Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 1st 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, scroll down on the front page and look at all the other sites I have up there. Bookmark them for future use because once in a while the big ones go down and you’re left with these other ones to draw from. This way you can always get the latest shows if you have them bookmarked. There are [sites listed above]. Also remember that you are the listeners who bring ME to YOU. Most hosts get paid by advertisers and they bring the advertisers on once in a while; they have to do that and they get paid for it. So it’s up to you to keep me going. The ads on this show are paid directly from the advertiser to RBN the radio station for this program, for the broadcast, the satellite and all the rest of it, their equipment, their staff and their bills. Everybody gets bills. Therefore, it’s up to you to keep me going. Go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and see what I have for sale. You can either buy the books, CDs and DVDs I have up there or you can donate; it’s up to you. For those that get the disks burned and passed to them, they don’t use the computer but they get them passed at a lot of meetings and so on and they play them on their CD player, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
You know, when you just turn your mind back on what you have observed in your lifetime, it’s astonishing really – it’s utterly astonishing – to see many years ago, how the world has been brought together by forces… forces which were associations, well funded, all to bring the world together into regional blocs plus into this world governmental system. It’s so funny, even when they publish world government from the top, even at the end of World War II they had so many books churned out FROM people at the United Nations talking about the goal IS to establish a world government and so on. We’ve had lots of articles since come out. We’ve had Tony Blair, Gordon Brown from Britain – the Prime Ministers – use this term in their opening speeches at major meetings. And yet when you use the same term, they laugh at it. They laugh at you as some kind of nut case. It’s quite an amazing phenomenon in psychology that this TRICK can be used. They can say something when it suits them and laugh at you when you use their very words and actually quote their statements. We think we are a rational people and we think that we are a logical people, but you don’t realize… Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking before the break about how we think we are so rational and yet how many people do you know who also think they are rational, who’ve agreed with you on certain points and perhaps even brought information forward YEARS ago to do with what was happening, what’s coming and so on, who’ve completely forgotten all about it and have just adapted into the new system? They don’t even want to talk about it anymore but they ADAPTED into it, so much so they can blot out the fact that, at one time, they were clueing in as to the big things which were happening in the world. So we’re not as rational as we really think. OR, we forget that we’re very prone to subtle brainwashing and overt brainwashing, which comes constantly through novels, media, and entertainment.
It’s through everything. There is nothing you can watch now in a movie that doesn’t bring in global warming. It doesn’t matter what the subject of the movie is, you’ll see all the same topics mentioned over and over again. That’s by deliberation. Nothing goes into a movie without being debated by staffs of people, whole big staffs of people. Nothing, nothing at all, not one single word even. Everything is analyzed and dissected and cut out and interjected and so on. That’s how precise things are. Therefore, you always have politics being played and promoted through everything, all KINDS of communication, really ALL communication to be honest with you.
We take so much for granted, especially to do with the basic necessities of life. Part of the reason is that we RUSH through our lives. We’ve been taught to rush through our lives. We’ve also been taught to be happy and not to look at anything too seriously. That’s a factual thing today. Leave it to the experts; they will always take care of big problems for us. We should be playing ourselves and enjoying ourselves. Because of that we are utterly ignorant.
Someone had sent me a disk recently to do with the food industry. I didn’t realize that McDonalds, the big chain McDonalds, because they were the biggest purchasers of ground beef and other types of meat started to dictate to the packers. Then you had a cartel of packers which got smaller and smaller and smaller until there are only about 2 main packers today. Then of course, they started dictating to the breeders, through the packers, what kind of meat they are going to purchase and it’s got to have these various chemicals because it suits the way they can prepare it fast and all the rest of it. EVERYTHING has been altered. EVERY THING has been altered. Who would have thought that a fast food chain would have that kind of power? WE don’t clue into these things until we are told the facts of who buys most of the beef and so on. Then we all have to follow suit.
They’ve added SO many different things over the years to make the meat cook even better and faster, etc, for THEM, but they’ve also added an awful lot of chemicals, hormones and all the rest of it. Everything has been tampered with. Everything out there has been tampered with. It’s astonishing. Now they’re going ahead with the nanotechnology and there’s an article in the Independent today to do with this nanotechnology in food.
Spray-on miracle could revolutionise manufacturing
By Steve Connor / February 1, 2010 / Independent.co.uk
It’s a kind of a spray-on silicone film that can literally be used against so many things, all food preparation purposes, all fabrics, and so on. It’s supposed to be able to do away with disinfecting these surfaces all together because it doesn’t let bacteria or virus through. But you can go on and on and on with it. It’s also going to be, as I say, used in all food preparation places and so on. So it will be IN the food as well. Then you jump from there and you go into this article here. It’s from Health Freedom Alliance.
If You Liked Bovine Growth Hormone, You’ll love Beta Agonists
HealthFreedomAlliance.org
While researchers and scientists investigate the cause of our diabetes, obesity, asthma and ADHD epidemics, they should ask why the FDA approved a livestock drug banned in 160 nations and responsible for hyperactivity, muscle breakdown and 10 percent mortality in pigs, according to angry farmers who phoned the manufacturer. The beta agonist ractopamine, a repartitioning agent that increases protein synthesis, was recruited for livestock use when researchers found the drug, used in asthma, made mice more muscular says Beef magazine.
But unlike the growth promoting antibiotics and hormones used in livestock which are withdrawn as the animal nears slaughter, ractopamine is started as the animal nears slaughter. (Alan: It’s the reverse.)
As much as twenty percent of Paylean, given to pigs for their last 28 days, Optaflexx, given to cattle their last 28 to 42 days and Tomax, given to turkeys their last 7 to 14 days, remains in consumer meat says author and well known veterinarian Michael W. Fox.
Though banned in Europe, Taiwan and China–more than 1,700 people were “poisoned” from eating Paylean-fed pigs since 1998 says the Sichuan Pork Trade Chamber of Commerce– ractopamine is used in 45 percent of US pigs says Elanco Animal Health which manufactures all three products.
How does a drug marked, “Not for use in humans. Individuals with cardiovascular disease should exercise special caution to avoid exposure. (A: How does it get into the food?) Use protective clothing, impervious gloves, protective eye wear, and a NIOSH-approved dust mask” become “safe” in human food? With no washout period? (A: How does this stuff get into your food?)
The same way Elanco’s other two blockbusters, Stilbosol (diethylstilbestrol (A: Which is a female type hormone.) or DES), now withdrawn, and Posilac or bovine growth hormone (rBST), bought from Monsanto (A: Monsanto again… big clout, you see.) in 2008, became part of the nation’s food supply: shameless corporate lobbying. A third of meetings on the Food Safety and Inspection Service’s public calendar in January 2009 were with Elanco, a division of Eli Lilly (A: And we all know about Eli Lilly!)–or about ractopamine.
In fact, in 2002, three years after Paylean’s approval, the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine’s Office of Surveillance and Compliance accused Elanco of withholding information about “safety and effectiveness” and “adverse animal drug experiences” upon which ractopamine was approved, in a 14-page warning letter. (A: And on and on it goes.)
What I’m saying is, we have no idea. We take everything for granted now. I’ve said this for so long, especially when you live in the country. You’ll find that so many people now today, especially the city folk, won’t eat anything, any game meat at all. It’s got to come from the supermarket. It’s got to be under that nice bright light under the glass in the supermarket. It’s got to be properly packaged and SHINY, that shiny cellophane stuff over it so they think it’s clean and hygienic and all the rest of it. But what they’re buying really is a compound of chemicals and hormones and all the rest of it. That’s what they’re getting. Those same people would never, ever eat venison, or moose, or rabbit that was prepared at home. They’d never eat it.
It shows you how we are ODD as human creatures. How we are predictable, from the top, because they do studies on all of this. Psychology and behavioral psychology is the greatest science of all today at the top. They’ve got to use it for every product that’s made. They will wean you from good stuff into the bad stuff and then make you think the bad stuff is good for you. And we think we’re rational beings. Are we? Are we really rational beings? It’s astonishing.
There is a guy living around here who’s an Indian, Ojibwa, and he traps beaver for the local government because they create dams and flood the highways. I don’t think he’s been in a supermarket in his entire life. Everything is game food that he eats… all game food. He doesn’t need cash. He doesn’t need to go in there and buy this rubbish when he can get the best from the stuff he’s catching all around him. Healthy as can be too, in all kinds of weather. Not like us.
We’ve been conned, conned, conned, conned by big, big, big business. Of course, they also get together at the top, these big businesses, like cartels, and get acts pushed through that, again, further scrub out the smaller farmers that used to be ALL over the place. Every town had farmers around about them and most of them are gone, because they can’t afford all the different fees and licensing and laws, etc put out on them by the environmentalists and all the rest of it. All done by design. Who can afford to hire banks of lawyers and writers to deal with the taxes and with the government stipulations? Only the big boys. They can get banks of them no problem and write that cost off too, down to their taxes. But the small guy can’t. He can’t spend all his day filling in forms and so on. All done by design.
Remember too what the United Nations said years ago. They said that farming was too important to be left to farmers. In this big world order, you can see how it’s been set up. In fact you find the Marxists talking about this at the turn of the 20th century. They saw no reason why eventually one factory should not produce ALL the furniture for ALL the people, and for a whole country. One factory could produce all the shoes for the whole country. They called that efficiency… but no choice. We have China producing everything now for the entire planet. That’s also by design. And you think you’re still running in a Capitalist type system? The two of them work together, as they did in the Soviet Union, by the way. That’s the music coming in and I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ve watched farce after farce to do with security since 2001. Some countries saw it before 2001. Britain tried to bring in the ID cards in about 1998 – I think it was – but the people didn’t go for it at that time. They needed something to happen to get it all rolling forward. Being the lucky lotto pickers they are, they won with September the 11th 2001.
Since then they’re on a roll. Big business is on a roll. One of the biggest businesses too, is security. We don’t realize that there are so many. There are actual international security forces, private corporations that get LOTS of business out of this, never mind the guys that are churning out the gadgets and the machines for airports. You know they’re even putting fences up and barbed wire across some of the ferry crossings across Canada. Believe it or not. They never even had this is World War II but we’ve got it today. Everybody is getting in on the act to make bucks.
We’ve watched the scans… We went from pat down and all the rest of it and holding your pants up to humiliate you and get you used to OBEYING Big Brother and walking around without shoes on, to getting patted down. Then the scans came in. They can scan you now and look at you in the nude… and nobody bats an eyelid. Of course that’s not far enough. I said at the time – I quipped about it – they won’t be happy until they’re giving you a complete physical with doctors and all the rest of it. Which isn’t a bad idea when you think about it because in countries like Canada where you can’t get a doctor in a lot of places outside of the main cities… Under Agenda 21 they closed ALL the little hospitals down and you have to go to the main cities to get anything. Even then they are so overcrowded you might wait months to see a doctor about anything, even just for a visit. So it’s a good idea having all this stuff at the airport because now if you’re really clever in Canada you can go there and they’ll give you a complete checkup. They look down your throat, into your stomach and they’ll look up your rear. Just ask for a copy and take it back and then just go to the hospital with that; you’ve got the report right there. It will save you time. I will save you years actually. So it’s not a bad idea.
This article is along that subject and it’s from the Mail Online.
Terrorists ‘plan attack (A: I knew this would come.) on Britain with bombs INSIDE their bodies’ to foil new airport scanners
(A: Oh, ho, oh… [Alan laughing.])
By Christopher Leake, Mail Online / 30th January 2010
(A: I’m not kidding. Can you just imagine gynecologists there and there’ll be guys there to give you a colonoscopy too, for your rear end and all the rest of it? You can see all these professionals being there. So it’s not a bad idea for third-rate medical systems like Canada.)
Britain is facing a new Al Qaeda (A: Oh! Al Qaeda….) terror threat from suicide ‘body bombers’ with explosives surgically inserted inside them.
Until now, terrorists have attacked airlines, Underground trains and buses by secreting bombs in bags, shoes or underwear to avoid detection. (A: Oh, what a joke eh? Because everything just happens on cue. They’ve got these things ready to go, these machines, all they need is the incident and bingo, they always seem to get it. And it’s always a ludicrous incident too isn’t it?)
But an operation by MI5 (A: Oooh….) has uncovered evidence (A: which we’ll never get to hear about.) that Al Qaeda (A: you know, this big mystical strange thing that’s a big abstract thing in the ether somewhere. Al Qaeda, as soon as you mention the name, that’s all you need know.) is planning a new stage in its terror campaign by inserting ‘surgical bombs’ inside people for the first time. (A: Maybe we should all go over to Afghanistan for operations. It seems they must have damn good surgeons over there. That’s another thing for Canadians, keep that in mind.)
Security services believe (A: Security services, the guys that make the big bucks… BELIEVE…) the move has been prompted by the recent introduction at airports of body scanners, which are designed to catch terrorists before they board flights. (A: What a joke! I mean that guy with the underwear, you know. He was helped on the plane with no passport by a very important person… but that’s never mentioned. [Alan laughing] So it’s all baloney but I’ll carry on with the nonsense.)
It is understood MI5 became aware of the threat after observing increasingly vocal internet ‘chatter’ on Arab websites this year.
The warning comes in the wake of the failed attempt by London-educated Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow up an airliner approaching Detroit on Christmas Day.
A leading source (A: They don’t even need names anymore. You just need ‘experts’ on anything eh? Before that it says ‘security source,’ there’s no names involved anymore. We’re all trained and conditioned like Pavlov’s dogs to respond to these terms aren’t we?) added that male bombers would have the explosive secreted near their appendix or in their buttocks, while females would have the material placed inside their breasts in the same way as figure-enhancing implants. [Alan laughing.]
Experts said the explosive PETN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate) would be placed in a plastic sachet inside the bomber’s body before the wound was stitched up like a normal operation incision and allowed to heal. (A: You can image them sitting there and the smoke comes out of their ears eh? … before the bang? [Alan laughing.] This is like something from a comedy.)
A shaped charge of 8oz of PETN can penetrate five inches of armour and would easily blow a large hole in an airliner.
Security sources (A: Here we go again. I like these definitions.) said the explosives would be detonated by the bomber using a hypodermic syringe to inject TATP (Triacetone Triperoxide) through their skin into the explosives sachet. (A: So when he’s sitting there and he’s trying to stick in his… or the woman is trying to stick this in to her breast… that’s a good tip as to what’s happening. [Laughing] Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I just had to laugh at that last article because they have, again, teams of these MI-5 guys sitting and dreaming up what they could possibly do. What would THEY do themselves and they came up with all the ridiculous scenarios and to be honest with you, you’d have to stop everyone flying all together if you wanted total safety. But the idea of women having implants in their breasts and then they have to stick a hypo into it… beware now, BEWARE if you see a mother on there and she’s got a child with her that looks a bit fake, very still, and she starts feeding it and taps it to break the wind, she’s popping in the syringe. That’s what’s happening, it’s coming out of its mouth. Be careful. Be on the look out for that one. They should get better writers for MI-5 and that’s all I can say.
Geo-politics is something we are always out of the loop with because we get events AS they start to happen visibly to us. Even major events can happen and it’s kept quiet from the public, even all the little wars they can have going on for years that we know nothing about… when your own countries are involved in them, maybe even started them up. With geo-politics… there is always a far-range plan in geo-politics. It’s not a matter of let’s go into this country because they’ve got uranium or something – like the Congo, that’s why most of the stuff happens in the Congo, the high uranium content – or they’ve got oil and leave it at that. No. They’re always going on about who would they attack after that and after that and after that.
That’s how you get HEGEMONY which means TOTAL POWER or CONTROL OVER ALL THESE AREAS REGIONS OR COUNTRIES. That really is a strategy of the so-called imperial, dominant country for its time period. Britain, remember, has an alliance with the US to basically FURTHER an empire, a global type empire. It was started a LONG TIME AGO. We see the Cecil Rhodes Foundation that merged with the Lord Alfred Milner Group and they became the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, for America. Their job, the early members, was to take over the resources, ALL the resources ACROSS THE ENTIRE WORLD. They set up the League of Nations to become the United Nations to bring in this WORLD EMPIRE based on the British Empire. Why waste the fact that Britain already had an empire at that time? You build on it. You use it as a nucleus and you build on it and complete it. That really is what it’s all about.
The writers themselves FROM the Royal Institute of International Affairs have written about this copiously over the last 50, 60 years or more. So when we read articles like this one,
US boosts missile presence in Gulf as warning to Iran
This is not a warning folks. This is them getting set up for an invasion of Iran. That’s why you do that. That’s the real reason behind it. Remember, there is no difference between changes of the House, as they like to call it, of Congress. There are no changes that happen in policies. They don’t toss out opposition laws and bills that were put in before they came in. They keep them going. You’ll notice that. I doesn’t matter who gets in. If there truly were opposing parties they would chuck out the olds ones and bring in new laws. They sign all these treaties with United Nations as they go along. They’ve never reneged on them. There has never been a party that came in and says, well, we wouldn’t have done that, therefore we are tearing it up. It never happens. So when they go ahead with Iran, you know it’s part of the same strategy as the Bush crowd was going to do. Because the group that comprised the council for the policy of the New American Century group, where they had all the countries lined up that they had to attack and take over, starting with Afghanistan, THEN Iraq, then Iran, and then Syria. It’s the SAME agenda that’s still going on today. This article is from the Guardian.co.uk.
US boosts missile presence in Gulf as warning to Iran
Pentagon expands Patriot missile programme across Middle East after Tehran repeatedly spurns hand of diplomacy
(A: Now that’s not true because they’ve allowed all the UN inspectors in. The same stuff, same format as we saw with Iraq. We had Spitz – I think the guy’s name was – from the United Nations. He was always in the newspapers. He was always sent in by the UN with his teams. They never found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the war. But that wasn’t good enough because the agenda was to invade them anyway. Well it’s the same thing that’s going on here.)
James Sturcke and agencies / guardian.co.uk, Sunday 31 January 2010
The Obama administration is intensifying pressure on Iran by increasing its missile defences in the Middle East to defend against potential missile strikes in the region by Tehran, it emerged today.
The US military has boosted the capability of land-based Patriot defensive missiles in several Arab nations in the Gulf, and one official told the Associated Press the navy was also increasing the presence of ships capable of knocking out hostile missiles in flight.
The move – reported in several US newspapers this morning – appears to be a deliberate attempt by the White House to ratchet up pressure on Iran ahead of attempts to increase sanctions against the country. (A: Sanctions is the first move, THEN in comes the hardware and preparation for the invasion. This is standard procedure for invasion.)
The US is reappraising its Iran policy after months of unsuccessful diplomatic moves, and is attempting to win broad international consensus for sanctions against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, believed to control a covert nuclear arms programme, the New York Times reported. (A: I like how they say ‘believed’. It’s not really a legal term. It’s like ‘known’ for instance. It’s a way out for them after this is all over.)
Last week, in his state of the union speech, Barack Obama spoke of “consequences” if Iran failed to comply with UN demands to stop nuclear fuel production.
They have already admitted there is production there but it’s for… all the countries in the West use nuclear facilities for their electrical power. The UN has already admitted that they aren’t making weapons-grade stuff in Iran, but that won’t make any difference; the agenda is the agenda. The Project for a New American Century had those countries on its list, whether they like it or not. It wouldn’t matter who’s running the countries, they’d still get demonized and invaded and that’s that. It’s a policy and we little people at the bottom will never, ever, ever get the truth from the big boys at the top. Never, ever, ever. The big NOBLE LIE, as they say… It’s for everyone’s good but they wouldn’t understand it, so we have to lie to them. That’s how it’s done.
Agenda 21. It’s an interesting article because people keep asking about Agenda 21. It’s the United Nation’s Agenda 21. This was written in October 2009. It’s from the American Thinker. It’s talking about what it is. It says…
UN Agenda 21 – Coming to a Neighborhood near You
By Scott Strzelczyk and Richard Rothschild / October 28, 2009 / AmericanThinker.com
Most Americans are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program known as Agenda 21. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development created Agenda 21 as a sustainability agenda which is arguably an amalgamation of socialism and extreme environmentalism brushed with anti-American, anti-capitalist overtones.
A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. (A: You have all the links on this site. I’ll put all these articles I’m talking about tonight up on my web site at the end of the show, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Agenda 21, because so many people were talking about it, who understood it on radio stations such as this, was given a bad name. People were starting to be educated as to what it was all about. So they had to start CHANGING SOME OF THE TERMS they were using when they referred to it.) Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development. The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. (A: It’s from international, national, down to local.) The United Nations purposely recommends (A: Now listen to this…) avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggests a cleverly named alternative: “smart growth.” (A: You’ve heard that haven’t you? Smart growth…ads on TV…that’s Agenda 21. They ‘suggested,’ that means they ordered people to use alternative names.) The United Nations Millennium Papers – Issue 2 (page 5) (A: The links are here too.) says this of Agenda 21 and smart growth: (A: This is the United Nations’ own writing here and advice to their members.)
Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth [emphasis added]. (A: That’s from the United Nations’ own site. That’s their advice to their own members. So if you talk about it, you’re a conspiracy nut, right. You know, it doesn’t say in their little bit of advice there that they are NOT going to bring in a world government. It says, This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’… we’re not supposed to FEAR it, you see, which is also an ADMISSION.)
Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn’t care less whether it’s called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways (A: That’s another term they’re using, Pathways.) was drafted by the County Planning Department. The plan, if enacted, proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights:
(A: What do they do about land rights? …with Pathways and smart growth…)
-Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks
-Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers
-Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums
-Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities
-Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods
Carroll County, Maryland is one of 1,168 cities, towns, and counties worldwide that are members of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) – Local Governments for Sustainability, which is an international association of local governments as well as national and regional local government organizations that have made a commitment to sustainable development. (A: See how they’ve bypassed everything… Congress, State, right down to your local level by creating all these organizations that then TELL the local councils what to do.) The ICLEI mission statement closely resembles that of Agenda 21. In fact, the ICLEI has Special Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council and coordinates local government representation in the UN processes related to Agenda 21.
They have these special community leaders, UNELECTED community leaders. That’s how the world is run, by these Soviet-style non-governmental organizations all under the direction of the United Nations and they are working steadily across the whole world, taking all your rights away, bypassing all discussion in governmental level and all departments, until they have achieved what they want. Very, very clever. Very clever, but then they have multi billions and trillions of dollars to back them. They have full-time staff working to lobby, etc, and set up these groups. An END-RUN AROUND THE CONSTITUTION was what one guy on the Council on Foreign Relations says. They wouldn’t hit it head on; they’d just go around it. Well, that’s exactly what they have been doing for years and years and years. Years and years and years.
Then Obama has announced the government greenhouse gas emissions targets. People thought that nothing was going to come out of the Copenhagen Treaty. I said not at all; they will agree to agree on all the next stuff that comes up. That’s what they agreed upon, to sign everything into law. This article is from the Washington Post.
Obama announces government greenhouse gas emissions targets
By Juliet Eilperin and Anne E. Kornblut / Washington Post
President Obama set greenhouse gas emissions targets for the federal government, announcing Friday that it would aim to reduce its emissions by 28 percent in 2020.
“As the largest energy consumer in the United States, we have a responsibility to American citizens to reduce our energy use and become more efficient,” (A: How cleverly that’s worded isn’t it. Again, by these PR specialists that work for the government. So they make it sound as if it’s on BEHALF OF YOU, your good, right.) Obama said in a statement. “Our goal is to lower costs, reduce pollution, and shift Federal energy expenses away from oil and towards local, clean energy.” (A: They’ve already admitted before in many other articles, it costs an awful, awful lot more for YOU to buy that energy, if you go green, as they say, go green. Ha! They also say that for every job created through greening that two other jobs are lost… and that’s a fact as well, when you look into all the other ways you supply electricity.)
The White House estimated a savings of $8 billion to $11 billion in energy costs, and Nancy Sutley, who chairs the White House Council on Environmental Quality, estimated that it would amount to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 88 million metric tons by 2020 — equivalent to taking 17 million cars off the road for one year. (A: They keep bringing up these rubbishy kind of statistics don’t they? I mean, 88 million metric tons… they don’t even go by measuring any carbon. What they do is see how much ENERGY is going to be USED and that’s how they work out this fake carbon figure. That’s why you’re going to pay for everything, every joule of every energy that you burn. You are going to pay through the nose for it, big time.)
The initiative, Sutley told reporters, “will hold the federal government accountable for leading by example.” [Alan laughing.] (A: These are the guys that just put trillions in to the banks that just looted the country and the world. Argh.)
But it is not as sweeping as it could have been: (A: Here they are telling you that it’s not as bad, so we should breathe a sigh of relief and just be grateful.) It does not, for instance, include emissions that stem from the activity of federal suppliers, or from federal employees’ commutes. And while the Defense Department pledged Friday to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in non-combat areas 34 percent by 2020, this pledge does not include combat operations, which account for 62 percent of the department’s carbon footprint. (A: Have you ever watched these Hollywood movies where they’re always blowing things up and all you see are these massive black clouds all over the place? How come they can get away with it but we can’t? How come? Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. There is Dave in Arizona, I think I’ll try and get him in. Are you there Dave?
Dave: I just wanted to make a comment about the Al Qaeda thing. There was a really interesting documentary a few years ago called the Power of Nightmares, BBC. They made a comment in there which is pretty interesting, that Al Qaeda was a fictitious name MADE to implicate Bin Laden in the African Embassy bombing under a RICO law statute. So I mean it’s not even real.
Alan: It’s not real and then a CIA operative that retired admitted that Al Qaeda eventually became to be used as a loose term for a particular radio connection they’d all call into for connecting with people in the Middle East, the different agents and all the rest of it… CIA agents. They called it Al Qaeda.
Dave: Yeah. Basically is this like their made-up boogeyman, the big brother, the… you know?
Alan: They’ve got to have perpetual war. They can’t ram the changes through and turn your whole way of life upside-down in a short period of time. They cannot do that unless they go through a war type scenario and that’s what it’s all for.
Dave: So they just create some kind of an enemy that isn’t there to pass their agendas.
Alan: Yes, and of course, they can give you the occasional mind control patsy. That’s old, old stuff. They can do that for any situation. The next thing you’ll find there is some guy who… I mean how far do you want to go with imagination. How about explosives in your dental fillings? You could imagine anything that you want. There is no end to it.
Dave: I remember they used to say that people were smuggling in drugs through dead babies and stuff. So it’s kind of like the same deal like that, only now it’s explosives.
Alan: That’s right. So they can carry this on for as long as they want but remember, the whole world is changing as this happens. We have accepted so many losses of freedom in the last few years that, if you’re conscious at all, what you’re living in now is almost unrecognizable and the worst is yet to come.
Dave: Is this really just kind of like a merger with China or something?
Alan: It’s a merger with the whole planet. The whole planet is coming under this scenario. This IS a World War. People don’t realize that this whole farce that they’ve got going right now is a WORLD WAR that everybody who’s signed on to the United Nations is under anti-terrorism warfare laws right now. This is a world war. Remember what Carroll Quigley said, the main purpose of war – apart from looting all the resources that you want for the private businesses – the main purpose is to CHANGE THE CULTURES on ALL sides and all participants because government takes over more and more rights OVER the general public in all different departments and areas. THAT’S what’s happening right now. We are LIVING THROUGH this and we are IN to what literally is a police state and it hasn’t become evident to everyone yet. Some people in some big cities have noticed it already. We are already into a police state which IS to get even worse. We have no rights of privacy whatsoever, at all. Of course now they are chucking out ALL rights to even enter your homes. They’ve got maybe 6, 7, maybe even 10 laws in Canada where they can come in without any kind of warrants and they are ADDING to them all the time.
Dave: Thanks Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 2nd 2010. For newcomers to the show, I always suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. That’s the main web site; scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use in case the big ones go down again. I should always mention at the start of the show that these are the official web sites that I have; anything else is not mine. There are some people who put up shows of mine and they don’t keep it up to date so I get the complaints and then it takes me forever to figure out that it’s not one of my sites at all. So these are the official sites: [listed above]. As always, I always tell the people during the tin-can-shaking-one-minute, it’s up to you to keep me going. I don’t take money from advertisers and then bring them on as guests and so on. That’s how most hosts get paid, by pushing those that promote them. The adverts on this show go right to RBN to pay them for their air time, their staff, and equipment. It’s expensive to run these radio stations. It’s up to you to keep me going and you can go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, see the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Even though it says donate, you can also order through PayPal, just send a separate email with your order and I’ll get it out to you. For those that get the disks burned and passed to them to play on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. It’s important that you do this because as I say, everyone sits around expecting everyone else to throw in a buck here and there and when that happens no one does it; they’re all waiting for everyone else to do it.
We live in a time when we take things for granted. We think things are free. NOTHING is free. Nothing is free. I’ve seen what they’ve termed in the past Patriot Radio stations. In the past they’ve gone down because people wouldn’t help them out. They’d expect everything else to be free. Anything that’s truly free out there, it doesn’t exist as free; there is always an ANGLE to it. Everything has its price. Truth certainly has a price too. I’ve seen so many stations over the past just close down. One day they’re not there and that’s when everybody screams and hollers what happened, what happened? Well, if they’d helped out when they were asked all along the way they’d find out what happened; no one helped out. That’s what happens. It’s the same with a lot of radio talk show hosts in the past that tried it the same way as I do, by going alone. They couldn’t get the support. Everyone loves their information. Everybody uses their information but no one would pay for it. That’s a sad statement on humanity but it’s a true one nevertheless and we’ve got to accept that as just the way it is. I hear the music coming in and I’ll come back with tonight’s topics after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I often go on about reality and people think what on earth is he talking about? We all know what reality is. We all live in it. What I’m really referring to is the indoctrinations that we get every day that we take for granted as being actually really news and we believe we’re kept up to date in a very open kind of society.
Often people will point to all the different, the hundreds of radio stations, especially in the US, and television stations with their newscasters. It seems impossible that they could all be coordinated into deceiving them for any particular reason. They don’t realize that all these newscasters get their sources from TWO main news sources, AP and Reuters. That’s where really all data comes from in this day and age, apart from your local news as to what your council is doing. If you even look into your local newspapers, you’ll find organizations to do with greening, etc and you don’t realize that all of those organizations are not your local spontaneous grass roots movements that are advising your council. They all belong to the United Nations. These kinds of things are never mentioned by the main stream. They want to keep you in the dark.
Reality is really a form of obedience. It’s a system in which we live. We are born into it. Your parents were born into it. They believed it. They didn’t question it. They’d complain about parties and what they were doing in politics but they didn’t ever catch on to the fact that there is a bigger program under way and what was really behind it. It seemed absurd even to go beyond the usual party politics to find out that there is something else guiding this world.
Academia, of course, is entirely different. That’s why they don’t talk so much about it, party politics. They talk about terms like Darwinism, technocracy, and stuff like this. Ideas that came out FROM the time of Darwin where science WAS RISEN TO TAKE OVER FROM EXISTING RELIGIONS and even existing POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS. Where they believed in the 1800s that scientists had the right, through pure rationalism, to run the world and guide the world as to where THEY thought it should actually go. So it depends where you are in life and what you are involved in life as to what your idea of reality happens to be.
If you go by the newspapers, forget it. That’s your left-right paradigm. If you’ve noticed today too, especially in the last I’d say 5 years, we’ve found that ADVISORY boards are on everybody’s governments today; unelected advisory boards made up of supposed academia and scientific specialists. This is the RISE of technocracy that’s supposed to take us over and bring us into a planned society where our whole way of life is to be altered completely. Remember, the members of the Club of Rome were given the job, the task, of finding a way to UNITE humanity, to unite them under a common cause, maybe a war type scenario, so that we’d give up our rights, go along with all the new ideas they’d give to us, but ultimately to bring in a controlled, ordered, planned society. That means family planning for everyone across the entire planet in a post-nationalistic world, an INTERdependent society, with their global order. That’s again, what the United Nations is ultimately supposed to rise up to; the occasion to be the boss of all of this, corrupt as they are, mind you.
We never get beyond that, that so much has been really planned for us. Our education goes towards this CREATION of a reality to foster obedience to a system. That’s really what your education is all about. It is very true that you’re told very little about reality while you are in school. You are told all you NEED to know… by your masters. They certainly discourage thinking outside of the box in academia. You parrot what your professor says and you make good marks and you come through. That means you’re given a scroll at the end. Your head is ‘squared’ and that means that you have been given a QUALITY APPROVAL STAMP to join their system and work for them, your masters in this world. But you’ll never really figure it out for yourself.
There is a good article here on Carbon Currency. This fits into this topic. Carbon currency, I’ve told you already that this carbon tax and so on is not to just be put on big business and big corporations, it’s to come down to YOU. How much YOU will cost society from birth to death and you are going to pay for it, you see. You will get personal tax, carbon tax invoices, bills coming from the governments, across the world. That is part of it. This goes back again, into technocracy. This article is called…
Global currency replacing all paper currencies,
limiting manufacturing, food production and people movement
Carbon Currency: A New Beginning for Technocracy?
By Patrick Wood / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / canadafreepress.com
Critics who think that the U.S. dollar will be replaced by some new global currency are perhaps thinking too small.
On the world horizon looms a new global currency that could replace all paper currencies and the economic system upon which they are based.
The new currency, simply called Carbon Currency, is designed to support a revolutionary new economic system based on energy (production, and consumption), instead of price. Our current price-based economic system and its related currencies that have supported capitalism, socialism, fascism and communism, is being herded to the slaughterhouse in order to make way for a new carbon-based world.
It is plainly evident that the world is laboring under a dying system of price-based economics as evidenced by the rapid decline of paper currencies. The era of fiat (irredeemable paper currency) was introduced in 1971 when President Richard Nixon decoupled the U.S. dollar from gold. (Alan: Actually, it was already in fractional reserve long before that.) Because the dollar-turned-fiat was the world’s primary reserve asset, (A: Because the dollar was its primary asset.) all other currencies eventually followed suit, leaving us today with a global sea of paper that is increasingly undesired, unstable, unusable.
The deathly economic state of today’s world is a direct reflection of the sum of its sick and dying currencies, but this could soon change.
Forces are already at work to position a new Carbon Currency as the ultimate solution to global calls for poverty reduction, population control, environmental control, global warming, energy allocation and blanket distribution of economic wealth. (A: That’s the real reasons for this con game of environmental control, global warming and so on. These are the real reasons behind it. That’s WHAT they dreamt up at the Club of Rome remember.)
Unfortunately for individual people living in this new system, it will also require authoritarian and centralized control over all aspects of life, from cradle to grave.
What is Carbon Currency and how does it work? In a nutshell, Carbon Currency will be based on the regular allocation of available energy to the people of the world. If not used within a period of time, the Currency will expire (like monthly minutes on your cell phone plan) so that the same people can receive a new allocation based on new energy production quotas for the next period. (A: I’ve mentioned before, Bertrand Russell wrote in the 40s about this very system when he said that eventually the government will dish out CREDITS to the public. Of course now we know it will be carbon credits. But he said the same thing, everyone on the bottom level would start off with the same amount, you can’t save it up, it starts at the same amount every Monday. That’s all to do with control. This is not a new idea. It’s an ongoing movement by a very well organized group that’s been here for an awful long time.)
Because the energy supply chain is already dominated by the global elite, setting energy production quotas will limit the amount of Carbon Currency in circulation at any one time. It will also naturally limit manufacturing, food production and people movement.
Local currencies could remain in play for a time, but they would eventually wither and be fully replaced by the Carbon Currency, much the same way that the Euro displaced individual European currencies over a period of time.
Sounds very modern in concept, doesn’t it? In fact, these ideas date back to the 1930’s (A: It’s actually much older.) when hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens were embracing a new political ideology called Technocracy and the promise it held for a better life. (A: Actually, I’ve got writings from the organizations in the 1800s talking about it, from the minutes of their meetings.) Even now-classic literature was heavily influenced by Technocracy: George Orwell’s 1984, H.G. Wells’ The Shape of Things to Come and Huxley’s “scientific dictatorship” in Brave New World.
This paper investigates the rebirth of Technocracy and its potential to recast the New World Order into something truly “new” and also totally unexpected by the vast majority of modern critics.
Background
Philosophically, Technocracy found it roots in the scientific autocracy of Henri de Saint-Simon (1760-1825) and in the positivism of Auguste Comte (1798-1857), (A: They also called it ‘modernists,’ the modernists movement.) the father of the social sciences. (A: Communist really.) Positivism elevated science and the scientific method above metaphysical revelation. (A: That’s what communism is based on.) Technocrats embraced positivism because they believed that social progress was possible only through science and technology. [Schunk, Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 5th, 315]
The social movement of Technocracy, with its energy-based accounting system, can be traced back to the 1930’s when an obscure group of engineers and scientists offered it as a solution to the Great Depression.
The principal scientist behind Technocracy was M. King Hubbert, a young geoscientist who would later (in 1948-1956) invent the now-famous Peak Oil Theory (A: Another con game.), also known as the Hubbert Peak Theory. (A: I’ll be back with more on this very interesting article and topic after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just going through technocracy. It’s called other things too. They had the Modernist Movement. They had different terms for it. Just like today, they have many terms for Agenda 21 because it wasn’t a very… Really, it wasn’t well accepted by all the public because it guaranteed and swore to destroy all previous types of governments. That’s why it was hand-and-glove with communism. That’s why communists actually adopted that whole theory that science should RULE over everything else. That’s all religions, all other types of being, basically. This article goes on to say…
In 1933, Hubbert and Howard Scott formed an organization called Technocracy, Inc. Technocracy is derived from the Greek words “techne” meaning skill and “kratos”, meaning rule. Thus, it is government by skilled engineers, scientists and technicians as opposed to elected officials. It was opposed to all other forms of government, including communism, socialism and fascism, all of which function with a price-based economy.
Technocracy postulated that only scientists and engineers (A: Here we go. This is exactly where we are today. If we look at the panel that’s behind Obama, the panel behind Brown and previously Blair in Britain, and every other country that signed on to the UN, they all have their panels of these scientists.) were capable of running a complex, technology-based society. Because technology, they reasoned, changed the social nature of societies, previous methods of government and economy were made obsolete. They disdained politicians and bureaucrats, who they viewed as incompetent. By utilizing the scientific method and scientific management techniques, Technocrats hoped to squeeze the massive inefficiencies out of running a society, thereby providing more benefits for all members of society while consuming less resources. (A: Very important part, consuming less resources.)
The other integral part of Technocracy was to implement an economic system based on energy allocation (A: Here you go. This is an old movement.) rather than price. They proposed to replace traditional money with Energy Credits. (A: That’s where we are today. It is pushed through the Rockefeller Foundation and all the other foundations which DO comprise the parallel government, by the way.)
Their keen focus on the efficient use of energy is likely the first hint of a sustained ecological/environmental movement in the United States.
Because that’s exactly where they were. It’s the same bunch today, the society that’s come down through the generations and they’ve tied environmentalism, ecological, and sustainability all together with a monetary system that will keep all this in check and help THEM to control it all. That means controlling all of us. This site also has a lot of quotes by a lot of the players in it that are well known today. So it’s well worth looking at this article.
I’ll put the links up on my site at the end of the show, just go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. That depends on if XplorNet, the satellite company that I upload with, graces me with enough of a time period to upload. I am heavily censored today and they cut me right back until I can’t watch any videos at all. So anybody who sends me video links, please burn me copies and send them. I can’t do it anymore. It takes 5 hours now to upload all the shows to the sites because they’ve cut me by at least, actually it’s more than 2/3rds speed. But they still take the same amount of money for high speed from me. So I’m being blackmailed by XplorNet very deliberately.
Here’s a good web site for vaccines. We know the con of vaccines. By the way, that ties in with the last article because they also talked – HG Wells, Russell and all the rest of them – talked about using the NEEDLE and PHARMACOLOGY to control the public. That also meant using the needle to even sterilize the public, written about long ago in the 20s and 30s and even beforehand. This article is from NVIC, Vaccine News by Barbara Loe Fisher. She talks about, really it’s what happens when you go against the system when you work for the system.
Vaccines: Doctor Judges & Juries Hanging Their Own
1/29/2010 / by Barbara Loe Fisher / NVIC.org
I remember the day I met Dr. Andrew Wakefield. It was September 12, 1997 and he had just flown into Dulles Airport from London the night before to speak at the First International Public Conference on Vaccination sponsored by the National Vaccine Information Center. The title of his talk was “Measles Virus & Measles Vaccine: Lessons to be Learned.”
It was five months before he and 12 other physician colleagues would publish a study in The Lancet calling for more research into a possible association between inflammatory bowel disease, MMR vaccine and developmental delays in some children.
I met Dr. Wakefield that day in 1997 in the auditorium where our conference was to take place as he was trying to decide what to do with a slide that identified him as being employed by the Royal Free Hospital. You see, he had received a telephone threat from London in the middle of the night warning him that if he spoke at our conference, he might not have a job when he returned to Britain. (A: That’s the power of licensing. That’s what licensing is for, by the way.) He then described to me the intense pressure he had been under from senior health officials in Britain to withdraw from our conference.
In September 1997, Andrew Wakefield was a young British gastroenterologist, a rising star in the world of experimental medicine. He had received awards and scholarships for original research into the pathogenesis and etiology of inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn’s disease. He had a bright future ahead of him until he examined children suffering with both inflammatory bowel disease and developmental delays (A: I’ve mentioned how it can go to the brain and the bowel before, from these shots. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from NVIC Vaccine News to do with what happens to really good doctors who are investigating certain areas that are taboo. Believe it or not, they like to represent medicine with other sciences as actual sciences. If they are sciences then nothing should be taboo. No investigation should be taboo, even when they come up with findings. The whole idea is to go over them and try to replicate what led up to those findings. That’s how you start to get to truth. But we have these incredible medical decrees from on high that says THIS is what we’ve found, this is the law and don’t go any further with it, and if you buck the system you suffer. This is what happened to this young British gastroenterologist who was a rising star in the world of experimental medicine. It says here…
He had a bright future ahead of him until he examined children suffering with both inflammatory bowel disease and developmental delays and decided to investigate the reports by parents that their once normal children regressed and began exhibiting symptoms of autism after getting an MMR shot. (A: It’s astonishing to me too, because you see, autism used to be noticeable basically from birth onwards. The child did not go through the normal milestones of saying dada at a certain age, crawling at a certain age, and so on. That was the standard type of autism. Then in came this new one. They were normal up to getting their shot and THEN they regressed. This is the normal, new type that’s all over the place.)
So, as Andrew Wakefield and I were standing in the conference auditorium five months before The Lancet article (A: That’s the main medical journal in Britain.) was published, I told him that he did not have to speak at our conference. I told him it was not worth losing his job. I told him that I could look back and count the doctors lying on the road, who had lost their careers because they dared to conduct research into or speak about vaccine risks. I told him his own colleagues would hang him for challenging the status quo.
Despite the fact he had been threatened by senior doctors in positions of authority demanding that he withdraw from our conference, Andrew Wakefield refused my offer to stand down. He said that if he did not speak at our conference, he would always be afraid and he was not going to live in fear for the rest of his life.
And then we sat down and had a long talk about freedom of thought, conscience and scientific inquiry. (A: And so on and so on.)
And I knew then, that despite my warnings to Andrew Wakefield that he could lose everything if he tried to investigate or speak out about vaccine risks, this man was not going to stand down. He was going to risk it all.
It was a moment I will never forget because I knew the price he would pay for standing up to colleagues ordering him to salute smartly and remain silent.
Today, doctors in positions of authority in Britain, who have sought to intimidate Andrew Wakefield even before the February 1998 Lancet article was published, have declared through the General Medical Council that he and two other brave doctors, who refused to recant the conclusions of The Lancet article, are guilty of professional misconduct. (A: That’s what they branded him as.) The General Medical Council does not operate a legal court of law; it is rather a medical court of opinion, where doctors can sanction other doctors and, in effect, hang their own. (A: I’ll put this link up too on my web site at the end of the show.)
That’s the reality of the world. It’s FAR different from the way it’s presented by the supposed exposés in the media which are generally cover-ups in themselves. It’s pretty disgusting isn’t it? Pretty disgusting.
I’ve talked about the scandals within the United Nations and how the special investigations teams they set up to investigate their own within the UN [have been ‘cut back’], after the Oil For Food scandal where the head of the United Nations, the supreme chutzpa, was involved in raking in a lot of personal cash for Oil For Food on Iraq at the time. Of course they shifted the blame to his son and he said, I knew nothing about it… as his Swiss bank account swelled into obscenity. These characters at the top, you’ve got to understand how they get up there. They are not just left wing. They are psychopaths who sense the change of where it’s all going to go, where it’s APPROVED by the big boys who really run the world, the guys that run all the big foundations, the multi, multi trillionaires. They sniff it and they get in on it, at the bottom level, and if it’s for ecology and sustainability, they immediately learn all this stuff and parrot it off and claw their way to the top.
This is about one of the characters. I’ve mentioned before Dr. Rajendra Pachauri who is the head of the IPCC, the panel of liars who make up this group who say, we’re all going to die, we’re all going to die… because it’s global warming… the idea dreamed up by the Club of Rome. Remember, that was their job to dream up that whole idea. They are utter liars and they ARE psychopaths. This character shouldn’t even be near children. I’m not kidding about it. Now, there is a thing about a psychopath, they cannot help but show their ego, THEY LOVE TO SHOW OFF because a psychopath IS pure ego. They would kill the world, destroy the world before their ego must get hurt. The world revolves around themselves. They’ve got an incredible opinion of themselves, how SMART they are. You’ll find this with serial killers, etc, who think they are so clever and they’re always quiet. Once they get caught though, they want the reporters in so they can boast of how clever they were. This is a standard thing. Well, here is another way of showing the same thing. There are many ways to do it. This article is from the Telegraph. It says….
Revealed: the racy novel (A: It’s actually a pornographic novel.) written by the world’s most powerful climate scientist
(A: See how he’s into ‘other’ things as well. You can imagine how he spends his spare time, by the way.)
The chair of the UN’s panel on climate change Dr Rajendra Pachauri has taken a break from writing academic papers on global warming to pen a racy romantic novel.
(A: They call it ‘romantic’… being very kind.)
By Robert Mendick and Amrit Dhillon in Delhi / 30 Jan 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
As the UN’s climate change chief, Dr Rajendra Pachauri has spent his career writing only the driest of academic articles. (A: Well actually his staff all do that for him.) But the latest offering from the chairman of the UN’s climate change panel is an altogether racier tome.
Some might even suggest Dr Pachauri’s first novel is frankly smutty. (A: I’d go a lot further than that.)
Return to Almora, published in Dr Pachauri’s native India earlier this month, tells the story of Sanjay Nath, (A: A fictional character, that’s Pachauri’s alter ego, right.) an academic in his 60s reminiscing on his “spiritual journey” through India, Peru and the US. (A: I should actually say, this is the standard form that’s written for travel. Actually, I’ve seen this on some gay travel site. Someone sent me one on a very prominent person who does the travel sites for the major TV companies but he’s also got a gay site on the side. It tells you where all the best fun is for guys and so on. There’s actually a method to the way this guy is writing; I can tell just by that.)
Return to Almora, published in Dr Pachauri’s native India earlier this month, tells the story of Sanjay Nath, an academic in his 60s reminiscing on his “spiritual journey” through India, Peru and the US. On the way he encounters, among others, Shirley MacLaine, (A: Remember, the reincarnation and “I am God” stuff?) the actress, who appears as a character in the book. While relations between Sanjay and MacLaine remain platonic, he enjoys sex – a lot of sex – with a lot of women.
In breathless prose that risks making Dr Pachauri, who will be 70 this year, a laughing stock among the serious, high-minded scientists and world leaders with whom he mixes, he details sexual encounter after sexual encounter.
The book, which makes reference to the Kama Sutra, starts promisingly enough as it tells the story of a climate expert with a lament for the denuded mountain slopes of Nainital, in northern India, where deforestation by the timber mafia and politicians has “endangered the fragile ecosystem”. (A: That’s probably a timber-for-food plan there.)
But talk of “denuding” is a clue of what is to come.
By page 16, Sanjay is ready for his first liaison with May in a hotel room in Nainital. “She then led him into the bedroom,” writes Dr Pachauri.
“She removed her gown, slipped off her nightie and slid under the quilt on his bed… Sanjay put his arms around her and kissed her, first with quick caresses and then the kisses becoming longer and more passionate. (A: The probably gave off a lot of CO2 there in the process as well, I would imagine.)
“May slipped his clothes off one by one, removing her lips from his for no more than a second or two.
“Afterwards she held him close. ‘Sandy, I’ve learned something for the first time today. You are absolutely superb after meditation. Why don’t we make love every time immediately after you have meditated?’.” (A: So there is meditation and ecology wrapped in with a lot of sexual promiscuity.)
More follows, including Sanjay and friends queuing to have sexual encounters with Sajni, (A: So prostitutes as well, it’s okay.) an impoverished but willing local: “Sanjay saw a shapely dark-skinned girl lying on Vinay’s bed. He was overcome by a lust that he had never known before … He removed his clothes and began to feel Sajni’s body, caressing her voluptuous breasts.” (A: Ahrgh.)
Sadly for Sanjay, writes Dr Pachauri, “the excitement got the better of him, before he could even get started”.
While teaching meditation to women in the US, Sanjay can once more barely contain his ardour. (A: Because of course, they all think they are rather easy in the US. That’s a common thing.) Again, breasts – usually heaving or else voluptuous – are thrust to the fore.
“He enjoyed the sensation of gently pushing Susan’s shoulders back a few inches, an action that served to lift her breasts even higher,” writes Dr Pachauri. (A: blah, blah, blah.)
This is the HEAD… I can go on and on and on. He’s even got GROUP sex in here too and orgies… and sado-masochistic sex. This is the guy that’s the LIAR that’s at the head of the IPCC who’s lied over and over and over showing his psychopathic traits right in front of the world! Right in front of the world. This is a PEACE PRIZE winner. You wouldn’t let your… I won’t let my dog near him. I’m not kidding you. Never mind a daughter. This guy is DANGEROUS. You don’t have to be a top specialist to notice this guy is absolutely a SICKO. What can you say? This is the guy that’s in charge of the IPCC that are churning out all this FAKERY, who have been caught with lying after lying after lying about things. These are the psychopaths that help run all the con games that we’ve all to obey and get taxed on. What do you think of that?
Here’s another article on Pachauri from the Mail Online.
Controversial climate change boss uses car AND driver to travel one mile to office… (but he says YOU should use public transport)
By Simon Parry / 31st January 2010 / The Mail Online
He is the climate change chief whose research body produced a report warning that the glaciers in the Himalayas might melt by 2035 (A: That’s because Pachauri and all his boys are having sex on them, I think.) and earned a Nobel Prize for his work – so you might expect Dr Rajendra Pachauri to be doing everything he can to reduce his own carbon footprint.
But as controversy continued to simmer last week over the bogus ‘Glaciergate’ claims in a report by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – which he heads – Dr Pachauri showed no apparent inclination to cut global warming in his own back yard.
On Friday, for the one-mile journey from home to his Delhi office, Dr Pachauri could have walked, or cycled, or used the eco-friendly electric car provided for him, known in the UK as G-Wiz. (A: G-Wiz….)
But instead, he had his personal chauffeur collect him from his £4.5million home (A: Which by the way, he got because he had his own private company in eco that gets all this grant money thrown at him.)– in a 1.8-litre Toyota Corolla.
Hours later, the chauffeur picked up Dr Pachauri from the office of the environmental charity where he is director-general (A: A charity….)– The Energy and Resources Institute – blatantly ignoring the institute’s own literature, which gives visitors tips on how to reduce pollution by using buses. (A: These guys make you utterly SICK!)
You know, it’s the same as the Soviet system, this WORLD Soviet system. Remember what the Reece Commission said, they’d blend the Soviet system with that of the West, and they’ve done it basically. Where, in the Soviet system you’d need passes to go everywhere, even outside your own local area. Only the wealthy elite for years and years could have the cars, the chauffeur driven cars. Everybody else had to walk it, the shank’s pony, or take a bicycle or something. And only gradually, after 10 years on the waiting list, you might get one of these rotten cars that kept breaking down. That’s also the reason too by the way, that they are making it harder and harder and more of a hassle to get on board a flight because the head of British aviation that works for the British government, the Minister, or politician appointed to oversee it said, we are DELIBERATELY DISCOURAGING AIR TRAVEL because of pollution. So in the future it will be just like the old Soviet was. There will be officials and bureaucrats and VIPs ONLY and they won’t have any checks to go through. THAT’S what’s coming down the pike. There is always another reason remember, and always, there’s a good reason for the public and then there is the REAL reason. Quite something.
You can go on and on with these psychos. I mean, you could do show after show on them where you get into their personal cons and scams and how they channel and funnel the money into their own coffers… and just give the finger to the whole planet. That’s the psychopath for ya.
Airport scanners, part of the plan to put you all off travel all together in this brave new world where we’ll all be living in our regions, right down to our local area and THAT’S where you’ll have to stay.
