Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:15 am

Hi folks.  I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 2^nd of January, 2013.

For newcomers as always I hope you make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  There are well over a thousand audios for download for free.  And I go through the big system you’re born into.  I explain how it came to be about.  I go across the foundations and organizations, the big clubs that own it in fact, set it up and own it and their intentions of taking the world over basically and running it properly on their own behalf of course.  And really we’re all down to renewable resources, that’s what humanity happens to be.  We’re classified amongst trees and everything else.  And we’re quite cheap actually to maintain.  And the big boys simply are going for the whole planet now, all the resources, food, water, everything.   And they pretty well own it all because after all they own all governments and they put them in place for you.  And they solidify them in your mind as though it’s all real, by repetition, repetition.  And really a government really is just a fiction, it’s an idea.  That’s all government really is you know.  And you have to go along with it for it to exist.  It’s very, very simple.  And the trick that they’ve used for so long now is to use authority and authoritarian reports from newscasts and so on to make it more real and solidify it in your minds.  But it’s just an idea remember.  Like money is an idea, just like a price is an idea as well.  So always remember that when you hear all the bad news.  That all these governments and so on, all the parasites and multi-layered governmental officials, they’re adding all the time to them, are nothing but their own idea.  And using massive propaganda to make you believe that it’s all exceptionally real.

And remember too that you are the audience that bring me to you.  You can keep me going by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  And you can purchase them from the U.S. to Canada by using a personal check or an international postal money order, or you can send cash, or use Paypal.  And across the world you’ve got Western Union, Moneygram, and Paypal.  Remember straight donations are really, really awfully welcome in these austere times as it’s called.

And I hope you all had a good Christmas and a Happy New Year as well.  And talking about Happy New Years as well and the cons that go on incessantly because you see we’re run by nothing but cons and incredible lies that are all, at the top they come to consensus, they’re called consensus builders.  Some of the foundations, the fronts for the big international private bankers, actually have foundations that just do nothing but build consensus between countries, NGOs, and other foundations so they’re all onboard together to get things through.  Always lying to the public about the real intentions or the reasons for them.  But weather of course, weather is one of the big ones they’re using right now and blaming us all for carbon, etcetera.  It’s all our fault apparently as these, what can you call them, they’re bar stewards you know, these characters.  Who get stinking rich off you because you are the herd you understand.  You are a herd.  And since the most ancient times those that put up with money were called the good shepherds.  And they run the world now, these good shepherds, you see.  And it is awfully good, for them that is, as we all go under with their fictitious money scams.  And it all is truly fiction.  It really is.  Today’s money is all fiction.

But:

"Greenland..."

Alan:  For instance

 "...Ends The Year With Some Of The Coldest Weather Ever Recorded"

 Alan:  It says; in these times of global warming. And it says:

"On December 29 they hit -78F, five degrees above the coldest temperature ever recorded there."

"NASA is only interested in a couple of days during the summer when temperatures got barely above freezing for a couple of hours."

Alan:  But it doesn’t matter you understand because Richard Haass and all the kin that he’s got at the Council on Foreign Relations must get this scam through because it’s going to rake in trillions for them, trillions and trillions across the planet.  And control us all into austerity and poverty as proper sheep should be you see.  Because that’s how they see us, as sheep.  Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks.  I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix and you understand that war takes many, many forms.  And they all work together, different types of warfare all work together.  From soft wars, psychological wars, into hard wars and hardware wars as well.  So it goes on all the time because you’re run by a dominant minority.  And a dominant minority has to take out the last of the resisting countries, the countries that didn’t adapt to central banking systems and so on.  Because the world is to be standardized so that they can rule it properly you see.  For themselves that is.  And that means destroying all cultures as well.  Cultural war is an awful big one because it’s not an intention of bringing in new cultures to countries like they did with Britain and then telling them to adapt into the system.  They did at one time but then they changed it to, “no, keep your cultures,” and so you’ve got these little segregated ghettos all over all the major cities.  This was done intentionally.  And they end up really having skirmishes and the government loves that kind of stuff because then government can bring more laws out and more laws out to control everybody you see.  It’s very simple.  It’s been used many times, even thousands of years ago and by money boys then too.

So there are many ways to do it as I say and money is one of the biggest ones there is to take down countries.  And even Pakistan is going to the International Monetary Fund to seek a fresh bailout.  Now Pakistan of course is on the so-called enemies list and mainly because they’re still a Muslim country.  And all Muslim countries have to be abolished basically.  And that’s how they’re using this because Muslims have an enemy and it’s not Americans or British, but they have an enemy.  A traditional enemy apparently and they have to be taken out and put into the standardized system and then the western culture, which isn’t western culture, it was also given to you by a minority, was to be imposed there; then they’ll have lots of prostitution, they’ll have lots of abortions, and all their old culture will just go by the wayside.  That’s how you destroy countries.  It’s very simple to do when you own the system.  And the system everywhere in the first world countries is completely owned.  All your media is owned, all your entertainment is owned by the same dominant minority who know how to take you down because you imitate what you see.  And the children especially are very, very easily influenced and they copy the same attitudes, etcetera, that’s put across to them.  Very simple stuff.  And here’s an article that ties in with it, to an extent anyway.

It says:

"How To Win The War For Your Mind"

Alan:  And it goes on about the usual kind of stuff with how they teach this kind of stuff to the powers that be.  But it also mentions tricks to defend yourself, against the psychological attacks.

It says:

"As with any method of self-defense, constant training is required.  For the past century, at least in the United States, a subversive and secret cold war has been waged against the people in the form of psychological subjugation.  This cold war is designed to weaken our resolve, our heritage,"

Alan:  That’s your culture and everything.

"...our self-belief, our confidence and our integrity in preparation for a “hot war” against our time-honored Constitutional rights."

Alan:  Well remember I’ve put this up years ago, the CFR itself, it’s an article in Foreign Affairs magazine where one of the top special people wrote about running rings around the constitution rather than just hitting it head on and having a backlash.  They would just run rings around it or superstructures over it and get what they wanted that way.  And they’ve been doing that all along too.

And it says:

"The power elite know well that the most effective strategy for victory in any battle is to convince your enemy to surrender before the fight even begins.  Today, the American populace is being conditioned to lie down and die a mental death, to give up the inner war, so that when the outer war comes, they will already be defeated."

Alan:  Now I should add to this too that a lot of this is also done by bringing in depressions, you know, financial depressions.  And the money game is just that, it’s a money game, it’s a con job.  They make money out of nothing at the top.  It’s only important that their victims believe it’s all real.  And you think it is because you can swap that dollar for a few caramels or something.  And of course it always gets inflated and inflated, meaning it’s devalued and devalued all the time.  And when you go for your pay raise at the beginning of the year and you get extra numbers at the end of it, the amount that you’re given, you think oh you’re winning.  No, you’re not winning because everybody else puts their prices up at the same time too.  You’re actually going backwards if you look at the wages for the last twenty, thirty years in Canada, the States and so on, they’ve been going backwards.  So money controls everything at this.  And mind you governments could, if people got real governments in, which they haven’t done for a long, long time, then they could easily start making their own money and selling it to the banks like they used to do in the Bank of Canada.  And that way it’s created debt-free to start with.

And no country should be in the business of being a banker itself and lending to other countries either.  It’s got nothing to do with your nation.  And even Jefferson said the same thing, that any generation born with a standing debt already there from a previous generation are defacto slaves.  And you must never forget that, this is a slavery system.  And the boys who rule it have been in the slave business for thousands of years.  I hope you understand that too.  Nothing new to them.  There is no trick they haven’t learned, you understand.

It says:

"Corrupt governments rely heavily on what they call “psyops,” which are primarily propaganda initiatives meant to demoralize their target (usually the citizenry).  In the case of a despotic regime, psyops involves the insinuation of lies, half-truths, threats and brutality that is choreographed to elicit a very specific reaction.  It is used to instigate strong emotional responses en masse that will work in favor of the oligarchy.  The following guidelines can shield you from the arrows of deceit, allowing you to maintain control and avoid being unconsciously influenced to labor against your own cause..."

Then it goes on to:

"Do Not Fear Hypothetical Dangers"

"Fear is the weapon of choice when it comes to totalitarian proponents.  Conquering armies and bureaucracies are notorious for exaggerating their strength and numbers in order to squelch the fighting spirit of those they intend to rule.  Genghis Kahn, for instance, used the tactic of exaggerated numbers, along with vicious genocide, to strike terror in regions he had not yet attempted to overtake.  Upon his arrival, the Mongol hordes had received such a reputation (some of it fabricated) that many regions surrendered immediately without question.  When becoming an activist against a criminal establishment, it is very common to be the target of fear campaigns.  Today, those of us in the liberty movement hear warnings from “random” concerned parties constantly telling us that our efforts are “all for nothing,” that we are “making ourselves targets.” That the globalist system is far too strong and far too advanced to be defeated.  That they have predator drones and NSA databases and soldiers without empathy etc, etc.  Their hope is to make us afraid of hypothetical situations which can neither be confirmed nor denied.  To make us obsess over the "odds" rather than the objective.   In other words, they hope to encourage a state of mass cowardice.  To undo this tactic, you must remain focused on your goal regardless of the possible danger.  That is to say, the strength of the enemy, whether real or fantasy, is irrelevant.  It is meaningless.  Goliath is nothing but an obstacle, and all obstacles can be dealt with.  Move forward toward the objective and never stop."

Alan:  And it’s true enough if you stand up and say, or even get close to saying the truth you will have massive smear campaigns, massive smear campaigns and even government coming down on top of you because you’re not allowed to say certain things you see.  Because you’re occupied, you’re all slaves you see.

And it says:

"Do Not Be Distracted By Minor Inconveniences And Personal Problems"

"At the height of communist power in East Germany, the Stasi secret police deployed a tactic which they called “Zersetzung,” which means to “corrode” or “undermine.”  The Zersetzung policy involved the use of subtle manipulations of a particular person’s life in order to interfere with his ability to function normally and participate fully in dissenting activities.  The Stasi would send agents to a person’s home to rearrange items or fake a break-in.  Often, they would attempt to create emotional conflicts between the dissident and his wife, family and friends and to damage business relationships."

Alan:  And it’s true they make phone calls to the place you work and all these kind of things.  And start spreading rumors and so on.

"The purpose was to force the target to divert his attention from his political and social work over to more minor inconveniences."

Alan:  Sometimes they do that, even burn your house down or try to.

"Personal firestorms, whether engineered by Stasi or by natural conflict, are destructive only when you give them too much credence and attention.  Some people become utterly fixated with their own private soap operas, and this weakness is often exploited by government elements.  The truth is, our home lives and the tensions in them are secondary when it comes to defending our principles and our culture against enslavement and oblivion."

Alan:  Now that part of that is very, very true.  It’s not just your culture; it’s what you want to keep of your culture, or keeping it all together.  Because you see to conquer people you must destroy the culture, it makes people very, very strong.  A common culture is the biggest problem and really all cultures down through history generally had a main religion, whether you believed in it or not, didn’t matter, it united the people you see.  And that’s what the big boys fear.  In all the writings from the far left, which is also owned as a weapon of the dominant minority, they always talked about big ideas.  Ideas were terrifying to them because they could unite people you see.  And so they weren’t scared so much of retaliatory action physically.   Big ideas that would really spread and take over was the biggest thing that they ever feared.  And that’s why your culture is almost decayed at this particular stage of the game after fifty, sixty years of TV and degradation going down the tubes.  But it says here...

"Family and friends who get in the way or are manipulated into getting in the way should be ignored."

Alan:  And that’s true if you’re serious about this at all.  You can’t be put off by people just falling away from you.

"Do Not Be Seduced By Gifts"

It says:

"Tyrants love to offer gifts to the populace, especially at the onset of their rise to dominance.  It may be the promise of new jobs, better infrastructure, free healthcare, more food, more safety or even free cellphones."

Alan:  Which they also do is offer a lot of people celebrity status.  Because it costs a lot to get celebrity status you understand.  It’s a lot.  They make stars today and it costs a fortune.  So when they come up and offer it to you for nothing, on certain terms, then most folk take the bait.  Sometimes they don’t even know that they’re being used.  It can be done so slickly because everyone believes in celebrities.  Back after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks.  We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix, reading an article, it’s quite good, about protecting your mind basically for the war that you intend to go into which is psychological primarily.  And it says:

"Do Not Concern Yourself With Ridicule"

It says:

"Fighting disinformation is vital, but our personal pride is not important.  Safeguarding our egos is not important.  Trying to please everyone all the time is impossible and also not important.  Ridicule is used not only to discredit activists; it is also used to make them question their own resolve.  If you cannot be embarrassed or browbeaten, then you cannot be made afraid and you cannot be defeated by mere words.  Require your opponents to answer your legitimate questions."

Alan:  See, if they can’t get you on what you’re saying, because they can’t because what you’re saying is the truth and you’ve checked it all you see, then they try to do these Ad Hominem attacks on you and get other idiots to follow, which they will get idiots to follow, you see.  People that can’t think or reason and use logic, they follow quite easily through emotional attacks you see.

"Require your opponents to answer your legitimate questions.  Move past their distractions and push the issue of tangibility.  Make them produce a legitimate argument.  When they cannot, and continue to revert to Ad Hominem attacks, they expose the frailty of their position, and you have won."

Alan:  Remember too a lot of these people are actually paid to do what they do.  They won’t tell their followers that; they just use the followers.  But they get paid to do it and you won’t be the only one they’re paid for, often there are organizations under one name that are meant to do this.  We know this from their own government disclosures.

And it goes on too, about:

"Accept The Risk Before Confronting The Enemy"

Alan:  And so on.  And there are risks of course; as I say if you go all the way and say the whole truth, it’s illegal, it’s not legal to tell the whole truth today.  Here’s another article here too.

It says:

"Crypto-Eugenic Media Group: Population Control Brainwashing A “Smash Hit”"

Alan:  And this is interesting, it ties right in with it you see.  I’ve talked about this many, many times before, about brainwashing.  And that’s all you get through media and entertainment.  Entertainment’s even better, it’s more effective because the people don’t know they’re getting brainwashed.  They think they’re getting entertainment and to enjoy themselves.

But it says:

"President of the Population Media Center, Bill Ryerson, recently bragged that its population control brainwashing campaign in developing nations has been “a smash hit.”"

Alan:  Now, that goes back to the perpetual war article I read from the military’s own magazine, the U.S. military, where they said they would use the same degenerate culture that has replaced American culture, through television and so on.  And they would use that as a weapon on other third world countries to destroy their cultures.  That’s how you must dominate and destroy their cultures, it’s so obvious.

And it says:

"The Population Media Center is an American population group producing fictional programs for worldwide dissemination purposes.  Its mission: to spread the message of population reduction through works of fiction.  Ryerson, the Center’s president, also heads the Washington-based Population Institute.  Both groups are active in the modern day “population movement”, striving for worldwide population reduction in the name of the earth.  During an interview with PeakProsperity’s Chris Martenson, Ryerson boasted that (radio) soap-operas are the most effective way to cull populations worldwide."

Alan:  And I’ve got the link for that too, you can hear the guy’s interview.  I’ll put that up tonight too.

"“One of the things that we do – and that is the primary thing we do – is to use a strategy of communications that has turned out, from everything we have been able to measure, to be the most cost-effective strategy for changing behavior... ”"

Alan:  So it’s behavior modification you see.

"“...with regard to family size and contraceptive use on a per-behavior change basis of any strategy we have found on the planet.”  Ryserson explains that fictional platforms have proven to be successful carriers of the crypto-eugenic message:  “(…) the use of long-running serialized dramas, melodramas like soap operas, in which characters gradually evolve from the middle of the road in that society into positive role models for daughter education, delaying marriage and childbearing until adulthood, spacing of children, limiting of family size, and various other health and social goals of each country.  And we have now done such programs in forty-five countries.”"

Alan:  Forty-five countries.

"Ryerson continues to brag about the Center’s propaganda campaigns, especially those in Nigeria:"

He said:

"“(…) a program we ran from 2007 to 2009 was listened to by 70% of the population...”"

Alan:  Was listened to, this is the radio show.

"“...of the population at least weekly.  It was a twice a week program.  It was clearly a smash hit.  And it was a smash hit because it was highly suspenseful and highly entertaining.  But it had a storyline dealing with a couple deciding to use family planning, which is almost taboo in northern Nigeria because less than 10% of the people in that region use any modern method of contraception.  We had eleven clinics have healthcare workers ask clients what had motivated them to come in for family planning, and 67% percent of them named the program...”"

Alan:  The fictional program.

"“...as the motivation.”"

Alan:  And that’s just radio.  It’s used in the West all the time.  All of these techniques are used in the West more so.

It says:

"“That”, Ryerson explained, “is the kind of thing that can dramatically change demographic trends globally.  We need to greatly expand this type of work.”"

"The Center is heavily sponsored by the corporate and “philanthropic” elites."

Alan:  That’s your big foundations again, the banker fronts.

"On its slick-looking website, the Center states “contributions from and partnerships with the following organizations have enabled us to do work which initiates improved health in people all around the world, while providing engaging entertainment!”.  Their list counts many UN organizations among its “contributors” as well as USAID divisions operating in so-called “high-fertility nations”:"

Alan:  And it’s got a whole list of all the UNICEF groups and United Nations groups, a whole chapter of them basically involved in this.

It says:

"In addition, the Center receives funding from literally all the major foundations including the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Foundation, Bank of America Charitable Gift Fund, The David Rockefeller Fund, Ford Foundation, and the IMF Employees’ Fund."

Alan:  Now remember this is just radio.  You’ve had fifty, sixty years of this stuff on television and your whole culture has been destroyed.  Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫ - You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network because you can handle the truth - ♫}

Hi folks.  I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix and carbon taxes, eh.  I mean energy taxes, carbon taxes and so on.  All the big elite’s plan hinges on more taxes from you as they bring you down you see.  Remember what they said at the Club of Rome, the big think tank for the United Nations.  They said, back in the 70’s, that they bring you into a post-industrial, post-consumer society, which meant austerity you see.  And when your own governments, which are not your own governments of course, signed the World Trade Organization’s various treaties to ship all your manufacturing off to China, and it was all done deliberately.  China didn’t force their arms to do it.  It was all prearranged years and years and years ago.  They knew there would be no work left for anyone else you see, and they’d bring in this so-called austerity.  They’d also create a massive welfare system during that time as well to take care of some of the damage because they didn’t want revolution too early you understand, or backlash from the people.  So they postponed it by throwing out credit cards as well like crazy through the 70’s and 80’s.  Everybody could get them.  It doesn’t matter even if you defaulted on them, they’d give you more.

So it was all to get you through that period without too much chaos and too much poverty being visible at least.  And they threw all the cards out there.  But the big one now is of course Austerity.  We’re going into austerity and the big, big stick.  It doesn’t matter, again remember what a meme is, a meme which becomes a theme but it really is put out there.  I like me-me, that’s the way I prefer to say it.  But they put this out there.  Like the “fiscal cliff” is a meme you see.  And then they track how many people are using the terminology, instantly, in real time, and what’s catching on with the public.  Everything out there is weaponized.  They have massive panels of marketers and specialists and neuroscientists working out these little slogans that you’re going to pick up on.  And it becomes concretized in your mind.  It becomes physical in your mind.  It’s an abstract idea, it’s nonsense, and it’s a con as well.  It’s a con, a pure con game that’s all.  Because they need all this cash to bring you into austerity while their own banks of this special dominant minority end up getting all the cash coming, flowing into them.  And then it eliminates the middle classes.  The same with the fiscal cliff idea, get rid of the middle classes you see.  Then you’ll have just the ultra elite and all the peasants down below for the New World Order, this new system, this new organized society run properly, the way that those in academia say it should be.  Of course they’re all on board with it too.  Academia was weaponized an awful long time ago.  It’s completely politicized, completely politicized.  That’s its goal, is to turn out the next bunch of global managers that will dominate you.

But Australia put in the carbon tax as you know.  And I’ll put this article up, it says...

"Australian Carbon Tax Responsible for Damaging 80% of Australian Small Businesses"

Alan:  Well you can understand these same characters tried this same thing before World War II came along even.  In countries in Europe small business was getting put under by big malls opening across, especially in Germany and different countries like that, doing away with the Mom-and-Pop stores.  And then the prices, once they put them all under, the prices all shot up with the guys who monopolized everything through their massive malls, etcetera.  They were eventually, when the Nazis came in, they actually took them all down and went back to the Ma’s and Pa’s because they knew that a people that want to keep their own independence have to have real competition.  When you’ve got ten green grocers on one big long street it’s good, that, because it keeps the prices down.  The same with your meat and everything else.

So Maggie Thatcher even touched on this, she said that the future would be big corporations only.  Small business would be out of the way.  And she did her best to destroy all small business.  This is the agenda.  The same with small farms and everything else, nothing but corporate farms you see.  That’s the agenda for the future, worked out years ago before you were born.  You see the big boys never change their plan, never ever change their plan.  They don’t have to change their plans.

And then you get into this one here.  It’s quite interesting, the Council on Foreign Relations, this, again, private organization that’s just an American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  Both private organizations you see and they speak on behalf of the elite.  They give you all your media through Reuters and so on, to make sure it’s all standardized lies that you get.  Because all media always lies.  Nobody does investigative reporting today, it doesn’t happen you see.  But it’s very, very important to make sure that you get standardized lies so as you all believe it you see.  And they spent a long, long time trying to convince the public through marketing campaigns how truthful they are, even in Canada.  About fifteen years ago suddenly radio broadcasts and news broadcasts, and your TV news broadcasts, even the government-owned ones in Canada, would give you your “most trusted man in Canada.”  A guy you’ll never meet who is just a mouthpiece and reads his script on his news.  And apparently he’s very believable to most folk who truly watch it every night.  Every country was at this.

