Mystery Religion ForumTranscripts: TranscriptsTranscripts 2012

Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Transcripts 2012

#1 · March 12, 2021, 6:03 pm

Transcripts 2012

#2 · March 13, 2021, 8:11 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:11 am
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on... it’s actually January the 3^rd 2012. For newcomers, as always, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find a host of, thousands actually, of audios for free download where hopefully, if you can, if you have it in you, you can wade through so much material, information about this so-called new world order, which isn’t new at all. You’ll find out the big players, the organizations, thousands of organizations that work together to make it all happen, all the way from your educational systems, even kindergarten, from the United Nations, through foundations, NGOs, just countless, countless organizations all working together on a global plan for a new type of society, an ordered society, post democratic. I give you the planners from a long time ago and the money boys that helped to finance it all and of course profit from it too at the same time, and how it’s all playing out today. You’re living through the big changes, and they actually call this ‘the era of change.’ So get used to it, but at least find out what’s happening and why you’re changing and why you’re adapting to it as well.

Remember, go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself. Also too, all the sites listed there have transcripts in English of a lot of the talks I’ve given if you want to print them up. Go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu if you want transcripts in other languages. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you and you can help me get by, by buying the books and disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and donating as well. [Order and donation options listed above.]

I try, as I say, to chronicle the events as we go through things and explain why we go through things, why we adapt. Basically I describe human nature which is so well understood by the big boys themselves as they treat us as the ‘mass man’ basically, this old concept from the old industrial era of mass production. You’re the mass man and what works for one man generally will work for another and the same with women as well; Bernays knew these techniques, worked them to the full, and it’s worked so successfully. Really, we are a composite, today, of the big thinkers and players that created the 20^th century, and they created the cultures as well, as they broke apart the old cultures that held us together. So we’re in flux in a sense. When you’re in flux, when you have no traditions to hang onto, you’re in constant movement and you follow the leaders, who are well supplied to you through all the media, movies, etc, your favorite stars on television; that’s what they do. And you copy them and follow them, emulate them, even their speech, and whatever they do you will do as well. You’re not free at all. You’re really under a form of mind control, or perception management. I’ve gone through a lot of this perception management too, and the big boys who help bring this in across society. All the media uses it, all entertainment uses it as well, all the newscasters use it because they all belong to the same organization basically, the Council on Foreign Relations. So you’re getting the same messages, many of them not quite subliminal, they’re above subliminal, most of them, but you start to parrot them yourselves:  They can’t all be wrong can they; therefore it must be me that’s wrong in my thinking.  And so you adapt to theirs instead, very simple technique. And most folk will give up their own individual thought patterns, conclusions, to go along with the majority; it happens all the time. Young people are more susceptible because they have peer pressure; they want to be accepted by their group; they haven’t really found individuality yet. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about perception management and how everything IS perception management and how we’re really trained generation by generation. And by that I don’t mean 70 years, I mean literally the system is upgraded into what you’ll be taught, or what you’ll experience 30 years down the road, when you go into kindergarten today. And they upgrade it every year pretty well. And the next hundred years is already worked out, maybe 200 years in fact, of the kind of citizens they want to have, what they’ll believe, what their behaviors will be, and what they’ll accept. In other words, new normals, and it will all be approved by the State. And the State will also tell them what to disapprove of as well. It’s already happening today, very, very swiftly, as folk adapt and adapt and adapt. They can’t really think for themselves. Why should they, because the media’s doing it all for them; that’s what Brzezinski said 30-odd years ago in his own book Between Two Ages. So that’s happened.

And we’re also being taught to believe in experts all the time. Statistics abound and we don’t have any means of checking them ourselves, of course, or even doing the experiments to find out what we read is true. But you see, a long time ago, back in the 20^th century, early 20^th century, the big players like Bertrand Russell and others said that science and scientists would take over the positions, not only of the old priesthoods of religions but also they’d take over from politicians eventually – that also comes under technocracy. And we have a lot of that today, right down to having people appointing themselves to your town councils even under the guise of experts on the environment, they’re there to take care of the environment; they sort of just put themselves on the board and you don’t elect them. You can get rid of them too if you know what’s going on, but most folk don’t so they allow them to stay.

Anyway, this article here is about statistics and the cons that go on within science itself; because we’re so well trained, we just believe what they tell us, you see. As I say, it’s so convoluted whatever they give to you; you have no way to check on it so you got to take their word for it. And this article here is about...

How one man got away with mass fraud by saying ‘trust me, it’s science’

news.nationalpost.com / Joseph Brean / Dec 30, 2011

When news broke this year that Diederik Stapel, a prominent Dutch social psychologist, was faking his results on dozens of experiments, the fallout was swift, brutal and global.

Science and Nature, the world’s top chroniclers of science, were forced to retract papers that had received wide popular attention, including one that seemed to link messiness with racism, because “disordered contexts (such as litter or a broken-up sidewalk and an abandoned bicycle) indeed promote stereotyping and discrimination.”

As a result, some of Prof. Stapel’s junior colleagues lost their entire publication output; Tilburg University launched a criminal fraud case; Prof. Stapel himself returned his PhD and sought mental health care; and the entire field of social psychology — in which human behaviour is statistically analyzed — fell under a pall of suspicion.

One of the great unanswered questions about the Stapel affair, however, is how he got away with such blatant number-fudging, especially in a discipline that claims to be chock full of intellectual safe-guards, from peer review to replication by competitive colleagues. How can proper science go so wrong?  (Alan: Well actually it’s not unusual. You see it all across the board now, and look at all the fudged statistics from the political organizations, that call themselves scientists, to do with the climate change stuff. Same thing.)

The answer, according to a growing number of statistical skeptics, is that without release of raw data and methodology, this kind of research amounts to little more than “‘trust me’ science,” in which intentional fraud and unintentional bias remain hidden behind the numbers. Only the illusion of significance remains.

Stanley Young and Alan Karr of the US National Institute of Statistical sciences, for example, point to several shocking published claims that were not borne out by the data on which they were based, including coffee as a cause of pancreatic cancer, Type A personality causing heart attacks, and eating breakfast cereal increasing the odds that a woman will give birth to a boy.

“The more startling the claim, the better,” they wrote in a recent issue of the journal Significance. “These results are published in peer-reviewed journals, and frequently make news headlines as well. They seem solid. They are based on observation, on scientific method, and on statistics. But something is going wrong. There is now enough evidence to say what many have long thought: that any claim coming from an observational study is most likely to be wrong – wrong in the sense that it will not replicate if tested rigorously.”

Victor Ivrii, a University of Toronto math professor, described the problem similarly on his blog: “While Theoretical Statistics is (mainly) a decent albeit rather boring mathematical discipline (Probability Theory is much more exciting), so called Applied Statistics is in its big part a whore. Finding dependence (true or false) opens exciting financing opportunities and since the true dependence is a rare commodity many “scientists” investigate the false ones.”

“If jumping to wrong conclusions brings a scorn of colleagues and a shame, they will be cautious. But this does not happen these days,” Prof. Ivrii said in an email. “Finding that eating cereals does not affect your cardio [for example] brings neither fame nor money, but discovering that there is some connection allows you to apply for a grant to investigate this dependence.”  (A: See, they all live on grants.)

Science, at its most basic, is the effort to prove new ideas wrong. The more startling the idea, the stronger the urge to disprove it, as was illustrated when European physicists last month seemed to have seen particles travel faster than light, which has prompted a massive effort to replicate (or more likely debunk) such a shocking result.

Although science properly gets credit for discovery and progress, falsifiable hypotheses are its true currency, and when scientists fail to disprove a false hypothesis, they are left with a false positive.

Technically known as the incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis, a false positive is “perhaps the most costly error” a scientist can make, according to a trio of leading American researchers who this fall published “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.”

So with all that fancy terminology basically what they’re really saying is that they’re going into it with a bias, in other words a pre-conclusion, and they try to prove their pre-conclusion, especially when you can get grant money to go ahead with it. And there’s no one else really doing the same tests so they don’t bother checking on it, and it’s published by peer reviews and up it goes on the billboard. But it’s even better, as I say, when it’s to do with climate science and there’s a lot of cash involved, and a political agenda at the same time.

But we’re taught, it must be true, it’s statistics, you know, you can’t disprove statistics.  That’s what they tell you. Because you see, we live in a materialistic society and the more materialistic we become the more we depend on DATA, what we think is raw data, disprovable data is there. And of course even in the technotronic society and techniques and other branches of the same organization in fact, they talked about algorithms and how they could break ALL nature and ALL behavior down to algorithms. And they’re actually using that in the RAND Corporation for all governments; they use us as the data and they feed us through its algorithms and all those algorithms, that’s YOU there, you see, you’re predictable basically, because of all these numbers.

And that’s how we’re put down to. It’s just amazing what we go through in life when you look back through the sciences. And we go from one religion to the next, to the religion of science, and like all other religions, science says, you know we’re the real one because we got all the data to prove it. And then they do a bunch of sums and equations and all that, and a lot of scribbling and stuff, look awfully important, get lots of money and we tend to believe them for a while. But unfortunately, at least in other religions they give you a bit of spiritual food, whereas in science they try to bring you down to the lowest common denominator and say that you’re an amoeba that crawled out of the mud and they can do what they want with you. And we believe them too; we allow them to do that as well. You’re just another animal, you see. And that’s taught in eugenics, you’re just another animal, we can do with them what we please to do with them, especially since we’re the most evolved ones at the top. You understand what happens when you throw out the old religions? You’re fair game. You’re fair game for the top predators to do as they wish. And you ain’t seen nothing yet; they’re just getting started.

Now China, China’s greatest threat is internal, apparently. China’s claiming – in 2 articles I have here; one is from the CFR – that the West is using cultural wars against China. Now, communist countries understand cultural wars because it was the communists within America, through Hollywood and various organizations and television that were really pushing the communist liberalism, as they called it in the West, to destroy the culture, to bring in a new type of culture. The old man/woman stuff, family had to go all together, and you had to get all the youngsters separated from the older population and make them believe that they’re actually guiding their own path and, you know, on the ‘cutting edge’ of ‘my generation’ so that they could destroy them ever going back to having a wife, husband and family. So they understand wars very well, cultural wars, and they’re blaming the West for trying to interfere with the Chinese version of communism and trying to force on them the Fabian/Western type of socialist communism which we’re under here, if you don’t know it. You see. We’re actually under it here. So anyway it says...

China's Greatest Threat Is Internal - Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations / cfr.org / December 28, 2011

And Mr Haass of course, who is the current President of the Council on Foreign Relations, the only organization that literally is an advisor to every government on the planet, again, a private organization set up by the bankers long ago, but he goes on about the other parts of it too, to do with the internal problems of China, how they’re keeping their currency artificially low so as that people will keep buying their mass goods. And at the same time there’s trouble within China now with the incredible, incredible gap between the rich and the very, very poor; it’s just astronomical now. But that’s what comes when you bring in this form of what you think is capitalism. You get a tiny group of multi-trillionaires eventually and masses of poor around them and prostitution and drugs and everything.   Just like the West, you see, we’re already finished; it’s already happened here. Because this is a technique, it’s a technique of rule, for those who’ve been around for thousands of years who know how to do it. So I’ll put this link up tonight from Mr Haass. Remember, Mr Haass too, remember that link I put up last week, also commented on the Middle East and other countries around the Middle East as well including Iran, to do with this war, he said, will go on for another, at least 3 decades. 3 DECADES, that also means 3 decades of anti-terrorism and more laws passed until we’re... what will we be then? This is perpetual war. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about China as an example, really having internal problems, but also they’re trying to fight back against what they see as Western encroachment on their socialist system, their Chinese socialism, by using Western socialism; that’s what we live under today, for those who don’t know. It doesn’t matter what party’s in it’s all the same, you see, the same boys are actually in behind it. So this article here, it says...

Hu Says West Is Trying to Divide China by Using Ideology, Cultural Weapons

bloomberg.com / Jan 2, 2012

Hu Jintao, China's president, speaks during a news conference with U.S. President Barack Obama (A: ...has a chat with Obama...) in the East Room of the White House (A: I guess that means... when the East Wing is mentioned it’s always like they’re meeting as Masons, you know, the sun comes up and all that.)  in Washington, D.C., U.S., Jan. 19, 2011.

The West is using cultural means to divide China (PRCH), which needs to be alert to this threat, President Hu Jintao said in a Communist Party magazine.

“International forces are trying to Westernize and divide us by using ideology and culture,”  (A: That’s how we were destroyed back here, by the same group actually.)  Hu wrote in an article in Qiushi. “We need to realize this and be alert to this danger.”

Many countries, especially Western powers, are attempting to expand their influence through cultural hegemony, and China must deepen and promote its own values of “socialism with Chinese characteristics,” Hu wrote in the article, which was published on the government’s website on Jan 1. China needs to strengthen its cultural values as it faces possible challenges from the West, he said.

Hu’s comments are part of a wider push by the party to reassert its influence over Chinese culture and society, including in television and the arts. (A: See, that’s how it happened here too, television, the arts, education and so on.)  China’s leaders are grappling with the best way to manage Twitter-like social-media sites such as Sina Corp (SINA)’s (A: That’s almost most like Sinai.) Weibo service that are hard for government censors to control.  (A: Nothing’s hard for them to control.)

The Communist Party’s Central Committee said it will supervise the world’s biggest online community more closely, promote “constructive” websites and punish the spread of “harmful information,” according to a communique from its Oct. 15-18 meeting released by the official Xinhua News Agency.

Members of the party’s Politburo visited web companies after a deadly train crash in July. Internet users criticized the government’s handling of the crash and spread commentary and photos of the accident at odds with the official line.  (A: So in other words they like to censor a lot of stuff there. We have it censored, and we’re given other stuff to replace it so you don’t really know it’s being censored. We’re cleverer here; they’re still old-fashioned there. They do it, you know, in a very straight fashion. We are much more sophisticated in the West, because we’ve been at it for such a long time.)

Now, you hear all this stuff about drugs and just today I was reading about different drug effects on the front parts of the brain for chronic weed users, for instance. And they find they actually have smaller parts in the front parts of their brain, in their offspring even, so it affects it, but that’s an old study really too; they keep doing it and come up with the same findings. The ventricles, also, in the brain expand so it affects long-term use on the brain itself. And we always see how the US is pretending to fight all the drugs and stuff like that coming in from Canada. And a lot of it’s true; I mean, a lot of it is coming in from Canada. And it says...

Vancouver health body begins free crack pipe program for addicts

(A: We’re much more socialist in Canada, we treat our addicts better, after getting them addicted.)

news.nationalpost.com / Postmedia News Dec 30, 2011 / Jan 1, 2012 / Jenelle Schneider

Hugh Lampkin, president of the Vancouver Area of Network Drug Users, shows one of 60,000 crack smoking kits that will be distributed at five sites throughout Vancouver's Downtown Eastside to help reduce the spread of disease.

Now see, the Chinese aren’t really that daft or crazy about what they’re saying. They’re talking about culture. This is Canadian culture now, you see, at least on the West side of Canada. And a few years ago they were teaching children at school, about the age of 5 to 8, how to safely inject heroin, on the premise that probably they’ll be using it down the road. They’re getting taught this in school. So now they’re giving out crack smoking kits, and of course it would be quite easy for the cops to stop the stuff coming in in the first place, if that was a mandate but it’s not. Remember, drugs too, was mentioned by Huxley and also by Bertrand Russell and many, many others, as a form of bringing down society at this particular phase, because they helped plan it, this phase we’re living through today. And so it’s being used. Regular pharma’s involved; they’ve got half the population or three-quarters of it drugged already. And of course the illegal side is all run by the same big boys as well. And as long as you’re drugged on something, it doesn’t really matter what it is. So here they are, they’re helping them, giving them free pipes for Christmas, you know – they still believe in some kind of Christmas here. Well, you can’t say Christmas... a Happy Holiday pipe I guess.

Anyway, in Scotland too, Scotland’s been hammered. I remember long ago in Scotland when the CFR came over to do their world meeting, it was, at the time, with the Royal Institute of International Affairs, to decide who would give the world its culture and they decided at that meeting that America was better equipped. Hollywood had the techniques and they would be given the job of creating a world culture along with the American music industry. They also mentioned at the same meeting, and it was in the papers at the time, that Scotland would be turned into a tourist area. You know, we would be sitting selling beads at the side of the road, probably to Chinese businessmen I guess; that’s how far ahead they plan things. In other words, they were going to close down all factories and the mines and leave them with pretty well nothing, except making beads and making rugs. You know, like model little places you go and visit on holiday:  here’s a peasant Scot weaving a rug, you know, and here’s a peasant making beads, and stuff like that. And it’s pretty well gone that way. It says...

400 Scots a week to face being insolvent this year

(A: Because they don’t replace anything when they take anything out; they’re way ahead of the US and NAFTA, losing all their factories through the World Trade Organization, way ahead.)

heraldscotland.com / Catriona Stewart / 2 January 2012

MORE than 400 Scots a week will become insolvent this year as the economy fails to show signs of recovery from the downturn, a leading accountancy firm has warned.  (A: I tell you, tourists too, the whole tourism trade is way down as well you see, and they count on that because it’s pretty well all they got, and making booze for the few big boys, the foreigners that own the whiskey companies. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and just mentioning how Scotland truly indeed was put into a tourist industry basically. And it says...

PKF has estimated that more than 20,000 people will have been sequestrated (A: ...they call it.) – the Scottish legal term for personal bankruptcy – or will have taken out a Protected Trust Deed (PTD) at the end of 2011.

So it just shows you that this is across the whole world and some countries are more ahead of others as we go through all these changes, these transitions actually. That’s the official name for this phase – it’s called World Transitions – right down to your local level as you bring in communitarianism; you bring in private agencies and charities to help and do the social work services, etc. That’s all happening now too. And your whole mode of thinking is supposed to change with it too; you’re being taught how to think locally, etc. So it’s just amazing.

Now in Australia, we know they’re really going to be the world leader for carbon taxes and all that kind of thing. And now they’re getting hit with their turn for electric prices to go surging up. Maurice Strong mentioned this, by the way, in the early 90s when he came to Canada back from the United Nations to privatize Ontario Hydro; he did that. We found out later he was getting two paychecks, one from the Ontario government and one from the United Nations. Anyway, he did privatize it and he said in the mainstream then, he says, the world we’re bringing in will be one where electricity will be rationed out to those who need it and eventually, he says, we shall have to figure ways of getting most of the electricity to those who still produce in big corporations, etc. So what we’re living through today worldwide was planned a long time ago. And Maurice Strong was in charge of the Rio Summit; he will be in charge of this year’s Rio Summit too. That’s the big one that brought you Agenda 21, the Millennium Project, all the things you’re hearing about now, which they’re actually implementing; a lot of it is already implemented and so on. Anyway it says...

Power surge to price surge: prepare for an expensive education, says expert Clay Lucas

theage.com.au / January 3, 2012

VICTORIANS need to urgently educate themselves about the looming surge in electricity prices this year, or face bills so high many will struggle to pay them, the chief of an energy price comparison service says.

Power use surged yesterday . . . (A: They talk about the temperatures and folk are using air conditioning. And it says, this new system that they’ve got in now, just like Canada...)

Much of this increase was on the charge to consumers for simply being connected to the grid (A: So you’re paying for just being connected.) - meaning users will now pay more regardless of whether they cut their power use or not.  (A: And that’s the world you’re going into. Canada’s the same; Ontario’s going up about eight-fold actually over the next 4 years; they’ve told us that from the company themselves.)

The new tax (A: They’ve got a new carbon tax as well.), combined with mandatory renewable energy targets and chronic under-investment by power companies in infrastructure, will cause prices to rise further across Australia. ''We are looking at the doubling of the cost of power in five years' time,'' Mr Freund said.  (A: ...I guess that’s close to Freud, but it’s Freund.)

Anyway, it’s going to be a lot more than double, believe you me, because it’s to be more than double in Ontario, and across the world too. So they’re really moving now. That’s what I’m saying, it doesn’t matter, when you’re told what to look at by mainstream media, don’t look at it because believe you me, there’s something bigger happening all around you, lots of things. Lots of things.

I’ve mentioned this article before but here it is again, as they’re back again.

U.N. Taking Over City Councils Across America! - youtube.com

And it’s a video; people can watch this and see for themselves the organization that’s actually working. It’s a private organization working for the United Nations that have put themselves on every board, every city, and even local councils across the country, across Canada as well. And nothing can get passed anywhere for land use or anything without their permission. And what they say goes goes. So as I say, it’s just astonishing. You ARE post-democratic; in fact you never really had it. But it was a nice idea at the time; it kept us all dizzy and happy. But we never really had democracy but now, there’s not even a pretense of democracy now. So like the Club of Rome said, you’re post-democratic, you’re post-consumer and you’re now into austerity. So these guys plan well and they never, as Albert Pike says, bring off or start a premature revolution.  This is part of a revolution, you understand, from the masters of revolutions.

Again in Australia too...

Foreclosures rise as more borrowers fail to repay Louise Hall

smh.domain.com.au / January 3, 2012

BANKS and building societies have repossessed 22.5 per cent more homes than in 2010, with western Sydney and big regional centres in NSW hardest hit.

Lenders asked the NSW (A: New South Wales) Supreme Court to issue 2466 writs of possession against borrowers in default in the 10 months to November last year.

The number of writs issued in the same period in 2010 was 2143 . . . (A: ...so it’s up to 2466. So everything’s going to stay like that for a long time as we go down the tubes into the new system, or transition, as again they say it, it’s transitioning.)

And another organization that’s been put into place through the United Nations is called

NaturalEngland.org.uk

(A: I’ll put the links up for all these articles tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Natural England, they seem to be everywhere; again, a private company. They have got permission to use...)

Enforcement  (A: ...of all environmental laws. And their web site says...)

Enforcement is used as a last resort but it is sometimes necessary to ensure the natural environment is protected. We aim to use enforcement in a consistent and proportionate manner that is targeted at illegal activities that have the greatest impact on wildlife, geology and landscapes.

And you should see the size of this site and all their pages. So here’s this private group, again. This is how you’re trained; it’s a new feudal system and the private guys all pretend they’re wonderful communistic people who are taking care of the planet, because you’re just too irresponsible to do it yourselves. And of course they’ve got bosses above them that end up getting the land, and they get drilling rights and everything else there and mineral rights on them.

The breakup of the countries... now, Lenin talked about eventually that the nation-state would wither away. It would wither away. We’ve seen it in Europe when Rompuy stood up and says that the sovereign state is now gone. And nobody hiccupped, because they don’t know... they can’t remember Lenin saying much the same thing, you see. They can’t relate things one to another unless you teach them it, and no one’s been taught it for a long time. Anyway...

Sir Gus O’Donnell (Britain's most senior civil servant):

The UK faces break-up

(A: Now, that was to work in those countries that wouldn’t quite toe-the-line and Scotland’s talking about joining Norway under a Scandinavian group and things like that.)

telegraph.co.uk / Christopher Hope, and James Kirkup / 21 Dec 2011

Sir Gus O’Donnell is Britain's most senior civil servant.

Writing in The Telegraph, Sir Gus O’Donnell asks whether the Union can survive increasing pressure for Scottish independence.  (A: It’s not really Scottish independence. Scotland’s got a group in there that would do... you know, actually Lenin would love them, Lenin would love them because they’re totally Marxist in a sense; some of them aren’t Scottish whatsoever but it doesn’t matter, people think they are.)

Sir Gus, who is the head of more than 440,000 civil servants in England, Scotland and Wales, says the future of the Union is one of several “enormous challenges” facing the political establishment in the coming years.  (A: Now remember too, that England’s already given... they’re merging parts of England with France, French companies or corporations, they’ve already bought the rights to whole areas from seaports right through inland and you can see how it’s happening there too. So the nation-state is to wither away one way or another, and they do it all ways.)

John Pilger talks about what’s happening in India right now, quite an interesting article. He talks about the first signs of an Indian spring, as peasants are revolting about... Because now the money’s pouring in, all funneled through the World Trade Organization, the IMF, etc, as they are slated to come up, with all our tax money, and it’s going into the hands of the profiteers, the guys who will be the new upper, very upper class, and the rest of them get awfully poor. So he’s talking about what’s happening there and just the same old stuff that’s happened elsewhere.

In the land of facades, mark the first signs of an Indian spring - johnpilger.com / 29 December 2011

Also in India too, a little girl was killed in a ritual sacrifice to ensure better crops.

India girl killed in ritual sacrifice to ensure better harvest - worldnews.msnbc.msn.com / Jan 3, 2012

Part of it is due to the fact that the Rothschilds have been actually buying up all the farms after they decimated the farms and the land and bought the farms up for pennies. Thousands and thousands of farmers committed suicide because they now have to buy the Rothschild company’s GM group seed, they have their own GM seed group, and the chemicals that go with it. So the farmers were killing themselves and Rothschilds bought up a good part of India. But now they’re sacrificing people to make things grow again. So it’s rather sad what’s happening across the globe right now.

Now...

NATO forces to attend drill in Israel

Ynetnews.com / Yoav Zitun / 01.02.12 / Israel News

(A: I didn’t know Israel was part of NATO; I don’t think it is. Anyway, this is the excuse they’re giving us for them being over there.)

Organization's search and rescue units, emergency services to take part for first time in Home Front Command drill simulating massive earthquake.  (A: That’s the reason that we’re given for it.)

NATO forces are scheduled to participate, for the first time, in a home front drill that will be held in Israel next October.

In recent years, the IDF took part in several exercises held by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization abroad, but has never hosted its members in Israel.

The drill, dubbed "Turning Point 6," (A: That will take a lot of deciphering there.) will simulate a massive earthquake leading to wide-scale destruction and large amounts of casualties.

NATO Search and rescue units, as well as supporting units will arrive in Israel to take part in the drill . . .

Now, NATO remember, is the military wing of the United Nations. They were the guys who went in and bombed Libya. They’re not really known for helping in earthquakes and things. They might cause a few but not for helping afterwards. So I’ll put this article up tonight too.

And also, before I go to the callers, I want to mention this. There’s a bunch of PDFs I’m going to put up too and they’re from the Council on Foreign Relations or the United Nations, for those who think the Kyoto Protocol’s dead and they lost everything at the Durban meeting you’d better read this one here. Because there’s one here...

Decision -CMP.7:   Land use, land-use change and forestry - unfccc.int

They’ve gone for the whole kit-and-caboodle, right down to your private little garden round about you. I’ll put that one up for you there tonight and you can see they lost nothing. No. They told you that but that’s actually a con to get all this through so as that you wouldn’t object. Another one is called...

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005

...that came out of it as well. That goes back to 2005 to show you how far they’ve come from then to the present. That’s quite a good one as well. And then there’s also this one here...

World Development Report - wdr2011.worldbank.org

...very interesting study for the United Nations again. It’s showing you that step by step, by the Fabian style with their fingers in a thousand pies across the world, they’re pulling it all off, everything’s working, and how they actually communicate to each other, make sure that all media’s on board with them, get the right propaganda out en mass and never change your story, always say the same story, etc, etc... how your minds are shaped. Also one for the...

United Nations Global Compact

Policy for the “Communication on Progress” (COP) - unglobalcompact.org

And another one here is about the land use again. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, and a different version of it as well.   So I’ll put all of that up tonight and you can have a little peek, for those who are serious about learning what’s going on, as apart from who you’re supposed to vote for, because that changes nothing, at all. Never has, it’s a sideshow. Because all these laws and treaties are put into law, immediately by presidents, and you simply follow them. It’s also taught in schools right away, doesn’t matter who’s in power. So that’s how the world’s changed.

Now, we’ll go to the callers now and there’s Carlton from New York on the line there. Are you there Carlton?

Carlton: How you doin’ Mr Watt? Happy New Year.

Alan: Happy New Year to you too. Yeah.

Carlton: I just wanted to say I did get your book in the mail; thank you for that. And thank you for letting me know about my email too.  I was going to ask you something about... well you was just talking about basically perception management.  And I was talking to somebody yesterday about, you know, just some history and we was talking about Obamacare and things of that nature, and he was an Obama supporter. But I was just trying to point certain things out to him, of course like, you know, it’s not really him that’s doing it, it’s just his name, he’s the front man. And he understood all of that. But then he hit me with the phrase [Caller laughing.], he said to me, he’s like, I watch CNBC, I know what’s going on.

Alan: [Alan laughing.]

Carlton: [Caller laughing.]   That one like just... I just had to stop and laugh because I was like okay, you can go ahead and [Caller laughing.] you believe in that. But I wanted to ask you about this because there’s a guy who came out. He’s written a few books about like cures that they don’t want you to know about, his name’s Kevin Trudeau. Have you ever heard of him?

Alan: I think so.

Carlton: Well, like a big infomercial dude. Well he came out with this whole thing called The Global Information Network and I would say like the main underlying thing that it’s really pushing is somewhat of the... what is it? You think about it and it happens... what is that called again?

Alan: You’re talking about trends and memes and things?

Carlton: Like you just think positive about something and then it just happens.

Alan: Oh, yeah, yeah. The New Age stuff.

Carlton: Right, right, right, right. But now, I’ve just got to ask you this question. Do you think there’s some truth to it, because just me thinking about like, just the fact that I’m starting to become more aware of certain things and more people and more information’s just starting to flow to me. Now, maybe it’s because I’m more aware of it. The law of attraction, yeah, that’s what it’s called. And I don’t believe that you actually sitting here thinking about a Ferrari, that you put pictures up on the wall and it’s going to happen. No. You got to put some work in to actually make it manifest. But what is, what are your thoughts on that, like just not even really saying that that’s really the whole, the whole crux of it. But just coming into something or being more aware of it and then more information and more people of that same mindset are just hitting you. Because that’s happened to me, like...

Alan: Well part of it too, part of it is that because you’re more aware you’re actually noticing the people who are also aware. You understand, when you’re not aware you don’t notice them either, that there is a bit more life in them, there’s a bit more... You might even hear little bits of conversation, whereas before if you’re not awake at all you don’t notice them. So partly it’s because you’re still waking up yourself, you’re seeing more and more of them. And again, you’ll be more visible too, because you can then jump in and join the conversation as well. So that works that way. But there’s definitely a part of it, it’s like motivational courses, where you can motivate yourself; that’s really the name for it. You’re motivating yourself to always be aware, to try and promote the information that you have; and it does work that way. It certainly will work that way, you know; it’s not a magical thing in itself.

Carlton: It’s crazy. Like one day I was actually with a friend of mine and we were going to, actually doing like a charity event, we were handing out some gifts to some kids, right. And we’re walking and out of the blue, there was a guy out on the corner that just was doing something, and this was a guy that I’m actually involved with some activism with. And the guy that was on the corner just out the blue just said, keep spreading the truth, brother, keep spreading the truth. And I was like... we just looked at each other like, what, he don’t even know like what we’re about or what we do or anything. And it was like, you get that, just, you know what I’m saying, it gravitates around you.

Alan: Sure, yeah.

Carlton: And you know that because you got to be on a radio show and you talk to people from all over the world.

Alan: Yeah. Oh, yeah. But it is, though, for people who are living in a desert to hear someone else just say a few words about it, it really brightens up their day, it’s water in the desert for them, sure. Thanks for calling and we’ll go to Alex after this break. Back in a few moments.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ve got Alex from Victoria BC hangin’ on the line. Are you there Alex?

Alex: I’m here. How are ya?

Alan: Not too bad at all.

Alex: Hope you’re having as good a new year as can be under the circumstances.

Alan: Yeah, well I’ve got between 10 and 15 and sometimes 20 below zero, that’s on the Fahrenheit scale, at the moment, so at least I can keep warm inside, yeah.

Alex: Right. We have electric heat here, I guess we’ve got a water system, and we got a boiler, and we’ve been waking up with extremely sore throats; they’re dry, covered in spots. I actually have some kind of things that feel like toothbrush bristles sticking out of the roof of my mouth sometimes. And we were wondering what was causing it, maybe it was just too dry or something at first but it’s been going on four months. And I’ve noticed after considerable study that when we wake up, like we listened to Werner and we got under the blankets when it was happening and it actually sort of resolved somewhat. He was saying there’s a possibility the air is being changed into nitrogen, through directed energy or something, right.

Alan: It is known, for the listeners who are not aware, it’s known that British Columbia is a big test area for lots of these technotronic weapons, for those who wonder what we’re talking about. It is a big test area out that way, yeah.

Alex: That’s right. Good point. So I noticed when this stuff was happening to me that there seemed to be a spike in the current going, electrical, and that when our throats were dry and sore and stuff I got up and I turned on the light, the fluorescent light with ballasts, and it made one hell of a racket, whereas when it’s not happening, which is when we’re out of bed, all of us are up using computers and you know, doing normal things, that that spike in current isn’t there. We measured it and a safe level would be 50 and sometimes it’s as high as 1600. So it’s quite bizarre. And it seems to me that this stuff is acting in concert with what might be a binary weapon system which we’re breathing in through the weaponized aerosol, which they’re spraying all over Sicktoria, here on Guinea Pig island in Vancouver British Columbia, Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

Alan: Well, I do know that the spraying is very heavy out there, because even airline pilots have told me that same thing too, that BC is heavily, heavily sprayed; other areas get it too, heavily, but they really seem to pick that area for some reason there. And again, there’s military bases out there too, US and Canadian, and they do test a lot of stuff out in that area. The odd thing is too, with the new electronics that are in as well, with Smart Meters and all your so-called energy-saving bulbs, which actually give off radio signals, because you put a radio up next to them and the signal just goes on the radio, or a meter for that matter. And it spikes just like microwave; you’ll see it spiking on your meter. So these things in a sense are all working in concert with each other. And it could possibly be part of the technotronic system that Brzezinski and others have talked about, so I’ve no doubt there’s more going on than meets the eye. But in the winter, regardless, I always put a pot of water on the woodstove and that keeps enough moisture in the air to try to keep most of the static down; lots of static otherwise and you do get sore throats. So rule that out first and then see what happens.

Alex: Yeah. We have 3 Smart Meters 10 feet from my bed, just in the...

Alan: Oh, you shouldn’t have that. You should... you got to screen that off. You got to screen that off from yourself and just use like the mosquito mesh, three layers of it in fact, behind the meter and try and screen that stuff off.

Alex: We’ll do that. [Caller laughing.]

Alan: Okay. That’s really bad for you. And Ryan from Ontario, maybe you can call tomorrow; sorry I couldn’t get to you.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

"Trust Me, it's Science"---Science Grants and Fraud

China Claims Western Socialism is Trying to Undermine Chinese Socialism

Internal Problems with China

Vancouver--Free Crack Pipes for Addicts

400 Scots per Week Going Insolvent

Power Surge to Price Surge for Australians

UN Taking over City Councils via ICLEI

Foreclosures Rise in Australia

Natural England--NGO UN Group, Earth Charter, Agenda 21 etc..

Natural England Enforcing Laws

Break-up of UK?

Indian Spring Next?

Girl Sacrificed in India for Better Harvest

NATO-Israel Exercises

UN and Land Use--from Durban Meeting

Framework Convention on Climate Change

World Development Report

UN--Global Compact on Communication on Progress

Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on... it’s actually January the 3^rd 2012. For newcomers, as always, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find a host of, thousands actually, of audios for free download where hopefully, if you can, if you have it in you, you can wade through so much material, information about this so-called new world order, which isn’t new at all. You’ll find out the big players, the organizations, thousands of organizations that work together to make it all happen, all the way from your educational systems, even kindergarten, from the United Nations, through foundations, NGOs, just countless, countless organizations all working together on a global plan for a new type of society, an ordered society, post democratic. I give you the planners from a long time ago and the money boys that helped to finance it all and of course profit from it too at the same time, and how it’s all playing out today. You’re living through the big changes, and they actually call this ‘the era of change.’ So get used to it, but at least find out what’s happening and why you’re changing and why you’re adapting to it as well.

Remember, go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself. Also too, all the sites listed there have transcripts in English of a lot of the talks I’ve given if you want to print them up. Go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu if you want transcripts in other languages. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you and you can help me get by, by buying the books and disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and donating as well. [Order and donation options listed above.]

I try, as I say, to chronicle the events as we go through things and explain why we go through things, why we adapt. Basically I describe human nature which is so well understood by the big boys themselves as they treat us as the ‘mass man’ basically, this old concept from the old industrial era of mass production. You’re the mass man and what works for one man generally will work for another and the same with women as well; Bernays knew these techniques, worked them to the full, and it’s worked so successfully. Really, we are a composite, today, of the big thinkers and players that created the 20^th century, and they created the cultures as well, as they broke apart the old cultures that held us together. So we’re in flux in a sense. When you’re in flux, when you have no traditions to hang onto, you’re in constant movement and you follow the leaders, who are well supplied to you through all the media, movies, etc, your favorite stars on television; that’s what they do. And you copy them and follow them, emulate them, even their speech, and whatever they do you will do as well. You’re not free at all. You’re really under a form of mind control, or perception management. I’ve gone through a lot of this perception management too, and the big boys who help bring this in across society. All the media uses it, all entertainment uses it as well, all the newscasters use it because they all belong to the same organization basically, the Council on Foreign Relations. So you’re getting the same messages, many of them not quite subliminal, they’re above subliminal, most of them, but you start to parrot them yourselves: They can’t all be wrong can they; therefore it must be me that’s wrong in my thinking. And so you adapt to theirs instead, very simple technique. And most folk will give up their own individual thought patterns, conclusions, to go along with the majority; it happens all the time. Young people are more susceptible because they have peer pressure; they want to be accepted by their group; they haven’t really found individuality yet. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about perception management and how everything IS perception management and how we’re really trained generation by generation. And by that I don’t mean 70 years, I mean literally the system is upgraded into what you’ll be taught, or what you’ll experience 30 years down the road, when you go into kindergarten today. And they upgrade it every year pretty well. And the next hundred years is already worked out, maybe 200 years in fact, of the kind of citizens they want to have, what they’ll believe, what their behaviors will be, and what they’ll accept. In other words, new normals, and it will all be approved by the State. And the State will also tell them what to disapprove of as well. It’s already happening today, very, very swiftly, as folk adapt and adapt and adapt. They can’t really think for themselves. Why should they, because the media’s doing it all for them; that’s what Brzezinski said 30-odd years ago in his own book Between Two Ages. So that’s happened.

And we’re also being taught to believe in experts all the time. Statistics abound and we don’t have any means of checking them ourselves, of course, or even doing the experiments to find out what we read is true. But you see, a long time ago, back in the 20^th century, early 20^th century, the big players like Bertrand Russell and others said that science and scientists would take over the positions, not only of the old priesthoods of religions but also they’d take over from politicians eventually – that also comes under technocracy. And we have a lot of that today, right down to having people appointing themselves to your town councils even under the guise of experts on the environment, they’re there to take care of the environment; they sort of just put themselves on the board and you don’t elect them. You can get rid of them too if you know what’s going on, but most folk don’t so they allow them to stay.

Anyway, this article here is about statistics and the cons that go on within science itself; because we’re so well trained, we just believe what they tell us, you see. As I say, it’s so convoluted whatever they give to you; you have no way to check on it so you got to take their word for it. And this article here is about...

How one man got away with mass fraud by saying ‘trust me, it’s science’

news.nationalpost.com / Joseph Brean / Dec 30, 2011

When news broke this year that Diederik Stapel, a prominent Dutch social psychologist, was faking his results on dozens of experiments, the fallout was swift, brutal and global.

Science and Nature, the world’s top chroniclers of science, were forced to retract papers that had received wide popular attention, including one that seemed to link messiness with racism, because “disordered contexts (such as litter or a broken-up sidewalk and an abandoned bicycle) indeed promote stereotyping and discrimination.”

As a result, some of Prof. Stapel’s junior colleagues lost their entire publication output; Tilburg University launched a criminal fraud case; Prof. Stapel himself returned his PhD and sought mental health care; and the entire field of social psychology — in which human behaviour is statistically analyzed — fell under a pall of suspicion.

One of the great unanswered questions about the Stapel affair, however, is how he got away with such blatant number-fudging, especially in a discipline that claims to be chock full of intellectual safe-guards, from peer review to replication by competitive colleagues. How can proper science go so wrong? (Alan: Well actually it’s not unusual. You see it all across the board now, and look at all the fudged statistics from the political organizations, that call themselves scientists, to do with the climate change stuff. Same thing.)

The answer, according to a growing number of statistical skeptics, is that without release of raw data and methodology, this kind of research amounts to little more than “‘trust me’ science,” in which intentional fraud and unintentional bias remain hidden behind the numbers. Only the illusion of significance remains.

Stanley Young and Alan Karr of the US National Institute of Statistical sciences, for example, point to several shocking published claims that were not borne out by the data on which they were based, including coffee as a cause of pancreatic cancer, Type A personality causing heart attacks, and eating breakfast cereal increasing the odds that a woman will give birth to a boy.

“The more startling the claim, the better,” they wrote in a recent issue of the journal Significance. “These results are published in peer-reviewed journals, and frequently make news headlines as well. They seem solid. They are based on observation, on scientific method, and on statistics. But something is going wrong. There is now enough evidence to say what many have long thought: that any claim coming from an observational study is most likely to be wrong – wrong in the sense that it will not replicate if tested rigorously.”

Victor Ivrii, a University of Toronto math professor, described the problem similarly on his blog: “While Theoretical Statistics is (mainly) a decent albeit rather boring mathematical discipline (Probability Theory is much more exciting), so called Applied Statistics is in its big part a whore. Finding dependence (true or false) opens exciting financing opportunities and since the true dependence is a rare commodity many “scientists” investigate the false ones.”

“If jumping to wrong conclusions brings a scorn of colleagues and a shame, they will be cautious. But this does not happen these days,” Prof. Ivrii said in an email. “Finding that eating cereals does not affect your cardio [for example] brings neither fame nor money, but discovering that there is some connection allows you to apply for a grant to investigate this dependence.” (A: See, they all live on grants.)

Science, at its most basic, is the effort to prove new ideas wrong. The more startling the idea, the stronger the urge to disprove it, as was illustrated when European physicists last month seemed to have seen particles travel faster than light, which has prompted a massive effort to replicate (or more likely debunk) such a shocking result.

Although science properly gets credit for discovery and progress, falsifiable hypotheses are its true currency, and when scientists fail to disprove a false hypothesis, they are left with a false positive.

Technically known as the incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis, a false positive is “perhaps the most costly error” a scientist can make, according to a trio of leading American researchers who this fall published “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.”

So with all that fancy terminology basically what they’re really saying is that they’re going into it with a bias, in other words a pre-conclusion, and they try to prove their pre-conclusion, especially when you can get grant money to go ahead with it. And there’s no one else really doing the same tests so they don’t bother checking on it, and it’s published by peer reviews and up it goes on the billboard. But it’s even better, as I say, when it’s to do with climate science and there’s a lot of cash involved, and a political agenda at the same time.

But we’re taught, it must be true, it’s statistics, you know, you can’t disprove statistics. That’s what they tell you. Because you see, we live in a materialistic society and the more materialistic we become the more we depend on DATA, what we think is raw data, disprovable data is there. And of course even in the technotronic society and techniques and other branches of the same organization in fact, they talked about algorithms and how they could break ALL nature and ALL behavior down to algorithms. And they’re actually using that in the RAND Corporation for all governments; they use us as the data and they feed us through its algorithms and all those algorithms, that’s YOU there, you see, you’re predictable basically, because of all these numbers.

And that’s how we’re put down to. It’s just amazing what we go through in life when you look back through the sciences. And we go from one religion to the next, to the religion of science, and like all other religions, science says, you know we’re the real one because we got all the data to prove it. And then they do a bunch of sums and equations and all that, and a lot of scribbling and stuff, look awfully important, get lots of money and we tend to believe them for a while. But unfortunately, at least in other religions they give you a bit of spiritual food, whereas in science they try to bring you down to the lowest common denominator and say that you’re an amoeba that crawled out of the mud and they can do what they want with you. And we believe them too; we allow them to do that as well. You’re just another animal, you see. And that’s taught in eugenics, you’re just another animal, we can do with them what we please to do with them, especially since we’re the most evolved ones at the top. You understand what happens when you throw out the old religions? You’re fair game. You’re fair game for the top predators to do as they wish. And you ain’t seen nothing yet; they’re just getting started.

Now China, China’s greatest threat is internal, apparently. China’s claiming – in 2 articles I have here; one is from the CFR – that the West is using cultural wars against China. Now, communist countries understand cultural wars because it was the communists within America, through Hollywood and various organizations and television that were really pushing the communist liberalism, as they called it in the West, to destroy the culture, to bring in a new type of culture. The old man/woman stuff, family had to go all together, and you had to get all the youngsters separated from the older population and make them believe that they’re actually guiding their own path and, you know, on the ‘cutting edge’ of ‘my generation’ so that they could destroy them ever going back to having a wife, husband and family. So they understand wars very well, cultural wars, and they’re blaming the West for trying to interfere with the Chinese version of communism and trying to force on them the Fabian/Western type of socialist communism which we’re under here, if you don’t know it. You see. We’re actually under it here. So anyway it says...

China's Greatest Threat Is Internal - Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations / cfr.org / December 28, 2011

And Mr Haass of course, who is the current President of the Council on Foreign Relations, the only organization that literally is an advisor to every government on the planet, again, a private organization set up by the bankers long ago, but he goes on about the other parts of it too, to do with the internal problems of China, how they’re keeping their currency artificially low so as that people will keep buying their mass goods. And at the same time there’s trouble within China now with the incredible, incredible gap between the rich and the very, very poor; it’s just astronomical now. But that’s what comes when you bring in this form of what you think is capitalism. You get a tiny group of multi-trillionaires eventually and masses of poor around them and prostitution and drugs and everything. Just like the West, you see, we’re already finished; it’s already happened here. Because this is a technique, it’s a technique of rule, for those who’ve been around for thousands of years who know how to do it. So I’ll put this link up tonight from Mr Haass. Remember, Mr Haass too, remember that link I put up last week, also commented on the Middle East and other countries around the Middle East as well including Iran, to do with this war, he said, will go on for another, at least 3 decades. 3 DECADES, that also means 3 decades of anti-terrorism and more laws passed until we’re... what will we be then? This is perpetual war. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about China as an example, really having internal problems, but also they’re trying to fight back against what they see as Western encroachment on their socialist system, their Chinese socialism, by using Western socialism; that’s what we live under today, for those who don’t know. It doesn’t matter what party’s in it’s all the same, you see, the same boys are actually in behind it. So this article here, it says...

Hu Says West Is Trying to Divide China by Using Ideology, Cultural Weapons

bloomberg.com / Jan 2, 2012

Hu Jintao, China's president, speaks during a news conference with U.S. President Barack Obama (A: ...has a chat with Obama...) in the East Room of the White House (A: I guess that means... when the East Wing is mentioned it’s always like they’re meeting as Masons, you know, the sun comes up and all that.) in Washington, D.C., U.S., Jan. 19, 2011.

The West is using cultural means to divide China (PRCH), which needs to be alert to this threat, President Hu Jintao said in a Communist Party magazine.

“International forces are trying to Westernize and divide us by using ideology and culture,” (A: That’s how we were destroyed back here, by the same group actually.) Hu wrote in an article in Qiushi. “We need to realize this and be alert to this danger.”

Many countries, especially Western powers, are attempting to expand their influence through cultural hegemony, and China must deepen and promote its own values of “socialism with Chinese characteristics,” Hu wrote in the article, which was published on the government’s website on Jan 1. China needs to strengthen its cultural values as it faces possible challenges from the West, he said.

Hu’s comments are part of a wider push by the party to reassert its influence over Chinese culture and society, including in television and the arts. (A: See, that’s how it happened here too, television, the arts, education and so on.) China’s leaders are grappling with the best way to manage Twitter-like social-media sites such as Sina Corp (SINA)’s (A: That’s almost most like Sinai.) Weibo service that are hard for government censors to control. (A: Nothing’s hard for them to control.)

The Communist Party’s Central Committee said it will supervise the world’s biggest online community more closely, promote “constructive” websites and punish the spread of “harmful information,” according to a communique from its Oct. 15-18 meeting released by the official Xinhua News Agency.

Members of the party’s Politburo visited web companies after a deadly train crash in July. Internet users criticized the government’s handling of the crash and spread commentary and photos of the accident at odds with the official line. (A: So in other words they like to censor a lot of stuff there. We have it censored, and we’re given other stuff to replace it so you don’t really know it’s being censored. We’re cleverer here; they’re still old-fashioned there. They do it, you know, in a very straight fashion. We are much more sophisticated in the West, because we’ve been at it for such a long time.)

Now, you hear all this stuff about drugs and just today I was reading about different drug effects on the front parts of the brain for chronic weed users, for instance. And they find they actually have smaller parts in the front parts of their brain, in their offspring even, so it affects it, but that’s an old study really too; they keep doing it and come up with the same findings. The ventricles, also, in the brain expand so it affects long-term use on the brain itself. And we always see how the US is pretending to fight all the drugs and stuff like that coming in from Canada. And a lot of it’s true; I mean, a lot of it is coming in from Canada. And it says...

Vancouver health body begins free crack pipe program for addicts

(A: We’re much more socialist in Canada, we treat our addicts better, after getting them addicted.)

news.nationalpost.com / Postmedia News Dec 30, 2011 / Jan 1, 2012 / Jenelle Schneider

Hugh Lampkin, president of the Vancouver Area of Network Drug Users, shows one of 60,000 crack smoking kits that will be distributed at five sites throughout Vancouver's Downtown Eastside to help reduce the spread of disease.

Now see, the Chinese aren’t really that daft or crazy about what they’re saying. They’re talking about culture. This is Canadian culture now, you see, at least on the West side of Canada. And a few years ago they were teaching children at school, about the age of 5 to 8, how to safely inject heroin, on the premise that probably they’ll be using it down the road. They’re getting taught this in school. So now they’re giving out crack smoking kits, and of course it would be quite easy for the cops to stop the stuff coming in in the first place, if that was a mandate but it’s not. Remember, drugs too, was mentioned by Huxley and also by Bertrand Russell and many, many others, as a form of bringing down society at this particular phase, because they helped plan it, this phase we’re living through today. And so it’s being used. Regular pharma’s involved; they’ve got half the population or three-quarters of it drugged already. And of course the illegal side is all run by the same big boys as well. And as long as you’re drugged on something, it doesn’t really matter what it is. So here they are, they’re helping them, giving them free pipes for Christmas, you know – they still believe in some kind of Christmas here. Well, you can’t say Christmas... a Happy Holiday pipe I guess.

Anyway, in Scotland too, Scotland’s been hammered. I remember long ago in Scotland when the CFR came over to do their world meeting, it was, at the time, with the Royal Institute of International Affairs, to decide who would give the world its culture and they decided at that meeting that America was better equipped. Hollywood had the techniques and they would be given the job of creating a world culture along with the American music industry. They also mentioned at the same meeting, and it was in the papers at the time, that Scotland would be turned into a tourist area. You know, we would be sitting selling beads at the side of the road, probably to Chinese businessmen I guess; that’s how far ahead they plan things. In other words, they were going to close down all factories and the mines and leave them with pretty well nothing, except making beads and making rugs. You know, like model little places you go and visit on holiday: here’s a peasant Scot weaving a rug, you know, and here’s a peasant making beads, and stuff like that. And it’s pretty well gone that way. It says...

400 Scots a week to face being insolvent this year

(A: Because they don’t replace anything when they take anything out; they’re way ahead of the US and NAFTA, losing all their factories through the World Trade Organization, way ahead.)

heraldscotland.com / Catriona Stewart / 2 January 2012

MORE than 400 Scots a week will become insolvent this year as the economy fails to show signs of recovery from the downturn, a leading accountancy firm has warned. (A: I tell you, tourists too, the whole tourism trade is way down as well you see, and they count on that because it’s pretty well all they got, and making booze for the few big boys, the foreigners that own the whiskey companies. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and just mentioning how Scotland truly indeed was put into a tourist industry basically. And it says...

PKF has estimated that more than 20,000 people will have been sequestrated (A: ...they call it.) – the Scottish legal term for personal bankruptcy – or will have taken out a Protected Trust Deed (PTD) at the end of 2011.

So it just shows you that this is across the whole world and some countries are more ahead of others as we go through all these changes, these transitions actually. That’s the official name for this phase – it’s called World Transitions – right down to your local level as you bring in communitarianism; you bring in private agencies and charities to help and do the social work services, etc. That’s all happening now too. And your whole mode of thinking is supposed to change with it too; you’re being taught how to think locally, etc. So it’s just amazing.

Now in Australia, we know they’re really going to be the world leader for carbon taxes and all that kind of thing. And now they’re getting hit with their turn for electric prices to go surging up. Maurice Strong mentioned this, by the way, in the early 90s when he came to Canada back from the United Nations to privatize Ontario Hydro; he did that. We found out later he was getting two paychecks, one from the Ontario government and one from the United Nations. Anyway, he did privatize it and he said in the mainstream then, he says, the world we’re bringing in will be one where electricity will be rationed out to those who need it and eventually, he says, we shall have to figure ways of getting most of the electricity to those who still produce in big corporations, etc. So what we’re living through today worldwide was planned a long time ago. And Maurice Strong was in charge of the Rio Summit; he will be in charge of this year’s Rio Summit too. That’s the big one that brought you Agenda 21, the Millennium Project, all the things you’re hearing about now, which they’re actually implementing; a lot of it is already implemented and so on. Anyway it says...

Power surge to price surge: prepare for an expensive education, says expert Clay Lucas

theage.com.au / January 3, 2012

VICTORIANS need to urgently educate themselves about the looming surge in electricity prices this year, or face bills so high many will struggle to pay them, the chief of an energy price comparison service says.

Power use surged yesterday . . . (A: They talk about the temperatures and folk are using air conditioning. And it says, this new system that they’ve got in now, just like Canada...)

Much of this increase was on the charge to consumers for simply being connected to the grid (A: So you’re paying for just being connected.) - meaning users will now pay more regardless of whether they cut their power use or not. (A: And that’s the world you’re going into. Canada’s the same; Ontario’s going up about eight-fold actually over the next 4 years; they’ve told us that from the company themselves.)

The new tax (A: They’ve got a new carbon tax as well.), combined with mandatory renewable energy targets and chronic under-investment by power companies in infrastructure, will cause prices to rise further across Australia. ''We are looking at the doubling of the cost of power in five years' time,'' Mr Freund said. (A: ...I guess that’s close to Freud, but it’s Freund.)

Anyway, it’s going to be a lot more than double, believe you me, because it’s to be more than double in Ontario, and across the world too. So they’re really moving now. That’s what I’m saying, it doesn’t matter, when you’re told what to look at by mainstream media, don’t look at it because believe you me, there’s something bigger happening all around you, lots of things. Lots of things.

I’ve mentioned this article before but here it is again, as they’re back again.

U.N. Taking Over City Councils Across America! - youtube.com

And it’s a video; people can watch this and see for themselves the organization that’s actually working. It’s a private organization working for the United Nations that have put themselves on every board, every city, and even local councils across the country, across Canada as well. And nothing can get passed anywhere for land use or anything without their permission. And what they say goes goes. So as I say, it’s just astonishing. You ARE post-democratic; in fact you never really had it. But it was a nice idea at the time; it kept us all dizzy and happy. But we never really had democracy but now, there’s not even a pretense of democracy now. So like the Club of Rome said, you’re post-democratic, you’re post-consumer and you’re now into austerity. So these guys plan well and they never, as Albert Pike says, bring off or start a premature revolution. This is part of a revolution, you understand, from the masters of revolutions.

Again in Australia too...

Foreclosures rise as more borrowers fail to repay Louise Hall

smh.domain.com.au / January 3, 2012

BANKS and building societies have repossessed 22.5 per cent more homes than in 2010, with western Sydney and big regional centres in NSW hardest hit.

Lenders asked the NSW (A: New South Wales) Supreme Court to issue 2466 writs of possession against borrowers in default in the 10 months to November last year.

The number of writs issued in the same period in 2010 was 2143 . . . (A: ...so it’s up to 2466. So everything’s going to stay like that for a long time as we go down the tubes into the new system, or transition, as again they say it, it’s transitioning.)

And another organization that’s been put into place through the United Nations is called

NaturalEngland.org.uk

(A: I’ll put the links up for all these articles tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Natural England, they seem to be everywhere; again, a private company. They have got permission to use...)

Enforcement (A: ...of all environmental laws. And their web site says...)

Enforcement is used as a last resort but it is sometimes necessary to ensure the natural environment is protected. We aim to use enforcement in a consistent and proportionate manner that is targeted at illegal activities that have the greatest impact on wildlife, geology and landscapes.

And you should see the size of this site and all their pages. So here’s this private group, again. This is how you’re trained; it’s a new feudal system and the private guys all pretend they’re wonderful communistic people who are taking care of the planet, because you’re just too irresponsible to do it yourselves. And of course they’ve got bosses above them that end up getting the land, and they get drilling rights and everything else there and mineral rights on them.

The breakup of the countries... now, Lenin talked about eventually that the nation-state would wither away. It would wither away. We’ve seen it in Europe when Rompuy stood up and says that the sovereign state is now gone. And nobody hiccupped, because they don’t know... they can’t remember Lenin saying much the same thing, you see. They can’t relate things one to another unless you teach them it, and no one’s been taught it for a long time. Anyway...

Sir Gus O’Donnell (Britain's most senior civil servant):

The UK faces break-up

(A: Now, that was to work in those countries that wouldn’t quite toe-the-line and Scotland’s talking about joining Norway under a Scandinavian group and things like that.)

telegraph.co.uk / Christopher Hope, and James Kirkup / 21 Dec 2011

Sir Gus O’Donnell is Britain's most senior civil servant.

Writing in The Telegraph, Sir Gus O’Donnell asks whether the Union can survive increasing pressure for Scottish independence. (A: It’s not really Scottish independence. Scotland’s got a group in there that would do... you know, actually Lenin would love them, Lenin would love them because they’re totally Marxist in a sense; some of them aren’t Scottish whatsoever but it doesn’t matter, people think they are.)

Sir Gus, who is the head of more than 440,000 civil servants in England, Scotland and Wales, says the future of the Union is one of several “enormous challenges” facing the political establishment in the coming years. (A: Now remember too, that England’s already given... they’re merging parts of England with France, French companies or corporations, they’ve already bought the rights to whole areas from seaports right through inland and you can see how it’s happening there too. So the nation-state is to wither away one way or another, and they do it all ways.)

John Pilger talks about what’s happening in India right now, quite an interesting article. He talks about the first signs of an Indian spring, as peasants are revolting about... Because now the money’s pouring in, all funneled through the World Trade Organization, the IMF, etc, as they are slated to come up, with all our tax money, and it’s going into the hands of the profiteers, the guys who will be the new upper, very upper class, and the rest of them get awfully poor. So he’s talking about what’s happening there and just the same old stuff that’s happened elsewhere.

In the land of facades, mark the first signs of an Indian spring - johnpilger.com / 29 December 2011

Also in India too, a little girl was killed in a ritual sacrifice to ensure better crops.

India girl killed in ritual sacrifice to ensure better harvest - worldnews.msnbc.msn.com / Jan 3, 2012

Part of it is due to the fact that the Rothschilds have been actually buying up all the farms after they decimated the farms and the land and bought the farms up for pennies. Thousands and thousands of farmers committed suicide because they now have to buy the Rothschild company’s GM group seed, they have their own GM seed group, and the chemicals that go with it. So the farmers were killing themselves and Rothschilds bought up a good part of India. But now they’re sacrificing people to make things grow again. So it’s rather sad what’s happening across the globe right now.

Now...

NATO forces to attend drill in Israel

Ynetnews.com / Yoav Zitun / 01.02.12 / Israel News

(A: I didn’t know Israel was part of NATO; I don’t think it is. Anyway, this is the excuse they’re giving us for them being over there.)

Organization's search and rescue units, emergency services to take part for first time in Home Front Command drill simulating massive earthquake. (A: That’s the reason that we’re given for it.)

NATO forces are scheduled to participate, for the first time, in a home front drill that will be held in Israel next October.

In recent years, the IDF took part in several exercises held by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization abroad, but has never hosted its members in Israel.

The drill, dubbed "Turning Point 6," (A: That will take a lot of deciphering there.) will simulate a massive earthquake leading to wide-scale destruction and large amounts of casualties.

NATO Search and rescue units, as well as supporting units will arrive in Israel to take part in the drill . . .

Now, NATO remember, is the military wing of the United Nations. They were the guys who went in and bombed Libya. They’re not really known for helping in earthquakes and things. They might cause a few but not for helping afterwards. So I’ll put this article up tonight too.

And also, before I go to the callers, I want to mention this. There’s a bunch of PDFs I’m going to put up too and they’re from the Council on Foreign Relations or the United Nations, for those who think the Kyoto Protocol’s dead and they lost everything at the Durban meeting you’d better read this one here. Because there’s one here...

Decision -CMP.7: Land use, land-use change and forestry - unfccc.int

They’ve gone for the whole kit-and-caboodle, right down to your private little garden round about you. I’ll put that one up for you there tonight and you can see they lost nothing. No. They told you that but that’s actually a con to get all this through so as that you wouldn’t object. Another one is called...

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005

...that came out of it as well. That goes back to 2005 to show you how far they’ve come from then to the present. That’s quite a good one as well. And then there’s also this one here...