Airport scanners go live today, kids included
The peeping Tom you can’t refuse
By John Oates / 1st February 2010 / theregister.co.uk
Body scanners went into operation at Heathrow and Manchester airports this morning. People chosen by security staff will not be allowed onto flights without going through the machine from now on.
(A: This guy… I can’t believe the names they give these characters…) Lord Adonis (A: Lord Adonis? Ah…) said he expected more machines to go live later this month, with further examples to be introduced at Birmingham airport soon.
Anyone selected for the scanners must go through the machine – there is no option to choose a pat-down search instead. (A: So they lied again, right. It will keep the schmucks happy, tell them they’ll get a pat down until we’ve got them up and then we’ll just make them go through it.) Children can also be selected for scanning – despite early concerns that taking such images could breach child pornography laws. A spokesman for the Department of Transport said this was a proportional response on national security grounds. (A: They can do anything to you, ANYTHING, on the grounds of national security. But it’s true; this is going to be a great boon for child pornography. I’m sure Dr. Pachauri and all that kind of ilk will just love it.)
A spokeswoman at Heathrow confirmed the machines had gone live, but said it was too early to gauge passenger response.
The government has issued an interim code of practice which requires airport operators to put in place a privacy policy (A: Ha!) to protect passengers. (A: That’s the music folks. I’ll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. There is someone from New York. Are you there?
Deon: Hi Alan.
Alan: Who is it?
Deon: Deon.
Alan: How are you doing?
Deon: I’m alright. You know what; I can’t really say that and mean it. You know what I mean?
Alan: I know. [Laughing]
Deon: I wanted to mention that this Sunday was the 52nd Grammy Awards. They had some performances there that were just in-your-face indoctrination. First one was like the biggest act right now called Lady Gaga.
Alan: Oh, yeah, okay. I’ve got some stuff on her.
Deon: She played with SIR Elton John. She has a lot of subliminals in her songs.
Alan: Oh, I’ve got a whole list of stuff. You’re right. They’ve taken her in almost nude into Masonic temples and stuff like that.
Deon: The second was Beyonce Knowles. She sings a song called Upgrade You. But on this performance she sings ‘If I was a Boy.’ And all the while she is surrounded by these SWAT team, storm trooper dancers. It’s crazy.
Alan: Really?
Deon: Yeah, you’ve got to see it. Third, which is I think the worst is Black Eyed Peas. They do this song called ‘I’m a Be’, which is like a short, dumbed down way of saying ‘I’m gonna be.’ And they are just repeating the whole time, I’m a be, I’m a be, I’m a be.
Alan: I’m a bee.
Deon: You understand?
Alan: Sure.
Deon: Where I’m going with this… Maybe you could tell your new listeners what the whole bee thing is and with the Masons, what that’s all about and a great line and that is “I’m a be, the upgraded new Negro.”
Alan: Really!
Deon: Yeah. And at the end he yells out “Welcome to the future.” So if anyone missed that you can see all the performances online. It’s really… you’ve got to laugh at it, it’s so crazy.
Alan: What night was that on?
Deon: This was on Sunday.
Alan: On Sunday. I’ll get someone to look into that for me.
Deon: Everything was just Masonic, futuristic. Oh, and the Black Eyed Peas, their album cover is this green digital man.
Alan: Oh, green digital man, interesting that, because even that’s Masonic. They call every Mason a green man, a man of nature.
Deon: I was wondering Alan, are you working on any new books?
Alan: I am to be honest with you, but the problem is I’ve got so much on the go too, so it takes a little while to do. You’d be surprised at the work I do EVERY day from morning till night, including weekends. Just getting through THIS stuff here and answering the emails etc. that I have to answer, and doing write-ups for other articles as well. So it’s just… I hope to get something out soon, but things are moving too fast, there’s so much.
Deon: I’d like to recommend your books to the audience. I bought them. I was really surprised, especially the Cutting Through series. You read it and I was like a little confused the whole way but at the end of it, it comes together and it’s really rewarding and it’s really cool. I’ve got to recommend it to your listeners.
Alan: It’s a form of DE-indoctrination. We think linearly. We are taught linearly. I try and burst through that and make your mind start to work for itself and think for itself.
Deon: Yeah. It was really weird. It was like the weirdest books in a good way, like different. It wasn’t like a book I’ve read and I was really glad to get it. So thanks Alan and I’ll let you go.
Alan: Well, thanks for calling.
Deon: Alright, see ya.
Alan: Bye now.
I tell you, it’s right in front of you. They’ve even got an article out now. It was about Hollywood. They have their own Grammies and Emmys and Oscars now for the PORNO INDUSTRY as well. I didn’t know that. Where else but Hollywood, eh? …the above scene as always and the below scene; the overworld, the underworld. These guys run both sides of it.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 3rd 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page, bookmark all the other sites I have listed there for future use. You’ll need them once in a while when the big sites go down. These are the official sites: [listed above]. I always say this is the tin can moment. I should actually get a tin can and put a couple of cents in it and rattle it here to remind you that you are the audience who bring me to you. I don’t get paid by anybody else to promote anything. That’s how most shows get their cash. They bring on guests and so on who, really, are there to sell you something at the end of the show. So it’s up to you to keep me going. This way too, I’m unfettered in a sense; I can say a lot more about different topics that could be kind of iffy at times. So if you could keep me going that’s great. You can find out how to do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or donating to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those that get the disks burned and passed to them, they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
Synchronicities are something that’s interested me my whole life. I used to wonder if things just popped up across the world with the same topics at the same time. By chance? Or does the media get bored with the same old stories and they all get together and put things out there? Sometimes that will happen and sometimes it isn’t just boredom; sometimes it’s collusion when big agendas are being pushed like global warming and what’s supposed to be done about it. That kind of thing happens but once in a while you find out that synchronicities certainly do occur even in your own personal life. Things will pop up. If you are thinking about a particular subject, you might just get an email that day that mentions that particular topic. It might be the first time in a whole year you’ve heard anybody else mention it, that kind of stuff. You’ll find these things in media, these kinds of ‘trends’ they call them, and I was thinking of the medical system. The medical system brought me on to other things. I’ll be back with more after this break on this topic.
HI folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about the synchronicities that pop up once in a while. Before I get on to the topics, it reminds me of an old, it was a very elderly guy in Mexico, one of the oldest people supposedly to be known in existence, who killed himself a few years back. He committed suicide. He did leave a note and it was in the papers at the time. He said basically he was just bored. He was bored at watching life go around and around with the same things happening all the time. With politicians and how they pander to the public to get in, do all these odd things which they never talked about when they were running for elections and how they always talked about how GREAT they were at serving the public. And it’s all lies basically. All he had to look forward to was more of the same old nonsense basically. That was it. In other words, nothing much changed in this guy’s life. The lies were the same and the routines were the same.
That’s what we get in organized systems that we live in. We call them civilization. We get organizations where people join them, whether it’s the military, the police, or even governments, or a political party. These are all institutions where technically you lose your identity. You BELONG to the party. You give up the self when you go in. Then you are indoctrinated into THAT particular system and you will stand up to DEFEND that system, against all odds. It doesn’t matter if it’s police, military or politics. That’s basically the nature of organizations.
There’s been so much going on about health care. This is the synchronicity. It pops up in Canada at the same time as they are talking about bringing in a system in the US, for the people. It all sounds wonderful. It all sounds wonderful, what they promise to give you but you never get that. You never GET what’s promised because when politics runs a system it comes down to economics. Remember, political parties have agendas. You can’t couple population reduction as part of an agenda with helping the people to be well and fit; it doesn’t equate. There is something missing here. It doesn’t work out quite right. On the other hand I quite understand the GREED… the MASSIVE, INCREDIBLE greed within medical systems, even the ones that work for the Canadian government and the pharma companies. Their INCREDIBLE greed is… They know that people will sell their homes, they’ll mortgage their grandparent’s homes, everybody will chip in to save little Tommy that’s dying of this or that and they will try and save him.
People do the same thing with their pets in cities. One of the most lucrative businesses to be in today is small veterinary practice that’s for small animals in major cities. People will literally spend everything they have to save the dog or the cat and that’s quite natural too. So wherever there’s this bonding here, and a form of blackmail, it’s going to be used by unscrupulous people. Professions, really, really, these kind of professions, they ARE unscrupulous. When greed becomes the prime motive, then all humanity goes out the window… and all decency goes out the window… and the wealthiest survive.
While they are talking about bringing in a system in the US, and I’ve seen the study done by the RAND Corporation on behalf of the US government. RAND was asked to do an investigation into ways of cutting costs to bring in a system. What RAND did basically was look at the British system that’s been through YEARS of this setting the system up, having it run efficiently, and then start cutting the branches from it as it went along, until it’s running on bare bones at times. They basically said here is what we can do to cut out all the extra costs. Now, people in the US right now are not refused treatment. That’s a misconception by a lot of people in other countries. The taxpayer will pick up the tab but they will get treatments that they could never get if they were in a medical, Medicare system like Canada. You get the bare bones minimum.
There is a policy in Canada and Britain for instance, to just keep prescribing pills to patients, for the rest of their lives, even though it might be shortening their lives, if need be, because it cuts costs. PATIENTS pay for the pills, and a surgical operation that might solve their problem all together costs money. That’s how they get around this kind of stuff. It’s all cutting costs. You wouldn’t be in the hospital getting good treatment once that system comes in if you are at the bottom of the totem pole amongst the rest of the general population; you don’t get that kind of treatment.
I’ve experienced this in Canada myself. Where I am in Canada you cannot get a doctor up here at all. It’s called a city, just north of me here, but you can’t get on a waiting list for a doctor. You can be on it for 10-15 years and still not get on the waiting list. They have walk-in clinics where you get this 4-inch-high number and you sit like a cow basically, until they call your number. It might take 4 hours or something, 5 hours, sometimes 6 just to see a doctor and even then they don’t want you to sit down. I’m not kidding. They are standing with a prescription in their hand when you walk in the door and they want to just give you something to get you out the door again, as fast as can be. ‘The flying doctors,’ that’s what they’re called, because they have so many patients coming and the government has cut back so heavily they can’t even get doctors to stay up in that city. That’s the great health system. Because of that people who can afford it, the few who can afford it, go to the States right now to get operations done. Or they could be waiting here for years and they will die on the waiting list. THAT’S the reality, folks. That’s reality. Here is an article about Canadian politicians who don’t wait in the queue.
Canadian Politicians Without a Queue
ThePatientFactor.com / February 3, 2010
When you think about our universal health care system do you ever wonder about the fairness of waiting lists, otherwise known as queues? Our politicians claim queues provide Canadians with equal access (Alan: We’re very EQUAL up here.) to health care. Do they really?
Remember the recent outcry when hockey players and their families jumped the queue for the H1N1 flu vaccine? I don’t understand why that caused such a stir because athletes, like politicians, always receive preferential treatment. Do you honestly think that any of them wait months on a list for an MRI or surgery? (A: Do you? Do you really believe they wait months like you do?)
How can you be considered a queue-jumper if you are never really in the queue to begin with? In 2007 former Prime Minister Jean Chretien discussed his medical symptoms while playing a round of golf with a Cardiologist. He received testing the next day that revealed arterial blockage. Media reported that a cardiologist then requested emergency quadruple heart bypass surgery for the following day. This swift access to testing and surgery helped prevent heart damage from occurring. The Montreal Heart Institute denies that Chretien received any special treatment indicating that all of their patients receive the same standard of care. Oh, really? How many other patients are able to schedule their emergency surgery? On December 11, 2007 Chretien appeared on the CBC television show The Hour with George Stroumboulopoulos.
In the first two minutes of the interview we learn that after receiving the results of his tests Chretien was told that he would need surgery at some point in the future. His response was that he’d like to have it right away and they agreed to perform it the next morning. When asked why he didn’t have to wait on a list like everybody else he attributes it to luck. (A: He was a good liar. I mean, he lied all the time, Old Jean.) The truth is that luck has very little to do with it.
While on the campaign trail in 2006, the media reported that New Democratic Party (NDP) (A: That’s the party that’s a bit further left than Marx. It’s called the National Democratic Party in Canada.) leader Jack Layton received a hernia operation in the 1990’s at the Shouldice hospital, a private facility in Toronto. (A: Very expensive.) An interesting choice for such a fierce defender of the public health care system. Then again, if labour unions helped found your political party then I suppose you are beholden to them politically not personally.
The truth is that universal health care and its queues do not provide each of us with equal access when it comes to caring for our health. In a 2005 judgment, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that “Access to a waiting list is not access to care”. (A: Oh yeah. You can have access to a waiting list but not care, you understand?) The shameful part is that politicians continue to shape our health policy and promote a public health care system whose shortcomings they will never experience.
And that’s a fact. They don’t experience it themselves. This came to light because we’ve got this article here too form the Globe and Mail.
Newfoundland Premier travels to U.S. for heart surgery
By SARAH BOESVELD AND ROY MACGREGOR / February 2, 2010 / Globe and Mail
(A: Newfoundland is a big province in Canada. This is basically about the Premier, which is like a Governor in the States, for this HUGE province.)
The heart and soul of Newfoundland politics is in for repair – and it’s not in his home province or even in Canada, for that matter.
Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams is scheduled for heart surgery in the United States, a move that throws into question his province’s and his nation’s health-care system.
A source confirmed to The Globe and Mail late yesterday that Mr. Williams has left St. John’s for an undisclosed destination in the U.S. to have heart surgery later in the week.
The 59-year-old Conservative left yesterday morning, spokesperson Elizabeth Matthews said, without disclosing his location. While some of his critics were tight-lipped last night, the online public questioned his exodus – why the care he needed was not available in Canada, or whether he preferred treatment in the U.S. (A: You understand, this is the reality of universal health care. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the health care systems and how they always claim that it’s all equal and fair and so on and just. The reality is always very, very, very different because politics has different agendas and they are always cutting costs in different areas for wars and things like that, or to bail out banks and their friends. They have nothing left for the people, except on paper perhaps. Here is the Premier, that’s like the Governor, of a big province in Canada. He’s another one actually. He’s not the first to go down to the States for medical treatment. It says…
The 59-year-old Conservative left yesterday morning, spokesperson Elizabeth Matthews said, without disclosing his location. While some of his critics were tight-lipped last night, the online public questioned his exodus – why the care he needed was not available in Canada, or whether he preferred treatment in the U.S.
The severity of Mr. Williams’ condition is not publicly known, however he was reportedly not overly concerned about his health, as he told close friends his greatest regret was the possibility of missing his Tuesday night hockey outings. (A: Well, I guess it’s very severe to have hockey on his mind.)
The remaining details are expected to be revealed at a news conference today by Deputy Premier Kathy Dunderdale.
At risk is the already tarnished image of the province’s health-care system, which has suffered in recent years. (A: It’s been across the board in the whole of Canada.)
Then too, we find in this other newspaper the same kind of thing. (Remember, I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the night.) This article says…
N.L. premier’s U.S. heart surgery sparks health-care debate
By Mike De Souza and Sharon Kirkey, Canwest News Service February 2, 2010
Supporters and critics of Canada’s health-care system have found themselves in a new debate sparked by the decision of a provincial premier to seek heart surgery in the United States.
The Newfoundland government said Tuesday that Premier Danny Williams would be absent for a few weeks after his doctors recommended (A: So his doctors recommended…) he travel to the U.S. for a heart procedure.
“Think about the absurdity about Canadians spending their income on medical treatment outside the country because it’s not provided here at home,” said Brett Skinner, president of the Fraser Institute, the Vancouver-based free-market think-tank. (A: Then it goes on and on and on.)
The point of all of this is once you are into a system, when you swear into a system – police and military especially and governmental parties – you close ranks. Your first job is to protect the system, the organization that you belong to and you never tell the public the truth, even though the evidence is self-evident where ever you look. As I say, where I am you can’t get. You just can’t get a GP. You can’t do it and what you do get are walk-in clinics where there’s going to be 100, 200 folks going through in a day and one doctor there who’ll dash between 4 and 5 rooms. They don’t want you to sit down because they don’t want you to stay. They don’t have your records there either so they don’t know who you are. You’ll see a different one each time. All they want to do is to give you something to keep you happy and get you out the door, literally. That’s what you get under this health care. A lot of folk, I’m telling you, a lot of folk must simply die in ignorance never knowing that they’ve been neglected and that they were not given the best care of treatment. And the waiting lists are incredible. Often people do die before they can get operations and so on done. It’s disgusting.
What they’ll do when they give you a health care system is make sure that the special, big cities have at least a better health care system because that’s under Agenda 21 as well. They want all the main Super Cities to have at least something to deal with emergencies, especially car emergencies. That’s a show by the way, where 10 of them will be on staff and in they rush and do all the stuff that you see on TV because people think of injuries and hospitals and what might happen to themselves. But for ordinary straight through operations, you just can’t get them. The waiting lists last for years sometimes. That’s the reality of it… and that’s what’s coming to the States. And yet, here are the politicians from Canada – not just recently or just this one, it’s been happening over the years – going to the States for the better treatment and getting it very quickly, thorough treatment.
So there you are. Can you really have governments and politics running health care systems? Can you really? Their whole job is cutbacks, cutbacks and cutbacks. The cutbacks in Britain are so incredible. I mean literally too and there are reports coming out there where it’s so bad now that you’ve got ambulance guys and paramedics going out there and putting patients on stretchers where there is feces from a previous patient, and blood on them as well. Cutbacks, cutbacks, cutbacks. This article here is from the BBC.
London NHS ‘heads towards crisis’, says doctors
Bbc.co.uk / 20 January 2010
(A: Now as I said, they make sure that the better, standard – not the best – the better standard they are going to give you is in the big cities but even now they are slashing them. Who are they going to pay, the bankers or the hospitals? Hmm? The war guys or the hospitals?)
London hospitals “could close as healthcare in the capital heads towards a major financial crisis”, the British Medical Association (BMA) has said.
As much as £5bn could be cut from NHS London’s budget by 2017, it claimed.
The BMA’s report, London’s NHS On The Brink, predicts that from 2011 there will be a freeze on NHS budgets, with the worst cuts falling in London. (A: I’ll be back with more on this article after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the so-called Universal Health Care systems versus the private ones. As I say, I really don’t have much regard for medicine at all to be honest with you. I think it’s such a greedy industry because pharma really runs it all now. The price that they charge people who are going to die or whatever for pills that might extend their lives a little bit are phenomenal. You know, certain pills cost maybe $1,000-$2,000 each – no kidding – that are not given, certainly, on the national health service systems because of the expense.
The GREED in pharma is so incredible. There is nothing wrong with basically the health care system people, per se. It’s when government gets involved in it that it goes down the tubes. They can only run according to the budget they are given and governments will always slash back on budgets. In Britain the hospitals were told to increase the number of bed space because – at the time I think it was Blair – said it should be so, just to keep the people happy. They took all the wheels off the trolleys IN the corridors and called them beds now that they were stationary, right. They were not movable, they were beds… and that’s how they got around that. Little wangles to keep the bureaucrats happy, to keep the Parliaments happy. You can’t do that when you are dealing with people and lives and all the rest of it. You can certainly get fast treatment and no waiting list really, for tubal ligations and vasectomies, things for depopulation, abortions, but when it comes to regular, because again, you’ve got politics involved then in the medical system. You can’t have the two combined. And you always get it with national, government run health care systems.
I’m talking about London here now with the cutbacks. This is just one city. It says…
But an NHS spokesman (A: This is the one who will lie to the public.) said: “To give people leading expert care we also need to centralise some services.” (A: So here is the remedy for the cutbacks.)
The BMA’s report, written by health expert Dr John Lister, criticises some of the proposals that NHS London has made public, including:
-Cutting the number of people going to hospital A&E departments by a target of 60% (A: So I guess they’re just going to turn them away. This is how they’re going to solve the problem right.) and the number going to hospital outpatients by 55%. (A: That’s a great way of solving the problem.)
-Diverting millions of patients to “unproven polysystems” or clinics that have not yet been built
-Cutting up to £1.1bn from London hospital budgets “forcing wide scale cutbacks and closures”
-A 66% reduction in staffing of “non-acute services”, including community services for older people and district nurses
-A 33% cut in the length of GP appointment times
The report surveyed board papers and other published material from primary care trusts (PCTs) in London.
NHS London spokeswoman Anne Rainsberry defends proposed changes. (A: So she’s the spokesperson. As I say, when you join a party, an organization, it’s very uniform. You submerge your identity in it and you become a liar. That’s just the way of organizations and humans. So she DEFENDS the proposed changes, which is basically slashing everything by over half.)
An NHS London spokesman said: “To give Londoners a better standard of NHS care we need to provide more of the services people use the most, closer to where people live. (A: That’s Agenda 21. Get them all out [of the country and suburbs], get them crammed in the center of the big cities and that will be centralization. That is exactly what they are doing with Agenda 21.)
“To give people leading expert care we also need to centralise some services to create, for example, dedicated stroke and trauma units,” he added.
“This will save hundreds of lives every year.” (A: So in other words, what they are telling you here by halving everything, LESS IS BETTER, right, and ‘choco rations are up’, as George Orwell would have said in 1984.)
That’s what happens when governments run the system. Now, the governments have no problems from putting trillions of pounds into all these banks across the planet, which have just ripped of the general public. No problem, done so swiftly too, isn’t it? So swiftly. But you watch the systems for health care crumbing; crumbling and crumbling for years and slashing them and that’s it folks. That tells you who is important in this system. Believe you me, the bankers won’t have to wait in any queue for treatment either. Ah, pretty disgusting eh? It’s pretty disgusting.
Here is an article. It’s an oddball one that someone sent me. It’s the United States Attorney’s Office from Massachusetts. There’s a point to this particular article.
SPRINGFIELD ANESTHESIOLOGIST CHARGED WITH FALSIFYING MEDICAL RESEARCH
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JANUARY 14, 2010 – USDOJ.GOV/USAO/MA – CHRISTINA DiIORIO-STERLING
BOSTON, MA – The former chief of acute pain at Bay State Hospital in Springfield, Massachusetts (A: This is part of a CHAIN of hospitals you get in the private sector too, chains of them.) was charged today in federal court with falsifying medical research studies, including studies that were published in medical journals regarding pain management.
United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz; Mark Dragonetti, Special Agent in Charge of the Food & Drug Administration – Office of Criminal Investigations; Susan J. Waddell, Special Agent in Charge of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; and Warren T. Bamford, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation – Boston Field Division, announced today that SCOTT REUBEN was charged in an Information with one count of health care fraud.
The Information alleges that REUBEN solicited and obtained research grants from pharmaceutical companies to perform research studies on pain management, (A: Big business, BIG, BIG business for people with various cancers, MASSIVE. You have pharma competing to get the business in the chains by even giving little freebies for a few weeks and stuff like that.) often associated with various surgical procedures, but that he did not actually perform the research studies. (A: The guy that solicited the research grants, he didn’t do the studies himself.) Instead he made up patient data, (A: He created it out of thin air. Made up the patient data…) submitted it to medical journals and caused false articles to appear in a number of medical journals.
If convicted on this charge, REUBEN faces up to 10 years imprisonment, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine.
The case was investigated by the Food & Drug Administration – Office of Criminal Investigations, Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
As I say, where he was working was the Bay State Hospital that deals with really chronic care and chronic pain and it’s part of a chain. So the guy was really taking the kickbacks and so on from pharma and putting out very good write-ups to medical journals on BEHALF of the particular medications that these pharmas, that approached him, were selling. That’s how corrupt the system is. Everything is corrupt. I’ve got lots and lots more on these particular kinds of cases in the US and elsewhere. They will often give freebies. For instance, they will go to the National Health Service and they might give you 10 weeks of a free pain management pill for so many hundred patients if you will take them on for a 5 year plan. Stuff like that. The really high marketing, very high powered marketing strategies to sell their drugs. They are very expensive drugs. Maybe not the BEST drugs, but they will give the best deal to the health services for the cost, especially when the government is running it, but never the best that’s available. THAT’S the reality of it too.
It does make you wonder, as I say. It really does make you wonder about the system in which we live in, doesn’t it? This again, is synchronicity. Health care, aging and all the rest of it, it’s all over the place right now. This is called…
Inconvenient truth on ageing
Bernard Salt / From: The Australian / February 4, 2010
WAYNE Swan clearly missed a great opportunity earlier this week with the release of the third Intergenerational Report. He referred to the report by the bureaucratic abbreviation 3IGR4, but if the Treasurer really wanted to appear “with it” he should have christened it the iGen 3.0 Report.
The Intergenerational Report is, of course, the government’s key reference document canvassing policy options for managing the ageing of Australia’s population (A: Every country is at this right now, by the way.)– the problem being that from 2011 onwards (A: This is the projection for the rest of the world too.) more baby boomers exit than Generation Ys enter the workforce. (A: It’s to do with money, by the way, not how sick you are.)
The issue is not just the number of baby boomers looking for an aged pension; it’s the loss of this cohort’s contribution to the tax base. (A: So in other words, they retire, they are not producing. Remember, the definition at the United Nations of a good global citizen is a good producer AND consumer. When you retire you’re a consumer. You’re not a good citizen anymore. They would rather have you go through an exit home.)
The favoured solution so far to managing this matter has been to grow the worker base, and in this regard Kevin Rudd was emphatic on the ABC’s 7.30 Report last October when he stated he believed in a bigger Australia, and further that he made no apology for that view. (A: Meaning, bringing more people in to it.) The Prime Minister’s comments have sparked furious debate about the sustainability and advisability of future growth.
(A: Then it goes down about all the other options that are available and what can they do.) Faced with two alternatives — strong population growth or productivity gains — the astute political preference will be for the productivity option.
Strong population growth demands costly investment in hard (and often property) infrastructure. It also ignites impassioned concern from environmental lobbyists. (A: Who don’t want so many folk on the planet. Not that we should be listening to them in the first place. They’re a bunch of nutters.) On the other hand, who is going to argue with a policy of better education and improved access to technology?
But this raises the question of what is the range of policy options to deal with the ageing of the population. (A: Then they go through what the governments consider on how to manage aging population. Again, it’s all to do with finances.)
Here’s how we could manage the ageing population.
1. Raise the retirement age. It has already been lifted from 65 to 67. However, by the time many baby boomers actually get to 67, I suspect “retirement age” will have been pushed out to 70. In fact, with any luck most boomers will drop dead just short of the line. (A: In other words, you pay all this money IN to it all your life and you’ll die before you can get a penny back. That’s what GOVERNMENT honestly, really wants. They have other things to do with that cash than dish it out to you every month. That’s the reality of the world we live in, for the very naïve out there.)
There are some callers on the line so I’ll take John from Connecticut if he is still there. Are you there John?
John: Good evening. I’m going to be a little bit off topic regarding what you are talking about, although I’ll heard when you mentioned about knocking us all off before we get to retirement. The chemtrail spraying is probably one of their most favored tactics in that department.
Alan: Yes. It does because the elderly and the young too by the way, are getting bronchial infections that they cannot get rid of. They keep persisting and coming back.
John: That’s right. Now, tonight a lady sent me something from ABC News Channel 7. It’s actually 2 minutes and 9 seconds long. I could play it but what it’s about is the computer brain interfacing technology. Basically, they are using it now for, like they put the head set on somebody, like kids games. It’s using your mind only. You are able to alter the stuff that’s on the screen. I had heard somebody speak about this before. I’m just wondering what you know about it. I know they will eventually, supposedly use not just headsets externally but implanted chips. The military may already be very advanced in this. I just wondered if you could speak on that and I’ll listen off the air.
Alan: Okay. You are absolutely right. DARPA published an article. It’s in my archives section from last year I think it was, where DARPA claimed that they had implanted a brain chip in a quadriplegic. Now, DARPA is for the military; it’s got nothing to do with civilians and helping paraplegics. Apparently this young man could then email by thoughts, email his friends via computer hookup. But this is nothing new. Sweden was leading the world in this experimentation since the 1970s using prisoners in prison with direct hookups to computers. In Canada you had Mr. Persinger; he’s a professor of Laurentian University in neuro-science. He’s got an interesting history, this man, because he worked and he had contracts with the Pentagon AND the CIA in the 70s working on various weaponry to do with immobilizing people by firing different pulse waves into the brain of crowds and so on, that could immobilize them. He also worked with the Koren Helmet. The Koren Helmet, it’s been here for maybe 25, maybe even 30 years. He could put this on his students and with using electromagnetic pulse and electrical radiation they could stimulate ANY part of the brain, to experience whatever you would normally experience when that part would light up. They can cause it to light up and you will have the experience. It’s the reverse order but it works the same way.
Persinger and others worked in high-level teams with other professors on these very projects. The end result definitely is to implant chips into the brain, again, for the peaceful obedient type society of pretty well the near future. They had the brain so well mapped out; it’s rather staggering what they know about it. You have to go into the fields of neuro-linguistics, neuro-science, psycho-linguistics; language is very important. Psycho-linguistics is VERY important in how we understand and it also deals with the parts of the brain that come into interface with each other. But remember, each time you have a thought clusters of brain cells are activated in unison and they give off electromagnetic fields which can be picked up remotely. If you do it in reverse order, you will actually make a person think of something, even visually, that kind of thing. There is more than one language, not just written or vocal. There’s also the visual.
It’s a fantastic field but they are SO far ahead of it. The chip actually – I’m pretty certain – is ready. If they can implant one to a quadriplegic that can make him communicate to people, they can pretty well do it with anything. Remember too, this will be interfaced with regional or local computers. You will not design the programs for the computer, someone else will, which means that technically someone else is now in charge of your brain. I hope everyone understands that and NEVER FORGETS IT. What a power tool. What a power trip that will be if this is ever put across the world on any large scale at all. Because if people think the big boys are going to do this for YOU and give you great experiences and leave it at that, you really don’t understand your history or you don’t understand power and humanity at all. You’ve got an awful shock. I’ve actually had young people say to me, well, the brain chip won’t be bad; we can go into the matrix system and fight it from within. The whole point of the matrix movie is, you did not create the program. Everything that you could do is anticipated. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ll go to Kevin in Ontario. Are you there Kevin?
Kevin: I’m not all there but I’m still here.
Alan: That’s good enough.
Kevin: I wanted to call in; it’s been in the news all day I’m sure. Every truth radio show has talked about it and that was the passing of the great Eustace Mullins. You know it’s sad to see him go and ones like him will be missed but at least we can take comfort in knowing that truth seekers like you and others are still out there at least trying to fight the good fight and trying to get people to wake up to what’s going on here.
Alan: Yes. Plus he left a lot of books behind him as well, which will be around for a long time.
Kevin: Absolutely. I’m sure, since you live only about a hour and 15 minutes away from where I’m at, about a week and a half ago you saw all those planes spraying the skies like crazy over here. They were checker boarding the skies here.
Alan: Yes. Oh, I know. I know. Sometimes it’s so bad that some of the stuff comes down, when it’s very cold, in clumps and lands on the trees.
Kevin: I’ve seen it and I pointed it out to some people. Some people saw it for what it was and then just become apathetic and say, what do you want me to do about it. They still believe they were just contrails. It’s like, are you ….? It’s pathetic. A lot of people know what’s going on but again, the problem I’ve always been facing around here, especially North Bay, is APATHY. A lot of people know the new world order. They know the push for world government at the hands of the Masons and the hand of the golden elite, their scientists or whatever. But they say, what do you want me to do about it?
Alan: Well that’s it. That’s their easiest way out. Again, that’s a very interesting out that they give themselves. It’s very, very common. You have to go into psychology. It is well explained as to how people give themselves that option and the out so that they don’t have to be responsible for doing anything – it’s phenomenal – even though it’s all around them.
Kevin: I think one of the best solutions to fight this new world order system… I think Max Egan’s idea of non-compliance on a mass scale, if it’s even possible to be done, is probably one of the best ways to do it. Also, if you can get involved with local groups that are trying to not only to protest and to bring awareness to these political atrocities but also to have a group that can fend for themselves and grow their own food and to have a small community of truthers, like the We Are Change group that are popping up everywhere. We have one here in North Bay, you are invited to join us anytime you like Alan.
Alan: I appreciate that. It’s true. This is what people need, they’ve got to really start to have non-compliance because it’s a passive way to do it. It’s not aggressive. If you get aggressive, they love that because they turn the force on you, I mean pure force, and then you look bad, the way that the media will spin it with selected photographs and shots. So passive aggression is the only way, on a long-term basis, to eventually get your goal achieved and it’s going to be a hard battle, believe you me.
Kevin: Absolutely, yeah. I tell that to people. Violence is NOT the answer to this whole new world order scenario. I heard people saying, let’s march on Washington with guns blazing. I said, you idiots; if you guys do that, that will play right into their handbook.
Alan: They’ve actually expected that and they’ve been preparing for that very scenario for 30 years, with multi-SWAT teams interloping; multi-jurisdictional task force in Canada. They’re all interwoven, all the different services, and they are prepared for any situation because 30 years ago they knew that TODAY, with all these problems, was coming, because it was scheduled.
Kevin: Ordo ab Chao…
Alan: That’s right. Thanks for calling though; that’s the music coming in for the end of the show.
For Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 4th 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and you’ll see all the other sites I have up there. You should bookmark these for future use because the big ones go down once in a while. Sometimes too, if you experience stickiness on downloads when you’re in the .com site, it’s because everyone else is on the .com site at the same time. So you might get through quicker on these other sites. The official sites are: [listed above]. Remember, you are the audience that brings me to you. I’m probably one of the few hosts out there who doesn’t get backing. Not because I couldn’t get it. I can certainly get backing. There would be no problem. I’ve been offered from so many companies to back me and so on and I said no. But it’s up to you to keep me going. That leaves me independent basically and I can say much more than other people can. You’re kind of tied if you’re getting money directly from people who you’ll bring on as guests who actually sell stuff and so on. Therefore it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. See what’s for sale there, the books that I’ve written and CDs and DVDs, or you can donate. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] Also, a lot of people get disks burned and passed to them to play on CD players; you can get in touch with me at [address above].
Remember, don’t sit back and wait for someone else to chip in. That’s what everyone does at the same time but the result is that no one chips in. I don’t charge for these shows as you well know. I’ve given out hundreds of talks in the past for free. It certainly doesn’t help me on this end at all. Believe you me, it’s a big, big sacrifice, sometimes too much of one.
Since 2001 the world has altered DRASTICALLY into, really, a world police state under the guise of terrorism and we all have to change our ways, not just for terror. If you notice, the globalization boys are bringing in ECOLOGY, EUGENICS, POPULATION REDUCTION, all of these things are all part of this new world order. This is called THE CENTURY OF CHANGE. It was called that in the last century by those in academia who were working towards this very present system of totalitarianism, a system where SCIENCE and ACADEMIA will rule our lives. We won’t have to think or make a single decision for ourselves. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I often mention what’s happened since 2001 because we ADAPT so quickly that we tend to forget it all and we go on to the next thing and the next thing and the next thing not realizing that all of this is nothing more, this whole part of this script that we’re living through, literally IS that. It’s a script. We are living through a planned script with implementation dates for new parts of the script to come into effect.
When 2001 happened, immediately the media was on the streets, in every country – Canada, the States, Britain, everywhere – with the same questions. Would you give up your freedom and your rights for security? That’s what it was all about… to try to get us used to the idea that THAT is what was coming. It’s the oldest trick in the book of course, to give up all your rights and freedoms for that very thing, for security. Whether it’s the King who promises it or the government, the state, whatever, it’s all the same thing. It’s always an ulterior motive behind it. The ancient Romans did it once in a while when a tyrant came into power.
Here they go again and sure enough we adapt into it. We’ve had so many crises since 2001 that you can’t keep up with them. It’s impossible by the law of averages to have so many crises happen one after another in such a span of FEW years. We’ve had the so-called terrorists to begin with. Terrorism, terrorism EVERYWHERE. We’ve had countless stories of ships off New York harbor that could blow up with nuclear explosions and all this kind of stuff, and red alert. All the stuff we saw in the Star Trek movies that got us used to that whole idea, amber, orange, and red alerts and so on, one after another. Then we went through the bird flu was going to kill us. Then it was West Nile virus; it was going to be a massive plague and then it just died off into nothing. Then of course we had the bank crashes followed by getting plundered by our governments to pay the banks for their cunningness in crashing the economy. Then immediately followed up with the flu, the coming flu pandemic that never happened either.
Government was throwing money EVERYWHERE, everywhere this whole time. Isn’t it ASTONISHING that before 2001 they didn’t have the money for good health care. They didn’t have money for good social security. They just didn’t have money for this, that and the other but as soon as 2001 comes up, boy, BILLIONS AND BILLIONS go into the war effort and all the different agencies that have been created since, in every country. Trillions went into bailing out the banks. Billions went into buying useless flu vaccines recently. And we forget all this. It’s astonishing and it’s so true too, that we’ve been called the most adaptable species on the planet and WE ARE. We’ll adapt to anything, no matter how crazy it is, until everything becomes normal again, you see. Normal is always a NEW normal and we take it for granted. That’s why you can’t let things happen like this and just let it go. You can’t adapt and let it go or it’s here forever and it will get worse. That’s the INTENTION of it.
The Century of Change is to bring in the planned society. The society where no longer will you or your families decide to even get married or to have families for that matter, everything will be decided by the state according to the needs of the state. I’m talking about the world state, by the way. How many laborers they will need in a particular century for particular jobs; how many workers in other areas and other fields? Cloning and genetic engineering will come into to it to create special workers. That’s old stuff and the big academic papers and magazines are full of that. It’s all about that. It’s giving THEM the rights to rule the world being the ones best suited to rule it, according to themselves of course. That’s what it’s about.
Every government is going into this transitional phase where they’ve got committees and members of these organizations ON BOARD with government with them. They are UNELECTED. This is part of the transition phase into this brave new world. If you remember, HG Wells’ movie and his novel to do with the future that was coming down, he actually wrote it I think before World War I. It was The Shape of Things to Come. Eventually they found that the ‘scientists of the air,’ he actually called them ‘a new Freemasonry of the air’ in his book – and in the first old black and white movie – there is no democracy there whatsoever. It’s a dictatorship of the air made up of the top scientists. You’ll find that in so many movies.
The messages are out there that basically we are post-political. We’re post-democratic, EXACTLY what the Club of Rome said in their book, The First Global Revolution. They said they looked at ALL the different systems in the world of running and ruling people and they came to believe that ‘collectivism’, as closest to the Soviet system, was the best means of RULE because in democracy there are too many conflicting parties, too many demands being made by different parties, that they couldn’t get anything done. I’ve mentioned this before, that Margaret Thatcher talked about belonging to this parallel government, that Quigley talked about also, which is of course the Royal Institute of International Affairs which is also the Council on Foreign Relations. She said the same thing. She said, I, as an ex-Prime Minister, know all the other ex-Prime Ministers of other countries and President and together we form a parallel government. We have power. We know how to get things done and they are not responsible to the public. Exactly what Quigley had said. He said, remember, this organization had ALREADY been running the US for 60 years and he wrote his book back in the 1960s.
So we’re on a roll through a script. A script where they know exactly, through the incredible studies they’ve done on humanity and human behavior, through the sciences, how long to give it between each HIT, as they HIT us with something new. They even know adaptation times for different types of things that are coming down the pike. That’s how precise all this stuff is.
They gave us the internet too. I know they’re talking about licensing it now. They’ve been talking about that for years. That will come eventually. You’ll be licensed and AUTHORIZED to be on there with a whole set of rules on what to talk about and not to talk about, etc. However, we forget that they gave us the internet. It’s been a fantastic tool for them. The Military-Industrial Complex was using it for years and years and years before they decided to give the people the internet. It was NOT a bunch of guys in their back sheds all communicating together that created the internet. THAT’S A MYTH! It’s as much of a myth as Bill Gates creating the empire himself, all mythology making. This was designed to come into being because everything in our system will be cashless. Everything will be done through computers. It’s also teaching you and training YOU to go further and further from just the basic computer, and then you’ve got your iPods and your Bluetooth’s and all the rest of it. Everything is getting smaller, much more packed into it and eventually, they’re going to say, we can’t make it any smaller with all these things; we’ll just put it in your head. Simple solution, we’ll put it in your head… and we’re being adapted and adapted right to that very stage of course.
It’s also the greatest tool for watching the whole population of the planet. DAILY they have access to whatever you are looking at. I’ve read the surveys they’ve done already on clusters, how clusters of people are formed, why do you like these people, why do you communicate with these people, what do you all have in common, outside the obvious, what’s the other, underlying factors behind it too? ALL massive studies done on us all the time, and personality profiles as well. The Pentagon has a whole world, a virtual reality, with every one of us IN IT as a person with a profile and they update it accordingly… because they must know that we are all perfectly predictable.
This article is only one of many. I get kind of fed up reading this kind of stuff because they’ve been watching us since they gave us the internet. It says…
Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks
By Ellen Nakashima / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / WashingtonPost.com
The world’s largest Internet search company and the world’s most powerful electronic surveillance organization (Alan: It’s a spy organization. It spies on the whole world, the NSA.) are teaming up in the name of cybersecurity.
Under an agreement that is still being finalized, the National Security Agency would help Google analyze a major corporate espionage attack (A: What a great excuse.) that the firm said originated in China and targeted its computer networks, according to cybersecurity experts familiar with the matter. The objective is to better defend Google — and its users — from future attack. (A: So it’s for YOUR good, you see.)
Google and the NSA declined to comment on the partnership. But sources with knowledge of the arrangement, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the alliance is being designed to allow the two organizations to share critical information without violating Google’s policies or laws that protect the privacy of Americans’ online communications. (A: Well that’s simple, because they do what they did in the government too. When the law is in the way, they simply change the laws… then it’s legal.) The sources said the deal does not mean the NSA will be viewing users’ searches or e-mail accounts or that Google will be sharing proprietary data. (A: Well, the NSA has been spying on us all with all our data since it was set up – that was its purpose – an awful, awful long time ago.)
The partnership strikes at the core of one of the most sensitive issues for the government and private industry in the evolving world of cybersecurity: how to balance privacy and national security interests. On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair called the Google attacks, which the company acknowledged in January, a “wake-up call.” Cyberspace cannot be protected, he said, without a “collaborative effort that incorporates both the U.S. private sector and our international partners.”
That’s only one of the many articles and I’ll go on with more, where the police are going with it too, after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how the creeping powers certainly do creep. Sometimes they charge but generally it’s a creeping attack that they do over time, insidiously, until we adapt again, so quickly and easily to it once we know it’s there. A lot of people really don’t mind. Most of the public, mind you, honestly don’t mind what’s happening in the world at all, as long as they get their paycheck, can spend money and buy little things to amuse themselves with, to reward themselves with, and watch television and play games. They are egosyntonic, exactly the kind of culture that Bertrand Russell said that they would create. He said that back in the 40s I think it was. Egosyntonic and hedonistic… that’s what you have out there; a disconnected society where no one is connected to anyone else, except for personal predatory purposes which are transitory.
Here’s another article from Cnet News and it says…
Police want backdoor to Web users’ private data
(A: So why shouldn’t the cops get in on the act as well.)
February 3, 2010 / by Declan McCullagh / cnet.com
(A: At the moment apparently, there is a special deal that all the big servers give the police and someone actually sent it to me where it lists all the different prices and companies. How much it takes to spy on each person for a week, for a month, and so on, and all the deals they have for police services. It’s an in-house thing only but I got it sent to me. So this is kind of like a rehash of this in a sense because they already have these, but they want a speedier, faster way of getting access to peoples’ mail and data.)
Anyone with an e-mail account likely knows that police can peek inside it if they have a paper search warrant. (A: Do you really believe that? Do you really believe that… that they need a paper search warrant? We’ll let that pass.)
But cybercrime investigators are frustrated by the speed of traditional methods of faxing, mailing, or e-mailing companies these documents. They’re pushing for the creation of a national Web interface linking police computers with those of Internet and e-mail providers so requests can be sent and received electronically. (A: What they really mean is automatically.)
CNET has reviewed a survey scheduled to be released at a federal task force meeting on Thursday, which says that law enforcement agencies are virtually unanimous in calling for such an interface to be created. (A: There is nothing they don’t want right? There is nothing that… the cops are getting the same equipment the military has got and all the rest of the toys and goodies. Why shouldn’t they go the whole way? That’s what they are now, a military force… within.) Eighty-nine percent of police surveyed, it says, want to be able to “exchange legal process requests and responses to legal process” through an encrypted, police-only “nationwide computer network.”
The survey, according to two people with knowledge of the situation, is part of a broader push from law enforcement agencies to alter the ground rules of online investigations. Other components include renewed calls for laws requiring Internet companies to store data about their users for up to five years and increased pressure on companies to respond to police inquiries in hours instead of days.
But the most controversial element is probably the private Web interface, which raises novel security and privacy concerns, especially in the wake of a recent inspector general’s report (PDF) [The link is on this site.] from the Justice Department. The 289-page report detailed how the FBI obtained Americans’ telephone records by citing nonexistent emergencies and simply asking for the data or writing phone numbers on a sticky note rather than following procedures required by law.
Some companies already have (A: This is what I was talking about.) police-only Web interfaces. Sprint Nextel operates what it calls the L-Site, also known as the “legal compliance secure Web portal.” The company even has offered a course that “will teach you how to create and track legal demands through L-site. Learn to navigate and securely download requested records.” Cox Communications makes its price list for complying with police requests public; a 30-day wiretap is $3,500. (A: I’ve got the list price for all of them actually here, Google and Yahoo and so on, all the biggies.)
The police survey is not exactly unbiased: its author is Frank Kardasz, who is scheduled to present it at a meeting (PDF) of the Online Safety and Technology Working Group, organized by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Kardasz, a sergeant in the Phoenix police department and a project director of Arizona’s Internet Crimes Against Children task force, (A: They always use the children for all this. We’ll have no rights at all because they claim it’s for the children.) said in an e-mail exchange on Tuesday that he is still revising the document and was unable to discuss it.
So everything is on the cards but most folk honestly, truly – as you know this yourself too, you listeners out there – most folk that you meet who are outside the loop really don’t mind what happens at all. They really, really don’t. You know, when they put these shows on television where they bring couples on and they discuss their incredible family problems and start yelling at each other, on public international television, of who’s having affairs with whom, is my wife a prostitute, and it’s up to the host and them to find out. When you see this kind of stuff happening, you know it’s game over for the general public. They’ve never really ever been here to be lost. There’s got to be another term for it, but they certainly have never been aware or sentient creatures. So they don’t care that the government knows everything that they’re watching on the internet. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Going back to the Council on Foreign Relations which is just one branch, it’s the American branch – although other countries that are non British Empire or Commonwealth countries, as they like to call it – also have its departments on the Council of Foreign Relations. They couldn’t very well say the Royal Institute of International Affairs for America; it wouldn’t go down too well, so they called it the Council on Foreign Relations. This article is in the Indy Truth who took it from I think the August Review or ‘august’ review. It’s on the Council on Foreign Relations. It’s a brief, very, very brief, very condensed kind of history but it says…
Council on Foreign Relations
cfr.org
Writes The August Review,
Prior to the founding of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was the most significant body of global-minded elitists in the United States. (A: Actually, they go much, much further back.) As far back as 1959, the CFR was explicit about a need for world government. (A: Long before that, even during World War II they were calling for world government.)
They did so claiming,
The U.S. must strive to build a new international order… including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’… to maintain and gradually increase the authority of the United Nations. (A: And that was the purpose, one of the main purposes, of the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR. It was to bring IN the United Nations. They created it. It was to bring in a global system of government and destroy nationhood.)
Since its founding funded by the Rockefeller family, the CFR has been “a Who’s Who of the elitist eastern establishment.”
The CFR’s mission statement scratches the surface of what they are about:
Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.
The wording of this mission statement is very interesting. Examination of the CFR’s actions and documents shows that the “foreign policy” described is in fact Globalism and the loss of national sovereignty. The methods carrying out these policies hardly allow for “choice” as they describe, at least not in respect for the democratic process.
The CFR is a leading contributor to a movement to build an international infrastructure system of SuperCorridors through America (see their document, Building a North American Community). (A: You can get links right from this site to it.) This has involved selling public roads to foreign corporations, utilizing imminent domain laws to take land from American citizens, and forming a new secretive policy organization set on stripping America of its sovereignty, the North American Forum. (A: The link for that is on there too.) Thanks to the involvement of mainstream media in organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations (see list below), Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg, the borders are being erased without the input, approval or even knowledge of the American people. (A: That’s very true. The bulk of the populace haven’t a clue… and don’t really care what’s going on.)
The CFR has also advocated Globalizing Currency, arguing that eliminating monetary sovereignty will stabilize the global economy. (A: Which, by the way, the big bankers that are on the board of the CFR also run as well.) The plan is flawed however, as it abandons the gold standard. The U.S. dollar has become unstable and suffered heavy inflation since it has been printed without the backing of gold. Abandoning the gold standard puts the value of currency solely into the hands of those who print it, who are of course the bankers who have funded and continue to influence (see list below) on the Council on Foreign Relations.
(A: There is a list here of the CFR Board of Directors. It’s really interesting. It’s just for the US that is. All the biggies, anybody who’s anybody is on this board of directors here. That’s not all the members, just the board of directors. It’s interesting, even Madeleine Albright is on it too, of course.)
•Madeleine K. Albright, Principal, The Albright Group LLC
(A: You look at what else Madeleine Albright is on. She’s on one of the director boards for NATO for the war-making boys and all the rest of it. They are ALL intertwined with all world affairs and policies, all the characters here. There is a long list and you should go through this. I’ll put the links up on my site at the end of the show and you can go through them at your leisure.)
Now, from their own site, the Council on Foreign Relations, they’ve got an international advisory board as well. I’m going to put this link up too. Once again, it’s astonishing to see this list of the who’s who across the world and all the big corporations that they run. They’re into all the big things too, the Food Industry, they own it all. All the big boys who own it are all on the board, stuff like that. It’s quite fascinating really. That’s what they meant at the Club of Rome, that democracy, the democratic governments were of no use and that’s why Thatcher said, she talked about belonging to the parallel government and that’s what she was referring to. Here is an example, again from the Council on Foreign Relations’ own site of one of these foreign directors. His name is…
Council on Foreign Relations
cfr.org
Syed Babar Ali
(Pakistan) Chairman, Interbank; Advisor, Packages Limited; Former Minister of Finance, Economic Affairs and Planning, Pakistan
Mr. Ali is an advisor to Packages Limited, Pakistan’s largest paper and board mill. He is also chairman of Aventis Pakistan Limited (A: That’s the big pharma company, remember, that gives all the shots.); Bayer CropScience Pakistan Limited (A: Bayer Corporation, the Rothschild company that GMOs, the food crop sciences. They’ve been in trouble recently. One of their boys, remember I read recently, said that they’ve contaminated all the crops now and they can’t stop it. That was from Bayer Corporation CropScience.); Siemens Pakistan Engineering Company Limited; and Coca-Cola Beverages Pakistan Limited. From 1972 to 1996, he served in various capacities at the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (A: Again, you think it’s all the little greenies with their tin cans at the bottom that are making the shots. They are just the idiots that are following. They are the clones that just all go and follow the boys at the top. These guys RUN the World Wildlife institutes and so on. So this guy was the head of the WWF. They make the rules. They want the ‘conservation’ in because it’s nothing to do with what you think it is. It’s for a CONTROLLED population and society.), was international president from 1996 to 1999, and is now vice president emeritus of WWF International. In 1993, he served as Pakistan’s minister of finance, economic affairs and planning.
That’s the sort of characters they’ve got on their international board member lists. It’s quite fascinating really. And you think you live in democracies… you really do. You really, really do… astonishing.
Here is an article; I’m going to put the link up for this too. It’s from Wiley Interscience. It’s about, I mentioned neuroscience the other day that brings in the neuro-linguistics and psycho-linguistics; it’s all part of it. It’s to do with understanding the brain and actually stimulating and controlling the brain. This article is about Neuro Law.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
Wiley.com
Neurolaw – also known as law and neuroscience or legal neuroscience – studies legal issues raised by recent developments in neuroscience, including cognitive and social neuroscience. Some proponents of neurolaw think that neuroscience will soon be used widely throughout the legal system and that it is bound to produce profound changes in both substantive and procedural law. In contrast, other leaders in neurolaw employ a less sanguine tone, urging caution so as to prevent misuses and abuses of neuroscience within courts, legislatures, prisons, and other parts of the legal system. Regardless of perspective, neurolaw studies not only the descriptive and predictive issues of how neuroscience is and will be used in the legal system but also the normative issues of how neuroscience should and should not be used within the legal system. There are several topical areas where neuroscience potentially enters legal discourse, which we outline below. (A: And what is it about?)
MIND READING
(A: Here we go… mind reading. At the top they’ve got ‘the abstract’ and ‘what is on the horizon’ and so on.)