Because you see the generation before was very mistrustful of the news.  Knowing, you see, in their day, that it was always used by the big corporate elite.  They owned all the papers so you always were very suspicious of what they were saying.  Not now; people really believe the news.  They really do.  They never question it.

The Council on Foreign Relations anyway, remember they are the big, big front pieces to make sure the standardized news gets to you, and that all the right books are on the shelves in the stores on the right facts that they’re going to give you on history and in the making, and "predictive history," that’s what they also call it, that’s another term, "predictive history".  In other words they predict in advance their agenda, where they want to go with it, and they predict it will be written that way in history looking back.  And that’s actually how it works in fact.  You see you’re run by agendas and nothing happens by itself.  Nothing happens by itself.

"CFR: Challenges for Global Governance in 2013"

"This roundup is a feature of the Council of Councils initiative,"

Alan:  They also have on the CFR a special branch called the Council of Councils.  Whose only job it is, is to keep pulse through all their big think tanks and their affiliates in governmental agencies that spy on you, to make sure that you’re all starting to behave and believe what you’re given.  And behave the appropriate way, you see, for global government.  So the Council of Councils’ initiative is to get just that.  They don’t want to call it government, they go ahead and call it governance.  It sounds better you see.

And it says:

"From the Iran nuclear crisis to global economic woes, the upcoming year will pose steady challenges to international bodies seized with maintaining peace and prosperity."

Alan:  You see, so what they mean by peace is conquering everybody on the planet and prosperity for their bosses that they serve.

"Experts from four leading think tanks weigh the issues."

Alan:  So here’s your think tanks again you see.

And it says:

"Michael Fullilove,"

Alan:  Strange name, that, Fullilove, I don’t think there’s any love in him at all.

"...of Australia’s Lowy Institute for International Policy, says China must assume “the responsibilities incumbent on a global power” but China’s vision of “stepping up” will not be the same as that of the United States."

Alan:  Now what he’s really saying and they’ve been saying this for years at the CFR, they have to take over the world as the policeman of the world from the United States.  That’s what that means.  They’ve said it many times before in the past.  That’s what that means.

It says:

"In addition to the crisis in Syria and Iran’s progression toward nuclear capabilities,"

Alan:  Which again

"...President Richard Haass identifies..."

Alan:  Also that as a problem.  And Haass has got a great background, you can look that up too.  You’ll find commonalities between all of them at the top.

"...identifies trade, cybersecurity, and climate change as major governance tests."

Alan:  You see, cybersecurity, that means you’re all being spied on.  Do you understand you’re in a fenceless prison camp?  You are.  You’re in a fenceless prison camp of cyber war.  They’re spying on you on everything.  Everything you’re doing.  Everything you say.  And again climate change, they’ve got to get this climate change thing through to bring on austerity to make sure they bring in a proper poor population across the world.  Then you dominate them very easily.  With poor people it’s very easy to dominate them.

And it says here:

"The Shanghai Institutes for International Studies’ Jiemian Yang says governance priorities are strengthening existing institutions,"

Alan:  That’s all the new ones that they’ve created for carbon taxes and everything else.

"...forging consensus..."

Alan:  Here’s the consensus building again.

"...between state and non-state actors,"

Alan:  That’s big corporate international business and NGOs that are also financed by the foundations.

"...and harnessing regional efforts in areas like trade into common global action."

Alan:  That’s again strengthening and bringing the rest of the countries into these three trading blocs that Karl Marx talked about would come about, in the 1800’s.

"Similarly, INSOR’s Igor Yurgens identifies three issues—the continuing turmoil in the Middle East, environmental concerns, and the growing wealth gap—that will have serious implications for global governance."

Alan:  Which they know because see they’re creating the global wealth gap, as they destroy all the jobs that gave you a wage you could at least live on.

And then it goes into:

"Michael Fullilove, Executive Director, Lowy Institute for International Policy"

Alan:  So, you think you’re voting for governments?  No, these are the guys who run your governments and you don’t vote for any of them or the foundations that they work for.  Or you’ve got nothing to do with the guys who finance these characters at the top.  Yet they tell your governments what to do.  Your government doesn’t listen to you, they listen to these guys.  This is called the parallel government, the combination of these organizations and foundations.  That’s what Thatcher called it.  And she joined it once she left politics.  She talked about it.  She said it’s the real government.

It says:

"The world’s greatest global governance challenge is to establish shared responsibility for the most intractable problems of our post-unipolar world."

Alan:  That means post-American world.

"Much of the world chafed against the United States’ enormous relative power in the first decade after the end of the Cold War.  Many enjoyed its grievous overreach in the following decade.  But now, more capitals need to assume the role of “responsible stakeholders” that was urged on Beijing by Robert Zoellick in 2005.  China serves as the most pressing example of a country that must embrace its growing power in the international arena."

Alan:  And that’s back to military you understand.

"Beijing has been more active in its dealings with the international community in many positive ways.  Yet, it has so far demurred from assuming the responsibilities incumbent on a global power,"

Alan:  Military again.

"... and nurturing the international system it hopes to help to lead."

Alan:  See it’s all, you understand your future is all decided by people you have never met or even heard of.  And you still go and vote for this joke that you’re given in every country.  You still go and vote.  They’re all screened and put in by these characters like the CFR.

"In the UN Security Council chamber and other forums, China is increasingly willing to take the lead and behave more like a great power.  On the other hand, it remains disengaged from issues that do not trespass directly on its core interests.  It is largely preoccupied with protecting its interests and those of its allies rather than projecting its influence, or doing much to strengthen the international system."

Alan:  And then of course being the CFR they go on about...

"The Iran nuclear issue is only one example.  Beijing’s interests on Iran are not, of course, identical to Western interests."

Alan:  Well it’s not Western interests, it’s the folk who are the dominant minority in the West.  Because the West wouldn’t care two hoots about Iran having nuclear reactors and cheaper power.  But somebody does, guess?

It says:

"Yet as a key player in the international political and economic system, it is giving insufficient weight to the great risk posed by an Iranian nuclear bomb."

Alan:  {Laughs}

It says:

"China has changed the way it does business, but it continues to define its national interests narrowly and pursue them with an uncompromising resolve.  China wants respect, but not responsibility.  It is reluctant to bind its own freedom of movement and subsume it within international institutions in the way the United States did after the Second World War...."

Alan:  See, they’re admitting here that the U.S. as a system of government, and a system with a constitution, threw it away by the traitors who signed on to the United Nations at the end of the Second World War.  That’s when it all really changed.  They tried to change it when FDR first got in remember.  They created a depression to make sure that he got in with a coterie of let’s just call them communists.  It’s safer that way.  But they all were actually card-carrying communist members.  But that’s how they got him in, Wall Street got their man in by creating the Great Depression and they staffed it with communists to destroy what would be the great power you see.  Especially the old system of the old type with a pretty solid culture.  Because everybody who went to America became American, willingly and happily.  Not like now.

It says:

"As China’s wealth and power grow, so will its interests expand.  A middle-power foreign policy is inadequate for a great power.  If China is to help run the international system, then it has a stake in strengthening it.  I suggest respectfully that China and other rising powers need to strike a new balance between their traditional economic and security concerns and the broader imperatives they must now satisfy, including stable great-power relations, non-proliferation, and developing their international prestige.  The old principle applies: with great power comes great responsibility."

Alan:  You understand, those who dominate the world also dominate China.  I hope you understand that.  It’s the last thing you’ll think of and it is.

And here again:

"Council on Foreign Relations Reveals How World Government Can Be Achieved in 2013"

"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an organisation established in 1921 by the global elite, has publicized what it believes to be the challenges that need to be overcome to establish World Government in 2013.  In summary, the Council on Foreign Relations has sought the opinion of four Globalists from around the world on what are the greatest challenges the world faces that would prevent the formation of World Government in 2013.

• Richard N. Haass – President, Council on Foreign Relations (2012). Bilderberg Group (2005)
• Yang Jiemian – Trilateral Commission Member (2010)
• Igor Yurgens – Chairman of the Management Board, Institute of Contemporary Development, Russian Federation (2012)
• Michael Fullilove – Executive Director of the Lowy Institute for International Policy (2012)"

It says:

"Astonishingly, these Globalists claim that the emergence of World Government will not occur if the following 7 ‘challenges’ are not overcome 2013."

1)      "The world needs to establish shared responsibility for the most intractable problems of our post-unipolar world. Therefore, for World Government to become a reality, China needs to play a greater role as a global power."

Alan:  As I’ve just said.  They’re talking about a military role.

2)      "To implement World Government, it is essential to strengthen organizations like the United Nations, World Trade Organisation, International Monetary Fund and the G20."

Alan:  None of these things were voted on by any populace in any country.  Just like the G20 that just formed itself.

It says:

3)      "Major powers need to begin engaging less prominent countries so that both major and minor players in the global political landscape can further the “networked governance” principle."

Alan:  You ever heard of a "networked governance principle"?  Well I’ll put the link up tonight for you.

    "Essentially, the key to World Government in 2013 is for all countries to enter into new mindsets and functioning mechanisms."

Alan:  Meaning a one type mechanism system.

4)      "Globally, trade needs to be more regulated.  In 2013, government subsidies should be tackled at the global level as opposed to regional or bilateral level."

5)      "The World needs to begin harnessing regional efforts into common action on a global level."

Alan:  It’s all standardization you understand, standardization.

It says:

6)      "The Internet needs to be more regulated.  It is believed that governments should start ‘maintaining’ the free flow of information on the internet to limit the amount of cyber-aggression."

Alan:  Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks.  We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix and you got to understand too this dominant minority, the ones who are now the dominant minority, came out a long time ago with a war on every country they entered into.  In order to dominate and have your own culture established you must destroy all the rest you see.  But part of it too was to do with a theory that they had, that people didn’t like them because of being mentally ill.  No kidding, what an amazing conclusion to come to.  That everyone else was mentally ill.  And I’ve gone through this before with quite a few of their different organizations, foundations, etcetera, like the Frankfurt School.  And you find people like Adorno, Theo Adorno, who came out with the Authoritarian Personality.  He was quite explicit into why they were doing what they were doing.  And they got permission to set up in the U.S. when they ran out of Germany and continue its program there.  And part of it too was they got presidential authority to set up, along with the Macy group, and alter American culture because they thought they could become Nazis.  No kidding.

And they also brought in psychiatry.  That was another weaponized thing they dreamed up, psychiatry.  Again to try to establish that everybody else was mentally ill except themselves you see.  And that’s why they brought Freud forward.  That was part of that technique as well.  And they also claimed that the reason, I’m not kidding you, these are big, big, big foundations, they believed that the reason that the West really didn’t like them too much and really kept their cultures and wouldn’t let them take over their culture, was because they weren’t having enough sex.  That’s why they pushed Freud out there with all his sexual theories.  And so they’d try and make people uninhibited in the West while they kept for their own group strictly to certain laws.  Very old laws in fact so that they wouldn’t destroy themselves in the process.  This is all fact folks.  You can read it yourself.  Read their own books.

And they also came up with a theory before they even knew what genes were, that it must be a genetic thing.  A genetic thing you see.  And one day they’ll get the perfect population of slaves to serve them by altering all their genetic codes.  And take in this certain one and put in another one and so on and make you very placid and happy.

"DNA of Sandy Hook killer Adam Lanza to be examined for ‘evil’ gene in first study of its kind ever conducted on a mass murderer"

Alan:  Ooh.

So it says here:

"Scientists have been asked to study the DNA of Newtown school killer Adam Lanza to see if has an ‘evil’ gene that led him to carry out the massacre.  The study, which will look at any abnormalities or mutations in his individual DNA, is believed to be the first of its kind ever carried out.  Lanza slaughtered 20 children..."

Alan:  And so on, blah, blah, blah.  They make sure they get that little bit in there.

And it says:

"The 20 year old also shot dead his mother..."

Alan:  And so on and so on.

So anyway:

"The massacre prompted President Obama to look into new gun controls and banning assault rifles such as AR-15 Bushmaster used by Lanza in his rampage."

Alan:  I’ll put that up tonight too along with Feinstein’s site as I said too because she’s got a fascinating history herself.  I mean she’s made billions along with her husband.  She gets laws passed through the senate and his private company gets all the deals.  They got a deal with India I think it was for a certain kind of trade thing that she pushed through and they raked in 42 billion in their own company.  It’s not bad, not bad being government if you’re very, very special isn’t it?  But you’ve all got bad genes you see and one day there won’t be bad genes around anymore.  And these special folk will make sure of it by giving themselves the rights to test all of you before you can have children.  And I’m not kidding.  This is old stuff folks, old stuff.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight, and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Greenland Closes Year with Some of the Coldest Weather Ever Recorded

Pakistan ---Heading-back-to-the-IMF

How to Win the War for Your Mind

Weaponizing Entertainment for Behaviour Modification

& More on Above

Aussie Carbon Tax Responsible for Damaging 80% of Small Business

CFR on Global Governance 2013

CFR on World Government

& More on Above

Geneticists at it Again--Studying Lanza's Genetic Code

Feinstein to Introduce Updated Firearms Bill

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:15 am

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on January the 8^th, 2013.

For newcomers, as always, I suggest you make use of the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself to the free audios; there’s lots of them to choose from. And I go through the system that you’re born into and explain how it came to be about. It didn’t evolve by itself. It wasn’t a natural evolution. It was a designed society; a designed system. And, of course, they use the old communist techniques, of course (like the United Nations does, as well) of fifty-year plans, hundred-year plans, hundred-and-fifty-year plans, for different parts of this long-term goal (agenda) towards global government. But not just global government; a type of government run by the people who believe it’s their right to rule all the rest, you see. And they brought on academia, on board with them (in fact, they put most of the big professors in the big academies) to make sure that the proper doctrine is taught to all the newcomers. And it’s been like that for an awful long time. A reality is given to us, in other words. And the cards are definitely stacked against anyone who tries to find things out by themselves. You really have to search for previous historians who lived through these times of changes and kept track of what was going on and who was doing it and what their goals were. There’s lots of information out there, so help yourself to the website, as I say.

Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you and you can help me keep going by just buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or donating. And remember, from the US to Canada, you can still use personal checks or international postal money orders from the post office or you can send cash or use PayPal. And across the world you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram and PayPal, once again.

We truly are living in a planned society. Most folk don’t know it. They don’t even know why there’s so much chaos today. And the chaos is very, very easily explained if you just go through the changes, the revolutions they call them, that took place, from about the 1940’s onwards, to the present time. We’re still going through parts of the same revolution, with a whole list of people to be freed, supposedly, to help destroy the old existing culture; that’s the whole aim of the whole plan, in fact, in order to give you a new culture. And the culture, really, is obeyance to the new system. And we’re all in it together; perpetual warfare forever basically, perpetual terrorism forever. And everyone is under suspicion; that’s exactly how the communist system worked, as well. Because after they had sealed off their borders in Russia and overtook some of the countries and brought them into the bloc, they also did the same thing: they had to find a reason to keep this military-type system in place. And they went after counter-revolutionaries; they were everywhere. They were under everybody’s beds: counter-revolutionaries. They even churned out stacks of movies about it to brainwash the people, just like we have here, in fact, by the Pentagon, about the terrorists who apparently are everywhere, too. So, it’s the same system, by the same people, by the way, who are running the system today. They own the media; they own, pretty-well, all of the media and that was part of their plans an awful long time ago. And I’ve gone through the history of how Rockefeller and others got together back in the thirties and found out, did a survey to see how many papers they’d have to own, so that they could control the information for every American. And all the smaller papers would copy their lead, you see. And they came to a magic number of about thirty. Now they own them all actually; it’s just a handful of people in one club, that own all of your news, whether visual or written or whatever. So, we’re living in that time. And it’s not just America; it’s across the world, today.

So, standardization is very important for mass control and they’re guiding us through the changes (the planned changes), into the new austerity system. Austerity, because, apparently, you see, you’ve all had it too good; all of you, no matter what country you’ve been in, you’ve all had it too good, according to those who rake in trillions off of your labor. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And with all of this talk, of course, about gun confiscation, because of violent acts, etc, people overlook lots and lots of other topics related to it, because, as I say, the system (the world system) declared an awful long time ago (even when it brought in the League of Nations, before the United Nations), that eventually they would have a disarmed society across the whole planet, except for their military force. The UN has repeated the same things over and over again. And there’s even been a treaty signed by every country, in fact, at the time of JFK, that they would disarm the public worldwide, to bring in this world of peace, ruled by the authoritarian body, you see, the new authoritarian body. And that way, there’d be no repercussions or  backlash against them if they went into austerity, obviously. And of course, that’s going to happen too, which is one reason why lots of these shootings will keep happening until these big boys try and get their way. But you read the reports that come out even from the so-called think tanks, that all work for the military, as well, remember. And when they publish items for the public, it is for public consumption. And it’s very schizophrenic because they always leave half of the story out. And here’s one of the articles here, for instance. It says,

“Media Violence Consumption Increases the Relative Risk of Aggression, Analysis Shows”

 

Alan: Thank god for experts, eh? What would you do without experts, to tell you stuff like this? And it says,

“As president of the International Society for Research on Aggression...”

 

Alan: And there’s an international society, remember, for research on aggression. It says,

“... and with consent of the organization’s elected council, Craig Anderson appointed an international Media Violence Commission last December to prepare a public statement on the known effects of media violence exposure, based on the current state of scientific knowledge.”

 

Alan: Now, remember, I’ve done screeds of stuff before on video games, for instance, that were all developed by the military to indoctrinate soldiers and to get them to kill on command, basically, without thinking at all, and to desensitize them to actually killing real people; that’s what the video games were meant to do. And so they’re way ahead, again. So, here’s this think tank that obviously knows all this stuff, but it doesn’t mention who puts all this stuff out or why it’s being put out (all the violent stuff); cause and effect, right? So, they go through this hoopla here. It says,

“The Iowa State University Distinguished Professor of psychology appointed 12 IRSA researchers to the commission, including Douglas Gentile, an ISU associate professor of psychology. The Media Violence Commission’s research-based report concludes that the research clearly shows that media violence consumption increases the relative risk of aggression...”

 

Alan: Well, thank god for experts, as I say, eh? Amazing, eh? See, the public have no brains because you don’t have all the letters behind your names, apparently.

“...defined as intentional harm to another person that could be verbal, relational, or physical. The report is published in the September/October issue of the journal Aggressive Behavior.”

 

Alan: Remember, the military wants aggressive behavior. It’s the first thing you’re taught to do, once you’re in the military: you better get aggressive or you’re going to get stomped on. It says,

“‘Basically, the commission looked at, ‘What does the research literature say?’’”

 

Alan: And it goes on and says this.

“In their report, the commission wrote that aside from being sources of imitation, violent images -- such as scenes in movies, games or pictures in comic books -- act as triggers for activating aggressive thoughts and feelings already stored in memory. If these aggressive thoughts and feelings are activated over and over again because of repeated exposure to media violence, they become chronically accessible, and thus more likely to influence behavior.”

 

Alan: In other words, it works, just like the designers at the Pentagon thought it would work. I mean, have you seen how many movies these guys at the Pentagon promote and fund? when they want lots of young idiots to go into the military and fight wars, and they’re given the most basic form of propaganda (that’s all it takes now, is very simple propaganda) and away they go and fight wars. Well, they use all these techniques on them, you see. And for over twenty-odd years, thirty years really now, they’ve been giving you nothing but more violence, more violence and blood and guts in the movies. And you can’t even say who is the bad guy or the good guy anymore, except the good guy ends up getting the blonde and he’s got a badge at the end of the show, as well, so he must be the good guy, because he slaughters as much as the bad guys. And that’s the message to children; that’s what they get out of it. They don’t want to be the weakling – they want to be the guy who wins, you see.

So, they admit here, that scenes in the movies and games and so on, are stored in memory and then, over and over again with repetition, they become chronically accessible and then they start to mimic the behavior; they show the behavior (they manifest the behavior). And that’s the same with sex, as well. Because the same group, that wanted to destroy your cultures across the world and brought you psychiatry, for instance, are also into the same destruction of all your cultures, including making sure that the end of marriage (the plank of the Manifesto, again: destroy the family unit). It’s all been done, folks.