World Development Report - wdr2011.worldbank.org

...very interesting study for the United Nations again. It’s showing you that step by step, by the Fabian style with their fingers in a thousand pies across the world, they’re pulling it all off, everything’s working, and how they actually communicate to each other, make sure that all media’s on board with them, get the right propaganda out en mass and never change your story, always say the same story, etc, etc... how your minds are shaped. Also one for the...

United Nations Global Compact

Policy for the “Communication on Progress” (COP) - unglobalcompact.org

And another one here is about the land use again. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, and a different version of it as well. So I’ll put all of that up tonight and you can have a little peek, for those who are serious about learning what’s going on, as apart from who you’re supposed to vote for, because that changes nothing, at all. Never has, it’s a sideshow. Because all these laws and treaties are put into law, immediately by presidents, and you simply follow them. It’s also taught in schools right away, doesn’t matter who’s in power. So that’s how the world’s changed.

Now, we’ll go to the callers now and there’s Carlton from New York on the line there. Are you there Carlton?

Carlton: How you doin’ Mr Watt? Happy New Year.

Alan: Happy New Year to you too. Yeah.

Carlton: I just wanted to say I did get your book in the mail; thank you for that. And thank you for letting me know about my email too. I was going to ask you something about... well you was just talking about basically perception management. And I was talking to somebody yesterday about, you know, just some history and we was talking about Obamacare and things of that nature, and he was an Obama supporter. But I was just trying to point certain things out to him, of course like, you know, it’s not really him that’s doing it, it’s just his name, he’s the front man. And he understood all of that. But then he hit me with the phrase [Caller laughing.], he said to me, he’s like, I watch CNBC, I know what’s going on.

Alan: [Alan laughing.]

Carlton: [Caller laughing.] That one like just... I just had to stop and laugh because I was like okay, you can go ahead and [Caller laughing.] you believe in that. But I wanted to ask you about this because there’s a guy who came out. He’s written a few books about like cures that they don’t want you to know about, his name’s Kevin Trudeau. Have you ever heard of him?

Alan: I think so.

Carlton: Well, like a big infomercial dude. Well he came out with this whole thing called The Global Information Network and I would say like the main underlying thing that it’s really pushing is somewhat of the... what is it? You think about it and it happens... what is that called again?

Alan: You’re talking about trends and memes and things?

Carlton: Like you just think positive about something and then it just happens.

Alan: Oh, yeah, yeah. The New Age stuff.

Carlton: Right, right, right, right. But now, I’ve just got to ask you this question. Do you think there’s some truth to it, because just me thinking about like, just the fact that I’m starting to become more aware of certain things and more people and more information’s just starting to flow to me. Now, maybe it’s because I’m more aware of it. The law of attraction, yeah, that’s what it’s called. And I don’t believe that you actually sitting here thinking about a Ferrari, that you put pictures up on the wall and it’s going to happen. No. You got to put some work in to actually make it manifest. But what is, what are your thoughts on that, like just not even really saying that that’s really the whole, the whole crux of it. But just coming into something or being more aware of it and then more information and more people of that same mindset are just hitting you. Because that’s happened to me, like...

Alan: Well part of it too, part of it is that because you’re more aware you’re actually noticing the people who are also aware. You understand, when you’re not aware you don’t notice them either, that there is a bit more life in them, there’s a bit more... You might even hear little bits of conversation, whereas before if you’re not awake at all you don’t notice them. So partly it’s because you’re still waking up yourself, you’re seeing more and more of them. And again, you’ll be more visible too, because you can then jump in and join the conversation as well. So that works that way. But there’s definitely a part of it, it’s like motivational courses, where you can motivate yourself; that’s really the name for it. You’re motivating yourself to always be aware, to try and promote the information that you have; and it does work that way. It certainly will work that way, you know; it’s not a magical thing in itself.

Carlton: It’s crazy. Like one day I was actually with a friend of mine and we were going to, actually doing like a charity event, we were handing out some gifts to some kids, right. And we’re walking and out of the blue, there was a guy out on the corner that just was doing something, and this was a guy that I’m actually involved with some activism with. And the guy that was on the corner just out the blue just said, keep spreading the truth, brother, keep spreading the truth. And I was like... we just looked at each other like, what, he don’t even know like what we’re about or what we do or anything. And it was like, you get that, just, you know what I’m saying, it gravitates around you.

Alan: Sure, yeah.

Carlton: And you know that because you got to be on a radio show and you talk to people from all over the world.

Alan: Yeah. Oh, yeah. But it is, though, for people who are living in a desert to hear someone else just say a few words about it, it really brightens up their day, it’s water in the desert for them, sure. Thanks for calling and we’ll go to Alex after this break. Back in a few moments.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ve got Alex from Victoria BC hangin’ on the line. Are you there Alex?

Alex: I’m here. How are ya?

Alan: Not too bad at all.

Alex: Hope you’re having as good a new year as can be under the circumstances.

Alan: Yeah, well I’ve got between 10 and 15 and sometimes 20 below zero, that’s on the Fahrenheit scale, at the moment, so at least I can keep warm inside, yeah.

Alex: Right. We have electric heat here, I guess we’ve got a water system, and we got a boiler, and we’ve been waking up with extremely sore throats; they’re dry, covered in spots. I actually have some kind of things that feel like toothbrush bristles sticking out of the roof of my mouth sometimes. And we were wondering what was causing it, maybe it was just too dry or something at first but it’s been going on four months. And I’ve noticed after considerable study that when we wake up, like we listened to Werner and we got under the blankets when it was happening and it actually sort of resolved somewhat. He was saying there’s a possibility the air is being changed into nitrogen, through directed energy or something, right.

Alan: It is known, for the listeners who are not aware, it’s known that British Columbia is a big test area for lots of these technotronic weapons, for those who wonder what we’re talking about. It is a big test area out that way, yeah.

Alex: That’s right. Good point. So I noticed when this stuff was happening to me that there seemed to be a spike in the current going, electrical, and that when our throats were dry and sore and stuff I got up and I turned on the light, the fluorescent light with ballasts, and it made one hell of a racket, whereas when it’s not happening, which is when we’re out of bed, all of us are up using computers and you know, doing normal things, that that spike in current isn’t there. We measured it and a safe level would be 50 and sometimes it’s as high as 1600. So it’s quite bizarre. And it seems to me that this stuff is acting in concert with what might be a binary weapon system which we’re breathing in through the weaponized aerosol, which they’re spraying all over Sicktoria, here on Guinea Pig island in Vancouver British Columbia, Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

Alan: Well, I do know that the spraying is very heavy out there, because even airline pilots have told me that same thing too, that BC is heavily, heavily sprayed; other areas get it too, heavily, but they really seem to pick that area for some reason there. And again, there’s military bases out there too, US and Canadian, and they do test a lot of stuff out in that area. The odd thing is too, with the new electronics that are in as well, with Smart Meters and all your so-called energy-saving bulbs, which actually give off radio signals, because you put a radio up next to them and the signal just goes on the radio, or a meter for that matter. And it spikes just like microwave; you’ll see it spiking on your meter. So these things in a sense are all working in concert with each other. And it could possibly be part of the technotronic system that Brzezinski and others have talked about, so I’ve no doubt there’s more going on than meets the eye. But in the winter, regardless, I always put a pot of water on the woodstove and that keeps enough moisture in the air to try to keep most of the static down; lots of static otherwise and you do get sore throats. So rule that out first and then see what happens.

Alex: Yeah. We have 3 Smart Meters 10 feet from my bed, just in the...

Alan: Oh, you shouldn’t have that. You should... you got to screen that off. You got to screen that off from yourself and just use like the mosquito mesh, three layers of it in fact, behind the meter and try and screen that stuff off.

Alex: We’ll do that. [Caller laughing.]

Alan: Okay. That’s really bad for you. And Ryan from Ontario, maybe you can call tomorrow; sorry I couldn’t get to you.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

"Trust Me, it's Science"---Science Grants and Fraud

China Claims Western Socialism is Trying to Undermine Chinese Socialism

Internal Problems with China

Vancouver--Free Crack Pipes for Addicts

400 Scots per Week Going Insolvent

Power Surge to Price Surge for Australians

UN Taking over City Councils via ICLEI

Foreclosures Rise in Australia

Natural England--NGO UN Group, Earth Charter, Agenda 21 etc..

Natural England Enforcing Laws

Break-up of UK?

Indian Spring Next?

Girl Sacrificed in India for Better Harvest

NATO-Israel Exercises

UN and Land Use--from Durban Meeting

Framework Convention on Climate Change

World Development Report

UN--Global Compact on Communication on Progress

#3 · March 13, 2021, 8:12 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:12 am
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January the 4^th 2012. Newcomers, always make use of the web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find hundreds and hundreds of audios for free download where hopefully, if you can persevere, you’ll understand the big system that really runs the world, why things are the way they are, and why they’re going the way they’re going. Because you’ll find, as I say, there’s a big, super... I wouldn’t even call it government. It’s beyond government. It’s an intermeshing of big corporations, big foundations, big international bankers who planned the system an awful long time ago, and academia of course is a big part of it too because they always churn out the next generation of children who are going to really believe in the latest indoctrination and push the latest fad in philosophy or politics and so on. So you’ll find how it all works together if you help yourself to those audios. Massive organizations, very, very powerful, run the world, outside of your vote, way outside of your vote. In fact, they put your candidates in for you to pick. While you’re there too, remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can help me keep going by buying the books and disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember, straight donations are really awfully welcome.

What I try to do on this broadcast is chronicle the events, give you the history of the powerful institutions and organizations that met, over 100 years ago, to plan the world. The type of world that they wanted to bring in would be an authoritarian type society, post-democratic of course, although they would use democracy to con the public for a long time, but really it’s anything but democratic, and how they would create massive welfare states, for a while, just for a while, to get people dependent on a particular type of system and then of course they would have rule, the government would have rule over many, many people, the minds of people, and even politics itself, which has been awfully successful too in every country. They also wanted to destroy the cultures of all the countries, to annihilate them along the Marxist lines and to help eventually to bring in a world government and the old nations would fade away. That’s what’s happening supposedly in the European Union and eventually to do with the American amalgam as well, the NAFTA organization.

So we’re going through all of this. We’re watching the turmoil, which was expected too mind you, to do with finances, etc, as we go through this big upheaval into globalism and into global governance, as they like to call it. Because as I say, it’s not really a single government, it’s an amalgam of a whole bunch of different organizations, all on board with each other, all with the same philosophies and all taking their orders from a higher superior, obviously. And that’s what we’re going through right now. We are the generation that they call the ‘cannon fodder’ to go through all of this. And we have to suffer with inflation, with austerity, as they redistribute the wealth of the world. In other words, your tax money across the planet to their corporations; really that’s what they mean by redistribution of wealth. And all the Marxist groups are on board with all of this too; they’ve fallen for it all. And of course, they’re all led, too, by their own particular agents who work for the same organizations. Every group has got its leader supplied to them. I’ve said that many, many years ago. You don’t have to go creating a group because you’ll find there’s already one, or more, already made up for you, perfect. Why bother starting your own group when they’ve done it all for you in the first place? And that’s why you never get any further forward. You end up back with the voting stuff and that’s been a con game since its inception because one person, for instance, in one party isn’t going to change this... unless they were doing something awfully, awfully drastic. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and as I say, I try to make sense by going through history to find the big organizations that got together, and some of them amalgamated in the late 1800s and early 1900s to form big famous institutions which advise all governments. They not only advise them, they actually put their own people in as the heads of them. Carroll Quigley admitted that too; he was the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations for a while and the Royal Institute of International Affairs as well; it’s the same organization. And he said that, there hasn’t been a President or Prime Minister that has been put in in the last 60 years, and that was in the 1960s that he mentioned that, that wasn’t one of this organization’s people. So you’ve been run by them for an awful long time across the world now, it turns out; they have them in every country, the same organization. And they work with the big international bankers.

They do believe in getting countries into debt as a way of owning and controlling countries. And they also believe, as I say, in creating massive welfare systems; and the bankers love that because they live on interest. But it’s also to get people to give up their rights basically and become wards of the state to an extent, perpetual children. And now you have generations of them that expect to be taken care of just because they’re born into that family. Of course they can also be used for rioting when you cut back on their cash; so they’re good to have on standby, and every country has them. This is intentional. This is all intentional, folks. And you take away their ability to even take care of themselves. They don’t know how to anymore once they’re born into that system.   There are children growing up and they say that their social workers are their best friends, their social workers that visit them every day; they call each other on a first-name basis.

And this is the system that the big boys planned a long time ago, because they said they’d have to destroy the family unit. They’d have to follow every plank of the Communist Manifesto. It makes no surprise too that the big institutions that I’m talking about here helped fund the Marxist governments from its inception, in Russia, and all through its longevity as well. We even fed them from the West; strange thing to do with a country that was going to bomb you and nuke you, isn’t it? Feed them as well. And no one asked these obvious questions. Anyway, they still run the world and they’re going for broke now. They want a perfectly organized planet, a reduced population; we’re postindustrial, most countries now in the first world, so they want to bring us down quickly. And Rockefeller himself called for rapid depopulation, instead of the old-fashioned way taking us down more slowly through rotten food, you know, that doesn’t nourish you, and injections and all the usual stuff, and stuff in your drinking water.

So anyway, part of it was also, too, to destroy culture across the globe, first world countries. And that really took on a speed of its own in the 50s and the 60s. In came the drugs, in came the pill; feminists weren’t responsible for fighting their way up there. It was the pill, as Bertrand Russell said, science gave them what they think is freedom. But along with freedom comes a lot of catastrophe as well because the rest of society ends up, for the ones that do have children, single mums, paying for them all, so the state technically has taken over the place of the father – another part of the communist line as well. So they were fulfilling all of these things so easily. And also they knew too, that the people who were promiscuous, they would never bond. So they were teaching it in school under the guise of sex education, that sex is a distinct thing from having an emotional bonding towards somebody. Very successful in that area as well, so much so that mass immigration is brought into countries, because the domestic populations aren’t having any children, and they claim there’s not enough to pay off the national debt in the future. This is all mainstream stuff.

So we’re played with by the high and mighty, and we go along very willingly because it’s like putting children into a candy store and telling them to do what they want. You know, all children are the same, they don’t know what to do. They think they know it all but they don’t. They have no wisdom. So that’s how they treat the people, so-called adults. We have adults today that are still children. They’ve never grown up; never will grow up in fact. They play their whole lives, on the internet and play games and things like that. And the responsibility that come with having children and families and the rest of it, they’ve never had them either; that would just get in the way of their fun. So they’re technically extinct, even though they’re still walking around. They’re technically extinct.

And along with that too, came corruption. Corruption through everything. We see it everywhere we look in all officialdom. In the past they were awfully good at hiding it, at high places; now they don’t even bother, because the public don’t really care. But we find that the culture’s so degraded now, so degraded because all the old religions that at least gave you a basic moral code all went out the window too – another plank of the Manifesto – and basically they have nothing to fall back on, except the guy who’s toughest and nastiest generally wins. You see. That’s what the youngsters see in all their video games. I mean who wants to be a loser, eh, one of those guys on their knees begging for mercy, those peasants, you know, the civilians? Who wants to be a loser like that? Don’t you want to wear all that fancy gear and all the armor plating and have the big gun? It’s quite simple isn’t it?

Here’s an article from Britain...

The criminals in uniform: Almost 1,000 officers with convictions from drug dealing to perverting justice are still in the police

(Alan: There’s a lot more than that actually.)

dailymail.co.uk / Chris Greenwood / 3rd January 2012

Two detective chief inspectors among 944 officers in England and Wales with a criminal record.

One officer found guilty of gross misconduct after sending racist and sexist texts is still in his job.

Hundreds of others facing misconduct allegations are allowed to escape punishment by quitting their forces.

More than 900 police officers continue to serve despite being convicted of crimes including violence, robbery and fraud.

Forces employ policemen and women with criminal records for assault, burglary, supplying drugs and perverting the course of justice.

Among them are several senior officers, including two detective chief inspectors and a chief inspector working for the Metropolitan Police.

In some cases continuing to employ officers appears to directly contradict Government guidelines which insist on ‘proven integrity’.

They highlight that people with convictions for certain offences, including assault, dangerous driving and burglary, should not be recruited.

At least 944 serving officers and police community support officers (PCSOs) have a conviction. Most are for traffic offences such as speeding and drink-driving, but there are also offences of dishonesty and fraud.  (A: Then he goes through different ones, case histories, burglary, as teenagers, supplying drugs, etc, etc, robbery, and break and enters, and all that kind of stuff.)

So that’s what you’ve got now taking care of you. As I say, there’s no morality anymore; it’s really over for all of that. Their job now is to get as many convictions as they can, and climb the ladder, and be a winner. Again, everybody has to be a winner. You don’t want to be a loser do you? And here’s an article that falls right in with it...

Caught on film: Moment a police officer 'planted drugs in suspect's car'

dailymail.co.uk / By Daily Mail Reporter / 4th January 2012

A video taken from a police vehicle's dashcam shows an officer allegedly placing a bag in the car of a man they had pulled over for running a stop sign.

The video, which was filmed on February 11, 2011, shows the officers searching the car as the man stands handcuffed.

The officers are from Utica, New York, and the video was released by the local paper, the Utica Phoenix.

One of the officers is shown pulling a bag out of his pocket as he gets into the passenger side of the car.

He then emerges from the car with the same bag.

It is not clear what is inside the bag.

The video has gone viral since it was uploaded on YouTube on January 2.

When it was first put on the Phoenix's website it got so many hits - 64,000 in just under 24 hours - it crashed the site, wktv.com reports.

Utica police say they are still investigating the incident and that the video is also being reviewed by the FBI.

The video posted on the internet is one minute 40 seconds long, but the full video is 30 minutes.

Early in the full video, an officer's empty hand is shown going into the driver's jacket pocket and pulling out a bag.

So you got to understand that this is common. This is very, very common, to get convictions. And when you’re in court the judge always takes the policeman’s version, and that’s just the way it is, you know. And if they’re wanting more convictions and you’re the unlucky sap they’ve caught that night for maybe having a taillight out or something, then you go off to prison. And there’s a lot of folk in prison like that. So easy. So simple. But what I’m showing you is the complete moral decline in society. In fact, entertainment today is just moral degradation; we lap it all up. That’s all you’re given now. That’s all you’re given. And there’s a good reason for that too.

And also too, to do with the US as well, it says...

Both Sides Unhappy with Debt Commission's Proposals - pbs.org

They want to up the taxes across the US. I’ll put that up tonight, that link. I’ll put all these links up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the broadcast just so you can see for yourself.

Now, eugenics is a big part of this, this system that runs the world. They’ve always talked about creating the perfect slaves, basically, different types of them. Huxley’s Brave New World was part of that whole scenario too, and he wrote that book, remember, in the 1930s. And so they were well aware, in his particular class and certain families, and he was related to the Darwins too. They were well aware of where they were going with all of this agenda down the road.

Scientists grow sperm in laboratory dish

Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory.

telegraph.co.uk / 02 Jan 2012

(A: Part of it too is just to do away with normal guys, and women too for that matter.)

The development opens up the possibility of infertile men being able to father their own children rather than using donor sperm.

Now as you well know through the articles I’ve read here over the years, most men today, very early on, are actually infertile, and the sperm that they do produce are really blind as bats; they can’t find the target and they have bad mobility and all the rest of it. So we’re being sterilized, on cue, because they said they would sterilize, in the old books:  what do you do with all the people, oh we sterilize them. You don’t ask for volunteers, you find ways, like Russell said, of putting it in the food or injecting them and different ways to sterilize them. And you’ll find that across the board, all the stuff too, Bisphenol A, the estrogen mimickers that they have in food and all the rest of it, is all part of it too. They’ve known this since the 1800s by the way, that these things did it to men. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and just talking about an article here about growing male sperm outside the human body, in the laboratory, and the reasons, really, behind it all. Because eventually of course, as everyone goes sterile, only the wealthy will be able to afford this kind of treatment, and other ones, the ones who have proven that they’re better than the rest and that they’re more fit to go on into a new future and their children as well. This kind of stuff has even been discussed in movies, as I’m sure you’ve all seen, in the past. It says here...

Researchers in Germany and Israel were able to grow mouse sperm from a few cells in a laboratory dish.

In a world first a team headed by Professor Stefan Schlatt, at Muenster University in Germany, were able to grow sperm by using germ cells. These are the cells in testicles that are responsible for sperm production.  (A: Now why not go and find out the reason why they’re sterile in the first place and aren’t coming out of these cells, eh?)

Scientists grew the sperm by surrounding the germ cells in a special compound called agar jelly to create an environment similar to that found in testicles.

Prof. Mahmoud Huleihel, who also grew the sperm at Israel's Ben Gurion University in Beersheba, said: "I believe it will eventually be possible to routinely grow human male sperm to order by extracting tissue containing germ cells from a man's testicle and stimulating sperm production in the laboratory."

So they’re going full-scale ahead at that. But there’s no attempt, whatsoever, there’s not even shock or panic when they keep announcing every year that we’re down about 85% now of sperm production in the average male from about 25 and over. You know. Just incredible. Oh, there’s no crisis. No. Why is it not a crisis? It’s because it’s being done on purpose, that’s why it’s not a crisis. Believe you me, if it wasn’t being done on purpose it would be a crisis, by the controllers’ point of view. But no, there’s no crisis about it. And of course they’re not going to fix that problem; they’ll just grow them outside the body for those who can afford it.

Now, as we go now into the new authoritarian society, the one mentioned by the Club of Rome. They said that democracy was dead, it really didn’t work – for the big boys that is – to get their plans through so they’d have to do away with it.  We’re now into authoritarianism and technocracy, etc, etc. But you see, every country that joins the world government – and trading blocs, as they start off before they become world government. Countries get a lot of money that would come in on importing stuff from abroad, and that protected the producers at home as well to buy locally, buy your own stuff. In free trade you do away with all of that so you got to find another way to make up all that tax money. So they create Value Added Tax, a con just to get another tax on everything, everything you purchase. So they call it Value Added Tax. And years ago they started it off in Europe and food and different things were exempt. But of course, you know, anybody with half a brain knew darn well down the road they would jack it up on food as well, and medications and everything.

EU PLAN TO SLAP VAT ON FOOD

express.co.uk / January 3, 2012 / Padraic Flanagan

EU plans for a radical tax shake-up could cost struggling families and pensioners £800 a year.

The European Commission wants VAT exemptions on food, children’s clothes and other essentials abandoned in an effort to harmonise (A: In other words, standardize...) the sales tax across Europe.

Its plans come after the Coalition raised the VAT rate to 20 per cent (A: ...that’s on everything you buy, 20% taxes on top of what you see as the price.)  last year but kept an exemption for food, children’s clothes, passenger travel, books, newspapers and other products.

Last night the proposals sparked outrage among politicians and public-spending campaigners who attacked the Eurocrats for trying to interfere in Britain’s tax affairs.  (A: Well of course they’re going to interfere; Britain’s signed their sovereignty away by all the traitors that went before them, all these politicians.)  Ukip leader Nigel Farage said: “In their desperation to raise cash, the EU is prepared to do anything and hurt the most vulnerable. (A: Well that kills two birds with one stone, the poor will die off; you know, they can’t afford food.)

“These plans would add up to 20 per cent costs on food and children’s clothes. To put an extra tax on books and newspapers would be a strike for ignorance over education.

“Everyone would suffer, but the most vulnerable would suffer the most.”

The Commission, supported by the London-based Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, called for the exemptions to be abandoned to allow a common VAT (A: Value Added Tax) regime that would streamline the single market.  (A: Well why not just throw out the Value Added Tax all together? Why are folk paying this? ... for more bureaucrats and more and more bureaucrats in the EU parliament.)

But the move, which could raise £24billion a year for Government coffers, would deliver a crippling blow to the country’s poorest families and hard-pressed pensioners.  (A: Well, they’ve had all of that come in; they’ve got problems even heating themselves in the winter now. But again that’s eugenics, you let the poor die off first. And if you’re elderly as well, well you’re a bad citizen because you’re just consuming, you’re not producing anymore; that’s according to the United Nations you see. So eugenics is a big, big part of this depopulation program. And the fittest and healthiest and wealthiest should survive according to the ones at the top.)

And you know eugenics is everywhere, everywhere you look there’s eugenics and experiments. The US has been famous for doing a lot of stuff on people in their own country. So is Britain, very famous for doing secret trials on drugs through the National Health Service and even spraying a lot of their citizens with different things, like cadmium they were doing through the 50s, 60s and 70s, all over eastern England. It says...

Anger over secret drug trials on Indian children (A: This is India...)

news.yahoo.com / Sanjay Sharma | AFP – Tue, Jan 3, 2012

Indian activists have reacted angrily after 12 doctors were fined less than $100 each for conducting secret drug trials on children and patients with learning disabilities.

The Madhya Pradesh state government said the tests had not been cleared by health authorities, and it added that the doctors refused to disclose further details citing patient confidentiality laws.  (A: In other words, they’ve got deals with big pharma to experiment on children. Who’s going to care about a few children in India, eh? Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article...   It’s amazing, isn’t it? We say, oh it’s for the children. We always love children. Nobody wants any but we all love children. At least that’s what government says all the time, isn’t it? ...when they want to jack up prices, etc. But here’s India, as I say, and they’re using children there, the big, big pharmas are over there; they’ve got such a market to do what they want and nothing’s said. And of course, the bribery works awfully well over there, it’s so corrupt in India, that everything’s kept quiet, including all the deaths they cause as well. So this article goes on to say that...

. . . India has been turning into a hot spot for drug trials, with hospital patients used as guinea pigs for the world's pharmaceutical companies, often without consent.

Low costs, weak laws and inadequate enforcement and penalties are blamed for making India an attractive destination for conducting the tests.

Rai, who was suspended from his job after publicising the Indore cases (A: You always fire the guy, the whistle-blower, right.), believes it will be many years before the malpractice can be curbed.

"Drug trials are increasing here because they cost just one-sixth of what they do in the West," he said.

"The regulatory system here is comparatively corrupt, and pharmaceutical companies can easily register patients and begin trials.  (A: And guess what a lot of these drugs they were using on children were for? Sexual dysfunction, this is what they’re telling us. I’ll bet it’s to do with sterility and different things like that. Anyway, I’ll put this article up tonight too. Then there’s GSK labs as well.)

GSK lab fined over vaccine tests that killed 14 babies

buenosairesherald.com / Jan 5, 2012

GlaxoSmithKline Argentina Laboratories company was fined 400,000 pesos by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky following a report issued by the National Administration of Medicine, Food and Technology (ANMAT in Spanish) for the killing of 14 babies during illegal lab vaccine trials conducted between 2007 and 2008.

Likewise, two doctors -Héctor Abate, and Miguel Tregnaghi- were fined with 300,000 pesos each for irregularities during the studies.

The charges included experimenting with human beings, falsifying parental authorizations so babies could participate in vaccine-trials conducted by the laboratory from 2007 to 2008.

Since 2007, 15,000 children under the age of one from Mendoza, San Juan and Santiago del Estero have been included in the research protocol, a statement of what the study is trying to achieve. Babies were recruited from poor families that attended to public hospitals.  (A: That’s why they love National Health Services, get the poor in and you can do anything you want.)

A total of 7 babies died in Santiago del Estero; 5 in Mendoza; and 2 in San Juan.

So anyway, it’s just going on across the whole world because you see, it’s big, big business. And you know the elite have got a lot more planned for us, and they’ve got to make sure that whatever they hit us with next really does work and that’s part of it too. A lot of these big companies, remember, work with governments because they are biowarfare areas of research. They deal with all the big viruses and so on that kill people; they weaponize stuff as well. Why create your own weapons laboratory when these vaccine companies already have them? That’s what they are really. That’s what they are. Quite something.

And talking about dysfunction too, when government creates the massive welfare state, and then of course at this time, now is the time to privatize them...

Charities and private firms to be paid £15,000 to turn around each 'Shameless' family

(A: They call them ‘Shameless’ families now. If you’re poor your shameless, you see.)

dailymail.co.uk / James Chapman / 3rd January 2012

Private firms and charities are to be paid bounties of up to £15,000 a time to lead a crackdown on Britain’s 120,000 ‘Shameless’ families, ministers (A: That’s politicians.) will announce today.

In a major experiment in a system of ‘payment by results’ – which ministers hope to use as a model across the public sector – up to £200million will be paid to private and voluntary sector organisations.

But it will depend on their success over a three-year period in tackling a hardcore of troublemaking, workless households dubbed Shameless families after the dysfunctional Gallagher clan in the Channel 4 drama series.  (A: So they’re using fiction, I’d imagine, to show you how it works.)

Providers will be paid in three stages – when they have made a member of a troublemaking family sign up to a personal action plan, when the plan is completed, and finally when the individual has moved into employment. In total, a three-year contract will be worth up to £15,000 per family.  (A: So there’s more and more cash going to privatization again.)

The scheme will be targeted at families that make up just one per cent of the population, but cost taxpayers an astonishing £8billion a year.

So they create the welfare system, make the people helpless, and you can make people helpless you know. They don’t believe they can work, eventually, and they have no role models because their parents went through the same system, social workers are in and out of the house all the time making all the big decisions for them, and you’re a child, you’re a child forever. That’s what socialism brings, you’re eternal children. And that’s what they want for the whole world, to be eternal children. They’ve done a good job, mind you. Science is wonderful isn’t it? Just studying the public and finding out how to destroy the culture is quite simple and easy.

Children, 4, 'to be fingerprinted to borrow school books from library' - telegraph.co.uk / Andrew Hough / 28 May 2010

Again too, to bring up children in the required system that’s going to be there in 20-30 years’ time, you always make sure that you start the children at school. That’s why they were the first ones to go through all the detectors, metal detectors and so on, and then all the drug-sniffing gear as well – and they think it’s all quite natural being patted down at airports – so they’re already geared for it. So now your world will be iris scans and fingerprinting to get your school meal or to borrow a school book. It’s quite obvious. It’s a good training, Pavlovian training exercise and it will work pretty well.

Canadians don’t know it either that a lot of them have been affected by Agent Orange. I mentioned this a few years ago when it was found out that all the military bases across Canada sprayed from the air, all the bases and around the bases and there’s always towns around these bases built up around them, Agent Orange to kill off the weeds. They were doing that right through the 60s, 70s and 80s and I think some even into the 90s. And the public hadn’t a clue. Like most things that really happen, we haven’t got a clue. Anyway it broke out and I read the article a few years back. Here’s another article on it, a recent one.

More cash for Agent Orange victims

torontosun.com / Kris Sims / December 31, 2011

OTTAWA – More people will soon be compensated for their suffering caused by Agent Orange that was sprayed in Canada as a defoliant over several decades.

“The government has relented and realized the error of their ways (A: Well, they’re human aren’t they...) and approximately 30 people (A: That’s very big, 30 people...) will be notified very soon that they indeed will be receiving the $20 thousand Agent Orange compensation,” said NDP MP Peter Stoffer.

“The unfortunate part is, they are leaving out hundreds of thousands of other people who may have qualified.”  (A: They’re probably dead already with cancers and so on.)

Stoffer cites the creation of the Canadian Forces base in Gagetown, N.B., as an example of the chemical's misuse.

“Instead of using manual labour to eradicate all of the leaves and the trees, they used chemicals, and those chemicals were sprayed in the lakes, rivers and the foliage,” said Stoffer.

Stoffer said the NDP (A: That’s a political party that’s further left than Marx.) wants a full public inquiry into the spraying of Agent Orange and similar chemicals in Canada to find out how many people were affected and what health problems they may have developed as a result.

Well they should read the articles I was reading a few years back there, maybe 4 or 5 years ago, because you see, they’d done all the statistics then and even the ones down, like Base Borden, have found out the same thing, that the children had all these different things breaking out in them, malformations and diseases, cancers. It’s no big mystery. So they’ll do another inquiry into it; we love inquiries in democratic countries; they go on forever. And then you get inquiries on top of the inquiries just to, you know, until you’re all dead.

And in the States...

Boeing to Close Wichita Facility by the End of 2013

ksnt.com / Jan 5, 2011

The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] today announced that the Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS) facility in Wichita will close by the end of 2013. The Wichita facility currently employs more than 2,160 employees.  (A: They’re just closing it right down.)

"The decision to close our Wichita facility was difficult but ultimately was based on a thorough study of the current and future market environment and our ability to remain competitive while meeting our customers' needs (A: ...blah, blah.... blah, blah, blah. So anyway...) . . .”

Boeing Wichita is the base for the company's Global Transport & Executive Systems business and its B-52 and 767 International Tanker programs. The facility also provides support for flight mission planning and integrated logistics.  (A: So I guess they’ll be getting the big tanks in from China, to keep the continuous spraying of the skies going I guess.)

Now, ha! People probably know this, but you have all these planes going over your areas every so often by the government and they photograph everything to see if you’ve improved anything in your property, so they can tax you. Well now they’re sending drones in to do it instead.

Arkansas residents may face taxation by aerial image.

suannews.com / 20 December 2011 / Gary Mortimer

Just as privacy concerns are raised by ACLU and others over drone use in the USA, Quorum Court in Arkansas has approved the use of aerial imagery to collect data on property sizes. Not at the moment from UAS but it does not take much of an imagination to realise they could be used for this service.

Looking at the Pictometry website they are creating products that several UK based companies achieve with sUAS. Pictometry must be chomping at the bit to use lower altitude imagery that can create higher resolution products.  (A: So that’ll be the way of the future, you’ll see these darn drones coming around, sniffing around your home and then in comes the big bill because you repaired the garage or shored up a broken window here and there. Because you see, they’re really on a roll now to get all the cash in from you.)

MF Global sold assets to Goldman before the collapse, sources have come out. It’s amazing how corruption can come out. Nobody will go to court for anything; they’re untouchable... isn’t it?

KPMG plans timely return of MF Global assets

reuters.com / Lauren Tara LaCapra and Matthew Goldstein / Jan 3, 2012

(Reuters) - MF Global unloaded hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of securities to Goldman Sachs in the days leading up to its collapse, according to two former MF Global employees with direct knowledge of the transactions. But it did not immediately receive payment from its clearing firm and lender, JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), one of the sources said.

The sale of securities to Goldman occurred on October 27, just days before MF Global Holdings Ltd (MFGLQ.PK) filed for bankruptcy on October 31, the ex-employees said. One of the employees said the transaction was cleared with JPMorgan Chase.

At the same time MF Global, which was run by former Goldman Sachs head Jon Corzine, was selling securities to Goldman to raise badly needed cash, the futures firm was also drawing down a $1.2 billion revolving line of credit it had with JPMorgan, according to one of the former MF Global employees.

JPMorgan spokeswoman Mary Sedarat said the bank did not withhold money because of the line of credit. She declined further comment on details of the transactions.  (A: So it’s all in the family really isn’t it? ...as they take care of each other and we all get, you know, the shaft and the bill. Not bad at all. They’re beyond it all.)

Rothschild, this is quite a little interesting intrigue, intriguing article. It’s not really a conspiracy, it’s an intriguing article about Rothschild...

Rothschild Exposes Gold Mining Deal For Fake or Feint;

Deripaska’s Attempt to Sell Rusal (A: These are companies.)  to Alcoa

also Exposed

businessinsider.com / John Helmer, Dances With Bears | Dec. 30, 2011

Nathaniel Rothschild’s libel lawsuit against the Daily Mail and Associated Newspapers, due to commence on January 23 in the High Court in London, is now unravelling even more Russian oligarch secrets. (A: Because they’re in bed with the Russians too; the Rothschilds are all over the place you know.)  As they crack open, so do suspicions of even more inexplicable involvement by Rothschild’s friend, Lord Peter Mandelson (A: This is the guy who ran Britain for while, you know, when Blair was off doing his stuff. This is the guy, Mandelson, who actually boasted he was running Britain from Lord Rothschild’s swimming pool in France, you know. It’s in your face now isn’t it? Anyway it says...) . .

The point on which the entire tale hangs, at least for Rothschild, is that in January 2005, Mandelson was the European Union’s trade commissioner. (A: That’s a top job.   I mean, that’s where all the deals come through, through you. Lots of bribes and money goes on in there all the time; that’s just the way it is folks. And he’s an inside man with all the knowledge, you see.)  The events reported by the newspaper in its initial publication, and now in new evidence before the court, suggest that Mandelson was involving himself (A: He was doing his own business AS he was the head of the EU trade commission. So he’s been doing his own private business too at the same time...) in Russian business deals which he knew, or should have known, created the appearance of a conflict of interest with his official position.  (A: He’ll just give the public the finger; that’s what they do now.)

Rothschild’s claim is that it was libelous to suggest that he put Mandelson in that position.  (A: Well he’s put Prime Ministers in before; why shouldn’t he put Mandelson in there too? [Alan chuckles.])  Mandelson’s position is that he wouldn’t countenance a conflict of interest, or the appearance of one.   (A: And when you read through this article you’ll find out Rothschild actually joined Mandelson in Russia and they visited different sites, and it was to do with massive gold deposits as well. It’s quite an intriguing little piece here. But yeah, Mandelson was obviously Rothschild’s man and that’s how some people climb very high, very, very quickly. And they fall slowly because they give them certain golden parachutes and exemptions from fines and prison. Quite something isn’t it?)

Now I’m putting up a link tonight too, one of the latest studies from the Journal of Neurovirology, to do with polio. I’ve been saying for years that much of these particular viruses that they inject into you, especially with the polio virus and others, ended up in the brains of people who became autistic, children who became autistic. And this is the latest study that proves it once again, folks. I’ll put this one up for you if you want to have a little peek at it, for those who still care.

Association of autism with polyomavirus infection in postmortem brains - informahealthcare.com

And this article here is about Eurofanatics and it says...

The Eurofanatics should join the Marxists in the dustbin of history

The end of the euro may prove chaotic, but recovery will come – sooner rather than later.

telegraph.co.uk / Bruce Anderson / 3 Jan 2012

The only solution to the crisis is for Chancellor Merkel, right, to bail out the rest of the euro zone - that is not going to happen, despite the pleading of France's Nicolas Sarkozy, left.

Geoffrey Howe is guilty. Whatever he actually said about Liverpool’s problems during some early Thatcher Cabinet meetings, he was culpable for his failure to draw the obvious conclusion. The city was finding it impossible to compete with London and the South of England. In different circumstances, this could have been rectified by devaluation. Liverpool would then have used a weaker currency: let us call it the Scouse.

In a single country, that option was not available, so there was only one alternative. Despite Geoffrey Howe’s reservations, Liverpool received large subsidies from taxpayers elsewhere in Britain: fiscal transfers. Yet even under that generous regime, it continued to struggle.  (A: So what the article goes on to say is now we’re doing fiscal transfers across the whole of darn Europe. You’re not just bailing out one little area in your own country; you’re bailing out the whole of Europe.)

And all the Marxists are behind this by the way. They’re actually Trotskyists; they’ve got different names for themselves now. They’re churned out of the universities. I was reading an article yesterday about some of the top Marxist leaders and writers and teachers and professors in universities, and you’re stuffed with them; every country’s got them. And they’re all through the Ivy League ones too, you know. Lansky was a good one in Britain there; he taught for, oh, about 50 years or something, maybe more, about the wonders of Marxism to all the ones in Cambridge and occasionally he taught in Oxford as well. So why would you allow professors to teach in your own countries Marxism, which vowed to destroy your culture, your way of living, etc, etc, etc, demolish them, and have mass slaughters if need be too?  Why would you allow them to teach? It’s because the big boys wanted them there. It’s the dialectic process, isn’t it?

And from...

Adm. Mike Mullen: 'National Debt Is Our Biggest Security Threat'

(A: ...not terrorism.)

huffingtonpost.com / First Posted: 6/24/10 Updated: 5/25/11

America's highest-ranking military official thinks the U.S. has bigger security problems than al-Qaeda, suicide bombers and an increasingly deadly nine-year war.

"Our national debt is our biggest national security threat," said Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at a "Tribute to the Troops" breakfast sponsored by The Hill on Thursday morning, according to two staffers at the gathering. He also noted a troubling trend -- that veterans from Afghanistan and Iraq are becoming homeless at four times the rate the country witnessed in the wake of Vietnam.  (A: Well, thank you very much, out you go; you’re on the street, folks. You got a little tin star though, little tin star; isn’t that pretty. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and there’s some callers on the line. I’ll take Michael from Indiana if he’s there. Are you there Michael?

Michael: Yeah, yeah I’m here. I had a question for you. It seems to me more and more that Newt Gingrich is going to be the republican candidate here in America. And I try to tell people that, you know, I mean, that that’s not really the way, you know, we should go. And I know that you’ve talked about him, like speaking at Loyola. Is there any way, any place I can find, like the meeting minutes to that?

Alan: They had a censored version; they really edited it very quickly, down to 600 pages of this first meeting for the World Science meeting. That was to do with brain chipping the population, and I’m not kidding about that. And I have it here. But they put an edited version out. And they’ve had a meeting every year I believe at that university and other universities. In fact, he had one recently, I read a little bit about it too, but they’ve toned it down quite a bit, and that’s the meeting that he brought in the top bioscientists dealing with microchipping from Tokyo. And one of the speeches made by them was that they have the chip ready, actually, to put in the public, it’s just that now it’s a matter of convincing the public to want it, to actually want it. And they said that what they would do is they would put it into movies and make it exciting to have a chip, things like that. And sure enough, movies suddenly came out of nowhere, like the one with Robin Williams, it was called The Final Cut, where you have a chip that records your memory for life and then they use it when you die for your funeral, and things like that. So they had all the top speakers there and of course Newt Gingrich is a total globalist; he’s mentioned it. Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave, he gave his book to every congressman in the Congress. He believes in a changing society, changing it along this designed path of course with science at the top running it all; technocracy in other words.

But it won’t matter to the voters. The voters will always go with mainstream and the mainstream point them in the right directions. Most of the public are so brain dead they won’t go for anybody except the ones that are put up there for the two main parties. The elite gave us this type of, what they call, democracy for that reason. It’s easy to get the herd to go the way that you want them to go and that’s why they like the word democracy. They only use democracy when the herd go for what they’re supposed to go for – and that’s the only time you get any kind of democracy – and vote for the person that they select for you to vote for. But really, it would take much more than one person, I don’t care who they are, getting into government. See, America’s changed every 20 years so much that it’s not America anymore. And by the time you hit 20 it’s not America anymore. There’s 4,000 laws signed into law just this year alone. The last year over 4,800 laws were passed in America, and there’s more to come. There’s more binding treaties across the world internationally with the United Nations; it’s not America anymore. And Quigley said the same thing, when the two parties are on the campaign trail, they talk about the same things, unemployment, health insurance, education, that’s it; you’re both the same party now.  You’re talking about social issues; the rest of the time they hardly mention social issues once they’re in. It’s a world agenda, interlocking, and you have so many treaties you’d have to tear up. The G20 recently, and according to the CFR, is really an international government. It’s above the United States. And the US is a member to it, Canada’s a member, we’re all members to it. It’s above it, so it’s the end of national governments. So you’d have to literally go in there and burn a lot of carbon by burning thousands and thousands of stacks of papers and start afresh. But one man would be knocked off before he could get up on the podium. Thanks for calling.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.  And remember help me along by donating and buying the books and so on.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Police Recruiting UK--Scraping the Bottom of the Barrel

Police Planting Drugs

Scientists Grow Sperm

EU to Slap Value Added Tax on Food

India--Anger over Secret Drug Trials on Children

GSK Lab Fined for Killing Babies

Charities and Private Firms to Tackle Welfare Problem--Britain

Fingerprints for School Library Books

More Cash for Agent Orange Victims

Boeing to Close Wichita Facility

Property Tax Imaging by Drones

MF Global Sold Assets to Goldman Before Collapse

Intrigue of Mandelson, Rothschild and Russian Gold

Association of Autism with Polyomavirus infection

Eurofanatics Should Join Marxism in Dustbin of History

National Debt is Biggest Security Threat

Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January the 4^th 2012. Newcomers, always make use of the web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find hundreds and hundreds of audios for free download where hopefully, if you can persevere, you’ll understand the big system that really runs the world, why things are the way they are, and why they’re going the way they’re going. Because you’ll find, as I say, there’s a big, super... I wouldn’t even call it government. It’s beyond government. It’s an intermeshing of big corporations, big foundations, big international bankers who planned the system an awful long time ago, and academia of course is a big part of it too because they always churn out the next generation of children who are going to really believe in the latest indoctrination and push the latest fad in philosophy or politics and so on. So you’ll find how it all works together if you help yourself to those audios. Massive organizations, very, very powerful, run the world, outside of your vote, way outside of your vote. In fact, they put your candidates in for you to pick. While you’re there too, remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can help me keep going by buying the books and disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember, straight donations are really awfully welcome.

What I try to do on this broadcast is chronicle the events, give you the history of the powerful institutions and organizations that met, over 100 years ago, to plan the world. The type of world that they wanted to bring in would be an authoritarian type society, post-democratic of course, although they would use democracy to con the public for a long time, but really it’s anything but democratic, and how they would create massive welfare states, for a while, just for a while, to get people dependent on a particular type of system and then of course they would have rule, the government would have rule over many, many people, the minds of people, and even politics itself, which has been awfully successful too in every country. They also wanted to destroy the cultures of all the countries, to annihilate them along the Marxist lines and to help eventually to bring in a world government and the old nations would fade away. That’s what’s happening supposedly in the European Union and eventually to do with the American amalgam as well, the NAFTA organization.

So we’re going through all of this. We’re watching the turmoil, which was expected too mind you, to do with finances, etc, as we go through this big upheaval into globalism and into global governance, as they like to call it. Because as I say, it’s not really a single government, it’s an amalgam of a whole bunch of different organizations, all on board with each other, all with the same philosophies and all taking their orders from a higher superior, obviously. And that’s what we’re going through right now. We are the generation that they call the ‘cannon fodder’ to go through all of this. And we have to suffer with inflation, with austerity, as they redistribute the wealth of the world. In other words, your tax money across the planet to their corporations; really that’s what they mean by redistribution of wealth. And all the Marxist groups are on board with all of this too; they’ve fallen for it all. And of course, they’re all led, too, by their own particular agents who work for the same organizations. Every group has got its leader supplied to them. I’ve said that many, many years ago. You don’t have to go creating a group because you’ll find there’s already one, or more, already made up for you, perfect. Why bother starting your own group when they’ve done it all for you in the first place? And that’s why you never get any further forward. You end up back with the voting stuff and that’s been a con game since its inception because one person, for instance, in one party isn’t going to change this... unless they were doing something awfully, awfully drastic. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and as I say, I try to make sense by going through history to find the big organizations that got together, and some of them amalgamated in the late 1800s and early 1900s to form big famous institutions which advise all governments. They not only advise them, they actually put their own people in as the heads of them. Carroll Quigley admitted that too; he was the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations for a while and the Royal Institute of International Affairs as well; it’s the same organization. And he said that, there hasn’t been a President or Prime Minister that has been put in in the last 60 years, and that was in the 1960s that he mentioned that, that wasn’t one of this organization’s people. So you’ve been run by them for an awful long time across the world now, it turns out; they have them in every country, the same organization. And they work with the big international bankers.

They do believe in getting countries into debt as a way of owning and controlling countries. And they also believe, as I say, in creating massive welfare systems; and the bankers love that because they live on interest. But it’s also to get people to give up their rights basically and become wards of the state to an extent, perpetual children. And now you have generations of them that expect to be taken care of just because they’re born into that family. Of course they can also be used for rioting when you cut back on their cash; so they’re good to have on standby, and every country has them. This is intentional. This is all intentional, folks. And you take away their ability to even take care of themselves. They don’t know how to anymore once they’re born into that system. There are children growing up and they say that their social workers are their best friends, their social workers that visit them every day; they call each other on a first-name basis.

And this is the system that the big boys planned a long time ago, because they said they’d have to destroy the family unit. They’d have to follow every plank of the Communist Manifesto. It makes no surprise too that the big institutions that I’m talking about here helped fund the Marxist governments from its inception, in Russia, and all through its longevity as well. We even fed them from the West; strange thing to do with a country that was going to bomb you and nuke you, isn’t it? Feed them as well. And no one asked these obvious questions. Anyway, they still run the world and they’re going for broke now. They want a perfectly organized planet, a reduced population; we’re postindustrial, most countries now in the first world, so they want to bring us down quickly. And Rockefeller himself called for rapid depopulation, instead of the old-fashioned way taking us down more slowly through rotten food, you know, that doesn’t nourish you, and injections and all the usual stuff, and stuff in your drinking water.

So anyway, part of it was also, too, to destroy culture across the globe, first world countries. And that really took on a speed of its own in the 50s and the 60s. In came the drugs, in came the pill; feminists weren’t responsible for fighting their way up there. It was the pill, as Bertrand Russell said, science gave them what they think is freedom. But along with freedom comes a lot of catastrophe as well because the rest of society ends up, for the ones that do have children, single mums, paying for them all, so the state technically has taken over the place of the father – another part of the communist line as well. So they were fulfilling all of these things so easily. And also they knew too, that the people who were promiscuous, they would never bond. So they were teaching it in school under the guise of sex education, that sex is a distinct thing from having an emotional bonding towards somebody. Very successful in that area as well, so much so that mass immigration is brought into countries, because the domestic populations aren’t having any children, and they claim there’s not enough to pay off the national debt in the future. This is all mainstream stuff.

So we’re played with by the high and mighty, and we go along very willingly because it’s like putting children into a candy store and telling them to do what they want. You know, all children are the same, they don’t know what to do. They think they know it all but they don’t. They have no wisdom. So that’s how they treat the people, so-called adults. We have adults today that are still children. They’ve never grown up; never will grow up in fact. They play their whole lives, on the internet and play games and things like that. And the responsibility that come with having children and families and the rest of it, they’ve never had them either; that would just get in the way of their fun. So they’re technically extinct, even though they’re still walking around. They’re technically extinct.

And along with that too, came corruption. Corruption through everything. We see it everywhere we look in all officialdom. In the past they were awfully good at hiding it, at high places; now they don’t even bother, because the public don’t really care. But we find that the culture’s so degraded now, so degraded because all the old religions that at least gave you a basic moral code all went out the window too – another plank of the Manifesto – and basically they have nothing to fall back on, except the guy who’s toughest and nastiest generally wins. You see. That’s what the youngsters see in all their video games. I mean who wants to be a loser, eh, one of those guys on their knees begging for mercy, those peasants, you know, the civilians? Who wants to be a loser like that? Don’t you want to wear all that fancy gear and all the armor plating and have the big gun? It’s quite simple isn’t it?

Here’s an article from Britain...

The criminals in uniform: Almost 1,000 officers with convictions from drug dealing to perverting justice are still in the police

(Alan: There’s a lot more than that actually.)

dailymail.co.uk / Chris Greenwood / 3rd January 2012

Two detective chief inspectors among 944 officers in England and Wales with a criminal record.

One officer found guilty of gross misconduct after sending racist and sexist texts is still in his job.

Hundreds of others facing misconduct allegations are allowed to escape punishment by quitting their forces.

More than 900 police officers continue to serve despite being convicted of crimes including violence, robbery and fraud.

Forces employ policemen and women with criminal records for assault, burglary, supplying drugs and perverting the course of justice.

Among them are several senior officers, including two detective chief inspectors and a chief inspector working for the Metropolitan Police.

In some cases continuing to employ officers appears to directly contradict Government guidelines which insist on ‘proven integrity’.

They highlight that people with convictions for certain offences, including assault, dangerous driving and burglary, should not be recruited.

At least 944 serving officers and police community support officers (PCSOs) have a conviction. Most are for traffic offences such as speeding and drink-driving, but there are also offences of dishonesty and fraud. (A: Then he goes through different ones, case histories, burglary, as teenagers, supplying drugs, etc, etc, robbery, and break and enters, and all that kind of stuff.)

So that’s what you’ve got now taking care of you. As I say, there’s no morality anymore; it’s really over for all of that. Their job now is to get as many convictions as they can, and climb the ladder, and be a winner. Again, everybody has to be a winner. You don’t want to be a loser do you? And here’s an article that falls right in with it...

Caught on film: Moment a police officer 'planted drugs in suspect's car'

dailymail.co.uk / By Daily Mail Reporter / 4th January 2012

A video taken from a police vehicle's dashcam shows an officer allegedly placing a bag in the car of a man they had pulled over for running a stop sign.

The video, which was filmed on February 11, 2011, shows the officers searching the car as the man stands handcuffed.

The officers are from Utica, New York, and the video was released by the local paper, the Utica Phoenix.

One of the officers is shown pulling a bag out of his pocket as he gets into the passenger side of the car.

He then emerges from the car with the same bag.

It is not clear what is inside the bag.

The video has gone viral since it was uploaded on YouTube on January 2.

When it was first put on the Phoenix's website it got so many hits - 64,000 in just under 24 hours - it crashed the site, wktv.com reports.

Utica police say they are still investigating the incident and that the video is also being reviewed by the FBI.

The video posted on the internet is one minute 40 seconds long, but the full video is 30 minutes.

Early in the full video, an officer's empty hand is shown going into the driver's jacket pocket and pulling out a bag.

So you got to understand that this is common. This is very, very common, to get convictions. And when you’re in court the judge always takes the policeman’s version, and that’s just the way it is, you know. And if they’re wanting more convictions and you’re the unlucky sap they’ve caught that night for maybe having a taillight out or something, then you go off to prison. And there’s a lot of folk in prison like that. So easy. So simple. But what I’m showing you is the complete moral decline in society. In fact, entertainment today is just moral degradation; we lap it all up. That’s all you’re given now. That’s all you’re given. And there’s a good reason for that too.

And also too, to do with the US as well, it says...

Both Sides Unhappy with Debt Commission's Proposals - pbs.org

They want to up the taxes across the US. I’ll put that up tonight, that link. I’ll put all these links up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the broadcast just so you can see for yourself.

Now, eugenics is a big part of this, this system that runs the world. They’ve always talked about creating the perfect slaves, basically, different types of them. Huxley’s Brave New World was part of that whole scenario too, and he wrote that book, remember, in the 1930s. And so they were well aware, in his particular class and certain families, and he was related to the Darwins too. They were well aware of where they were going with all of this agenda down the road.

Scientists grow sperm in laboratory dish

Scientists have made a major breakthrough that could soon see human sperm grown in the laboratory.

telegraph.co.uk / 02 Jan 2012

(A: Part of it too is just to do away with normal guys, and women too for that matter.)

The development opens up the possibility of infertile men being able to father their own children rather than using donor sperm.

Now as you well know through the articles I’ve read here over the years, most men today, very early on, are actually infertile, and the sperm that they do produce are really blind as bats; they can’t find the target and they have bad mobility and all the rest of it. So we’re being sterilized, on cue, because they said they would sterilize, in the old books: what do you do with all the people, oh we sterilize them. You don’t ask for volunteers, you find ways, like Russell said, of putting it in the food or injecting them and different ways to sterilize them. And you’ll find that across the board, all the stuff too, Bisphenol A, the estrogen mimickers that they have in food and all the rest of it, is all part of it too. They’ve known this since the 1800s by the way, that these things did it to men. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and just talking about an article here about growing male sperm outside the human body, in the laboratory, and the reasons, really, behind it all. Because eventually of course, as everyone goes sterile, only the wealthy will be able to afford this kind of treatment, and other ones, the ones who have proven that they’re better than the rest and that they’re more fit to go on into a new future and their children as well. This kind of stuff has even been discussed in movies, as I’m sure you’ve all seen, in the past. It says here...

Researchers in Germany and Israel were able to grow mouse sperm from a few cells in a laboratory dish.

In a world first a team headed by Professor Stefan Schlatt, at Muenster University in Germany, were able to grow sperm by using germ cells. These are the cells in testicles that are responsible for sperm production. (A: Now why not go and find out the reason why they’re sterile in the first place and aren’t coming out of these cells, eh?)

Scientists grew the sperm by surrounding the germ cells in a special compound called agar jelly to create an environment similar to that found in testicles.

Prof. Mahmoud Huleihel, who also grew the sperm at Israel's Ben Gurion University in Beersheba, said: "I believe it will eventually be possible to routinely grow human male sperm to order by extracting tissue containing germ cells from a man's testicle and stimulating sperm production in the laboratory."

So they’re going full-scale ahead at that. But there’s no attempt, whatsoever, there’s not even shock or panic when they keep announcing every year that we’re down about 85% now of sperm production in the average male from about 25 and over. You know. Just incredible. Oh, there’s no crisis. No. Why is it not a crisis? It’s because it’s being done on purpose, that’s why it’s not a crisis. Believe you me, if it wasn’t being done on purpose it would be a crisis, by the controllers’ point of view. But no, there’s no crisis about it. And of course they’re not going to fix that problem; they’ll just grow them outside the body for those who can afford it.

Now, as we go now into the new authoritarian society, the one mentioned by the Club of Rome. They said that democracy was dead, it really didn’t work – for the big boys that is – to get their plans through so they’d have to do away with it. We’re now into authoritarianism and technocracy, etc, etc. But you see, every country that joins the world government – and trading blocs, as they start off before they become world government. Countries get a lot of money that would come in on importing stuff from abroad, and that protected the producers at home as well to buy locally, buy your own stuff. In free trade you do away with all of that so you got to find another way to make up all that tax money. So they create Value Added Tax, a con just to get another tax on everything, everything you purchase. So they call it Value Added Tax. And years ago they started it off in Europe and food and different things were exempt. But of course, you know, anybody with half a brain knew darn well down the road they would jack it up on food as well, and medications and everything.

EU PLAN TO SLAP VAT ON FOOD

express.co.uk / January 3, 2012 / Padraic Flanagan

EU plans for a radical tax shake-up could cost struggling families and pensioners £800 a year.

The European Commission wants VAT exemptions on food, children’s clothes and other essentials abandoned in an effort to harmonise (A: In other words, standardize...) the sales tax across Europe.

Its plans come after the Coalition raised the VAT rate to 20 per cent (A: ...that’s on everything you buy, 20% taxes on top of what you see as the price.) last year but kept an exemption for food, children’s clothes, passenger travel, books, newspapers and other products.

Last night the proposals sparked outrage among politicians and public-spending campaigners who attacked the Eurocrats for trying to interfere in Britain’s tax affairs. (A: Well of course they’re going to interfere; Britain’s signed their sovereignty away by all the traitors that went before them, all these politicians.) Ukip leader Nigel Farage said: “In their desperation to raise cash, the EU is prepared to do anything and hurt the most vulnerable. (A: Well that kills two birds with one stone, the poor will die off; you know, they can’t afford food.)

“These plans would add up to 20 per cent costs on food and children’s clothes. To put an extra tax on books and newspapers would be a strike for ignorance over education.

“Everyone would suffer, but the most vulnerable would suffer the most.”

The Commission, supported by the London-based Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, called for the exemptions to be abandoned to allow a common VAT (A: Value Added Tax) regime that would streamline the single market. (A: Well why not just throw out the Value Added Tax all together? Why are folk paying this? ... for more bureaucrats and more and more bureaucrats in the EU parliament.)

But the move, which could raise £24billion a year for Government coffers, would deliver a crippling blow to the country’s poorest families and hard-pressed pensioners. (A: Well, they’ve had all of that come in; they’ve got problems even heating themselves in the winter now. But again that’s eugenics, you let the poor die off first. And if you’re elderly as well, well you’re a bad citizen because you’re just consuming, you’re not producing anymore; that’s according to the United Nations you see. So eugenics is a big, big part of this depopulation program. And the fittest and healthiest and wealthiest should survive according to the ones at the top.)

And you know eugenics is everywhere, everywhere you look there’s eugenics and experiments. The US has been famous for doing a lot of stuff on people in their own country. So is Britain, very famous for doing secret trials on drugs through the National Health Service and even spraying a lot of their citizens with different things, like cadmium they were doing through the 50s, 60s and 70s, all over eastern England. It says...

Anger over secret drug trials on Indian children (A: This is India...)

news.yahoo.com / Sanjay Sharma | AFP – Tue, Jan 3, 2012

Indian activists have reacted angrily after 12 doctors were fined less than $100 each for conducting secret drug trials on children and patients with learning disabilities.

The Madhya Pradesh state government said the tests had not been cleared by health authorities, and it added that the doctors refused to disclose further details citing patient confidentiality laws. (A: In other words, they’ve got deals with big pharma to experiment on children. Who’s going to care about a few children in India, eh? Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article... It’s amazing, isn’t it? We say, oh it’s for the children. We always love children. Nobody wants any but we all love children. At least that’s what government says all the time, isn’t it? ...when they want to jack up prices, etc. But here’s India, as I say, and they’re using children there, the big, big pharmas are over there; they’ve got such a market to do what they want and nothing’s said. And of course, the bribery works awfully well over there, it’s so corrupt in India, that everything’s kept quiet, including all the deaths they cause as well. So this article goes on to say that...

. . . India has been turning into a hot spot for drug trials, with hospital patients used as guinea pigs for the world's pharmaceutical companies, often without consent.

Low costs, weak laws and inadequate enforcement and penalties are blamed for making India an attractive destination for conducting the tests.

Rai, who was suspended from his job after publicising the Indore cases (A: You always fire the guy, the whistle-blower, right.), believes it will be many years before the malpractice can be curbed.