One of the most controversial topics that sits at the nexus of these two disciplines is the application of neuroscience for mind reading or detecting mental states. (A: They’re already using primitive ones in the airports.) One important type of mind reading is lie detection. Traditional lie detection (polygraph) is not admitted in any legal jurisdiction in the United States other than New Mexico. Recently, some companies have claimed success in detecting lies using neuroscience-based methods. One such method, Electroencephalography (EEG), measures brain activity via small electrodes placed on various areas of the scalp. This noninvasive, widely accepted method of measuring brain electrical potentials is employed in two forensic techniques that have made courtroom appearances: Brain Fingerprinting and Brain Electrical Oscillations Signature (BEOS). Brain Fingerprinting purportedly tests for guilty knowledge (memory of a kind that only a guilty person could have) rather than directly for deception. This method was admitted into a legal proceeding in Iowa in 2001 that was followed by the release of Terry Harrington, who had been serving a life sentence for a 1977 murder. (A: Then it goes on and on about the different types of detections they are using, using what they are now calling neuroscience and neuroscientific methods. Quite something really, the way it’s rampaging ahead.)
What happens when you’ve got chips in your brain? Well, they’ll go directly to the chip and they won’t need to put any wires on you at all. Mind you, they won’t have to really wonder what you’ve done because there will be central computers GUIDING what you’ve done every day for the last few years that you’ve had the thing implanted. That came out, remember, at the 2001 Loyola Meeting. I’ve talked about it before. It was a World Science Meeting with top scientists in the fields of microchips and biology and various other sciences. They said that they HAVE the chip ready to go. A 600-page report came out at the time. They’ve had meetings ever since. Newt Gingrich was put in as the chairman of these particular annual meetings now; he of all people. It really gave impetus to some movies that came out immediately following it too, with chips that could store your memories. I think it was The Final Cut they called it, which came out later to do with funeral directors who would be able to go into the chip, take out your memories and put a nice little collage together for the people to see before you are getting buried at the funeral. That kind of stuff.
they are dead serious with this. They said the chip was ready to go, all they have to do now it put enough movies out there, novels and so on, propaganda, and get the public to accept it. They also said that this would be the END OF INDIVIDUALITY as we know it. One of the guys from Japan, a top guy who had experimented in implanting these chips, which BIND on to the neurons by the way; you can’t just remove them in some back alley surgical unit. He said that you can’t think of yourself as the individual; think more of ‘the hive.’ He said, you’ll hear the whispers through your head – exactly like you saw that the Borg had in the Star Trek movies – You’ll hear the whispers going back and forth from the central computer to them and back and forth – that’s what he said you will hear – and you will be UNABLE EVER to even conceive or perceive of yourself as being a distinct, separate, human individuals once this chip is implanted.
None of these things… Why do we bother having governments because it really is just a show isn’t it, the governmental aspect of things. They never, EVER touch on the big, big ongoing things that are planned and gradually implemented. What governments are, really, is a rubber stamp for institutions that plan this kind of stuff. They just say it’s time you went ahead with this, get the stuff on the table and stamp it… and announce it to the public. That’s what governments are really there for. We’re not supposed to know that the governments haven’t been running us for an awful long time… THINK TANKS and PRIVATE COMMITTEES HAVE BEEN RUNNING OUR LIVES for an awful, awful long time. That’s the reality of it.
Nothing is ever done in the open. It’s the same with the STEALTH technique of combining the EU into one big conglomeration, not just of a meeting place where they would work together for trade, but actually to create a new entity called the EU Parliament, a SOVEREIGN power, a NEW sovereign POWER in this day and age. A new sovereign power, that’s a big, big deal that something this size, bigger than the Soviet Union was, and still bringing in more clients all the time, members. And nobody at the start said either, that you’d give up your sovereignty. They said, no, it was just a meeting place to deal with trade. They kept this lie up for 20-30 years as they worked towards it steadily since 1948. Then once it was all up and running and the Parliament was established, they declassified some of the first papers they put out there and it said right in there that THE PUBLIC WERE NOT TO KNOW and THEY WERE NOT TO BE TOLD THE TRUTH THAT THIS WAS FOR A TOTAL AMALGAMATION and loss of sovereignty UNTIL IT WAS COMPLETED. And that is exactly what they did. That’s how the world runs with everything.
They don’t ever tell the public any truth, on anything. If you go into the writings of the advice given by Francis Bacon in one of his books to the King, they loved write these résumés, very Machiavellian, to impress the King on how to be cunning and how to handle the public. He said that it is best that the public never know the true machinations of government. This has always been this way. This article, it says…
EU commission ’embassies’ granted new powers
ANDREW RETTMAN / 21.01.2010 / EUOBSERVER.COM
(A: What are the new powers? Well you see, these embassies are real embassies. The EU now has its own embassies to take over from sovereign embassies, from all the participating countries. That’s the eventual end goal of it all.)
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – The EU has converted 54 out of the European Commission’s 136 foreign delegations into embassy-type missions authorised to speak for the entire union.
The move follows the coming into force last year of the Lisbon Treaty, which has the creation of a new EU diplomatic corps as one of its main provisions. (A: If people can’t realize that’s to do away with your own independent one, then what do you think it’s for? Why would you need 2 of them? It’s to take over all those countries’ embassies and BE those embassies, for the union. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll go to the phones and there is Jeff from Massachusetts there. Are you there Jeff?
Jeff: As far as the internet is concerned, the technology and where things are going towards, with global government and the CFR and all this other stuff, let me bring it down to a very, very low, low and primal level which is the stomach. People in America, when the proverbial you-know-what hits the fan and people are starving and they can’t get their beer, and they can’t watch the football game and American Idol, they’re going to simply say, we have to get rid of all these vermin that caused this mess. All these right-wing yahoos down south, the Midwest flyover country, I mean, if they’re going to rid of them, good riddance to them and all these Christians that caused these wars in Iraq and so forth and the Jews that part of this together into the war with Iran and these other countries. People in America are going to make the Nazis look very tame in comparison, if I may use that term. You see, this country has lost its foundation.
Alan: That’s the key to it.
Jeff: We have completely lost our foundation and this country is a prime target for a French Revolution style downfall. No different than Lebanon, when Yasser Arafat and his thugs went into Lebanon and tore that country apart and the Muslims used the liberalism of Lebanon to take over. No different. And this has happened all throughout history and the only difference is, we’re going to have this on a global scale.
Alan: Actually, there’s a huge department within the UN and all the big security companies, the agencies, that plan and deal with that very thing. They call them ‘collapsed nations,’ where the internal structure has collapsed, the internal structure is a mess. Their job is to go in and regain control through massive, and rather brutal, martial law. So the US would also be under that if it should happen. You are quite right, it can happen anywhere now.
Jeff: Exactly. You know, what’s funny is the American people for the most part are very unaware of this. There are very few people that are privy to this kind of information and I don’t think the American people want to know this information. There is a person that I knew a long time ago and he says to me, Jeff, I do not want to talk about religion and geo-politics; all I want to talk about is sports and pornography.
Alan: Yes. Absolutely.
Jeff: He said that to me FLAT OUT and I’m going to close with this. There are people ready, right now, who feel that Christians in China deserve to be in the gulag because Christians are pushy. You see the seeds for holocaust are already being planted to where the fetus is a parasite. And everything has to do with cost. Cost, cost, cost… dollar signs, dollar signs, dollar signs. I thank you for having me on the broadcast and have a good one.
Alan: And you too. It’s all down to dollars and cents and that’s what our lives supposedly are valued at by governments. How much is so and so worth? If not enough, well, you have to go… and that’s as simple as that, for the new world system.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 4th 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and you’ll see all the other sites I have up there. You should bookmark these for future use because the big ones go down once in a while. Sometimes too, if you experience stickiness on downloads when you’re in the .com site, it’s because everyone else is on the .com site at the same time. So you might get through quicker on these other sites. The official sites are: [listed above]. Remember, you are the audience that brings me to you. I’m probably one of the few hosts out there who doesn’t get backing. Not because I couldn’t get it. I can certainly get backing. There would be no problem. I’ve been offered from so many companies to back me and so on and I said no. But it’s up to you to keep me going. That leaves me independent basically and I can say much more than other people can. You’re kind of tied if you’re getting money directly from people who you’ll bring on as guests who actually sell stuff and so on. Therefore it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. See what’s for sale there, the books that I’ve written and CDs and DVDs, or you can donate. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] Also, a lot of people get disks burned and passed to them to play on CD players; you can get in touch with me at [address above].
Remember, don’t sit back and wait for someone else to chip in. That’s what everyone does at the same time but the result is that no one chips in. I don’t charge for these shows as you well know. I’ve given out hundreds of talks in the past for free. It certainly doesn’t help me on this end at all. Believe you me, it’s a big, big sacrifice, sometimes too much of one.
Since 2001 the world has altered DRASTICALLY into, really, a world police state under the guise of terrorism and we all have to change our ways, not just for terror. If you notice, the globalization boys are bringing in ECOLOGY, EUGENICS, POPULATION REDUCTION, all of these things are all part of this new world order. This is called THE CENTURY OF CHANGE. It was called that in the last century by those in academia who were working towards this very present system of totalitarianism, a system where SCIENCE and ACADEMIA will rule our lives. We won’t have to think or make a single decision for ourselves. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I often mention what’s happened since 2001 because we ADAPT so quickly that we tend to forget it all and we go on to the next thing and the next thing and the next thing not realizing that all of this is nothing more, this whole part of this script that we’re living through, literally IS that. It’s a script. We are living through a planned script with implementation dates for new parts of the script to come into effect.
When 2001 happened, immediately the media was on the streets, in every country – Canada, the States, Britain, everywhere – with the same questions. Would you give up your freedom and your rights for security? That’s what it was all about… to try to get us used to the idea that THAT is what was coming. It’s the oldest trick in the book of course, to give up all your rights and freedoms for that very thing, for security. Whether it’s the King who promises it or the government, the state, whatever, it’s all the same thing. It’s always an ulterior motive behind it. The ancient Romans did it once in a while when a tyrant came into power.
Here they go again and sure enough we adapt into it. We’ve had so many crises since 2001 that you can’t keep up with them. It’s impossible by the law of averages to have so many crises happen one after another in such a span of FEW years. We’ve had the so-called terrorists to begin with. Terrorism, terrorism EVERYWHERE. We’ve had countless stories of ships off New York harbor that could blow up with nuclear explosions and all this kind of stuff, and red alert. All the stuff we saw in the Star Trek movies that got us used to that whole idea, amber, orange, and red alerts and so on, one after another. Then we went through the bird flu was going to kill us. Then it was West Nile virus; it was going to be a massive plague and then it just died off into nothing. Then of course we had the bank crashes followed by getting plundered by our governments to pay the banks for their cunningness in crashing the economy. Then immediately followed up with the flu, the coming flu pandemic that never happened either.
Government was throwing money EVERYWHERE, everywhere this whole time. Isn’t it ASTONISHING that before 2001 they didn’t have the money for good health care. They didn’t have money for good social security. They just didn’t have money for this, that and the other but as soon as 2001 comes up, boy, BILLIONS AND BILLIONS go into the war effort and all the different agencies that have been created since, in every country. Trillions went into bailing out the banks. Billions went into buying useless flu vaccines recently. And we forget all this. It’s astonishing and it’s so true too, that we’ve been called the most adaptable species on the planet and WE ARE. We’ll adapt to anything, no matter how crazy it is, until everything becomes normal again, you see. Normal is always a NEW normal and we take it for granted. That’s why you can’t let things happen like this and just let it go. You can’t adapt and let it go or it’s here forever and it will get worse. That’s the INTENTION of it.
The Century of Change is to bring in the planned society. The society where no longer will you or your families decide to even get married or to have families for that matter, everything will be decided by the state according to the needs of the state. I’m talking about the world state, by the way. How many laborers they will need in a particular century for particular jobs; how many workers in other areas and other fields? Cloning and genetic engineering will come into to it to create special workers. That’s old stuff and the big academic papers and magazines are full of that. It’s all about that. It’s giving THEM the rights to rule the world being the ones best suited to rule it, according to themselves of course. That’s what it’s about.
Every government is going into this transitional phase where they’ve got committees and members of these organizations ON BOARD with government with them. They are UNELECTED. This is part of the transition phase into this brave new world. If you remember, HG Wells’ movie and his novel to do with the future that was coming down, he actually wrote it I think before World War I. It was The Shape of Things to Come. Eventually they found that the ‘scientists of the air,’ he actually called them ‘a new Freemasonry of the air’ in his book – and in the first old black and white movie – there is no democracy there whatsoever. It’s a dictatorship of the air made up of the top scientists. You’ll find that in so many movies.
The messages are out there that basically we are post-political. We’re post-democratic, EXACTLY what the Club of Rome said in their book, The First Global Revolution. They said they looked at ALL the different systems in the world of running and ruling people and they came to believe that ‘collectivism’, as closest to the Soviet system, was the best means of RULE because in democracy there are too many conflicting parties, too many demands being made by different parties, that they couldn’t get anything done. I’ve mentioned this before, that Margaret Thatcher talked about belonging to this parallel government, that Quigley talked about also, which is of course the Royal Institute of International Affairs which is also the Council on Foreign Relations. She said the same thing. She said, I, as an ex-Prime Minister, know all the other ex-Prime Ministers of other countries and President and together we form a parallel government. We have power. We know how to get things done and they are not responsible to the public. Exactly what Quigley had said. He said, remember, this organization had ALREADY been running the US for 60 years and he wrote his book back in the 1960s.
So we’re on a roll through a script. A script where they know exactly, through the incredible studies they’ve done on humanity and human behavior, through the sciences, how long to give it between each HIT, as they HIT us with something new. They even know adaptation times for different types of things that are coming down the pike. That’s how precise all this stuff is.
They gave us the internet too. I know they’re talking about licensing it now. They’ve been talking about that for years. That will come eventually. You’ll be licensed and AUTHORIZED to be on there with a whole set of rules on what to talk about and not to talk about, etc. However, we forget that they gave us the internet. It’s been a fantastic tool for them. The Military-Industrial Complex was using it for years and years and years before they decided to give the people the internet. It was NOT a bunch of guys in their back sheds all communicating together that created the internet. THAT’S A MYTH! It’s as much of a myth as Bill Gates creating the empire himself, all mythology making. This was designed to come into being because everything in our system will be cashless. Everything will be done through computers. It’s also teaching you and training YOU to go further and further from just the basic computer, and then you’ve got your iPods and your Bluetooth’s and all the rest of it. Everything is getting smaller, much more packed into it and eventually, they’re going to say, we can’t make it any smaller with all these things; we’ll just put it in your head. Simple solution, we’ll put it in your head… and we’re being adapted and adapted right to that very stage of course.
It’s also the greatest tool for watching the whole population of the planet. DAILY they have access to whatever you are looking at. I’ve read the surveys they’ve done already on clusters, how clusters of people are formed, why do you like these people, why do you communicate with these people, what do you all have in common, outside the obvious, what’s the other, underlying factors behind it too? ALL massive studies done on us all the time, and personality profiles as well. The Pentagon has a whole world, a virtual reality, with every one of us IN IT as a person with a profile and they update it accordingly… because they must know that we are all perfectly predictable.
This article is only one of many. I get kind of fed up reading this kind of stuff because they’ve been watching us since they gave us the internet. It says…
Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks
By Ellen Nakashima / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / WashingtonPost.com
The world’s largest Internet search company and the world’s most powerful electronic surveillance organization (Alan: It’s a spy organization. It spies on the whole world, the NSA.) are teaming up in the name of cybersecurity.
Under an agreement that is still being finalized, the National Security Agency would help Google analyze a major corporate espionage attack (A: What a great excuse.) that the firm said originated in China and targeted its computer networks, according to cybersecurity experts familiar with the matter. The objective is to better defend Google — and its users — from future attack. (A: So it’s for YOUR good, you see.)
Google and the NSA declined to comment on the partnership. But sources with knowledge of the arrangement, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the alliance is being designed to allow the two organizations to share critical information without violating Google’s policies or laws that protect the privacy of Americans’ online communications. (A: Well that’s simple, because they do what they did in the government too. When the law is in the way, they simply change the laws… then it’s legal.) The sources said the deal does not mean the NSA will be viewing users’ searches or e-mail accounts or that Google will be sharing proprietary data. (A: Well, the NSA has been spying on us all with all our data since it was set up – that was its purpose – an awful, awful long time ago.)
The partnership strikes at the core of one of the most sensitive issues for the government and private industry in the evolving world of cybersecurity: how to balance privacy and national security interests. On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair called the Google attacks, which the company acknowledged in January, a “wake-up call.” Cyberspace cannot be protected, he said, without a “collaborative effort that incorporates both the U.S. private sector and our international partners.”
That’s only one of the many articles and I’ll go on with more, where the police are going with it too, after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how the creeping powers certainly do creep. Sometimes they charge but generally it’s a creeping attack that they do over time, insidiously, until we adapt again, so quickly and easily to it once we know it’s there. A lot of people really don’t mind. Most of the public, mind you, honestly don’t mind what’s happening in the world at all, as long as they get their paycheck, can spend money and buy little things to amuse themselves with, to reward themselves with, and watch television and play games. They are egosyntonic, exactly the kind of culture that Bertrand Russell said that they would create. He said that back in the 40s I think it was. Egosyntonic and hedonistic… that’s what you have out there; a disconnected society where no one is connected to anyone else, except for personal predatory purposes which are transitory.
Here’s another article from Cnet News and it says…
Police want backdoor to Web users’ private data
(A: So why shouldn’t the cops get in on the act as well.)
February 3, 2010 / by Declan McCullagh / cnet.com
(A: At the moment apparently, there is a special deal that all the big servers give the police and someone actually sent it to me where it lists all the different prices and companies. How much it takes to spy on each person for a week, for a month, and so on, and all the deals they have for police services. It’s an in-house thing only but I got it sent to me. So this is kind of like a rehash of this in a sense because they already have these, but they want a speedier, faster way of getting access to peoples’ mail and data.)
Anyone with an e-mail account likely knows that police can peek inside it if they have a paper search warrant. (A: Do you really believe that? Do you really believe that… that they need a paper search warrant? We’ll let that pass.)
But cybercrime investigators are frustrated by the speed of traditional methods of faxing, mailing, or e-mailing companies these documents. They’re pushing for the creation of a national Web interface linking police computers with those of Internet and e-mail providers so requests can be sent and received electronically. (A: What they really mean is automatically.)
CNET has reviewed a survey scheduled to be released at a federal task force meeting on Thursday, which says that law enforcement agencies are virtually unanimous in calling for such an interface to be created. (A: There is nothing they don’t want right? There is nothing that… the cops are getting the same equipment the military has got and all the rest of the toys and goodies. Why shouldn’t they go the whole way? That’s what they are now, a military force… within.) Eighty-nine percent of police surveyed, it says, want to be able to “exchange legal process requests and responses to legal process” through an encrypted, police-only “nationwide computer network.”
The survey, according to two people with knowledge of the situation, is part of a broader push from law enforcement agencies to alter the ground rules of online investigations. Other components include renewed calls for laws requiring Internet companies to store data about their users for up to five years and increased pressure on companies to respond to police inquiries in hours instead of days.
But the most controversial element is probably the private Web interface, which raises novel security and privacy concerns, especially in the wake of a recent inspector general’s report (PDF) [The link is on this site.] from the Justice Department. The 289-page report detailed how the FBI obtained Americans’ telephone records by citing nonexistent emergencies and simply asking for the data or writing phone numbers on a sticky note rather than following procedures required by law.
Some companies already have (A: This is what I was talking about.) police-only Web interfaces. Sprint Nextel operates what it calls the L-Site, also known as the “legal compliance secure Web portal.” The company even has offered a course that “will teach you how to create and track legal demands through L-site. Learn to navigate and securely download requested records.” Cox Communications makes its price list for complying with police requests public; a 30-day wiretap is $3,500. (A: I’ve got the list price for all of them actually here, Google and Yahoo and so on, all the biggies.)
The police survey is not exactly unbiased: its author is Frank Kardasz, who is scheduled to present it at a meeting (PDF) of the Online Safety and Technology Working Group, organized by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Kardasz, a sergeant in the Phoenix police department and a project director of Arizona’s Internet Crimes Against Children task force, (A: They always use the children for all this. We’ll have no rights at all because they claim it’s for the children.) said in an e-mail exchange on Tuesday that he is still revising the document and was unable to discuss it.
So everything is on the cards but most folk honestly, truly – as you know this yourself too, you listeners out there – most folk that you meet who are outside the loop really don’t mind what happens at all. They really, really don’t. You know, when they put these shows on television where they bring couples on and they discuss their incredible family problems and start yelling at each other, on public international television, of who’s having affairs with whom, is my wife a prostitute, and it’s up to the host and them to find out. When you see this kind of stuff happening, you know it’s game over for the general public. They’ve never really ever been here to be lost. There’s got to be another term for it, but they certainly have never been aware or sentient creatures. So they don’t care that the government knows everything that they’re watching on the internet. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Going back to the Council on Foreign Relations which is just one branch, it’s the American branch – although other countries that are non British Empire or Commonwealth countries, as they like to call it – also have its departments on the Council of Foreign Relations. They couldn’t very well say the Royal Institute of International Affairs for America; it wouldn’t go down too well, so they called it the Council on Foreign Relations. This article is in the Indy Truth who took it from I think the August Review or ‘august’ review. It’s on the Council on Foreign Relations. It’s a brief, very, very brief, very condensed kind of history but it says…
Council on Foreign Relations
cfr.org
Writes The August Review,
Prior to the founding of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was the most significant body of global-minded elitists in the United States. (A: Actually, they go much, much further back.) As far back as 1959, the CFR was explicit about a need for world government. (A: Long before that, even during World War II they were calling for world government.)
They did so claiming,
The U.S. must strive to build a new international order… including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’… to maintain and gradually increase the authority of the United Nations. (A: And that was the purpose, one of the main purposes, of the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR. It was to bring IN the United Nations. They created it. It was to bring in a global system of government and destroy nationhood.)
Since its founding funded by the Rockefeller family, the CFR has been “a Who’s Who of the elitist eastern establishment.”
The CFR’s mission statement scratches the surface of what they are about:
Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments.
The wording of this mission statement is very interesting. Examination of the CFR’s actions and documents shows that the “foreign policy” described is in fact Globalism and the loss of national sovereignty. The methods carrying out these policies hardly allow for “choice” as they describe, at least not in respect for the democratic process.
The CFR is a leading contributor to a movement to build an international infrastructure system of SuperCorridors through America (see their document, Building a North American Community). (A: You can get links right from this site to it.) This has involved selling public roads to foreign corporations, utilizing imminent domain laws to take land from American citizens, and forming a new secretive policy organization set on stripping America of its sovereignty, the North American Forum. (A: The link for that is on there too.) Thanks to the involvement of mainstream media in organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations (see list below), Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg, the borders are being erased without the input, approval or even knowledge of the American people. (A: That’s very true. The bulk of the populace haven’t a clue… and don’t really care what’s going on.)
The CFR has also advocated Globalizing Currency, arguing that eliminating monetary sovereignty will stabilize the global economy. (A: Which, by the way, the big bankers that are on the board of the CFR also run as well.) The plan is flawed however, as it abandons the gold standard. The U.S. dollar has become unstable and suffered heavy inflation since it has been printed without the backing of gold. Abandoning the gold standard puts the value of currency solely into the hands of those who print it, who are of course the bankers who have funded and continue to influence (see list below) on the Council on Foreign Relations.
(A: There is a list here of the CFR Board of Directors. It’s really interesting. It’s just for the US that is. All the biggies, anybody who’s anybody is on this board of directors here. That’s not all the members, just the board of directors. It’s interesting, even Madeleine Albright is on it too, of course.)
•Madeleine K. Albright, Principal, The Albright Group LLC
(A: You look at what else Madeleine Albright is on. She’s on one of the director boards for NATO for the war-making boys and all the rest of it. They are ALL intertwined with all world affairs and policies, all the characters here. There is a long list and you should go through this. I’ll put the links up on my site at the end of the show and you can go through them at your leisure.)
Now, from their own site, the Council on Foreign Relations, they’ve got an international advisory board as well. I’m going to put this link up too. Once again, it’s astonishing to see this list of the who’s who across the world and all the big corporations that they run. They’re into all the big things too, the Food Industry, they own it all. All the big boys who own it are all on the board, stuff like that. It’s quite fascinating really. That’s what they meant at the Club of Rome, that democracy, the democratic governments were of no use and that’s why Thatcher said, she talked about belonging to the parallel government and that’s what she was referring to. Here is an example, again from the Council on Foreign Relations’ own site of one of these foreign directors. His name is…
Council on Foreign Relations
cfr.org
Syed Babar Ali
(Pakistan) Chairman, Interbank; Advisor, Packages Limited; Former Minister of Finance, Economic Affairs and Planning, Pakistan
Mr. Ali is an advisor to Packages Limited, Pakistan’s largest paper and board mill. He is also chairman of Aventis Pakistan Limited (A: That’s the big pharma company, remember, that gives all the shots.); Bayer CropScience Pakistan Limited (A: Bayer Corporation, the Rothschild company that GMOs, the food crop sciences. They’ve been in trouble recently. One of their boys, remember I read recently, said that they’ve contaminated all the crops now and they can’t stop it. That was from Bayer Corporation CropScience.); Siemens Pakistan Engineering Company Limited; and Coca-Cola Beverages Pakistan Limited. From 1972 to 1996, he served in various capacities at the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (A: Again, you think it’s all the little greenies with their tin cans at the bottom that are making the shots. They are just the idiots that are following. They are the clones that just all go and follow the boys at the top. These guys RUN the World Wildlife institutes and so on. So this guy was the head of the WWF. They make the rules. They want the ‘conservation’ in because it’s nothing to do with what you think it is. It’s for a CONTROLLED population and society.), was international president from 1996 to 1999, and is now vice president emeritus of WWF International. In 1993, he served as Pakistan’s minister of finance, economic affairs and planning.
That’s the sort of characters they’ve got on their international board member lists. It’s quite fascinating really. And you think you live in democracies… you really do. You really, really do… astonishing.
Here is an article; I’m going to put the link up for this too. It’s from Wiley Interscience. It’s about, I mentioned neuroscience the other day that brings in the neuro-linguistics and psycho-linguistics; it’s all part of it. It’s to do with understanding the brain and actually stimulating and controlling the brain. This article is about Neuro Law.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
Wiley.com
Neurolaw – also known as law and neuroscience or legal neuroscience – studies legal issues raised by recent developments in neuroscience, including cognitive and social neuroscience. Some proponents of neurolaw think that neuroscience will soon be used widely throughout the legal system and that it is bound to produce profound changes in both substantive and procedural law. In contrast, other leaders in neurolaw employ a less sanguine tone, urging caution so as to prevent misuses and abuses of neuroscience within courts, legislatures, prisons, and other parts of the legal system. Regardless of perspective, neurolaw studies not only the descriptive and predictive issues of how neuroscience is and will be used in the legal system but also the normative issues of how neuroscience should and should not be used within the legal system. There are several topical areas where neuroscience potentially enters legal discourse, which we outline below. (A: And what is it about?)
MIND READING
(A: Here we go… mind reading. At the top they’ve got ‘the abstract’ and ‘what is on the horizon’ and so on.)
One of the most controversial topics that sits at the nexus of these two disciplines is the application of neuroscience for mind reading or detecting mental states. (A: They’re already using primitive ones in the airports.) One important type of mind reading is lie detection. Traditional lie detection (polygraph) is not admitted in any legal jurisdiction in the United States other than New Mexico. Recently, some companies have claimed success in detecting lies using neuroscience-based methods. One such method, Electroencephalography (EEG), measures brain activity via small electrodes placed on various areas of the scalp. This noninvasive, widely accepted method of measuring brain electrical potentials is employed in two forensic techniques that have made courtroom appearances: Brain Fingerprinting and Brain Electrical Oscillations Signature (BEOS). Brain Fingerprinting purportedly tests for guilty knowledge (memory of a kind that only a guilty person could have) rather than directly for deception. This method was admitted into a legal proceeding in Iowa in 2001 that was followed by the release of Terry Harrington, who had been serving a life sentence for a 1977 murder. (A: Then it goes on and on about the different types of detections they are using, using what they are now calling neuroscience and neuroscientific methods. Quite something really, the way it’s rampaging ahead.)
What happens when you’ve got chips in your brain? Well, they’ll go directly to the chip and they won’t need to put any wires on you at all. Mind you, they won’t have to really wonder what you’ve done because there will be central computers GUIDING what you’ve done every day for the last few years that you’ve had the thing implanted. That came out, remember, at the 2001 Loyola Meeting. I’ve talked about it before. It was a World Science Meeting with top scientists in the fields of microchips and biology and various other sciences. They said that they HAVE the chip ready to go. A 600-page report came out at the time. They’ve had meetings ever since. Newt Gingrich was put in as the chairman of these particular annual meetings now; he of all people. It really gave impetus to some movies that came out immediately following it too, with chips that could store your memories. I think it was The Final Cut they called it, which came out later to do with funeral directors who would be able to go into the chip, take out your memories and put a nice little collage together for the people to see before you are getting buried at the funeral. That kind of stuff.
they are dead serious with this. They said the chip was ready to go, all they have to do now it put enough movies out there, novels and so on, propaganda, and get the public to accept it. They also said that this would be the END OF INDIVIDUALITY as we know it. One of the guys from Japan, a top guy who had experimented in implanting these chips, which BIND on to the neurons by the way; you can’t just remove them in some back alley surgical unit. He said that you can’t think of yourself as the individual; think more of ‘the hive.’ He said, you’ll hear the whispers through your head – exactly like you saw that the Borg had in the Star Trek movies – You’ll hear the whispers going back and forth from the central computer to them and back and forth – that’s what he said you will hear – and you will be UNABLE EVER to even conceive or perceive of yourself as being a distinct, separate, human individuals once this chip is implanted.
None of these things… Why do we bother having governments because it really is just a show isn’t it, the governmental aspect of things. They never, EVER touch on the big, big ongoing things that are planned and gradually implemented. What governments are, really, is a rubber stamp for institutions that plan this kind of stuff. They just say it’s time you went ahead with this, get the stuff on the table and stamp it… and announce it to the public. That’s what governments are really there for. We’re not supposed to know that the governments haven’t been running us for an awful long time… THINK TANKS and PRIVATE COMMITTEES HAVE BEEN RUNNING OUR LIVES for an awful, awful long time. That’s the reality of it.
Nothing is ever done in the open. It’s the same with the STEALTH technique of combining the EU into one big conglomeration, not just of a meeting place where they would work together for trade, but actually to create a new entity called the EU Parliament, a SOVEREIGN power, a NEW sovereign POWER in this day and age. A new sovereign power, that’s a big, big deal that something this size, bigger than the Soviet Union was, and still bringing in more clients all the time, members. And nobody at the start said either, that you’d give up your sovereignty. They said, no, it was just a meeting place to deal with trade. They kept this lie up for 20-30 years as they worked towards it steadily since 1948. Then once it was all up and running and the Parliament was established, they declassified some of the first papers they put out there and it said right in there that THE PUBLIC WERE NOT TO KNOW and THEY WERE NOT TO BE TOLD THE TRUTH THAT THIS WAS FOR A TOTAL AMALGAMATION and loss of sovereignty UNTIL IT WAS COMPLETED. And that is exactly what they did. That’s how the world runs with everything.
They don’t ever tell the public any truth, on anything. If you go into the writings of the advice given by Francis Bacon in one of his books to the King, they loved write these résumés, very Machiavellian, to impress the King on how to be cunning and how to handle the public. He said that it is best that the public never know the true machinations of government. This has always been this way. This article, it says…
EU commission ’embassies’ granted new powers
ANDREW RETTMAN / 21.01.2010 / EUOBSERVER.COM
(A: What are the new powers? Well you see, these embassies are real embassies. The EU now has its own embassies to take over from sovereign embassies, from all the participating countries. That’s the eventual end goal of it all.)
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – The EU has converted 54 out of the European Commission’s 136 foreign delegations into embassy-type missions authorised to speak for the entire union.
The move follows the coming into force last year of the Lisbon Treaty, which has the creation of a new EU diplomatic corps as one of its main provisions. (A: If people can’t realize that’s to do away with your own independent one, then what do you think it’s for? Why would you need 2 of them? It’s to take over all those countries’ embassies and BE those embassies, for the union. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll go to the phones and there is Jeff from Massachusetts there. Are you there Jeff?
Jeff: As far as the internet is concerned, the technology and where things are going towards, with global government and the CFR and all this other stuff, let me bring it down to a very, very low, low and primal level which is the stomach. People in America, when the proverbial you-know-what hits the fan and people are starving and they can’t get their beer, and they can’t watch the football game and American Idol, they’re going to simply say, we have to get rid of all these vermin that caused this mess. All these right-wing yahoos down south, the Midwest flyover country, I mean, if they’re going to rid of them, good riddance to them and all these Christians that caused these wars in Iraq and so forth and the Jews that part of this together into the war with Iran and these other countries. People in America are going to make the Nazis look very tame in comparison, if I may use that term. You see, this country has lost its foundation.
Alan: That’s the key to it.
Jeff: We have completely lost our foundation and this country is a prime target for a French Revolution style downfall. No different than Lebanon, when Yasser Arafat and his thugs went into Lebanon and tore that country apart and the Muslims used the liberalism of Lebanon to take over. No different. And this has happened all throughout history and the only difference is, we’re going to have this on a global scale.
Alan: Actually, there’s a huge department within the UN and all the big security companies, the agencies, that plan and deal with that very thing. They call them ‘collapsed nations,’ where the internal structure has collapsed, the internal structure is a mess. Their job is to go in and regain control through massive, and rather brutal, martial law. So the US would also be under that if it should happen. You are quite right, it can happen anywhere now.
Jeff: Exactly. You know, what’s funny is the American people for the most part are very unaware of this. There are very few people that are privy to this kind of information and I don’t think the American people want to know this information. There is a person that I knew a long time ago and he says to me, Jeff, I do not want to talk about religion and geo-politics; all I want to talk about is sports and pornography.
Alan: Yes. Absolutely.
Jeff: He said that to me FLAT OUT and I’m going to close with this. There are people ready, right now, who feel that Christians in China deserve to be in the gulag because Christians are pushy. You see the seeds for holocaust are already being planted to where the fetus is a parasite. And everything has to do with cost. Cost, cost, cost… dollar signs, dollar signs, dollar signs. I thank you for having me on the broadcast and have a good one.
Alan: And you too. It’s all down to dollars and cents and that’s what our lives supposedly are valued at by governments. How much is so and so worth? If not enough, well, you have to go… and that’s as simple as that, for the new world system.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 5th 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. That’s the main web site. Look down the front page, bookmark all the other sites you’ll see there for future use because sometimes the big ones go down and if you have them bookmarked you can always download the latest shows. Remember, these are the only official sites that I have and that I am in control of: [listed above]. If you find you are getting stickiness on the download, it’s because everyone is going into the .com site at the same time so you can try these other ones and you might get through much easier. This is the minute for shaking the tin can. The tin can is where you throw your pennies in, because I am probably the only person out there who doesn’t take money directly from the advertisers, agencies, companies and so on. So it’s up to YOU to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and see what I have for sale, the books, CDs and DVDs. I would be churning out books if I had more time but I don’t have that much time. You can also donate to me as well. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Some people just send cash. That cuts out a lot of podgy fingers of men in very expensive suits. The ads you hear on this show are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN. I’ve got nothing to do with them. That pays for THIS air time. It pays RBN for its broadcast, their staff, and their bills and their technicians and all the rest of it. So it’s up to you to keep me going. I get a free hand basically to go into other areas and answer question a bit more truthfully about certain things, where I couldn’t do so if I was getting backed by certain corporations or sellers. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them to play on their CD players because they don’t have computers, they don’t want computers, you can get in touch with me by writing to [address above].
And that about covers the usual. I run through this quickly where most folk would be pushing it every 10 minutes throughout the show because I need the money to keep going on this particular show. I’d like to get another form of upload to my sites because I go through XplorNet. XplorNet has deliberately, and have told me so; they’ve cut me back by 2/3rds speed. That’s because they’ve been told to get at me. The music is coming in so I’ll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. The matrix is an interesting concept because basically it’s where everything comes from, if you like. Your whole reality with all of its sources that GIVES you and reinforces that reality. It updates you all the time, in reality, and keeps you absolutely ignorant of the fact that your opinions are given to you. They are giving you opinions all the time to suit the particular month or the year in which the big boys are manipulating events. We simply adapt. We are very good at adapting into anything really.
If you take the peasant of the Middle Ages, the SERF who was on the land, he was bought and sold with the land. If he was a third, fourth, fifth generation serf, he would think that was all quite natural. He didn’t know any better. He hadn’t heard any term, which was given much, much later on, about democracy or social injustice or anything. He’d have an occasional rebellion. A rebellion always against being taxed more through the food they were growing, so much so that their own food for their families had been taken from them for some war effort or the King’s wars or whatever. That’s when they would revolt and all they asked for really was to go back to the way things were. That’s what they demanded. That’s the only thing they could think of. They didn’t know there could be any other way of living. Everybody was taught a very basic line; it was still used right up into the 20th century in Britain, for instance, and that was ‘mind your place.’ Mind your place and most folk did.
We don’t realize that culture is given to us. It’s shaped constantly. What’s right in one era can be totally wrong in the next and vice-versa, upside-down. We are very, very plastic as a species and those who control and rule know that too. Quite a few years ago, there was a KGB defector who came over to the West who specialized in psychological warfare. He is up on YouTube and I mentioned it about a year ago and gave the link; I don’t know if that link is still working. His name was Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov. He gives a four-part talk, in an interview style, on how you take down a country. What’s really interesting is that he goes through the ideological subversion that started in the US especially and Western countries around the same time, about the late 50s early 60s. Now, when I’m talking about this particular subversion method, think back to another article I read recently where the Pentagon and the big boys up with Obama were using academia, certain guys in academia who specialize in subversion, to infiltrate what they thought were radical groups or patriot type groups and basically alter the ideology, destroy their ideology from within. Make them unsure of it until they had nothing to hold on, to fight for. That’s a very important part. When everything that you held as a belief is taken from you and you’re not sure anymore, then you’ve been conquered.
The first step to taking down a nation, as this man Yuri said, was ideological subversion. That was done. That was completed in the 1980s in the Western countries. You had demoralization. That also came in with the ideological subversion followed by demoralization. That was already complete too. Then you have destabilization through upheavals in monetary systems and unemployment, all that kind of stuff. You create crisis. Then you bring in a new government which is actually Soviet, or communist, without using the term communist. Then you bring in a period of normalization. Normalization generally means you are under a totalitarian, strict, military type, police style rule.
If you think for a minute that you haven’t already gone through all these stages into a form of world system… Remember, communism was to be a world system. You’ve missed it all. You’ve lived through it and you didn’t know it. Part of it was to totally degrade all society on the way down. You do that by attacking all the things that keep society together as a cohesive unit for survival purposes. What keeps people together? What are they willing to fight for? It goes all the way down to the family unit. Break up the family unit, promote incredible promiscuity – they will not bond – and then the state has everyone under their thumb. They can talk directly down to you. Yes, YOU… YOU… YOU… just you. NO one else is going to stand up for you. That’s what they showed you in George Orwell’s 1984.
It’s interesting that Sunstein was the guy who was chosen to head the teams to subvert the Patriot movements by the same tactics. Make them unsure, that’s ideological subversion. Make them unsure of their cause and that is followed by demoralization. So this technique, this Soviet system, is STILL being used by those at the top. You’ll find, if you were to go into all the big boys behind Obama and so on, they were basically communists. And that’s just a fact. The thing is that the Western world has gone that way without knowing it. They were subverted a long time ago.
Academia STILL pushes the Soviet globalist system. Remember, we’re supposed to blend in – in the dialectic – with the Soviet system. That’s why the wall supposedly came down, to blend in the Soviet system worldwide now. It was time for the next move and they merge with the Capitalist system of the West. You’ll find the top Soviet people who were and are still in the West, work in Universities, they are professors. Very, very important point I just made there. Certain countries are absolutely more full of them than others, like Canada for instance, but they still teach in the US. You’ll find they are very good at radicalizing students. Students have nothing in their head except what they are given, even though you can’t tell them that because their ego is out of control at that age. They are given their causes and now it’s all INTERNATIONAL causes, if you notice. It’s been like that for a long time because the next step is internationalism. That’s why destruction of the nation-state was imperative.
Canada, through the CBC, that’s the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, which is our version of the BBC. It is government run and funded. You wouldn’t believe the basic, very primitive, communist style plays and made for TV movies that they create. It’s astonishing. It’s done in the crudest, straightforward fashion with the enemy blatantly portrayed as a redneck who believes in his country. There was one on last night. I watched about 5 minutes of it with my little rabbit ears up here on the television set. It was about a woman running for politics in British Columbia I think it was. I watched 5 minutes of it to get the gist and that’s all I needed. The votes came in and she lost. Then she said, it was the ethnic vote in Vancouver who stopped this from happening. She said that ethnic vote… it went against her because she wasn’t interested in the countries that they came from. In other words, all politics now are supposed to be global. You see. You can’t just go for your own country. This woman was portrayed as the real nasty, obviously a dinosaur from the past somewhere.
We’re already communist and we just don’t know it. Socialist is another term for it as well. The big boys that run the Western world really are the Fabian Socialists that work and are part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations. It’s all actually HAPPENED. That’s what I’m trying to say.
I mentioned The Soviet Story, a great documentary. It was put out just about a year ago or so. I put up the link for that too but I don’t know if it’s still up there on YouTube or if it’s been pulled. I heard there was tremendous furor within Russia by high-powered people. Some of them now are members of the European Parliament for Europe and they demanded that it get pulled down. Here’s an article about it in the newspaper. This is the first time I’ve seen any newspaper mention it in fact.
No refuting the hard truths in the Soviet Story: Worthington
By Peter Worthington / 3rd February 2010 / TorontoSun.com
Those who are concerned that once history is distorted, it often never gets corrected, can breathe easier after a startlingly accurate documentary was premiered this past Sunday at the Ukrainian Cultural Centre in Toronto.
Even so, The Soviet Story, made two years ago and shown mostly in the Baltic states and Europe, has resulted in angry protests in communist quarters. (Alan: Communism is alive and well for those who… you are in communist countries now. We really are. Of course the commies are shouting it’s Fascist but it’s actually communist. If it was Fascist, your country would only be concerned about your own country right now. How can we be Fascist when we’re going totally global at a GALLOPING pace?) The documentary’s young writer and director, Edvin Snores, a Latvian, has been hanged in effigy and denounced as a liar by some in the European Parliament. (A: These are these Soviet boys that are there now.)
One Russian historian publicly regretted having taken part in the film — a film in which he did not take part. (A: I guess that was for publicity for him.) Such is the outrage.
The Economist urged “those who want to ban it should try refuting it first.”
I’ve seen the film (it premiered in the U.S. six months ago) and, put bluntly, it cannot be refuted. Rejected, maybe; offensive to some sensitivities, perhaps; horrifying, undoubtedly; painful, without doubt. But refuted? Impossible.
The core theme is the Soviet Union under Josef Stalin was mentor to Hitler (A: That’s a fact. Hitler and his boys during the Stalin/Soviet Pact went to them to find out how to take over the country, how to eradicate all opposition and how to eliminate MASS amounts of people because the Soviet system were the EXPERTS already at that.) and the Nazis. (A: That’s in the movie. You see them collaborating together too.) Until Hitler turned on his ally, Stalin and the USSR were Hitler’s partners in war, with a treaty to divide Europe once the pesky problem of defeating Britain had been solved.
Most people do not realize — or have forgotten, or never knew — how closely Nazi propaganda… (A: I’ll be back with more on this story, it’s an excellent article, after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Toronto Sun that’s about 6 months late in publishing this kind of stuff. I mentioned it last year and gave the links when this actual documentary was up on YouTube, [Google Video, etc]. It says here…
Most people do not realize — or have forgotten, or never knew — how closely Nazi propaganda emulated Soviet propaganda (A: You should see the posters. They show you them all in it. How they are identical posters.) — similar images of muscular men in posters, smiling young women, all working for the improvement of mankind by eliminating human trash like Jews, Serbs, Gypsies, even Scotsmen! (A: Why Scotsmen? Well, look at the list that was put out first by the Fabian Society. They had Scotsmen on it too. HG Wells was a lovely character. The reason they had them on it is because they kept rebelling. They didn’t like… they were allergic to slavery.)
The genesis for genocide to rid the world of the weak or unwanted, originated with Karl Marx who, around 1849, wrote: “Killing is justified, especially if it cleanses society.” (A: That’s a CORE BELIEF in Marxism, by the way. Oh, I could go on about Marxism including some of the people who are running a lot of this stuff and putting information out that people pick up and repeat on Patriot radio. Anyway…)
Lenin agreed, Stalin expanded the creed and Hitler copied it.
In the early days of the Second World War, Jews who fled Germany to the USSR were rounded up by the NKVD and turned over to the Nazis.
Where Hitler and Stalin differed in building a pure society and better human beings, was Hitler digressed from Stalin’s formula of “class warfare” and introduced “racial cleansing.” (A: It’s just a substitute for basically the same thing in a sense, when you understand there is a class system of groups that actually run the economy.) Hitler watched with envy how the NKVD eliminated seven million Ukrainians (A: That was all the peasant farmers and so on.) by imposing the world’s first man-made famine on Ukraine in 1932-33, confiscating all food and making record sales of Ukrainian grain to Europe. (A: They were exporting the stuff. You’ll see them going around to the little farms there and taking out what was left for the peasants to eat themselves. It was a deliberate, planned starvation process with a benefit of making money by exporting it abroad, but not for the farmers.)
The world paid no attention — the few journalists who did (Malcolm Muggeridge) were ignored. The New York Times correspondent in Moscow, Walter Duranty, won a Pulitzer Prize for dodging the famine. (A: And they did. They knew it was going on but they were all communists, these characters, and they were saying it was a great experiment in Russia. It was very successful and they would not criticize it. Including, they wouldn’t criticize the SLAUGHTERING they were doing. It wasn’t until Germany and Moscow became enemies that these same people, to save Russia, started to talk about how bad the Germans were.)
The film footage is ghastly but persuasive. Mountains of skeletal, starved bodies are bulldozed into mass graves. (A: This is for years. This went on for years and years.) Vivid photos of victims shot in the head and tumbling into mass graves. There is Katyn Forest, where 20,000 Polish reservists (A: They were all officers, by the way.) were shot, (A: Because that was ANOTHER thing. Marxism believes that you always get the people who can teach or lead the rest and KILL them.) some buried alive in mass graves, and our side pretended the Germans did it. (A: Yep. That’s true.)
The world remembers the horrors of the Nazi death camps, but we hunger to forget, if we can, the 20-plus million who died in the Soviet Gulag at the whim of our wartime ally, “Uncle Joe.” (A: 20 million folk were slaughtered and starved to death… in the Gulag’s prison camps alone.)
Among Edvin Snores’ interviews are aging women who recall the famine, the massacre of their families, the Gulag. Painful, but essential to record.
With younger generations reluctant to believe history, it’s important there be a source for unvarnished truth.
— The movie can be bought at sovietstory.com (A: I’ll put that up on my site too.)
It’s WELL WORTH IT. I’m not kidding you. When you get these INCREDIBLE, fundamental, Marxist professors in your universities prattling on about the greatness of Marxist regime, which is coming in to view as far as they can see, then you can get them to see The Soviet Story. It’s so important. So important.
Part of that thing that Yuri Bezmenov was talking about, the KGB defector, was, he said, towards the end, once you’ve demoralized, destabilized, de-idealized a society and brought it down… again, he meant also through all techniques including but primarily though the Culture Industry, then all those who had promoted communism, and were thinking they were on a roll, when after the crisis came in, as financial crisis and all the other stuff – that’s why TOP communists go into economics and they teach in universities – They will become enemies of the new regime because they literally think they were fighting for these particular liberations and freedoms. They don’t realize the new system, it’s more totalitarian than the one you had before. Well, just look at what’s happening now, all you communists out there. Look what’s happening now.
We are losing our freedoms at incredible rate, absolutely incredible rate. You have to see who’s in charge of your governments and all the people behind them. The blending of the two systems, believe you me, has happened. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s interesting to go over the techniques used to take down countries and it’s from WITHIN, always from within. There are real hard-line Marxists still around because it didn’t die off. It was supposed to blend, remember, with the systems of the West according to The Reece Commission. Senator Norman Dodd was sent out by the Congress to investigate the private foundations, these multi trillion dollar foundations that FUND all the NGOs, all the left wing groups, to ask them why they seemed to be funding communism. The heads of the Ford Foundation at the time said, our job is to change the culture, alter it so drastically and radically in the West that they will blend with that of the Soviet down the road. That has happened today. That’s HAPPENED today. It’s already here, under the guise of liberations, freedoms for individuals and so on. You have a particular chaos and you are also seeing the masses of troops and cops to DEAL with that chaos on the streets. That’s all part of it too, getting you ready for the next PHASE of it.
Part of it was explained by SO many big players in the past that worked for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, like Lord Bertrand Russell, a KEY man who went through, along with Julian Huxley, the first CEO of UNESCO. UNESCO was set up at the United Nations in order to create a common culture by indoctrination of youth, especially pushing promiscuity to STOP BONDING in later life. That was a must be. Russell and he talked about it quite a lot in their various publications. I’ve read a lot of it on the air, from their books. The whole idea of sexual education for pre-PUBERTAL children was really, them helping to advocate indulgence in sexual activity before puberty. That was part of the experimental schools that Russell ran to see if it would work, so that they wouldn’t bond in later life.
Of course, everything that’s happened today you think just happens as happenstance but nothing is further from the truth. It’s planned that way. You see, Plato himself said in his book The Republic, the handbook many of them mention. HG Wells said it was his most favorite of all books. Plato said that all women eventually will be held ‘in common.’ That didn’t mean they would round them all up and keep them in some big camp and pull them out for sexual favors once in a while. It meant literally, you create promiscuity amongst them. And that’s happened. There are many ways to make all women in common and a woman who has had hundreds of partners for her whole life long is now held in common. That’s what they mean by that.
So here is the outcome, as you see; we live through it. Britain is the flagship for all this testing. That’s why the big writers like Bertrand Russell, Julian Huxley, HG Wells, all these boys, lived in Britain. They knew they’d tested certain things out in experimental schools before everyone else did, the perfect society to try it out on. This article here is from the Mail Online. It ties right in with this ongoing fallout that was predictable because it was desirable from those at the top. It says…
Fury at school pregnancy tests for girls aged 11
By Daily Mail Reporter / 5th February 2010
(A: At age 11 now, age 11!)
Girls as young as 11 are to be offered pregnancy tests at school.
They will also have access to contraception, the morning-after pill and advice on sexually transmitted infections.
All of the services will be confidential – meaning the teenagers’ (A: They call them teenagers. You’re not a teenager when you are 11 years old.) parents might never be told. The scheme is being piloted in sexual health (A: They call it health, sexual health. Just like family planning by Sanger, which is abortion. They always love to alter the terminology. Sexual health, ) drop-in clinics set up in state secondary schools in Wirral and Liverpool, an area with above-average rates of teenage pregnancy. (A: It’s a pilot project for the rest of the country.)
It is part of a Government strategy which could see sexual health clinics opening in every secondary school and college in England.
The pupils will be encouraged to tell their parents of their visits to the clinics, although their consent is not required. (A: Under the Laws of the Child that the wonderful UN put out not so long ago.)
Health chiefs have written to parents saying they are not obliged to inform them if their daughter has a pregnancy test or is prescribed the morning-after pill.
They claim that the moves will help cut the number of unplanned pregnancies
(A: Now, when I was young, this really was an odd, odd, odd occurrence if anything like this happened. You see, this stuff came out first in girls’ magazines, young girls’ magazines… even before that they brought out the music to really enforce it upon them, too. Parents don’t read what young girls magazines are on about. I’m talking about children who are in junior school and so on, stuff like that. Then of course, it was backed up by the Spice Girls, you know, that kind of stuff where the whole idea is sex, sex, sex, sex, sex. You’re just a desirable sexual object basically. We’ve had years and years of going down the hill, right down to the awful rap stuff that’s VERY explicit and I won’t even use the terms they use in the minimalistic language they manage to mumble. But it’s all out there and that’s what the youngsters have been brought up on… watching this stuff. So the whole thing is telling them that THIS IS WHAT YOU DO. Go and do it. Go and do it. Go and do it. Reinforcement, psychic driving in a sense and they do it. But that was a direction that those who plan the years, like 50 year plans, 100 year plans, that’s what they wanted and they have achieved it. They say here…)
They claim that the moves will help cut the number of unplanned pregnancies and abortions among teenagers, many of whom will be under 16 – the legal age of consent.
But critics say the move will encourage under-age sex. (A: It’s a bit late for that because unless you literally pushed the whole culture industry out, out, out of its house and kicked it into some ship on the sea somewhere, it’s going to continue.)
That’s their agenda. The music industry, the movie industry, it doesn’t just go by trends that are making money, believe you me. And because we are plastic and pliable they could take you off in ANY direction, any direction at all. This is the one that was CHOSEN because it IS the direction where people, the more partners they have the very little chance they’ll have of bonding ever, for any length of time with any one person and then they will not have children, you see. So it’s all going to plan and that’s why it’s happening.