And the children don’t have the parents they used to have, or at least one person at home that would see little Johnny playing outside the window there, and sword-fencing with his pals, with sharp sticks and let them know, enough of that, you know, when the time came, enough of that. And that’s how folk were trained. All the young boys went through it when I was small. And they had toy guns and they had toy swords and all the rest of it, but no one got hurt and they didn’t grow up to be crazy, either, because someone was there watching them and if your mother wasn’t there, a neighbor was watching you, because all the women used to do that, because at that time they weren’t running after the almighty dollar. So, the destruction of the family unit helped this come into being. And also too, they’ve found out with lots of the gangs in the US and elsewhere across the world now, and Britain, they don’t have fathers. There’s no male role model there, at all. In today’s generation, the dad is seldom involved even with the children; he’s either too busy or the children have been taught to ignore their parents, which is through all the comedy shows that you watch especially: ignore dad, or they’re into their electronic games. And this has finished off the family unit, basically, or passing on what you think of as morality, to help them through life. It’s done, you see. Remember what Bertrand Russell says... Lord Bertrand Russell says about this... he says, eventually the State will give the new morality to the children. That’s been done.  The State also includes the media and all the movies and entertainment. It’s been done. That’s where they get their morality from (the new morality). And he actually said too, that he thought that at one time they’d have to remove the children from the parents, because the parents of the old culture were contaminated with old ideas (“contamination” was the communist term, too, they used), and therefore, the State would have to give them the new morality. It has been done. So, here’s all these experts in this article here, coming out with their lofty thoughts about what happens... stuff we all know, of course – if you watch blood and guts over and over again, if you watch pornography over and over again, you’re going to start to imitate what you see, and especially children. It says,

“‘One may also become more vigilant for hostility and aggression in the world, and therefore, begin to feel some ambiguous actions by others (such as being bumped in a crowded room) are deliberate acts of provocation,’ the commission wrote in the report. The commission recommends that parents know what media their children and adolescents are using.”

 

Alan: Now, I don’t think that’s even possible these days, because if they’re not watching it in your house, they’re watching it somewhere else, on their own cellphones or something like that.

“Rating systems...”

 

Alan: And they go back to the old story of rating systems, which is absolute rubbish, absolutely nonsensical because if it’s rated, at all, the child is going to want to get a hold of it and they will. And then:

“‘Parents can also set limits on screen use...’”

 

Alan: So, this is a big foundation/academy, talking about their expert opinions. They don’t mention the destruction of the family unit. They don’t mention that the military funds most of these aggressive movies, and blood and guts and blood and guts all through them. The latest Judge Dredd one is just one slaughterhouse, right through the whole movie, from beginning to end, with minimalistic speech at all, just little sentences here and there (probably stretching to about a paragraph in the whole movie) and the rest of it, they probably fired more blank bullets than they did live ones in World War II, making that movie. And that’s what the children are fed. That’s what they’re fed, folks. This is deliberate. So, the parents are at fault here, according to them.

“The commission recommends improving media ratings”

 

Alan: Like that’s going to make any difference, again, too. The same old stuff, same old stuff, same old stuff. It says,

“‘But the other piece is education, and if parents aren’t educated -- not just about what the ratings system does, but also about why it’s important for them to take control of their child’s media diet -- then it doesn’t matter how good the ratings system is, because they’re going to ignore it anyway,’ he added.”

 

Alan: Thank god for experts, eh? Well, here’s another spin on it, you see. And you have to go outside the box, to get the other spins on it. And you can actually go into articles... let me see if I can find this one here. It’s this one here. It says,

“Why Americans cannot discipline their children”

 

Alan: And it says here,

“The ultimate reason that Americans are unable to discipline their children is that they have no authority over them. The American state, together with private industry, especially the ‘helping professions,’...”

 

Alan: Like psychiatry and psychology and so on

“...have usurped their authority in loco parentis, thus empowering physicians, psychologists, judges, social workers, dentists and other health workers by, in effect, reducing people to parental incompetence. American children run amuck, throw tantrums in the ‘terrible twos’ and ‘fearsome fours,’...”

 

Alan: All these terms come from your talk shows on television.

“...and commit indignities against their parents and maliciously disobey them such as to shock the rest of the world. A Eda Leshan in 1985 published a book called When Your Child Drives You Crazy. Children’s actual socialization comes from the ever-present baby sitter, television, and the school,...”

 

Alan: Which gives you your doctrine.

“...neighborhood pals and their interaction at play. American parents are reduced to their entertainers, meal tickets and gift givers;...”

 

Alan: Now, Bertrand Russell, who helped plan this part that you are living through, today, of culture change – everything that’s happened, he was a big, big part of the world think tanks on this – Bertrand Russell also said, we used to think that we’d have to take children from their parents at birth, but now with scientific indoctrination at school, he says, they can go home afterwards and it doesn’t matter what the parents try to say to them, the scientific indoctrination will make the child reject the parent’s advice. That has worked. I’ll be back on this, after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt, discussing this article here, about Americans cannot discipline their children, it says. And bring in Bertrand Russell, who said that eventually the only function the American parent will have is for providing economic support for the child; in other words, raising the child just by giving them cash. The State would be in charge. And that’s happened folks. Remember too, they also brought Dr. Spock in, Dr. Spock: don’t scold your child, don’t spank your child (all that kind of stuff). It’s interesting at the end, once they’d been very successful in pushing this over – because remember, there’s a war going on to destroy your culture and your families and the whole bit. This was all part of it and Spock was part of it. He said at the very end of his life, he said, we’ve raised a nation of psychopaths, because of the lack of discipline. But again, it was with help, again, from the media and so on and entertainment. Now, it says,

“American parents are reduced to their entertainers,...”

 

Alan: ...for children, their...

“...meal tickets and gift givers; in the U.S. the glorification of consumption and the warfare of status materialism see the parents constantly showering their ‘kids’ with presents, all too often in place of true love and affection. The mother resorts to shrewishness and constant nagging to obtain minimal obedience from her children, while the deadbeat American husband and father...”

 

Alan: That’s how he’s portrayed in all the comedies and so on.

“... has emotionally abandoned the family and takes little part in family life. A 1971 study by college psychologists of fathers in the Boston area found that they spent a grand total of 37 seconds a day on average spending time with their infants. Parents do not guide, comfort, govern, teach, nurse, control, restrain or mentor their children, although they are fond of giving them a good teasing now and then. Sadly, the author has observed thousands of times children crying and reaching out in misery and just begging for comfort and reassurance from their parents, who stand there helplessly as if paralyzed or moronic as to what to do, or they insensitively without any insight scold their offspring for being ‘cry babies.’ The bewildered parents simply do not know what to do, and the surfeit of advice from so-called experts, which has increased exponentially since 1945, has ameliorated the problem not at all; mothers who diligently study Chilton-like manuals to learn ‘maternal instinct’ still are incompetent, and the malaise has only intensified after that year.”

 

Alan: Because, you understand, when I was young, when women had children quite naturally as they always did, quite naturally – it was no surprise – and being pregnant wasn’t treated as an illness, by the way. And they didn’t have to go to hospital for exercises and advice from experts on what to expect, because, you see, their mothers had been through it, their other relatives had been through it, the people in the street had been through it and they all talked to each other and they knew what to expect and they knew how to deal with simple, simple things that came along; they were not problems. And it says,

“Permissive child rearing, the way Americans raise their children, may seem to be an issue championed and criticized by conservatives. James Dobson, a conservative, wrote the bestseller Dare to Discipline, the chief virtue of which may lie in the sensible message of its title. The Duke of Windsor (King Edward Vlll), notably remarked in 1957, ‘the thing that impresses me most about America is the way parents obey their children.’”

 

Alan: It’s a fact; that’s how fast it happened, with the big push with the Frankfurt School and all the rest of them, who put psychiatry to the front and brought in the Freudian disciplines, until all that nonsense destroyed people’s own logic. And they lost their ability even to value their own thoughts: I can’t be right, they must be right; the specialists must be right. You see. It says,

“But actually criticism of and effective action against permissive child rearing ought to be a cause of radicalism.”

 

Alan: And it goes on and on and on about how bad it is. But you understand, there’s been a war on, and you’re living through part of it and the fallout and the chaos is all part of it, too. Society has been wrecked, for most people out there... completely wrecked. And the ones who are being wrecked are still glued to the television, that mocks them – with their sitcoms and their comedies and so on – it mocks them and they’re laughing at themselves, being mocked by those who help destroy you. You got to throw that darn thing out the window, that television set, I’m telling you, you got to do it.

And, getting back to this con again, from those who want to disarm the public in the US, because, remember, the US is not a British colony—at least it wasn’t (put it that way); it might be again, after the CFR got established in there because it’s part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (they run the whole country and the media and their politics). But you’ve got to remember too, that if a science is a science, like psychiatry – I call it “trick cyclists,” you know, psychiatrists, because that’s what it really is, it’s a joke, but it was brought in as a weapon. In fact, when Freud was brought across to see America, in New York, he says, I’m not bringing them help, he says, I’m bringing them a plague... these were his words, check it up, it’s in his own memoirs... to destroy, you understand. Anyway, they’re always blaming the parents for whatever, for school violence or guns. And it’s so true, what happened in Rwanda, when the Tutsis and the Hutus went at it together? I mean you had thousands of people with machetes, that just kept slashing at people for days and days and days; it doesn’t matter what they’re using... it wouldn’t matter what they’re using. They should be asking, why is this happening in the States? Apart from all the ridiculous things they will not tell you about these... even when they put gag controls over news stories, so as you don’t know what’s happening in these so-called school shootings. It makes you suspicious, as well. Why won’t they tell you what happened? How can you have a debate about anything until you find out what happened, with all parties, anyone involved? You cannot get a proper debate because they don’t want a proper debate; they want to simply ban the firearms, that were the weapon of choice at the time. Back with more, after this.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And, talking about psychiatry and its big role, as it’s pretending that it’s a real science. And, really, psychiatrists today don’t bother so much with psycho-therapy; they simply dish out the pills – that’s all they do and, try this one or try that one and it’s all try-try-try. There have been many exposés of folk going into psychiatrists’ offices with cameras, you know, hidden cameras and going from one psychiatrist to another, with the same complaint and getting a completely different diagnosis from each one and different medications from each one. So, it’s a joke. It’s part of the control mechanism. And, of course, those who deemed that they were the dominant minority who should rule the world said that, that was part of their strategy, a long time ago; that they’d have to use psychiatry and promote it, because they believed, or had to make the people believe, that everyone who opposed multiculturalism and a global government, were psychologically ill, pathologically ill actually, they said. And that still is repeated today, at the high quarters and echelons and so on. So, here’s an article from France. I mean psychiatrists should be held to account – if they call it a doctrine then it should be held to account, right?

“A French psychiatrist whose patient hacked an elderly man to death was found guilty of manslaughter on Tuesday in a groundbreaking case that could affect the way patients are treated. A court in Marseilles said Daniele Canarelli, 58, had committed a "grave error" by failing to recognize the public danger posed by Joel Gaillard, her patient of four years. Gaillard hacked to death 80-year-old Germain Trabuc with an axe in March 2004 in Gap, in the Alps region of southeastern France, 20 days after fleeing a consultation with Canarelli at Marseilles’s Edouard Toulouse hospital. Canarelli was handed a one-year prison sentence and ordered to pay 8,500 euros to the victim’s children, in the first case of its kind in France. Defense lawyers said the ruling would have serious repercussions for treatment of the mentally ill. ‘If a psychiatrist lives in fear of being sentenced, it will have very real consequences and probably lead to harsher treatment of patients,’ said Canarelli’s lawyer, Sylvain Pontier.”

 

Alan: Well of course they’ll say that. But, the fact is, you see, she didn’t notify the authorities that this lunatic was on the loose, that wanted to go and kill this particular person and then actually what he did do, he just went straight to him and you know, hacked him to pieces. So, they should be held to account. And all these school shootings that you see too, it’s always the same story: the person’s been on drugs, they’re seeing a psychiatrist – often military psychiatrist, strangely enough, even the one they had in Dunblane, Scotland, that was seeing a military psychiatrist and of course the guy who was the perpetrator wasn’t a member of the military. It’s kind of interesting, that in itself. But the psychiatrists keep it all to themselves, you see, and suddenly these folk go crazy and they go and do a mass shooting, which always ends up in the papers for the big call for gun control, you see... always fulfills its destiny. And it’s used awfully, awfully frequently today (this kind of thing) by those who have to destroy the culture. You understand, the culture has pretty-well had it. It truly has. There’s only a few folk here and there that have got any sense of morality (the old morality), at all. And with the old morality, you had a real culture and even if you didn’t believe in your given culture, the one you were born into, of religion, at least you still understood its basic tenets and laws and that gave you a morality that you followed, whether you liked it or not, and you did, everybody did. So, that had to be awfully well demolished and it has been really demolished now, as well. So, I’ll put this link up tonight, as well.

Also, in between stories here, people don’t know about the fracking... not just fracking that’s going on; there’s geothermal testing going on, where they’re trying to tap into volcanoes, folks, and explode the upper crusts and tap the geothermal heat and so on, that comes out of it, for future energy. This article says,

“A Seattle-based energy company is now finished creating miniature earthquakes in Central Oregon.”

 

Alan: It says,

“AltaRock Energy of Seattle wanted to see if they could expand an exploratory geothermal well, dug by another company, into a geothermal reservoir. Executives said they did just that. Starting in October, AltaRock pumped cold water into the 10,600-foot well...”

 

Alan: That’s quite deep, you know.

“... which is near Newberry Crater. When the cold water hit the hot rock, deep in the well...”

 

Alan: With it getting pumped in...

“... it created fractures which would serve as a reservoir. The Bend Bulletin says the firm also pumped in bits of biodegradable plastic, to clog the newly-created cracks. This allows the cold water to create even more fractures. AltaRock finished that work on December 7. All this fracturing created tiny earthquakes in the region. Scientists registered 26 seismic events of magnitude 1 or greater since October. Residents had expressed concerns over the possibility of larger earthquakes and over the use of plastics and chemicals in the water.”

 

Alan: Well, I’d say so. And,

“The US Geological Survey did monitor the project and there is a final public meeting about the experiment to be held at the end of...”

 

Alan: This month.

“... January.”

 

Alan: So, we’ll keep an eye on that one to see what they do with their earthquake making and earth crust blasting.

And also, I’ll put up tonight too, one I’ve put up many times before; it’s one of the top pioneers in creating vaccines. It’s a YouTube, where he admits about adding cancer cells and viruses to the vaccines and how they all knew it and so on and so on. I’ll put that up again, tonight too, for those who want to have a look at it.

Now, talking about drugs and psychiatry and so on, and it’s no secret to those that follow Jane’s magazine; I think twenty years ago they talked about the pharma soldier of the future, who would be in a kind of numb state as far as feelings went, but he’d be a great soldier and a good guy to go out and slaughter people. And they’ve achieved it, but what a cost, too, because now suicides in the US Army have overtaken all the other kinds of accidents that happened to them or getting shot or whatever... suicides. It says,

“Last year, the Pentagon spent more on pills, injections and vaccines than it did on Black Hawk helicopters, Abrams tanks, Hercules C-130 cargo planes and Patriot missiles — combined. Some of the prescription drugs that have fueled the military’s skyrocketing pharmaceutical budget are the same ones that have medicated the civilian world over the past decade. Since 2002, the Department of Defense has spent more than $5 billion on Lipitor, Plavix, Advair, Nexium and Singulair. Rather than a reflection of the drugs needed to treat wounded troops, the top-selling prescriptions signal an increase in aging military retirees covered by the military’s health program, Tricare, with drugs for arthritis, osteoporosis and diabetes costing billions. The Department of Defense also spent more than $380 million on erectile dysfunction drugs and $238 million on testosterone therapy drugs over the decade.”

 

Alan: They really pump them up with amazing amounts of testosterone. It causes awful problems, mind you, down the road, too, and it shrinks their testicles, as some people who are awfully famous actors found out.

“But the military drug purchases also paint a picture of a fighting force increasingly reliant on antidepressants, psychotropic drugs and powerful narcotic painkillers that critics call dangerous and that have been involved in a growing number of prescription drug overdoses. The military spent at least $2.7 billion on antidepressants and more than $1.6 billion on opioid painkillers such as Oxycontin and hydrocodone over the past decade. More than $507 million was spent on the sleeping pill Ambien and its generic equivalents. The details come from an unprecedented American-Statesman analysis of nearly every individual drug purchase made by the Department of Defense since 2002. The paper’s analysis also showed that many drug manufacturers saw their revenue from military sales soar over a decade that featured two wars and a large influx of beneficiaries covered by Tricare, the military’s health program. They were led by giant Pfizer [corporation], with more than $8 billion in sales from the Department of Defense since 2002. Abbott’s sales jumped nearly 300 percent and Novartis more than doubled its military sales to around $400 million in 2011, according to data provided by the military. In one sense, the drug analysis is but another reminder of skyrocketing health care costs. Veterans groups say paying for the health needs of America’s fighting force and retirees is a cost of war and part of the nation’s moral debt to its troops. Yet experts say that the rapidly rising cost of health care for active and retired service members — the overall military health budget has nearly doubled since 2002 — could imperil the nation’s safety by potentially siphoning off money that needs to be spent for training and weapon systems. High-priced specialty drugs, in particular, will continue to drive military drug spending, predicted Jim Wilson, a University of Texas College of Pharmacy professor and former head of the Army’s pharmacy programs.”

 

Alan: So, it goes on and on, actually, but you’ve got a completely drugged military out there, completely drugged. And these guys, once they come out of the military, they’re addicted like crazy, to all these drugs; never mind the side effects and the permanent side effects that a lot of them cause, as well. Total war, indeed, eh... total war.

Now, it’s bad enough that we’re already eating GM vegetables and so on (genetically engineered). And genetically modified fish is now on the dinner table, it says here.

“US decision after 17-year battle over fast-growing salmon could pave way for same step in Britain”

 

Alan: It says. And, it says,

“A GM salmon which grows twice as fast as ordinary fish could become the first genetically-modified animal in the world to be declared officially safe to eat, after America’s powerful food-safety watchdog ruled it posed no major health or environmental risks. The US Food and Drug Administration...”

 

Alan: Which is all on the take, of course.

“... said it could not find any valid scientific reasons to ban the production of GM Atlantic salmon engineered with extra genes from two other fish species – a decision that could soon lead to its commercial production. The verdict clears one of the last remaining hurdles for GM salmon to be lawfully sold and eaten in the US and will put pressure on salmon producers in Britain and Europe to follow suit.”

 

Alan: So, I’ll put this one up tonight too, plus one where they’ve put human genes in rice, growing in the US, of all places. And they already did it to pigs, mind you, in the 1970’s. Did you know that?  Maybe that’s part of the giving you the finger, folk who like to eat that kind of stuff.

Now, also, this article here, is very interesting. It says,

“The Overlooked Costs of the Permanent War Economy...”

 

Alan: You want to know why they want to really take your guns off at this step? I mean they always wanted to do it, but at this particular step, because they know what’s coming down. You’re into austerity, you’re going into post-consumerism, your energy prices are soaring across the world; it’s meant to do it all on cue – these public-private partnership deals, where the public pay for everything, including the upkeep of all these big systems, and the boys who own it just rake in profits. So,

“The Overlooked Costs of the Permanent War Economy: A Market Process Approach”

 

Alan: It says.

“How does the permanent war economy interact, and subsume, the private, non-military economy? Can the two remain at a distance while sharing resource pools? This paper argues that they cannot. Once the U.S. embarked upon the path of permanent war, starting with World War II, the result was a permanent war economy. The permanent war economy continuously draws resources into the military sector at the expense of the private economy, even in times of peace. We explore the overlooked costs of this process. The permanent war economy does not just transfer resources from the private economy, but also distorts and undermines the market process which is ultimately responsible for improvements in standards of living.”

 

Alan: And there’s a PDF that comes with it and I’ll put that up tonight too and let you peruse it. And it’s from the GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 12-51. Because this is the real reason... Americans haven’t got a clue (and I really mean that) of the standards of living in Europe and how folk are scrimping by. And how the arguments in the homes, as they break up, are generally all about money and not about extras; it’s about basic things like rent etc. That’s where America is supposed to go. And they can’t imagine it. And the big boys know there’s going to be trouble. They know that. They know there’ll be skirmishes here and there and they don’t want to be on the losing end of it, so they’re getting ready for it all; that’s why they’ve been building up a private army inside America for thirty years, for goodness sake.

Now, eugenics is the big, big thing today. And getting back to the Frankfurt School and all these boys that brought in psychiatry, because all the other cultures apparently were all pathological, basically, pathogenic societies, because they weren’t the same as the culture that was coming in; that’s why they called it that, you see. But they also brought in all these genetic reasons for why the people were all sick. And it wasn’t the Germans that were the biggest eugenicists, believe you me. The ones who rule this world today are the biggest eugenicists. And, this article here is one of these happy-happy stories. It says,

“When the Francis Crick Institute opens next to London’s St Pancras station in 2015, Nobelist Paul Nurse...”

 

Alan: Now, I’ve mentioned Paul Nurse before, who is one of the heads of the Royal Society of scientists in England, who have been at, basically, you know, improving the race, since its inception, but not the general people; their own race, you know. And it says here that it won’t be just growing

“...bacteria, mould or stem cells. ‘As soon as someone becomes a star, universities do everything to hold on to them,’ says Nurse, a 2001 Nobel Prize winner in physiology or medicine for work on cell cycle regulation and a former president of Rockefeller University...’”

 

Alan: Where else?

“‘...in New York. ‘As soon as we have a star, we will do everything to get rid of them.’ Nurse is leading a four-year effort to build the facility at a cost of 600 million pounds...”

 

Alan: And it actually says here, the other estimate is $962 million.

“At 1 million square feet and with as many as 1,500 employees, including 1,250 scientists, he says the Crick Institute will become Europe’s largest science research center in one building.”

 

Alan: Now, the science they’re going into, of course, is to do with genetics. And he actually refers to this; he’s leading the four-year program and so on... and he says:

“His ambition is for the eight-story Crick Institute to rival the U.S.’s Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.”