"Drug trials are increasing here because they cost just one-sixth of what they do in the West," he said.

"The regulatory system here is comparatively corrupt, and pharmaceutical companies can easily register patients and begin trials. (A: And guess what a lot of these drugs they were using on children were for? Sexual dysfunction, this is what they’re telling us. I’ll bet it’s to do with sterility and different things like that. Anyway, I’ll put this article up tonight too. Then there’s GSK labs as well.)

GSK lab fined over vaccine tests that killed 14 babies

buenosairesherald.com / Jan 5, 2012

GlaxoSmithKline Argentina Laboratories company was fined 400,000 pesos by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky following a report issued by the National Administration of Medicine, Food and Technology (ANMAT in Spanish) for the killing of 14 babies during illegal lab vaccine trials conducted between 2007 and 2008.

Likewise, two doctors -Héctor Abate, and Miguel Tregnaghi- were fined with 300,000 pesos each for irregularities during the studies.

The charges included experimenting with human beings, falsifying parental authorizations so babies could participate in vaccine-trials conducted by the laboratory from 2007 to 2008.

Since 2007, 15,000 children under the age of one from Mendoza, San Juan and Santiago del Estero have been included in the research protocol, a statement of what the study is trying to achieve. Babies were recruited from poor families that attended to public hospitals. (A: That’s why they love National Health Services, get the poor in and you can do anything you want.)

A total of 7 babies died in Santiago del Estero; 5 in Mendoza; and 2 in San Juan.

So anyway, it’s just going on across the whole world because you see, it’s big, big business. And you know the elite have got a lot more planned for us, and they’ve got to make sure that whatever they hit us with next really does work and that’s part of it too. A lot of these big companies, remember, work with governments because they are biowarfare areas of research. They deal with all the big viruses and so on that kill people; they weaponize stuff as well. Why create your own weapons laboratory when these vaccine companies already have them? That’s what they are really. That’s what they are. Quite something.

And talking about dysfunction too, when government creates the massive welfare state, and then of course at this time, now is the time to privatize them...

Charities and private firms to be paid £15,000 to turn around each 'Shameless' family

(A: They call them ‘Shameless’ families now. If you’re poor your shameless, you see.)

dailymail.co.uk / James Chapman / 3rd January 2012

Private firms and charities are to be paid bounties of up to £15,000 a time to lead a crackdown on Britain’s 120,000 ‘Shameless’ families, ministers (A: That’s politicians.) will announce today.

In a major experiment in a system of ‘payment by results’ – which ministers hope to use as a model across the public sector – up to £200million will be paid to private and voluntary sector organisations.

But it will depend on their success over a three-year period in tackling a hardcore of troublemaking, workless households dubbed Shameless families after the dysfunctional Gallagher clan in the Channel 4 drama series. (A: So they’re using fiction, I’d imagine, to show you how it works.)

Providers will be paid in three stages – when they have made a member of a troublemaking family sign up to a personal action plan, when the plan is completed, and finally when the individual has moved into employment. In total, a three-year contract will be worth up to £15,000 per family. (A: So there’s more and more cash going to privatization again.)

The scheme will be targeted at families that make up just one per cent of the population, but cost taxpayers an astonishing £8billion a year.

So they create the welfare system, make the people helpless, and you can make people helpless you know. They don’t believe they can work, eventually, and they have no role models because their parents went through the same system, social workers are in and out of the house all the time making all the big decisions for them, and you’re a child, you’re a child forever. That’s what socialism brings, you’re eternal children. And that’s what they want for the whole world, to be eternal children. They’ve done a good job, mind you. Science is wonderful isn’t it? Just studying the public and finding out how to destroy the culture is quite simple and easy.

Children, 4, 'to be fingerprinted to borrow school books from library' - telegraph.co.uk / Andrew Hough / 28 May 2010

Again too, to bring up children in the required system that’s going to be there in 20-30 years’ time, you always make sure that you start the children at school. That’s why they were the first ones to go through all the detectors, metal detectors and so on, and then all the drug-sniffing gear as well – and they think it’s all quite natural being patted down at airports – so they’re already geared for it. So now your world will be iris scans and fingerprinting to get your school meal or to borrow a school book. It’s quite obvious. It’s a good training, Pavlovian training exercise and it will work pretty well.

Canadians don’t know it either that a lot of them have been affected by Agent Orange. I mentioned this a few years ago when it was found out that all the military bases across Canada sprayed from the air, all the bases and around the bases and there’s always towns around these bases built up around them, Agent Orange to kill off the weeds. They were doing that right through the 60s, 70s and 80s and I think some even into the 90s. And the public hadn’t a clue. Like most things that really happen, we haven’t got a clue. Anyway it broke out and I read the article a few years back. Here’s another article on it, a recent one.

More cash for Agent Orange victims

torontosun.com / Kris Sims / December 31, 2011

OTTAWA – More people will soon be compensated for their suffering caused by Agent Orange that was sprayed in Canada as a defoliant over several decades.

“The government has relented and realized the error of their ways (A: Well, they’re human aren’t they...) and approximately 30 people (A: That’s very big, 30 people...) will be notified very soon that they indeed will be receiving the $20 thousand Agent Orange compensation,” said NDP MP Peter Stoffer.

“The unfortunate part is, they are leaving out hundreds of thousands of other people who may have qualified.” (A: They’re probably dead already with cancers and so on.)

Stoffer cites the creation of the Canadian Forces base in Gagetown, N.B., as an example of the chemical's misuse.

“Instead of using manual labour to eradicate all of the leaves and the trees, they used chemicals, and those chemicals were sprayed in the lakes, rivers and the foliage,” said Stoffer.

Stoffer said the NDP (A: That’s a political party that’s further left than Marx.) wants a full public inquiry into the spraying of Agent Orange and similar chemicals in Canada to find out how many people were affected and what health problems they may have developed as a result.

Well they should read the articles I was reading a few years back there, maybe 4 or 5 years ago, because you see, they’d done all the statistics then and even the ones down, like Base Borden, have found out the same thing, that the children had all these different things breaking out in them, malformations and diseases, cancers. It’s no big mystery. So they’ll do another inquiry into it; we love inquiries in democratic countries; they go on forever. And then you get inquiries on top of the inquiries just to, you know, until you’re all dead.

And in the States...

Boeing to Close Wichita Facility by the End of 2013

ksnt.com / Jan 5, 2011

The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] today announced that the Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS) facility in Wichita will close by the end of 2013. The Wichita facility currently employs more than 2,160 employees. (A: They’re just closing it right down.)

"The decision to close our Wichita facility was difficult but ultimately was based on a thorough study of the current and future market environment and our ability to remain competitive while meeting our customers' needs (A: ...blah, blah.... blah, blah, blah. So anyway...) . . .”

Boeing Wichita is the base for the company's Global Transport & Executive Systems business and its B-52 and 767 International Tanker programs. The facility also provides support for flight mission planning and integrated logistics. (A: So I guess they’ll be getting the big tanks in from China, to keep the continuous spraying of the skies going I guess.)

Now, ha! People probably know this, but you have all these planes going over your areas every so often by the government and they photograph everything to see if you’ve improved anything in your property, so they can tax you. Well now they’re sending drones in to do it instead.

Arkansas residents may face taxation by aerial image.

suannews.com / 20 December 2011 / Gary Mortimer

Just as privacy concerns are raised by ACLU and others over drone use in the USA, Quorum Court in Arkansas has approved the use of aerial imagery to collect data on property sizes. Not at the moment from UAS but it does not take much of an imagination to realise they could be used for this service.

Looking at the Pictometry website they are creating products that several UK based companies achieve with sUAS. Pictometry must be chomping at the bit to use lower altitude imagery that can create higher resolution products. (A: So that’ll be the way of the future, you’ll see these darn drones coming around, sniffing around your home and then in comes the big bill because you repaired the garage or shored up a broken window here and there. Because you see, they’re really on a roll now to get all the cash in from you.)

MF Global sold assets to Goldman before the collapse, sources have come out. It’s amazing how corruption can come out. Nobody will go to court for anything; they’re untouchable... isn’t it?

KPMG plans timely return of MF Global assets

reuters.com / Lauren Tara LaCapra and Matthew Goldstein / Jan 3, 2012

(Reuters) - MF Global unloaded hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of securities to Goldman Sachs in the days leading up to its collapse, according to two former MF Global employees with direct knowledge of the transactions. But it did not immediately receive payment from its clearing firm and lender, JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), one of the sources said.

The sale of securities to Goldman occurred on October 27, just days before MF Global Holdings Ltd (MFGLQ.PK) filed for bankruptcy on October 31, the ex-employees said. One of the employees said the transaction was cleared with JPMorgan Chase.

At the same time MF Global, which was run by former Goldman Sachs head Jon Corzine, was selling securities to Goldman to raise badly needed cash, the futures firm was also drawing down a $1.2 billion revolving line of credit it had with JPMorgan, according to one of the former MF Global employees.

JPMorgan spokeswoman Mary Sedarat said the bank did not withhold money because of the line of credit. She declined further comment on details of the transactions. (A: So it’s all in the family really isn’t it? ...as they take care of each other and we all get, you know, the shaft and the bill. Not bad at all. They’re beyond it all.)

Rothschild, this is quite a little interesting intrigue, intriguing article. It’s not really a conspiracy, it’s an intriguing article about Rothschild...

Rothschild Exposes Gold Mining Deal For Fake or Feint;

Deripaska’s Attempt to Sell Rusal (A: These are companies.) to Alcoa

also Exposed

businessinsider.com / John Helmer, Dances With Bears | Dec. 30, 2011

Nathaniel Rothschild’s libel lawsuit against the Daily Mail and Associated Newspapers, due to commence on January 23 in the High Court in London, is now unravelling even more Russian oligarch secrets. (A: Because they’re in bed with the Russians too; the Rothschilds are all over the place you know.) As they crack open, so do suspicions of even more inexplicable involvement by Rothschild’s friend, Lord Peter Mandelson (A: This is the guy who ran Britain for while, you know, when Blair was off doing his stuff. This is the guy, Mandelson, who actually boasted he was running Britain from Lord Rothschild’s swimming pool in France, you know. It’s in your face now isn’t it? Anyway it says...) . .

The point on which the entire tale hangs, at least for Rothschild, is that in January 2005, Mandelson was the European Union’s trade commissioner. (A: That’s a top job. I mean, that’s where all the deals come through, through you. Lots of bribes and money goes on in there all the time; that’s just the way it is folks. And he’s an inside man with all the knowledge, you see.) The events reported by the newspaper in its initial publication, and now in new evidence before the court, suggest that Mandelson was involving himself (A: He was doing his own business AS he was the head of the EU trade commission. So he’s been doing his own private business too at the same time...) in Russian business deals which he knew, or should have known, created the appearance of a conflict of interest with his official position. (A: He’ll just give the public the finger; that’s what they do now.)

Rothschild’s claim is that it was libelous to suggest that he put Mandelson in that position. (A: Well he’s put Prime Ministers in before; why shouldn’t he put Mandelson in there too? [Alan chuckles.]) Mandelson’s position is that he wouldn’t countenance a conflict of interest, or the appearance of one. (A: And when you read through this article you’ll find out Rothschild actually joined Mandelson in Russia and they visited different sites, and it was to do with massive gold deposits as well. It’s quite an intriguing little piece here. But yeah, Mandelson was obviously Rothschild’s man and that’s how some people climb very high, very, very quickly. And they fall slowly because they give them certain golden parachutes and exemptions from fines and prison. Quite something isn’t it?)

Now I’m putting up a link tonight too, one of the latest studies from the Journal of Neurovirology, to do with polio. I’ve been saying for years that much of these particular viruses that they inject into you, especially with the polio virus and others, ended up in the brains of people who became autistic, children who became autistic. And this is the latest study that proves it once again, folks. I’ll put this one up for you if you want to have a little peek at it, for those who still care.

Association of autism with polyomavirus infection in postmortem brains - informahealthcare.com

And this article here is about Eurofanatics and it says...

The Eurofanatics should join the Marxists in the dustbin of history

The end of the euro may prove chaotic, but recovery will come – sooner rather than later.

telegraph.co.uk / Bruce Anderson / 3 Jan 2012

The only solution to the crisis is for Chancellor Merkel, right, to bail out the rest of the euro zone - that is not going to happen, despite the pleading of France's Nicolas Sarkozy, left.

Geoffrey Howe is guilty. Whatever he actually said about Liverpool’s problems during some early Thatcher Cabinet meetings, he was culpable for his failure to draw the obvious conclusion. The city was finding it impossible to compete with London and the South of England. In different circumstances, this could have been rectified by devaluation. Liverpool would then have used a weaker currency: let us call it the Scouse.

In a single country, that option was not available, so there was only one alternative. Despite Geoffrey Howe’s reservations, Liverpool received large subsidies from taxpayers elsewhere in Britain: fiscal transfers. Yet even under that generous regime, it continued to struggle. (A: So what the article goes on to say is now we’re doing fiscal transfers across the whole of darn Europe. You’re not just bailing out one little area in your own country; you’re bailing out the whole of Europe.)

And all the Marxists are behind this by the way. They’re actually Trotskyists; they’ve got different names for themselves now. They’re churned out of the universities. I was reading an article yesterday about some of the top Marxist leaders and writers and teachers and professors in universities, and you’re stuffed with them; every country’s got them. And they’re all through the Ivy League ones too, you know. Lansky was a good one in Britain there; he taught for, oh, about 50 years or something, maybe more, about the wonders of Marxism to all the ones in Cambridge and occasionally he taught in Oxford as well. So why would you allow professors to teach in your own countries Marxism, which vowed to destroy your culture, your way of living, etc, etc, etc, demolish them, and have mass slaughters if need be too? Why would you allow them to teach? It’s because the big boys wanted them there. It’s the dialectic process, isn’t it?

And from...

Adm. Mike Mullen: 'National Debt Is Our Biggest Security Threat'

(A: ...not terrorism.)

huffingtonpost.com / First Posted: 6/24/10 Updated: 5/25/11

America's highest-ranking military official thinks the U.S. has bigger security problems than al-Qaeda, suicide bombers and an increasingly deadly nine-year war.

"Our national debt is our biggest national security threat," said Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at a "Tribute to the Troops" breakfast sponsored by The Hill on Thursday morning, according to two staffers at the gathering. He also noted a troubling trend -- that veterans from Afghanistan and Iraq are becoming homeless at four times the rate the country witnessed in the wake of Vietnam. (A: Well, thank you very much, out you go; you’re on the street, folks. You got a little tin star though, little tin star; isn’t that pretty. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and there’s some callers on the line. I’ll take Michael from Indiana if he’s there. Are you there Michael?

Michael: Yeah, yeah I’m here. I had a question for you. It seems to me more and more that Newt Gingrich is going to be the republican candidate here in America. And I try to tell people that, you know, I mean, that that’s not really the way, you know, we should go. And I know that you’ve talked about him, like speaking at Loyola. Is there any way, any place I can find, like the meeting minutes to that?

Alan: They had a censored version; they really edited it very quickly, down to 600 pages of this first meeting for the World Science meeting. That was to do with brain chipping the population, and I’m not kidding about that. And I have it here. But they put an edited version out. And they’ve had a meeting every year I believe at that university and other universities. In fact, he had one recently, I read a little bit about it too, but they’ve toned it down quite a bit, and that’s the meeting that he brought in the top bioscientists dealing with microchipping from Tokyo. And one of the speeches made by them was that they have the chip ready, actually, to put in the public, it’s just that now it’s a matter of convincing the public to want it, to actually want it. And they said that what they would do is they would put it into movies and make it exciting to have a chip, things like that. And sure enough, movies suddenly came out of nowhere, like the one with Robin Williams, it was called The Final Cut, where you have a chip that records your memory for life and then they use it when you die for your funeral, and things like that. So they had all the top speakers there and of course Newt Gingrich is a total globalist; he’s mentioned it. Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave, he gave his book to every congressman in the Congress. He believes in a changing society, changing it along this designed path of course with science at the top running it all; technocracy in other words.

But it won’t matter to the voters. The voters will always go with mainstream and the mainstream point them in the right directions. Most of the public are so brain dead they won’t go for anybody except the ones that are put up there for the two main parties. The elite gave us this type of, what they call, democracy for that reason. It’s easy to get the herd to go the way that you want them to go and that’s why they like the word democracy. They only use democracy when the herd go for what they’re supposed to go for – and that’s the only time you get any kind of democracy – and vote for the person that they select for you to vote for. But really, it would take much more than one person, I don’t care who they are, getting into government. See, America’s changed every 20 years so much that it’s not America anymore. And by the time you hit 20 it’s not America anymore. There’s 4,000 laws signed into law just this year alone. The last year over 4,800 laws were passed in America, and there’s more to come. There’s more binding treaties across the world internationally with the United Nations; it’s not America anymore. And Quigley said the same thing, when the two parties are on the campaign trail, they talk about the same things, unemployment, health insurance, education, that’s it; you’re both the same party now. You’re talking about social issues; the rest of the time they hardly mention social issues once they’re in. It’s a world agenda, interlocking, and you have so many treaties you’d have to tear up. The G20 recently, and according to the CFR, is really an international government. It’s above the United States. And the US is a member to it, Canada’s a member, we’re all members to it. It’s above it, so it’s the end of national governments. So you’d have to literally go in there and burn a lot of carbon by burning thousands and thousands of stacks of papers and start afresh. But one man would be knocked off before he could get up on the podium. Thanks for calling.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. And remember help me along by donating and buying the books and so on.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Police Recruiting UK--Scraping the Bottom of the Barrel

Police Planting Drugs

Scientists Grow Sperm

EU to Slap Value Added Tax on Food

India--Anger over Secret Drug Trials on Children

GSK Lab Fined for Killing Babies

Charities and Private Firms to Tackle Welfare Problem--Britain

Fingerprints for School Library Books

More Cash for Agent Orange Victims

Boeing to Close Wichita Facility

Property Tax Imaging by Drones

MF Global Sold Assets to Goldman Before Collapse

Intrigue of Mandelson, Rothschild and Russian Gold

Association of Autism with Polyomavirus infection

Eurofanatics Should Join Marxism in Dustbin of History

National Debt is Biggest Security Threat

#4 · March 13, 2021, 8:12 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:12 am
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 18^thof July, 2012.

Newcomers, I always suggest that you look into the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com, it goes back many years and it’s got over a thousand audios for free download. The sites listed on the com site also, they all carry transcripts for print up as well in English, and if you want to go into other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can take your pick from the choice offered there.

Remember too you are the audience that bring me to you because I don’t bring on advertisers as guests and I don’t get sponsored by advertisers, I don’t have shares in companies either that sell products. All I sell are the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, so if you like what you hear, and I go through the history of this big system that you’re born into and to show you how it started, the people that started it too, organizations they built up worldwide, and how they have a long-term business plan. You’re living through a long-term business plan. Every step of the agenda is planned many, many years, sometimes fifty or a hundred years, ahead of implementation. And that’s why everything goes smoothly when they bring across the new parts of the implementation worldwide, it’s already done and the organizations are already set up and running by the time you hear of them.

So, help yourself to those, and remember too from the U.S. to Canada you can order the books and discs using personal checks or international postal money orders, you can use PayPal, or you can send cash. Across the world you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal once again. And straight donations are really, really welcome because as I say I don’t get paid for selling products or anything like that.

Now what I do, as I say, is I go into the past, into the histories. If you don’t understand the histories of the world, especially the big movements that happened, like the industrial revolution, the big robber barons that came up in the United States, the associations they formed including long-term agenda planning, you won’t understand what’s happening today. You think it’s happenstance, you think it’s done out of necessity of the moment through crisis, but nothing is further from the truth. Even the wars, perpetual wars as the military call it, right now, this whole system we’re going through in the Middle East, were planned a long, long time ago and published a long time ago, the exact list that we’re going through country by country today.

The people have adapted to it because you see we’re trained to be that way, we’re trained to adapt into this system and we’ve lost sight of what even democracy was. Democracy remember was where the government is supposed to serve the public. It’s the opposite way here, where the government really have made sure that you all serve them and they’re omnipotent and you don’t dare cross them because they come down on you with overwhelming force. That’s the technique of authoritarianism which the Club of Rome, the big think tank for the United Nations, came out with in the 1970’s. They said democracy would never work, because you see they had all these big plans for all of you. Such as controlling you from birth to death basically, and monitoring you, following you, and upgrading you through indoctrinations. Not just through schooling but through everything that you read, even novels. The amount of money that’s put into novels to insert the PC agenda is just astronomical, same with movies too. So you’re indoctrinated your whole life long to adapt and into adaptation of the big system that controls you. In the 1800’s some people even talked, even Blavatsky and her pseudo Masonic society, said that eventually the system would arise where the public wouldn’t even understand, never mind even know, that their opinions were being put right into their heads. That’s happened today. People don’t logically and clearly think through things, they just find out they’ve got opinions on this and that and the other. Mainly because everyone else has the same opinion about the same time through the techniques which are used today. You must understand how your thoughts are formed and who forms them for you. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about how we arrive at conclusions. We’re given opinions by the masters. We’ve been trained to listen to experts and the big boys of course actually wrote books about that back in the 1950’s, even in the 1940’s, of how they’d bring in this society, a society that couldn’t eventually even change the diaper on a baby without listening to experts first. And at that time it was a ludicrous thing because everyone knew how to do it, we’d all been brought up you see with babies in the house and you knew how to change diapers. Not now, everything’s a mystery today you see. And apart from that you might do it wrong. There’s always an expert to tell you how to do it. Even how to dress for the rain, look at the weather forecast and so on and how they announce it all, you’ll need to wear this and so on because of the weather tomorrow.

I mean you’re trained like a child to always be a child. And most of all you see expert training makes you think that you can never really trust your own judgment; that’s part of it too. And it’s all done deliberately so that the big boys can always, you know, change the whole culture here and there, upgrade it when they want to, to a different way of looking at things, doing things, and the people follow obediently without really a thought, most of them. It’s simply automatic with them; the same with politically correct attitudes on different topics. Things that were taboo are now pushed and promoted as an excellent idea, and a 180-degree shift can happen so quickly and easily and most folk around you will start using the new PC terminology just like that. Just like that, without a thought, because there’s not a thought there you see. That’s how easy it is.

Now remember I’ve gone into the histories too of Bernays over the many years; Bernays is given too much credit actually but he definitely was one of the first ones to come out publicly admitting that he helped to create the American culture. Especially the culture of consumerism, but also a culture of obedience to government because many presidents used him, pulled him in on big, big tasks to alter the culture of America.

At the end of World War II big communist groups that fled the Nazi regime in the 30’s all came over to Britain and the U.S. and they were given government money to set up their programs because they were dealing with creating a compliant society and your tax money helped them create a brand new system again, a secondary system for America, that would come in gradually and replace the consumer society with simply the obedient and austere society, very soviet in a sense. And one of them was the Macy Group and we have the Frankfurt School of course, and the president himself at the time gave them permission to set up and do this; it was from the top down. So, people really have been tinkered with for their whole lives, and your parents, and your grandparents too, without even knowing it you see. And it’s still going on today.

Now, I’ve talked about Bezmenov and other people too. Yuri Bezmenov came over from the Soviet Union, he defected. And he talked about this system and how they’d use liberalism, same as we find that Khrushchev talked about it, he said, we don’t have communists in the U.S., we call them liberals in the U.S. And under the liberal agenda they’ve pushed all the barriers you see that created a strong society, a society that would stay together and go against government if government was too intrusive or changed their morality or whatever very, very quickly. But they have done it all. They’ve done all their objectives very, very well because the public didn’t know this was happening to them from the top down. The same thing happened with the Reece Commission that was done a long time ago, back in the 50’s, to do with the investigation by congress into the big foundations. Now, the parallel government consists of the big foundations. It’s often mentioned; even Thatcher used that term when she left politics, she said, I now belong to the parallel government, because all your ex presidents and prime ministers across the world, who all know each other, once they retire, we belong to the parallel government. We can get things done, we’re not responsible to the public anymore, we can go forward with the agenda and just work behind the scenes and really get things done, whereas the present politicians have to put on a show for the public, the parallel government doesn’t.

And the parallel government also consists of big private corporations, international corporations with IBM. They use all academia as well; they decide what’s going to be taught for the future leaders, for the next generation, the managerial class from universities. They are into sociology of all kinds, behaviorism, and they are into the global agenda for a world system which this elite will rule you see. Remember the parallel government through foundations was set up by the big international banking boys of their day. And it was a way to funnel their tax money, away from the tax man, but literally they are tax-free and they run trillions and trillions of dollars every year, literally providing all the leaders and the leadership systems to bring us into what they call the New World Order. They have thousands of nongovernmental organizations, thousands and thousands across the whole world. And each NGO, nongovernmental organization, specializes in its own particular area. They’ve covered all of the branches of society and sociology and they get instant access to all the world’s media because the same big barons that run the foundations and employ these NGOs and pay them also run and own the media.

The Council on Foreign Relations is a well known arm of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and this group basically has a group in every single country on the planet. And they’ve been picking your presidents and prime ministers for a hundred years now, a hundred years. And that came from Carroll Quigley, who was the historian for the group. They keep their own histories you see because they are behind the wars and that’s what Quigley said too. They needed international wars, World Wars, to get the people to their knees and then through this intermediary they would set up, meaning the United Nations, we’d all sign treaties and gradually give up all our rights. And nationalism would eventually disappear and countries would disappear as they were brought into trading blocks just like the EU and NAFTA for North America.

So we’re going through it constantly and they even have a Far-Eastern/Pacific-Rim group as well to bring Australia and New Zealand in with China and a few other countries as well. So this is ongoing and don’t think it’s a recent plan because Karl Marx talked about it too. And most folk get completely confused because you think in a linear fashion; you’re taught to think in black and white, there’s no grey in your vision of thinking at all. And most folk can’t comprehend why the so-called top capitalists, those who owned big industry across the world, would be funding an opposite called communism. And you have to understand that communism is socialism and collectivism, a controlled indoctrinated society. Well, bankers like that much better because it’s easier for them to deal with their loans, etcetera. When they have centralized government they can keep loaning to the centralized government rather than go door-to-door collecting off you personally, for your personal loan.

And through the power of money they can create all kinds of disruptions, they can crash economies. They’re uniting Europe even closer and closer until there’ll be no individual countries at all. They’re trying to even get rid of the names of the countries in the EU. And through crisis creation through financing they can bring this about, and say the only way out of this, to save us all, we’ve got to give up all nationality all together and simply be European and allow the International Monetary Fund to come in and do all your bookkeeping for you and decide how much will get spent on welfare for this area, this region, etcetera. That’s already under way.

Now, the U.S. of course is artificially inflated in a sense because it’s the battering ram for the New World Order. As long as it supplies the troops, the tax money to buy the tanks, the missiles, the drones and everything else, and build massive compounds in all the countries they’re going into, then they’ve got a use. Once it’s finished, once they’ve finished with the Moslem countries, and I’ve said this for years, they will pull the rug from under the Americans at home. They’re actually doing it in slow motion right now because in the U.S. they still have cheaper food than the rest of the world. In the U.S. they don’t have the value added tax yet. All the countries across the planet have to have value added tax because in austerity and under austerity all your disposable income, your extra income, is to go to vital necessities: food, shelter, clothing, energy. That’s the big plan.

But people don’t know how to deal with this, even the ones who know what’s going on, and there is no big organization to fight it in a traditional manner of politics or anything else. Politics is a waste of time because, as I say, these boys, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, CFR, have run politics for a hundred years, actually more than a hundred years. Because before they were called that they had different names in the 1800’s and they already had control of the U.S. and Britain at that time.

So, people are adapting, they’re adapting even as they think they’re fighting about it, and all we have are safety valves like shows like this where you can let off some steam. And that’s really what they’re for, it lets you let off some steam. In other areas you can go deeper and deeper because at least understanding what’s going on gives you a personal freedom of mind. Only the thing is though, the effect of that is you’ll find it harder to communicate to those around you who are still completely indoctrinated and who actually quite like the system as long as there’s lots of cheap entertainment. You’ve never had so much entertainment churned out. It’s like George Orwell talked about, where even machines churned out novels and made the novels and the songs and lots of pornography he said too because that will always work.

So it’s hard to get through to those people who still think “well I’ve got the weekend coming up, it’s party time and I’ll do all the little things that I like to do” and it’s fairly cheap at the moment so they’ve never had it so good in that direction. And it’s so amazing too that cheap entertainment can be used as such a weapon. Incredible weapon to stop you stopping and thinking and discussing with other people about the gravity of the situation we’re all in. And that’s what it does. People will shy away from that which is nasty and always gravitate towards that which is pleasant. They avoid pain, you see, and that’s what catered to today, lots of entertainment. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix. And as I say most people will gravitate to the patriot radio really to let off steam because everyone’s angry about something. And they’re also confused. And they have a little bit of knowledge as to what’s happening. Most folk don’t really wake up; most folk really simply wake up only to the things that are affecting them personally. They can see the inflation; they see the cost of living going up. They’re afraid of losing their jobs, things like that. And they still go and vote, mind you, even though there’s no point in voting because all leaders, according to Professor Carroll Quigley, again the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations, all their leaders for a hundred years have been picked by this organization, so they’re members of the Council on Foreign Relations. It doesn’t matter which party you vote for, the top guy is always a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in every country. And they have their set agenda.

If you read their books, by the Council on Foreign Relations, they’ll always say at the beginning, a preface, because they’re funded by the Rockefeller Foundation in the U.S., and they’ll always say it’s a nonprofit organization, under a charitable designation, and they are nonpolitical. And they’re telling you the truth, they don’t play politics. See, agendas, agendas are not playing politics, you see. And so they always preface it, and then you read it all, and for the average person they’ll think they’re actually reading about politics; no, they’re telling you where they’re taking the world. There’s no other system like that, they’re taking the world in a certain direction, there’s no opposition. And politics is there to rubber-stamp the orders given to them by these big foundations that are running the world. IBM is more important in this world today than politicians because they do a lot of subcontracting, it goes out to them from government, and they advise them. All these big think tanks like the Royal Institute of International Affairs and many, many others, they advise governments on what to do in every situation. That’s the norm. So why have a government when they have to go to these other guys that you don’t elect and ask them what to do? Why bother voting? Actually, just not voting at all will show you that the system will continue, but at least the ones behind it all will have to come out or at least get new front men to come out and speak for them and keep it continuing and you’ll see what really runs your countries.

When you vote you go into a legality. You’re consenting to be ruled by people you don’t know. And by people by record who are always lying to you, in every generation. And as soon as they’re in they go off on some other tangent from all their promises. Because you see there’s only one agenda and they’re in on the one agenda. They must make sure it continues; it doesn’t matter what party it is. Quigley also said that the junior politicians are allowed to compete amongst themselves to get higher status. That’s the only battling that goes on, is for personal status within politics, to make a name for themselves. The ones at the top are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Now as I’ve mentioned before, everything is planned long in advance, even the New American Century group when they came out under the Project for the New American Century with Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld and all the rest of them on board with it, they had the list of countries to take out in the Middle East and we’ve taken out most of them already. They’ve got some to go yet. And it was the same list of course that Israel had because Israel worked very closely when it comes to the Middle East because they’re the only ones going to be allowed to have any kind of weaponry there at all, any kind of weaponry in fact. And that’s the big plan of course. I’ve gone through the history of the Middle East and even who helped set up Israel, from the British governor generals that were sent in when they brought in the Russians to come in and populate Israel. I’ve gone through the histories, look into the archive section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Because the guys who were the governor generals wrote their memoirs about it and they let a lot out then at that time and one of them even said, Sir Ronald Storrs, he said that we’re creating a new Ulster in the Middle East. Ulster was what Britain did to Ireland. They sent in a different people into Ireland, with a different religion, who were guaranteed to run the country and have naturally opposition for ever and ever because they were so different in their policies, and they’d also be loyal to London.

Anyway, we watch and we live through all the shenanigans that go on as people get slaughtered across the planet, you’re paying for it all. You paid for China to come up as the most prosperous country on the planet; it’s the manufacturer for the whole world. An idea again dreamed up by the Council on Foreign Relations and they published articles on that in the 1930’s. But we see the characters come and go in politics and get well rewarded afterwards and as I say it doesn’t matter what side that you think that they’re on, they’re not for you, even the working man. They voted in Tony Blair for the working man, who is kidding who? He was one of their boys from the start.

And it says:

"Blair’s shameful war and a wall of silence"

Alan: This is what they always do after we’ve slaughtered a whole bunch of folk. Years later they have an inquiry and then they do a lot of hoopla and oh this is terrible and all that, and then nothing happens and it goes on and on forever. It says:

"Tony Blair stands accused, by this paper among many other observers, of one of the most serious abuses of power a prime minister can commit. The charge is that he made a private agreement with George Bush to join the US in an offensive war against Iraq."

Alan: That was the New American Century Project.

"Then, with the aid of spin doctor Alastair Campbell, he wildly exaggerated evidence that Saddam Hussein posed a deadly threat to this country, so as to persuade the Cabinet, Parliament and the British people that the invasion was justified."

Alan: Remember Powell too, giving us fuzzy photographs, oh, that’s a missile launcher. It turns out to be something Britain sold them to launch weather balloons. But we go and slaughter folk for that. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫ - You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network because you can handle the truth - ♫}

Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about Tony Blair as an example, of one of many, who took his country into a war and they set up an inquiry, you always have inquiries after the fact put out by government, and this one in Britain is headed by Sir John Chilcot he’s called. And it says:

"The accusation at the heart of Sir John Chilcot’s inquiry, which spent 18 months hearing evidence until early last year. Since then, the panel has produced a million words of a draft report, almost twice as long as War and Peace."

Alan: You know the book.

"Yet, incredibly, Sir John now says his findings must be delayed for a year – more than a decade after the invasion – because officials are seemingly refusing to let him publish Blair’s private messages to Mr Bush, on which his conclusions are based."

"We understand why some politicians and members of the security services may be reluctant for the full facts to emerge. Yet Blair, Campbell and other interested parties have all been allowed to publish self-serving accounts of the war – and to make money out of them. We also note that Lord Justice Leveson, in his inquiry into the disreputable but hardly life-and-death matter of voicemail hacking, shows no qualms about publishing every scrap of private correspondence that may be relevant. So how sickening that, where political crimes are concerned, a wall of secrecy comes slamming down to deny the public their right to know what offences have been committed in their name. Coincidentally, the delay comes as Blair, now a multi-millionaire, slithers back into public life as a Labour adviser."

Alan: That’s a party adviser.

"If the party had any ethical core, it would suspend him until the Chilcot Report is published – complete with the evidence that could damn him for ever."

Alan: Well it won’t matter because you see they can’t do anything to him because you’ve got present prime ministers continuing these wars. Not just in Britain, elsewhere too. And if you start a precedent of putting him in the slammer for starting wars, then the whole thing would fall apart. And of course these wars must go on until the whole world is conquered and the Moslem countries exist no more. That’s why they’re doing it. Plus, they’ve got to grab all their land, oil, and everything else.

So, that’s the reality of the world. There’s no comeback for these guys. They must be given a form of immunity or you would never get a prime minister or president again. They would not take the job because they always do what they’re told and these orders are there, perpetual war. They’ve had that in the military magazines, that’s what we’re in now, perpetual war for the rest of your lives. And perpetual terrorism as well. That’s the agenda. And of course it’s all to make sure you’ve got an utterly controlled society that bends over and does what they’re told, very compliant, in a totalitarian system.

I read an article too yesterday about BPA, that’s an estrogen mimicker they call it, it’s in all plastics and we’ve been consuming that for years. It literally destroys the hormonal system, especially of males. It’s in cosmetics for the mothers who are pregnant, and it does distort the male characteristics of the fetus from 8 to 12 weeks if the mother is using that stuff and she’s absorbing it, it will get into the child and he’ll never be a complete man again. He’ll have lots of organizations mind you, they’re called kind of happy, their name means happy, and they can join them later down the road. And they’ve known this for years. But this says:

"As a result of widespread consumer backlash, many companies have rolled out “BPA-free” plastic products,"

Alan: This is the latest gimmick, oh they’re free.

"…ranging from bottles and sippy cups to reusable water bottles, meant to appeal to those health-conscious consumers looking to avoid toxins. Many are simply swapping another bisphenol,"

Alan: Which is called

"…bisphenol-S (BPS), which is now showing up in human urine concentrations at levels similar to those of BPA. Research suggests BPS has similar hormone-mimicking characteristics as BPA, but it may be significantly less biodegradable, and more heat-stable and photo-resistant, which means it may cause even more health and environmental damage over time."

"If you’re interested in avoiding any number of chemical toxins leaching into your food and beverages, choose glass over plastic, especially when it comes to products that will come into contact with food or beverages, or those intended for pregnant women, infants and children."

Alan: So, it’s typical too, it’s like some drugs that they have that cause terrible effects on the public, they simply move a molecule to the left or to the right and call it a different name and this is what they’re doing here. It’s standard legal technique and you’re still getting poisoned and you’ll still get effeminate characteristics. It’s not good for women either; remember this is synthetic stuff; it’s not even real stuff. It does trick the body but it does a lot more damage than even the real stuff would do. And it doesn’t break down once it hits the receptors; it stays there.

"Bureaucrats Bully Family Farms in Washington, D.C. Exurbs"

Alan: It says Fauquier is the name of the place.

"Fauquier County, Virginia has become a new battleground against the sprawl of Washington-style government bullying. Under the guise of business zoning authority, Fauquier is now depriving an agricultural community of its liberty to live the farm life when a little commerce is, and even is not, involved. The county, you see, wants to regulate and fine farm residents on grounds of holding pumpkin carvings, birthday parties for little girls, and Boy Scout jamborees. Fauquier County is an agricultural community in the beautiful Piedmont mountain region about an hour west of Washington. Its motto is “life as it should be.”"

Alan: Everything’s a joke today, isn’t it? what’s happening.

"To some county bureaucrats and officials, that means “life as we tell you how it should be.” The growth of the federal government, along with its bureaucratic mentality, has sprawled into Northern Virginia, and mostly up to now, just shy of Fauquier. In once-bucolic Loudon County to the north of Washington, where family farms stood just 15 years ago, now stand high-rise offices of businesses with government contracts, lobbyists, and others feeding at the government trough. Loudon, the fastest-growing county in America, is not the free market at work. It's a concrete and steel metropolis built directly and indirectly on taxpayer money flowing into and out of Washington. Virginia is divided now -- in many ways -- between the Washington suburbs of Northern Virginia and the rest of the state. With the sprawl of big government comes the bureaucratic mentality that what's yours is theirs to regulate, control, and dictate. Virginia, of course, was the home of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Patrick Henry, and George Mason. The spirit of liberty still runs deep in parts of Virginia. Sadly, however, the sense of freedom has been dampened if not eviscerated among those tied to and benefiting from government money and power."

And it says:

"It has long been supportive of agriculture, and the state has a Right to Farm law. While family farms are struggling, Virginia has discovered that its soil and climate are splendid for grapes. Hence, wineries are popping up to the joy of a good number of Virginians now employed by them, tourists, and many tax revenue dollars are collected as well. Fauquier this past week, though, passed a new county ordinance requiring wineries to close their doors at 6 p.m. and requiring them to pay the county for special permits for such things as extended hours and catered food. Because of one or two wineries where bacchanalia has caused grief for some neighbors, the county decided to punish all wineries...oh, and to make more money off its theft of liberty, too. The wineries have numbers and money to fight this punitive over-regulation. By using narrowly tailored exemptions, though, the county bought off opposition from some, including one that defeated the county at the Virginia Supreme Court not long ago. When government believes that it owns our liberty, it selectively dishes out some as bribery."

Alan: And that’s the problem with the countries too, you can’t get people to stand together because folk are always bribed off. Because we’re living in a corrupt society now, corruption is the norm because of moral relativity teaching and training in schools.

"But Fauquier isn't just stealing liberty from wineries. Using Orwellian oversight and threats of fines, Fauquier is also bullying a tiny farm in Paris, Virginia that takes in rescued animals and sells organic tea but is not a winery. Reading the order against the farm issued by Fauquier County Zoning Administrator Kimberley Johnson, one may confuse Fauquier for an anti-family banana republic. In deciding to seek fines against the farm, Ms. Johnson's April 30 order includes the following specious, frivolous, and ridiculous items: "

"1. The farm has rescued animals;"

Alan: Well that’s what it does.

"2. The farm advertised an "organic tea café" and films its on-site small-farm events;"

Alan: Oh they actually film small events, can you imagine they’re getting away with that?

"3. As a means to unscrupulously load up her case, Ms. Johnson includes in her list of allegations certain "events" at the farm she found in an internet search that even her own order later acknowledges were never held on the property;

Using her questionable internet investigative "techniques" (the county hasn't yet used drones), Ms. Johnson alleges two other events in support of her claims: a "wine testing" in September 2011, and "a seasonal pumpkin patch and carving event" in October. Maybe Ms. Johnson should notify Homeland Security, too. Those kids carving pumpkins have knives!

Perhaps the single most offensive allegation by Ms. Johnson is that the farm's Facebook page "includes photographs of a child's birthday party that was held" on January 22. Ms. Johnson believes that a party of eight 10-year-old girls on a family farm is subject to her regulatory purview and is cause to threaten county citizens with fines up to $5,000.

Ms. Johnson has shut down, or attempted to shut down, political fundraisers on residential farms for lack of a permit. The farm owners could have sued her and the county under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for violating constitutional rights under the color of state law. Ms. Johnson, the menace, wasn't fired or sued for her imperious view of her power versus her limited view of people's rights on private property. That's a shame. Now, she's attempting to fine a county resident for holding Boy Scout jamborees on his property."

Alan: This is terrible getting away with all that, isn’t it?

"Not all victims of Ms. Johnson's lawbreaking are wealthy enough to assert their rights through civil actions. And that's how bureaucrats build on their arrogant lawbreaking. They bully citizens who are good, mind-their-own business types, or who lack the resources to file suit."

Alan: Then it goes on about other things that are happening too. You understand, this is symptomatic of this whole world organization. It’s authoritarian. Remember, I’ve said that before, that the major, the premier think tank for the United Nations that runs all this stuff, for the new laws, they all come from the U.N., they have the Club of Rome as their main think tank, and they were the guys in the 1970’s that said they’d have to gradually change the system to an authoritarian system. That means bureaucrats with power, people you don’t elect in to government. And these departments are growing like cancers, folks. And like all cancers they eventually choke the body. And unfortunately people are accepting it and accepting it because people do that. Dzerzhinsky of the Soviet system said the same thing, he said, What do I think of people? he says, Well, you can starve them, you can beat them to death and abuse them, and will they ever rebel? he says, No, they’ll turn round and eat their dead. You understand we’ve been studied so meticulously by the behaviorists for so long, and these behaviorists have been at the top of every top revolution like the Soviet system, studying and studying and studying for techniques they can use down the road on everybody else. And they know how far to push people, how much to, but they also know the techniques of indoctrinating the public to accept abuse. And that’s what it is, it’s abuse. And as this guy said in this article here, the U.S. is like a banana republic now with these major domos and their little badges or titles. What are you going to do about it? What are you going to do about it? You see, if people would stand together and do something you’d be noticed. You can’t have little tiny groups all competing for power themselves and they don’t even like each other by the way, all these little groups that form to oppose things. You’ve got to come together all as one because you’re all in it together. It’s going to affect all of you. And you’ve got to demand. No, you don’t compromise, you demand.

Now the U.S. has had secret jails across Europe for their tortures and so on and this is an article here in the Telegraph.

"Court demands secret files on US…"

Alan: They call them

"…'black jails’"

Alan: For black-ops.

"The United States is facing fresh embarrassment over its use of 'black' detention sites after the European Court of Human Rights ordered Poland to hand over secret documents about its role in the War on Terror, The Daily Telegraph has learned."

"Judges in Strasbourg have requested documents that contain details of how the CIA set up its "extraordinary rendition" centre outside Warsaw in 2002 where it subjected al-Qaeda suspects to water-boarding and other extreme interrogation techniques. A month ago, a Polish whistle-blower alleged that a document existed which allowed the setting up of the prison – including procedures to adopt in the event of an inmate's death."

Alan: They kill a lot of them during torture.

"It was said to have been signed by the head of Polish intelligence."

Alan: And this is another thing too with this world order, you see all your intelligence agencies work together. And they don’t even have to go through the political realms at all. One guy who talked about this in 1920 was H.G. Wells, because he says the League of Nations, the precursor of the United Nations, he says now our agencies can all communicate with each other without going through the politicians that are collected and we can get the agenda through. Just to show you how old the system is. Anyway, it says:

"According to the leak, American officials "laughed" and refused to sign the document. "They considered us amateurs and explained that this kind of business could not be dealt with by means of formal agreements," the Polish newspaper reported. Polish officials have refused to confirm or deny the existence of the agreement, citing official secrets laws, as part of a four-year investigation into the jail."

Alan: They always say that, oh we can’t tell you for reasons of national security. You understand the public have no rights whatsoever. We don’t have any rights, let’s not kid ourselves.

And, in Australia, who are really getting hammered now because they suddenly got all the whole New World Order techniques forced on them quickly and all their factories are now, now that they’ve signed all the agreements with China, they’re just flooding out there, they’re bringing in foreign workers and all the rest of it.

"Observers say Falcon…"

Alan: This is from Ford company, they make Falcon vehicles.

"…signals Ford's end"

Alan: They just fired about 400 workers and they’re going to start building them probably in Thailand or somewhere it says here.

"The car industry observers say Ford's days of making cars in Australia will be numbered once the next version of the Falcon rolls off the production line. They announced it would cut up to 440 jobs on Tuesday at two of its plants in Melbourne and cut production of its cars to meet falling demand. The Ford Falcon and the Holden Commodore were among Australia's most popular 15 years ago."

Alan: They were the cars that is. Anyway they’ve got all these offers from other countries including Thailand and to build them cheaply and of course China as well. You understand, the system you’re living in now, we’ve all become so debased. People don’t realize they are debased because they don’t know how their grandparents really were, or great grandparents, when they actually had a culture where they would stand up and just say enough, you know. But you debase the people and they can’t stand up for anything. There’s no family unit to stand up for now, so guys won’t stand up for anything at all, except maybe that their pornography continues on television and internet. And so many incredible awful things are happening.

"Human corpses harvested in multimillion-dollar trade"

"A grisly trade in human body parts leaves relatives grieving and some recipients at risk of life-threatening disease."

Alan: It says they found on a raid by Ukrainian authorities, this is international by the way, heels from feet, two elbows, eardrums, teeth, and so on, and so on.

"On February 24, Ukrainian authorities made an alarming discovery: bones and other human tissues crammed into coolers in a grimy white minibus. “From day one, everything was forged; everything, because we could.”"

Alan: Get away with it, says one of the guys.

"“As long as the paperwork looked good, it was fine”"

Alan: So there was a real high tech group involved in this. And they even found “amid the body parts, envelopes stuffed with cash and autopsy results written in English.” International body trade. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix and this article I’m reading now is about body parts, an international ring that was caught. It will be just the tip of the iceberg of course. And we also have the scandals too, in New Jersey; we’ve had that in the past too with body parts getting smuggled in and all the rest of it. But this says:

"What the security service had disrupted was not the work of a serial killer but part of an international pipeline of ingredients for medical and dental products that are routinely implanted into people around the world. The seized documents suggested that the remains of dead Ukrainians were destined for a factory in Germany belonging to the subsidiary of a US medical products company, Florida-based RTI Biologics. RTI is one of a growing industry of companies that make profits by turning mortal remains into everything from dental implants to bladder slings to wrinkle cures. The industry has flourished even as its practices have roused concerns about how tissues are obtained and how well grieving families and transplant patients are informed about the realities and risks of the business. “I was in shock” ... Kateryna Rahulina says she did not give permission for the body of her mother Olha to be harvested."

Alan: They’re just stealing the bodies and shipping them off.

"“I was in shock” ... she says."

"In the US alone, the biggest market and the biggest supplier, an estimated two million products derived from human tissue are sold each year, a figure that has doubled over the past decade. It is an industry that promotes treatments and products that literally allow the blind to see (through cornea transplants) and the lame to walk (by recycling tendons and ligaments for use in knee repairs). It's also an industry fuelled by powerful appetites for bottom-line profits and fresh human bodies. In the Ukraine, for example, the security service believes that bodies passing through a morgue in the Nikolaev district, the gritty shipbuilding region located near the Black Sea, may have been feeding the trade, leaving behind what investigators described as potentially dozens of “human sock puppets” — corpses stripped of their reusable parts. Industry officials argue that such alleged abuses are rare, and that the industry operates safely and responsibly."

Alan: Well they’re born liars, aren’t they? I mean haven’t we learned that by now?

"For its part, RTI didn't respond to repeated requests for comment or to a detailed list of questions provided a month before this publication."

Alan: You understand the whole society is corrupt now because you see we accept more and more horror. Even corpses now that are plasticized and they put them on show and people go in and have a little chuckle and laugh at them. The abortion industry is a fantastic big, big, big business. We kill more children than live births now and we think nothing of it. See, life is becoming cheap and when that happens too your owners, the guys at the top, look at you with even more disdain at the bottom. And you accept it all as you go along with it all. It all comes home to roost in the end.

And in India of course, where corruption rules the country, look at what they’re doing there. They’re giving complete hysterectomies to women there for their health insurance scams that they’ve got out now.

"India's Chhattisgarh state is investigating reports that thousands of women had unnecessary hysterectomies so hospitals could make insurance claims. They were carried out under a national insurance scheme whereby private hospitals claim for treating patients who cannot afford expensive procedures. They estimate more than 2,000 women were talked into having their wombs removed in the last six months. The 34 medical centers accused have not yet commented on the allegations."

Alan: This sort of thing is worldwide, and you want to save, you think you can save this? Your politicians remember are worse, they’re more degraded and psychopathic. And we’re going to answer to it all personally when they come for you, because they’ll want something from you one day. What are you going to do about it? Just accept it until they do come for you?

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight, and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Blair's War

BPA Free, But Products Now Use BPS

Bureaucrats Bully Family Farms in D.C.

Court Demands Files on US Secret Jails

Ford Co. Australia

Multimillion Dollar Human Corpse Industry

Health Insurance Scam in India--Thousands of Women had Wombs Removed

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 18^thof July, 2012.

Newcomers, I always suggest that you look into the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com, it goes back many years and it’s got over a thousand audios for free download. The sites listed on the com site also, they all carry transcripts for print up as well in English, and if you want to go into other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can take your pick from the choice offered there.

Remember too you are the audience that bring me to you because I don’t bring on advertisers as guests and I don’t get sponsored by advertisers, I don’t have shares in companies either that sell products. All I sell are the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, so if you like what you hear, and I go through the history of this big system that you’re born into and to show you how it started, the people that started it too, organizations they built up worldwide, and how they have a long-term business plan. You’re living through a long-term business plan. Every step of the agenda is planned many, many years, sometimes fifty or a hundred years, ahead of implementation. And that’s why everything goes smoothly when they bring across the new parts of the implementation worldwide, it’s already done and the organizations are already set up and running by the time you hear of them.

So, help yourself to those, and remember too from the U.S. to Canada you can order the books and discs using personal checks or international postal money orders, you can use PayPal, or you can send cash. Across the world you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal once again. And straight donations are really, really welcome because as I say I don’t get paid for selling products or anything like that.

Now what I do, as I say, is I go into the past, into the histories. If you don’t understand the histories of the world, especially the big movements that happened, like the industrial revolution, the big robber barons that came up in the United States, the associations they formed including long-term agenda planning, you won’t understand what’s happening today. You think it’s happenstance, you think it’s done out of necessity of the moment through crisis, but nothing is further from the truth. Even the wars, perpetual wars as the military call it, right now, this whole system we’re going through in the Middle East, were planned a long, long time ago and published a long time ago, the exact list that we’re going through country by country today.

The people have adapted to it because you see we’re trained to be that way, we’re trained to adapt into this system and we’ve lost sight of what even democracy was. Democracy remember was where the government is supposed to serve the public. It’s the opposite way here, where the government really have made sure that you all serve them and they’re omnipotent and you don’t dare cross them because they come down on you with overwhelming force. That’s the technique of authoritarianism which the Club of Rome, the big think tank for the United Nations, came out with in the 1970’s. They said democracy would never work, because you see they had all these big plans for all of you. Such as controlling you from birth to death basically, and monitoring you, following you, and upgrading you through indoctrinations. Not just through schooling but through everything that you read, even novels. The amount of money that’s put into novels to insert the PC agenda is just astronomical, same with movies too. So you’re indoctrinated your whole life long to adapt and into adaptation of the big system that controls you. In the 1800’s some people even talked, even Blavatsky and her pseudo Masonic society, said that eventually the system would arise where the public wouldn’t even understand, never mind even know, that their opinions were being put right into their heads. That’s happened today. People don’t logically and clearly think through things, they just find out they’ve got opinions on this and that and the other. Mainly because everyone else has the same opinion about the same time through the techniques which are used today. You must understand how your thoughts are formed and who forms them for you. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about how we arrive at conclusions. We’re given opinions by the masters. We’ve been trained to listen to experts and the big boys of course actually wrote books about that back in the 1950’s, even in the 1940’s, of how they’d bring in this society, a society that couldn’t eventually even change the diaper on a baby without listening to experts first. And at that time it was a ludicrous thing because everyone knew how to do it, we’d all been brought up you see with babies in the house and you knew how to change diapers. Not now, everything’s a mystery today you see. And apart from that you might do it wrong. There’s always an expert to tell you how to do it. Even how to dress for the rain, look at the weather forecast and so on and how they announce it all, you’ll need to wear this and so on because of the weather tomorrow.

I mean you’re trained like a child to always be a child. And most of all you see expert training makes you think that you can never really trust your own judgment; that’s part of it too. And it’s all done deliberately so that the big boys can always, you know, change the whole culture here and there, upgrade it when they want to, to a different way of looking at things, doing things, and the people follow obediently without really a thought, most of them. It’s simply automatic with them; the same with politically correct attitudes on different topics. Things that were taboo are now pushed and promoted as an excellent idea, and a 180-degree shift can happen so quickly and easily and most folk around you will start using the new PC terminology just like that. Just like that, without a thought, because there’s not a thought there you see. That’s how easy it is.

Now remember I’ve gone into the histories too of Bernays over the many years; Bernays is given too much credit actually but he definitely was one of the first ones to come out publicly admitting that he helped to create the American culture. Especially the culture of consumerism, but also a culture of obedience to government because many presidents used him, pulled him in on big, big tasks to alter the culture of America.

At the end of World War II big communist groups that fled the Nazi regime in the 30’s all came over to Britain and the U.S. and they were given government money to set up their programs because they were dealing with creating a compliant society and your tax money helped them create a brand new system again, a secondary system for America, that would come in gradually and replace the consumer society with simply the obedient and austere society, very soviet in a sense. And one of them was the Macy Group and we have the Frankfurt School of course, and the president himself at the time gave them permission to set up and do this; it was from the top down. So, people really have been tinkered with for their whole lives, and your parents, and your grandparents too, without even knowing it you see. And it’s still going on today.

Now, I’ve talked about Bezmenov and other people too. Yuri Bezmenov came over from the Soviet Union, he defected. And he talked about this system and how they’d use liberalism, same as we find that Khrushchev talked about it, he said, we don’t have communists in the U.S., we call them liberals in the U.S. And under the liberal agenda they’ve pushed all the barriers you see that created a strong society, a society that would stay together and go against government if government was too intrusive or changed their morality or whatever very, very quickly. But they have done it all. They’ve done all their objectives very, very well because the public didn’t know this was happening to them from the top down. The same thing happened with the Reece Commission that was done a long time ago, back in the 50’s, to do with the investigation by congress into the big foundations. Now, the parallel government consists of the big foundations. It’s often mentioned; even Thatcher used that term when she left politics, she said, I now belong to the parallel government, because all your ex presidents and prime ministers across the world, who all know each other, once they retire, we belong to the parallel government. We can get things done, we’re not responsible to the public anymore, we can go forward with the agenda and just work behind the scenes and really get things done, whereas the present politicians have to put on a show for the public, the parallel government doesn’t.

And the parallel government also consists of big private corporations, international corporations with IBM. They use all academia as well; they decide what’s going to be taught for the future leaders, for the next generation, the managerial class from universities. They are into sociology of all kinds, behaviorism, and they are into the global agenda for a world system which this elite will rule you see. Remember the parallel government through foundations was set up by the big international banking boys of their day. And it was a way to funnel their tax money, away from the tax man, but literally they are tax-free and they run trillions and trillions of dollars every year, literally providing all the leaders and the leadership systems to bring us into what they call the New World Order. They have thousands of nongovernmental organizations, thousands and thousands across the whole world. And each NGO, nongovernmental organization, specializes in its own particular area. They’ve covered all of the branches of society and sociology and they get instant access to all the world’s media because the same big barons that run the foundations and employ these NGOs and pay them also run and own the media.

The Council on Foreign Relations is a well known arm of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and this group basically has a group in every single country on the planet. And they’ve been picking your presidents and prime ministers for a hundred years now, a hundred years. And that came from Carroll Quigley, who was the historian for the group. They keep their own histories you see because they are behind the wars and that’s what Quigley said too. They needed international wars, World Wars, to get the people to their knees and then through this intermediary they would set up, meaning the United Nations, we’d all sign treaties and gradually give up all our rights. And nationalism would eventually disappear and countries would disappear as they were brought into trading blocks just like the EU and NAFTA for North America.

So we’re going through it constantly and they even have a Far-Eastern/Pacific-Rim group as well to bring Australia and New Zealand in with China and a few other countries as well. So this is ongoing and don’t think it’s a recent plan because Karl Marx talked about it too. And most folk get completely confused because you think in a linear fashion; you’re taught to think in black and white, there’s no grey in your vision of thinking at all. And most folk can’t comprehend why the so-called top capitalists, those who owned big industry across the world, would be funding an opposite called communism. And you have to understand that communism is socialism and collectivism, a controlled indoctrinated society. Well, bankers like that much better because it’s easier for them to deal with their loans, etcetera. When they have centralized government they can keep loaning to the centralized government rather than go door-to-door collecting off you personally, for your personal loan.

And through the power of money they can create all kinds of disruptions, they can crash economies. They’re uniting Europe even closer and closer until there’ll be no individual countries at all. They’re trying to even get rid of the names of the countries in the EU. And through crisis creation through financing they can bring this about, and say the only way out of this, to save us all, we’ve got to give up all nationality all together and simply be European and allow the International Monetary Fund to come in and do all your bookkeeping for you and decide how much will get spent on welfare for this area, this region, etcetera. That’s already under way.

Now, the U.S. of course is artificially inflated in a sense because it’s the battering ram for the New World Order. As long as it supplies the troops, the tax money to buy the tanks, the missiles, the drones and everything else, and build massive compounds in all the countries they’re going into, then they’ve got a use. Once it’s finished, once they’ve finished with the Moslem countries, and I’ve said this for years, they will pull the rug from under the Americans at home. They’re actually doing it in slow motion right now because in the U.S. they still have cheaper food than the rest of the world. In the U.S. they don’t have the value added tax yet. All the countries across the planet have to have value added tax because in austerity and under austerity all your disposable income, your extra income, is to go to vital necessities: food, shelter, clothing, energy. That’s the big plan.

But people don’t know how to deal with this, even the ones who know what’s going on, and there is no big organization to fight it in a traditional manner of politics or anything else. Politics is a waste of time because, as I say, these boys, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, CFR, have run politics for a hundred years, actually more than a hundred years. Because before they were called that they had different names in the 1800’s and they already had control of the U.S. and Britain at that time.

So, people are adapting, they’re adapting even as they think they’re fighting about it, and all we have are safety valves like shows like this where you can let off some steam. And that’s really what they’re for, it lets you let off some steam. In other areas you can go deeper and deeper because at least understanding what’s going on gives you a personal freedom of mind. Only the thing is though, the effect of that is you’ll find it harder to communicate to those around you who are still completely indoctrinated and who actually quite like the system as long as there’s lots of cheap entertainment. You’ve never had so much entertainment churned out. It’s like George Orwell talked about, where even machines churned out novels and made the novels and the songs and lots of pornography he said too because that will always work.

So it’s hard to get through to those people who still think “well I’ve got the weekend coming up, it’s party time and I’ll do all the little things that I like to do” and it’s fairly cheap at the moment so they’ve never had it so good in that direction. And it’s so amazing too that cheap entertainment can be used as such a weapon. Incredible weapon to stop you stopping and thinking and discussing with other people about the gravity of the situation we’re all in. And that’s what it does. People will shy away from that which is nasty and always gravitate towards that which is pleasant. They avoid pain, you see, and that’s what catered to today, lots of entertainment. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix. And as I say most people will gravitate to the patriot radio really to let off steam because everyone’s angry about something. And they’re also confused. And they have a little bit of knowledge as to what’s happening. Most folk don’t really wake up; most folk really simply wake up only to the things that are affecting them personally. They can see the inflation; they see the cost of living going up. They’re afraid of losing their jobs, things like that. And they still go and vote, mind you, even though there’s no point in voting because all leaders, according to Professor Carroll Quigley, again the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations, all their leaders for a hundred years have been picked by this organization, so they’re members of the Council on Foreign Relations. It doesn’t matter which party you vote for, the top guy is always a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in every country. And they have their set agenda.

