A: 40% of their generating capacity… you thought it was all about carbon output and all that nonsense. No, THEY TRAIN YOU INTO POVERTY. That’s what it’s for.) as 14 of our major nuclear and coal-fired power stations are forced to close, (A: They are forcing them all to close down.) how do the parties propose to keep Britain’s lights on and our computer-dependent economy functioning? (A: That’s already happening in Canada too. They had a Pickering power plant in Ontario and they said they were not going to upgrade it or keep it going, which means we are going to get less and less power, as we get trained and trained and trained. That’s what the Smart Meters are for too, eventually as a quota system on the Smart Meter that will cut you off when you go over your allocated quota. Who put that into being? Who was the guy who started it, kicked it off for Canada? Mr Maurice Strong… at the United Nations. They brought him in FROM the United Nations into Ontario. He was put at the head of the project to privatize all our systems, which we paid for by all our tax money, and of course his pals got the present for peanuts. Also it was to start brining down our consumption of energy, as they called it, to TRAIN us into austerity. That was 20 years ago.)
The energy policy of the Conservative Party appears to rest on four main pillars. The first is that electricity companies should not be allowed to replace those coal-fired power stations which help provide us with 35 per cent of our electricity unless new ones are fitted with a system to pipe off their CO2 emissions and bury them under the North Sea. (A: Can you believe this nonsense?) The Government has allocated some £4 billion for four new plants to pioneer this unproven technology (A: I love this. There will be quite the bubbles under the sea.) (to be paid for by all of us through electricity bills), but the Tories say that no new plants should be permitted unless carbon capture is already in place.
The only problem is that two recent studies have shown why carbon capture and storage on this scale is simply not physically possible. Two academic petroleum experts in Texas, Michael and Christine Economides, have shown that it is impossible to inject such huge quantities of CO2 into underground aquifers – 20,000 tons a day for a 1 gigawatt power station – without fracturing the surrounding rock, making further injection impossible. (A: Well, if you put gas into something it’s going to blow it up.) This finding is confirmed in a study by the Grantham Institute at Imperial College. (A: It’s beautiful isn’t it? Simple physics, but they spend millions improving it. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ll go to the phones now and there is Dave from Arizona there. Are you there Dave?
Dave: How are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Dave: You know, it’s funny, the Agenda 21 thing, it kind of goes along with the housing market crash, bad economics and so forth. If you think about it, now people are going to be so burned by the experience of owning a house that they probably won’t want to own one.
Alan: Well, the agenda is eventually that all private property as we know it, with the small landlords and so forth, will all be abolished. It’s to be the big, multi chain landlords ONLY; big corporations that will be in bed with government, these public/private partnerships and that’s what’s to rule our lives so that you can never have property again. They have said in their manifestos, the communists, and of course the United Nations a well, the same thing actually. THE ABOLITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY IS A MAIN TENET OF THEIR ORGANIZATION because it gives you… People fight for property; they’ll fight for the land; they will fight for their home. But when you don’t own anything, there is less impetus or reason to fight for it. You’re quite right.
Dave: Kind of like the vision that you get from reading 1984. It’s like a small dumpy apartment. It’s like a dirty, toxic city. It’s like one screen constantly on.
Alan: Yes. And you will be watched wherever you go. You’ll see Big Brother’s face on a screen when you walk in the lobby. You’ll come up to your apartment and he’ll be at the top of the stairs. He’ll be in your room. This is all part of the techniques that totalitarian regimes have always used.
Dave: One more thing, it’s kind of an ode to the Western male. It’s kind of like, I think the average… the first marriage/divorce rate is around 45%.
Alan: It’s probably even higher. I know that promiscuity, even in marriage... and why should they stop being promiscuous when they are married. See, it doesn’t stop there. Not when they’ve been conditioned to, it’s no big deal; as is often said today. Dropping your pants is no big deal; both women and men say it today. So, why should they stop when they are married? It doesn’t stop now. In fact, that was also part of what Wells hoped would happen and he knew it would happen. He said, if we could encourage most of the women to go into the work force and they will spend most of their day with other males and only maybe a couple of hours at night with their own husband. So that would help to abolish marriage.
Dave: Right. Especially when you look at the role models for women.
Alan: Yes. I know.
Dave: You know they’re all sluts.
Alan: Well, that’s it. Someone sent me some of the Grammy Awards for the best female ones. They were all dressed like prostitutes. What was interesting too, is they all had storm trooper guys dancing around them, with a SWAT team and stuff. So it’s like it’s very COOL now to be under martial law. It’s sexy, I guess; that’s the whole thing. And a lot of Masonic imagery too flashed in front of your face, through all the stuff, to get the youth really fascinated. That’s what it’s all for, the occult, it’s to fascinate the youth. It intrigues them. Sex and violence now in totalitarianism, apparently, is very sexy and you can get awards. It’s also part of the destruction of the age groups. The communists said they’d have to abolish the bonding and transmission of ideas between old and young and the best way to do it was to create a young generation, a youth image. That’s what we have now. Now people are terrified to get old. They will spend fortunes to look young. Anyone who is older is obsolete. You don’t get listened to; you have nothing to say to the public. You’re out of the picture. That’s the message we’ve got today.
Dave: They miss out on the wisdom of the older people.
Alan: Absolutely. And you don’t learn anything that way, when no wisdom is transmitted. Easy to manage.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Effects of Pornography on Boys--Their Relationships with Girls
Overburdened Countries shut out Migrants-Canada to be next Haven
Australian Government Wishes to Increase Immigrant Population -Poll Says Australians Opposed
Biometric ID Workers Card-Starting with Immigrants
China's Mass Manipulation-Social Approval-Disapproval Technique
Take Down of Energy for Control through Rationing
Transcribed by Diana
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:05 amHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on May 12, 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. I always stress that you bookmark all the other sites you’ll see there because I DO have trouble with the Yahoo/.com site right now and eventually I’ll probably get pulled. So look at the alternate sites, bookmark them and you can download the latest shows from my other sites; they are all on that site and listed there. [Official sites listed above.] While you are in there, look and see the books that I have for sale, the DVDs, the CDs I have for sale because that helps me to trickle over, along with the occasional donation. It’s expensive to do what I do. Believe you me, it’s more than any full-time job; I wouldn’t pick this in a million years if it was just for money. But it’s up to you the audience to keep me going and you can do so by buying the books and disks or donating to me and passing the word around of what I’m doing. Bring more people into the show, although there are lots coming in all the time. The more the merrier, because this is a war to the finish here for things that are and things that will be. The things that will be are not to our liking, believe you me, when they are coming down the pike. They are inside now, in fact, all the things that we are about to have hoisted upon us. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Lots of folk just get the disks burned and passed to them; they’ve gone off computers all together because it’s been in all the newspapers for the last year or so just how much data they are storing on everybody and the fact that they are monitoring every single person, every day, and storing all their communiqué. So they’ve gone off of them all together; they play these CDs on their CD players. You can get in touch with me at [address above].
As I said before, all the things that are coming down, the things that WILL BE are now turning the bend in the creek and we are seeing them manifest themselves. Those at the top who’ve been working in institutions for these long-term goals of theirs are rejoicing because they really believe they have us in an enough stage of chaos that we will accept everything. A whole new way of living, a new REGIMENTED society from cradle to grave, with so many agencies controlling us all through our lives, that we will simply be too content playing video games, watching TV, staring at porn, and all of that kind of stuff, as the entertainment really ramps up into more violent, more sexual themes all the time. That’s how they are countering this too; keeping people from thinking about the hard facts, to keep them in a form of DOUBLE MIND and DOUBLE SPEAK. They partly know what’s going on, partly, a little bit at the back of their minds; the rest of it is mixed up in with their media, their mainstream news, which is like a circus. It’s PRESENTED like a circus as you go from horrific deeds and murders and rapes on your news, over to Afghanistan and drones blowing up hundreds of people that happen to be standing around, and everything is a big, surrealistic circus. They don’t care. They are out of the picture. They are out of the running. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. The matrix I always describe, it’s where everything comes from. Your whole reality, it’s given to you, really. You are born into this reality. It has many other realities within it. You are given one at the bottom level, generally. There are different classes of people given HIGHER realities. Then you have those who help run the world system who are given more hard facts and data from archives, a different education completely, too, on the past and a lot of it is to do – just like the ancient pharos being taught by the priest, they get taught by their fathers and their uncles – how the world REALLY runs and how the cons of rulership – because that’s all rulership is about, it conning people really, these days – how they are carried out and how you can use mass manipulation by using the SUBCONSCIOUS URGES of the great unwashed masses.
Part of the plan, I’ve gone over it so many times it gets so sickening but unfortunately that’s what we are in. If you are in a war and you were fighting every single day, you’d have to get together with your captains and your majors and so on, and you discuss the war and your strategies. You’d get pretty sick of it too, but you’ve got to do it every day because you ARE in a fight for life and death literally and this is no different. It’s no different at all because those at the top who believe they are the most evolved of all can have the right to dominate us. Not just dominate us but now reduce and cull off, definitely cull off a lot of us, as they have been doing with inoculations and now the GMO food until we have populations that are coming down with incredible allergies.
Everybody has amazing allergies. Children are BORN with them now. Children, some children have their skin peeling off them… and they just don’t understand what’s happening, this NEW phenomena. Like the sterilization, which is strange too, they just don’t know why the men are going infertile. Then, other scientists will say, here it is and they give you all the data and why, and it’s ignored again and you are back to the beginning question mark, we don’t know what’s causing it.
There is an article that I was going to read earlier and I didn’t bother because it’s terrifically horrible, but it’s also kind of passé in this day and age. I’ll say what I mean by that when I get through this little story. It was from the Sunday Times.
Doctors sterilise Uzbek women by stealth
Mark Franchetti / From The Sunday Times April 25, 2010 / timesonline.co.uk
WHEN her baby died soon after delivery, Gulbahor Zavidova, 28, a poor farmer’s wife, longed to be pregnant again. After months of trying she and her husband visited a doctor who told her she could never have another child because she had been sterilised. (Alan: She didn’t know it.)
The procedure had been performed immediately after she gave birth, by doctors who did not ask her consent. On learning she could not bear children, her husband left her.
“Not a day passes without me crying,” she said. “I was outraged when I found out what they had done. How could they do such a horrible thing without asking me?” (A: This is what the point of it is. You have to go into the writings of all of these eugenicists and elitists at the top, like John Holdren and the book he participated in, EcoScience, to do with bringing the population down by stealth. Holdren said, they could do it in the third world countries where there is less education and get away with it quite easily; they wouldn’t have to be terribly devious, just don’t tell the patients what you are doing to them. But he said, for the West - for the United States and Canada and Europe - they’d have to use stealth methods, where they would have to use something in the food or the inoculations to carry it out. He’s up there with Obama now; we should be VERY afraid, I keep telling you that. They are there for a reason now. They are there for a very good reason now. There are no coincidences when these guys get in and they get appointed on the boards of governments across the world, ALL at the same time. Back to the story…)
According to human rights groups, tens of thousands of young women like Zavidova have been sterilised without their consent in the authoritarian former Soviet state of Uzbekistan.
Uzbek sources say the measure was ordered by Islam Karimov, the president, who has ruled with an iron fist for 20 years. The policy is aimed at keeping down the country’s poor population (A: See, they don’t want the POOR to breed, same as Charles Galton Darwin in his book, The Next Million Years.) — with 28m people, it is Central Asia’s most densely populated state.
Activists say mass sterilisation began in 2003, but was eased after two years following an outcry. It is said to have restarted in February this year, when the health ministry ordered doctors to recommend sterilisation as an “effective contraceptive”. (A: Sterilization as an “effective contraceptive”.) Critics claim every doctor was told to persuade “at least two women” a month to have the procedure. (A: You see, that’s National Health Care folks. When a doctor works for the health care system of the government, he’s an AGENT of government. People better get that through their heads. They do what they are told.) Doctors who failed faced reprisals and fines.
The reason I didn’t mention this one before was because I was thinking about what’s been happening in the West. I’ve gone through so many articles over the years on fertility in the West plummeting and the phthalates, the Bisphenol As and so on, and the chemicals that get into the mother’s body, by design, when the baby boy is between about 8-12 weeks. Literally, they actually produce some sperm then and if that could be stopped right then, with the phthalates and Bisphenol-A which is in the cosmetics and different things that the woman uses every day pretty well, IT STERILIZES THE MALE FOR LIFE. They know all this; they’ve know it for 50, 60, 70 years… so it’s not an accident.
In Wise Up Journal, he’s got an article from The Daily Mail…
The infertility timebomb: Are men facing rapid extinction?
wiseupjournal.com
Daily Mail / 10.05.2010 / By Tamara Sturtz
One in five men could suffer from fertility problems. And scientists have warned that it’s just going to get worse… (A: It’s amazing. They don’t know what’s causing it but they know it’s just going to get worse.)
There’s a crisis brewing, but it has nothing to do with the economic deficit or the current political uncertainty. Scientists are warning that rising levels of male infertility have become so perilous that it is a serious ‘public health issue’. And some go even further.
One science writer even suggested, in starkly terrifying terms, that if scientists from Mars were to study the male reproductive system, they would possibly conclude that man was destined for rapid extinction.
And if it continues, this trend could indicate men are on a path to becoming completely infertile within a few generations.
Reports claim that as many as one in five healthy young men between the ages of 18 and 25 produce abnormal sperm counts. (A: It’s actually much higher; I’ll find that link from one I put up last year. It was The Disappearing Male from the CBC Canada, a good documentary. It’s much higher than that. It was more like 5 in 25 had some kind of motile or moveable sperm; the rest were dead.)
Only 5 to 15 per cent of their sperm is good enough to be classed as ‘normal’ under World Health organisation rules - proving that infertility is not just a female problem. Indeed, among those experiencing difficulty with conception, a male fertility problem is considered important in about 40 per cent of couples.
But women trying to get pregnant are facing another astonishing claim: that the core problems of male fertility - while they may be exacerbated by environmental issues - start in the womb.
(A: So they know that this is happening. One of the experts in the field said that…)
‘Sperm counts are declining and there is mounting evidence that the problem starts even before birth,’ says Dr Gillian Lockwood, medical director of Midland Fertility Services.
She cites growing evidence that although the process of sperm production - known as spermatogenesis - starts in adolescence, the crucial preparations are made in the few months before and after birth.
Factors such as women eating a lot of beef (A: They actually go into beef eating and rubbish like this and it’s nothing to do with that. It does actually mention that the chemicals, the damaging chemicals that can come out too, from pesticides etc, plastics of course, from the Bisphenol-A and the phthalates and even soya beans.) during pregnancy - which means they have consumed a diet rich in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that are potentially damaging chemicals - to the issue of obesity during pregnancy and a woman’s exposure to smoke, pesticides, traffic fumes, plastics and even soya beans are all thought to have a bearing on a male foetus’s future fertility.
Experts talk of a ‘window’ of testicular development that begins in the growing foetus and ends in the first six months of life. Problems in this period mean that the baby boy may never be able to produce babies of his own.
So, it’s on track. It’s working, you see. That’s the stealth method that Mr Holdren said in the book the he was working on with Paul Ehrlich, another guy who wanted to drastically eradicate all the useless eaters on the planet when they wrote the book EcoScience. Folk will never really get it, will they? They will never, EVER really get it, what’s really going on. It’s strange that, how it must always be someone else that’s got it… or that’s going to get it. That’s how we think, like Russian roulette. I think people see the news now and read things and it doesn’t affect them. That’s why when they are told that all their private material has been stored for government agencies, they don’t really want to believe it and they carry on in denial. In a purposeful, choiceful denial… and that’s their problem.
Remember too, that I mentioned an article last year as well, where the UN World Health Organization had, with its umbrella group it sent in, all these NGOs. The UN supplied all the abortion kits and they aborted lots of babies and sterilized women in Peru, THOUSANDS OF THEM. I think it was something like 400,000 had been sterilized without their knowledge. That again was done by stealth; they just simply didn’t tell them and now they’re all sterilized under the wonderful United Nations. Isn’t that just great. I’ll try and find that too and put it up tonight on my web site.
Peruvian Government Shelves Investigation into Massive Forced Sterilizations of Indigenous Women
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent / lifesitenews.com / Friday June 19, 2009
Remember too, you’ll find the links that I put up are in the audio section archive at the end of the show. You’ll see it on the front page and then it goes into the archives along with all these other links I mention.
What a world we are in to. What a world, it’s just incredible… absolutely incredible. And they haven’t stopped there, folks. I’ll tell a little story about how they used prisoners to test what I’m going to talk about now, to BLAST the sperm in the male testes, sonically. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I read parts of a book on the air maybe a couple of years ago and it was called Acres of Skin. It was a history of prisoners that had been used in the United States in prisons, who were used to test out various nefarious chemicals and inoculations and other things. Some of them even had, I think it was radiation applied to the genital area to see how fast they could sterilize them, stuff like that. These were all officially sanctioned by the United States government. It’s a horror story.
The reason it was called Acres of Skin is because the Mengele type character who was in charge of this, when he saw all the prisoners at his disposal for his tests, that’s what he said himself… ahh, we’ve got acres of skin. That was his field. Then he went to work on it and made an awful mess of a lot of these lives. He killed a lot too of course, all under the guise of experimentation, to SAVE people in the future and all that nonsense that they give us. It’s the same with DARPA, as they are wanting to brain-implant quadriplegics. That’s what the Military-Industrial Complex is all about, helping quadriplegics, right? No. It’s about death and destruction in the future. Anyway, this put me in mind of this article here and it’s from the Mail Online, today.
The male Pill? Ultrasound hailed as new contraceptive for men
By Daily Mail Reporter / 12th May 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
(A: It’s the testes blaster, that’s another name, or sperm blaster.)
Ultrasound is being hailed as a cheap, reversible (A: Reversible… really?) contraceptive for men, offering a potential new birth control option for couples throughout the world.
Scientists claim a one-off blast of ultrasound is enough to stop sperm production for up to six months. (A: I’d say that’s quite the blast folks.)
Clinical trials currently underway suggest the technique could finally provide the male equivalent to the female contraceptive Pill.
Lead researcher Dr James Tsuruta said: 'We think this could provide men with up to six months of reliable, low-cost, non-hormonal contraception from a single round of treatment.
'Our long-term goal is to use ultrasound from therapeutic instruments that are commonly found in sports medicine or physical therapy clinics as an inexpensive, long-term, reversible male contraceptive suitable for use in developing to first world countries.' (A: I wonder how many deformed children will be born out of this, as it deforms the sperm and everything else, when it supposedly wears off.)
One all 'sperm reserves' have been depleted the man will be temporarily infertile, researchers from the University of North Carolina claim. (A: I guess they’ve been testing it on prisoners down there somewhere.)
Ultrasound, which produces waves of energy with a frequency above the human hearing range, is commonly used on pregnant women to produce scans of unborn babies, and to treat sports injuries. (A: Again, I read an article last year on that because it became so common for women to get little photographs to send on their Facebooks to all their, you know, millions of friends across the world. They found that these children have MUCH SLOWER LEARNING ABILITIES than the ones who hadn’t had ultrasounds at all. Who knows what else it’s caused. What they did say, it was because the brain was enclosed in such a thin skull at the time and this stuff vibrates in a very high frequency and it isn’t much different really at that frequency than MICROWAVE radiation. It was a very in-depth article. So here they want to use it on men. Well, I’m sure some will go for it.)
The university has been given £67,000 from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (A: Those wonderful guys that just jump from one field to another. It’s always to do, mind you, with reducing the population. Remember, he attended the Millionaires’ Club, that they called it, last year. It was published again in the Irish Free Press. Their whole topic was about reducing the world’s population. Oprah Winfrey and all those characters were there too, remember. It was held somewhere in New York and Mr Rockefeller, obviously, was there too.) to allow them to push ahead with further trials.
But experts warned the long-term effects of the treatment remained unclear.
The Male Contraception Information Project's Elaine Lissner said it had not been proved whether fertility would continue to return if a man was subjected to ultrasound blasts over a number of years.
'The exciting thing (A: Oh, there is the end here…) is that we're getting started finding out,' she said. (A: Oh, it’s EXCITING… exciting.)
You know, if folk knew what was happening today, we’d have to make Hitler a Boy Scout… and Mengele maybe a Cub Scout. You know, because what’s happening today is WAY BEYOND what they did back then. It’s way beyond it. IT IS HAPPENING FOLKS. It’s happening all the time. You should read the book, Acres of Skin; what an eye opener of what they have been doing the United States and no doubt other countries too, with prisoners. Just astonishing… astonishing.
Everything has changed in our day that we live in. Everything has changed. Morality is utterly gone, out the window, because it was the kind of morality that at least HELD people together and give us a sense of what was right and wrong. Here are the rules, and it was simple to follow. People were decent. People would help you out. They didn’t have the TV shows where the cops ran in or bust through your doors with black outfits and machine guns. They hadn’t got to that stage then. It was still the local cop. That’s how they portrayed this in places like Britain with silly programs like Dixon of Dock Green who was kind of half social worker, half father-figure to the young, and the rest cop. I’ll explain this when I come back from this break what’s happening now in Britain.
I’m Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. This article I’m about to read is about what happened to a woman who was drowning and what had to be done to save her.
Hero students leap into river to save drowning woman...
as police officers REFUSE to help
By Daily Mail Reporter / 12th May 2010/ dailymail.co.uk
Three students risked their lives by jumping into a river to save a drowning woman because police refused to rescue her because they said it was not their responsibility.
The 18 year olds took action and after spotting the victim shouting for help and struggling to keep her head above the water level.
Police were at the scene but said it was up to the fire and rescue service to save the 37 year old.
Instead, officers held back the crowd from the edge of the river, Clyde’s bank. Lifebelts were thrown into the water but were out of the woman’s reach.
Graham McGrath, Rosie Lucey and Rhys Black who were walking along the Clyde towards Glasgow Green jumped into the river near Albert Bridge after it became apparent the officers were not going to do it.
After dragging the unconscious woman to the bank and Lucey performed CPR on the victim who’s lips were blue. They were told the woman was close to death and that they had saved her life.
Mr McGrath said: 'There was a woman in the water shouting for help. There was somebody throwing lifebelts to her, but she couldn't get to them. '
The police were holding people back from the edge of the bridge.
'It became apparent nobody was doing anything else. She was getting lower and lower in the water.'
Miss Lucey said: 'We realised we were watching someone drown.' (A: So they jumped in and pulled her to the bank.)
Mr Black jumped in and dragged all three ashore.
The trio, who are all 18-year-old first-year students at Glasgow University, yesterday recalled the rescue, which happened at around 1.30pm on Saturday. (A: Then they go through the whole scenario, her lips were blue, and what was happening.)
(A: What did the police say?…)
The police spokesman said that a woman jumped in the Clyde, was rescued by a member of the public, prior to the arrival of the emergency services. (A: Well, by the time they arrived she would have been long gone, you see.)
Everything is COMPARTMENTALIZED now. It’s like when the hurricane hit Louisiana and New Orleans, the neighbors were told not to help neighbors if they were drowning. You had to allow FEMA to do it. And FEMA would stop anyone… they’d arrest you, in fact, if you tried to help. But these cops are standing there. I’ll guarantee you if they were told to kill some Arab suspect who was drowning in the water, they’d be blowing his head off, for fun. But to go and help somebody who’s drowning, no, no, they won’t go and help you. This is the society we live in now. This is the society we live in. I’ve said before, guys who hang about in CROWDS, I don’t care if it is a gang, an army, or the police, are technically COWARDS… you understand that. They need permission from each other to go as the gang and do something. Then they are all very brave. On their own, no, it’s a different story all together. Now you have the divisions of labor in all of their forces. Oh, that’s not our particular department. So what are they going to do? Stand and watch a person drown. These same guys, if you dropped a piece of paper, or a £5 note, would fine you for doing so… immediately. That’s the society we are in today.
All the structured fabric that held us together has been systematically destroyed through the culture creating industry and the school system. Ego-syntonic behavior was encouraged, ego-centric behavior too, hedonistic behavior, me, me, me. That’s all people care about is me, me, me and a culture like that cannot stand up against tyrants. That’s what the tyrants also know. That’s why they promoted THAT kind of culture and lifestyle. They are easily managed. When everyone thinks they are doing their own thing and they don’t help each other out, they are ALL under Big Brother. Big Brother is organizing and ordering them about. There is always a boss.
What you have is a dysfunctional society today, very dysfunctional. What’s even more dysfunctional about it is that we are now allowed to read the horrific things that are being done across the world. It’s getting us trained that this is all going to be done to us. Now, when the Department of Defence in Britain, followed by the US military, the big boys, their think tanks, came out with the SAME reports, one month after another, to do with the projection for the next 30-odd years, they talked about flash mobs arising in the US, Canada, the European countries and how the authorities were preparing to deal with it. There would be food shortages, strangely enough, because you see only the 5 food companies have taken over the entire supply of the world. They’ve got us at their mercy. All the small farmers, almost all the small farmers are gone… by design.
We’ve seen what they’ve been talking about to do with drones, spy drones and all the rest of it. They can blow up people in Afghanistan and people are forgetting that now they are sending them over the United States. They can also blow up YOU. What do you think all this is for? Why would they be flying drones all over the United States? Just to spy you think? JUST to spy? No, this is all part of a possibly COLLAPSING SYSTEM to make sure that the dominant minority stay in power. Last night I read about DARPA, who loves to give us their stuff on brain chipping. Here is another article about DARPA right here, an interesting one. Popular Science…
Out of the Blue, DARPA Seeks Means to Manipulate Lightning
By Clay Dillow Posted 12.21.2009 / popsci.com
Lightning Mother Nature has it. DARPA wants it.
China and Russia try to control rain clouds and the Dutch use technology to keep low-lying inland areas from flooding, so why shouldn’t the United States be able to manipulate lightning? In an attempt to better understand one of nature’s most powerful processes, DARPA issued a broad agency announcement yesterday asking for ideas on how to best protect (A: Right, “protect”…) American personnel and resources from dangers and costs associated with lightning strikes. To wit:
Lightning causes more than $1B/year in direct damages to property in addition to the loss of lives, disruption of activities (for example, postponement of satellite launches) and their corresponding costs. A better understanding of the physics underlying lightning discharge, associated emissions, and related processes (for example, tribocharging in the clouds) (A: TRIBOCHARGING, they call it.) may lead to revolutionary advances in the state of the art of lightning protection.
At the bottom of the article it actually says that a lot of folk will actually see this as weaponry, which of course it REALLY IS. It is forms of CREATING lightning and DIRECTED lightning for weaponry. A couple of years ago I read article and I’ve read article since to do with strobing the clouds with laser beams and so on. This is all tied in to the same thing. They’ve been doing it for quite a few years. One night in the summer when it wasn’t raining, which I think was about 1 day in the summer last year, I sat and watched this strobing effect going across the clouds. It was like someone from north to south playing a piano keyboard; just running their fingers up and down it in sequence. And incredible flashes; no noise at the time at all. But they eventually built up thunder and lightning.
It’s all to do with the big scientists, the scientific community, who truly have been risen to the top in the scientific dictatorship type of mentality that Aldous Huxley and others talked about. They were all kind of for it, so was Lord Bertrand Russell. That’s why they have all these supposed, supposed EXPERTS and SCIENCE CZARS appointed to the US government now, and across the British government and every other government… and population experts, which really means depopulation experts, by the way; that’s what it means.
I’ve mentioned too, that whatever comes along the pike we are conditioned into it before it happens. We are conditioned without even knowing we are being conditioned, sometimes by little bit and bytes of TV. That’s how you get presented with news now, bits and bytes of things, never in-depth anything or reasons for the things often. They are just presented in bits and bytes that scatter around your fragmented brain’s hard drive. You are being programmed, predictive programming. The youth are always programmed primarily through movies. It’s even in their video games too, the coming scenarios, and they will take it all as quite natural.
A few years ago I mentioned that the first Loyola University meeting of world science took place, hosted by Newt Gingrich, and then the scientists followed Newt Gingrich’s speech. They talked about brain implants and setting up regional area computers that would basically interface remotely, broadband wise, directly with the brains of people with implants. They had experts on all of these subjects from all over the world talking. A scientist from Japan said that it was ready to go and all they had to do really was convince the public to go along with that. That’s why we are getting more and more articles now with brain implants; this is getting you prepared. Of course, they are using the guise that it’s going to HELP people. That’s not the reason at all. The scientist from Japan actually said at that meeting that once this is installed in the brain there will be no more INDIVIDUALITY. He said, think of it more like the beehive; you’ll hear the whispers of commands from central/regional computers going out to those around you and you will hear the whispers coming back from those around you back to the central computer. That’s exactly what you saw in those movies with Star Trek, with the Borg. When they showed you the Borg, they all lived in this… their heads were full of whispers from the computer. But that’s what they said at that meeting, their only problem now is to convince the public over a few years to take it, to accept it… and it was ready to go. Ready to go…
They said what would happen to get it familiar to the public were that movies would get pushed out very quickly to get us used to the idea and they came out with the movie, The Final Cut. That was about a chip that was put in your head when you were very young, maybe at birth even, and it would see through your eyes, records what you hear. That’s how they presented it, a human interest type story, they always have a human interest story as a hook, you see. AT the funerals, once you died, they can take this out and edit out all the bad bits and leave you a nice picture of a person growing up, going through their lives, loving everybody, that’s shown at their funerals. They had other movies since with a similar kind of thing. That’s how they said they’d do it. They also said that they’d pay novelists to write it into their stories in science fiction; they’ve always done that, mind you.
Here is from TechMan.
TechMan: Want a record of your whole brilliant life?
Sunday, May 02, 2010 / By Ced Kurtz, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette / post-gazette.com
Ever think what it would be like to have a record of your entire life -- everything you wrote, watched, heard, e-mailed, spoke?
It sounds daunting and maybe a little absurd, but Gordon Bell and Jim Gemmell at Microsoft are working on it. Their MyLifeBits project is composed of two parts: software to retrieve captured materials and an effort to completely document the life of Mr. Bell.
TechMan heard Mr. Bell speak about the project at the opening of the Seagate Research Center in the Strip District. The research center is gone, but the idea lives on. Mr. Bell and Mr. Gemmell have written a book about the project called "Total Recall."
Before coming to Microsoft in 1995, Mr. Bell already had a distinguished career that included teaching computer science at Carnegie Mellon University and helping to design the PDP and VAX line of computers for the Digital Equipment Corp. He also co-founded the Computer History Museum.
He freely admits that he stands on the shoulders of Vannevar Bush with this idea. Mr. Bush was in effect the first presidential science adviser. In 1945, he wrote an article in the Atlantic Monthly magazine proposing a machine called a memex that could record knowledge and allow its retrieval. The idea foreshadowed the World Wide Web.
To build a modern-day memex, you need devices to record the information. For information in digital form -- which is increasingly all information -- the hardware is out there. For recording things in the analog world, scanning technology has advanced to allow fast input of written and printed materials.
But how do we record things we see and hear each day? Microsoft has developed the SenseCam, a device containing a camera and embedded sensors worn around a user's neck that automatically takes a series of thousands of still images and records ambient light levels, temperature and movement. (A: That’s just PART of the predictive programming to get you for the chip because they could put the chip in you right now. It’s much easier to do it step by step; it doesn’t spook the people.)
Researchers at CMU have used the SenseCam to allow elderly people to review their experiences during the day as a way of aiding short-term memory.
Once we capture this huge amount of data, how do we store it? Advances in hard drive capacity are the answer. A 1 terabyte (1,000 gigabytes) hard drive now starts at about $75, and drives are getting bigger and cheaper every day.
What can 1 terabyte store? (A: and all the other technology they can add to that to store it, more and more and more as they go along.)
Mr. Gemmell and Roger Lueder have written database software that makes annotation easy, adding a text "note" to files, even by voice, so they can be found. Advances in facial recognition and video and audio search soon will make it easier to find any kind of material.
So you see how everything works together, and you are always given it first… Generally you are given it after world meetings and scientists and so on but it’s presented to you through movies and little science blurbs on television. They are trying to get trendy, in science fiction especially. The youngsters are fascinated by this idea. They think it’s going to give them lots of powers. Some of them actually think that they can go into this virtual world and fight, and win, never realizing that just like the Matrix movie, as Neo was told by the Grand Architect, that there wasn’t a single move that he couldn’t do because it was all PREDICTED. Every possible move he could do was predicted by the programmer. So you can’t fight on an equal term on anything.
We’re on a FAST, fast decline into really the end of a part of a system until they bring in the new. We’re getting sterilized. We’re dying off. There are lots of nice new diseases on the go. At the same time, they want everyone chipped and monitored… and WE’RE ALLOWING IT ALL TO HAPPEN. The folk in the cities have no privacy whatsoever, but most don’t mind. They’re already gone folks and you have to accept that. Most are already gone. Don’t waste your time with those ones. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and just before I go to a caller, one last article, I’ll put the link up too, and it’s from The Mail Online in Britain, talking about the cops who won’t help people who are drowning.
Pagan police win the right to take time off for festivals
By Daily Mail Reporter / 11th May 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
Pagan police officers have been given the right to take days off to celebrate festivals where they leave food out for the dead and take part in 'unabashed sexual promiscuity'.
I’ll go to the callers now and there is Mark from Wisconsin. Are you there Mark?
Mark: Yes, I am. Hey, don’t you think it’s kind of funny how whenever you see those ultrasounds on TV the baby is always jumping around?
Alan: That’s right. [Alan and the caller laughing.] I think I’d be doing the same thing if I was getting bombarded with those.
Mark: It’s probably blowing his eardrums out. I was going to mention how, you know, in Brave New World, they oxygen-deprived the babies to make them stupid, to make them into slaves?
Alan: That was the Betas or the Thetas; that’s right.
Mark: Right. They started clamping the umbilical cord sometime here in the United States, I believe in the early 70s and I can’t find any medical facts on why they did it or why they are still doing it.
Alan: You know something? They are testing on the public all the time in different areas. I watched a DVD recently that was sent to me about how the US medical, different hospitals were actually working with the government and they injected PLUTONIUM into peoples’ arms and legs, with massive syringes. Of course the doctors were all wearing lead gloves and shields, telling these patients that they had cancer and this treatment could cure them. Then they told you that they didn’t have cancer at all. They didn’t have cancer at all; they lied to them from the beginning and used them as guinea pigs. They all died of awful, terrible cancers that were caused by the radiation. You wouldn’t believe what they are really doing in private, in secret, amongst the populations.
Mark: Yep. The experiments go on. Could you go over some time this Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged? I’ve been doing a little research on her and she seems to come from the usual suspects. She lived in Crimea, the settlement, and she had a Bolshevik education. Then she comes over here and she writes 2 best-selling books and she’s writing Broadway plays. What can you tell me about this lady?
Alan: I think it was Alisa Rosenbaum that her name was; she changed her name. She went right over and became the mistress of Lord Rothschild for a while; it was the first guy she was a mistress of. Then she went right over to Hollywood where she mixed with the big Hollywood crowd and became a mistress of various ones at different times. If you simply reverse the logic of the followers and see it from her point of view, she is saying that those who are already masters of the world and geniuses should not be held back by the masses. Tie that in with today, the Rothschilds are taking over. They’ve got the World Bank on the go, the Land For Debt Swap which they get through the IMF. They’ve got the carbon tax thing. They’ve got the whole world under their belt. She’s basically not for the little guy with his little gold pieces; she’s not talking about them. She’s talking about the geniuses who have got control already shouldn’t be held accountable by the laws of the general population and they should be allowed to do what they want; that’s what she was really saying.
Mark: That’s objectivism. So where did she get all this money to run all these social and psychological experiments on people in New York?
Alan: Look at the company she kept. There are photographs out there; Einstein was one of her best pals. Lord Rothschild and a whole bunch of other Lords were funding her and I’ve no doubt she was getting money funneled through even all the big banking family channels too.
Mark: Thick as thieves. Thanks a lot.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Yes, nothing is ever as it seems and followers should always check and see it from the leader’s point of view. She was talking about the ultra elite, THEY were the ones that should go on and not be held accountable to the general public.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Overpopulation? Don't Worry, its All Under Control
VIDEO: "The Disappearing Male" CBC Newsworld
Ultrasound Sperm Blaster-New Contraceptive
Police at Scene Refuse to Help Drowning Woman-Not their Department
Darpa Seeks to Manipulate Lightning
Final Cut-MyLifeProject-Record of Your Life
Pagan Police Allowed Time Off for Pagan Festivals-Food for the Dead followed by Sexual Promiscuity
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on May 12, 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. I always stress that you bookmark all the other sites you’ll see there because I DO have trouble with the Yahoo/.com site right now and eventually I’ll probably get pulled. So look at the alternate sites, bookmark them and you can download the latest shows from my other sites; they are all on that site and listed there. [Official sites listed above.] While you are in there, look and see the books that I have for sale, the DVDs, the CDs I have for sale because that helps me to trickle over, along with the occasional donation. It’s expensive to do what I do. Believe you me, it’s more than any full-time job; I wouldn’t pick this in a million years if it was just for money. But it’s up to you the audience to keep me going and you can do so by buying the books and disks or donating to me and passing the word around of what I’m doing. Bring more people into the show, although there are lots coming in all the time. The more the merrier, because this is a war to the finish here for things that are and things that will be. The things that will be are not to our liking, believe you me, when they are coming down the pike. They are inside now, in fact, all the things that we are about to have hoisted upon us. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Lots of folk just get the disks burned and passed to them; they’ve gone off computers all together because it’s been in all the newspapers for the last year or so just how much data they are storing on everybody and the fact that they are monitoring every single person, every day, and storing all their communiqué. So they’ve gone off of them all together; they play these CDs on their CD players. You can get in touch with me at [address above].
As I said before, all the things that are coming down, the things that WILL BE are now turning the bend in the creek and we are seeing them manifest themselves. Those at the top who’ve been working in institutions for these long-term goals of theirs are rejoicing because they really believe they have us in an enough stage of chaos that we will accept everything. A whole new way of living, a new REGIMENTED society from cradle to grave, with so many agencies controlling us all through our lives, that we will simply be too content playing video games, watching TV, staring at porn, and all of that kind of stuff, as the entertainment really ramps up into more violent, more sexual themes all the time. That’s how they are countering this too; keeping people from thinking about the hard facts, to keep them in a form of DOUBLE MIND and DOUBLE SPEAK. They partly know what’s going on, partly, a little bit at the back of their minds; the rest of it is mixed up in with their media, their mainstream news, which is like a circus. It’s PRESENTED like a circus as you go from horrific deeds and murders and rapes on your news, over to Afghanistan and drones blowing up hundreds of people that happen to be standing around, and everything is a big, surrealistic circus. They don’t care. They are out of the picture. They are out of the running. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. The matrix I always describe, it’s where everything comes from. Your whole reality, it’s given to you, really. You are born into this reality. It has many other realities within it. You are given one at the bottom level, generally. There are different classes of people given HIGHER realities. Then you have those who help run the world system who are given more hard facts and data from archives, a different education completely, too, on the past and a lot of it is to do – just like the ancient pharos being taught by the priest, they get taught by their fathers and their uncles – how the world REALLY runs and how the cons of rulership – because that’s all rulership is about, it conning people really, these days – how they are carried out and how you can use mass manipulation by using the SUBCONSCIOUS URGES of the great unwashed masses.
Part of the plan, I’ve gone over it so many times it gets so sickening but unfortunately that’s what we are in. If you are in a war and you were fighting every single day, you’d have to get together with your captains and your majors and so on, and you discuss the war and your strategies. You’d get pretty sick of it too, but you’ve got to do it every day because you ARE in a fight for life and death literally and this is no different. It’s no different at all because those at the top who believe they are the most evolved of all can have the right to dominate us. Not just dominate us but now reduce and cull off, definitely cull off a lot of us, as they have been doing with inoculations and now the GMO food until we have populations that are coming down with incredible allergies.