 

Alan: Go into my archives at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and I’ve done talks on the Eugenics Society of America – again, Rockefeller funded it all up and funded the cash for the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, where they were going to find ways to kill off all the dumb folk (the ones with bad genes). They even said that folk who can’t get work have “poverty genes” and so on and so on. And Nurse (this guy Nurse I’m talking about that’s opening up this English one), is a complete eugenicist and elitist in his thinking.

“‘This can become a very attractive place, a magnet for international recruitment,’ said Nurse, who still oversees a research lab and serves as president of the Royal Society, a position once held by Isaac Newton. ‘We will very rapidly turn into the same type of location as these other international institutions.’”

 

Alan: And he’s talking about eugenics institutions. And, of course, they come down with the usual stuff, oh we can find ways to stop cancer and all that... all the same, all rubbish. These guys are into eugenics, folks, to give longevity to themselves (the elite) and how to bring down the rest of the population. Complete eugenicists. It’s what it’s about.

And, this other article too is to do with non-governmental organizations. There’s thousands of these armies of NGOs, making good livings and wages and retirement benefits, protesting governments – who are simply waiting there to be protested by them, mind you, because they all know the same thing – in order to change what’s left of society and guide it into the new society. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And just before I go to the caller, I’ll put up this one too:

“NGOs Plot Wave of Criminal Referrals to Legitimize International Criminal Court”

 

Alan: They’re trying to bring it up to an international status for the world global system. Now, I think there’s Darin, in Ireland, hanging on there. Are you still there, Darin? Hello?

Darin: Hello, Alan. How are you? How was your Christmas?

Alan: Yes. It was a quiet one.

Darin: There’s a book I was reading by a Lord {inaudible}, it’s one of them kind of treatises similar to Machiavelli but predates it about two thousand years. And then there’s one part I just kind of want to read out, which is kind of fascinating because it’s kind of the same topic that comes up in a lot of other ancient texts. And it goes like this and it’s from Chapter Eight, Policies: “The one who could conquer a strong army is he who has had first time conquering his own people, for, in a way, in which conquering his people is based upon regulating of the people, like defective smelting, in regard to metal or the work of a potter, in regard to clay. If the base is not solid, then the people are like flying birds and animals.”  And I was reading a lot of ancient scriptures through the Koran and the Bible, and even in the Book of the Dead, it makes references to man being made from clay and I was just wondering what your view is on that.

Alan: In the Old Testament, there’s always a bit of an esoteric, depending on which faith you’re looking from, at the whole thing. Most folk think Adam... Adam means red, ruddy, from the humus, the earth. If you read Genesis, there’s really two Genesis in there; the first one ends with God made man and woman. In his own image, he made them, perfectly... perfect image... in other words, they’d have the powers too. This is taught by another religion. Whereas in Genesis it goes on, then it says, there was no one to till the soil so God made Adam. So Adam, in other words, was made to be a worker, a toiler of the soil. And so that’s part of the meaning behind that, you know. So, what’s the next part that you asked there?

Darin: Just one more quick question. It’s kind of interesting, people’s names and I was reading a lot of stuff about Native Americans and even in older cultures, they always named people in regards to kind of something... you know, like names today are kind of meaningless, but even in the past, they actually meant something, like there was more of a kind of emphasis in their name. Do you think a name of the person can affect them down through life? and I even see this in history with people’s names and it just kind of does something even maybe subconsciously to people without them knowing. I don’t know if you have any thoughts on that.

Alan: When you actually follow the whole history, from, say, Mazzini, who studied under Albert Pike, to take over the World Revolutionary Party, that turned into the Communist Party, you’ll find a lot of these agents actually had names which fitted their purpose very, very succinctly and they’d often adopt these names; otherwise, their parents would actually change the name for the purpose of the family’s mission. And sometimes they would go through two or three generations with that particular mission. That was their part of the mission. And that still holds true today, by the way. There is such a thing as an ongoing international revolutionary body and they do have names often that go along with their function (their particular function) and it’s inter-generational. So, there’s no doubt about it. And some of them change it, like Armand Hammer, his dad changed it to the arm and hammer for the communist flag. But thanks for calling.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

{Closing Music ♫}

Topics of show covered in following links:

Media Entertainment Violence and its Effect on Youngsters

Why Americans Cannot Discipline Their Children

French Psychiatrist Sentenced after Failing to Prevent Patient Murdering 80yr. old Man

Energy Company Creates Miniature Earthquakes in Oregon

Top Vaccine Pioneer Discusses Cancer Virus in Vaccines

US--Soaring Cost of Military Trooper-Drugging Could Hurt Budget

First GM Salmon Ready for the Table

Human Genes Engineered into Rice Growing in Kansas

The Overlooked Costs of the Permanent War Economy: A Market Process Approach

New Genetics Lab. in UK is a Cover for Eugenics Programme

Directed History and Global Institutions -in-Waiting

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:16 am

Hi folks.  I’m Alan Watt.  This is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 29^th of May, 2013.

Newcomers please help yourself to the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  If you go into the archive section you’ll have lots and lots of hours of downloaded audios for going over, pouring over, where I go through the system you’re living in.  It’s a big system designed a long, long time ago by the richest people on the planet.  And they were the guys who created the foundations, the big non-profit organizations, that run in trillions of dollars every year and they have armies and armies of NGOs which lobby governments.  They lobby newspapers and so on and they get articles printed all the time about the shape of the world, the way it’s going to be.  In other words they direct the course of our cultures, our nations, our thoughts and so on into the future.  Because the future is definitely guided by those up above us of course and it’s always really been that way, only more so today with instant communication, etcetera.  It’s so easy to indoctrinate millions of people across the planet at the same time with the same news and so on, the same propaganda.

So help yourself to the audios, as I say, they’re all for free download.  And there are well over a thousand up there to listen to.  And I go through the guys who started up this system and how they would use science to indoctrinate children at school and so much so that any parental input would be negated basically by social indoctrination at school.  It worked very, very well back in the 1920’s, it’s even better today, and they’ve worked on it very steadily ever since.

So, as I say the future is directed.  So go into the website and find out how it’s done because you’re living through it.  You are the actual proof of how it works and you find that your opinions are given to you.  What you feel is given to you as well about certain topics and so on.  You’ll have emotional reactions to different topics, either for or against, immediately too.  And that’s Pavlovian responses because you’ve been conditioned to have them by your indoctrination.

And remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you.  You can buy the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com where I go through the history of the system and how the knowledge of running millions of people’s minds is nothing new, the ancients did it with the ancient priesthoods right up to the present time, and knowledge is never lost.  And advisors are far more important than presidents and prime ministers because they’re taught the real sciences of social engineering and mass manipulation and so on.  They call it communications by the way and they have lots of degrees in that.

So as I say help yourself.  And if you buy the books and discs you’ll find out how it’s done.  From the U.S. to Canada you can use personal checks still or you can still use international postal money orders from the post office, you can send cash or use Paypal.  Across the world, Western Union, Moneygram, and Paypal.  Straight donations are awfully well received believe you me because it takes a lot of cash to run what I do here with all the sites I have up there and the satellite communications and all the rest of it and I depend upon you.  If I brought on advertisers I could certainly get lots of cash raking in here but then I’d have to really plug lots of ads and sell you stuff all through it etcetera, etcetera.  And of course that would detract from giving you the basic info that I’m putting out there.

And we are living through this big 21^st century plan.  Because everything was to culminate in the 21^st century, the Century of Change, the Age of Aquarius all the New Agers talked about because that was all given to them too by the ones who already directed the world.  And everyone’s been shaped into the changes that have to come in, in this 21^st century.  We are living through it and there are clashes of civilizations you might call it too happening in the old countries where immigrants come in on mass, etcetera.  This is all part of the big, big change, the century of change.  The things that the people think of as the far left have been pushing for ages but in actual fact it wasn’t the far left at all.  The international bankers have been promoting this for an awful long time, for different ends of course because they prefer a social system with lots of bureaucracy and government to train the public.  It’s much easier to get obedient people who are going to pay up in the future.

Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks.  We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix.  As I say we are going through the time of change and the changes that are happening now were agreed upon through lots of government and bureaucratic meetings, international meetings, since about the 1980’s in fact to do with trade and to do with foreign investment or takeover of companies within your own countries from foreigners.  And it’s still going on of course, it’s accelerating now.  And you can’t deny them access to buy over anything in your country now because it’s a world agreement that was arranged through the World Trade Organization.  And they held the meetings in France for over a two-year period.  It was kept very low-key in the media.  And every government had sent their diplomats over to take part in it.  And that was in the 90’s for the final signatories on it.  And it was all passed, so you can’t stop them coming in and taking over.

But they can also take lots of food out of your country as well.  That’s part of it too.  We’re living in a time of unbridled greed as well.  As companies go for broke basically to maximize the profits, which generally means that you pay the workers less money or use inferior materials for production and of course that’s a big one now too, inferior materials.  Wherever they can cut a penny off they’ll do it.  And you end up with plastic things on small engines and so on that fall off and break and are constantly replaced if you can even find them.  But it’s buyer beware time and it will get worse and worse as we go through this maximizing the profit stuff because we are in an age where there are so many folk who are consumed with what they call success.  And success to them is having lots of cash, their own private jet, etcetera, and free from all the worries that the people down below have.  And of course it’s very short-sighted because they don’t realize they’re destroying everything in the process.  It doesn’t matter to them.

Anyway we find now of course that Hong Kong it says, and this is from Reuters...

"China’s Shuanghui International said it would buy Smithfield Foods Inc for $4.7 billion..." 

Alan:  It’s a U.S. company.

"...in cash to help satisfy growing demand for U.S.-made pork in its home market, but the deal may raise concerns in the United States." 

Alan:  Now it’s not just pork, because I’ve got another article I’ll put up alongside this one, it’s to do with the fact and I wondered what was behind it, where the U.S. had pushed for new terms for the...

Hi folks.  I’m back again; I had a power cut just came in there.  And I was just mentioning this Chinese deal with the U.S. with its food system and so on.  Where they’ll take more pork, and actually beef too I believe, into China.  But they’re also, in another article which I’ll put up tonight, they’re renaming, giving new names to  old cuts basically, of pork and so you’ll end up with, they’ll take the best stuff and you’ll end up with the bottom stuff which sounds better because they’re giving them fancy names.  So that’s going to justify the increases and so on for even worse food.  So I’ll put them both up tonight.  But this article says that the growing demand of U.S. made pork in its home market is booming and so on in China but the deal may raise concerns.  It says:

"The agreement, announced on Wednesday, comes after Smithfield’s largest shareholder agitated for change at the Virginia-based pork producer – the world’s largest – including a call to break up the company.  The deal is subject to review by the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, a government panel that reviews transactions that would bring U.S. businesses under foreign control, Smithfield said in a statement.  The transaction would be the largest Chinese takeover of a U.S. company, with an enterprise value of $7.1 billion, which includes the assumption of debt.  The biggest Chinese cross-border deal was with..." 

Alan:  The previous list was with…

"…CNOOC Ltd’s 2012 acquisition of Canada’s Nexen Ltd, with an enterprise value of about $17.7 billion, according to Thomson Reuters data."

"Relations between the United States and China over cross-border deals have become testy as of late.  The issue may arise next week when U.S. President Barack Obama meets with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, in California to talk about cyber-security." 

Alan:  So I’ll put this link up tonight for those who want to keep it.  And by the way you should take these stories if you’re interested in any of the stories at all, I put them up at the end of the night, all the links for them, and copy them because in the future they will all go missing.  They will just disappear, very simple as that.  It’s already happening in fact; there are lots of articles and you have to go through everything with a link checker every week now to try and find, if you can find the old stories which have been moved or deleted or whatever.  And that’s how the past is eradicated.

Now, and also too I want to mention that the…

"U.S. and Canadian authorities spar over Peace Bridge"

Alan:  Believe it or not, it’s called the Peace Bridge; here they are sparring over it.

"In recent months, Mr. Cuomo’s chief representative to the binational authority that manages the bridge has described his Canadian counterparts as “duplicitous,” criticizing their “deceitful, disrespectful and arrogant behaviour,” according to e-mails he sent them.  “The fact that you ask for ‘mutual respect’ is nothing short of laughable,” William B. Hoyt III told the Canadians.  The dispute began over efforts to expand the plaza on the New York side of the bridge, with Canadian members of the authority’s board expressing reservations about spending far more for land than its assessed value."

Alan:  And it turned personal.

"Mr. Hoyt, the authority’s vice-chairman, has tried to remove the general manager of the authority – a Canadian – has boycotted some of the authority’s board meetings and alleged that Canadian officials were guilty of a raft of improprieties." 

Alan:  So it’s a business thing really.  And of course they can call themselves nasty names and all the rest of it, which is a standard technique in modern business, but regardless somebody will get it anyway and it will go through and so on.  But it’s all really nasty stuff coming from Cuomo’s office, which is standard kind of New York stuff anyway.  I think that’s how they talk to each other in New York anyway.

Now also…

 "To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here" 

Alan:  And this is a good article, it goes through some of the histories which they think they know about.  I always laugh at all their eschatology to do with the earth’s atmosphere and temperatures and so on because it’s all guesswork really.  But they do go through a lot of the histories they can sort of pretty well say happened with temperatures they took from various ice samples they get at different poles, things like that, and also with tree rings and so on.  And they go through what’s happened.  It goes through the cooling periods we had at different periods in history, the warming periods, and how it goes up and down like a yo-yo.  And it’s always been like that as far as we can tell.  It’s always been like that.

But you find now that there are a lot of people and scientists who want to keep some credibility, absconding from or leaving the Global Warming parties because they’re losing all their credibility because they’re not getting their warming, in fact we’re getting cooling across the world.  Lots of articles from all countries in Europe to do with this.  And they’re even having snow in some parts of the U.S. still and we’re getting freezing temperatures at night up where I am in Ontario, Canada still.  And you have to put a fire on every night.  So I’ll put that one up too.

Now also, I can’t fathom why people who are told they’re being monitored all the time have to get the devices that monitor them.  I can understand if you have to have a computer for a show or something like that, doing a broadcast, then you need something there, but you put on as little on that computer as possible to do in any personal way whatsoever because it’s a monitoring device in many ways actually.

Even in the late 90’s there were scandals when it was found out that laptops could be listening to you and the remote authorities at agencies could basically trigger the microphone on even if you switched it off.  Things like that; that’s all been admitted to in the past.  So people keep using it and now of course they’re used to using cell phones and blabbing off in front of whole crowds in queues at checkout counters and they’ll say the most intimate things and everyone hears them and they don’t care anymore.  Well I just in my mind I write these people off, that they’re not complete human beings obviously anymore.  They live in a fictional reality, like a cartoon show or something.

Anyway people are buying the Xboxes, the new ones and they find out there is a monitoring device under the guise of a gaming console, they’ll buy it regardless for the children because the children will nag them after seeing all the ads.  That’s how they design these ads of course; they’re designed to hit at the children and then they nag the parents into getting them.  But it says this guy goes on to talk about the old systems which you had and you were left alone, etcetera, and it was all yours, but today it’s completely different.  He says:

"The unveiling of these capabilities no one asked for has lifted some eyebrows around the world." 

"Tim Vines, director at Civil Liberties Australia, told GamesFIX that Microsoft has a lot to answer for with a product that has the ability to listen and watch everything a person does." 

Alan:  Why would you buy something like that?  I can’t fathom it.

"“People should have the ability to turn off the camera or microphone, even if it limits the functionality of the machine,” he said.  Vines believes privacy is “all about control”.  “Of course, if Microsoft doesn’t allow that control, then people should vote with their wallets and skip the next Xbox.”" 

And he says:

"Microsoft should be upfront about what it does with data collected by Xbox One.  “Microsoft’s new Xbox meets the definition of a surveillance device under some Australian laws, so they need to be upfront and tell customers whether anyone else can intercept their information or remotely access their device,”..." 

Alan:  Well I read an article last year about that.  They were doing this with the Xbox or they were going to do it with the Xboxes.  The military was one of the agencies that was involved and they wanted to assess children’s abilities and so on.  And no doubt they’ll recruit them down the road for drone strikes and things like that, and I’m sure that’s part of it too.

"According to Berlin’s federal data protection commissioner, Peter Schaar, the Xbox One is nothing more than a monitoring device under the guise of a gaming console." 

"“The Xbox One continuously records all sorts of personal information about me.  My reaction rates, my learning or emotional states.  These are then processed on an external server, and possibly even passed on to third parties.  The fact that Microsoft could potentially spy on my living room is merely a twisted nightmare.”" 

Alan:  Now remember too the articles to do with the rise of the mental health authorities.  They will also have all the access to your emotional states as it says here.  Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Alan:  Hi folks.  I think I’m back now.  Anyway, the U.S. has really been hammered over the years with changes, which what used to be called communism at one time demanded were made and they would change the whole face and structure and culture of the U.S.  And of course it’s happened.  It has happened.  And they’re on such a roll today, the ones behind this, all the different groups and so on behind this, that they’re very arrogant about it too.  And as I say this is the Century of Change, the 21^st century, where all these far, far left communistic types of programs are to be pushed to the maximum and it’s taking down what used to be the U.S.  The reason that people used to flood into the U.S. from Europe was because it had so many freedoms and rights and so on.  But now they’re really pushing ahead and telling you no you don’t have them.  It’s probably the most policed place in the world today.  It’s got the biggest prison population.  This homeland security thing is way beyond what the Stasi had in East Germany and it’s getting worse.

Anyway it says:

"Teacher facing discipline for reminding students of Constitutional rights" 

Alan:  As you know they’ve been trying to destroy this Constitution for an awful long time or just ignoring it.  And back in the 70’s I think it was, there was an article from the CFR, Council on Foreign Relations, that said rather than hitting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights head on like we’ve always done before, he said, we’ll have to go around it to simply build bridges over it and around it, and that’s what they’ve done.  And those new laws that surpass it basically and go over it are the ones that they look at today as the legal way to run things.

Anyway it says:

"An Illinois community is rallying around a teacher who is reportedly up against disciplinary action for informing his students of their rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment before the high-schoolers answered a survey regarding their personal behavior.  John Dryden, a social studies teacher at Batavia High School, not far from Chicago, Illinois, told the Kane County Chronicle he was docked a day’s pay for reminding his students they have the right to not incriminate themselves before administering a drug-screening survey to the class.  The exact contents of the survey were not disclosed, but Dryden said each form was printed with a student’s name and had questions relating to drug use, alcohol consumption, and emotional tendencies." 

Alan:  Now if you signed that and put it in there that’s a record for life.  It will be kept somewhere.

"The results were to be reviewed by school officials, social workers, counselors and psychologists, according to the Chicago Daily Herald.  For advising the students of their rights guaranteed by the Constitution, Dryden was scheduled to face a closed-door meeting with school board officials on Tuesday night.  He was charged with the vague count of “unprofessional conduct” and could be disciplined with a “letter of remedy” that would remain on his 20-year employment record, along with the docked pay." 

Alan:  It’s just like the old Soviet system used to be, isn’t it?

"Dryden said it was “dumb luck” that he examined the contents in the survey before handing them out.  He said that if he had been notified about the questions, he would have consulted a school administrator over the issue." 

"“Somebody needs to remind them they have the ability not to incriminate themselves,” Dryden said.  “I made a judgment call.  There was no time to ask anyone.”  School Superintendent Jack Barshinger told the Daily Herald the survey was meant to determine which students were emotionally unstable and considering self-harm."

Alan:  That’s what they’ll tell you of course.  And as I say all these things, all these forms and so on get sent to mental health authorities and all the rest of it, even police.

He says:

"“We can’t help them if we aren’t aware of their needs,” he said.  A letter mailed to parents did not specify whether the survey was mandatory or optional." 

Alan:  That’s standard.  Most people take it for granted it must be mandatory.  And that’s what they count on.

"A petition of support, which described Dryden as an “uncharacteristically engaging educator,” attracted 4,000 signatures and pleaded with administrators to not discipline him." 

"“It is Mr. Dryden’s task as an educator to impart his students with the knowledge and ability to make informed choices, even if these lead to conscientious objection,” the letter read.  “For the administration of Batavia High School to pursue disciplinary action against a dedicated educator, whose instruction is solely student centered is, in our opinion, an extreme lapse of professional competence.”" 

"Through the scrutiny and media attention Dryden has maintained that the survey’s legality, not he, should be the focus of the story." 

Alan:  And isn’t that the truth, eh?

"“I have asked people to talk about the survey.  I think I am a sideshow,” he said.  “I’m not a martyr.  I’m trying to refocus people’s attentions.”" 

And he says:

"“Calm down.”" 

Alan:  Well but that sort of thing is happening all over.  They’re training a whole population, a whole generation, that you really don’t have rights.  Government is the boss you see.  And I’ve mentioned before about H.G. Wells that said eventually we’ll train the populations like this, that government is the supreme boss, it’s a God basically.  And many of the big top social scientists engaged in creating the culture that we’re now going through today said the same thing.  And people unfortunately are believing it too.  Of course all the fiction they watch on TV doesn’t help either because it’s loaded with all these suggestions in it of course that you just follow and obey, obey, obey.  That’s what it’s about.

Now in Canada it’s a bit different here, they actually strip-search students and so on.

"SAINT-JEROME, Que. — A school board north of Montreal has launched an internal investigation after school staff strip-searched 28 high school students to find a cellphone during a year-end exam." 

Alan:  Can you imagine that, eh?  I mean the 21^st century; it doesn’t look too good does it?