I remember reading – and I read it on the air too – it was just about a month before 9/11 2001 where the International Censor Bureaus got together. Now, you think your censorship bureaus are there to safeguard your culture. NO! What they said was they keep a pulse on the public to see if they are ready to push the envelope to the next PHASE and they all agreed at that time to push the homosexual agenda, through movies and plays and comedies and so on, AT that particular meeting. Then articles appeared in the paper the next day where professors actually, one in Canada and one in the States, stood up and said, we’ve won the battle for homosexual rights, now we have to go for INTERGENERATIONAL SEX and BESTIALITY. That’s from your wonderful… See, everything that’s out there that you think is there to safeguard you, NO, it’s not there to safeguard you. It’s to see if you are ready to accept the next part of the agenda. They can bring you down and bring you down further and this is where you end up with it. This is where you end up with it. It’s no surprise. It was designed that way.
There is Jason from Ohio on the line. Are you there Jason?
Jason: I called in a couple of weeks ago about education. This week, I was talking to one of my English teachers. I was talking to her about a book called The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte Iserbyt. She said she read some excerpts. When I started talking to her and I was mentioning how forced schooling causes all these problems in society where, kids escape to the drugs and alcohol. I started talking to her about that and I noticed how, you were talking about abortions, promiscuity and the whole culture industry. I was linking everything together like financial problems lead to divorce, morals which the schools and mass media also add to that and the culture influences. I also observed that every generation going from the generation before the baby boomers down to my generation, I noticed how disrespectful and how immoral people like me are. My teacher said that public schooling is used to help solve family problems. What do you think about that?
Alan: She said that public schooling was there to help family problems?
Jason: To help with, like solve family problems. For example, family divorces.
Alan: I tell you, recently I read an article and I’ll try and find it. It’s an article to do with a speech given to the National Teachers Association and they say to them that they are part of the culture creation industry now and they are social engineers. That’s part of their job is social engineering. Basically they have already taken over the role of parents. That’s what Bertrand Russell said, that if we can use scientific indoctrination on the students then whatever the parents tell them regarding their old, antiquated morality will be of no affect whatsoever. So, they know they are change agents. They know very well that they are change agents. I think that’s the term that Charlotte Iserbyt actually uses on the teachers.
Jason: I was in the same class and I asked this one kid if they though that school was dumbing him down. He says yeah, I think so too. I gave this one kid the book from John Taylor Gatto called Weapons of Mass Instruction. I asked him to look at that and Fall of the Republic which you know, that’s a great documentary that you were in. I applaud you on that. This is very wild what’s going on with the educational system. I’m fighting against it. Giving out Fall of the Republic DVDs with a little letter on it, trying to create essays and theses and… What do you recommend? What do you recommend that’s like the best way to take it down from the inside?
Alan: You have to go and try and teach the students. The teachers are too compromised. They are on a big fat paycheck. I’ve talked to groups of teachers in the past. They admit, where else could you get $120,000 at the age of 27 and they are quite content to take their cash and be social engineers, even though they know that what they are preaching is not what they themselves personally would chose. So they are change agents. They are compromised. Personally, I think they are prostitutes. I don’t think anyone can stay in any job where they feel compromised and their own beliefs are being squashed, for money. I really don’t believe you can. That’s the problem with human nature though. So go for the students because their minds are more open and they haven’t been completely contaminated, not completely contaminated with the indoctrination they’ve got, although they already have that from even cartoons. Someone sent me a series of cartoons. I think it was Captain Planet, a whole series of them. It starts off and Captain Planet is after all the big contractors that are cutting trees down, the guys who are drilling for oil across the world. It’s save the planet, save the planet ALL through it. Big money indoctrinating children before they even get to school.
Here’s what Brzezinski said about this. He knows. He’s one of the players for this new culture. He says television gives a younger viewer a first glimpse of the outside world. It first defines and does so compellingly by combining the visual and audio impact, the meaning of the good life. That’s whatever he says it is the good life. It sets the standard… It sets the standard of what is to be considered to be achievement, fulfillment, good taste… and good taste can be utter promiscuity… and proper conduct. It conditions desires – you’d better believe that – It defines aspirations and expectations and draws the line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Remember, it’s all reversed as he’s talking about this. With audiences around the world increasing glued to the television set, there is nothing comparable either in the area of enforced religious orthodoxy or even at the high point of totalitarian indoctrination to the cultural and philosophical conditioning that television exercise on its viewers. Believe you me, he’s one of the boys who uses it to its maximum so he knows this.
Jason: One of my friends, me and this one kid were debating about the education system and I was telling him that George Washington, David Farragut, they didn’t have very much schooling. They did mentoring and everything. He was debating saying all these people are stupid if they don’t go to school. I mean, he doesn’t notice this. He plays a lot of Call of Duty 4, the new modern warfare game that came out. He’s saying all these people are stupid if you don’t go to school, you become stupid and complacent and you’re dumb. I was like no, that’s not true. I heard from somebody that you can learn things on your own. This kid learned calculus when he was 15.
Alan: Yes… And you can, absolutely. Most schooling now is social indoctrination into utter globalism, interdependence, you don’t think so much about your country. You’re on about countries that you’ll perhaps never even get to see or visit that seem so far removed from you. We’re supposed to be concerned about everyone else across the world, even though we have no input on what’s happening there and probably never will have. But keep trying on. Go for the students. It’s the best way to teach is through them and show them evidence. Never use your own stuff, they will come at you, the teachers will come at you. Use documented evidence if you are handing it out. Thanks for calling.
Then we’ll go to Shawn from Utah. Are you there Shawn?
Shawn: Good to speak with you again. I just had a little story to share. I was listening to one of these morning comedy shows, drive to work shows and they were talking about the 5 day after pill, on the line of abortion you were talking about. Where instead of the morning after pill you can take the pill for 5 days after. The conversation went to, the guy said why can’t they just give young people a pill that will suppress the hormones? And the guy actually made a really good point but it was in a comedic setting so I don’t thank anybody would have caught on to that but I just thought I’d share that.
Alan: Actually, they have been doing it too because young men now – and I’ve talked to some of them – are losing their sexual interest by the time they are 25 and 30. So you see, they are already… I’ve read articles even recently in the last week. Not just the bisphenol A and so on, but there is one I read the other night where they were putting actually stilbesterol in the food supply. That was from a high source as well; it wasn’t guesswork from some conspiracy nut. They actually admit they’ve been doing that.
Shawn: I was really blown away by it because that’s not part of the agenda to do something like that.
Alan: Sure it is. It’s all there if you want it but you just can’t do it because you got stilbesterol. Thanks for calling. Back after this break.
HI folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. There is also John from Miami. Are you there John?
John: I had an observation. I saw on one of your articles from yesterday. One of them was on the Council on Foreign Relations on the International Advisory Board and that you used an example. You showed an example of a guy and his name was Syed Babar Ali. One of the things I saw also on the advisory board was a guy named Gustavo A. Cisneros. He is from Venezuela. The interesting thing about it, as an example for what you said, he is the leader of supposedly the opposition in Venezuela and he and Hugo Chavez, which Huge Chavez is not the greatest person in the world either. But they show you how these two people that hate each other but they are basically working towards the same goal.
Alan: That’s right.
John: I thought that was interesting because he is the leader of the opposition and Chavez, he’s the same thing.
Alan: It’s the same thing. It’s the dialectic process for change. To get change you’ve got to have 2 parties pushing and pushing and then you have the compromise that comes out of the 2 of them and that’s your new thesis and that’s exactly how they do it. You’re right on. That’s how it works.
John: That was the only thing, the observation. Thanks.
Alan: Thanks for calling. There’s Cheri from Texas. Are you there Cheri?
Cheri: I wanted to share a quick story with you and it’s good to speak with you again. I wanted to talk to you. I have a friend and this just boggles my mind but at the same time I understand how perfect mind control is so I know what’s going on here. This is a friend of mine. She’s a 30 year old single mother. All of a sudden she wants to join the military. I’m just really trying to talk her out of it and she has her mind made up. She thinks it’s the way to start over for a second chance and she seems to know all the bells and whistles the recruiters are giving her, of course. After several people urging her, why don’t you check out the air force, something maybe a little less harsh, you know. They told her, you know, she’s too old and the Navy she has to be in for 8 years. You know, to me that would have come down to a maybe. I’m a 30 year old woman and maybe I shouldn’t be joining right now in the middle of a war, you know something to get her off it. I come at her, what about the vaccinations that they give you? She understands there is corruption in the medical industry…
Alan: I’ve had a lot of women who were in the US military come back and write to me and they all have fertility problems now, with all the inoculations they were given. They were also given special pills every morning. They didn’t know what they were but they were forced to take them and the Sergeants made sure they did actually swallow them. They’ve all had incredible problems, uterine problems and ovarian problems. They are only young women of about 25, 26 and so on.
Cheri: Amazing. Yes. I keep telling her, with all different things. You know, what about Henry Kissinger and kiss the boys goodbye.
Alan: Kissinger actually said, remember, and I’d quote this to her. Kissinger said in his own book that “the American military are dumb, stupid animals to be used for foreign policy.”
Cheri: Yes. And I’ve told her that exactly and she’s like yeah, yeah, but. She just doesn’t want to accept what reality is and it’s just… This is a girl who 5 years ago, she would have NEVER thought to go to the military at all.
Alan: Tell her there is nothing about it that is anything like what’s portrayed in the movies and so on and it’s a very dangerous occupation, especially when you are fighting for a geo-political agendas which you are never told about. You will never profit personally by it. Thanks for calling though.
For myself and Hamish in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 8th 2010. For the newcomers out there, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and scroll down. You’ll find all the other sites I have up there. Bookmark them for future use because sometimes the big ones do go down and I do believe, the way the various laws are being passed, a lot more will be going down in the near future. So if you bookmark these you can always get the latest downloads for free. There are: [official sites listed above]. Sometimes too it’s a good idea if you find when you go into the .com site, and generally after the show everyone goes in at once, it can have sticky downloads. So spread them out into these other sites and it might solve the problem.
I always get my tin can out now and rattle it for you. The reason it’s quite is because there is nothing in it. But the fact is, I need YOU, you’re the audience who brings me to you. I’m not backed by any sponsor. I’m not backed by any company selling anything. The ads on the show that you hear are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the broadcast of this particular program and I’ve got nothing at all to do with it. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into any of my web sites and see what I have for sale – the books, CDs and DVDs – and you can also donate. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of all the talks I do and they are passed to them at meetings and so on, who don’t like using computers, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. That about covers it. Don’t wait for other people to throw a few pennies this way because that way no one does it. That’s the nature of humanity. That’s the way it goes.
Everything is supposed to be free these days. There is a whole generation growing up thinking everything is free. They don’t realize that everything that is free really is a trap to get more information from them. With everything that is free you generally find there are spins on things because people have a particular agenda, even when they are disclosing truthful information; it’s how they spin it that depends on who is backing them. There are big organizations out there, there are world organizations spewing out information like you wouldn’t believe with details on world events that you don’t get access to. It’s because they are well organized and well funded and they work together with the big boys who run the foundations. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s quite interesting that so many things are going on at the same time today that you can’t keep up with them. There are TOO many things happening all together but they all FLOW in one direction… all the things that you hear and see and they talk about, all flow in ONE particular direction and they come together.
It’s quite amazing to see how a planned global society that can push part of a plan, wait for 5 years, push the envelope a bit further along the same direction, wait another 5 years. Actually it’s getting shorter now; they can train us every year and update us every year or so. They do the same with every other part of the global agenda and yet most of us still think we are living on the cutting edge of the information age where we know everything that’s going on. We’re always given reasons or excuses for things but even the simplest person knows there is something else behind what we’re being told. It’s always been this way, to be honest with you. We are the last to know anything. The ordinary people are the last to know EVER what’s really, really happening. You generally have to wait 50 years, if you live that long, or even 100 sometimes because they can reclassify stuff after its time for exposure for another 50 years… or even 100 years. That’s what they actually do. Why would you have to classify certain information for 50 or 100 years? …from ANY population? …by its own government supposedly? When it’s, supposedly again, you are given the whole story at the time in the media, at least what you are supposed to believe FOR the next 50 to 100 years.
We never get the truth. It’s the same with wars. Wars, from the most ancient times have been economic wars. Economic wars and POWER wars. Power of very high people stemming originally from small families or clans who rose to the top by being utterly ruthless with everyone else around them and going off and conquering the next one and after a few generations they can run a country basically. From the countries they occupy – this happened in ancient times too – they then recruit millions of land troops to go off and invade other countries. That’s how big empires were actually made. And yet, in every generation, even in the conquered countries that were supplying troops, they would then see themselves as being say Roman, for instance, and have no contact with the generations before them who obviously were not Roman because they were not brought up in that area. That’s what empires are based on.
It’s so strange that, for instance, you can take a country like England that eventually creates Britain and then the UK and goes off and conquers, we’re told, ¾ of the world. They took the taxpayers’ money to fund those armies and equip those armies. They were given pittances for paychecks. Behind them came the army engineers who would build the bridges and lay the train tracks and so on. They’d often import people from India, even into Africa, to lay the lines. That was so COMMERCE could flow because they wanted the resources of that country and the resources were then owned by not the country. The country would spend the money to take care of it and police it and supply the military to defend it but it was for PRIVATE CORPORATIONS and nothing really, really has changed. Nothing at all has really, really changed. We’re led by the media to think that we’re on the cutting edge and whatever they tell you is good enough at the time. Unfortunately for most people it is good enough at the time and for the rest of their lives very often.
This will tie in with some of the things that I’m going to talk about tonight but before I do, I’m going to mention that I’ll put up a couple of links. One is for the Environmental Modification Treaty from the United Nations to show you at least how far back we can trace the original treaties. This one too, isn’t the first one; it’s in the 1970s but it does mention that they’ve not to use the creation of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts or floods on other countries. It doesn’t say anything about not using it upon your own people. I’ll put that link up there.
CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES
Article I
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.
There is also a good video… I depend on people sending me videos because XplorNet has cut me back at least two-thirds of the speed because someone in a high place told them to do so. I cannot download even audios; it’s the bad. There is a video that someone sent me that’s called, The Great Global Warming Swindle. It came out in about 2007. There are a lot of people who worked at the IPCC for the United Nations who left it on this particular video. They’re all scientists themselves; these are not people answering the question, what to you BELIEVE about so and so. They are telling you what they know about it. It’s very informative indeed.
There is also another link to two other major scientists who debunk the whole theory of greenhouse gases and the greenhouse effect in fact. I’ll put that link up as well. There is a .pdf from that link. It takes you to their actual writings. You’ll enjoy that. Going through it, it’s kind of dry, it’s quite long, but it really uses science to show and to prove. That’s what you are supposed to use science for. You don’t go up to people and say, what do you believe. So I’ll put those up there and you can look into them.
The Science (Fiction) of the Greenhouse Effect
Written by Rebecca Terrell / Wednesday, 27 January 2010
Two German physicists have written a paper debunking the “theory” of the greenhouse gas effect by demonstrating how it violates basic laws of physics. Their paper, Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame of Physics, was published last year in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Modern Physics.
The authors are Gerhard Gerlich, a professor of mathematical physics at the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Braunschweig, and Ralf Tscheuchner, a retired professor of theoretical physics and freelance lecturer and researcher in physics and applied informatics.
Anyone who’s got any good videos out there at all, please send them to me because as I say, I cannot download videos anymore because I’ve been a bad boy and governments have ways of phoning big corporations and using the old school ties to say, John, why don’t you censor ole Watt there; he’s been a bit of a nuisance. That’s what they do; they give you the run around. They give you a thousand excuses but you’re being… they call it ‘technical censorship’ when they actually alter the speed by technical means. They call it ‘technical censorship.’ I’ve read the articles that the whole British Empire is actually doing this now. A few years ago, I used to have a lot of people in the Canadian government and bureaucrats who would, during their breaks or their lunch hour, they would listen to some of the shows and download the shows. It was the same in the US, a lot of governmental people. THEY ALL TOLD ME THAT THEY CAN’T GET ME ANYMORE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HAS LITERALLY PUT A BLOCK ON ME FOR ALL GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS. That was quite a few years ago, so they’ve been at this for a long time… for those who really think they’ve got free speech.
There is movie called Gattaca. I’ve mentioned it quite few times over the years. It’s about an age – which is pretty well here; it’s coming shortly – where genetic enhancement, meaning scientists intervene between the sperm and the ovum and take out what they claim MIGHT be defective genes and basically put together the perfect future world citizen to serve their system. It creates a class system where people who are conceived and born in the old-fashioned way are second-class citizens. All the good ones [genetically enhanced] get the top jobs; space exploration, high paying and all that stuff. Gattaca ties in with this article here that is from the Telegraph.
Gene test to be offered to couples planning children
Couples planning to have children will be able to take a test to see if they are at risk of having a baby with a genetic disease, it has been reported.
8 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
The screening has prompted criticism in some quarters by medical professionals who argue it plays on parents’ fears (Alan: That’s exactly what it’s for. It’s like reading you hand. It tells you as much as someone reading the palm of your hand.) and is verging on ‘eugenics’. (A: It IS eugenics. That’s the whole point of it. That’s where it’s supposed to go. They gave the little tests to get your own one done, remember. They’ve done exposés on television on that, showing you it’s all bunkum because they really can’t predict if you will or will not get this or that.)
The saliva test, involving samples taken from each prospective parent, would discover if either was carrying a genetic mutation which could lead to cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy or sickle cell anaemia.
Couples will be able to pay £700 (A: That’s a lot of money.) for the test at the Bridge Fertility Clinic in London. (A: Everything starts in London. It’s just quite amazing. But then again, that’s the flagship for the world isn’t it? That’s what they said at the Fabian Society. That’s what they said at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that the British system and the British Empire would be the nucleus of the system that the whole world was to get build upon. That was taken up by the CFR also.)
The clinic says it will only offer the screening alongside counselling, but the US company which developed the test plans to sell it online without medical advice, according to The Times.
The screening has prompted criticism in some quarters by medical professionals who argue it plays on parents’ fears and is verging on “eugenics”.
If the results show both parents carry recessive genes which could lead (A: I love the ‘coulds’ and ‘maybes’.) to a disease, parents could choose to have IVF (A: That’s exactly what I’m talking about.) and then screen their embryos to ensure healthy ones are implanted in the womb. (A: I wonder too, when they take ones out, which ones they are putting back in there to get the perfect, obedient citizen?)
They could also opt for genetic testing during pregnancy, sperm donation or adoption to prevent giving birth to a child with a genetic condition. (A: So we’re going into the Handmaid’s Tale as well, obviously.)
People with a history of conditions such as cystic fibrosis can already be screened on the NHS.
The new test, developed by Consyl, checks for numerous conditions and would be available to the wider population and not just high risk groups.
(A: So they use the usual stuff…) “Couples have a fundamental right to know their carrier status (A: This is the people who are selling it, right.) and to make reproductive decisions on the basis of that status without outside interference.” (A: They use all this scary stuff and ‘your rights’ to sell their whole gimmickry here because that’s where it really is right now. They can’t really tell which gene is going to line up with what other gene in the other person. It’s like reading the palm of your hand, but people will go for it.)
People will go for it. Anything to do with genetics, science is good, you know. Cutting edge science, we’ve all got to get cutting edge science, it’s just good for us, you know. It’s for our benefit too. That’s how it’s sold. That is how it is sold so it will take off like crazy.
We are going into this incredible Big Brother phase, with also Big Nanny coupled with it. Big Nanny and Big Brother. A nanny state where governments, through various enforcement agencies and right through the educational system, are really becoming the police over our THOUGHTS and our ACTIONS and all the rest of it. They are training us Pavlovian style to simply OBEY by automatic conditioned response. Things get sillier and sillier and sillier. This article is from New York.
Girl, 12, arrested in New York for doodling on school desk
2/5/2010 | USAToday.com
NEW YORK (AP) — A New York City junior high student has been arrested for doodling on her desk with a marker.
Twelve-year-old Alexa Gonzalez scribbled “Lex was here 2/1/10” (A: Oh, that’s terrible. Oh.) on her desk Monday at Junior High School 190 in Queens. She also wrote “I love my friends Abby and Faith.”
The girl says the doodles could have been erased. (A: So it was erasable marker.)
Moraima Tamacho says her daughter was released several hours after she was taken in handcuffs to a police station. (A: Is this the society that you are all paying your taxes for? Is it? Is it? What are these teachers these days? What ARE they? What sado-masochistic college did these people get selected from to train? Can you believe that?)
Education department spokesman (A: A spokesman is a PR specialist.) David Cantor said the incident shouldn’t have happened, and that common sense should prevail. (A: Well, ‘should’ isn’t good enough is it?)
Last month, the New York Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit alleging more than 20 instances of wrongful arrests and assaults by school safety officers. (A: See, once you start getting all these safety officers they’ve got to make work for themselves. They can’t put in ‘nothing’ reports, just blank reports, nothing happened, nothing happened. Whenever a government or any agency creates another agency they’ve got to start producing. It’s the same with the police. You put them on the roads, they’ve got to start handing out tickets, and then they get quotas. That’s how it works.)
Gonzalez has been assigned eight hours of community service, a book report and an essay on what she’s learned from the experience. (A: She could write a darn good novel on that, labeled under horror. You know.)
That’s the sort of thing that’s happening. I thought these things were really happening more in Britain that starts it all first you see, and then everybody else copies. It’s actually worse than that. Here is another article with a little boy Patrick.
Laura Timoney fumes after son Patrick, 9,
is busted for bringing 2-inch-long toy gun to PS 52
BY Matthew Lysiak, Kate Nocera and Larry Mcshane / mydailynews.com / February 4th 2010
Patrick Timoney, 9, with (A: It shows him with the little…) plastic gun – barely 2 inches long – that nearly got him suspended after PS 52 Principal Evelyn Mastroianni took action.
An irate Staten Island mom blasted a grade school principal Wednesday for treating her son like a pint-sized Plaxico Burress after he brought a 2-inch-long toy gun to school.
“This principal is a bully and a coward, and needs to be held accountable,” said Laura Timoney, 44, after her teary fourth-grader was nearly suspended for playing with the tiny toy at lunch.
“The school should be embarrassed. This is a common-sense issue.”
What you are also seeing… you’ve got to understand how academia trains teachers. Remember, academia is a BIG ARM now OF GOVERNMENT. It has been since really the beginning of World War II. I actually have the papers and documents from big think tanks who discussed this, using universities as a training tool for SOCIAL CHANGE and for SOCIAL INDOCTRINATION. That’s what they’ve been doing for a long time and so have the primary schools as well. The teachers go into these universities and get a FURTHER conditioning in to it. They themselves, when they see anything at all to do with a plastic gun, have a Pavlovian freak-out response; that’s how they’re trained and this is what they go and do about it. This is the sort of toy you get in a Lucky Bag in candies. Now, this could also get people killed. Supposing that freaked out teacher did have a fire arm and they see something that looks like something that they’ve been… it’s like burned with a poker into their brain Pavlovian style, gun’s bad, guns bad, guns bad… They could have actually shot the child and I’m not kidding about that.
Patrick Timoney, 9, was terrified when he was yanked into the principal’s office to discuss the teeny-weeny plastic “weapon.”
“The gun was so little,” the boy said. “I don’t understand why the principal got so upset. I was a little nervous. They made me sign a statement.” (A: At 9, eh?) [Alan laughing.]
Patrick and a friend were playing with Lego figures in the school cafeteria on Tuesday when he pulled out the faux machine gun and stuck it in the hands of his plastic police officer. (A: A 2-inch machine gun, eh?)
Boom! Trouble ensued, with Patrick’s mom getting a phone call from Public School 52 Principal Evelyn Mastroianni saying her son had somehow gone from straight A’s to the NRA.
“I was in disbelief,” the still-fuming mother said. “Why didn’t anyone step up with an ounce of common sense and put an end to the harassment of my child?” (A: Well these stories are just like avalanching today. They come out in avalanches; you can’t keep up with it, there is too much… too much. It’s happening all over the place and in different countries too.)
For those in the States that really don’t get it yet that their country is rapidly changing to catch up with the rest, it’s already been completely socialized. Remember, the new system that we have to live in is a COLLECTIVIST/COMMUNIST blend WITH the big corporate big boys and their corporations where capitalism comes together with it and the system is not quite communist and not quite capitalist. It’s actually SOCIALIST. That’s what Lenin talked about when he said that the state would wither away. He also meant that the state would wither away because through international treaties, through a central body, eventually people would give up every last vestige of their sovereignty and that’s what has happened over the many, many years since the United Nations was set up.
Here are some of the freedoms that you do have in America. Even though they are coming down on it, I heard Hilary Clinton in a newscast once talking about she wanted to end home schooling. They really came down on it all over Europe. An Italian Prime Minster said the reason he was banning it was because he wants every child to have the same – and the word in the newspaper said – indoctrination, the same indoctrination. This article is from the Telegraph.
German homeschoolers’ political asylum in America exposes the EU Gulag
(A: Who would have thunk, eh. Who would have thunk that people would have to RUN to the States to get away from Europe.)
By Gerald Warner World Last updated: February 1st, 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
The case of the homeschooling couple from Germany who were granted political asylum in the United States, about which Ed West blogged recently, becomes even more interesting if one reads the remarks of the man who granted the Romeikes asylum, Immigration Judge Lawrence O. Burman, of Memphis, Tennessee.
Burman said: “We can’t expect every country to follow our constitution. The world might be a better place if it did. However, the rights being violated here are basic human rights that no country has a right to violate.” (A: Well, it’s happening IN the US in a lot of states.) He observed: “Homeschoolers are a particular social group that the German government is trying to suppress. This family has a well-founded fear of persecution… therefore, they are eligible for asylum…”
Those last remarks might have been uttered in 1933. Do we truly realise the significance of what has happened? Do we understand that, as citizens of the European Union, (A: This is a British paper remember.) we now belong to a totalitarian state from which fleeing citizens are being granted political asylum in the United States? Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, tyranny is back in business in Germany.
Judge Burman added that the scariest thing about this case was the motivation of the German government. He said that, rather than being concerned with the welfare of the children, it was trying to stamp out parallel societies. (A: That’s exactly right. He is spot on there. Any other way of living, you see, and getting the same or better results than the government is doing themselves. See, totalitarian government can have NO competition, you understand that. They say we shall all be one. There will be ONE world government and ONE system. Every part of its laws, there will be ONE law for each thing and EVERY country across the entire planet will have to follow it ruthlessly. Parallel societies have to be stamped out.) Making his court order, the judge voiced concern that, although Germany was a democratic country and an ally, the policy of persecuting homeschoolers was “repellent to everything we believe as Americans”.
That offers a useful insight into how Americans, living in a free country, view the creeping totalitarianism that has engulfed Europe. (A: And it is. Even politicians inside the EU Parliament have said this is a new Soviet state. It’s actually worse.) For this is not just a German issue: we are all helots under state control. Why did the German homeschoolers not seek political asylum in Britain? Because our rulers subscribe to the same tyrannical statist philosophy, is the answer. (A: They’ve signed away all their sovereignty into the European Union. They take orders from the EU Parliament.) Every possible obstacle is put in the way of homeschooling parents in Britain. (A: They are really persecuting them under the same laws as Germany.)
The mentality is that the state – not parents – is the natural controller and shaper of children’s lives and beliefs. (A: That was all through UNESCO at the United Nations.) When a schoolgirl can be given an abortion without her parents’ knowledge, we know that, while public utilities may have been privatised, children have been nationalised. (A: They’ve privatized utilities but they’ve also nationalized the children.) The Romeikes who fled from Germany objected to their children being forced to follow a curriculum that they believed was anti-Christian. (A: Well, you’ve got to read the constitution they’ve got up there at the EU to see that it said right in it that the only religion it’s following is SECULAR HUMANISM. They will stand NO competition, no parallel system, no parallel belief.) The same would apply in British state schools, where pornographic sex education is increasingly being made compulsory.
Is that a new idea? Not at all. It was first implemented as government policy in 1919, during the short-lived communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in Hungary… (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I though I’d let the guitar wail a bit there because you feel like wailing when you read this kind of stuff and you know what’s happening in the world and you know why it’s happening and most of the public don’t know why it’s happening. Under the Laws of the Child, the UN has basically stripped away the rights of the parents. That’s a good part of what’s happening here. If you home-school they’ll claim, from the major schools that will stand no competition obviously, that you are not socializing your child. I don’t know. You know, when you went to school in Britain it was the roughest place you could possibly get thrown into because if you couldn’t fight your way out you’d be stamped under. That’s what they call socializing. To be honest with you it was pretty rough. But no, they want everybody to go under the ONE indoctrination system. This particular journalist here is bang on with it. It’s not often you get people who are bang on and he ties in the communist thing. He’s right. You’ve got to look at the symptoms of a disease and I’ll tell you, when they keep adding up and adding up, you’re right on track and it has merged. It was the big bankers who funded communism; the big boys who started up the biggest corporations, international corporations, who FUNDED communism for the collectivist end product which we are going right into now. He says…
Is that a new idea? (A: This is about the sex education which really is teaching them to be active sexually and into pre-puberty. AGAIN, Huxley even had that in Brave New World, in the book version. And it’s here.)
Is that a new idea? Not at all. It was first implemented as government policy (A: That’s getting the children really involved in sex in pre-puberty.) in 1919, during the short-lived communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in Hungary, when Georg Lukacs, as deputy commissar for “culture”, enforced his system of Cultural Terrorism, force-feeding children pornographic sex education, teaching them to laugh at their parents and at monogamy (A: That’s exactly like Brave New World again isn’t it?) and to reject the family and religion. Lukacs was a founder of the Frankfurt School of Marxism, (A: All these boys in the Frankfurt School came across to Britain and the US. They wrote lots of books, like Theo Adorno who was right in there with music too. The musicians and Frank Zappa and all these boys were all involved with the Frankfurt School.) later popularised by Herbert Marcuse, whose demented notions are today called Political Correctness and, as such, have colonised Western governments.
It takes the forthright remarks of an American judge, (A: Its true isn’t it?) in a country where the culture war has not yet been lost, (A: I don’t know…) to bring home to us in Europe that we already inhabit the Gulag. The Berlin Wall did not “fall” – it was just moved further west.
It’s bang on because that comes out of the speech that Gorbachev gave when he was President of the Soviet Union and he gave it to the Politburo. Do a search for Eric Margolis; he was the correspondent for the Toronto Sun at the time and he put the speech in the newspaper. Gorbachev said to them, you’ll hear that communism is dead; don’t believe it. We are moving out into the next phase. This is all here. That’s all tying together, if you wonder what’s really happening in the world around you.
Years ago when Margaret Thatcher was in, there was an article that came in the paper about once and it really got no comment because it was too stunning to even believe. It was to do with the Island of Skye off the coast of Scotland. Supposedly part of Scotland you see, it always had been and thousands of people lived there and all the rest of it, but it had been sold off by the British government to a multi billionaire from Holland at the time. A few people who thought at the time, scratched their heads and says how can a government sell off part of what’s supposed to belong to the people? You see. Obviously that meant with all the land and houses sitting on it, that somebody was going to pay tribute – which is just taxes – to some new master. It was not an April Fools joke either because when Maggie Thatcher was in and because of all the other governments before her, and during her time, the International Monetary Fund came in… and the World Bank and the whole bunches involved. When the IMF comes in they start running your economy, what you must cut back on, health care, this, that and the other, in order to pay what you owe. They always slash health care first, by the way, and then they go into other areas of social welfare. Part of it is LAND FOR DEBT SWAPS. Something everyone should look into, Land for Debt swaps. It came, again, from the United Nations. I though this was… here again, it’s not April the 1st. This is from The Mail Online.
White Cliffs of Dover (A: Everyone knows this song that was made popular as a propaganda song in World War II.) to be sold to the French (A: The French Government.) to help reduce Government’s debt (A: The British government’s debt.)
By Vanessa Allen / 8th February 2010 / Mail Online
For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence.
The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.
But now part of that proud history is up for sale and the leading bidder is revealed as the former age-old enemy – France. (A: France really was never an enemy of Britain. It was just the Kings, who were all cousins, that were all fighting each other.)
The Port of Dover is being recommended by Government advisers for sale to the French authorities.
It is one of a string of public assets (A: Do you understand that everywhere, even the town in which you might live, is a public asset. There are many sets of books that the public NEVER get to know the truth of what a country even is. It’s a corporation. Then there are titles which are subdivided down to the local level, corporations. Even your police forces are corporations. They are not in the blue pages where government things should be. They are in the commerce section. So here it says…) It is one of a string of public assets which have been earmarked for privatisation as the Government battles with a record £830billion national debt. (A: Thanks Tony Blair.)
The proposal for the port has prompted outrage.
Prospective Tory MP for Dover Charles Elphicke said: ‘It’s clear Gordon Brown (A: That’s the Prime Minister.) has no sense of the history of our nation or the pride of our town. (A: Well believe you me, Gordon Brown knows EXACTLY what’s going on and so did all his predecessors as well because they had meetings when they were doing the GATT Treaty at the time – the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs – they had their meetings in France to do with another aspect and that was the ability for private corporations to come into any country and literally buy up the land for their factories or their plants or whatever else they were doing. There is only ONE documentary ever made and even that was very shallow because they weren’t allowing the public in, and that was by the CBC in Canada. I think the rest of the world didn’t even know it was happening. Canada, the US and all the different representatives were there. They had been working on it for 4 or 5 years… and NO ONE was told except through that one little documentary that came out, that this was part of the plan for the future. So it says…)
‘How dare he consider selling it all off to the French? Dover is the English border. The people of Dover have a clear message for him – hands off our port, hands off the English border.’ (A: That’s a politician speaking and all the oppositions would say the same thing.)
A sale of the Port of Dover, Europe’s busiest ferry port, could net up to £350million for the Treasury. Its harbour board applied to the Transport Secretary for voluntary privatisation last month.
The sale is expected to be rubber-stamped and the leading bidder has emerged as Nord-pas-de-Calais regional council, which also owns Calais. (A: So they are going to own all the ports across the planet.) [Alan laughing.]
The French port is just 21 miles away across the Channel and the sale would mark a dramatic reversal in the fortunes of the two towns. (A: See, we are all getting bought and sold and folk don’t even know we are getting bought and sold. Bought and sold… and the land that you sit on… because they must destroy – and this is the time for it – any remnants of nation statehood… Nation Statehood… for a global society of interdependence.)
As I say, we never know what’s really going on. Little articles come out; they’re never given much credence or even publicity by the people who should make a stink about it. Here’s another article about… Here we live in a world and they keep prattling on about this word ‘democracy.’ We’ve NEVER had democracy. No nation has ever had democracy. IT’S A MYTH. It’s an utter myth when you realize that there are parts of Canada that are technically owned still by the Grovenor family and the Mansfield family and all these big families that came from the Norman descendancy. Still owned! There are parts of the States that technically are still under their dominion yet, because they had the charters from the King long before the Revolution. They’ve never been changed. Under law everything reverts back to the original title holder if they so claim it. Americans don’t know that a good part of their… in fact most of their income taxes go straight through a system to the British Crown and via other places from there. We are mushrooms! We’re kept in the dark and we’re fed fecal matter.
Here is an article…
Secret summit of top bankers
News.com.au / By George Lekakis and Fleur Leyden From: Herald Sun February 6, 2010 Source: AP
(A: This is the 21st century! When we’re supposedly sending troops across the world to bring in democracy to free these ‘primitive’ peoples and get rid of their ancient, crazy, silly beliefs and bring in secular humanism and all that stuff. We’ll all be one happy, happy family… of slaves.)
THE world’s top central bankers began arriving in Australia yesterday as renewed fears about the strength of the global economic recovery gripped world share markets.
Representatives from 24 central banks and monetary authorities including the US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank landed in Sydney to meet tomorrow (A: So it’s already done.) at a secret location, the Herald Sun reports.
Organised by the Bank for International Settlements (A: Here we go again, the Bank for International Settlements.) last year, the two-day talks are shrouded in secrecy with high-level security believed to have been invoked by law enforcement agencies.
Speculation that the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Dr Ben Bernanke, would make an appearance could not be confirmed last night. (A: So that means he was there.)
The event will be dominated by Asian delegations and is expected to include governors of the Peoples Bank of China, the Bank of Japan and the Reserve Bank of India.
The arrival of the high-powered gathering coincided with a fresh meltdown on world sharemarkets, sparked by renewed concerns about global growth and sovereign debt. (A: Sovereign debt, that’s what they’re using for selling off parts of Britain.)
Fears countries including Greece, Portugal, Spain and Dubai could default on debt repayments combined with disappointing US jobs data to spook investors.
Australia’s ASX 200 slumped 2.4 per cent, to its lowest close since November 5, echoing a sharp fall on Wall Street.
Asian share markets were also pummelled, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 down almost 3 per cent and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng slumping 3.3 per cent.
The damage was also being felt by European markets last night with London’s FTSE 100 down sagging 1 per cent in early trade. (A: Then it goes on about the usual stuff that we don’t even understand, with Dow Jones and blah, blah, blah and all that stuff we are not meant to understand because it’s all nonsense anyway. Back after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I think Shawn called back and he can hear me now, so are you there Shawn?
Shawn: Yes I am. How are you tonight?
Alan: No so bad.
Shawn: Good. I’m glad to hear that. You were just speaking of the great con, money, and how we are bought and sold every day and how the serfs go with the land and all those sorts of things. Pretty interesting facts. You know a lot of folk are getting real concerned about the $13 trillion national debt of the US, but that’s only part of it, which is one of the smallest parts of the debt of the US which is actually approaching $50 trillion, double the national debt of the US, is 26 trillion, and that is bond debt. That’s municipal bonds that people, cities sell to large players that we never hear about.
Alan: We never hear about them.
Shawn: They own whole regions of the country. Anyway, I’ll try to be succinct here. You were talking about indoctrination with the schooling system and those articles that you read; I mean they are just… reality is getting stranger and stranger and more stranger than fiction every day. I think the indoctrination with this digital TV age, digital iPod system, and everything turning digital… You’ve talked about all the flicker rates designed at MIT and all that kind of stuff. You can see people of the United States that watch several hours of TV a day, they are gone. They are literally goners living in a different reality than I definitely am.
Alan: They are hypnotized. There’s no doubt about it. They are deliberately hypnotized and downloaded with messages all the time and these particular little slogans, little things they keep repeating in their conversations to their friends, come from television. They are downloaded right into them. They are actually formulated in between all the other words so that you will tune out the other words and you’ll hear the little slogans and catch phrases and so on and go green and all that stuff… and you just parrot them in your conversations. It’s a simple technique but it’s extremely effective.
Shawn: Neuro-linguistic programming.
Alan: Yes, it is.
Shawn: It’s just incredible. As I’ve gotten further into decoding the words and sounds and all those sorts of things and how they affect the brain and how they really direct your thoughts.
Alan: Yes. Without even knowing it. And most people truly, as Brzezinski said back in the 70s, they will be unable to think or reason for themselves; all they will be able to do is talk about the topics they got from yesterday’s media, from the television. THAT’S happened. That HAS happened.
Shawn: Absolutely. You know one of the other things, like I said, as I’ve gotten these codings, I hear a new word, I carry around an unabridged dictionary in my pick-up with me all the time. But not only that, mainly when I hear a word it almost explodes into pieces and I see the individual letters and I can start putting the prefix and the suffixes and all these things together. It’s really a neat…
Alan: It’s a whole science.
Shawn: Absolutely.
Alan: It’s a whole science. It isn’t JUST communication. It’s the masters of communication that gave it to us and they use it to its fullest extent and the public are oblivious to it. Thanks for calling, that’s the music coming in now.
Shawn: Thanks.
Alan: Thank you.
I’ll be back tomorrow night so from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 8th 2010. For the newcomers out there, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and scroll down. You’ll find all the other sites I have up there. Bookmark them for future use because sometimes the big ones do go down and I do believe, the way the various laws are being passed, a lot more will be going down in the near future. So if you bookmark these you can always get the latest downloads for free. There are: [official sites listed above]. Sometimes too it’s a good idea if you find when you go into the .com site, and generally after the show everyone goes in at once, it can have sticky downloads. So spread them out into these other sites and it might solve the problem.
I always get my tin can out now and rattle it for you. The reason it’s quite is because there is nothing in it. But the fact is, I need YOU, you’re the audience who brings me to you. I’m not backed by any sponsor. I’m not backed by any company selling anything. The ads on the show that you hear are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the broadcast of this particular program and I’ve got nothing at all to do with it. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into any of my web sites and see what I have for sale – the books, CDs and DVDs – and you can also donate. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of all the talks I do and they are passed to them at meetings and so on, who don’t like using computers, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. That about covers it. Don’t wait for other people to throw a few pennies this way because that way no one does it. That’s the nature of humanity. That’s the way it goes.
Everything is supposed to be free these days. There is a whole generation growing up thinking everything is free. They don’t realize that everything that is free really is a trap to get more information from them. With everything that is free you generally find there are spins on things because people have a particular agenda, even when they are disclosing truthful information; it’s how they spin it that depends on who is backing them. There are big organizations out there, there are world organizations spewing out information like you wouldn’t believe with details on world events that you don’t get access to. It’s because they are well organized and well funded and they work together with the big boys who run the foundations. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s quite interesting that so many things are going on at the same time today that you can’t keep up with them. There are TOO many things happening all together but they all FLOW in one direction… all the things that you hear and see and they talk about, all flow in ONE particular direction and they come together.
It’s quite amazing to see how a planned global society that can push part of a plan, wait for 5 years, push the envelope a bit further along the same direction, wait another 5 years. Actually it’s getting shorter now; they can train us every year and update us every year or so. They do the same with every other part of the global agenda and yet most of us still think we are living on the cutting edge of the information age where we know everything that’s going on. We’re always given reasons or excuses for things but even the simplest person knows there is something else behind what we’re being told. It’s always been this way, to be honest with you. We are the last to know anything. The ordinary people are the last to know EVER what’s really, really happening. You generally have to wait 50 years, if you live that long, or even 100 sometimes because they can reclassify stuff after its time for exposure for another 50 years… or even 100 years. That’s what they actually do. Why would you have to classify certain information for 50 or 100 years? …from ANY population? …by its own government supposedly? When it’s, supposedly again, you are given the whole story at the time in the media, at least what you are supposed to believe FOR the next 50 to 100 years.
We never get the truth. It’s the same with wars. Wars, from the most ancient times have been economic wars. Economic wars and POWER wars. Power of very high people stemming originally from small families or clans who rose to the top by being utterly ruthless with everyone else around them and going off and conquering the next one and after a few generations they can run a country basically. From the countries they occupy – this happened in ancient times too – they then recruit millions of land troops to go off and invade other countries. That’s how big empires were actually made. And yet, in every generation, even in the conquered countries that were supplying troops, they would then see themselves as being say Roman, for instance, and have no contact with the generations before them who obviously were not Roman because they were not brought up in that area. That’s what empires are based on.
It’s so strange that, for instance, you can take a country like England that eventually creates Britain and then the UK and goes off and conquers, we’re told, ¾ of the world. They took the taxpayers’ money to fund those armies and equip those armies. They were given pittances for paychecks. Behind them came the army engineers who would build the bridges and lay the train tracks and so on. They’d often import people from India, even into Africa, to lay the lines. That was so COMMERCE could flow because they wanted the resources of that country and the resources were then owned by not the country. The country would spend the money to take care of it and police it and supply the military to defend it but it was for PRIVATE CORPORATIONS and nothing really, really has changed. Nothing at all has really, really changed. We’re led by the media to think that we’re on the cutting edge and whatever they tell you is good enough at the time. Unfortunately for most people it is good enough at the time and for the rest of their lives very often.
This will tie in with some of the things that I’m going to talk about tonight but before I do, I’m going to mention that I’ll put up a couple of links. One is for the Environmental Modification Treaty from the United Nations to show you at least how far back we can trace the original treaties. This one too, isn’t the first one; it’s in the 1970s but it does mention that they’ve not to use the creation of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts or floods on other countries. It doesn’t say anything about not using it upon your own people. I’ll put that link up there.
CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES
Article I
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.
There is also a good video… I depend on people sending me videos because XplorNet has cut me back at least two-thirds of the speed because someone in a high place told them to do so. I cannot download even audios; it’s the bad. There is a video that someone sent me that’s called, The Great Global Warming Swindle. It came out in about 2007. There are a lot of people who worked at the IPCC for the United Nations who left it on this particular video. They’re all scientists themselves; these are not people answering the question, what to you BELIEVE about so and so. They are telling you what they know about it. It’s very informative indeed.
There is also another link to two other major scientists who debunk the whole theory of greenhouse gases and the greenhouse effect in fact. I’ll put that link up as well. There is a .pdf from that link. It takes you to their actual writings. You’ll enjoy that. Going through it, it’s kind of dry, it’s quite long, but it really uses science to show and to prove. That’s what you are supposed to use science for. You don’t go up to people and say, what do you believe. So I’ll put those up there and you can look into them.
The Science (Fiction) of the Greenhouse Effect
Written by Rebecca Terrell / Wednesday, 27 January 2010
Two German physicists have written a paper debunking the “theory” of the greenhouse gas effect by demonstrating how it violates basic laws of physics. Their paper, Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame of Physics, was published last year in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Modern Physics.
The authors are Gerhard Gerlich, a professor of mathematical physics at the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Braunschweig, and Ralf Tscheuchner, a retired professor of theoretical physics and freelance lecturer and researcher in physics and applied informatics.
Anyone who’s got any good videos out there at all, please send them to me because as I say, I cannot download videos anymore because I’ve been a bad boy and governments have ways of phoning big corporations and using the old school ties to say, John, why don’t you censor ole Watt there; he’s been a bit of a nuisance. That’s what they do; they give you the run around. They give you a thousand excuses but you’re being… they call it ‘technical censorship’ when they actually alter the speed by technical means. They call it ‘technical censorship.’ I’ve read the articles that the whole British Empire is actually doing this now. A few years ago, I used to have a lot of people in the Canadian government and bureaucrats who would, during their breaks or their lunch hour, they would listen to some of the shows and download the shows. It was the same in the US, a lot of governmental people. THEY ALL TOLD ME THAT THEY CAN’T GET ME ANYMORE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HAS LITERALLY PUT A BLOCK ON ME FOR ALL GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS. That was quite a few years ago, so they’ve been at this for a long time… for those who really think they’ve got free speech.
There is movie called Gattaca. I’ve mentioned it quite few times over the years. It’s about an age – which is pretty well here; it’s coming shortly – where genetic enhancement, meaning scientists intervene between the sperm and the ovum and take out what they claim MIGHT be defective genes and basically put together the perfect future world citizen to serve their system. It creates a class system where people who are conceived and born in the old-fashioned way are second-class citizens. All the good ones [genetically enhanced] get the top jobs; space exploration, high paying and all that stuff. Gattaca ties in with this article here that is from the Telegraph.
Gene test to be offered to couples planning children
Couples planning to have children will be able to take a test to see if they are at risk of having a baby with a genetic disease, it has been reported.
8 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
The screening has prompted criticism in some quarters by medical professionals who argue it plays on parents’ fears (Alan: That’s exactly what it’s for. It’s like reading you hand. It tells you as much as someone reading the palm of your hand.) and is verging on ‘eugenics’. (A: It IS eugenics. That’s the whole point of it. That’s where it’s supposed to go. They gave the little tests to get your own one done, remember. They’ve done exposés on television on that, showing you it’s all bunkum because they really can’t predict if you will or will not get this or that.)
The saliva test, involving samples taken from each prospective parent, would discover if either was carrying a genetic mutation which could lead to cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy or sickle cell anaemia.
Couples will be able to pay £700 (A: That’s a lot of money.) for the test at the Bridge Fertility Clinic in London. (A: Everything starts in London. It’s just quite amazing. But then again, that’s the flagship for the world isn’t it? That’s what they said at the Fabian Society. That’s what they said at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that the British system and the British Empire would be the nucleus of the system that the whole world was to get build upon. That was taken up by the CFR also.)
The clinic says it will only offer the screening alongside counselling, but the US company which developed the test plans to sell it online without medical advice, according to The Times.
The screening has prompted criticism in some quarters by medical professionals who argue it plays on parents’ fears and is verging on “eugenics”.
If the results show both parents carry recessive genes which could lead (A: I love the ‘coulds’ and ‘maybes’.) to a disease, parents could choose to have IVF (A: That’s exactly what I’m talking about.) and then screen their embryos to ensure healthy ones are implanted in the womb. (A: I wonder too, when they take ones out, which ones they are putting back in there to get the perfect, obedient citizen?)
They could also opt for genetic testing during pregnancy, sperm donation or adoption to prevent giving birth to a child with a genetic condition. (A: So we’re going into the Handmaid’s Tale as well, obviously.)
People with a history of conditions such as cystic fibrosis can already be screened on the NHS.
The new test, developed by Consyl, checks for numerous conditions and would be available to the wider population and not just high risk groups.
(A: So they use the usual stuff…) “Couples have a fundamental right to know their carrier status (A: This is the people who are selling it, right.) and to make reproductive decisions on the basis of that status without outside interference.” (A: They use all this scary stuff and ‘your rights’ to sell their whole gimmickry here because that’s where it really is right now. They can’t really tell which gene is going to line up with what other gene in the other person. It’s like reading the palm of your hand, but people will go for it.)
People will go for it. Anything to do with genetics, science is good, you know. Cutting edge science, we’ve all got to get cutting edge science, it’s just good for us, you know. It’s for our benefit too. That’s how it’s sold. That is how it is sold so it will take off like crazy.
We are going into this incredible Big Brother phase, with also Big Nanny coupled with it. Big Nanny and Big Brother. A nanny state where governments, through various enforcement agencies and right through the educational system, are really becoming the police over our THOUGHTS and our ACTIONS and all the rest of it. They are training us Pavlovian style to simply OBEY by automatic conditioned response. Things get sillier and sillier and sillier. This article is from New York.
Girl, 12, arrested in New York for doodling on school desk
2/5/2010 | USAToday.com
NEW YORK (AP) — A New York City junior high student has been arrested for doodling on her desk with a marker.
Twelve-year-old Alexa Gonzalez scribbled “Lex was here 2/1/10” (A: Oh, that’s terrible. Oh.) on her desk Monday at Junior High School 190 in Queens. She also wrote “I love my friends Abby and Faith.”
The girl says the doodles could have been erased. (A: So it was erasable marker.)
Moraima Tamacho says her daughter was released several hours after she was taken in handcuffs to a police station. (A: Is this the society that you are all paying your taxes for? Is it? Is it? What are these teachers these days? What ARE they? What sado-masochistic college did these people get selected from to train? Can you believe that?)
Education department spokesman (A: A spokesman is a PR specialist.) David Cantor said the incident shouldn’t have happened, and that common sense should prevail. (A: Well, ‘should’ isn’t good enough is it?)
Last month, the New York Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit alleging more than 20 instances of wrongful arrests and assaults by school safety officers. (A: See, once you start getting all these safety officers they’ve got to make work for themselves. They can’t put in ‘nothing’ reports, just blank reports, nothing happened, nothing happened. Whenever a government or any agency creates another agency they’ve got to start producing. It’s the same with the police. You put them on the roads, they’ve got to start handing out tickets, and then they get quotas. That’s how it works.)
Gonzalez has been assigned eight hours of community service, a book report and an essay on what she’s learned from the experience. (A: She could write a darn good novel on that, labeled under horror. You know.)
That’s the sort of thing that’s happening. I thought these things were really happening more in Britain that starts it all first you see, and then everybody else copies. It’s actually worse than that. Here is another article with a little boy Patrick.
Laura Timoney fumes after son Patrick, 9,
is busted for bringing 2-inch-long toy gun to PS 52
BY Matthew Lysiak, Kate Nocera and Larry Mcshane / mydailynews.com / February 4th 2010
Patrick Timoney, 9, with (A: It shows him with the little…) plastic gun – barely 2 inches long – that nearly got him suspended after PS 52 Principal Evelyn Mastroianni took action.
An irate Staten Island mom blasted a grade school principal Wednesday for treating her son like a pint-sized Plaxico Burress after he brought a 2-inch-long toy gun to school.
“This principal is a bully and a coward, and needs to be held accountable,” said Laura Timoney, 44, after her teary fourth-grader was nearly suspended for playing with the tiny toy at lunch.
“The school should be embarrassed. This is a common-sense issue.”
What you are also seeing… you’ve got to understand how academia trains teachers. Remember, academia is a BIG ARM now OF GOVERNMENT. It has been since really the beginning of World War II. I actually have the papers and documents from big think tanks who discussed this, using universities as a training tool for SOCIAL CHANGE and for SOCIAL INDOCTRINATION. That’s what they’ve been doing for a long time and so have the primary schools as well. The teachers go into these universities and get a FURTHER conditioning in to it. They themselves, when they see anything at all to do with a plastic gun, have a Pavlovian freak-out response; that’s how they’re trained and this is what they go and do about it. This is the sort of toy you get in a Lucky Bag in candies. Now, this could also get people killed. Supposing that freaked out teacher did have a fire arm and they see something that looks like something that they’ve been… it’s like burned with a poker into their brain Pavlovian style, gun’s bad, guns bad, guns bad… They could have actually shot the child and I’m not kidding about that.