Everybody has amazing allergies. Children are BORN with them now. Children, some children have their skin peeling off them… and they just don’t understand what’s happening, this NEW phenomena. Like the sterilization, which is strange too, they just don’t know why the men are going infertile. Then, other scientists will say, here it is and they give you all the data and why, and it’s ignored again and you are back to the beginning question mark, we don’t know what’s causing it.
There is an article that I was going to read earlier and I didn’t bother because it’s terrifically horrible, but it’s also kind of passé in this day and age. I’ll say what I mean by that when I get through this little story. It was from the Sunday Times.
Doctors sterilise Uzbek women by stealth
Mark Franchetti / From The Sunday Times April 25, 2010 / timesonline.co.uk
WHEN her baby died soon after delivery, Gulbahor Zavidova, 28, a poor farmer’s wife, longed to be pregnant again. After months of trying she and her husband visited a doctor who told her she could never have another child because she had been sterilised. (Alan: She didn’t know it.)
The procedure had been performed immediately after she gave birth, by doctors who did not ask her consent. On learning she could not bear children, her husband left her.
“Not a day passes without me crying,” she said. “I was outraged when I found out what they had done. How could they do such a horrible thing without asking me?” (A: This is what the point of it is. You have to go into the writings of all of these eugenicists and elitists at the top, like John Holdren and the book he participated in, EcoScience, to do with bringing the population down by stealth. Holdren said, they could do it in the third world countries where there is less education and get away with it quite easily; they wouldn’t have to be terribly devious, just don’t tell the patients what you are doing to them. But he said, for the West - for the United States and Canada and Europe - they’d have to use stealth methods, where they would have to use something in the food or the inoculations to carry it out. He’s up there with Obama now; we should be VERY afraid, I keep telling you that. They are there for a reason now. They are there for a very good reason now. There are no coincidences when these guys get in and they get appointed on the boards of governments across the world, ALL at the same time. Back to the story…)
According to human rights groups, tens of thousands of young women like Zavidova have been sterilised without their consent in the authoritarian former Soviet state of Uzbekistan.
Uzbek sources say the measure was ordered by Islam Karimov, the president, who has ruled with an iron fist for 20 years. The policy is aimed at keeping down the country’s poor population (A: See, they don’t want the POOR to breed, same as Charles Galton Darwin in his book, The Next Million Years.) — with 28m people, it is Central Asia’s most densely populated state.
Activists say mass sterilisation began in 2003, but was eased after two years following an outcry. It is said to have restarted in February this year, when the health ministry ordered doctors to recommend sterilisation as an “effective contraceptive”. (A: Sterilization as an “effective contraceptive”.) Critics claim every doctor was told to persuade “at least two women” a month to have the procedure. (A: You see, that’s National Health Care folks. When a doctor works for the health care system of the government, he’s an AGENT of government. People better get that through their heads. They do what they are told.) Doctors who failed faced reprisals and fines.
The reason I didn’t mention this one before was because I was thinking about what’s been happening in the West. I’ve gone through so many articles over the years on fertility in the West plummeting and the phthalates, the Bisphenol As and so on, and the chemicals that get into the mother’s body, by design, when the baby boy is between about 8-12 weeks. Literally, they actually produce some sperm then and if that could be stopped right then, with the phthalates and Bisphenol-A which is in the cosmetics and different things that the woman uses every day pretty well, IT STERILIZES THE MALE FOR LIFE. They know all this; they’ve know it for 50, 60, 70 years… so it’s not an accident.
In Wise Up Journal, he’s got an article from The Daily Mail…
The infertility timebomb: Are men facing rapid extinction?
wiseupjournal.com
Daily Mail / 10.05.2010 / By Tamara Sturtz
One in five men could suffer from fertility problems. And scientists have warned that it’s just going to get worse… (A: It’s amazing. They don’t know what’s causing it but they know it’s just going to get worse.)
There’s a crisis brewing, but it has nothing to do with the economic deficit or the current political uncertainty. Scientists are warning that rising levels of male infertility have become so perilous that it is a serious ‘public health issue’. And some go even further.
One science writer even suggested, in starkly terrifying terms, that if scientists from Mars were to study the male reproductive system, they would possibly conclude that man was destined for rapid extinction.
And if it continues, this trend could indicate men are on a path to becoming completely infertile within a few generations.
Reports claim that as many as one in five healthy young men between the ages of 18 and 25 produce abnormal sperm counts. (A: It’s actually much higher; I’ll find that link from one I put up last year. It was The Disappearing Male from the CBC Canada, a good documentary. It’s much higher than that. It was more like 5 in 25 had some kind of motile or moveable sperm; the rest were dead.)
Only 5 to 15 per cent of their sperm is good enough to be classed as ‘normal’ under World Health organisation rules - proving that infertility is not just a female problem. Indeed, among those experiencing difficulty with conception, a male fertility problem is considered important in about 40 per cent of couples.
But women trying to get pregnant are facing another astonishing claim: that the core problems of male fertility - while they may be exacerbated by environmental issues - start in the womb.
(A: So they know that this is happening. One of the experts in the field said that…)
‘Sperm counts are declining and there is mounting evidence that the problem starts even before birth,’ says Dr Gillian Lockwood, medical director of Midland Fertility Services.
She cites growing evidence that although the process of sperm production - known as spermatogenesis - starts in adolescence, the crucial preparations are made in the few months before and after birth.
Factors such as women eating a lot of beef (A: They actually go into beef eating and rubbish like this and it’s nothing to do with that. It does actually mention that the chemicals, the damaging chemicals that can come out too, from pesticides etc, plastics of course, from the Bisphenol-A and the phthalates and even soya beans.) during pregnancy - which means they have consumed a diet rich in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that are potentially damaging chemicals - to the issue of obesity during pregnancy and a woman’s exposure to smoke, pesticides, traffic fumes, plastics and even soya beans are all thought to have a bearing on a male foetus’s future fertility.
Experts talk of a ‘window’ of testicular development that begins in the growing foetus and ends in the first six months of life. Problems in this period mean that the baby boy may never be able to produce babies of his own.
So, it’s on track. It’s working, you see. That’s the stealth method that Mr Holdren said in the book the he was working on with Paul Ehrlich, another guy who wanted to drastically eradicate all the useless eaters on the planet when they wrote the book EcoScience. Folk will never really get it, will they? They will never, EVER really get it, what’s really going on. It’s strange that, how it must always be someone else that’s got it… or that’s going to get it. That’s how we think, like Russian roulette. I think people see the news now and read things and it doesn’t affect them. That’s why when they are told that all their private material has been stored for government agencies, they don’t really want to believe it and they carry on in denial. In a purposeful, choiceful denial… and that’s their problem.
Remember too, that I mentioned an article last year as well, where the UN World Health Organization had, with its umbrella group it sent in, all these NGOs. The UN supplied all the abortion kits and they aborted lots of babies and sterilized women in Peru, THOUSANDS OF THEM. I think it was something like 400,000 had been sterilized without their knowledge. That again was done by stealth; they just simply didn’t tell them and now they’re all sterilized under the wonderful United Nations. Isn’t that just great. I’ll try and find that too and put it up tonight on my web site.
Peruvian Government Shelves Investigation into Massive Forced Sterilizations of Indigenous Women
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent / lifesitenews.com / Friday June 19, 2009
Remember too, you’ll find the links that I put up are in the audio section archive at the end of the show. You’ll see it on the front page and then it goes into the archives along with all these other links I mention.
What a world we are in to. What a world, it’s just incredible… absolutely incredible. And they haven’t stopped there, folks. I’ll tell a little story about how they used prisoners to test what I’m going to talk about now, to BLAST the sperm in the male testes, sonically. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I read parts of a book on the air maybe a couple of years ago and it was called Acres of Skin. It was a history of prisoners that had been used in the United States in prisons, who were used to test out various nefarious chemicals and inoculations and other things. Some of them even had, I think it was radiation applied to the genital area to see how fast they could sterilize them, stuff like that. These were all officially sanctioned by the United States government. It’s a horror story.
The reason it was called Acres of Skin is because the Mengele type character who was in charge of this, when he saw all the prisoners at his disposal for his tests, that’s what he said himself… ahh, we’ve got acres of skin. That was his field. Then he went to work on it and made an awful mess of a lot of these lives. He killed a lot too of course, all under the guise of experimentation, to SAVE people in the future and all that nonsense that they give us. It’s the same with DARPA, as they are wanting to brain-implant quadriplegics. That’s what the Military-Industrial Complex is all about, helping quadriplegics, right? No. It’s about death and destruction in the future. Anyway, this put me in mind of this article here and it’s from the Mail Online, today.
The male Pill? Ultrasound hailed as new contraceptive for men
By Daily Mail Reporter / 12th May 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
(A: It’s the testes blaster, that’s another name, or sperm blaster.)
Ultrasound is being hailed as a cheap, reversible (A: Reversible… really?) contraceptive for men, offering a potential new birth control option for couples throughout the world.
Scientists claim a one-off blast of ultrasound is enough to stop sperm production for up to six months. (A: I’d say that’s quite the blast folks.)
Clinical trials currently underway suggest the technique could finally provide the male equivalent to the female contraceptive Pill.
Lead researcher Dr James Tsuruta said: 'We think this could provide men with up to six months of reliable, low-cost, non-hormonal contraception from a single round of treatment.
'Our long-term goal is to use ultrasound from therapeutic instruments that are commonly found in sports medicine or physical therapy clinics as an inexpensive, long-term, reversible male contraceptive suitable for use in developing to first world countries.' (A: I wonder how many deformed children will be born out of this, as it deforms the sperm and everything else, when it supposedly wears off.)
One all 'sperm reserves' have been depleted the man will be temporarily infertile, researchers from the University of North Carolina claim. (A: I guess they’ve been testing it on prisoners down there somewhere.)
Ultrasound, which produces waves of energy with a frequency above the human hearing range, is commonly used on pregnant women to produce scans of unborn babies, and to treat sports injuries. (A: Again, I read an article last year on that because it became so common for women to get little photographs to send on their Facebooks to all their, you know, millions of friends across the world. They found that these children have MUCH SLOWER LEARNING ABILITIES than the ones who hadn’t had ultrasounds at all. Who knows what else it’s caused. What they did say, it was because the brain was enclosed in such a thin skull at the time and this stuff vibrates in a very high frequency and it isn’t much different really at that frequency than MICROWAVE radiation. It was a very in-depth article. So here they want to use it on men. Well, I’m sure some will go for it.)
The university has been given £67,000 from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation (A: Those wonderful guys that just jump from one field to another. It’s always to do, mind you, with reducing the population. Remember, he attended the Millionaires’ Club, that they called it, last year. It was published again in the Irish Free Press. Their whole topic was about reducing the world’s population. Oprah Winfrey and all those characters were there too, remember. It was held somewhere in New York and Mr Rockefeller, obviously, was there too.) to allow them to push ahead with further trials.
But experts warned the long-term effects of the treatment remained unclear.
The Male Contraception Information Project's Elaine Lissner said it had not been proved whether fertility would continue to return if a man was subjected to ultrasound blasts over a number of years.
'The exciting thing (A: Oh, there is the end here…) is that we're getting started finding out,' she said. (A: Oh, it’s EXCITING… exciting.)
You know, if folk knew what was happening today, we’d have to make Hitler a Boy Scout… and Mengele maybe a Cub Scout. You know, because what’s happening today is WAY BEYOND what they did back then. It’s way beyond it. IT IS HAPPENING FOLKS. It’s happening all the time. You should read the book, Acres of Skin; what an eye opener of what they have been doing the United States and no doubt other countries too, with prisoners. Just astonishing… astonishing.
Everything has changed in our day that we live in. Everything has changed. Morality is utterly gone, out the window, because it was the kind of morality that at least HELD people together and give us a sense of what was right and wrong. Here are the rules, and it was simple to follow. People were decent. People would help you out. They didn’t have the TV shows where the cops ran in or bust through your doors with black outfits and machine guns. They hadn’t got to that stage then. It was still the local cop. That’s how they portrayed this in places like Britain with silly programs like Dixon of Dock Green who was kind of half social worker, half father-figure to the young, and the rest cop. I’ll explain this when I come back from this break what’s happening now in Britain.
I’m Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. This article I’m about to read is about what happened to a woman who was drowning and what had to be done to save her.
Hero students leap into river to save drowning woman...
as police officers REFUSE to help
By Daily Mail Reporter / 12th May 2010/ dailymail.co.uk
Three students risked their lives by jumping into a river to save a drowning woman because police refused to rescue her because they said it was not their responsibility.
The 18 year olds took action and after spotting the victim shouting for help and struggling to keep her head above the water level.
Police were at the scene but said it was up to the fire and rescue service to save the 37 year old.
Instead, officers held back the crowd from the edge of the river, Clyde’s bank. Lifebelts were thrown into the water but were out of the woman’s reach.
Graham McGrath, Rosie Lucey and Rhys Black who were walking along the Clyde towards Glasgow Green jumped into the river near Albert Bridge after it became apparent the officers were not going to do it.
After dragging the unconscious woman to the bank and Lucey performed CPR on the victim who’s lips were blue. They were told the woman was close to death and that they had saved her life.
Mr McGrath said: 'There was a woman in the water shouting for help. There was somebody throwing lifebelts to her, but she couldn't get to them. '
The police were holding people back from the edge of the bridge.
'It became apparent nobody was doing anything else. She was getting lower and lower in the water.'
Miss Lucey said: 'We realised we were watching someone drown.' (A: So they jumped in and pulled her to the bank.)
Mr Black jumped in and dragged all three ashore.
The trio, who are all 18-year-old first-year students at Glasgow University, yesterday recalled the rescue, which happened at around 1.30pm on Saturday. (A: Then they go through the whole scenario, her lips were blue, and what was happening.)
(A: What did the police say?…)
The police spokesman said that a woman jumped in the Clyde, was rescued by a member of the public, prior to the arrival of the emergency services. (A: Well, by the time they arrived she would have been long gone, you see.)
Everything is COMPARTMENTALIZED now. It’s like when the hurricane hit Louisiana and New Orleans, the neighbors were told not to help neighbors if they were drowning. You had to allow FEMA to do it. And FEMA would stop anyone… they’d arrest you, in fact, if you tried to help. But these cops are standing there. I’ll guarantee you if they were told to kill some Arab suspect who was drowning in the water, they’d be blowing his head off, for fun. But to go and help somebody who’s drowning, no, no, they won’t go and help you. This is the society we live in now. This is the society we live in. I’ve said before, guys who hang about in CROWDS, I don’t care if it is a gang, an army, or the police, are technically COWARDS… you understand that. They need permission from each other to go as the gang and do something. Then they are all very brave. On their own, no, it’s a different story all together. Now you have the divisions of labor in all of their forces. Oh, that’s not our particular department. So what are they going to do? Stand and watch a person drown. These same guys, if you dropped a piece of paper, or a £5 note, would fine you for doing so… immediately. That’s the society we are in today.
All the structured fabric that held us together has been systematically destroyed through the culture creating industry and the school system. Ego-syntonic behavior was encouraged, ego-centric behavior too, hedonistic behavior, me, me, me. That’s all people care about is me, me, me and a culture like that cannot stand up against tyrants. That’s what the tyrants also know. That’s why they promoted THAT kind of culture and lifestyle. They are easily managed. When everyone thinks they are doing their own thing and they don’t help each other out, they are ALL under Big Brother. Big Brother is organizing and ordering them about. There is always a boss.
What you have is a dysfunctional society today, very dysfunctional. What’s even more dysfunctional about it is that we are now allowed to read the horrific things that are being done across the world. It’s getting us trained that this is all going to be done to us. Now, when the Department of Defence in Britain, followed by the US military, the big boys, their think tanks, came out with the SAME reports, one month after another, to do with the projection for the next 30-odd years, they talked about flash mobs arising in the US, Canada, the European countries and how the authorities were preparing to deal with it. There would be food shortages, strangely enough, because you see only the 5 food companies have taken over the entire supply of the world. They’ve got us at their mercy. All the small farmers, almost all the small farmers are gone… by design.
We’ve seen what they’ve been talking about to do with drones, spy drones and all the rest of it. They can blow up people in Afghanistan and people are forgetting that now they are sending them over the United States. They can also blow up YOU. What do you think all this is for? Why would they be flying drones all over the United States? Just to spy you think? JUST to spy? No, this is all part of a possibly COLLAPSING SYSTEM to make sure that the dominant minority stay in power. Last night I read about DARPA, who loves to give us their stuff on brain chipping. Here is another article about DARPA right here, an interesting one. Popular Science…
Out of the Blue, DARPA Seeks Means to Manipulate Lightning
By Clay Dillow Posted 12.21.2009 / popsci.com
Lightning Mother Nature has it. DARPA wants it.
China and Russia try to control rain clouds and the Dutch use technology to keep low-lying inland areas from flooding, so why shouldn’t the United States be able to manipulate lightning? In an attempt to better understand one of nature’s most powerful processes, DARPA issued a broad agency announcement yesterday asking for ideas on how to best protect (A: Right, “protect”…) American personnel and resources from dangers and costs associated with lightning strikes. To wit:
Lightning causes more than $1B/year in direct damages to property in addition to the loss of lives, disruption of activities (for example, postponement of satellite launches) and their corresponding costs. A better understanding of the physics underlying lightning discharge, associated emissions, and related processes (for example, tribocharging in the clouds) (A: TRIBOCHARGING, they call it.) may lead to revolutionary advances in the state of the art of lightning protection.
At the bottom of the article it actually says that a lot of folk will actually see this as weaponry, which of course it REALLY IS. It is forms of CREATING lightning and DIRECTED lightning for weaponry. A couple of years ago I read article and I’ve read article since to do with strobing the clouds with laser beams and so on. This is all tied in to the same thing. They’ve been doing it for quite a few years. One night in the summer when it wasn’t raining, which I think was about 1 day in the summer last year, I sat and watched this strobing effect going across the clouds. It was like someone from north to south playing a piano keyboard; just running their fingers up and down it in sequence. And incredible flashes; no noise at the time at all. But they eventually built up thunder and lightning.
It’s all to do with the big scientists, the scientific community, who truly have been risen to the top in the scientific dictatorship type of mentality that Aldous Huxley and others talked about. They were all kind of for it, so was Lord Bertrand Russell. That’s why they have all these supposed, supposed EXPERTS and SCIENCE CZARS appointed to the US government now, and across the British government and every other government… and population experts, which really means depopulation experts, by the way; that’s what it means.
I’ve mentioned too, that whatever comes along the pike we are conditioned into it before it happens. We are conditioned without even knowing we are being conditioned, sometimes by little bit and bytes of TV. That’s how you get presented with news now, bits and bytes of things, never in-depth anything or reasons for the things often. They are just presented in bits and bytes that scatter around your fragmented brain’s hard drive. You are being programmed, predictive programming. The youth are always programmed primarily through movies. It’s even in their video games too, the coming scenarios, and they will take it all as quite natural.
A few years ago I mentioned that the first Loyola University meeting of world science took place, hosted by Newt Gingrich, and then the scientists followed Newt Gingrich’s speech. They talked about brain implants and setting up regional area computers that would basically interface remotely, broadband wise, directly with the brains of people with implants. They had experts on all of these subjects from all over the world talking. A scientist from Japan said that it was ready to go and all they had to do really was convince the public to go along with that. That’s why we are getting more and more articles now with brain implants; this is getting you prepared. Of course, they are using the guise that it’s going to HELP people. That’s not the reason at all. The scientist from Japan actually said at that meeting that once this is installed in the brain there will be no more INDIVIDUALITY. He said, think of it more like the beehive; you’ll hear the whispers of commands from central/regional computers going out to those around you and you will hear the whispers coming back from those around you back to the central computer. That’s exactly what you saw in those movies with Star Trek, with the Borg. When they showed you the Borg, they all lived in this… their heads were full of whispers from the computer. But that’s what they said at that meeting, their only problem now is to convince the public over a few years to take it, to accept it… and it was ready to go. Ready to go…
They said what would happen to get it familiar to the public were that movies would get pushed out very quickly to get us used to the idea and they came out with the movie, The Final Cut. That was about a chip that was put in your head when you were very young, maybe at birth even, and it would see through your eyes, records what you hear. That’s how they presented it, a human interest type story, they always have a human interest story as a hook, you see. AT the funerals, once you died, they can take this out and edit out all the bad bits and leave you a nice picture of a person growing up, going through their lives, loving everybody, that’s shown at their funerals. They had other movies since with a similar kind of thing. That’s how they said they’d do it. They also said that they’d pay novelists to write it into their stories in science fiction; they’ve always done that, mind you.
Here is from TechMan.
TechMan: Want a record of your whole brilliant life?
Sunday, May 02, 2010 / By Ced Kurtz, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette / post-gazette.com
Ever think what it would be like to have a record of your entire life -- everything you wrote, watched, heard, e-mailed, spoke?
It sounds daunting and maybe a little absurd, but Gordon Bell and Jim Gemmell at Microsoft are working on it. Their MyLifeBits project is composed of two parts: software to retrieve captured materials and an effort to completely document the life of Mr. Bell.
TechMan heard Mr. Bell speak about the project at the opening of the Seagate Research Center in the Strip District. The research center is gone, but the idea lives on. Mr. Bell and Mr. Gemmell have written a book about the project called "Total Recall."
Before coming to Microsoft in 1995, Mr. Bell already had a distinguished career that included teaching computer science at Carnegie Mellon University and helping to design the PDP and VAX line of computers for the Digital Equipment Corp. He also co-founded the Computer History Museum.
He freely admits that he stands on the shoulders of Vannevar Bush with this idea. Mr. Bush was in effect the first presidential science adviser. In 1945, he wrote an article in the Atlantic Monthly magazine proposing a machine called a memex that could record knowledge and allow its retrieval. The idea foreshadowed the World Wide Web.
To build a modern-day memex, you need devices to record the information. For information in digital form -- which is increasingly all information -- the hardware is out there. For recording things in the analog world, scanning technology has advanced to allow fast input of written and printed materials.
But how do we record things we see and hear each day? Microsoft has developed the SenseCam, a device containing a camera and embedded sensors worn around a user's neck that automatically takes a series of thousands of still images and records ambient light levels, temperature and movement. (A: That’s just PART of the predictive programming to get you for the chip because they could put the chip in you right now. It’s much easier to do it step by step; it doesn’t spook the people.)
Researchers at CMU have used the SenseCam to allow elderly people to review their experiences during the day as a way of aiding short-term memory.
Once we capture this huge amount of data, how do we store it? Advances in hard drive capacity are the answer. A 1 terabyte (1,000 gigabytes) hard drive now starts at about $75, and drives are getting bigger and cheaper every day.
What can 1 terabyte store? (A: and all the other technology they can add to that to store it, more and more and more as they go along.)
Mr. Gemmell and Roger Lueder have written database software that makes annotation easy, adding a text "note" to files, even by voice, so they can be found. Advances in facial recognition and video and audio search soon will make it easier to find any kind of material.
So you see how everything works together, and you are always given it first… Generally you are given it after world meetings and scientists and so on but it’s presented to you through movies and little science blurbs on television. They are trying to get trendy, in science fiction especially. The youngsters are fascinated by this idea. They think it’s going to give them lots of powers. Some of them actually think that they can go into this virtual world and fight, and win, never realizing that just like the Matrix movie, as Neo was told by the Grand Architect, that there wasn’t a single move that he couldn’t do because it was all PREDICTED. Every possible move he could do was predicted by the programmer. So you can’t fight on an equal term on anything.
We’re on a FAST, fast decline into really the end of a part of a system until they bring in the new. We’re getting sterilized. We’re dying off. There are lots of nice new diseases on the go. At the same time, they want everyone chipped and monitored… and WE’RE ALLOWING IT ALL TO HAPPEN. The folk in the cities have no privacy whatsoever, but most don’t mind. They’re already gone folks and you have to accept that. Most are already gone. Don’t waste your time with those ones. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and just before I go to a caller, one last article, I’ll put the link up too, and it’s from The Mail Online in Britain, talking about the cops who won’t help people who are drowning.
Pagan police win the right to take time off for festivals
By Daily Mail Reporter / 11th May 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
Pagan police officers have been given the right to take days off to celebrate festivals where they leave food out for the dead and take part in 'unabashed sexual promiscuity'.
I’ll go to the callers now and there is Mark from Wisconsin. Are you there Mark?
Mark: Yes, I am. Hey, don’t you think it’s kind of funny how whenever you see those ultrasounds on TV the baby is always jumping around?
Alan: That’s right. [Alan and the caller laughing.] I think I’d be doing the same thing if I was getting bombarded with those.
Mark: It’s probably blowing his eardrums out. I was going to mention how, you know, in Brave New World, they oxygen-deprived the babies to make them stupid, to make them into slaves?
Alan: That was the Betas or the Thetas; that’s right.
Mark: Right. They started clamping the umbilical cord sometime here in the United States, I believe in the early 70s and I can’t find any medical facts on why they did it or why they are still doing it.
Alan: You know something? They are testing on the public all the time in different areas. I watched a DVD recently that was sent to me about how the US medical, different hospitals were actually working with the government and they injected PLUTONIUM into peoples’ arms and legs, with massive syringes. Of course the doctors were all wearing lead gloves and shields, telling these patients that they had cancer and this treatment could cure them. Then they told you that they didn’t have cancer at all. They didn’t have cancer at all; they lied to them from the beginning and used them as guinea pigs. They all died of awful, terrible cancers that were caused by the radiation. You wouldn’t believe what they are really doing in private, in secret, amongst the populations.
Mark: Yep. The experiments go on. Could you go over some time this Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged? I’ve been doing a little research on her and she seems to come from the usual suspects. She lived in Crimea, the settlement, and she had a Bolshevik education. Then she comes over here and she writes 2 best-selling books and she’s writing Broadway plays. What can you tell me about this lady?
Alan: I think it was Alisa Rosenbaum that her name was; she changed her name. She went right over and became the mistress of Lord Rothschild for a while; it was the first guy she was a mistress of. Then she went right over to Hollywood where she mixed with the big Hollywood crowd and became a mistress of various ones at different times. If you simply reverse the logic of the followers and see it from her point of view, she is saying that those who are already masters of the world and geniuses should not be held back by the masses. Tie that in with today, the Rothschilds are taking over. They’ve got the World Bank on the go, the Land For Debt Swap which they get through the IMF. They’ve got the carbon tax thing. They’ve got the whole world under their belt. She’s basically not for the little guy with his little gold pieces; she’s not talking about them. She’s talking about the geniuses who have got control already shouldn’t be held accountable by the laws of the general population and they should be allowed to do what they want; that’s what she was really saying.
Mark: That’s objectivism. So where did she get all this money to run all these social and psychological experiments on people in New York?
Alan: Look at the company she kept. There are photographs out there; Einstein was one of her best pals. Lord Rothschild and a whole bunch of other Lords were funding her and I’ve no doubt she was getting money funneled through even all the big banking family channels too.
Mark: Thick as thieves. Thanks a lot.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Yes, nothing is ever as it seems and followers should always check and see it from the leader’s point of view. She was talking about the ultra elite, THEY were the ones that should go on and not be held accountable to the general public.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Overpopulation? Don't Worry, its All Under Control
VIDEO: "The Disappearing Male" CBC Newsworld
Ultrasound Sperm Blaster-New Contraceptive
Police at Scene Refuse to Help Drowning Woman-Not their Department
Darpa Seeks to Manipulate Lightning
Final Cut-MyLifeProject-Record of Your Life
Pagan Police Allowed Time Off for Pagan Festivals-Food for the Dead followed by Sexual Promiscuity
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:05 amHi folks, this is Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, on the 24th of September, 2010. And, as always, I suggest newcomers, and there's always newcomers coming into the show, I know that by the emails I get, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. You'll find a massive archive there of audios and transcripts, as well, for download. Remember too, that all those sites you see listed on that front page, it's very important that you bookmark them, because they all carry the same information. Sometimes I get one or two going down at a time. And if you bookmark the lot of them, you'll have at least one of them, which I'm sure hopefully will work. And they all carry the audios, they all carry transcripts in English of a lot of the talks that I've given. And if you want audios, and if you want the transcripts in another language, go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can find them for print up in other languages of your choice.
Remember too, that you are the audience that brings me to you. I don't rely on advertisers to pay my way. That's generally how hosts make their living, and it's pretty lucrative, too. You are the people who bring me to you. It's up to you to purchase the books, the discs and so on that I have for sale, on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And that just makes me trickle over. That's all I do, is trickle over. And I don't bring on guests who terrify you and then sell you the antidote at the end. Because that's really how a lot of it works. And the ads you hear on this show are paid by advertisers, and I've got nothing to do with it, straight to RBN, and that pays for their airtime and their staff, equipment, and their bills. And we've all got massive bills. And it also pays for the broadcast, as well. So, it's up to you to keep me going, and you can do so by purchasing the books and items, or donating to me. Remember, from the U.S. to Canada, you can use a personal check to Canada. You can still use an international postal money order to Canada. Some people just send cash, and do their order. If you want to order through PayPal, send the PayPal donation, and a separate email with your name, address, and order on it, and I'll get it back to you. Across the rest of the world, you do have the option of using Western Union, which is kind of expensive, Money Gram, which is cheaper, cash, you can also use PayPal to donate, or to purchase. Remember, a separate email after the donation with your name, address, and the order, and I'll get that out to you, wherever you live across the planet. And so far, the post office isn't too bad. They are making changes. In the U.S. they're cutting back on staff, and closing a lot of post offices down, in fact. I have no doubt Canada is to follow. And I know that in places like Australia it's sometimes a nightmare to get the stuff out to Australia, because they can get it fast enough through airmail, but they hang on to it for about two months or more. It's just amazing. Anyway, that's the little trials and tribulations we go through all the time.
And on this show, as I say, I try to show you the bigger picture. Same with the archives and the audios. I've got the history, archives I've got up there. You've got to go into them, because you will save yourself a lot of time and trouble, and a lot of loops, there's a lot of loops that have been put out there for you to follow, around in circles and circles and circles, just to chase rainbows and chasing aliens and all kinds of weird stuff. That will take a good part of your time up, but it won't help you at all in understanding what's really happening, and it won't help to make a stronger person out of you either, if you're living in constant fear. After all, if aliens are running the world, what chance do you have in doing anything, eh? It's a great way to get you out of the running of even doing anything, participating, and that's called counter-intelligence, by the way. That's how it works.
You know, this New World Order, as I say, there's nothing really new about it, at all. It was planned an awful long time ago. Lots of books were written in the 1800s by big players, and into the 1900s, and in the 20th century. Now, the music is coming in, and I'll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, I'm back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about this big world order that's been ongoing for an awful long time. The Big Boys before World War II were very, very ambitious about their plans. They had lots of books written out there. The British Eugenics Society worked with the American Eugenics Society, and various other Eugenics Societies to try and find ways to eliminate all the working classes that would simply have to go. Because even then, they knew, they were bringing in a world government, and they wouldn't need all these laboring classes anymore. And they were terrified the lower classes would outbreed the brighter ones, you know, the ones who deserve to live, obviously. And they devised different plans and methods, and discussed things at world meetings, on how to depopulate. Even from the beginning, at the League of Nations in 1918, or 1919, they discussed this too. That became the United Nations, and they still discuss it, because they have a Department of Population Control there. And it's been an ongoing battle all the time.
Now, the thing is, the average person is taught to be a good citizen, see, a good citizen. A good citizen is what those in power decide you should really be. They decide too, or their minions beneath them of bureaucrats, decide what kind of pacified, happy little taxpayer that you are. And they give you your moral codes for that time, for each time. And they also destroy morals, when they want to bring in a new system. Then, out of the chaos, they give you the next system. It's an old, old technique, which is ongoing, all the time. It's ongoing as we live, in fact. And most folk never catch on. You're born into your own time. You go through your standard educational system, where your teachers help to brainwash you that everything that they tell you is true, and that you're living in a world, and a government too, you serve a government who is awfully nice, awfully nice people, who have your best interests at heart, all the time. They worry about you. They even make movies about them too, in the States, you know, about the politicians and how they worry about the general public. It's quite a nice farce, but this is the sort of stuff you get fed to keep you naive and dumb and silly, you see, and to make sure you don't recognize what's really happening, even when people are dropping dead all over the place with cancer, from the inoculations they got back from the fifties onwards, for the polio vaccines, etc, etc. Plus, the heavily tampered food that we eat too. It isn't just pesticide laced, and I mean soaked, literally through the cells of the plants, but it's also modified as well, GMO, it's modified. You don't bring in Monsanto, remember that helped with Agent Orange, military-industrial boys, all their top scientists to make a better potato, because they'd like you to have a good french fry. Why would you bring in all these guys to mix different genes together, knowing, in high biochemistry, they can create, plants will create specific enzymes and poisons and all the rest of it. You see, they can actually sterilize you through food alone. Do you understand that? That was also discussed at the United Nations, years ago. And the Rockefellers were in on a type of rice, that was going to feed the world, but they also put out a patent that this particular rice could also help sterilize people. In other words, they don't ask for volunteers.
When they made you dumb and stupid and happy, and they told you how to be happy and this is a good citizen, and everyone wants to belong to the same group and be happy, and talk about the same things, to be accepted, then you don't know that you're actually being sterilized and killed off, and it's a plan. You're taught that everything that happens in life is always an accident. Oh, no one could have foreseen this coming along, oh, my goodness. It's like the New Agers. The New Agers are taught to be nice and happy, always ignore the nasty things, and don't prepare for anything like that. You always think positive about things. That was all put out by the top boys. The CIA ran the New Age from its inception in the U.S. and of course MI6 had a branch in Britain that literally put out a few gurus as well. So, they create the New Age, which is a form of mind control, you see. And even the Soviets were intensely interested. They sent over people just to monitor the New Age and how it was taking off in the West, because they found it was such a great way to control people and make them happy, regardless of the circumstances they were living under or the realities of the lifestyles that they were going to suffer under.
And it reminds me of, it wasn't the Life of Brian, but it was written by Terry Gilliam. It was Erik the Viking. Very interesting movie, very funny. And it shows you the Vikings taking off. They hit the Island of the Blessed. And the Island of the Blessed, it's like a fairy tale land, where everybody is a New Ager. They're all happy as can be, they wear flowers in their hair. They all talk nice to each other. You don't see any heavy work or anything. But the thing is, this magical spell would be broken if a single drop of blood hit the soil, you see. And of course, a couple of the Vikings got a bit drunk one night, and bit angry, and a drop hit the soil. And so the whole island shook, and the Vikings took to their boats, knowing it was going to sink, and you see all the heads, the head departments, the king and all that, and his top echelon, sinking gradually down and down into the water. They refuse rescue by the Vikings, because, oh don't worry about it. We've got it all under control. We've set up a committee to do an inquiry, and find out, we'll fix this. And down they went of course, and that was them gone. Always positive thinkers, you see, and totally taught to ignore the negative. That's the world you're living in, mind control.
Of course, they talk about now about neuroscience. Neuroscience is a compilation of behavioral psychology, with the behaviorists like Skinner, with his stuff involved. Pavlov of course, is big time in there, and all the other experimenters, who made their names by sticking wires in folks' heads and stuff, like Delgado. And they've had big plans for you, big, big plans. But they must always make it enticing. You see, the next part is always made enticing to you. You think you'll be superman or you'll have special powers, and who wants a brain-chip in their head so they can open their garage door? You know. You've already got a pot belly, I mean, use your muscles. Anyway this is the farce that you're fed. It's always going to be for your benefit, while they go on and on about depopulation.
About a month ago or so, the BBC, BBC 4 it was, and I have the link on my website, that I may put up tonight again, where you can download the audios, had a professor on a panel, of course, doing the usual dialectic. They bring on the antis and the pros, or the uncles, whatever, and the discussion was about Eugenics and even sterilization, compulsory sterilization, starting in Britain, which is the most socialized, advanced country in the world. It came out of World War II, after fighting National Socialism, and it came out as a Nationalist Socialist country, because government had expanded like cancer during WWII. Now, I always tell you that when these ideas are floated like trial balloons, you better believe an agenda is starting to get under way, to convince the public, a little bit by little bit by little bit more, each time to go along with an agenda. And the public themselves, never really think through things, they learn through osmosis. It kind of sinks gradually into their minds, vaguely, through little clips and bits and bites that they hear. And then, when it's so familiar to them, even though they've never rationalized it, thought through it, critically analyzed it, they'll say, well, I guess it had to come, it sounds kind of familiar, you know. Here's the next step. And this is in a mainstream British newspaper, Mail Online.
Why we should sterilize teenage girls ... temporarily at least
(Alan: And you know that's a lie right away. I know the agenda, because I've read their stuff. And it says here:)
Young mums: 'Not having a baby takes intelligence and planning'
(A: Then they always get a picture posed by model to show you what a young mum looks like. Have you ever noticed that rubbish they put on there? Like we read cartoons.)
Last week, an intriguing proposition was mooted by Government minister Dawn Primarolo. (A: Primarolo, her name is.)
Teenage girls, she said, could be steered towards what is described as "long-term contraception".
(A: It's actually long-term sterilization.)
This is now possible thanks to the development of contraceptive jabs and implants which can last up to five years.
In other words, there is a way of effectively sterilizing girls for a lengthy period of time.
(A: This is your government talking folks. Hmm? Think about it.)
At what age? Well, doesn't 12 until 17 sound rather sensible?
(A: You know when they start this, you get familiarized with the idea. You know, well, we're already doing it up to 17, what's wrong with going on to thirty, and then what's wrong in doing it permanently? You know this is coming. This is how they play with the children, eh. We're the children. It says:)
This would have the advantage of bringing down the teenage pregnancy rate, so high in this country it makes us a disgrace among the nations - the worst offenders in Europe.
(A: Now, all they've been fed, since the 1960s, you know, the "swinging sixties", you know what swinging means, you know. And when the National Health Service starting dishing, and throwing out the pills by the sack full, and then you had a massive campaign from the BBC. They all came, everybody at the BBC worked and came from Eton. You had the upper class managing the BBC, pushing all this sexual lifestyle. Why? To destroy what was to bring in that which is new. They destroy the family. They destroy the old morality. It's all gone now. People can't even remember what it was. And then you bring in the new. You create chaos, and then you come out with the solution. It's so simple. Old technique. And all they see on television, the youngsters too, is music television, where everybody is dancing like a stripper. And mums and dads sit now, they're so used to it, isn't that cute, she's dancing like a stripper. And none of these articles will ever mention the culture industry. I've never seen it in my lifetime. Never, because the culture industry, like the media, is an essential part of governing and controlling people, and altering their behavior. It says:)
The abortion rate would fall sharply. And silly young girls could get on with the education that is meant to produce serious, responsible taxpayers, (A: See, there's your function. You're supposed to become a serious, responsible taxpayer, not a benefit recipient. Amazing that too, that's your reason for living, you know. That's what life's all about, to make her a serious, responsible taxpayer, a nice little slave. It says:)
Now, many people will see this modest proposal as little short of horrific - nothing less than state interference in our reproductive lives.
But think about it: it might not be such a bad idea.
And I'll read the rest of this intro of this article, that, you know, some dictators would have loved, after this break.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. I like the guitar wailing. Once in a while, you've got to wail, especially on a Friday, to get all this off your chest. You know it's awfully boring, living your life, always knowing what's coming along the pike, telling people, and they say that will never happen. And sure enough, it happens. And do they say you were right? No, nope. Then you tell them what's going to happen next. No, that will never happen. And those are the brain dead. You see, there's total conditioning. They are the products of total conditioning. Their minds have been completely damaged and stuck in a little compartment somewhere inside that skull. Anyway, this guy goes on to talk about how they're discussing it in Parliament and sterilization and so on. And it says:
But think about it: it might not be such a bad idea.