Back with more after this.

{Break ♫ - You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network because you can handle the truth - ♫}

Alan:  Hi folks.  We’re back Cutting Through the Matrix and talking about this article here from Quebec, Canada where the school board in Canada had an internal investigation after school staff strip-searched 28 high school students about the age of 15 to 16.  And there were 28 of them, these students.  It said:

"The students were ordered to put their phones on a teacher’s desk to prevent cheating during a math exam but one phone was unaccounted for, prompting teachers to order the strip search.  "They put us in a small room," [said] one teenage girl, who didn’t give her name. They said ‘take off your bra, then raise your arms.’ They even tapped us on the back." 

"School board spokeswoman Nadyne Brochu admits the teachers went too far." 

Alan:  And so on and so on.  But they didn’t find the phone.  It doesn’t say it here if they found it or not. But regardless I mean this is the new system.  This is the new system which is going way beyond any progress that was made over the years because schools when I was small were even worse than that.  And that was the old rigorous stuff too.  You were marched into the school like you were in the military, literally marched.  And you’d line outside your schools in long lines in the pouring rain, it didn’t matter if it was snow or rain or boiling hot.  And you’d have to march in and out as it was regimented, literally regimented.  Then they made some progress for a while and now it seems to be going back the other way again.

Now there are a couple of callers on the phone.  We’ll take Dan from Pennsylvania.

Dan:  Hi.  Thanks for taking my call.  I was just wondering if you had any recommendations of any old ancient history books or ancient philosophy books from a trustworthy author that would provide somewhat of a foundation for somebody who is in their young 20’s and trying to learn about all this stuff from a very base perspective.

Alan:  You’re best to get some of the university books on the philosophers themselves because the translations are pretty good.  They are out there; there is a good selection to choose from, from the old Greeks actually.  And you’ll find even the writings of the philosophers themselves translated is the best way to learn.  You will find what they were driving at during their discourses as they call them and where they wanted to take the minds of their listeners, or the readers.  And that’s the best way to learn.  If you find, you can also get the commentaries of specialists supposedly on philosophy, etcetera, who give you their spins on the take, how they take these writings, but they can also spin them off into different directions.  It’s best to start with the actual writings themselves like Plato and Aristotle, etcetera and start from there.  That’s the best way to learn anything.  But the university libraries, a lot of them sell off the older books, and so on.  You’ll find them online.  And you can certainly get them really cheap, nowadays.  Does that help?

Dan:  I appreciate it.  Thanks a lot.

Alan:  Okay.  Yeah, you have to really search for yourself and get the best buys because there are a lot of good books out there for good prices.  At one time they were awfully expensive to buy before you had e-books and so on or you had the internet to look up for books, used books, but now it’s pretty easy to get a hold of.  And you’ll get to the right sort of conclusions too.  And it’s very, very true, what it gives you is an insight into sciences that were known thousands of years ago on how the people’s minds worked, the majority of people, and that’s really what it’s about, how it works.  Today as I say it’s massive sciences, neuroscience, psychology, behaviorism, it’s all based really on these ancient founders of philosophy, etcetera.  And of course even the shape and direction of the world, where it’s going is also to do with what we see as the left, the far left, the far right, and ultimately if you read the books for yourself you’ll find out there is no difference between the two of them.  They both believe that the intelligent, the elect, should run the world.  And so it doesn’t matter if you vote left-wing or right-wing, that’s where it’s all supposed to go according to today’s system.

Now also I want to mention this…

"Russia warns Obama about Monsanto"

Alan:  Everybody else inside the States and Canada and everywhere else is warning them about Monsanto.

"The shocking minutes relating to President Putin’s meeting this past week with US Secretary of State John Kerry reveal the Russian leaders “extreme outrage” over the Obama regimes continued protection of global seed and plant bio-genetic giants Syngenta and Monsanto in the face of a growing “bee apocalypse” that the Kremlin warns “will most certainly” lead to world war." 

Alan:  He says.  But of course it won’t do that.  It’ll certainly be a war of foodstuffs for sure because they’re killing the bees off.

" According to these minutes, released in the Kremlin today by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation (MNRE), Putin was so incensed over the Obama regimes refusal to discuss this grave matter that he refused for three hours to even meet with Kerry, who had traveled to Moscow on a scheduled diplomatic mission, but then relented so as to not cause an even greater rift between these two nations.  At the center of this dispute between Russia and the US, this MNRE report says, is the “undisputed evidence” that a class of neuro-active insecticides chemically related to nicotine, known as neonicotinoids, are destroying our planets bee population," 

Alan:  Which actually they are.  It’s been tested out all over the place.

"...and which if left unchecked could destroy our world’s ability to grow enough food to feed its population." 

Alan:  Because people don’t realize that the farmers rent, they hire these guys to come in with their bees to pollinate the fields and so on.  And that’s so true.

"So grave has this situation become, the MNRE reports, the full European Commission (EC) this past week instituted a two-year precautionary ban set to begin on 1 December 2013 on these “bee killing” pesticides following the lead of Switzerland, France, Italy, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine, all of whom had previously banned these most dangerous of genetically altered organisms from being used on the continent." 

"Two of the most feared neonicotinoids being banned are Actara and Cruiser made by the Swiss global bio-tech seed and pesticide giant Syngenta AG which employs over 26,000 people in over 90 countries and ranks third in total global sales in the commercial agricultural seeds market.  Important to note, this report says, is that Syngenta, along with bio-tech giants Monsanto, Bayer, Dow and DuPont, now control nearly 100% of the global market for genetically modified pesticides, plants and seeds." 

Alan:  And of course you buy their seed and then to grow the seeds and their plants you got to use their pesticides.  And that’s the deal they come along with you see.

"Also to note about Syngenta, this report continues, is that in 2012 it was criminally charged in Germany for concealing the fact that its genetically modified corn killed cattle, and settled a class-action lawsuit in the US for $105 million after it was discovered they had contaminated the drinking supply of some 52 million Americans in more than 2,000 water districts with its “gender-bending” herbicide Atrazine." 

Alan:  It’s basically a synthetic form of estrogen.

"To how staggeringly frightful this situation is, the MNRE says, can be seen in the report issued this past March by the American Bird Conservancy (ABC) wherein they warned our whole planet is in danger, and as we can, in part, read:

“As part of a study on impacts from the world’s most widely used class of insecticides, nicotine-like chemicals called neonicotinoids, American Bird Conservancy (ABC) has called for a ban on their use as seed treatments and for the suspension of all applications pending an independent review of the products’ effects on birds, terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates, and other wildlife." 

Alan:  But this stuff is seeping into the water.  And I read the articles last year from India where they brought the stuff in there and so many of their wells now for a two hundred mile radius are utterly poisoned, utterly poisoned with this stuff.  But again it’s big business and big business has a lot of clout and it is U.S. government policy.  I’ve read the articles too where the government told all of their people from embassies and so on to push this product across the planet.  It’s quite something.

Now there’s one little victory for raw milk.  One guy was acquitted recently.  It says:

"In these days of creeping tyranny – some would say galloping tyranny – whenever freedom wins a battle, it’s time for a celebration.  So pour yourself a champagne glass full of healthful, delicious, GMO-free raw milk, and raise a toast to Vernon Hershberger, who was just acquitted by a jury on three of four counts of “foodcrime.”  Hershberger can now return to his farm and continue producing healthy food for his neighbors.  The jury’s verdict sent an unmistakeable message:  When a farmer like Hershberger wants to run a cooperative food club, and provide his neighbors with raw milk and other non-Monsanto, farm-grown foods without a retail license, he is acting within his legitimate rights.  In other words, both raw milk and direct-to-consumer food clubs have been effectively legalized in Wisconsin." 

Alan:  So that’s one that’s got away with it there.  And it’s true enough because we eat so much poison today because of the processed foods.  Because we are drinking milk that is often from cattle fed with the GM corn and so on, as I say it killed a lot of them off in Germany, that we’re being poisoned too.  The whole food chain is as they go into it.  We’re actually eating a lot of stuff too which is simply the by-products, the waste products, of the chemical industry; it’s added to all kinds of foods today.  And that’s well known.

And talking about food too…

"A side dish of maggots with supermarket meat!" 

"Livestock to be fed larvae..."

Alan:  Maggot larvae.

"...reared on cow and pig excrement in EU trial to meet rising demands for meat" 

Alan:  Now the rising demand for meat is simply the fact that they want to export it all to China and so on.  And so greed again is at the fountainhead of the move to debase the food all together, cheapen it too and cut the corners for maximizing the profit as they call it.  So they’re going to feed them this.  So it says here they’re going to:

• "...use protein-rich fly maggots instead of soya beans in animal feed"
• "Waste products including spent grain from whisky-making could be used"
• "Global demand for meat and dairy products is predicted to double by 2050" 

"It is hardly the most appetizing of prospects, but it could just be the only viable way to satisfy the ever-increasing global demand for meat." 

Alan:  Or basically greed from the ones that want to export it.  So they want to:

"...feed animals with protein-rich maggots... " 

"Soya beans which are normally used in feed for animals such as chickens, pigs and fish, are in great demand so scientists and farmers have been searching for a cheap and viable alternative." 

Alan:  And that’s the whole point, cheap and viable alternative, right?

"The EU plan would see flies bred on an industrial scale using readily-available animal and vegetable waste, with the maggots, or larvae, which they create then being used for feed.  The type of waste product used would vary depending on the location of the ‘fly farms’ with sawdust and even used grain from the whisky distilling process being touted as possibilities.  With the rising population and changes in dietary habits, the demand for meat and dairy products is predicted to double by 2050, when there will be an estimated three billion extra mouths to feed." 

Alan:  Well actually it’s going to fall like hell because I’ve read all the articles from the United Nations itself on that too and a few other studies have been done that it’s actually going to fall after about 2040 as folk get more sterile on the stuff that they’re eating, because it does that to you too.  It’s quite something else, isn’t it?  What they’re doing here is just going ahead to cheapen everything that costs to maximize the profit.  That’s all it’s about.  That’s all it’s about, folks.  So I’ll put this article up tonight too.

And also in this age of bringing in lots of foreign students and so on…

"NY University Researchers Accused of Sharing Secrets With China for Tuition, Rent" 

"Federal prosecutors on Monday charged three NYU researchers with commercial bribery conspiracy for sharing their work on MRI technology with a Chinese company.  Only two were arrested as the third had already fled to China, Reuters reports.  The lead researcher, Yudong Zhu, allegedly received $400,000, from an executive with China’s United Imaging Healthcare.  His assistants, Xing Yang and Ye Li, didn’t receive cash, but allegedly had their tuition and rent paid for, respectively.  We are way beyond briefcases full of money." 

Alan:  Sent to them.  So, big money.  Of course you can’t really have secrets in this day and age when there is so much money out there.  That’s why so many of the cops now are selling dope on the streets; they confiscate it and they also go and sell it.

And in Sweden too that’s been really pushed by especially one primary group to take in multiculturalism in a big, big way, from a woman who actually came in from New York, who is pushing a lot of it.  They’re getting ethnic unrest now with riots in the immigrant areas.

"Night 7 in Sweden: Cars ablaze, police attacked" 

"Automobiles were torched and police confronted stone-wielding youths in Stockholm’s suburbs early Sunday as riots, which erupted following reports that police had killed an elderly immigrant, enter their first week." 

Alan:  Well the guy himself was fighting with a machete, waving it about, and he’d hit the cops if they came to him.

"Pockets of violence and vandalism continue to pose a challenge to police in Stockholm, the Swedish capital that is home to an increasingly diverse 2 million residents.  “When it comes to car fires, there have been a few, spread out in various locations, but not as many as in recent days,” Stockholm police reports." 

Alan:  So around that area is the home of quite a large population of immigrants and of course they’re criticizing not having enough welfare system and all the usual stuff that you find.  But the countries of course can’t afford, like Britain for instance, can’t afford taking in immigrants and spending so much on a welfare system and borrowing money to pay for it.  The bankers love it.  The big bankers that lend to nations love that.  But the population in a small country can’t afford to do that and it’s got a small enough population, a small country.  Anyway it’s going on.

And also too and as we go through all the political correctness which is the total destruction of Western civilization really.  That’s what it is, I’ve gone through it from the Frankfurt School and so on where all culture in the west had to be totally destroyed, even right down to giving you terrible art and calling it art in the first place by putting away realistic type arts and so on with talent or talented artists, until you get zig-zags and stripes across the canvas and splotches, etcetera, and they call that art.  That was all part of the Frankfurt School’s agenda.  And they were heavily backed by a big, big organization and still are by the way under different names.

But it says:

"New Children’s Cartoon ‘SheZow’ Features Boy Turning Into Girl" 

Alan:  You see.  And then it says:

"Hub, a cable channel for children owned by Discovery and Hasbro, is hoping its new cartoon "SheZow" can turn the channel’s fortunes around.  Hub has struggled to gain viewers since its debut in 2010, but it’s betting a 12-year-old boy named "Guy" who transforms into a female superhero, complete with a purple skirt and cape, pink gloves and white go-go boots, will change that." 

"To become a female superhero, Guy uses his magic ring and says the words “You go girl!”"

"“When I first heard about the show, my reaction was ‘Are you out of your minds?’ Then I looked at it and I thought, ‘This is just funny,’” Margaret Loesch, chief executive of Hub, told the Los Angeles Times.  "Hasbro does not tell us how to run the business," Loesch said. “They of course share with me which of the properties they think would tie in best with their strategy, which is a win-win for us.”" 

Alan:  No doubt they’ll make a whole bunch of clothing to go with it, the he-she and so on.  Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Alan:  Hi folks.  We’re back Cutting Through the Matrix and I was going to mention too, that I’ve mentioned before a few months back, that Australia had dropped the U.S. dollar as a currency exchange and they’re dealing directly with China now.  Now New Zealand has followed them up and they’re dropping the U.S. dollar too.  It says that:

"New Zealand—Seeking to help its exporters, New Zealand is negotiating with China to make their currencies directly convertible, a spokeswoman for Prime Minister John Key said.  Most of New Zealand’s exports to China are agricultural products—particularly milk powder, meat and wool—while most of its imports from there are computers, mobile phones and clothes.  Above, sheep shearing near Dunedin, New Zealand in September." 

Alan:  And so on.

"Wellington’s push is aimed at driving down costs for companies that do business with China, which is close to overtaking Australia as New Zealand’s No. 1 trading partner." 

Alan:  They’re also selling a lot of farms off too, to China, in New Zealand as well.

"Talks are in the “very early stages”..." 

Alan:  And so on.  So anyway, everyone is dropping the dollar it seems as they go into this big trade deal with China and it’s going to expand and expand and expand.

Also:

"Monsanto Found Guilty of Chemical Poisoning in Landmark Case" 

Alan:  of a…

"French farmer who can no longer perform his routine farming duties because of permanent pesticide injuries has had his day in court, literally, and the perpetrator of his injuries found guilty of chemical poisoning."

So:

"The French court in Lyon ruled that Monsanto’s Lasso weedkiller formula, which contains the active ingredient alachlor,"

Alan:  It’s called.

"...caused Paul Francois to develop lifelong neurological damage that manifests as persistent memory loss, headaches, and stuttering during speech." 

Alan:  It also makes them, gives them ataxia and so on, all these things, difficulty walking and so on.  So that’s the effect you get, neurotoxic, from Monsanto.  And you’re eating their stuff mind you and that stuff gets into the cells of the foodstuff remember.  I hope you remember all of that.

And also:

"Max Planck Institute For Meteorology:"

Alan:  Which is a big proponent for the Global Warming.

"“Prognoses Confirm Model Forecasts” - Warming [Period] Postponed “Hundreds Of Years”" 

Alan:  For maybe hundreds of years. It won’t matter though, the carbon taxes will roll ahead.

And also too:

"Pedophile who ‘killed elderly couple and raped two-year-old’ had been released from prison for almost identical attack just HOURS earlier" 

Alan:  Before he killed them.

"A man charged with murdering an elderly couple and sexually assaulting their two year old grandchild had been released from prison just hours earlier after serving time for a similar attack." 

Alan:  His name is…

"Jerry Active, 24, broke in to the house where Touch Chea, 71, and his wife, Sorn Sreap, 73, were babysitting their granddaughter and allegedly beat the couple to death and raped the little girl." 

Alan:  Identical attack in Alaska.

"The toddler’s parents returned to their home in Anchorage, Alaska, on Saturday night to find Active naked in their bedroom with the two-year-old." 

Alan:  And he was arrested, etcetera, etcetera.  But I mean it’s just getting crazy, folks.  And today we have all these bleeding hearts, as they say, who say we’re too hard on these characters, etcetera, etcetera, and we should go softer on them.  And this is what they’re doing.  And they’re letting them out way too early.  There is no treatment by the way for pedophiles.  There is no effective treatment that’s ever had any benefit whatsoever.  And in all the cases that they get when they’ve interviewed them they’re completely unrepentant of their acts, etcetera, completely.  And they let them out in the streets again and they do it over and over and over again.  It’s disgusting.  But this is again the takedown of the culture as well, for those who don’t quite understand it all.  It’s all part of it.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight, and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

China's Shuanghui to buy Smithfield Foods for $4.7 billion

Pork and Beef Industry

US Canada and Peace Bridge

To the Horror of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling is Here

New Xbox is a Monitoring Device

US---Teacher Disciplined for Reminding Students of Constitutional Rights

Quebec Teachers Strip-Search Students During Math Exam

Russia Unhappy over US Pushing Monsanto

US Farmer Acquitted on selling Raw Milk

Livestock to be fed larvae reared on cow and pig excrement in EU trial

Three NYU Scientists Accused of Taking Bribes from China

'Diverse Immigrants' Still Rioting in Stockholm

New Children's Cartoon has Boy Turning into Girl

New Zealand follows Australia---Dropping US Dollar for Chinese Yuan

Monsanto Found Guilty of Poisoning

Global Warming Postponed

Alaska--Pedophile who 'killed elderly couple and raped two-year-old' had been released from prison for almost identical attack just HOURS earlier

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:17 am

May 27, 2013 (#1339)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 27, 2013:

GIRFEC: The Suspective Collective:

"Scotland, the Test-Bed for Social Engineering,
Government Overseer for Every Child is Pioneering,
The Soviet System and Staasi, Decrepit, Salivating,
Envious of the State Power They'd Been all Craving,
Parents to Be Rated by Their Kindergarten Children,
Views on Ethnic Diversity Rated Fair to Middlin',
A Giant Database to House All Information,
As Lifelong Records Added to for Collectivization,
Pavlovians, Skinnerians are Taking this Opportunity
To Engineer Good Citizens, Pillars of Community"

Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt. This is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 27th of May 2013.

I always suggest to newcomers to make sure they make good use of the website CuttingThroughTheMatrix.Com and you’ll see a bunch of the official sites I have listed there. They all carry audios for free download and they carry transcripts in English for print-up of lots of the talks I’ve given over the years and if you want transcripts in other languages go into AlanWattSentientSentinel.eu and take your luck there from the choice that’s offered.

And also too remember that you are the ones that bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests and so on. I just depend upon you to keep me ticking along and buying the books and discs at CuttingThroughTheMatrix.Com and I go through the art of conology. Conology is a great art because it’s always been used down through the ages and today it’s much more refined and specialised with neuroscience, psychologists and so on, marketers. Very good marketers, in fact, who know the sciences of the human mind and how it works and they work on the mass man and woman, basically, across the whole planet; and these arts used to be in the hands of individual advisors and now they’re in the hands of whole teams and teams of people behind presidents and prime ministers. They really are behind the governments altogether, in fact. Prime ministers or presidents tend to be puppets these days.

So help yourself to the website and you’ll start to understand the system you’re living in and it is a big system, a very definite system, very well worked out system too, to bring the world into a global society and I go into the organisations that control it and set up their organisations over a hundred years ago, officially, out in the open with their big, big plan for a global society, including bringing on world wars if necessary to get countries to give up their sovereignty and, of course, they were started off by the biggest international moneylenders of their day who formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, same thing, and they have branches across the whole world in all governments today. Even with the European Union they have their European Council on Foreign Relations and George Soros runs that one; he’s in charge of it. So you’ll find that we’re run, really by... it means all the media too. They’re all members of it and entertainment moguls, etc, they’re all members of the same thing. Because, after all, to give you culture and change, you must be in charge of the culture industry and they certainly, certainly are.

Most of the people’s ideas and opinions come from movies and dramas on television, not from actual reality, and all to get this big world agenda through. Not a happy world as you think of it but a planned society. A planned society will come out of this eventually and right down to who can breed, who cannot breed and who will have children, etc and of course, cloning is a big part of it too because after all the big boys want to go off into the future and they claim there is too many of all the rest of you, you see, to be sustainable and they’ll take the best genes, etc, to create the best kind of clones and servile workers for the future. There’s no doubt about it. That’s where your tax money is going.

So from the U.S. to Canada, remember, you can order using personal cheques or International Postal Money Orders or you can send cash or use Paypal. Across the world, Western Union, Moneygram and Paypal, and I’ll get them out to you. As I say, I go through more of this in detail in the books and so on.

But our realities are given to us and often it starts with your own parents because your parents have been indoctrinated in turn; many of them don’t ever ask the right questions and ask the whys that things are happening and so on, and they pass it on to the children and then, of course, television even takes over before they even get into pre-school through their cartoons loaded with P.C. statements and so on for the global society, etc, etc, and then they go into, as I say, kindergarten then school and they’re indoctrinated right through their whole schooling. Jacques Ellul, who was a philosopher, said that your subsequent propaganda, it won’t take on you unless you have your proper indoctrination starting at school. Very important. Very, very important.