Patrick Timoney, 9, was terrified when he was yanked into the principal’s office to discuss the teeny-weeny plastic “weapon.”
“The gun was so little,” the boy said. “I don’t understand why the principal got so upset. I was a little nervous. They made me sign a statement.” (A: At 9, eh?) [Alan laughing.]
Patrick and a friend were playing with Lego figures in the school cafeteria on Tuesday when he pulled out the faux machine gun and stuck it in the hands of his plastic police officer. (A: A 2-inch machine gun, eh?)
Boom! Trouble ensued, with Patrick’s mom getting a phone call from Public School 52 Principal Evelyn Mastroianni saying her son had somehow gone from straight A’s to the NRA.
“I was in disbelief,” the still-fuming mother said. “Why didn’t anyone step up with an ounce of common sense and put an end to the harassment of my child?” (A: Well these stories are just like avalanching today. They come out in avalanches; you can’t keep up with it, there is too much… too much. It’s happening all over the place and in different countries too.)
For those in the States that really don’t get it yet that their country is rapidly changing to catch up with the rest, it’s already been completely socialized. Remember, the new system that we have to live in is a COLLECTIVIST/COMMUNIST blend WITH the big corporate big boys and their corporations where capitalism comes together with it and the system is not quite communist and not quite capitalist. It’s actually SOCIALIST. That’s what Lenin talked about when he said that the state would wither away. He also meant that the state would wither away because through international treaties, through a central body, eventually people would give up every last vestige of their sovereignty and that’s what has happened over the many, many years since the United Nations was set up.
Here are some of the freedoms that you do have in America. Even though they are coming down on it, I heard Hilary Clinton in a newscast once talking about she wanted to end home schooling. They really came down on it all over Europe. An Italian Prime Minster said the reason he was banning it was because he wants every child to have the same – and the word in the newspaper said – indoctrination, the same indoctrination. This article is from the Telegraph.
German homeschoolers’ political asylum in America exposes the EU Gulag
(A: Who would have thunk, eh. Who would have thunk that people would have to RUN to the States to get away from Europe.)
By Gerald Warner World Last updated: February 1st, 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
The case of the homeschooling couple from Germany who were granted political asylum in the United States, about which Ed West blogged recently, becomes even more interesting if one reads the remarks of the man who granted the Romeikes asylum, Immigration Judge Lawrence O. Burman, of Memphis, Tennessee.
Burman said: “We can’t expect every country to follow our constitution. The world might be a better place if it did. However, the rights being violated here are basic human rights that no country has a right to violate.” (A: Well, it’s happening IN the US in a lot of states.) He observed: “Homeschoolers are a particular social group that the German government is trying to suppress. This family has a well-founded fear of persecution… therefore, they are eligible for asylum…”
Those last remarks might have been uttered in 1933. Do we truly realise the significance of what has happened? Do we understand that, as citizens of the European Union, (A: This is a British paper remember.) we now belong to a totalitarian state from which fleeing citizens are being granted political asylum in the United States? Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, tyranny is back in business in Germany.
Judge Burman added that the scariest thing about this case was the motivation of the German government. He said that, rather than being concerned with the welfare of the children, it was trying to stamp out parallel societies. (A: That’s exactly right. He is spot on there. Any other way of living, you see, and getting the same or better results than the government is doing themselves. See, totalitarian government can have NO competition, you understand that. They say we shall all be one. There will be ONE world government and ONE system. Every part of its laws, there will be ONE law for each thing and EVERY country across the entire planet will have to follow it ruthlessly. Parallel societies have to be stamped out.) Making his court order, the judge voiced concern that, although Germany was a democratic country and an ally, the policy of persecuting homeschoolers was “repellent to everything we believe as Americans”.
That offers a useful insight into how Americans, living in a free country, view the creeping totalitarianism that has engulfed Europe. (A: And it is. Even politicians inside the EU Parliament have said this is a new Soviet state. It’s actually worse.) For this is not just a German issue: we are all helots under state control. Why did the German homeschoolers not seek political asylum in Britain? Because our rulers subscribe to the same tyrannical statist philosophy, is the answer. (A: They’ve signed away all their sovereignty into the European Union. They take orders from the EU Parliament.) Every possible obstacle is put in the way of homeschooling parents in Britain. (A: They are really persecuting them under the same laws as Germany.)
The mentality is that the state – not parents – is the natural controller and shaper of children’s lives and beliefs. (A: That was all through UNESCO at the United Nations.) When a schoolgirl can be given an abortion without her parents’ knowledge, we know that, while public utilities may have been privatised, children have been nationalised. (A: They’ve privatized utilities but they’ve also nationalized the children.) The Romeikes who fled from Germany objected to their children being forced to follow a curriculum that they believed was anti-Christian. (A: Well, you’ve got to read the constitution they’ve got up there at the EU to see that it said right in it that the only religion it’s following is SECULAR HUMANISM. They will stand NO competition, no parallel system, no parallel belief.) The same would apply in British state schools, where pornographic sex education is increasingly being made compulsory.
Is that a new idea? Not at all. It was first implemented as government policy in 1919, during the short-lived communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in Hungary… (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I though I’d let the guitar wail a bit there because you feel like wailing when you read this kind of stuff and you know what’s happening in the world and you know why it’s happening and most of the public don’t know why it’s happening. Under the Laws of the Child, the UN has basically stripped away the rights of the parents. That’s a good part of what’s happening here. If you home-school they’ll claim, from the major schools that will stand no competition obviously, that you are not socializing your child. I don’t know. You know, when you went to school in Britain it was the roughest place you could possibly get thrown into because if you couldn’t fight your way out you’d be stamped under. That’s what they call socializing. To be honest with you it was pretty rough. But no, they want everybody to go under the ONE indoctrination system. This particular journalist here is bang on with it. It’s not often you get people who are bang on and he ties in the communist thing. He’s right. You’ve got to look at the symptoms of a disease and I’ll tell you, when they keep adding up and adding up, you’re right on track and it has merged. It was the big bankers who funded communism; the big boys who started up the biggest corporations, international corporations, who FUNDED communism for the collectivist end product which we are going right into now. He says…
Is that a new idea? (A: This is about the sex education which really is teaching them to be active sexually and into pre-puberty. AGAIN, Huxley even had that in Brave New World, in the book version. And it’s here.)
Is that a new idea? Not at all. It was first implemented as government policy (A: That’s getting the children really involved in sex in pre-puberty.) in 1919, during the short-lived communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in Hungary, when Georg Lukacs, as deputy commissar for “culture”, enforced his system of Cultural Terrorism, force-feeding children pornographic sex education, teaching them to laugh at their parents and at monogamy (A: That’s exactly like Brave New World again isn’t it?) and to reject the family and religion. Lukacs was a founder of the Frankfurt School of Marxism, (A: All these boys in the Frankfurt School came across to Britain and the US. They wrote lots of books, like Theo Adorno who was right in there with music too. The musicians and Frank Zappa and all these boys were all involved with the Frankfurt School.) later popularised by Herbert Marcuse, whose demented notions are today called Political Correctness and, as such, have colonised Western governments.
It takes the forthright remarks of an American judge, (A: Its true isn’t it?) in a country where the culture war has not yet been lost, (A: I don’t know…) to bring home to us in Europe that we already inhabit the Gulag. The Berlin Wall did not “fall” – it was just moved further west.
It’s bang on because that comes out of the speech that Gorbachev gave when he was President of the Soviet Union and he gave it to the Politburo. Do a search for Eric Margolis; he was the correspondent for the Toronto Sun at the time and he put the speech in the newspaper. Gorbachev said to them, you’ll hear that communism is dead; don’t believe it. We are moving out into the next phase. This is all here. That’s all tying together, if you wonder what’s really happening in the world around you.
Years ago when Margaret Thatcher was in, there was an article that came in the paper about once and it really got no comment because it was too stunning to even believe. It was to do with the Island of Skye off the coast of Scotland. Supposedly part of Scotland you see, it always had been and thousands of people lived there and all the rest of it, but it had been sold off by the British government to a multi billionaire from Holland at the time. A few people who thought at the time, scratched their heads and says how can a government sell off part of what’s supposed to belong to the people? You see. Obviously that meant with all the land and houses sitting on it, that somebody was going to pay tribute – which is just taxes – to some new master. It was not an April Fools joke either because when Maggie Thatcher was in and because of all the other governments before her, and during her time, the International Monetary Fund came in… and the World Bank and the whole bunches involved. When the IMF comes in they start running your economy, what you must cut back on, health care, this, that and the other, in order to pay what you owe. They always slash health care first, by the way, and then they go into other areas of social welfare. Part of it is LAND FOR DEBT SWAPS. Something everyone should look into, Land for Debt swaps. It came, again, from the United Nations. I though this was… here again, it’s not April the 1st. This is from The Mail Online.
White Cliffs of Dover (A: Everyone knows this song that was made popular as a propaganda song in World War II.) to be sold to the French (A: The French Government.) to help reduce Government’s debt (A: The British government’s debt.)
By Vanessa Allen / 8th February 2010 / Mail Online
For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence.
The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.
But now part of that proud history is up for sale and the leading bidder is revealed as the former age-old enemy – France. (A: France really was never an enemy of Britain. It was just the Kings, who were all cousins, that were all fighting each other.)
The Port of Dover is being recommended by Government advisers for sale to the French authorities.
It is one of a string of public assets (A: Do you understand that everywhere, even the town in which you might live, is a public asset. There are many sets of books that the public NEVER get to know the truth of what a country even is. It’s a corporation. Then there are titles which are subdivided down to the local level, corporations. Even your police forces are corporations. They are not in the blue pages where government things should be. They are in the commerce section. So here it says…) It is one of a string of public assets which have been earmarked for privatisation as the Government battles with a record £830billion national debt. (A: Thanks Tony Blair.)
The proposal for the port has prompted outrage.
Prospective Tory MP for Dover Charles Elphicke said: ‘It’s clear Gordon Brown (A: That’s the Prime Minister.) has no sense of the history of our nation or the pride of our town. (A: Well believe you me, Gordon Brown knows EXACTLY what’s going on and so did all his predecessors as well because they had meetings when they were doing the GATT Treaty at the time – the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs – they had their meetings in France to do with another aspect and that was the ability for private corporations to come into any country and literally buy up the land for their factories or their plants or whatever else they were doing. There is only ONE documentary ever made and even that was very shallow because they weren’t allowing the public in, and that was by the CBC in Canada. I think the rest of the world didn’t even know it was happening. Canada, the US and all the different representatives were there. They had been working on it for 4 or 5 years… and NO ONE was told except through that one little documentary that came out, that this was part of the plan for the future. So it says…)
‘How dare he consider selling it all off to the French? Dover is the English border. The people of Dover have a clear message for him – hands off our port, hands off the English border.’ (A: That’s a politician speaking and all the oppositions would say the same thing.)
A sale of the Port of Dover, Europe’s busiest ferry port, could net up to £350million for the Treasury. Its harbour board applied to the Transport Secretary for voluntary privatisation last month.
The sale is expected to be rubber-stamped and the leading bidder has emerged as Nord-pas-de-Calais regional council, which also owns Calais. (A: So they are going to own all the ports across the planet.) [Alan laughing.]
The French port is just 21 miles away across the Channel and the sale would mark a dramatic reversal in the fortunes of the two towns. (A: See, we are all getting bought and sold and folk don’t even know we are getting bought and sold. Bought and sold… and the land that you sit on… because they must destroy – and this is the time for it – any remnants of nation statehood… Nation Statehood… for a global society of interdependence.)
As I say, we never know what’s really going on. Little articles come out; they’re never given much credence or even publicity by the people who should make a stink about it. Here’s another article about… Here we live in a world and they keep prattling on about this word ‘democracy.’ We’ve NEVER had democracy. No nation has ever had democracy. IT’S A MYTH. It’s an utter myth when you realize that there are parts of Canada that are technically owned still by the Grovenor family and the Mansfield family and all these big families that came from the Norman descendancy. Still owned! There are parts of the States that technically are still under their dominion yet, because they had the charters from the King long before the Revolution. They’ve never been changed. Under law everything reverts back to the original title holder if they so claim it. Americans don’t know that a good part of their… in fact most of their income taxes go straight through a system to the British Crown and via other places from there. We are mushrooms! We’re kept in the dark and we’re fed fecal matter.
Here is an article…
Secret summit of top bankers
News.com.au / By George Lekakis and Fleur Leyden From: Herald Sun February 6, 2010 Source: AP
(A: This is the 21st century! When we’re supposedly sending troops across the world to bring in democracy to free these ‘primitive’ peoples and get rid of their ancient, crazy, silly beliefs and bring in secular humanism and all that stuff. We’ll all be one happy, happy family… of slaves.)
THE world’s top central bankers began arriving in Australia yesterday as renewed fears about the strength of the global economic recovery gripped world share markets.
Representatives from 24 central banks and monetary authorities including the US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank landed in Sydney to meet tomorrow (A: So it’s already done.) at a secret location, the Herald Sun reports.
Organised by the Bank for International Settlements (A: Here we go again, the Bank for International Settlements.) last year, the two-day talks are shrouded in secrecy with high-level security believed to have been invoked by law enforcement agencies.
Speculation that the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Dr Ben Bernanke, would make an appearance could not be confirmed last night. (A: So that means he was there.)
The event will be dominated by Asian delegations and is expected to include governors of the Peoples Bank of China, the Bank of Japan and the Reserve Bank of India.
The arrival of the high-powered gathering coincided with a fresh meltdown on world sharemarkets, sparked by renewed concerns about global growth and sovereign debt. (A: Sovereign debt, that’s what they’re using for selling off parts of Britain.)
Fears countries including Greece, Portugal, Spain and Dubai could default on debt repayments combined with disappointing US jobs data to spook investors.
Australia’s ASX 200 slumped 2.4 per cent, to its lowest close since November 5, echoing a sharp fall on Wall Street.
Asian share markets were also pummelled, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 down almost 3 per cent and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng slumping 3.3 per cent.
The damage was also being felt by European markets last night with London’s FTSE 100 down sagging 1 per cent in early trade. (A: Then it goes on about the usual stuff that we don’t even understand, with Dow Jones and blah, blah, blah and all that stuff we are not meant to understand because it’s all nonsense anyway. Back after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I think Shawn called back and he can hear me now, so are you there Shawn?
Shawn: Yes I am. How are you tonight?
Alan: No so bad.
Shawn: Good. I’m glad to hear that. You were just speaking of the great con, money, and how we are bought and sold every day and how the serfs go with the land and all those sorts of things. Pretty interesting facts. You know a lot of folk are getting real concerned about the $13 trillion national debt of the US, but that’s only part of it, which is one of the smallest parts of the debt of the US which is actually approaching $50 trillion, double the national debt of the US, is 26 trillion, and that is bond debt. That’s municipal bonds that people, cities sell to large players that we never hear about.
Alan: We never hear about them.
Shawn: They own whole regions of the country. Anyway, I’ll try to be succinct here. You were talking about indoctrination with the schooling system and those articles that you read; I mean they are just… reality is getting stranger and stranger and more stranger than fiction every day. I think the indoctrination with this digital TV age, digital iPod system, and everything turning digital… You’ve talked about all the flicker rates designed at MIT and all that kind of stuff. You can see people of the United States that watch several hours of TV a day, they are gone. They are literally goners living in a different reality than I definitely am.
Alan: They are hypnotized. There’s no doubt about it. They are deliberately hypnotized and downloaded with messages all the time and these particular little slogans, little things they keep repeating in their conversations to their friends, come from television. They are downloaded right into them. They are actually formulated in between all the other words so that you will tune out the other words and you’ll hear the little slogans and catch phrases and so on and go green and all that stuff… and you just parrot them in your conversations. It’s a simple technique but it’s extremely effective.
Shawn: Neuro-linguistic programming.
Alan: Yes, it is.
Shawn: It’s just incredible. As I’ve gotten further into decoding the words and sounds and all those sorts of things and how they affect the brain and how they really direct your thoughts.
Alan: Yes. Without even knowing it. And most people truly, as Brzezinski said back in the 70s, they will be unable to think or reason for themselves; all they will be able to do is talk about the topics they got from yesterday’s media, from the television. THAT’S happened. That HAS happened.
Shawn: Absolutely. You know one of the other things, like I said, as I’ve gotten these codings, I hear a new word, I carry around an unabridged dictionary in my pick-up with me all the time. But not only that, mainly when I hear a word it almost explodes into pieces and I see the individual letters and I can start putting the prefix and the suffixes and all these things together. It’s really a neat…
Alan: It’s a whole science.
Shawn: Absolutely.
Alan: It’s a whole science. It isn’t JUST communication. It’s the masters of communication that gave it to us and they use it to its fullest extent and the public are oblivious to it. Thanks for calling, that’s the music coming in now.
Shawn: Thanks.
Alan: Thank you.
I’ll be back tomorrow night so from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 9, 2010. Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Look at all the other sites I have up there. [Official sites listed above.] Bookmark them for future use and try these alternate sites once in a while, often you’ll get through quicker because everyone goes into the .com at the same time. There is also alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, the European site, and you can download audios from it but you can also choose from a bunch of transcripts that have been done in the various language of Europe for print up. A lot of folk are going into there and using it quite frequently. So if you want anything to read just print them up. I think it’s much better reading than listening sometimes and you can take it with you wherever you go, including the washroom, the throne.
It’s up to you the listeners to keep me going. I always stress that no one is backing me here. This is probably the only program out there that isn’t backed by some company or corporation. I don’t sell things, except the books I write and so on, on this show. So it’s up to you to back me and keep me going. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertisers – I’ve got nothing to do with it – to RBN for broadcasting the show, for the satellite and so on. That pays RBN for the time, their staff, board ops and all the bills that flood in. So you can keep me going by buy that which I have for sale on the web sites. [Order and donation options listed above.] I think the United States is the only country left where you can still use international postal money orders from your post office. It used to be across the board, across the world but they’ve stopped it everywhere else except the States; the pink, communist one is the international one for the world and that can get cashed in socialist Canada. Those that get the disks burned and passed to them and don’t use computers – to play on CD players – you can get in touch with me at [address listed above]. It’s very important you get the postal code right too. I’m not kidding you, just one letter and they will hold it up at customs forever… and then they send it back to you. It’s incredible, one letter. Even though the town is correct and everything else is correct, that one letter and suddenly they are like robots, they just don’t know what to do. They can’t look it up on a map or anything. But that’s the way it is in this computerized world, where people can’t think anymore for themselves. It’s very important too, now when you donate to me – it’s very much appreciated for those who do. It’s always the same bunch but occasionally a new person comes in, on a one time thing, and that’s really necessary because this is not a job. It’s a full time… it’s not even a career; it’s beyond a career. There is no time to do much else except prepare and do all the shows and get things ready for the shows at night. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ve talked so much in the past about the accidental view of history versus the planned view of history. Academia would love to have everyone believe – through all their various professors that churn out the books, the authorized history books for us – that everything just happens by chance here and there. Nations rise up and when somebody wants to go to war – and the world gets in an awful mess and we all pay for it – then out of that comes something from emergency meetings at the end of wars and all of that. That’s quite interesting to see that point of view, however it can’t be denied, when you go over the books that were written by big players before World War I even, that many of them talked about the necessity, especially the globalists, the ones who wanted to bring in an international socialist order.
Again too, it’s so confusing. Most folk think of socialism as a system… ideally it’s a system where if a government is going to tax you then they plow all the money back into serving the people with services and so on. That’s the ideal, which has never, ever been in existence and in reality. But an international socialist world order, backed by the big boys, the financial elite, who always look to the future, they were hiring think tanks back in the 1700s because they must always decide the trends. Trends don’t happen by themselves. If you allow them to happen by themselves you would lose control of the entire structural system that’s already in existence. So you create the trends. You fund the organizations. You fund the associations, of very rich people, middle class people, all the way down to the lower strata. And you GUIDE them. You guide them.
In the 1800s they wanted a world society. HG Wells wrote about it. Now, all the Marxists were on board with this idea of course. It was for global revolution. There are many ways to have revolutions. There are many KINDS of revolutions. Most of them are done through social change. Then you have to create the trend to create the movement. Sometimes it can take 20-30-40 years to create a particular movement that eventually is powerful enough to make its voice heard and make its demands heard. That’s like the green movement that started a long time ago, funded by the big foundations, again, to bring in an international socialist world order. They wanted the destruction of nations. Again, that sounds like a wonderful thing, the destruction of countries that keep battling each other and fighting and going to war. But no one asks well wait a minute, why did they always go to these wars? Who funded the wars? Who profited from wars, ongoing war? Who lent to Kings, Queens and governments? …huge amounts of money and at that time it was gold, solid bars of gold that was transferred back and forth by ships and carriages. You have to ask all these questions.
Getting back to what I said earlier, those who were in charge of financial situations worldwide always had to mange the trends, including using what we now call ‘futurist think tanks,’ people who take the trends of today, where is this going to go tomorrow, 50 years, 100 years, and then they control, they create the movements to control the direction of the world. That really is how it’s planned. It’s no different than any kind of social planning from a local council setting up areas for building houses for the next 50 years. The expansion of the population, where do they want to put the population and where do they want to remove the populations from as well. That’s happening right now under the greening movement, the environmental movement. They actually want to destroy and eradicate the suburbs. I’ve read the articles that Obama spoke about and the man that he brought in who came up, supposedly, with the idea of mass destruction of suburban areas that are now defunct. The factories have gone, they no longer want them around because we’ve all to live in the middle cities, the big cities, the centralized cities, the super cities as the United Nations calls them, while we are managed going down this road to a world state which eradicates all the other nation-states.
The nation-states will turn into regional blocs. That was part of the plan, and that’s not the whole plan either. Remember, this is an ongoing thing. They do nickname it ‘the never-ending story.’ Man is the material. We are clay. We can be molded into any shape, form – meaning psychologically and eventually genetically – to serve the purposes of the elite. Nothing is impossible given the finances, the money and backing the scientists for research and development. Nothing is impossible. They also want to reshape the world and eradicate the systems which they used in the past, which were nation-states for war and conquest and empire building. Britain was the country they chose eventually to bring in a good part of the BEGINNINGS for a world empire. It pretty well ruled ¾ of the globe… and we forget about that. Once that was done they brought in the League of Nations and then the big one, the United Nations. They said at the time they would use the British Commonwealth countries, as they then re-termed it – you see it sounds better than an empire, commonwealth countries – as a nucleus of a standardized system of democracy for the rest of the world. Then they would start demolishing the nation-states by putting them into regional blocs initially and then over a period of 50 years they would take them down by splitting them up, divvying them up like a piece of cake, like a wedding cake, so they could never unite again as a big powerful country.
Yesterday I read an article concerning the sale of the Port of Dover. As that old song goes, ‘there are blue birds over the white cliffs of Dover’. Well, Dover now belongs to a French international corporation that is buying up ports worldwide. Interesting that too, you see under the globalist agenda, which is also a combination of Marxism to bring in the collective society at the bottom run in a communistic basis with an elite feudal system above it all of corporate CEOs. You find that CEOs and companies are getting exactly what Marx suggested. There will be one company that will run all ports, one company that will run factories for shoes, one factory… and so on and so on. That’s what is to be down to it. They think it’s going to be more efficient you see. Then they split it all off into these small city-state type places. The futurist reports for the next 50 years, after the riots that are to occur shortly and then end in about 50 years, will end up with certain cities that still exist today; not all of them will still be around but some of them will still exist. The high-tech cities, super cities, which will be extremely wealthy and high-tech and full of people into the sciences there, they are the ones who will come though, according to the books churned out by people like Jacques Attali who has churned out books on this very thing. There may only be 5 super cities across the whole planet; outside it’s a sort of wasteland, barbaric remnants and stuff like that as they are dying off. I’m not kidding. This is from their own think tanks.
Here is an example of what they have been doing too. It’s just right on queue. I always say I’m never shocked by anything because I have read their books, and many of their older books, as I could get my hands on. This article is…
EU (Alan: The Economic Union, which is a parliament super-state now, remember, a new soviet.) wipes England off the map – as Gordon Brown (A: The Prime Minister.) flies the flag of St George over Downing Street (A: It’s well named Downing Street because it’s going down.)
23 April 2008 / dailymail.co.uk
The Tories (A: Conservatives.) have issued a St George’s Day rallying cry against plans by Brussels to “wipe England off the map” and create a United Europe.
As Gordon Brown hoisted the English national flag over 10 Downing Street to celebrate St George’s Day, it was revealed that EU officials had revised a map wiping out the country and the Channel.
The change splits England into three and lumps those parts together with chunks of other countries to create “transnational regions”. (A: Interesting, right on queue. Wells wrote about this in the late 1800s when he worked with the Fabian Society.)
It is claimed these zones – which have been allocated their own budgets – are intended to boost trade between EU nations. (A: They always give you a plausible truth but never the real one.)
But the Tories yesterday accused the Government of trying “to create a European superstate via the back door”. (A: Well come on, it’s already here; haven’t they noticed?)
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG, counties along England’s south coast form the “Manche Region” along with northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East has been paired up with regions across the Channel.
The “Atlantic Region” takes in western England, along with Ireland, Wales and parts of Portugal, Spain, France and Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the “North Sea Region”, which covers areas of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, Norway and the Netherlands.
The UK Government is fully behind the project (A: Well, it’s totally Fabian socialist. Brown is a complete Fabian. He’s a member of the Fabian Society; look into their web site; so is Tony Blair before him.), even though the words “England” and “Britain” are left off official maps of each area and the Manche Region renames the English Channel “The Channel Sea”.
Each region, which will be given taxpayers’ money (A: They always use the slaves’ money to put them in chains.) to promote trade links, cultural ties, transport policies and tourism, is to be run by a “managing authority” (A: A private authority.) of unelected officials overseen by a director. (A: Welcome to the new system, the new feudal system.)
None will be based in the UK, with Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by the Portuguese and North Sea by the Danes.
The regions have legal status (A: As entities, like corporations. I’ll read more of this when I come back from this break. It’s amazing. It’s quite amazing, and not so at the same time.)
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and that’s the guitar wailing because we’ve got lots to wail about, although most folk will go on as before. They don’t see the immediate changes and they adapt into it gradually, as it’s all planned to happen. I’m talking about the divvying up of the UK. People can laugh but it’s going to happen in Canada and the States as well. It’s also going to happen across in the Far East too. It says here…
The regions have legal status and Manche has a budget of £261million (A: They already allocated it back in 2007 and the next part is to be done in 2013.) between 2007 and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North Sea £219million. (A: To get them off the ground basically.)
Every project funded by a region must have a publicity campaign which ensures “there is provision for flying the EU flag at least one week every year”. (A: See, it’s again Fabian, a bit at a time and you get used to it.)
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives’ communities spokesman, said: “We already knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the white flag of surrender to the European Constitution. (A: Actually it was the red flag that Mr Brown hoisted long ago, and all the people before him as well. That’s what was happening there.)
This article is also from The Mail Online, going back to 2006.
New map of Britain that makes Kent part of France…
and it’s a German idea
TIM SHIPMAN / 4 September 2006 / dailymail.co.uk
For centuries the people of Kent have called their county the Garden of England. So they might find it quite a surprise that – according to the European Union at least – they are actually part of France.
Along with next-door Sussex, Kent has been rolled in with the Calais area on a map drawn up for Brussels.
The counties now belong to the “Trans-Manche region”.
Under the plans from German cartographers, the East of England has also been shoehorned into a new region, which includes Scandinavia.
The Western side of Britain has been lumped together with Ireland and the Atlantic coasts of France, Spain and Portugal.
The Tories (A: Conservatives.) accused the EU of plotting to undermine nation states and even “wipe Britain off the map”.
They warned that the German government wants to make the downgrading of national borders a key plank of its presidency of the EU next year (A: That already happened.) – despite the rejection of the European Constitution by voters. (A: Which now of course is all passed, whether they liked it or not.)
Brussels bureaucrats are poised to take charge of all “spatial information” in EU nations, forcing the 25 member states to bring their maps into line with specifications laid down by Brussels. (A: All planned before anybody signed anything. They knew they’d ram all the votes through you see. They never give up. It’s very interesting when you read the minutes and the books put out by the Royal Institute of International Affairs which basically has different branches including the Fabian Society. They run the right and the left wing and all things in between. Carroll Quigley said in his own book, as the historian of that organization, which is also called the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations, that they don’t mind who comes in, dictators, communists, Marxists, fascists, whatever, as long as they all go along with the agenda. And that’s what they have used, everybody.)
Those living in counties from Essex northwards will join the North Sea region under the plans, which take in coastal areas of Belgium, Holland, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway.
The new regions have been drawn up for a project called Interreg, which wants to foster cross-border co-operation (A: I love this ‘cooperation’ thing. It’s like ‘closer ties’ which means totally bound together legally.) on issues such as tourism, trade, health and the environment. (A: Now, when you go into economics they say that EVERYTHING, all laws revolve around economics; all laws, in every country. That’s why they used trade and economics to bind the European Union together in the first place; that was the reason for it. You will have a complete amalgamation if you bind it all through economics.)
The EU project will lead to a harmonisation of geographical names, administrative units and maps.
Brussels will also be able to create a database of property information used for taxation purposes. (A: Because now THEY will be sending out the tax forms to everybody around their new soviet bloc.)
The Tories claim this could be the first step in imposing an EU-wide property tax.
Local government spokesman Eric Pickles said: “Under the Labour Government, Britain has already been subdivided into regions as part of John Prescott’s empire building. (A: It wasn’t his; it was planned long before he was born.)
“I fear that there is an agenda to undermine national identities (A: … a fear, you fear? …it’s like a slight suspicion? Boy oh boy, I tell ya, they play the game.) and impose a United States of Europe by stealth. (A: Well that has happened now.) Conservatives will fight these attempts to Balkanise Britain. (A: Meanwhile every government, left wing, right wing, that’s been in Britain, for as long as I’ve been born, and before I was born, were signing further integration treaties with the EU. They actually set up the offices in every government in Europe under agreements made at the end of World War II. But they set up the actual bureaucratic structures in 1948 and they have been signing agreements ever since for total integration. Quite amazing, but not really. Read their old books and you’ll get the whole picture. I’ll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I was thinking about all the other things that are happening right now with the enviro taxes that are coming down the pike, the carbon trading, right down to YOU being billed for your carbon usage, estimated according to how much energy you use, electricity and so on. Eventually you are going to see rationing on gasoline and various other things as they all get you into your little regions where you can move around in but you will be unable to use private transportation, according to the United Nations Agenda 21. All this stuff is out there for those that want to look at it; most folk don’t want to.
Most folk don’t really want to look at this. Even people who are going crazy with the internet… and some people are going crazy. I get crazy emails all the time. I’ll give you an example. Yesterday I read about the weather warfare treaty and I didn’t use the UN site and some guy emailed me up and says, I couldn’t find it anywhere. Meanwhile I’ve downloaded everything from the UN site on weather warfare, because they update the treaty every year, or every couple of years. The guy said he couldn’t find it. Well I can’t be his nanny you see, and he’s probably too busy looking in a hundred different directions for other things at the same time and he can’t concentrate on one thing. So there is a downside to information overload as well.
Taxes… everywhere. There is also a Tobin Tax. You have heard the name floated once in a while, for those that still have memory. And people really are losing their memories. They have just forgotten that we had the flu scare there and we had billions of dollars thrown at it and it didn’t exist and now it just faded away. But it’s officially, by the way, been announced that it’s over. I hope you understand that now. You can breathe a sigh of relief that it’s over; the nonevent is over. And before that you just got suckered by the banks that collapsed, supposedly, with trillions of bucks as well, but that’s all forgotten now as well.
The Tobin Tax has been floated many times. It’s a WORLD TAX. This article is about that.
“Tobin Tax” and UN Global Taxman Making A Comeback
Written by William F. Jasper / Monday, 8 February 2010 / thenewamerican.com
For decades, the “Tobin Tax” — a proposed global tax on currency transactions — has remained far from economic mainstream thought, being primarily the hobby horse of left-wing academics and advocates of world government, such as the World Federalists, or communist dictators, such as Fidel Castro. The past few years, however, have seen a host of Tobin-type proposals coming from more establishment sources.
In the past few months, it has been boosted by liberal-left economists Paul Krugman and Robert Kuttner, as well as French President Nicolas Sarkozy, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, the European Council, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou (who is also president of the Socialist International) and the U.K.’s Financial Services Authority chairman Lord Adair Turner.
Advocates of the Tobin tax, named for the late Yale economics professor and Nobel laureate James Tobin, suggest a tax on foreign currency transactions would engender international currency stability by discouraging speculation. (A: What it actually does too is pass the cost of every transaction of the goods which are imported and then sold to you, all the way down to YOU, because obviously the big boys have to pass it down. They don’t want to pay it. They are going to pass it on down to the guy at the bottom. It means all of YOU, because everything now is imported.) Some politicians, like Gordon Brown and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, have pushed for Tobin taxes at the national level. However, as the British journal The Economist noted, “Unless a Tobin tax were implemented worldwide, trading would move out of any country that enforced it.”
Tobin proponents differ greatly on the optimum rate that should be charged, which is to be expected, since the line between speculating and investing is largely subjective. Some Tobin tax advocates propose “simplifying” things by levying a tax not only on foreign currency conversions, but all securities transactions. With tens of trillions of dollars in transactions taking place, that raises the possibility of raising hundreds of billions of dollars annually in new tax revenues. Voila! Suddenly the Tobin tax is transformed from a “stabilizing” tool into an almost inexhaustible global source of revenue. (A: Remember the whole deal too is to get the UN up to its proper status because that’s what it’s supposed to be. It’s never been the negotiating table, believe you me. It’s been a system set up for advocating ALL the global policies to bring them into a world government. That was its function, but it needs the cash to do so. And it’s going to get a lot already through all of these carbon taxes, by the way, once Lord Rothschild’s bank has had his hands on it for a while, gathering interest, in Switzerland, then it gets passed on to the United Nations. So this is another one that’s going to be tacked on to the UN as well.)
Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, addressing the UN’s World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, in Durban, South Africa, in September, 2001, proposed a Tobin tax that would provide the UN with a trillion dollars annually. Fidel said:
“May the tax suggested by Nobel Prize Laureate James Tobin be imposed in a reasonable and effective way on the current speculative operations accounting for trillions of US dollars every 24 hours, then the United Nations, which cannot go on depending on meager, inadequate, and belated donations and charities, (A: Charities… it’s multi-trillion foundations.) will have one trillion US dollars annually to save and develop the world. (A: Ha, ha, ha.) Given the seriousness and urgency of the existing problems, which have become a real hazard for the very survival of our specie on the planet, that is what would actually be needed before it is too late.”
Cuba’s erstwhile “Maximum Leader” would find few to disagree with him over at the Tobin Tax Campaign and Policy Network, which includes dozens of groups of the far Left, such as the National Lawyers Guild, the Institute for Policy Studies, Friends of the Earth, World Federalists Association, Rainforest Action Network, Oxfam, the World Council of Churches, (A: Yep! See, you join these groups and then they go into conferences that Mr Rockefeller set up, the World Council of Churches… you are just being used.) the Commission on Global Governance, and the AFL-CIO.
The AFL-CIO, however, apparently realizes that a Tobin tax is more politically feasible if the revenues generated from it are promised to spending on domestic programs, rather than the UN, though it is not averse to funding UN projects as well.
Most news stories paint the Obama administration as being firmly against any type of Tobin tax, with much being made of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s (A: By the way, the links are all on here, even Geithner’s reported opposition.) reported opposition to Gordon Brown’s Tobin proposal at last November’s G20 summit. Geithner’s anti-Tobin comments may or may not reflect genuine opposition by the administration to the transaction tax; there is ample reason for suspecting that the announced opposition is mere posturing and maneuvering, and that Team Obama may be planning a strategic flip-flop on the issue. (A: And it will happen.) After all, that is what Gordon Brown did; before becoming a top Tobin advocate, he was a leading opponent.
By they way, it’s great in Canada. I can remember when the NAFTA treaty was coming in, after the Free Trade negotiations had already been done. I think Brian Mulroney for the conservatives said he was fighting it. He was fighting NAFTA and that’s what he ran his ticket on. He got in and two weeks after he got in it was all over the papers, he’d suddenly changed his mind and he was now the leading advocate for NAFTA. Then after we all got sick of him and voted in the left wing, the liberals, then Chretien, he ran his ticket on the same thing. He was against NAFTA and sure enough, within a month he was now the leading advocate for NAFTA; he had a sudden change of heart. So they are ALL, all the boys belong to the same club.
There is no such thing as left wing and right wing anymore. If fact there really hasn’t been in the past; there really hasn’t been. They all get paid to get in there by the same big multi-trillionaires. And do you think they are just free gifts they are giving them? No. That’s a payoff you are given… to do as you are told. Carroll Quigley said himself, that the United States for instance, and he meant Britain too and good part of Europe. He says, for the last 60 years has been run by this organization. He meant the Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs. He said, they always put in the tops for elections, the tops of all parties for elections, and their top advisors are put in there as well, their vice presidents and so on. So it’s just been a game for the public to believe in, as they manage us along into this new, brave new world, but first going into the Orwellian phase of it – it’s actually a mixture of the two right now – to bring out their final outcome. And that’s what we are living through. We are just living through a script, as I say, and they must keep us placated and stupid and dumb with fairly, although minimalistically plausible answers. And that’s what’s done to us.
It’s astonishing too what is happening in the States. When you see legislators going through the motions of madness, in a sense, this article, again, should be an April Fools Day thing but it’s not, it’s true. I think it’s from Raw Story; it’s in other papers as well.
No Joke: South Carolina Now Requires ‘Subversives’ to Register
(A: …with the government! No kidding.)
Raw Story – February 5, 2010
Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now register with South Carolina’s Secretary of State and declare their intentions — or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.
The state’s “Subversive Activities Registration Act,” passed last year and now officially on the books, states that “every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States … shall register with the Secretary of State.” (A: Well you see, they’ve got most of them already there already, and that’s the corporations of America, because their leaders have been leading you into this new global system run by the United Nations from before you were born. Can you imagine they are actually asking you to do this? And they are even charging you a $5 filing fee.)
There’s even a $5 filing fee. (A: A $5 filing fee to get put on the books.)
By “subversive organization,” the law means “every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [or] of this State.” (A: [Alan laughing.] And you can get a PDF if you want and download it as well.)
It’s quite the world we are in. I wonder too, you’ll probably get some idiots that will go and register with it as well. It’s amazing. I guess the choice then is prison or the looney bin, and perhaps they think the food is better in prison. I don’t know, but it does make you wonder doesn’t it? People were talking about the big pharma’s push, through the FDA and other organizations, to do with getting the alternate natural health products off the shelves. It’s happened across Europe; they are heavily regulated now. They put a lot of people out of business. They are trying to do the same here. It was all signed, again, through the United Nations, our big brother. This article is about big pharma’s push through Canada.
Stop selling unlicensed natural health remedies: pharmacy regulators
The National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities (NAPRA) says pharmacists cannot be assured the products are safe until they are granted a government licence
Tom Blackwell, nationalpost.com / Feb. 6, 2010 (A: In Canada; it’s for the States too.)
Makers of natural-health products say they are bracing for widespread layoffs and millions of dollars in losses after Canada’s pharmacy regulators issued a surprise directive recently urging druggists to stop selling unlicensed natural remedies.
The order affects thousands of herbal treatments, multi-vitamins and other products, most of them waiting for approval from Health Canada under a backlogged, five-year-old program to regulate natural-health goods.
The National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities (NAPRA) says pharmacists cannot be assured the products are safe until they are granted a government licence, and should not sell them in those circumstances. (A: Now, the National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities, these are the guys who basically are the front men for the pharma groups, just like the FDA is in the US. I read the thing the other day where they had uncovered documents and mail between big pharma to members within the FDA to do with advocating, the enquiry, and being all for Ritalin and so on being given to youngsters. That’s what they said at, I think, the company Eli Lilly. They said, we have 5 doctors there on the board who are our friends, they are friendly to our company; they will be on our side. And they named them too, who these doctors were. There is a video up as well on YouTube about them and you will see these guys. So here you have the same thing in Canada. Everything is corrupt really. There is nothing there for what you think they are there for. They are all on the payroll of somebody else.) “Pharmacists are obliged to hold the health and safety of the public or patient as their first and foremost consideration,” (A: So again, they give you a plausible reason.) said the association’s recently issued position statement.
Representatives of the natural health industry, however, have reacted angrily to the directive issued last month, predicting it will have little impact on patient safety, while triggering an economic “crisis” for their members.
“We are talking about job loss, we are talking about a lot of income loss, we are talking about product stuck in warehouses that cannot be sold,” Jean-Yves Dionne, a spokesman for the Canadian Health Food Association, said in an interview.
A statement issued by the association calls the directive self-serving and contrary to federal government policy.
“It has taken a sledge hammer to a finishing nail,” the group said. “It will create confusion for consumers. It is the wrong thing to do.”
NAPRA is comprised of representatives of the provincial colleges of pharmacy that regulate the profession. It is now up to the individual provinces to implement the statement. The Ontario and Quebec colleges have already done so, with Ontario pressing pharmacists to not buy or order any more of the affected products, and its neighbour pushing for druggists to also remove unlicensed product already on their shelves, Mr. Dionne said.
Pharmacies, as surprised by the directive as anyone, are caught in the middle, said Jeff Poston of the Canadian Pharmacists Association.
“One of the questions that everybody is asking in the pharmacy world is, ‘Why now?’ As far as people can determine, nothing has significantly changed.” (A: Well a lot has changed. They had the big global meeting about it at the United Nations to do with this and certain people, myself included, have mentioned it in the past that this was going to happen. I’ll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I think there is time to get Stefan from Germany on the line if he’s there. Are you there Stefan?
Stefan: Thanks for taking my call. I’ve got a question regarding the European Union. I would like if you could tell, in your opinion, what does the flag of European Union signify, the first one.
Alan: I haven’t looked at it too closely to be honest with you. There’s a blue background; blue in the societies always stood for something under law. That’s why most police in the Western countries wore the blue uniform, before they turned to the black of the executioner for this era. So blue generally stands for law, by the force of law. Then you have the white stars; it’s a circle of white stars. Very interesting there are 12 of them. They said at the beginning that even though they might have 30 or 40 or more members, they’d always keep the 12 originating states on that flag; they wouldn’t add to it. If you look at Benjamin Franklin who was a member of the Rosicrucian Society and also the English Lodge Society; he was also a member of the Hellfire Club at the Dashwood Club in England. He said he hoped that the federation of the United States would be eventually a federation of the world. That’s what it was to lead to. He said it wouldn’t be run by a government as such. He said, it would be run by 12 wise men, because they brought the Cabala into it of course, just like Albert Pike did later on. So you have the 12 rulers. There are always 12 rulers that are always in the background, the wise men who give the orders to the puppet governments in front of them basically. These 12 men are steeped in the agenda.
I was going to mention before, it’s the same with the books from the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations; they are always funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. They will state in every book, we are a non-political organization. Now you think, my god, they are into every part of politics. They are correct; they do not play politics. They control an agenda. So they are not in politics; they control an agenda, including controlling the politicians. So they are telling you a truth there. We have never had democracy. We’ve had an agenda on the go. Democracy was the means to get everybody to go along with it and this agenda was on the table. When Karl Marx wrote about a regional society, regional blocs of trading nations, back in the 1800s, he was also in on the agenda, as were quite a few others, very top players at that time. They are going along with the agenda. After using the world through our tax money, through our militaries to bring in a world society, through NATO, the UN, and so on, it’s time now to take those countries apart, into smaller regions and break them up so they can, as Tony Blair said when he was Prime Minister of Britain, flood the countries with so much multiculturalism that Britain will never, ever be English again. That’s what he said.
How Labour threw open doors to mass migration
in secret plot to make a multicultural UK
By James Slack / dailymail.co.uk / 10th February 2010
That’s what he said and I read the article from the newspaper. It’s happened. This is a deliberate agenda to destroy all the old existing nations so we can all be ruled by the few in a totalitarian manner, and we can’t come together as peoples anymore with things in common to fight them. That’s a technique of warfare. Thanks for calling; that’s the end of the show coming in.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 10th of February 2010.
I always suggest newcomers look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. Bookmark all the sites you see up there. They’re all the alternate sites I have for future use because sometimes the big ones go down or they stop me from uploading the latest shows. The only official sites I have are www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, www.cuttingthroughthematrix.net, www.cuttingthroughthematrix.us. There’s also www.cuttingthroughthematrix.ca. There’s www.alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca. There’s www.cuttingthrough.jenkness.com and there’s also www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu which is the European site. You can download all the audios from there too but you’ve got the addition of transcripts of a lot of the talks I’ve given for print up and you can choose from a variety of languages from Europe.
I always say this is the ‘tin can’ moment so I rattle the tin can at the beginning of the show. If I was really a professional money grabber I’d say it every 10 minutes throughout the show but I don’t. I give you this break, so I say remember, you bring me to you. You the audience, you’re the only ones who support me financially, albeit low as it is basically. It’s usually the same ones over and over who help out and there’re not too many of them. Once in a while a new one comes in as a one-time thing. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can see how to do it if you go into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
You can either buy the books or discs I have for sale or you can donate. You can donate or buy the books through various means. Personal cheques are good from the US to Canada. International Postal Money Orders are good from the US to Canada from your Post Office but you’ve got to remember to stress ‘International’. That’s the pinky international communist one. That’s accepted in Canada. You can also use Paypal to purchase or to donate, just send me a separate email with the donation and I’ll get the stuff out to you. Outside the Americas, same idea but you have the addition of Western Union or Moneygram. You can also send cash. Any country can send cash and it’s accepted through the banking system here. Of course, they charge a fee at this end for doing so but it’s up to you how you want to do it but again you’ve got to keep me going.
The ads on this show are paid by the advertisers, I don’t speak to any of the advertisers, directly to RBN and I’ve got nothing to do with that. That pays RBN for the airtime and for their staff and equipment and for broadcasting us through satellite and so on. So it’s up to you, as I say. If you want to keep me going it really is up to you.
Most hosts out there, if not all of them, are backed by companies or corporations selling something or other and they bring on a lot of guests who simply promote the products although they bring in the New World Order and all the rest of it, sometimes very, very informed about it too but their main thing is to pitch their particular products at the end as well because all things and all information too runs on business. This is the one that doesn’t. As I say, the history of the past, where people have tried this kind of thing I’m doing in the past generally falls flat on its face. The other big sites out there that are responsible for putting out information to all the other sites, and there’re some here in Canada by the way, are backed by sources I better not talk about. Anyway, that’s up to you to see the different ways of doing it.
If you get the discs burned and passed to you to play on your CD player at home, of the talks that I’ve given, you can get in touch with me [listed above].
Back after this break with tonight’s topics.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
You know, it’s interesting to see the emails that come in because people’s headspaces are in a so vast a variety of places. I understand it too because what happens is there are so many factors that make up this world in which we live and so many movements and organisations going off in different directions. Power is an amazing thing when you get organisations. They generally start really with the intent of gaining some kind of power or legitimate say in affairs of the world, even locally or wherever, but power’s behind so much that we hear about.
Even the licensing of certain professions and so on really come from the idea of a power base to give them legitimacy and academic standing as they like to say. If you had scientific standing for the last 100 years or so, add scientific to it, you can do anything, you can sell anything. “It’s science you know”. That’s all they need to hear, “scientifically proven”.
Academia and professionalism has really taken a massive surge forward as the new priesthood, as the old traditional religions were being submerged mainly by the same academia. It’s interesting to see the forces that take shape because the difference with this world order, there’ve been world orders in the past, generally never complete world orders, to do with trading, military force, empires and so on. This is the first coming into being a complete world totalitarian system where a centralised government will (and really does) make and issue the orders for the rest of the planet to follow through, through the ‘binding treaties’ they call them.
To me there’s nothing binding. If you join an organisation and they say, “Here’s our mandate, here’s what we believe in”, and they go off in some strange tangent once you’ve joined, I don’t see why on earth you’d want to stay in it. People do stay in organisations once they’ve joined and they become familiar. They feel almost embarrassed to leave the group. They feel safe in the group or they get status or money through the group or something. That’s the sad statement of humanity but it happens all the time.
People have talked about society and all the secret societies. Most societies that are secretive have an open, a front for the general public. It doesn’t matter what they’re called to be honest with you, even so-called charitable organisations. You can take the charities, such as the Freemasons, and you have to ask yourself, “Why would a group of men have to swear secret oaths, and so on and have their meetings in secret, if they’re just a charitable organisation who wants to do good for society? It doesn’t quite wash and of course there’s a lot more to it than that because ‘binding oaths’ mean you’re giving your word. Your word means an awful lot when you bind it. It’s a legality to a particular cause. And of course the low level masons think it’s just something to do with doing good works and a self-improvement course type of thing, and they really do. Other ones go in for the camaraderie they get and then an awful lot go in because the one thing that Masons will let you know is that if you join then you’ll get up the ladder at work, you see. It’s a network that’s sworn to help its own get up there in life.
No-one asks why on earth they push particular agendas which fall right in with this big totalitarian agenda, such as fingerprinting. They used to run the fingerprinting courses for children.
Remember, your fingerprints are there for life. It doesn’t matter how tall you grow or whatever it’s the same fingerprints. And of course, they run what is now called the ‘Masonichip Program’ if you look into any of the Masonic sites. Why are they financing the ‘Masonichip Program’?
The chip is actually something that can be put clothing and stuff like that but you know where it’s all going to go don’t you? We don’t even need to guess where it’s supposed to go eventually as we’re trained to the familiarity of having a chip on us. It goes into your body eventually as they’re already doing with Alzheimers patients and certain prisoners and that kind of stuff.
Here’s an article from a ‘freesheet’ it’s called, one of these advertisers you get in your mailbox of maybe a few pages where it’s pure advertising. Any stories are simply organisations sending in their little blurbs of what they’re doing and so on, and charity drives.
This is from Thursday, February 4th. ‘The Northern Life’. I get it up here in Canada. ‘Northern Life’ and it shows a little ad with a girl, a little girl, with a finger in front of her mouth, and it says;
“Child Identification Clinic”
“Free digital fingerprints, digitalised voice sample, video images…”
(A: So they take the video as well)
“Dental imprint…”
(A: As well, they take that as well)
“Includes DNA sample”
(A: Where about do you get it?)
Sudbury-Manitoulin Freemasons, Sudbury Masonic Centre, off Regent Street, York Street, behind Memorial Hospital Tower entrance.”
(A: And when to attend and it gives you the times and so on and the days)
“www.masonichip.org”
(A: Or you can phone them. It’s 682 4775)
These are all over, not just in Canada, you see the same thing in the Masonic sites across Britain and different parts of Europe and elsewhere.
Why are they into that? These are the same things they want to put on the personal ID for the whole planet here but they train the children first. You know, you always train the children into the new agenda before they’re old and wise enough to say ‘no’. They have no suspicions when they’re young, especially when they’re dealing with adults. They don’t have suspicions and that database goes to the police as well and it’ll go to every other agency and security agency maybe even across the world. It’s astonishing what happens. Everyone trusts and trusts and ‘it’s for the good’ but do they need all of that; your voiceprint as well? They actually need your DNA and your dental imprint for records keeping as well? All that stuff? The Freemasons?
Anyway, that’s one little thing I wanted to talk about too but there’s much, much more going on.
This whole world we’re going into, this controlled Socialist system, is quite fascinating when you see it from all the different angles and all the participants involved in it and how old it is in fact because remember it all really started with Karl Marx.
Karl Marx himself, in the magazine that he used to write for in about 1849, talked about the need during the revolutionary phase, which could last maybe 20, 30, 40 or 50 years, however long it took, would have to eliminate all its opposition and also those who basically were unfit to live in a Socialist world, long before…that’s where Adolf Hitler got all his ideas from. That’s where John Stuart Mill also got his ideas from when he labelled different peoples or ethnic groups as being too far behind progress to catch up, so you’d have to eliminate them. That was the idea. There were still people across Europe who were peasant farmers. They were completely self-sufficient. They even spun their own cloth. But they didn’t go ahead and do much with money. It was almost an unnecessary thing for them and therefore they were maybe two steps behind or what they called two eras behind the modern Capitalist society to force a revolution so you simply eliminated them because they’d bring down those in the advance revolution.
That’s what happened of course with the Soviet system as well, based on Marx again, both Nazism and Communism came out of Marxism and you’ve got to see the movie, ‘The Soviet Story’, you’ve got to see it. I’ve mentioned it for months and months now and those who don’t see it really are missing a lot of documented information.