If you read their books, by the Council on Foreign Relations, they’ll always say at the beginning, a preface, because they’re funded by the Rockefeller Foundation in the U.S., and they’ll always say it’s a nonprofit organization, under a charitable designation, and they are nonpolitical. And they’re telling you the truth, they don’t play politics. See, agendas, agendas are not playing politics, you see. And so they always preface it, and then you read it all, and for the average person they’ll think they’re actually reading about politics; no, they’re telling you where they’re taking the world. There’s no other system like that, they’re taking the world in a certain direction, there’s no opposition. And politics is there to rubber-stamp the orders given to them by these big foundations that are running the world. IBM is more important in this world today than politicians because they do a lot of subcontracting, it goes out to them from government, and they advise them. All these big think tanks like the Royal Institute of International Affairs and many, many others, they advise governments on what to do in every situation. That’s the norm. So why have a government when they have to go to these other guys that you don’t elect and ask them what to do? Why bother voting? Actually, just not voting at all will show you that the system will continue, but at least the ones behind it all will have to come out or at least get new front men to come out and speak for them and keep it continuing and you’ll see what really runs your countries.

When you vote you go into a legality. You’re consenting to be ruled by people you don’t know. And by people by record who are always lying to you, in every generation. And as soon as they’re in they go off on some other tangent from all their promises. Because you see there’s only one agenda and they’re in on the one agenda. They must make sure it continues; it doesn’t matter what party it is. Quigley also said that the junior politicians are allowed to compete amongst themselves to get higher status. That’s the only battling that goes on, is for personal status within politics, to make a name for themselves. The ones at the top are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Now as I’ve mentioned before, everything is planned long in advance, even the New American Century group when they came out under the Project for the New American Century with Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld and all the rest of them on board with it, they had the list of countries to take out in the Middle East and we’ve taken out most of them already. They’ve got some to go yet. And it was the same list of course that Israel had because Israel worked very closely when it comes to the Middle East because they’re the only ones going to be allowed to have any kind of weaponry there at all, any kind of weaponry in fact. And that’s the big plan of course. I’ve gone through the history of the Middle East and even who helped set up Israel, from the British governor generals that were sent in when they brought in the Russians to come in and populate Israel. I’ve gone through the histories, look into the archive section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Because the guys who were the governor generals wrote their memoirs about it and they let a lot out then at that time and one of them even said, Sir Ronald Storrs, he said that we’re creating a new Ulster in the Middle East. Ulster was what Britain did to Ireland. They sent in a different people into Ireland, with a different religion, who were guaranteed to run the country and have naturally opposition for ever and ever because they were so different in their policies, and they’d also be loyal to London.

Anyway, we watch and we live through all the shenanigans that go on as people get slaughtered across the planet, you’re paying for it all. You paid for China to come up as the most prosperous country on the planet; it’s the manufacturer for the whole world. An idea again dreamed up by the Council on Foreign Relations and they published articles on that in the 1930’s. But we see the characters come and go in politics and get well rewarded afterwards and as I say it doesn’t matter what side that you think that they’re on, they’re not for you, even the working man. They voted in Tony Blair for the working man, who is kidding who? He was one of their boys from the start.

And it says:

"Blair’s shameful war and a wall of silence"

Alan: This is what they always do after we’ve slaughtered a whole bunch of folk. Years later they have an inquiry and then they do a lot of hoopla and oh this is terrible and all that, and then nothing happens and it goes on and on forever. It says:

"Tony Blair stands accused, by this paper among many other observers, of one of the most serious abuses of power a prime minister can commit. The charge is that he made a private agreement with George Bush to join the US in an offensive war against Iraq."

Alan: That was the New American Century Project.

"Then, with the aid of spin doctor Alastair Campbell, he wildly exaggerated evidence that Saddam Hussein posed a deadly threat to this country, so as to persuade the Cabinet, Parliament and the British people that the invasion was justified."

Alan: Remember Powell too, giving us fuzzy photographs, oh, that’s a missile launcher. It turns out to be something Britain sold them to launch weather balloons. But we go and slaughter folk for that. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫ - You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network because you can handle the truth - ♫}

Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about Tony Blair as an example, of one of many, who took his country into a war and they set up an inquiry, you always have inquiries after the fact put out by government, and this one in Britain is headed by Sir John Chilcot he’s called. And it says:

"The accusation at the heart of Sir John Chilcot’s inquiry, which spent 18 months hearing evidence until early last year. Since then, the panel has produced a million words of a draft report, almost twice as long as War and Peace."

Alan: You know the book.

"Yet, incredibly, Sir John now says his findings must be delayed for a year – more than a decade after the invasion – because officials are seemingly refusing to let him publish Blair’s private messages to Mr Bush, on which his conclusions are based."

"We understand why some politicians and members of the security services may be reluctant for the full facts to emerge. Yet Blair, Campbell and other interested parties have all been allowed to publish self-serving accounts of the war – and to make money out of them. We also note that Lord Justice Leveson, in his inquiry into the disreputable but hardly life-and-death matter of voicemail hacking, shows no qualms about publishing every scrap of private correspondence that may be relevant. So how sickening that, where political crimes are concerned, a wall of secrecy comes slamming down to deny the public their right to know what offences have been committed in their name. Coincidentally, the delay comes as Blair, now a multi-millionaire, slithers back into public life as a Labour adviser."

Alan: That’s a party adviser.

"If the party had any ethical core, it would suspend him until the Chilcot Report is published – complete with the evidence that could damn him for ever."

Alan: Well it won’t matter because you see they can’t do anything to him because you’ve got present prime ministers continuing these wars. Not just in Britain, elsewhere too. And if you start a precedent of putting him in the slammer for starting wars, then the whole thing would fall apart. And of course these wars must go on until the whole world is conquered and the Moslem countries exist no more. That’s why they’re doing it. Plus, they’ve got to grab all their land, oil, and everything else.

So, that’s the reality of the world. There’s no comeback for these guys. They must be given a form of immunity or you would never get a prime minister or president again. They would not take the job because they always do what they’re told and these orders are there, perpetual war. They’ve had that in the military magazines, that’s what we’re in now, perpetual war for the rest of your lives. And perpetual terrorism as well. That’s the agenda. And of course it’s all to make sure you’ve got an utterly controlled society that bends over and does what they’re told, very compliant, in a totalitarian system.

I read an article too yesterday about BPA, that’s an estrogen mimicker they call it, it’s in all plastics and we’ve been consuming that for years. It literally destroys the hormonal system, especially of males. It’s in cosmetics for the mothers who are pregnant, and it does distort the male characteristics of the fetus from 8 to 12 weeks if the mother is using that stuff and she’s absorbing it, it will get into the child and he’ll never be a complete man again. He’ll have lots of organizations mind you, they’re called kind of happy, their name means happy, and they can join them later down the road. And they’ve known this for years. But this says:

"As a result of widespread consumer backlash, many companies have rolled out “BPA-free” plastic products,"

Alan: This is the latest gimmick, oh they’re free.

"…ranging from bottles and sippy cups to reusable water bottles, meant to appeal to those health-conscious consumers looking to avoid toxins. Many are simply swapping another bisphenol,"

Alan: Which is called

"…bisphenol-S (BPS), which is now showing up in human urine concentrations at levels similar to those of BPA. Research suggests BPS has similar hormone-mimicking characteristics as BPA, but it may be significantly less biodegradable, and more heat-stable and photo-resistant, which means it may cause even more health and environmental damage over time."

"If you’re interested in avoiding any number of chemical toxins leaching into your food and beverages, choose glass over plastic, especially when it comes to products that will come into contact with food or beverages, or those intended for pregnant women, infants and children."

Alan: So, it’s typical too, it’s like some drugs that they have that cause terrible effects on the public, they simply move a molecule to the left or to the right and call it a different name and this is what they’re doing here. It’s standard legal technique and you’re still getting poisoned and you’ll still get effeminate characteristics. It’s not good for women either; remember this is synthetic stuff; it’s not even real stuff. It does trick the body but it does a lot more damage than even the real stuff would do. And it doesn’t break down once it hits the receptors; it stays there.

"Bureaucrats Bully Family Farms in Washington, D.C. Exurbs"

Alan: It says Fauquier is the name of the place.

"Fauquier County, Virginia has become a new battleground against the sprawl of Washington-style government bullying. Under the guise of business zoning authority, Fauquier is now depriving an agricultural community of its liberty to live the farm life when a little commerce is, and even is not, involved. The county, you see, wants to regulate and fine farm residents on grounds of holding pumpkin carvings, birthday parties for little girls, and Boy Scout jamborees. Fauquier County is an agricultural community in the beautiful Piedmont mountain region about an hour west of Washington. Its motto is “life as it should be.”"

Alan: Everything’s a joke today, isn’t it? what’s happening.

"To some county bureaucrats and officials, that means “life as we tell you how it should be.” The growth of the federal government, along with its bureaucratic mentality, has sprawled into Northern Virginia, and mostly up to now, just shy of Fauquier. In once-bucolic Loudon County to the north of Washington, where family farms stood just 15 years ago, now stand high-rise offices of businesses with government contracts, lobbyists, and others feeding at the government trough. Loudon, the fastest-growing county in America, is not the free market at work. It's a concrete and steel metropolis built directly and indirectly on taxpayer money flowing into and out of Washington. Virginia is divided now -- in many ways -- between the Washington suburbs of Northern Virginia and the rest of the state. With the sprawl of big government comes the bureaucratic mentality that what's yours is theirs to regulate, control, and dictate. Virginia, of course, was the home of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Patrick Henry, and George Mason. The spirit of liberty still runs deep in parts of Virginia. Sadly, however, the sense of freedom has been dampened if not eviscerated among those tied to and benefiting from government money and power."

And it says:

"It has long been supportive of agriculture, and the state has a Right to Farm law. While family farms are struggling, Virginia has discovered that its soil and climate are splendid for grapes. Hence, wineries are popping up to the joy of a good number of Virginians now employed by them, tourists, and many tax revenue dollars are collected as well. Fauquier this past week, though, passed a new county ordinance requiring wineries to close their doors at 6 p.m. and requiring them to pay the county for special permits for such things as extended hours and catered food. Because of one or two wineries where bacchanalia has caused grief for some neighbors, the county decided to punish all wineries...oh, and to make more money off its theft of liberty, too. The wineries have numbers and money to fight this punitive over-regulation. By using narrowly tailored exemptions, though, the county bought off opposition from some, including one that defeated the county at the Virginia Supreme Court not long ago. When government believes that it owns our liberty, it selectively dishes out some as bribery."

Alan: And that’s the problem with the countries too, you can’t get people to stand together because folk are always bribed off. Because we’re living in a corrupt society now, corruption is the norm because of moral relativity teaching and training in schools.

"But Fauquier isn't just stealing liberty from wineries. Using Orwellian oversight and threats of fines, Fauquier is also bullying a tiny farm in Paris, Virginia that takes in rescued animals and sells organic tea but is not a winery. Reading the order against the farm issued by Fauquier County Zoning Administrator Kimberley Johnson, one may confuse Fauquier for an anti-family banana republic. In deciding to seek fines against the farm, Ms. Johnson's April 30 order includes the following specious, frivolous, and ridiculous items: "

"1. The farm has rescued animals;"

Alan: Well that’s what it does.

"2. The farm advertised an "organic tea café" and films its on-site small-farm events;"

Alan: Oh they actually film small events, can you imagine they’re getting away with that?

"3. As a means to unscrupulously load up her case, Ms. Johnson includes in her list of allegations certain "events" at the farm she found in an internet search that even her own order later acknowledges were never held on the property;

Using her questionable internet investigative "techniques" (the county hasn't yet used drones), Ms. Johnson alleges two other events in support of her claims: a "wine testing" in September 2011, and "a seasonal pumpkin patch and carving event" in October. Maybe Ms. Johnson should notify Homeland Security, too. Those kids carving pumpkins have knives!
Perhaps the single most offensive allegation by Ms. Johnson is that the farm's Facebook page "includes photographs of a child's birthday party that was held" on January 22. Ms. Johnson believes that a party of eight 10-year-old girls on a family farm is subject to her regulatory purview and is cause to threaten county citizens with fines up to $5,000.

Ms. Johnson has shut down, or attempted to shut down, political fundraisers on residential farms for lack of a permit. The farm owners could have sued her and the county under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for violating constitutional rights under the color of state law. Ms. Johnson, the menace, wasn't fired or sued for her imperious view of her power versus her limited view of people's rights on private property. That's a shame. Now, she's attempting to fine a county resident for holding Boy Scout jamborees on his property."

Alan: This is terrible getting away with all that, isn’t it?

"Not all victims of Ms. Johnson's lawbreaking are wealthy enough to assert their rights through civil actions. And that's how bureaucrats build on their arrogant lawbreaking. They bully citizens who are good, mind-their-own business types, or who lack the resources to file suit."

Alan: Then it goes on about other things that are happening too. You understand, this is symptomatic of this whole world organization. It’s authoritarian. Remember, I’ve said that before, that the major, the premier think tank for the United Nations that runs all this stuff, for the new laws, they all come from the U.N., they have the Club of Rome as their main think tank, and they were the guys in the 1970’s that said they’d have to gradually change the system to an authoritarian system. That means bureaucrats with power, people you don’t elect in to government. And these departments are growing like cancers, folks. And like all cancers they eventually choke the body. And unfortunately people are accepting it and accepting it because people do that. Dzerzhinsky of the Soviet system said the same thing, he said, What do I think of people? he says, Well, you can starve them, you can beat them to death and abuse them, and will they ever rebel? he says, No, they’ll turn round and eat their dead. You understand we’ve been studied so meticulously by the behaviorists for so long, and these behaviorists have been at the top of every top revolution like the Soviet system, studying and studying and studying for techniques they can use down the road on everybody else. And they know how far to push people, how much to, but they also know the techniques of indoctrinating the public to accept abuse. And that’s what it is, it’s abuse. And as this guy said in this article here, the U.S. is like a banana republic now with these major domos and their little badges or titles. What are you going to do about it? What are you going to do about it? You see, if people would stand together and do something you’d be noticed. You can’t have little tiny groups all competing for power themselves and they don’t even like each other by the way, all these little groups that form to oppose things. You’ve got to come together all as one because you’re all in it together. It’s going to affect all of you. And you’ve got to demand. No, you don’t compromise, you demand.

Now the U.S. has had secret jails across Europe for their tortures and so on and this is an article here in the Telegraph.

"Court demands secret files on US…"

Alan: They call them

"…'black jails’"

Alan: For black-ops.

"The United States is facing fresh embarrassment over its use of 'black' detention sites after the European Court of Human Rights ordered Poland to hand over secret documents about its role in the War on Terror, The Daily Telegraph has learned."

"Judges in Strasbourg have requested documents that contain details of how the CIA set up its "extraordinary rendition" centre outside Warsaw in 2002 where it subjected al-Qaeda suspects to water-boarding and other extreme interrogation techniques. A month ago, a Polish whistle-blower alleged that a document existed which allowed the setting up of the prison – including procedures to adopt in the event of an inmate's death."

Alan: They kill a lot of them during torture.

"It was said to have been signed by the head of Polish intelligence."

Alan: And this is another thing too with this world order, you see all your intelligence agencies work together. And they don’t even have to go through the political realms at all. One guy who talked about this in 1920 was H.G. Wells, because he says the League of Nations, the precursor of the United Nations, he says now our agencies can all communicate with each other without going through the politicians that are collected and we can get the agenda through. Just to show you how old the system is. Anyway, it says:

"According to the leak, American officials "laughed" and refused to sign the document. "They considered us amateurs and explained that this kind of business could not be dealt with by means of formal agreements," the Polish newspaper reported. Polish officials have refused to confirm or deny the existence of the agreement, citing official secrets laws, as part of a four-year investigation into the jail."

Alan: They always say that, oh we can’t tell you for reasons of national security. You understand the public have no rights whatsoever. We don’t have any rights, let’s not kid ourselves.

And, in Australia, who are really getting hammered now because they suddenly got all the whole New World Order techniques forced on them quickly and all their factories are now, now that they’ve signed all the agreements with China, they’re just flooding out there, they’re bringing in foreign workers and all the rest of it.

"Observers say Falcon…"

Alan: This is from Ford company, they make Falcon vehicles.

"…signals Ford's end"

Alan: They just fired about 400 workers and they’re going to start building them probably in Thailand or somewhere it says here.

"The car industry observers say Ford's days of making cars in Australia will be numbered once the next version of the Falcon rolls off the production line. They announced it would cut up to 440 jobs on Tuesday at two of its plants in Melbourne and cut production of its cars to meet falling demand. The Ford Falcon and the Holden Commodore were among Australia's most popular 15 years ago."

Alan: They were the cars that is. Anyway they’ve got all these offers from other countries including Thailand and to build them cheaply and of course China as well. You understand, the system you’re living in now, we’ve all become so debased. People don’t realize they are debased because they don’t know how their grandparents really were, or great grandparents, when they actually had a culture where they would stand up and just say enough, you know. But you debase the people and they can’t stand up for anything. There’s no family unit to stand up for now, so guys won’t stand up for anything at all, except maybe that their pornography continues on television and internet. And so many incredible awful things are happening.

"Human corpses harvested in multimillion-dollar trade"

"A grisly trade in human body parts leaves relatives grieving and some recipients at risk of life-threatening disease."

Alan: It says they found on a raid by Ukrainian authorities, this is international by the way, heels from feet, two elbows, eardrums, teeth, and so on, and so on.

"On February 24, Ukrainian authorities made an alarming discovery: bones and other human tissues crammed into coolers in a grimy white minibus. “From day one, everything was forged; everything, because we could.”"

Alan: Get away with it, says one of the guys.

"“As long as the paperwork looked good, it was fine”"

Alan: So there was a real high tech group involved in this. And they even found “amid the body parts, envelopes stuffed with cash and autopsy results written in English.” International body trade. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix and this article I’m reading now is about body parts, an international ring that was caught. It will be just the tip of the iceberg of course. And we also have the scandals too, in New Jersey; we’ve had that in the past too with body parts getting smuggled in and all the rest of it. But this says:

"What the security service had disrupted was not the work of a serial killer but part of an international pipeline of ingredients for medical and dental products that are routinely implanted into people around the world. The seized documents suggested that the remains of dead Ukrainians were destined for a factory in Germany belonging to the subsidiary of a US medical products company, Florida-based RTI Biologics. RTI is one of a growing industry of companies that make profits by turning mortal remains into everything from dental implants to bladder slings to wrinkle cures. The industry has flourished even as its practices have roused concerns about how tissues are obtained and how well grieving families and transplant patients are informed about the realities and risks of the business. “I was in shock” ... Kateryna Rahulina says she did not give permission for the body of her mother Olha to be harvested."

Alan: They’re just stealing the bodies and shipping them off.

"“I was in shock” ... she says."

"In the US alone, the biggest market and the biggest supplier, an estimated two million products derived from human tissue are sold each year, a figure that has doubled over the past decade. It is an industry that promotes treatments and products that literally allow the blind to see (through cornea transplants) and the lame to walk (by recycling tendons and ligaments for use in knee repairs). It's also an industry fuelled by powerful appetites for bottom-line profits and fresh human bodies. In the Ukraine, for example, the security service believes that bodies passing through a morgue in the Nikolaev district, the gritty shipbuilding region located near the Black Sea, may have been feeding the trade, leaving behind what investigators described as potentially dozens of “human sock puppets” — corpses stripped of their reusable parts. Industry officials argue that such alleged abuses are rare, and that the industry operates safely and responsibly."

Alan: Well they’re born liars, aren’t they? I mean haven’t we learned that by now?

"For its part, RTI didn't respond to repeated requests for comment or to a detailed list of questions provided a month before this publication."

Alan: You understand the whole society is corrupt now because you see we accept more and more horror. Even corpses now that are plasticized and they put them on show and people go in and have a little chuckle and laugh at them. The abortion industry is a fantastic big, big, big business. We kill more children than live births now and we think nothing of it. See, life is becoming cheap and when that happens too your owners, the guys at the top, look at you with even more disdain at the bottom. And you accept it all as you go along with it all. It all comes home to roost in the end.

And in India of course, where corruption rules the country, look at what they’re doing there. They’re giving complete hysterectomies to women there for their health insurance scams that they’ve got out now.

"India's Chhattisgarh state is investigating reports that thousands of women had unnecessary hysterectomies so hospitals could make insurance claims. They were carried out under a national insurance scheme whereby private hospitals claim for treating patients who cannot afford expensive procedures. They estimate more than 2,000 women were talked into having their wombs removed in the last six months. The 34 medical centers accused have not yet commented on the allegations."

Alan: This sort of thing is worldwide, and you want to save, you think you can save this? Your politicians remember are worse, they’re more degraded and psychopathic. And we’re going to answer to it all personally when they come for you, because they’ll want something from you one day. What are you going to do about it? Just accept it until they do come for you?

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight, and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Blair's War

BPA Free, But Products Now Use BPS

Bureaucrats Bully Family Farms in D.C.

Court Demands Files on US Secret Jails

Ford Co. Australia

Multimillion Dollar Human Corpse Industry

Health Insurance Scam in India--Thousands of Women had Wombs Removed

#5 · March 13, 2021, 8:13 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:13 am
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on August 23, 2012. For newcomers out there you should help yourself to the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find over a thousand audios for free download, where I go through this history of the big system that runs the world and how they have thousands of think tanks across the planet working full time to do all the cultural changes, to affect all of you of course, and your children; and the same thing happened of course to your parents and your grandparents. This has been going on for an awful long time. So if you help yourself to the audios you’ll find out the organizations and the foundations behind it and their big, big plans for the future. They did publish their own books, lots of books, at the beginning of the 20^th century. For those who have managed to get some of the ones I’ve mentioned I’m sure they’ve had an awful eye-opener as to the reality of the world, vastly different from the media spin you get every day. And pretty well everything to do with the media is spin or distraction. So help yourself to those. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can purchase the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] Straight donations are really, really welcome, and you’ll find out how to do it, as I say, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com website.

And those who don’t understand the past, and it truly is a maze to even find the past, even the recent past, as they constantly change history; it’s quite the chore. But when you do get into the old books it’s an awful eye-opener. Books written at the time, when you’re going through wars, that kind of thing, and then you look back about 20 years later and you’ve got a completely different version of what happened. The same as 9/11, those who kept all the data coming out at the time find a completely different story from the official version that emerged later, and we end up with all of these wars. Then you find out that all the wars were planned before 9/11 happened anyway. So it’s just amazing. The boys at the top have such good luck; they’re always winning. They should go to the casinos, I guess they’d win all the time, because they can always predict what’s going to happen, and they’ve always got troops outside countries before anything does happen, and then in go the troops. Because they were planned that way a long time ago to do so.

As I say, your daily media spin is really made up today of cultural changes; the things that you accept as little laughable things, are actually meant to change culture, like Harry with his nude little orgy there, that type of stuff, and then they play it up. Because you see, that wouldn’t have flown very well only 10, 15 years ago. Now they can because they have their pulse on the public. And as the public watch television and dramas and comedies they’re being degraded as they watch them, so that you now all accept it as no big deal. Nothing becomes a big deal, so much so that nothing shocks us at all, on any level. Right down to the mass abortion of children that we’re doing in our own countries and we’re paying for across the world as well; nothing shocks the public anymore. So you’re being altered by design and your opinions are being given to you, and you generally will adopt the ideas of your peer group and they all go along with the official versions because that’s the world they live in.

Also, it’s very difficult for people to really believe that such big powers would want to lie to them in the first place. They truly believe they’re free. They truly believe that the boys above them, the people who come out of special wombs, the dynasties that go into politics, they truly believe that they’re special people who are designed to somehow deal with big problems and allow you at the bottom to just go and play. You’ll find big authors in the past that designed the system you’re in today, they actually wrote books about it, like Bertrand Russell; and he said that we’ll teach them to basically ignore politics and let the government simply rule over them. That’s happened for most folk already. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about basically how our thoughts are given to us, and our topics are given to us, so much so that Brzezinski mentioned this 40 years ago, that eventually the public would be unable to reason for themselves, they’d expect the media to do their reasoning for them and their topics every day would be the previous day’s news. That’s already happened, news and sports, so we’re given our topics to talk about; it’s all very safe stuff of course. That’s what the media is there for. Remember, the media all belong to one organization pretty well across the world now. It’s the Council on Foreign Relations; they have a department in every country. They own the media and the journalists and the guys that come on the television and so on and give you your thoughts.

But getting back to democracy. Democracy… it’s never really been defined as such; it’s not got a static definition. It’s elastic you might say. And of course over a hundred years ago those who talked about democracy coming in said that eventually only the biggest groups would have a say in anything. People at that time, some of them thought it was just the political parties, but it also meant big groups of anything, any particular agenda. And we’ve got lots of them out there all paid for by the big foundations, etc. Now, this article here is to do with something that the US is already putting through their books to do with birth-control and I guess abortion too. This article is put in the paper and it says…

Should the Government Pay for Birth Control?

Canadian Doctors Think So

ca.shine.yahoo.com/blogs/team-mom / Lia Grainger 17 Aug, 2012

(Alan: Now, you don’t elect Canadian doctors; that’s your first point, remember. But they’re a big group and an Association, so they obviously now see themselves as a political group as well. It says…)

The issue of government funding for contraception has fueled fierce ideological debate recently with our friends south of the border. Yet here in Canada, it appears our own debate is stirring. (A: What a coincidence eh? At the same time.)

Canadian doctors recently recommended that all forms of birth control be made available for free. (A: ...and that obviously would include abortion, you see.) A resolution was approved on Wednesday at the annual meeting of the Canadian Medical Association (A: As I say, this is a private, professional group; you don’t elect them in. And they’re supposed to, mind you, take care of health. They’ve forgotten what they’re there for, obviously. They’re supposed to be there to save life, etc. Now they’re into eugenics.) that states, "The Canadian Medical Association supports full coverage for all forms of contraception."

And while resolution DM 5-58 passed with about 70 per cent in favour, the issue still spurred lively discussion among the doctors.

According to the CBC (A: ...television in Canada…), the motion was introduced by Dr. Sarah Cook, a Yellowknife family doctor, who believes that birth control is not accessible enough, and that even when it is accessible, the cost is often prohibitive. Another Yellowknife doctor added that unwanted pregnancies are a far greater public health expense than birth control.  (A: So they’re down to economics, you see, these doctors that are supposed to deal in healthcare are down to economics and the value of life; I’m talking about economic value.)

A similar argument was made when several American states recently cut subsidies for contraceptives, despite analysis that the cuts would cost more money than they saved, reports the National Post.

Some doctors at the meeting questioned which level of government would fund the initiative.  (A: Now, what level of government does it matter? The taxpayer is the only ones who fund anything, from government.)

"Is this going to be a provincial or territorial or federal program that will be available to all patients? There's a cost that's involved," said Dr. Laurence Colman of Toronto.

It is not yet clear how the CMA will lobby the federal government to fund contraception, (A: Now, why would the Canadian Medical Association be lobbying the government to start with? Really? Really? They don’t ask the public what they want, you see. See, the public, really, in democracy are out of the picture. You’re either a big NGO, nongovernmental organization funded by the big foundations with trillions of dollars across the planet, or you’re a bunch like this that often they don’t know who’s funding them, except that we’re all paying them in Canada, and no doubt too they’ll be getting grants from big Pharma as well, and other organizations.) as providing healthcare falls under provincial jurisdiction. Exactly how the CMA resolutions will be implemented is something that will continue to be debated and decided by members throughout the year.  (A: Now, it’s not up to them to decide what’s to happen to the general public. As I say, we don’t vote these characters in. They’re allowed to have their opinions and that’s that.)

"The CMA carries a lot of weight, and I think it's great they'll be lobbying the federal government on this issue," says Agathe Gramet-Kedzior, acting executive director of Canadians for Choice, a national pro-choice charitable foundation. (A: So there you go, there’s your charitable foundation in there – there’ll be a lot of them in there too – run by the big foundations, to do with eugenics.) "Contraceptives should be fully-funded: they prevent STIs (A: ...that’s sexually transmitted infections, rather than disease. Disease sounds nastier, you see, so they call it infections here.) and unwanted pregnancies, which cost our healthcare system a huge amount of money."

She points out that there are many reasons someone might not be able to afford birth control, be it woman in a precarious employment situation, or a young person that doesn't want their parents to know they're sexually active.  (A: Well, most of them are because that’s all that’s been rammed down their throats through music television and the comedies and the movies, for years and years, to make that happen, you see. Monkey see, monkey do.)

Matthew Wojciechowski -- project manager at Campaign Life Coalition, a Canadian pro-life advocacy organization -- sees the resolution as a poor financial decision.

"We're already drowning in debt, we're suffering financially," says Wojciechowski. "We need more nurses, more doctors, better technology, but instead they're calling on taxpayers to fund lifestyle choices, (A: ...and that’s true, lifestyle choices…) and we don't agree with that."

So, as I say, most folk will say, and Canadians will definitely do it, they’ll say, oh the Canadian Medical Association... Well, they’re not part of government. They’re allowed their opinions but they shouldn’t be lobbying for what the general public will have to end up paying for. And it’s true, it’s lifestyle choices. You never hear any of them ever come out, ever, ever come out when these things are going on and say, well can’t we put some restrictions on maybe Hollywood? Oh my goodness, that would never happen. Never happen. And all the porn they’ve made sure was freely available for all children to see through the Internet. It will never happen. You see, we’re all being guided down a path and eventually the system will be, like they said at the Fabian Society a long time ago, you’ll have to come to them and they’ll decide whether you should be born in the first place, if they need you, and once you’re alive you’ll have to come to them and say why they should keep you alive; you must serve the world state. You see. That’s what’s coming down the pike.

Now...

Australia to boost refugee numbers

(A: War is great, you see; it floods other countries with all the refugees, who naturally run out. I would too, wouldn’t you?)

Australia said it would increase its annual refugee intake by 40 per cent to 20,000 a year, as part of a plan to deter people smugglers.  (A: ...because you get people smugglers making a lot of cash off of... A lot of different people make money off war you know.)

telegraph.co.uk / 23 Aug 2012

Prime Minister Julia Gillard said the rise, which was recommended by a recent expert inquiry into refugee policy, would include the immediate resettlement of 400 asylum-seekers from Indonesia as a gesture of goodwill.

That’s part of the reason too they’ve flooded a good part of Europe, with the wars, folk trying to get away and get out. And they know this is going to happen before they start the wars too. It fulfills different parts of the purpose of the great plan too, to multiculturalize society and destroy the initial culture that was there. That came out with Tony Blair and his assistant Prime Minister in the mainstream a while back. Nothing happens by chance, nothing at all. It’s all planned that way.

It’s amazing too, that there’s never enough money for everything, supposedly, or hardly anything for the general public, but we’ve got money for wars. And it’s a great industry, the war industry, massive industry. And it’s all to keep you safe, of course. That’s been the ancient technique from then to the present time, it’s to keep you safe. There’s so much money thrown at it all, but not all the stuff that’s put into the air right away or different kinds of weaponry that’s used right away. A lot of it’s put into experimentation for the future, billions and billions and billions of dollars. Anyway, it says...

Chameleon 2.0: American defence robot can creep into rooms and then disguise itself against surfaces  (A: ...just like something out of sci-fi.)

dailymail.co.uk / Eddie Wrenn / 20 August 2012

America's defence agency has released footage of their latest research project - a robot that can crawl on to any surface and then discreetly camouflage itself.

The robot, made of soft silicone, has been designed to infiltrate areas through small gaps, before adapting its 'skin-tone' to that of its surroundings.

While movie fans may see overtones of the sinister shape-shifting robot from The Terminator series, for the moment this robot is still in prototype form and takes 30 seconds to change colour.  (A: So they’re working on that. There’s a video that goes along with it too, I’ll put that up. They love to show videos to say how wonderful it is. We’re supposed to praise them for all this knowledge and expertise when they come out with all these new things.)

The soft robot can be seen in the video walking on a bed of rocks, before being filled with fluid to match the color of the rocks and break up the robot’s shape.

By introducing narrow channels into the molds through which air and various types of fluids can be pumped, the robot can be made to change its color, contrast, apparent shape and temperature to blend with its environment.

It can also glow through chemiluminescence, and most importantly, achieve movement through pneumatic pressurisation and inflation of the channels.

At a pumping rate of 2.25 milliliters per minute, color change in the robot required 30 seconds. Once filled, the color layers require no power to sustain the color.

The robot moves at a speed of approximately 40 meters per hour - without the colored fluid, it can move at approximately 67 meters per hour.  (A: So you might get these sneaking under your doors at night too, and then climbing up the wall and blending in with the wallpaper I suppose. That’s the way things seem to be going. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I always take interesting articles, when articles come out of your own country for instance, and they lambast some other country for some kind of corruption or something, and you get the same thing in your own country, just the same, you know. But it says here…

Food security: China’s food production characterized by corruption, health-threatening practices

homelandsecuritynewswire.com / 22 August 2012

A report on Chinese TV showed rotten peaches spiked with sodium metabisulfite to make the fruit look fresh (A: Now, I know for a fact people in Canada who work with companies that go around the grocery stores, early in the morning, before the people get in, and they spray stuff on all the veggies to make them look fresh, and the fruit. [Alan chuckles.] But here’s China, so it’s bad, right?), seasoned in bleaching agents and additives harmful to the human liver and kidneys, and pickled in outdoor pools surrounded by garbage; the peaches are then packed in dirty bags which were previously used to hold animal feed, and shipped off to big brand stores; trouble is, this story is typical of, rather than an exception to, food production practices in China.

In a disturbing report, China’s national broadcaster CCTV detailed the manufacturing process followed by sixteen different Chinese companies that sell preserved fruit.

The report showed rotten peaches spiked with sodium metabisulfite to make the fruit look fresh, seasoned in bleaching agents and additives harmful to the human liver and kidneys, and pickled in outdoor pools surrounded by garbage. The peaches are then packed in dirty bags which were previously used to hold animal feed, and shipped off to big brand stores.

The potentially toxic fruit is just the latest item on China’s growing list of food products which are seriously dangerous to citizens. Baby formula adulterated with melamine made the headlines (A: That was Nestlé that was at the head of that one at the time.), but the New York Times reports that other food stuffs produced by Chinese manufacturers include meat containing banned steroids, rice contaminated with cadmium (a metal), noodles flavored with ink and paraffin, mushrooms treated with fluorescent bleach, and cooking oil recycled from street gutters.  (A: I actually saw a program on that once, where every night in the main cities there were guys employed and they’d lift up the gratings on the gutters – and the oil floats to the top, and that’s where they dump all their cooking oil – so these guys would suck it all out again and recycle it. I guess they call it ‘very practical’ in the communist systems.)

The food safety problems are a result of the country’s business ethics and the failure of government regulators to keep pace with an expanding market. Observers say that the poor government oversight is an indication of a deeper problem of a weakening civic morality.  (A: Well, they’re only copying the immorality at the top. That’s how all socialist/communist type systems work. Because the ones at the top, believe you me, are living high on the hog, and it’s a very fixed, rigid system.)

In 2009 the Chinese government enacted the Food Safety Law to prohibit the use of unauthorized additives and materials and to provide a basis for food oversight from production to households. A national commission of three vice premiers and twelve minister-level officials was set up. The end result, however, has not been what the government or citizens were aiming for.  (A: There’s so much corruption and it mentions that too.)

Inefficiency and corruption are widespread among the officials which were supposed to enforce these laws.  (A: You get corruption too, in Canada and the States and everywhere else. It happens all over. I’ve seen it. I’ve actually seen it in places I’ve worked in the past, and money changes hands and eyes look the other way. And that’s how things really are in the great world. But as I say, it’s always kind of funny when your country tries to lambast some other country when they’re doing pretty much the same kind of stuff.)

This article too is for the UK listeners…

Have your say on the draft Communications Data Bill

parliament.co.uk / 9 July 2012

(A: I’ll put this up tonight. It’s a joke, because you don’t have any say, but you can always complain. It’s been out already for about a month but it’s going on for another month and it says…)

The Joint Committee on the draft Communications Data Bill, chaired by Lord Blencathra, is conducting pre-legislative scrutiny into the draft Bill and the policies it seeks to implement. (A: This is the one that’s really going to… You’re already observed to the n^thdegree but this is going into even more privacy.) The Joint Committee comprises 6 MPs and 6 Peers. It will take oral and written evidence and make recommendations in a report to both Houses. The Joint Committee invites interested organisations and individuals to submit written evidence as part of the inquiry. (A: So I’ll put that up tonight for those who want to waste their time.)

This article’s quite interesting too, it’s about Iceland. Of course, we’ve heard what Iceland did. They didn’t go bankrupt like all the other countries and put their people into austerity. They threw out the bankers in fact, and some of them they put in prison I believe; I know they’ve charged them.

Iceland Was Right, We Were Wrong: The International Monetary Fund

thestreet.com / Jeff Nielson / 08/15/12

For approximately three years, our governments, the banking cabal, and the Corporate Media have assured us that they knew the appropriate approach for fixing the economies that they had previously crippled with their own mismanagement. We were told that the key was to stomp on the Little People with "austerity" in order to continue making full interest payments to the Bond Parasites -- at any/all costs.

Following three years of this continuous, uninterrupted failure, Greece has already defaulted on 75% of its debts, and its economy is totally destroyed. The UK, Spain and Italy are all plummeting downward in suicide-spirals, where the more austerity these sadistic governments inflict upon their own people the worse their debt/deficit problems get. Ireland and Portugal are nearly in the same position.

Now in what may be the greatest economic "mea culpa" in history, we have the media admitting that this government/banking/propaganda-machine troika has been wrong all along. They have been forced to acknowledge that Iceland's approach to economic triage was the correct approach right from the beginning.

What was Iceland's approach? To do the exact opposite of everything the bankers running our own economies told us to do. The bankers (naturally) told us that we needed to bail out the criminal Big Banks, at taxpayer expense (they were Too Big To Fail). Iceland gave the banksters nothing.  (A: I’ll continue with this when I come back from this break.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Iceland and what they did to deal with their crisis that the bankers caused of course. It says…

The bankers told us that no amount of suffering (for the Little People) was too great in order to make sure that the Bond Parasites got paid at 100 cents on the dollar. Iceland told the Bond Parasites they would get what was left over, after the people had been taken care of (by their own government).

The bankers told us that our governments could no longer afford the same education, health care and pension systems which our parents had taken for granted. Iceland told the bankers that what the country could no longer afford was to continue to be blood-sucked by the worst financial criminals in the history of our species. Now, after three-plus years of this absolute dichotomy in economic policymaking, a clear picture has emerged (despite the best efforts of the propaganda machine to hide the truth).  (A: And there are three pages to this; I’ll put this link up tonight and you can go through all the rest of it for yourselves, to see how they actually got out of it and how they’re coping today.)

And the countries of course that didn’t fight back in any way, and then they sat back and watched the big crooks being rewarded with your tax money and bailed out, you’ll find that this is what’s happening in Italy and Greece and elsewhere.

Italian dies after setting himself on fire outside parliament

reuters.com / ROME | Aug 19, 2012

(Reuters) - A 54-year-old man died on Sunday after setting himself on fire outside the Italian parliament last week to highlight his struggle with unemployment, police said.

Angelo di Carlo suffered 85 percent burns after the incident in front of the lower house of parliament - the Chamber of Deputies - in central Rome during the early hours of August 11, Italian media reported.

Police on duty nearby put out the flames with fire extinguishers and took him to hospital.

The widower was facing economic difficulties after losing his job and had struggled for years before that with temporary work contracts that offered little protection or benefits, according to media reports.  (A: It’s always the ones at the bottom who get hit first; they’re the first to get hit, and the hardest too.)

Italians are grappling with a recession and rising unemployment while facing higher taxes and state spending cuts introduced by the government to try to help rein in Italy's massive public debt.  (A: So that the big guys who are too big to fail of course, can go on having their big massive lunches with each other, and conspiring to pull off the next con.)

This article here too, is to do with US intelligence tests and they’re using crowd-sourcing against experts, it says. It says…

U.S. intelligence tests crowd-sourcing against its experts

Might large groups be better predictors of wars and terrorism than analysts in government spy services?

latimes.com / August 21, 2012 / Ken Dilanian

WASHINGTON — Nine years ago, Congress blocked a Pentagon agency from setting up a website that would have allowed anyone with a credit card to bet on the likelihood of foreign assassinations, coups and terrorist attacks.

The idea was to take advantage of the "wisdom of crowds," a social science maxim that contends the average of a group of forecasters, under certain circumstances, tends to be more accurate than even the most knowledgeable single forecaster.

But lawmakers worried the proposed predictions market could allow terrorists to profit from their own misdeeds. (A: ...kind of like the bankers eh? They can bet on things failing.) Congress forced the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency -- the military's cutting-edge research arm, known as DARPA -- to scuttle the program.

Now terrorism futures are back.

DARPA's sister agency (A: ...the one that you haven’t really heard of much…) -- the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, which funds experimental projects for the U.S. intelligence community -- is running a four-year, $50-million program that pays people willing to predict major world events, including wars and terrorist strikes. Unlike the earlier scheme, participants can't profit from their predictions.

Now in its second year, the so-called crowd-sourcing project involves competing corporate and university teams, including UC Irvine. Each team includes more than a dozen social scientists and as many as 2,000 participants, who can answer hundreds of questions each if they want.

The study, known as (A: They love these names…) Aggregative Contingent Estimation, is designed to see whether the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community can aggregate the judgment of its thousands of analysts -- rather than rely on the expertise of just a few -- to issue more accurate warnings to policy makers before and during major global events.

Participants in the project give their best guesses on whether the Free Syrian Army (A: ...you know, the ones we all employ to go over there and overthrow Syria.) will gain control of Aleppo, for example, or whether Kim Jong Un will resign as the leader of North Korea before April 1, 2013, according to project websites.  (A: ...etc, etc. But they’ve got a whole bunch of universities into it, including the University of Pennsylvania and different ones. So they’re getting everybody into the spy game. It’s a bit of a joke when you’ve got long-term policy already made. Maybe the whole thing is to find out how many folk will clue in of what they want to do next according to the agenda. Because it’s all an agenda you know.)

This is an article too about possible Civil War in the US. It says…

Texas official warns of Obama civil war

chron.com / Compiled by Chronicle Staff / August 22, 2012

A Lubbock County, Texas, judge, the panhandle county's chief administrator, is asking for a tax increase to hire deputies for the inevitable civil war he believes would follow President Obama's re-election.

The way he puts it, Judge Tom Head wants to prepare for the "worst", which to him means "civil unrest, civil disobedience" and possible "civil war", according to a report from Fox 34 Lubbock

Judge Tom Head and Commissioner Mark Heinrich told the station this week that a 1.7 cent tax increase for the next fiscal year was necessary to prepare for many contingencies, including Obama's re-election. He also mentioned to the station that the county needs a pay increase is needed for the district attorney's office and more funds to pay for more sheriff's office deputies.

"He's going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the (United Nations), and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked the station during a Monday interview. "I'm thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we're not just talking a few riots here and demonstrations, we're talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms and get rid of the guy."

Head also seems to fear the retaliation of such civil unrest.

"Now what's going to happen if we do that, if the public decides to do that? He's going to send in U.N. troops. I don't want 'em in Lubbock County. OK. So I'm going to stand in front of their armored personnel carrier and say 'you're not coming in here'.  (A: I remember it was Kissinger that said many, many, many years ago, when they were talking about the United Nations troops coming into the United States one day, and he says, under the right circumstances the people would welcome them in. And you should ask yourself why he was saying that, giving that speech in the first place. And that was in California, I think, he gave that speech.)

"And the sheriff, I've already asked him, I said 'you gonna back me' he said, 'yeah, I'll back you'. Well, I don't want a bunch of rookies back there. I want trained, equipped, seasoned veteran officers to back me."

The station reports that the tax hike will provide an additional $832,433 coupled with $2 million in cuts to make the numbers work.

So there you go. Who knows? I know that there will be civil unrest down the road because we’re all turning into third world countries, whether we recognize it or not. The signs are all around you. I mean, you’ve got Senators that want to bring in big hefty sentences for people who are stealing metal now. They’re even stealing the metal from graveyards because the economy is kaput. Kaput. It’s all overseas, and that was the plan when they signed the deal with China a long time ago.

An article came out too, to do with be careful who you follow because you’ll find behind all the uprisings and so on, and always behind terrorist bombings, inside the US, you’ve always got the FBI. It says…

Man who armed Black Panthers was FBI informant, records show

baycitizen.org / Seth Rosenfeld, Center for Investigative Reporting / August 20, 2012

The man who gave the Black Panther Party some of its first firearms and weapons training – which preceded fatal shootouts with Oakland police in the turbulent 1960s – was an undercover FBI informer, according to a former bureau agent and an FBI report.

One of the Bay Area’s most prominent radical activists of the era, Richard Masato Aoki was known as a fierce militant who touted his street-fighting abilities. He was a member of several radical groups before joining and arming the Panthers, whose members received international notoriety for brandishing weapons during patrols of the Oakland police and a protest at the state Legislature.

Aoki went on to work for 25 years as a teacher, counselor and administrator at the Peralta Community College District, and after his suicide in 2009, he was revered as a fearless radical.

But unbeknownst to his fellow activists, Aoki had served as an FBI intelligence informant, covertly filing reports on a wide range of Bay Area political groups, according to the bureau agent who recruited him.

That agent, Burney Threadgill Jr., recalled that he approached Aoki in the late 1950s, about the time Aoki was graduating from Berkeley High School. He asked Aoki if he would join left-wing groups and report to the FBI.

“He was my informant. I developed him,” Threadgill said in an interview. “He was one of the best sources we had.”

The former agent said he asked Aoki how he felt about the Soviet Union, and the young man replied that he had no interest in communism.

“I said, ‘Well, why don’t you just go to some of the meetings and tell me who’s there and what they talked about?’ Very pleasant little guy. He always wore dark glasses,” Threadgill recalled.

See, they can tell you this many, many years after the fact because there are official secrets acts and time limits to all these things. They tell you way after the fact when most of them are dead and no one cares anymore. But the same techniques are being used all the time. So those out there, especially young guys, who are going to get radicalized by people, be very, very careful because you’re getting set up. It’s the same everywhere across the world, Canada, Britain, you name it, especially in this day and age. Don’t follow anybody.

Here’s the article actually here to do with metal being stolen in the States. And in Britain it’s got pretty bad too; they’re even stealing the lead sheeting under the roofs of churches over in Britain now because it’s just dire straits.

Sen. Schumer aims to make metal theft a federal offense

gsnmagazine.com / 2012-08-10 / Mark Rockwell

Critical infrastructure isn’t just under electronic assault, according to one New York lawmaker. It is also being physically assaulted by metal thieves cutting away at bridges, gas lines and other facilities, in search of a quick buck.

As scrap metal prices skyrocket, metal thieves pose a potentially dire threat to the nation’s bridges, water and gas lines, and electrical systems, said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) on Aug. 8.  (A: Have you seen the price of copper these days? I mean, it’s sky high.)

Schumer, appeared at a press conference at a Syracuse, NY, school where metal thieves had stolen copper air conditioning lines, causing thousands of dollars in damage, said he has introduced legislation that would make stealing metals, such as iron, copper and other metals, a federal offense.  (A: And it really is going through the roof. But as I say, it’s happening all over the place because the economy is kaput. And when that happens crime rises. People will survive one way or another, you know, that’s just the way it is.)

I’ve mentioned before about neuroscience, it wants to create itself as a proper science. Most sciences are really full of nothing but theories and guesses; a theory is just somebody’s guess, that they all agree is a good guess. [Alan chuckles.] So anyway, neuroscience, since it’s pushing itself up there, has put different videos up there on trying to get psychopaths off with easy court sentences. They can’t help it, you see, and neuroscience, they say, can help prove that. You see. So here’s another article on it and it says…

Biology gives American psychopaths a legal break

Thedailyherald.com / 16 August 2012

(A: I knew this was going to happen years ago.)

LONDON--Criminal psychopaths in the United States whose lawyers provide biological evidence for their brain condition are more likely to be sentenced to shorter jail terms than those who are simply said to be psychopaths, according to new research.  (A: So just SAYING it’s a biological condition at the courtroom is going to get a leaner sentence.)

A study published in the journal Science found that if judges were told a criminal was a psychopath, they considered it an aggravating factor. But if they also heard biological explanations for the disorder, they gave shorter sentences.

Researchers from the University of Utah who conducted the study said the findings were surprising and worrying, and external experts said they had problematic implications for how brain science might affect criminal justice in future. (A: And that’s why they’re trying to get into everything, especially the justice system, with all their theories, you know.)  "In the coming years, we are likely to find out about all kinds of biological causes of criminal behaviour, so the question is,  (A: This is an old communist idea by the way, that there had to be biological causes for criminal behavior, you see. That’s why if you were a psychopath and a criminal you got a very light jail sentence in Russia. But if you spoke out against the government you were locked away for life and probably killed. See, under their belief system anyone can be RETRAINED, you understand.) so the question is, why does the law care if most behaviour is biologically caused?" said Teneille Brown, an associate professor at the university's college of law.

Seena Fazel, a clinical senior lecturer in forensic psychiatry at Britain's Oxford University, noted there are already known biological bases for many disorders criminals suffer from, including drug abuse, alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder. "So if psychopathy reduces your sentence because it has a biological basis, why shouldn't these other more common conditions also result in reduced sentences?" he said.  (A: See how it affects everything else? You see.)

The Utah team carried out a survey of 181 judges in 19 U.S. states who were given a hypothetical case of aggravated battery to consider. They found that when judges were given a "biomechanical" explanation for a criminal's psychopathy, they saw this as a mitigating factor and reduced the sentence, on average by about a year.

Now, they haven’t found any biological or biomechanical reason for it at all. They really haven’t found it. And even when they say there’s a certain part that’s a different size in the frontal lobe of the brain, that’s literally smaller in psychopaths, it doesn’t mean all psychopaths commit crime, by the way. There’s lots of psychopaths out there, and who are professionals, in surgery, or a lot of them in academia, and definitely a lot in politics, you see, but it doesn’t mean there’s a biological cause for it. They haven’t got the proof of that, or they’d all be crazy and antisocial and nasty. But it doesn’t matter. This is the big agenda, because neuroscience you see is eventually to take control of all of us from birth to death, and psychological testing from birth to death. And this is part of the agenda here that I’m reading right now, as they raise their standard as being a new science that’s going to show that they are the top science of human behavior.

This article here too, is to do with (from CNN it actually is from)...

Surveillance unit produced no terrorism leads, NYPD says

cnn.com / David Ariosto / August 22, 2012

(A: Remember a whole bunch of them were caught in a room and they were part of a spy network watching Muslims; but it says surveillance unit produced no terrorism leads, the NYPD says.)

The NYPD's Demographics Unit was put together with the CIA's help

(A: Now, this is the CIA working inside the US, and it doesn’t matter about the laws anymore, they can do what they want.)

The unit's reports never led to a terrorism investigation in at least 6 years of monitoring

(A: ...the Islamics.)

Thomas P. Galati's testimony was part of a suit that began with class-action case in 1971

NYPD says "premise that the demographic unit was used for wholesale spying.. was false"

New York (CNN) -- A controversial NYPD surveillance unit that cataloged information on Muslim communities never produced a lead that linked to a potential terrorist plot during years of investigating, according to the head of the city's police intelligence division.

The NYPD's Demographics Unit -- or Zone Assessment Unit -- was put together with the CIA's help following the September 11, 2001, attacks. The unit has acknowledged that it engaged in monitoring that included Muslim-owned business and mosques across the New York region.  (A: ...but they didn’t have one thing to report in six years of surveillance. So you know…ppffew, there it goes. That’s how things really work out, unless the FBI’s in there with an instigator. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and I’ve mentioned many times about this big system and how they decided a long time ago to use socialism, or communistic style bureaucracy to control all the people through numerous ways from birth to death, in all situations, and all data would be kept on you, etc, and government officials and agencies would rule your life all through your life; that’s already happened of course. And that pleases the fascists on top, you know, the big bankers that run the whole system. Here’s an article here which shows you how the chaos of globalization affects everyone, especially those who really need the cash. Because in Britain they have a winter fuel allowance, it’s only 200 pounds they get, for pensioners. I’ve read the articles year after year here on how many thousands die in Britain, in their homes, pensioners, because they can’t afford the bills. And that’s an acceptable amount to the government, you see. It’s acceptable. You know, they’re over the hill, they’re not paying taxes anymore because they’re pensioners, or they’re paying low taxes. But they’re pensioners and they’re not, you know, not consumers anymore and producers. Remember, the United Nations definition of a good world citizen is a producer AND consumer. Once you’re retired you’re no longer a producer. But it says…

Pensioners to take 'temperature tests' before receiving winter fuel allowance

telegraph.co.uk / Rowena Mason / 23 Aug 2012

Pensioners will have to take a "temperature test" before claiming their £200 winter fuel allowance after the European Union ruled the British expatriots in tropical countries are eligible for the heating benefits. (A: So it’s going to take more money away from folk living in Britain, to give to folk who’ve moved off into the hot countries; they have to get paid as well.)

Iain Duncan-Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has promised to fight the "ridiculous" EU ruling that could cost the UK almost £100 million per year.   (A: They’re still in it. See, Britain doesn’t really have, this Parliament they have in Britain is just a sham; they’re under this massive Soviet system of the EU.)

The diktat (A: ...and that’s what they call it, diktat...) means 444,000 expatriots who have spent most of their working life in Britain would be eligible for the payment. Currently, only 73,000 who currently get it because they still lived in the UK when they retired.

Mr Duncan-Smith is now planning to bring in a new rule saying the payments can only go to people living in cooler climates.

"The winter fuel payment is about helping British pensioners with heating costs," he told a newspaper. "It is ludicrous we could have to pay more pensioners in hot countries."   (A: That’s globalization for you. That’s your socialist system, you know. That’s how it goes folks.)

Another article I’ll put up tonight too, and go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com to get all these articles. This is about Ritalin....

Raising the Ritalin generation

joannejacobs.com / August 19, 2012 / By Joanne

(A: It gives you an example about a child who was diagnosed, an eight-year-old boy of course, with the usual eight-year-old boy’s energy, and the school teacher suggested an evaluation. School teachers don’t like boys with a bit of energy and stuff; they don’t sit like little girls. But in a socialist system you’ve all to be the same now.)

But the third-grade teacher suggested an evaluation.

. . . once you start looking for a problem, someone’s going to find one, and attention deficit has become the go-to diagnosis, increasing by an average of 5.5 percent a year between 2003 and 2007, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (A: It’s not a disease.) As of 2010, according to the National Health Interview Survey, 8.4 percent, or 5.2 million children, between the ages of 3 and 17 had been given diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

There’s no test for ADHD, she writes. Teachers’ impressions... (A: ...They’re given impressions; they are the ones who make the diagnosis and make the recommendations to go off and see the quack, and they drug the children. And you all think it’s normal. You all think it’s normal.)

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Canadian Doctors Want Public Taxpayers to Fund All Kinds of Birth Control

Australia to Boost Refugee Numbers

Darpa Creates Chameleon-like Robot

Food Production Practices in China

Communications Data Bill UK---Have Your Say

Iceland was Right, We Were Wrong---IMF

Italian Man Sets Himself on Fire Outside Parliament

AIRPA using Crowd-Sourcing for Intelligence Predictions

Texan Judge Warns of Civil War in US

Man who Armed Black Panthers was FBI Informant

Senator Schumer and Heavy Metal

Neuroscience Giving Psychopaths Hypothetical Reasons for Reduced Sentencing

NYPD's Muslim Watch Produced No Terrorism Leads

Pensioners to Take "Temperature Test" Before Receiving Winter Fuel Allowance----UK

Raising the Ritalin Generation

Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on August 23, 2012. For newcomers out there you should help yourself to the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find over a thousand audios for free download, where I go through this history of the big system that runs the world and how they have thousands of think tanks across the planet working full time to do all the cultural changes, to affect all of you of course, and your children; and the same thing happened of course to your parents and your grandparents. This has been going on for an awful long time. So if you help yourself to the audios you’ll find out the organizations and the foundations behind it and their big, big plans for the future. They did publish their own books, lots of books, at the beginning of the 20^th century. For those who have managed to get some of the ones I’ve mentioned I’m sure they’ve had an awful eye-opener as to the reality of the world, vastly different from the media spin you get every day. And pretty well everything to do with the media is spin or distraction. So help yourself to those. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can purchase the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] Straight donations are really, really welcome, and you’ll find out how to do it, as I say, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com website.

And those who don’t understand the past, and it truly is a maze to even find the past, even the recent past, as they constantly change history; it’s quite the chore. But when you do get into the old books it’s an awful eye-opener. Books written at the time, when you’re going through wars, that kind of thing, and then you look back about 20 years later and you’ve got a completely different version of what happened. The same as 9/11, those who kept all the data coming out at the time find a completely different story from the official version that emerged later, and we end up with all of these wars. Then you find out that all the wars were planned before 9/11 happened anyway. So it’s just amazing. The boys at the top have such good luck; they’re always winning. They should go to the casinos, I guess they’d win all the time, because they can always predict what’s going to happen, and they’ve always got troops outside countries before anything does happen, and then in go the troops. Because they were planned that way a long time ago to do so.

As I say, your daily media spin is really made up today of cultural changes; the things that you accept as little laughable things, are actually meant to change culture, like Harry with his nude little orgy there, that type of stuff, and then they play it up. Because you see, that wouldn’t have flown very well only 10, 15 years ago. Now they can because they have their pulse on the public. And as the public watch television and dramas and comedies they’re being degraded as they watch them, so that you now all accept it as no big deal. Nothing becomes a big deal, so much so that nothing shocks us at all, on any level. Right down to the mass abortion of children that we’re doing in our own countries and we’re paying for across the world as well; nothing shocks the public anymore. So you’re being altered by design and your opinions are being given to you, and you generally will adopt the ideas of your peer group and they all go along with the official versions because that’s the world they live in.

Also, it’s very difficult for people to really believe that such big powers would want to lie to them in the first place. They truly believe they’re free. They truly believe that the boys above them, the people who come out of special wombs, the dynasties that go into politics, they truly believe that they’re special people who are designed to somehow deal with big problems and allow you at the bottom to just go and play. You’ll find big authors in the past that designed the system you’re in today, they actually wrote books about it, like Bertrand Russell; and he said that we’ll teach them to basically ignore politics and let the government simply rule over them. That’s happened for most folk already. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about basically how our thoughts are given to us, and our topics are given to us, so much so that Brzezinski mentioned this 40 years ago, that eventually the public would be unable to reason for themselves, they’d expect the media to do their reasoning for them and their topics every day would be the previous day’s news. That’s already happened, news and sports, so we’re given our topics to talk about; it’s all very safe stuff of course. That’s what the media is there for. Remember, the media all belong to one organization pretty well across the world now. It’s the Council on Foreign Relations; they have a department in every country. They own the media and the journalists and the guys that come on the television and so on and give you your thoughts.

But getting back to democracy. Democracy… it’s never really been defined as such; it’s not got a static definition. It’s elastic you might say. And of course over a hundred years ago those who talked about democracy coming in said that eventually only the biggest groups would have a say in anything. People at that time, some of them thought it was just the political parties, but it also meant big groups of anything, any particular agenda. And we’ve got lots of them out there all paid for by the big foundations, etc. Now, this article here is to do with something that the US is already putting through their books to do with birth-control and I guess abortion too. This article is put in the paper and it says…

Should the Government Pay for Birth Control?

Canadian Doctors Think So

ca.shine.yahoo.com/blogs/team-mom / Lia Grainger 17 Aug, 2012

(Alan: Now, you don’t elect Canadian doctors; that’s your first point, remember. But they’re a big group and an Association, so they obviously now see themselves as a political group as well. It says…)

The issue of government funding for contraception has fueled fierce ideological debate recently with our friends south of the border. Yet here in Canada, it appears our own debate is stirring. (A: What a coincidence eh? At the same time.)

Canadian doctors recently recommended that all forms of birth control be made available for free. (A: ...and that obviously would include abortion, you see.) A resolution was approved on Wednesday at the annual meeting of the Canadian Medical Association (A: As I say, this is a private, professional group; you don’t elect them in. And they’re supposed to, mind you, take care of health. They’ve forgotten what they’re there for, obviously. They’re supposed to be there to save life, etc. Now they’re into eugenics.) that states, "The Canadian Medical Association supports full coverage for all forms of contraception."

And while resolution DM 5-58 passed with about 70 per cent in favour, the issue still spurred lively discussion among the doctors.

According to the CBC (A: ...television in Canada…), the motion was introduced by Dr. Sarah Cook, a Yellowknife family doctor, who believes that birth control is not accessible enough, and that even when it is accessible, the cost is often prohibitive. Another Yellowknife doctor added that unwanted pregnancies are a far greater public health expense than birth control. (A: So they’re down to economics, you see, these doctors that are supposed to deal in healthcare are down to economics and the value of life; I’m talking about economic value.)

A similar argument was made when several American states recently cut subsidies for contraceptives, despite analysis that the cuts would cost more money than they saved, reports the National Post.