Back with more after this.

 

{Music Break}

Hi folks. I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix. Many times I’ve talked about the big system and how we’ve all to be trained, trained perfectly by those who are better than us, ones who are up there, the elect people, you see, specialists, and this is the age of specialists. This is the age of transition, the 21st century. This is the century of change where all the big socialist ideas have to be implemented completely, before the century’s out, and they’re starting it big time in various countries ahead of the rest.

If you go back into the 20th century you’ll find a lot of the big planners of this present system who are dead now, a lot of these guys, like Bertrand Russell, talked about the children and the parents and how the state would take over from the parents and give the child their new value system. He said that the parents were contaminated. He used the communist term, contaminated culture, meaning old-fashioned ideas, and they’d have to be eradicated, those ideas. He said we used to think, he said... now remember he was a member of many world organisations, the Macy group, Frankfurt school, he worked with them too, to create a new culture for this present time and lots of other international meetings too. The American Psychiatric Association, he worked sometimes with them as well; and he said we used to think we’d have to remove the children from their parents, but, he says, now with social indoctrination at school at a very early age it can override any parental input. The indoctrination is too powerful, although he didn’t rule out the fact, he said, that we might have to remove the children. He says, at one time prior to this we thought we definitely had to take the children from their parents, all of them, and bring about a world where the children wouldn’t know their parents, in fact. This was also taken over by even the early kibbutzes in Israel. They tried that in a big way too and there’s a book called Children of the Dream, an excellent book to read. It’s excellent on the studies they did in Israel.

Anyway, we find that it’s still going on, of course, because it’s truly into socialism for this European amalgamation which is a new Soviet system, by the way, and on behalf of the elite who run it, and the top socialists are multi-millionaires most of them. I hope you realise that. Same with the communists. That’s how they were. The top communists, in fact, ran the top banks in the world.  But anyway it says...

“Now it’s a social worker for every child - in Scotland”

 

Alan: This is the test case for Scotland, you see. They always use a country or an island, even, for a lot of these test studies. For instance, the Smart Cities are being tested off Denmark with a controlled population on a small island there and they’ve got a Smart Grid up and all the rest of it and they’re monitoring how it goes, etc. In Scotland it’s for social change and scientific experiments; and it says...

 

“Now it’s a social worker for every child - in Scotland”

“More state interference in families will not protect the children”

“For anyone familiar with how our “child protection” system too often works in practice, rather loud alarm bells might be rung by a Bill currently going through the Scottish Parliament that takes the state’s intervention in family life to a startling new level. Under the Children and Young People (Scotland) Bill, every child from birth will be given a “named person”, charged with keeping an eye on that child’s interests until it reaches adulthood.”

 

“We are familiar with the idea that state employees are expected to take an interest in a child’s welfare, from health visitors to teachers at school. But this proposal that local authorities should be empowered to appoint an official to act as a personal “guardian”, or social worker, to oversee every aspect of a child’s life from birth onwards is a world first.”

 

Alan: Now the United Nations is behind it and some of this GIRFEC programme, they call it GIRFEC, is not just for Scotland. It’s to go across the whole of Europe and then the world and even the last president of France, apparently, was one of the guys involved in setting this system up. Top socialist system. So that’s one article on it and then you find this one and it says...

“State snoops checking out new parents”

Alan: Very interesting. So it isn’t just to do with the state taking over and naming a guardian, a government worker in charge of every single child, which overrules all parents, remember, and authorities. It’s also to find out your points of view. It says...

“Parents are being secretly judged on their views on race and diversity while in hospital with their newborn babies under the SNP Government’s latest assault on family life.”

 

“During the scheme, parents are secretly monitored by maternity staff to judge their parenting skills”

 

Alan: They’re turning everybody into spies. P.C. Spies. This is the Soviet Union. This is the Stasi of Eastern Germany. It’s beyond that, in fact. So here is maternity staff going to psych you out to find out your opinions on things; and it says...

“In a further twist, the same health board is asking children - some of them still at nursery school - to rate their parents or carers on a scale of 1-10.”

Alan: So children at nursery school are going to evaluate their parents. It says...

“The project is part of the sinister Big Brother-style system of state meddling called Getting It Right For Every Child...”

Alan: That’s what GIRFEC is called, you see.

“...(GIRFEC) which is being quietly rolled out across Scotland.”

“Last week, this newspaper exposed the "scary" plans for all children to be given a state guardian - or Named Person - who will have the legal right to tell parents how to raise their offspring.”

“GIRFEC also includes proposals to store a child’s personal details on a series of databases, which can be accessed by social workers, teachers and other officials.”

Alan: In other words all government agencies, police, everything. Wherever you go in that country they can instantly access your data and your life history, by the way, because this is right up until you’re an adult. And I’m telling you another thing too, they want to continue after adulthood. They haven’t said it yet but they’ve hinted at it.

 

“The "parental capacity to provide wellbeing"...”

Alan: This whole wellbeing thing you thought was just a strange little fad they were going through. No, no, no. Remember the Federal Reserve head of the U.S. He mentioned wellbeing will have to be pushed ahead of GDP and so on. This is what they meant by this. See, they’ll see if you’re getting depressed about having no work for the rest of your life, things like that, and give you the right medications to make you feel happy, you understand. See, as long as you’re happy you’re okay. It doesn’t matter if you’re sleeping on the street, you’re okay, as long as you’re happy about it; they’ll give you the right pills. It says...

“Under one part of the scheme, parents are secretly monitored by maternity staff to assess their suitability for raising children.  If they are deemed to be worthy of further investigation, another form then asks whether or not they "respect and value diversity" and give "due prominence to their racial, ethnic and cultural heritage.  Another part of Lanarkshire’s GIRFEC "toolkit" includes a questionnaire children to rate their parents or carers on a scale of 1-10 in a range of different areas.  The youngsters, who can still be at nursery school, are given a series of prompts, including "do you have someone who listens seriously to your opinions and ideas and anything you have to say?".”

 

“Emma Carr, deputy director of Big Brother Watch, said: "Why is the Scottish Government so suspicious of parents? Midwives shouldn’t be lumbered with acting as social workers and parent monitors when they already have important jobs to be getting on with."”

 

"This sort of heavy handed bureaucracy smacks of treating every new parent as a suspect and the NHS should get on with providing new parents with the best health care and support available, not policing forms about parent’s views of diversity.”

 

Alan: The U.S. will be getting this put in too, remember. They’re trying it off in Scotland and it comes under a National Health Service system and that’s what they want to implement in the U.S. and across the rest of the world as well under a National Health Service. I hope you understand this. It says...

 

"Asking nursery aged children for their ‘official’ views on their parents...”

 

Alan: Can you imagine what they might say if they’re in a bad mood?

 

“...is a disaster waiting to happen. What happens when children don’t receive the toy that they wanted for Christmas? Public authorities should think about what it is they are trying to achieve, rather than sending out intrusive forms to young children and attempting to create creating a generation of sandbox snoopers.”

 

“Meanwhile, despite claims that personal details will be not be stored centrally, Lanarkshire’s own GIRFEC newsletter - published in March - states that "core data about a child’s wellbeing and wider world" will soon be available to teachers at a "click of a button".”

 

“GIRFEC is also at an advanced stage in most other council and health board areas across Scotland.  This is despite the fact that the SNP’s Children and Young Person’s Bill, which sets out much of the legal framework, has yet to be approved by Parliament.”

 

Alan: Now Ireland’s also got the same thing in under the Child Protection Act and various other United Nations agreements. And it says...

“Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw said: “This is typical of the SNP wanting to probe into people’s lives too deeply.””

“A spokesman for NHS Lanarkshire said most mothers and fathers would get a one-part assessment, looking at health concerns and "parenting skills".”

 

“However, a "small proportion of families" would be subjected to a "more detailed assessment" by the midwife.”

Alan: Everybody’s involved here. You’ll have to have children in secret shortly. Really.

“He added: "At all times, assessments are carried out in a supportive way and in partnership with the family.”

Alan: See, this is the terminology that they all use. Partnership. Harmony. You see.

“All information is gathered solely to support the baby’s wellbeing is only used for this purpose.”

Alan: Liars. Utter liar. Because a spokesperson is a PR propagandist. Public relations. That’s their job, is to make the worst things sound pleasant. They’re taught this, you know, with psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics. Harmony, partnerships and so on. Anyway, It says...

“Parents have the right to refuse to answer any questions they are uncomfortable with as part of the assessment.”

Alan: Well, you’ll get a black mark for doing that. You know that. That’s going to happen immediately. And also too another one. It says....

“SNP bill to spy on parents is criticised by families”

“The SNP's plans are being criticised by many”

“Hundreds have signed an online petition demanding MSPs (Members of Scottish Parliament) vote against the proposals when they come before Holyrood as part of The Children and Young People Bill later this summer.”

Alan: People should look it up and sign it. It’s going to start there and it’s going to go on and on and on, until it’s way beyond anything that they dreamed up in the Soviet Union or Germany in the war or any of these countries. This is really way beyond it.

“There is also the possibility of a legal challenge under the European Convention on Human Rights...”

Alan: Yeah, that’s all you need is to go to the E.U. that’s behind it all.

“... which gives everybody the right to a private and family life, free from state interference.”

Alan: Yes but they have all these caveats at the end, don’t they? when you read the small print. I’ll be back with more on this after these messages.

{Music Break}

Hi folks. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and reading about GIRFEC. This is this new so-called ‘rights of the child’ thing where the parents have no rights whatsoever, plus the child is to snoop on the parents and every child gets a legal guardian appointed by the government, to snoop on every single child in the country. I hope you understand what this is. But it says here...

"GIRFEC implementation by box-ticking bullies is already causing detriment to some families and frightening children, which is frankly scandalous."

“The Schoolhouse petition, which calls on MSPs to reject the Named Person and database sections of the Bill, has gathered more than 700 signatures in less than a fortnight.”

 

“For children under five, the state guardian will usually be a health visitor, …”

Alan: From the government, that is.

“...while for school-age children it will usually be the headteacher or deputy head.”

 

“They will have to record "routine information" about their charges, which is then stored in a vast database, and can raise concerns about a child’s wellbeing that could ultimately result in them being taken into care.”

Alan: It could also end up with the parents going to prison.

“However, I wouldn’t rule out a legal challenge to these specific aspects.”

“Marion Samson, headteacher at Westquarter Primary and Nursery in Falkirk,...”

Alan: That’s a little place in Scotland too.

“... is a ‘Named Person’ who says her role is to "challenge" families who are not bringing up their children properly.”

Alan: Well, what does ‘properly’ mean?  If you ever go into eugenics and the whole idea of this totalitarian system that Lord Bertrand Russell was helping set up for today, that is, during his lifetime, he actually went into that. That the state will decide what’s proper and what’s not. That’s talking about political correctness, all the latest P.C. updates, etc. It says...

“However, in response to her profile on the government’s Engage for Education blog, one teacher - giving her name as Sian Dawson - described GIRFEC as "quite a scary notion".  She wrote: "Perhaps the Scottish Government would be far better tightening up the processes surrounding child protection for those who actually need help rather than not trusting the majority of families to do a good job."”

“According to a Scottish Government training document seen by this newspaper, the specific aim of GIRFEC is to undermine parents and give the "community" a greater role in raising children.”

Alan: Now go back to Hillary Clinton’s idea too. Remember her book and the whole bit, ‘It Takes A Village to raise a child’. This is all part of this communitarian, collectivist society that they were pushing. It’s still on the go, folks, because this was designed a long time ago, a hundred years ago this was planned to hit today, today. They knew it would take a hundred years to implement it. Here we are, folks. It’s here.  It says...

"From the time that the child is a baby the family and the community should come together in oneness to raise the child so that the child can grow up to be a pillar of society.”

Alan: Can you believe this?

"In so doing everyone benefits and the community is strengthened."

 

Alan: So you’ll all be like clones with the same opinion on everything. Scotland used to have a lot of diversity alright of opinion. That was the greatest thing about it. You had so many characters there that thought outside the box. That’s why they’re coming down on Scotland as a starter. There’s no doubt about that.

“A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The safety and protection of children in Scotland is crucial. The named person - who is likely to be a health visitor, Head or Deputy Head teacher and will usually already know the child - will be a first point of contact if help is needed. This is formalising what should already happen and there is evidence it is working well in many areas.”

Alan: So the snooping is working well and they’re already shopping a lot of people.

“The provisions, including those on information sharing, in the Children and Young People Bill will help to protect and promote the wellbeing of our children and make Scotland a safer place.”

Alan: For whom? For whom? Oh maybe for the government. That’s what it’s all about, folks. All governments want this power. I hope you understand that. All tyrants and totalitarians want this kind of power to make everyone trained into the one system. Thinking the same. Saying the same. Behaving the same and be utterly predictable. That’s always been the dream of tyrants. So I’ll put, remember, all these links up tonight at CuttingThroughTheMatrix.Com.

Now there’s Jay from Massachusetts hanging on the line there. Are you still there Jay?

Jay: Yes, I am. Hi and thank you for taking my call.

Alan: Yes. Go ahead.

Jay: I have a question about I guess what you could call black magic, telling the future. Would it be quite incredible, that is, so implausible, as to elicit disbelief that something like this were to happen, like totalitarian experts like doctors, lawyers, scientists, college grads, government employees, politicians, authors, write to, say, businesses or hospitals or corporations about fictional events which later became reality, that is, to tell the future, like in that episode of Family Guy about the bombing?

 

Alan: Well, you can certainly predict the future if you belong to the societies that guide the future and make it happen. I mean, that’s what governments at the top and all these agencies high, high above them are all about, is predicting and guiding the future. That’s how they guided the European Union into place. The general populations of every country were completely oblivious that a team had been set up to guide the future of them all into a European Union with one parliament running them all. That’s what the elite have always done, the powerful, is shape the future. They don’t want it ever to come out willy-nilly. They’ve got to always direct where it’s going to go. The same with the United Nations. That’s why they set that up. So you can call it, in a sense, I’d say black magic, in a sense, because it’s kept quiet from the public. It’s secret. It’s occultic. It’s secret. It’s hidden and that’s really what occultic means. And we forget there are literally thousands of think-tanks working for the United Nations all paid for by your tax money and by private foundations owned by the wealthiest bankers on the planet, working full-time to bring their perfect world in with the masses being dumbed down, stupid and very obedient. I mean, to them that’s Utopia, you understand. But for us, of course, at the bottom, it’s to be our hell. Back with more after this.

{Music Break}

Hi folks. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. I should really reiterate too that most of my programs I’ve been doing, broadcasts, for years, are about the fact that we’re living through a script and the future is always guided. That’s what the United Nations was set up to do, to be a sort of intermediary, a nexus, a hub, that passes all these things on and keeps them all coordinated. All these big plans for the world including societal changes and everything else and, of course, they work with the big foundations, privately-owned foundations, of the richest folk in the world, that run the hundreds and hundreds of armies of non-governmental organisations across the world that make this come into being. They also donate money to universities to make sure the right curriculum is taught and certain things are not taught; they’re not even mentioned in fact; they’re forbidden. And so we live in a world that’s very, very managed. Nothing is left to chance, in fact, and as we go on into this brave new world even less and less is being left to chance as governments show their true colours and become totalitarian. After all we’re supposed to be run by experts now. We’re all too stupid to run our lives ourselves, you see, so we’re to be run by experts and science. Science. That’s the new religion. The guys in the white coats and the fancy letters behind their names are the guys now who are going to rule your lives and they’re already doing it.

Now also getting into other things too, we know that weather modification is a big, big, big thing and there is many different websites out there now with lots of articles on the geo-engineering that has been going on for years and they’re controlling the weather, even the Air Force had that article about controlling the weather and it’s pretty well here I’d say. And we’re getting dumped on with lots of spraying in the skies since ’98 solid, from then on it’s been daily almost and they’re definitely cooling the atmosphere for sure. I think they’ve overdone it. There was nothing wrong with it, mind you, but they’ve really cooled it and they’ve overdone it now. But it says...

“Snow blankets parts of Europe”

“Despite the fact that summer is only days away, the temperatures are still very disappointing across many parts of Europe.  Over the past few days snow has fallen across southern Germany, France, Switzerland and Italy.  In the mountains temperatures have dropped below zero, and the snow even fell at lower levels.   On 24 May 2013, temperatures in Churwalden struggled to reach 3C. On the same day last year, temperatures soared to 20C.”

Alan: Temperatures had been up to the 20 degree centigrade mark. And it goes on and on and on. I’ll put this link up tonight too. I should say too that last night it snowed in some parts of the U.S. And every night I’m hitting the freezing mark here and you got heavy, heavy frost even right up to the present time and it will be the same again tonight. So, so much for global warming, eh? And now they’ll call it radical climate change. That’s what they’ll call it, you see, because they can’t give up because carbon taxes are behind this, and carbon taxes and carbon re-engineering all of us again is to make us change our way of living completely. It’s to be the big stick to make us change our way of living. But the big boys at the top are making this a whole new economy, on carbon taxes, so that you’re in a post-consumer society where you won’t have extra cash to spend on anything, it’ll all go to fees and energy taxes, etc, and carbon taxes. That’s what it’s all about. We’re managed like children. Truly. We truly are.

Now we also know too that big corporations like Bill Gates’s Microsoft and so on shot to the top. The parting of the sea happened to let them all through. All government agencies parted. They were all given the word to let this happen because they wanted one main one where everyone would be monitored through this one system. There’s no doubt about it. It’s to do with monitoring. It’s just like Google, admitted so many times it gives lots of information to various government agencies. It’s part, it is a government agency. It’s part of the N.S.A. And we know too that food is to go into the hands of a few corporations, you see, all working together. Same shareholders regardless. They’re not really different ones at all. They’re all the same one. But it says...

“Senate rejects GM food labeling amendment to farm bill”

Alan: So it’ll be just like Canada.

“The Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly rejected an amendment that would allow states to require labeling of genetically modified foods.  Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said his amendment was an attempt to clarify that states can require the labels, as several legislatures have moved toward putting such laws into place. The Vermont house and the Connecticut senate voted this month to make food companies declare genetically modified ingredients on their packages.”

 

“The Senate rejected the amendment on a 71-27 vote, during debate on a wide-ranging, five-year farm bill that includes generous supports for crops like corn and soybeans that are often genetically modified varieties. Senators from farm states that use a lot of genetically modified crops strongly opposed the amendment, saying the issue should be left up to the federal government and that labels could raise costs for consumers.”

Alan: Well what about the cost when the consumers get all the different cancers and sicknesses that come from all these poisons they’re using on them? Hmm? How about that?

“The Food and Drug Administration does not require such labeling, but organic food companies and some consumer groups have stepped up their efforts to lobby for labels, arguing that the modified seeds are floating from field to field and contaminating pure crops. Such groups have been bolstered by a growing network of consumers wary of processed and modified foods.”

 

Alan: And I’ll put this up too. I think it was this weekend too there was a worldwide protest against Monsanto trying to take the world’s food supply over and that’s what they’re actually doing, by the way.

Also too everything is to be privatised in this century. Everything. Governments have been at it, of course, in the 20th century, in the late part of it they’ve been privatising so many of their departments and even parts of the military are being privatised. The British nuclear arms system, all their weaponry, was privatised as well last year, and I read the articles in the papers at the time too, on the air, so everything is being privatised and they’re going for the few things that actually work, like in the States they’re going for the U.S. Mail system. They’re trying to privatise that. They’re trying to say that they’re bust. They’re not. They’re actually plundering the profits from the U.S. Mail system. It’s the only one that actually makes a lot of money and they’re putting it into higher civil servants pension schemes. That’s where the money is going that they’re plundering from the mail system in the U.S. But in Britain it’s much the same. It says...

“Royal Mail reveals profits boost - but Vince Cable says ‘no alternative’ to privatisation”

Alan: It’s on the cards. They’re going to do it and it says...

 

“Business Secretary Vince Cable today insisted there is "no alternative" to controversial plans privatising the Royal Mail.  The organisation faces a "fundamental threat" from email and must be reformed in order to survive, the Liberal Democrat insisted.”

 

Alan: What’s a Liberal Democrat, eh?

“But unions have warned that services will go into decline if the business is sold off.  Dave Ward, deputy general secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU), whose members will be balloted on the proposals this week, claimed loopholes would allow the universal service obligation to be eroded.”

Alan: Well, definitely that’s all part of it too. They’ll get rid of all the unions and get more and more profits and give you worse service. Everything they’ve privatised goes way up. It rockets. It skyrockets, from water to your electricity companies. Everything skyrockets in costs and the government lies their face off. But they lie about everything, don’t they?  Because in Canada too they said, oh, privatisation of the public utilities, that the taxpayers actually owned, supposedly, were given to these pals, bigwigs for peanuts and the taxpayers have to put up with an 8 to 10% increase every year in electricity rates. What a great deal that is, eh? And apart from that too we must also pay them extra cash, taxes, to maintain their system. They just rake the profits in. Isn’t that a great deal? And also in Britain too...

“Royal Mail CEO In Line For £500,000 Bonus”

“Moya Greene to receive payout for steering sharp improvement in postal firm’s performance last year...”