We are moving into a science fiction age in which life itself can be created in a test tube, and it seems that, before long, perfect babies could be bred at will, largely free of hereditary disease and illness.
(A: And remember in Eugenics Societies, and they're still on the go, they call themselves bioethicists now at universities. And they say you've got a poverty gene, you see. A poverty gene, it's what makes you poor. Nothing to do with the culture industry. Nothing to do with having about forty years, fifty years of Socialism. That back in the '70s even, early '70s said they were going to start to make single parent families houses only, because they were going to create such a society where women wouldn't need guys, just for about five minutes perhaps in their life, and then they could have children on their own, and the state would bring up the babies for them. It's so bad now the children actually call their social workers by their first names. They've been raised by them. No kidding. They said they would get the man out of the picture, because, you see, the man stands up for his family. No family, man no stand up. So it says:)
So, in my view, there is little point any more in feeling shock-horror at the idea of mass sterilization.
Neither do I believe it will encourage "promiscuity" because girls will feel they have nothing to fear in sleeping around. In truth, they seem to be doing that already. (A: It's absolutely true, because you see that's all you've been encouraged to do since the sixties. He says:) I'm afraid we are now in a time when sex is mere recreational pleasure to thousands of young women.
(A: Which is exactly what Bertrand Russell said it would be and Julian Huxley too, when they were talking about destroying the family, the means they would use to do it. And they would aim all their P.R. at the female, they said. And they did. You see, you're just living in a script. Then they cause chaos, and then they say, ah, look at the chaos, we've got to do something about this. And out comes the new law. You see? Quite simple)
The trouble is that pregnancy no longer holds the fear for teenagers it once did. The social stigma has gone.
(A: Because it's the norm now, you see, for single mums.)
Indeed, for many, it seems, a child has actually become a kind of perverse badge of honour.
(A: That's quite something to say, isn't it? A child has actually become a kind of perverse badge of honour. Think about that too.)
Obviously, there are millions of sensible young girls, but for many, having a baby seems to be the logical, and even desirable, result of their teenage flings.
If it wasn't, they'd stir themselves to do something to prevent themselves getting pregnant, like taking the morning-after pill.
(A: And aborting it, you see.)
But they don't. Because the benefits of doing nothing to stop it are obvious.
Suddenly, they can give birth to someone who will offer unconditional love in a bleak, busy, money-grubbing world.
(A: Which the Big Boys gave you, you see. They certainly have made Britain bleak, thanks to the government and the bankers.)
The council will offer a free home away from nagging parents. (A: That's true. That's forty or fifty years of Socialism.) They will have independence, sexual freedom and no more humiliating exams to try to pass - because, more than likely, their education will fall by the wayside.
Nowadays, ask some girls why they want a baby so badly and they will say vaguely: "Oh, I want to fulfill myself."
Once, they would have confidently said of the father: "I love him. And I want a bit of me, a bit of him, to go on for all eternity."
(A: Well, that went out I think with oh, the beginning of the color movies in Hollywood, I think, that stage. They'd already attacked it all and destroyed it then.)
It's not like that any more. Love is seen as little more than a neurotic dependency to the young.
(A: That's all it is, you see, it's a neurotic dependency. It's probably another bad gene.)
The fear of pregnancy used to stop girls having sex. To be pregnant and unmarried was a major life disaster (as it is still in some of our ethnic communities.)
You were disgraced, soiled goods: the child was removed, no one would marry you.
I had a great aunt locked up for life in an asylum from the age of 20 until she died. She had been declared a "moral imbecile" because she had a baby out of wedlock.
(A: Well, maybe he's got a bad gene. Maybe he's really a moral imbecile himself, the guy that's writing this. Doesn't seem to have much morality at all.)
My mother tried to rescue her - but to no avail. The rest of the family was against it. After 30 years, she was so institutionalized, anyway, that she didn't want to leave.
This condemnation of the sexually imprudent was not meant to be unkind. People were poor, babies without fathers suffered and there was no way women could earn money if they had a child.
It was a moral issue but the stigma was born out of necessity: a desperate attempt to stop girls from doing what came naturally until a father and a home could be provided.
But for all that, unwelcome babies went on being born - the human impulse to procreate being what it is.
How to have sex without getting pregnant was in those days a real mystery. Now we know everything there is to know about preventing babies, yet still girls take risks.
Understanding how the body works and what happens next seem to make no difference.
(A: Well, they know that too. It makes them hyper sexual, when they teach them young.)
Currently, our teenage pregnancy rate is twice as high as in Germany, three times as high as in France and six times as high as in the Netherlands.
Someone sent me a little series from the BBC on some woman detective. And she's banging away at some young fellow, half her age, in the sack half the time on the show. And I'll go into that when I come back from this message too, just to show you what they've been feeding these young girls.
Hi folks, I'm back, Cutting Through the Matrix, and carrying on with this article here, but I also mentioned what they're showing them. What they've been growing up with, as I say, all the basically Music Television, which is really just promoting young girls stripping, pretty well. It's all about sex and nothing else. And all the magazines they've got. And even the crappy papers like this one I'm reading, because when you see the stuff down the right hand side, it's all what happens to the celebrity females, and you know, who's got the latest boob job, and all that kind of stuff. That's what they give you. But they never mention that aspect of why the culture has gone this way. They can't because they'd have to tell you they planned it this way, you see. They'd have to tell you that. And as I say, this series of female detectives and so on, who's always in the sack with some young fellow, banging away everywhere. And her friend, who's a victim in this crime story, is banging guys on fence posts. I mean, for god's sake, this is what they've been feeding women in Britain for about thirty or forty years now, and getting away with, and wondering why young girls are, never mind all the stuff they're getting taught very, very young, as Bertrand Russell wanted them to be, so that they could separate act from the emotional bonding part of it. That's all happened, successful. Back to the story, it says:
Is this because, in this country, getting pregnant while still at school has become a status symbol for the girls, as ASBOs have for the boys?
(A: That's Anti-Social Behavior, apparently.)
In spite of all the efforts of the Government's Teenage Pregnancy Unit, and millions of pounds spent on initiatives to persuade girls that having babies young is a bad, bad thing, the rates stay sky-high.
(A: You see, you only have the culture that they put out to you. It's always, like Plato said, culture is given out from the top, not from the bottom. It's always from the top, managed from the top. And the BBC, believe you me, which is owned by the British government, led the charge for all this, years ago, back in the sixties. It says:)
In 2005, there were 39,804 conceptions by under-18s in England - a rate of 41.3 per thousand.
The trouble for those who would tackle the pregnancy problem is that the very act of warning against pregnancy can be unproductive.
A certain proportion of teenagers like to defy fate - and the more you warn them not to smoke, drink, have sex, stay up late, join gangs, the more they will.
Defying authority, not doing what you're told, is, for many, part of growing up - (A: No, it's taught in school now. It's been taught for years. And you also have the Rights of the Child. You can't even say to them, I'm not letting you in at 3 o'clock in the morning. The cops come up to the door and make you take them in. And you can't do anything with them. "I know my rights." The ones at ten know this.) …a necessary preparation for leaving the nest. Persuasion doesn't work. The instinct to rebel goes too deep.
Boys have always wanted to have sex and notch up "scores" on the bedpost. (A: That would be kind of painful, I think.)
The trouble now is that the girls - who once wanted just to be loved by someone, anyone - are under intense peer pressure, don't want to be outdone or be seen to be 'square', and so behave like the boys.
(A: Well, who gave them that culture folks? It didn't happen by itself. Didn't happen. I lived through a lot of it and watched it all happening. And I knew how it was happening, and who was behind it. It says that:)
It seems that many of today's girls just like being pregnant, and emotionally and physically - not just practically - have more to gain than lose if they are. Sex education hasn't helped, and may indeed have harmed.
Freud's view of the psychosexual development of the child has been ignored. His opinion was that you interfere with the "latency" phase of ages nine to 12 at your peril, for fear of stopping further development.
In Freud's theory, the latency phase is when a child unconsciously denies the facts of life until he or she is ready to face them. If unpalatable facts are forced down the child's throat it's traumatizing, and progression to sexual maturity is halted.
(A: Well, he was wrong about everything.)
In other words, if you start teaching the birds and the bees too early, all that the nine, ten or 11-year-olds will do is want to experiment ...
Well, that part's true, because that's exactly what Huxley said, and that's what also Julian Huxley said, first CEO of UNESCO, that lovely United Nations organization for children, and it's also what Lord Bertrand Russell said because he tried these experimental schools back in the '20s, special permission by the crown to do so, and his job there was to try to get them into pre-pubertal sex, to stop any emotional bonding later in life. He said it was very successful. So they experimented to make sure it worked before they gave to society and forced it on them. So, this goes on and on and on. You're going to see more and more and more of this now, because they're on a roll for eugenics, folks. Although they now call it bioethics. It's all run by academia, you know, that's joined with government, has been joined at the hip for an awful long time, since at least World War II.
Here's another article that ties in with it. You think you're eating nice stuff and so on, well, listen to this. Here's a patent here.
FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE AND METHOD OF USE
(A: And I'll put the link up on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, at the end of the show. And this goes into this, all its different patent number, publication dates, and so on. It came from the University of Georgia, Research Foundation, Inc., probably with a Rockefeller grant, no doubt. And Boyd Graduate Studies Research Center at Athens. It gives the names of the inventor, FAYRER-HOSKEN, Richard, A.; and SANDBERG, Victoria, A, and it's called, title:)
FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE AND METHOD OF USE
(A: They've already tried it out on various animals and so on, and it works very effectively, and it works by, it says:)
A vaccine comprising an antigen derived from a zona pellucida glycoprotein is effective to impair fertility in animals, preferably carnivores. (A: That's us folks.) The vaccine can be used as an immunosterilant or an immunocontraceptive.
So it can actually sterilize you or act as a contraceptive. That's the stuff too that they join with a type of wheat or corn or something and gave to the poor countries through the United Nations, I was talking about earlier, and rice too, I believe. So, I'll put that up there, and let you know what you're chomping on. And you, know, turn on your television, and watch all the garbage and the filth that you're watching and become more and more and more debauched. You do have that choice. You really do have that choice.
Now, there's callers there, and there's Prentice from Alaska. Are you there Prentice? Hello?
Prentice: Hello. Thanks for taking my call, Alan. I know a lot of your callers have called in, and you know, they wonder how, some good ways to meet other people like themselves, you know, who are thinking and asking questions, and trying to, you know, break into a lot of this information. And one good way to do that, is to, you know, just get out there, there's a lot of good resources on the internet. One group is called, one website is called meetup.com. And you can get on there, and you can start a meetup group, buy Alan's books, get a lot of the books that, you know, Alan has talked about on the show, and you know, just try to get together with people on there, and that website generates regular bulletins to people in the area, and you know, you can gather together, and you can try to, you know, put together what you've found, what other people have discovered, and you know, that will help heighten your level of awareness, you know, to the next level. Because it's one thing to read the information. It's another thing to listen to the information. But, you know, it's not until you start talking to other people who are along the same path that you really start connecting a lot of the dots. And that helps build up your confidence and things like that, so that when you do go out in the streets or whatever, and start, you know, passing out information, you know what you're talking about, and you know that you're not the only one who knows what this information is about. Another one is Skype, and you know, that's a free program, you can download it, and you can talk through the computer for free. All you need is a headset. I'm on there. And you know, bring Alan's books. If you don't have them, purchase them. One of the best books to get that you've mentioned, that's helped me a lot is really the big daddy as far as this history goes to me, is Tragedy and Hope by Professor Carroll Quigley. And you know, it talks about the bankers in there, and you've gone over this book a few times, but it talks about the history of how the bankers have manipulated both sides in the wars.
Alan: That's right.
Prentice: Now, you're not going to get this history in the public school system; you're not going to get this history in the college school system. Also, it talks about parallels in there too. And it's a 1500 page book, but you've got to go through it in order to learn the history. It's an important book though. I think it's a part a lot of people overlook. But it goes into the dynamics of the family. And this is a historian, Professor Carroll Quigley. And he's just analyzing the dynamics of the family that are leading to the breakdown of the family. He's in every age group in that family. He's describing every gender in the family, precisely and what's going on in their heads, and what elements are related to the breakdown of the family perfect.
Alan: And he worked for the guys who were doing it.
Prentice: Another one that you mentioned that was great was The Hidden Persuaders. Now in that book, it goes into an article from Time Magazine, titled Bio Control. And in that article it talks about, they were using methods to control human beings by electrodes, placed on the scalp in the 1950s. And that book was written by Vance Packard. I believe he wrote for the New Yorker, if I'm not mistaken. But it goes into the mind control, the programming methods that the advertising industry uses. And the book was written in the 1950s, okay. Once again, this is stuff that you're not going to get in public school. This is stuff you're not going to get in college. And you know, it's when you start looking into this stuff, that you realize, I don't know anything, you know what I'm saying.
Alan: Yeah, we've been given a fake reality to make us naive, compliant, obedient citizens.
Prentice: Yep. And you know, I mean you have to try to, you know and get together with people and talk about these issues, because a lot of people have never heard about this stuff. I know, you know a lot of people are talking about the eugenics movement now. But people didn't start talking about that until you talked about it on the show, Alan.
Alan: Yeah, I know.
Prentice: And if you do not know the history of the whos, what, wheres, whens, and whys of the eugenics, you don't know your history at all.
Alan: Absolutely.
Prentice: Because that was the most nefarious scientific movement in history, period.
Alan: And as I say, it's still ongoing, through the United Nations and its Department of Population. They are the Big Boys where they sign all the treaties on population control across the world.
Prentice: Exactly. And once again, completely written out of the mainstream history books, period. You know. How can you go through public school and this stuff is never mentioned?
Alan: Well, as I say, the function of public school is not to inform you, or to wake you up. It's to get you under the spell and to be one of the mindless masses, who are obedient, pay taxes, and work their life away, never figuring out what's going on.
Prentice: Exactly, and you know, to think that you're educated to the point where you can't learn anything else.
Alan: Exactly. Or that you know everything. I mean, most people out there, really think they're informed like Brzezinski said. He said shortly the public will be unable to reason for themselves. They'll only be able to repeat in a conversation that which they heard on the previous night's news. And that's happened with most folk.
Prentice: Yeah. Ain't that the truth. But, that's what you have to do. You've got to start paying homage to the people who helped you and also, help others after you get that information.
Alan: That's right.
Prentice: You know, because if we don't nobody else is. You know. But I appreciate everything you do, Alan. A great show. And you have yourself a great weekend.
Alan: Yeah, thanks for calling. Take care, bye now. Now there's also Dan in Pennsylvania. Are you there Dan?
Dan: Hi. Yeah, I agree with the last caller, I mean, you do, you really, really, really do have to stick together, because, I mean, if you try to stay by yourself in this thing, you're going to lose your mind. Yeah, I just wanted to say, thank you for everything that you do. And especially for your dvd. I was watching it last night with my mom, and I'm 21 years old, you know, and I was trying to get through to her, and you know, the first thing that she would say would be, you know, who is this guy? What are his credentials? You know, everything like that. And you know, after a while, you start trying to explain it to her and everything, and here I found out that in high school she had to read Brave New World and you know, she actually had some, you know, but she didn't really understand it at the time.
Alan: No, most folk don't realize it. It seems so science fiction at the time to them, they didn't relate it to reality. Real human beings at the top would never do that to us. And yet, here I am, reading an article today about that very thing that they are bringing it in, and they have been doing it to us.
Dan: Yeah, well I mean, it just goes to show you that, if you keep pounding this information into the people that you love, you know, and not, like forcing it upon them, because ultimately they'll do what they want to do in the end, and there's nothing you can really do about that. But, I mean, you'll realize that a lot of these people have definitely, you yourself, I mean, you've definitely known this, from the time you could realize it, you know. You can feel it in your gut, like you know something's wrong. And you really just don't know what to do about it, until you learn about it.
Alan: That's right.
Dan: And the other thing I wanted to ask you about really was, I'd been researching some of this stuff before. I really actually, you know, started listening to you. And I had heard about this guy, named John Todd. And I don't know what to think about him, because, he really, he really sounds like he knows what he's talking about, whenever he's talking about the music industry, how, he says about how he used to be in the Illuminati, and he...
Alan: (Chuckle)
Dan: Do you know what I'm talking about in any way? He talks about how like....
Alan: I've heard quite a few of those guys, and most of them are a fraud, of course, you know. They'll say a lot of stuff that's out there on Patriot Radio, but they're frauds. But hold on, I'll be back after this break.
Alan: Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And I don't know if Dan's still on the line there, is he?
Dan: Yeah, I just really wanted to know about, because I know you talk about, or a lot of people had talked about you know, hidden meanings in music. And you know, a lot of people listen to like, you know, the Beatles, and a lot of bands that they'll wear. They'll be personal billboards for the Beatles and everything. It's ridiculous. And they have no idea what their songs are about. They don't know what they're listening to, you know.
Alan: You don't have to know, on a conscious level. Your subconscious, believe it or not, really will take a lot in. And it goes into what's called by Carl Jung, the unconscious, the wild part of the brain, where everything is in your deep dreams, where all things can happen. And that's where it really starts working on you, on the so-called primitive levels of you. That's where it really starts working, and then it manifests. You cannot subdue this kind of force, this dynamic, and it will eventually surface into your behavior itself, and you act out the behavior that's programmed into you. It's a very old technique. Even Plato talked about it. He wanted all musicians to be licensed at the time, because of this power, especially they had over the young, you know.
Dan: Well, yeah. I mean, that makes a lot of sense, because you know, a lot of the times, like I'll just listen to music, you know, every once in a while, just the instrumentals, you know, like jazz instrumentals and stuff like that, because personally that's what I'm into. But I mean a lot of the people will just, they'll just blindly come out with, it's partly what they think is new and trendy, you know, a lot of people my age think.
Alan: They never stop, and see what they don't know is, when you are writing music, and you're a professional writer, it comes down, the grapevine comes from the top with what they're going to push this year. What's the in thing, you see. It's the same with all the brands and types of music you've had since the 1950s onwards, literally. Because the CIA was involved in this, by the way, big time, and that's admitted in the cultural Cold Wars, the declassified stuff that's put out by the government. Every writer immediately gets all the latest updates on, this is going to sell. If you've got this in it, and this in it, and this in it, that's out. So men and women, I love you stuff, that's out, you see. If it's gender specific, it's out. It's got to be vague. It could be he or she. So you don't mention he or she, and you leave it not gender specific. That comes down to the writers, and then to embed different stuff in the higher studios, they'll embed a lot of stuff that promotes stuff that you don't even know you're being indoctrinated with at the time. Then you couple it with the visual aspects of course, and the occultic symbolism. Occultic just means hidden symbolism, and it's again archetypal symbols. They're very primitive. We all understand at some deep, again primitive level, but they work on you like a language. Because you're actually seeing a written language. And then you couple out with the sexual part, too, that kicks in the stimulation. And you're embedding, you're embedding a personality into yourself actually, when you're doing this.
Dan: Yeah, and it's just like whenever you know, the people will see things in magazines, and it will make themselves feel less adequate, or that they need to be part of that.
Alan: Always, always to make you feel less adequate. And they aim specifically at the women. They're easier to change. Women, by the way, are in control of the sexual act, outside of rape. And the Big Boys said that years ago. They'd aim all, Bernays said it. We'll aim all the propaganda at the women, because we can make her unhappy with herself, we'll make her want to look like a film star, and she'll buy all the things, she'll go for all the beauty cosmetics and so on, but they can also modify her behavior, and they've done it.
Dan: Alright, well, thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling. And Tom, sorry I can't get to you, so maybe call back on Monday. From all you out there, from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it's good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
BBC--Live Debate on Sterilization Wed August 25 and Sat. 28
Push for Sterilizing Women Beginning with Young Girls--UK (Told you so)
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, on the 24th of September, 2010. And, as always, I suggest newcomers, and there's always newcomers coming into the show, I know that by the emails I get, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. You'll find a massive archive there of audios and transcripts, as well, for download. Remember too, that all those sites you see listed on that front page, it's very important that you bookmark them, because they all carry the same information. Sometimes I get one or two going down at a time. And if you bookmark the lot of them, you'll have at least one of them, which I'm sure hopefully will work. And they all carry the audios, they all carry transcripts in English of a lot of the talks that I've given. And if you want audios, and if you want the transcripts in another language, go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can find them for print up in other languages of your choice.
Remember too, that you are the audience that brings me to you. I don't rely on advertisers to pay my way. That's generally how hosts make their living, and it's pretty lucrative, too. You are the people who bring me to you. It's up to you to purchase the books, the discs and so on that I have for sale, on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And that just makes me trickle over. That's all I do, is trickle over. And I don't bring on guests who terrify you and then sell you the antidote at the end. Because that's really how a lot of it works. And the ads you hear on this show are paid by advertisers, and I've got nothing to do with it, straight to RBN, and that pays for their airtime and their staff, equipment, and their bills. And we've all got massive bills. And it also pays for the broadcast, as well. So, it's up to you to keep me going, and you can do so by purchasing the books and items, or donating to me. Remember, from the U.S. to Canada, you can use a personal check to Canada. You can still use an international postal money order to Canada. Some people just send cash, and do their order. If you want to order through PayPal, send the PayPal donation, and a separate email with your name, address, and order on it, and I'll get it back to you. Across the rest of the world, you do have the option of using Western Union, which is kind of expensive, Money Gram, which is cheaper, cash, you can also use PayPal to donate, or to purchase. Remember, a separate email after the donation with your name, address, and the order, and I'll get that out to you, wherever you live across the planet. And so far, the post office isn't too bad. They are making changes. In the U.S. they're cutting back on staff, and closing a lot of post offices down, in fact. I have no doubt Canada is to follow. And I know that in places like Australia it's sometimes a nightmare to get the stuff out to Australia, because they can get it fast enough through airmail, but they hang on to it for about two months or more. It's just amazing. Anyway, that's the little trials and tribulations we go through all the time.
And on this show, as I say, I try to show you the bigger picture. Same with the archives and the audios. I've got the history, archives I've got up there. You've got to go into them, because you will save yourself a lot of time and trouble, and a lot of loops, there's a lot of loops that have been put out there for you to follow, around in circles and circles and circles, just to chase rainbows and chasing aliens and all kinds of weird stuff. That will take a good part of your time up, but it won't help you at all in understanding what's really happening, and it won't help to make a stronger person out of you either, if you're living in constant fear. After all, if aliens are running the world, what chance do you have in doing anything, eh? It's a great way to get you out of the running of even doing anything, participating, and that's called counter-intelligence, by the way. That's how it works.
You know, this New World Order, as I say, there's nothing really new about it, at all. It was planned an awful long time ago. Lots of books were written in the 1800s by big players, and into the 1900s, and in the 20th century. Now, the music is coming in, and I'll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, I'm back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about this big world order that's been ongoing for an awful long time. The Big Boys before World War II were very, very ambitious about their plans. They had lots of books written out there. The British Eugenics Society worked with the American Eugenics Society, and various other Eugenics Societies to try and find ways to eliminate all the working classes that would simply have to go. Because even then, they knew, they were bringing in a world government, and they wouldn't need all these laboring classes anymore. And they were terrified the lower classes would outbreed the brighter ones, you know, the ones who deserve to live, obviously. And they devised different plans and methods, and discussed things at world meetings, on how to depopulate. Even from the beginning, at the League of Nations in 1918, or 1919, they discussed this too. That became the United Nations, and they still discuss it, because they have a Department of Population Control there. And it's been an ongoing battle all the time.
Now, the thing is, the average person is taught to be a good citizen, see, a good citizen. A good citizen is what those in power decide you should really be. They decide too, or their minions beneath them of bureaucrats, decide what kind of pacified, happy little taxpayer that you are. And they give you your moral codes for that time, for each time. And they also destroy morals, when they want to bring in a new system. Then, out of the chaos, they give you the next system. It's an old, old technique, which is ongoing, all the time. It's ongoing as we live, in fact. And most folk never catch on. You're born into your own time. You go through your standard educational system, where your teachers help to brainwash you that everything that they tell you is true, and that you're living in a world, and a government too, you serve a government who is awfully nice, awfully nice people, who have your best interests at heart, all the time. They worry about you. They even make movies about them too, in the States, you know, about the politicians and how they worry about the general public. It's quite a nice farce, but this is the sort of stuff you get fed to keep you naive and dumb and silly, you see, and to make sure you don't recognize what's really happening, even when people are dropping dead all over the place with cancer, from the inoculations they got back from the fifties onwards, for the polio vaccines, etc, etc. Plus, the heavily tampered food that we eat too. It isn't just pesticide laced, and I mean soaked, literally through the cells of the plants, but it's also modified as well, GMO, it's modified. You don't bring in Monsanto, remember that helped with Agent Orange, military-industrial boys, all their top scientists to make a better potato, because they'd like you to have a good french fry. Why would you bring in all these guys to mix different genes together, knowing, in high biochemistry, they can create, plants will create specific enzymes and poisons and all the rest of it. You see, they can actually sterilize you through food alone. Do you understand that? That was also discussed at the United Nations, years ago. And the Rockefellers were in on a type of rice, that was going to feed the world, but they also put out a patent that this particular rice could also help sterilize people. In other words, they don't ask for volunteers.
When they made you dumb and stupid and happy, and they told you how to be happy and this is a good citizen, and everyone wants to belong to the same group and be happy, and talk about the same things, to be accepted, then you don't know that you're actually being sterilized and killed off, and it's a plan. You're taught that everything that happens in life is always an accident. Oh, no one could have foreseen this coming along, oh, my goodness. It's like the New Agers. The New Agers are taught to be nice and happy, always ignore the nasty things, and don't prepare for anything like that. You always think positive about things. That was all put out by the top boys. The CIA ran the New Age from its inception in the U.S. and of course MI6 had a branch in Britain that literally put out a few gurus as well. So, they create the New Age, which is a form of mind control, you see. And even the Soviets were intensely interested. They sent over people just to monitor the New Age and how it was taking off in the West, because they found it was such a great way to control people and make them happy, regardless of the circumstances they were living under or the realities of the lifestyles that they were going to suffer under.
And it reminds me of, it wasn't the Life of Brian, but it was written by Terry Gilliam. It was Erik the Viking. Very interesting movie, very funny. And it shows you the Vikings taking off. They hit the Island of the Blessed. And the Island of the Blessed, it's like a fairy tale land, where everybody is a New Ager. They're all happy as can be, they wear flowers in their hair. They all talk nice to each other. You don't see any heavy work or anything. But the thing is, this magical spell would be broken if a single drop of blood hit the soil, you see. And of course, a couple of the Vikings got a bit drunk one night, and bit angry, and a drop hit the soil. And so the whole island shook, and the Vikings took to their boats, knowing it was going to sink, and you see all the heads, the head departments, the king and all that, and his top echelon, sinking gradually down and down into the water. They refuse rescue by the Vikings, because, oh don't worry about it. We've got it all under control. We've set up a committee to do an inquiry, and find out, we'll fix this. And down they went of course, and that was them gone. Always positive thinkers, you see, and totally taught to ignore the negative. That's the world you're living in, mind control.
Of course, they talk about now about neuroscience. Neuroscience is a compilation of behavioral psychology, with the behaviorists like Skinner, with his stuff involved. Pavlov of course, is big time in there, and all the other experimenters, who made their names by sticking wires in folks' heads and stuff, like Delgado. And they've had big plans for you, big, big plans. But they must always make it enticing. You see, the next part is always made enticing to you. You think you'll be superman or you'll have special powers, and who wants a brain-chip in their head so they can open their garage door? You know. You've already got a pot belly, I mean, use your muscles. Anyway this is the farce that you're fed. It's always going to be for your benefit, while they go on and on about depopulation.
About a month ago or so, the BBC, BBC 4 it was, and I have the link on my website, that I may put up tonight again, where you can download the audios, had a professor on a panel, of course, doing the usual dialectic. They bring on the antis and the pros, or the uncles, whatever, and the discussion was about Eugenics and even sterilization, compulsory sterilization, starting in Britain, which is the most socialized, advanced country in the world. It came out of World War II, after fighting National Socialism, and it came out as a Nationalist Socialist country, because government had expanded like cancer during WWII. Now, I always tell you that when these ideas are floated like trial balloons, you better believe an agenda is starting to get under way, to convince the public, a little bit by little bit by little bit more, each time to go along with an agenda. And the public themselves, never really think through things, they learn through osmosis. It kind of sinks gradually into their minds, vaguely, through little clips and bits and bites that they hear. And then, when it's so familiar to them, even though they've never rationalized it, thought through it, critically analyzed it, they'll say, well, I guess it had to come, it sounds kind of familiar, you know. Here's the next step. And this is in a mainstream British newspaper, Mail Online.
Why we should sterilize teenage girls ... temporarily at least
(Alan: And you know that's a lie right away. I know the agenda, because I've read their stuff. And it says here:)
Young mums: 'Not having a baby takes intelligence and planning'
(A: Then they always get a picture posed by model to show you what a young mum looks like. Have you ever noticed that rubbish they put on there? Like we read cartoons.)
Last week, an intriguing proposition was mooted by Government minister Dawn Primarolo. (A: Primarolo, her name is.)
Teenage girls, she said, could be steered towards what is described as "long-term contraception".
(A: It's actually long-term sterilization.)
This is now possible thanks to the development of contraceptive jabs and implants which can last up to five years.
In other words, there is a way of effectively sterilizing girls for a lengthy period of time.
(A: This is your government talking folks. Hmm? Think about it.)
At what age? Well, doesn't 12 until 17 sound rather sensible?
(A: You know when they start this, you get familiarized with the idea. You know, well, we're already doing it up to 17, what's wrong with going on to thirty, and then what's wrong in doing it permanently? You know this is coming. This is how they play with the children, eh. We're the children. It says:)
This would have the advantage of bringing down the teenage pregnancy rate, so high in this country it makes us a disgrace among the nations - the worst offenders in Europe.
(A: Now, all they've been fed, since the 1960s, you know, the "swinging sixties", you know what swinging means, you know. And when the National Health Service starting dishing, and throwing out the pills by the sack full, and then you had a massive campaign from the BBC. They all came, everybody at the BBC worked and came from Eton. You had the upper class managing the BBC, pushing all this sexual lifestyle. Why? To destroy what was to bring in that which is new. They destroy the family. They destroy the old morality. It's all gone now. People can't even remember what it was. And then you bring in the new. You create chaos, and then you come out with the solution. It's so simple. Old technique. And all they see on television, the youngsters too, is music television, where everybody is dancing like a stripper. And mums and dads sit now, they're so used to it, isn't that cute, she's dancing like a stripper. And none of these articles will ever mention the culture industry. I've never seen it in my lifetime. Never, because the culture industry, like the media, is an essential part of governing and controlling people, and altering their behavior. It says:)
The abortion rate would fall sharply. And silly young girls could get on with the education that is meant to produce serious, responsible taxpayers, (A: See, there's your function. You're supposed to become a serious, responsible taxpayer, not a benefit recipient. Amazing that too, that's your reason for living, you know. That's what life's all about, to make her a serious, responsible taxpayer, a nice little slave. It says:)
Now, many people will see this modest proposal as little short of horrific - nothing less than state interference in our reproductive lives.
But think about it: it might not be such a bad idea.
And I'll read the rest of this intro of this article, that, you know, some dictators would have loved, after this break.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. I like the guitar wailing. Once in a while, you've got to wail, especially on a Friday, to get all this off your chest. You know it's awfully boring, living your life, always knowing what's coming along the pike, telling people, and they say that will never happen. And sure enough, it happens. And do they say you were right? No, nope. Then you tell them what's going to happen next. No, that will never happen. And those are the brain dead. You see, there's total conditioning. They are the products of total conditioning. Their minds have been completely damaged and stuck in a little compartment somewhere inside that skull. Anyway, this guy goes on to talk about how they're discussing it in Parliament and sterilization and so on. And it says:
But think about it: it might not be such a bad idea.
We are moving into a science fiction age in which life itself can be created in a test tube, and it seems that, before long, perfect babies could be bred at will, largely free of hereditary disease and illness.
(A: And remember in Eugenics Societies, and they're still on the go, they call themselves bioethicists now at universities. And they say you've got a poverty gene, you see. A poverty gene, it's what makes you poor. Nothing to do with the culture industry. Nothing to do with having about forty years, fifty years of Socialism. That back in the '70s even, early '70s said they were going to start to make single parent families houses only, because they were going to create such a society where women wouldn't need guys, just for about five minutes perhaps in their life, and then they could have children on their own, and the state would bring up the babies for them. It's so bad now the children actually call their social workers by their first names. They've been raised by them. No kidding. They said they would get the man out of the picture, because, you see, the man stands up for his family. No family, man no stand up. So it says:)
So, in my view, there is little point any more in feeling shock-horror at the idea of mass sterilization.
Neither do I believe it will encourage "promiscuity" because girls will feel they have nothing to fear in sleeping around. In truth, they seem to be doing that already. (A: It's absolutely true, because you see that's all you've been encouraged to do since the sixties. He says:) I'm afraid we are now in a time when sex is mere recreational pleasure to thousands of young women.
(A: Which is exactly what Bertrand Russell said it would be and Julian Huxley too, when they were talking about destroying the family, the means they would use to do it. And they would aim all their P.R. at the female, they said. And they did. You see, you're just living in a script. Then they cause chaos, and then they say, ah, look at the chaos, we've got to do something about this. And out comes the new law. You see? Quite simple)
The trouble is that pregnancy no longer holds the fear for teenagers it once did. The social stigma has gone.
(A: Because it's the norm now, you see, for single mums.)
Indeed, for many, it seems, a child has actually become a kind of perverse badge of honour.
(A: That's quite something to say, isn't it? A child has actually become a kind of perverse badge of honour. Think about that too.)
Obviously, there are millions of sensible young girls, but for many, having a baby seems to be the logical, and even desirable, result of their teenage flings.
If it wasn't, they'd stir themselves to do something to prevent themselves getting pregnant, like taking the morning-after pill.
(A: And aborting it, you see.)
But they don't. Because the benefits of doing nothing to stop it are obvious.
Suddenly, they can give birth to someone who will offer unconditional love in a bleak, busy, money-grubbing world.
(A: Which the Big Boys gave you, you see. They certainly have made Britain bleak, thanks to the government and the bankers.)
The council will offer a free home away from nagging parents. (A: That's true. That's forty or fifty years of Socialism.) They will have independence, sexual freedom and no more humiliating exams to try to pass - because, more than likely, their education will fall by the wayside.
Nowadays, ask some girls why they want a baby so badly and they will say vaguely: "Oh, I want to fulfill myself."
Once, they would have confidently said of the father: "I love him. And I want a bit of me, a bit of him, to go on for all eternity."
(A: Well, that went out I think with oh, the beginning of the color movies in Hollywood, I think, that stage. They'd already attacked it all and destroyed it then.)
It's not like that any more. Love is seen as little more than a neurotic dependency to the young.
(A: That's all it is, you see, it's a neurotic dependency. It's probably another bad gene.)
The fear of pregnancy used to stop girls having sex. To be pregnant and unmarried was a major life disaster (as it is still in some of our ethnic communities.)
You were disgraced, soiled goods: the child was removed, no one would marry you.
I had a great aunt locked up for life in an asylum from the age of 20 until she died. She had been declared a "moral imbecile" because she had a baby out of wedlock.
(A: Well, maybe he's got a bad gene. Maybe he's really a moral imbecile himself, the guy that's writing this. Doesn't seem to have much morality at all.)
My mother tried to rescue her - but to no avail. The rest of the family was against it. After 30 years, she was so institutionalized, anyway, that she didn't want to leave.
This condemnation of the sexually imprudent was not meant to be unkind. People were poor, babies without fathers suffered and there was no way women could earn money if they had a child.
It was a moral issue but the stigma was born out of necessity: a desperate attempt to stop girls from doing what came naturally until a father and a home could be provided.
But for all that, unwelcome babies went on being born - the human impulse to procreate being what it is.
How to have sex without getting pregnant was in those days a real mystery. Now we know everything there is to know about preventing babies, yet still girls take risks.
Understanding how the body works and what happens next seem to make no difference.
(A: Well, they know that too. It makes them hyper sexual, when they teach them young.)
Currently, our teenage pregnancy rate is twice as high as in Germany, three times as high as in France and six times as high as in the Netherlands.
Someone sent me a little series from the BBC on some woman detective. And she's banging away at some young fellow, half her age, in the sack half the time on the show. And I'll go into that when I come back from this message too, just to show you what they've been feeding these young girls.
Hi folks, I'm back, Cutting Through the Matrix, and carrying on with this article here, but I also mentioned what they're showing them. What they've been growing up with, as I say, all the basically Music Television, which is really just promoting young girls stripping, pretty well. It's all about sex and nothing else. And all the magazines they've got. And even the crappy papers like this one I'm reading, because when you see the stuff down the right hand side, it's all what happens to the celebrity females, and you know, who's got the latest boob job, and all that kind of stuff. That's what they give you. But they never mention that aspect of why the culture has gone this way. They can't because they'd have to tell you they planned it this way, you see. They'd have to tell you that. And as I say, this series of female detectives and so on, who's always in the sack with some young fellow, banging away everywhere. And her friend, who's a victim in this crime story, is banging guys on fence posts. I mean, for god's sake, this is what they've been feeding women in Britain for about thirty or forty years now, and getting away with, and wondering why young girls are, never mind all the stuff they're getting taught very, very young, as Bertrand Russell wanted them to be, so that they could separate act from the emotional bonding part of it. That's all happened, successful. Back to the story, it says:
Is this because, in this country, getting pregnant while still at school has become a status symbol for the girls, as ASBOs have for the boys?
(A: That's Anti-Social Behavior, apparently.)
In spite of all the efforts of the Government's Teenage Pregnancy Unit, and millions of pounds spent on initiatives to persuade girls that having babies young is a bad, bad thing, the rates stay sky-high.
(A: You see, you only have the culture that they put out to you. It's always, like Plato said, culture is given out from the top, not from the bottom. It's always from the top, managed from the top. And the BBC, believe you me, which is owned by the British government, led the charge for all this, years ago, back in the sixties. It says:)
In 2005, there were 39,804 conceptions by under-18s in England - a rate of 41.3 per thousand.
The trouble for those who would tackle the pregnancy problem is that the very act of warning against pregnancy can be unproductive.
A certain proportion of teenagers like to defy fate - and the more you warn them not to smoke, drink, have sex, stay up late, join gangs, the more they will.
Defying authority, not doing what you're told, is, for many, part of growing up - (A: No, it's taught in school now. It's been taught for years. And you also have the Rights of the Child. You can't even say to them, I'm not letting you in at 3 o'clock in the morning. The cops come up to the door and make you take them in. And you can't do anything with them. "I know my rights." The ones at ten know this.) …a necessary preparation for leaving the nest. Persuasion doesn't work. The instinct to rebel goes too deep.
Boys have always wanted to have sex and notch up "scores" on the bedpost. (A: That would be kind of painful, I think.)
The trouble now is that the girls - who once wanted just to be loved by someone, anyone - are under intense peer pressure, don't want to be outdone or be seen to be 'square', and so behave like the boys.
(A: Well, who gave them that culture folks? It didn't happen by itself. Didn't happen. I lived through a lot of it and watched it all happening. And I knew how it was happening, and who was behind it. It says that:)
It seems that many of today's girls just like being pregnant, and emotionally and physically - not just practically - have more to gain than lose if they are. Sex education hasn't helped, and may indeed have harmed.
Freud's view of the psychosexual development of the child has been ignored. His opinion was that you interfere with the "latency" phase of ages nine to 12 at your peril, for fear of stopping further development.
In Freud's theory, the latency phase is when a child unconsciously denies the facts of life until he or she is ready to face them. If unpalatable facts are forced down the child's throat it's traumatizing, and progression to sexual maturity is halted.
(A: Well, he was wrong about everything.)