Some doctors at the meeting questioned which level of government would fund the initiative. (A: Now, what level of government does it matter? The taxpayer is the only ones who fund anything, from government.)

"Is this going to be a provincial or territorial or federal program that will be available to all patients? There's a cost that's involved," said Dr. Laurence Colman of Toronto.

It is not yet clear how the CMA will lobby the federal government to fund contraception, (A: Now, why would the Canadian Medical Association be lobbying the government to start with? Really? Really? They don’t ask the public what they want, you see. See, the public, really, in democracy are out of the picture. You’re either a big NGO, nongovernmental organization funded by the big foundations with trillions of dollars across the planet, or you’re a bunch like this that often they don’t know who’s funding them, except that we’re all paying them in Canada, and no doubt too they’ll be getting grants from big Pharma as well, and other organizations.) as providing healthcare falls under provincial jurisdiction. Exactly how the CMA resolutions will be implemented is something that will continue to be debated and decided by members throughout the year. (A: Now, it’s not up to them to decide what’s to happen to the general public. As I say, we don’t vote these characters in. They’re allowed to have their opinions and that’s that.)

"The CMA carries a lot of weight, and I think it's great they'll be lobbying the federal government on this issue," says Agathe Gramet-Kedzior, acting executive director of Canadians for Choice, a national pro-choice charitable foundation. (A: So there you go, there’s your charitable foundation in there – there’ll be a lot of them in there too – run by the big foundations, to do with eugenics.) "Contraceptives should be fully-funded: they prevent STIs (A: ...that’s sexually transmitted infections, rather than disease. Disease sounds nastier, you see, so they call it infections here.) and unwanted pregnancies, which cost our healthcare system a huge amount of money."

She points out that there are many reasons someone might not be able to afford birth control, be it woman in a precarious employment situation, or a young person that doesn't want their parents to know they're sexually active. (A: Well, most of them are because that’s all that’s been rammed down their throats through music television and the comedies and the movies, for years and years, to make that happen, you see. Monkey see, monkey do.)

Matthew Wojciechowski -- project manager at Campaign Life Coalition, a Canadian pro-life advocacy organization -- sees the resolution as a poor financial decision.

"We're already drowning in debt, we're suffering financially," says Wojciechowski. "We need more nurses, more doctors, better technology, but instead they're calling on taxpayers to fund lifestyle choices, (A: ...and that’s true, lifestyle choices…) and we don't agree with that."

So, as I say, most folk will say, and Canadians will definitely do it, they’ll say, oh the Canadian Medical Association... Well, they’re not part of government. They’re allowed their opinions but they shouldn’t be lobbying for what the general public will have to end up paying for. And it’s true, it’s lifestyle choices. You never hear any of them ever come out, ever, ever come out when these things are going on and say, well can’t we put some restrictions on maybe Hollywood? Oh my goodness, that would never happen. Never happen. And all the porn they’ve made sure was freely available for all children to see through the Internet. It will never happen. You see, we’re all being guided down a path and eventually the system will be, like they said at the Fabian Society a long time ago, you’ll have to come to them and they’ll decide whether you should be born in the first place, if they need you, and once you’re alive you’ll have to come to them and say why they should keep you alive; you must serve the world state. You see. That’s what’s coming down the pike.

Now...

Australia to boost refugee numbers

(A: War is great, you see; it floods other countries with all the refugees, who naturally run out. I would too, wouldn’t you?)

Australia said it would increase its annual refugee intake by 40 per cent to 20,000 a year, as part of a plan to deter people smugglers. (A: ...because you get people smugglers making a lot of cash off of... A lot of different people make money off war you know.)

telegraph.co.uk / 23 Aug 2012

Prime Minister Julia Gillard said the rise, which was recommended by a recent expert inquiry into refugee policy, would include the immediate resettlement of 400 asylum-seekers from Indonesia as a gesture of goodwill.

That’s part of the reason too they’ve flooded a good part of Europe, with the wars, folk trying to get away and get out. And they know this is going to happen before they start the wars too. It fulfills different parts of the purpose of the great plan too, to multiculturalize society and destroy the initial culture that was there. That came out with Tony Blair and his assistant Prime Minister in the mainstream a while back. Nothing happens by chance, nothing at all. It’s all planned that way.

It’s amazing too, that there’s never enough money for everything, supposedly, or hardly anything for the general public, but we’ve got money for wars. And it’s a great industry, the war industry, massive industry. And it’s all to keep you safe, of course. That’s been the ancient technique from then to the present time, it’s to keep you safe. There’s so much money thrown at it all, but not all the stuff that’s put into the air right away or different kinds of weaponry that’s used right away. A lot of it’s put into experimentation for the future, billions and billions and billions of dollars. Anyway, it says...

Chameleon 2.0: American defence robot can creep into rooms and then disguise itself against surfaces (A: ...just like something out of sci-fi.)

dailymail.co.uk / Eddie Wrenn / 20 August 2012

America's defence agency has released footage of their latest research project - a robot that can crawl on to any surface and then discreetly camouflage itself.

The robot, made of soft silicone, has been designed to infiltrate areas through small gaps, before adapting its 'skin-tone' to that of its surroundings.

While movie fans may see overtones of the sinister shape-shifting robot from The Terminator series, for the moment this robot is still in prototype form and takes 30 seconds to change colour. (A: So they’re working on that. There’s a video that goes along with it too, I’ll put that up. They love to show videos to say how wonderful it is. We’re supposed to praise them for all this knowledge and expertise when they come out with all these new things.)

The soft robot can be seen in the video walking on a bed of rocks, before being filled with fluid to match the color of the rocks and break up the robot’s shape.

By introducing narrow channels into the molds through which air and various types of fluids can be pumped, the robot can be made to change its color, contrast, apparent shape and temperature to blend with its environment.

It can also glow through chemiluminescence, and most importantly, achieve movement through pneumatic pressurisation and inflation of the channels.

At a pumping rate of 2.25 milliliters per minute, color change in the robot required 30 seconds. Once filled, the color layers require no power to sustain the color.

The robot moves at a speed of approximately 40 meters per hour - without the colored fluid, it can move at approximately 67 meters per hour. (A: So you might get these sneaking under your doors at night too, and then climbing up the wall and blending in with the wallpaper I suppose. That’s the way things seem to be going. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I always take interesting articles, when articles come out of your own country for instance, and they lambast some other country for some kind of corruption or something, and you get the same thing in your own country, just the same, you know. But it says here…

Food security: China’s food production characterized by corruption, health-threatening practices

homelandsecuritynewswire.com / 22 August 2012

A report on Chinese TV showed rotten peaches spiked with sodium metabisulfite to make the fruit look fresh (A: Now, I know for a fact people in Canada who work with companies that go around the grocery stores, early in the morning, before the people get in, and they spray stuff on all the veggies to make them look fresh, and the fruit. [Alan chuckles.] But here’s China, so it’s bad, right?), seasoned in bleaching agents and additives harmful to the human liver and kidneys, and pickled in outdoor pools surrounded by garbage; the peaches are then packed in dirty bags which were previously used to hold animal feed, and shipped off to big brand stores; trouble is, this story is typical of, rather than an exception to, food production practices in China.

In a disturbing report, China’s national broadcaster CCTV detailed the manufacturing process followed by sixteen different Chinese companies that sell preserved fruit.

The report showed rotten peaches spiked with sodium metabisulfite to make the fruit look fresh, seasoned in bleaching agents and additives harmful to the human liver and kidneys, and pickled in outdoor pools surrounded by garbage. The peaches are then packed in dirty bags which were previously used to hold animal feed, and shipped off to big brand stores.

The potentially toxic fruit is just the latest item on China’s growing list of food products which are seriously dangerous to citizens. Baby formula adulterated with melamine made the headlines (A: That was Nestlé that was at the head of that one at the time.), but the New York Times reports that other food stuffs produced by Chinese manufacturers include meat containing banned steroids, rice contaminated with cadmium (a metal), noodles flavored with ink and paraffin, mushrooms treated with fluorescent bleach, and cooking oil recycled from street gutters. (A: I actually saw a program on that once, where every night in the main cities there were guys employed and they’d lift up the gratings on the gutters – and the oil floats to the top, and that’s where they dump all their cooking oil – so these guys would suck it all out again and recycle it. I guess they call it ‘very practical’ in the communist systems.)

The food safety problems are a result of the country’s business ethics and the failure of government regulators to keep pace with an expanding market. Observers say that the poor government oversight is an indication of a deeper problem of a weakening civic morality. (A: Well, they’re only copying the immorality at the top. That’s how all socialist/communist type systems work. Because the ones at the top, believe you me, are living high on the hog, and it’s a very fixed, rigid system.)

In 2009 the Chinese government enacted the Food Safety Law to prohibit the use of unauthorized additives and materials and to provide a basis for food oversight from production to households. A national commission of three vice premiers and twelve minister-level officials was set up. The end result, however, has not been what the government or citizens were aiming for. (A: There’s so much corruption and it mentions that too.)

Inefficiency and corruption are widespread among the officials which were supposed to enforce these laws. (A: You get corruption too, in Canada and the States and everywhere else. It happens all over. I’ve seen it. I’ve actually seen it in places I’ve worked in the past, and money changes hands and eyes look the other way. And that’s how things really are in the great world. But as I say, it’s always kind of funny when your country tries to lambast some other country when they’re doing pretty much the same kind of stuff.)

This article too is for the UK listeners…

Have your say on the draft Communications Data Bill

parliament.co.uk / 9 July 2012

(A: I’ll put this up tonight. It’s a joke, because you don’t have any say, but you can always complain. It’s been out already for about a month but it’s going on for another month and it says…)

The Joint Committee on the draft Communications Data Bill, chaired by Lord Blencathra, is conducting pre-legislative scrutiny into the draft Bill and the policies it seeks to implement. (A: This is the one that’s really going to… You’re already observed to the n^thdegree but this is going into even more privacy.) The Joint Committee comprises 6 MPs and 6 Peers. It will take oral and written evidence and make recommendations in a report to both Houses. The Joint Committee invites interested organisations and individuals to submit written evidence as part of the inquiry. (A: So I’ll put that up tonight for those who want to waste their time.)

This article’s quite interesting too, it’s about Iceland. Of course, we’ve heard what Iceland did. They didn’t go bankrupt like all the other countries and put their people into austerity. They threw out the bankers in fact, and some of them they put in prison I believe; I know they’ve charged them.

Iceland Was Right, We Were Wrong: The International Monetary Fund

thestreet.com / Jeff Nielson / 08/15/12

For approximately three years, our governments, the banking cabal, and the Corporate Media have assured us that they knew the appropriate approach for fixing the economies that they had previously crippled with their own mismanagement. We were told that the key was to stomp on the Little People with "austerity" in order to continue making full interest payments to the Bond Parasites -- at any/all costs.

Following three years of this continuous, uninterrupted failure, Greece has already defaulted on 75% of its debts, and its economy is totally destroyed. The UK, Spain and Italy are all plummeting downward in suicide-spirals, where the more austerity these sadistic governments inflict upon their own people the worse their debt/deficit problems get. Ireland and Portugal are nearly in the same position.

Now in what may be the greatest economic "mea culpa" in history, we have the media admitting that this government/banking/propaganda-machine troika has been wrong all along. They have been forced to acknowledge that Iceland's approach to economic triage was the correct approach right from the beginning.

What was Iceland's approach? To do the exact opposite of everything the bankers running our own economies told us to do. The bankers (naturally) told us that we needed to bail out the criminal Big Banks, at taxpayer expense (they were Too Big To Fail). Iceland gave the banksters nothing. (A: I’ll continue with this when I come back from this break.)

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Iceland and what they did to deal with their crisis that the bankers caused of course. It says…

The bankers told us that no amount of suffering (for the Little People) was too great in order to make sure that the Bond Parasites got paid at 100 cents on the dollar. Iceland told the Bond Parasites they would get what was left over, after the people had been taken care of (by their own government).

The bankers told us that our governments could no longer afford the same education, health care and pension systems which our parents had taken for granted. Iceland told the bankers that what the country could no longer afford was to continue to be blood-sucked by the worst financial criminals in the history of our species. Now, after three-plus years of this absolute dichotomy in economic policymaking, a clear picture has emerged (despite the best efforts of the propaganda machine to hide the truth). (A: And there are three pages to this; I’ll put this link up tonight and you can go through all the rest of it for yourselves, to see how they actually got out of it and how they’re coping today.)

And the countries of course that didn’t fight back in any way, and then they sat back and watched the big crooks being rewarded with your tax money and bailed out, you’ll find that this is what’s happening in Italy and Greece and elsewhere.

Italian dies after setting himself on fire outside parliament

reuters.com / ROME | Aug 19, 2012

(Reuters) - A 54-year-old man died on Sunday after setting himself on fire outside the Italian parliament last week to highlight his struggle with unemployment, police said.

Angelo di Carlo suffered 85 percent burns after the incident in front of the lower house of parliament - the Chamber of Deputies - in central Rome during the early hours of August 11, Italian media reported.

Police on duty nearby put out the flames with fire extinguishers and took him to hospital.

The widower was facing economic difficulties after losing his job and had struggled for years before that with temporary work contracts that offered little protection or benefits, according to media reports. (A: It’s always the ones at the bottom who get hit first; they’re the first to get hit, and the hardest too.)

Italians are grappling with a recession and rising unemployment while facing higher taxes and state spending cuts introduced by the government to try to help rein in Italy's massive public debt. (A: So that the big guys who are too big to fail of course, can go on having their big massive lunches with each other, and conspiring to pull off the next con.)

This article here too, is to do with US intelligence tests and they’re using crowd-sourcing against experts, it says. It says…

U.S. intelligence tests crowd-sourcing against its experts

Might large groups be better predictors of wars and terrorism than analysts in government spy services?

latimes.com / August 21, 2012 / Ken Dilanian

WASHINGTON — Nine years ago, Congress blocked a Pentagon agency from setting up a website that would have allowed anyone with a credit card to bet on the likelihood of foreign assassinations, coups and terrorist attacks.

The idea was to take advantage of the "wisdom of crowds," a social science maxim that contends the average of a group of forecasters, under certain circumstances, tends to be more accurate than even the most knowledgeable single forecaster.

But lawmakers worried the proposed predictions market could allow terrorists to profit from their own misdeeds. (A: ...kind of like the bankers eh? They can bet on things failing.) Congress forced the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency -- the military's cutting-edge research arm, known as DARPA -- to scuttle the program.

Now terrorism futures are back.

DARPA's sister agency (A: ...the one that you haven’t really heard of much…) -- the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, which funds experimental projects for the U.S. intelligence community -- is running a four-year, $50-million program that pays people willing to predict major world events, including wars and terrorist strikes. Unlike the earlier scheme, participants can't profit from their predictions.

Now in its second year, the so-called crowd-sourcing project involves competing corporate and university teams, including UC Irvine. Each team includes more than a dozen social scientists and as many as 2,000 participants, who can answer hundreds of questions each if they want.

The study, known as (A: They love these names…) Aggregative Contingent Estimation, is designed to see whether the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community can aggregate the judgment of its thousands of analysts -- rather than rely on the expertise of just a few -- to issue more accurate warnings to policy makers before and during major global events.

Participants in the project give their best guesses on whether the Free Syrian Army (A: ...you know, the ones we all employ to go over there and overthrow Syria.) will gain control of Aleppo, for example, or whether Kim Jong Un will resign as the leader of North Korea before April 1, 2013, according to project websites. (A: ...etc, etc. But they’ve got a whole bunch of universities into it, including the University of Pennsylvania and different ones. So they’re getting everybody into the spy game. It’s a bit of a joke when you’ve got long-term policy already made. Maybe the whole thing is to find out how many folk will clue in of what they want to do next according to the agenda. Because it’s all an agenda you know.)

This is an article too about possible Civil War in the US. It says…

Texas official warns of Obama civil war

chron.com / Compiled by Chronicle Staff / August 22, 2012

A Lubbock County, Texas, judge, the panhandle county's chief administrator, is asking for a tax increase to hire deputies for the inevitable civil war he believes would follow President Obama's re-election.

The way he puts it, Judge Tom Head wants to prepare for the "worst", which to him means "civil unrest, civil disobedience" and possible "civil war", according to a report from Fox 34 Lubbock

Judge Tom Head and Commissioner Mark Heinrich told the station this week that a 1.7 cent tax increase for the next fiscal year was necessary to prepare for many contingencies, including Obama's re-election. He also mentioned to the station that the county needs a pay increase is needed for the district attorney's office and more funds to pay for more sheriff's office deputies.

"He's going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the (United Nations), and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked the station during a Monday interview. "I'm thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we're not just talking a few riots here and demonstrations, we're talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms and get rid of the guy."

Head also seems to fear the retaliation of such civil unrest.

"Now what's going to happen if we do that, if the public decides to do that? He's going to send in U.N. troops. I don't want 'em in Lubbock County. OK. So I'm going to stand in front of their armored personnel carrier and say 'you're not coming in here'. (A: I remember it was Kissinger that said many, many, many years ago, when they were talking about the United Nations troops coming into the United States one day, and he says, under the right circumstances the people would welcome them in. And you should ask yourself why he was saying that, giving that speech in the first place. And that was in California, I think, he gave that speech.)

"And the sheriff, I've already asked him, I said 'you gonna back me' he said, 'yeah, I'll back you'. Well, I don't want a bunch of rookies back there. I want trained, equipped, seasoned veteran officers to back me."

The station reports that the tax hike will provide an additional $832,433 coupled with $2 million in cuts to make the numbers work.

So there you go. Who knows? I know that there will be civil unrest down the road because we’re all turning into third world countries, whether we recognize it or not. The signs are all around you. I mean, you’ve got Senators that want to bring in big hefty sentences for people who are stealing metal now. They’re even stealing the metal from graveyards because the economy is kaput. Kaput. It’s all overseas, and that was the plan when they signed the deal with China a long time ago.

An article came out too, to do with be careful who you follow because you’ll find behind all the uprisings and so on, and always behind terrorist bombings, inside the US, you’ve always got the FBI. It says…

Man who armed Black Panthers was FBI informant, records show

baycitizen.org / Seth Rosenfeld, Center for Investigative Reporting / August 20, 2012

The man who gave the Black Panther Party some of its first firearms and weapons training – which preceded fatal shootouts with Oakland police in the turbulent 1960s – was an undercover FBI informer, according to a former bureau agent and an FBI report.

One of the Bay Area’s most prominent radical activists of the era, Richard Masato Aoki was known as a fierce militant who touted his street-fighting abilities. He was a member of several radical groups before joining and arming the Panthers, whose members received international notoriety for brandishing weapons during patrols of the Oakland police and a protest at the state Legislature.

Aoki went on to work for 25 years as a teacher, counselor and administrator at the Peralta Community College District, and after his suicide in 2009, he was revered as a fearless radical.

But unbeknownst to his fellow activists, Aoki had served as an FBI intelligence informant, covertly filing reports on a wide range of Bay Area political groups, according to the bureau agent who recruited him.

That agent, Burney Threadgill Jr., recalled that he approached Aoki in the late 1950s, about the time Aoki was graduating from Berkeley High School. He asked Aoki if he would join left-wing groups and report to the FBI.

“He was my informant. I developed him,” Threadgill said in an interview. “He was one of the best sources we had.”

The former agent said he asked Aoki how he felt about the Soviet Union, and the young man replied that he had no interest in communism.

“I said, ‘Well, why don’t you just go to some of the meetings and tell me who’s there and what they talked about?’ Very pleasant little guy. He always wore dark glasses,” Threadgill recalled.

See, they can tell you this many, many years after the fact because there are official secrets acts and time limits to all these things. They tell you way after the fact when most of them are dead and no one cares anymore. But the same techniques are being used all the time. So those out there, especially young guys, who are going to get radicalized by people, be very, very careful because you’re getting set up. It’s the same everywhere across the world, Canada, Britain, you name it, especially in this day and age. Don’t follow anybody.

Here’s the article actually here to do with metal being stolen in the States. And in Britain it’s got pretty bad too; they’re even stealing the lead sheeting under the roofs of churches over in Britain now because it’s just dire straits.

Sen. Schumer aims to make metal theft a federal offense

gsnmagazine.com / 2012-08-10 / Mark Rockwell

Critical infrastructure isn’t just under electronic assault, according to one New York lawmaker. It is also being physically assaulted by metal thieves cutting away at bridges, gas lines and other facilities, in search of a quick buck.

As scrap metal prices skyrocket, metal thieves pose a potentially dire threat to the nation’s bridges, water and gas lines, and electrical systems, said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) on Aug. 8. (A: Have you seen the price of copper these days? I mean, it’s sky high.)

Schumer, appeared at a press conference at a Syracuse, NY, school where metal thieves had stolen copper air conditioning lines, causing thousands of dollars in damage, said he has introduced legislation that would make stealing metals, such as iron, copper and other metals, a federal offense. (A: And it really is going through the roof. But as I say, it’s happening all over the place because the economy is kaput. And when that happens crime rises. People will survive one way or another, you know, that’s just the way it is.)

I’ve mentioned before about neuroscience, it wants to create itself as a proper science. Most sciences are really full of nothing but theories and guesses; a theory is just somebody’s guess, that they all agree is a good guess. [Alan chuckles.] So anyway, neuroscience, since it’s pushing itself up there, has put different videos up there on trying to get psychopaths off with easy court sentences. They can’t help it, you see, and neuroscience, they say, can help prove that. You see. So here’s another article on it and it says…

Biology gives American psychopaths a legal break

Thedailyherald.com / 16 August 2012

(A: I knew this was going to happen years ago.)

LONDON--Criminal psychopaths in the United States whose lawyers provide biological evidence for their brain condition are more likely to be sentenced to shorter jail terms than those who are simply said to be psychopaths, according to new research. (A: So just SAYING it’s a biological condition at the courtroom is going to get a leaner sentence.)

A study published in the journal Science found that if judges were told a criminal was a psychopath, they considered it an aggravating factor. But if they also heard biological explanations for the disorder, they gave shorter sentences.

Researchers from the University of Utah who conducted the study said the findings were surprising and worrying, and external experts said they had problematic implications for how brain science might affect criminal justice in future. (A: And that’s why they’re trying to get into everything, especially the justice system, with all their theories, you know.) "In the coming years, we are likely to find out about all kinds of biological causes of criminal behaviour, so the question is, (A: This is an old communist idea by the way, that there had to be biological causes for criminal behavior, you see. That’s why if you were a psychopath and a criminal you got a very light jail sentence in Russia. But if you spoke out against the government you were locked away for life and probably killed. See, under their belief system anyone can be RETRAINED, you understand.) so the question is, why does the law care if most behaviour is biologically caused?" said Teneille Brown, an associate professor at the university's college of law.

Seena Fazel, a clinical senior lecturer in forensic psychiatry at Britain's Oxford University, noted there are already known biological bases for many disorders criminals suffer from, including drug abuse, alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder. "So if psychopathy reduces your sentence because it has a biological basis, why shouldn't these other more common conditions also result in reduced sentences?" he said. (A: See how it affects everything else? You see.)

The Utah team carried out a survey of 181 judges in 19 U.S. states who were given a hypothetical case of aggravated battery to consider. They found that when judges were given a "biomechanical" explanation for a criminal's psychopathy, they saw this as a mitigating factor and reduced the sentence, on average by about a year.

Now, they haven’t found any biological or biomechanical reason for it at all. They really haven’t found it. And even when they say there’s a certain part that’s a different size in the frontal lobe of the brain, that’s literally smaller in psychopaths, it doesn’t mean all psychopaths commit crime, by the way. There’s lots of psychopaths out there, and who are professionals, in surgery, or a lot of them in academia, and definitely a lot in politics, you see, but it doesn’t mean there’s a biological cause for it. They haven’t got the proof of that, or they’d all be crazy and antisocial and nasty. But it doesn’t matter. This is the big agenda, because neuroscience you see is eventually to take control of all of us from birth to death, and psychological testing from birth to death. And this is part of the agenda here that I’m reading right now, as they raise their standard as being a new science that’s going to show that they are the top science of human behavior.

This article here too, is to do with (from CNN it actually is from)...

Surveillance unit produced no terrorism leads, NYPD says

cnn.com / David Ariosto / August 22, 2012

(A: Remember a whole bunch of them were caught in a room and they were part of a spy network watching Muslims; but it says surveillance unit produced no terrorism leads, the NYPD says.)

The NYPD's Demographics Unit was put together with the CIA's help

(A: Now, this is the CIA working inside the US, and it doesn’t matter about the laws anymore, they can do what they want.)

The unit's reports never led to a terrorism investigation in at least 6 years of monitoring

(A: ...the Islamics.)

Thomas P. Galati's testimony was part of a suit that began with class-action case in 1971

NYPD says "premise that the demographic unit was used for wholesale spying.. was false"

New York (CNN) -- A controversial NYPD surveillance unit that cataloged information on Muslim communities never produced a lead that linked to a potential terrorist plot during years of investigating, according to the head of the city's police intelligence division.

The NYPD's Demographics Unit -- or Zone Assessment Unit -- was put together with the CIA's help following the September 11, 2001, attacks. The unit has acknowledged that it engaged in monitoring that included Muslim-owned business and mosques across the New York region. (A: ...but they didn’t have one thing to report in six years of surveillance. So you know…ppffew, there it goes. That’s how things really work out, unless the FBI’s in there with an instigator. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and I’ve mentioned many times about this big system and how they decided a long time ago to use socialism, or communistic style bureaucracy to control all the people through numerous ways from birth to death, in all situations, and all data would be kept on you, etc, and government officials and agencies would rule your life all through your life; that’s already happened of course. And that pleases the fascists on top, you know, the big bankers that run the whole system. Here’s an article here which shows you how the chaos of globalization affects everyone, especially those who really need the cash. Because in Britain they have a winter fuel allowance, it’s only 200 pounds they get, for pensioners. I’ve read the articles year after year here on how many thousands die in Britain, in their homes, pensioners, because they can’t afford the bills. And that’s an acceptable amount to the government, you see. It’s acceptable. You know, they’re over the hill, they’re not paying taxes anymore because they’re pensioners, or they’re paying low taxes. But they’re pensioners and they’re not, you know, not consumers anymore and producers. Remember, the United Nations definition of a good world citizen is a producer AND consumer. Once you’re retired you’re no longer a producer. But it says…

Pensioners to take 'temperature tests' before receiving winter fuel allowance

telegraph.co.uk / Rowena Mason / 23 Aug 2012

Pensioners will have to take a "temperature test" before claiming their £200 winter fuel allowance after the European Union ruled the British expatriots in tropical countries are eligible for the heating benefits. (A: So it’s going to take more money away from folk living in Britain, to give to folk who’ve moved off into the hot countries; they have to get paid as well.)

Iain Duncan-Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has promised to fight the "ridiculous" EU ruling that could cost the UK almost £100 million per year. (A: They’re still in it. See, Britain doesn’t really have, this Parliament they have in Britain is just a sham; they’re under this massive Soviet system of the EU.)

The diktat (A: ...and that’s what they call it, diktat...) means 444,000 expatriots who have spent most of their working life in Britain would be eligible for the payment. Currently, only 73,000 who currently get it because they still lived in the UK when they retired.

Mr Duncan-Smith is now planning to bring in a new rule saying the payments can only go to people living in cooler climates.

"The winter fuel payment is about helping British pensioners with heating costs," he told a newspaper. "It is ludicrous we could have to pay more pensioners in hot countries." (A: That’s globalization for you. That’s your socialist system, you know. That’s how it goes folks.)

Another article I’ll put up tonight too, and go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com to get all these articles. This is about Ritalin....

Raising the Ritalin generation

joannejacobs.com / August 19, 2012 / By Joanne

(A: It gives you an example about a child who was diagnosed, an eight-year-old boy of course, with the usual eight-year-old boy’s energy, and the school teacher suggested an evaluation. School teachers don’t like boys with a bit of energy and stuff; they don’t sit like little girls. But in a socialist system you’ve all to be the same now.)

But the third-grade teacher suggested an evaluation.

. . . once you start looking for a problem, someone’s going to find one, and attention deficit has become the go-to diagnosis, increasing by an average of 5.5 percent a year between 2003 and 2007, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (A: It’s not a disease.) As of 2010, according to the National Health Interview Survey, 8.4 percent, or 5.2 million children, between the ages of 3 and 17 had been given diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

There’s no test for ADHD, she writes. Teachers’ impressions... (A: ...They’re given impressions; they are the ones who make the diagnosis and make the recommendations to go off and see the quack, and they drug the children. And you all think it’s normal. You all think it’s normal.)

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Canadian Doctors Want Public Taxpayers to Fund All Kinds of Birth Control

Australia to Boost Refugee Numbers

Darpa Creates Chameleon-like Robot

Food Production Practices in China

Communications Data Bill UK---Have Your Say

Iceland was Right, We Were Wrong---IMF

Italian Man Sets Himself on Fire Outside Parliament

AIRPA using Crowd-Sourcing for Intelligence Predictions

Texan Judge Warns of Civil War in US

Man who Armed Black Panthers was FBI Informant

Senator Schumer and Heavy Metal

Neuroscience Giving Psychopaths Hypothetical Reasons for Reduced Sentencing

NYPD's Muslim Watch Produced No Terrorism Leads

Pensioners to Take "Temperature Test" Before Receiving Winter Fuel Allowance----UK

Raising the Ritalin Generation

#6 · March 13, 2021, 8:13 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:13 am
Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on October the 9^th, 2012.

For newcomers, as always I suggest you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and make good use of the site. There’s well over a thousand audios for free download, where I go into the past. I bring the past to the present to show you you’re living through a script; a script designed a long time ago by those who pretty-well owned a good chunk of the planet and lots of its resources and how they decided to take over the rest of it, too, using foundations as their fronts, basically, which would employ armies of lobbyists and politicians. And they formed the United Nations to be the umbrella group of course (the big kind of formal world government idea) with its umbrella organizations beneath it, to bring in this new global society. Science was to rise to the top to manage us all in a scientific manner. And it’s been written about a long, long time ago by the Fabian Society (another branch, really, of the Royal Institute for International Affairs). The Fabian Society pretends to handle the left-wing and they’re really into the scientific dictatorship idea. Huxley talked about it; so did Lord Bertrand Russell. And they said that this scientific tyranny would be more of a tyranny than any that ever previously had existed (any other kind of tyrannies), but he favored it, nonetheless. And that’s what you’re going into. We’re managed, you see. This is the age of world-managers and we have so many of them and so many organizations running us all our lives, minutely, that you can’t even keep up with them. There’s so many getting well financed by the foundations. So, help yourself to that. Find out how the whole system works. Find out that nothing happens by chance. Wars are planned many, many, many years ahead. And the boys at the top literally see the world as a big long-term business project. That’s how it’s run by professionals.

Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests. I don’t get cash from advertisers. I don’t get money from any products sold outside of my own website, which is just the books and the discs that I sell to keep me toddling along. So, if you want to keep me going you can buy the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And you can also donate, as well, because that’s really the best thing to do, in these austere times. And from the U.S. to Canada, remember you can still use personal checks or international postal money orders. You can send cash or use PayPal. Across the world, Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal. Remember, straight donations are really, really awfully welcome.

And, as I say, it’s just an amazing thing to see people here and there who start to catch on that something’s awfully wrong for the first time. They tend to panic and then they run off to find out who’s got all the information on it and then they panic all the more and they don’t know how to handle it because they’ve never grown up understanding this system. It’s been here your whole life, and your parents when they were born and before they were born, even when your grandparents were alive, this system was in play with the rich men of the world running the whole system because the big organization that started it all became known as the Council on Foreign Relations in America and across other parts of the world, and it was called the Royal Institute for International Affairs in Britain, or London, I should say. They have run the world for a hundred years and they plan to go on with it too. And they recruit in every generation, their own type to carry it on. You have to go into their sites and make good use of them. Just go in to the Rockefeller Foundation and look at every aspect of the environment, population reduction, everything you can imagine. They’ve got ongoing studies. They pay scientists across the planet, universities to do studies, continuous studies to do with us and how to control us. It’s all about that, ultimately... and depopulation.

Now, that’s the music coming in, so I’ll go on with the stories which will connect with what I’m talking about tonight, after these messages.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. You don’t realize how much psychological tinkering you’ve had your whole life long, through your education process and how many little questionnaires that have been handed to you so they can really get your whole personality down on pat, basically. And they claim that these things are pretty accurate, as to how you’re going to end up in the different traits that you have. All that kind of stuff. That all came out, again, of the eugenics movement that was tied at the hip with psychiatry at that time and now they have geneticists themselves attached to the whole thing. So, you have neuroscientists, psychologists, psychiatry all involved in the same thing. Because it’s their job now to makes sure we’re all... well the ones really who are possibly going to be criminals and possibly going to be a nuisance to the State (they won’t be well-behaved), should be eliminated at birth. We know that, from the articles I’ve read just over the last couple of days. They’re talking about all of that: removing genes from sperm and ovum to create the perfect kind of morons that will be happy in this world system, run by their betters. And they use test countries for all these different things. Scotland’s one of the main ones for their testing of all this, this Fabian technique. Because the Fabians talked about that, when they started up their organization a long time ago, founded by the money from the Astor family (Lord Astor). And Lord Astor also was in with the Royal Institute for International Affairs (at that time it was the Milner Group).

Here’s an article here. I read it last year, by the way, but it’s interesting, it ties in with what’s been happening lately with all the talk now, to modify us before we’re even born. It says,

“Scottish toddlers to be tested to see if they will grow up to be drug addicts or criminals”

Alan: This is a law, folks. And it says,

“Children aged between 24 and 30 months will be examined to determine their capacity for violent crime, drug abuse and mental illness when they are older. Health officials will look for emotional and behavioural problems under the scheme, which will be launched in Glasgow this year.”

“The move comes amid growing concern that those most at risk of developing violent tendencies or chronic addictions are not being identified early enough. Experts...”

Alan: You know, these experts again.

“... hope the Healthy Child programme...”

Alan: They call it “Healthy Child.” {Laughs}

“...will help tackle levels of violence and drug abuse in Glasgow, which are among the worst in the world. Dr Phil Wilson, a GP...”

Alan: General practitioner, that’s a doctor.

“...who is part of a working group behind the project, said: ‘One of the really worrying things is that on the overall measures of child well-being that Unicef publishes...’”

Alan: It’s from the United Nations, of course.

“‘...Scotland is bottom of the league of developed countries.’”

Alan: Because they’ve been kept in utter poverty all these years. That’s why they’re at the bottom, folks. There’s no work left there.

“Under the scheme, health workers will complete a questionnaire with parents to establish if their children are aggressive, bullying, spiteful and if they lie or cheat.”

Alan: If they do, they might get a job in politics.

“Toddlers will also be checked for poor grasp of language, which can indicate problems such as attention deficit disorder. The parents of those who fall into the "at risk" group will be offered support.”

Alan: They also drug the children, of course.

“Glasgow SNP [Scottish National Party] MSP Sandra White said she was concerned that children could be pigeon-holed.”

Alan: Well, that’s exactly what they’re going to do with it, folks. Birth to death, they want to do this to. She says,

“‘We are looking at a stage of development when young children do misbehave and are prone to tantrums. I would be worried that young children will be labelled unnecessarily and unfairly.’ But Dr Wilson, a senior lecturer in infant mental health at Glasgow University, defended the scheme. He said: ‘It is important that this programme is seen as an exercise in giving children the best chance.’”

Alan: You understand how it’s all perception management, what they want to do to you. It’s to help the children and give them the best chance.

“Senior health officials warn that only a small minority of people with anti-social or behavioural problems are picked up by health or social services as young children. Long-term studies have found links with poor mental health in pre-school kids and violence in later life.”

Alan: And then they pop into the...

“Swedish study has shown that children of 30 months who could not put two words together and who had a vocabulary of fewer than 50 words had a 70 per cent probability of having a psychiatric diagnosis.”

Alan: Well I know children today all across America and Canada that are lucky to have fifty words they can put together. And it’s getting worse all the time: linguistic minimalism.

And then this article here, too, is the same thing:

“Glasgow Parenting Support Framework Evaluation. The implementation of a public health approach to parenting support in Glasgow, with its National Health Service infrastructure... ”

Alan: See, it’s all about the National Health Service that’s all in cahoots with UNICEF on this and America (the U.S.) is going to go into its National Health system. This is what it’s all about. It’s nothing to do with a better system for the people. It’s so as they can monitor you, exploit you, stick a lot of needles in your arms and give you drugs and all that kind of stuff, and label people as potential future problems. It says,

“We aim to establish the effectiveness of the Glasgow Parenting Support Framework. The main part of our research assesses the emotional and social wellbeing of children from aged 30 months until the age of ten using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire...”

Alan: Now, there’s another program that they have that takes over from that and goes on for the whole of your life, by the way. But I’ll put these up. And it talks about all the data collection that they’ve got as well on all of this. And every child is going to have all their data, day by day, stuck into this computer system. Great stuff, eh? That’s coming to be worldwide, you understand. This is a test bed for worldwide stuff. And Sarkozy was even involved in the setting up of this system in Britain.

And we all remember (some of us remember), the New American Century crew. It was a doublespeak to hide something. A lot of folk had dual citizenship that were all around Bush Jr. A lot of them had dual citizenship with the U.S. and Israel; that was well known. It was in all the press. Etc etc. And so naturally, they were all for Israel first, in other words too. It seems that Romney... and this is a Foreign Relations, CFR article, by the way, but he is going through the same stuff, because that’s his job, not that Obama hasn’t. Obama simply took over the New American Century and he took out a few countries and started up another one, ready to fall as well. And in will come the next knight in shining armor when you’re fed up with Obama and it’s the same thing all over again, the New American Century group behind Romney. It says,

“Can Romney Put Foreign Policy in Play?”

Alan: It says. CFR.

“In the first foreign policy speech following his momentum-gaining debate against President Barack Obama, GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney expanded on his vision of an ‘American century...’”

Alan: There you are: a new American century.

“... a view he tied to the legacy of leaders like General George Marshall as he outlined a muscular, moral U.S. foreign policy with American exceptionalism at its core.”

Alan: Which means nothing at all.

“Romney aimed to distinguish his world view from the president’s... ”

Alan: That’s Obama’s.

“... as he has in far-lower-profile foreign policy speeches, promising to "change course" in the Middle East by helping to provide arms to Syrian rebels ”

Alan: Well, Obama’s already doing that.

“... and talking and acting even tougher on Iran.”

Alan: Well, you have to do that because he went over to Israel to get the kiss of Netanyahu and that was in the mainstream papers. That’s who’s backing them all. He says,

“‘It is the responsibility of our president,’ Romney said Monday at the Virginia Military Institute, ‘to use America’s great power to shape history – not to lead from behind, leaving our destiny at the mercy of events.’”

Alan: That’s exactly what they said with the New American Century group.

“‘Unfortunately, that is exactly where we find ourselves in the Middle East under President Obama.’”

Alan: It says,

“Romney wove together a constellation of tumultuous events in the Middle East that he said has left ‘the risk of conflict in the region’ higher ‘now than when the president took office.’ And he promised what amounted to a middle ground between President George W. Bush’s activist ‘freedom agenda’...”

Alan: “Freedom agenda” was also called “revolutionary democracy,” where you go and invade them and you force democracy on them. That what we’ve been doing.

“... and the pragmatic and downsized ambitions of an America exhausted and depleted by two wars in one decade.”

Alan: Never minding Gulf War I. It was a continuation of Gulf War I. That’s like twenty-odd years. So, anyway, it’s the same old thing so that the New American Century is back in the saddle. And there’s some interesting things, too. I’ll put up one from Veterans Today. They really bash the guys that are behind Romney as well and say much the same thing. It’s the same bunch in behind Romney. And they do mention a few things. A lot of people won’t like this article but they do mention a few things.

“And what’s worse...”

Alan: It says,

“... they control most of the United States Federal Court system and mainstream media, and are running the campaign of presidential candidate Mitt Romney.”

Alan: It says,

“Romney’s top foreign policy advisor is Rabbi Dov Zakheim, one of the leading suspected hands-on designers and controllers of the... ”

Alan: They call it:

“... Israeli-instigated 9/11 false-flag operation. On May 4th, 2001, Zakheim was appointed Comptroller of the Pentagon...”

Alan: That’s where they handle all the cash and budgets.

“... where he proceeded to ‘lose’ at least 2.3 trillion dollars – a sum amounting to more than five times the Pentagon’s annual budget. (CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer says the actual sum is 9.1 trillion dollars.) On Monday, September 10th, 2001, Pentagon Chief Donald Rumsfeld announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing from the Pentagon.”

Alan: And the link for that is up on YouTube, as well. You can actually see him talking about that, at the time.

“The oddest thing about this announcement, besides the gargantuan sum, was its timing. It was the first and last time that any significant political figure has ever chosen to announce major bad news on a Monday.”

Alan: Which is true. They always do it on a Friday, then you forget about it. And then they go on about Rumsfeld too, mentioning about all the cash they lost etc etc. and what it’s doing now. But it’s the same bunch, in other words they’re getting at, that’s running, behind Romney as it was behind Bush Jr. That’s what they’re getting at.

The International Monetary Fund was to be the big heavy boy. A heavy is someone who’s a debt collector. For the money boys. That’s generally what they have. And it was set up, again, by the Royal Institute for International Affairs. They’re the boys who came out with the idea of a World Bank, which we have, of course. And they also had a Bank for International Settlements, which would be the big meeting place and coordinator for all the private central banks that would run the world, which they have that too. And the International Monetary Fund would be the big debt collector and heavy that would come into countries that were defaulting because they were broke and the IMF would then run that country behind the scenes until some of it was paid off. Even during Thatcher’s reign, the IMF came in and actually dictated a lot of the British policy, at the time. So, the IMF now (these unelected institutions) cut growth forecasts for the UK economy.

“The International Monetary Fund has slashed its growth forecast for the UK - predicting that the economy will shrink by 0.4% this year.”

Alan: Now, with them doing this, of course, since they’re already borrowing money like crazy, to lend to the Euro Central Bank to throw away at Spain and Italy and elsewhere, they’re going to be paying massive compound interest on this one. High interest rates. That’s what it does when they downgrade you. The banks are running the whole show. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And this article too,

“Leading World Bank Demographer: Vaccination Campaigns Part Of Population Reduction Policy”

Alan: That’s official, folks. “Reduction policy.” I’ll repeat that for the hard of thinking: “population reduction policy.”

“American Undergraduates Recruited For Population Control Agenda As UN Raises The Stakes”

Alan: It says.

“Neo-eugenicist John Seager to undergraduates: ‘you’re the ones who are going to be able to move this forward and complete what I see as one of the great social movements of our time.’”

Alan: That’s convincing the public that they’ve got to die, you know.

“In a recent biennial report released last week by the United Nations Population Fund... ”

Alan: And the link’s on here too.

“(UNFPA) the projection for global population growth in 2050 has been raised with an additional 117 million people on top of the earlier projection of 8 billion people. As the UN keeps up the pressure an effort is underway to flood universities and colleges throughout the United States with population control propaganda. One of the people doing the rounds across academic America is former EPA chief John Seager... ”

Alan: You see, the Environmental Protection Agency, environmental groups and so on, were all part of the same agenda under camouflage. You understand that? It’s all eugenics. It’s all eugenics, folks. Anyway, it says,

“... who now heads up an organization called ‘Population Connection’, dedicated to the selling of human population reduction. On October 3 2012, Pennsylvania State University provided a stage for Seager, president of ‘Population Connection’, an organization promoting the culling of the overall human population. Accepting an invitation by the Institute of Environmental Studies, Seager attempted to convince a hall filled with undergraduates of the need to bring down the population for “sustainability” purposes. In an October 4 article titled ‘Lecturer Explores Population Control Issues,’ the Daily Pennsylvanian reports Population Connection aims to inform no less than three million k-12 students throughout the United States “about this issue and to lobby Congress to garner support for international family planning.’ ‘About 98 to 99 percent of all the population growth is happening in generally very poor places that are very far away [from America],’ Seager told the Daily Pennsylvanian. ‘And to bring this issue to your average American is a very hard challenge.’”

Alan: What he means is, the average American, it’s a hard challenge to get through to them.

“The man who extended the invitation, Stanley Laskowski, explained why he attracted Seager to lecture: ‘population growth is the root of all environmental problems and his insight into the issue at hand is invaluable.’ This is exactly the idea Seager is promulgating across the US. As a former EPA chief appointed by the Clinton administration in the mid 90s, Seager has found an eager audience in the establishment academic scene. During one of his recent lectures, held at the Nicholas School of the Environment, he stressed that man is the foremost enemy to the planet... ”

Alan: That’s straight out of the agenda in the book from the Club of Rome, where they said they were given the task of finding a reason to unite the whole planet and they said that eventually they dreamed up the idea that global warming, famine and plague and the like would fit the bill. And it says,

“... and the global population should be curbed towards what he calls ‘sustainable levels.’ Speaking of the UN’s population projection for the next decades- which will have the human population at 8 billion by 2050- Seager (from 35 minutes onward) stresses that this ‘(…) if we move to that low line on the UN projection- in my view the best possible outcome in terms of human population growth (through voluntary programs)- it would be the biggest single slice of the carbon pie. It would do more than thousand mile per gallon cars. It would do more than that.’ Seager states that technological solutions to Co2 emissions will not be sufficient to prevent global climatic Armageddon.”

Alan: They’re always on about this, you know, these big prophets of gloom and doom, but they have to terrify the public. I’ve read all the articles from these top guys before, where they say they have to always scare the public with scary scenarios and vastly overestimate things to get us to listen to them. Anyway,

“‘Tim Dyson at the London School of Economics found that if we reduced our carbon footprint by one percent a year in the developed world over the next forty years, a hundred percent of that is wiped out by population growth.’”

Alan: It says. So, he

“... argues, the birthrate in the developing countries should be drastically reduced. This is the global consensus in the scientific community today. Whatever we do to diminish our ‘carbon footprint’ in the developed world, only a thorough culling of the Third World population will make sure the earth has a chance of survival.”

Alan: And it goes on and on and on. So, don’t think it’s just over there, folks; it’s happening to you at home, as well. The cancer rates are skyrocketing and disabilities too are skyrocketing, with all the injections and so on and the poisoned food that you’ve been made to eat. And this article ties in with it.

“Hilary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy. During remarks that she made for the 15th Anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development...”

Alan: I’ll read that again.

“...International Conference on Population and Development...”

Alan: They’ve had these for about a hundred years folks. They’re not just sitting, making a wish-list; they implement them.

“... U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the launch of a new program that according to Clinton will now become the centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy. This new program is known as the Global Health Initiative, and it is being incredibly well-funded at a time when the U.S. government is drowning in debt. According to Clinton, 63 billion dollars will be spent by the U.S. to prevent pregnancies and to improve...”

Alan: What they call,

“...‘family planning’ services around the globe over the next six years.”

Alan: It’s abortions and so on.

“In other words, the new centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy is all about eugenics and population control. The following is an excerpt from Clinton’s remarks: In addition to new funding, we’ve launched a new program that will be the centerpiece of our foreign policy, the Global Health Initiative, which commits us to spending $63 billion over six years to improve global health by investing in efforts to reduce maternal and child mortality... ”

Alan: How do you do it? By stopping them having children, folks.

“prevent millions of unintended pregnancies, and avert millions of new HIV infections, among other goals.”

Alan: I wonder what the other goals are, as well. Back with more on this after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And I’ll put up this article with all the rest of these articles tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, all the links up for you to look up yourself. It also has a whole bunch of YouTube’s to watch, to do with depopulation as well and how this eugenic movement has been on for a long, long time, what the real goals are and all the rest of it. It’s quite something. It’s interesting too, that Hilary Clinton is either going across the world convincing other countries to go in and slaughter other people in the Middle East or she’s wanting to slaughter all the children that could be born. So, it’s just, well, what can you say, folks? I mean that’s fact, you know. That’s fact. You’d have to get in the mindset of these people; if you did, you’d have to be awfully strong if you could possibly emerge unscathed by the weird thoughts that go on in their heads. Also tonight, I’ll put up a link to “The Man Who Saved Iceland,” basically, or he changed Iceland. And he was the guy who got the big marches going and so on to chuck all the big international crooks out of their country. I’ll put that up tonight, too. He’s going around Europe right now, giving lectures on how to do the same thing. I hope people take advantage of what he’s saying and try to use it because I’m so sick of watching folk getting their heads bashed in with cops in different countries now. It’s the new normal as the real face of the real owners of you, under all the farce and guises of democracy or whatever they want to call it, as they emerge. See, everything comes down to brute force. You’re really run by brute force or the threat of it; that’s what law is about; intimidation through law followed up by brute force. So, the threat of force and then brute force, as the big boys show just how caring they really are and how evolved they’ve become – your big leaders at the top, behind the scenes. Those who own you, lock, stock and barrel. And always have, by the way. {Laughs}

And this article too is interesting.

“Veteran Law Enforcement Official’s Lawsuit Charges Lesbian Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano With Favoring Gal-Pals For Positions, Says Her Chief Of Staff Suzanne Barr Engaged In Numerous Acts Of Sexually Offensive Behavior To Humiliate And Intimidate Male Employees”

Alan: This is from Washington. It says,

“A veteran US law-enforcement official has filed a blockbuster discrimination lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, charging she pushed him aside to make way for a less-qualified woman who’s “enjoyed a long-standing relationship” with the anti-terror chief. That woman, Dora Schriro, was later appointed by Mayor Bloomberg as commissioner of the city Department of Correction, a post she still holds. The court papers also allege that Suzanne Barr, Napolitano’s chief of staff at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has engaged in “numerous” acts of “sexually offensive behavior” intended to “humiliate and intimidate male employees.”

Alan: Well, once you put a bunch of these folks in, that’s what they do, you know.

“Barr’s alleged acts include calling one man ‘in his hotel room and screaming at him that she wanted...’”

Alan: To do something with his something in the back of her throat. And that was in the mainstream; it’s been in the mainstream too. And so it says,

“The suit was filed by James T. Hayes Jr., special agent in charge of New York City investigations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Hayes, who began his career with the feds as a border patrol agent in 1995, formerly served as director of ICE Detention and Removal Operations in Washington, DC, where he oversaw about 8,500 workers and a $2.5 billion budget.”

Alan: So he was no low-down guy; he was up there.

“But Hayes says he was demoted following President Obama’s election and the appointment of Napolitano, a former Arizona governor, to head the Department of Homeland Security.”

Alan: It says,

“In court papers filed in Washington federal court, Hayes says Schriro — who previously served as director of the Arizona Department of Corrections under Napolitano — was named a “special adviser” to Napolitano on detention and removal operations in February 2009 and began to replace him at DHS and ICE meetings. ‘Schriro was not as qualified for the position plaintiff had because of lack of federal law-enforcement experience,’ Hayes’ suit says. ‘Schriro did have experience, however, working with Secretary Napolitano. Schriro enjoyed a long-standing relationship with the secretary.’ The suit doesn’t detail the nature of their relationship. During her 2002 gubernatorial campaign, Napolitano publicly denied rumors that she’s a lesbian. In a 2009 interview, she said, ‘I just happen not to be married.’ When asked at that time if she was ‘seeing anybody now,’ she answered, ‘Yes, my staff.’ Hayes’ suit says that when it became clear he was going to be removed from his post, he ‘felt that he was being targeted because of his gender.’ He charges that in April and May 2009, ICE chief of staff Barr “removed the entire contents...”

Alan: Listen to this:

“‘... the entire contents of the offices of three male employees, including nameplates, computers and telephones, to the men’s bathroom at ICE headquarters.’”

Alan: So they had to work in the bathroom in their desks, and folk were still going in and out of the bathroom, right, doing their stuff.

“‘Barr also created a frat-house type atmosphere that is targeted to humiliate and intimidate male employees,’ ...”

Alan: You understand, there are folk who hate and these folk tend to truly... and they are haters, these folk. It’s not just chips on their shoulders. It’s beyond that.

“In addition to the alleged hotel phone call, Barr allegedly ‘covertly took an ICE BlackBerry device assigned to a male special agent in charge and sent a BlackBerry Messenger message to his female supervisor indicating that the male employee had a crush on the female supervisor and fantasized about her.’ ‘Further, Barr promoted and otherwise rewarded those male employees who play along with her sexually charged games,’ the suit says.”

Alan: You understand, these people are obsessed with sex, way beyond the average people. Obsessed with it. And they can’t keep it out of the workplace. So, anyway, that’s going ahead with that one. And even Geraldo came up with that:

“Geraldo Rivera Addresses Lesbian Rumors About Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary”

Alan: It says here. And he

“... raised questions about a ‘lesbian cabal’ and ‘same-sex takeover’ at the Department of Homeland Security, went further Monday, encouraging DHS and its head, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, to ‘tell people who they are.’”

Alan: And I’ll put these links up tonight, as well, for those who want to know. And this article too is from the LGBT. It’s from one of their articles here.

“Rights advocates are welcoming news a surgical penis-construction procedure for transgender men will be paid for by public medical insurance in B.C. [British Columbia]”

Alan: It’s a priority, obviously, isn’t it? And it says,

“... for transgender men...”

Alan: Now, it’s really for women who want to have a penis constructed because they want to pretend that they’re men, you see. Because they’re really lesbians and it will help them in a lesbian endeavor, you understand. Anyway,

“Phalloplasty will be covered under the Medical Services Plan (MSP) for up to five people each year, the provincial Ministry of Health has confirmed. After previously rejecting calls to provide such coverage, the ministry decided to make the change following a review this year of recent medical literature on the procedure.”

Alan: And it goes on and on and on about their mental health and how it will really improve and all that kind of stuff. Another article I’ll put up tonight too, is called,

“‘Too easy’: Ex-drone operator on watching civilians die”

Alan: It says,

“James Jeffrey served as an officer in the British Army in both Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2009, he helped guide drones flying over Helmand Province, where he had to make life and death decisions about whether to engage the enemy. Speaking to Orla Guerin, the BBC’s correspondent in Pakistan, he describes how he almost ordered a drone attack on a suspected militant thought to be planting an improvised explosive device. At the last minute the strike was cancelled when he realised the potential enemy he could see on the monitor was in fact a child playing. Mr Jeffrey also talked about witnessing - via a video link from a fighter jet - a missile strike on Taliban targets in built up areas that left several civilians dead. Having now left the military and living in the US, Mr Jeffrey warns that while drones are a precise and effective weapon they have also made it ‘too easy to kill.’”

Alan: “Too easy to kill” and isn’t that the truth. Mind you, Mr. Jones was probably brought up too with video games and X-boxes and all that, so they’re already primed for this kind of stuff, you understand. They’re already primed for it.

And this article too says,

“Eleven dead, thousands in danger amid spreading meningitis outbreak”

Alan: That’s caused by that corticosteroid, which they’ve been injecting in folk, for inflammation of their spine, for arthritis and so on.

“A deadly meningitis outbreak that has left eleven dead, 119 infected and up to 13,000 at risk is taking its toll across the US. With symptoms showing up weeks after exposure, many more patients are expected to get sick. The meningitis-tainted steroid shots were dispersed to health care centers across 23 US states and administered to about 13,000 patients who requested treatment for back pain, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. But the shots have cost many their life.”

Alan: Then it gives you an example of a guy and his wife who went for the shots and his wife died.

“After responding to medication, her spirits were lifted and she spent her time Skyping with her grandsons in the hospital. But shortly thereafter, she suffered a stroke and was removed from life support. ‘They advised me to watch for symptoms,’ ...”

Alan: He says. And he:

“... is just one of thousands watching the clock, waiting and hoping not to acquire any signs of illness. The outbreak has been linked to the New England Compounding Center (NECC), Inc., which is one of thousands of pharmacies that repackages or recombines medications. The Food and Drug Administration has no power to regulate compounded medications made at pharmacies like the one that dispersed the meningitis-tainted steroid shots. Lawmakers claim the health crisis is demonstrating the need for stronger FDA regulations...”

Alan: What a joke, FDA. {Laughs} It’s stacked with guys from big pharma. And:

“Compounding pharmacies often produce cheaper medications.”

Alan: Well they’ll have to put them out of business too, I suppose. It says,

“The NECC had shipped 17,676 vials of the steroid methylprednisolone acetate – which contained the meningitis – to 76 healthcare facilities from July through September. Last week, it recalled all the vials...”

Alan: That they’ve got left, I guess.

“...and voluntarily shut down its services.”

Alan: So, they’ll be looking into it, but it just shows you that we’re all trained to automatically just take medicines when it’s prescribed and of course it doesn’t work out that way and it’s not like the movies.

In Canada, the ex-chief of the First Nations Indians association:

“... will be ‘used as pawns’ as former chief to meet Iranian leaders”

Alan: So, there’s your spin off the bat from the mainstream media. Because this ex-chief of the First Nations Indians, Canadian Indians, is going to go over to see the Iranian leaders. So he’s going to be used as a pawn and that’s the part you’re supposed to remember, you see. Right off the bat. It’s very open, our media in Canada here, you see. And it says,

“A former First Nations chief says he will meet with the Iranian regime in Tehran next week as part of an ‘exploratory mission’ to discuss resource development and ‘human rights abuses’ in Canada, sparking widespread condemnation and concerns about Iran’s intentions.”

Alan: And what they do, they actually have, the opposing person here is Nazanin Afshin-Jam, who is married to the Chief of Defense for Canada. She’s from Iran. And she’s an activist to get all to demolish the present system in Iran. Anyway, it says,

“What do you say to concerns the regime will enlist First Nations to perpetrate violence against Canada?”

Alan: And Nelson says,

“That’s a pretty big stretch. When have First Nations people ever bombed anything? The worst we’ve ever done is make the white man late for lunch when we do our protests in the city street. I’m 59 years old. If I was going to bomb something, I would have bombed it a long time ago. Peter MacKay’s wife... ”

Alan: That’s the Iranian woman.

“... is constantly pushing the Conservative agenda and talking about human rights violations. [Iranian-Canadians] might not like the Iranian government, but does that mean they support the deaths of millions of their people [because of the economic sanctions]?”

Alan: And it is too, this sanctions stuff... it was the same with the Iraqis. It would be the same as you. Just put yourself in the same boat. If some other country was much bigger and larger and you were down a little bit on the totem pole and they put sanctions on you, millions of you would die. How could you get your government out of it? What could you do about it? Nothing. So, starving the population is ridiculous. Anyway, I’ll put this link up tonight and he talks about the fact that he’s pushing for... and it’s true enough, have any of these guys that he’s talking about, has MacKay and his wife, ever gone into any Indian Reserve and looked around there, in Canada, for human’s rights and abuses and all the rest of it? You see everything is a farce and hypocritical, isn’t it? Such hypocrites. As we pretend that we’ve got democracy... what is democracy? What is democracy? Tell me what democracy is. You can’t own your house; they’ll tax it from you. If you can’t afford that, you’re out. You do what you’re told. You’re told not to speak about certain topics—in a free society? Well, obviously, they shouldn’t call us a “free society” if you can’t talk about certain things. Obviously.

I’ll also put this article up tonight too. It’s an article from Slate Magazine and it says,

“How can we ban hate speech against Jews while defending mockery of Muslims?”

Alan: It’s a good article. And it says,

“What have these laws produced?”

Alan: It says,

“Look at the convictions upheld or accepted by the European Court of Human Rights.”

Alan: And it says,

“Four Swedes who distributed leaflets that called homosexuality ‘deviant’ and ‘morally destructive’ and blamed it for AIDS. An Englishman who displayed in his window a 9/11 poster proclaiming, ‘Islam out of Britain.’ A Turk who published two letters from readers angry at the government’s treatment of Kurds. A Frenchman who wrote an article disputing the plausibility of poison gas technology at a Nazi concentration camp. Look at the defendants rescued by the court. A Dane ‘convicted of aiding and abetting the dissemination of racist remarks’ for making a documentary in which three people ‘made abusive and derogatory remarks about immigrants and ethnic groups.’ A man ‘convicted of openly inciting the population to hatred’ in Turkey by ‘criticizing secular and democratic principles and openly calling for the introduction of Sharia law.’”

Alan: He goes through a whole list of them that end up in court, you see. And then they go into the case of a

“Frenchman who sought free-speech protection under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights:...”

Alan: And it says,

“Denis Leroy is a cartoonist. One of his drawings representing the attack on the World Trade Centre was published in a Basque weekly newspaper … with a caption which read: ‘We have all dreamt of it ... Hamas did it.’ Having been sentenced to payment of a fine for ‘condoning terrorism,’ Mr Leroy argued that his freedom of expression had been infringed. The Court considered that, through his work, the applicant had glorified the violent destruction of American imperialism, expressed moral support for the perpetrators of the attacks of 11 September, commented approvingly on the violence perpetrated against thousands of civilians and diminished the dignity of the victims.”

Alan: And it says,

“How can you justify prosecuting cases like these while defending cartoonists and video makers who ridicule Mohammed?”

Alan: That’s true. How can we sit here in other countries and watch all this vilification of Mohammed? And we do. We’re all getting conditioned to do it. You’re always taught to hate an enemy, you understand. You must demonize an enemy. Look at all... you can go up on the websites and look at all the cartoons they brought out for World War II and all the posters, the propaganda posters. You’ll see Japanese with buck teeth and big glasses and that’s how they portrayed them all. And Germans: they were just like robots in big helmets and really just like clones of each other. Demonize the enemy. I’ll put up tonight too, that one I’ve put up many times before to do with “real bad Arabs” and how Hollywood has been training you to hate Arabs for over forty years. But then it says,

“The principle born out of the wretched record of hate speech prosecutions is worth defending but first we have to live up to it.”