Alan: They put her in, you see, to try to boost it up, getting it ready for privatisation, so they’re paying her a bonus. 500,000 pound bonus. That’s not bad, eh? So they can screw thousands of postal workers.  So...

“The chief executive of Royal Mail is being lined up for an annual bonus worth almost £500,000 just months before the company presses the button on Britain’s biggest privatisation for a generation.  Moya Greene, who took over as the boss of the state-owned postal operator in 2010, is expected to receive the payout after nearly trebling Royal Mail’s operating profit to £403m last year.  Royal Mail’s remuneration committee, chaired by non-executive director Orna Ni-Chionna, has yet to formally agree the pay proposals for the 2012-13 financial year.”

 

Alan: So it’s quite something, as I say, as they privatise the things off and, as I say, you’ll end up with things that are not working at all or systems where they really gouge for high, high tax hikes and so on and high increases just like they’ve done in Canada and elsewhere.

Also today I’m putting up a link to Polanski, Roman Polanski. It’s called Polanski the Predator, recently unsealed Grand Jury minutes from the 1977 sexual assault case, when he ran off to Europe, actually, to escape it, has been released to the public. And it’s interesting too because they had a documentary special on T.V. years ago about it and what it was, it was young girls, about ten to twelve-year-olds whose mummies were these show business mums that wanted their children to get into show business and when they were auditioning, a very prominent well known actor that everyone knows, pal of Polanski, would pick up these girls for a drive in his car. The mums wouldn’t object because oh they were all in awe with this famous actor and he would drive them to Polanski’s who would get them in the bathtub and sexually assault them and he escaped for that off to Europe, of course. He’s still there yet.

So I’ll put this up tonight and you can go through it. There’s a lot of pages on it. You have to go page by page to do with the transcript from the meeting and see what happened yourself. Also too, I didn’t know this, but it says here the...

“Cabinet Office...”

Alan: In Britain; that’s the big government office.

“... to fly rainbow flag for gay pride week”

 

Alan: It says here.

“Francis Maude and Nick Clegg have agreed to demonstrate the government’s commitment to equality by allowing the rainbow flag to fly from the Cabinet Office during Pride week.  They argue that there should be greater public acceptance of same-sex relationships.”

 

Alan: They’ll be asking the parents and children this too, you know, when they give the children their things to fill out on their parents.

“Some 133 Tory MPs voted against plans to allow same sex marriage earlier.  Fifteen Labour MPs, four Lib Dems, eight Democratic Unionist and an independent were also against the move.  The rainbow flag was designed by Gilbert Baker in 1978 as a symbol of gay and lesbian community pride.  It first flew from government buildings during Pride 2012.  Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said: "Flying the rainbow flag is a great symbol of pride..."”

 

Alan: It’s funny how they don’t have a straight pride week, eh? Have you noticed that? In fact, there’s a whole war against straight people and families. In fact, families altogether, from those people, you see, as they’re all falling apart and under attack, etc, etc. So anyway they go through this, it’s a P.R. piece obviously and it’s all wonderful, wonderful, wonderful and we’re supposed to be all happy about it, etc, and cheer. What is it they call it? You’re supposed to join in and cheer.... celebrate. Celebrate their lifestyle.

And also too I’ll put up an article to do with the States (“At least one Milwaukee mom won’t be sending her child to school on cross-dressing ‘Switch It Up Day’”) because they’ve got a trans-gender, it’s a trans-gender dress-up thing for young children at school and the boys have to dress as women/girls and the girls to dress as boys to get them used to the idea, I guess, you know? Etc, etc. Maybe the ones who won’t dress up, they’ll see special psychologists and get special treatment down the road.

Also too I’ve mentioned many, many times about the incredible manipulation of the weather. Lots of articles out at big science magazines and so on and you also have them coming out of the military, the U.S. military and other countries militaries’ establishments and there’s one here. It says it’s from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. It says...

“NRL Scientists Produce Densest Artificial Ionospheric Plasma Clouds Using HAARP”

Alan: That’s the High Auroral Aerial Research Program where they actually put tremendous amounts of power they call plasma, raw power. They bounce it off the ionosphere and they can target anywhere on earth as a weapon, actually; they can also use it to modify the weather very easily and very quickly and they can superheat parts of the atmosphere as well and cause explosions in the sky. That’s what you find with these meteorites, they can never find the meteorites coming in but you hear these massive booms going on all over the place. That’s HAARP that does that. They’ve got it in Australia too. But it says...

 

“U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) research physicists and engineers from the Plasma Physics Division, working at the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) transmitter facility, Gakona, Alaska, successfully produced a sustained high density plasma cloud in Earth’s upper atmosphere.”

 

"Previous artificial plasma density clouds have lifetimes of only ten minutes or less," said Paul Bernhardt, Ph.D., NRL Space Use and Plasma Section. This higher density plasma ‘ball’ was sustained over one hour by the HAARP transmissions and was extinguished only after termination of the HAARP radio beam.”

 

“Artificial Ionospheric Plasma Clouds - Sequence of images of the glow plasma discharge produced with transmissions at the third electron gyro harmonic using the HAARP HF transmitter, Gakona, Alaska. The third harmonic artificial glow plasma clouds were obtained with HAARP using transmissions at 4.34 megahertz (MHz).”

 

Alan: You can actually pick it up on your short-wave radio, I do it all the time, and you’ll hear it blasting away.

“The resonant frequency yielded green line (557.7 nanometer emission) with HF on November 12, 2012, between the times of 02:26:15 to 02:26:45 GMT.”

Alan: And it gives you the times and so on. It says...

“These glow discharges in the upper atmosphere were generated as a part of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)...”

Alan: So it’s the military that runs it, you see.

“...sponsored Basic Research on Ionospheric Characteristics and Effects (BRIOCHE) campaign to explore ionospheric phenomena and its impact on communications and space weather. Using the 3.6-megawatt high-frequency (HF) HAARP transmitter, the plasma clouds, or balls of plasma, are being studied for use as artificial mirrors at altitudes 50 kilometers below the natural ionosphere and are to be used for reflection of HF radar and communications signals.”

Alan: So it can certainly disrupt all your signal communication. There’s no doubt about that. But it also affects all your usual radio signals as well and no doubt television ones too. So I’ll put this article up. It’s quite a long article and you can read it for yourselves and this is what they’re releasing today. I’m sure there’s a lot more going on but they won’t tell you about that, of course, or what it’s really for.  Now, the...

“Max Planck Institute For Meteorology: “Prognoses Confirm Model Forecasts”...”

Alan: For the weather.

“...Warming Postponed “Hundreds Of Years””

 

“Now that global temperatures have not risen in 15 years, a number of scientists find themselves having great difficulty coming to terms with that new reality.  The Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) in Hamburg is no exception. For years the institute insisted that the man-made climate catastrophe was real and happening now. Today it finds itself scrambling for a backdoor. “Otto et al” is that back door.”

 

“The MPI-M recently issued a press release with interesting revelations about the now famous “Otto et al” paper, to which its two directors contributed.  When we read the MPI-M press release, we quickly discover that this Otto et al paper is actually just the latest in speculative crystal-ballwork - the results have little value other than to provide a desperately needed face-saving opportunity for accepting a lower CO2 climate sensitivity.”

 

Alan: As they backtrack. Back with more after this.

{Music Break}

Hi folks. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and also getting back to eugenics and so on and to do with tampering in families and so on that wants to be done by the authorities today. There’s a judge came out in Britain too called Alan Goldsack and he’s joined the bandwagon as well and he says...

  

“Babies born to prostitutes, drug addicts and other criminals should be adopted at birth to prevent them following their parents into jail, a leading judge has said.”

Alan: Now, you never used to have all these prostitutes, drug addicts and lots of other criminals and so on, or dysfunctional or destroyed families or single-parent mothers and all this kind of stuff. This is all a new phenomenon.

“Alan Goldsack QC [Queen’s Counsel], the Recorder of Sheffield, said it was the state’s duty to intervene to stop the ‘next generation of criminals’.  He said it was ‘frightening’ how many of the criminals he was sentencing today were the grandchildren of those he had dealt with 40 years ago.  ‘Crime runs in families the same way that being a doctor, teacher or lawyer does,’ he said...”

Alan: And it’s true enough. A lot of these doctors and teachers and lawyers are criminals, I’d say. In other words they haven’t really phrased this right, have they? Or bankers for that matter, I guess that runs in the family too. Just ripping people off, crashing the banks twice a century. Does that run in the family too? Why not, eh?

“ ‘Some people become criminals because they enjoy crime and think it’s a good way of life and if they don’t get caught they think they can have a good lifestyle’.”

‘But a frightening thing is the number of people I see who are the grandchildren of the people I have prosecuted and defended 40 years ago.’

 

“The state had to ‘remove young babies from the families that are going to produce the next generation of criminals’, he said.  He added that a dysfunctional family would often have £250,000 spent on them,...”

Alan: On one family.

 

“... ‘but if we get in early and removed children we could save thousands’.  He said a ‘huge proportion’ of prisoners were a ‘product of the care system’.  He added: ‘The care system is not working as well as it should be by a long chalk. If you leave a child until they are nine or ten, you can’t do much for them at all.’  Children removed at 11 or 12 would ‘invariably end up in a children’s home’.”

 

“The 65 year-old judge made his remarks after 43 years in the legal profession. But children’s campaigners accused him of criminalising babies.  ‘If you look at the baby in their cot, they are not a criminal. Taking babies from parents because they happen to be in criminal families is not the right solution.’  ‘We need to address the way that we work with disturbed families and children.’  Alison Worsley of Barnardo’s said the Government needed to do more to support children of prisoners.”

Alan: They should really look into why is there so much crime going on. Why are there so many prisoners? Why is the world in such a state of dysfunction? Well, it has been because after about a hundred years of intense war, war on the West by ones who now call themselves ‘liberals’, you see.  Understand too and I remember seeing an interview with Khrushchev when he visited the U.S. And he was asked about the Communist Party in the U.S. and he gave a little smile and he said, Oh, we don’t call them communists in the U.S., we call them liberals, he says. And he went through some of their system and their agenda, of course, because liberals were dedicated to destroying – under the guise of freedom and liberation – destroying what previously existed.  Read the Frankfurt school’s records, all the things that they promoted. The destruction of the family unit was essential. Marxian, you see. Also the state bringing up the children. That was all part of it too and the complete destruction of western values and western culture. That was all part of it as well. They said that would have to go, completely. No memory of it whatsoever.   Brave new world, eh?

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

A Social Worker for Every Child in Scotland

State Snoops Checking Out New Parents

SNP Bill to Spy on Parents----Scotland

Parts of Europe Recently Blanketed in Snow

Senate rejects GM food labeling amendment to farm bill

Royal Mail reveals profits boost - but Vince Cable says 'no alternative' to privatisation

Royal Mail CEO In Line For £500,000 Bonus

Royal Mail sounds out market for £1.5 billion IPO loan

Pedo-Predator-Polanski

UK Gov. Cabinet Office to Fly Gay Rainbow Flag

Gender Bender Day at School

HAARP and Plasma Clouds---US Navy

Global Warming Postponed

Crime Runs in Families

Quote from Hamish on March 13, 2021, 8:17 am

Hi folks.  I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on October the 2^nd, 2013.

For newcomers please make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  You’ll find lots of audios for download where I go through the system, that’s the real system you’re born into actually, your parents and grandparents too, that was set up a hundred years ago or even older than that in fact.  But it came out in the open a hundred years ago and formed their big foundations, tax-exempt foundations, under the guise of philanthropic organizations and charitable organizations.  They run hundreds and hundreds, actually thousands, of non-governmental organizations across the world.  And these foundations were set up by the biggest industrialists and bankers of the world back then and now their children take over of course and it’s ongoing.

And they decided to bring in a new type of system, a system, a planned society, a global society which they would rule.  And eventually through wars and various other means and eventually though capital itself, through money itself, and creating the laws to do with international lending and borrowing and big institutions which they built up like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the Bank for International Settlements, they would force the world into this one monetary system run by themselves, this private system run by themselves.  And that’s already happened as we’ve lived through it.  In fact we see the IMF going up to its full power and the World Bank too and the Bank for International Settlements that’s in charge of all the private central banks.  It’s all one big clique at the top, a gang of moneymen and this is the big clincher today, is creating a crisis, a massive crisis, and then having a global meeting of course at the United Nations which they also set up and they’ll come out with exactly what they want, a new global society, and one group runs the money of the whole planet basically, decides the value of it, downgrades you and all the rest of it officially, etcetera, etcetera.

So help yourself to the website.  Remember too you can get print-ups of many of the talks I’ve given over the years in English on all the sites listed at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can get ones in other languages for print-up if you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu.

Now remember too that you bring me to you because I don’t bring on advertisers as guests, I don’t ask for advertisers as guests, in fact I decline them and I depend upon the people to buy the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  So to order from the U.S. to Canada if you want to understand the art of conology, how to con whole populations down through the ages, a very old science of course.  It’s much more perfected today under neuroscience and behaviorism, etcetera.  You can buy the books and discs using personal checks from the U.S. to Canada, you can also send cash or use Paypal.  And across the world you’ve got Western Union, Moneygram, and Paypal.  And straight donations are seriously welcome as we go through the planned inflationary periods.  And the inflation is to carry on for about another ten years according to all the bigwigs of the moneybags boys at the top.

So we’re going through a planned society.  Even the wars across the world too to take down countries by economic means through their banking and downgrading them, etcetera, is all part of them copying the exact same system, a private centralized bank under the IMF and so on.  They’ve got to borrow money from the World Bank and pay it back through the IMF and they’ve got to be under the BIS, the Bank for International Settlements, and if they don’t agree they’re being bombed out of existence as we speak.

And of course it’s the time of plunder too.  They’re called resource wars.  Back in the 70’s they talked about resource wars, the coming resource wars, and how there will be real hard wars to bring in, for the big, big corporations, international corporations, to get all the territory and oil and minerals and so on they want across the world.  And we know they’re going into Africa big time now.  They’ve been setting this up for years as well.

So anyway, we’re going through a long-term business plan.  And that’s what it is, it’s a business plan.  Most folk can’t get their heads around that; they think we’re all national still.  And even before Gulf War I, every country was mentioning the global, global, global, we’re all global and that was all the mantra at the time and suddenly you became national again when they needed troops to go over and fight for the resource wars for the big international corporations that give you nothing back except the bills of course.  And then after this is all done too we’ll go back to being global once more.

It’s quite amazing how we can put on a globalist cap for years and then put the nationalist one back on when it suits the bigwigs to use us.  Because nations are already gone, they’re already gone.  And of course Rompuy the head of the EU parliament said the same thing.  I’ve read the article on the air in a speech he gave at the EU parliament, that the nation-state is dead.  That was their goal for centuries by the way because these organizations have been going down through the centuries causing revolutions to bring in a kind of socialist type order.  And they work with the big bankers because big bankers prefer socialism.  Under socialism you have big government.  Big government needs to borrow money, because they’ve never got enough, even though they tax the people to death.  And bankers live off the interest off it.  They don’t care if the lump sum is going to get paid back; it never can be at compound interest.  It’s only important that they get massive sums every year.  That’s called balancing the budget.  It doesn’t mean you pay off the main collateral that you owe; it’s the interest on the debt that you pay off.  And it’s been like that your whole life.  That’s how it’s been; every country is the same, folks.  Because every country was taken over a long, long time ago by the same money people who came in from other countries.

So we go through the charade of pretending again that we’re nations, etcetera.  While the G20 was formed out of your prime ministers and presidents across the world and the public never even got a vote on it.  Here’s a private club basically that formed itself above all constitutions and created their own private club, signed global agreements and contracts, and they also dish out your money across the world.  Your cash, the cash they tax off of you, across the planet for all their foreign excursions and their plans, etcetera, and their international companies too.

We bailed out the big banks of course when they decided to have the crash because they decided to have the crash.  They knew they weren’t going to last forever bumping up the prices of mortgages and then passing them off to the next bank that would buy them for a profit and keep bumping them up again.  It’s a complete bubble of course, an artificial bubble.  And it’s criminality of course.  But of course no one, there is nothing, nobody is going to try them, nobody goes to jail over this.

We’re given democracy, this thing called democracy, something called democracy that the big boys when they formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations in America, when they formed them they had no intention of giving you democracy.  They gave you the appearance of democracy, then you wouldn’t rebel every four or five years, you would vote another bunch in.  That’s what you do.  And meanwhile the parallel government, the real government that’s above the ones that you think you elect, run the show and they tell the boys what to do that you think you put in.

I can remember when Brian Mulroney came into government in Canada as prime minister and he ran on getting us out of NAFTA.  Within two weeks he was the champion pushing it forth you see.  They’re all liars and they’re put in by again the same organization, the Council on Foreign Relations.  They’re all members of it.  And they have been that way for it’s now a hundred years.  Every prime minister and president of the U.S. too has been a member for a hundred years.  This is how long it’s been going in picking presidents and prime ministers.

So they all know their roles.  And Brian Mulroney pushed NAFTA, he was all for it.  He said oh it will create jobs galore.  Of course it did in Mexico and elsewhere across the world but not in Canada.  And then a few years after he came out of government he was doing an interview and he was asked what he thought of NAFTA now and did it really help Canada, he said to be perfectly honest I don’t know.  You see when he’s in government he’s doing what he’s told.  He is not the top man at all.  He is doing what he’s told to push through and it’s all the same across Britain and the U.S. and elsewhere.  That’s how it really, really works.  There is one organization running the world.

Winston Churchill brought it out in parliament at one time because he was out of the loop on certain things before the Royal Institute of International Affairs was called its present name; it was called the Lord Alfred Milner Group.  And this group had fomented wars in South Africa.  They got the Boer War going by causing it to happen and then blaming the Boers of course, so as the British army would come in and then the big business interest which of course was themselves.  The same member group, they grabbed all the gold fields and the diamonds and so on.  That’s how the thing really works in this world folks.  It’s vastly different from what you think.

Back with more I think after this break.  I think that’s the music coming in.

{Break ♫}

Hi folks.  We’re back Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about the system and the system really is all encompassing, all encompassing.  Your whole reality was given to you and every generation is updated with your new PC ways of behavior and so on and accepting various things and having certain opinions and so on.  We’re being standardized all the time but the previous generation had its own standardization given to them too, thinking it’s all normal.  But in fact for centuries we have been bred for work.  That’s what we do, we work and we fight, we go to wars.  And Fort, Charles Fort, said that a long time ago.  "I think we’re farmed", he said.  And really that’s how you look at it; you’re pretty well farmed.  And meanwhile of course you’re conned all the way thinking that you have a country and you are free and you’re independent.  All countries tell their folks that.  All countries say that.  And they have the best healthcare in the world and the best everything in the world.  That’s the standard routine that you go through.  And most folk believe it and serve their country in all kinds of ways which perhaps they shouldn’t sometimes.

But the technique of creating such societies as I say is very, very old indeed.  And when your reality is all encompassing and you accept it and your peer group accepts it too, you don’t realize that, no, you’re in a form of slavery basically.  If you had true freedom no one could lean on you for a previous generation’s debt for instance.  And that’s what we all do because we’re all paying off the debt of previous generations and anyone born in the future is going to be doing the same.  And that’s a slavery form you see.  It’s a more sophisticated form of slavery.  That’s what Charles Galton Darwin was talking about in his book, "The Next Million Years".  That’s what he meant by that, a more sophisticated form of slavery, meaning the slaves would never figure out they were slaves.

You think everything is quite natural.  Everything exists because it’s there when you’re born, and your peer group, the same age group too, will think the same thing as you, so you’re all quite sane and that’s how you think it all works of course and nothing is further from the truth.  It’s all contrived that way.  It’s set up that way and you’re not allowed to dig into any areas that are outside the box so to speak.  And it will go on and on and on until they have the perfect society, as we’re dying off actually.  And we certainly are dying off because very few folk in the first world countries are breeding, they’re not having children.  The U.N. happily reports on this every year and also happily reports that they have to bring in masses of immigration from other countries to bring them in to help pay off the national debts we’ve all accumulated for these wars and bailing banks out and everything else that we do for the big corporations.  That’s reality.

But we’re also tampered with our minds all the time by professionals.  And I’ve gone through the psychological nudge units they have in Britain and the U.S. and Canada and elsewhere.  We all have them now and they nudge you in so many ways into thinking or behaving in a different way or having different opinions than you used to have.  These are all the nudges and you’re guided to them so that you’ll feel that you belong with the peer group.

The more education you have the easier it is to program you.  And I’ve read the articles too.  They have done study after study in universities to do with that very topic because those who get higher up into the middle classes are so desperate to hang on to being a middle class person and mixing with their peer group, drinking wine standing up and all the rest of it, that they don’t want to be seen as someone not in the know.  And they immediately adapt and adopt any new behavior that’s given out to them by their bosses, their masters, you see.

Now in Britain they’re trying to desensitize the public to war, to the effects of war.  And it says here that...

"“We must make war more acceptable”: MOD (Ministry of Defence) urged to make repatriation ceremonies low-key and use more drones, SAS (Special Air Service) and mercenaries to reduce..." 

Alan:  What’s called the...

"...“body bag syndrome”" 

• "Report says images of flag-draped coffins reduces support for military action" 

Alan:  Remember the first thing you got to do in war is to get the public support behind you by telling lots of lies, about an enemy bayoneting babies or something like that, that’s the standard old stuff.