If you think that these people who promise you a lovely equality of a future, a nice Utopia, you’ve got to see what they’re actually about. You’ve got to listen and you’ll see it on ‘The Soviet Story’. You’ll see George Bernard Shaw from Britain, from the Fabian Society, one of the biggest players today with so many members. The Prime Minister of Britain is still a member. The previous Prime Minister Blair is a member and they have them all over the world belonging to the Fabian Society and many of its other groups because it doesn’t like to use the name outside too much of Britain but it’s all the same group and they are part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It’s an umbrella. The Royal Institute of International Affairs is a massive umbrella group of all these organisations that work together towards their common purpose.
George Bernard Shaw goes through on this Soviet Story, an old, rare clip of him talking where he says that “you will have to come to us and ask why we should keep you alive, justify your existence” he says. He was all for the elimination of those who are behind. In other words, ‘sub-species’. That’s where all this stuff comes from. ‘Sub-species’ they’re talking about.
Now for those who think that Communism is dead, utter nonsense. It was to move into its next phase as it blended with Capitalism. That’s why the bankers funded it. That’s why Canada and the US fed the Soviet Union for its entire existence right up to and after the collapse of the wall, the Berlin Wall.
Every year it was in the newspapers in Canada that the US and Canada were competing for the best prices on their grain that all went to Russia.
People don’t like to talk about nasty facts that are unsettling and that’s the problem. You see these things crop up again and get worse the next time. All the old Marxists, all the old hippy Marxists and all the academia Marxists that live in Canada and the States and all through Europe all belong to the big largest organisations across the world having global meetings, globetrotting across from meeting to meeting to meeting, putting up their petitions, writing things out, massive drafts and getting governments to sign them through the UN, and we are all obeying.
Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m going to put a link up. It’s just a Google link for a search. There’re a whole bunch of sites up there with little flash videos of Gorbachev, Mikhail Gorbachev who was the President of the Soviet Union when it supposedly went down and mind you, he immediately walked right into something he’d set up in advance in the US when he took over the Presidio, he was given it basically, as the President of a new organisation to use again, ecology and greening, to bring in the New World Order, the Socialist World Order.
And he walks across the world, well he doesn’t walk he gets jetted across the world of course, by again, massive funding from foundations and governments to talk about a sort of world Socialist society.
This particular site here has him back in ’96 when he said, and you can see it for yourself. He says,
“The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order”
You see, “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order.”
That was to be, and of course it has been used since then as we well know. It’s ‘terror, terror, the sky is falling’ and we’re all to blame apparently, it’s all of us, exactly as the Club of Rome had stated in their book, ‘The First Global Revolution’, in the early 1970s. Actually it was printed in the ‘90s but the two founders of the Club of Rome wrote that book, ‘The First Global Revolution’. They said in the ‘70s they dreamed up the idea because that was their job, to find a way to unite the planet and they said they would use global warming, famine and the like, to basically scare the people into going along with this.
There’s a site out there called, I think it’s called ‘New World Order Report’ but it’s about the Club of Rome and different organisations involved in all this scaremongering and they have the quotes there. It’s on many other sites as well. I’ve read them on the air before from different sites, of different players in the environmental movement, the ones who have big voices with the IPCC at the United Nations and all the rest of them and here’s what one of them said. He said;
““The data doesn’t matter…”
(A: The ‘data’, meaning the facts, doesn’t matter
“The data doesn’t matter.
We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”
(A: That’s their computer systems and I’ve already mentioned other videos to watch from other people who left the IPCC who said it was all utter nonsense and fake science. That last quote was said by Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.
“The models are convenient fictions
that provide something very useful.”
– Dr David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University
(A: “The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
Yeah, a cover, a front to get through the agenda of the planned Socialist population reduction agenda, where only the ‘right’ folk come through and live and be able to eat. You see Socialism, again going back to the Soviet story, Nazism was involved and you can see how they worked together actually, all through the ‘30s. In fact, in a sense, the ways of disposing of millions of people, was learned by Hitler and his generals who went over to visit the Soviets who had lots of experience in that.
It’s always the same thing. They kill off at least 10% of the people by extermination as soon as they get into power in fact. That’s standard in Socialism. While Socialism runs again, it doesn’t matter what guise it goes under, it’s an International Socialist order. When they talk about this equality etc. through sustainability, they’re talking about a World Socialist Society. However, those at the top of Socialism are always ultra elitists just like George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells and those who funded them and put them and made them who they were actually.)
“It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true.”
(A: There’s a scientist talking for you)
– Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace
“Unless we announce disasters no one will listen.”
– Sir John Houghton
(A: who was the first chairman of IPCC)
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world.”
– Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment
Do you think, are you getting the picture as to why we suddenly have to give our money across the whole planet? The redistribution of wealth.
Did you think, all you people who used to believe in Communism and so on, did you believe it was the rich folks’ wealth they were talking about spreading across the world? Did you?
Understand that elitism, survival of the fittest, is a complete doctrine intertwined with Marxism that brought in Nazism and Communism and now World Socialism.
And all these characters, John Holdren and all the rest of it are now up there. They’re now up there in government, running us.
I wonder how many people really get it? I wonder how many people really, really get it?
I’ll be back with more on this after this break.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt. We’re cutting Through the Matrix.
We always get the mainstream news after all the big meetings have taken place, after presentations have been basically put into workable formats and presented to governments to sign into law. That’s standard and the media ignores all these big international meetings that go on; completely.
Once in a while they’ll mention the name of something as it is happening and won’t really tell you what it’s about because they’re all part of it. Their owners are part of it.
This article here is actually from a conference. It’s the;
“Conference on Economic De-Growth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity”
Paris, 18-19 April 2008
It’s a PDF of the whole thing and I’ll put this up too on my site. All these articles I read you I put up on the site at the end of the night if “Xplornet” graces me with enough speed to upload it since they’ve cut me back deliberately.
This particular conference here is one of many that go on across the world, put on by the big foundations and with government grants. Our governments give grants to all these private organisations, who then make policy that the government introduces. You see, this is the new Soviet system. The Soviet system, ideally but never in truth, was run by really, ‘councils’. That’s what Soviet means; rule by councils, meaning that they’d have ‘worker’ councils for factories, and councils for other departments, the different areas of human existence, life and management and all the rest of it.
In the West we call them Non-Governmental Organisations. The Soviets picked the heads or the Politburo picked the heads of the NGOs or the Soviets in the Soviet system. In the West the heads aren’t just picked, they’re created by the big foundations. The followers don’t matter much, they really don’t.
It’s a class system at work. It’s so wonderful how they use it. They always find the discontented amongst all classes and a lot of the lower classes too. They go into the massive movements and they become…they’ve got something to bitch about, completely, constantly in their lives and it’s given to them and they become the raging fanatics which are useful for those who are heading them, who are off in a different direction of course. They’re always led by elitists who are generally very wealthy and very well paid elitists who work for these foundations.
As I say, this article’s amazing though because this is a typical one on how ‘de-grow’ the farming industry, the industrial industry to bring them all down to sustainable levels; bring them all down.
They don’t say how they’ll replace, by the way, the food from the farming and all that. Meaning, we have to start depopulating very fast.
“Exploration of campaign tools for equity and sustainability”
(A: So there’s that ‘equity’ bit again)
“An equally downgraded planet for the masses”
(A: while the top bunch go on ahead. Believe you me, the academics involved in this and all those in academia truly believe they’re a much higher evolved species, just like the Soviet system was based on a ‘superman’, exactly the same as Germany.)
Evolution is a big part of it and they thought they could breed in a new type of Russian Soviet, an evolved type, the same as Adolf Hitler. Again that’s in The Soviet Story. You’ve got to see it.
This has a lot of the names of the organisations that funded and took part in this thing in Paris. Telecom was there. All the big organisations. The Club of Rome was there of course and all the American big corporation’s bosses were there. The World Wildlife Fund, all the usual players that are now dictating to us and using governments, whether it’s congresses or parliaments, to then write it into law to make it happen, which really should tell you something.
Your government, I don’t care where you live, is not your government. It really isn’t.
Don’t tell me for a minute…I know they’re a bunch of psychopaths that generally go into politics. They are psychopaths. I’ve got a list of the crimes committed by politicians in Britain before and during, while they’re still active in politics. You’ve never seen such a bunch of people who are bankrupt on credit cards, drunk-driving charges galore and all kinds of mayhem as they wreak havoc throughout their lives. Such people are great in politics because you understand, they’re always broke. They live way beyond their means; they’re very happy to have a helping hand, we might say, from the right quarters.
As I say, this Paris link I’ll put up to show you all the different characters that took part in it. It also has links to all the different things that they came up with. It’s very typical, of all the other, world meetings that they have across the globe. It’s actually the very same people involved over and over and over again. And the use of the environment as the big stick, exactly what Gorbachev said, and I quoted it earlier on. So you’re going to get all this kind of stuff.
You understand, the people in the European countries, more so in the US I’d say, are revolting. They’re going into revolt. A revolt is different from a revolution. What we’re experiencing is a revolution on us as the big boys bring in their complete revolution; a planned revolution.
You’ve got to understand, that before the 1800s or the 1700s, really the late 1700s, there were many people and groups in society who would revolt against new dictates that came from on high. And a revolt generally was meant to…it was a last ditch effort, like a back to the wall thing to protest some new law that came down and made you poorer, generally the peasants and different people, but often they were joined with nobility and feudal lords as well. Different classes were mixed in with it, and that’s when their backs were to the wall in the peasant class generally when instead of having a meal maybe once a day, now it was maybe 2 days or 3 days to get the granaries up in the king’s particular silos because he was feeding armies to go abroad; that kind of stuff.
They wanted to go back to a previous juster time. That’s the difference between people who revolt. Revolutions were organised in the late 1700s and they became successful and now you have the plan of revolution as it’s called that came out with Karl Marx and really, he used his basis for his whole agenda on really, the French Revolution, not other revolutions prior to that. His theories of revolutions always being from a class below pushing upwards being a natural thing down through history was absolute bunkum; absolute bunkum.
Look who funded Karl Marx. Look who funded him. Look who funded every Communist organisation in the 20th Century and it wasn’t little guys with tin cups. It was the big bankers and the big industrialists who financed it and there are so many articles out there.
“Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution” is an excellent book to read by a professor. An excellent book to read is “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler” is another one. There are many books like that with documented stuff on who funded these organisations and the big industrialists are still funding them all today.
Look at, and I’ve read the articles before when it happened at Copenhagen, the big meeting when all the big, big international corporations were all there to make sure they got their pieces of the pie because they’re going to trade billions of Dollars of carbon taxes to each other and making massive profits off it. They already are. You pay everything at the bottom.
You see, it’s a strange Socialism isn’t it? Because as George Orwell said;
“Some people are more equal than others in such Utopias”.
It’s always a class thing and a tiny minority lives high on the hog in these systems and the rest of you keep them in that lifestyle and you’re all living at the bottom.
And I’ll tell you too, these International Socialists, using this ‘Eco-Socialism’ as it’s called, look up Wiki yourself. At least it’s got some good articles here on the types of Socialism because they’re all they’re all really the same and they call it ‘Eco-Socialism’.
It’s actually ‘Racism’. I’ll tell you why it’s Racism, it’s because it doesn’t matter what colour they are, if you want to use the word colour, which is kind of ridiculous to me anyway, but it doesn’t matter what group they put themselves into, or you put them into, they believe they’re a higher evolved species and you’re sub-human. Therefore it’s a Racist thing, an anti-human thing; anti-human.
Now, part of this World Socialist agenda has always been the abolition of private property, that the state should really own all the property and rent it out. That’s exactly what Bertrand Russell said would happen eventually and that everyone will get their little credits dished out to them by the government every week. You couldn’t save them up at the bottom level. You would rent everything and Agenda 21 from the United Nations which is totally and completely and has been entirely from the inception of it, a Communist regime funded and set up by the big foundations, the big multi-trillionaires that run the world, like the Rockefellers and the group of bankers that formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and still run it, to run the rest of us but we’ve no private property.
There’re many ways to achieve an objective and the public generally hit the first argument that they’re given. They don’t see why it’s been done. It doesn’t matter what reason they give you, it’s the same agenda. It’s an agenda. Reasons are almost incidental. It’s like waving a flag at a bull. You go for the flag and you miss the guy that’s holding it.
It says here in this article here. This is from Australia. www.news.com.au
“Government’s switched on energy move”
They’re following Britain. Now, all Commonwealth countries, run by England still yet, yes and they still are, will follow suit very quickly as an example to the rest of the world, you see. And it says;
“Government’s switched on energy move.” February 7th 2010.
“ALL Australian homes will have to undergo a mandatory energy-efficiency assessment – costing up to $1500 per property…”
(A: That’s just to have the inspection
“…before they can be sold or rented under new laws to tackle carbon emissions.”
(A: Now I read an article maybe a month ago or longer about this happening in Britain too. Again, Britain gave this to a public/private corporation to get all the loot coming in from this con job)
“The mandatory assessment – being drafted into law by the federal and state governments – will rate homes by an energy efficiency star system, similar to the ratings given to fridges and washing machines.
It will apply to all commercial properties from later this year and to all residential properties from May 2011, Adelaide Now reports.
A spokesman for State Energy Minister Pat Conlon said the ratings would inform prospective owners or tenants of a building’s energy use, so they could factor it in to their buying or rental decision.
The spokesman said details of the “Mandatory Disclosure” scheme – including who would carry out the assessments and how much they would cost – were yet to be decided.
Energy efficiency expert Arthur Grammatopoulos, of Helica Architecture, said rating properties could cost up to $1500 per house.”
(A: Well, you know where it’s all going because eventually, and I’m not kidding, and very shortly in fact, you won’t be able to sell it without first paying through the nose for this assessment and then complying with all the recommendations that you have to do before you can sell it. It even mentions in here too)
“Queensland’s State Government introduced a mandatory Sustainability Declaration form on January 1, requiring homeowners to declare their property’s green credentials to prospective buyers or risk a $2000 fine.
Mandatory disclosure has been criticised by property experts…”
(A: How can you be a property expert? It’s either yours or it isn’t. I think you’re the expert)
“…as an unwarranted expense that will not influence purchasing decisions or cut household pollution.”
But this is how it’s all being run; the big con, the big, big con isn’t it? Isn’t it wonderful how they can use this environmental thing to get the whole manifesto through? Isn’t it wonderful?
And as I say, we can never go back to something once something’s happened. It doesn’t happen that way. The difference with a revolt is when people try to get back to better time when it was a little bit better. We’re going through a revolution that we’re not running. The people who are bringing this on that we all have to abide by are running it all and they’re using the governments that are just pawns really, basically as I can see myself.
As all this is happening too, you see, under the exact thing that Marx talked about, you know, the value of life, valuable life, the United Nations statement on its charter that a good global citizen is a producer and consumer which means that if you’re now a consumer, and you’ve retired, well you’re a problem. You’re a problem as their top writers would probably say. You’re costing the world money and that could be used for better things; scientific purposes and stuff like that.
This article here is from The Mail Online.
“A generation in denial: Millions face retirement poverty because they’ve remortgaged their homes and saved too little”
10th February 2010.
“Millions of people approaching retirement are being hit by a crippling combination of large mortgages and no savings.”
(A: They’re going to get hit too with devaluing money. It’s plummeting. It’s what you can actually purchase with that same bank note)
“Those aged between 55 and 64, known as ‘pre-retirees’ have been unrealistic about their pensions…”
(A: Well a pension was brought in, you see, to get you through once you had retired because you were never paid enough when you worked at one time to save up anything and in the UK that was certainly so when I was small. Workers couldn’t just…at that time before they started throwing credit cards at everybody, you almost had a fixed economy. You could go from North to South from East to West in Britain, look at the trade papers and you would see, for instance, that a carpenter would be earning to start the same as an apprentice from Land’s End to John O’Groats; same starting pay. Rents were pretty much the same across the whole darn nation. They knew how much it would cost the average small family, man/wife maybe 1 or 2 children, to get through that week and you were paid proportionally. You couldn’t save; fixed economy.
The Communists have been at it for an awful long time.)
Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix.
There’s an article too from CNN on DNA collecting.
Now we all know, I think we all know by now that the governments have been collecting DNA for over 30 years on everybody born in hospitals from Australia all the way to Canada to Britain and elsewhere. It’s never been told ‘why?’ to the public, why they actually took these samples but I guess it was to do with genetic testing, you know, for inferior and superior types. The same things they’re going into shortly. I read the article the other day there about them setting up the clinics in Britain where you can go and see if you might have medical problems that’ll pass onto your child.
Then again, just like the present system of testing, they’ll say, “Your child might be a little defective in this area or that area, are you sure you want to have it? We can deal with this for you if you don’t”.
And I’ve also read articles where a lot of mothers were advised to abort their children and they found out the children had nothing wrong with them, they were quite healthy. But that doesn’t matter you see because science must prevail. The myth of science must prevail over evidence and straightforward facts and evidence.
This article here is from www.cnn.com
“The government has your baby’s DNA”
By Elizabeth Cohen, CNN Senior Medical Correspondent
It says;
“Genetic testing for newborns started in the 1960s. Specimens are often given to outside researchers…”
(A: Yep, from the very beginning too)
“Scientists have heralded this enormous collection of DNA samples as a “gold mine” for doing research…”
(A: And it is for them believe you me)
“When Annie Brown’s daughter, Isabel, was a month old, her pediatrician asked Brown and her husband to sit down because he had some bad news to tell them: Isabel carried a gene that put her at risk for cystic fibrosis.”
While grateful to have the information — Isabel received further testing and she doesn’t have the disease — the Mankato, Minnesota, couple wondered how the doctor knew about Isabel’s genes in the first place. After all, they’d never consented to genetic testing.
It’s simple, the pediatrician answered: Newborn babies in the United States are routinely screened for a panel of genetic diseases. Since the testing is mandated by the government, it’s often done without the parents’ consent, according to Brad Therrell, director of the National Newborn Screening & Genetics Resource Center.
(A: And the link to that center’s on here too)
“In many states, such as Florida, where Isabel was born, babies’ DNA is stored indefinitely, according to the resource center.
Many parents don’t realize their baby’s DNA is being stored in a government lab, but sometimes when they find out, as the Browns did, they take action. Parents in Texas, and Minnesota have filed lawsuits, and these parents’ concerns are sparking a new debate about whether it’s appropriate for a baby’s genetic blueprint to be in the government’s possession.”
Now I also read an article recently as well because someone in Australia tipped me to fact that he went on a hunt to try to get his little card back that the test is actually imprinted on. It was taken from him without his knowledge and he found that everybody in Australia has had the same thing as well and he found the place where it was all stored for his particular area in Australia and he still couldn’t get it off them as far as I know. What came out in Australia too is that the police have been using this stuff and even planting people that they simply didn’t like or they wanted them out the way, planting DNA evidence at the crime scenes by using the stored DNA.
Isn’t it amazing that everything they sell to us, and we just sit back and say “Oh that’s nice for them to do that, that’s nice to catch crooks”. You don’t realize, you never clue in that they have an alternate reason.
Well from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada. I think that’s the music coming in and I’ll be back with more tomorrow. So goodnight and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 11th 2010. For the newcomers, I always suggest you go right into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down and look at all the other sites I have up there. Bookmark them for future use because when the big ones stop me from uploading again – that happens once in a while and they can never figure out why for about a month supposedly, but if you have these other sites bookmarked you can always pull down the latest shows. It’s a good idea too, at the end of the night or even first thing in the morning to try these alternate sites when you want to download a show because everyone seems to go into the .com site at the same time and that kind of jams it up a bit. The official sites are: [listed above].
Remember too, that you are the audience that brings me to you. It’s a kind of tough thing to do this because I don’t get backing. I could have lots of backing, believe you me, by sponsors and then I’d have to start pushing products and bringing guests on who may be informed in certain areas of the economy and different things but then they’d have to push their products and you are really listening to an hours advertising. It’s well paying, believe you me, for those that do it but I don’t do it that way. It’s up to YOU to keep me going because I’d rather have a free hand to go the way I want to go, say what I want to say and that way there are no strings attached to the information that I’m giving out and I can give an honest opinion. You must keep me going and it’s up to you to do so. Go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com or the other sites, see how you can donate to me or buy the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale. That will make me just trickle along. Believe you me, it just trickles along here. I’m certainly not in it for the money or I would take all these sponsors on and be way up there with a huge business on the go. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disked burned and passed to them of the talks I’ve given, who prefer to play them on CD players and actually don’t use computers – there are lots of people out there who don’t like computers and I don’t blame them – you can get in touch with me at [address above]. People should remember too, if they send me letters or anything make sure that you have the postal code correct on it or it won’t get here. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. The matrix I refer to is the one where it’s your whole reality. It’s where all your reality since you were born really comes from. It’s really pushed and promoted from so many different sources AT YOU, even beginning with your parents who think it’s all real because they have lived in Plato’s cave and they don’t know that there is a big, other, alternate reality out there.
There are many alternate realities actually. I’m not going into sci-fi. I’m talking about levels of knowing and understanding. Even within government and way above government there are levels of understanding. If you think that government is the top of the pyramid here, you’ve got another thing coming. Governments, really, as far as I maintain this and I’ve maintained this my whole life. Government’s jobs are simply to keep the people happy. They’re also a Punch and Judy show; you throw tomatoes at them. They take the heat for all the bad news and they do what they are told. I’ve gone over so many bills in the past that have been passed in different countries and they are ALL the same, all the SAME. You get Omnibus bills with thousands of pages that really will affect everybody in the country concerned and not one politician could possibly even read them, but they all vote yes or no on them. What they get is a summary of a half-page or something telling them that it’s a good thing for the party and they must go with the party.
This party system is such a joke isn’t it? Really. I’ve always maintained too, we should have a party leader and that’s all you have. No other candidates beneath them, because the rest of them simply are trained seals that clap for the guy at the top, with their fins, standing on a little tub in the circus. That’s what they are. The whole idea of democracy, supposedly, supposedly – it’s never existed – was that you sent off your local representative, who represented you or your town or your area, your county or whatever and he took YOUR complaints and YOUR concerns to the debating table in government and was heard and came back and reported to YOU. He worked on your behalf. But they brought this party system in and yeah, he’ll pretend he knows what his constituents want but then he’ll come back and tell them, I know that but I had to go with the party. Why bother having him for a representative? …if he must go with the party? …or the party boss?
It would be a lot cheaper too. Just have the two dictators basically, at least the appearance of dictators, the puppets as they say, and it would save us a lot of money, an awful lot of money. The media wouldn’t be happy because they love to have all these other ones to write about, who said what and all the rest of it. I’d prefer just one person there, maybe two. The one who writes his scripts could get an Oscar for politics; have their own Oscar shows for all the best speeches. That would be quite a good show for the public as well. Then eventually you could phase out the guy you pick as the party boss and just have the scriptwriter there since he’s the guy that’s giving the information to us. That’s all we really need. I’m talking about cost cutting here, something government doesn’t know much about. But it would be very, very practical. In the Soviet system, they just had Politburo member 1, 2, 3 or 4 as candidates to choose from. So they had a one-party system basically. You had to vote. It was the law. You had to vote. It’s kind of like Australia, Holland and a few other countries; you’ve GOT to vote or you get fined… because it’s such a sham folk don’t even go and vote anymore. Politics is a scam pure and simple.
As I say, what guy, what person could possibly be handed a bill to peruse for a few days, containing thousands of legalese pages and then go and vote yes and no on it, when really it would take a bank of computers to analyze the legalese to see what they are really getting at and the hidden… what’s it really after in other words. But they do what they are told and vote yes and that’s all there is to it. That’s ONE reality.
Again, there are the realities that are around them, because where is it written in democracy, or any democratic constitution, that governments will listen PRIMARILY to private organizations like the foundations’ boys, for instance? The World Wildlife Fund or the so-called greenies that are all social movements but they’re not, supposedly… supposedly, they pretend they’re not political movements but really they are, using the greenie agenda to bring in the same old Marxist system. Where does it say that? Well, go back into the writings in the 1800s and the early 1900s about democracy. Big players wrote about it and told you what it was. It said eventually the system will be that which will give power to the biggest GROUP of voices out there. Now, since the general public doesn’t have the finances, they’re not backed by multi trillion dollar private foundations that are owned in turn by the biggest CEO or corporate magnates on the planet and bankers on the planet, you don’t have a chance of being heard. These NGOs have full time lobbyists working for them because they all get paid through the big foundations. It’s astonishing.
There IS a PARALLEL GOVERNMENT at work there, the ones who really make the agenda and pressurize governments. Governments are IN the know. They get the nod and the wink from the guys like the Rockefellers to listen to these pressure groups. These are the ones you listen to, nod and a wink, and if you’re very wise you say ‘a word to the wise’ – lots of Masons say that – and you’ll get your cue and you’ll help put their recommendations into law that will affect all the rest of the people who believe they are living in a democracy. That’s the short and simple of it. That’s what it is.
We live according to a plan, lots of plans. There are lots of plans on the go at the same time to do with the future, what kind of society they HOPE to bring in, or PLAN to bring in down the road. The whole idea of a planned society in a post-democratic society system was mentioned 60-70 years ago and then reiterated through a lot of academic works and through again, private foundations like the Club of Rome. They said that the system they were bringing in is a post-democratic type because democracy was too slow, too cumbersome, too many conflicting opinions all battling to be heard, to get anything done. Well the whole point of getting anything done is to wait and see what the people want to be done. That’s what democracy is supposed to be about. What they are telling you is we have the plans, democracy is in the way, and therefore, we have to train the public to stay out of it all together, don’t even take an interest and let the lobbying groups be the new type of Soviet democracy.
Remember, we forget that other countries called themselves democracies too. Totalitarian governments called themselves democracies because whether they were single party or not, it didn’t matter. When you have a unified, greenie agenda and a depopulation agenda, an agenda to eventually eradicate certain gene pools from the human species, and all those with supposedly possible defects in their genetic make up, all that kind of stuff, then you have, really, a one-party totalitarian system. If you notice, no one else’s voice is being heard. But worse than that, it’s an INTERNATIONAL system, going through the United Nations, and they all work together through their own governments, signing treaties with the UN to accept these recommendations by this ONE PARTY GLOBAL, GREENING, SOCIALIST SYSTEM… backed by the bankers, by the way.
The bankers like it because, don’t get confused about the Capitalist versus the Communist idea. A collectivist society, a socialist, communist type society is well suited to the bankers. I’m talking about the BIG bankers. It’s far easier to get governments to take on debt and pay off the debt and leave it to the governments to ENFORCE the collection of that debt, than lend out private sums to little individuals throughout countries and then have to send in your own teams in, your heavies, to try and get the cash back. It’s FAR easier to get the governments to do it for you. So the big international bankers prefer lending to governments. It’s been like that longer than I’ve been alive and way beyond my parents’ time and so on. That system, it’s been here for an awful long time.
That’s why the big international bankers backed a planned society. A planned society also ensures that those same bankers and their families, this club you might say, I could go further and say with even a clan. They are really a clan of elitists you might say, who are intermarried, massively intermarried – all the big top banking families – and have been for hundreds of years. They prefer that kind of system, a collectivist world would suit them far better where the same laws are passed that affect the whole world at the same time so they don’t have to do different calculations, etc, for different countries. It will all be the same worldwide and eventually they will go through the International Monetary Fund or whatever that morphs into, for the United Nations, to do the collection of the cash worldwide.
We’ve already seen it too, with this bill going forward for supposedly financial transactions that will help the poor across the planet. Well, my whole life I’ve heard about different taxes that have come and stayed that were going to help the poor but I’ve never seen anything happen with it. You never see the RESULTS of it. In Canada they brought in the General Sales Tax when Brian Mulroney was the Prime Minister. At first he tried to bring in the Value Added Tax, the same as all the Europeans have got; that’s up to 18% on every purchase you buy as a tax. They wanted to copy that too. The whole world, by the way, is to get that Value Added Tax eventually and it doesn’t matter if they call it that or anything else. It’s a full tax on everything that you purchase. This new international transaction fee charge is supposed to go to help the poor across the world; REDISTRIBUTION of your wealth, but it’s not going to go to the poor. It’s going to go through banking systems, especially the Rothschild bank, the same bank that’s collecting carbon credits. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, mentioning that Brain Mulroney was only one Prime Minister who brought in a particular tax. Supposedly it was going to help the pay off the national debt. Everybody of course had no option but to pay it. These taxes by the way, are like Value Added Tax. Every stage of the production of any particular item from raw ore, say – if you are making steel – would pass from the guys who dig the stuff, the guys who eventually smelt it down and extract it, make the iron and all the rest of it, mix the stuff together, get the steel, send it off to the other factories who then splice it up into cut layer or whatever else they are making… all the way down to the consumer; from all the middle men to the shop and then to you. At every single stage, that tax was collected. Can you believe it? It’s like a rollercoaster that snowballs all the way down to that little pen knife that you buy to peel your apples. You are saddled with the final outcome, the roll off that is all hidden inside of that, and the ultimate cost of it is all passed on to you. Then when Mulroney left office, when he was asked about it he said, well, actually not one single penny went to pay off the national debt. Then the same government started off various provincial and federal gambling facilities. That was going to help all the school systems. It was going to help the charities. It was going to help the hospitals. Well, how come the hospitals are still begging yet and cutting back and cutting back on their services because they can’t get enough cash coming in from the government?
We just accept these things. It was like the tsunami a few years back, remember? Every single government got in on the act and said, for every dollar that you donate to charity the government will match it with a tax dollar. BILLIONS were raked in from every country. Then at the end of it, who did they appoint to be in charge? It was I think Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton, the two most trusted guys on the planet and that’s the last you heard of it. That was the last you heard of it. They were doing documentaries back in the most disheveled countries that were hit by it and sure as I said at the beginning, they’ll be finding bits of corrugated iron, sticks and knocking old shacks back up again and that’s exactly what they were doing.
Everything on any high, major level is a con. We’ve been living through the most gigantic scandals to do with a flu that never was. Multi billions of your tax money – that’s borrowed by the way and you’re put down to pay it off and the children that you might never have also are put down to pay it off – and the pharmas are bursting at the seams with cash. That was an utter con. Some top newspapers in the world luckily, eventually, had to come out and say this is the greatest scam we’ve ever seen. But it isn’t the greatest. It’s only one of many that happen all the time.
Remember what Hitler said, if you are going to tell a lie make sure it’s a big one. Because the public are used to the little white lies that they will give in their own personal lives. They can understand the little con. But when something is so big and so huge and so brazen, it’s UNBELIEVABLE that someone would try and pull that off… and therefore they get away with it. It’s the same with the big, top… You try to tell me that all these academic facilities that churn out people specializing in economics and finances can NEVER GET IT RIGHT? And every few years we have a bank crisis and crashes? And the money goes to money heaven, we’re told… money heaven. Where is that? Which God… is it Mammon you pray to? Is it that one? We’ll have to look into this act and see where the Temple of Mammon is; and it just goes WHOOFFF, just gone! But guess what? Once again, you’re going to pay it off. Who do governments go to get the cash to pay it off? They go to the International bankers. Who is put down as the creditor, the guarantor? YOU. YOU ARE THE GUARANTOR FOR IT and your children’s great grandchildren, down to the seventh generation. That’s pretty well how it works.
The biggest scams in history are happening all the time and the public never catch on. They still want to believe in the nice humanity of people helping people. That’s why charitable foundations have the biggest crooks in them. How many exposés, even by mainstream once every few years, show you how much of the dollar that you put into any charity actually gets there? It’s about 10 cents… if they’re lucky.
You could go on about every area of the scams of this existence that we are living in because we are living in Plato’s cave. They guys that run it are outside the cave basking in the sunshine. We breed another generation to grow up in Plato’s cave and then of course the school system will make sure that they truly believe that they really know all that there is to know about that cave they live in and there is nothing outside of it. We are trained like Pavlov’s dog, so often and in so many different areas, with automatic responses, even when it becomes ludicrous.
Police, the history of policing really came out from Britain in a sense. The King always had the King’s men to do his own policing work but that was mainly to keep the King and his establishment safe and protected. They had to know everything that was going on in their land so that no one would rebel and they were unprepared. Policing came out as such and they were called the ‘peelers,’ by John Peel in England. It was really a private company and the local residents of a rich area would pay into this company and these ‘coppers’ – because they wore copper badges – would walk around their area to patrol them. That eventually became incorporated into the City of London eventually and it spread out from there. Their job used to be, to protect. Now they’re called ‘enforcers’ because they wear ninja outfits and they all want to be in the military. I’ll be back with more of this when I come back from this break, hang on.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I’m talking about the different systems we take for granted without ever questioning how they got there or what they really are at times and how the police have changed over the years. I’ll tell you how things work.
When you’re really pushing forward a global society you need the countries of the West to go through and work in their rotten little factories and you give them cheap booze and you promote clubs and booze and all that kind of stuff HEAVILY for the culture. The Culture Industry makes sure that’s promoted. You make sure that the ordinary guys at the bottom can get cheap transportation, their own car, which is generally an old banger. When I first came to Canada, I was so impressed, I was SO impressed that so many people living in a big city like Toronto for instance, were going around with these old bangers with rust on them and holes in the bodies and stuff like that and they never got stopped. The cops left them alone because they were producing, they were creating things – there were lots of factories outside of Toronto – and stuff like that. They needed that because they were taking the massive taxation base from all of those workers and all of those factories and the products that they were selling to build up the system for internationalism.
Every federal government built up departments to distribute that money abroad, across the planet, already… long before the latest scams to redistribute your wealth were going on. You all have your overseas economic department of development and so on built into your Parliamentary or governmental systems. So once you’re over, you’re post industrial, guess what? Just like Britain. Britain had already been deindustrialized then. Then the cops were told to clamp down on all bangers and they got pulled off the road. Initially it’s for the really bad ones and then it works down and down and down until you’ve got a pin hole somewhere and carbon monoxide gas MIGHT get through that pin hole, which is so crazy because here you are sitting and talking to the cop with your window rolled down, on a highway with cars pumping gas all over the place. But they want YOU off the road. You don’t HAVE to travel now, in a post-industrial era. All the goodies that you liked and enjoyed, your cigarettes – well they want to get rid of cigarettes now – and all the little things you have that kept you going and made life bearable are going to be taken from you, you see. Now folk don’t even travel to the bars or the clubs. They stay at home with their cases of beer, watch their sports, and just get sozzled. That’s what they do, post-industrial.
That’s why in China right now they don’t have all those laws. They’re giving them all the breaks. They can get the cheap smokes. They can buy the cheap old bangers that are a 3rd, 4th, 5th cast down. So they’re given those freebies. THIS IS A SCIENCE we are talking about. THESE ARE SCIENCES. Every era that they bring up, and plan to bring up, and what they expect to get out of it, must have certain concessions to the public to keep us fairly content and going along with it. Then they use the police to enforce the takedowns of it once that period is over. Now they’re into the business of TRAINING the public. Training the public.
Part of this road watch stop, when the RIDE programs… It was so funny because the woman that they used for Ontario, Canada was given all the credit for starting this, to save people from getting killed and children and stuff. Eventually she was given a board, for doing such a good job, a seat on the board of the LIQUOR control board, with a salary and the whole bit; the liquor control board, the ones that sell the booze to the public. That’s how it’s done. It’s quite fantastic because the real intention was to get the public, for the first time, used to getting stopped, en mass, or even singly, under the suspicion, just to see if you have been drinking even though there was no sign that you had. That’s the real intention of it.
In Britain, here is the Mail Online. Britain is the flagship for all of this remember. It says…
Police who play burglar in the middle of the night
By Jaya Narain / 11th February 2010 / Mail Online
A shadowy figure lurking in the garden in the early hours. A rattle on a window latch. It must be a burglar.
But don’t panic too soon and call the police. That could be them outside.
Officers have begun testing windows and doors at night as part of a campaign to increase home security. (Alan: So they train you on the roads to do what you are told. Now they’re training you that basically you’ve got no peace at night or day from them. Now you’ve got to be afraid of them rather than burglars. God help anybody that takes a two-by-four or a bat or something and clobbers one of these guys on the head… which will happen.)
If they find one open, they are under orders to knock on the door and drag sleepy residents from their beds and lecture them. (A: See, we’re all children now. We’re all just wee children.)
The move is part of an initiative called Operation Golden which aims to slash burglary rates in Macclesfield, Cheshire. (A: This will catch on across the country.)
Police say their actions are necessary as almost 40 per cent of all burglars gain access through an unsecured window or door.
But some residents have condemned the plan, saying it could cause alarm and increase the fear of crime, especially among the elderly. (A: Well, the elderly don’t count any more do they? I mean, they are taking their health care and everything from them. After all, they’re not producing anything; they’re consumers… but not producers. They are bad global citizens. Then they go on to tell you the different complaints by elderly residents, that are getting scared of this and so on. But it won’t matter.)
In this world people don’t really matter, especially if you’re not a producer any more. We live in a society that’s been taught to have DISDAIN for the elderly because a long time ago they made sure that the generations were split. What they knew by sociology and history was that the elderly were the ones who could pass on information of the great big scams and cons that happened in their lives and then teach the young to watch for them in theirs. You couldn’t have that. People have forgotten there was literally a generational war CREATED to separate the generations, starting in the 1960s, promoted by the Communist Party of the USA. It started with “Don’t trust anybody over 30” and it actually got down lower than that eventually. That’s why they also put younger teachers in school, so the children would identify with THEM and listen to and believe THEM.
We live in a vastly different world than the one we are taught to believe really exists. There’s always a game on. It’s an agenda. It’s a world agenda. There are literally thousands of organizations specializing in different parts of society working together and GUIDED from a COMMON HEAD, for this agenda. It’s amazing that all the different groups aren’t even in conflict, if you notice. They never complain when the other groups gets the extra funding for their part of the agenda; they know it must be necessary. They also have instant access to every politician in Parliament or Congress. They have access to all the news media to get their points across. They also have their agenda taught in school, sometimes even in Kindergarten.
You walk into any Kindergarten and you have for years, or you’ll see it on television and you’ll see “We are the world.” WE are the world… everything is starting right off for a global society. It sounds really wonderful until you realize, as you grow up, there is a much bigger and different agenda behind all of this. It’s not because they like all of us, wherever we happen to be across the planet. It’s rather disgusting really, how to an extent people also can WANT to be conned into the fake reality. They want to believe that everything is being taken care of. They want to believe that these politicians really have their best interests at heart, which you can look at from a hundred angles by the way – that statement – and it’s never done. They want to believe that all the big services out there are out to help them when they need them. They truly want to believe in that. That’s why they get conned time after time after time and never learn. They never learn.
There is a caller from Vancouver, it’s Cat. Are you there?
Cat: Yes. Terrific show today. I want to thank you for all of the information that you are giving out. I have a quick question for you. The Colonel who was recently arrested on murder charges, do you find the way that this is being handled somewhat different from in the past?
Alan: Well definitely. It’s being handled differently too. They must try and pretend… This is about a top Canadian military official who was right up there, right up there. He was the commander of one of the largest Air Force bases in Canada. He flew politicians around across the world. They’ve found out that he’s killed, murdered at least 2 women and molested others. In other words, he is a serial murderer… would appear to be. I think what they don’t want to go into is that this guy has been stationed across the world and they don’t want to bring that up. If they look into those countries where he’s been stationed, since this isn’t a recent and sudden attack of serial killing – he’s probably been at it for his whole life, you see – they won’t want to give Canada a bad name by saying this guy has killed elsewhere, outside of Canada. They don’t want to look into that and they don’t want us to even think about it.
Cat: Okay. You know, typically when there is a case like this, the individual lawyers up and the case goes on forever and it costs the taxpayer millions of dollars and we find out that the man has confessed. It’s just very different from previous cases.
Alan: It’s different to the extent… It will still go on for a while because it will depend on if they go ahead and dig up all the rest of the victims, or if they want to brush it under the carpet and save the good name of the military. There are politics involved here. He’s been all over the world in charge of big, big bases for Canada. As I say, it won’t be a sudden, recent thing that he got up one morning and decided to rape and murder women. It will have been happening down through his lifetime and his career. His career too would be a darned good shield for it. What you will find out too, is that a lot of other people around him had suspicions or knew about it. That will also eventually trickle out.
Cat: Okay. Thank you very much and have a good evening.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
It says here, this is the WashingtonPost.com.
Top Canadian military official charged with murder
By ROB GILLIES / The Associated Press / Monday, February 8, 2010
~~~[Alan’s audio cut out and the broadcast put on canned music during the interruption.]~~~
Hi folks. I’m back again. We got cut off when I was talking about Canada. I was telling you that I am already censored by XplorNet in Canada and I’m reading this thing about a top Canadian military official of one of the largest Air Force bases who has been charged with murder and so on and BINGO, the telephone connection cut me off, which isn’t new. I’ve had these things done to me before but here it happens live for you… just to show you what really does go on. To carry on with this story, it says…
TORONTO — The commander of Canada’s largest Air Force base, who once flew dignitaries around the country, has been charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of two women.
Ontario Provincial Police Det. Insp. Chris Nicholas said Monday that Col. Russell Williams, 46, was also charged in the sexual assaults of two other women. Williams was arrested Sunday in Ottawa.
The charges left Canada’s military in a state of shock.
Williams, a 23-year military veteran, was appointed as the base commander of Canadian Forces Base Trenton in Trenton, Ontario last July. Trenton is Canada’s busiest Air Force base and is providing logistical support for Canada’s missions in Haiti and Afghanistan as well as support for the Vancouver Winter Games.
Williams is charged with the first-degree murder of Jessica Lloyd, 27, of a Belleville, Ontario, resident whose body was found earlier Monday, and Marie Comeau, a 38-year-old corporal found dead in her Brighton, Ontario, home in November.
Authorities said Williams came to the attention of police during a roadside canvas on Feb. 4, six days after Lloyd was deemed missing. (A: That means they already had an idea, right.)
Williams is also charged with forcible confinement, breaking and entering and sexual assault after two women (A: This is another 2 women I think.) were sexually assaulted during two separate home invasions in the Tweed, Ontario area in September of 2009.
“We’re shocked by the connection that has been made with a leader in our Air Force,” Maj. Gen. Yvan Blondin, the direct commander of Williams, said in Trenton. (A: It’s quite astonishing. This guy has been in charge of bases for Canada across the world. He’s flown the biggest dignitaries to Canada across the world, personally. Obviously the highest of clearance and Canada will not be wanting to go into the other bases he’s worked on across the world, obviously, to find out if he’s killed other women, which he no doubt has. Serial killers don’t suddenly start like that; there is always a history of it.)
So much will have to get swept under the carpet with this one because they will say the ‘good name’ of the military is at stake and how much they will disclose to the public will depend on how much they want to cover-up as well. That’s the real world, once again, in which we live. There is a lot more to this story but it won’t be fed to us for a long time.
Here’s another article. You know, going around the internet right now is about hackers shutting down the government sites in Australia. It’s quite interesting but not quite all there, the stories that are coming out. In the Science and Technology section of the Winnipeg Free Press it says…
Hackers shut down Australian government Web sites to protest compulsory Internet filter
(A: A year ago I read about the filters bringing down Christian sites in Australia. They don’t want Christian sites that are advocating anti-abortion, for instance. No one else outside in the world or in Australia really protested that particular thing happening. The biggest protest right now, apparently, is that the government is using pornography to bring in the next step of shutting sites down and THAT gets a response. That’s what got the response. Of course it won’t end with pornography, it will obviously be meant to go into anyone who, they claim, is – the new term is – ANTI-GOVERNMENT. If you complain about government at all, you are ‘anti-government’. Which means that the opposing party, the party opposition IN Parliament must be the biggest anti-government guys out there… obviously, using logic.)
Hackers shut down Australian government Web sites to protest compulsory Internet filter
By: THE ASSOCIATED PRESS / 10/02/2010 / The Canadian Press
(A: So they all got up in arms about their pornography sites were going to get closed down. Remember too, you guys who quite rightly know it’s going to go further, don’t get confused with the big business of pornography, who might even lead you at times… you understand… lead you and use you… for their own ends as well. Why didn’t you back up the sites that were against abortion? …at least putting their point of view out, they weren’t making you believe them. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how some people, the hackers actually did this but it also says that there were so many that folk complained about the filtering systems being put in by ISP providers to cut out pornography that so many people flooded the government web sites complaining, that it actually crashed them for a few days. Which makes you wonder, it tells you where people’s values are, eh? The people will only stand up for that which they value… so they will stand up for pornography. I wonder if they will stand up and stop this $1,500 mandatory home inspection fee for eco-friendly housing? Nah, don’t hold your breath; it won’t happen.
You know the only time Canadians stood up en mass and flooded Parliament with anything to object about was when the elderly – they call them the snowbirds – were complaining because the cable TV industry was deregulating and the companies were going to double or triple all charges including the elderly; before they got a break as pensioners. That’s what they stood up for. That was their values… TELEVISION! That’s what they stand up for, the things they value. Health care getting cut, that’s okay, I’m healthy at the moment; someone else might not be but I’m okay. It’s the same thing with Australia. Where were all the people backing the people standing up for the rights of those to give birth?
Listen to ‘The Future;’ the song The Future with Leonard Cohen. We don’t like children anyhow… he tells you. It’s all laid out there, in that. The whole future was laid out in that song. The future is murder, it says.
That’s the reality of life and here again, in a free society you have to let ALL views and all sides have a say. But don’t allow the crooks also, that are into big business and shady stuff and some awful stuff as well – I mean awful physically and torturously and etc and exploiting – don’t let them use otherwise good movements that are standing up to protect the freedom of other sites. You’ve got to make a distinction or you have no morals at all. Therefore, if you have no morals, why shouldn’t someone shut you down?
In the States they use to have these laws that people complained about because sometimes the crooks got free because of the rights that they had and the procedures they would have to go through. However, that also ensured that the ones who were probably innocent went free as well, you see. When they start treating you all the same, a lot of free innocent people go inside when they take away those rights. You’ve got to allow freedom of speech by all sides regardless of how it really upsets you… because if you close down one, the people’s rights to speak and their venue for doing so, they will close down yours eventually as well. That’s the world we live in. It’s give and take.
Don’t allow an industry that’s known to do some rather evil stuff and I mean it. The porno industry… they’ve wrecked so many – a little bit further than just wrecked a lot of people’s lives and the use of drugs too, to get them into that state to go along with everything – is just astonishing. It’s the lowest life form out there, to be honest with you.
That’s the music coming in for tonight’s ending of the show. Excuse my sermonizing but that’s how I feel about things. So from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 12th 2010. As always, I suggest to the newcomers – and there are newcomers coming in all the time – to look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down and see all the other sites that I have up there. These are the official sites. Bookmark them for future use; that way, when the big ones stop me from uploading which they do once in a while, while they sort out their strange technical problems, you can always get the latest shows for download. It’s a good idea too, to try these alternate sites sometimes if you find that there is a sticking on download; it’s generally because everyone goes into the .com site at the same time. [Official sites listed above.]
This is the tin can moment. I don’t give you many all through the show; it’s just this one at the start. I’m different from everybody else. That stops you from getting upset but it also unfortunately helps you forget by the end of the show. But it’s up to you to keep me going because I’m probably the only person out there who is not backed by a foundation, as you can tell by my web site. I’m not backed by any big corporation to sell their products. I don’t get money from advertisers. That’s how most hosts rake in their cash; they bring them on as guests, they are backed by them, and they push whatever they sell. The ads you hear on this show are paid directly by the advertisers to RBN to broadcast this show, to pay for the air time, to pay for their satellite upload, and their staff and bills. We all get the bills coming in. So it’s up to you to keep ME going and you can do so by buying the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation option listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, because they don’t like using computers but they play them on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. People should be really careful with those postal codes because they are so sticky now. Just one letter or number off and they get thrown into a frenzy of absolute dumbness; they don’t know what to do about it even if the rest of the address is there. It’s astonishing. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. A lot of young people email me. Every other day there is someone with so many questions and it’s quite understandable naturally because they’ve gone through the intense indoctrination – socialization, they call it at school – process. They are getting trained to be social creatures under scientific guidance, supposedly, yet a lot of the students know there is just something wrong with everything. They can’t really pinpoint any exact thing, just sort of everything. That’s generally the first thing that you experience when you are waking up to this world that you’ve been trained to see in a certain way with all of its media and its educational system. You just know there is something wrong about it. You see the natural injustices.
Children see natural injustices so quickly and easily but what they can’t tell are the various reasons for those injustices; therefore, they can be given the wrong reasons for them and whoever gets the blame, those children will start blaming as well. That’s how they use the ecological indoctrination, their religion in school, to show that the big boys are the bad boys. What they don’t tell them is that the big boys WANT the controlled society, the controlled world. The big boys never lose. When the UN takes over a biosphere for instance, well guess what? Under the UN treaties, the big corporations get the first dibs to go in and mine or whatever else it’s supposed to do. It actually cuts out all competition for the favorite ones at the top. It’s like free trade too. Free trade is not free trade for every little corporation or company. It’s really a restrictive trade to do with the big boys that get to. The BIG international corporations can have unrestricted free trade.
Everything has a double meaning. It’s double think in fact, that we live in where nothing really is as it seems to be. Definitely, it’s never as it’s presented to the public. So the idea to train youth for the upcoming generation, the upcoming life style that they will be trained in to with its changes, is started very early in school. That was the old Marxian idea; bypass the older ones who have a bit of wisdom. They have caught on to the cons that go on in life with politicians. They’ve found out eventually that it will take 20 years before the truth of any major event is given to the public, which is generally vastly different from the reasons given at the time. So rather than trying to brainwash all the adults, you always go for the youth and program them for the changes they are PLANNED to experience in their lifetime and accept it all as quite natural and normal.
It’s no coincidence they used sociologists and psychologists and behavioral psychologists to MINUTELY study the dictatorships of the past to see why it worked so well, and the types of people that it affected, who were the really ardent followers. They found the same thing with some religions, early religions. It was the youth who were idealistic; it’s those ones that you go for. Of course, dictators also know that is what you go for. You APPEAL directly to the youth and they will worship you like a movie star or a pop star, whatever. That’s what you do. You build up an image of that person as superhuman and they are looked up to, admired.
I watched a documentary not long ago that someone sent me on a disk because I can’t watch anything on video here because of XplorNet’s cutting me back all the time, until I’m crawling. I’m paying the same price for high speed which I never get. Anyway, some people send me disks of things and there was one of China, a very good documentary in different sections going through the phases of the communist regime in China with Mao Tse Tung and how he was worshipped by teenagers… when he was an old man. It was the same phenomena where one young girl said that she shook his hand and they showed her – when she was young shaking his hand – and she said she never washed that hand for about a week because it had touched this famous God-like creature. It’s the same phenomenon which was used with Elvis Presley. He used to wipe the sweat off his brow and toss the handkerchiefs into the audience and they’d fight to get it. They’d FIGHT to get it. I think there is one of them enclosed in a glass case so that it would always contain that sweat, you know. That’s what you see with people who want to worship people.
This technique and this phenomena are USED to its maximum IN SCHOOL where the youngsters are given their ecological heroes… like Al Gore. You elevate a person up; they’ve got to elevate a person UP on the world stage. A stage, you must understand, in show business, is understood to be an ALTAR. It’s an ALTAR; you are UP there above the rest. You are ELEVATED on the altar. A lot of forces come into play when youngsters and older people see someone elevated up on that stage. They are UNAWARE of these forces but they stem from religious forces as well, and very archaic methods of behavior we automatically fall into.
Therefore they give you the heroes to follow. When that hero speaks, whatever he said will be taken as the ABSOLUTE, GOSPEL TRUTH by the youngsters. That’s why, as I say, Al Gore and others, an ex-Vice President who always reminds the children, I’m ex-Vice President. That’s like saying that I was the right-hand man to the messiah. Literally, it is to a child. That technique is used to the advantage of those who brainwash the up and coming youth INTO a stage that they will NEVER LISTEN TO ANY PARENTS. They will never listen to any other opinion, any contrary opinion. They will be DEVOUT and even FANATICAL followers that will come out of them to carry on the agenda.
Beria talked about this. Beria was the head of the NKVD in the Soviet Union in the early days. In 1934 at the International Communist meeting – the Comintern, where the communist parties from all over the world went to attend – he said that it used to take a generation to indoctrinate what we call today ‘setting a trend in motion,’ like a meme, and it flows and flows and gathers momentum like a wave. It used to take 70 years, he said, a generation – that’s how he classed a generation then – to introduce the planned change that would manifest like a wave in 70 years time. He said, NOW – this was in 1934 – with scientific indoctrination through schooling, we can introduce changes every 5 years, major changes, because they had already worked in the categories of age groups in turn. He said, eventually we’ll be able to change them much quicker, introduce them every year, maybe even in months. Well, we are at that phase today.