Alan: It says. And it gives a whole bunch of good information on it and shows you how much... you cannot be hypocritical. Either there’s no hate-speech laws or everybody goes under hate-speech laws. That’s it. That’s fairness. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And this article too, is to do with Iran, as well. It says,

“In the Washington Post today, Richard Cohen expresses surprise that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is "starting to make some sense" and "wax rationally". Cohen specifically cites this statement from the Iranian president last week:”

Alan: When he said,

“‘Let’s even imagine that we have an atomic weapon, a nuclear weapon. What would we do with it? What intelligent person would fight 5,000 American bombs with one bomb?’ Cohen’s surprise notwithstanding, numerous Iranian leaders, including Ahmadinejad, have long made the same point. And it’s a point so obvious it should not even need to be made. No rational person takes seriously the claim that Iran, even if it did obtain a nuclear weapon, would commit instant and guaranteed national suicide by using it to attack a nation that has a huge nuclear stockpile, which happens to include both the US and Israel. One can locate nothing in the actions of Iran’s regime that even suggests irrationality on that level, let alone suicidal impulses. That Iran will use its nuclear weapons against the US and Israel is rather obviously the centerpiece of the fear-mongering campaign against Tehran, to build popular support for threats to launch an aggressive attack in order to prevent them from acquiring that weapon. So what, then, is the real reason that so many people in both the US and Israeli governments are so desperate to stop Iranian proliferation? Every now and then, they reveal the real reason: Iranian nuclear weapons would prevent the US from attacking Iran at will, and that is what is intolerable.”

Alan: I’ll say that again:

“Iranian nuclear weapons would prevent the US from attacking Iran at will, and that is what is intolerable. The latest person to unwittingly reveal the real reason for viewing an Iranian nuclear capacity as unacceptable was GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the US’s most reliable and bloodthirsty warmongers. On Monday, Graham spoke in North Augusta, South Carolina, and was asked about the way in which sanctions were harming ordinary Iranians. Ayman Hossam Fadel was present and recorded the exchange. Answering that question, Graham praised President Obama for threatening Iran with war over nuclear weapons, decreed that ‘the Iranian people should be willing to suffer now for a better future,’ and then – invoking the trite neocon script that is hauled out whenever new wars are being justified – analogized Iranian nukes to Hitler in the 1930s.”

Alan: {Laughs} We’re way beyond Hitler, folks.

“But in the middle of his answer, he explained the real reason Iranian nuclear weapons should be feared: They have two goals: one, regime survival. The best way for the regime surviving, in their mind, is having a nuclear weapon, because when you have a nuclear weapon, nobody attacks you.’ Graham added that the second regime goal is ‘influence’, that ‘people listen to you’ when you have a nuclear weapon. In other words, we cannot let Iran acquire nuclear weapons because if they get them, we can no longer attack them when we want to and can no longer bully them in their own region. Graham’s answer is consistent with what various American policy elites have said over the years about America’s enemies generally and Iran specifically: the true threat of nuclear proliferation is that it can deter...”

Alan: And that’s what it’s called: nuclear deterrence. That’s why they call it that.

“... American aggression. Thomas Donnelly of the American Enterprise Institute and the New American Century Project has long been crystal clear that this is the real reason for opposing Iranian nuclear capability...”

Alan: And this is what he said, this Thomas Donnelly:

“‘When their missiles are tipped with warheads carrying nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, even weak regional powers have a credible deterrent regardless of the balance of conventional forces … In the post cold war era, America and its allies, rather than the Soviet Union, have become the primary objects of deterrence and it is states like Iraq, Iran and North Korea who most wish to develop deterrent capabilities.’”

Alan: And he added:

“‘The surest deterrent to American action is a functioning nuclear arsenal...’”

Alan: So, that’s what it really is about. It’s also about that too and plunder and standardizing them all (all the countries across there) into the same private central banking system, under the Bank of International Settlements and getting them all in debt. That’s so as that the rich guys of the world can plunder it, like they’ve done with the rest. That’s what it’s about.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

{Closing Music ♫}

Topics of show covered in following links:

The Fabian Laboratory Called Scotland

& More on Above

Romney Commits to New American Century Part 2

New American Century Crew Still in the Saddle

IMF Downgrades Britain's Growth Forecast

American Undergraduates Recruited for Population Control Agenda

Population Control to Become Centerpiece of US Foreign Policy

Icelander Speaks on Technique of Ousting International Mobsters

Lawsuit Against Napolitano

Geraldo Rivera on Lesbian Rumours on Napolitano

B.C. Med. Insurance to Cover Phalloplasty

Drones Make it Too Easy to Kill says Ex- Drone Operator

Meningitis Tainted Cortico-Steroid Injections Put Thousands in Danger

Former First Nations Chief Terrance Nelson to Meet with Iran's Ahmadinejad

& More on Above

Free Speech Versus Hate Speech

Hollywood, Propaganda and Portrayal of "Real Bad Arabs"

The Real Reason US Fears Iran Nukes--They Can Deter US Attacks

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on October the 9^th, 2012.

For newcomers, as always I suggest you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and make good use of the site. There’s well over a thousand audios for free download, where I go into the past. I bring the past to the present to show you you’re living through a script; a script designed a long time ago by those who pretty-well owned a good chunk of the planet and lots of its resources and how they decided to take over the rest of it, too, using foundations as their fronts, basically, which would employ armies of lobbyists and politicians. And they formed the United Nations to be the umbrella group of course (the big kind of formal world government idea) with its umbrella organizations beneath it, to bring in this new global society. Science was to rise to the top to manage us all in a scientific manner. And it’s been written about a long, long time ago by the Fabian Society (another branch, really, of the Royal Institute for International Affairs). The Fabian Society pretends to handle the left-wing and they’re really into the scientific dictatorship idea. Huxley talked about it; so did Lord Bertrand Russell. And they said that this scientific tyranny would be more of a tyranny than any that ever previously had existed (any other kind of tyrannies), but he favored it, nonetheless. And that’s what you’re going into. We’re managed, you see. This is the age of world-managers and we have so many of them and so many organizations running us all our lives, minutely, that you can’t even keep up with them. There’s so many getting well financed by the foundations. So, help yourself to that. Find out how the whole system works. Find out that nothing happens by chance. Wars are planned many, many, many years ahead. And the boys at the top literally see the world as a big long-term business project. That’s how it’s run by professionals.

Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests. I don’t get cash from advertisers. I don’t get money from any products sold outside of my own website, which is just the books and the discs that I sell to keep me toddling along. So, if you want to keep me going you can buy the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And you can also donate, as well, because that’s really the best thing to do, in these austere times. And from the U.S. to Canada, remember you can still use personal checks or international postal money orders. You can send cash or use PayPal. Across the world, Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal. Remember, straight donations are really, really awfully welcome.

And, as I say, it’s just an amazing thing to see people here and there who start to catch on that something’s awfully wrong for the first time. They tend to panic and then they run off to find out who’s got all the information on it and then they panic all the more and they don’t know how to handle it because they’ve never grown up understanding this system. It’s been here your whole life, and your parents when they were born and before they were born, even when your grandparents were alive, this system was in play with the rich men of the world running the whole system because the big organization that started it all became known as the Council on Foreign Relations in America and across other parts of the world, and it was called the Royal Institute for International Affairs in Britain, or London, I should say. They have run the world for a hundred years and they plan to go on with it too. And they recruit in every generation, their own type to carry it on. You have to go into their sites and make good use of them. Just go in to the Rockefeller Foundation and look at every aspect of the environment, population reduction, everything you can imagine. They’ve got ongoing studies. They pay scientists across the planet, universities to do studies, continuous studies to do with us and how to control us. It’s all about that, ultimately... and depopulation.

Now, that’s the music coming in, so I’ll go on with the stories which will connect with what I’m talking about tonight, after these messages.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. You don’t realize how much psychological tinkering you’ve had your whole life long, through your education process and how many little questionnaires that have been handed to you so they can really get your whole personality down on pat, basically. And they claim that these things are pretty accurate, as to how you’re going to end up in the different traits that you have. All that kind of stuff. That all came out, again, of the eugenics movement that was tied at the hip with psychiatry at that time and now they have geneticists themselves attached to the whole thing. So, you have neuroscientists, psychologists, psychiatry all involved in the same thing. Because it’s their job now to makes sure we’re all... well the ones really who are possibly going to be criminals and possibly going to be a nuisance to the State (they won’t be well-behaved), should be eliminated at birth. We know that, from the articles I’ve read just over the last couple of days. They’re talking about all of that: removing genes from sperm and ovum to create the perfect kind of morons that will be happy in this world system, run by their betters. And they use test countries for all these different things. Scotland’s one of the main ones for their testing of all this, this Fabian technique. Because the Fabians talked about that, when they started up their organization a long time ago, founded by the money from the Astor family (Lord Astor). And Lord Astor also was in with the Royal Institute for International Affairs (at that time it was the Milner Group).

Here’s an article here. I read it last year, by the way, but it’s interesting, it ties in with what’s been happening lately with all the talk now, to modify us before we’re even born. It says,

“Scottish toddlers to be tested to see if they will grow up to be drug addicts or criminals”

Alan: This is a law, folks. And it says,

“Children aged between 24 and 30 months will be examined to determine their capacity for violent crime, drug abuse and mental illness when they are older. Health officials will look for emotional and behavioural problems under the scheme, which will be launched in Glasgow this year.”

“The move comes amid growing concern that those most at risk of developing violent tendencies or chronic addictions are not being identified early enough. Experts...”

Alan: You know, these experts again.

“... hope the Healthy Child programme...”

Alan: They call it “Healthy Child.” {Laughs}

“...will help tackle levels of violence and drug abuse in Glasgow, which are among the worst in the world. Dr Phil Wilson, a GP...”

Alan: General practitioner, that’s a doctor.

“...who is part of a working group behind the project, said: ‘One of the really worrying things is that on the overall measures of child well-being that Unicef publishes...’”

Alan: It’s from the United Nations, of course.

“‘...Scotland is bottom of the league of developed countries.’”

Alan: Because they’ve been kept in utter poverty all these years. That’s why they’re at the bottom, folks. There’s no work left there.

“Under the scheme, health workers will complete a questionnaire with parents to establish if their children are aggressive, bullying, spiteful and if they lie or cheat.”

Alan: If they do, they might get a job in politics.

“Toddlers will also be checked for poor grasp of language, which can indicate problems such as attention deficit disorder. The parents of those who fall into the "at risk" group will be offered support.”

Alan: They also drug the children, of course.

“Glasgow SNP [Scottish National Party] MSP Sandra White said she was concerned that children could be pigeon-holed.”

Alan: Well, that’s exactly what they’re going to do with it, folks. Birth to death, they want to do this to. She says,

“‘We are looking at a stage of development when young children do misbehave and are prone to tantrums. I would be worried that young children will be labelled unnecessarily and unfairly.’ But Dr Wilson, a senior lecturer in infant mental health at Glasgow University, defended the scheme. He said: ‘It is important that this programme is seen as an exercise in giving children the best chance.’”

Alan: You understand how it’s all perception management, what they want to do to you. It’s to help the children and give them the best chance.

“Senior health officials warn that only a small minority of people with anti-social or behavioural problems are picked up by health or social services as young children. Long-term studies have found links with poor mental health in pre-school kids and violence in later life.”

Alan: And then they pop into the...

“Swedish study has shown that children of 30 months who could not put two words together and who had a vocabulary of fewer than 50 words had a 70 per cent probability of having a psychiatric diagnosis.”

Alan: Well I know children today all across America and Canada that are lucky to have fifty words they can put together. And it’s getting worse all the time: linguistic minimalism.

And then this article here, too, is the same thing:

“Glasgow Parenting Support Framework Evaluation. The implementation of a public health approach to parenting support in Glasgow, with its National Health Service infrastructure... ”

Alan: See, it’s all about the National Health Service that’s all in cahoots with UNICEF on this and America (the U.S.) is going to go into its National Health system. This is what it’s all about. It’s nothing to do with a better system for the people. It’s so as they can monitor you, exploit you, stick a lot of needles in your arms and give you drugs and all that kind of stuff, and label people as potential future problems. It says,

“We aim to establish the effectiveness of the Glasgow Parenting Support Framework. The main part of our research assesses the emotional and social wellbeing of children from aged 30 months until the age of ten using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire...”

Alan: Now, there’s another program that they have that takes over from that and goes on for the whole of your life, by the way. But I’ll put these up. And it talks about all the data collection that they’ve got as well on all of this. And every child is going to have all their data, day by day, stuck into this computer system. Great stuff, eh? That’s coming to be worldwide, you understand. This is a test bed for worldwide stuff. And Sarkozy was even involved in the setting up of this system in Britain.

And we all remember (some of us remember), the New American Century crew. It was a doublespeak to hide something. A lot of folk had dual citizenship that were all around Bush Jr. A lot of them had dual citizenship with the U.S. and Israel; that was well known. It was in all the press. Etc etc. And so naturally, they were all for Israel first, in other words too. It seems that Romney... and this is a Foreign Relations, CFR article, by the way, but he is going through the same stuff, because that’s his job, not that Obama hasn’t. Obama simply took over the New American Century and he took out a few countries and started up another one, ready to fall as well. And in will come the next knight in shining armor when you’re fed up with Obama and it’s the same thing all over again, the New American Century group behind Romney. It says,

“Can Romney Put Foreign Policy in Play?”

Alan: It says. CFR.

“In the first foreign policy speech following his momentum-gaining debate against President Barack Obama, GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney expanded on his vision of an ‘American century...’”

Alan: There you are: a new American century.

“... a view he tied to the legacy of leaders like General George Marshall as he outlined a muscular, moral U.S. foreign policy with American exceptionalism at its core.”

Alan: Which means nothing at all.

“Romney aimed to distinguish his world view from the president’s... ”

Alan: That’s Obama’s.

“... as he has in far-lower-profile foreign policy speeches, promising to "change course" in the Middle East by helping to provide arms to Syrian rebels ”

Alan: Well, Obama’s already doing that.

“... and talking and acting even tougher on Iran.”

Alan: Well, you have to do that because he went over to Israel to get the kiss of Netanyahu and that was in the mainstream papers. That’s who’s backing them all. He says,

“‘It is the responsibility of our president,’ Romney said Monday at the Virginia Military Institute, ‘to use America’s great power to shape history – not to lead from behind, leaving our destiny at the mercy of events.’”

Alan: That’s exactly what they said with the New American Century group.

“‘Unfortunately, that is exactly where we find ourselves in the Middle East under President Obama.’”

Alan: It says,

“Romney wove together a constellation of tumultuous events in the Middle East that he said has left ‘the risk of conflict in the region’ higher ‘now than when the president took office.’ And he promised what amounted to a middle ground between President George W. Bush’s activist ‘freedom agenda’...”

Alan: “Freedom agenda” was also called “revolutionary democracy,” where you go and invade them and you force democracy on them. That what we’ve been doing.

“... and the pragmatic and downsized ambitions of an America exhausted and depleted by two wars in one decade.”

Alan: Never minding Gulf War I. It was a continuation of Gulf War I. That’s like twenty-odd years. So, anyway, it’s the same old thing so that the New American Century is back in the saddle. And there’s some interesting things, too. I’ll put up one from Veterans Today. They really bash the guys that are behind Romney as well and say much the same thing. It’s the same bunch in behind Romney. And they do mention a few things. A lot of people won’t like this article but they do mention a few things.

“And what’s worse...”

Alan: It says,

“... they control most of the United States Federal Court system and mainstream media, and are running the campaign of presidential candidate Mitt Romney.”

Alan: It says,

“Romney’s top foreign policy advisor is Rabbi Dov Zakheim, one of the leading suspected hands-on designers and controllers of the... ”

Alan: They call it:

“... Israeli-instigated 9/11 false-flag operation. On May 4th, 2001, Zakheim was appointed Comptroller of the Pentagon...”

Alan: That’s where they handle all the cash and budgets.

“... where he proceeded to ‘lose’ at least 2.3 trillion dollars – a sum amounting to more than five times the Pentagon’s annual budget. (CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer says the actual sum is 9.1 trillion dollars.) On Monday, September 10th, 2001, Pentagon Chief Donald Rumsfeld announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing from the Pentagon.”

Alan: And the link for that is up on YouTube, as well. You can actually see him talking about that, at the time.

“The oddest thing about this announcement, besides the gargantuan sum, was its timing. It was the first and last time that any significant political figure has ever chosen to announce major bad news on a Monday.”

Alan: Which is true. They always do it on a Friday, then you forget about it. And then they go on about Rumsfeld too, mentioning about all the cash they lost etc etc. and what it’s doing now. But it’s the same bunch, in other words they’re getting at, that’s running, behind Romney as it was behind Bush Jr. That’s what they’re getting at.

The International Monetary Fund was to be the big heavy boy. A heavy is someone who’s a debt collector. For the money boys. That’s generally what they have. And it was set up, again, by the Royal Institute for International Affairs. They’re the boys who came out with the idea of a World Bank, which we have, of course. And they also had a Bank for International Settlements, which would be the big meeting place and coordinator for all the private central banks that would run the world, which they have that too. And the International Monetary Fund would be the big debt collector and heavy that would come into countries that were defaulting because they were broke and the IMF would then run that country behind the scenes until some of it was paid off. Even during Thatcher’s reign, the IMF came in and actually dictated a lot of the British policy, at the time. So, the IMF now (these unelected institutions) cut growth forecasts for the UK economy.

“The International Monetary Fund has slashed its growth forecast for the UK - predicting that the economy will shrink by 0.4% this year.”

Alan: Now, with them doing this, of course, since they’re already borrowing money like crazy, to lend to the Euro Central Bank to throw away at Spain and Italy and elsewhere, they’re going to be paying massive compound interest on this one. High interest rates. That’s what it does when they downgrade you. The banks are running the whole show. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And this article too,

“Leading World Bank Demographer: Vaccination Campaigns Part Of Population Reduction Policy”

Alan: That’s official, folks. “Reduction policy.” I’ll repeat that for the hard of thinking: “population reduction policy.”

“American Undergraduates Recruited For Population Control Agenda As UN Raises The Stakes”

Alan: It says.

“Neo-eugenicist John Seager to undergraduates: ‘you’re the ones who are going to be able to move this forward and complete what I see as one of the great social movements of our time.’”

Alan: That’s convincing the public that they’ve got to die, you know.

“In a recent biennial report released last week by the United Nations Population Fund... ”

Alan: And the link’s on here too.

“(UNFPA) the projection for global population growth in 2050 has been raised with an additional 117 million people on top of the earlier projection of 8 billion people. As the UN keeps up the pressure an effort is underway to flood universities and colleges throughout the United States with population control propaganda. One of the people doing the rounds across academic America is former EPA chief John Seager... ”

Alan: You see, the Environmental Protection Agency, environmental groups and so on, were all part of the same agenda under camouflage. You understand that? It’s all eugenics. It’s all eugenics, folks. Anyway, it says,

“... who now heads up an organization called ‘Population Connection’, dedicated to the selling of human population reduction. On October 3 2012, Pennsylvania State University provided a stage for Seager, president of ‘Population Connection’, an organization promoting the culling of the overall human population. Accepting an invitation by the Institute of Environmental Studies, Seager attempted to convince a hall filled with undergraduates of the need to bring down the population for “sustainability” purposes. In an October 4 article titled ‘Lecturer Explores Population Control Issues,’ the Daily Pennsylvanian reports Population Connection aims to inform no less than three million k-12 students throughout the United States “about this issue and to lobby Congress to garner support for international family planning.’ ‘About 98 to 99 percent of all the population growth is happening in generally very poor places that are very far away [from America],’ Seager told the Daily Pennsylvanian. ‘And to bring this issue to your average American is a very hard challenge.’”

Alan: What he means is, the average American, it’s a hard challenge to get through to them.

“The man who extended the invitation, Stanley Laskowski, explained why he attracted Seager to lecture: ‘population growth is the root of all environmental problems and his insight into the issue at hand is invaluable.’ This is exactly the idea Seager is promulgating across the US. As a former EPA chief appointed by the Clinton administration in the mid 90s, Seager has found an eager audience in the establishment academic scene. During one of his recent lectures, held at the Nicholas School of the Environment, he stressed that man is the foremost enemy to the planet... ”

Alan: That’s straight out of the agenda in the book from the Club of Rome, where they said they were given the task of finding a reason to unite the whole planet and they said that eventually they dreamed up the idea that global warming, famine and plague and the like would fit the bill. And it says,

“... and the global population should be curbed towards what he calls ‘sustainable levels.’ Speaking of the UN’s population projection for the next decades- which will have the human population at 8 billion by 2050- Seager (from 35 minutes onward) stresses that this ‘(…) if we move to that low line on the UN projection- in my view the best possible outcome in terms of human population growth (through voluntary programs)- it would be the biggest single slice of the carbon pie. It would do more than thousand mile per gallon cars. It would do more than that.’ Seager states that technological solutions to Co2 emissions will not be sufficient to prevent global climatic Armageddon.”

Alan: They’re always on about this, you know, these big prophets of gloom and doom, but they have to terrify the public. I’ve read all the articles from these top guys before, where they say they have to always scare the public with scary scenarios and vastly overestimate things to get us to listen to them. Anyway,

“‘Tim Dyson at the London School of Economics found that if we reduced our carbon footprint by one percent a year in the developed world over the next forty years, a hundred percent of that is wiped out by population growth.’”

Alan: It says. So, he

“... argues, the birthrate in the developing countries should be drastically reduced. This is the global consensus in the scientific community today. Whatever we do to diminish our ‘carbon footprint’ in the developed world, only a thorough culling of the Third World population will make sure the earth has a chance of survival.”

Alan: And it goes on and on and on. So, don’t think it’s just over there, folks; it’s happening to you at home, as well. The cancer rates are skyrocketing and disabilities too are skyrocketing, with all the injections and so on and the poisoned food that you’ve been made to eat. And this article ties in with it.

“Hilary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy. During remarks that she made for the 15th Anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development...”

Alan: I’ll read that again.

“...International Conference on Population and Development...”

Alan: They’ve had these for about a hundred years folks. They’re not just sitting, making a wish-list; they implement them.

“... U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the launch of a new program that according to Clinton will now become the centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy. This new program is known as the Global Health Initiative, and it is being incredibly well-funded at a time when the U.S. government is drowning in debt. According to Clinton, 63 billion dollars will be spent by the U.S. to prevent pregnancies and to improve...”

Alan: What they call,

“...‘family planning’ services around the globe over the next six years.”

Alan: It’s abortions and so on.

“In other words, the new centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy is all about eugenics and population control. The following is an excerpt from Clinton’s remarks: In addition to new funding, we’ve launched a new program that will be the centerpiece of our foreign policy, the Global Health Initiative, which commits us to spending $63 billion over six years to improve global health by investing in efforts to reduce maternal and child mortality... ”

Alan: How do you do it? By stopping them having children, folks.

“prevent millions of unintended pregnancies, and avert millions of new HIV infections, among other goals.”

Alan: I wonder what the other goals are, as well. Back with more on this after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And I’ll put up this article with all the rest of these articles tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, all the links up for you to look up yourself. It also has a whole bunch of YouTube’s to watch, to do with depopulation as well and how this eugenic movement has been on for a long, long time, what the real goals are and all the rest of it. It’s quite something. It’s interesting too, that Hilary Clinton is either going across the world convincing other countries to go in and slaughter other people in the Middle East or she’s wanting to slaughter all the children that could be born. So, it’s just, well, what can you say, folks? I mean that’s fact, you know. That’s fact. You’d have to get in the mindset of these people; if you did, you’d have to be awfully strong if you could possibly emerge unscathed by the weird thoughts that go on in their heads. Also tonight, I’ll put up a link to “The Man Who Saved Iceland,” basically, or he changed Iceland. And he was the guy who got the big marches going and so on to chuck all the big international crooks out of their country. I’ll put that up tonight, too. He’s going around Europe right now, giving lectures on how to do the same thing. I hope people take advantage of what he’s saying and try to use it because I’m so sick of watching folk getting their heads bashed in with cops in different countries now. It’s the new normal as the real face of the real owners of you, under all the farce and guises of democracy or whatever they want to call it, as they emerge. See, everything comes down to brute force. You’re really run by brute force or the threat of it; that’s what law is about; intimidation through law followed up by brute force. So, the threat of force and then brute force, as the big boys show just how caring they really are and how evolved they’ve become – your big leaders at the top, behind the scenes. Those who own you, lock, stock and barrel. And always have, by the way. {Laughs}

And this article too is interesting.

“Veteran Law Enforcement Official’s Lawsuit Charges Lesbian Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano With Favoring Gal-Pals For Positions, Says Her Chief Of Staff Suzanne Barr Engaged In Numerous Acts Of Sexually Offensive Behavior To Humiliate And Intimidate Male Employees”

Alan: This is from Washington. It says,

“A veteran US law-enforcement official has filed a blockbuster discrimination lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, charging she pushed him aside to make way for a less-qualified woman who’s “enjoyed a long-standing relationship” with the anti-terror chief. That woman, Dora Schriro, was later appointed by Mayor Bloomberg as commissioner of the city Department of Correction, a post she still holds. The court papers also allege that Suzanne Barr, Napolitano’s chief of staff at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has engaged in “numerous” acts of “sexually offensive behavior” intended to “humiliate and intimidate male employees.”

Alan: Well, once you put a bunch of these folks in, that’s what they do, you know.

“Barr’s alleged acts include calling one man ‘in his hotel room and screaming at him that she wanted...’”

Alan: To do something with his something in the back of her throat. And that was in the mainstream; it’s been in the mainstream too. And so it says,

“The suit was filed by James T. Hayes Jr., special agent in charge of New York City investigations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Hayes, who began his career with the feds as a border patrol agent in 1995, formerly served as director of ICE Detention and Removal Operations in Washington, DC, where he oversaw about 8,500 workers and a $2.5 billion budget.”

Alan: So he was no low-down guy; he was up there.

“But Hayes says he was demoted following President Obama’s election and the appointment of Napolitano, a former Arizona governor, to head the Department of Homeland Security.”

Alan: It says,

“In court papers filed in Washington federal court, Hayes says Schriro — who previously served as director of the Arizona Department of Corrections under Napolitano — was named a “special adviser” to Napolitano on detention and removal operations in February 2009 and began to replace him at DHS and ICE meetings. ‘Schriro was not as qualified for the position plaintiff had because of lack of federal law-enforcement experience,’ Hayes’ suit says. ‘Schriro did have experience, however, working with Secretary Napolitano. Schriro enjoyed a long-standing relationship with the secretary.’ The suit doesn’t detail the nature of their relationship. During her 2002 gubernatorial campaign, Napolitano publicly denied rumors that she’s a lesbian. In a 2009 interview, she said, ‘I just happen not to be married.’ When asked at that time if she was ‘seeing anybody now,’ she answered, ‘Yes, my staff.’ Hayes’ suit says that when it became clear he was going to be removed from his post, he ‘felt that he was being targeted because of his gender.’ He charges that in April and May 2009, ICE chief of staff Barr “removed the entire contents...”

Alan: Listen to this:

“‘... the entire contents of the offices of three male employees, including nameplates, computers and telephones, to the men’s bathroom at ICE headquarters.’”

Alan: So they had to work in the bathroom in their desks, and folk were still going in and out of the bathroom, right, doing their stuff.

“‘Barr also created a frat-house type atmosphere that is targeted to humiliate and intimidate male employees,’ ...”

Alan: You understand, there are folk who hate and these folk tend to truly... and they are haters, these folk. It’s not just chips on their shoulders. It’s beyond that.

“In addition to the alleged hotel phone call, Barr allegedly ‘covertly took an ICE BlackBerry device assigned to a male special agent in charge and sent a BlackBerry Messenger message to his female supervisor indicating that the male employee had a crush on the female supervisor and fantasized about her.’ ‘Further, Barr promoted and otherwise rewarded those male employees who play along with her sexually charged games,’ the suit says.”

Alan: You understand, these people are obsessed with sex, way beyond the average people. Obsessed with it. And they can’t keep it out of the workplace. So, anyway, that’s going ahead with that one. And even Geraldo came up with that:

“Geraldo Rivera Addresses Lesbian Rumors About Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary”

Alan: It says here. And he

“... raised questions about a ‘lesbian cabal’ and ‘same-sex takeover’ at the Department of Homeland Security, went further Monday, encouraging DHS and its head, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, to ‘tell people who they are.’”

Alan: And I’ll put these links up tonight, as well, for those who want to know. And this article too is from the LGBT. It’s from one of their articles here.

“Rights advocates are welcoming news a surgical penis-construction procedure for transgender men will be paid for by public medical insurance in B.C. [British Columbia]”

Alan: It’s a priority, obviously, isn’t it? And it says,

“... for transgender men...”

Alan: Now, it’s really for women who want to have a penis constructed because they want to pretend that they’re men, you see. Because they’re really lesbians and it will help them in a lesbian endeavor, you understand. Anyway,

“Phalloplasty will be covered under the Medical Services Plan (MSP) for up to five people each year, the provincial Ministry of Health has confirmed. After previously rejecting calls to provide such coverage, the ministry decided to make the change following a review this year of recent medical literature on the procedure.”

Alan: And it goes on and on and on about their mental health and how it will really improve and all that kind of stuff. Another article I’ll put up tonight too, is called,

“‘Too easy’: Ex-drone operator on watching civilians die”

Alan: It says,

“James Jeffrey served as an officer in the British Army in both Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2009, he helped guide drones flying over Helmand Province, where he had to make life and death decisions about whether to engage the enemy. Speaking to Orla Guerin, the BBC’s correspondent in Pakistan, he describes how he almost ordered a drone attack on a suspected militant thought to be planting an improvised explosive device. At the last minute the strike was cancelled when he realised the potential enemy he could see on the monitor was in fact a child playing. Mr Jeffrey also talked about witnessing - via a video link from a fighter jet - a missile strike on Taliban targets in built up areas that left several civilians dead. Having now left the military and living in the US, Mr Jeffrey warns that while drones are a precise and effective weapon they have also made it ‘too easy to kill.’”

Alan: “Too easy to kill” and isn’t that the truth. Mind you, Mr. Jones was probably brought up too with video games and X-boxes and all that, so they’re already primed for this kind of stuff, you understand. They’re already primed for it.

And this article too says,

“Eleven dead, thousands in danger amid spreading meningitis outbreak”

Alan: That’s caused by that corticosteroid, which they’ve been injecting in folk, for inflammation of their spine, for arthritis and so on.

“A deadly meningitis outbreak that has left eleven dead, 119 infected and up to 13,000 at risk is taking its toll across the US. With symptoms showing up weeks after exposure, many more patients are expected to get sick. The meningitis-tainted steroid shots were dispersed to health care centers across 23 US states and administered to about 13,000 patients who requested treatment for back pain, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. But the shots have cost many their life.”

Alan: Then it gives you an example of a guy and his wife who went for the shots and his wife died.

“After responding to medication, her spirits were lifted and she spent her time Skyping with her grandsons in the hospital. But shortly thereafter, she suffered a stroke and was removed from life support. ‘They advised me to watch for symptoms,’ ...”

Alan: He says. And he:

“... is just one of thousands watching the clock, waiting and hoping not to acquire any signs of illness. The outbreak has been linked to the New England Compounding Center (NECC), Inc., which is one of thousands of pharmacies that repackages or recombines medications. The Food and Drug Administration has no power to regulate compounded medications made at pharmacies like the one that dispersed the meningitis-tainted steroid shots. Lawmakers claim the health crisis is demonstrating the need for stronger FDA regulations...”

Alan: What a joke, FDA. {Laughs} It’s stacked with guys from big pharma. And:

“Compounding pharmacies often produce cheaper medications.”

Alan: Well they’ll have to put them out of business too, I suppose. It says,

“The NECC had shipped 17,676 vials of the steroid methylprednisolone acetate – which contained the meningitis – to 76 healthcare facilities from July through September. Last week, it recalled all the vials...”

Alan: That they’ve got left, I guess.

“...and voluntarily shut down its services.”

Alan: So, they’ll be looking into it, but it just shows you that we’re all trained to automatically just take medicines when it’s prescribed and of course it doesn’t work out that way and it’s not like the movies.

In Canada, the ex-chief of the First Nations Indians association:

“... will be ‘used as pawns’ as former chief to meet Iranian leaders”

Alan: So, there’s your spin off the bat from the mainstream media. Because this ex-chief of the First Nations Indians, Canadian Indians, is going to go over to see the Iranian leaders. So he’s going to be used as a pawn and that’s the part you’re supposed to remember, you see. Right off the bat. It’s very open, our media in Canada here, you see. And it says,

“A former First Nations chief says he will meet with the Iranian regime in Tehran next week as part of an ‘exploratory mission’ to discuss resource development and ‘human rights abuses’ in Canada, sparking widespread condemnation and concerns about Iran’s intentions.”

Alan: And what they do, they actually have, the opposing person here is Nazanin Afshin-Jam, who is married to the Chief of Defense for Canada. She’s from Iran. And she’s an activist to get all to demolish the present system in Iran. Anyway, it says,

“What do you say to concerns the regime will enlist First Nations to perpetrate violence against Canada?”

Alan: And Nelson says,

“That’s a pretty big stretch. When have First Nations people ever bombed anything? The worst we’ve ever done is make the white man late for lunch when we do our protests in the city street. I’m 59 years old. If I was going to bomb something, I would have bombed it a long time ago. Peter MacKay’s wife... ”

Alan: That’s the Iranian woman.

“... is constantly pushing the Conservative agenda and talking about human rights violations. [Iranian-Canadians] might not like the Iranian government, but does that mean they support the deaths of millions of their people [because of the economic sanctions]?”

Alan: And it is too, this sanctions stuff... it was the same with the Iraqis. It would be the same as you. Just put yourself in the same boat. If some other country was much bigger and larger and you were down a little bit on the totem pole and they put sanctions on you, millions of you would die. How could you get your government out of it? What could you do about it? Nothing. So, starving the population is ridiculous. Anyway, I’ll put this link up tonight and he talks about the fact that he’s pushing for... and it’s true enough, have any of these guys that he’s talking about, has MacKay and his wife, ever gone into any Indian Reserve and looked around there, in Canada, for human’s rights and abuses and all the rest of it? You see everything is a farce and hypocritical, isn’t it? Such hypocrites. As we pretend that we’ve got democracy... what is democracy? What is democracy? Tell me what democracy is. You can’t own your house; they’ll tax it from you. If you can’t afford that, you’re out. You do what you’re told. You’re told not to speak about certain topics—in a free society? Well, obviously, they shouldn’t call us a “free society” if you can’t talk about certain things. Obviously.

I’ll also put this article up tonight too. It’s an article from Slate Magazine and it says,

“How can we ban hate speech against Jews while defending mockery of Muslims?”

Alan: It’s a good article. And it says,

“What have these laws produced?”

Alan: It says,

“Look at the convictions upheld or accepted by the European Court of Human Rights.”

Alan: And it says,

“Four Swedes who distributed leaflets that called homosexuality ‘deviant’ and ‘morally destructive’ and blamed it for AIDS. An Englishman who displayed in his window a 9/11 poster proclaiming, ‘Islam out of Britain.’ A Turk who published two letters from readers angry at the government’s treatment of Kurds. A Frenchman who wrote an article disputing the plausibility of poison gas technology at a Nazi concentration camp. Look at the defendants rescued by the court. A Dane ‘convicted of aiding and abetting the dissemination of racist remarks’ for making a documentary in which three people ‘made abusive and derogatory remarks about immigrants and ethnic groups.’ A man ‘convicted of openly inciting the population to hatred’ in Turkey by ‘criticizing secular and democratic principles and openly calling for the introduction of Sharia law.’”

Alan: He goes through a whole list of them that end up in court, you see. And then they go into the case of a

“Frenchman who sought free-speech protection under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights:...”

Alan: And it says,

“Denis Leroy is a cartoonist. One of his drawings representing the attack on the World Trade Centre was published in a Basque weekly newspaper … with a caption which read: ‘We have all dreamt of it ... Hamas did it.’ Having been sentenced to payment of a fine for ‘condoning terrorism,’ Mr Leroy argued that his freedom of expression had been infringed. The Court considered that, through his work, the applicant had glorified the violent destruction of American imperialism, expressed moral support for the perpetrators of the attacks of 11 September, commented approvingly on the violence perpetrated against thousands of civilians and diminished the dignity of the victims.”

Alan: And it says,

“How can you justify prosecuting cases like these while defending cartoonists and video makers who ridicule Mohammed?”

Alan: That’s true. How can we sit here in other countries and watch all this vilification of Mohammed? And we do. We’re all getting conditioned to do it. You’re always taught to hate an enemy, you understand. You must demonize an enemy. Look at all... you can go up on the websites and look at all the cartoons they brought out for World War II and all the posters, the propaganda posters. You’ll see Japanese with buck teeth and big glasses and that’s how they portrayed them all. And Germans: they were just like robots in big helmets and really just like clones of each other. Demonize the enemy. I’ll put up tonight too, that one I’ve put up many times before to do with “real bad Arabs” and how Hollywood has been training you to hate Arabs for over forty years. But then it says,

“The principle born out of the wretched record of hate speech prosecutions is worth defending but first we have to live up to it.”

Alan: It says. And it gives a whole bunch of good information on it and shows you how much... you cannot be hypocritical. Either there’s no hate-speech laws or everybody goes under hate-speech laws. That’s it. That’s fairness. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And this article too, is to do with Iran, as well. It says,

“In the Washington Post today, Richard Cohen expresses surprise that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is "starting to make some sense" and "wax rationally". Cohen specifically cites this statement from the Iranian president last week:”

Alan: When he said,

“‘Let’s even imagine that we have an atomic weapon, a nuclear weapon. What would we do with it? What intelligent person would fight 5,000 American bombs with one bomb?’ Cohen’s surprise notwithstanding, numerous Iranian leaders, including Ahmadinejad, have long made the same point. And it’s a point so obvious it should not even need to be made. No rational person takes seriously the claim that Iran, even if it did obtain a nuclear weapon, would commit instant and guaranteed national suicide by using it to attack a nation that has a huge nuclear stockpile, which happens to include both the US and Israel. One can locate nothing in the actions of Iran’s regime that even suggests irrationality on that level, let alone suicidal impulses. That Iran will use its nuclear weapons against the US and Israel is rather obviously the centerpiece of the fear-mongering campaign against Tehran, to build popular support for threats to launch an aggressive attack in order to prevent them from acquiring that weapon. So what, then, is the real reason that so many people in both the US and Israeli governments are so desperate to stop Iranian proliferation? Every now and then, they reveal the real reason: Iranian nuclear weapons would prevent the US from attacking Iran at will, and that is what is intolerable.”

Alan: I’ll say that again:

“Iranian nuclear weapons would prevent the US from attacking Iran at will, and that is what is intolerable. The latest person to unwittingly reveal the real reason for viewing an Iranian nuclear capacity as unacceptable was GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the US’s most reliable and bloodthirsty warmongers. On Monday, Graham spoke in North Augusta, South Carolina, and was asked about the way in which sanctions were harming ordinary Iranians. Ayman Hossam Fadel was present and recorded the exchange. Answering that question, Graham praised President Obama for threatening Iran with war over nuclear weapons, decreed that ‘the Iranian people should be willing to suffer now for a better future,’ and then – invoking the trite neocon script that is hauled out whenever new wars are being justified – analogized Iranian nukes to Hitler in the 1930s.”

Alan: {Laughs} We’re way beyond Hitler, folks.

“But in the middle of his answer, he explained the real reason Iranian nuclear weapons should be feared: They have two goals: one, regime survival. The best way for the regime surviving, in their mind, is having a nuclear weapon, because when you have a nuclear weapon, nobody attacks you.’ Graham added that the second regime goal is ‘influence’, that ‘people listen to you’ when you have a nuclear weapon. In other words, we cannot let Iran acquire nuclear weapons because if they get them, we can no longer attack them when we want to and can no longer bully them in their own region. Graham’s answer is consistent with what various American policy elites have said over the years about America’s enemies generally and Iran specifically: the true threat of nuclear proliferation is that it can deter...”

Alan: And that’s what it’s called: nuclear deterrence. That’s why they call it that.

“... American aggression. Thomas Donnelly of the American Enterprise Institute and the New American Century Project has long been crystal clear that this is the real reason for opposing Iranian nuclear capability...”

Alan: And this is what he said, this Thomas Donnelly:

“‘When their missiles are tipped with warheads carrying nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, even weak regional powers have a credible deterrent regardless of the balance of conventional forces … In the post cold war era, America and its allies, rather than the Soviet Union, have become the primary objects of deterrence and it is states like Iraq, Iran and North Korea who most wish to develop deterrent capabilities.’”

Alan: And he added:

“‘The surest deterrent to American action is a functioning nuclear arsenal...’”

Alan: So, that’s what it really is about. It’s also about that too and plunder and standardizing them all (all the countries across there) into the same private central banking system, under the Bank of International Settlements and getting them all in debt. That’s so as that the rich guys of the world can plunder it, like they’ve done with the rest. That’s what it’s about.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

{Closing Music ♫}

Topics of show covered in following links:

The Fabian Laboratory Called Scotland

& More on Above

Romney Commits to New American Century Part 2

New American Century Crew Still in the Saddle

IMF Downgrades Britain's Growth Forecast

American Undergraduates Recruited for Population Control Agenda

Population Control to Become Centerpiece of US Foreign Policy

Icelander Speaks on Technique of Ousting International Mobsters

Lawsuit Against Napolitano

Geraldo Rivera on Lesbian Rumours on Napolitano

B.C. Med. Insurance to Cover Phalloplasty

Drones Make it Too Easy to Kill says Ex- Drone Operator

Meningitis Tainted Cortico-Steroid Injections Put Thousands in Danger

Former First Nations Chief Terrance Nelson to Meet with Iran's Ahmadinejad

& More on Above

Free Speech Versus Hate Speech

Hollywood, Propaganda and Portrayal of "Real Bad Arabs"

The Real Reason US Fears Iran Nukes--They Can Deter US Attacks

#7 · March 13, 2021, 8:14 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:14 am
Nov. 15, 2012 (#1216)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 15, 2012:

Behaviourists have a Ball
When You Down Your Firewall:

"Doublespeak, Doublethink Rules our Day,
Public Adapt and Parrot the Fabian Way,
Kept in Ignorance, They Work and Scurry,
Zone Out on TV, Interrupts the Worry,
Downloaded with Updates While in a Daze,
Fact and Fiction Meld into a Haze,
Targets of Neurolinguistic Programming,
Modifying Behaviour, Evidence is Damning"

Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November the 15^th, 2012. For newcomers, make sure you make good use of cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can go back for years and you can start piecing the system together for yourselves, because what you’re living through is an agenda, a very well-planned, all-encompassing agenda that goes across the whole planet, and the planet is going into the next phase of total control, by a small minority really, that’s been at it for hundreds of years, bringing in the new scientific age where they bring up the people from cradle to grave – if they need you that is, otherwise you’re simply extinguished and you won’t be born at all – and you’ll serve the great system which they’re bringing in, to suit themselves. They believe they have the right to do it. And there’s no opposition because all the institutions that you think of, like education, are all on board with the same thing again. So it’s an all-encompassing system that’s infiltrated every part of what you take as your normal existence. So help yourself to the audios, there’s hundreds to choose from and hopefully you’ll get an understanding of the big picture, where the organizations formed a long time ago to bring in this system, very rich, rich people, rich corporations and international bankers, and they’re still working it out today.

And at the same time too, remember that you are the audience that bring me to you, so you can help me keep going by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and donating. Because these are austere times, as I say, and we’re going through inflation, and of course people are getting laid off all over the world now and so money drops down. As I say, if you want to keep going, you can help me keep going too by putting a few pennies here or there when required, because things are getting pretty tight. [Order and donation options listed above.]

We’re going through massive transitions. This is the Age of Transitions, remember, that was planned and chatted about in academia for the last 50 years before this century came along. Because in this century all of the changes that they’ve been talking about since the Enlightenment have to get pushed forth, where intelligent people run the world, scientists run the world and at the very top of the tree of course, you’ve got the very famous group of people who run all the money system across the entire planet. That’s just how it’s going to be. That’s how it is right now. And everybody is on board because they set up the United Nations to make sure that you’d all sign treaties to make it so. And it has been made so. You’re living through the big, big changes.

Remember too, the Club of Rome said that democracy – which they’d always use as an excuse to con the public; they still use it once in a while, the same terms; it doesn’t really mean anything at all.  TRUE DEMOCRACY WOULD NEVER WORK, they said at the Club of Rome, on behalf of the United Nations. They said that what they’re doing is TRAINING THE PUBLIC TO OBEY AUTHORITARIANISM; AUTHORITARIANISM WAS THE ONLY WAY TO GET THROUGH THIS TRANSITION PHASE INTO THE NEXT STEP. So that’s what you’re living through right now. You’re being trained and trained and trained that authoritarianism is the natural order of things. Most folk will adapt into it; they’ll obey any rules that come along. It’s beautiful, under the guise of antiterrorism too, because people don’t stop to think at all, they’re just rushed along, and they adapt very quickly to this system. But it’s all about transitions, the great transitions that you’re being taught about, going into austerity, which means more profit for those at the top actually, as they give you less for more money, and that’s all energy and everything else as well. Plus you get personal taxes to do with the fact that you’re alive, and you’ll get personal carbon taxes because you’re costing the planet, etc, and apparently there are owners of the planet that don’t like that. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks I’m Alan Watt, we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Most folk of course listen to the news and they simply… They don’t reason through it, what they’re hearing. They just simply download into their minds the bits and bytes that are given to them. Jacques Ellul, I’ve mentioned before, went through the whole process of how people really react to news, or really don’t react to it at all. It programs them to an extent, but they’re not really aware of it. They take on opinions; they are rather vague as to where they get the opinions from, and all the data from. But that’s how folk really are. They’re half-conscious when it comes to listening to news, especially since all the newscasters today and all the stations are pretty well owned by the same people. It’s the same stuff you’re getting over and over, repetition.

We take it for granted now and I’ve read articles yesterday to do with we’re in perpetual war, and they accept perpetual war as being the normal. There are youngsters now putting on the uniforms that were really young when 9/11 happened, and they’ve known nothing except this present system of authoritarianism, and uniforms, and machine guns, and antiterrorism, etc. That’s what I was talking about, that the Club of Rome obviously had in the back of their mind when they mentioned this new authoritarian society, back in the 1970s; see, they always plan way ahead of what happens. And now you’re seeing the Middle East, you’re living through it getting blown up all over the place. And the gunsights keep changing from one country to the next country, just like Orwell talked about...  WHO ARE WE FIGHTING TODAY, EAST ASIA, WEST ASIA, WHO HAPPENS...? And of course you’re not supposed to notice that they keep changing their targets all the time.

That’s the strategy that’s used, because, you understand, experts run your minds. Experts, whole academies of experts run your mind. They employ them. Even when to give the presidential speeches, even the little ones that he gives, all go through all these PR firms, and then it has to go to all these experts on neuroscience and neurolinguistics before it’s given out to the public. Because they make it in such a way that you simply get downloaded with it without thinking much about it, but it does program you and your opinions. Everything is propaganda, and very good propaganda, mind you. It’s not the old stuff that they used to use, the old techniques, it’s much more advanced than that today. Here’s an example of it too. I mean, here is, of course, Israel saying that they’re getting bombarded with these old, old rockets, that can’t hit anything. And of course the Western media, as always, is going along with the whole thing. It says here that…

U.S. and Israel finish largest-ever joint military exercise

jta.org / November 14, 2012

(Alan: What a coincidence that is, they just finished yesterday.)

JERUSALEM (JTA) -- The U.S. military and the Israel Defense Forces concluded Austere Challenge 2012 (A: It costs a lot of cash; it wasn’t that austere.), called the largest joint exercise ever held by the two countries.

The exercise ended Tuesday following a two-day, live-fire exercise that was deemed a success by military observers from the U.S. European Command and the IDF.

The three-week exercise, which began last month and involved more than 2,500 American service personnel and 1,000 Israeli soldiers, was designed to improve interoperability between the U.S. and Israeli militaries and was conducted as part of a long-standing strategic agreement to hold bilateral training exercises on a regular basis.

"We made great strides in improving our tactics and our command and control processes." (A: And the rest of it is just public relations, PR spin, propaganda. But I mean, no one questions this. No one questions why you’re having the US military in bed with, really, a foreign government. Why is that? Why have this mess across the whole Middle East? And very few folk will delve into it and find out why for themselves. They just accept things the way they are, even when they’re getting worse all the time. But I’ll put this link up tonight, and all the other articles, of course I always put up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show.)

Also there’s an old book that’s been reissued again and it says…

AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH:

The Banking ‘Transfer Agreement’ Between Hitler and the Zionists

21stcenturywire.com / November 13, 2012

(A: ...that caused a big stir when it first came out, and that was 25 years ago, but it’s now republished in its 25^th Anniversary republication.)

Best-selling author Black, who himself is Jewish, outlines an apparently coordinated effort between the Nazis, American and European Jewish Zionists and the British, in a financial operation where millions in profit was generated between two banks set up to handle the transfer of Jewish assets out of Germany – Pal Troy (or Pal Treu) Bank in Germany, and the Anglo-Palestine Bank located in British Palestine. (A: Because Britain ran Palestine at that time.) Question: who owned these two banks? With the help of Adolph Hitler and the Third Reich, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to British Palestine (now Israel) between 1933 and 1941 through the “Transfer Agreement” between Nazis and Zionists, where Jewish property with an estimated valued at $100 million – was transferred out in the form of German industrial goods used to build Israel’s early European-style infrastructure. In the beginning, it was all about money, but when the deals soured and America entered the war, the Transfer Agreement came to a halt, and other monies began pouring into Nazi Germany from the bankers in New York.

That stuff all came out too, by the way, in The Crimes and Punishment of IG Farben, the big corporation that the Western banks set up in Germany that created the finances for the whole Nazi military apparatus. And of course, it’s quite amazing in the book because America flew over planeloads of lawyers to defend the private companies, Ford and all these companies were involved in it, IBM, etc., which comprised IG Farben, the umbrella organization. They tried to get them all off the hook. They got most of them off the hook actually, and I think they put one or two low-level guys in prison as a token, for a very short period of time. So there’s nothing really as it seems to be when it comes to government, because governments never tell the public the truth on anything. I mean, that’s just how they are, they never tell the public the truth on anything, and in any level of government either for that matter. They all have their public relations, which is to spin a truth, or deviate from the truth, or get far, far away from any truth, but they never give you the truth. You’re managed like a herd of children and I hope you understand that, and it’s always been that way. It really has always been that way.

Also, in Australia, because of Agenda 21, also called sustainable development, they did what they did to Canada in the fishery industries, and in Canada they were put out of business basically a long time ago, with the same United Nations officials. But they’re doing the same thing in Australia too. It says…

Network of marine reserves put into law

abc.net.au / James Glenday and Lexi Metherell / Nov 16, 2012

The Federal Government has officially put its enormous network of marine reserves into law today.

The plans for the reserves (A: These are parks, in the ocean, by the way.), which cover more than 2.3 million square kilometres of ocean, were announced by the Government in June.

Now after several months of consultation, the areas will be officially proclaimed by Environment Minister Tony Burke.

The network is made up of five zones surrounding every state and territory - see where they are.  (A: And they give you a map to show you where they are.)

Mr Burke says the marine reserves are a world first and will only have a small impact on commercial fishing.  (A: Oh really? Well he’s not a fisherman is he?)

"There's still a further stage of working out the management plan to specify what fishing gear will be permitted in each area," he said.  (A: It’s laws, laws, regulations, laws, just like the Soviet Union, you know. It’s actually worse because we are a step beyond the Soviet Union now, through the United Nations.)

"The principle is the same as national parks, to have some parts of our ocean that are simply protected for nature.

"There are some areas where you've got fishing still continuing but some activities such as trawling are banned.

"You've got some areas where oil and gas exploration is banned and then you've got a number of areas that are highly protected where all forms of extractive activity are banned."

Business affected by the changes will be able to access $100 million in assistance.

They’re putting them all, all the fishermen, out of business. And remember, once they put something on the books and pass it, within a year they’ve expanded it massively to cover more areas and more types of fishing boats and all the rest of it too. That’s how they always work. Get it on the books, just like your carbon taxes when they come in, and then start expanding it and expanding it, all the time. And most folk accept it because they don’t understand they could have a different system than the one they have; they can’t imagine that. Strange, that, isn’t it?

I used to wonder why the Egyptian slaves never ran away. I mean, Egypt, the only time they had rebellions from slaves is when other countries invaded them, and occasionally, a couple of times people conquered them. It was the only time that the slaves suddenly got an idea that they could be free. But the rest of the time they didn’t run away because they had all these magic eyes, and priests, and all these symbols, that they felt that they were getting watched wherever they go and the great god Ra could see right into their heads, so they never ran away. They thought that being bred as slaves – because you were bred, just like they did in America – where they’d match you up with someone else for a certain particular height and strength, but they didn’t want you too bright by the way, because they had ways of doing that too – and you would just grow up your life thinking that was your natural order of things; you know, there’s all kinds of animals and then there’s you.

So that’s how people really are in the world, especially with all the massive propaganda of what they think is bringing them freedom, which is lots of news. It never dawns on them all the lots-of-news is all coordinated to brainwash them further into compliance in everything, under authority. And obedience to authority, I’ve done programs on that before on the radio, it works awfully well. People never question why. As I’ve said before, everything is façade and training, you understand. In the old days it was the King’s men. The King’s men would go around every so often to collect taxes, and if you didn’t have the cash they’d take your house, or they’d take your pigs or your chickens or whatever they could get a hold of. And that was accepted. And they had massive charters that were written down with all the inventories of everything that you owned, right down to the chair that you owned in your little mud hut. Then when it got more and more official and you had governments, then you had better-looking uniforms, and more public relations, propaganda, you think it’s your Army and so on, then you have your police. Your police now stand on the road, like highwaymen, and demand cash off you via tickets and so on; they are given quotas to fulfill. Now, you could see a highwayman standing there with his pistols, and you know this guy is a robber. But when you put a uniform on him you think it’s a different thing. It’s the same. It’s the same thing, a guy’s got a gun on his hip and he’s demanding something from you, and you stop when you’re told or he’ll shoot you. It’s the same with everything. That’s how you’re conditioned into everything, is obedience to authority. It doesn’t matter what the authority is, it can be made normal. Any kind of authority can be made normal; that’s been proven through history. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Also tonight I’ll put up a video that I’ve put up before; it was done in 2003. It’s by an Israeli filmmaker, Yoav Shamir, who shows you “the everyday interaction between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian civilians at several of the region’s Israel Defence Forces checkpoints” and what they go through, to get through all these checkpoints, just to get back and forth and so on.

Checkpoint - every day life in Israel - Documentary - youtube.com

But it’s kind of reminiscent of what’s coming to North America and the rest of the world under authoritarianism, if you understand what you’re looking at. And I mean really understand what you’re looking at. This is like an ageless thing. It doesn’t matter what the uniform is or what country it is, it’s an ageless thing that always ends up, as you have the ones who are superior, financially and militarily, with equipment so on, and the ones who end up losing everything. It’s an old, old story. We’ve had it all across Europe, in Britain and Scotland and so on over the centuries, and nothing really changes. Nothing really changes.

Unfortunately humanity is not a really nice thing altogether. This idea that we’re all the same is nonsense. People are not the same, in any place, even in the same town. You’re not the same. There are nasty people around you, who will do nasty things to the people; and every country and every nationality has got them. But it shows you what’s coming across the whole planet, as I say. You understand, when you watch that, remember, it’s here, in a sense. It’s here. You don’t see the big, big bars at the moment in front of you, but you’re going to see them. Because that is the agenda, folks, under austerity.

This article here too, this other one, is from an Australian. It shows you the attitudes and the mentality of the ones who are up there in politics. I don’t know this particular character but it says…

'Send street thugs to fight wars'

au.news.yahoo.com / GARETH PARKER / November 16, 2012

A Western Australian Labor Member of Parliament has blamed "nastier" violence on the streets on the fact that those who commit such crimes are not being "culled" by being sent to foreign wars.

(A: He sounds like an old old-fashioned Tory that you’d have in Britain, because that’s how they used to do it in Britain. I don’t know that if you realize that up into World War I and World War II, and even afterwards, actually even in Canada it’s happened too, that a lot of people would end up getting the choice if they were in the court, for some petty crime, of joining the military or going to prison. And that’s how a lot of the armies were really created, especially before major wars, before they called people up by law to get into the military, drafting you. So they had to rely on a lot of criminal types. And you find that even in the British Navy, which was famous for it too, where they used to basically shanghai people, and cudgel them, and bag them, bag their heads and they’d wake up on board a ship and that was it until the voyage was over; you belonged to HM King or HM Queen. But here’s this Labor MP in Australia talking about, they’re not culling the people who commit crimes on the streets by being sent to foreign wars.)

During debate in Parliament on legislation to enable uniform R18+ classification for video games, Forrestfield MP Andrew Waddell said violence on the streets was less frequent but nastier.

“I put it that one of the reasons for that is the sorts of people who are committing those violent crimes are the very same types of people who in past times were sent off to fight in wars,” he said.

“The reality is that we are not culling the young any more. We are not sending them off to a foreign battlefield to kill other people any more. And that is why they are on our streets.

“That is the reality. The fact is we have not had a major conflict in a very long time.”

RSL State president Bill Gaynor said Mr Waddell’s comments demeaned professional servicemen and women.  (A: But do they really? Do they really? You understand, there’s different realities at work, between guys who put uniforms on and the ones who rule over them. Remember what Kissinger said when he was asked about it. You understand, the ones who are bringing in this world system, through the guise of science and treaties and all the rest of it, they don’t see any of you, really, as human; you’re all down below, you’re part of the big herd, otherwise you would be up there with them. And they really see and really mean a big distinction between you and them.

Kissinger himself said a truth, to an extent it was a truth. He said the American soldiers... They HATE the military, even though they’ll use them, and wipe them all out if need be, but they’ll use them for their geopolitics. Kissinger said, the American soldier, he says, the soldiers are there for... THEY ARE DUMB STUPID ANIMALS, he said, WHO ARE THERE FOR FOREIGN POLICY. Now, from his point of view he’s telling the truth, the way he sees it. Because at the soldier’s level, he’s given a flag and little bits of tin stars, lots of movies to watch, thinking he’s going to be a hero, and he hasn’t a clue of geopolitics and what the real long-term reasons are for it. He really doesn’t know. Two completely different realities, you understand. And this guy here is talking about putting the crooks back into the military and getting them killed in foreign wars; that way the big businesses can benefit, as these guys get killed off, and conquer at the same time FOR the businesses. That’s an old, old story. That’s what armies are for.

Armies and money go together. Without money you couldn’t get a professional army. You might get little bands of robbers but they wouldn’t hang around for long, they’d drift off one at a time back home and so on, because they would take plunder with them in lieu of cash; they didn’t have money. Once you had money in existence, and those who ruled by money, which still rule today by the way, you could get a complete Army, a regiment formed, train them, keep them there, they wouldn’t wander off, you paid them money, they could use that money to get anything they wanted, and they’d carry on. That’s what wars are about. Wars and money go together. So anyway, there’s different ways of looking at things, as I say, and this guy claims that they should really just be putting them into the military to go off and fight wars. He says…)

“These people choose to enlist,” he said. “They choose to do the training and they become very proficient at the work they are trained to do.”  (A: This is the guy who is rebuffing it. Anyway, there’s different ways of seeing the reality. The ones at the bottom never see reality. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. With all the stuff going on over in Britain with pedophilia and so on, and the big boys getting in and trying to divert it into other areas, and even telling the public to shut up, and telling the media too to shut up about it. Because remember, Jimmy Savile is only one guy, who was a procurer for people above him, and very important people, knighted people just like himself, even higher up the Knighthood ranking step ladder. But here’s an article here, because remember too, when it came out that Savile and Prince Charles were great buddies and all the rest of it, and that Savile had that place in Scotland, he went up and bought that place there to do his little hideaway nasty stuff as well, that Charles would visit him. They had to divert the public away from that, so here’s Scotland here, Scotland. It says…

Members of the Scottish Parliament

(A: ...which is a puppet regime; they didn’t even have the guts to hit back at Van Rompuy of the EU, who said they didn’t want to give Scotland its independence. I know what I would’ve told him, the little prune that he is.)

Give principle backing to 'royal secrecy' information bill

The proposals would cover communications with senior members of the Royal Family

bbc.co.uk/ 15 November 2012

MSPs have (A: ...so the Scottish Parliament...) backed the general principles of a bill that includes plans to keep communications between ministers (A: ...that’s government workers and politicians.) and senior Royal Family members a secret.

The Scottish government had been urged to drop the move, under reforms to freedom of information laws.

Ministers (A: ...politicians...) said the change would bring the situation in Scotland into line with the rest of the UK. (A: What kind of independence is that?)