• "It adds special forces and mercenary deaths don't hit public as hard" 
• "MOD says document is to foster 'debate' and..."

Alan:  So far it...

"...is not policy" 

Alan:  But it will become policy.  So:

"Repatriation ceremonies for the remains of dead soldiers should have a lower profile in order to make war more palatable to the British public," 

"It examines how to sway ‘casualty averse’ public opinion, a situation commonly known as 'body bag syndrome', and was published by the Ministry of Defence’s strategy formulation unit.  The document suggests that the Ministry of Defence should ‘reduce the profile of the repatriation ceremonies’ where coffins carrying deceased soldiers are brought back to UK bases such as RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire.  It discusses ways to ‘reduce public sensitivity’ and methods of explaining that ‘risks are knowingly and willingly undertaken’ by armed forces personnel.

Suggestions included making greater use of the Special Forces and mercenaries because it claims losses sustained by the elite soldiers and hired guns do not have the same impact on the public and press.  “Neither the media nor the public in the west appear to identify with contractors in the way that they do with their military personnel.  Thus casualties from within the contractorised force are more acceptable in pursuit of military ends than those from among our own forces.”" 

Alan:  So they want to use more private armies is what they’re saying here because you don’t think about them as being yours as much; they’re just international mercenaries.

"It added: 'The public appear to have a more robust attitude to SF (Special Forces) losses.'  Reassurances are made in the paper that the British public may not be as ‘risk-averse’ as they appear, and suggests this is ‘based on recent, post-2000 experience’." 

"The report adds: ‘The public have become better informed and our opponents more sophisticated in the exploitation of the sources of information with the net result that convincing the nation of the need to run military risks has become more difficult but no less essential.’

The report, written in 2012 and released under the Freedom of Information Act, has been met with criticism by relatives of soldiers killed while serving their country." 

Alan:  And it goes on and on and on.  But that’s a pretty standard one as we get our heads tampered with again you see.  Everything is a show to the public, even the presentations of everything you will see on television is a show to the public as it goes through editing, it goes through careful structuring by professionals in marketing and so on, on how to get opinions over to the public.  The correct opinions, the ones they want you to have that can be completely 180 degrees from the reality, in other words they’re an absolute lie.  But that’s okay, that’s quite acceptable when you’re dealing with the public.  This is how we’re treated you know.

And I really cannot figure out how people prattle on about democracies, that you’ve got democracies.  Where?  Where do you have a democracy?

Also, this one reminded me of Scotland actually, this article here.  It’s talking about Ontario, Canada...

"Six different boreholes produced approximately 5 km of core samples while exploring a deep geological repository near the Bruce Power Nuclear Plant in Ontario.  The GR has been proposed to store nuclear waste deep underground."

Alan:  So they’re going to store it.  They don’t know where to put it you see.  And some of these countries like Canada are bringing the stuff in from other countries and refining it supposedly, you know kind of recharging it in a sense, but there is always stuff left over; what are you going to do with it all?  Well, you bury it.

So:

"Core samples dug in and around the site beside Lake Huron show the rock formation to be extremely stable with no signs of movement for millions of years." 

Alan:  Well that’s a bet, isn’t it?

"This will make it safe from any future geological event such as earthquakes." 

"Six different bore holes produced approximately five kilometres of core samples while exploring a deep geological repository near the Bruce Power nuclear plant. The DGR is being proposed to store nuclear waste deep underground. Core samples dug in and around the site beside Lake Huron show the rock formation to be extremely stable...." 

Alan:  Etcetera, etcetera.  And this is what they plan to do with it.  And then it gives you a story of someone who lives near the plant itself.  It’s called the Bruce Nuclear Plant.  It’s a woman, and it says she is getting up in arms about it.  She is not happy about this stuff getting sunk near her at all under this stable rock as they claim.  But that’s what they were doing in Scotland back in the 70’s.  They were bringing it up from England and boring it into the Grampian Mountains or encasing it in a glass casing and dumping it into the lochs.

Back with more after this.

{Break ♫ - You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network because you can handle the truth - ♫}

Alan:  Hi folks.  We’re back Cutting Through the Matrix and talking about the farce of the world because that’s all we have really is farce, isn’t it, when it comes to disclosures to the public that’s put through marketing and censorship and all the rest of it.  It’s like George Orwell’s "1984", we’re living in it.  It’s all around us in fact.

But you have an article like this and that came out last week in fact.

"US intelligence chiefs urge Congress to preserve surveillance programs" 

"US intelligence chiefs used an appearance before Congress on Thursday to urge lawmakers not to allow public anger over the extent of government surveillance to result in changes to the law that would impede them from preventing terrorist attacks." 

Alan:  So they urged lawmakers not to allow public anger.  So don’t get angry, you’re not allowed to be angry, you see.

"General Keith Alexander, the director of the National Security Agency, conceded that disclosures by the whistleblower Edward Snowden "will change how we operate"."

Alan:  Meaning it will be harder to find out what they’re up to.

"But he urged senators, who are weighing a raft of reforms, to preserve the foundational attributes of a program that allows officials to collect the phone data of millions of American citizens.

In testy exchanges at the Senate intelligence committee, Alexander and the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, refused to say on the record where the NSA had ever sought to trawl cell site data, which pinpoints the location of individuals via their phones.

They were challenged by Democratic senator Ron Wyden who, as a member of the committee, has for years been privy to classified briefings that he cannot discuss in public."

He says:

"“You talk about the damage that has been done by disclosures, but any government official who thought this would never be disclosed was ignoring history.  The truth always manages to come out,” he said." 

Alan:  I wonder if it does though.  Anyway it says:

"“The NSA leadership built an intelligence data collection system that repeatedly deceived the American people.  Time and time again the American people were told one thing in a public forum, while intelligence agencies did something else in private.”" 

Alan:  Well that’s called lying you know, just outright lies.

"“Asked by Udall whether it was the NSA's aim to collect the records of all Americans, General Alexander replied: "I believe it is in the nation's best interest to put all the phone records into a lockbox – yes.”" 

Alan:  So they’re going to keep doing it forever by the looks of it but then that’s the world agenda.  All countries are the same now folks.  We’re way beyond the Stasi system that they had in Eastern Germany, way, way beyond their system.

And also this article too, to do with the agenda.  The agenda is right on track to where it’s supposed to go.  Remember the Council on Foreign Relations and you’ve heard it from different members of the CFR saying this, they always say that, “How can we use this disaster to our advantage?”  What they mean is a disaster to their agenda’s advantage you see, to push it in line with the agenda.  In other words they live off disasters that appear to come out of the blue to the general public, but they’re not.  They are not, not from 9/11 onwards, it hasn’t come out of the blue at all.  And it goes right along with the agendas of course.  It’s the same with the agenda now for the unification of all the monetary system under the Bank for International Settlements.  And there’ll be another big crash when it’s time.  When it’s time for the next crash it will happen.  It’s planned that way you see.  And it always is horrible to the public but not to the guys that plan it all.  They get what they want out of it you see.  But it says:

"US Census Report Shows Entrenched Poverty and Declining Living Standards" 

Alan:  In the U.S.  So:

"A US Census Bureau report released Tuesday, entitled “Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012,” makes a mockery of President Barack Obama’s claims to be restoring “security and opportunity for the middle class” in the wake of the 2008 financial breakdown.

The report provides a snapshot of a society in immense crisis.  Poverty is at a near-generation high of 15 percent, close to the high point since the 1965 War on Poverty, the 15.2 percent rate reached in 1983.  According to Tuesday’s report, 46.5 million Americans, including 9.5 million families, live in poverty.  Some 20.4 million people live on an income less than 50 percent of the official poverty line, 7.1 million of these being children under 18.  More than 48 million remain without health insurance." 

Alan:  Well a lot of them will still get by anyway because the rest of the folk will have to pay it for them.

"More than 31 percent of the population experienced some period of impoverishment during the years 2009-2011." 

Alan:  Then in another article it says here from the Business Insider...

"2012 U.S. Census data released last week doesn’t look good for the middle class, with median household income, income growth, and share of the total national income all continuing to decline.  Liberal think tank Center for American Progress published several charts on these depressing trends." 

Alan:  And I’ll put up the links for all these tonight, including the chart.

"David Madland, the Director of the American Worker Project, thinks that the trends will continue, barring major policy changes in the government. “My expectation going forward is that median household income will be stagnant while the incomes for the wealthiest will increase significantly,” He told Business Insider." 

Alan:  Well that’s been that way for years because even the United Nations is happy to shout that too, that the gulf between the rich and the poor is staggering.  The middle class are really just getting put into the bottom class now.  And the ones who are wealthy today, this big, big clique are getting wealthier and wealthier all the time.

"The recent decline of middle class incomes is because almost all of the economic growth since the latest recession has been gobbled up by the super-rich.  Large leaps in wealth for the top 5% have masked declines in income for the bottom 95%, giving the appearance that the economic recovery has benefited all parties.

Even in good economic times (such as 2001-2007), median household income stayed flat.  These trends, says Madland, are 30 years in the making — the result of “trickle down” economic policy and the loss of workers’ economic power to get higher wages." 

Alan:  What they don’t mention here is it’s also because you’re run by private institutions that gave you the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its private court that decides who gets free trade and who doesn’t.  And they decided to give it to China.  And your factories all went abroad.  The same in Canada, they all went abroad.  And not only that, they use the taxpayer in these secret agreements actually, at the time they were pretty secret, the taxpayers funded those factories to get up and move.  And also, we funded any losses they incurred during that process of setting up in China.

So of course it’s all planned that way.  And they knew all the fallout of it before it happened.  They plan everything and say, what will the fallout be?  Oh millions will be unemployed.  {Laughs}  What are we going to replace them with?  What are we going to make them work at?  Well they’ll just have to go on unemployment, etcetera, etcetera.  I mean this is all planned.  We’re global folks.  We’re run by international globalists.  The private organizations that set up the WTO were the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, England, it’s a private organization.  Every media mogul is a member of it so that’s where you get your propaganda from.  And their branch in the U.S. is called the Council on Foreign Relations.  It’s the same thing; they do the same thing there.  Anybody who’s anybody in the U.S. is a member of it.  And they want global free trade and a global government and one system running the banking system across the planet, all in private hands.  Their hands you see.  It’s very, very simple to figure out.

Now fracking of course, again this is what really gets me, they always use the public, the public’s purse, put it that way, for the big projects at home or abroad nowadays, big corporations.  And the governments give you great public relations like we’re going to have energy for another hundred years because we can do fracking and get energy at home.  And then once they get all the grants put in and they’re doing it and so on and then start bottling the gas, etcetera, they start selling it abroad.  So, so much for having it at home.  It will be gone, it will all be gone abroad you see.  And I’ve read the articles on the air about it.  Everything is a racket folks and government is part of the racket.  But anyway it’s always fallout for the public in more ways than one.

"Dangerous levels of radioactivity found at fracking waste site in Pennsylvania"

Alan:  I mentioned this before but they’ve done a deep study on it.

"A gas production site at the Marcellus shale formation in Pennsylvania." 

"Scientists have for the first time found dangerous levels of radioactivity and salinity at a shale gas waste disposal site that could contaminate drinking water.  If the UK follows in the steps of the US "shale gas revolution", it should impose regulations to stop such radioactive buildup, they said.  The Duke University study, published on Wednesday, examined the water discharged from Josephine Brine Treatment Facility into Blacklick Creek," 

Alan:  It’s called.

"...which feeds into a water source for western Pennsylvania cities, including Pittsburgh.  Scientists took samples upstream and downstream from the treatment facility over a two-year period, with the last sample taken in June this year.

Elevated levels of chloride and bromide, combined with strontium, radium, oxygen, and hydrogen isotopic compositions, are present in the Marcellus shale wastewaters, the study found.

Radioactive brine is naturally occurring in shale rock and contaminates wastewater during hydraulic fracturing – known as fracking.  Sometimes that "flowback" water is re-injected into rock deep underground, a practice that can cause seismic disturbances, but often it is treated before being discharged into watercourses.

Radium levels in samples collected at the facility were 200 times greater than samples taken upstream.  Such elevated levels of radioactivity are above regulated levels and would normally be seen at licensed radioactive disposal facilities, according to the scientists at Duke University's Nicholas school of the environment in North Carolina." 

So:

"Hundreds of disposal sites for wastewater could be similarly affected, said Professor Avner Vengosh, one of the authors of the study published in Environmental Science & Technology, a peer-reviewed journal." 

Alan:  And I’ll put the links up for that one too.

"“If people don't live in those places, it's not an immediate threat in terms of radioactivity.  However, there's the danger of slow bio-accumulation of the radium.”" 

Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Alan:  Hi folks.  We’re Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about the system, which is everything of course.  It’s all that we know, is the system.

And another article too about the border, the U.S. and Canada border.  And there have been so many horror stories coming out of there too over the years since 9/11 as it’s got crazy; it’s got crazy and so on.  And the Department of Homeland Security really has the full right to do whatever they want apparently.  But apparently there is a TV show called, "On the Media" and the producer and the family and friends of this producer of the "On the Media" show were detained after attending a wedding in Canada.  And I think her name is Sarah Abdurrahman.  So it says:

"Everyone they detained was an American citizen, coming back to the US after attending a wedding of a cousin.  They were treated terribly, put in a cold room with no food or drinks, and no information on what was going on.  CBP demanded they hand over their electronics, and made it clear they might not get them back."

Alan:  It’s true, they take your cell phones off you and everything.

 "The thing is, this isn't a unique situation.  As the report notes, there's almost no oversight over CBP actions, allowing them to act with impunity.  In the report, the story is told of a 4-year-old girl, an American citizen, who was detained for 14 hours, in a cold room, without being allowed to speak to her parents and given no food beyond a cookie.  And then she was deported.  Even though she was a US citizen.  She was allowed to come back weeks later, but now has symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Abdurrahman's own story is perhaps not that crazy, but is still ridiculous.  She tried to find out information during the detainment, but was repeatedly told "it's not your right to know."  She wasn't even allowed to know the names of the CBP agents who detained them.  When she asked, agents turned their backs to her so she couldn't see their name tags.  Multiple attempts at getting Homeland Security or CBP to respond to questions failed."

"She also tells the story of some other wedding attendees who were similarly detained with incredibly obnoxious behavior from CBP agents." 

Alan:  Border Patrol agents

"The first one they met was quizzing everyone in the car on their names, and the 3-year-old child in the back cheerily volunteered his name and the CBP agent snapped at him."

Alan:  Yelled at him.

"The agents initially promised that they wouldn't search their phones, but then demanded that people unlock their phones, and even told them the phones would be confiscated and not returned.  People complained that they needed their phones for work and were basically told too bad.  Abdurrahman notes that three full cars of people from that one wedding all had their phones confiscated, and she notes that DHS..."

Alan:  Department of Homeland Security.

"...claims only about 15 phones are confiscated each day by CBP, and wonders why everyone from one wedding appear to have nearly reached that quota." 

Alan:  And it gets worse and worse actually but I’ll put the link up tonight for you to have a look at.  And I think there is an audio that goes with it if you want to listen to the audio.

Now we know too that the big internationalists have never changed their...  You got to understand the psychology of psychopaths.  They’re not creative psychopaths but they get to the top as CEOs of massive corporations.  And they’re megalomaniacs too.  But a psychopath really is all out for themselves, the world revolves around themselves, that’s it.  And they have never changed their attitudes to the rest of the public.  They’re there for their use of.  That’s what the public is for.  And they tend to get up into politics too.  Anywhere where the big public purse is, they get up there.  They like power, they like accolades and applause.

So they’ve used the same systems down through the ages.  Well I knew when they were building Dubai and for the very, very rich folk to go and live in Dubai, they imported people from all over the world, even from Latin America.  And they bring them in under the same old cons that the British Empire used, part of your pay to get over there is deducted from your wage every week and eventually they’ll deduct money for you to get back home again.  And of course because you have to spend money when you’re living there, you can never save up the money to get back home, so you’re a slave.

And this one is at Qatar.  Now Qatar is the great place for the U.S. and Britain and other countries to ship their arms into for the Syrian rebels.  That’s been in mainstream news and I’ve read that on the air too.  So they have:

"‘Slaves worked to death’ building Qatar’s World Cup paradise – report"

"Protesters demonstrate against the perceived exploitation of workers in Qatar, the location of the 2022 World Cup, before a UEFA Congress in central London on May 24, 2013." 

"One construction worker a day dies as Qatar seeks to build facilities for the World Cup.  That’s the finding of The Guardian newspaper, which characterizes the conditions facing migrant workers in the country as “slave labor.”" 

Alan:  Now as I say that was the same in Dubai because I knew a doctor who went over there for a couple of months and he couldn’t believe these people were living literally in cardboard boxes.  These are the workers.  They were working twelve to fourteen hours a day in that kind of heat too.  And many of them got sick, many of them died, and they just didn’t even know who they were, they just buried them.  This still goes on today folks.  And don’t think for an instant that the same people who brought these people over to build this World Cup place wouldn’t do the same to you if they could get away with it, because they would.  In all ages they have, they have.  Never think that you’re somehow getting civilized and that human nature is changing.  It hasn’t at all, not in the least.  Not with the psychopathic types.

Also this article is pretty good too...

"MasterCard today unveiled a new global report, “The Cashless Journey,” that tracks how 33 major economies are progressing from cash-based to cashless societies." 

Alan:  They planned this long, long ago.  Long ago.

"The report, produced by MasterCard Advisors, identifies new technologies, government programs and consumer preferences as key factors that are driving this shift, creating more productive and inclusive economies." 

Alan:  That’s a nice way of saying it but there is more to it of course.  But it goes through the different countries.

"The report identifies Belgium (where an estimated 93% of the value of consumer spend was cashless), France (92%), Canada (90%), the UK (89%), Sweden (89%), Australia (86%) and the Netherlands (85%) as countries where cashless payments are nearly ubiquitous, and attributes the broad movement away from cash to the uptake of new cashless payment technologies such as mobile, contactless and EMV Chip and a modern payments infrastructure."

"Countries such as the United States (where an estimated 80% of the value of consumer spend was cashless) and Singapore (69%) are approaching the “tipping point” to becoming nearly cashless, and remaining cash use is largely a product of consumer habit."

Alan:  So it’s just habit they’re telling you, right.  And then they give you the ones that are down at the bottom, that haven’t caught up yet.

But then you go into this article to give you another look at it.

"Israel eyes..."

Alan:  Israel.

"...eyes cashless economy to boost tax collection" 

Alan:  You see there are many ways to put this kind of stuff out you see.

"Off-the-books payments cost the Israeli public because billions of shekels go untaxed and don't contribute to the treasury, according to the head of the new committee that will propose ways of reducing cash transactions and increasing electronic payment methods. 

Alan:  So they’re doing ways that are actually going to discourage folk from using cash.  You get little bonuses, little free this and that if you don’t use cash you see.  It always works with the people unfortunately, doesn’t it?  And it’s all for that.  And too the governments planned years ago to go completely cashless and eventually in your computer, will be linked right to the government tax office and any purchase you make or anything that you sell will be taxed immediately as you do it in real time and it’ll go straight to the government.  I’ve read about that years ago.  So that’s why we’re all going this way.  That’s why.

Also it says:

"Feds arrest the alleged founder of Bitcoin’s largest drug market" 

"Federal prosecutors have indicted a man named Ross William Ulbricht in San Francisco.  They say he is the founder of Silk Road, a controversial website that allows users to buy and sell narcotics and other illicit goods.  Founded in 2011, Silk Road website used Bitcoin, a digital currency that helped mask the identity of Silk Road's merchants and customers. 

The government shuttered the site and seized approximately 26,000 Bitcoins worth approximately $3.6 million.  The government says it was the largest ever Bitcoin seizure in history.

“During its two and a half years in operation, Silk Road has been used by several thousand drug dealers and other unlawful vendors to distribute hundreds of kilograms of illegal drugs and other illicit goods and services to well over a hundred thousand buyers,” the government alleges in its indictment.  The government says that 600,000 Bitcoins changed hands on the site, which at current exchange rates translates to $1.2 billion.  In addition to narcotics, Silk Road also had listings for fake drivers' licenses, counterfeit currency,"

Alan:  I wonder what counterfeit is?  If money is backed by nothing, what is it, eh?  It’s a religion, it’s backed by faith.

"...hacking services and much more, the government alleges." 

Alan:  And so on and so on.  But we’ll all be cashless shortly and then it’s like Bertrand Russell said when he talked about giving the people credits instead of money.  It’s the same thing you see, cashless, it doesn’t matter what the cash is, it’s credits.  And eventually they’ll just stop all of your, they’ll take what they want from your account, the government will do that, or shut you down if you’ve been bad or politically incorrect on your site.  Things like that.  It’s all been discussed before you heard of the internet.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight, and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Ministry of Defence urged to make repatriation ceremonies low-key to reduce 'body bag syndrome'

How Ontario plans to deal with tonnes of nuclear waste: Bury the problem

Chiefs Urge Congress to Keep Domestic Spying Programs

US Census Report Shows Entrenched Poverty and Declining Living Standards

Decline of American Middle-Class

& More on Above

Radioactivity Found at Fracking Waste Site in Pennsylvania

& More on Above

Border Horror Stories---Canada/US

Slaves Worked to Death in Qatar

MasterCard Study Reveals the Rapidly Growing Cashless Economies

Israel eyes cashless economy to boost tax collection

Feds Arrest Alleged Founder of Bitcoin's Largest Drug Market