With scientific indoctrination – like any big script where you introduce 5 year plans, 10, 15, 20, and so on – with every induction of Kindergarten children, what they are getting taught is a little bit more advanced as to what they WILL experience in their lifetime, than the ones who were inducted a year before. It’s that PRECISE. That’s what Bertrand Russell talked about in Education and the Good Life, one of the books that he wrote for the world socialist controlled society. It’s quite fascinating and people are unaware of it. They are unaware of – like Bernays talked about – the unconscious factors which motivate them, but those who understand those unconscious factors can manipulate you like a puppet to your behavior, your mannerisms, the terminology you’ll pick up and use automatically, to the opinions that you will get into arguments over and literally be angry – you might even fight over them – and they are not even your own. You won’t even come to that understanding. THAT’S the incredible macabre beauty of these sciences. They’re very effective.
Most people don’t get their opinions through logical, critical thinking. If you use logical, critical thinking you will question ALL data given through schooling and elsewhere to see if it follows a logical pattern. Very few folk will do that today. We are downloaded. It’s like an osmosis really; we learn by osmosis. It’s given to us. It sinks down the levels of propaganda IN to us. We parrot and because we are a social creature – as they all know – people don’t like to be different from other people. Even the rebels in society, the youth who are trying to find their identity, you’ll see the ones who want to adapt and go for the good careers. They used to call them ‘mods’ many years ago. The mods, the moderns, because that’s what they were called; those who believed in the modernistic view of society like HG Wells, long before the mods came along. And the rockers, the ones who were the rebels and who didn’t drive on scooters; they drove on motorbikes and wore leather and they were the bad boys. Even the uniforms that you wear to be bad are given to you by the same people who design your culture industry; your drama, your entertainment, your music, and right down to the fashion and the fashionable way to dress to rebel. I used to laugh when you see them with the baggy pants and hats on backwards. Wherever you went you’d see this. They showed you a documentary years ago on television, where you’d see the same thing all the way to Africa. People were falling into the classification of how they identify or what they identified with. They didn’t realize this is all given to you… all given to you. The same techniques, you understand, were used when dictators come into power. Hitler had his brownshirts; they were the bad boys. Everybody was terrified of the bad boys.
Again, the Bernays of this world and different ones understand all these techniques perfectly and it’s far deeper than even Bernays expounded to the public. He knew far more. He’d been taught by experts long, long before him, from childhood by the way. There are whole massive departments working for governments doing the same. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I generally don’t plan anything to say at night; it just comes to me. I had these ideas just tossing around in my head, just waiting for the call to start the show. It’s so evident to me how generations are used in turn for the preplanned agenda, something that was written a long time ago. You really do come to understand that you are living through a script. Incredible propaganda powers are used and have been used my whole life long and long before me, to guide this world along a planned path to this sort of collectivist, socialist society run by the big elitists at the top, the richest people on the planet.
That’s what’s so deceptive for people who’ve been indoctrinated in particular doctrines such as communism and fascism and so on. They don’t realize that they are all funded from the same source. The system that they are bringing in and I’ve got articles here from some of the big boys. It is a collectivist system. Look into the Club of Rome, they talk about it. They preferred, after looking at all the systems that were used across the world in history, they preferred the collectivist system. They are talking about a socialist system where the state makes all your decisions for you. Some of them have actually said that, like Arthur Koestler. He said that you won’t need to think anymore, the state will be making all your decisions for you. Well, we are already there with so many government agencies and more expanding all the time and being created all the time to take more powers away from the average person. From birth to death in a socialist controlled society you’ll be run with a massive bureaucracy. Above all of this collectivist/socialist system you will have the ultra elite living, the richest people on the planet, in a completely different lifestyle than you could ever even imagine… beyond your imagination.
We have to understand that to see where we are all being led and for all the followers that help it along, without even realizing where it’s going. They THINK they do. That’s the beauty of indoctrination in the big con; you think you know where it’s going because you’ve been trained to think that. You become the bitterest enemy of the totalitarian regime once it’s there, as you find out that your utopia hasn’t actually materialized. That’s when they come down and smash you. That’s how the Soviets did it. They USED what they called the ‘ultra liberals’ that are always talking about more and more freedoms, more liberty, etc. They used them to bring down countries and once the Soviets took over, they eliminated those ones because they were the biggest problem. They were the ones who were used to standing up and shouting and yelling for we want rights and so on. Once they got the system in, it was all to destroy the idealistic system, the idealism that you have in you of what your nation is. That’s what the liberals were used FOR, to destroy ALL the premises that you stood for and gave you an idealistic idea of your country. Destroy the idealism, destroy the culture and THEN you bring in the Sovietized, WORLD SOVIETIZED by the way, and then you destroy those liberals who led it because they won’t be happy when they realize they are going to be run by the big boot in the face, as George Orwell called it.
There is a caller on the line and it’s Charles from Toronto. I’ll take him now. Is Charles there?
Charles: Yes Alan. How are you this evening?
Alan: Not too bad.
Charles: I’ve got a couple of questions for you on religion and mind control. The first one, is there a book or series of books that describe the elites’ religion? You have many times said that it is in some ways like Hinduism.
Alan: It is in fact very much like Hinduism. Remember, you can’t put ALL of the elite into the same basket. They are allowed to, really, believe as a side issue, in other areas or other types of religions. Their main religion together is one of superiority through a Darwinistic determination. That’s their main one. They are allowed to go further than that in their own little ways if they want to. It’s a harmless distraction you might say. But they believe firmly… HG Wells wrote about this in his two books, The Outline of History. He classified the different categories of people into eugenic settings and levels for inferior, mediocre, etc, all the way up to superior; the ones who have got up there through whatever means possible. They don’t care actually if they slaughtered their way up, like the old feudal families, or if they got up through counting the money, being very, very shrewd or ripping folk off, as long as they got up there and THEN became respectable and held on to that power that money bring you for at least 3 or 4 generations. By Darwinian standards you have proven your right to rule the lessers. That’s what they mean by that too. What they’ve said in some of their books is that the evolutions at the present state of or condition of humanity took place a long time ago and therefore THEY are obviously the ones who had jumped through the great jump, or they crossed over the great divide. They jumped to a higher standard of evolution than the rest of the peasantry. So they promote it. Now, when you go into Darwinism, Darwin starts off with the amoebas, the slime and all the rest of it, with this innate need to evolve into something better and bigger and all the rest of it. That’s based on Hinduism because when you go into the religions of Hinduism, they also have the same philosophy that everything started with slime and eventually little living matter came out of it and evolved and evolved and evolved. That’s the whole theory of the Brahmanistic world view.
Charles: Great. I’ve got a second question for you.
Alan: Hold on. The music is there and I’ll come back after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix talking to Charles from Toronto. Are you still there Charles?
Charles: Yes. My second question is, religion, I agree, over the long haul is used to control people. It goes back for many ages. In your opinion, are the originators of the religions in on the scam or they divinely inspired?
Alan: I can tell you one thing. From Madame Blavatsky in the 1800s onwards, there’s no doubt they were put there to create a new religion. In fact she said in her own book that her job, or the job of theosophy, which is a blend of Freemasonry; and yes, she was given a Masonic charter by the way, eventually to exist as theosophy. She said their job is to prepare the future for a blending of the Eastern religions – she meant India primarily – with that of the West. She said also that their ultimate goal was to blend SPIRIT with SCIENCE. Spirit with science… which is a very interesting statement because we’re in an age now where they’re talking about brain interfaces and chips and all the rest of it; I think this is a very old plan. They had incredible faith in science in the 1800s. They really believed that they would become Godlike. When you look at HG Wells’ Shape of Things to Come, and the movie especially shows that too. In the movie there is even a race of scientists who see themselves as, again, more evolved than the peasants all down below. That’s all to do with the evolutionary theory of Darwin once again.
Now, people in all areas of the world have religions and always have had religions because we are as people, human beings, religious people. Part of it is a need to reach out to something which you know or you suspect is there because no theory explains the wonders of everything at all. There is no theory out there that can do it. Even Darwin admitted that with all the knowledge that they had and all the theories that they had. If they took books and books and books of all these theories, including his own, and throw them into a laboratory, an eye still would not make itself from all those books. But that wasn’t the intent of Darwinism. Darwinism was a deliberate intent, preplanned again, to destroy the existing religion to bring in a secularized society where we would be obedient to the new scientific gurus as Gods. That was what happened.
Remember, Charles Darwin’s grandfather also wrote a book about evolution. His father did as well. Darwin himself, belonging to the Royal Society, was eventually put forward and he used all of Wallace’s theories. It’s now admitted, the Royal Society now gives Wallace equal credence with Darwin. He should have been at the head because Darwin took all of his theories to put them forward. But the intent, as I say, was to ELEVATE SCIENCE OVER RELIGION for an age of what they called ‘reason’. Also for an age where those with the proper intelligence, the proper breeding would guide society rather than this wishy-washy way that they claimed that religions had run peoples before. Regardless though, people always have a need to look beyond this. The scientist will ALWAYS come out and tell you, especially the Darwinists, that it’s our inability to explain the phenomena of the universe and our own existence that forms the need in us to look for an answer within religion. That’s their way of downplaying it. But with all their theories…
It’s amazing even with medicine, for instance. A hundred years ago you would be bled for anything that was wrong with you; maybe even for hemorrhage they’d bleed you. Whatever was wrong with you they’d bleed you. It was all quackery. It’s the same in veterinary science. They had fantastic potions that they’d brew in front of you and mix some copper sulfate and watch wonderful stuff fizz and change color. That’s what impressed you, but really what it did for you was pretty well nothing, although it might kill you. We have seen marketing elevate pharmacology to an incredible degree where every drug that comes out is THE wonder drug. Prozac did that too. There were millions that went in to the marketing of it. Every paper ran with it because they all look to the scientists as the new Gods to give us all the cures. Well, they haven’t given us a cure for anything.
Charles: Yes. It’s just a lot of confusion. Even the scientists, if you listen to them today, say that quantum theory is so complicated that nobody can understand it. So it’s beyond the realm of understanding.
Alan: That’s right. Even Stephen Hawkins came out and said that Einstein didn’t even understand all of the theories that went up to make the quantum theory. So in other words, it‘s how many angels can stand on the head of a pin. It’s back to the same thing. There’s no difference with the scientists. They go through their fads and then they leave their fads behind as they get a new theory or fad given to them. This is amazing with science, and medicine too, as they keep changing their minds about things and tossing theories out but never saying they were wrong. It’s like the IPCC at the UN. They never say they are wrong, they just quietly stop mentioning one part that’s come to disgrace and carry on as though nothing had happened. That’s the nature of professions that take over.
Now, any religion that’s existed in the past on a tribal level generally was part of the social structure as well. It gave the people the rules so they could live with each other without killing each other, in close confinement often, and got them through the tough times. When religion becomes formalized into institutions over generations, and you get the same generations of elite going into them at the head, then it become corrupt obviously, like any government. Any government too, even if it starts off with great intentions becomes corrupt in about the second or third generation. That’s standard as well.
Charles: People, yeah, who want control. The thing that always impressed me about spirit and science is I would suggest the 3 greatest scientific minds of the last 500 years would be Leonardo Da Vinci, Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein and all of them had a deep belief of God.
Alan: I wouldn’t believe in them at all, to be honest with you.
Charles: Really?
Alan: No. Not at all. Einstein was classified, and this is the history books, as a dummy at school. His parents were VERY wealthy in Switzerland. They got him a job in the patenting department. The patenting department is there not to just put patents through but – as you know, the war industry runs everything and anybody that came up with a good idea – it was to actually STEAL their ideas. His reward for being a good person in that department and passing stuff on to his bosses was to be, we’ll make you a famous scientist. He never gave a lecture publicly at all and everybody who interviewed him, including CP Snow said, all he ever talked about was International Zionism and a world run by scientific elitism and that’s how it should be. He couldn’t discuss anything without his notes there, on a scientific basis. If you go back into the other ones too, Isaac Newton, the guy was quite the character. He never left Cambridge you know. He didn’t like women at all. He was bringing over, I think it was Fabio from Italy to live with, and he cracked up at the last minute in case of the scandal it would cause. When he died and they emptied out his rooms, he was into alchemy and Cabala. That’s where he was getting everything from, all his ideas, the Cabala. These guys were not Christians by any, any, any possible means. I also think it’s very, very true, like Jacques Ellul said, the idea of bringing forth famous people, whether it’s actors or scientist, to give opinions on political venues, it’s no different then bringing forth your plumber, your carpenter or the person who rings the till at your grocery store because they know no more about it than they do. We are more enthralled by their STATUS than their knowledge.
Thanks for calling and I’ll go onto the next caller. There’s Vince from London. Are you there Vince?
Vince: Isaac Newton, I’ll have to disagree with you on that one.
Alan: That’s okay.
Vince: He created something called laws and that’s the provable…
Alan: He wasn’t the first one to come up with these laws, you understand. It’s no different than today, it’s who grabs something first, who gets the acclaim for it. The same scandal happened exactly…
Vince: He was denounced by all his peers, all his contemporaries. He actually went back and became a bureaucrat.
Alan: He wasn’t a bureaucrat. His reward was getting put in charge of the Royal Mint, which was a darn cushy job and very well paying.
Vince: It was a bureaucrat’s job though isn’t it?
Alan: He didn’t do anything. It’s like getting appointed at the head of some commission. You’ve got to understand, every country will elevate the main characters they give you as famous people. What surprises me too, is when you go into say Russia, they were teaching through the Soviet era that so and so, Popov, or whoever invented the television set. Another guy was the first guy to fly an aircraft. This character who’s Russian was a creator of electricity. Every country has this sort of thing going on. It’s like the future. Let’s take say 10 years down the road when they have this whole thing set up and steamrolling forward with the environment, population reduction, all of that kind of stuff, they will then elevate for future generations that Al Gore was the genius, the genius behind it and that’s what will be taught in the schools. Writers will come out and write screeds of fantasy about them that become dogma and that’s the reality of the world that we live in.
Vince: They call Newton, his theories are called LAWS, the laws of motion, the laws of gravity. But they don’t call global warming a law. It’s not science. You shouldn’t even really call them theories; in truth they are just hypothesis.
Alan: They are not even hypothesis. It’s not even a hypothesis. You see, it’s an AGENDA. It’s an agenda. The idea of what’s happening today was dreamed up by commissions and committees by the Club of Rome back in the early 70s and they wrote about it in their own book. They take a CLAIM for coming up with this idea.
Vince: I wouldn’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Science, there is hard science and there’s something, you have to discriminate.
Alan: You’ve got to understand, science is like which witch doctor do you want to believe in, you see. That’s what it is. That’s what science is. Right now that’s exactly where science is. We haven’t been a scientific society for very long. We don’t know enough to make these incredible statements. However, what we do have are big, massive foundations putting up multi billions of bucks to bring in a planned society, a planned future USING the guise of global warming to bring it around and to make us give up rights, freedoms, and all the rest of it, to change our behavior. The Club of Rome is a top think tank for the UN. In their OWN book, the founders wrote their own book on it, called The First Global Revolution and they published it in the 1990s. In there they said that they were given the task of finding a way to unite the whole world under a common cause, going in a common direction, into a collectivist society. They said, they came up with the IDEA of global warming, “WE CAME UP WITH THE IDEA OF GLOBAL WARMING, FAMINES… In other words, scary things.
Vince: I know. The things I’m interested in, that I wanted to bring up, the things that don’t really get talked about, you know, things that bothered me the last couple of weeks. There is actually something that you said about Abraham Lincoln and Karl Marx.
Alan: Well, that’s not my opinion. Don’t blame me for saying something that’s in the Congressional Records in the US. That Karl Marx actually…
Vince: It just triggered something else. It’s just like, well…
Alan: Karl Marx DID telegraph Lincoln and congratulated him for defeating the south because one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto was a strong, basically totalitarian, CENTRALIZED government and Lincoln had established and achieved that. Before Lincoln they didn’t have this incredibly powerful, centralized government. In fact, the Confederation had so many things written into the Constitution. The Confederation…
Vince: That’s what I wanted to talk about. I’ll get to the nitty-gritty. It’s this thing called the Constitution. We know that everything is falling apart and it’s happening here in Britain. There is nothing here on the radio that I can find so I tend to listen to everything in America. All I ever hear is the same thing, Constitution, the Constitution, we’ve got to get back to the Constitution. Oh, we get Ron Paul in and everything we’ll get back and everything will be right and then it will be great again. You know, all this kind of thing. It’s winding me up basically. Could we just talk about the Constitution because if you Google it, you get a picture of it. It says there in massive letters, WE THE PEOPLE… is that a collectivist statement or what?
Alan: It’s supposed to be a collectivist to the extent that for the first time in history, again this is the standard version I’m giving you, where they’d actually sat down and wrote out a CHARTER of rights basically, along with the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights came from the ordinary folk who protested. Like I say, there is a difference between a rebellion and a revolution. In a revolution, you have a preplanned agenda using revolt first but you also know where you’re going to take the revolt through stages into a new society which is then revolutionary, you see. Most of them will rebel and then go back; that’s the history of even Britain with the Levelers and the peasants’ revolts and all the rest of it. They wanted to go back to a time when things were better, a little bit better than the unbearable situation they had come to. The founding fathers of America, once they had won or been granted their independence basically, wanted to copy, model it on almost a British system, including how much land you should have to vote.
Vince: Kick out the British and then put in a British system? That doesn’t make sense.
Alan: Exactly. So really, and people have really questioned that. Did they simply bring in another appendage of Britain under a guise? Initially Washington and these guys didn’t think the ORDINARY person had the intellectual or educational capacity to make the CORRECT kind of vote. So they wanted you to own X-amount of land before you even had the right to vote or run for congress. There was a big lot of to-do about that. People don’t realize that there were rebellions right after that within the United States in some places, as folk saw what was coming and what was getting set up. So in a sense the US went back, whereas the French Revolution, which again, was a collectivist revolution with an agenda and with people behind it, at the top, who knew they were going to bring it into a TRUE revolution, from a rebellion, into what became the basis of the communistic/socialistic system. That’s what Karl Marx studied. The US, as I say, at one point they even wrote to the descendant of the Stuart dynasty who was in Italy at the time, asking if he was maybe interested in being the King. They even thought of making him the King of America. Thanks for calling. I’ll be back after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ve got Maggie from Texas on the line. Are you there Maggie?
Maggie: Hello Alan. The other day I listened to a guest on another program and he was combining space-age flying-saucer type technology with alien stories and wrapping it all in religion. He went on and on about aliens, good aliens, bad aliens, real aliens, false aliens, robot aliens, you know…
Alan: And illegal aliens. [Laughing]
Maggie: [Laughing] No. He did not mention those. Anyway, he went on beyond the point where ordinarily I just flip the channel but because he was also talking about religion, Old Testament and earlier, I kept listening for while thinking maybe I could learn something of value. I decided to ask you, since you are a scholar of religion. First, what do you really think of this alien idea? Who do you believe was the first to introduce it in religion, identifying them specifically as travelers from space or from the stars? What do you think inspired that story?
Alan: Ho, oh. I’ll tell you. It’s quite good because John Dewey was the first one to say that in a major speech.
Maggie: Really?
Alan: John Dewey, yeah. Remember the whole thing was collectivist world planned society, around the time of the League of Nations. He said, if we could only show that we were getting invaded from an external, extraterrestrial enemy, the world would come together and unite as one. Another person who said it was Lester B Pearson. Lester B Pearson became the Prime Minister of Canada; he was also the head of the UN at one point. He drafted up the UN Charter with Alger Hiss.
Maggie: Are you saying that there is no precedent for it in ancient religions because this guy was coming up with stuff about it?
Alan: No. I’ll tell you what they did. They started with Eric Von Daniken that came out. He was launched a long time ago by David Frost. Eric Von Daniken eventually was exposed, with all his space aliens and stuff, and the guy on the sort of cosmic motorcycle, and all the stuff that he was churning out. Chariots of the Gods was his first one. He was exposed because of a British journalist sent, he went over to South America, Mexico, and found the guy that was making all these steles that Daniken was claiming were ancient. He was only paying the guy about 10 pesos each for this and he was making a fortune, so he was a con man. They’ve never stopped this stuff. But here is what Lester B Pearson said, from the United Nations, 1957 and I’ve got it from the original paper here, by the way, The Globe and Mail. It says…
Perhaps there is a hopeful possibility here in the conquest of outer space. Interplanetary activity may well give us planetary peace. Once we discover Marian space ships hovering over earth’s space, we will all come together and we’ll say, how dare they threaten us like this. We shall shout as ONE as a really United Nations.
That was Canadian diplomat Lester Pearson, Noble Peace Prize lecturer, given in December 1957. He drafted up the Constitution for the UN with Alger Hiss and became Prime Minister of Canada.
Maggie: Okay. I gather you think that the people who are coming up with this stuff are disinformation agents?
Alan: I would say absolutely so. Plus it’s a good way to rake in the cash from the people who want that kind of stuff.
Maggie: I have heard some people suggest that the giants of the earth, of the Old Testament, might have been thought of as space aliens. Is that so or is that not so?
Alan: Well, when we see their big, massive skeletons… Remember, there is one born every minute. The guy who said that made an artificial one and took it on his circus tour and made lots of money. It was made of wax.
I’ll be back Monday night. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 15th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use because once in while I can’t upload to the major sites for some strange reason. It can take up to two weeks to get them going again. So if you bookmark the other sites you can always get the latest shows and download them. You can also try these other sites because if you find there is stickiness as you are downloading sometimes on the .com site it’s because there are too many going into that one site at the same time and the other ones are perfectly good. So try them once in a while. The official sites are [listed above]. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, they don’t have computers and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I always say this is the tin can moment to see how many pennies are in it. It’s up to you to keep me going. I’m probably the only one out there who doesn’t live on advertising income. Generally you get paid by advertisers and I could do it certainly and I’d bring them on as guests or mention them once in a while and you get paid each time you do it. But this way I’ve got a freer hand. The advertisements that you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertiser to RBN to pay for this air time. It pays RBN for their broadcast and their satellite, equipment, bills and their staff. So it’s up to you to support me, keep me going at the same time and you can do so by getting the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on the web site or your can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] It’s important to keep me going because I’m probably the only one that’s gone this long trying it this way and it’s not easy. It’s not an income by any means and it certainly isn’t the way that you support yourself and it certainly is not a business either. As I say, my hands are free that way. I can go into areas and talk about things that otherwise I could be restricted if I was backed by companies and so on.
We live in a world where we see the scams today when they are exposed by people like myself and others who go through the latest scams and show you how they work. I can also show you how famous people are created. It’s no different than the creation of, out of thousands of say musicians, you can pick one little group and make them the top. It’s done by professionals, not by the group. I’ll talk about that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about what we are living through today and how people are risen to astronomical heights of importance and people truly believe they are geniuses and they give their all TO them. It’s really the same technique that’s used in the creation of a movie star or to raise, say, one of thousands of singers to the top.
You create a mystique, a persona, and you give them incredible exposure. The more you tell people out there that this person is the best thing since sliced bread, they will believe it, just by repetition and the fact that you say it. The more people who say it in the right magazines and the right talk shows on TV, the more they believe it. It is that simple, honestly. When you think about how they have risen up people in the past for political agendas, it’s no different than raising them up today to superstar status. I was thinking of people like Al Gore.
What credentials does Al Gore have? And yet he’s basically the kingpin for the inconvenient SPOOF that’s being taught all over the schools across the planet by mandates of government. What exactly is he? What does he have to his credit? It’s just the creation of a star IMAGE as some kind of ultra-special specialist that gives him the God-like powers to speak, like God, and it’s done; it is SO; so mote it be, as they say, and it’s suddenly done. All the papers parrot him, all the media parrot him and governments immediately put new laws into the school for education to make sure the children are brainwashed in a political agenda.
It’s never been any different when you go into the past, down through history and they gave you famous players and raise them up to the top, the famous players that come out as top scientists, and they are BUILT UP by the media before they even appear to the public for the first time. They are built up into genius status by repetition and claims. So if they appear they are immediately treated like a God by the audience. That truly is how simple it is. We go into the Royal Society, for instance, in England, and the Masons admit this themselves in their own books and documentaries. It was a Masonic institution; it still is. Its core was to lead the world and guide the world by SCIENCES, what sciences should be available to the general population and to governments. In other words, it came out of the old alchemists schools, as they call them, where alchemists were graded. They always have the ones who are into real chemistry at the top, and exploration of science. Then they have all the wanna-bes down below who are not IN on the true acts, who practice mixing eye of toads and newts and making funny smoke and casting spells. Just like today, you have all the new agers trying to do the same thing through communication of oneness with each other and all that stuff and tapping in to the ALL, the universal consciousness and all that kind of stuff. They are trying to do what the boys at the top are doing by plugging brains in to computers. It’s the same thing, you see.
The reality is that the high echelons of the Royal Society HAVE GUIDED THE WORLD, really, on what was to be made available because one thing in the real alchemists, not the phonies all down below, the real guys were a BROTHERHOOD and they knew their secrets of chemistry and all the rest of it. Their discoveries were powerful. They knew the weaponry they could create back then too. Then knew that Kings, Queens and governments would come to THEM for the power that they could give to the governments and that hasn’t changed today either. We forget, it’s not just that knowledge is power, it is particular kinds of knowledge that are very, very powerful indeed. They also decided that it was time to go into their Age of Reason. They gave us, again, the heroes for the Age of Reason and prior to that as well. They built them up into superstar status, the idea being that they would eradicate the old religions and bring in their OWN religion basically, a form or secular humanism but once again, where the scientists now would get risen to the top AS the new priesthood.
Well, it’s quite astonishing since this political agenda, not the scientific cover that it’s got, this political agenda of global warming has risen THOUSANDS of scientists up to superstar status with incredible salaries and grants, money thrown at them, and it’s all a scam. So they certainly are benefiting from it. Luckily, enough scientists have refused to join the IPCC, the phony group at the United Nations OR they have joined it and left when they found out that they were not using science at all. It was PURELY A POLITICAL AGENDA, once again, to control the direction of the world according to the beliefs of this particular political group. That’s how it’s done. As I say, Al Gore is a great example. It’s the same in the past. You’ll find that all the major players they give you, especially from Britain because Britain was set to lead the world, right, so you have to make sure that all the main inventors are obviously British. When you go into the reports of what they were discovering back in the 1500s and 1600s from the Royal Society members, it was all coming from much older texts that they were copying directly from the Moslem countries.
It is astonishing. We don’t even realize that right up into the beginnings of the 20th century all medicine practiced in the Western world had been taken from Medieval times from Moslems, ALL MEDICINE. It was the same with all astronomy, ALL astronomy. There is a very good series that was on TV recently. It was about the written word and how language developed through writing. It goes into the era where the Moslem nations were so into sending people across the whole planet to gather ALL knowledge. Very rich and wealthy leaders in those countries literally spent years and years and years building incredible libraries up, with handwritten books by the people who went out to gather the information on EVERY branch of what we today call science… all kinds of medicines, all kinds of theories, all religions, astronomy, real sciences too, as well. They were into dissecting the colors of the crystal, the light in other words, of the rainbow into its true colors, prisms; all the stuff that they were doing hundreds of years later with Isaac Newton and others.
Again, it’s amazing how you can squash a country or a people that you put down into a third world status often, which is wrong again because many of them are not at all, especially people like the Iranians. You don’t want to believe that they could have been way ahead. It doesn’t look good when they are way ahead of the up-and-coming superpower… and they were way ahead HUNDREDS of years ago. Pretty well all of the philosophers that we know today, all the writings were lost to the Western world and they all came through the Moslem countries in, again, the Age of Translations, as they called it. They went out and they got copies of all the ancient philosophers; they kept them. We got them back around the 10th century from the Moslems. What’s astonishing to me is the more you read, the more you realize that even the top astronomers who came out in Britain literally took the Arabic writings and translated them right into their own and claimed it as their own basically. Amazing. The proof is there, from the original writings of the Moslems. Astonishing.
So they created superstars again to lead the world saying we are the greatest; we are the people; we are the greatest. That’s how you build up a superpower by saying, yeah, we rule the world; we run it; we are the inventors of everything, you see. Now it’s the US’s turn, same idea. They give you people like Al Gore; build him into a superstar and what is this hack politician anyway? What is he other than that? Really? Yet he is a GOD. He is a literal God to children around the age of 8 or 9 years of age, who stand in awe of this guy that was Vice president. That’s all you have to say is ‘vice president’ and they stand in awe as this guy prattles on about the green agenda and how they are going to live in the future and how they will cut back on the lifestyles that their nasty, rotten parents had, another myth as well by the way. That’s how the children are brainwashed. Everything is political today. EVERYTHING is political.
We watched the rise of the superstars. Pachauri, another one at the IPCC for the United Nations. What was he before he came into that position? Here he is making all these POLITICAL statements. That’s what they are because they really want to decimate the planet so that the elite, the intelligentsia as they think of themselves, will survive. That’s as simple as that. They also cannot stand the fact that you might be living in a fairly comfortable life and eating well and using up what they call THEIR RESOURCES. In the Darwinian scale of things, the inferiors must die off so’s that the superiors can go ahead and live. And here you are, eating, chomping away with your French fries. That just cannot be done, you know. THAT’S WHAT THEY MEAN BY UNSUSTAINABLE, as they jet across the world polluting all over the place and that’s okay. I’ve even read articles about that; about his private limo and all the rest of it. He can’t even walk a mile to his work, from his £5 million house, one of them, as he writes his porno novels to pass the time.
These are the characters that they raise up as heroes. It’s just incredible. When they are doing it today and you are living through it and you see how it’s done and you KNOW it – and out there the listeners to this show certainly do know it – it was exactly the same in the past when they gave us the heroes and the top scientists and all the rest of it, and the Darwin’s and long before them… POLITICAL reasons.
I used to laugh when Benjamin Franklin, at the time when he was a Mason, and that’s in his own diaries. He tells you when he was admitted to the different lodges and the English Rite and so on, and the York Rite and the blah, blah, blah, all the other Rites. Eventually he was a Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris. He initiated Voltaire into them; that’s also in his own letters and writings in the Franklin Institute, so read it for yourself. He wanted to go down – like all Masons at that time because they thought of themselves as scientists first and men of reason – as an inventor. He made an awful stove that leached smoke. They still sell them today or you’ll find a few old ones. But then they said, we’ll make you, Benjamin, discoverer of the lightning conductor; you’ll go down in history as that… even though the Romans had it 2,000 years ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, dispelling the myths of the past and present. It’s rather astonishing, as I say, how we create these giants in our minds, or the media does at least for us. Big money certainly does it because you spend a lot of money promoting someone up to the top and creating the myth. We’ve been given real sciences eventually from real scientists but what I’m saying is, when they create BIG, IMPORTANT people who end up immediately discussing politics and saying how the world should go, you know that there is something else going on. You’ll always find the other scientists that generally did the real work were displaced and put to the bottom or suppressed and often they simply were eliminated and their work was taken by the political groups. That’s another fact of history and the same is true today. You’d be surprised how many of the Freemasons especially wanted to go down in history as scientists that brought something to the world.
With Franklin, he’s the perfect example. He wrote about it, that he was practicing with electricity with batteries. Everybody in those days was doing it, at the top. He also was given, supposedly he was the inventor of the lightning rod. They had to give him something for a sign. But as I say, the ancient Roman temples had these things on top of them too, with these copper wires coming down into the temples and you can read about them in the history books. Sometimes in some of the temples, like the Temple of Jupiter, they’d have the thing wired to the main God and if the lightning struck the temple, the lightning rod, the thing sort of glowed and sparked and it was quite the sight to see. There is even a record where about 5 priests that were all touching the idol and touching each other, were electrocuted; that was quite the sacrifice, quite the show. They enjoyed that. This is how they recycle various sciences and give us stars who are risen to the top and then put onto political agendas… and nothing has changed. Big bucks go into it.
With Al Gore and so on, the myth-making machine went to extraordinary lengths to create him from a nobody into a somebody and make him some sort of top scientist. It’s amazing how people have this fugue state where the propaganda takes over and they start to see him as a real scientist and so on and they forget this guy is a politician. That’s pretty well all he is, and not a very good one at that either. But he is well connected and he was mentored by Armand Hammer. He was a very interesting character who was able to not only be a multi millionaire, not only the very fact that his father renamed him Arm-and-Hammer, for the arm and hammer of the Soviet flag, the communist flag, which is also, by the way, the British Freemasons’ one; they actually have the arm and the hammer inside the compass. That’s what he had. He was the next-door neighbor, he was given an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin. He crossed, all through the Cold War, back and forth with impunity from anybody, no CIA, no whatever. BIG politics are behind the political agenda and the direction that the world is not destined to go, but planned to go by very, very, very rich people working in combination.
Here is an article about the latest scandal from the IPCC at the United Nations. Remember, everything at the United Nations, I don’t care what department, they have a political agenda. You should read your history on it. This one is from the Telegraph.
African crops yield another catastrophe for the IPCC
One more alarming claim in the IPCC’s 2007 report is disintegrating under closer examination, says Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker / 13 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
Ever more question marks have been raised in recent weeks over the reputations of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and of its chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri. But the latest example to emerge is arguably the most bizarre and scandalous of all. It centres on a very specific scare story which was included in the IPCC’s 2007 report, although it was completely at odds with the scientific evidence (Alan: Like everything else that they do.)– including that produced by the British expert in charge of the relevant section of the report. Even more tellingly, however, this particular claim has repeatedly been championed by Dr Pachauri himself.
Only last week Dr Pachauri was specifically denying that the appearance of this claim in two IPCC reports, including one of which he was the editor, was an error. Yet it has now come to light that the IPCC, ignoring the evidence of its own experts, deliberately published the claim for propaganda purposes. (A: That means POLITICAL purposes, folks.)
One of the most widely quoted and most alarmist passages in the main 2007 report was a warning that, by 2020, global warming could reduce crop yields in some countries in Africa by 50 per cent. Dr Pachauri not only allowed this claim to be included in the short Synthesis Report, of which he was co-editor, but has publicly repeated it many times since.
The origin of this claim was a report written for a Canadian advocacy group (A: That’s a political greening group.) by Ali Agoumi, a Moroccan academic who draws part of his current income from advising on how to make applications for “carbon credits”. (A: He’s an opportunist. You understand what an opportunist is?) As his primary sources he cited reports for three North African governments. But none of these remotely supported what he wrote. The nearest any got to providing evidence for his claim was one for the Moroccan government, which said that in serious drought years, cereal yields might be reduced by 50 per cent. The report for the Algerian government, on the other hand, predicted that, on current projections, “agricultural production will more than double by 2020”. Yet it was Agoumi’s claim that climate change could cut yields by 50 per cent that was headlined in the IPCC’s Working Group II report in 2007. (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the cons and the deception and the political agenda within the IPCC where they’re still prattling on about false reports and claiming they’re true, even though it’s been admitted elsewhere they are packs of lies basically. He was on about this particular report from the Telegraph.
What made this even odder, however, was that the group’s co-chairman was a British agricultural expert, Dr Martin Parry, whose consultancy group, Martin Parry Associates, had been paid £75,000 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for two reports which had come to totally different conclusions. Specifically designed to inform the IPCC’s 2007 report, these predicted that by 2020 any changes were likely to be insignificant. (A: That was the report that Pachauri was handed and yet he lied and went the opposite way with it.) The worst case they could come up with was that by 2080 climate change might decrease crop yields by “up to 30 per cent”. (A: That’s like if some oddball thing happened that wasn’t predicted.)
British taxpayers poured out money for the section of the IPCC report for which Dr Parry was responsible. Defra paid £2.5 million through the Met Office, plus £330,000 for Dr Parry’s salary as co-chairman, and a further £75,000 to his consultancy for two more reports on the impact of global warming on world food supplies. Yet when it came to the impact on Africa, all this peer-reviewed work – including further expert reports by Britain’s Dr Mike Hulme and Dutch and German teams – was ignored in favour of a prediction from one Moroccan activist at odds with his own cited sources. (A: In other words, a guy who lied through his teeth, which I read at the beginning of this particular article.)
Fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud. I’m just wondering if the myth-making machine that created the IPCC and the UN, these holy men at the top, these guys who literally are all out, they sacrifice their lives to help the world, you know. I wonder if that myth will overcome this data here. We’ll find out won’t we?
The Mail on Sunday had this about the same thing.
The professor’s amazing climate change retreat
13th February 2010 / Mail Online
Untold billions of pounds have been spent on turning the world green and also on financing the dubious trade in carbon credits.
Countless gallons of aviation fuel have been consumed carrying experts, lobbyists and politicians to apocalyptic conferences on global warming.
Every government on Earth has changed its policy, hundreds of academic institutions, entire school curricula and the priorities of broadcasters and newspapers all over the world have been altered – all to serve the new doctrine that man is overheating the planet and must undertake heroic and costly changes to save the world from drowning as the icecaps melt.
You might have thought that all this was based upon well-founded, highly competent research and that those involved had good reason for their blazing, hot-eyed certainty and their fierce intolerance of dissent.
But, thanks to the row over leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit, we now learn that this body’s director, Phil Jones, works in a disorganised fashion amid chaos and mess.
(A: Then he goes through the different things about how his record keeping is; it’s just absolute mayhem. He doesn’t need it because he makes things up as he goes. But here is Jones, after all those leaked emails came out where he’s telling people to destroy evidence of global cooling and all the rest of it. It says…)
Even more strikingly, he (A: Jones) also sounds much less ebullient about the basic theory (A: of global warming.), admitting that there is little difference between global warming rates in the Nineties and in two previous periods since 1860 and accepting that from 1995 to now there has been no statistically significant warming. (A: Isn’t that a complete turnaround? We’ve all to change our lives for these utter liars that have been caught out.)
He also leaves open the possibility, long resisted by climate change activists, that the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ from 800 to 1300 AD, and thought by many experts to be warmer than the present period, could have encompassed the entire globe. (A: Well, I tell you, isn’t that an about-face, eh?)
This is an amazing retreat, since if it was both global and warmer, the green movement’s argument that our current position is ‘unprecedented’ would collapse.
And it better collapse because if you understand the hell they have planned for you, this political agenda, you’d make sure it collapsed right now. You’d make sure that all this INDOCTRINATION at school was thrown out the window as well. You would make sure that ALL these green journalists, and this is true. There is a whole section, a NEW category of journalism. Every newspaper has a green journalist; that’s his specialty. He’s a POLITICAL journalist; this is how he is activated to promote the propaganda. They have to get thrown out. They have to get thrown out. You cannot have people who are biased, and media, putting out these reports as if they were absolutely true and factual, these GOSPELS that they have, these new gospels, when they have a political agenda. You cannot have truth, it doesn’t happen when you have a political agenda. Amazing. So this is the Mail Online and I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show, if XplorNet graces me with enough speed to put it up there even tough I’ve been paying for high speed and they take the money. I’ll put up all the links on my site for your perusal.
It’s so interesting too, how everything is politics. Everything is politics and we don’t really get it. We don’t understand, really, what’s going on with us as we get taxed to death and put under. I’m looking for a particular article here and it’s from The Economist. Very interesting article because this guy, this is in the green.view column; this is the journalist whose job it is to push his religion under the pretense he is a journalist.
Conflict conservation
Biodiversity down the barrel of a gun
Feb 8th 2010 / From Economist.com
THERE was a time when conservation meant keeping people away from nature. America’s system of national parks, a model for similar set-ups around the world, was based on the idea of limiting human presence to passing visits, rather than permanent habitation.
In recent years this way of doing things has come under suspicion. To fence off large areas of parkland is often impractical and can also be immoral. (A: Here is what he goes through now, how conservation areas are now created. It’s through perpetual war. War is good he says, really. We need perpetual war because in between the strips like North Korea, South Korea, places like that, nature thrives in these no-go zones. And it also kills off the human population, these wars, and it helps nature and animals and the birdies and stuff like that. So this pretended journalist is actually a fanatic with a cause, getting paid as a journalist for his green page and is promoting perpetual war for human depopulation and to allow the animals and the fungi and the ferns and so on to grow. Quite something. He goes through the different instances in the world today where this is happening because of conflict and war. Quite something. So his last paragraph says…)
Military conflict and the preparations that surround it are not, in themselves, good for the environment: far from it. Animals big enough to be eaten, or with body parts that can be sold for a profit, are well advised to stay out of war zones. It is depopulation that matters. (A: He’s talking about PEOPLE here, by the way.) Armed conflict and its knock-on effects simply happen to be one of the few forces on the planet that can cause quick and thorough depopulation. (A: Wars, get wars going.) These areas struggle to survive when peace arrives. (A: He’s talking about the animals now.) The nasty truth is that the likelihood of random and violent death is the cheapest form of conservation yet invented.
It’s time we got all these so-called green journalists out in the trash heap because THEY MEAN IT. These are the worst fanatics and you can imagine if they get ahead with this green agenda. If you think the Soviet system or the Nazi system was bad, YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
Politics, politics, everything is politics. The BBC. This is not new to me because I’ve known how the scriptwriters, especially in Canada, so openly propagandize. They copied stuff right from the Soviet system. You can’t watch any entertainment without getting your ‘consciousness raised’ in certain areas, you understand, about this and ‘sensitivity’ and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It’s so bad in Canada but it’s always been that way. The BBC is a bit more subtle, at least it used to be, but they’ve gotten pretty coarse about it now. The US do the better ones; they give you movies you get INVOLVED in and you lose yourself and then you get brainwashed really good at the end. The BBC, it says here…
BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who (A: A series.) to bring down Margaret Thatcher
By Tom Kelly / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online
She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.
Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a ‘Tardis revolution’ by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.
In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.
Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners’ strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
The revelations appear to confirm claims that the 1980s BBC opposed Mrs Thatcher’s government, with the then Tory chairman Norman Tebbit claiming it was in the hands of a ‘Marxist mafia’. (A: Well, he was absolutely true on that; it was. You know what’s amazing to me, the BBC, which is run by the government and funded by the tax payers through the government and is owned by the government, the CBC in Canada and the other British Commonwealth countries that all have their versions, same base, owned by the government, are all staffed by Marxists. There is nothing new in that. One of the communists who defected from the Soviet Union, a KGB guy, went to work with the CBC and he said the he met more communists, true communists, in the CBC working there, than he ever did in the Soviet Union. Back to this article…)
Sylvester McCoy, the actor who played the Doctor from 1987 to 1989, said: ‘Our feeling was that Margaret Thatcher was far more terrifying than any monster the Doctor had encountered.
This is nothing new though. I’ve got articles here where the writers who put together a lot of stuff for Walt Disney slipped so much in it, in the songs too. They actually had Marxist meanings and were meant to hit people subliminally as well. They admit about the time it took to get just the right word for a particular line; it might take them weeks to decide on the proper word for IMPACT. That’s quite something.
You cannot get entertainment today where there is no propaganda. That Avatar movie is something else. It’s training the children to plug in. The whole idea is you plug in to the net and get lost in this new Peter Pan Disneyland where everything is wonderful, you are all one with the planet, the plants are connected with you and you use this sort of tail you’ve got to hook yourself into them. Well, that’s like plugging in; the same with The Matrix movie isn’t it. Everything is propaganda. everything was ONE and Mother Nature ruled. Mother Nature ruled, keeping the balance, you know the Cabalistic balance of everything. A fairly land, absolute fairly land of fantasy. You know something? The worse they make it is this world to survive, with all the things that are coming down, the more youngsters will want to escape into this fake reality. Not just youngsters, by the way; apparently adults are hooked with the virtual reality world as well, some of them. EVERYTHING in that movie, EVERYTHING was the new agey, conservation propaganda to a tee. Quite something.
The world they are bringing in and they discussed this an awful, awful long time ago, even before they called themselves the Royal Institute of International Affairs and we can go back further to the Milner Group, the Cecil Rhodes Society and again, you had the Royal Society there too with its umbrella organizations going back for hundreds of years. They planned the sort of future world that they envisaged should come in and they could make it happen, these very powerful and rich people. Eventually they wanted a world where everyone in that world would be run like a beehive, in what they called ‘a perfect social order’. This was articulated by HG Wells, the heads of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It’s been said again recently at some of their meetings. They are bringing in a world of SERVICE where you’ll all be born, if they need you to be born, to serve them. It will be a world of service to the world society, to the state, the world state.
If you don’t like that, you’re anti-social; the same technique they used in China. You cannot have individuality and free choice in these totalitarian systems. And the greatest thing is, they can camouflage it so well that the people don’t even see it for a totalitarian system. It’s that incredible, the psychology they can use? This article here is about how they are going to tax you literally, a pre-death tax now. Britain, Canada, and the Commonwealth countries are the most highly taxed countries on the planet. In Canada it’s a general sales tax and various other hidden taxes galore on everything that you purchase. In all the European countries, it’s a Value Added Tax that started off only, supposedly, for things you don’t need, like binoculars. Eventually it spread onto everything. Well, that’s going up by the way, to 20% now on every purchase. You can tack on 20% on EVERY purchase. This article is about ANOTHER TAX they are going to hit you with. Well, one day you might need health care as you are dying, so we are going to make you pay £20,000 in advance for that care. How’s that? How is that?
Council chiefs back ‘death tax’
By Nick Triggle / Health reporter, BBC News / 11 Feb 2010
Pressure is growing on the government to clarify its position over the so-called “death tax” after social care chiefs and charities backed the levy. (A: What do charities have to do with this? Well, this is their living, by the way, then they call themselves a charity.)
Ministers in England are considering introducing a compulsory fee, possibly up to £20,000, to pay for social care. (A: They already pay for social care; that’s what the National Health system was created FOR. It’s been funded to the hilt, but you’re supposed to forget that of course.)
The government said it would be making an announcement soon.
John Jackson, from ADASS, (A: It should be called S-A-D, SADASS.) which represents social service chiefs working for councils, said extra funding was “much needed”. (A: But they’re not going to make it a voluntary scheme either. It’s going to become compulsory. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. This article that I’m reading from the BBC is about a new tax they want to bring in where you’re going to have to pay in advance for care you might get when you’re dying, even though the National Health Service is robbing people blind to provide all these cares already.
The problem – they don’t mention it here – is with the government expanding its wars along with the US across the world and buying all these drones too from the US, they’ve got to take the money from the needy to get all the weaponry and stuff. It’s a lot of dough for these big bangs they put up there, to get the latest gizmos. They got to cut back from the usual places so they’re just going to keep taxing the people for more and more and more and giving them less service. Here are people who have lost their homes, probably millions and millions – because of the last crash and the same con as they were using in the US with all these pyramid schemes for mortgages – and taxed to the gunnels, lack of jobs, overrun with… the immigrants are complaining there are too many immigrants. They can’t get work; there are too many immigrants. It’s getting flooded and that’s Labour’s policy to eradiate what was the British culture. That’s what the article I read from Tony Blair and his best buddies said that in the paper last week. I quoted it a few times and it’s on the web site from the mainstream. But here they are hitting them with another one, £20,000 in case you one day have to get treatment as you are dying, even though you are already paying for it, your whole life long, with your taxes into the National Health Service. Quite something, eh? Quite something.
From the CBC Canada; I love the new normals. I call them ‘new normals’ when everything is one way, like 1 in sort of 150,000 children might show the signs of autism. That’s how it was right up until the 60s and then bang, it started going up like a rocket until it’s like 1 in 4 who’s got autism and that’s the new normal now. We’re not supposed to equate the inoculations and stuff with it of course; that’s just not allowed… even though they darn well know it. The CBC has an article here on the new asthma. Remember about 2 years ago – I think I read it on the air here; it’s in my archives section – how allergies had gone up 60-odd percent, 65% in the last 5 years… a new normal. No money was put into finding out why… because they know what causes it. It’s in your food too, by the way. That’s what causes it. It changed with GMO food. They are well aware of what causes it.
1 in 3 chance of developing asthma: study
By CBC News / February 15, 2010
One in three people can expect to be diagnosed with asthma in their lifetimes, Ontario research suggests. (A: I like how they ‘suggest’ things.)
Asthma is more likely to develop in childhood, but can also occur in adults (A: Which is a brand new thing.), with a 33 per cent risk over a lifetime, Ontario research suggests.
Researchers followed the medical histories of more than nine million Ontarians for 16 years, between April 1991 and March 2007. A study of the data found the lifetime risk of developing asthma was 33.9 per cent.
What I’m telling you here is that this is a NEW NORMAL. They are spraying the bejesus out of us every day in the sky and have been steadily, steadily since 1998. Before that it was occasionally as they were testing stuff, but STEADILY though from 1998. Big spraying in Ontario because as the jet stream comes up here, they spray at one end, Michigan, and they spray it where I am up here in Sudbury and it’s carried all the way down to New York state, BIG COVERAGE AREA. That’s why we have the asthma now, by the way… and they know this too.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 15th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use because once in while I can’t upload to the major sites for some strange reason. It can take up to two weeks to get them going again. So if you bookmark the other sites you can always get the latest shows and download them. You can also try these other sites because if you find there is stickiness as you are downloading sometimes on the .com site it’s because there are too many going into that one site at the same time and the other ones are perfectly good. So try them once in a while. The official sites are [listed above]. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, they don’t have computers and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I always say this is the tin can moment to see how many pennies are in it. It’s up to you to keep me going. I’m probably the only one out there who doesn’t live on advertising income. Generally you get paid by advertisers and I could do it certainly and I’d bring them on as guests or mention them once in a while and you get paid each time you do it. But this way I’ve got a freer hand. The advertisements that you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertiser to RBN to pay for this air time. It pays RBN for their broadcast and their satellite, equipment, bills and their staff. So it’s up to you to support me, keep me going at the same time and you can do so by getting the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on the web site or your can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] It’s important to keep me going because I’m probably the only one that’s gone this long trying it this way and it’s not easy. It’s not an income by any means and it certainly isn’t the way that you support yourself and it certainly is not a business either. As I say, my hands are free that way. I can go into areas and talk about things that otherwise I could be restricted if I was backed by companies and so on.
We live in a world where we see the scams today when they are exposed by people like myself and others who go through the latest scams and show you how they work. I can also show you how famous people are created. It’s no different than the creation of, out of thousands of say musicians, you can pick one little group and make them the top. It’s done by professionals, not by the group. I’ll talk about that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about what we are living through today and how people are risen to astronomical heights of importance and people truly believe they are geniuses and they give their all TO them. It’s really the same technique that’s used in the creation of a movie star or to raise, say, one of thousands of singers to the top.
You create a mystique, a persona, and you give them incredible exposure. The more you tell people out there that this person is the best thing since sliced bread, they will believe it, just by repetition and the fact that you say it. The more people who say it in the right magazines and the right talk shows on TV, the more they believe it. It is that simple, honestly. When you think about how they have risen up people in the past for political agendas, it’s no different than raising them up today to superstar status. I was thinking of people like Al Gore.
What credentials does Al Gore have? And yet he’s basically the kingpin for the inconvenient SPOOF that’s being taught all over the schools across the planet by mandates of government. What exactly is he? What does he have to his credit? It’s just the creation of a star IMAGE as some kind of ultra-special specialist that gives him the God-like powers to speak, like God, and it’s done; it is SO; so mote it be, as they say, and it’s suddenly done. All the papers parrot him, all the media parrot him and governments immediately put new laws into the school for education to make sure the children are brainwashed in a political agenda.
It’s never been any different when you go into the past, down through history and they gave you famous players and raise them up to the top, the famous players that come out as top scientists, and they are BUILT UP by the media before they even appear to the public for the first time. They are built up into genius status by repetition and claims. So if they appear they are immediately treated like a God by the audience. That truly is how simple it is. We go into the Royal Society, for instance, in England, and the Masons admit this themselves in their own books and documentaries. It was a Masonic institution; it still is. Its core was to lead the world and guide the world by SCIENCES, what sciences should be available to the general population and to governments. In other words, it came out of the old alchemists schools, as they call them, where alchemists were graded. They always have the ones who are into real chemistry at the top, and exploration of science. Then they have all the wanna-bes down below who are not IN on the true acts, who practice mixing eye of toads and newts and making funny smoke and casting spells. Just like today, you have all the new agers trying to do the same thing through communication of oneness with each other and all that stuff and tapping in to the ALL, the universal consciousness and all that kind of stuff. They are trying to do what the boys at the top are doing by plugging brains in to computers. It’s the same thing, you see.
The reality is that the high echelons of the Royal Society HAVE GUIDED THE WORLD, really, on what was to be made available because one thing in the real alchemists, not the phonies all down below, the real guys were a BROTHERHOOD and they knew their secrets of chemistry and all the rest of it. Their discoveries were powerful. They knew the weaponry they could create back then too. Then knew that Kings, Queens and governments would come to THEM for the power that they could give to the governments and that hasn’t changed today either. We forget, it’s not just that knowledge is power, it is particular kinds of knowledge that are very, very powerful indeed. They also decided that it was time to go into their Age of Reason. They gave us, again, the heroes for the Age of Reason and prior to that as well. They built them up into superstar status, the idea being that they would eradicate the old religions and bring in their OWN religion basically, a form or secular humanism but once again, where the scientists now would get risen to the top AS the new priesthood.