But Information Commissioner Rosemary Agnew said it effectively eroded the rights of the public.  (A: Well of course it does.)

The secrecy clause was raised during a debate in parliament on the principles of the Freedom of Information (Amendment) (Scotland Bill).

At the moment, information about the Royal Family can be published in Scotland if it passes a public interest test.  (A: Well who is to decide what a public interest test is?)

Ministers want to remove that test under the proposed reforms, thereby banning any release and bringing the situation in Scotland into line with legislation in other parts of the UK.

The amendment would exempt communications with the monarch, the heir to the throne or a member of the royal household acting on their behalf.

The Scottish Parliament's finance committee, which has been scrutinising the bill, said "substantial" arguments had been made against including the Royal exemption, and urged ministers to think again.

The committee also raised concern that the use of "arms length" bodies to provide public services, which were not covered under FoI laws, meant people's right of access to information was also being reduced.

(A: It’s amazing. You know, Scotland’s always been under intense attack. You know, when the big boys came into London and took over England, and based themselves in, you know, The City, with the big banking system, where they brought their pyramid over by the way and stuck it on the Thames – wherever they go they always put an obelisk there, always. Then they hammered at Scotland for centuries and centuries and centuries. Then Scotland, even then it wasn’t defeated; you had a few clans that would fight here and there. But in Scotland, the high ministers in Edinburgh in the 1700s sat together debating about whether they should join England or not, unite the two crowns. It was never ratified, you know; they just adjourned and never went back. We only found that out in the 1990s when somebody at Buckingham Palace came out with the old scroll; it was never signed by anybody. So Scotland has been paying taxes to London for all this time for nothing, never mind guys for their wars and all the rest of it.)

In opening the debate, Ms Sturgeon said there needed to be appropriate measures ensuring the protection of confidential information relating to the monarchy.  (A: Well you better believe that. You better believe that. Dangerous thing to start connecting dots, it can be a very dangerous thing to think, even more dangerous if you actually say anything, obviously.)

Then again, as they try to divert it from Savile, they’re going to small fries that were connected with Savile just to give the public, you know, someone to condemn. It’s the old mob mentality, you understand; you always give them someone to throw stones at. So they always give you a little one at the bottom to throw the stones at.

Police make new arrest in Savile case

reuters.com / Nov 15, 2012

(Reuters) - Police have arrested a man in his 60s from the central English county of Bedfordshire as part of an investigation into alleged child abuse centering on former BBC presenter Jimmy Savile.

Police said in a statement the man, who they declined to name, was arrested on Thursday morning on suspicion of sexual offences and taken into custody.

It said that so far 450 victims have come forward and that police had recorded 200 allegations of sexual assault.

Police are dividing their investigation into three strands: offences allegedly committed alone by Savile, who died last year aged 84, offences committed by him with others and offences committed by others alone.

The statement said Thursday's arrest fell into the third category, "others." It was the fourth arrest in an operation police have codenamed "Yewtree".

Anyway, they’ll give you a few little ones at the bottom. They’ve also arrested some other DJ as well; I’ll put that up tonight as well, an old DJ, but they’re not going for the big boys above, because Savile said it himself.  I CAN GET ANYTHING I WANT, he said. He procures things. And he wasn’t a grass, he wouldn’t snipe out on the ones above him.

Former Radio 1 DJ Dave Lee Travis held as Jimmy Savile probe widens - dailymail.co.uk / 15 November 2012

And here you are, authoritarianism, as folk accept it and accept it and accept it. But mind you, they accept it under a situation they’ve never had before, incredible entertainment. I mean, they’re lapping up all the indoctrination through movies and stuff, that’s teaching them to simply obey authority. They’re addicted to it.

Big Brother is watching: Fears over 'homeland security' streetlights that can record your conversations and track your movements

dailymail.co.uk / Daniel Miller / 27 October 2011

(A: I remember reading that ages ago, but they’ve come out with it in the mainstream.)

Like something out of a sinister Orwellian vision of the future, streetlights with the ability to monitor conversations and announce government warnings are being installed on American streets.

As part of a federally-funded project, manufacturers Illuminating Concepts (A: That’s the name of the company that makes them, Illuminating Concepts…) have begun installing the system, dubbed 'Intellistreets' in the town of Farmington Hills, Michigan.

According to the company’s video presentation the capabilities of the devices include homeland security, public safety, traffic control, advertising and video surveillance features.  (A: And there’s a video that goes with it. It’s almost like a PR thing. It’s like an ad, this thing, in fact. That’s how they always announce this stuff to you. Rather than tell you, are you going to accept this? You know. No. No. They tell you how wonderful the science is, oh wow. Ay-ay-ay.)

Also tonight too I’ll put up a documentary, that I’ve put up before I think, real Cold War Chemical Testing Conducted on the US Neighborhoods; I’ve done that before. There’s another one too, when they were using radiation. There’s quite a few out there actually. There was even one, it was amazing, where in the 50s and 60s you could see these guys in biochemical suits, radioactive suits actually, anti-radioactive suits. They had big massive syringes and they conned these people in the States, it was generally black people, they told them they had cancers and they didn’t and they said we’ll give you free treatment. What they were actually doing was injecting this stuff, radioactive material, into their veins and then monitoring all the tumors that would arise from it all. You know, just for the interest of science, you understand. What a world! And folk still go and vote, you know. They vote. For what? For what?

The Manhattan-Rochester Coalition, research on the health effects of radioactive materials, and tests on vulnerable populations without consent in St. Louis, 1945—1970 -- gradworks.umi.com/35/15/3515886.html / Martino-Taylor, Lisa, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA, 2011

Also I’ll put up tonight too...

Debt crisis: anti-austerity strikes hit Europe

telegraph.co.uk / 14 Nov 2012

Let’s call it what it is, you know, forced-into-poverty strikes – on behalf of the new world order, and the United Nations that came up with all this idea. Austerity is part of Agenda 21, remember, and sustainable development. And you’ve got to live like, you know, happy little rats, basically, and don’t be unhappy. Gross well-being, remember what the chairman of the Federal Reserve says, WE SHOULD PUSH GROSS WELL-BEING RATHER THAN GDP, you see. And of course that’s from the United Nations as well; they’re pushing this all across the world now. Even in Scotland, you know. IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY YOU’VE GOT, HOW HAPPY ARE YOU? AREN’T YOU HAPPY? Bloomberg and his philanthropic organization in the States, has just set it off in the States as well; the first survey of it was in California. They go to California first, right, where they’re really unhappy, eh? But anyway, that’s how you’re managed.

As I say, people are rioting in different countries over it, and I hope there’s more riots to come. Because if they don’t riot now they’re going to really be back to wearing rags, as the rich men get richer, obviously. You have no option. Because the World Bank and the IMF and the European central banks have said that there’s no negotiation here. Up until the year 2020, or beyond, you’re going to be forced to repay, supposedly, all this debt. Now, most of the countries like Britain and that, the debt is from borrowing from these bankers to throw at other countries, to get them out of the hole from the same bankers, this roundabout that they have. So you have to start wearing rags.

You understand, it’s not just about making money. This is an agenda to bring you down into utter poverty, the way you should be living, according to the elite at the top. You’ve had it too good, they say, it’s unsustainable. Remember what the United Nations said years ago? They said, WE CAN KEEP MAYBE A FEW MILLION PEOPLE LIVING AT THIS STANDARD OF LIVING, and at that time they were using America as an example, AND THE REST WOULD HAVE TO LIVE IN POVERTY, OR ALL OF THEM WOULD LIVE IN POVERTY IF YOU SHARED IT OUT. The elite take that to heart. They don’t want to live in poverty, so they’re going to make sure that you are all poor. And you’ll pay more and more and more and more for the same old things. You’re not even eating food anymore, for goodness sake. You don’t know what real food is anymore. You’re eating chemical refuse that’s dumped into the stuff that you eat. And you think that’s food. That’s not what the elite are eating.

And then there’s one here too, it’s called…

Ecocide: The Push to Criminalize Humanity

For the Sake of Saving the Planet

occupycorporatism.com / Susanne Posel / November 10, 2012

By the year 2020, the eco-fascists hope to make ecocide the ultimate crime against the planet. With the green economy (A: Now, what’s a green economy?…) installed, and the mandates of Agenda 21 firmly in place, the only thing left to do is criminalize the entire human race. And ecocide promises to be the definitive “crime against peace”.  (A: You understand, these are the terms that Orwell talked about. People can’t get their minds around the terminology, so they can’t think beyond it. A crime against peace… if you heat yourself in the winter and you can’t afford carbon taxes.)

Tell me something. Has the God of the world risen up there, and we can see this God of the world that owns the planet here? Is mother earth staggering right above us there and saying hey you’ve got to pay me? No. No. No. These are people, folks, just like you, who decided that they rule the planet. And they go to the toilet like you do, and they drop their pants and do the same stuff you do – they may be more expensive pants and on a more expensive toilet, but they’re still the same as you. And what they leave is just what you leave too. Stop! Stop looking at these people as though they’re some kind of gods! And stop looking at science as though it’s a factual reality, objective. It’s not. All sciences are politicized; they are social agendas, just like global warming. Very simple. Very, very simple.

Tonight too I’ll mention about this. It says…

Former Radio 1 DJ Dave Lee Travis is held in the Jimmy Savile sex abuse investigation.

I mean, I don’t know how old this guy is now, but he’s down the totem pole, this guy, way down the totem pole. Then they mention the other ones too like Freddie Starr and Gary Glitter; these guys are 69 and 68 years of age. I mean, for goodness sake, they’re down the totem pole, that were known, and charged, back then, way back then for what they were up to, mainly with young boys, at least Gary Glitter was.

And in Australia. Now, you understand, to get to the top of the tree and get up there and get working for the big boys, you’ve got a put a life in, and you’ve got to go into the United Nations agendas, then you’ve got to parrot all this stuff the United Nations goes along with, and preferably you join an NGO, under socialism. And when you join any organization under the UN umbrella, you must accept ALL of the UN’s agenda, all of it. You can’t say, I like this stuff but I don’t agree with that. You got to accept all of it. But that’s how you get up the tree there, you know, women’s rights, and pro-abortion, and all the stuff that’s getting pushed at the top. That’s what Julia Gillard did, you see. Then she was involved with the unions through her boyfriend…

The $5000 question – claims Julia Gillard's ex-boyfriend Bruce Wilson put cash into her account

dailytelegraph.com.au / November 14, 2012

(A: The media there, she even tried to get laws passed so as they couldn’t mention this.)

Julia Gillard's past continued to haunt her last night, with allegations emerging that in June 1996 a union employee told the national head of the Australian Workers Union that he deposited $5000 cash into her account.

The allegation, outlined exclusively in The Australian today, is that the cash had come from the Prime Minister's then boyfriend (A: That I guess she was living with.), AWU official Bruce Wilson.  (A: He was the head of the AWU union.)

Ms Gillard has always denied any wrongdoing over the creation of a union slush fund on behalf of Mr Wilson and union official Ralph Blewitt during her time as a lawyer for Slater and Gordon.  (A: What the guy apparently was doing was buying houses all over the place and she was involved with him.)

The allegation comes as Mr Blewitt indicated he is willing to speak openly about his role in the union scandal but wants the police to guarantee him immunity from prosecution.

Police have asked the lawyer for a key player in the Australian Workers Union scandal whether his client would provide details about an alleged "slush" fund used by Julia Gillard's former boyfriend Bruce Wilson.   (A: So anyway, money was getting deposited into her account at the same time as she was with this boyfriend, who was in charge of the union with the slush fund and so on and so on. But it goes further, as I say, there’s a whole bunch of homes and different things, they were sinking the money into property apparently. That’s how you get up the ladder, you see. But it won’t matter, because bigger people have put her in place, this Fabian socialist. The Fabian Society.)

You understand, the Fabian Society was set up to bring in the Soviet type system, and even further than the old Soviet type system, using more science, and using the Fabian technique of incrementalism, slow, as the folk adapt and adapt and adapt, until you’re there. The wolf in sheep’s clothing. It goes way back to biblical times, the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Remember Jesus says I SEND YOU OUT AS SHEEP AMONGST WOLVES. Well see, here’s the wolves, pretending that they’re sheep, that’s why they have the logo of the Fabian Society; they pretend they are you, and say all nice things to you, oh they like to help poor people and all that stuff, but they’re actually wolves. And that’s how they would do it. You also see on the stained-glass window of the house where the Fabian Society started up, and you’ll see the founders of it there with the globe, the world, on an anvil, and you’ll see them smashing it into the way it should be, a big hammering the world the way they want it to be. Of course that anvil and the hammer are awfully significant of something too. And these guys literally worked hand-in-glove with the Soviet system all through its period, because the idea was eventually to merge the two together. And the richest people on the planet were all for this, because they funded communism from its very beginning.

But that’s how you get up the ladder, you join all the NGOs, you say all the right things, yes, you know, and abortion, yeah, yeah, and so on and so on. And then you get up there, you’ve proven that you’ve got the right stuff, you got the right stuff, you will not compromise on anything, you’ll stick to your opinions, and force laws down people’s throats, you see, for the good of all, you understand... the greater good. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ll go to Clint from Ontario if he’s still hanging on there.

Clinton:  Yeah, I’m here, Alan. Thanks for taking my call.  I thought I’d call in tonight because you were going on about the UN and stuff and IG Farben. I figured I’d call in and just tie in a man who brought up Codex Alimentarius for us. And his name is Fritz De Meer, the Nazi chemist. If people want to just think for a minute, why the UN would hire a man to implement a program that absolutely controls the world’s food and agriculture? From him being a chemist making Zyklon-b and whatever else he did for the Nazis, for IG Farben, to then going to being Bayer Aspirin, the world’s leading pharmaceutical company, one of them, at the time.

Alan:  That’s right.

Clinton:  And, Alan, if you think about it, how many people in the past 50 years, 60 years have taken an aspirin. You know what I mean. So what the hell has actually been in that stuff? But anyways, for Fritz to go on to the UN and be appointed to help create this Codex Alimentarius, just five years after being released from prison, from the Nuremberg trials, you know, for good behavior. And this guy was probably, if not one of the main masterminds, with everybody else eliminating, what, 6 million Jews they said, in these camps, and other people. So how is this man all of a sudden a saint and they want to have him help everybody in the world with the benefit of food for everybody? You know what I mean? It’s sickening.

Alan:  It is sickening. And when you go into the Soviet system, which was also socialist, remember. The Soviet system gave a lot of prizes from the United Nations for their scientists there that were doing even worse experiments for 40 to 50 years on people. They literally took the tops of their heads off, as they were alive; and there’s even videos of them up there where they did it, actually. You see these guys all lined up in beds, maybe 40 of them in a big long ward, none of them have the tops of their skulls on, and all these guys are probing them and so on and so on. These guys got prizes for that from the United Nations, and all the scientific organizations. Socialism, remember what socialism really means. The guy at the bottom thinks it’s about getting something back for your taxes. It’s not. It’s a complete science of managing the herd from birth to death. Of course that’s why the big right-wing boys are in on it too, because it’s one agenda. It’s two parties – you think it’s two parties, that’s just so you’ll vote. It’s the ONE agenda; they’re both in on the same thing. And it’s disgusting. But tonight too I’ll put up an article, it’s about the Codex Alimentarius, and folk in Canada who have taken a lawsuit against Health Canada as they try to stop it, the bill, going all the way here. They’re banning lots and lots of vitamin pills and stuff that you’ll need these days because the stuff you’re getting called food is rubbish. It’s rubbish.

Clinton:  Do you think that maybe over time, like, because he was a very smart man... There’s no doubt about all of those scientists back then, they were all very smart.  Do you think that maybe they could have perfected something that was put into the food, perhaps that is going to help with the slow kill, of eugenics?

Alan:  Oh, it’s already there. Just go into any supermarket and read all the chemicals, and it’s in all the packaging and the tins. That’s the stuff that’s killing you. And when you go through that and the history... just take one chemical, go through the history of it. They knew back in the late 1800s what killed folk, what made folk infertile, sterilized you and all the rest of it. They know all this stuff. This is not by chance. It’s not by chance that they took a chemical waste, that was highly toxic and lethal, and put it in your toothpaste, and made you buy the stuff. And then put it in your drinking water. They’ve known this for a long time. Bisphenol A, they knew about it in the late 1890s, what it did; it made you infertile as well. There’s no accidents here.

Clinton:  No, none at all. Thanks, Alan, for taking my call.

Alan:  No, none whatsoever. Thanks for calling.

LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST HEALTH CANADA - canadianawareness.org / / November 8, 2012

“NUTRICIDE: THE KILLING CAMPS OF CODEX ALIMENTARIUS”

http://xstatic99645.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/nutricide.pdf1

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

U.S. and Israel Finish Largest-ever Joint Military Exercise

The Banking 'Transfer Agreement' Between Hitler and the Zionists

United Nations Sustainable Development--Australia

Checkpoint - Everyday Life in Israel - Documentary

Australian Politician says Send street thugs to fight wars

Members of Scottish Parliament give Principle Backing to 'Royal Secrecy' Information Bill

Arrest in Savile Case

DJ Arrested in Savile BBC Inquiry

Big Brother is watching: Fears over 'homeland security' streetlights that can record your conversations and track your movements

The Manhattan-Rochester Coalition, research on the health effects of radioactive materials, and tests on vulnerable populations without consent in St. Louis, 1945-1970

Anti-Austerity (Bank Plundering) Strikes Hit Europe

Ecocide--Push to Criminalize Humanity under Guise of Saving Planet

Aussie Prime Minister On the Take?

Lawsuit Filed Against Health Canada for Restricting Sales of Health Products

Killing Camps of Codex Alimentarius

Nov. 15, 2012 (#1216)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Behaviourists have a Ball
When You Down Your Firewall:

"Doublespeak, Doublethink Rules our Day,
Public Adapt and Parrot the Fabian Way,
Kept in Ignorance, They Work and Scurry,
Zone Out on TV, Interrupts the Worry,
Downloaded with Updates While in a Daze,
Fact and Fiction Meld into a Haze,
Targets of Neurolinguistic Programming,
Modifying Behaviour, Evidence is Damning"

Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November the 15^th, 2012. For newcomers, make sure you make good use of cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can go back for years and you can start piecing the system together for yourselves, because what you’re living through is an agenda, a very well-planned, all-encompassing agenda that goes across the whole planet, and the planet is going into the next phase of total control, by a small minority really, that’s been at it for hundreds of years, bringing in the new scientific age where they bring up the people from cradle to grave – if they need you that is, otherwise you’re simply extinguished and you won’t be born at all – and you’ll serve the great system which they’re bringing in, to suit themselves. They believe they have the right to do it. And there’s no opposition because all the institutions that you think of, like education, are all on board with the same thing again. So it’s an all-encompassing system that’s infiltrated every part of what you take as your normal existence. So help yourself to the audios, there’s hundreds to choose from and hopefully you’ll get an understanding of the big picture, where the organizations formed a long time ago to bring in this system, very rich, rich people, rich corporations and international bankers, and they’re still working it out today.

And at the same time too, remember that you are the audience that bring me to you, so you can help me keep going by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and donating. Because these are austere times, as I say, and we’re going through inflation, and of course people are getting laid off all over the world now and so money drops down. As I say, if you want to keep going, you can help me keep going too by putting a few pennies here or there when required, because things are getting pretty tight. [Order and donation options listed above.]

We’re going through massive transitions. This is the Age of Transitions, remember, that was planned and chatted about in academia for the last 50 years before this century came along. Because in this century all of the changes that they’ve been talking about since the Enlightenment have to get pushed forth, where intelligent people run the world, scientists run the world and at the very top of the tree of course, you’ve got the very famous group of people who run all the money system across the entire planet. That’s just how it’s going to be. That’s how it is right now. And everybody is on board because they set up the United Nations to make sure that you’d all sign treaties to make it so. And it has been made so. You’re living through the big, big changes.

Remember too, the Club of Rome said that democracy – which they’d always use as an excuse to con the public; they still use it once in a while, the same terms; it doesn’t really mean anything at all. TRUE DEMOCRACY WOULD NEVER WORK, they said at the Club of Rome, on behalf of the United Nations. They said that what they’re doing is TRAINING THE PUBLIC TO OBEY AUTHORITARIANISM; AUTHORITARIANISM WAS THE ONLY WAY TO GET THROUGH THIS TRANSITION PHASE INTO THE NEXT STEP. So that’s what you’re living through right now. You’re being trained and trained and trained that authoritarianism is the natural order of things. Most folk will adapt into it; they’ll obey any rules that come along. It’s beautiful, under the guise of antiterrorism too, because people don’t stop to think at all, they’re just rushed along, and they adapt very quickly to this system. But it’s all about transitions, the great transitions that you’re being taught about, going into austerity, which means more profit for those at the top actually, as they give you less for more money, and that’s all energy and everything else as well. Plus you get personal taxes to do with the fact that you’re alive, and you’ll get personal carbon taxes because you’re costing the planet, etc, and apparently there are owners of the planet that don’t like that. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks I’m Alan Watt, we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Most folk of course listen to the news and they simply… They don’t reason through it, what they’re hearing. They just simply download into their minds the bits and bytes that are given to them. Jacques Ellul, I’ve mentioned before, went through the whole process of how people really react to news, or really don’t react to it at all. It programs them to an extent, but they’re not really aware of it. They take on opinions; they are rather vague as to where they get the opinions from, and all the data from. But that’s how folk really are. They’re half-conscious when it comes to listening to news, especially since all the newscasters today and all the stations are pretty well owned by the same people. It’s the same stuff you’re getting over and over, repetition.

We take it for granted now and I’ve read articles yesterday to do with we’re in perpetual war, and they accept perpetual war as being the normal. There are youngsters now putting on the uniforms that were really young when 9/11 happened, and they’ve known nothing except this present system of authoritarianism, and uniforms, and machine guns, and antiterrorism, etc. That’s what I was talking about, that the Club of Rome obviously had in the back of their mind when they mentioned this new authoritarian society, back in the 1970s; see, they always plan way ahead of what happens. And now you’re seeing the Middle East, you’re living through it getting blown up all over the place. And the gunsights keep changing from one country to the next country, just like Orwell talked about... WHO ARE WE FIGHTING TODAY, EAST ASIA, WEST ASIA, WHO HAPPENS...? And of course you’re not supposed to notice that they keep changing their targets all the time.

That’s the strategy that’s used, because, you understand, experts run your minds. Experts, whole academies of experts run your mind. They employ them. Even when to give the presidential speeches, even the little ones that he gives, all go through all these PR firms, and then it has to go to all these experts on neuroscience and neurolinguistics before it’s given out to the public. Because they make it in such a way that you simply get downloaded with it without thinking much about it, but it does program you and your opinions. Everything is propaganda, and very good propaganda, mind you. It’s not the old stuff that they used to use, the old techniques, it’s much more advanced than that today. Here’s an example of it too. I mean, here is, of course, Israel saying that they’re getting bombarded with these old, old rockets, that can’t hit anything. And of course the Western media, as always, is going along with the whole thing. It says here that…

U.S. and Israel finish largest-ever joint military exercise

jta.org / November 14, 2012

(Alan: What a coincidence that is, they just finished yesterday.)

JERUSALEM (JTA) -- The U.S. military and the Israel Defense Forces concluded Austere Challenge 2012 (A: It costs a lot of cash; it wasn’t that austere.), called the largest joint exercise ever held by the two countries.

The exercise ended Tuesday following a two-day, live-fire exercise that was deemed a success by military observers from the U.S. European Command and the IDF.

The three-week exercise, which began last month and involved more than 2,500 American service personnel and 1,000 Israeli soldiers, was designed to improve interoperability between the U.S. and Israeli militaries and was conducted as part of a long-standing strategic agreement to hold bilateral training exercises on a regular basis.

"We made great strides in improving our tactics and our command and control processes." (A: And the rest of it is just public relations, PR spin, propaganda. But I mean, no one questions this. No one questions why you’re having the US military in bed with, really, a foreign government. Why is that? Why have this mess across the whole Middle East? And very few folk will delve into it and find out why for themselves. They just accept things the way they are, even when they’re getting worse all the time. But I’ll put this link up tonight, and all the other articles, of course I always put up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show.)

Also there’s an old book that’s been reissued again and it says…

AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH:

The Banking ‘Transfer Agreement’ Between Hitler and the Zionists

21stcenturywire.com / November 13, 2012

(A: ...that caused a big stir when it first came out, and that was 25 years ago, but it’s now republished in its 25^th Anniversary republication.)

Best-selling author Black, who himself is Jewish, outlines an apparently coordinated effort between the Nazis, American and European Jewish Zionists and the British, in a financial operation where millions in profit was generated between two banks set up to handle the transfer of Jewish assets out of Germany – Pal Troy (or Pal Treu) Bank in Germany, and the Anglo-Palestine Bank located in British Palestine. (A: Because Britain ran Palestine at that time.) Question: who owned these two banks? With the help of Adolph Hitler and the Third Reich, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to British Palestine (now Israel) between 1933 and 1941 through the “Transfer Agreement” between Nazis and Zionists, where Jewish property with an estimated valued at $100 million – was transferred out in the form of German industrial goods used to build Israel’s early European-style infrastructure. In the beginning, it was all about money, but when the deals soured and America entered the war, the Transfer Agreement came to a halt, and other monies began pouring into Nazi Germany from the bankers in New York.

That stuff all came out too, by the way, in The Crimes and Punishment of IG Farben, the big corporation that the Western banks set up in Germany that created the finances for the whole Nazi military apparatus. And of course, it’s quite amazing in the book because America flew over planeloads of lawyers to defend the private companies, Ford and all these companies were involved in it, IBM, etc., which comprised IG Farben, the umbrella organization. They tried to get them all off the hook. They got most of them off the hook actually, and I think they put one or two low-level guys in prison as a token, for a very short period of time. So there’s nothing really as it seems to be when it comes to government, because governments never tell the public the truth on anything. I mean, that’s just how they are, they never tell the public the truth on anything, and in any level of government either for that matter. They all have their public relations, which is to spin a truth, or deviate from the truth, or get far, far away from any truth, but they never give you the truth. You’re managed like a herd of children and I hope you understand that, and it’s always been that way. It really has always been that way.

Also, in Australia, because of Agenda 21, also called sustainable development, they did what they did to Canada in the fishery industries, and in Canada they were put out of business basically a long time ago, with the same United Nations officials. But they’re doing the same thing in Australia too. It says…

Network of marine reserves put into law

abc.net.au / James Glenday and Lexi Metherell / Nov 16, 2012

The Federal Government has officially put its enormous network of marine reserves into law today.

The plans for the reserves (A: These are parks, in the ocean, by the way.), which cover more than 2.3 million square kilometres of ocean, were announced by the Government in June.

Now after several months of consultation, the areas will be officially proclaimed by Environment Minister Tony Burke.

The network is made up of five zones surrounding every state and territory - see where they are. (A: And they give you a map to show you where they are.)

Mr Burke says the marine reserves are a world first and will only have a small impact on commercial fishing. (A: Oh really? Well he’s not a fisherman is he?)

"There's still a further stage of working out the management plan to specify what fishing gear will be permitted in each area," he said. (A: It’s laws, laws, regulations, laws, just like the Soviet Union, you know. It’s actually worse because we are a step beyond the Soviet Union now, through the United Nations.)

"The principle is the same as national parks, to have some parts of our ocean that are simply protected for nature.

"There are some areas where you've got fishing still continuing but some activities such as trawling are banned.

"You've got some areas where oil and gas exploration is banned and then you've got a number of areas that are highly protected where all forms of extractive activity are banned."

Business affected by the changes will be able to access $100 million in assistance.

They’re putting them all, all the fishermen, out of business. And remember, once they put something on the books and pass it, within a year they’ve expanded it massively to cover more areas and more types of fishing boats and all the rest of it too. That’s how they always work. Get it on the books, just like your carbon taxes when they come in, and then start expanding it and expanding it, all the time. And most folk accept it because they don’t understand they could have a different system than the one they have; they can’t imagine that. Strange, that, isn’t it?

I used to wonder why the Egyptian slaves never ran away. I mean, Egypt, the only time they had rebellions from slaves is when other countries invaded them, and occasionally, a couple of times people conquered them. It was the only time that the slaves suddenly got an idea that they could be free. But the rest of the time they didn’t run away because they had all these magic eyes, and priests, and all these symbols, that they felt that they were getting watched wherever they go and the great god Ra could see right into their heads, so they never ran away. They thought that being bred as slaves – because you were bred, just like they did in America – where they’d match you up with someone else for a certain particular height and strength, but they didn’t want you too bright by the way, because they had ways of doing that too – and you would just grow up your life thinking that was your natural order of things; you know, there’s all kinds of animals and then there’s you.

So that’s how people really are in the world, especially with all the massive propaganda of what they think is bringing them freedom, which is lots of news. It never dawns on them all the lots-of-news is all coordinated to brainwash them further into compliance in everything, under authority. And obedience to authority, I’ve done programs on that before on the radio, it works awfully well. People never question why. As I’ve said before, everything is façade and training, you understand. In the old days it was the King’s men. The King’s men would go around every so often to collect taxes, and if you didn’t have the cash they’d take your house, or they’d take your pigs or your chickens or whatever they could get a hold of. And that was accepted. And they had massive charters that were written down with all the inventories of everything that you owned, right down to the chair that you owned in your little mud hut. Then when it got more and more official and you had governments, then you had better-looking uniforms, and more public relations, propaganda, you think it’s your Army and so on, then you have your police. Your police now stand on the road, like highwaymen, and demand cash off you via tickets and so on; they are given quotas to fulfill. Now, you could see a highwayman standing there with his pistols, and you know this guy is a robber. But when you put a uniform on him you think it’s a different thing. It’s the same. It’s the same thing, a guy’s got a gun on his hip and he’s demanding something from you, and you stop when you’re told or he’ll shoot you. It’s the same with everything. That’s how you’re conditioned into everything, is obedience to authority. It doesn’t matter what the authority is, it can be made normal. Any kind of authority can be made normal; that’s been proven through history. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Also tonight I’ll put up a video that I’ve put up before; it was done in 2003. It’s by an Israeli filmmaker, Yoav Shamir, who shows you “the everyday interaction between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian civilians at several of the region’s Israel Defence Forces checkpoints” and what they go through, to get through all these checkpoints, just to get back and forth and so on.

Checkpoint - every day life in Israel - Documentary - youtube.com

But it’s kind of reminiscent of what’s coming to North America and the rest of the world under authoritarianism, if you understand what you’re looking at. And I mean really understand what you’re looking at. This is like an ageless thing. It doesn’t matter what the uniform is or what country it is, it’s an ageless thing that always ends up, as you have the ones who are superior, financially and militarily, with equipment so on, and the ones who end up losing everything. It’s an old, old story. We’ve had it all across Europe, in Britain and Scotland and so on over the centuries, and nothing really changes. Nothing really changes.

Unfortunately humanity is not a really nice thing altogether. This idea that we’re all the same is nonsense. People are not the same, in any place, even in the same town. You’re not the same. There are nasty people around you, who will do nasty things to the people; and every country and every nationality has got them. But it shows you what’s coming across the whole planet, as I say. You understand, when you watch that, remember, it’s here, in a sense. It’s here. You don’t see the big, big bars at the moment in front of you, but you’re going to see them. Because that is the agenda, folks, under austerity.

This article here too, this other one, is from an Australian. It shows you the attitudes and the mentality of the ones who are up there in politics. I don’t know this particular character but it says…

'Send street thugs to fight wars'

au.news.yahoo.com / GARETH PARKER / November 16, 2012

A Western Australian Labor Member of Parliament has blamed "nastier" violence on the streets on the fact that those who commit such crimes are not being "culled" by being sent to foreign wars.

(A: He sounds like an old old-fashioned Tory that you’d have in Britain, because that’s how they used to do it in Britain. I don’t know that if you realize that up into World War I and World War II, and even afterwards, actually even in Canada it’s happened too, that a lot of people would end up getting the choice if they were in the court, for some petty crime, of joining the military or going to prison. And that’s how a lot of the armies were really created, especially before major wars, before they called people up by law to get into the military, drafting you. So they had to rely on a lot of criminal types. And you find that even in the British Navy, which was famous for it too, where they used to basically shanghai people, and cudgel them, and bag them, bag their heads and they’d wake up on board a ship and that was it until the voyage was over; you belonged to HM King or HM Queen. But here’s this Labor MP in Australia talking about, they’re not culling the people who commit crimes on the streets by being sent to foreign wars.)

During debate in Parliament on legislation to enable uniform R18+ classification for video games, Forrestfield MP Andrew Waddell said violence on the streets was less frequent but nastier.

“I put it that one of the reasons for that is the sorts of people who are committing those violent crimes are the very same types of people who in past times were sent off to fight in wars,” he said.

“The reality is that we are not culling the young any more. We are not sending them off to a foreign battlefield to kill other people any more. And that is why they are on our streets.

“That is the reality. The fact is we have not had a major conflict in a very long time.”

RSL State president Bill Gaynor said Mr Waddell’s comments demeaned professional servicemen and women. (A: But do they really? Do they really? You understand, there’s different realities at work, between guys who put uniforms on and the ones who rule over them. Remember what Kissinger said when he was asked about it. You understand, the ones who are bringing in this world system, through the guise of science and treaties and all the rest of it, they don’t see any of you, really, as human; you’re all down below, you’re part of the big herd, otherwise you would be up there with them. And they really see and really mean a big distinction between you and them.

Kissinger himself said a truth, to an extent it was a truth. He said the American soldiers... They HATE the military, even though they’ll use them, and wipe them all out if need be, but they’ll use them for their geopolitics. Kissinger said, the American soldier, he says, the soldiers are there for... THEY ARE DUMB STUPID ANIMALS, he said, WHO ARE THERE FOR FOREIGN POLICY. Now, from his point of view he’s telling the truth, the way he sees it. Because at the soldier’s level, he’s given a flag and little bits of tin stars, lots of movies to watch, thinking he’s going to be a hero, and he hasn’t a clue of geopolitics and what the real long-term reasons are for it. He really doesn’t know. Two completely different realities, you understand. And this guy here is talking about putting the crooks back into the military and getting them killed in foreign wars; that way the big businesses can benefit, as these guys get killed off, and conquer at the same time FOR the businesses. That’s an old, old story. That’s what armies are for.

Armies and money go together. Without money you couldn’t get a professional army. You might get little bands of robbers but they wouldn’t hang around for long, they’d drift off one at a time back home and so on, because they would take plunder with them in lieu of cash; they didn’t have money. Once you had money in existence, and those who ruled by money, which still rule today by the way, you could get a complete Army, a regiment formed, train them, keep them there, they wouldn’t wander off, you paid them money, they could use that money to get anything they wanted, and they’d carry on. That’s what wars are about. Wars and money go together. So anyway, there’s different ways of looking at things, as I say, and this guy claims that they should really just be putting them into the military to go off and fight wars. He says…)

“These people choose to enlist,” he said. “They choose to do the training and they become very proficient at the work they are trained to do.” (A: This is the guy who is rebuffing it. Anyway, there’s different ways of seeing the reality. The ones at the bottom never see reality. Back with more after this break.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. With all the stuff going on over in Britain with pedophilia and so on, and the big boys getting in and trying to divert it into other areas, and even telling the public to shut up, and telling the media too to shut up about it. Because remember, Jimmy Savile is only one guy, who was a procurer for people above him, and very important people, knighted people just like himself, even higher up the Knighthood ranking step ladder. But here’s an article here, because remember too, when it came out that Savile and Prince Charles were great buddies and all the rest of it, and that Savile had that place in Scotland, he went up and bought that place there to do his little hideaway nasty stuff as well, that Charles would visit him. They had to divert the public away from that, so here’s Scotland here, Scotland. It says…

Members of the Scottish Parliament

(A: ...which is a puppet regime; they didn’t even have the guts to hit back at Van Rompuy of the EU, who said they didn’t want to give Scotland its independence. I know what I would’ve told him, the little prune that he is.)

Give principle backing to 'royal secrecy' information bill

The proposals would cover communications with senior members of the Royal Family

bbc.co.uk/ 15 November 2012

MSPs have (A: ...so the Scottish Parliament...) backed the general principles of a bill that includes plans to keep communications between ministers (A: ...that’s government workers and politicians.) and senior Royal Family members a secret.

The Scottish government had been urged to drop the move, under reforms to freedom of information laws.

Ministers (A: ...politicians...) said the change would bring the situation in Scotland into line with the rest of the UK. (A: What kind of independence is that?)

But Information Commissioner Rosemary Agnew said it effectively eroded the rights of the public. (A: Well of course it does.)

The secrecy clause was raised during a debate in parliament on the principles of the Freedom of Information (Amendment) (Scotland Bill).

At the moment, information about the Royal Family can be published in Scotland if it passes a public interest test. (A: Well who is to decide what a public interest test is?)

Ministers want to remove that test under the proposed reforms, thereby banning any release and bringing the situation in Scotland into line with legislation in other parts of the UK.

The amendment would exempt communications with the monarch, the heir to the throne or a member of the royal household acting on their behalf.

The Scottish Parliament's finance committee, which has been scrutinising the bill, said "substantial" arguments had been made against including the Royal exemption, and urged ministers to think again.

The committee also raised concern that the use of "arms length" bodies to provide public services, which were not covered under FoI laws, meant people's right of access to information was also being reduced.

(A: It’s amazing. You know, Scotland’s always been under intense attack. You know, when the big boys came into London and took over England, and based themselves in, you know, The City, with the big banking system, where they brought their pyramid over by the way and stuck it on the Thames – wherever they go they always put an obelisk there, always. Then they hammered at Scotland for centuries and centuries and centuries. Then Scotland, even then it wasn’t defeated; you had a few clans that would fight here and there. But in Scotland, the high ministers in Edinburgh in the 1700s sat together debating about whether they should join England or not, unite the two crowns. It was never ratified, you know; they just adjourned and never went back. We only found that out in the 1990s when somebody at Buckingham Palace came out with the old scroll; it was never signed by anybody. So Scotland has been paying taxes to London for all this time for nothing, never mind guys for their wars and all the rest of it.)

In opening the debate, Ms Sturgeon said there needed to be appropriate measures ensuring the protection of confidential information relating to the monarchy. (A: Well you better believe that. You better believe that. Dangerous thing to start connecting dots, it can be a very dangerous thing to think, even more dangerous if you actually say anything, obviously.)

Then again, as they try to divert it from Savile, they’re going to small fries that were connected with Savile just to give the public, you know, someone to condemn. It’s the old mob mentality, you understand; you always give them someone to throw stones at. So they always give you a little one at the bottom to throw the stones at.

Police make new arrest in Savile case

reuters.com / Nov 15, 2012

(Reuters) - Police have arrested a man in his 60s from the central English county of Bedfordshire as part of an investigation into alleged child abuse centering on former BBC presenter Jimmy Savile.

Police said in a statement the man, who they declined to name, was arrested on Thursday morning on suspicion of sexual offences and taken into custody.

It said that so far 450 victims have come forward and that police had recorded 200 allegations of sexual assault.

Police are dividing their investigation into three strands: offences allegedly committed alone by Savile, who died last year aged 84, offences committed by him with others and offences committed by others alone.

The statement said Thursday's arrest fell into the third category, "others." It was the fourth arrest in an operation police have codenamed "Yewtree".

Anyway, they’ll give you a few little ones at the bottom. They’ve also arrested some other DJ as well; I’ll put that up tonight as well, an old DJ, but they’re not going for the big boys above, because Savile said it himself. I CAN GET ANYTHING I WANT, he said. He procures things. And he wasn’t a grass, he wouldn’t snipe out on the ones above him.

Former Radio 1 DJ Dave Lee Travis held as Jimmy Savile probe widens - dailymail.co.uk / 15 November 2012

And here you are, authoritarianism, as folk accept it and accept it and accept it. But mind you, they accept it under a situation they’ve never had before, incredible entertainment. I mean, they’re lapping up all the indoctrination through movies and stuff, that’s teaching them to simply obey authority. They’re addicted to it.

Big Brother is watching: Fears over 'homeland security' streetlights that can record your conversations and track your movements

dailymail.co.uk / Daniel Miller / 27 October 2011

(A: I remember reading that ages ago, but they’ve come out with it in the mainstream.)

Like something out of a sinister Orwellian vision of the future, streetlights with the ability to monitor conversations and announce government warnings are being installed on American streets.

As part of a federally-funded project, manufacturers Illuminating Concepts (A: That’s the name of the company that makes them, Illuminating Concepts…) have begun installing the system, dubbed 'Intellistreets' in the town of Farmington Hills, Michigan.

According to the company’s video presentation the capabilities of the devices include homeland security, public safety, traffic control, advertising and video surveillance features. (A: And there’s a video that goes with it. It’s almost like a PR thing. It’s like an ad, this thing, in fact. That’s how they always announce this stuff to you. Rather than tell you, are you going to accept this? You know. No. No. They tell you how wonderful the science is, oh wow. Ay-ay-ay.)

Also tonight too I’ll put up a documentary, that I’ve put up before I think, real Cold War Chemical Testing Conducted on the US Neighborhoods; I’ve done that before. There’s another one too, when they were using radiation. There’s quite a few out there actually. There was even one, it was amazing, where in the 50s and 60s you could see these guys in biochemical suits, radioactive suits actually, anti-radioactive suits. They had big massive syringes and they conned these people in the States, it was generally black people, they told them they had cancers and they didn’t and they said we’ll give you free treatment. What they were actually doing was injecting this stuff, radioactive material, into their veins and then monitoring all the tumors that would arise from it all. You know, just for the interest of science, you understand. What a world! And folk still go and vote, you know. They vote. For what? For what?

The Manhattan-Rochester Coalition, research on the health effects of radioactive materials, and tests on vulnerable populations without consent in St. Louis, 1945—1970 -- gradworks.umi.com/35/15/3515886.html / Martino-Taylor, Lisa, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA, 2011

Also I’ll put up tonight too...

Debt crisis: anti-austerity strikes hit Europe

telegraph.co.uk / 14 Nov 2012

Let’s call it what it is, you know, forced-into-poverty strikes – on behalf of the new world order, and the United Nations that came up with all this idea. Austerity is part of Agenda 21, remember, and sustainable development. And you’ve got to live like, you know, happy little rats, basically, and don’t be unhappy. Gross well-being, remember what the chairman of the Federal Reserve says, WE SHOULD PUSH GROSS WELL-BEING RATHER THAN GDP, you see. And of course that’s from the United Nations as well; they’re pushing this all across the world now. Even in Scotland, you know. IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY YOU’VE GOT, HOW HAPPY ARE YOU? AREN’T YOU HAPPY? Bloomberg and his philanthropic organization in the States, has just set it off in the States as well; the first survey of it was in California. They go to California first, right, where they’re really unhappy, eh? But anyway, that’s how you’re managed.

As I say, people are rioting in different countries over it, and I hope there’s more riots to come. Because if they don’t riot now they’re going to really be back to wearing rags, as the rich men get richer, obviously. You have no option. Because the World Bank and the IMF and the European central banks have said that there’s no negotiation here. Up until the year 2020, or beyond, you’re going to be forced to repay, supposedly, all this debt. Now, most of the countries like Britain and that, the debt is from borrowing from these bankers to throw at other countries, to get them out of the hole from the same bankers, this roundabout that they have. So you have to start wearing rags.

You understand, it’s not just about making money. This is an agenda to bring you down into utter poverty, the way you should be living, according to the elite at the top. You’ve had it too good, they say, it’s unsustainable. Remember what the United Nations said years ago? They said, WE CAN KEEP MAYBE A FEW MILLION PEOPLE LIVING AT THIS STANDARD OF LIVING, and at that time they were using America as an example, AND THE REST WOULD HAVE TO LIVE IN POVERTY, OR ALL OF THEM WOULD LIVE IN POVERTY IF YOU SHARED IT OUT. The elite take that to heart. They don’t want to live in poverty, so they’re going to make sure that you are all poor. And you’ll pay more and more and more and more for the same old things. You’re not even eating food anymore, for goodness sake. You don’t know what real food is anymore. You’re eating chemical refuse that’s dumped into the stuff that you eat. And you think that’s food. That’s not what the elite are eating.

And then there’s one here too, it’s called…

Ecocide: The Push to Criminalize Humanity

For the Sake of Saving the Planet

occupycorporatism.com / Susanne Posel / November 10, 2012

By the year 2020, the eco-fascists hope to make ecocide the ultimate crime against the planet. With the green economy (A: Now, what’s a green economy?…) installed, and the mandates of Agenda 21 firmly in place, the only thing left to do is criminalize the entire human race. And ecocide promises to be the definitive “crime against peace”. (A: You understand, these are the terms that Orwell talked about. People can’t get their minds around the terminology, so they can’t think beyond it. A crime against peace… if you heat yourself in the winter and you can’t afford carbon taxes.)

Tell me something. Has the God of the world risen up there, and we can see this God of the world that owns the planet here? Is mother earth staggering right above us there and saying hey you’ve got to pay me? No. No. No. These are people, folks, just like you, who decided that they rule the planet. And they go to the toilet like you do, and they drop their pants and do the same stuff you do – they may be more expensive pants and on a more expensive toilet, but they’re still the same as you. And what they leave is just what you leave too. Stop! Stop looking at these people as though they’re some kind of gods! And stop looking at science as though it’s a factual reality, objective. It’s not. All sciences are politicized; they are social agendas, just like global warming. Very simple. Very, very simple.

Tonight too I’ll mention about this. It says…

Former Radio 1 DJ Dave Lee Travis is held in the Jimmy Savile sex abuse investigation.

I mean, I don’t know how old this guy is now, but he’s down the totem pole, this guy, way down the totem pole. Then they mention the other ones too like Freddie Starr and Gary Glitter; these guys are 69 and 68 years of age. I mean, for goodness sake, they’re down the totem pole, that were known, and charged, back then, way back then for what they were up to, mainly with young boys, at least Gary Glitter was.

And in Australia. Now, you understand, to get to the top of the tree and get up there and get working for the big boys, you’ve got a put a life in, and you’ve got to go into the United Nations agendas, then you’ve got to parrot all this stuff the United Nations goes along with, and preferably you join an NGO, under socialism. And when you join any organization under the UN umbrella, you must accept ALL of the UN’s agenda, all of it. You can’t say, I like this stuff but I don’t agree with that. You got to accept all of it. But that’s how you get up the tree there, you know, women’s rights, and pro-abortion, and all the stuff that’s getting pushed at the top. That’s what Julia Gillard did, you see. Then she was involved with the unions through her boyfriend…

The $5000 question – claims Julia Gillard's ex-boyfriend Bruce Wilson put cash into her account

dailytelegraph.com.au / November 14, 2012

(A: The media there, she even tried to get laws passed so as they couldn’t mention this.)

Julia Gillard's past continued to haunt her last night, with allegations emerging that in June 1996 a union employee told the national head of the Australian Workers Union that he deposited $5000 cash into her account.

The allegation, outlined exclusively in The Australian today, is that the cash had come from the Prime Minister's then boyfriend (A: That I guess she was living with.), AWU official Bruce Wilson. (A: He was the head of the AWU union.)

Ms Gillard has always denied any wrongdoing over the creation of a union slush fund on behalf of Mr Wilson and union official Ralph Blewitt during her time as a lawyer for Slater and Gordon. (A: What the guy apparently was doing was buying houses all over the place and she was involved with him.)

The allegation comes as Mr Blewitt indicated he is willing to speak openly about his role in the union scandal but wants the police to guarantee him immunity from prosecution.

Police have asked the lawyer for a key player in the Australian Workers Union scandal whether his client would provide details about an alleged "slush" fund used by Julia Gillard's former boyfriend Bruce Wilson. (A: So anyway, money was getting deposited into her account at the same time as she was with this boyfriend, who was in charge of the union with the slush fund and so on and so on. But it goes further, as I say, there’s a whole bunch of homes and different things, they were sinking the money into property apparently. That’s how you get up the ladder, you see. But it won’t matter, because bigger people have put her in place, this Fabian socialist. The Fabian Society.)

You understand, the Fabian Society was set up to bring in the Soviet type system, and even further than the old Soviet type system, using more science, and using the Fabian technique of incrementalism, slow, as the folk adapt and adapt and adapt, until you’re there. The wolf in sheep’s clothing. It goes way back to biblical times, the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Remember Jesus says I SEND YOU OUT AS SHEEP AMONGST WOLVES. Well see, here’s the wolves, pretending that they’re sheep, that’s why they have the logo of the Fabian Society; they pretend they are you, and say all nice things to you, oh they like to help poor people and all that stuff, but they’re actually wolves. And that’s how they would do it. You also see on the stained-glass window of the house where the Fabian Society started up, and you’ll see the founders of it there with the globe, the world, on an anvil, and you’ll see them smashing it into the way it should be, a big hammering the world the way they want it to be. Of course that anvil and the hammer are awfully significant of something too. And these guys literally worked hand-in-glove with the Soviet system all through its period, because the idea was eventually to merge the two together. And the richest people on the planet were all for this, because they funded communism from its very beginning.

But that’s how you get up the ladder, you join all the NGOs, you say all the right things, yes, you know, and abortion, yeah, yeah, and so on and so on. And then you get up there, you’ve proven that you’ve got the right stuff, you got the right stuff, you will not compromise on anything, you’ll stick to your opinions, and force laws down people’s throats, you see, for the good of all, you understand... the greater good. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ll go to Clint from Ontario if he’s still hanging on there.

Clinton: Yeah, I’m here, Alan. Thanks for taking my call. I thought I’d call in tonight because you were going on about the UN and stuff and IG Farben. I figured I’d call in and just tie in a man who brought up Codex Alimentarius for us. And his name is Fritz De Meer, the Nazi chemist. If people want to just think for a minute, why the UN would hire a man to implement a program that absolutely controls the world’s food and agriculture? From him being a chemist making Zyklon-b and whatever else he did for the Nazis, for IG Farben, to then going to being Bayer Aspirin, the world’s leading pharmaceutical company, one of them, at the time.

Alan: That’s right.

Clinton: And, Alan, if you think about it, how many people in the past 50 years, 60 years have taken an aspirin. You know what I mean. So what the hell has actually been in that stuff? But anyways, for Fritz to go on to the UN and be appointed to help create this Codex Alimentarius, just five years after being released from prison, from the Nuremberg trials, you know, for good behavior. And this guy was probably, if not one of the main masterminds, with everybody else eliminating, what, 6 million Jews they said, in these camps, and other people. So how is this man all of a sudden a saint and they want to have him help everybody in the world with the benefit of food for everybody? You know what I mean? It’s sickening.

Alan: It is sickening. And when you go into the Soviet system, which was also socialist, remember. The Soviet system gave a lot of prizes from the United Nations for their scientists there that were doing even worse experiments for 40 to 50 years on people. They literally took the tops of their heads off, as they were alive; and there’s even videos of them up there where they did it, actually. You see these guys all lined up in beds, maybe 40 of them in a big long ward, none of them have the tops of their skulls on, and all these guys are probing them and so on and so on. These guys got prizes for that from the United Nations, and all the scientific organizations. Socialism, remember what socialism really means. The guy at the bottom thinks it’s about getting something back for your taxes. It’s not. It’s a complete science of managing the herd from birth to death. Of course that’s why the big right-wing boys are in on it too, because it’s one agenda. It’s two parties – you think it’s two parties, that’s just so you’ll vote. It’s the ONE agenda; they’re both in on the same thing. And it’s disgusting. But tonight too I’ll put up an article, it’s about the Codex Alimentarius, and folk in Canada who have taken a lawsuit against Health Canada as they try to stop it, the bill, going all the way here. They’re banning lots and lots of vitamin pills and stuff that you’ll need these days because the stuff you’re getting called food is rubbish. It’s rubbish.

Clinton: Do you think that maybe over time, like, because he was a very smart man... There’s no doubt about all of those scientists back then, they were all very smart. Do you think that maybe they could have perfected something that was put into the food, perhaps that is going to help with the slow kill, of eugenics?

Alan: Oh, it’s already there. Just go into any supermarket and read all the chemicals, and it’s in all the packaging and the tins. That’s the stuff that’s killing you. And when you go through that and the history... just take one chemical, go through the history of it. They knew back in the late 1800s what killed folk, what made folk infertile, sterilized you and all the rest of it. They know all this stuff. This is not by chance. It’s not by chance that they took a chemical waste, that was highly toxic and lethal, and put it in your toothpaste, and made you buy the stuff. And then put it in your drinking water. They’ve known this for a long time. Bisphenol A, they knew about it in the late 1890s, what it did; it made you infertile as well. There’s no accidents here.

Clinton: No, none at all. Thanks, Alan, for taking my call.

Alan: No, none whatsoever. Thanks for calling.

LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST HEALTH CANADA - canadianawareness.org / / November 8, 2012

“NUTRICIDE: THE KILLING CAMPS OF CODEX ALIMENTARIUS”

http://xstatic99645.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/nutricide.pdf1

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

U.S. and Israel Finish Largest-ever Joint Military Exercise

The Banking 'Transfer Agreement' Between Hitler and the Zionists

United Nations Sustainable Development--Australia

Checkpoint - Everyday Life in Israel - Documentary

Australian Politician says Send street thugs to fight wars

Members of Scottish Parliament give Principle Backing to 'Royal Secrecy' Information Bill

Arrest in Savile Case

DJ Arrested in Savile BBC Inquiry

Big Brother is watching: Fears over 'homeland security' streetlights that can record your conversations and track your movements

The Manhattan-Rochester Coalition, research on the health effects of radioactive materials, and tests on vulnerable populations without consent in St. Louis, 1945-1970

Anti-Austerity (Bank Plundering) Strikes Hit Europe

Ecocide--Push to Criminalize Humanity under Guise of Saving Planet

Aussie Prime Minister On the Take?

Lawsuit Filed Against Health Canada for Restricting Sales of Health Products

Killing Camps of Codex Alimentarius

#8 · March 13, 2021, 8:14 am

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:14 am
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 20^th of December, 2012. I always suggest and get this out of the road – I know most folk skip this part – because I always mention that you are the audience that bring me to you and I depend upon you to keep me going. So you can buy the books, hopefully, and the discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] And remember, straight donations are awfully, awfully welcome. If you go into my website you’ll see other sites listed, the official sites I have. They all have audios for free download and they have transcripts for print-up in English. If you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu you can get transcripts in other languages of some of the talks that I’ve given.

I go through the history of this big system that you’re born into, the system that you take for granted, as did your parents and grandparents before you. People don’t realize they’re born into a complete system. It’s a complete total system worked out by professionals at very high levels, thousands and thousands of them that work for every single government. In fact, the government really works for them when you really boil it all down. Because there is a parallel government which is the real government, the one made by foundations which front for the big international banking boys who got together, formed these organizations, and even got Royal charters like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, to help bring in a world type system, which they and the elite would run, in a different way, a scientific way, than previous governments and ages. They’d also go after all the resources on the planet, including human resources too. Big, big plans.

Of course, HG Wells was a propagandist for them in fact. Huxley worked for them as well, both Huxleys, and various other ones, bringing in this new system. Their big idea was to alter the mindset of the general population, get rid of individuality. The United Nations has stated this too, THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE ENEMY OF THE WORLD STATE. They want a collective society of dumbed-down obedient people where the proper people would run the world, THE ONES WHO WOULD STILL BE WILD IN TEMPERAMENT, they wouldn’t be inoculated into a dumb morass like the general public, AND THEY WOULD KEEP THEIR INSTINCTS SHARP, SO THEY WOULD BE UNAFFECTED. AND THEY WOULD RULE THE WORLD. Charles Galton Darwin himself wrote the book, The Next Million Years, where he discussed this, about not altering themselves at the top. But he also said too that THE ORDINARY PEOPLE WOULDN’T NEED THEIR COMPLETE INTELLECT OR INSTINCTS BECAUSE THE STATE, by then, WOULD BE MAKING ALL THEIR DECISIONS FOR THEM. And here you are, it’s all here. It’s happened. And the public have just adapted step by step into the changes.

You have to go through the history of revolutions, not just the major bloody ones, but most revolutions that have happened all through the 20^th century, in conjunction with the bloody ones. Because domestically in the countries that were unaffected, bloodwise that is, you had all these quieter revolutions. And the sexual revolutions. Now you’ve got gender revolutions and so on. These were all part of the strategies to divide and conquer, divide and conquer a society from a monolithic type structure into a divided, completely multi-divided nation, each one. Then the elite group who planned all this come in and dominate you as a DOMINANT MINORITY. That’s what Huxley called them himself, a dominant minority. And it’s all happened pretty well.

This is the Century of Change, remember, the 21^st century that they talked about in academia for the last 50-odd years. Their big utopian dream was to come to pass in this century of the scientifically-managed society. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix. It truly is a matrix system because most folk really have been brought up with scientific indoctrination. This goes way, way back to the boys who worked for this global society, this big agency they worked for at the time, associated with the Royal Institute of International Affairs – the American branch is the Council on Foreign Relations; now they have Council on Foreign Relations branches across the world.

They even have their own version of history. One of their historians was Professor Carroll Quigley who worked with the State Department. He actually wrote a book on it, how they actually were RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE BIG EVENTS OF THE 20^TH CENTURY, actually right up to this step too. Because the wars you’re seeing going on are simply continuations of standardizing the planet, taking the world over, instituting puppet governments across the world which they call democratic. Which are not, they’re all on board exactly with each other’s agendas and there’s no difference whatsoever in their priorities either. And they standardized central banks under The World Bank. Again, that was all figured out in Quigley’s book too, The Anglo-American Establishment. It’s a book you’ve got to read. So it’s all arranged, and most folk don’t know it.

And as it’s happening too, they make sure you have the proper type of schooling which dumbs you down. It doesn’t teach you reasoning and logic; it actually impairs it in fact, if not blocks it all together. You get groupthink now in school – they call it groupthink – because you have to agree with the class, the class has to agree with you. And if you don’t agree with the class they’ll keep at you until you come around and see it their way, you’re on board with them. So you standardize the public as well. That’s also helped with incredible amounts of novels for children, and then into video games, and also into cartoons and everything else to do with children. All the politically correct updates are in those particular things. It gives you your opinions as you grow up, how you feel about certain things as you grow up, and even how to react against things that you’ve been taught to react against, or for, for that matter. It’s just astonishing how well it’s really worked so well.

But today too we have the same old games going on, because the media’s all owned by a club of the same boys basically, across the world. They’re on board with the agenda too. They keep us, you know, amused at times. They also keep us confused much of the time and give us lots and lots of trivia. But now the children themselves are watching TV, these high definition screens, digital and all the rest of it; they can’t tell fact from fiction anymore. And so many of them are drugged to the eyeballs and dull of emotional responses in fact. Some who get off it eventually say that, they were like zombies when they were on it; they felt nothing. Of course, this is a well-established fact; there’s lots of articles on the drugging of children and what it does to them. But at the same time too, some of these so-called antipsychotic drugs they’re giving them as well, along with speed or amphetamines really, because they give them that too. For being hyper they give them speed; there’s a magic potion for you. But you understand, they’re bombed out of their skulls. Then they’re watching movies like you wouldn’t believe by the militarized Hollywood culture where we’ve had 20-odd years or more of nothing but movies and good guys/bad guys and mass slaughter… for fun. We’re given this for fun. Because you see, they need a militarized culture right now to recruit guys, right now, and for the last 10, 15, 20 years, to fight all the wars which they knew they’d make happen at this time to standardize the rest of the countries into the global system.

But again, people have no idea of the collusion that Hollywood has to do with what you think and what you feel about things, your opinions and everything else too. And you think you’re being entertained. You don’t bring on professors and specialists to help work out movies, people who are into behaviorism and neuroscientists and all of this, just to make movies, folks. This is to make sure the right impressions are instilled, imprinted in fact, on the minds of the viewers. They first started to see how easy it was using simple things which they knew were drives, like sexual drives and so on and they sexified everything until they overdid it of course. All the children start copying it, and then you have a dysfunctional generation when they grow up. Then one of the communist planks is fulfilled, because no one gets married, you see; that was part of it too. And they need the militarized culture.

Then you’ve got youngsters too, supposedly shooting places up and all the rest of it. Because their hero is the guy who’s got the power, and the power is dressed in black with all the armor plating on and you look just like a combat trooper, a SWAT team person. And that’s what they emulate, the person with the power. And they know all this too. Plus too, I’ll put up a little link tonight, and this fact is true, that this Dark Knight movie has so much in it to do with the references of the two last shootings we’ve had, Aurora and Sandy Hook. You actually see the actual map that they used, and plus they were sending out posters before this, with the little place circled, this little town circled on it, to do with ‘attack zone’ and so on. That is not coincidence. That is not coincidence, folks. But again, Hollywood churned out lots of movies before 9/11 and they had the word ‘911’, or even the weight ‘911’ in it too. And you can’t just dismiss this. This is twilight language, as they say. And it’s almost like the big boys putting their little jokes in there and giving you the finger at the same time. And I’m not kidding about that.