In other words, if you start teaching the birds and the bees too early, all that the nine, ten or 11-year-olds will do is want to experiment ...
Well, that part's true, because that's exactly what Huxley said, and that's what also Julian Huxley said, first CEO of UNESCO, that lovely United Nations organization for children, and it's also what Lord Bertrand Russell said because he tried these experimental schools back in the '20s, special permission by the crown to do so, and his job there was to try to get them into pre-pubertal sex, to stop any emotional bonding later in life. He said it was very successful. So they experimented to make sure it worked before they gave to society and forced it on them. So, this goes on and on and on. You're going to see more and more and more of this now, because they're on a roll for eugenics, folks. Although they now call it bioethics. It's all run by academia, you know, that's joined with government, has been joined at the hip for an awful long time, since at least World War II.
Here's another article that ties in with it. You think you're eating nice stuff and so on, well, listen to this. Here's a patent here.
FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE AND METHOD OF USE
(A: And I'll put the link up on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, at the end of the show. And this goes into this, all its different patent number, publication dates, and so on. It came from the University of Georgia, Research Foundation, Inc., probably with a Rockefeller grant, no doubt. And Boyd Graduate Studies Research Center at Athens. It gives the names of the inventor, FAYRER-HOSKEN, Richard, A.; and SANDBERG, Victoria, A, and it's called, title:)
FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE AND METHOD OF USE
(A: They've already tried it out on various animals and so on, and it works very effectively, and it works by, it says:)
A vaccine comprising an antigen derived from a zona pellucida glycoprotein is effective to impair fertility in animals, preferably carnivores. (A: That's us folks.) The vaccine can be used as an immunosterilant or an immunocontraceptive.
So it can actually sterilize you or act as a contraceptive. That's the stuff too that they join with a type of wheat or corn or something and gave to the poor countries through the United Nations, I was talking about earlier, and rice too, I believe. So, I'll put that up there, and let you know what you're chomping on. And you, know, turn on your television, and watch all the garbage and the filth that you're watching and become more and more and more debauched. You do have that choice. You really do have that choice.
Now, there's callers there, and there's Prentice from Alaska. Are you there Prentice? Hello?
Prentice: Hello. Thanks for taking my call, Alan. I know a lot of your callers have called in, and you know, they wonder how, some good ways to meet other people like themselves, you know, who are thinking and asking questions, and trying to, you know, break into a lot of this information. And one good way to do that, is to, you know, just get out there, there's a lot of good resources on the internet. One group is called, one website is called meetup.com. And you can get on there, and you can start a meetup group, buy Alan's books, get a lot of the books that, you know, Alan has talked about on the show, and you know, just try to get together with people on there, and that website generates regular bulletins to people in the area, and you know, you can gather together, and you can try to, you know, put together what you've found, what other people have discovered, and you know, that will help heighten your level of awareness, you know, to the next level. Because it's one thing to read the information. It's another thing to listen to the information. But, you know, it's not until you start talking to other people who are along the same path that you really start connecting a lot of the dots. And that helps build up your confidence and things like that, so that when you do go out in the streets or whatever, and start, you know, passing out information, you know what you're talking about, and you know that you're not the only one who knows what this information is about. Another one is Skype, and you know, that's a free program, you can download it, and you can talk through the computer for free. All you need is a headset. I'm on there. And you know, bring Alan's books. If you don't have them, purchase them. One of the best books to get that you've mentioned, that's helped me a lot is really the big daddy as far as this history goes to me, is Tragedy and Hope by Professor Carroll Quigley. And you know, it talks about the bankers in there, and you've gone over this book a few times, but it talks about the history of how the bankers have manipulated both sides in the wars.
Alan: That's right.
Prentice: Now, you're not going to get this history in the public school system; you're not going to get this history in the college school system. Also, it talks about parallels in there too. And it's a 1500 page book, but you've got to go through it in order to learn the history. It's an important book though. I think it's a part a lot of people overlook. But it goes into the dynamics of the family. And this is a historian, Professor Carroll Quigley. And he's just analyzing the dynamics of the family that are leading to the breakdown of the family. He's in every age group in that family. He's describing every gender in the family, precisely and what's going on in their heads, and what elements are related to the breakdown of the family perfect.
Alan: And he worked for the guys who were doing it.
Prentice: Another one that you mentioned that was great was The Hidden Persuaders. Now in that book, it goes into an article from Time Magazine, titled Bio Control. And in that article it talks about, they were using methods to control human beings by electrodes, placed on the scalp in the 1950s. And that book was written by Vance Packard. I believe he wrote for the New Yorker, if I'm not mistaken. But it goes into the mind control, the programming methods that the advertising industry uses. And the book was written in the 1950s, okay. Once again, this is stuff that you're not going to get in public school. This is stuff you're not going to get in college. And you know, it's when you start looking into this stuff, that you realize, I don't know anything, you know what I'm saying.
Alan: Yeah, we've been given a fake reality to make us naive, compliant, obedient citizens.
Prentice: Yep. And you know, I mean you have to try to, you know and get together with people and talk about these issues, because a lot of people have never heard about this stuff. I know, you know a lot of people are talking about the eugenics movement now. But people didn't start talking about that until you talked about it on the show, Alan.
Alan: Yeah, I know.
Prentice: And if you do not know the history of the whos, what, wheres, whens, and whys of the eugenics, you don't know your history at all.
Alan: Absolutely.
Prentice: Because that was the most nefarious scientific movement in history, period.
Alan: And as I say, it's still ongoing, through the United Nations and its Department of Population. They are the Big Boys where they sign all the treaties on population control across the world.
Prentice: Exactly. And once again, completely written out of the mainstream history books, period. You know. How can you go through public school and this stuff is never mentioned?
Alan: Well, as I say, the function of public school is not to inform you, or to wake you up. It's to get you under the spell and to be one of the mindless masses, who are obedient, pay taxes, and work their life away, never figuring out what's going on.
Prentice: Exactly, and you know, to think that you're educated to the point where you can't learn anything else.
Alan: Exactly. Or that you know everything. I mean, most people out there, really think they're informed like Brzezinski said. He said shortly the public will be unable to reason for themselves. They'll only be able to repeat in a conversation that which they heard on the previous night's news. And that's happened with most folk.
Prentice: Yeah. Ain't that the truth. But, that's what you have to do. You've got to start paying homage to the people who helped you and also, help others after you get that information.
Alan: That's right.
Prentice: You know, because if we don't nobody else is. You know. But I appreciate everything you do, Alan. A great show. And you have yourself a great weekend.
Alan: Yeah, thanks for calling. Take care, bye now. Now there's also Dan in Pennsylvania. Are you there Dan?
Dan: Hi. Yeah, I agree with the last caller, I mean, you do, you really, really, really do have to stick together, because, I mean, if you try to stay by yourself in this thing, you're going to lose your mind. Yeah, I just wanted to say, thank you for everything that you do. And especially for your dvd. I was watching it last night with my mom, and I'm 21 years old, you know, and I was trying to get through to her, and you know, the first thing that she would say would be, you know, who is this guy? What are his credentials? You know, everything like that. And you know, after a while, you start trying to explain it to her and everything, and here I found out that in high school she had to read Brave New World and you know, she actually had some, you know, but she didn't really understand it at the time.
Alan: No, most folk don't realize it. It seems so science fiction at the time to them, they didn't relate it to reality. Real human beings at the top would never do that to us. And yet, here I am, reading an article today about that very thing that they are bringing it in, and they have been doing it to us.
Dan: Yeah, well I mean, it just goes to show you that, if you keep pounding this information into the people that you love, you know, and not, like forcing it upon them, because ultimately they'll do what they want to do in the end, and there's nothing you can really do about that. But, I mean, you'll realize that a lot of these people have definitely, you yourself, I mean, you've definitely known this, from the time you could realize it, you know. You can feel it in your gut, like you know something's wrong. And you really just don't know what to do about it, until you learn about it.
Alan: That's right.
Dan: And the other thing I wanted to ask you about really was, I'd been researching some of this stuff before. I really actually, you know, started listening to you. And I had heard about this guy, named John Todd. And I don't know what to think about him, because, he really, he really sounds like he knows what he's talking about, whenever he's talking about the music industry, how, he says about how he used to be in the Illuminati, and he...
Alan: (Chuckle)
Dan: Do you know what I'm talking about in any way? He talks about how like....
Alan: I've heard quite a few of those guys, and most of them are a fraud, of course, you know. They'll say a lot of stuff that's out there on Patriot Radio, but they're frauds. But hold on, I'll be back after this break.
Alan: Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And I don't know if Dan's still on the line there, is he?
Dan: Yeah, I just really wanted to know about, because I know you talk about, or a lot of people had talked about you know, hidden meanings in music. And you know, a lot of people listen to like, you know, the Beatles, and a lot of bands that they'll wear. They'll be personal billboards for the Beatles and everything. It's ridiculous. And they have no idea what their songs are about. They don't know what they're listening to, you know.
Alan: You don't have to know, on a conscious level. Your subconscious, believe it or not, really will take a lot in. And it goes into what's called by Carl Jung, the unconscious, the wild part of the brain, where everything is in your deep dreams, where all things can happen. And that's where it really starts working on you, on the so-called primitive levels of you. That's where it really starts working, and then it manifests. You cannot subdue this kind of force, this dynamic, and it will eventually surface into your behavior itself, and you act out the behavior that's programmed into you. It's a very old technique. Even Plato talked about it. He wanted all musicians to be licensed at the time, because of this power, especially they had over the young, you know.
Dan: Well, yeah. I mean, that makes a lot of sense, because you know, a lot of the times, like I'll just listen to music, you know, every once in a while, just the instrumentals, you know, like jazz instrumentals and stuff like that, because personally that's what I'm into. But I mean a lot of the people will just, they'll just blindly come out with, it's partly what they think is new and trendy, you know, a lot of people my age think.
Alan: They never stop, and see what they don't know is, when you are writing music, and you're a professional writer, it comes down, the grapevine comes from the top with what they're going to push this year. What's the in thing, you see. It's the same with all the brands and types of music you've had since the 1950s onwards, literally. Because the CIA was involved in this, by the way, big time, and that's admitted in the cultural Cold Wars, the declassified stuff that's put out by the government. Every writer immediately gets all the latest updates on, this is going to sell. If you've got this in it, and this in it, and this in it, that's out. So men and women, I love you stuff, that's out, you see. If it's gender specific, it's out. It's got to be vague. It could be he or she. So you don't mention he or she, and you leave it not gender specific. That comes down to the writers, and then to embed different stuff in the higher studios, they'll embed a lot of stuff that promotes stuff that you don't even know you're being indoctrinated with at the time. Then you couple it with the visual aspects of course, and the occultic symbolism. Occultic just means hidden symbolism, and it's again archetypal symbols. They're very primitive. We all understand at some deep, again primitive level, but they work on you like a language. Because you're actually seeing a written language. And then you couple out with the sexual part, too, that kicks in the stimulation. And you're embedding, you're embedding a personality into yourself actually, when you're doing this.
Dan: Yeah, and it's just like whenever you know, the people will see things in magazines, and it will make themselves feel less adequate, or that they need to be part of that.
Alan: Always, always to make you feel less adequate. And they aim specifically at the women. They're easier to change. Women, by the way, are in control of the sexual act, outside of rape. And the Big Boys said that years ago. They'd aim all, Bernays said it. We'll aim all the propaganda at the women, because we can make her unhappy with herself, we'll make her want to look like a film star, and she'll buy all the things, she'll go for all the beauty cosmetics and so on, but they can also modify her behavior, and they've done it.
Dan: Alright, well, thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling. And Tom, sorry I can't get to you, so maybe call back on Monday. From all you out there, from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it's good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
BBC--Live Debate on Sterilization Wed August 25 and Sat. 28
Push for Sterilizing Women Beginning with Young Girls--UK (Told you so)
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:06 amHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 1, 2010 and it’s amazing how time is certainly flying. I always start off the show by advising the new listeners to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and help yourself to the hundreds of hours of talks I’ve put up there in audio form. While you are at it too, bookmark the other sites you’ll see listed; they are handy if you find sticking on the .com site. A lot of folk go in at one time to do downloads and you might find it easier picking these alternate sites. They are all listed there. They all also have a lot of transcripts in English for print up, of the talks, and if you want transcripts in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu which is also listed on the .com site and take your pick from the variety shown.
Remember too, that you are the audience that brings me to you. I don’t bring on the advertisers. I’m not backed by them. The ads you hear on this show are paid by the advertisers directly to RBN to pay for their broadcasting, to pay for their staff and equipment and their bills. So you can help me with mine. Buy the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on my web sites. [Order and donation options listed above.] Money Gram is cheaper than Western Union and if you get it in the check form it is cheaper still. You can make it out in Canadian dollars right there in Britain or wherever and you can post it; it will take 7 days or so and it gets here okay. Those are the main ways to keep me ticking over, and that’s all it does, ticking over. For those who don’t donate… please do because you certainly listen to the stuff, every night of the week pretty well, 5 nights a week, year after year, and I know so because it’s up on web sites all over the world the following day and no one thinks to donate to me. It’s the same people over and over and over again. I’ve even got one youngster who’s been donating for 2 years and he sends me a dollar. A dollar per week and believe you me, it’s not too small. If everybody did that I’d be laughing here and I wouldn’t have so many worries. So help me out. Things aren’t as free as you think. That which is free is generally suckering you into something else, or somebody else’s financing big bucks behind it. As you well know, money doesn’t grow on trees; it comes out of the imaginations of the guys that run the banking systems.
The new world order is pretty well up and running. Someone sent me a link, which I’ve seen before, and I might put up from my archives the whole bunch of the series of Yuri Bezmenov.
Yuri Bezmenov, L.A. 1983
youtube.com / dailymotion.com
He was a Soviet agent who came over to the other side as they say, and he explained the technique of how America and the West was being taken down. During the different stages of demoralization, the creation of apathy, and the creation of a form of liberalistic thought that would completely indoctrinate the next intake into universities, who would become themselves the next teachers in universities. He says once that has happened it is pretty well over. They can take up to 15-20 years for that to happen and that happened ages ago, he said back in the 70s or 80s. It had already happened and he says they are now contaminated. It doesn’t matter how much evidence you give to them, you will never decontaminate their thinking. They are on automatic mode and that has happened too. The big boys are running your countries; although they don’t really run the countries. They do what their masters tell them, quite happily. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. What’s interesting is that everything really that was predicted a long time ago, and written about too by a lot of the big players in the past, has all come to pass really. We’ve gone public/private as they say, in this new feudal system which Carroll Quigley talked about. Professor Carroll Quigley who wrote Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment to show you that there was a group who had worked down through time basically. He traces their origins from at least when they changed their name to the Milner Group and then into the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Then he traces all the different works they did, the creation of wars in Africa to try to get an African bloc, and by the way they are still working on an African bloc to eventually join with the rest of the European community; there have been articles in the papers recently. They sent out emissaries for many years working on Australia, New Zealand, and the Far East to create an Asia Pacific Rim bloc, a region. They had two or three front groups actually; they didn’t want to use their name so they called it the Institute for Pacific Studies and another couple of organizations as well. It was all actually the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
They have pulled it all pretty well off, the same thing for the Americas. The Council on Foreign Relations, a branch of the same organization, was to work out the complete unification of the Americas. That’s why we’ve had the Free Trade Negotiations, which was supposed to help integrate all our trade policies, and eventually, what has happened already, our taxing policies for imports; we share them with the United States. All intelligence in shared, with the same computers being used by the FBI and the RCMP and CSIS. We are pretty well integrated as far as we know, but we have some, a bit of a way to go yet before they can have a single government to run all of the Americas. They talked about it during the Free Trade Negotiations that they would have a parliament. At that time they said they might situate it in Montreal.
It’s all been discussed. I’ve no doubt the plan will go ahead because these guys never change their plans. Why should they? They are the complete masters of the universe now. That’s how they see themselves right now. They are on a roll. They have deculturalized the countries. They have helped to demoralize the countries. They have created an apathy as well through the taking away of all your great factories, the car industry, all of that kind of stuff that kept the countries going. That was planned to happen. All of your factories went to China through agreements they signed through the World Trade Organization and especially the GATT Treaty. Sure as blazes, up they went. They uprooted their factories and went off to China knowing darn well they were going to replace the work at home with nothing; the workers would have nothing to walk into, and they didn’t have any intention of retraining millions of people to do the same few jobs that remained. So nothing happens by chance.
Because of this planned financial crash, which was the next part of it of course, to raise the IMF up to its proper position, as it was intended to do, as the big governing body for every nation’s bookkeeping, by the way. They want to do your bookkeeping for you. They have already demanded it for Europe and they will do the same thing for the Americas. Interesting enough too, Gordon Brown, the ex-Prime Minister of Britain, is to go over to Washington and be stationed there to work with the IMF for the American plan, their part of it. Since he wrecked Britain very well, he’s going to help finish off America. And I’m not kidding about that. That’s why they are sent. They know what they are doing. This is a big plan.
So here we have this public/private strange game where these institutions, these PRIVATE organizations run the world. They have for a long time. We have never had democracy. We had the illusion of it and that was all. They run all of the media too, all the big moguls belong to the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Trilateral Commission; the Trilaterals and the CFR are just branches, major branches, of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. So where would they have, naturally, this global conference to do with the IMF coming up to its full status as the world manager of all its money? They would have it in Chatham House, the headquarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. So from their own web site it says…
Global Financial Forum: The New Global Economic Order
3 November 2010 | Chatham House, London / chathamhouse.org.uk
(Alan: So it’s to be held on the 3rd, 2 days away. The New Global Economic Order is the title of it, the NEW GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER. And I’ll put this up on my web site too at the end of the night and you can have a look for yourself. It says here…)
Speaker Highlights (A: Who will be kicking it off, the different people who will be talking there…)
Andrew Balls (A: …of course, they like that sort of thing; they are rather base people, these characters. It’s quite interesting.) Managing Director PIMCO.
Jamil Baz Chief Investment Strategist GLG Partners LP
Olivier Blanchard Chief Economist International Monetary Fund (A: So there is the IMF there, you see. This is not being held under governmental auspices but all the governments are attending this private organization that runs the world.)
Angel Estrada Director General of Macroeconomic Analysis and International Economics, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Spain
Sir John Gieve Senior Adviser, GLG and Former Deputy Governor, Bank of England (A: He’s no lightweight either, is he.)
Andrew Haldane Executive Director for Financial Stability, Bank of England
Mark Hoban MP Financial Secretary, HM Treasury (A: Her Majesty’s Treasury. Interesting too, they still say, ‘her majesty’s treasury,’ not the British treasury or the UK treasury. It’s Her Majesty’s treasury.)
Dr DeAnne Julius Chairman Chatham House
Markus Kerber Director General, Fiscal policy and Macroeconomic Affairs, Federal Ministry of Finance, Germany
Elena Panariti Member of Parliament, Constituency State, PA.SO.K Greece
Randal K Quarles Managing Director The Carlyle Group (A: So there is the Carlyle Group in there too, all the big players, all the big front groups.)
Alfredo Sáenz Abad Second Vice Chairman and CEO, Banco Santander
Paola Subacchi Research Director, International Economics, Chatham House (A: All the big players are there.)
John Varley Group Chief Executive Barclays (A: That’s the Barclays Group of investment companies and banks.)
Nicolas Veron Resident Scholar Bruegel
William R White Chairman of the Economic and Development Review Committee, OECD, Paris (A: A very important organization, the OECD, because every country that signed on to the UN has a branch of that working out of their government. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, they take your tax money and invest it into their own private international corporations in supposedly third world countries …to help the third world people of course.)
Professor Yao Yang China Centre for Economic Research (A: So even China is in on this big one. As I say, it’s to be held on the 3rd of November. This gives you some of the different topics they will be bringing up. That’s the title of it, it’s the NEW GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER. )
Why not bring it through at this private organization that runs all the governments, rather than go through your own parliaments or congresses? That’s the way the world really is run. I have another little article here, just as an offside. We know that Aspartame has changed its name. Remember Aspartame was flogged by the company that had the CEO, Mr Rumsfeld at the time, who pushed it. When he got into politics he pushed it through to get it put into law that it was all safe and all the rest of it. It’s had a terrible effect on people’s health, especially their children. They know this too. It certainly tames them down, maybe that’s why the Aspar-tame part is in it. It says here they have been given the go-ahead to put it in all kinds of foods now. It got a bad name in soft drinks and all the rest of it. This other link I’ll put up there will explain all that to you; a lot of it is in Codex Alimentarius.
ASPARTAME... list of foods its been approved for
timebomb2000.com
Found this on the codex website under "current official standards list" one of the many .pdf listed for our food standards.
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.do?lang=en
ASPARTAME: It starts on page 74 of a 259 .pdf listing food additives and how much can go into a product. Cheese, bread, veggies, fruits, fish, coffee...... beer
General Standard for Food Additives
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/more_info.jsp?id_sta=4
ASPARTAME
INS 951 Aspartame Functional Class: Flavour enhancer, Sweetener (A: It’s still called a flavor enhancer, by the way, and a sweetener.)
01.1.2 Dairy-based drinks, flavoured and/or fermented (e.g., chocolate milk, cocoa, eggnog, drinking yoghurt, whey based drinks) (A: And they tell you how much they are going to put in…) 600 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
01.3.2 Beverage whiteners (A: That’s the awful stuff some people use in their coffee.) 6000 mg/kg (A: So it’s very high in there.) 161 & 191 2008
01.4.4 Cream analogues 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
01.5.2 Milk and cream powder analogues 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
01.6.1 Unripened cheese 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
01.6.5 Cheese analogues 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
01.7 Dairy-based desserts (e.g., pudding, fruit or flavoured yoghurt) 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
02.3 Fat emulsions mainly of type oil-in-water, including mixed and/or flavoured products based on fat emulsions 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
02.4 Fat-based desserts excluding dairy-based dessert products of food category 01.7 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
03.0 Edible ices, including sherbet and sorbet 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007 (A: I guess that’s Popsicles they call them here.)
04.1.2.1 Frozen fruit 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
04.1.2.2 Dried fruit 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008 (A: Why do you need to put this stuff in fruit? Huh? See, there are other reasons for all of this stuff that’s going into the food supply, believe you me.)
04.1.2.3 Fruit in vinegar, oil, or brine 300 mg/kg 144 & 191 2007
04.1.2.4 Canned or bottled (pasteurized) fruit 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
04.1.2.5 Jams, jellies, marmelades 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
04.1.2.6 Fruit-based spreads (e.g., chutney) excluding products of food category 04.1.2.5 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
04.1.2.7 Candied fruit 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
So I guess that’s what they’ll put in with all the other stuff you get in all your candies. You’ve already got all the soya flour in the candies now. They put it in everything. It’s on board with the agenda; we’ll all die off with cancers. And we are dying off pretty well with them as it is, apparently, but not fast enough, according to Mr Rockefeller’s last general meeting. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, there is so much news out there but it’s all trivia. Most of it’s trivia. Most of it really is almost irrelevant. You get a kind of nose for what’s relevant and what isn’t after a while when you’re scouring so much news. You realize a lot of it is filler; a lot of it is recycled news. A lot of it, yeah, it might be appropriate in some areas where people stick on the one topic and it adds to that topic’s information. Really we are going at such a pace now, so fast as everything is being implemented quickly, that they don’t tell us all the big things that are happening and they are giving us lots and lots of trivia. The US is actually worse for it because the US, for all of its SO many stations across the country, television and radio, are given less news than probably any other people on the planet. It’s rather startling to realize that they are contained that way. It’s a containment form where they are meant to think everything is still fine and rosy and all the rest of it, even though a lot of their old cities are getting crushed down, all the old urban areas. They almost have… well they do have ghost towns here and there now. It’s just incredible what’s happened to them, as they have been devastated.
And the bankers are going to hit them even harder, apparently, next year, as they have all bought up all these terrible mortgages that have passed through so many hands now they are buying them up for peanuts, the big banks. They want to go after them next January, and millions more they say, millions, are going to lose their homes. It’s quite something what’s actually being allowed to happen, but this IS the agenda. I’ve always said it, they’d flatten America, they’d take it down once its job was almost over. And that’s what’s happening today. Just incredible… and tragic, tragic to watch what’s happening. Tent cities, I watched a DVD at the weekend there about the tent cities that have been springing up all over the place. Quite common now, under motorways and places, and how the people are having to live. Of course so many of them are still confused; they don’t know what we know here on shows like this, what’s been happening, how it came to pass, what the agenda is. They are just trying to survive as best they can. A lot of folk who are at the soup kitchens and the food banks are the working poor, as well as the unemployed. They are still forking out maybe $800 in rent while they only bring in $900 a month, all together, to live on so they have to go get their food at food banks. The food banks now are stretched beyond the crisis level. They have turn people away. You can imagine how you’d feel turning people away at the end when you’ve run out of food. This is America. It’s America. That was planned for America and it’s happened.
They knew all this would come when they signed the GATT treaty. Then they use your tax money to fund your own factories to get up and move out and root up and go over to China. They paid for the transportation over to China… and the retooling and the setting up in China. All paid by the taxpayer, who wasn’t told a darn thing at the time. Then the companies who set up in China can claim, from the government, again, back home, for 10 years for any losses they claim was incurred, according to their projected profits, what they expected to get. If they didn’t get it, they get it made up by the taxpayers again. We are getting raped and plundered and worse. And people will still go and vote… for the SAME damn system. The SAME… how can you… People ask me, you know, can we do it by getting the right people in? You can’t put the right people in to the tower of Babel. It’s been there a long time. It was crooked from its foundations. It’s teetering and tottering with band-aids and superglue holding it together. And it’s UTTERLY CORRUPT. You see it was taken over a long, long time ago. Then they built this big tower, this new world order, a long time ago, long before Bush Sr mentioned it.
Here are some of the scams that are happening too, because the big boys at the top are allowed to do scams and get away with it and there are no inquiries and there are no courts you can drag them into anyway. This one is about Chinese companies now, who naturally are in on the big greenhouse gas scams, just like the Europeans ones are, who have traded millions of Euros of FREE trading credits they were given by the European Union, that strange big ultra-Soviet secretive organization. They gave them all these free trading cards and they have made millions off it already, even though nothing has been produced. They just make millions by selling them and trading them. China is the same.
Chinese firms blamed in huge greenhouse gas scam
Damian Carrington / October 28, 2010 / smh.com.au
BRUSSELS: The European Commission is planning to clamp down on a €2 billion ($2.8 billion) carbon trading scam involving the deliberate production of greenhouse gases which the fraudulent manufacturers are then paid to destroy. (A: What a wonderful thing, eh?)
The Climate Change Commissioner, Connie Hedegaard, says the use of these carbon permits, from industrial gas projects in China, could be banned because of their ''total lack of environmental integrity''. (A: Well, where is the integrity in the whole con game of greenhouse gases in the first place? It’s a political movement, a political agenda. It’s nothing to do with what is real.)
Billions of euros worth of the controversial permits were used between 2008-09 in the European Union's emission trading scheme, in which companies must exchange pollution permits for emissions produced.
The scheme allows some of those permits to be bought in from developing countries.
The most popular of these so-called offsets come from projects that destroy the greenhouse gas HFC-23, a byproduct of the manufacture of the refrigerant gas HCFC-22.
The Environmental Investigation Agency said in June that many Chinese chemical companies were manufacturing HCFC-22 primarily to earn money from destroying HFC-23, which can be five times the value of the refrigerant gas the plants are ostensibly set up to create. (A: Great scams! Again, the minds that go around to places you’d never figure out in the first place, just like the guys that do all the bubbles for financing. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix. There are two callers on the line so I’ll try and get them in now. One is Jay from Ohio. Are you there Jay?
Jay: Oh, great. Wow. I finally get to talk to Alan Watt. I’ve been listening to you a lot over the summer as I skate and exercise and think about a lot of stuff. One thing that [audio interference]… and I know you have said a lot. Yeah, there are sociopaths that, and that’s what they are. I work in mental health as a counselor and I see a lot of the same kinds of behaviors, in what we call the axis, of the DSM4, the manual that… [audio interference]. …a lot of those things…
Alan: Are you on a cell phone?
Jay: Yeah. Here, let me…
Alan: It’s crackling a little bit and I can’t make out much.
Jay: Okay, is that better?
Alan: That’s better, yep.
Jay: Okay. So it’s like, sociopaths are running things now. I read a lot. I got the book that you mentioned about foundations, it was sometime at the end of August and I went out and bought it. I’m reading it and it’s like the deeper I get into reading about this I see how deep the matrix is and I’m like, holy cow.
Alan: That’s right. It’s been here an awful long time. The foundations have been here for SO long… basically directing the direction of the countries. Since they are not listed as political bodies, the public don’t know about them. We don’t vote them in but here they are telling governments what to do, and creating the NGOs, all the opposition groups, to protest the different things and so on, and they get no problems getting air time in the television and the newspapers. And people think they are official bodies of government or something but they are not. They are independent bodies all together. And how can you compete with that kind of propaganda when the foundations have trillions of dollars per annum to spend?
Jay: Right. Right. It’s a lot… it’s like a big... well you know, it’s a big distortion campaign. In a funny way it’s like the fatal attraction woman, you know, they call the borderlines. And they are just like them because if you do something that the borderlines don’t like or the borderlines have their own agenda, along with the antisocials, then they will smear ya.
Alan: Absolutely.
Jay: I have a couple of clients that are like that on my caseload. One thing that I wonder as I listen to you and Alex, has there ever been in history a defeat or a major setback for the elite? I think there has got to be. These guys can’t be invincible. They are very conniving like most crooks and thieves are; they use their powers the wrong way.
Alan: They have had prolonged wars basically in certain times in history, very prolonged wars. To get what they wanted they had to eradicate the old existing religions at one point, and that was their longest of wars. We had 100 years war at one point in one country, and on and on it went to destroy, infiltrate from within as well, and destroy – they are still doing that today in fact, infiltrating patriot movements and destroying them; it’s the same technique. They also hoped after World War I, going to all that trouble to create World War I, they really hoped at that time that President Wilson under the League of Nations would bring in a form of world government then. But the public in most countries were not ready for it; they didn’t want it. They hoped again under World War II, at the end of it, that this was the beginning of the official UN body. They had so much pomp and circumstance put out on the big Pathe News and all the different movie house news items they put out, telling the world that this was the end of war, this would be peace, and the UN would be brought up to a high power in the affairs of the world to do with government or governance. That didn’t work out too well because again, the public did not want this strangely… it’s almost an abstract body. It’s not a country as such although it’s got official status, a sovereign status. It’s based in New York State, of all places. By the way, it was demanded they build it in the US. The Russians demanded that it was to be built IN the US, which is very interesting. Of course that fitted right in with Mr Rockefeller’s idea too. So you have this body, and the people weren’t ready to accept a world government then, again. So they’ve had umpteen, many, many wars in between, as they went down to Latin America and other countries to standardize those countries, same across Africa, trying to standardize them all. Now they are doing the Middle East and doing it the long way around. That’s why Bush Sr said he now sees the beginning coming in, a dawning of a new world order. They have gone around the hard way to do it, not bothering to wean or really coax the public along with them, just bypass them, until the public are conditioned that it’s there, it is a world body, it is the official body. It’s done by osmosis, eventually; we accept that it kind of IS a world body but really it’s a private organization, and that’s how it’s registered.
Jay: Right. Right. Right. Maybe it was you or someone else, was talking. I am a musician; that’s not my day job but in my spare time that’s what I prefer to do. It’s hard to… I don’t understand how anyone can concentrate on anything. Well, they don’t. Most people don’t know about all this. But I find it really hard to want to spend any time BUT to research and try and do something about it.
Alan: Yep. And the hardest thing is, what do you do about it once you know this? You know.
Jay: Right. Right. I bought some newsletter software. I think I’m going to give that a shot. You know, a lot of this stuff is available but I just feel the need to do my own writing and then even just distribute it to my friends, because at least they will listen, they will at least look at it. Maybe that will spawn something, I don’t know.
Alan: It’s all you can. I started off by writing by hand. I didn’t have a typewriter initially, and I would do long essays and so on, with data, put in a few pictures for them and then photocopy them and send bundles of them off to different people, and anyone at all. People who already had the ability to get stuff out in print or whatever, and once in a while someone would take it and run with it and print it. That’s all I could do at the time; it’s all I was thinking of doing. I was teaching small groups here and there, in much greater detail, but at least I was putting out packages. I didn’t charge anything for them at all. And often I never heard back from people, but they’d actually ultimately use the material, that kind of thing. But you do what you can. It’s amazing what can grow out of just your name getting out there, eventually, what does come out of that, or the people who will try and get in touch with you, if you give them a means to get in touch with you. Because it might be one in 500 that you actually strike the chord with and they will get back in touch with you.
Jay: Right. Right. Well I don’t want to take up too much time. I hope one of these days I’m going to get some of your books; I’m trying to help everybody out a little bit.
Alan: Yeah. That’s all you can do.
Jay: I can’t read enough. There is so much.
Alan: There is so much and again, too, that’s part of data overload. We are in that time; there is too much data. You have to be very discerning what you want to teach, and try to keep on the facts that you can prove, by the writings of those involved. Stick to that. Stick to that and stick to that; nothing else. Just stick to that.
Jay: Right. Right. Right. Definitely thanks for all your work. I appreciate it, as you get right down to what the truth is… there’s no BS… and that’s what we all need.
Alan: That’s right. We don’t.
Jay: Keep up the good work.
Alan: Thanks for calling. There is also Mark from Wisconsin there. Are you there Mark?
Mark: How are you doing, Alan?
Alan: Not too bad.
Mark: I was going to ask you, I heard you mention Bouvier before. I was wondering, what do you know about Bouvier’s and Black’s Law Dictionary? Who’s all behind that?
Alan: Well, I know that Bouvier was interesting because Benjamin Franklin, when he went over to London, High Wycombe, and he joined The Hellfire Club. Strangest thing. I mean, here he was basically representing the US during the Revolutionary Wars, he was able to get a boat over to London, back and forth – he even went to the opera you know – and no one stopped him or bothered him. He had all the right passwords of course, and gestures, and the right friends in London, because I think he was part of the London group actually. He mentioned that they had not quite what you would call a prostitution house, not what we think of as a prostitution house, but those who served the work and who had the higher intellect and who would learn and who were doing the great work, they called them ‘highly operative freemasons.’ They had the right to mate, because they do believe in eugenics. They believe that high intellect should mate with high intellect. And certain women apparently, they claimed, which I think is probably true, carry the genes in them, where the right mix is made and they will have a very good, highly intelligent offspring. They call them ‘dollies.’ That’s what he called them. He called them, in his own memoirs, dollies. He’s known too for bringing over a French dolly that became the baby doll, in fact. The baby doll is a representation of what he saw as the average female carrier, which is a dolly; you carry things on a dolly. So again, they love that hidden symbolism in something. He mentioned Madam Bouvier was the head over there. Madame Bouvier, and there are still descendants yet in France, 2 Bouvier sisters, old sisters. It was Jacqueline Kennedy who was descended from the Bouvier family as well. So she was a carrier of the genes. They were also related I think to Baines Johnson. What is interesting there, is they go way, way back, because the Baines part comes from one of the branches of the families of Macbeth, of all people, the Castle Macbeth. All intertwined together. It’s just astonishing. It’s just like the Presidents today; they all seem to be related to Royalty. It doesn’t matter what party they come from, or who they are, or the color of their skin, they are always related to the same Royalty. Well it’s the same on this side as well, when it comes to these particular high players. They are all given their high mates to get married to. I’ve read a lot, in some of the high Masonry’s books, and they more than just hint at this, over and over. They talk about the head above and the head below… well, you know what the head below obviously is – that’s the base side of things. However, they do say that the 3rd generation Freemason, that’s the grandson, the son of a Mason and an Eastern Star, is a higher candidate to go straight up the ranks of Freemasonry and even higher than the regular ranks. So the third generation is what they are after. So if you are very, very good, and you are presented with your wife, who is the carrier of the gene, and you are introduced to her, and you take the hint and do the right thing, then you are pretty well guaranteed the good offspring, the ‘lewin’ as they call them, who goes on to higher things. A lewis or a lewin, they call them.
Mark: Right. I was just floored to find out, do you remember William James Bryant, Cross of Gold speech? I was just floored to find out, Alan, that he was backed by Carnegie. What the heck is going on here!?! [Caller laughing.]
Alan: Yeah, yeah. It’s amazing isn’t it? Isn’t it just amazing? [Alan laughing.] And I love the stories, too, of all these guys, these great founders of the foundations. Even the bankers, too, how they came from rags to riches and all that rubbish. And Carnegie, the same idea; a poor little, you know, shoemaker just makes good, and makes billions, and starts off the foundations. It’s all rubbish. These guys are sent there, over to this US, and they are set up by a BIG well-funded organization that already existed, the same with the Rothschilds. That’s why no one could touch him. No one could touch some of them, no one could assassinate them. That’s how they had decided a long, long time ago, that by their foundations, under the guise of charities, they would take over the entire world. Don’t forget that even Adam Weishaupt said that. He said, that through the creation of foundations and charitable organizations we shall bypass all governments and become the world government.
Mark: And didn’t Paul Warburg say in front of Congress, we shall have world government either by consent or conquest?
Alan: That’s correct.
Mark: It never ends. Thanks a lot, Alan. Have a good night.
Alan: Thank you too.
Yeah, [Alan laughing.] it’s quite the world we live in isn’t it? And people are oblivious to it. And again, we get stuck up in the daily news and I don’t like that at all, because you’ve got to know all the background stuff, what got us to this situation in the first place. Not just what they are doing to us today, what knives are they sticking in us today, but how did we get here. And once you really understand you don’t have what you think of as a government that belongs to the people, you have government that does what it’s told by very rich powerful people, who own not just the foundations, they own massive international businesses, and they are tightly interwoven with all the Military-Industrial Complex. When you understand that, you understand that you are living in a scientific form of dictatorship, as Aldous Huxley talked about. And we are controlled scientifically, our minds are controlled scientifically.
There is still the underlying eugenics bunch beneath it, call them what you want; you can call them Freemasons, whatever, it’s all the same thing, with a definite eugenics plan. Look at the oldest books from the Rosicrucians if you can get them, they are available, they are cheap I believe, and you will start to see the hints all through that, of the proper mating. Proper mating is all through all it. Always it’s proper mating, with a proper kind of wife, to get the proper son, who is then given to the Grandmaster to be taught all the things, all the mysteries and so on. And the mysteries are to bring in a better world. Then you look into all of the communal living associations in the United States, amazing history of communal living. Christian communists too, they went under the guise of Christian Communists; they came IN from abroad. They were not Christians at all. But under the Constitution they had protection and they called themselves Christian Communists. Like the big one in New York there, with Noyes; Mr Noyes, [pronounced ‘noise’] strange name but you can actually find the root of that name and you’ll find he’s not Christian at all. Then you find that Mr Noyes was backed on his experiment on free love and special selective breeding. In the 1800s he was backed by the Royalty of Britain. The Hudson Bay Company gave them the biggest contract, even though they hadn’t even started a business, for making traps. Then they were given a massive silver working company to support themselves with. Then of course Noyes’s cousin, or his uncle, just happened to be Mr Hayes who was the governor who became president of the United States. It’s all tied in together, eugenics and so on. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll go to Anthony from New York. Are you there Anthony?
Anthony: Yes, thank you very much for everything you are doing right now. I appreciate everything that you’ve let out there on the air waves. The question that I have is, you spoke about the dollies, are they still in existence today? Also, what would be the opposite lifestyle we can live in, instead of the new world order that they are trying to push against us?
Alan: The first one was, who is still in existence?
Anthony: The dollies, the dollies of the Freemasonry.
Alan: Oh yeah, they are. I’m sure they are still in existence. Absolutely. When you look at the history even of Royalties, their mates were always selected for them. It goes as far back as the pharaohs; the same thing happened. Sometimes they’d even marry their sisters, to keep it really in the family. The Rothschilds are exactly the same; they always marry their nieces. So certain of these families – that’s one of their M.O.s, how you can spot them – of their particular marriage habits too. They are still in existence today. The higher Freemasons are still advised to… you know, your Grandmaster for instance will invite you to a dinner or something and he will introduce you to what is to be your prospective wife. If you take the hint, as I say, you will do awfully well; you are going to have doors open to you, get well rewarded for it, and you will go up the ladder in whatever occupation you are in. It’s really the son that they are after though because the wife is definitely a dolly, as they say, and belongs to the right lineage.
Anthony: Wow. Thank you very much.
Alan: Thanks for calling. It’s interesting even if you look at the King James Bible. It was first published in Scotland remember, in Edinburgh. I have a copy of it here and it mentions the late Queen, Elizabeth the 1st; they call her that bright eastern star… in the forward to it, by the printers, that bright star. And then they talk about King James, and now we have our new Sion – spelt with an S. Not a Scion, which is a cutting; also a Masonic term, as you are grafted onto the tree of life, if you have done the good work, the great work. But as a Sion, because they used to spell it not Zion as a Z – often in English they did an S – so he was a Sion. The King, that was his title. So she was the Star and he was the new coming Sion. This has been all down through history, this kind of stuff. And yeah, they are still mated up today. All the big players you’ll find that are put out there that are supposed to change the world, the Gates and so on; it’s interesting to go into their wives and all the rest of it. And again, you can hide family names, of their actual names, by Mrs So-and-so, and put the front guy out there. Often it’s the wives that are very more important because of their lineages.
There is also Steven from Oregon. Are you there Steven?
Steven: I’m here. Alan, it’s a pleasure to talk to you, sir. I called in because of the other caller. He’s a musician. I know I can see that he is so frustrated and that’s me, because we are just learning this stuff. I knew it all my life but it gets kind of hard. And it’s very interesting too. It’s very interesting, what do I do, what do I do with this? You know, and we can be survivors. We can, we can write music. We are so caught...
Alan: We can. We have the talents and skills if you can get it out there. You are absolutely right on. We’ve got to get a concentrated movement, a counter culture, to put across alternate music with the messages in it. Thanks for calling; that’s the music and the end of the show.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Yuri Bezmenov, ex-KGB explaining take down from within-Video
Yuri Bezmenov, The Subversion Process-Video
Chatham House Hosts Global Financial Forum
Aspartame Approved to be Added to Following Foodstuff
Chinese Firms and Huge Greenhouse Gas Carbon Scam
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 1, 2010 and it’s amazing how time is certainly flying. I always start off the show by advising the new listeners to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and help yourself to the hundreds of hours of talks I’ve put up there in audio form. While you are at it too, bookmark the other sites you’ll see listed; they are handy if you find sticking on the .com site. A lot of folk go in at one time to do downloads and you might find it easier picking these alternate sites. They are all listed there. They all also have a lot of transcripts in English for print up, of the talks, and if you want transcripts in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu which is also listed on the .com site and take your pick from the variety shown.
Remember too, that you are the audience that brings me to you. I don’t bring on the advertisers. I’m not backed by them. The ads you hear on this show are paid by the advertisers directly to RBN to pay for their broadcasting, to pay for their staff and equipment and their bills. So you can help me with mine. Buy the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on my web sites. [Order and donation options listed above.] Money Gram is cheaper than Western Union and if you get it in the check form it is cheaper still. You can make it out in Canadian dollars right there in Britain or wherever and you can post it; it will take 7 days or so and it gets here okay. Those are the main ways to keep me ticking over, and that’s all it does, ticking over. For those who don’t donate… please do because you certainly listen to the stuff, every night of the week pretty well, 5 nights a week, year after year, and I know so because it’s up on web sites all over the world the following day and no one thinks to donate to me. It’s the same people over and over and over again. I’ve even got one youngster who’s been donating for 2 years and he sends me a dollar. A dollar per week and believe you me, it’s not too small. If everybody did that I’d be laughing here and I wouldn’t have so many worries. So help me out. Things aren’t as free as you think. That which is free is generally suckering you into something else, or somebody else’s financing big bucks behind it. As you well know, money doesn’t grow on trees; it comes out of the imaginations of the guys that run the banking systems.
The new world order is pretty well up and running. Someone sent me a link, which I’ve seen before, and I might put up from my archives the whole bunch of the series of Yuri Bezmenov.
Yuri Bezmenov, L.A. 1983
youtube.com / dailymotion.com
He was a Soviet agent who came over to the other side as they say, and he explained the technique of how America and the West was being taken down. During the different stages of demoralization, the creation of apathy, and the creation of a form of liberalistic thought that would completely indoctrinate the next intake into universities, who would become themselves the next teachers in universities. He says once that has happened it is pretty well over. They can take up to 15-20 years for that to happen and that happened ages ago, he said back in the 70s or 80s. It had already happened and he says they are now contaminated. It doesn’t matter how much evidence you give to them, you will never decontaminate their thinking. They are on automatic mode and that has happened too. The big boys are running your countries; although they don’t really run the countries. They do what their masters tell them, quite happily. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. What’s interesting is that everything really that was predicted a long time ago, and written about too by a lot of the big players in the past, has all come to pass really. We’ve gone public/private as they say, in this new feudal system which Carroll Quigley talked about. Professor Carroll Quigley who wrote Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment to show you that there was a group who had worked down through time basically. He traces their origins from at least when they changed their name to the Milner Group and then into the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Then he traces all the different works they did, the creation of wars in Africa to try to get an African bloc, and by the way they are still working on an African bloc to eventually join with the rest of the European community; there have been articles in the papers recently. They sent out emissaries for many years working on Australia, New Zealand, and the Far East to create an Asia Pacific Rim bloc, a region. They had two or three front groups actually; they didn’t want to use their name so they called it the Institute for Pacific Studies and another couple of organizations as well. It was all actually the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
They have pulled it all pretty well off, the same thing for the Americas. The Council on Foreign Relations, a branch of the same organization, was to work out the complete unification of the Americas. That’s why we’ve had the Free Trade Negotiations, which was supposed to help integrate all our trade policies, and eventually, what has happened already, our taxing policies for imports; we share them with the United States. All intelligence in shared, with the same computers being used by the FBI and the RCMP and CSIS. We are pretty well integrated as far as we know, but we have some, a bit of a way to go yet before they can have a single government to run all of the Americas. They talked about it during the Free Trade Negotiations that they would have a parliament. At that time they said they might situate it in Montreal.
It’s all been discussed. I’ve no doubt the plan will go ahead because these guys never change their plans. Why should they? They are the complete masters of the universe now. That’s how they see themselves right now. They are on a roll. They have deculturalized the countries. They have helped to demoralize the countries. They have created an apathy as well through the taking away of all your great factories, the car industry, all of that kind of stuff that kept the countries going. That was planned to happen. All of your factories went to China through agreements they signed through the World Trade Organization and especially the GATT Treaty. Sure as blazes, up they went. They uprooted their factories and went off to China knowing darn well they were going to replace the work at home with nothing; the workers would have nothing to walk into, and they didn’t have any intention of retraining millions of people to do the same few jobs that remained. So nothing happens by chance.
Because of this planned financial crash, which was the next part of it of course, to raise the IMF up to its proper position, as it was intended to do, as the big governing body for every nation’s bookkeeping, by the way. They want to do your bookkeeping for you. They have already demanded it for Europe and they will do the same thing for the Americas. Interesting enough too, Gordon Brown, the ex-Prime Minister of Britain, is to go over to Washington and be stationed there to work with the IMF for the American plan, their part of it. Since he wrecked Britain very well, he’s going to help finish off America. And I’m not kidding about that. That’s why they are sent. They know what they are doing. This is a big plan.
So here we have this public/private strange game where these institutions, these PRIVATE organizations run the world. They have for a long time. We have never had democracy. We had the illusion of it and that was all. They run all of the media too, all the big moguls belong to the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Trilateral Commission; the Trilaterals and the CFR are just branches, major branches, of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. So where would they have, naturally, this global conference to do with the IMF coming up to its full status as the world manager of all its money? They would have it in Chatham House, the headquarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. So from their own web site it says…
Global Financial Forum: The New Global Economic Order
3 November 2010 | Chatham House, London / chathamhouse.org.uk
(Alan: So it’s to be held on the 3rd, 2 days away. The New Global Economic Order is the title of it, the NEW GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER. And I’ll put this up on my web site too at the end of the night and you can have a look for yourself. It says here…)
Speaker Highlights (A: Who will be kicking it off, the different people who will be talking there…)
Andrew Balls (A: …of course, they like that sort of thing; they are rather base people, these characters. It’s quite interesting.) Managing Director PIMCO.
Jamil Baz Chief Investment Strategist GLG Partners LP
Olivier Blanchard Chief Economist International Monetary Fund (A: So there is the IMF there, you see. This is not being held under governmental auspices but all the governments are attending this private organization that runs the world.)
Angel Estrada Director General of Macroeconomic Analysis and International Economics, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Spain
Sir John Gieve Senior Adviser, GLG and Former Deputy Governor, Bank of England (A: He’s no lightweight either, is he.)
Andrew Haldane Executive Director for Financial Stability, Bank of England
Mark Hoban MP Financial Secretary, HM Treasury (A: Her Majesty’s Treasury. Interesting too, they still say, ‘her majesty’s treasury,’ not the British treasury or the UK treasury. It’s Her Majesty’s treasury.)
Dr DeAnne Julius Chairman Chatham House
Markus Kerber Director General, Fiscal policy and Macroeconomic Affairs, Federal Ministry of Finance, Germany
Elena Panariti Member of Parliament, Constituency State, PA.SO.K Greece
Randal K Quarles Managing Director The Carlyle Group (A: So there is the Carlyle Group in there too, all the big players, all the big front groups.)
Alfredo Sáenz Abad Second Vice Chairman and CEO, Banco Santander
Paola Subacchi Research Director, International Economics, Chatham House (A: All the big players are there.)
John Varley Group Chief Executive Barclays (A: That’s the Barclays Group of investment companies and banks.)
Nicolas Veron Resident Scholar Bruegel
William R White Chairman of the Economic and Development Review Committee, OECD, Paris (A: A very important organization, the OECD, because every country that signed on to the UN has a branch of that working out of their government. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, they take your tax money and invest it into their own private international corporations in supposedly third world countries …to help the third world people of course.)
Professor Yao Yang China Centre for Economic Research (A: So even China is in on this big one. As I say, it’s to be held on the 3rd of November. This gives you some of the different topics they will be bringing up. That’s the title of it, it’s the NEW GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER. )
Why not bring it through at this private organization that runs all the governments, rather than go through your own parliaments or congresses? That’s the way the world really is run. I have another little article here, just as an offside. We know that Aspartame has changed its name. Remember Aspartame was flogged by the company that had the CEO, Mr Rumsfeld at the time, who pushed it. When he got into politics he pushed it through to get it put into law that it was all safe and all the rest of it. It’s had a terrible effect on people’s health, especially their children. They know this too. It certainly tames them down, maybe that’s why the Aspar-tame part is in it. It says here they have been given the go-ahead to put it in all kinds of foods now. It got a bad name in soft drinks and all the rest of it. This other link I’ll put up there will explain all that to you; a lot of it is in Codex Alimentarius.
ASPARTAME... list of foods its been approved for
timebomb2000.com
Found this on the codex website under "current official standards list" one of the many .pdf listed for our food standards.
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/standard_list.do?lang=en
ASPARTAME: It starts on page 74 of a 259 .pdf listing food additives and how much can go into a product. Cheese, bread, veggies, fruits, fish, coffee...... beer
General Standard for Food Additives
http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/more_info.jsp?id_sta=4
ASPARTAME
INS 951 Aspartame Functional Class: Flavour enhancer, Sweetener (A: It’s still called a flavor enhancer, by the way, and a sweetener.)
01.1.2 Dairy-based drinks, flavoured and/or fermented (e.g., chocolate milk, cocoa, eggnog, drinking yoghurt, whey based drinks) (A: And they tell you how much they are going to put in…) 600 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
01.3.2 Beverage whiteners (A: That’s the awful stuff some people use in their coffee.) 6000 mg/kg (A: So it’s very high in there.) 161 & 191 2008
01.4.4 Cream analogues 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
01.5.2 Milk and cream powder analogues 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
01.6.1 Unripened cheese 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
01.6.5 Cheese analogues 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
01.7 Dairy-based desserts (e.g., pudding, fruit or flavoured yoghurt) 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
02.3 Fat emulsions mainly of type oil-in-water, including mixed and/or flavoured products based on fat emulsions 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
02.4 Fat-based desserts excluding dairy-based dessert products of food category 01.7 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
03.0 Edible ices, including sherbet and sorbet 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007 (A: I guess that’s Popsicles they call them here.)
04.1.2.1 Frozen fruit 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008
04.1.2.2 Dried fruit 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2008 (A: Why do you need to put this stuff in fruit? Huh? See, there are other reasons for all of this stuff that’s going into the food supply, believe you me.)
04.1.2.3 Fruit in vinegar, oil, or brine 300 mg/kg 144 & 191 2007
04.1.2.4 Canned or bottled (pasteurized) fruit 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
04.1.2.5 Jams, jellies, marmelades 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
04.1.2.6 Fruit-based spreads (e.g., chutney) excluding products of food category 04.1.2.5 1000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
04.1.2.7 Candied fruit 2000 mg/kg 161 & 191 2007
So I guess that’s what they’ll put in with all the other stuff you get in all your candies. You’ve already got all the soya flour in the candies now. They put it in everything. It’s on board with the agenda; we’ll all die off with cancers. And we are dying off pretty well with them as it is, apparently, but not fast enough, according to Mr Rockefeller’s last general meeting. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, there is so much news out there but it’s all trivia. Most of it’s trivia. Most of it really is almost irrelevant. You get a kind of nose for what’s relevant and what isn’t after a while when you’re scouring so much news. You realize a lot of it is filler; a lot of it is recycled news. A lot of it, yeah, it might be appropriate in some areas where people stick on the one topic and it adds to that topic’s information. Really we are going at such a pace now, so fast as everything is being implemented quickly, that they don’t tell us all the big things that are happening and they are giving us lots and lots of trivia. The US is actually worse for it because the US, for all of its SO many stations across the country, television and radio, are given less news than probably any other people on the planet. It’s rather startling to realize that they are contained that way. It’s a containment form where they are meant to think everything is still fine and rosy and all the rest of it, even though a lot of their old cities are getting crushed down, all the old urban areas. They almost have… well they do have ghost towns here and there now. It’s just incredible what’s happened to them, as they have been devastated.
And the bankers are going to hit them even harder, apparently, next year, as they have all bought up all these terrible mortgages that have passed through so many hands now they are buying them up for peanuts, the big banks. They want to go after them next January, and millions more they say, millions, are going to lose their homes. It’s quite something what’s actually being allowed to happen, but this IS the agenda. I’ve always said it, they’d flatten America, they’d take it down once its job was almost over. And that’s what’s happening today. Just incredible… and tragic, tragic to watch what’s happening. Tent cities, I watched a DVD at the weekend there about the tent cities that have been springing up all over the place. Quite common now, under motorways and places, and how the people are having to live. Of course so many of them are still confused; they don’t know what we know here on shows like this, what’s been happening, how it came to pass, what the agenda is. They are just trying to survive as best they can. A lot of folk who are at the soup kitchens and the food banks are the working poor, as well as the unemployed. They are still forking out maybe $800 in rent while they only bring in $900 a month, all together, to live on so they have to go get their food at food banks. The food banks now are stretched beyond the crisis level. They have turn people away. You can imagine how you’d feel turning people away at the end when you’ve run out of food. This is America. It’s America. That was planned for America and it’s happened.
They knew all this would come when they signed the GATT treaty. Then they use your tax money to fund your own factories to get up and move out and root up and go over to China. They paid for the transportation over to China… and the retooling and the setting up in China. All paid by the taxpayer, who wasn’t told a darn thing at the time. Then the companies who set up in China can claim, from the government, again, back home, for 10 years for any losses they claim was incurred, according to their projected profits, what they expected to get. If they didn’t get it, they get it made up by the taxpayers again. We are getting raped and plundered and worse. And people will still go and vote… for the SAME damn system. The SAME… how can you… People ask me, you know, can we do it by getting the right people in? You can’t put the right people in to the tower of Babel. It’s been there a long time. It was crooked from its foundations. It’s teetering and tottering with band-aids and superglue holding it together. And it’s UTTERLY CORRUPT. You see it was taken over a long, long time ago. Then they built this big tower, this new world order, a long time ago, long before Bush Sr mentioned it.
Here are some of the scams that are happening too, because the big boys at the top are allowed to do scams and get away with it and there are no inquiries and there are no courts you can drag them into anyway. This one is about Chinese companies now, who naturally are in on the big greenhouse gas scams, just like the Europeans ones are, who have traded millions of Euros of FREE trading credits they were given by the European Union, that strange big ultra-Soviet secretive organization. They gave them all these free trading cards and they have made millions off it already, even though nothing has been produced. They just make millions by selling them and trading them. China is the same.
Chinese firms blamed in huge greenhouse gas scam
Damian Carrington / October 28, 2010 / smh.com.au
BRUSSELS: The European Commission is planning to clamp down on a €2 billion ($2.8 billion) carbon trading scam involving the deliberate production of greenhouse gases which the fraudulent manufacturers are then paid to destroy. (A: What a wonderful thing, eh?)
The Climate Change Commissioner, Connie Hedegaard, says the use of these carbon permits, from industrial gas projects in China, could be banned because of their ''total lack of environmental integrity''. (A: Well, where is the integrity in the whole con game of greenhouse gases in the first place? It’s a political movement, a political agenda. It’s nothing to do with what is real.)
Billions of euros worth of the controversial permits were used between 2008-09 in the European Union's emission trading scheme, in which companies must exchange pollution permits for emissions produced.
The scheme allows some of those permits to be bought in from developing countries.
The most popular of these so-called offsets come from projects that destroy the greenhouse gas HFC-23, a byproduct of the manufacture of the refrigerant gas HCFC-22.
The Environmental Investigation Agency said in June that many Chinese chemical companies were manufacturing HCFC-22 primarily to earn money from destroying HFC-23, which can be five times the value of the refrigerant gas the plants are ostensibly set up to create. (A: Great scams! Again, the minds that go around to places you’d never figure out in the first place, just like the guys that do all the bubbles for financing. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix. There are two callers on the line so I’ll try and get them in now. One is Jay from Ohio. Are you there Jay?
Jay: Oh, great. Wow. I finally get to talk to Alan Watt. I’ve been listening to you a lot over the summer as I skate and exercise and think about a lot of stuff. One thing that … and I know you have said a lot. Yeah, there are sociopaths that, and that’s what they are. I work in mental health as a counselor and I see a lot of the same kinds of behaviors, in what we call the axis, of the DSM4, the manual that… . …a lot of those things…
Alan: Are you on a cell phone?
Jay: Yeah. Here, let me…
Alan: It’s crackling a little bit and I can’t make out much.
Jay: Okay, is that better?
Alan: That’s better, yep.
Jay: Okay. So it’s like, sociopaths are running things now. I read a lot. I got the book that you mentioned about foundations, it was sometime at the end of August and I went out and bought it. I’m reading it and it’s like the deeper I get into reading about this I see how deep the matrix is and I’m like, holy cow.
Alan: That’s right. It’s been here an awful long time. The foundations have been here for SO long… basically directing the direction of the countries. Since they are not listed as political bodies, the public don’t know about them. We don’t vote them in but here they are telling governments what to do, and creating the NGOs, all the opposition groups, to protest the different things and so on, and they get no problems getting air time in the television and the newspapers. And people think they are official bodies of government or something but they are not. They are independent bodies all together. And how can you compete with that kind of propaganda when the foundations have trillions of dollars per annum to spend?
Jay: Right. Right. It’s a lot… it’s like a big... well you know, it’s a big distortion campaign. In a funny way it’s like the fatal attraction woman, you know, they call the borderlines. And they are just like them because if you do something that the borderlines don’t like or the borderlines have their own agenda, along with the antisocials, then they will smear ya.
Alan: Absolutely.
Jay: I have a couple of clients that are like that on my caseload. One thing that I wonder as I listen to you and Alex, has there ever been in history a defeat or a major setback for the elite? I think there has got to be. These guys can’t be invincible. They are very conniving like most crooks and thieves are; they use their powers the wrong way.
Alan: They have had prolonged wars basically in certain times in history, very prolonged wars. To get what they wanted they had to eradicate the old existing religions at one point, and that was their longest of wars. We had 100 years war at one point in one country, and on and on it went to destroy, infiltrate from within as well, and destroy – they are still doing that today in fact, infiltrating patriot movements and destroying them; it’s the same technique. They also hoped after World War I, going to all that trouble to create World War I, they really hoped at that time that President Wilson under the League of Nations would bring in a form of world government then. But the public in most countries were not ready for it; they didn’t want it. They hoped again under World War II, at the end of it, that this was the beginning of the official UN body. They had so much pomp and circumstance put out on the big Pathe News and all the different movie house news items they put out, telling the world that this was the end of war, this would be peace, and the UN would be brought up to a high power in the affairs of the world to do with government or governance. That didn’t work out too well because again, the public did not want this strangely… it’s almost an abstract body. It’s not a country as such although it’s got official status, a sovereign status. It’s based in New York State, of all places. By the way, it was demanded they build it in the US. The Russians demanded that it was to be built IN the US, which is very interesting. Of course that fitted right in with Mr Rockefeller’s idea too. So you have this body, and the people weren’t ready to accept a world government then, again. So they’ve had umpteen, many, many wars in between, as they went down to Latin America and other countries to standardize those countries, same across Africa, trying to standardize them all. Now they are doing the Middle East and doing it the long way around. That’s why Bush Sr said he now sees the beginning coming in, a dawning of a new world order. They have gone around the hard way to do it, not bothering to wean or really coax the public along with them, just bypass them, until the public are conditioned that it’s there, it is a world body, it is the official body. It’s done by osmosis, eventually; we accept that it kind of IS a world body but really it’s a private organization, and that’s how it’s registered.
Jay: Right. Right. Right. Maybe it was you or someone else, was talking. I am a musician; that’s not my day job but in my spare time that’s what I prefer to do. It’s hard to… I don’t understand how anyone can concentrate on anything. Well, they don’t. Most people don’t know about all this. But I find it really hard to want to spend any time BUT to research and try and do something about it.
Alan: Yep. And the hardest thing is, what do you do about it once you know this? You know.
Jay: Right. Right. I bought some newsletter software. I think I’m going to give that a shot. You know, a lot of this stuff is available but I just feel the need to do my own writing and then even just distribute it to my friends, because at least they will listen, they will at least look at it. Maybe that will spawn something, I don’t know.
Alan: It’s all you can. I started off by writing by hand. I didn’t have a typewriter initially, and I would do long essays and so on, with data, put in a few pictures for them and then photocopy them and send bundles of them off to different people, and anyone at all. People who already had the ability to get stuff out in print or whatever, and once in a while someone would take it and run with it and print it. That’s all I could do at the time; it’s all I was thinking of doing. I was teaching small groups here and there, in much greater detail, but at least I was putting out packages. I didn’t charge anything for them at all. And often I never heard back from people, but they’d actually ultimately use the material, that kind of thing. But you do what you can. It’s amazing what can grow out of just your name getting out there, eventually, what does come out of that, or the people who will try and get in touch with you, if you give them a means to get in touch with you. Because it might be one in 500 that you actually strike the chord with and they will get back in touch with you.
Jay: Right. Right. Well I don’t want to take up too much time. I hope one of these days I’m going to get some of your books; I’m trying to help everybody out a little bit.
Alan: Yeah. That’s all you can do.
Jay: I can’t read enough. There is so much.
Alan: There is so much and again, too, that’s part of data overload. We are in that time; there is too much data. You have to be very discerning what you want to teach, and try to keep on the facts that you can prove, by the writings of those involved. Stick to that. Stick to that and stick to that; nothing else. Just stick to that.
Jay: Right. Right. Right. Definitely thanks for all your work. I appreciate it, as you get right down to what the truth is… there’s no BS… and that’s what we all need.
Alan: That’s right. We don’t.
Jay: Keep up the good work.
Alan: Thanks for calling. There is also Mark from Wisconsin there. Are you there Mark?
Mark: How are you doing, Alan?
Alan: Not too bad.
Mark: I was going to ask you, I heard you mention Bouvier before. I was wondering, what do you know about Bouvier’s and Black’s Law Dictionary? Who’s all behind that?
Alan: Well, I know that Bouvier was interesting because Benjamin Franklin, when he went over to London, High Wycombe, and he joined The Hellfire Club. Strangest thing. I mean, here he was basically representing the US during the Revolutionary Wars, he was able to get a boat over to London, back and forth – he even went to the opera you know – and no one stopped him or bothered him. He had all the right passwords of course, and gestures, and the right friends in London, because I think he was part of the London group actually. He mentioned that they had not quite what you would call a prostitution house, not what we think of as a prostitution house, but those who served the work and who had the higher intellect and who would learn and who were doing the great work, they called them ‘highly operative freemasons.’ They had the right to mate, because they do believe in eugenics. They believe that high intellect should mate with high intellect. And certain women apparently, they claimed, which I think is probably true, carry the genes in them, where the right mix is made and they will have a very good, highly intelligent offspring. They call them ‘dollies.’ That’s what he called them. He called them, in his own memoirs, dollies. He’s known too for bringing over a French dolly that became the baby doll, in fact. The baby doll is a representation of what he saw as the average female carrier, which is a dolly; you carry things on a dolly. So again, they love that hidden symbolism in something. He mentioned Madam Bouvier was the head over there. Madame Bouvier, and there are still descendants yet in France, 2 Bouvier sisters, old sisters. It was Jacqueline Kennedy who was descended from the Bouvier family as well. So she was a carrier of the genes. They were also related I think to Baines Johnson. What is interesting there, is they go way, way back, because the Baines part comes from one of the branches of the families of Macbeth, of all people, the Castle Macbeth. All intertwined together. It’s just astonishing. It’s just like the Presidents today; they all seem to be related to Royalty. It doesn’t matter what party they come from, or who they are, or the color of their skin, they are always related to the same Royalty. Well it’s the same on this side as well, when it comes to these particular high players. They are all given their high mates to get married to. I’ve read a lot, in some of the high Masonry’s books, and they more than just hint at this, over and over. They talk about the head above and the head below… well, you know what the head below obviously is – that’s the base side of things. However, they do say that the 3rd generation Freemason, that’s the grandson, the son of a Mason and an Eastern Star, is a higher candidate to go straight up the ranks of Freemasonry and even higher than the regular ranks. So the third generation is what they are after. So if you are very, very good, and you are presented with your wife, who is the carrier of the gene, and you are introduced to her, and you take the hint and do the right thing, then you are pretty well guaranteed the good offspring, the ‘lewin’ as they call them, who goes on to higher things. A lewis or a lewin, they call them.
Mark: Right. I was just floored to find out, do you remember William James Bryant, Cross of Gold speech? I was just floored to find out, Alan, that he was backed by Carnegie. What the heck is going on here!?! [Caller laughing.]
Alan: Yeah, yeah. It’s amazing isn’t it? Isn’t it just amazing? [Alan laughing.] And I love the stories, too, of all these guys, these great founders of the foundations. Even the bankers, too, how they came from rags to riches and all that rubbish. And Carnegie, the same idea; a poor little, you know, shoemaker just makes good, and makes billions, and starts off the foundations. It’s all rubbish. These guys are sent there, over to this US, and they are set up by a BIG well-funded organization that already existed, the same with the Rothschilds. That’s why no one could touch him. No one could touch some of them, no one could assassinate them. That’s how they had decided a long, long time ago, that by their foundations, under the guise of charities, they would take over the entire world. Don’t forget that even Adam Weishaupt said that. He said, that through the creation of foundations and charitable organizations we shall bypass all governments and become the world government.
Mark: And didn’t Paul Warburg say in front of Congress, we shall have world government either by consent or conquest?
Alan: That’s correct.
Mark: It never ends. Thanks a lot, Alan. Have a good night.
Alan: Thank you too.
Yeah, [Alan laughing.] it’s quite the world we live in isn’t it? And people are oblivious to it. And again, we get stuck up in the daily news and I don’t like that at all, because you’ve got to know all the background stuff, what got us to this situation in the first place. Not just what they are doing to us today, what knives are they sticking in us today, but how did we get here. And once you really understand you don’t have what you think of as a government that belongs to the people, you have government that does what it’s told by very rich powerful people, who own not just the foundations, they own massive international businesses, and they are tightly interwoven with all the Military-Industrial Complex. When you understand that, you understand that you are living in a scientific form of dictatorship, as Aldous Huxley talked about. And we are controlled scientifically, our minds are controlled scientifically.
There is still the underlying eugenics bunch beneath it, call them what you want; you can call them Freemasons, whatever, it’s all the same thing, with a definite eugenics plan. Look at the oldest books from the Rosicrucians if you can get them, they are available, they are cheap I believe, and you will start to see the hints all through that, of the proper mating. Proper mating is all through all it. Always it’s proper mating, with a proper kind of wife, to get the proper son, who is then given to the Grandmaster to be taught all the things, all the mysteries and so on. And the mysteries are to bring in a better world. Then you look into all of the communal living associations in the United States, amazing history of communal living. Christian communists too, they went under the guise of Christian Communists; they came IN from abroad. They were not Christians at all. But under the Constitution they had protection and they called themselves Christian Communists. Like the big one in New York there, with Noyes; Mr Noyes, [pronounced ‘noise’] strange name but you can actually find the root of that name and you’ll find he’s not Christian at all. Then you find that Mr Noyes was backed on his experiment on free love and special selective breeding. In the 1800s he was backed by the Royalty of Britain. The Hudson Bay Company gave them the biggest contract, even though they hadn’t even started a business, for making traps. Then they were given a massive silver working company to support themselves with. Then of course Noyes’s cousin, or his uncle, just happened to be Mr Hayes who was the governor who became president of the United States. It’s all tied in together, eugenics and so on. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll go to Anthony from New York. Are you there Anthony?
Anthony: Yes, thank you very much for everything you are doing right now. I appreciate everything that you’ve let out there on the air waves. The question that I have is, you spoke about the dollies, are they still in existence today? Also, what would be the opposite lifestyle we can live in, instead of the new world order that they are trying to push against us?
Alan: The first one was, who is still in existence?
Anthony: The dollies, the dollies of the Freemasonry.
Alan: Oh yeah, they are. I’m sure they are still in existence. Absolutely. When you look at the history even of Royalties, their mates were always selected for them. It goes as far back as the pharaohs; the same thing happened. Sometimes they’d even marry their sisters, to keep it really in the family. The Rothschilds are exactly the same; they always marry their nieces. So certain of these families – that’s one of their M.O.s, how you can spot them – of their particular marriage habits too. They are still in existence today. The higher Freemasons are still advised to… you know, your Grandmaster for instance will invite you to a dinner or something and he will introduce you to what is to be your prospective wife. If you take the hint, as I say, you will do awfully well; you are going to have doors open to you, get well rewarded for it, and you will go up the ladder in whatever occupation you are in. It’s really the son that they are after though because the wife is definitely a dolly, as they say, and belongs to the right lineage.
Anthony: Wow. Thank you very much.
Alan: Thanks for calling. It’s interesting even if you look at the King James Bible. It was first published in Scotland remember, in Edinburgh. I have a copy of it here and it mentions the late Queen, Elizabeth the 1st; they call her that bright eastern star… in the forward to it, by the printers, that bright star. And then they talk about King James, and now we have our new Sion – spelt with an S. Not a Scion, which is a cutting; also a Masonic term, as you are grafted onto the tree of life, if you have done the good work, the great work. But as a Sion, because they used to spell it not Zion as a Z – often in English they did an S – so he was a Sion. The King, that was his title. So she was the Star and he was the new coming Sion. This has been all down through history, this kind of stuff. And yeah, they are still mated up today. All the big players you’ll find that are put out there that are supposed to change the world, the Gates and so on; it’s interesting to go into their wives and all the rest of it. And again, you can hide family names, of their actual names, by Mrs So-and-so, and put the front guy out there. Often it’s the wives that are very more important because of their lineages.
There is also Steven from Oregon. Are you there Steven?
Steven: I’m here. Alan, it’s a pleasure to talk to you, sir. I called in because of the other caller. He’s a musician. I know I can see that he is so frustrated and that’s me, because we are just learning this stuff. I knew it all my life but it gets kind of hard. And it’s very interesting too. It’s very interesting, what do I do, what do I do with this? You know, and we can be survivors. We can, we can write music. We are so caught...
Alan: We can. We have the talents and skills if you can get it out there. You are absolutely right on. We’ve got to get a concentrated movement, a counter culture, to put across alternate music with the messages in it. Thanks for calling; that’s the music and the end of the show.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Yuri Bezmenov, ex-KGB explaining take down from within-Video
Yuri Bezmenov, The Subversion Process-Video
Chatham House Hosts Global Financial Forum
Aspartame Approved to be Added to Following Foodstuff
Chinese Firms and Huge Greenhouse Gas Carbon Scam
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:06 amHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 16, 2010. I always advise newcomers, especially young people, to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and if you have the patience and time, you can help yourself to hundreds of audio talks I’ve given over the years, where I try, really try and give you shortcuts to understanding this big world order which you hear about all the time, from all of the official sources. They never really explain what they mean about it. They give you little bits and pieces, but they mean a world order, a complete new ordered way of living – that’s what it means – across the entire planet. It also means obviously that the entire planet has to be standardized into a singular system with the same laws, rules, regulations and even a new culture that’s to really come out of it, at the end of it. We are actually going through all of that right now. They even had their discussions back in the 60s to decide which culture they would give the public of the world. The CFR held the meeting in London with the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is their big daddy, and they decided that Hollywood and the music industry based in America would give the culture, the new culture, across the world, which everyone would emulate. That has happened. It’s pretty well happened. The few cultures that haven’t quite buckled under are getting taught right now, with cluster bombs and stuff like that, to give up their old culture, bring in a central bank, allow usury to be used upon them and join the world society. That’s basically what’s happening today.
Remember that is costs me a lot of money to keep this all going here. You’ll see on the site cuttingthroughthematrix.com that there are a whole bunch of sites I have up. I have to have these because I get trouble from the big boys occasionally and the main sites go down. So if you bookmark all of these sites you’ll have the alternate ones to choose from, hopefully, in case of emergency. Keep downloading as much as you can, while we can put this stuff up because it will cease one day. It will definitely cease one day. We will all be enemies of the world state, if you don’t go along with the authorized way of looking at it all, through new eyes, you see, and from a new voice and you’re all politically correct. And that’s something that some of us just can’t do. Buy the books, CDs and DVDs to keep me going; that’s all it does is keep me going. If you notice, I don’t bring on advertisers and that’s really how hosts pay themselves. That’s okay, business is business, but not for me. It’s not a business. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly to RBN to pay for their time and it costs them a lot of money to broadcast this show and to pay for their equipment, staff and they have a lot of bills coming in too. That’s how the world at the present certainly runs. So buy the items I have from me on my web sites. You’ll get a different take on history and the techniques that are used down through time to rule vast amounts of people. [Order and donation options listed above.] I’ll be back with more after these messages, on how the system works.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. We’re talking as well about free trade. Free trade was the big idea that John Dee came up with, and Bacon also participated in the idea of a world that would eventually be standardized under a British type system, or a London based, or run, system, going back to Queen Elizabeth 1st time in fact. That’s when they coined the term, he coined the term in fact, the Brytish Empire, an idea where free trade would dominate and they would break down all trade barriers. By doing so, they’d have an interdependent world, which meant really that no one was independent. That’s great if you want to take over the planet, and that always was the plan, believe it or not, and is still going on. It’s almost finished. That’s what we have been living through.
Wars were necessary of course, to make this happen. World War I was awfully important to bring in the League of Nations. The Milner Group helped to bring that upon. They worked for year and years to bring on a Second World War. They helped finance Hitler too, to make sure it came about, through the IG Farben organization and that became the war industry for Germany. They built them up in a very quick time. All the big boys, GM, Ford, and so on, were involved in it. Rockefeller was involved with Standard Oil. They built up the big German war machine, something they don’t want to talk about today. But they needed that to happen, to bring on a war, to create the United Nations, the even bigger League of Nations, to further this global integration system that was planned an awful long time ago. As I say, free trade, all that stuff comes in to it and they would make massive trading blocs. That’s why Karl Marx could talk about it in the 1800s with absolute certainty that’s the way it would go. Of course eventually you’d be under a world governmental system.
Japan, the Pacific Rim has been worked on as well. I’ve got the books going back, from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, to the 1930s. They talked about the Pacific Rim and how they’d have to work for a long time on the Pacific Region. They also said an upcoming war would be awfully handy to get Japan to attack the US and then bring the US into this coming war, long before it happened by the way, and that’s in their own books, their own writings. They discussed this in Melbourne, Australia when they had a meeting there. They got their wish, of course. They always get their wishes; it’s strange that way. Eventually they’d bring it all under wraps. They used a branch of the CFR, which they called the Pacific Rim, or the APEC leaders, or APEC initiators they called them initially, initiators. It was a branch of the CFR and they put them into all the Far Eastern countries to work up into government, first as diplomats and then from within those particular governments, using native Australians, New Zealanders, and even Japanese and so on. Here is an article to show you they have finished off the Pacific Rim, because they had a big meeting recently and this is what it says about it.
Japan is test case for Pac Rim free trade zone
November 14, 2010 | Associated Press / foxnews.com
Although Asia-Pacific leaders have committed themselves to achieving a Pacific-wide free trade zone following an annual summit, host Japan may prove a key test case for how realistic that vision is.
Acknowledging that Japan's economic power is declining, Prime Minister Naoto Kan declared his country must open up its markets and embrace free trade — or risk getting left further behind other regional rivals. (Alan: That’s what they told every country in Europe too: You’ve got to join or you’ll be left behind. If you’d been left behind, by the way, you’d have been out of the debt; you wouldn’t have all that massive debt you have to all share now, eh.)
"Japan is determined to reopen itself," Kan said at a press conference Sunday that wound up the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, alluding to the historic role that Yokohama, which hosted the summit, played more than 150 years ago as one of the first Japanese ports to open up to the West. (A: You ever see how that happened? the actual story? They sent in American war ships and forced them to open up trade at gunpoint. That’s the way it was done.)
That bold declaration represents a change for Japan, which for decades had been ruled by conservative administrations that were reluctant to engage in trade liberalization and were closely tied with farmers (A: Their own farmers…) who fiercely oppose lowering protective tariffs. Imported rice, for example, is subject to a 778 percent tariff. (A: So that’s why they are pretty healthy over there; they are not getting all of that GM stuff. But that’s out the window now; now they will get Rockefellers golden modified rice no doubt, which also helps to sterilize you, according to the UN.)
Japan and the other 20 members of APEC will face many such tough choices as they strive to execute their shared commitment (A: Shared commitment, there you go…) to free trade and greater regional integration (A: …integration folks, for the hard of thinking.) as outlined in the leaders' communique issued at the end of the weekend meeting.
Their overarching goal: To work toward establishing a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific that would envelope all members, from behemoths China and the U.S. to tiny Brunei and New Zealand. Slashing tariffs and other barriers to imports and investments, the so-called FTAAP would cover half the world's global commerce and two-fifths of its trade. Kan said the rough target date (A: total integration…) was 2020. (A: They will speed it all up actually and it will be done long before that. That’s so that they don’t terrify them with rapid changes. You see, interdependence means you can’t be independent even in feeding yourself. That’s one of the big goals. They claim of course, the big boys at the top, it’s to help stop wars and stuff. If you can feed yourself, you can’t have a war. You see. They have all these reasons for their totalitarian plan, and remember it’s a very, very, very old plan.)