Sandy Hook Labeled "Strike Zone" In Dark Knight Rises - gothamist.com

And when it comes to the joke of politics, I mean a politician is just a stooge who will take orders from his trainers. He’ll say what he’s told to say; he’ll read the dummy boards and he’ll behave in certain ways. Sometimes they give them a little bit more deportment; every politician in Britain has a minimum of £500 to £1000 worth of expenses that goes into deportment, and they’re taught by actors on how to stand and pause and look impressive, or sad or whatever. Everything today is an act, an incredible act. Because the publics are glued to TV. All their reality comes from TV, and they think it’s all just as real – the guy is doing all the right movements an actor would make, therefore he’s very, very good, and you believe them.

Now, there’s an article here, it says...

Obama Campaign Reveals How it Collaborated with Hollywood to Win

(Alan: And there’s nothing new in this kind of thing.)

laist.com

Before the presidential election, the Obama campaign wasn't shy about the fact that it was cozying up to Hollywood to rally support. But now, the administration has revealed just how much it worked with industry insiders to help re-elect the president, and it turns out that they had a significant and strategic involvement.

In a piece this week, the Hollywood Reporter discloses that Obama's official relationship with Hollywood executives began during a meeting in Beverly Hills last year between the incumbent and "top-level agents and producers":

The plan that emerged from that meeting, [Eric] Ortner says, was very scientific: "The idea was to mobilize constituency groups to build a ground game. It was very strategic."

From there, celebrities including Bruce Springsteen, Katy Perry and John Legend hit the ground running. They headlined concerts and made appearances in swing states, during which campaign workers would gather the contact information of attendees, whom they would later hit up directly with pleas to vote for Obama.

Their effort proved successful:

In the Vegas neighborhood where Perry performed for more than 13,000 people, area residents "rushed" their polling places on Election Day, according to local media accounts.

The actors and musicians involved with the effort also used social media to promote the president's campaign messages, with 90 million fans ultimately reached.

Obama's Hollywood Organizers Reveal Winning Strategy That Helped Tip Election - hollywoodreporter.com / 11/14/2012 / Tina Daunt

So that’s really how it’s done. And it wouldn’t make any difference which side was, you know, pushing this thing. They all use the same kind of techniques, if they can. But there’s no doubt, Hollywood is all for the global agenda. Because after all you see, it’s not there by chance. It’s not just there to entertain you, and to get awfully rich which it actually does too. It’s also there to influence you, because those who run, basically, the media and entertainment – the culture industry – run the country. And that’s a fact, folks. Because your culture is not the same culture you had when you were small, or your parents had. Hollywood literally changed it. People have adapted and adopted the Hollywood culture, on a much lower scale of course. But all that they’ve seen and heard and what they’ve been taught to think about, they have adopted it. So it’s all here.

And interesting too...

IntercontinentalExchange Finally Wins NYSE Euronext For $8.2 Billion

(A: New York Stock Exchange.)

forbes.com / 12/20/2012

IntercontinentalExchange, a collection of over-the-counter and options markets, will buy NYSE Euronext (A: It’s called. Euro-Next, interesting name eh.) for $8.2 billion in a cash-and-stock deal.

ICE will pay $33.12 a share, a 37% premium over yesterday’s closing price of $24.05. Plus, when the deal closes, NYSE Euronext shareholders will own 36% of ICE shares.

The NYSE Euronext headquarters on Wall Street will remain unchanged, the company says. ICE will open another New York building in 2013, adding to two existing locations in New York and Atlanta. By merging, the companies expect $450 million in cost synergies within two years. “Synergies appear massive for companies with little business overlap,” says Peter Lenardos, a RBC Capital Markets analyst.

New York Stock Exchange sold to derivatives company in $8bn takeover

guardian.co.uk / 20 December 2012 / Dominic Rushe

So everything is owned, isn’t it, you know. Everything, even your stock exchange is too. Of course they’re all owned; it’s not yours of course. It’s not yours at all. The money is not yours either, really. The debt is yours [Alan chuckles.]. They give it to you and you accept it. That’s why it’s yours, you accept it. But that’s how things really are.

Now going back to what I said at the beginning, perpetual childhood is really the dream of the socialist managers, perpetual childhood for all those that they manage, which is the vast populations. There’s a quote here and it’s from de Tocqueville. It says…

(Perpetual childhood In Strategy)

qualiaquotesforlife.wordpress.com/ June 2, 2011

“… (A) society which tries to keep its citizens in ‘perpetual childhood’: it will seek to preserve their happiness, but it chooses to be the sole agent and only arbiter of that happiness. Society will develop a new type of servitude which covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate … it does not tyrannise but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to be nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which government is the shepherd.” – de Tocqueville

Isn’t it the truth though. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. And what a life it is too, because we truly are treated like children and bombarded with media and data, and conflicting data too. It’s like the data that they give you at all these shootings and so on that happen. And then they give you so many conflicting stories that eventually you give up trying to think logically and just go with the eventual official story. That’s how it’s done. That’s why it’s done too. If there’s reporters on the spot, they don’t make mistakes, like second people being there and stuff like that, unless they are there, unless it’s intentional that they lie to you. And most reporters actually don’t even go there. They just get reports from the cops themselves. And the cops go through public relations. So everything’s managed, and eventually your mind is managed as well.

This article too is to do with the ongoing, to end this old system of sovereign nations you have to multiculturalize, and then make everyone feel guilty if they’re not too happy about it. But it’s not to create a hands-across-the-street sort of thing. It’s to do away with the existing culture, the dominant culture, for the new minority to take over, not the ones you’re seeing coming in by the way. Of course, even the incoming newcomers, immigrants and so on, they hope that they too will lose their culture and not adopt the old British system; there’s nothing left to adopt – it’s gone, for instance, this is in Britain. And so you get this new mushy culture, which really is a Sovietized culture where government is in charge of everything, with so many agencies, massive welfare systems too, social work departments, psychologists testing children, all that kind of stuff. This is the new society that they’ve dreamed of for so long. Bertrand Russell and others talked about it, ad-nauseam, where everyone would get tested psychologically, etc. and they’d create the proper kind of citizens. The state would create them.

Well here’s an article too and it’s by Peter Hitchens. Now, he was the brother of Christopher Hitchens and Christopher was at complete opposite poles with him, but it’s interesting how they viewed things. It says…

Alien nation: The new census reveals a Britain that would be unrecognisable even to our grandparents

dailymail.co.uk / Peter Hitchens / 15 December 2012

Peter Hitchens says that the Census (A: ...statements that came out, and numbers and figures.) is not just a description of the state of things on a day in 2011 but a prophetic document telling us where we are going.

Christianity is on the decline while Islam is on the up and fewer of us are married for the first time ever.

The future will be another country. They will do things differently there.  (A: The same place but it’s a different country and they’ll do things differently.)

The Census is not just a description of the state of things on a day in 2011, it is a prophetic document telling us where we are going, whether we like it or not. I don’t.

For the past 60 years or so, we have lived in a nation that was more or less familiar to anyone who had grown up in the pre-war Britain of 1939.

Even the devastation of conflict had not transformed it out of recognition.

People behaved, thought, worked, laughed and enjoyed themselves much as they had done for decades.

They lived in the same sorts of families in the same kind of houses. Their children went to the same kinds of schools.

And they had grown up in a land that was still identifiably the same as their grandparents had known.

And so it went back for centuries.

As recently as 1949, the prices of most goods were roughly the same, and expressed in the same money, as the prices of 1649.  (A: Because it was the old coinage they used.)

A short-distance time-traveller between 1912 and 2012 might be perplexed and astonished, but he would not be lost.

That period is now coming to an end. I suspect that anyone in Britain, travelling between 2012 and 2112 would be unable to believe that he was in the same place.

What is the most significant single fact in the Census? I do not think there is one. Several are shocking or disturbing, if you are not fond of change, and delightful if you are.

But there are some, which taken together, prophesy a transformation to come.

Look at these – manufacturing is now only the fourth-biggest employer, after supplying and selling goods and services, health and social work and education.  (A: So manufacturing is down.)

So, in the nation that was once the ‘Workshop of the World’, we now have more teachers than industrial workers. (A: And again, that’s part of the socialist system. Understand, even Lenin said this, and Stalin too, YOU’VE GOT TO PAY YOUR ARMY, YOUR MILITARY, YOUR POLICE AND YOUR TEACHERS, A LOT, BECAUSE THE TEACHERS INDOCTRINATE THE NEXT GENERATION, the way the state wants them indoctrinated.)

London is rapidly becoming a separate nation, as different from England as Scotland or Wales are, with indigenous British people now in a minority, in some areas a very small minority indeed, and incidentally with extremes of wealth and poverty not known since Edwardian times.

Then of course there is the decline in Christianity, down by four million, from 72 per cent to 59 per cent; the growth in indifference to religion, with non-believers almost doubling to 14.1 million; and also of Islam, rising so fast that one British resident in 20 is now a Muslim.  (A: This is all done on purpose, folks, by the big people who rule. And it’s not Muslim.)

The Muslim population is young, and keen on large families, while the Christian population tends to be older and less likely to have children.

This is very much a work in progress, far from complete. A lot of nominal Christians are no longer bothering to pretend to a faith they have never cared much about.

Do not be surprised if, in ten years, the gap between the number of professing Christians and the number of Muslims has grown much smaller.

The secularists, who have so enthusiastically sought to drive Christianity out of British life, may realise with a gulp of apprehension that they have only created a vacancy for Islam – a faith that is not at all troubled by Richard Dawkins.

Perhaps most significant of all is the accelerating disappearance of marriage as the normal state of life for grown-up people.

For the first time, fewer than half of adults are married.   (A: I’ll continue this article, it’s quite interesting, because the whole culture is gone. It’s not just religion; that was just a part of it. Whether you believed in it or not, it was a cultural society based on it for the common rules. Back after this.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about the big system changing and not just Britain but the world, and it’s all intentional. And Peter Hitchens whose brother was Christopher Hitchens, who was at the complete opposite pole. But Peter Hitchens is decrying basically the culture and things that held the culture together. Because at one time you could walk anywhere in complete safety and all the rest of it; you didn’t have all the trouble you have today. You didn’t have the joblessness as well. And it’s all gone, and the pride is gone. You’ve got a welfare state now, which means you’ve got a dominant government, a totally dominant government in a welfare state. But he says…

Getting hitched (A: He’s talking about getting married.): Homosexuals seem to be most enthusiastic about marriage just as heterosexuals tire of it

This means many things – a greater number of fatherless households, a greater number of cohabiting couples, the rapid disappearance of what was once a strong social force. (A: It’s also your communities too, are all destroyed as they were.)

Since the stable married family is a fortress of private life and individuality (A: And there’s the problem, individuality. They say it has to go.), its retreat will mean the opposite of that: more state interference and surveillance, more conformism – and more conformists – and mass culture. Its main effect will be on the children.

Many of them will grow up outside what used to be normal, a lifelong two-parent home.

They will, as a result, be different sorts of people. Already, almost half of Britain’s 15-year-olds do not live with their ‘birth parents’; 300,000 sets of parents split each year.

I cannot believe this is not part of the reason for the so-called ‘riots’ of 2011, in which young men brought up without male authority ran wild.

These were equal-opportunity events, and their causes were home-grown, not imported. This will get much, much worse.

Again, conservatives will find this worrying and ill-omened. Liberal ‘progressives’, who have never had much time for the married family, seeing it as a sort of prison, will view it as a liberation.  (A: ...because that’s part of the Manifesto.)

Edmund Leach, giving his influential Reith Lectures in 1967, put it this way: ‘Far from being the basis of the good society, the family, with its narrow privacy and tawdry secrets, is the source of all our discontents.’

It is striking that just as homosexuals seem to be most enthusiastic about getting married, heterosexuals are tiring of the whole thing.

But now compare the giant political fuss over same-sex marriage with the numbers of people affected. (A: Meaning, the promotion of it and the media coverage.) See just what a tiny proportion of the country is involved.

While the decline of conventional marriage involves many millions, there are 105,000 people in civil partnerships, one-fifth of one per cent of the population, one person in 500.

And that is seven years after they first became available.

I have deliberately left migration to the end. The figures are astonishing, with one in ten people in England and Wales now born abroad, and the rate of increase over the past few years equally astounding – almost half of these new citizens have arrived here since 2001.

And, in a figure that has not attracted the attention it should have, almost three million people live in households where no adults speak English as their first language.

The main significance of this is the speed of it. Even now, official immigration still stands at 180,000 a year. Probably these totals are an underestimate, as illegal migrants tend not to fill in forms.

But the really important fact is that this revolution is the result of a deliberate, planned attempt to change this country for ever, and we have the evidence of this.

On October 23, 2009, a former New Labour official called Andrew Neather wrote an article in the London Evening Standard which was that very rare thing – a genuine revelation of a political secret.

The crucial passage described ‘a major shift from the policy of previous governments’.

It disclosed that a ‘big immigration report was surrounded by an unusual air of both anticipation and secrecy . . . there was a paranoia about it reaching the media . . . Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

‘I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date. That seemed to me to be a manoeuvre too far.

‘Ministers were very nervous about the whole thing . . . There was a reluctance elsewhere in Government to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for Labour’s core white working-class vote . . .

‘Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom. But Ministers (A: ....politicians, that is.) wouldn’t talk about it.’ Why not? Because Labour voters wouldn’t have liked it. (A: It had been discussed.)

‘While Ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working-men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.’

On Friday the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, was still trying to appeal to working-class voters whose views his metropolitan fat-cat party secretly despises. (A: Ed Miliband remember, with his brother, their dad was a top communist in Britain; he taught in universities there. He ran off from Europe to Britain and taught it there, communism.)

While praising immigration to his London audience, he pretended to be concerned about it by admitting there is ‘anxiety’ about the pace of change.

He promised (absurdly, since the EU has controlled our frontiers for many years) that ‘Britain must always control its borders’.  (A: Actually, the EU said you couldn’t stop them coming in.)

But he then swiftly dismissed the idea – which would be the only hope of future harmony – that migrants should assimilate, saying this was ‘wrong for our country’.

He proclaimed: ‘One Nation doesn’t mean one identity. People can be proudly, patriotically British without abandoning their cultural roots.’

Is this true? In the days when the USA still sought to assimilate its migrants, it certainly didn’t think so. It insisted that they became Americans in every way, and as soon as they could.

Half the point of American state schools was the creation of new young Americans.

Since that policy was abandoned 30 years ago, the USA has in reality ceased to be one country, with large areas speaking Spanish and retaining the customs and cultures of their homes, hostile or chilly to their American fellow citizens, who return the favour.

Any observant person in Britain can see the same process in such cities as Bradford [in England], where multiculturalism has created two solitudes with their backs turned on each other.

Bit by bit, the people of this country are ceasing to have key things in common. They don’t share a religion, or a culture, or a history. Many don’t even share a language.

They don’t eat the same food or watch the same TV stations or have a common sense of humour.

They sometimes even disagree about whether to drive on the left.  (A: ...side of the road.)

They come from completely different legal and political traditions. (A: And it’s true, a lot of them come from countries where there’s been totalitarianism, and they actually go along with it when they come into totalitarian countries like, well, Britain. [Alan chuckles.])

In a strange paradox, many of the new Britons are more socially and morally conservative than their indigenous British neighbours, though their presence here is a sort of revolution in flesh and blood.

Many of the new migrants also have a completely different work ethic, not having grown up in our entitlement-based welfare state – which is why one of their main unspoken functions in Labour’s plan has been to keep wages down by providing a huge pool of cheap and willing unskilled labour.

Without mass immigration, the minimum wage would long ago have had to rise sharply, creating the crisis that all economists predicted when it was introduced.

As it is, we are fast becoming a low-wage, unskilled economy, with overcrowded cities, multi-occupied housing and hopelessly strained medical services, transport and schools.

There is also a widening gap between the rich, who can afford servants again for the first time since the era of Downton Abbey, and the poor, who have to be those servants.

The only way we will be able to sustain this is by becoming steadily cheaper, devaluing our currency through inflation and incidentally destroying the savings and pensions of the thrifty.

And he goes on and on about what’s happening. But it’s all happened. I mean, it’s all been done, by design, to bring in the new society, you see, which really is no society at all. It’s just an obedient society of many, many groups all obeying government, or else. I mean, that’s what the new system is. And it was designed a long, long time ago, and you have a new dominant minority running the whole show.

Also tonight I’ll put up, ha, in Scotland, Scotland, it’s incredible how the communism runs Scotland. It truly is. Because they’re really taking… The government agencies are in everybody’s homes. If you’ve got a child you’re probably terrified in Scotland because they’re right in there.

The Scottish Child Health Programme:

Guidance on the 27-30 month child health review

scotland.gov.uk

There’s a PDF that comes with this; I’ll give you it. Because this is from the UN too; they’re helping it out. The EU bunch are helping it out too. They want to literally monitor you, health-wise, mental-wise and so on, right through your life. This is only part of it, to the 30-month part. And even the 30-month part is comical; they want to go on long after that. But they’re right into their parents as well, what kind of jobs they have, are they healthy, do they smoke, do they occasionally drink, all this stuff, people who look after me and all this kind of stuff. Then it even goes into mental health; they also mean of the parents too – and that’s going to be judged by some social worker that’s been made paranoid by all of their indoctrinations and so on and so on. And then...

My wider world (A: It’s quite interesting. Up to 30 months, they’re talking about…)

Home learning environment

Play opportunities

Books and reading

Screen time (e.g. television, computer)

Early learning and childcare

Nursery/childminder/playgroup attendance or registration

Inoculations, vaccinations, it’s all there. Socialism is totally… Actually, the Soviets would have loved this system. See, we’re beyond the Soviet. We’re into what the Soviet was supposed to turn out to be. We’re the next phase of it. It’s all happened. Big government, you see, running it properly, scientifically.

Another article I’ll put up tonight too, is called…

New Report: Three-Fifths of Colleges Seriously Restrict Free Speech on Campus

thefire.org / Dec 18, 2012

So they can’t get it; it’s at loggerheads with the First Amendment. This is in the US. I’ll put this up tonight because it’s interesting. And it is true, their own speech codes in universities and colleges are conflicting, totally conflicting with the First Amendment right of free speech. So I’ll put this article up tonight as well.

Now, Hillary Clinton... As we go into all these partnerships with free trade organizations, the BRIC countries, you’ve got the Pacific Rim groups and so on, the transpacific partnerships, the trans-European partnerships. We’ve got all these partnerships. Free trade, again, the brainchild of the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, from a hundred years ago. And when anybody else tries to do the same, because they’re getting shelled in there by, say, different missiles surrounding their countries, you’re Sovietization, or Sovietizing your country.

Clinton’s ‘Sovietization’ comment attracts Kremlin’s ire

rt.com / December 19, 2012

(A: So the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, she’s annoyed the President of Russia.)

The Russian President’s press secretary said recent remarks by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about ‘re-Sovietizing the CIS countries points to a total lack of understanding about the processes taking place in the region.

As the former Soviet countries that make up the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) continue to adjust to the occasionally harsh realities of democracy and globalization, Clinton’s comment struck a raw nerve.

The US Secretary of State explained efforts to promote greater integration in the CIS as “a move to re-Sovietize the region.”

“It's not going to be called that,” Clinton remarked. "It's going to be called a customs union; it will be called the Eurasian Union and all of that. But let's make no mistake about it. We know what the goal is and we are trying to figure out effective ways to slow it down or prevent it."  (A: Now, that’s exactly what we’re doing. What do you think the economic union of Europe is? That’s a union, European UNION, you know. And we have the Transpacific Partnership, which is a union, and many other unions. But anybody else that’s not quite in the club, that does their own little thing, then apparently they’re becoming Soviet. And they didn’t call the BRIC countries Soviet, when the Latin American countries got involved with China and different ones making their own little deal. But there’s big bones to pick, you see, with Russia, for a lot of the folk that were kicked out of it.)

To associate these open developments with some sort of “Sovietization” fails to appreciate the changes taking place in the former Soviet Union,” he said in an interview with the Russia 24 TV channel.

Indeed, Russia and the CIS states, much like other regions of the world, are coalescing into various economic and political unions, not to mention security alliances. Moscow is certainly wondering if Clinton has forgotten that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which continues its mission creep across the former Soviet space, is a vestige of the Cold War period. Indeed, the majority of Russians believe the western military alliance has outlived its purpose and should be disbanded.  (A: Because it was supposed to be ONLY for the Cold War period, and of course they were in there bombing Libya and different places.)

At the same time, Clinton overlooked the basic differences between what passed for integration in the Soviet period compared with today. For starters, in the Soviet period, all of the decisions were passed down from Moscow in an effort to bring the various Soviet Republics in line with communist ideology.  (A: ...and he goes on and on and on.)

But it just shows you… Because the US, they’re into Bulgaria and different places putting missiles in; they put missiles into Turkey. And of course they’re trying to do the old Cold War thing and surrounding Russia with missiles. It’s the same thing on the go, you see. So that’s why that’s all happening.

Also I want to mention tonight too, about this... Talk about culture going down the tubes with the ones who are involved in culture creation. There’s a band in Britain called LostProphets and they’re all in the wilderness now, because their front man, their singer was accused of plotting to rape a baby. No kidding. He’s been arrested. It says…

Lostprophets band members in "state of shock" after frontman

Ian Watkins accused of plotting to rape a baby

mirror.co.uk / Natalie Evans / 20 Dec 2012

The band released a statement after the 35-year-old singer appeared in court yesterday charged with six child sex offences.  (A: The accused is Ian Watkins.)

Members of Welsh rock band Lostprophets are “in a state of shock” after lead singer Ian Watkins was accused of plotting to rape a baby.

The 35-year-old frontman appeared in court yesterday charged with six child sex offences - including conspiring with a female fan, 24, to rape a one-year-old girl.

(A: Apparently there’s two females now that they’ve got.)

The singer and two women, who cannot be named for legal reasons, are also accused of conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a girl under 13.  (A: Well I’d say yeah, a 1-year-old girl is under 13.)

Watkins - a former boyfriend of TV presenter Fearne Cotton - was further charged with three separate charges of possession, making and distributing indecent images of children.

He is also accused of possession of “extreme pornography”, some involving animals.

Watkins’ bandmates - Jamie Oliver, Lee Gaze, Luke Johnson, Mike Lewis and Stuart Richardson – released a statement on their website today speaking of their “shock”.  (A: Well, really?)

Lead singer of Welsh rock band Lostprophets, Ian Watkins, charged with child sex offences

mirror.co.uk / Natalie Evans / 19 Dec 2012

But you know, the whole culture is in degradation – I’ve been saying that for years – by design. And that TV tube has altered the world, intentionally too. Not just for ratings, not just for the cash… but by planning. I’ve mentioned before that the Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs had that meeting in the 60s to do with who they were going to give the power to, to give the world its culture. They were talking about using the British film studios that they had in London, or should they use Hollywood, to create not just music, but movies and music. They decided eventually, after this two-weeklong meeting, they would give it to the US and Hollywood, and it has been done. And the whole agenda pretty well of destroying the cultures of those countries has been completed.

So there’s nothing… This doesn’t even shock people anymore. What does shock people anymore? You don’t get shocked unless you follow the boob tube for your news, a school shooting, and they lead you through a whole bunch of things that supposedly have happened, haven’t happened, they keep changing their mind about the story, until you give up, but you go along with the emotion and it goes right into gun control. From there to there, just like that. So emotion and the creation of emotional hype has the desired effect for an agenda to go through. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. I’ll go to the calls now and there’s Anthony from New York hanging on there. Are you there Anthony?

Anthony: Yes I’m here. Thank you for taking my call.  I just wanted to slightly change the subject, but this one’s a follow-up on that one shooting, the Sandy Hook shooting over in Connecticut, was pretty horrible.  I noticed that there was a link between the Newtown, Connecticut and the shooting that took place in Australia, where the shooter was also from a place called Newtown, in Australia back in 1996. I was wondering if you knew anything about that shooting that took place in 1996 in Australia?

Alan: I do remember that. Again, it was the same kind of thing. It was a lone guy. I think he shot up a bunch of tourists actually, Japanese if I remember right, at the time. That was one of the big shootings that was set off there. It was never explained properly. And then there was another one after that too. There’s been a lot of questions asked, if these were set-ups as well. So yeah, when you get the names jiving like that you just can’t ignore them. There’s no doubt, particularly, the Hollywood guys sent out these posters with the little pictures of the map and so on, and T-shirts as well, to people before the movie even came out, with Aurora on it – and that’s in the movie; you can actually see it in the Batman movie on top of a building. Then you see the map where they’re going to have a hit, or a strike, and it’s Sandy Hook. I mean it’s there.

Anthony: Also, real quick, what was very interesting as well is that I believe a year before they had the Department of Homeland Security that had a drill there, which was… I guess the drill was probably supposed to be simulating something similar also as well, which is very, very interesting. Very bizarre also as well.

Alan: Yes. And again too, reporters are taught to report on facts before they publish anything to the people. And yet here they are saying there was a shooter found, another one found and handcuffed outside the school, and then he’s not there anymore. Then they found all these .223 cartridges all over the school from the rifle, then later they say the rifle was found in the trunk of the car; obviously it wasn’t used. They keep giving you these contradictory reports. Now, reporters don’t do that, just like that. Even in the excitement they’re supposed to get the facts right. So I think the technique they’re using is like a twilight technique, they call it, where you’re still addicted to the tube – because everyone today is, they’re addicted to the tube for all information. So they keep watching it and they get so confused, then eventually when the final story comes out they won’t question anything at all; they’ll take it just as it’s said. But nothing makes sense in this. They said that the woman was a homeschooler of this child; she was not. They said she worked at the school; she didn’t work at the school. They even said in the early reports, remember, that the husband in New Jersey was found dead; he wasn’t. I mean, you just don’t make these mistakes. Any reporter today has access to more information on us, than we have on each other, and they can get it instantly, believe you me, and in real time. So this is a technique that’s being used here to disassociate the people from thinking logically themselves, and pull them, step by step, right into the emotional bit, with the crying with Obama and all that, into the objective which is gun confiscation. This is a technique, there’s no doubt about it.

Anthony: That’s amazing. They were even saying that there were even reports of the principal giving some sort of report or complaint to the police, and now all of a sudden that’s been removed.

Alan: Everything gets removed step-by-step-by-step and you’re left in the twilight zone. But you’ve got the objective there, you’ve got rage, an emotional rage all mixed up with it. And it’s been done before. You have to go into the old Bath bombing in the US back in 1923, where a guy blew up a school, and they didn’t ban janitors; it was the janitor that did it. A taxi driver in Britain ran over eight guys after a dispute; they didn’t ban taxis. But thanks for calling.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Sandy Hook with Usual Hollywood "Coincidences"

Hollywood and Electing Obama

& More on Above

New York Stock Exchange Sold to Derivatives Company in $8bn takeover
Sale of nearly 200-year-old institution to Intercontinental Exchange comes amid historic shift to electronic trading

& IntercontinentalExchange Finally Wins NYSE Euronext For $8.2 Billion

de Tocqueville on Perpetual Childhood

Britain, Alien Nation

Scotland---Child Health Programme (Beyond Big Brother)

Three-Fifths of US Colleges' Speech Codes Conflict with 1st. Amendment Right

Hillary's "Sovietization" Comment attracts Kremlin's Ire

Lostprophets --Band Members in Wilderness after Lead Singer Charged with Plotting Rape of Baby and other Sex Offences

Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 20^th of December, 2012. I always suggest and get this out of the road – I know most folk skip this part – because I always mention that you are the audience that bring me to you and I depend upon you to keep me going. So you can buy the books, hopefully, and the discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] And remember, straight donations are awfully, awfully welcome. If you go into my website you’ll see other sites listed, the official sites I have. They all have audios for free download and they have transcripts for print-up in English. If you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu you can get transcripts in other languages of some of the talks that I’ve given.

I go through the history of this big system that you’re born into, the system that you take for granted, as did your parents and grandparents before you. People don’t realize they’re born into a complete system. It’s a complete total system worked out by professionals at very high levels, thousands and thousands of them that work for every single government. In fact, the government really works for them when you really boil it all down. Because there is a parallel government which is the real government, the one made by foundations which front for the big international banking boys who got together, formed these organizations, and even got Royal charters like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, to help bring in a world type system, which they and the elite would run, in a different way, a scientific way, than previous governments and ages. They’d also go after all the resources on the planet, including human resources too. Big, big plans.

Of course, HG Wells was a propagandist for them in fact. Huxley worked for them as well, both Huxleys, and various other ones, bringing in this new system. Their big idea was to alter the mindset of the general population, get rid of individuality. The United Nations has stated this too, THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE ENEMY OF THE WORLD STATE. They want a collective society of dumbed-down obedient people where the proper people would run the world, THE ONES WHO WOULD STILL BE WILD IN TEMPERAMENT, they wouldn’t be inoculated into a dumb morass like the general public, AND THEY WOULD KEEP THEIR INSTINCTS SHARP, SO THEY WOULD BE UNAFFECTED. AND THEY WOULD RULE THE WORLD. Charles Galton Darwin himself wrote the book, The Next Million Years, where he discussed this, about not altering themselves at the top. But he also said too that THE ORDINARY PEOPLE WOULDN’T NEED THEIR COMPLETE INTELLECT OR INSTINCTS BECAUSE THE STATE, by then, WOULD BE MAKING ALL THEIR DECISIONS FOR THEM. And here you are, it’s all here. It’s happened. And the public have just adapted step by step into the changes.

You have to go through the history of revolutions, not just the major bloody ones, but most revolutions that have happened all through the 20^th century, in conjunction with the bloody ones. Because domestically in the countries that were unaffected, bloodwise that is, you had all these quieter revolutions. And the sexual revolutions. Now you’ve got gender revolutions and so on. These were all part of the strategies to divide and conquer, divide and conquer a society from a monolithic type structure into a divided, completely multi-divided nation, each one. Then the elite group who planned all this come in and dominate you as a DOMINANT MINORITY. That’s what Huxley called them himself, a dominant minority. And it’s all happened pretty well.

This is the Century of Change, remember, the 21^st century that they talked about in academia for the last 50-odd years. Their big utopian dream was to come to pass in this century of the scientifically-managed society. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix. It truly is a matrix system because most folk really have been brought up with scientific indoctrination. This goes way, way back to the boys who worked for this global society, this big agency they worked for at the time, associated with the Royal Institute of International Affairs – the American branch is the Council on Foreign Relations; now they have Council on Foreign Relations branches across the world.

They even have their own version of history. One of their historians was Professor Carroll Quigley who worked with the State Department. He actually wrote a book on it, how they actually were RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE BIG EVENTS OF THE 20^TH CENTURY, actually right up to this step too. Because the wars you’re seeing going on are simply continuations of standardizing the planet, taking the world over, instituting puppet governments across the world which they call democratic. Which are not, they’re all on board exactly with each other’s agendas and there’s no difference whatsoever in their priorities either. And they standardized central banks under The World Bank. Again, that was all figured out in Quigley’s book too, The Anglo-American Establishment. It’s a book you’ve got to read. So it’s all arranged, and most folk don’t know it.

And as it’s happening too, they make sure you have the proper type of schooling which dumbs you down. It doesn’t teach you reasoning and logic; it actually impairs it in fact, if not blocks it all together. You get groupthink now in school – they call it groupthink – because you have to agree with the class, the class has to agree with you. And if you don’t agree with the class they’ll keep at you until you come around and see it their way, you’re on board with them. So you standardize the public as well. That’s also helped with incredible amounts of novels for children, and then into video games, and also into cartoons and everything else to do with children. All the politically correct updates are in those particular things. It gives you your opinions as you grow up, how you feel about certain things as you grow up, and even how to react against things that you’ve been taught to react against, or for, for that matter. It’s just astonishing how well it’s really worked so well.

But today too we have the same old games going on, because the media’s all owned by a club of the same boys basically, across the world. They’re on board with the agenda too. They keep us, you know, amused at times. They also keep us confused much of the time and give us lots and lots of trivia. But now the children themselves are watching TV, these high definition screens, digital and all the rest of it; they can’t tell fact from fiction anymore. And so many of them are drugged to the eyeballs and dull of emotional responses in fact. Some who get off it eventually say that, they were like zombies when they were on it; they felt nothing. Of course, this is a well-established fact; there’s lots of articles on the drugging of children and what it does to them. But at the same time too, some of these so-called antipsychotic drugs they’re giving them as well, along with speed or amphetamines really, because they give them that too. For being hyper they give them speed; there’s a magic potion for you. But you understand, they’re bombed out of their skulls. Then they’re watching movies like you wouldn’t believe by the militarized Hollywood culture where we’ve had 20-odd years or more of nothing but movies and good guys/bad guys and mass slaughter… for fun. We’re given this for fun. Because you see, they need a militarized culture right now to recruit guys, right now, and for the last 10, 15, 20 years, to fight all the wars which they knew they’d make happen at this time to standardize the rest of the countries into the global system.

But again, people have no idea of the collusion that Hollywood has to do with what you think and what you feel about things, your opinions and everything else too. And you think you’re being entertained. You don’t bring on professors and specialists to help work out movies, people who are into behaviorism and neuroscientists and all of this, just to make movies, folks. This is to make sure the right impressions are instilled, imprinted in fact, on the minds of the viewers. They first started to see how easy it was using simple things which they knew were drives, like sexual drives and so on and they sexified everything until they overdid it of course. All the children start copying it, and then you have a dysfunctional generation when they grow up. Then one of the communist planks is fulfilled, because no one gets married, you see; that was part of it too. And they need the militarized culture.

Then you’ve got youngsters too, supposedly shooting places up and all the rest of it. Because their hero is the guy who’s got the power, and the power is dressed in black with all the armor plating on and you look just like a combat trooper, a SWAT team person. And that’s what they emulate, the person with the power. And they know all this too. Plus too, I’ll put up a little link tonight, and this fact is true, that this Dark Knight movie has so much in it to do with the references of the two last shootings we’ve had, Aurora and Sandy Hook. You actually see the actual map that they used, and plus they were sending out posters before this, with the little place circled, this little town circled on it, to do with ‘attack zone’ and so on. That is not coincidence. That is not coincidence, folks. But again, Hollywood churned out lots of movies before 9/11 and they had the word ‘911’, or even the weight ‘911’ in it too. And you can’t just dismiss this. This is twilight language, as they say. And it’s almost like the big boys putting their little jokes in there and giving you the finger at the same time. And I’m not kidding about that.

Sandy Hook Labeled "Strike Zone" In Dark Knight Rises - gothamist.com

And when it comes to the joke of politics, I mean a politician is just a stooge who will take orders from his trainers. He’ll say what he’s told to say; he’ll read the dummy boards and he’ll behave in certain ways. Sometimes they give them a little bit more deportment; every politician in Britain has a minimum of £500 to £1000 worth of expenses that goes into deportment, and they’re taught by actors on how to stand and pause and look impressive, or sad or whatever. Everything today is an act, an incredible act. Because the publics are glued to TV. All their reality comes from TV, and they think it’s all just as real – the guy is doing all the right movements an actor would make, therefore he’s very, very good, and you believe them.

Now, there’s an article here, it says...

Obama Campaign Reveals How it Collaborated with Hollywood to Win

(Alan: And there’s nothing new in this kind of thing.)

laist.com

Before the presidential election, the Obama campaign wasn't shy about the fact that it was cozying up to Hollywood to rally support. But now, the administration has revealed just how much it worked with industry insiders to help re-elect the president, and it turns out that they had a significant and strategic involvement.

In a piece this week, the Hollywood Reporter discloses that Obama's official relationship with Hollywood executives began during a meeting in Beverly Hills last year between the incumbent and "top-level agents and producers":

The plan that emerged from that meeting, [Eric] Ortner says, was very scientific: "The idea was to mobilize constituency groups to build a ground game. It was very strategic."

From there, celebrities including Bruce Springsteen, Katy Perry and John Legend hit the ground running. They headlined concerts and made appearances in swing states, during which campaign workers would gather the contact information of attendees, whom they would later hit up directly with pleas to vote for Obama.

Their effort proved successful:

In the Vegas neighborhood where Perry performed for more than 13,000 people, area residents "rushed" their polling places on Election Day, according to local media accounts.

The actors and musicians involved with the effort also used social media to promote the president's campaign messages, with 90 million fans ultimately reached.

Obama's Hollywood Organizers Reveal Winning Strategy That Helped Tip Election - hollywoodreporter.com / 11/14/2012 / Tina Daunt

So that’s really how it’s done. And it wouldn’t make any difference which side was, you know, pushing this thing. They all use the same kind of techniques, if they can. But there’s no doubt, Hollywood is all for the global agenda. Because after all you see, it’s not there by chance. It’s not just there to entertain you, and to get awfully rich which it actually does too. It’s also there to influence you, because those who run, basically, the media and entertainment – the culture industry – run the country. And that’s a fact, folks. Because your culture is not the same culture you had when you were small, or your parents had. Hollywood literally changed it. People have adapted and adopted the Hollywood culture, on a much lower scale of course. But all that they’ve seen and heard and what they’ve been taught to think about, they have adopted it. So it’s all here.

And interesting too...

IntercontinentalExchange Finally Wins NYSE Euronext For $8.2 Billion

(A: New York Stock Exchange.)

forbes.com / 12/20/2012

IntercontinentalExchange, a collection of over-the-counter and options markets, will buy NYSE Euronext (A: It’s called. Euro-Next, interesting name eh.) for $8.2 billion in a cash-and-stock deal.

ICE will pay $33.12 a share, a 37% premium over yesterday’s closing price of $24.05. Plus, when the deal closes, NYSE Euronext shareholders will own 36% of ICE shares.

The NYSE Euronext headquarters on Wall Street will remain unchanged, the company says. ICE will open another New York building in 2013, adding to two existing locations in New York and Atlanta. By merging, the companies expect $450 million in cost synergies within two years. “Synergies appear massive for companies with little business overlap,” says Peter Lenardos, a RBC Capital Markets analyst.

New York Stock Exchange sold to derivatives company in $8bn takeover

guardian.co.uk / 20 December 2012 / Dominic Rushe

So everything is owned, isn’t it, you know. Everything, even your stock exchange is too. Of course they’re all owned; it’s not yours of course. It’s not yours at all. The money is not yours either, really. The debt is yours [Alan chuckles.]. They give it to you and you accept it. That’s why it’s yours, you accept it. But that’s how things really are.

Now going back to what I said at the beginning, perpetual childhood is really the dream of the socialist managers, perpetual childhood for all those that they manage, which is the vast populations. There’s a quote here and it’s from de Tocqueville. It says…

(Perpetual childhood In Strategy)

qualiaquotesforlife.wordpress.com/ June 2, 2011

“… (A) society which tries to keep its citizens in ‘perpetual childhood’: it will seek to preserve their happiness, but it chooses to be the sole agent and only arbiter of that happiness. Society will develop a new type of servitude which covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate … it does not tyrannise but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to be nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which government is the shepherd.” – de Tocqueville

Isn’t it the truth though. Back with more after this.

Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. And what a life it is too, because we truly are treated like children and bombarded with media and data, and conflicting data too. It’s like the data that they give you at all these shootings and so on that happen. And then they give you so many conflicting stories that eventually you give up trying to think logically and just go with the eventual official story. That’s how it’s done. That’s why it’s done too. If there’s reporters on the spot, they don’t make mistakes, like second people being there and stuff like that, unless they are there, unless it’s intentional that they lie to you. And most reporters actually don’t even go there. They just get reports from the cops themselves. And the cops go through public relations. So everything’s managed, and eventually your mind is managed as well.

This article too is to do with the ongoing, to end this old system of sovereign nations you have to multiculturalize, and then make everyone feel guilty if they’re not too happy about it. But it’s not to create a hands-across-the-street sort of thing. It’s to do away with the existing culture, the dominant culture, for the new minority to take over, not the ones you’re seeing coming in by the way. Of course, even the incoming newcomers, immigrants and so on, they hope that they too will lose their culture and not adopt the old British system; there’s nothing left to adopt – it’s gone, for instance, this is in Britain. And so you get this new mushy culture, which really is a Sovietized culture where government is in charge of everything, with so many agencies, massive welfare systems too, social work departments, psychologists testing children, all that kind of stuff. This is the new society that they’ve dreamed of for so long. Bertrand Russell and others talked about it, ad-nauseam, where everyone would get tested psychologically, etc. and they’d create the proper kind of citizens. The state would create them.

Well here’s an article too and it’s by Peter Hitchens. Now, he was the brother of Christopher Hitchens and Christopher was at complete opposite poles with him, but it’s interesting how they viewed things. It says…

Alien nation: The new census reveals a Britain that would be unrecognisable even to our grandparents

dailymail.co.uk / Peter Hitchens / 15 December 2012

Peter Hitchens says that the Census (A: ...statements that came out, and numbers and figures.) is not just a description of the state of things on a day in 2011 but a prophetic document telling us where we are going.

Christianity is on the decline while Islam is on the up and fewer of us are married for the first time ever.

The future will be another country. They will do things differently there. (A: The same place but it’s a different country and they’ll do things differently.)

The Census is not just a description of the state of things on a day in 2011, it is a prophetic document telling us where we are going, whether we like it or not. I don’t.

For the past 60 years or so, we have lived in a nation that was more or less familiar to anyone who had grown up in the pre-war Britain of 1939.

Even the devastation of conflict had not transformed it out of recognition.

People behaved, thought, worked, laughed and enjoyed themselves much as they had done for decades.

They lived in the same sorts of families in the same kind of houses. Their children went to the same kinds of schools.

And they had grown up in a land that was still identifiably the same as their grandparents had known.

And so it went back for centuries.

As recently as 1949, the prices of most goods were roughly the same, and expressed in the same money, as the prices of 1649. (A: Because it was the old coinage they used.)

A short-distance time-traveller between 1912 and 2012 might be perplexed and astonished, but he would not be lost.

That period is now coming to an end. I suspect that anyone in Britain, travelling between 2012 and 2112 would be unable to believe that he was in the same place.

What is the most significant single fact in the Census? I do not think there is one. Several are shocking or disturbing, if you are not fond of change, and delightful if you are.

But there are some, which taken together, prophesy a transformation to come.

Look at these – manufacturing is now only the fourth-biggest employer, after supplying and selling goods and services, health and social work and education. (A: So manufacturing is down.)

So, in the nation that was once the ‘Workshop of the World’, we now have more teachers than industrial workers. (A: And again, that’s part of the socialist system. Understand, even Lenin said this, and Stalin too, YOU’VE GOT TO PAY YOUR ARMY, YOUR MILITARY, YOUR POLICE AND YOUR TEACHERS, A LOT, BECAUSE THE TEACHERS INDOCTRINATE THE NEXT GENERATION, the way the state wants them indoctrinated.)

London is rapidly becoming a separate nation, as different from England as Scotland or Wales are, with indigenous British people now in a minority, in some areas a very small minority indeed, and incidentally with extremes of wealth and poverty not known since Edwardian times.

Then of course there is the decline in Christianity, down by four million, from 72 per cent to 59 per cent; the growth in indifference to religion, with non-believers almost doubling to 14.1 million; and also of Islam, rising so fast that one British resident in 20 is now a Muslim. (A: This is all done on purpose, folks, by the big people who rule. And it’s not Muslim.)

The Muslim population is young, and keen on large families, while the Christian population tends to be older and less likely to have children.

This is very much a work in progress, far from complete. A lot of nominal Christians are no longer bothering to pretend to a faith they have never cared much about.

Do not be surprised if, in ten years, the gap between the number of professing Christians and the number of Muslims has grown much smaller.

The secularists, who have so enthusiastically sought to drive Christianity out of British life, may realise with a gulp of apprehension that they have only created a vacancy for Islam – a faith that is not at all troubled by Richard Dawkins.

Perhaps most significant of all is the accelerating disappearance of marriage as the normal state of life for grown-up people.

For the first time, fewer than half of adults are married. (A: I’ll continue this article, it’s quite interesting, because the whole culture is gone. It’s not just religion; that was just a part of it. Whether you believed in it or not, it was a cultural society based on it for the common rules. Back after this.)

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about the big system changing and not just Britain but the world, and it’s all intentional. And Peter Hitchens whose brother was Christopher Hitchens, who was at the complete opposite pole. But Peter Hitchens is decrying basically the culture and things that held the culture together. Because at one time you could walk anywhere in complete safety and all the rest of it; you didn’t have all the trouble you have today. You didn’t have the joblessness as well. And it’s all gone, and the pride is gone. You’ve got a welfare state now, which means you’ve got a dominant government, a totally dominant government in a welfare state. But he says…

Getting hitched (A: He’s talking about getting married.): Homosexuals seem to be most enthusiastic about marriage just as heterosexuals tire of it

This means many things – a greater number of fatherless households, a greater number of cohabiting couples, the rapid disappearance of what was once a strong social force. (A: It’s also your communities too, are all destroyed as they were.)

Since the stable married family is a fortress of private life and individuality (A: And there’s the problem, individuality. They say it has to go.), its retreat will mean the opposite of that: more state interference and surveillance, more conformism – and more conformists – and mass culture. Its main effect will be on the children.

Many of them will grow up outside what used to be normal, a lifelong two-parent home.

They will, as a result, be different sorts of people. Already, almost half of Britain’s 15-year-olds do not live with their ‘birth parents’; 300,000 sets of parents split each year.

I cannot believe this is not part of the reason for the so-called ‘riots’ of 2011, in which young men brought up without male authority ran wild.

These were equal-opportunity events, and their causes were home-grown, not imported. This will get much, much worse.

Again, conservatives will find this worrying and ill-omened. Liberal ‘progressives’, who have never had much time for the married family, seeing it as a sort of prison, will view it as a liberation. (A: ...because that’s part of the Manifesto.)

Edmund Leach, giving his influential Reith Lectures in 1967, put it this way: ‘Far from being the basis of the good society, the family, with its narrow privacy and tawdry secrets, is the source of all our discontents.’

It is striking that just as homosexuals seem to be most enthusiastic about getting married, heterosexuals are tiring of the whole thing.

But now compare the giant political fuss over same-sex marriage with the numbers of people affected. (A: Meaning, the promotion of it and the media coverage.) See just what a tiny proportion of the country is involved.

While the decline of conventional marriage involves many millions, there are 105,000 people in civil partnerships, one-fifth of one per cent of the population, one person in 500.

And that is seven years after they first became available.

I have deliberately left migration to the end. The figures are astonishing, with one in ten people in England and Wales now born abroad, and the rate of increase over the past few years equally astounding – almost half of these new citizens have arrived here since 2001.

And, in a figure that has not attracted the attention it should have, almost three million people live in households where no adults speak English as their first language.

The main significance of this is the speed of it. Even now, official immigration still stands at 180,000 a year. Probably these totals are an underestimate, as illegal migrants tend not to fill in forms.

But the really important fact is that this revolution is the result of a deliberate, planned attempt to change this country for ever, and we have the evidence of this.

On October 23, 2009, a former New Labour official called Andrew Neather wrote an article in the London Evening Standard which was that very rare thing – a genuine revelation of a political secret.

The crucial passage described ‘a major shift from the policy of previous governments’.

It disclosed that a ‘big immigration report was surrounded by an unusual air of both anticipation and secrecy . . . there was a paranoia about it reaching the media . . . Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

‘I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date. That seemed to me to be a manoeuvre too far.

‘Ministers were very nervous about the whole thing . . . There was a reluctance elsewhere in Government to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for Labour’s core white working-class vote . . .

‘Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom. But Ministers (A: ....politicians, that is.) wouldn’t talk about it.’ Why not? Because Labour voters wouldn’t have liked it. (A: It had been discussed.)

‘While Ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working-men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.’

On Friday the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, was still trying to appeal to working-class voters whose views his metropolitan fat-cat party secretly despises. (A: Ed Miliband remember, with his brother, their dad was a top communist in Britain; he taught in universities there. He ran off from Europe to Britain and taught it there, communism.)

While praising immigration to his London audience, he pretended to be concerned about it by admitting there is ‘anxiety’ about the pace of change.

He promised (absurdly, since the EU has controlled our frontiers for many years) that ‘Britain must always control its borders’. (A: Actually, the EU said you couldn’t stop them coming in.)

But he then swiftly dismissed the idea – which would be the only hope of future harmony – that migrants should assimilate, saying this was ‘wrong for our country’.

He proclaimed: ‘One Nation doesn’t mean one identity. People can be proudly, patriotically British without abandoning their cultural roots.’

Is this true? In the days when the USA still sought to assimilate its migrants, it certainly didn’t think so. It insisted that they became Americans in every way, and as soon as they could.

Half the point of American state schools was the creation of new young Americans.

Since that policy was abandoned 30 years ago, the USA has in reality ceased to be one country, with large areas speaking Spanish and retaining the customs and cultures of their homes, hostile or chilly to their American fellow citizens, who return the favour.

Any observant person in Britain can see the same process in such cities as Bradford [in England], where multiculturalism has created two solitudes with their backs turned on each other.

Bit by bit, the people of this country are ceasing to have key things in common. They don’t share a religion, or a culture, or a history. Many don’t even share a language.

They don’t eat the same food or watch the same TV stations or have a common sense of humour.

They sometimes even disagree about whether to drive on the left. (A: ...side of the road.)

They come from completely different legal and political traditions. (A: And it’s true, a lot of them come from countries where there’s been totalitarianism, and they actually go along with it when they come into totalitarian countries like, well, Britain. [Alan chuckles.])

In a strange paradox, many of the new Britons are more socially and morally conservative than their indigenous British neighbours, though their presence here is a sort of revolution in flesh and blood.

Many of the new migrants also have a completely different work ethic, not having grown up in our entitlement-based welfare state – which is why one of their main unspoken functions in Labour’s plan has been to keep wages down by providing a huge pool of cheap and willing unskilled labour.

Without mass immigration, the minimum wage would long ago have had to rise sharply, creating the crisis that all economists predicted when it was introduced.

As it is, we are fast becoming a low-wage, unskilled economy, with overcrowded cities, multi-occupied housing and hopelessly strained medical services, transport and schools.

There is also a widening gap between the rich, who can afford servants again for the first time since the era of Downton Abbey, and the poor, who have to be those servants.

The only way we will be able to sustain this is by becoming steadily cheaper, devaluing our currency through inflation and incidentally destroying the savings and pensions of the thrifty.

And he goes on and on about what’s happening. But it’s all happened. I mean, it’s all been done, by design, to bring in the new society, you see, which really is no society at all. It’s just an obedient society of many, many groups all obeying government, or else. I mean, that’s what the new system is. And it was designed a long, long time ago, and you have a new dominant minority running the whole show.

Also tonight I’ll put up, ha, in Scotland, Scotland, it’s incredible how the communism runs Scotland. It truly is. Because they’re really taking… The government agencies are in everybody’s homes. If you’ve got a child you’re probably terrified in Scotland because they’re right in there.

The Scottish Child Health Programme:

Guidance on the 27-30 month child health review

scotland.gov.uk

There’s a PDF that comes with this; I’ll give you it. Because this is from the UN too; they’re helping it out. The EU bunch are helping it out too. They want to literally monitor you, health-wise, mental-wise and so on, right through your life. This is only part of it, to the 30-month part. And even the 30-month part is comical; they want to go on long after that. But they’re right into their parents as well, what kind of jobs they have, are they healthy, do they smoke, do they occasionally drink, all this stuff, people who look after me and all this kind of stuff. Then it even goes into mental health; they also mean of the parents too – and that’s going to be judged by some social worker that’s been made paranoid by all of their indoctrinations and so on and so on. And then...

My wider world (A: It’s quite interesting. Up to 30 months, they’re talking about…)

Home learning environment

Play opportunities

Books and reading

Screen time (e.g. television, computer)

Early learning and childcare

Nursery/childminder/playgroup attendance or registration

Inoculations, vaccinations, it’s all there. Socialism is totally… Actually, the Soviets would have loved this system. See, we’re beyond the Soviet. We’re into what the Soviet was supposed to turn out to be. We’re the next phase of it. It’s all happened. Big government, you see, running it properly, scientifically.

Another article I’ll put up tonight too, is called…

New Report: Three-Fifths of Colleges Seriously Restrict Free Speech on Campus

thefire.org / Dec 18, 2012

So they can’t get it; it’s at loggerheads with the First Amendment. This is in the US. I’ll put this up tonight because it’s interesting. And it is true, their own speech codes in universities and colleges are conflicting, totally conflicting with the First Amendment right of free speech. So I’ll put this article up tonight as well.

Now, Hillary Clinton... As we go into all these partnerships with free trade organizations, the BRIC countries, you’ve got the Pacific Rim groups and so on, the transpacific partnerships, the trans-European partnerships. We’ve got all these partnerships. Free trade, again, the brainchild of the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, from a hundred years ago. And when anybody else tries to do the same, because they’re getting shelled in there by, say, different missiles surrounding their countries, you’re Sovietization, or Sovietizing your country.

Clinton’s ‘Sovietization’ comment attracts Kremlin’s ire

rt.com / December 19, 2012

(A: So the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, she’s annoyed the President of Russia.)

The Russian President’s press secretary said recent remarks by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about ‘re-Sovietizing the CIS countries points to a total lack of understanding about the processes taking place in the region.

As the former Soviet countries that make up the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) continue to adjust to the occasionally harsh realities of democracy and globalization, Clinton’s comment struck a raw nerve.

The US Secretary of State explained efforts to promote greater integration in the CIS as “a move to re-Sovietize the region.”

“It's not going to be called that,” Clinton remarked. "It's going to be called a customs union; it will be called the Eurasian Union and all of that. But let's make no mistake about it. We know what the goal is and we are trying to figure out effective ways to slow it down or prevent it." (A: Now, that’s exactly what we’re doing. What do you think the economic union of Europe is? That’s a union, European UNION, you know. And we have the Transpacific Partnership, which is a union, and many other unions. But anybody else that’s not quite in the club, that does their own little thing, then apparently they’re becoming Soviet. And they didn’t call the BRIC countries Soviet, when the Latin American countries got involved with China and different ones making their own little deal. But there’s big bones to pick, you see, with Russia, for a lot of the folk that were kicked out of it.)

To associate these open developments with some sort of “Sovietization” fails to appreciate the changes taking place in the former Soviet Union,” he said in an interview with the Russia 24 TV channel.

Indeed, Russia and the CIS states, much like other regions of the world, are coalescing into various economic and political unions, not to mention security alliances. Moscow is certainly wondering if Clinton has forgotten that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which continues its mission creep across the former Soviet space, is a vestige of the Cold War period. Indeed, the majority of Russians believe the western military alliance has outlived its purpose and should be disbanded. (A: Because it was supposed to be ONLY for the Cold War period, and of course they were in there bombing Libya and different places.)

At the same time, Clinton overlooked the basic differences between what passed for integration in the Soviet period compared with today. For starters, in the Soviet period, all of the decisions were passed down from Moscow in an effort to bring the various Soviet Republics in line with communist ideology. (A: ...and he goes on and on and on.)

But it just shows you… Because the US, they’re into Bulgaria and different places putting missiles in; they put missiles into Turkey. And of course they’re trying to do the old Cold War thing and surrounding Russia with missiles. It’s the same thing on the go, you see. So that’s why that’s all happening.

Also I want to mention tonight too, about this... Talk about culture going down the tubes with the ones who are involved in culture creation. There’s a band in Britain called LostProphets and they’re all in the wilderness now, because their front man, their singer was accused of plotting to rape a baby. No kidding. He’s been arrested. It says…

Lostprophets band members in "state of shock" after frontman

Ian Watkins accused of plotting to rape a baby

mirror.co.uk / Natalie Evans / 20 Dec 2012

The band released a statement after the 35-year-old singer appeared in court yesterday charged with six child sex offences. (A: The accused is Ian Watkins.)

Members of Welsh rock band Lostprophets are “in a state of shock” after lead singer Ian Watkins was accused of plotting to rape a baby.

The 35-year-old frontman appeared in court yesterday charged with six child sex offences - including conspiring with a female fan, 24, to rape a one-year-old girl.

(A: Apparently there’s two females now that they’ve got.)

The singer and two women, who cannot be named for legal reasons, are also accused of conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a girl under 13. (A: Well I’d say yeah, a 1-year-old girl is under 13.)

Watkins - a former boyfriend of TV presenter Fearne Cotton - was further charged with three separate charges of possession, making and distributing indecent images of children.

He is also accused of possession of “extreme pornography”, some involving animals.

Watkins’ bandmates - Jamie Oliver, Lee Gaze, Luke Johnson, Mike Lewis and Stuart Richardson – released a statement on their website today speaking of their “shock”. (A: Well, really?)

Lead singer of Welsh rock band Lostprophets, Ian Watkins, charged with child sex offences

mirror.co.uk / Natalie Evans / 19 Dec 2012

But you know, the whole culture is in degradation – I’ve been saying that for years – by design. And that TV tube has altered the world, intentionally too. Not just for ratings, not just for the cash… but by planning. I’ve mentioned before that the Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs had that meeting in the 60s to do with who they were going to give the power to, to give the world its culture. They were talking about using the British film studios that they had in London, or should they use Hollywood, to create not just music, but movies and music. They decided eventually, after this two-weeklong meeting, they would give it to the US and Hollywood, and it has been done. And the whole agenda pretty well of destroying the cultures of those countries has been completed.

So there’s nothing… This doesn’t even shock people anymore. What does shock people anymore? You don’t get shocked unless you follow the boob tube for your news, a school shooting, and they lead you through a whole bunch of things that supposedly have happened, haven’t happened, they keep changing their mind about the story, until you give up, but you go along with the emotion and it goes right into gun control. From there to there, just like that. So emotion and the creation of emotional hype has the desired effect for an agenda to go through. Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. I’ll go to the calls now and there’s Anthony from New York hanging on there. Are you there Anthony?

Anthony: Yes I’m here. Thank you for taking my call. I just wanted to slightly change the subject, but this one’s a follow-up on that one shooting, the Sandy Hook shooting over in Connecticut, was pretty horrible. I noticed that there was a link between the Newtown, Connecticut and the shooting that took place in Australia, where the shooter was also from a place called Newtown, in Australia back in 1996. I was wondering if you knew anything about that shooting that took place in 1996 in Australia?

Alan: I do remember that. Again, it was the same kind of thing. It was a lone guy. I think he shot up a bunch of tourists actually, Japanese if I remember right, at the time. That was one of the big shootings that was set off there. It was never explained properly. And then there was another one after that too. There’s been a lot of questions asked, if these were set-ups as well. So yeah, when you get the names jiving like that you just can’t ignore them. There’s no doubt, particularly, the Hollywood guys sent out these posters with the little pictures of the map and so on, and T-shirts as well, to people before the movie even came out, with Aurora on it – and that’s in the movie; you can actually see it in the Batman movie on top of a building. Then you see the map where they’re going to have a hit, or a strike, and it’s Sandy Hook. I mean it’s there.

Anthony: Also, real quick, what was very interesting as well is that I believe a year before they had the Department of Homeland Security that had a drill there, which was… I guess the drill was probably supposed to be simulating something similar also as well, which is very, very interesting. Very bizarre also as well.

Alan: Yes. And again too, reporters are taught to report on facts before they publish anything to the people. And yet here they are saying there was a shooter found, another one found and handcuffed outside the school, and then he’s not there anymore. Then they found all these .223 cartridges all over the school from the rifle, then later they say the rifle was found in the trunk of the car; obviously it wasn’t used. They keep giving you these contradictory reports. Now, reporters don’t do that, just like that. Even in the excitement they’re supposed to get the facts right. So I think the technique they’re using is like a twilight technique, they call it, where you’re still addicted to the tube – because everyone today is, they’re addicted to the tube for all information. So they keep watching it and they get so confused, then eventually when the final story comes out they won’t question anything at all; they’ll take it just as it’s said. But nothing makes sense in this. They said that the woman was a homeschooler of this child; she was not. They said she worked at the school; she didn’t work at the school. They even said in the early reports, remember, that the husband in New Jersey was found dead; he wasn’t. I mean, you just don’t make these mistakes. Any reporter today has access to more information on us, than we have on each other, and they can get it instantly, believe you me, and in real time. So this is a technique that’s being used here to disassociate the people from thinking logically themselves, and pull them, step by step, right into the emotional bit, with the crying with Obama and all that, into the objective which is gun confiscation. This is a technique, there’s no doubt about it.

Anthony: That’s amazing. They were even saying that there were even reports of the principal giving some sort of report or complaint to the police, and now all of a sudden that’s been removed.

Alan: Everything gets removed step-by-step-by-step and you’re left in the twilight zone. But you’ve got the objective there, you’ve got rage, an emotional rage all mixed up with it. And it’s been done before. You have to go into the old Bath bombing in the US back in 1923, where a guy blew up a school, and they didn’t ban janitors; it was the janitor that did it. A taxi driver in Britain ran over eight guys after a dispute; they didn’t ban taxis. But thanks for calling.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

Sandy Hook with Usual Hollywood "Coincidences"

Hollywood and Electing Obama

& More on Above

New York Stock Exchange Sold to Derivatives Company in $8bn takeover
Sale of nearly 200-year-old institution to Intercontinental Exchange comes amid historic shift to electronic trading

& IntercontinentalExchange Finally Wins NYSE Euronext For $8.2 Billion

de Tocqueville on Perpetual Childhood

Britain, Alien Nation

Scotland---Child Health Programme (Beyond Big Brother)

Three-Fifths of US Colleges' Speech Codes Conflict with 1st. Amendment Right

Hillary's "Sovietization" Comment attracts Kremlin's Ire