The Asia-Pacific region has led the world's still-weak recovery from the financial crisis, and the region's leaders are convinced that open markets are a sure way to ensure future growth. (A: It’s going to put a lot of farmers out of business. There’s no doubt about it. No doubt about it, over there. It’s done it everywhere else. And a massive bureaucracy telling you who can farm, who can’t farm, and all that kind of stuff. But, well, that’s it.)
You know, Japan, modern Japan was set up as a temporary engine basically, because during World War II they had set up their post-war plans for Japan, after they would demolish it. And they knew they were going to demolish it because what they always do in war time is demolish the countries and the cities where they want to build brand new cities and new factories and all that. They had big, big plans for Japan. So war is partly a demolition job and to get rid of all the old structures. They had the cities, the modern cities all drafted up before they moved in, with the troops, to take it over. Sure enough, the Hopkins Plan it was called too, using the Marshall Plan, pumped the money in for Japan and they set them up to be the electronics manufacturers for the planet, for a while. They were also the guys set up as a proxy, because their government really worked as a banker to lend the money out for business. This was all under the so-called guidance of the US, or I should say the bankers of the US that also ran the US. The Hopkins idea was to work in a sense that it would be buying the debt of the US. You heard for years that Japan held the debt for the US; they would buy the debt. Now it’s China that’s buying the debt so Japan has to go down; it’s time it merged into this big conglomerate. They’ve also to open their doors, by the way, to mass immigration for the first time. So you can’t have a homogenous people anymore in this world system, at least for everybody except one and that’s the way it’s to be. It’s as simple as that.
Free trade, the new world order, and interdependence, meaning you have no independence at all, not even to feed yourself. Remember, they said at the United Nations, when they dole out the food to the world, and to the regions of the world, they will force you to keep down your population and of course what they’ll do, by rationing it out to you by the way, and eventually they will give you lower and lower rations by telling you it’s bad weather, you know, climate change and stuff like that. And you have to find a way to bring down your population even faster; it’s your problem. I’m not kidding you. I’ve got all the articles here. You think it’s a nice lovely cozy world you are going into? Tough cheese… because you have no idea what’s coming down. It’s run with the same bureaucratese language and silly craziness as the Soviet system was run. Because the same boys that gave them the Soviet system is running this; that’s why. That’s why.
Of course everyone is upset in the US about the FDA Food Safety Bill, which is going through the Senate this week; it’s on right now.
FDA FOOD “SAFETY” BILL POISED FOR SENATE VOTE THIS WEEK
By Sarah Foster / November 10, 2010 / NewsWithViews.com
It’s going to really go into all kinds of food that you are allowed to get and so on, but also into, can you even grow garden food for yourself and so on. It would also give government access to your kitchen; because literally it says that any place that prepares food… it doesn’t just mean commercial places. That means ANY place is any place; that’s your own kitchen too. They can come in and inspect and all this kind of stuff. I’ll put these links up on my sites at the end of the show. I just wanted to mention that, how you’ve got to be interdependent and get used to Big Brother in this great world society, this champion of freedoms as they call it. It’s Orwellian with doublethink. It’s just amazing that people can believe in it at all; it truly is. It truly, truly is.
Part of getting a people down into the gutter, for control, is to dehumanize them and destroy their cultures, and all that is good and wholesome in their cultures that kept them together, as a peaceful happy culture where everyone knew the basic rules, you didn’t need massive police forces to take care of things, everyone knew the rules. You always degenerate them and that’s happened in the West. I’ve read the report from the military from the US’s own web site, from their own magazine, that said they’d push the American culture, which IS degenerate they said, across the whole world. Why is that? It’s because people who become degenerate have nothing to stand up for. There’s nothing clean in them anymore to stand up for anything at all, like a clean idea. Germany is in for the big boot now because there are people who still hate Germany and it’s got to be brought down, now that they are rattling a little bit, in anger, on what’s happening over there. They don’t want total integration. They’ve only had a little bit of freedom for a little while when the wall came down and all that stuff, on queue of course. They are getting rather ticked off at being ruled by a little place called Brussels and paying everybody else’s debt. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix and just before I go onto this story about Germany and how they are going to bring them down further with degradation, even further than most countries, because a lot of folk still hate Germany you know. I should go back to the Pacific Rim group because the CFR created the Institute for Pacific Relations. That was one of the groups. It was a front for the CFR to integrate them all, work through a 20, 30 year plan to get them all ready for integration into this big world system. They had a couple of front groups and you can read that in Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, from the records that he took from the Council on Foreign Relations themselves. He was the official historian for them. So they were front groups and they worked for years and years and years to bring this all about, this grouping over there. Of course they also had their group working for the unification of Europe too, and the unification of the Americas – still ongoing in America.
Back to Germany, there are certain people who just don’t like Germany at all. They’ve got an awful thing about it and they want to totally degrade them further in case they get any ideas of being German again. It says here…
German Government Publication Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed
Micheal O'Brien, author on crisis of culture in West, says this "German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction"
By John-Henry Westen / lifesitenews.com / Monday July 30, 2007
BERLIN, July 30, 2007 (A: I read this at the time, but this is ongoing by the way.) - Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government's Ministry for Family Affairs (A: This is from the Ministry of Family Affairs, right. Over in the big Sovietized system, that they call Europe, you have a Ministry for Family Affairs; you have ministries for everything.) encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age. (A: I read this at the time in collusion with the United Nations’ pamphlet, the booklet that they put out on the same thing. They wanted communal masturbation in schools. And that was a fact. That’s a fact. They dished that out across the States too in different places as well.) Two 40-page booklets entitled "Love, Body and Playing Doctor" by the German Federal Health Education Center (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung - BZgA) are aimed at parents - the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6 years of age.
"Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. (A: …it says.) Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex," reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds. The authors rationalize, "The child touches all parts of their father's body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same." (A: I’m not kidding; this is what they are promoting. By the way, this comes from, it doesn’t mention it here, but it’s from the United Nations.)
Canadian author and public speaker Michael O'Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to LifeSiteNews.com about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, "State-encouraged incest, (A: Of course it is.) which in most civilized societies is a crime." The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of (A: …religion, he goes on to say, which gave a moral order.) the Judeo-Christian moral order.
"The imposed social revolution that has swept the western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man's value," said O'Brien. "It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power. If he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the 'will to power' and the 'will to pleasure'." (A: And this goes on and on and on, on what parents should do and should not do and so on. You can read it for yourself. I’ll put it up on the site for you and you can read it for yourself. I know where it’s all coming from too, and the reasons behind it. But you don’t, I’m sure, unless you do your homework… and you should do your homework.)
You understand that the whole training you are going through is for the new system. The children in school have all gone through the body searches sometimes. They’ve definitely gone through the detectors to detect anything that they may have. They’ve had raids on their lockers to check that they didn’t have anything hidden. We’ve seen all the ridiculous stories of having a pair of nail clippers and stuff at school can get you in trouble and all that kind of stuff. They were trained before the year 2001, for the year 2001 and for what was to happen afterwards with all of this scanning technology and so on. This one here talks about…
Technology identifies troubled individuals
By Lou Michel / buffalonews.com / September 26, 2010
Imagine using the same technology to locate a lone bomber before he carries out his terrorist act and to identify a troubled veteran or first responder ground down by tragedies and violence.
Some 120 local first responders from law enforcement and other agencies, the military and mental health professionals gathered Friday to hear firsthand about an advanced computer program that can accomplish those two seemingly different tasks.
The presentation was part of the International First Responder-Military Symposium (A: I mentioned this before.) held at Hilbert College in the Town of Hamburg.
A Swiss professor working with a Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientist who heads the Mind Machine Project (A: The MIND MACHINE project, folks…) there outlined how this program operates through computerized scanning of phone calls and electronic messages sent through e-mail and social networking mechanisms.
“Suppose you know there’s a threat to the president when he is visiting, say, Texas. Through information obtained by the National Security Agency, we have the tools to go through huge quantities of data obtained from that area,” said professor Mathieu Guidere of the University of Geneva.
How? “The computer system detects resentment in conversations (A: I told you about this ages ago they had a resentment meter, a computer, they were actually putting all this data into.) through measurements in decibels and other voice biometrics,” he said. “It detects obsessiveness with the individual going back to the same topic over and over, measuring crescendos.” (A: So if you keep mentioning the same thing over and over you’ve got a fixation on it; maybe like ice cream or something, you know, and it’s a really hot day. Then you get a SWAT team coming in the window to maybe cool you off in a different way. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through that old Matrix there and talking about the brave new world we are coming into, a brave new world planned an awful long time ago. That’s why they have all the details working today. They are not working them out as they go along. They had them all worked before you were born. They knew exactly where they’d be at this time and what part they’d be implementing at this time. They knew when the bank crash was going to happen because they planned it that way, to bring in austerity and the sharing of wealth across the planet; or as Karl Marx said, the redistribution of wealth. You see, they never change their plans, these boys, and they always get what they want. It’s only because they have an ignorant public that acquiesces to their own darn governments, which aren’t their governments at all, and don’t say boo. They are too happy being entertained and being degenerated to bother. When you’re degenerate you don’t care. You’re out partying and looking for… you’re a predator basically, on your own species. Some more on their own species than others of course, it depends what gender you go for. However, that’s how they are today, totally degenerate society and that’s the culture that’s been given to them.
Talking about that emotion detector and so on, they are doing that, they have been doing that for years to find out who’s who, saying what, and so on. Certain words crop up too many times in a conversation and you are labeled immediately as this, that or the other. You know that too. The Echelon was doing that years ago but they have really stepped it up. They were doing far, far more in-depth investigations years ago than they let on about. They know who everybody is. They’ve got personality profiles built up on everyone. They know who you are, how you think, how you tick. They know your habits, who you call, when you call them, what little groups you go and belong to, even what books you read from the library. They know everything about you and you are very predictable because of that… very predictable. It really helps them too, with Facebooks and all the idiots that put all their stuff up there, as though it was an open diary of their lives. They love that kind of stuff, and that’s why they gave it to you of course. Don’t think for a second these little front men that pretend to own them really come out with these ideas themselves and did it all by their little old selves, any more than Bill Gates did. It’s all part of the big security world system, and the Pentagon.
This was all in Brazil, the movie Brazil, a comedy. It’s so great to see someone who can put everything in a comedy and it gets so much across, without the comebacks you would have if it was a straight movie or a straight documentary or something, by all the critics. In a comedy you can get away with an awful lot and Terry Gilliam certainly did a lot of that stuff in the movie Brazil. It showed you a future where you’d have the SWAT teams cutting holes in the roof, just grabbing people and snuffing them – they’d disappear – and your world would be run by bureaucrats and scientists. That’s who would run your whole lives. And they would do their scientific tortures on different people, and then dispose of them. They had a massive Ministry of Information Retrieval, that’s the biggest building of all, massive security and each time you walked in to the building robots would just rush up to you and SNIFF you and check your irises and all the rest of it. I’m not kidding. And here you go…
Hi-tech eye scanners that track passengers
as they walk through airport go on trial in UKBy Daily Mail Reporter / 16th November 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
(A: They always start off in the UK because they are the most docile people ever beaten down. And boy have they been beaten down over such a long time. They are in shell shock actually. I’ve touched on it before but I never read the actual article to you.)
Passengers will have their eyes scanned as soon as they check in as part of a new trial a major UK airport.
High-tech machines that can recognise an individual's iris as they walk around will be installed at Manchester Airport at check in during the government-backed pilot. (A: So it’s a pilot run for all of them, as you well know.)
The technology has the potential to overhaul security and customs, with airport bosses hoping it could help in the fight against terrorism. (A: Just like the movie Brazil. You’ve got to see the movie. There are always bombs going off in the movie Brazil but no one ever sees a terrorist. But it’s awful essential for the system to have this terrorism going on; so of course the government are the terrorists. They’ve done this before.)
That’s one, but there is a link as well that I’m going to put up and it’s to do with a sniffer. You see the sniffer in the robot in Brazil. It comes up to you and it sniffs you all over. Well, they’ve got a sniffer dog, a new mechanical sniffer dog to do that as well, at the airports.
'Electronic sniffer dog' aims to cut down airport security time
By Travelmail Reporter / 12th November 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
They are trying that in Glasgow first for the rest of the country to follow. It will come up and fff-fff-fff and sniff away at you. What it does is apparently use little laser injections into your clothing and stuff searching for different stuff and it detects different chemicals or whatever, maybe even the cleaning stuff that you use on your clothes. I guess the dog will maybe bite your head off if it detects any of this stuff on you. Who knows what it’s going to do. It’s just like Brazil, because Terry Gilliam mixed with the right guys; he knew what was coming down, a long time ago. I think the movie was done in the 80s. You’ve got to see it.
So as I say, good luck to all those that get their irises scanned and help to promote this for the rest of the public that don’t go on air travel, because they will eventually use that across the board for everything. You know darn well it’s all coming down. It’s in all the sci-fi movies that are predictive programming. You’ll see all that stuff, been in there for years, and everybody has got used to the idea of it coming through fiction. That’s always how they promote it.
In the US they have already heard about Britain and its communitarian policy; they call it the Big Society. They already have the big organizations in action now, the nongovernmental organizations working out what they call the DEvaluation of power down to regions, where towns are amalgamated and so on, and you have local commissar boards. Just like the Soviet Union, this is a more perfect Soviet Union and it really is. The Soviet Union meant ‘rule by councils;’ that’s what ‘soviet’ means. That’s what you are having in Britain and across Europe and eventually into America too. And they’ll say, well it’s not coming to America, we’re still American, we’re still paying for the wars and… Yeah you are, but you already have the three people in top positions in the US. They have been working with the last few Presidents to bring in communitarianism IN America. You have to find out who they are. One is Amitai Etzioni; that’s one of them and I looked him up. Then there is Mary Ann Glendon who’s another one. And William Galston is the other one. The three of them are bringing in communitarianism for America, for the near future by the way, in case you didn’t know.
It gives a rundown on who these particular people are. It’s quite interesting to see their communist type background. They have other things in common apart from communism, which is not so surprising. One of the leaders that worked for the Presidents is called Amitai Etzioni; this is his name in the US.
wikipedia.org
Amitai Etzioni
In 1933, Amitai Etzioni was only four years old when the Nazis rose to power in Germany. He was separated from his family but reunited with them by the year 1947. In that time, Etzioni lived a year in Athens, went to Palestine, lived on a cooperative farm and went to boarding school. In 1950, he was enrolled in a special academic institute established by Martin Buber after having dropped out of tenth grade three years earlier to join Palmach (an elite commando unit of the Haganah). In 1951, he attended Hebrew University where he studied classical and contemporary works in Sociology, completing both BA and MA degrees. (A: So he was really an Israeli and he changed his name later on from his original name. It sounds much better, Etzioni… Etzioni, it’s got a thing to it, you see. He worked in all the big universities, the usual ones…)
In 1958 he received his PhD in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley, where he completed his degree in the record time of 18 months. He then became a professor of sociology at Columbia University for twenty years, serving as chair of the department for part of his time there. He joined the Brookings Institution (A: A big powerful think tank.) as a guest scholar in 1978 and then went on to serve as Senior Advisor to the White House from 1979-1980. In 1980 he was named the first University Professor at The George Washington University, where he currently serves as the director of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies. (A: You didn’t know you were getting taught that in the university… Yep, they have been getting taught Communitarian Policy Studies from the 1980s onwards.) He leads the Communitarian Network, a non-profit (A: of course), non-partisan organization which is dedicated to support the moral, social and political foundations of society. (A: Oh, really?) It is based in Washington, D.C. He also held a faculty position at Harvard Business School from 1987 to 1990 serving as the Thomas Henry Carroll Ford Foundation Professor. Etzioni is known for his work on socioeconomics and communitarianism. He was the founder of the communitarian movement in the early 1990s and established the Communitarian Network to disseminate the movement’s ideas. His writings emphasize the importance for all societies of a carefully crafted balance between rights and responsibilities and between autonomy and order. (A: They want ORDER… you see.)
It’s rather interesting as to who these guys actually, actually are. It labels him actually as a German-Israeli-American sociologist so you can take your pick. His real name he was born with was Werner Falk. So that’s one of the big boys who have been bringing it into the US for you, in case you didn’t know, and churning out lots of students, who are working quietly behind the scenes in the US, at present, just as they have been with Common Purpose in Britain for years as well for the European Union and communitarianism.
Then there is Mary Ann Glendon.
wikipedia.org
Mary Ann Glendon
Mary Ann Glendon (born October 7, 1938 Pittsfield, Massachusetts) J.D., LL.M., (A: She learned international law, human rights and all the usual stuff too.) was the United States Ambassador to the Holy See and is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. She teaches and writes on bioethics, comparative constitutional law, property, and human rights in international law. She is a pro-life feminist.
President George W. Bush and Laura Bush stand with 2005 National Humanities Medal recipient Mary Ann Glendon. Glendon graduated from University of Chicago Law School, where she served on law review.
Glendon is the author of Rights Talk; A Nation Under Lawyers, and A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt (A: Eleanor Roosevelt was one of her heroes, you know, the person who loved Pavlov, as she said in her own biography.) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (A: Eleanor Roosevelt is quite a fascinating person, if that’s what we’ll call it. She actually said in her own memoirs that she went to Russia especially to see Pavlov who was her hero. She went to see how his ideas for indoctrinating the youths, how it worked and she was awfully impressed by what she saw, ordinary lines of school children, very quietly going along the road, and staying on the sidewalks and so on. She says, it’s so different from the Americans who’ve got a bit of spirit and are lively and chatty and so on, and laugher, but she preferred the Soviet model for their orderliness, they are so orderly, you see, and that’s what impressed dear old Eleanor Roosevelt. So that was the hero of this woman who is bringing in your communitarianism Soviet system in America, along with some others. These people are given specific areas to work on, you understand, and infiltrate too, and even become the heads of.) In 1994, she was a signer of Evangelicals and Catholics Together, an ecumenical document aimed at rapprochement between Catholics and Evangelicals. Glendon became the first female President of the Roman Catholic Church's Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, when she was appointed by Pope John Paul II on March 9, 2004 (she was already a member of the academy since January 9, 1994). In 1995 she was the Vatican representative to the international 1995 Beijing Conference on Women (A: I don’t know if you’ve ever read about that. That was quite the conference. There were so many lesbians they had big massive lesbian parties in the streets, and it kind of shocked the Chinese.) sponsored by the United Nations, where she contested the anti-condom declarations for the prevention of HIV and AIDS. "The Holy See in no way endorses contraception or the use of condoms, either as a family planning measure or in HIV/AIDS prevention programs."
The National Law Journal named her one of the "Fifty Most Influential Women Lawyers in America" in 1998. Glendon was appointed by President Bush to the President's Council on Bioethics.
Bioethics, remember, is this big scientific body who have decided what the new ethics are for the new life. You know, should we kill folk, euthanize them, how many babies should be terminated every year, you know, keep the population down… all that stuff. What’s ethical… is it ethical to sell baby parts and make a profit off them? which of course they all agree, yes. It’s a big, big business. Stuff like that. We don’t need normalcy or people involved anymore; we’ve got bioethicists who tell us that they are the ones who are in charge of our emotions and our consciences. It’s not bad having a kind of proxy conscience now, eh? You don’t have to worry about anything. That’s another one and then there’s William Galston, quite an interesting guy.
wikipedia.org
William Galston
William Galston is a political theorist. He is the Saul I Stern Professor of Civic Engagement and the director of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at the School of Public Policy of University of Maryland, College Park. In addition, he is a Senior Fellow of Governance (A: GoverNANCE, very important word. I touched on that last night, soft power, how you go around official government policies. See, government has to answer to the public, technically, even though they don’t. Governance bypasses that; they don’t have to be responsible to the public at all. They just make sure that the government eventually signs agreements which they pass into law and govern the public.) at the Brookings Institution. He was also a senior adviser to President of the United States Bill Clinton on domestic policy, and has also been employed by the presidential campaigns of Al Gore and Walter Mondale. Since 1995, Galston has served as a founding member of the Board of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy and as chair of the Campaign's Task Force on Religion and Public Values. He previously taught in the department of Government at the University of Texas-Austin.
(A: He’s written different articles and works such as pluralism…) In political philosophy, Galston has written influential works on political pluralism and on domestic policy issues in liberal society.
(A: Here is the big one though…) Galston was a student of classicist and political philosopher Leo Strauss. (A: Leo Strauss, this is the guy that was a Nazi in Germany and of course a liberal in America. He was a Jewish Nazi… amazing. He’s the guy that came up with the whole New American Century idea, the guy that trained Wolfowitz and McCain and all these guys. He wanted to go across the world forcing democracy on people by invading them. They called it liberation theology in a sense, democracy… liberation democracy… by forcing wars on people and destroying their culture, like Iraq and Iran and so on, and forcing them into the standardized system. Quite a history, this guy, Leo Strauss. Quite a guy. [chuckles.] Quite the guy.)
And people don’t even know that lots of Jews were actually Nazis. At the beginning, in the 30s, an awful lot of Jews were Nazi. It wasn’t until they started to see the sights turning on them that they ran off to the States, but they carried the Nazi philosophy with them, because they liked the idea of special people, superior types and stuff like that. Interesting, eh? He’s your third character who is in charge of communitarianism for Americans. And Americans haven’t a clue that it’s even coming their way. They have already set up places IN the US that are doing and practicing communitarianism and regionalism. I’ve touched on a couple of them before, not so long ago.
What I’m trying to show you is that every big thing that’s happening, every major thing that’s happening, in fact almost everything that’s happening about you is done by this strange soft power of nongovernmental organizations and the foundations which have a semi-official backing, but you don’t vote them in. You don’t vote them in, folks. This is the new scientific way of governance. Scientific governance… that’s not responsible to the public. You don’t get a chance to say, well I don’t want the Brookings Institution to have anything to do with me; I’m not voting them in. Well, you don’t because you’ve never voted them in in the first place. And these characters get APPOINTED to it by the President, to his BOARD of scientific advisors or bioethics advisors and so on. Appointees… that’s the new public/private policy, you see. You’ve got to really get into your homework and find out what’s really going on and what it really, really is all about. I’ll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You’ve got to wail once in a while and I like the guitar wailing on there; it’s very appropriate. I’m just going to finish the night by – if we’ve got time – to add, that one of the big players who set up this present system. He’s dead now but he was one of the big movers. He went to all the big top think tanks, world meetings, worked with the US to bring in the US system as well, and that was Lord Bertrand Russell who, again, worked jointly with MI5 and MI6 and the CIA during World War II and afterwards. He was a big player in pushing this world society, because they used a lot of scientists in it. He wrote a book called The Impact of Science on Society, and this is what he says, we want to bring in this new collectivist society run by professionals, scientists, that’s the whole key to it.
Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society
The good of a multitude is a sum of the goods of the individuals composing it, not a new and separate good. In concrete fact, when it is pretended that the State has a good different from that of the citizens, what is really meant is that the good of the government or of the ruling class is more important than that of other people. Such a view can have no basis except in arbitrary power.
More important than these metaphysical speculations is the question whether a scientific dictatorship, such as we have been considering, (A: And it’s here now folks.) can be stable, or is more likely to be stable than a democracy.
Apart from the danger of war, I see no reason why such a regime should be unstable. After all, most civilized and semi civilized countries known to history have a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. (A: I hope you’re thinking and listening about this, for the hard of thinking I should really repeat that but I hope you heard it. These are the guys that are running this world. They bring in this system. He worked for the big institutions that I have mentioned here.) And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority (A: ...over the majority). When the government controls the distribution of food, (A: What were we talking about recently?) its power is absolute so long as it can count on the police (A: And you’ve got armies of police now.) and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship. (A: That’s what you are getting brought up into NOW. On page 67, that was page 66, he says at the bottom…)
I do not believe that dictatorship is a lasting form of scientific society – unless (but this proviso is important) it can become world-wide. (A: It must be a scientific dictatorship on a worldwide basis, which can only happen if you have a standardized culture across the world, the same system across the entire planet.)
And that guy took part in every major world think tank to help set up the formula that was used prior to World War II, during and after World War II, right up into the 80s and 90s, and it’s still on the go today, those same parts, because it’s a timetable they go by and he worked on the plans for over 100 years to come, along with other big famous players and big famous names. You are living through a script. Your whole life is going through a script. All the big changes and the wars and everything else that you hear are part of the script folks, including 2001, the towers going down and the need to keep you all safe… by taking every right and freedom away. But listen to the experts, as Russell said, because scientific experts will rule your lives, and by God they do. And you don’t elect them. Isn’t that nice? Welcome to the new freedom, that’s what it meant… the NEW freedom.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Japan is Test Case for Pacific Rim Free Trade
German Educational Authorities Promote Incest
Phones, Texts etc. Scanned for anti-Gov Resentment
Electronic Sniffer Tested at Airports
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 16, 2010. I always advise newcomers, especially young people, to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and if you have the patience and time, you can help yourself to hundreds of audio talks I’ve given over the years, where I try, really try and give you shortcuts to understanding this big world order which you hear about all the time, from all of the official sources. They never really explain what they mean about it. They give you little bits and pieces, but they mean a world order, a complete new ordered way of living – that’s what it means – across the entire planet. It also means obviously that the entire planet has to be standardized into a singular system with the same laws, rules, regulations and even a new culture that’s to really come out of it, at the end of it. We are actually going through all of that right now. They even had their discussions back in the 60s to decide which culture they would give the public of the world. The CFR held the meeting in London with the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is their big daddy, and they decided that Hollywood and the music industry based in America would give the culture, the new culture, across the world, which everyone would emulate. That has happened. It’s pretty well happened. The few cultures that haven’t quite buckled under are getting taught right now, with cluster bombs and stuff like that, to give up their old culture, bring in a central bank, allow usury to be used upon them and join the world society. That’s basically what’s happening today.
Remember that is costs me a lot of money to keep this all going here. You’ll see on the site cuttingthroughthematrix.com that there are a whole bunch of sites I have up. I have to have these because I get trouble from the big boys occasionally and the main sites go down. So if you bookmark all of these sites you’ll have the alternate ones to choose from, hopefully, in case of emergency. Keep downloading as much as you can, while we can put this stuff up because it will cease one day. It will definitely cease one day. We will all be enemies of the world state, if you don’t go along with the authorized way of looking at it all, through new eyes, you see, and from a new voice and you’re all politically correct. And that’s something that some of us just can’t do. Buy the books, CDs and DVDs to keep me going; that’s all it does is keep me going. If you notice, I don’t bring on advertisers and that’s really how hosts pay themselves. That’s okay, business is business, but not for me. It’s not a business. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly to RBN to pay for their time and it costs them a lot of money to broadcast this show and to pay for their equipment, staff and they have a lot of bills coming in too. That’s how the world at the present certainly runs. So buy the items I have from me on my web sites. You’ll get a different take on history and the techniques that are used down through time to rule vast amounts of people. [Order and donation options listed above.] I’ll be back with more after these messages, on how the system works.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. We’re talking as well about free trade. Free trade was the big idea that John Dee came up with, and Bacon also participated in the idea of a world that would eventually be standardized under a British type system, or a London based, or run, system, going back to Queen Elizabeth 1st time in fact. That’s when they coined the term, he coined the term in fact, the Brytish Empire, an idea where free trade would dominate and they would break down all trade barriers. By doing so, they’d have an interdependent world, which meant really that no one was independent. That’s great if you want to take over the planet, and that always was the plan, believe it or not, and is still going on. It’s almost finished. That’s what we have been living through.
Wars were necessary of course, to make this happen. World War I was awfully important to bring in the League of Nations. The Milner Group helped to bring that upon. They worked for year and years to bring on a Second World War. They helped finance Hitler too, to make sure it came about, through the IG Farben organization and that became the war industry for Germany. They built them up in a very quick time. All the big boys, GM, Ford, and so on, were involved in it. Rockefeller was involved with Standard Oil. They built up the big German war machine, something they don’t want to talk about today. But they needed that to happen, to bring on a war, to create the United Nations, the even bigger League of Nations, to further this global integration system that was planned an awful long time ago. As I say, free trade, all that stuff comes in to it and they would make massive trading blocs. That’s why Karl Marx could talk about it in the 1800s with absolute certainty that’s the way it would go. Of course eventually you’d be under a world governmental system.
Japan, the Pacific Rim has been worked on as well. I’ve got the books going back, from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, to the 1930s. They talked about the Pacific Rim and how they’d have to work for a long time on the Pacific Region. They also said an upcoming war would be awfully handy to get Japan to attack the US and then bring the US into this coming war, long before it happened by the way, and that’s in their own books, their own writings. They discussed this in Melbourne, Australia when they had a meeting there. They got their wish, of course. They always get their wishes; it’s strange that way. Eventually they’d bring it all under wraps. They used a branch of the CFR, which they called the Pacific Rim, or the APEC leaders, or APEC initiators they called them initially, initiators. It was a branch of the CFR and they put them into all the Far Eastern countries to work up into government, first as diplomats and then from within those particular governments, using native Australians, New Zealanders, and even Japanese and so on. Here is an article to show you they have finished off the Pacific Rim, because they had a big meeting recently and this is what it says about it.
Japan is test case for Pac Rim free trade zone
November 14, 2010 | Associated Press / foxnews.com
Although Asia-Pacific leaders have committed themselves to achieving a Pacific-wide free trade zone following an annual summit, host Japan may prove a key test case for how realistic that vision is.
Acknowledging that Japan's economic power is declining, Prime Minister Naoto Kan declared his country must open up its markets and embrace free trade — or risk getting left further behind other regional rivals. (Alan: That’s what they told every country in Europe too: You’ve got to join or you’ll be left behind. If you’d been left behind, by the way, you’d have been out of the debt; you wouldn’t have all that massive debt you have to all share now, eh.)
"Japan is determined to reopen itself," Kan said at a press conference Sunday that wound up the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, alluding to the historic role that Yokohama, which hosted the summit, played more than 150 years ago as one of the first Japanese ports to open up to the West. (A: You ever see how that happened? the actual story? They sent in American war ships and forced them to open up trade at gunpoint. That’s the way it was done.)
That bold declaration represents a change for Japan, which for decades had been ruled by conservative administrations that were reluctant to engage in trade liberalization and were closely tied with farmers (A: Their own farmers…) who fiercely oppose lowering protective tariffs. Imported rice, for example, is subject to a 778 percent tariff. (A: So that’s why they are pretty healthy over there; they are not getting all of that GM stuff. But that’s out the window now; now they will get Rockefellers golden modified rice no doubt, which also helps to sterilize you, according to the UN.)
Japan and the other 20 members of APEC will face many such tough choices as they strive to execute their shared commitment (A: Shared commitment, there you go…) to free trade and greater regional integration (A: …integration folks, for the hard of thinking.) as outlined in the leaders' communique issued at the end of the weekend meeting.
Their overarching goal: To work toward establishing a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific that would envelope all members, from behemoths China and the U.S. to tiny Brunei and New Zealand. Slashing tariffs and other barriers to imports and investments, the so-called FTAAP would cover half the world's global commerce and two-fifths of its trade. Kan said the rough target date (A: total integration…) was 2020. (A: They will speed it all up actually and it will be done long before that. That’s so that they don’t terrify them with rapid changes. You see, interdependence means you can’t be independent even in feeding yourself. That’s one of the big goals. They claim of course, the big boys at the top, it’s to help stop wars and stuff. If you can feed yourself, you can’t have a war. You see. They have all these reasons for their totalitarian plan, and remember it’s a very, very, very old plan.)
The Asia-Pacific region has led the world's still-weak recovery from the financial crisis, and the region's leaders are convinced that open markets are a sure way to ensure future growth. (A: It’s going to put a lot of farmers out of business. There’s no doubt about it. No doubt about it, over there. It’s done it everywhere else. And a massive bureaucracy telling you who can farm, who can’t farm, and all that kind of stuff. But, well, that’s it.)
You know, Japan, modern Japan was set up as a temporary engine basically, because during World War II they had set up their post-war plans for Japan, after they would demolish it. And they knew they were going to demolish it because what they always do in war time is demolish the countries and the cities where they want to build brand new cities and new factories and all that. They had big, big plans for Japan. So war is partly a demolition job and to get rid of all the old structures. They had the cities, the modern cities all drafted up before they moved in, with the troops, to take it over. Sure enough, the Hopkins Plan it was called too, using the Marshall Plan, pumped the money in for Japan and they set them up to be the electronics manufacturers for the planet, for a while. They were also the guys set up as a proxy, because their government really worked as a banker to lend the money out for business. This was all under the so-called guidance of the US, or I should say the bankers of the US that also ran the US. The Hopkins idea was to work in a sense that it would be buying the debt of the US. You heard for years that Japan held the debt for the US; they would buy the debt. Now it’s China that’s buying the debt so Japan has to go down; it’s time it merged into this big conglomerate. They’ve also to open their doors, by the way, to mass immigration for the first time. So you can’t have a homogenous people anymore in this world system, at least for everybody except one and that’s the way it’s to be. It’s as simple as that.
Free trade, the new world order, and interdependence, meaning you have no independence at all, not even to feed yourself. Remember, they said at the United Nations, when they dole out the food to the world, and to the regions of the world, they will force you to keep down your population and of course what they’ll do, by rationing it out to you by the way, and eventually they will give you lower and lower rations by telling you it’s bad weather, you know, climate change and stuff like that. And you have to find a way to bring down your population even faster; it’s your problem. I’m not kidding you. I’ve got all the articles here. You think it’s a nice lovely cozy world you are going into? Tough cheese… because you have no idea what’s coming down. It’s run with the same bureaucratese language and silly craziness as the Soviet system was run. Because the same boys that gave them the Soviet system is running this; that’s why. That’s why.
Of course everyone is upset in the US about the FDA Food Safety Bill, which is going through the Senate this week; it’s on right now.
FDA FOOD “SAFETY” BILL POISED FOR SENATE VOTE THIS WEEK
By Sarah Foster / November 10, 2010 / NewsWithViews.com
It’s going to really go into all kinds of food that you are allowed to get and so on, but also into, can you even grow garden food for yourself and so on. It would also give government access to your kitchen; because literally it says that any place that prepares food… it doesn’t just mean commercial places. That means ANY place is any place; that’s your own kitchen too. They can come in and inspect and all this kind of stuff. I’ll put these links up on my sites at the end of the show. I just wanted to mention that, how you’ve got to be interdependent and get used to Big Brother in this great world society, this champion of freedoms as they call it. It’s Orwellian with doublethink. It’s just amazing that people can believe in it at all; it truly is. It truly, truly is.
Part of getting a people down into the gutter, for control, is to dehumanize them and destroy their cultures, and all that is good and wholesome in their cultures that kept them together, as a peaceful happy culture where everyone knew the basic rules, you didn’t need massive police forces to take care of things, everyone knew the rules. You always degenerate them and that’s happened in the West. I’ve read the report from the military from the US’s own web site, from their own magazine, that said they’d push the American culture, which IS degenerate they said, across the whole world. Why is that? It’s because people who become degenerate have nothing to stand up for. There’s nothing clean in them anymore to stand up for anything at all, like a clean idea. Germany is in for the big boot now because there are people who still hate Germany and it’s got to be brought down, now that they are rattling a little bit, in anger, on what’s happening over there. They don’t want total integration. They’ve only had a little bit of freedom for a little while when the wall came down and all that stuff, on queue of course. They are getting rather ticked off at being ruled by a little place called Brussels and paying everybody else’s debt. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix and just before I go onto this story about Germany and how they are going to bring them down further with degradation, even further than most countries, because a lot of folk still hate Germany you know. I should go back to the Pacific Rim group because the CFR created the Institute for Pacific Relations. That was one of the groups. It was a front for the CFR to integrate them all, work through a 20, 30 year plan to get them all ready for integration into this big world system. They had a couple of front groups and you can read that in Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, from the records that he took from the Council on Foreign Relations themselves. He was the official historian for them. So they were front groups and they worked for years and years and years to bring this all about, this grouping over there. Of course they also had their group working for the unification of Europe too, and the unification of the Americas – still ongoing in America.
Back to Germany, there are certain people who just don’t like Germany at all. They’ve got an awful thing about it and they want to totally degrade them further in case they get any ideas of being German again. It says here…
German Government Publication Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed
Micheal O'Brien, author on crisis of culture in West, says this "German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction"
By John-Henry Westen / lifesitenews.com / Monday July 30, 2007
BERLIN, July 30, 2007 (A: I read this at the time, but this is ongoing by the way.) - Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government's Ministry for Family Affairs (A: This is from the Ministry of Family Affairs, right. Over in the big Sovietized system, that they call Europe, you have a Ministry for Family Affairs; you have ministries for everything.) encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age. (A: I read this at the time in collusion with the United Nations’ pamphlet, the booklet that they put out on the same thing. They wanted communal masturbation in schools. And that was a fact. That’s a fact. They dished that out across the States too in different places as well.) Two 40-page booklets entitled "Love, Body and Playing Doctor" by the German Federal Health Education Center (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung - BZgA) are aimed at parents - the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6 years of age.
"Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. (A: …it says.) Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex," reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds. The authors rationalize, "The child touches all parts of their father's body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same." (A: I’m not kidding; this is what they are promoting. By the way, this comes from, it doesn’t mention it here, but it’s from the United Nations.)
Canadian author and public speaker Michael O'Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to LifeSiteNews.com about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, "State-encouraged incest, (A: Of course it is.) which in most civilized societies is a crime." The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of (A: …religion, he goes on to say, which gave a moral order.) the Judeo-Christian moral order.
"The imposed social revolution that has swept the western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man's value," said O'Brien. "It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power. If he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the 'will to power' and the 'will to pleasure'." (A: And this goes on and on and on, on what parents should do and should not do and so on. You can read it for yourself. I’ll put it up on the site for you and you can read it for yourself. I know where it’s all coming from too, and the reasons behind it. But you don’t, I’m sure, unless you do your homework… and you should do your homework.)
You understand that the whole training you are going through is for the new system. The children in school have all gone through the body searches sometimes. They’ve definitely gone through the detectors to detect anything that they may have. They’ve had raids on their lockers to check that they didn’t have anything hidden. We’ve seen all the ridiculous stories of having a pair of nail clippers and stuff at school can get you in trouble and all that kind of stuff. They were trained before the year 2001, for the year 2001 and for what was to happen afterwards with all of this scanning technology and so on. This one here talks about…
Technology identifies troubled individuals
By Lou Michel / buffalonews.com / September 26, 2010
Imagine using the same technology to locate a lone bomber before he carries out his terrorist act and to identify a troubled veteran or first responder ground down by tragedies and violence.
Some 120 local first responders from law enforcement and other agencies, the military and mental health professionals gathered Friday to hear firsthand about an advanced computer program that can accomplish those two seemingly different tasks.
The presentation was part of the International First Responder-Military Symposium (A: I mentioned this before.) held at Hilbert College in the Town of Hamburg.
A Swiss professor working with a Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientist who heads the Mind Machine Project (A: The MIND MACHINE project, folks…) there outlined how this program operates through computerized scanning of phone calls and electronic messages sent through e-mail and social networking mechanisms.
“Suppose you know there’s a threat to the president when he is visiting, say, Texas. Through information obtained by the National Security Agency, we have the tools to go through huge quantities of data obtained from that area,” said professor Mathieu Guidere of the University of Geneva.
How? “The computer system detects resentment in conversations (A: I told you about this ages ago they had a resentment meter, a computer, they were actually putting all this data into.) through measurements in decibels and other voice biometrics,” he said. “It detects obsessiveness with the individual going back to the same topic over and over, measuring crescendos.” (A: So if you keep mentioning the same thing over and over you’ve got a fixation on it; maybe like ice cream or something, you know, and it’s a really hot day. Then you get a SWAT team coming in the window to maybe cool you off in a different way. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through that old Matrix there and talking about the brave new world we are coming into, a brave new world planned an awful long time ago. That’s why they have all the details working today. They are not working them out as they go along. They had them all worked before you were born. They knew exactly where they’d be at this time and what part they’d be implementing at this time. They knew when the bank crash was going to happen because they planned it that way, to bring in austerity and the sharing of wealth across the planet; or as Karl Marx said, the redistribution of wealth. You see, they never change their plans, these boys, and they always get what they want. It’s only because they have an ignorant public that acquiesces to their own darn governments, which aren’t their governments at all, and don’t say boo. They are too happy being entertained and being degenerated to bother. When you’re degenerate you don’t care. You’re out partying and looking for… you’re a predator basically, on your own species. Some more on their own species than others of course, it depends what gender you go for. However, that’s how they are today, totally degenerate society and that’s the culture that’s been given to them.
Talking about that emotion detector and so on, they are doing that, they have been doing that for years to find out who’s who, saying what, and so on. Certain words crop up too many times in a conversation and you are labeled immediately as this, that or the other. You know that too. The Echelon was doing that years ago but they have really stepped it up. They were doing far, far more in-depth investigations years ago than they let on about. They know who everybody is. They’ve got personality profiles built up on everyone. They know who you are, how you think, how you tick. They know your habits, who you call, when you call them, what little groups you go and belong to, even what books you read from the library. They know everything about you and you are very predictable because of that… very predictable. It really helps them too, with Facebooks and all the idiots that put all their stuff up there, as though it was an open diary of their lives. They love that kind of stuff, and that’s why they gave it to you of course. Don’t think for a second these little front men that pretend to own them really come out with these ideas themselves and did it all by their little old selves, any more than Bill Gates did. It’s all part of the big security world system, and the Pentagon.
This was all in Brazil, the movie Brazil, a comedy. It’s so great to see someone who can put everything in a comedy and it gets so much across, without the comebacks you would have if it was a straight movie or a straight documentary or something, by all the critics. In a comedy you can get away with an awful lot and Terry Gilliam certainly did a lot of that stuff in the movie Brazil. It showed you a future where you’d have the SWAT teams cutting holes in the roof, just grabbing people and snuffing them – they’d disappear – and your world would be run by bureaucrats and scientists. That’s who would run your whole lives. And they would do their scientific tortures on different people, and then dispose of them. They had a massive Ministry of Information Retrieval, that’s the biggest building of all, massive security and each time you walked in to the building robots would just rush up to you and SNIFF you and check your irises and all the rest of it. I’m not kidding. And here you go…
Hi-tech eye scanners that track passengers
as they walk through airport go on trial in UK
By Daily Mail Reporter / 16th November 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
(A: They always start off in the UK because they are the most docile people ever beaten down. And boy have they been beaten down over such a long time. They are in shell shock actually. I’ve touched on it before but I never read the actual article to you.)
Passengers will have their eyes scanned as soon as they check in as part of a new trial a major UK airport.
High-tech machines that can recognise an individual's iris as they walk around will be installed at Manchester Airport at check in during the government-backed pilot. (A: So it’s a pilot run for all of them, as you well know.)
The technology has the potential to overhaul security and customs, with airport bosses hoping it could help in the fight against terrorism. (A: Just like the movie Brazil. You’ve got to see the movie. There are always bombs going off in the movie Brazil but no one ever sees a terrorist. But it’s awful essential for the system to have this terrorism going on; so of course the government are the terrorists. They’ve done this before.)
That’s one, but there is a link as well that I’m going to put up and it’s to do with a sniffer. You see the sniffer in the robot in Brazil. It comes up to you and it sniffs you all over. Well, they’ve got a sniffer dog, a new mechanical sniffer dog to do that as well, at the airports.
'Electronic sniffer dog' aims to cut down airport security time
By Travelmail Reporter / 12th November 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
They are trying that in Glasgow first for the rest of the country to follow. It will come up and fff-fff-fff and sniff away at you. What it does is apparently use little laser injections into your clothing and stuff searching for different stuff and it detects different chemicals or whatever, maybe even the cleaning stuff that you use on your clothes. I guess the dog will maybe bite your head off if it detects any of this stuff on you. Who knows what it’s going to do. It’s just like Brazil, because Terry Gilliam mixed with the right guys; he knew what was coming down, a long time ago. I think the movie was done in the 80s. You’ve got to see it.
So as I say, good luck to all those that get their irises scanned and help to promote this for the rest of the public that don’t go on air travel, because they will eventually use that across the board for everything. You know darn well it’s all coming down. It’s in all the sci-fi movies that are predictive programming. You’ll see all that stuff, been in there for years, and everybody has got used to the idea of it coming through fiction. That’s always how they promote it.
In the US they have already heard about Britain and its communitarian policy; they call it the Big Society. They already have the big organizations in action now, the nongovernmental organizations working out what they call the DEvaluation of power down to regions, where towns are amalgamated and so on, and you have local commissar boards. Just like the Soviet Union, this is a more perfect Soviet Union and it really is. The Soviet Union meant ‘rule by councils;’ that’s what ‘soviet’ means. That’s what you are having in Britain and across Europe and eventually into America too. And they’ll say, well it’s not coming to America, we’re still American, we’re still paying for the wars and… Yeah you are, but you already have the three people in top positions in the US. They have been working with the last few Presidents to bring in communitarianism IN America. You have to find out who they are. One is Amitai Etzioni; that’s one of them and I looked him up. Then there is Mary Ann Glendon who’s another one. And William Galston is the other one. The three of them are bringing in communitarianism for America, for the near future by the way, in case you didn’t know.
It gives a rundown on who these particular people are. It’s quite interesting to see their communist type background. They have other things in common apart from communism, which is not so surprising. One of the leaders that worked for the Presidents is called Amitai Etzioni; this is his name in the US.
wikipedia.org
Amitai Etzioni
In 1933, Amitai Etzioni was only four years old when the Nazis rose to power in Germany. He was separated from his family but reunited with them by the year 1947. In that time, Etzioni lived a year in Athens, went to Palestine, lived on a cooperative farm and went to boarding school. In 1950, he was enrolled in a special academic institute established by Martin Buber after having dropped out of tenth grade three years earlier to join Palmach (an elite commando unit of the Haganah). In 1951, he attended Hebrew University where he studied classical and contemporary works in Sociology, completing both BA and MA degrees. (A: So he was really an Israeli and he changed his name later on from his original name. It sounds much better, Etzioni… Etzioni, it’s got a thing to it, you see. He worked in all the big universities, the usual ones…)
In 1958 he received his PhD in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley, where he completed his degree in the record time of 18 months. He then became a professor of sociology at Columbia University for twenty years, serving as chair of the department for part of his time there. He joined the Brookings Institution (A: A big powerful think tank.) as a guest scholar in 1978 and then went on to serve as Senior Advisor to the White House from 1979-1980. In 1980 he was named the first University Professor at The George Washington University, where he currently serves as the director of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies. (A: You didn’t know you were getting taught that in the university… Yep, they have been getting taught Communitarian Policy Studies from the 1980s onwards.) He leads the Communitarian Network, a non-profit (A: of course), non-partisan organization which is dedicated to support the moral, social and political foundations of society. (A: Oh, really?) It is based in Washington, D.C. He also held a faculty position at Harvard Business School from 1987 to 1990 serving as the Thomas Henry Carroll Ford Foundation Professor. Etzioni is known for his work on socioeconomics and communitarianism. He was the founder of the communitarian movement in the early 1990s and established the Communitarian Network to disseminate the movement’s ideas. His writings emphasize the importance for all societies of a carefully crafted balance between rights and responsibilities and between autonomy and order. (A: They want ORDER… you see.)
It’s rather interesting as to who these guys actually, actually are. It labels him actually as a German-Israeli-American sociologist so you can take your pick. His real name he was born with was Werner Falk. So that’s one of the big boys who have been bringing it into the US for you, in case you didn’t know, and churning out lots of students, who are working quietly behind the scenes in the US, at present, just as they have been with Common Purpose in Britain for years as well for the European Union and communitarianism.
Then there is Mary Ann Glendon.
wikipedia.org
Mary Ann Glendon
Mary Ann Glendon (born October 7, 1938 Pittsfield, Massachusetts) J.D., LL.M., (A: She learned international law, human rights and all the usual stuff too.) was the United States Ambassador to the Holy See and is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. She teaches and writes on bioethics, comparative constitutional law, property, and human rights in international law. She is a pro-life feminist.
President George W. Bush and Laura Bush stand with 2005 National Humanities Medal recipient Mary Ann Glendon. Glendon graduated from University of Chicago Law School, where she served on law review.
Glendon is the author of Rights Talk; A Nation Under Lawyers, and A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt (A: Eleanor Roosevelt was one of her heroes, you know, the person who loved Pavlov, as she said in her own biography.) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (A: Eleanor Roosevelt is quite a fascinating person, if that’s what we’ll call it. She actually said in her own memoirs that she went to Russia especially to see Pavlov who was her hero. She went to see how his ideas for indoctrinating the youths, how it worked and she was awfully impressed by what she saw, ordinary lines of school children, very quietly going along the road, and staying on the sidewalks and so on. She says, it’s so different from the Americans who’ve got a bit of spirit and are lively and chatty and so on, and laugher, but she preferred the Soviet model for their orderliness, they are so orderly, you see, and that’s what impressed dear old Eleanor Roosevelt. So that was the hero of this woman who is bringing in your communitarianism Soviet system in America, along with some others. These people are given specific areas to work on, you understand, and infiltrate too, and even become the heads of.) In 1994, she was a signer of Evangelicals and Catholics Together, an ecumenical document aimed at rapprochement between Catholics and Evangelicals. Glendon became the first female President of the Roman Catholic Church's Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, when she was appointed by Pope John Paul II on March 9, 2004 (she was already a member of the academy since January 9, 1994). In 1995 she was the Vatican representative to the international 1995 Beijing Conference on Women (A: I don’t know if you’ve ever read about that. That was quite the conference. There were so many lesbians they had big massive lesbian parties in the streets, and it kind of shocked the Chinese.) sponsored by the United Nations, where she contested the anti-condom declarations for the prevention of HIV and AIDS. "The Holy See in no way endorses contraception or the use of condoms, either as a family planning measure or in HIV/AIDS prevention programs."
The National Law Journal named her one of the "Fifty Most Influential Women Lawyers in America" in 1998. Glendon was appointed by President Bush to the President's Council on Bioethics.
Bioethics, remember, is this big scientific body who have decided what the new ethics are for the new life. You know, should we kill folk, euthanize them, how many babies should be terminated every year, you know, keep the population down… all that stuff. What’s ethical… is it ethical to sell baby parts and make a profit off them? which of course they all agree, yes. It’s a big, big business. Stuff like that. We don’t need normalcy or people involved anymore; we’ve got bioethicists who tell us that they are the ones who are in charge of our emotions and our consciences. It’s not bad having a kind of proxy conscience now, eh? You don’t have to worry about anything. That’s another one and then there’s William Galston, quite an interesting guy.
wikipedia.org
William Galston
William Galston is a political theorist. He is the Saul I Stern Professor of Civic Engagement and the director of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at the School of Public Policy of University of Maryland, College Park. In addition, he is a Senior Fellow of Governance (A: GoverNANCE, very important word. I touched on that last night, soft power, how you go around official government policies. See, government has to answer to the public, technically, even though they don’t. Governance bypasses that; they don’t have to be responsible to the public at all. They just make sure that the government eventually signs agreements which they pass into law and govern the public.) at the Brookings Institution. He was also a senior adviser to President of the United States Bill Clinton on domestic policy, and has also been employed by the presidential campaigns of Al Gore and Walter Mondale. Since 1995, Galston has served as a founding member of the Board of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy and as chair of the Campaign's Task Force on Religion and Public Values. He previously taught in the department of Government at the University of Texas-Austin.
(A: He’s written different articles and works such as pluralism…) In political philosophy, Galston has written influential works on political pluralism and on domestic policy issues in liberal society.
(A: Here is the big one though…) Galston was a student of classicist and political philosopher Leo Strauss. (A: Leo Strauss, this is the guy that was a Nazi in Germany and of course a liberal in America. He was a Jewish Nazi… amazing. He’s the guy that came up with the whole New American Century idea, the guy that trained Wolfowitz and McCain and all these guys. He wanted to go across the world forcing democracy on people by invading them. They called it liberation theology in a sense, democracy… liberation democracy… by forcing wars on people and destroying their culture, like Iraq and Iran and so on, and forcing them into the standardized system. Quite a history, this guy, Leo Strauss. Quite a guy. [chuckles.] Quite the guy.)
And people don’t even know that lots of Jews were actually Nazis. At the beginning, in the 30s, an awful lot of Jews were Nazi. It wasn’t until they started to see the sights turning on them that they ran off to the States, but they carried the Nazi philosophy with them, because they liked the idea of special people, superior types and stuff like that. Interesting, eh? He’s your third character who is in charge of communitarianism for Americans. And Americans haven’t a clue that it’s even coming their way. They have already set up places IN the US that are doing and practicing communitarianism and regionalism. I’ve touched on a couple of them before, not so long ago.
What I’m trying to show you is that every big thing that’s happening, every major thing that’s happening, in fact almost everything that’s happening about you is done by this strange soft power of nongovernmental organizations and the foundations which have a semi-official backing, but you don’t vote them in. You don’t vote them in, folks. This is the new scientific way of governance. Scientific governance… that’s not responsible to the public. You don’t get a chance to say, well I don’t want the Brookings Institution to have anything to do with me; I’m not voting them in. Well, you don’t because you’ve never voted them in in the first place. And these characters get APPOINTED to it by the President, to his BOARD of scientific advisors or bioethics advisors and so on. Appointees… that’s the new public/private policy, you see. You’ve got to really get into your homework and find out what’s really going on and what it really, really is all about. I’ll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You’ve got to wail once in a while and I like the guitar wailing on there; it’s very appropriate. I’m just going to finish the night by – if we’ve got time – to add, that one of the big players who set up this present system. He’s dead now but he was one of the big movers. He went to all the big top think tanks, world meetings, worked with the US to bring in the US system as well, and that was Lord Bertrand Russell who, again, worked jointly with MI5 and MI6 and the CIA during World War II and afterwards. He was a big player in pushing this world society, because they used a lot of scientists in it. He wrote a book called The Impact of Science on Society, and this is what he says, we want to bring in this new collectivist society run by professionals, scientists, that’s the whole key to it.
Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society
The good of a multitude is a sum of the goods of the individuals composing it, not a new and separate good. In concrete fact, when it is pretended that the State has a good different from that of the citizens, what is really meant is that the good of the government or of the ruling class is more important than that of other people. Such a view can have no basis except in arbitrary power.
More important than these metaphysical speculations is the question whether a scientific dictatorship, such as we have been considering, (A: And it’s here now folks.) can be stable, or is more likely to be stable than a democracy.
Apart from the danger of war, I see no reason why such a regime should be unstable. After all, most civilized and semi civilized countries known to history have a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. (A: I hope you’re thinking and listening about this, for the hard of thinking I should really repeat that but I hope you heard it. These are the guys that are running this world. They bring in this system. He worked for the big institutions that I have mentioned here.) And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority (A: ...over the majority). When the government controls the distribution of food, (A: What were we talking about recently?) its power is absolute so long as it can count on the police (A: And you’ve got armies of police now.) and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship. (A: That’s what you are getting brought up into NOW. On page 67, that was page 66, he says at the bottom…)
I do not believe that dictatorship is a lasting form of scientific society – unless (but this proviso is important) it can become world-wide. (A: It must be a scientific dictatorship on a worldwide basis, which can only happen if you have a standardized culture across the world, the same system across the entire planet.)
And that guy took part in every major world think tank to help set up the formula that was used prior to World War II, during and after World War II, right up into the 80s and 90s, and it’s still on the go today, those same parts, because it’s a timetable they go by and he worked on the plans for over 100 years to come, along with other big famous players and big famous names. You are living through a script. Your whole life is going through a script. All the big changes and the wars and everything else that you hear are part of the script folks, including 2001, the towers going down and the need to keep you all safe… by taking every right and freedom away. But listen to the experts, as Russell said, because scientific experts will rule your lives, and by God they do. And you don’t elect them. Isn’t that nice? Welcome to the new freedom, that’s what it meant… the NEW freedom.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Japan is Test Case for Pacific Rim Free Trade
German Educational Authorities Promote Incest
Phones, Texts etc. Scanned for anti-Gov Resentment
Electronic Sniffer Tested at Airports
Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:06 amHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December 6, 2010. Newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and help yourself to the hundreds of audios that are up there for download and listening to. I cover a broad range of topics but it’s really on the big system you are living in and how we got to be where we are, the big forces behind it, the agencies behind it, the foundations behind it, all of that kind of stuff is what I touch on and I try to give you shortcuts to understanding the big picture. You truly are living in a managed society. It’s completely managed including what you do, what you think, what your topics of conversation are, the fashions you wear, what they are going to be next year, 10 years from now, and the kind of societies you are going to live in, in 5, 10, 15, 20, all the way up to maybe 50-100 years time. That’s all in the works and you are actually living through the changes without realizing it because you are the most adaptable species on the planet, as Darwin said.
When you are in the web site, remember that you are the listeners who bring me to you. I don’t bring in advertisers to sell their products and that’s how generally hosts make their money – which is fine. But I’ve got more leeway by doing it this way. So it’s up to you the audience to support me. If you want to buy the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale then go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and choose what you want. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember too, donations are very welcome indeed. It doesn’t matter how small it is either. I’d be living very well right now if everybody sent 50 cents or a dollar per week, or per month, believe you me, because there are thousands and thousands who listen, but we live in an age where everyone thinks they are living in an everything-is-free world. They have been taught to think that everything is free, as they get led into the bigger cage of course. Nothing in the world out there is free, nothing. Nothing at all is free.
Every program that you download on your computer has a catch to it whether you know it or not and it’s all to do with monitoring YOU and basically putting you in your little ‘cluster’ – because we all belong to clusters apparently – with your habits and your social traits and the topics that you like, the forums that you join, even the clubs you might actually physically go to. They keep track of all of this kind of stuff, and the chit-chat between you and all of your ‘friends’, as they say, so that they can put a personality profile out on you and have an ideal exact duplicate, of you, working in big institutions like the Pentagon. I’ve read their official sites, when I went into that particular article, where they say there’s an IDENTICAL you, for everybody, in North America, in a virtual reality. All your updated data, daily, is taken, with all your exchanges and added to it so that you can be predictable. They run tests on virtual you’s to see what you would do in different situations. Talking about managing society, it’s a doddle, as they say… it’s easy. It’s very easy to manage society with the technology that’s out there today. It’s always been pretty easy, mind you, in all ages really. We’ve been managed very, very well. We’re taught all we need to know. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ve been managed down through the ages very, very well because the public are taught all they are supposed to know. And I mean supposed to know – not just what they need to know but what they are supposed to know. There are terrific minds down through the ages too who helped Kings and Queens and then governments, as advisors, on how to do it. These are arts that are very ancient. There ARE archives – I touched on that last week. There are admitted archives that Bertrand Russell talked about. He said that very few would get access to these particular archives and that even at universities too, each branch of the university, each area, each specialized area, would be run with elderly men who would keep it that way for the students coming up. The students would simply do what they were told and do experiments, which were already done so many times before. That’s what REsearch is. You’re searching what’s already been done before. Of course these elderly men would make sure that you’d go out into the world never knowing that there were sciences and experiments way beyond what you’d been trying. That keeps everything in a kind of status quo. The elite themselves must keep the high technology and the high sciences to themselves otherwise they would lose power, lose control over the general public.
Russell said this as well, in The Impact of Science on Society:
“The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy. Printing is not possible without paper, and all paper belongs to the State. Broadcasting and the cinema are equally public monopolies. The only remaining possibility of unauthorized propaganda is by secret whispers from one individual to another. (A: He was also talking about what was already up and running when he wrote his book back in the ’30s. You had the soviet system of course, doing everything that’s coming in here, in the world now. It was already being tested out in the Soviet Union. You had the rise of Nazi Germany too and all of the techniques were being used by both of these totalitarian powers because they were both socialist in structure, and socialism will always go this way.) But this, in turn, is rendered appallingly dangerous by improvements in the art of spying. Children at school are taught that it is their duty to denounce their parents if they allow themselves subversive utterances in the bosom of the family. No one can be sure that a man who seems to be his dearest friend will not denounce him to the police; the man may himself have been in some trouble, and may know that if he is not efficient as a spy his wife and children will suffer. All this is not imaginary, it is daily and hourly reality. Nor, given oligarchy, is there the slightest reason to expect anything else.”
That’s what we are living in today. I’ve gone through the Reece Commission in the past. I’ve gone through Norman Dodd’s report. He talked about it too; there is a video up on YouTube I believe, with him talking about the Commission. It was commissioned by the Congress to go and investigate the non-profit organizations, the big foundations as they call them, to find out why they seemed to be promoting and funding, with incredible amounts of money, the big so-called far left associations and movements. Why would multi-millionaires… why would the biggest capitalists on the planet be funding what seemed to be the far left movement that they thought of course, in Congress and so on, was its opposite. They got close to the truth because some of the CEOs of the big foundations, like the Ford Foundation, admitted that they took their orders directly from the White House, because the White House even then was run by the Council on Foreign Relations, according to Carroll Quigley. They also said their job was to change the culture so drastically in America and in Europe that it would blend seamlessly with that of the Soviet Union. Eventually they’d come together in a third way. This is what we have now; we’ve got the blending of the two into this third way.
They had to have a war to kick if off, so they got the War on Terror to kick it off and really go forward with it, because you can get more done under a war scenario, with taking rights away from the public, since they’ve tested all this before, even in World War II, in Britain and elsewhere. You can take all their rights from them. You can get them on rationing if need be. And the public will tend to obey and do what they’re told, and there’s less grumbling amongst them. They needed a warfare scenario. Bingo, they got what they wanted because they make things happen. The whole world is now under a form of totalitarianism. The trick now is to keep the public in perpetual warfare scenarios where it’s one thing after another. It’s financial crashes, it’s terrorist threats, it’s one thing after another. Of course, ALL correspondence is monitored, exactly as Russell talked about. Even when you whisper to someone, you wonder if there is a third ear somewhere, because they have so much gizmos and gadgetry out there you never know.
I read an article recently where the Pentagon had put in a massive order for all of these little drones, spy drones, some of them apparently they are working on look like birds… literally look like birds. They can sit on your telegraph wire and listen in, and follow you, even up corridors and so on. That’s the world they are bringing in. Everyone out there will think, they won’t bother me, I’m not important. Well, you understand, everyone is a variable in this big system. EVERY single person out there is a variable. That’s why they want you to be putting all your data up on the net, every day, and texting and all the rest of it, so they can monitor you in REAL time and upgrade the virtual you that they have in the big super Cray computers, where they can put their tests out and see, what will little Johnny do in this position or that position? What will he do? And they are generally right, as I say. All kinds of stress tests and so on that your virtual you is put under, they are pretty well on the ball. That’s the kind of world they are bringing in.
Someone asked last week about it too, about the cameras on buses and so on. What I’m saying is, that with the cameras, etc, everywhere, that’s all part of training you too, training you that this is going to be forever. The surveillance society is to be FOREVER. The war of terror, or the war on terror – I call it war OF terror because they always have a war OF terror when they have the next part of their revolutions. It has to train you for as long as it takes, and it will be forever I think, ongoing, that YOU are always under some surveillance. You will behave differently when you are under surveillance. You cannot be spontaneous. What they do too, as you are travelling in buses or trains or whatever, and you are chatting on your phone, that’s all done in real time; they know exactly where you are. They will know why you are going there, by the way. They will know who you are going to see. They will pretty well predict what you are going to talk about and so on. Everyone is a variable. Maybe a little knock on the head and it will fall and it might wake you up a bit, and you’ll start behaving erratically, and then they must use the knowledge they have ON you to try and get you back under control. That’s how terrified they are of someone that might get an idea.
All technology of course, with private enterprise, with the big international corporations, are on board with this big agenda. Every single one of them. I’ve gone through the list before where IBM calls its big meetings and any corporation that’s any kind of big corporation is right there with them, on board with them. I’ve given out their links and their sites and so on, to show you who all these corporations are and what they do. These are corporations that really run every aspect of your life, right down to your food supply, everything. That’s what it’s about. You understand, if you want to conquer people you must make them helpless, technically, without them knowing it. Most folk think they can always go to that grocery store and pick as much of that stuff that they eat whenever they want it. They think that will always be like that. Even though the big boys themselves have said they are now in the process of doing what Karl Marx said they’d do, which is the redistribution of wealth; that’s taking your money, robbing you, to put to international corporations that will base themselves in third world countries. You’ve got to be very predictable on how you will manage that or accept that. Most folk, again, as in all ages, we accept whatever the master does.
Russell said too, this dictatorship that would come in, he said he would go along with it if it was a scientific dictatorship. He said it will be horrible, it will be ruthless, on the general public, but it must be so. He was all for it. He helped plan a lot of what you are going through today. He and many others like him, in big think tanks that worked with people from all kinds of departments of society, to bring in what they call ‘the big society,’ ‘the world society’ run with scientific supervision and really a conveyor belt system from birth to the grave. That’s what he was talking about and that’s what we are going through today.
Here’s IBM today in fact. It says…
Transportation
www-03.ibm.com
(A: Transportation for your cars, and their smart cars are coming out. It says…)
Next time you're stuck in traffic, think about this: as smart as our cars have become, our roadways are about to get a whole lot smarter. (A: I remember talking about this years ago, when I saw posts getting put in along some of the highways, every 100-200 yards with the little devices on them. I thought, well that’s for tracking obviously. Then I found out of course, not only had the cars been getting these little tracking boxes in them, they also had embedded chips in the tires themselves. The manufacturers did it; they’ve done that for quite a few years.)
Building new roads and new lanes often just isn't possible any longer, but building intelligence into the roads and the cars-with roadside sensors, radio frequency tags, and global positioning systems-certainly is.
In Stockholm, a new smart toll system has reduced traffic congestion and carbon emissions (A: They all get on the bandwagon because they’re all working together for the same goal.) by impressive percentages. (A: That means they’ve taken a lot of cars off the road, or dissuaded the people from driving. That’s what that means. Not because it’s great technology. Technology has many different purposes and part of it can be to oppress you until you just get off the road.)
They go into all the different things they can do. They are working with the ‘internet of things’ on this site. I’ll leave this for you. There are a lot of videos they have up there from the IBM site itself and you can see what they’re up to, at least what they want to tell you they’re up to right now. Whenever they tell you they’re up to something and they show you videos on it, they’ve already got it. What’s to come, they won’t tell you at the time. What’s coming next year, they won’t tell you at the time, at least most of it; maybe 1% they’ll tell you. It’s got a whole bunch of things and they’re working in different countries, worldwide; this is a worldwide project. Of course everything will be linked to central computers for the planet. That’s what this is all about.
Part of it too, is the reengineering of society. I read an article last week, again, from Bertrand Russell and I gave the quote where he talked about needles, injections, and injunctions would… That’s the music coming in so I’ll be back with the rest of this after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I mentioned a quote just before I went off the air there, from Bertrand Russell, where he that diet, injections and injunctions – he meant also obviously coupled with psychological indoctrination – would produce the perfect citizen that the oligarchies, or the ruling class wanted. I think personally this has been done. Lots of them were involved, to do with injections, inoculations to find ways of targeting specific parts of the brain that (what they called) ‘stopped world peace’ from coming in. This part of the brain that made you you, that made you upset at times when something went wrong or someone was oppressing you – they wanted to eradicate that part of the brain and I think they’ve done it with a lot of people to be honest with you, which means of course that the Military-Industrial Complex – of course it did – it had the big pharma on board from the beginning, the very beginning. You’ll find the same people who own the big shares in big pharma are the same ones who own the big shares in everything else across the planet. There are not that many of them. The BIG shares I’m talking about, including your food supply. Regardless of the company they talk about investing in, there are only 5 big agri-food businesses out there.
Here’s an article here. It sounds very official, like all these things do. It’s from the Toronto Sun.
Register kids' vaccinations: health experts
By LAURA PAYTON, Parliamentary Bureau / tornontosun.com / December 6, 2010
OTTAWA – Canada needs a national vaccination registry so no child misses out on being immunized, a public health group says.
The Canadian Public Health Association says a registry would help the government track how many people across the country (A: Now, that’s not children. First they say it’s children, at the top, and now it says “track how many people across the country”…) have been vaccinated, as well as whether children who move between provinces are up to date on their shots.
In a report to be released Monday, the association says Canada needs a national strategy, the core of which would be the registry and a co-ordinated vaccine schedule.
Experts who contributed to the report fear kids miss out on immunization if they move between provinces because some are on different schedules. Not all provinces pay for the same vaccines either, leaving out poor families in some areas.
See, it’s vital, like getting televisions. It was vital at one time that all citizens of Britain got a television set. The government made a project to make sure that it became affordable for used and reconditioned sets and easy payment plans. China has the same policy in right now and so has up-and-coming India. Believe you me, it’s something more than just making sure you don’t have the occasional cough once in while. And who are they, these characters? Well, again, it’s the…
Canadian Public Health Association
cpha.ca
The Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA) is a national, independent, not-for-profit, voluntary (A: That’s charitable…) association representing public health in Canada.
So, did you know that Canadians all have the CPHA, as they call themselves, this voluntary association, who represent you and your health? They are actually, of course, they have their social motives and social plan to go along with it of course. They also work worldwide with the same things in every other country, the same non-profit association worldwide to make sure we all get out dumbing-down shots, the ones that give you chronic fatigue syndrome and all of that kind of stuff, which they know darn well about too. This is the world you are living in. Do you understand what Russell was talking about was a multi-pronged attack on YOU, your physical health? When you’re not feeling too energetic you’re no problem to any totalitarian government. You don’t have any energy, your mind is sluggish and you will go along with anything to get along and survive. Quite simple.
Then we find the big guys too, the multi-billionaires, who all suddenly hit the magic number of dollars and want to drastically reduce the population of the planet. No matter what they got their money in, suddenly they are philanthropists that want to kill you. Amazing isn’t it? From the Globe and Mail we see Ted Turner, another member of ‘the lucky gene club’ with Bill Gates and all those guys who want to do the same thing, bring down the population of the planet, so that it’s left for the better types, the ones that natural selection would say should go on into the next world order, without all of you, the defective types. It says…
Ted Turner urges global one-child policy to save planet
SHAWN McCARTHY / theglobeandmail.com / Dec. 5, 2010
Climate change and population control can make for a politically explosive mix, as media mogul Ted Turner demonstrated Sunday when he urged world leaders to institute a global one-child policy to save the Earth’s environment.
Mr. Turner spoke at a luncheon where economist Brian O’Neill from the U.S.’s National Center for Atmospheric Research unveiled his study on the impact of demographic trends on future greenhouse gas emission, a little-discussed subject given its political sensitivity.
Mr. O’Neill’s study concluded that a rapidly rising global population is contributing to an acceleration of emission growth, and that widespread availability of family planning could reduce the amount of emissions reductions required in 2050 by as much as 30 per cent.
See, that’s what family planning is all about. It’s abortion and sterilization, for those who still give money to charities that go out for women’s issues in the third world countries. These guys are telling you what it’s really for, if you understand what they are saying. By the way, I’ll put up a link to a video and you will hear one of these so-called specialists at the NOAA Project, The National Oceanographic and whatever else it is, the guys that do the weather for you. A professor, by the way; you’ll hear him giving a speech in front of all his supporters, for the eco groups, the greenies, and saying the same thing: We need vast depopulation. [‘Scientist: Reducing population is the "master variable"’ youtube.com] I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, when you read this stuff you get so fed up seeing the same repetitive agenda, because these guys do keep repeating, from a thousand sources, to make sure we all get the same message at the same time: We’ve got to reduce the population drastically. That’s what, really, this whole greening idea and saving the planet from emissions and CO2 is all about. Remember, the Eugenics Society, when it got a bad name after it was found out what was happening in Germany in World War II, they changed their names many-many times; they still have it on the go by the way, under different names based in Britain. They also went into the greening movement as a way to get their agenda through. Bring down the population… first bring up the green idea, to the maximum, get lots of supporters, and then hit them with their real mission which was to depopulate the planet from all of the useless eaters, as they like to call them, those people who are no longer required for a modern high-tech society. We’re non-industrial now; China makes all the industry, it’s the manufacturer for the world in fact.
That article I’ll put up with all the other links where they talk about bringing down the population, how we should copy China. I’ve told you years ago that the United Nations stated that China was the model state for the world to emulate or copy. That’s what you’ve got. It’s out in the open now. They are openly talking about basically getting rid of the elderly in hospitals by euthanasia; they are having programs on it in Britain, and I’ve given the links for some of them, where professors, again, come on with the pros and cons. But the whole idea is to get the idea into your head, to prepare you for it so you’ll accept it without any qualms, as long as it’s happening to someone else. That’s why.
We’ve seen the hoopla and all the lies. I’ve given all the statements by top members of the IPCC and government officials too, to do with the global warming scam. Miss McClellan from Canada, who was in a few years ago in the federal government said, it doesn’t matter if all the data on global warming is wrong, this can be used she says, we can use this for global equality. So you understand, there is always a political reason, a social reason behind something which they are not telling you. Everything is a front for something else is what I’m saying. Of course part of the ‘scary scenarios’ I read too, from the guy who said we always give them scary scenarios each time the big meetings come up, like the one at Cancun. They tell you scary scenarios to terrify the life out of you so that you’ll say, do something, do something. They want to get everybody to sign on board, to give up all our rights to anything at all and allow ourselves to be supervised and post-consumer and all the rest of it, down to austerity, which the banks help with too because they’re all in it together. And to get you to living like peasants used to live, as we die off, only they won’t leave you on the land, they want you crowded into the cities and dying off there.
Here’s what they’re telling us now, after all the ridiculous stuff they’ve come out with in the past, they throw a bone your way as they go on with the meeting. This is a bone. This is to put you off guard, to think, well I guess they’re going to back off now. It says…
Alarmist Doomsday warning of rising seas 'was wrong',
says Met Office study
By Daily Mail Reporter / dailymail.co.uk / 6th December 2010
Alarming predictions that global warming could cause sea levels to rise 6ft in the next century are wrong, it has emerged. (A: I’m glad something is emerging out of the sea.)
The forecast made by the influential 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (A: That’s the one headed by Pachauri who was a railroad engineer.) which would have seen cities around the world submerged by water, now looks ‘unlikely’. (A: …they say. Well, yeah, it’s very unlikely.)
A Met Office study also rules out the shutdown of the Atlantic Ocean’s conveyor belt, which would trigger Arctic winters in Britain like those seen in the film The Day After Tomorrow.
However, the report says the IPCC was right to warn of a sea level rise of up to 2ft by 2100, and that a 3ft rise could happen. (A: Well anything could happen. Isn’t it wonderful, any child can write anything on what could happen about anything… and you can’t disprove it if it hasn’t happened, you see.)
The IPCC underestimated the danger posed by the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and the release of methane from warmer wetlands, the report adds. (A: As they throw their bone to you, they hit you with all this other nonsense.)
They are going much, much further than that actually. They want to eventually take all your food under their wing, by bioengineering it and they’ll have the patents on it of course. They also want to do this with surgery. No kidding. This is like something out of a comic book.
Surgical anesthetic gases coming under fire for global warming potential – Only one problem: they haven’t been observed in the atmosphere
(A: … at all. It doesn’t matter though.)
December 5, 2010 by Anthony Watts / wattsupwiththat.com
The press release below is from the University of Copenhagen Department of Chemistry. The anesthetic gases isofluran, desflurane and sevoflurane are coming under scrutiny for global warming potential. (A: Potential, right.) However, what isn’t stated in the press release is this important paragraph of the scientific paper :
(A: Here is the important part.) There are no production numbers available in the literature for the anaesthetic agents. The three compounds have not yet been observed in the free atmosphere, and current atmospheric levels are expected to be small (of the order of part per trillion/volume). At these concentrations, when viewed in isolation, their present contribution to the relative forcing of climate change is negligible in comparison with the current forcing of 1.7 Watts/sq meter due to CO2.
Later though, even though they admit they have no numbers on the production quantity of these anaesthetic agents, and “the three compounds have not yet been observed in the free atmosphere”, they use some SWAG to make this claim:
Hence, we conclude that global emissions of inhalation anaesthetics, when measured by the 100 yr GWP, have a contribution to the radiative forcing of climate change which is comparable with that of the CO2 emissions (A: So here they have done no tests at all, but then they tell you that it’s actually comparable with that of the CO2 emissions…) from one coal-fired power plant or approximately 1 million passenger cars.
(A: That’s the stuff they call science. Do you understand, there are thousands of these lying bums living on incredibly large grants that will be on the street looking for jobs if all this falls through. These are the incredible lies that they are coming out with, but it ties in… it ties in with you getting used to the idea that your medical systems are going to be very minimalistic in the coming future. Countries like Britain are already finding that out as they slash and burn and slash and burn down to the bone. Remember what the United Nations said a long time ago, that every country under its charter will have the right, everybody will have the right to the MINIMUM, the bare minimum of health care. And it will be minimum indeed. I guess they’ll be back to putting a piece of rubber in your mouth or telling you to bite on a stick when they have to go in with the knife… because that’s where it seems to be going. Incredible isn’t it? So here they are, they haven’t tested this stuff at all and then later on they put a claim in that it’s comparable with that of CO2 emissions from one coal fired power plant or approximately 1 million passenger cars. It says…)
Gosh, more than a whole coal-fired power plant! Somebody tell China immediately so they can stop building two a week. (A: Under their treaties and the World Trade Organization they don’t have to bother about pollution at all; neither will India, Brazil and elsewhere, that the money is being sunk in to by those who own all the money of the world. So there you go.)
Again too, they used to say when I was small, you are what you eat. To an extent it’s awfully true. We’ve been eating GMO vegetables for God knows how long. It was 10 years in secrecy apparently before the public were told in Canada they were the guinea pigs. So how long was it really? We’ll have no idea because they won’t tell us. The same thing is happening with meat too, with all the different growth hormones and stuff in it. They’ve gone on to cloned cattle meat and milk. This is what they say here…
Cloned Cattle Meat And Milk 'Is Safe To Eat'
November 26, 2010 / news.sky.com / Pete Norman, Sky News Online
(A: It’s safe to eat… There you go. That’s good enough for me, is that good enough for you?)
Meat and milk from cloned cattle and their offspring is no different to conventional produce and is safe to consume, Government advisers have said. (A: It’s amazing now, you know, we just get experts telling us everything, exactly what Russell said, that they would train the public they must listen to experts and only do what the experts advise. That’s happened. We already have two or three generations grown up like that now.)
The recommendation could lead to food from cloned livestock being sold in shops. (A: Well I found out a few weeks back there, they’d already done it, and no one had asked for a license to do it, they just got it into the food chain.)
The Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP) said there was no evidence of any differences between produce from cloned animals and that from conventionally-bred cattle.
It was ordered to carry out the review after it emerged in August that milk and meat from the offspring of cloned cows had reached stores in the UK without a licence.
Responding to the findings, Andrew Wadge, (A: I wonder if that’s a cloned wedge…) chief scientist at the Food Standards Agency (FSA), said: "In considering this hypothetical application, the ACNFP has confirmed that meat and milk from cloned cattle and their offspring shows no substantial difference to conventionally produced (A: What do you mean no substantial difference? What differences are there? Are they going to tell us?) meat and milk and therefore is unlikely to present a food safety risk." (A: That’s the same statement they gave about Monsanto’s food as modified crops. It’s the same statement they gave, which meant that they don’t have to test it.)
The committee said more evidence was needed to show how rearing animals in different environments may affect the meat and milk. (A: That’s on your shelves now too. You don’t know what you’re eating anymore, except it’s not good for you whatever it is, even the vegetarians, believe you me.)
Getting back to the art, really, the art of managing whole herds of people, because that’s what they call us at the top. We are herds you see. In fact, in medicine they actually call it that now, herd management, when they come down to inoculations and so on, and herd inoculation. It’s actually in the medical books. I’ve read the articles from the papers when we had the SARS outbreak in Canada, or the phony SARS one, and they actually called it ‘herd management.’
David Cameron spent £66,000 on TV coaching by Obama's body language expert during election campaign
By Jason Groves and Tamara Cohen / dailymail.co.uk / 3rd December 2010
(A: Now, people have professionals, again, people who are hypnotists. One guy put a site up that was very good. He went through all the different gestures that Obama was making and he was quite correct in recognizing that lots of it was the same stuff that stage hypnotists use, on the audience. Cameron has been trained apparently by Obama’s, the same guy who taught Obama. And it cost £66,000.)
David Cameron spent more than £66,000 flying in Barack Obama’s body language expert to help prepare for the televised election debates, it emerged yesterday.
Figures published by the Electoral Commission reveal that the Tories (A: That’s the conservatives.) spent twice as much as Labour during the election. (A: Well, so what?)
The Conservatives’ campaign cost £16.7million, while Labour spent £8million. (A: That’s probably all nonsense anyway. I think they get a lot more than that from special interest groups.) The Liberal Democrats spent £4.8million
David Cameron was prepared for his TV debates by President Obama's body language expert who flew over four times to advise the Tory leader
Detailed receipts show the Tories spent £66,333 hiring the Washington firm SKDKnickerbocker to prepare Mr Cameron for the debates, in which he was widely considered to have been bested by Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg.
Consultant Anita Dunn, who advised President Obama on body language, was part of the team flown to London four times to prepare Mr Cameron.
I can remember when Thatcher was in and Ronald Regan sent his team over to remake her. She used to talk with a high-pitched voice and she was coached to talk much lower, and talk like that [Alan speaking slowly.]. They did her hair for her. They showed her how to stand, how to posture, all this kind of stuff. It’s used every time you see these guys. They are using a form of hypnotism on you. Of course really good salesmen are taught the same techniques. They’ll stand like you in fact, and it puts you at ease. You don’t realize why you’re at ease. It’s because they’re actually mirroring you and your gestures. You feel at home with those gestures and that person will then con you into buying something. So every trick in the book is used. After all, you see, politics is just a show for the public that YOU must believe in, but they certainly don’t run the world or the system or the country. They certainly don’t do that. Carroll Quigley said that every member, at the top, in all parliaments and Congress in the US, had always been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. And before it was called the Council on Foreign Relations; it was actually born in the 1880s. Every President and Prime Minister is all a member of the same organization that answered to a higher authority, NOT the public. I hope you understand that.
There’s an article here too, it’s worth mentioning and putting up on the site cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show.
Cancun climate conference: the warmists' last Mexican wave
The global warming scare was fun while it lasted, but the joke's over, says Christopher Booker.
telegraph.co.uk / By Christopher Booker 04 Dec 2010
If, last week, frozen behind a snowdrift, you heard a faint hysterical squeaking, it might well have been the sound of those 20,000 delegates holed up behind a wall of armed security guards in the sun-drenched Mexican holiday resort of Cancun, telling each other that the world is more threatened by runaway global warming than ever. Between their tequilas and lavish meals paid for by the world’s taxpayers, they heard how, by 2060, global temperatures will have risen by 4 degrees Celsius; how the Maldives and Tuvalu are sinking below the waves faster than ever; how the survival of salmon is threatened by CO2-induced acidification of the oceans; how the UN must ban incandescent light bulbs throughout the world. (A: [Alan chuckles.] We’re going back into the dark ages with them folks.)
“Scientists”, we were told, are calling for everyone to be issued with a “carbon ration card”, to halt all Western economic growth for 20 years.
Meanwhile, Dr Rajendra Pachauri (A: That’s the railroad engineer.) was telling us that we must spend hundreds of billions on covering the world’s oceans with iron filings, on building giant mirrors out in space and on painting all the world’s roofs white to keep out the heat from the sun. (A: I think he should go back to his train driving, this guy. I wonder if he ever was on time, this guy, or even arrived at the right destination?)
The most obvious thing about all this ritualised scaremongering was how stale it all was. Not one of these points hasn’t been a cliché for years. The only scientist who believes we should all be issued with carbon ration cards is a Prof Kevin Anderson, who has been saying it since 2004. It is only those same old computer models that predict that Tuvalu and the Maldives are about to drown, when real measurements show the sea around them not to be rising at all. Far from the oceans acidifying, their pH currently ranges between 7.9 and 8.3, putting them very firmly on the alkaline side of the threshold, at 7.0.
The prediction that global temperatures will rise by four degrees in 50 years comes from that same UK Met Office computer which five weeks ago was telling us we were about to enjoy a “milder than average” winter, after three years when it has consistently got every one of its winter and summer forecasts hopelessly wrong. (A: I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ll put these link up on my sites in about an hour’s time, maybe two hours before it will be up there for you to see and you can look them up for yourselves, and put the pieces together, of this big, wonderful totalitarian system you are being guided along into, mainly through lies and deception but that’s good enough when they’re all on board at the top. You’ll tend to doubt yourself and your own reason, that’s how it works so easily. Orwell put that out so well, with the bureaucratic class. He showed you how it worked, in 1984, for those who can still remember how to read.
There is a caller there, Kallel from North Carolina on the line. Are you there Kallel?
Kallel: Yes. I was reading The Third Wave by Alvin Toffler. He puts this new totalitarian system… he makes this analogous to the difference between the agricultural revolution versus the industrial revolution. These things are so different from each other. As I was reading this I was wondering is it even worth avoiding this third wave? If I could just get your comments on what the third wave is and you know, is it… I believe that it is worth avoiding but is it possible?
Alan: What it is, remember too, and who Toffler is. Toffler is one of the… he’s more far left than Marx. But he believes in superior expert run government worldwide, a global system. Newt Gingrich gave a copy of that book to every Congressman on the congressional steps a few years ago. The third wave actually has one meaning that he gives out himself to do with ripples in a pond type of idea, but it’s also a play on ‘the third way’ that Plato talked about. It’s a play as well on the Hegelian dialectic, that the third way comes out of the conflicts of the two opposing sides. They love their little plays amongst themselves and that’s really what it is. It’s exactly what the Reece Commission talked about. It’s what Lenin talked about where he said the dictatorship of the proletariat would last maybe a generation or so and eventually it would fade into something different, not quite capitalist, not quite communist. He was talking about a world socialist society and that’s exactly what they are bringing in. The socialist part of it and the bureaucratic part is to rear up a scientifically organized and run society, that would serve them well, changing over a vast period of time, maybe 50 years or 100 years, to get the perfect small society to serve them, but run by a scientific elite. That is what they claim is the height of rationale, how things should be rationally run. Not by emotions and not by people – individuals with their emotions running rather than reason – that’s how they talk about the masses. That really is what Toffler is all about. It’s the blending of the two systems, a sort of communistic bureaucratic system running the masses, but above that, really, a fascist elite. That’s what they always aimed at a long, long time ago. It’s all one movement, you understand, with no real opposing sides on it. They need the opposition to play the dialectic, to get out the synthesis as they merge together, and compromise. The compromise brings out a new thesis that starts it all over again. That’s what the whole of Marxist doctrine of progression was based upon. That’s what they claim they are putting us through; a forced evolution is what they claim they are bringing us through, to how the world would naturally end up. Rather than wait for it happening they make it happen instead.
I think that’s the music, so that’s the end of the show. My audio isn’t so good tonight and the telephones are pretty bad too. From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Internet Connectivity of Things IBM
Non-Profit Charitable Association Calls for Vaccination Registry
Turner Advocates World Follow China's Family Planning Rules
NOAA Scientist Calls for Population Reduction--and is Cheered
Met Office--Rising Seas ? We Won't Drown after All
Priests of Global Warming God go for Anesthetic Gases--Back to Biting the Stick(for commoners)
Cloned Meat Passed "Fit to Eat"
British PM Coached on Body Language by Obama's Trainer--for 66,000 Pounds
Cancun--Warmists' Last Mexican Wave--as Parts of World Freeze
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December 6, 2010. Newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and help yourself to the hundreds of audios that are up there for download and listening to. I cover a broad range of topics but it’s really on the big system you are living in and how we got to be where we are, the big forces behind it, the agencies behind it, the foundations behind it, all of that kind of stuff is what I touch on and I try to give you shortcuts to understanding the big picture. You truly are living in a managed society. It’s completely managed including what you do, what you think, what your topics of conversation are, the fashions you wear, what they are going to be next year, 10 years from now, and the kind of societies you are going to live in, in 5, 10, 15, 20, all the way up to maybe 50-100 years time. That’s all in the works and you are actually living through the changes without realizing it because you are the most adaptable species on the planet, as Darwin said.
When you are in the web site, remember that you are the listeners who bring me to you. I don’t bring in advertisers to sell their products and that’s how generally hosts make their money – which is fine. But I’ve got more leeway by doing it this way. So it’s up to you the audience to support me. If you want to buy the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale then go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and choose what you want. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember too, donations are very welcome indeed. It doesn’t matter how small it is either. I’d be living very well right now if everybody sent 50 cents or a dollar per week, or per month, believe you me, because there are thousands and thousands who listen, but we live in an age where everyone thinks they are living in an everything-is-free world. They have been taught to think that everything is free, as they get led into the bigger cage of course. Nothing in the world out there is free, nothing. Nothing at all is free.
Every program that you download on your computer has a catch to it whether you know it or not and it’s all to do with monitoring YOU and basically putting you in your little ‘cluster’ – because we all belong to clusters apparently – with your habits and your social traits and the topics that you like, the forums that you join, even the clubs you might actually physically go to. They keep track of all of this kind of stuff, and the chit-chat between you and all of your ‘friends’, as they say, so that they can put a personality profile out on you and have an ideal exact duplicate, of you, working in big institutions like the Pentagon. I’ve read their official sites, when I went into that particular article, where they say there’s an IDENTICAL you, for everybody, in North America, in a virtual reality. All your updated data, daily, is taken, with all your exchanges and added to it so that you can be predictable. They run tests on virtual you’s to see what you would do in different situations. Talking about managing society, it’s a doddle, as they say… it’s easy. It’s very easy to manage society with the technology that’s out there today. It’s always been pretty easy, mind you, in all ages really. We’ve been managed very, very well. We’re taught all we need to know. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ve been managed down through the ages very, very well because the public are taught all they are supposed to know. And I mean supposed to know – not just what they need to know but what they are supposed to know. There are terrific minds down through the ages too who helped Kings and Queens and then governments, as advisors, on how to do it. These are arts that are very ancient. There ARE archives – I touched on that last week. There are admitted archives that Bertrand Russell talked about. He said that very few would get access to these particular archives and that even at universities too, each branch of the university, each area, each specialized area, would be run with elderly men who would keep it that way for the students coming up. The students would simply do what they were told and do experiments, which were already done so many times before. That’s what REsearch is. You’re searching what’s already been done before. Of course these elderly men would make sure that you’d go out into the world never knowing that there were sciences and experiments way beyond what you’d been trying. That keeps everything in a kind of status quo. The elite themselves must keep the high technology and the high sciences to themselves otherwise they would lose power, lose control over the general public.
Russell said this as well, in The Impact of Science on Society:
“The completeness of the resulting control over opinion depends in various ways upon scientific technique. Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy. Printing is not possible without paper, and all paper belongs to the State. Broadcasting and the cinema are equally public monopolies. The only remaining possibility of unauthorized propaganda is by secret whispers from one individual to another. (A: He was also talking about what was already up and running when he wrote his book back in the ’30s. You had the soviet system of course, doing everything that’s coming in here, in the world now. It was already being tested out in the Soviet Union. You had the rise of Nazi Germany too and all of the techniques were being used by both of these totalitarian powers because they were both socialist in structure, and socialism will always go this way.) But this, in turn, is rendered appallingly dangerous by improvements in the art of spying. Children at school are taught that it is their duty to denounce their parents if they allow themselves subversive utterances in the bosom of the family. No one can be sure that a man who seems to be his dearest friend will not denounce him to the police; the man may himself have been in some trouble, and may know that if he is not efficient as a spy his wife and children will suffer. All this is not imaginary, it is daily and hourly reality. Nor, given oligarchy, is there the slightest reason to expect anything else.”
That’s what we are living in today. I’ve gone through the Reece Commission in the past. I’ve gone through Norman Dodd’s report. He talked about it too; there is a video up on YouTube I believe, with him talking about the Commission. It was commissioned by the Congress to go and investigate the non-profit organizations, the big foundations as they call them, to find out why they seemed to be promoting and funding, with incredible amounts of money, the big so-called far left associations and movements. Why would multi-millionaires… why would the biggest capitalists on the planet be funding what seemed to be the far left movement that they thought of course, in Congress and so on, was its opposite. They got close to the truth because some of the CEOs of the big foundations, like the Ford Foundation, admitted that they took their orders directly from the White House, because the White House even then was run by the Council on Foreign Relations, according to Carroll Quigley. They also said their job was to change the culture so drastically in America and in Europe that it would blend seamlessly with that of the Soviet Union. Eventually they’d come together in a third way. This is what we have now; we’ve got the blending of the two into this third way.
They had to have a war to kick if off, so they got the War on Terror to kick it off and really go forward with it, because you can get more done under a war scenario, with taking rights away from the public, since they’ve tested all this before, even in World War II, in Britain and elsewhere. You can take all their rights from them. You can get them on rationing if need be. And the public will tend to obey and do what they’re told, and there’s less grumbling amongst them. They needed a warfare scenario. Bingo, they got what they wanted because they make things happen. The whole world is now under a form of totalitarianism. The trick now is to keep the public in perpetual warfare scenarios where it’s one thing after another. It’s financial crashes, it’s terrorist threats, it’s one thing after another. Of course, ALL correspondence is monitored, exactly as Russell talked about. Even when you whisper to someone, you wonder if there is a third ear somewhere, because they have so much gizmos and gadgetry out there you never know.
I read an article recently where the Pentagon had put in a massive order for all of these little drones, spy drones, some of them apparently they are working on look like birds… literally look like birds. They can sit on your telegraph wire and listen in, and follow you, even up corridors and so on. That’s the world they are bringing in. Everyone out there will think, they won’t bother me, I’m not important. Well, you understand, everyone is a variable in this big system. EVERY single person out there is a variable. That’s why they want you to be putting all your data up on the net, every day, and texting and all the rest of it, so they can monitor you in REAL time and upgrade the virtual you that they have in the big super Cray computers, where they can put their tests out and see, what will little Johnny do in this position or that position? What will he do? And they are generally right, as I say. All kinds of stress tests and so on that your virtual you is put under, they are pretty well on the ball. That’s the kind of world they are bringing in.
Someone asked last week about it too, about the cameras on buses and so on. What I’m saying is, that with the cameras, etc, everywhere, that’s all part of training you too, training you that this is going to be forever. The surveillance society is to be FOREVER. The war of terror, or the war on terror – I call it war OF terror because they always have a war OF terror when they have the next part of their revolutions. It has to train you for as long as it takes, and it will be forever I think, ongoing, that YOU are always under some surveillance. You will behave differently when you are under surveillance. You cannot be spontaneous. What they do too, as you are travelling in buses or trains or whatever, and you are chatting on your phone, that’s all done in real time; they know exactly where you are. They will know why you are going there, by the way. They will know who you are going to see. They will pretty well predict what you are going to talk about and so on. Everyone is a variable. Maybe a little knock on the head and it will fall and it might wake you up a bit, and you’ll start behaving erratically, and then they must use the knowledge they have ON you to try and get you back under control. That’s how terrified they are of someone that might get an idea.
All technology of course, with private enterprise, with the big international corporations, are on board with this big agenda. Every single one of them. I’ve gone through the list before where IBM calls its big meetings and any corporation that’s any kind of big corporation is right there with them, on board with them. I’ve given out their links and their sites and so on, to show you who all these corporations are and what they do. These are corporations that really run every aspect of your life, right down to your food supply, everything. That’s what it’s about. You understand, if you want to conquer people you must make them helpless, technically, without them knowing it. Most folk think they can always go to that grocery store and pick as much of that stuff that they eat whenever they want it. They think that will always be like that. Even though the big boys themselves have said they are now in the process of doing what Karl Marx said they’d do, which is the redistribution of wealth; that’s taking your money, robbing you, to put to international corporations that will base themselves in third world countries. You’ve got to be very predictable on how you will manage that or accept that. Most folk, again, as in all ages, we accept whatever the master does.
Russell said too, this dictatorship that would come in, he said he would go along with it if it was a scientific dictatorship. He said it will be horrible, it will be ruthless, on the general public, but it must be so. He was all for it. He helped plan a lot of what you are going through today. He and many others like him, in big think tanks that worked with people from all kinds of departments of society, to bring in what they call ‘the big society,’ ‘the world society’ run with scientific supervision and really a conveyor belt system from birth to the grave. That’s what he was talking about and that’s what we are going through today.
Here’s IBM today in fact. It says…
Transportation
www-03.ibm.com
(A: Transportation for your cars, and their smart cars are coming out. It says…)
Next time you're stuck in traffic, think about this: as smart as our cars have become, our roadways are about to get a whole lot smarter. (A: I remember talking about this years ago, when I saw posts getting put in along some of the highways, every 100-200 yards with the little devices on them. I thought, well that’s for tracking obviously. Then I found out of course, not only had the cars been getting these little tracking boxes in them, they also had embedded chips in the tires themselves. The manufacturers did it; they’ve done that for quite a few years.)
Building new roads and new lanes often just isn't possible any longer, but building intelligence into the roads and the cars-with roadside sensors, radio frequency tags, and global positioning systems-certainly is.
In Stockholm, a new smart toll system has reduced traffic congestion and carbon emissions (A: They all get on the bandwagon because they’re all working together for the same goal.) by impressive percentages. (A: That means they’ve taken a lot of cars off the road, or dissuaded the people from driving. That’s what that means. Not because it’s great technology. Technology has many different purposes and part of it can be to oppress you until you just get off the road.)
They go into all the different things they can do. They are working with the ‘internet of things’ on this site. I’ll leave this for you. There are a lot of videos they have up there from the IBM site itself and you can see what they’re up to, at least what they want to tell you they’re up to right now. Whenever they tell you they’re up to something and they show you videos on it, they’ve already got it. What’s to come, they won’t tell you at the time. What’s coming next year, they won’t tell you at the time, at least most of it; maybe 1% they’ll tell you. It’s got a whole bunch of things and they’re working in different countries, worldwide; this is a worldwide project. Of course everything will be linked to central computers for the planet. That’s what this is all about.
Part of it too, is the reengineering of society. I read an article last week, again, from Bertrand Russell and I gave the quote where he talked about needles, injections, and injunctions would… That’s the music coming in so I’ll be back with the rest of this after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I mentioned a quote just before I went off the air there, from Bertrand Russell, where he that diet, injections and injunctions – he meant also obviously coupled with psychological indoctrination – would produce the perfect citizen that the oligarchies, or the ruling class wanted. I think personally this has been done. Lots of them were involved, to do with injections, inoculations to find ways of targeting specific parts of the brain that (what they called) ‘stopped world peace’ from coming in. This part of the brain that made you you, that made you upset at times when something went wrong or someone was oppressing you – they wanted to eradicate that part of the brain and I think they’ve done it with a lot of people to be honest with you, which means of course that the Military-Industrial Complex – of course it did – it had the big pharma on board from the beginning, the very beginning. You’ll find the same people who own the big shares in big pharma are the same ones who own the big shares in everything else across the planet. There are not that many of them. The BIG shares I’m talking about, including your food supply. Regardless of the company they talk about investing in, there are only 5 big agri-food businesses out there.
Here’s an article here. It sounds very official, like all these things do. It’s from the Toronto Sun.
Register kids' vaccinations: health experts
By LAURA PAYTON, Parliamentary Bureau / tornontosun.com / December 6, 2010
OTTAWA – Canada needs a national vaccination registry so no child misses out on being immunized, a public health group says.
The Canadian Public Health Association says a registry would help the government track how many people across the country (A: Now, that’s not children. First they say it’s children, at the top, and now it says “track how many people across the country”…) have been vaccinated, as well as whether children who move between provinces are up to date on their shots.
In a report to be released Monday, the association says Canada needs a national strategy, the core of which would be the registry and a co-ordinated vaccine schedule.
Experts who contributed to the report fear kids miss out on immunization if they move between provinces because some are on different schedules. Not all provinces pay for the same vaccines either, leaving out poor families in some areas.
See, it’s vital, like getting televisions. It was vital at one time that all citizens of Britain got a television set. The government made a project to make sure that it became affordable for used and reconditioned sets and easy payment plans. China has the same policy in right now and so has up-and-coming India. Believe you me, it’s something more than just making sure you don’t have the occasional cough once in while. And who are they, these characters? Well, again, it’s the…
Canadian Public Health Association
cpha.ca
The Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA) is a national, independent, not-for-profit, voluntary (A: That’s charitable…) association representing public health in Canada.
So, did you know that Canadians all have the CPHA, as they call themselves, this voluntary association, who represent you and your health? They are actually, of course, they have their social motives and social plan to go along with it of course. They also work worldwide with the same things in every other country, the same non-profit association worldwide to make sure we all get out dumbing-down shots, the ones that give you chronic fatigue syndrome and all of that kind of stuff, which they know darn well about too. This is the world you are living in. Do you understand what Russell was talking about was a multi-pronged attack on YOU, your physical health? When you’re not feeling too energetic you’re no problem to any totalitarian government. You don’t have any energy, your mind is sluggish and you will go along with anything to get along and survive. Quite simple.
Then we find the big guys too, the multi-billionaires, who all suddenly hit the magic number of dollars and want to drastically reduce the population of the planet. No matter what they got their money in, suddenly they are philanthropists that want to kill you. Amazing isn’t it? From the Globe and Mail we see Ted Turner, another member of ‘the lucky gene club’ with Bill Gates and all those guys who want to do the same thing, bring down the population of the planet, so that it’s left for the better types, the ones that natural selection would say should go on into the next world order, without all of you, the defective types. It says…
Ted Turner urges global one-child policy to save planet
SHAWN McCARTHY / theglobeandmail.com / Dec. 5, 2010
Climate change and population control can make for a politically explosive mix, as media mogul Ted Turner demonstrated Sunday when he urged world leaders to institute a global one-child policy to save the Earth’s environment.
Mr. Turner spoke at a luncheon where economist Brian O’Neill from the U.S.’s National Center for Atmospheric Research unveiled his study on the impact of demographic trends on future greenhouse gas emission, a little-discussed subject given its political sensitivity.
Mr. O’Neill’s study concluded that a rapidly rising global population is contributing to an acceleration of emission growth, and that widespread availability of family planning could reduce the amount of emissions reductions required in 2050 by as much as 30 per cent.
See, that’s what family planning is all about. It’s abortion and sterilization, for those who still give money to charities that go out for women’s issues in the third world countries. These guys are telling you what it’s really for, if you understand what they are saying. By the way, I’ll put up a link to a video and you will hear one of these so-called specialists at the NOAA Project, The National Oceanographic and whatever else it is, the guys that do the weather for you. A professor, by the way; you’ll hear him giving a speech in front of all his supporters, for the eco groups, the greenies, and saying the same thing: We need vast depopulation. [‘Scientist: Reducing population is the "master variable"’ youtube.com] I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, when you read this stuff you get so fed up seeing the same repetitive agenda, because these guys do keep repeating, from a thousand sources, to make sure we all get the same message at the same time: We’ve got to reduce the population drastically. That’s what, really, this whole greening idea and saving the planet from emissions and CO2 is all about. Remember, the Eugenics Society, when it got a bad name after it was found out what was happening in Germany in World War II, they changed their names many-many times; they still have it on the go by the way, under different names based in Britain. They also went into the greening movement as a way to get their agenda through. Bring down the population… first bring up the green idea, to the maximum, get lots of supporters, and then hit them with their real mission which was to depopulate the planet from all of the useless eaters, as they like to call them, those people who are no longer required for a modern high-tech society. We’re non-industrial now; China makes all the industry, it’s the manufacturer for the world in fact.
That article I’ll put up with all the other links where they talk about bringing down the population, how we should copy China. I’ve told you years ago that the United Nations stated that China was the model state for the world to emulate or copy. That’s what you’ve got. It’s out in the open now. They are openly talking about basically getting rid of the elderly in hospitals by euthanasia; they are having programs on it in Britain, and I’ve given the links for some of them, where professors, again, come on with the pros and cons. But the whole idea is to get the idea into your head, to prepare you for it so you’ll accept it without any qualms, as long as it’s happening to someone else. That’s why.
We’ve seen the hoopla and all the lies. I’ve given all the statements by top members of the IPCC and government officials too, to do with the global warming scam. Miss McClellan from Canada, who was in a few years ago in the federal government said, it doesn’t matter if all the data on global warming is wrong, this can be used she says, we can use this for global equality. So you understand, there is always a political reason, a social reason behind something which they are not telling you. Everything is a front for something else is what I’m saying. Of course part of the ‘scary scenarios’ I read too, from the guy who said we always give them scary scenarios each time the big meetings come up, like the one at Cancun. They tell you scary scenarios to terrify the life out of you so that you’ll say, do something, do something. They want to get everybody to sign on board, to give up all our rights to anything at all and allow ourselves to be supervised and post-consumer and all the rest of it, down to austerity, which the banks help with too because they’re all in it together. And to get you to living like peasants used to live, as we die off, only they won’t leave you on the land, they want you crowded into the cities and dying off there.
Here’s what they’re telling us now, after all the ridiculous stuff they’ve come out with in the past, they throw a bone your way as they go on with the meeting. This is a bone. This is to put you off guard, to think, well I guess they’re going to back off now. It says…
Alarmist Doomsday warning of rising seas 'was wrong',
says Met Office study
By Daily Mail Reporter / dailymail.co.uk / 6th December 2010
Alarming predictions that global warming could cause sea levels to rise 6ft in the next century are wrong, it has emerged. (A: I’m glad something is emerging out of the sea.)
The forecast made by the influential 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (A: That’s the one headed by Pachauri who was a railroad engineer.) which would have seen cities around the world submerged by water, now looks ‘unlikely’. (A: …they say. Well, yeah, it’s very unlikely.)
A Met Office study also rules out the shutdown of the Atlantic Ocean’s conveyor belt, which would trigger Arctic winters in Britain like those seen in the film The Day After Tomorrow.
However, the report says the IPCC was right to warn of a sea level rise of up to 2ft by 2100, and that a 3ft rise could happen. (A: Well anything could happen. Isn’t it wonderful, any child can write anything on what could happen about anything… and you can’t disprove it if it hasn’t happened, you see.)
The IPCC underestimated the danger posed by the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and the release of methane from warmer wetlands, the report adds. (A: As they throw their bone to you, they hit you with all this other nonsense.)
They are going much, much further than that actually. They want to eventually take all your food under their wing, by bioengineering it and they’ll have the patents on it of course. They also want to do this with surgery. No kidding. This is like something out of a comic book.
Surgical anesthetic gases coming under fire for global warming potential – Only one problem: they haven’t been observed in the atmosphere
(A: … at all. It doesn’t matter though.)
December 5, 2010 by Anthony Watts / wattsupwiththat.com
The press release below is from the University of Copenhagen Department of Chemistry. The anesthetic gases isofluran, desflurane and sevoflurane are coming under scrutiny for global warming potential. (A: Potential, right.) However, what isn’t stated in the press release is this important paragraph of the scientific paper :
(A: Here is the important part.) There are no production numbers available in the literature for the anaesthetic agents. The three compounds have not yet been observed in the free atmosphere, and current atmospheric levels are expected to be small (of the order of part per trillion/volume). At these concentrations, when viewed in isolation, their present contribution to the relative forcing of climate change is negligible in comparison with the current forcing of 1.7 Watts/sq meter due to CO2.
Later though, even though they admit they have no numbers on the production quantity of these anaesthetic agents, and “the three compounds have not yet been observed in the free atmosphere”, they use some SWAG to make this claim:
Hence, we conclude that global emissions of inhalation anaesthetics, when measured by the 100 yr GWP, have a contribution to the radiative forcing of climate change which is comparable with that of the CO2 emissions (A: So here they have done no tests at all, but then they tell you that it’s actually comparable with that of the CO2 emissions…) from one coal-fired power plant or approximately 1 million passenger cars.
(A: That’s the stuff they call science. Do you understand, there are thousands of these lying bums living on incredibly large grants that will be on the street looking for jobs if all this falls through. These are the incredible lies that they are coming out with, but it ties in… it ties in with you getting used to the idea that your medical systems are going to be very minimalistic in the coming future. Countries like Britain are already finding that out as they slash and burn and slash and burn down to the bone. Remember what the United Nations said a long time ago, that every country under its charter will have the right, everybody will have the right to the MINIMUM, the bare minimum of health care. And it will be minimum indeed. I guess they’ll be back to putting a piece of rubber in your mouth or telling you to bite on a stick when they have to go in with the knife… because that’s where it seems to be going. Incredible isn’t it? So here they are, they haven’t tested this stuff at all and then later on they put a claim in that it’s comparable with that of CO2 emissions from one coal fired power plant or approximately 1 million passenger cars. It says…)
Gosh, more than a whole coal-fired power plant! Somebody tell China immediately so they can stop building two a week. (A: Under their treaties and the World Trade Organization they don’t have to bother about pollution at all; neither will India, Brazil and elsewhere, that the money is being sunk in to by those who own all the money of the world. So there you go.)
Again too, they used to say when I was small, you are what you eat. To an extent it’s awfully true. We’ve been eating GMO vegetables for God knows how long. It was 10 years in secrecy apparently before the public were told in Canada they were the guinea pigs. So how long was it really? We’ll have no idea because they won’t tell us. The same thing is happening with meat too, with all the different growth hormones and stuff in it. They’ve gone on to cloned cattle meat and milk. This is what they say here…
Cloned Cattle Meat And Milk 'Is Safe To Eat'
November 26, 2010 / news.sky.com / Pete Norman, Sky News Online
(A: It’s safe to eat… There you go. That’s good enough for me, is that good enough for you?)
Meat and milk from cloned cattle and their offspring is no different to conventional produce and is safe to consume, Government advisers have said. (A: It’s amazing now, you know, we just get experts telling us everything, exactly what Russell said, that they would train the public they must listen to experts and only do what the experts advise. That’s happened. We already have two or three generations grown up like that now.)
The recommendation could lead to food from cloned livestock being sold in shops. (A: Well I found out a few weeks back there, they’d already done it, and no one had asked for a license to do it, they just got it into the food chain.)
The Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP) said there was no evidence of any differences between produce from cloned animals and that from conventionally-bred cattle.
It was ordered to carry out the review after it emerged in August that milk and meat from the offspring of cloned cows had reached stores in the UK without a licence.
Responding to the findings, Andrew Wadge, (A: I wonder if that’s a cloned wedge…) chief scientist at the Food Standards Agency (FSA), said: "In considering this hypothetical application, the ACNFP has confirmed that meat and milk from cloned cattle and their offspring shows no substantial difference to conventionally produced (A: What do you mean no substantial difference? What differences are there? Are they going to tell us?) meat and milk and therefore is unlikely to present a food safety risk." (A: That’s the same statement they gave about Monsanto’s food as modified crops. It’s the same statement they gave, which meant that they don’t have to test it.)
The committee said more evidence was needed to show how rearing animals in different environments may affect the meat and milk. (A: That’s on your shelves now too. You don’t know what you’re eating anymore, except it’s not good for you whatever it is, even the vegetarians, believe you me.)
Getting back to the art, really, the art of managing whole herds of people, because that’s what they call us at the top. We are herds you see. In fact, in medicine they actually call it that now, herd management, when they come down to inoculations and so on, and herd inoculation. It’s actually in the medical books. I’ve read the articles from the papers when we had the SARS outbreak in Canada, or the phony SARS one, and they actually called it ‘herd management.’
David Cameron spent £66,000 on TV coaching by Obama's body language expert during election campaign
By Jason Groves and Tamara Cohen / dailymail.co.uk / 3rd December 2010
(A: Now, people have professionals, again, people who are hypnotists. One guy put a site up that was very good. He went through all the different gestures that Obama was making and he was quite correct in recognizing that lots of it was the same stuff that stage hypnotists use, on the audience. Cameron has been trained apparently by Obama’s, the same guy who taught Obama. And it cost £66,000.)
David Cameron spent more than £66,000 flying in Barack Obama’s body language expert to help prepare for the televised election debates, it emerged yesterday.
Figures published by the Electoral Commission reveal that the Tories (A: That’s the conservatives.) spent twice as much as Labour during the election. (A: Well, so what?)
The Conservatives’ campaign cost £16.7million, while Labour spent £8million. (A: That’s probably all nonsense anyway. I think they get a lot more than that from special interest groups.) The Liberal Democrats spent £4.8million
David Cameron was prepared for his TV debates by President Obama's body language expert who flew over four times to advise the Tory leader
Detailed receipts show the Tories spent £66,333 hiring the Washington firm SKDKnickerbocker to prepare Mr Cameron for the debates, in which he was widely considered to have been bested by Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg.
Consultant Anita Dunn, who advised President Obama on body language, was part of the team flown to London four times to prepare Mr Cameron.
I can remember when Thatcher was in and Ronald Regan sent his team over to remake her. She used to talk with a high-pitched voice and she was coached to talk much lower, and talk like that [Alan speaking slowly.]. They did her hair for her. They showed her how to stand, how to posture, all this kind of stuff. It’s used every time you see these guys. They are using a form of hypnotism on you. Of course really good salesmen are taught the same techniques. They’ll stand like you in fact, and it puts you at ease. You don’t realize why you’re at ease. It’s because they’re actually mirroring you and your gestures. You feel at home with those gestures and that person will then con you into buying something. So every trick in the book is used. After all, you see, politics is just a show for the public that YOU must believe in, but they certainly don’t run the world or the system or the country. They certainly don’t do that. Carroll Quigley said that every member, at the top, in all parliaments and Congress in the US, had always been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. And before it was called the Council on Foreign Relations; it was actually born in the 1880s. Every President and Prime Minister is all a member of the same organization that answered to a higher authority, NOT the public. I hope you understand that.
There’s an article here too, it’s worth mentioning and putting up on the site cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show.
Cancun climate conference: the warmists' last Mexican wave
The global warming scare was fun while it lasted, but the joke's over, says Christopher Booker.
telegraph.co.uk / By Christopher Booker 04 Dec 2010
If, last week, frozen behind a snowdrift, you heard a faint hysterical squeaking, it might well have been the sound of those 20,000 delegates holed up behind a wall of armed security guards in the sun-drenched Mexican holiday resort of Cancun, telling each other that the world is more threatened by runaway global warming than ever. Between their tequilas and lavish meals paid for by the world’s taxpayers, they heard how, by 2060, global temperatures will have risen by 4 degrees Celsius; how the Maldives and Tuvalu are sinking below the waves faster than ever; how the survival of salmon is threatened by CO2-induced acidification of the oceans; how the UN must ban incandescent light bulbs throughout the world. (A: [Alan chuckles.] We’re going back into the dark ages with them folks.)
“Scientists”, we were told, are calling for everyone to be issued with a “carbon ration card”, to halt all Western economic growth for 20 years.
Meanwhile, Dr Rajendra Pachauri (A: That’s the railroad engineer.) was telling us that we must spend hundreds of billions on covering the world’s oceans with iron filings, on building giant mirrors out in space and on painting all the world’s roofs white to keep out the heat from the sun. (A: I think he should go back to his train driving, this guy. I wonder if he ever was on time, this guy, or even arrived at the right destination?)
The most obvious thing about all this ritualised scaremongering was how stale it all was. Not one of these points hasn’t been a cliché for years. The only scientist who believes we should all be issued with carbon ration cards is a Prof Kevin Anderson, who has been saying it since 2004. It is only those same old computer models that predict that Tuvalu and the Maldives are about to drown, when real measurements show the sea around them not to be rising at all. Far from the oceans acidifying, their pH currently ranges between 7.9 and 8.3, putting them very firmly on the alkaline side of the threshold, at 7.0.
The prediction that global temperatures will rise by four degrees in 50 years comes from that same UK Met Office computer which five weeks ago was telling us we were about to enjoy a “milder than average” winter, after three years when it has consistently got every one of its winter and summer forecasts hopelessly wrong. (A: I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ll put these link up on my sites in about an hour’s time, maybe two hours before it will be up there for you to see and you can look them up for yourselves, and put the pieces together, of this big, wonderful totalitarian system you are being guided along into, mainly through lies and deception but that’s good enough when they’re all on board at the top. You’ll tend to doubt yourself and your own reason, that’s how it works so easily. Orwell put that out so well, with the bureaucratic class. He showed you how it worked, in 1984, for those who can still remember how to read.
There is a caller there, Kallel from North Carolina on the line. Are you there Kallel?
Kallel: Yes. I was reading The Third Wave by Alvin Toffler. He puts this new totalitarian system… he makes this analogous to the difference between the agricultural revolution versus the industrial revolution. These things are so different from each other. As I was reading this I was wondering is it even worth avoiding this third wave? If I could just get your comments on what the third wave is and you know, is it… I believe that it is worth avoiding but is it possible?
Alan: What it is, remember too, and who Toffler is. Toffler is one of the… he’s more far left than Marx. But he believes in superior expert run government worldwide, a global system. Newt Gingrich gave a copy of that book to every Congressman on the congressional steps a few years ago. The third wave actually has one meaning that he gives out himself to do with ripples in a pond type of idea, but it’s also a play on ‘the third way’ that Plato talked about. It’s a play as well on the Hegelian dialectic, that the third way comes out of the conflicts of the two opposing sides. They love their little plays amongst themselves and that’s really what it is. It’s exactly what the Reece Commission talked about. It’s what Lenin talked about where he said the dictatorship of the proletariat would last maybe a generation or so and eventually it would fade into something different, not quite capitalist, not quite communist. He was talking about a world socialist society and that’s exactly what they are bringing in. The socialist part of it and the bureaucratic part is to rear up a scientifically organized and run society, that would serve them well, changing over a vast period of time, maybe 50 years or 100 years, to get the perfect small society to serve them, but run by a scientific elite. That is what they claim is the height of rationale, how things should be rationally run. Not by emotions and not by people – individuals with their emotions running rather than reason – that’s how they talk about the masses. That really is what Toffler is all about. It’s the blending of the two systems, a sort of communistic bureaucratic system running the masses, but above that, really, a fascist elite. That’s what they always aimed at a long, long time ago. It’s all one movement, you understand, with no real opposing sides on it. They need the opposition to play the dialectic, to get out the synthesis as they merge together, and compromise. The compromise brings out a new thesis that starts it all over again. That’s what the whole of Marxist doctrine of progression was based upon. That’s what they claim they are putting us through; a forced evolution is what they claim they are bringing us through, to how the world would naturally end up. Rather than wait for it happening they make it happen instead.
I think that’s the music, so that’s the end of the show. My audio isn’t so good tonight and the telephones are pretty bad too. From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Internet Connectivity of Things IBM
Non-Profit Charitable Association Calls for Vaccination Registry
Turner Advocates World Follow China's Family Planning Rules
NOAA Scientist Calls for Population Reduction--and is Cheered
Met Office--Rising Seas ? We Won't Drown after All
Priests of Global Warming God go for Anesthetic Gases--Back to Biting the Stick(for commoners)
Cloned Meat Passed "Fit to Eat"
British PM Coached on Body Language by Obama's Trainer--for 66,000 Pounds
Cancun--Warmists' Last Mexican Wave--as Parts of World Freeze