Well, it’s quite astonishing since this political agenda, not the scientific cover that it’s got, this political agenda of global warming has risen THOUSANDS of scientists up to superstar status with incredible salaries and grants, money thrown at them, and it’s all a scam. So they certainly are benefiting from it. Luckily, enough scientists have refused to join the IPCC, the phony group at the United Nations OR they have joined it and left when they found out that they were not using science at all. It was PURELY A POLITICAL AGENDA, once again, to control the direction of the world according to the beliefs of this particular political group. That’s how it’s done. As I say, Al Gore is a great example. It’s the same in the past. You’ll find that all the major players they give you, especially from Britain because Britain was set to lead the world, right, so you have to make sure that all the main inventors are obviously British. When you go into the reports of what they were discovering back in the 1500s and 1600s from the Royal Society members, it was all coming from much older texts that they were copying directly from the Moslem countries.
It is astonishing. We don’t even realize that right up into the beginnings of the 20th century all medicine practiced in the Western world had been taken from Medieval times from Moslems, ALL MEDICINE. It was the same with all astronomy, ALL astronomy. There is a very good series that was on TV recently. It was about the written word and how language developed through writing. It goes into the era where the Moslem nations were so into sending people across the whole planet to gather ALL knowledge. Very rich and wealthy leaders in those countries literally spent years and years and years building incredible libraries up, with handwritten books by the people who went out to gather the information on EVERY branch of what we today call science… all kinds of medicines, all kinds of theories, all religions, astronomy, real sciences too, as well. They were into dissecting the colors of the crystal, the light in other words, of the rainbow into its true colors, prisms; all the stuff that they were doing hundreds of years later with Isaac Newton and others.
Again, it’s amazing how you can squash a country or a people that you put down into a third world status often, which is wrong again because many of them are not at all, especially people like the Iranians. You don’t want to believe that they could have been way ahead. It doesn’t look good when they are way ahead of the up-and-coming superpower… and they were way ahead HUNDREDS of years ago. Pretty well all of the philosophers that we know today, all the writings were lost to the Western world and they all came through the Moslem countries in, again, the Age of Translations, as they called it. They went out and they got copies of all the ancient philosophers; they kept them. We got them back around the 10th century from the Moslems. What’s astonishing to me is the more you read, the more you realize that even the top astronomers who came out in Britain literally took the Arabic writings and translated them right into their own and claimed it as their own basically. Amazing. The proof is there, from the original writings of the Moslems. Astonishing.
So they created superstars again to lead the world saying we are the greatest; we are the people; we are the greatest. That’s how you build up a superpower by saying, yeah, we rule the world; we run it; we are the inventors of everything, you see. Now it’s the US’s turn, same idea. They give you people like Al Gore; build him into a superstar and what is this hack politician anyway? What is he other than that? Really? Yet he is a GOD. He is a literal God to children around the age of 8 or 9 years of age, who stand in awe of this guy that was Vice president. That’s all you have to say is ‘vice president’ and they stand in awe as this guy prattles on about the green agenda and how they are going to live in the future and how they will cut back on the lifestyles that their nasty, rotten parents had, another myth as well by the way. That’s how the children are brainwashed. Everything is political today. EVERYTHING is political.
We watched the rise of the superstars. Pachauri, another one at the IPCC for the United Nations. What was he before he came into that position? Here he is making all these POLITICAL statements. That’s what they are because they really want to decimate the planet so that the elite, the intelligentsia as they think of themselves, will survive. That’s as simple as that. They also cannot stand the fact that you might be living in a fairly comfortable life and eating well and using up what they call THEIR RESOURCES. In the Darwinian scale of things, the inferiors must die off so’s that the superiors can go ahead and live. And here you are, eating, chomping away with your French fries. That just cannot be done, you know. THAT’S WHAT THEY MEAN BY UNSUSTAINABLE, as they jet across the world polluting all over the place and that’s okay. I’ve even read articles about that; about his private limo and all the rest of it. He can’t even walk a mile to his work, from his £5 million house, one of them, as he writes his porno novels to pass the time.
These are the characters that they raise up as heroes. It’s just incredible. When they are doing it today and you are living through it and you see how it’s done and you KNOW it – and out there the listeners to this show certainly do know it – it was exactly the same in the past when they gave us the heroes and the top scientists and all the rest of it, and the Darwin’s and long before them… POLITICAL reasons.
I used to laugh when Benjamin Franklin, at the time when he was a Mason, and that’s in his own diaries. He tells you when he was admitted to the different lodges and the English Rite and so on, and the York Rite and the blah, blah, blah, all the other Rites. Eventually he was a Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris. He initiated Voltaire into them; that’s also in his own letters and writings in the Franklin Institute, so read it for yourself. He wanted to go down – like all Masons at that time because they thought of themselves as scientists first and men of reason – as an inventor. He made an awful stove that leached smoke. They still sell them today or you’ll find a few old ones. But then they said, we’ll make you, Benjamin, discoverer of the lightning conductor; you’ll go down in history as that… even though the Romans had it 2,000 years ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, dispelling the myths of the past and present. It’s rather astonishing, as I say, how we create these giants in our minds, or the media does at least for us. Big money certainly does it because you spend a lot of money promoting someone up to the top and creating the myth. We’ve been given real sciences eventually from real scientists but what I’m saying is, when they create BIG, IMPORTANT people who end up immediately discussing politics and saying how the world should go, you know that there is something else going on. You’ll always find the other scientists that generally did the real work were displaced and put to the bottom or suppressed and often they simply were eliminated and their work was taken by the political groups. That’s another fact of history and the same is true today. You’d be surprised how many of the Freemasons especially wanted to go down in history as scientists that brought something to the world.
With Franklin, he’s the perfect example. He wrote about it, that he was practicing with electricity with batteries. Everybody in those days was doing it, at the top. He also was given, supposedly he was the inventor of the lightning rod. They had to give him something for a sign. But as I say, the ancient Roman temples had these things on top of them too, with these copper wires coming down into the temples and you can read about them in the history books. Sometimes in some of the temples, like the Temple of Jupiter, they’d have the thing wired to the main God and if the lightning struck the temple, the lightning rod, the thing sort of glowed and sparked and it was quite the sight to see. There is even a record where about 5 priests that were all touching the idol and touching each other, were electrocuted; that was quite the sacrifice, quite the show. They enjoyed that. This is how they recycle various sciences and give us stars who are risen to the top and then put onto political agendas… and nothing has changed. Big bucks go into it.
With Al Gore and so on, the myth-making machine went to extraordinary lengths to create him from a nobody into a somebody and make him some sort of top scientist. It’s amazing how people have this fugue state where the propaganda takes over and they start to see him as a real scientist and so on and they forget this guy is a politician. That’s pretty well all he is, and not a very good one at that either. But he is well connected and he was mentored by Armand Hammer. He was a very interesting character who was able to not only be a multi millionaire, not only the very fact that his father renamed him Arm-and-Hammer, for the arm and hammer of the Soviet flag, the communist flag, which is also, by the way, the British Freemasons’ one; they actually have the arm and the hammer inside the compass. That’s what he had. He was the next-door neighbor, he was given an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin. He crossed, all through the Cold War, back and forth with impunity from anybody, no CIA, no whatever. BIG politics are behind the political agenda and the direction that the world is not destined to go, but planned to go by very, very, very rich people working in combination.
Here is an article about the latest scandal from the IPCC at the United Nations. Remember, everything at the United Nations, I don’t care what department, they have a political agenda. You should read your history on it. This one is from the Telegraph.
African crops yield another catastrophe for the IPCC
One more alarming claim in the IPCC’s 2007 report is disintegrating under closer examination, says Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker / 13 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
Ever more question marks have been raised in recent weeks over the reputations of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and of its chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri. But the latest example to emerge is arguably the most bizarre and scandalous of all. It centres on a very specific scare story which was included in the IPCC’s 2007 report, although it was completely at odds with the scientific evidence (Alan: Like everything else that they do.)– including that produced by the British expert in charge of the relevant section of the report. Even more tellingly, however, this particular claim has repeatedly been championed by Dr Pachauri himself.
Only last week Dr Pachauri was specifically denying that the appearance of this claim in two IPCC reports, including one of which he was the editor, was an error. Yet it has now come to light that the IPCC, ignoring the evidence of its own experts, deliberately published the claim for propaganda purposes. (A: That means POLITICAL purposes, folks.)
One of the most widely quoted and most alarmist passages in the main 2007 report was a warning that, by 2020, global warming could reduce crop yields in some countries in Africa by 50 per cent. Dr Pachauri not only allowed this claim to be included in the short Synthesis Report, of which he was co-editor, but has publicly repeated it many times since.
The origin of this claim was a report written for a Canadian advocacy group (A: That’s a political greening group.) by Ali Agoumi, a Moroccan academic who draws part of his current income from advising on how to make applications for “carbon credits”. (A: He’s an opportunist. You understand what an opportunist is?) As his primary sources he cited reports for three North African governments. But none of these remotely supported what he wrote. The nearest any got to providing evidence for his claim was one for the Moroccan government, which said that in serious drought years, cereal yields might be reduced by 50 per cent. The report for the Algerian government, on the other hand, predicted that, on current projections, “agricultural production will more than double by 2020”. Yet it was Agoumi’s claim that climate change could cut yields by 50 per cent that was headlined in the IPCC’s Working Group II report in 2007. (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the cons and the deception and the political agenda within the IPCC where they’re still prattling on about false reports and claiming they’re true, even though it’s been admitted elsewhere they are packs of lies basically. He was on about this particular report from the Telegraph.
What made this even odder, however, was that the group’s co-chairman was a British agricultural expert, Dr Martin Parry, whose consultancy group, Martin Parry Associates, had been paid £75,000 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for two reports which had come to totally different conclusions. Specifically designed to inform the IPCC’s 2007 report, these predicted that by 2020 any changes were likely to be insignificant. (A: That was the report that Pachauri was handed and yet he lied and went the opposite way with it.) The worst case they could come up with was that by 2080 climate change might decrease crop yields by “up to 30 per cent”. (A: That’s like if some oddball thing happened that wasn’t predicted.)
British taxpayers poured out money for the section of the IPCC report for which Dr Parry was responsible. Defra paid £2.5 million through the Met Office, plus £330,000 for Dr Parry’s salary as co-chairman, and a further £75,000 to his consultancy for two more reports on the impact of global warming on world food supplies. Yet when it came to the impact on Africa, all this peer-reviewed work – including further expert reports by Britain’s Dr Mike Hulme and Dutch and German teams – was ignored in favour of a prediction from one Moroccan activist at odds with his own cited sources. (A: In other words, a guy who lied through his teeth, which I read at the beginning of this particular article.)
Fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud. I’m just wondering if the myth-making machine that created the IPCC and the UN, these holy men at the top, these guys who literally are all out, they sacrifice their lives to help the world, you know. I wonder if that myth will overcome this data here. We’ll find out won’t we?
The Mail on Sunday had this about the same thing.
The professor’s amazing climate change retreat
13th February 2010 / Mail Online
Untold billions of pounds have been spent on turning the world green and also on financing the dubious trade in carbon credits.
Countless gallons of aviation fuel have been consumed carrying experts, lobbyists and politicians to apocalyptic conferences on global warming.
Every government on Earth has changed its policy, hundreds of academic institutions, entire school curricula and the priorities of broadcasters and newspapers all over the world have been altered – all to serve the new doctrine that man is overheating the planet and must undertake heroic and costly changes to save the world from drowning as the icecaps melt.
You might have thought that all this was based upon well-founded, highly competent research and that those involved had good reason for their blazing, hot-eyed certainty and their fierce intolerance of dissent.
But, thanks to the row over leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit, we now learn that this body’s director, Phil Jones, works in a disorganised fashion amid chaos and mess.
(A: Then he goes through the different things about how his record keeping is; it’s just absolute mayhem. He doesn’t need it because he makes things up as he goes. But here is Jones, after all those leaked emails came out where he’s telling people to destroy evidence of global cooling and all the rest of it. It says…)
Even more strikingly, he (A: Jones) also sounds much less ebullient about the basic theory (A: of global warming.), admitting that there is little difference between global warming rates in the Nineties and in two previous periods since 1860 and accepting that from 1995 to now there has been no statistically significant warming. (A: Isn’t that a complete turnaround? We’ve all to change our lives for these utter liars that have been caught out.)
He also leaves open the possibility, long resisted by climate change activists, that the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ from 800 to 1300 AD, and thought by many experts to be warmer than the present period, could have encompassed the entire globe. (A: Well, I tell you, isn’t that an about-face, eh?)
This is an amazing retreat, since if it was both global and warmer, the green movement’s argument that our current position is ‘unprecedented’ would collapse.
And it better collapse because if you understand the hell they have planned for you, this political agenda, you’d make sure it collapsed right now. You’d make sure that all this INDOCTRINATION at school was thrown out the window as well. You would make sure that ALL these green journalists, and this is true. There is a whole section, a NEW category of journalism. Every newspaper has a green journalist; that’s his specialty. He’s a POLITICAL journalist; this is how he is activated to promote the propaganda. They have to get thrown out. They have to get thrown out. You cannot have people who are biased, and media, putting out these reports as if they were absolutely true and factual, these GOSPELS that they have, these new gospels, when they have a political agenda. You cannot have truth, it doesn’t happen when you have a political agenda. Amazing. So this is the Mail Online and I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show, if XplorNet graces me with enough speed to put it up there even tough I’ve been paying for high speed and they take the money. I’ll put up all the links on my site for your perusal.
It’s so interesting too, how everything is politics. Everything is politics and we don’t really get it. We don’t understand, really, what’s going on with us as we get taxed to death and put under. I’m looking for a particular article here and it’s from The Economist. Very interesting article because this guy, this is in the green.view column; this is the journalist whose job it is to push his religion under the pretense he is a journalist.
Conflict conservation
Biodiversity down the barrel of a gun
Feb 8th 2010 / From Economist.com
THERE was a time when conservation meant keeping people away from nature. America’s system of national parks, a model for similar set-ups around the world, was based on the idea of limiting human presence to passing visits, rather than permanent habitation.
In recent years this way of doing things has come under suspicion. To fence off large areas of parkland is often impractical and can also be immoral. (A: Here is what he goes through now, how conservation areas are now created. It’s through perpetual war. War is good he says, really. We need perpetual war because in between the strips like North Korea, South Korea, places like that, nature thrives in these no-go zones. And it also kills off the human population, these wars, and it helps nature and animals and the birdies and stuff like that. So this pretended journalist is actually a fanatic with a cause, getting paid as a journalist for his green page and is promoting perpetual war for human depopulation and to allow the animals and the fungi and the ferns and so on to grow. Quite something. He goes through the different instances in the world today where this is happening because of conflict and war. Quite something. So his last paragraph says…)
Military conflict and the preparations that surround it are not, in themselves, good for the environment: far from it. Animals big enough to be eaten, or with body parts that can be sold for a profit, are well advised to stay out of war zones. It is depopulation that matters. (A: He’s talking about PEOPLE here, by the way.) Armed conflict and its knock-on effects simply happen to be one of the few forces on the planet that can cause quick and thorough depopulation. (A: Wars, get wars going.) These areas struggle to survive when peace arrives. (A: He’s talking about the animals now.) The nasty truth is that the likelihood of random and violent death is the cheapest form of conservation yet invented.
It’s time we got all these so-called green journalists out in the trash heap because THEY MEAN IT. These are the worst fanatics and you can imagine if they get ahead with this green agenda. If you think the Soviet system or the Nazi system was bad, YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
Politics, politics, everything is politics. The BBC. This is not new to me because I’ve known how the scriptwriters, especially in Canada, so openly propagandize. They copied stuff right from the Soviet system. You can’t watch any entertainment without getting your ‘consciousness raised’ in certain areas, you understand, about this and ‘sensitivity’ and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It’s so bad in Canada but it’s always been that way. The BBC is a bit more subtle, at least it used to be, but they’ve gotten pretty coarse about it now. The US do the better ones; they give you movies you get INVOLVED in and you lose yourself and then you get brainwashed really good at the end. The BBC, it says here…
BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who (A: A series.) to bring down Margaret Thatcher
By Tom Kelly / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online
She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.
Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a ‘Tardis revolution’ by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.
In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.
Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners’ strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
The revelations appear to confirm claims that the 1980s BBC opposed Mrs Thatcher’s government, with the then Tory chairman Norman Tebbit claiming it was in the hands of a ‘Marxist mafia’. (A: Well, he was absolutely true on that; it was. You know what’s amazing to me, the BBC, which is run by the government and funded by the tax payers through the government and is owned by the government, the CBC in Canada and the other British Commonwealth countries that all have their versions, same base, owned by the government, are all staffed by Marxists. There is nothing new in that. One of the communists who defected from the Soviet Union, a KGB guy, went to work with the CBC and he said the he met more communists, true communists, in the CBC working there, than he ever did in the Soviet Union. Back to this article…)
Sylvester McCoy, the actor who played the Doctor from 1987 to 1989, said: ‘Our feeling was that Margaret Thatcher was far more terrifying than any monster the Doctor had encountered.
This is nothing new though. I’ve got articles here where the writers who put together a lot of stuff for Walt Disney slipped so much in it, in the songs too. They actually had Marxist meanings and were meant to hit people subliminally as well. They admit about the time it took to get just the right word for a particular line; it might take them weeks to decide on the proper word for IMPACT. That’s quite something.
You cannot get entertainment today where there is no propaganda. That Avatar movie is something else. It’s training the children to plug in. The whole idea is you plug in to the net and get lost in this new Peter Pan Disneyland where everything is wonderful, you are all one with the planet, the plants are connected with you and you use this sort of tail you’ve got to hook yourself into them. Well, that’s like plugging in; the same with The Matrix movie isn’t it. Everything is propaganda. everything was ONE and Mother Nature ruled. Mother Nature ruled, keeping the balance, you know the Cabalistic balance of everything. A fairly land, absolute fairly land of fantasy. You know something? The worse they make it is this world to survive, with all the things that are coming down, the more youngsters will want to escape into this fake reality. Not just youngsters, by the way; apparently adults are hooked with the virtual reality world as well, some of them. EVERYTHING in that movie, EVERYTHING was the new agey, conservation propaganda to a tee. Quite something.
The world they are bringing in and they discussed this an awful, awful long time ago, even before they called themselves the Royal Institute of International Affairs and we can go back further to the Milner Group, the Cecil Rhodes Society and again, you had the Royal Society there too with its umbrella organizations going back for hundreds of years. They planned the sort of future world that they envisaged should come in and they could make it happen, these very powerful and rich people. Eventually they wanted a world where everyone in that world would be run like a beehive, in what they called ‘a perfect social order’. This was articulated by HG Wells, the heads of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It’s been said again recently at some of their meetings. They are bringing in a world of SERVICE where you’ll all be born, if they need you to be born, to serve them. It will be a world of service to the world society, to the state, the world state.
If you don’t like that, you’re anti-social; the same technique they used in China. You cannot have individuality and free choice in these totalitarian systems. And the greatest thing is, they can camouflage it so well that the people don’t even see it for a totalitarian system. It’s that incredible, the psychology they can use? This article here is about how they are going to tax you literally, a pre-death tax now. Britain, Canada, and the Commonwealth countries are the most highly taxed countries on the planet. In Canada it’s a general sales tax and various other hidden taxes galore on everything that you purchase. In all the European countries, it’s a Value Added Tax that started off only, supposedly, for things you don’t need, like binoculars. Eventually it spread onto everything. Well, that’s going up by the way, to 20% now on every purchase. You can tack on 20% on EVERY purchase. This article is about ANOTHER TAX they are going to hit you with. Well, one day you might need health care as you are dying, so we are going to make you pay £20,000 in advance for that care. How’s that? How is that?
Council chiefs back ‘death tax’
By Nick Triggle / Health reporter, BBC News / 11 Feb 2010
Pressure is growing on the government to clarify its position over the so-called “death tax” after social care chiefs and charities backed the levy. (A: What do charities have to do with this? Well, this is their living, by the way, then they call themselves a charity.)
Ministers in England are considering introducing a compulsory fee, possibly up to £20,000, to pay for social care. (A: They already pay for social care; that’s what the National Health system was created FOR. It’s been funded to the hilt, but you’re supposed to forget that of course.)
The government said it would be making an announcement soon.
John Jackson, from ADASS, (A: It should be called S-A-D, SADASS.) which represents social service chiefs working for councils, said extra funding was “much needed”. (A: But they’re not going to make it a voluntary scheme either. It’s going to become compulsory. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. This article that I’m reading from the BBC is about a new tax they want to bring in where you’re going to have to pay in advance for care you might get when you’re dying, even though the National Health Service is robbing people blind to provide all these cares already.
The problem – they don’t mention it here – is with the government expanding its wars along with the US across the world and buying all these drones too from the US, they’ve got to take the money from the needy to get all the weaponry and stuff. It’s a lot of dough for these big bangs they put up there, to get the latest gizmos. They got to cut back from the usual places so they’re just going to keep taxing the people for more and more and more and giving them less service. Here are people who have lost their homes, probably millions and millions – because of the last crash and the same con as they were using in the US with all these pyramid schemes for mortgages – and taxed to the gunnels, lack of jobs, overrun with… the immigrants are complaining there are too many immigrants. They can’t get work; there are too many immigrants. It’s getting flooded and that’s Labour’s policy to eradiate what was the British culture. That’s what the article I read from Tony Blair and his best buddies said that in the paper last week. I quoted it a few times and it’s on the web site from the mainstream. But here they are hitting them with another one, £20,000 in case you one day have to get treatment as you are dying, even though you are already paying for it, your whole life long, with your taxes into the National Health Service. Quite something, eh? Quite something.
From the CBC Canada; I love the new normals. I call them ‘new normals’ when everything is one way, like 1 in sort of 150,000 children might show the signs of autism. That’s how it was right up until the 60s and then bang, it started going up like a rocket until it’s like 1 in 4 who’s got autism and that’s the new normal now. We’re not supposed to equate the inoculations and stuff with it of course; that’s just not allowed… even though they darn well know it. The CBC has an article here on the new asthma. Remember about 2 years ago – I think I read it on the air here; it’s in my archives section – how allergies had gone up 60-odd percent, 65% in the last 5 years… a new normal. No money was put into finding out why… because they know what causes it. It’s in your food too, by the way. That’s what causes it. It changed with GMO food. They are well aware of what causes it.
1 in 3 chance of developing asthma: study
By CBC News / February 15, 2010
One in three people can expect to be diagnosed with asthma in their lifetimes, Ontario research suggests. (A: I like how they ‘suggest’ things.)
Asthma is more likely to develop in childhood, but can also occur in adults (A: Which is a brand new thing.), with a 33 per cent risk over a lifetime, Ontario research suggests.
Researchers followed the medical histories of more than nine million Ontarians for 16 years, between April 1991 and March 2007. A study of the data found the lifetime risk of developing asthma was 33.9 per cent.
What I’m telling you here is that this is a NEW NORMAL. They are spraying the bejesus out of us every day in the sky and have been steadily, steadily since 1998. Before that it was occasionally as they were testing stuff, but STEADILY though from 1998. Big spraying in Ontario because as the jet stream comes up here, they spray at one end, Michigan, and they spray it where I am up here in Sudbury and it’s carried all the way down to New York state, BIG COVERAGE AREA. That’s why we have the asthma now, by the way… and they know this too.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 15th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use because once in while I can’t upload to the major sites for some strange reason. It can take up to two weeks to get them going again. So if you bookmark the other sites you can always get the latest shows and download them. You can also try these other sites because if you find there is stickiness as you are downloading sometimes on the .com site it’s because there are too many going into that one site at the same time and the other ones are perfectly good. So try them once in a while. The official sites are [listed above]. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, they don’t have computers and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I always say this is the tin can moment to see how many pennies are in it. It’s up to you to keep me going. I’m probably the only one out there who doesn’t live on advertising income. Generally you get paid by advertisers and I could do it certainly and I’d bring them on as guests or mention them once in a while and you get paid each time you do it. But this way I’ve got a freer hand. The advertisements that you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertiser to RBN to pay for this air time. It pays RBN for their broadcast and their satellite, equipment, bills and their staff. So it’s up to you to support me, keep me going at the same time and you can do so by getting the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on the web site or your can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] It’s important to keep me going because I’m probably the only one that’s gone this long trying it this way and it’s not easy. It’s not an income by any means and it certainly isn’t the way that you support yourself and it certainly is not a business either. As I say, my hands are free that way. I can go into areas and talk about things that otherwise I could be restricted if I was backed by companies and so on.
We live in a world where we see the scams today when they are exposed by people like myself and others who go through the latest scams and show you how they work. I can also show you how famous people are created. It’s no different than the creation of, out of thousands of say musicians, you can pick one little group and make them the top. It’s done by professionals, not by the group. I’ll talk about that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about what we are living through today and how people are risen to astronomical heights of importance and people truly believe they are geniuses and they give their all TO them. It’s really the same technique that’s used in the creation of a movie star or to raise, say, one of thousands of singers to the top.
You create a mystique, a persona, and you give them incredible exposure. The more you tell people out there that this person is the best thing since sliced bread, they will believe it, just by repetition and the fact that you say it. The more people who say it in the right magazines and the right talk shows on TV, the more they believe it. It is that simple, honestly. When you think about how they have risen up people in the past for political agendas, it’s no different than raising them up today to superstar status. I was thinking of people like Al Gore.
What credentials does Al Gore have? And yet he’s basically the kingpin for the inconvenient SPOOF that’s being taught all over the schools across the planet by mandates of government. What exactly is he? What does he have to his credit? It’s just the creation of a star IMAGE as some kind of ultra-special specialist that gives him the God-like powers to speak, like God, and it’s done; it is SO; so mote it be, as they say, and it’s suddenly done. All the papers parrot him, all the media parrot him and governments immediately put new laws into the school for education to make sure the children are brainwashed in a political agenda.
It’s never been any different when you go into the past, down through history and they gave you famous players and raise them up to the top, the famous players that come out as top scientists, and they are BUILT UP by the media before they even appear to the public for the first time. They are built up into genius status by repetition and claims. So if they appear they are immediately treated like a God by the audience. That truly is how simple it is. We go into the Royal Society, for instance, in England, and the Masons admit this themselves in their own books and documentaries. It was a Masonic institution; it still is. Its core was to lead the world and guide the world by SCIENCES, what sciences should be available to the general population and to governments. In other words, it came out of the old alchemists schools, as they call them, where alchemists were graded. They always have the ones who are into real chemistry at the top, and exploration of science. Then they have all the wanna-bes down below who are not IN on the true acts, who practice mixing eye of toads and newts and making funny smoke and casting spells. Just like today, you have all the new agers trying to do the same thing through communication of oneness with each other and all that stuff and tapping in to the ALL, the universal consciousness and all that kind of stuff. They are trying to do what the boys at the top are doing by plugging brains in to computers. It’s the same thing, you see.
The reality is that the high echelons of the Royal Society HAVE GUIDED THE WORLD, really, on what was to be made available because one thing in the real alchemists, not the phonies all down below, the real guys were a BROTHERHOOD and they knew their secrets of chemistry and all the rest of it. Their discoveries were powerful. They knew the weaponry they could create back then too. Then knew that Kings, Queens and governments would come to THEM for the power that they could give to the governments and that hasn’t changed today either. We forget, it’s not just that knowledge is power, it is particular kinds of knowledge that are very, very powerful indeed. They also decided that it was time to go into their Age of Reason. They gave us, again, the heroes for the Age of Reason and prior to that as well. They built them up into superstar status, the idea being that they would eradicate the old religions and bring in their OWN religion basically, a form or secular humanism but once again, where the scientists now would get risen to the top AS the new priesthood.
Well, it’s quite astonishing since this political agenda, not the scientific cover that it’s got, this political agenda of global warming has risen THOUSANDS of scientists up to superstar status with incredible salaries and grants, money thrown at them, and it’s all a scam. So they certainly are benefiting from it. Luckily, enough scientists have refused to join the IPCC, the phony group at the United Nations OR they have joined it and left when they found out that they were not using science at all. It was PURELY A POLITICAL AGENDA, once again, to control the direction of the world according to the beliefs of this particular political group. That’s how it’s done. As I say, Al Gore is a great example. It’s the same in the past. You’ll find that all the major players they give you, especially from Britain because Britain was set to lead the world, right, so you have to make sure that all the main inventors are obviously British. When you go into the reports of what they were discovering back in the 1500s and 1600s from the Royal Society members, it was all coming from much older texts that they were copying directly from the Moslem countries.
It is astonishing. We don’t even realize that right up into the beginnings of the 20th century all medicine practiced in the Western world had been taken from Medieval times from Moslems, ALL MEDICINE. It was the same with all astronomy, ALL astronomy. There is a very good series that was on TV recently. It was about the written word and how language developed through writing. It goes into the era where the Moslem nations were so into sending people across the whole planet to gather ALL knowledge. Very rich and wealthy leaders in those countries literally spent years and years and years building incredible libraries up, with handwritten books by the people who went out to gather the information on EVERY branch of what we today call science… all kinds of medicines, all kinds of theories, all religions, astronomy, real sciences too, as well. They were into dissecting the colors of the crystal, the light in other words, of the rainbow into its true colors, prisms; all the stuff that they were doing hundreds of years later with Isaac Newton and others.
Again, it’s amazing how you can squash a country or a people that you put down into a third world status often, which is wrong again because many of them are not at all, especially people like the Iranians. You don’t want to believe that they could have been way ahead. It doesn’t look good when they are way ahead of the up-and-coming superpower… and they were way ahead HUNDREDS of years ago. Pretty well all of the philosophers that we know today, all the writings were lost to the Western world and they all came through the Moslem countries in, again, the Age of Translations, as they called it. They went out and they got copies of all the ancient philosophers; they kept them. We got them back around the 10th century from the Moslems. What’s astonishing to me is the more you read, the more you realize that even the top astronomers who came out in Britain literally took the Arabic writings and translated them right into their own and claimed it as their own basically. Amazing. The proof is there, from the original writings of the Moslems. Astonishing.
So they created superstars again to lead the world saying we are the greatest; we are the people; we are the greatest. That’s how you build up a superpower by saying, yeah, we rule the world; we run it; we are the inventors of everything, you see. Now it’s the US’s turn, same idea. They give you people like Al Gore; build him into a superstar and what is this hack politician anyway? What is he other than that? Really? Yet he is a GOD. He is a literal God to children around the age of 8 or 9 years of age, who stand in awe of this guy that was Vice president. That’s all you have to say is ‘vice president’ and they stand in awe as this guy prattles on about the green agenda and how they are going to live in the future and how they will cut back on the lifestyles that their nasty, rotten parents had, another myth as well by the way. That’s how the children are brainwashed. Everything is political today. EVERYTHING is political.
We watched the rise of the superstars. Pachauri, another one at the IPCC for the United Nations. What was he before he came into that position? Here he is making all these POLITICAL statements. That’s what they are because they really want to decimate the planet so that the elite, the intelligentsia as they think of themselves, will survive. That’s as simple as that. They also cannot stand the fact that you might be living in a fairly comfortable life and eating well and using up what they call THEIR RESOURCES. In the Darwinian scale of things, the inferiors must die off so’s that the superiors can go ahead and live. And here you are, eating, chomping away with your French fries. That just cannot be done, you know. THAT’S WHAT THEY MEAN BY UNSUSTAINABLE, as they jet across the world polluting all over the place and that’s okay. I’ve even read articles about that; about his private limo and all the rest of it. He can’t even walk a mile to his work, from his £5 million house, one of them, as he writes his porno novels to pass the time.
These are the characters that they raise up as heroes. It’s just incredible. When they are doing it today and you are living through it and you see how it’s done and you KNOW it – and out there the listeners to this show certainly do know it – it was exactly the same in the past when they gave us the heroes and the top scientists and all the rest of it, and the Darwin’s and long before them… POLITICAL reasons.
I used to laugh when Benjamin Franklin, at the time when he was a Mason, and that’s in his own diaries. He tells you when he was admitted to the different lodges and the English Rite and so on, and the York Rite and the blah, blah, blah, all the other Rites. Eventually he was a Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris. He initiated Voltaire into them; that’s also in his own letters and writings in the Franklin Institute, so read it for yourself. He wanted to go down – like all Masons at that time because they thought of themselves as scientists first and men of reason – as an inventor. He made an awful stove that leached smoke. They still sell them today or you’ll find a few old ones. But then they said, we’ll make you, Benjamin, discoverer of the lightning conductor; you’ll go down in history as that… even though the Romans had it 2,000 years ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, dispelling the myths of the past and present. It’s rather astonishing, as I say, how we create these giants in our minds, or the media does at least for us. Big money certainly does it because you spend a lot of money promoting someone up to the top and creating the myth. We’ve been given real sciences eventually from real scientists but what I’m saying is, when they create BIG, IMPORTANT people who end up immediately discussing politics and saying how the world should go, you know that there is something else going on. You’ll always find the other scientists that generally did the real work were displaced and put to the bottom or suppressed and often they simply were eliminated and their work was taken by the political groups. That’s another fact of history and the same is true today. You’d be surprised how many of the Freemasons especially wanted to go down in history as scientists that brought something to the world.
With Franklin, he’s the perfect example. He wrote about it, that he was practicing with electricity with batteries. Everybody in those days was doing it, at the top. He also was given, supposedly he was the inventor of the lightning rod. They had to give him something for a sign. But as I say, the ancient Roman temples had these things on top of them too, with these copper wires coming down into the temples and you can read about them in the history books. Sometimes in some of the temples, like the Temple of Jupiter, they’d have the thing wired to the main God and if the lightning struck the temple, the lightning rod, the thing sort of glowed and sparked and it was quite the sight to see. There is even a record where about 5 priests that were all touching the idol and touching each other, were electrocuted; that was quite the sacrifice, quite the show. They enjoyed that. This is how they recycle various sciences and give us stars who are risen to the top and then put onto political agendas… and nothing has changed. Big bucks go into it.
With Al Gore and so on, the myth-making machine went to extraordinary lengths to create him from a nobody into a somebody and make him some sort of top scientist. It’s amazing how people have this fugue state where the propaganda takes over and they start to see him as a real scientist and so on and they forget this guy is a politician. That’s pretty well all he is, and not a very good one at that either. But he is well connected and he was mentored by Armand Hammer. He was a very interesting character who was able to not only be a multi millionaire, not only the very fact that his father renamed him Arm-and-Hammer, for the arm and hammer of the Soviet flag, the communist flag, which is also, by the way, the British Freemasons’ one; they actually have the arm and the hammer inside the compass. That’s what he had. He was the next-door neighbor, he was given an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin. He crossed, all through the Cold War, back and forth with impunity from anybody, no CIA, no whatever. BIG politics are behind the political agenda and the direction that the world is not destined to go, but planned to go by very, very, very rich people working in combination.
Here is an article about the latest scandal from the IPCC at the United Nations. Remember, everything at the United Nations, I don’t care what department, they have a political agenda. You should read your history on it. This one is from the Telegraph.
African crops yield another catastrophe for the IPCC
One more alarming claim in the IPCC’s 2007 report is disintegrating under closer examination, says Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker / 13 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
Ever more question marks have been raised in recent weeks over the reputations of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and of its chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri. But the latest example to emerge is arguably the most bizarre and scandalous of all. It centres on a very specific scare story which was included in the IPCC’s 2007 report, although it was completely at odds with the scientific evidence (Alan: Like everything else that they do.)– including that produced by the British expert in charge of the relevant section of the report. Even more tellingly, however, this particular claim has repeatedly been championed by Dr Pachauri himself.
Only last week Dr Pachauri was specifically denying that the appearance of this claim in two IPCC reports, including one of which he was the editor, was an error. Yet it has now come to light that the IPCC, ignoring the evidence of its own experts, deliberately published the claim for propaganda purposes. (A: That means POLITICAL purposes, folks.)
One of the most widely quoted and most alarmist passages in the main 2007 report was a warning that, by 2020, global warming could reduce crop yields in some countries in Africa by 50 per cent. Dr Pachauri not only allowed this claim to be included in the short Synthesis Report, of which he was co-editor, but has publicly repeated it many times since.
The origin of this claim was a report written for a Canadian advocacy group (A: That’s a political greening group.) by Ali Agoumi, a Moroccan academic who draws part of his current income from advising on how to make applications for “carbon credits”. (A: He’s an opportunist. You understand what an opportunist is?) As his primary sources he cited reports for three North African governments. But none of these remotely supported what he wrote. The nearest any got to providing evidence for his claim was one for the Moroccan government, which said that in serious drought years, cereal yields might be reduced by 50 per cent. The report for the Algerian government, on the other hand, predicted that, on current projections, “agricultural production will more than double by 2020”. Yet it was Agoumi’s claim that climate change could cut yields by 50 per cent that was headlined in the IPCC’s Working Group II report in 2007. (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the cons and the deception and the political agenda within the IPCC where they’re still prattling on about false reports and claiming they’re true, even though it’s been admitted elsewhere they are packs of lies basically. He was on about this particular report from the Telegraph.
What made this even odder, however, was that the group’s co-chairman was a British agricultural expert, Dr Martin Parry, whose consultancy group, Martin Parry Associates, had been paid £75,000 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for two reports which had come to totally different conclusions. Specifically designed to inform the IPCC’s 2007 report, these predicted that by 2020 any changes were likely to be insignificant. (A: That was the report that Pachauri was handed and yet he lied and went the opposite way with it.) The worst case they could come up with was that by 2080 climate change might decrease crop yields by “up to 30 per cent”. (A: That’s like if some oddball thing happened that wasn’t predicted.)
British taxpayers poured out money for the section of the IPCC report for which Dr Parry was responsible. Defra paid £2.5 million through the Met Office, plus £330,000 for Dr Parry’s salary as co-chairman, and a further £75,000 to his consultancy for two more reports on the impact of global warming on world food supplies. Yet when it came to the impact on Africa, all this peer-reviewed work – including further expert reports by Britain’s Dr Mike Hulme and Dutch and German teams – was ignored in favour of a prediction from one Moroccan activist at odds with his own cited sources. (A: In other words, a guy who lied through his teeth, which I read at the beginning of this particular article.)
Fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud. I’m just wondering if the myth-making machine that created the IPCC and the UN, these holy men at the top, these guys who literally are all out, they sacrifice their lives to help the world, you know. I wonder if that myth will overcome this data here. We’ll find out won’t we?
The Mail on Sunday had this about the same thing.
The professor’s amazing climate change retreat
13th February 2010 / Mail Online
Untold billions of pounds have been spent on turning the world green and also on financing the dubious trade in carbon credits.
Countless gallons of aviation fuel have been consumed carrying experts, lobbyists and politicians to apocalyptic conferences on global warming.
Every government on Earth has changed its policy, hundreds of academic institutions, entire school curricula and the priorities of broadcasters and newspapers all over the world have been altered – all to serve the new doctrine that man is overheating the planet and must undertake heroic and costly changes to save the world from drowning as the icecaps melt.
You might have thought that all this was based upon well-founded, highly competent research and that those involved had good reason for their blazing, hot-eyed certainty and their fierce intolerance of dissent.
But, thanks to the row over leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit, we now learn that this body’s director, Phil Jones, works in a disorganised fashion amid chaos and mess.
(A: Then he goes through the different things about how his record keeping is; it’s just absolute mayhem. He doesn’t need it because he makes things up as he goes. But here is Jones, after all those leaked emails came out where he’s telling people to destroy evidence of global cooling and all the rest of it. It says…)
Even more strikingly, he (A: Jones) also sounds much less ebullient about the basic theory (A: of global warming.), admitting that there is little difference between global warming rates in the Nineties and in two previous periods since 1860 and accepting that from 1995 to now there has been no statistically significant warming. (A: Isn’t that a complete turnaround? We’ve all to change our lives for these utter liars that have been caught out.)
He also leaves open the possibility, long resisted by climate change activists, that the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ from 800 to 1300 AD, and thought by many experts to be warmer than the present period, could have encompassed the entire globe. (A: Well, I tell you, isn’t that an about-face, eh?)
This is an amazing retreat, since if it was both global and warmer, the green movement’s argument that our current position is ‘unprecedented’ would collapse.
And it better collapse because if you understand the hell they have planned for you, this political agenda, you’d make sure it collapsed right now. You’d make sure that all this INDOCTRINATION at school was thrown out the window as well. You would make sure that ALL these green journalists, and this is true. There is a whole section, a NEW category of journalism. Every newspaper has a green journalist; that’s his specialty. He’s a POLITICAL journalist; this is how he is activated to promote the propaganda. They have to get thrown out. They have to get thrown out. You cannot have people who are biased, and media, putting out these reports as if they were absolutely true and factual, these GOSPELS that they have, these new gospels, when they have a political agenda. You cannot have truth, it doesn’t happen when you have a political agenda. Amazing. So this is the Mail Online and I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show, if XplorNet graces me with enough speed to put it up there even tough I’ve been paying for high speed and they take the money. I’ll put up all the links on my site for your perusal.
It’s so interesting too, how everything is politics. Everything is politics and we don’t really get it. We don’t understand, really, what’s going on with us as we get taxed to death and put under. I’m looking for a particular article here and it’s from The Economist. Very interesting article because this guy, this is in the green.view column; this is the journalist whose job it is to push his religion under the pretense he is a journalist.
Conflict conservation
Biodiversity down the barrel of a gun
Feb 8th 2010 / From Economist.com
THERE was a time when conservation meant keeping people away from nature. America’s system of national parks, a model for similar set-ups around the world, was based on the idea of limiting human presence to passing visits, rather than permanent habitation.
In recent years this way of doing things has come under suspicion. To fence off large areas of parkland is often impractical and can also be immoral. (A: Here is what he goes through now, how conservation areas are now created. It’s through perpetual war. War is good he says, really. We need perpetual war because in between the strips like North Korea, South Korea, places like that, nature thrives in these no-go zones. And it also kills off the human population, these wars, and it helps nature and animals and the birdies and stuff like that. So this pretended journalist is actually a fanatic with a cause, getting paid as a journalist for his green page and is promoting perpetual war for human depopulation and to allow the animals and the fungi and the ferns and so on to grow. Quite something. He goes through the different instances in the world today where this is happening because of conflict and war. Quite something. So his last paragraph says…)
Military conflict and the preparations that surround it are not, in themselves, good for the environment: far from it. Animals big enough to be eaten, or with body parts that can be sold for a profit, are well advised to stay out of war zones. It is depopulation that matters. (A: He’s talking about PEOPLE here, by the way.) Armed conflict and its knock-on effects simply happen to be one of the few forces on the planet that can cause quick and thorough depopulation. (A: Wars, get wars going.) These areas struggle to survive when peace arrives. (A: He’s talking about the animals now.) The nasty truth is that the likelihood of random and violent death is the cheapest form of conservation yet invented.
It’s time we got all these so-called green journalists out in the trash heap because THEY MEAN IT. These are the worst fanatics and you can imagine if they get ahead with this green agenda. If you think the Soviet system or the Nazi system was bad, YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
Politics, politics, everything is politics. The BBC. This is not new to me because I’ve known how the scriptwriters, especially in Canada, so openly propagandize. They copied stuff right from the Soviet system. You can’t watch any entertainment without getting your ‘consciousness raised’ in certain areas, you understand, about this and ‘sensitivity’ and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It’s so bad in Canada but it’s always been that way. The BBC is a bit more subtle, at least it used to be, but they’ve gotten pretty coarse about it now. The US do the better ones; they give you movies you get INVOLVED in and you lose yourself and then you get brainwashed really good at the end. The BBC, it says here…
BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who (A: A series.) to bring down Margaret Thatcher
By Tom Kelly / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online
She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.
Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a ‘Tardis revolution’ by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.
In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.
Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners’ strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
The revelations appear to confirm claims that the 1980s BBC opposed Mrs Thatcher’s government, with the then Tory chairman Norman Tebbit claiming it was in the hands of a ‘Marxist mafia’. (A: Well, he was absolutely true on that; it was. You know what’s amazing to me, the BBC, which is run by the government and funded by the tax payers through the government and is owned by the government, the CBC in Canada and the other British Commonwealth countries that all have their versions, same base, owned by the government, are all staffed by Marxists. There is nothing new in that. One of the communists who defected from the Soviet Union, a KGB guy, went to work with the CBC and he said the he met more communists, true communists, in the CBC working there, than he ever did in the Soviet Union. Back to this article…)
Sylvester McCoy, the actor who played the Doctor from 1987 to 1989, said: ‘Our feeling was that Margaret Thatcher was far more terrifying than any monster the Doctor had encountered.
This is nothing new though. I’ve got articles here where the writers who put together a lot of stuff for Walt Disney slipped so much in it, in the songs too. They actually had Marxist meanings and were meant to hit people subliminally as well. They admit about the time it took to get just the right word for a particular line; it might take them weeks to decide on the proper word for IMPACT. That’s quite something.
You cannot get entertainment today where there is no propaganda. That Avatar movie is something else. It’s training the children to plug in. The whole idea is you plug in to the net and get lost in this new Peter Pan Disneyland where everything is wonderful, you are all one with the planet, the plants are connected with you and you use this sort of tail you’ve got to hook yourself into them. Well, that’s like plugging in; the same with The Matrix movie isn’t it. Everything is propaganda. everything was ONE and Mother Nature ruled. Mother Nature ruled, keeping the balance, you know the Cabalistic balance of everything. A fairly land, absolute fairly land of fantasy. You know something? The worse they make it is this world to survive, with all the things that are coming down, the more youngsters will want to escape into this fake reality. Not just youngsters, by the way; apparently adults are hooked with the virtual reality world as well, some of them. EVERYTHING in that movie, EVERYTHING was the new agey, conservation propaganda to a tee. Quite something.
The world they are bringing in and they discussed this an awful, awful long time ago, even before they called themselves the Royal Institute of International Affairs and we can go back further to the Milner Group, the Cecil Rhodes Society and again, you had the Royal Society there too with its umbrella organizations going back for hundreds of years. They planned the sort of future world that they envisaged should come in and they could make it happen, these very powerful and rich people. Eventually they wanted a world where everyone in that world would be run like a beehive, in what they called ‘a perfect social order’. This was articulated by HG Wells, the heads of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It’s been said again recently at some of their meetings. They are bringing in a world of SERVICE where you’ll all be born, if they need you to be born, to serve them. It will be a world of service to the world society, to the state, the world state.
If you don’t like that, you’re anti-social; the same technique they used in China. You cannot have individuality and free choice in these totalitarian systems. And the greatest thing is, they can camouflage it so well that the people don’t even see it for a totalitarian system. It’s that incredible, the psychology they can use? This article here is about how they are going to tax you literally, a pre-death tax now. Britain, Canada, and the Commonwealth countries are the most highly taxed countries on the planet. In Canada it’s a general sales tax and various other hidden taxes galore on everything that you purchase. In all the European countries, it’s a Value Added Tax that started off only, supposedly, for things you don’t need, like binoculars. Eventually it spread onto everything. Well, that’s going up by the way, to 20% now on every purchase. You can tack on 20% on EVERY purchase. This article is about ANOTHER TAX they are going to hit you with. Well, one day you might need health care as you are dying, so we are going to make you pay £20,000 in advance for that care. How’s that? How is that?
Council chiefs back ‘death tax’
By Nick Triggle / Health reporter, BBC News / 11 Feb 2010
Pressure is growing on the government to clarify its position over the so-called “death tax” after social care chiefs and charities backed the levy. (A: What do charities have to do with this? Well, this is their living, by the way, then they call themselves a charity.)
Ministers in England are considering introducing a compulsory fee, possibly up to £20,000, to pay for social care. (A: They already pay for social care; that’s what the National Health system was created FOR. It’s been funded to the hilt, but you’re supposed to forget that of course.)
The government said it would be making an announcement soon.
John Jackson, from ADASS, (A: It should be called S-A-D, SADASS.) which represents social service chiefs working for councils, said extra funding was “much needed”. (A: But they’re not going to make it a voluntary scheme either. It’s going to become compulsory. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. This article that I’m reading from the BBC is about a new tax they want to bring in where you’re going to have to pay in advance for care you might get when you’re dying, even though the National Health Service is robbing people blind to provide all these cares already.
The problem – they don’t mention it here – is with the government expanding its wars along with the US across the world and buying all these drones too from the US, they’ve got to take the money from the needy to get all the weaponry and stuff. It’s a lot of dough for these big bangs they put up there, to get the latest gizmos. They got to cut back from the usual places so they’re just going to keep taxing the people for more and more and more and giving them less service. Here are people who have lost their homes, probably millions and millions – because of the last crash and the same con as they were using in the US with all these pyramid schemes for mortgages – and taxed to the gunnels, lack of jobs, overrun with… the immigrants are complaining there are too many immigrants. They can’t get work; there are too many immigrants. It’s getting flooded and that’s Labour’s policy to eradiate what was the British culture. That’s what the article I read from Tony Blair and his best buddies said that in the paper last week. I quoted it a few times and it’s on the web site from the mainstream. But here they are hitting them with another one, £20,000 in case you one day have to get treatment as you are dying, even though you are already paying for it, your whole life long, with your taxes into the National Health Service. Quite something, eh? Quite something.
From the CBC Canada; I love the new normals. I call them ‘new normals’ when everything is one way, like 1 in sort of 150,000 children might show the signs of autism. That’s how it was right up until the 60s and then bang, it started going up like a rocket until it’s like 1 in 4 who’s got autism and that’s the new normal now. We’re not supposed to equate the inoculations and stuff with it of course; that’s just not allowed… even though they darn well know it. The CBC has an article here on the new asthma. Remember about 2 years ago – I think I read it on the air here; it’s in my archives section – how allergies had gone up 60-odd percent, 65% in the last 5 years… a new normal. No money was put into finding out why… because they know what causes it. It’s in your food too, by the way. That’s what causes it. It changed with GMO food. They are well aware of what causes it.
1 in 3 chance of developing asthma: study
By CBC News / February 15, 2010
One in three people can expect to be diagnosed with asthma in their lifetimes, Ontario research suggests. (A: I like how they ‘suggest’ things.)
Asthma is more likely to develop in childhood, but can also occur in adults (A: Which is a brand new thing.), with a 33 per cent risk over a lifetime, Ontario research suggests.
Researchers followed the medical histories of more than nine million Ontarians for 16 years, between April 1991 and March 2007. A study of the data found the lifetime risk of developing asthma was 33.9 per cent.
What I’m telling you here is that this is a NEW NORMAL. They are spraying the bejesus out of us every day in the sky and have been steadily, steadily since 1998. Before that it was occasionally as they were testing stuff, but STEADILY though from 1998. Big spraying in Ontario because as the jet stream comes up here, they spray at one end, Michigan, and they spray it where I am up here in Sudbury and it’s carried all the way down to New York state, BIG COVERAGE AREA. That’s why we have the asthma now, by the way… and they know this too.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 15th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use because once in while I can’t upload to the major sites for some strange reason. It can take up to two weeks to get them going again. So if you bookmark the other sites you can always get the latest shows and download them. You can also try these other sites because if you find there is stickiness as you are downloading sometimes on the .com site it’s because there are too many going into that one site at the same time and the other ones are perfectly good. So try them once in a while. The official sites are [listed above]. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, they don’t have computers and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I always say this is the tin can moment to see how many pennies are in it. It’s up to you to keep me going. I’m probably the only one out there who doesn’t live on advertising income. Generally you get paid by advertisers and I could do it certainly and I’d bring them on as guests or mention them once in a while and you get paid each time you do it. But this way I’ve got a freer hand. The advertisements that you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertiser to RBN to pay for this air time. It pays RBN for their broadcast and their satellite, equipment, bills and their staff. So it’s up to you to support me, keep me going at the same time and you can do so by getting the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on the web site or your can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] It’s important to keep me going because I’m probably the only one that’s gone this long trying it this way and it’s not easy. It’s not an income by any means and it certainly isn’t the way that you support yourself and it certainly is not a business either. As I say, my hands are free that way. I can go into areas and talk about things that otherwise I could be restricted if I was backed by companies and so on.
We live in a world where we see the scams today when they are exposed by people like myself and others who go through the latest scams and show you how they work. I can also show you how famous people are created. It’s no different than the creation of, out of thousands of say musicians, you can pick one little group and make them the top. It’s done by professionals, not by the group. I’ll talk about that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about what we are living through today and how people are risen to astronomical heights of importance and people truly believe they are geniuses and they give their all TO them. It’s really the same technique that’s used in the creation of a movie star or to raise, say, one of thousands of singers to the top.
You create a mystique, a persona, and you give them incredible exposure. The more you tell people out there that this person is the best thing since sliced bread, they will believe it, just by repetition and the fact that you say it. The more people who say it in the right magazines and the right talk shows on TV, the more they believe it. It is that simple, honestly. When you think about how they have risen up people in the past for political agendas, it’s no different than raising them up today to superstar status. I was thinking of people like Al Gore.
What credentials does Al Gore have? And yet he’s basically the kingpin for the inconvenient SPOOF that’s being taught all over the schools across the planet by mandates of government. What exactly is he? What does he have to his credit? It’s just the creation of a star IMAGE as some kind of ultra-special specialist that gives him the God-like powers to speak, like God, and it’s done; it is SO; so mote it be, as they say, and it’s suddenly done. All the papers parrot him, all the media parrot him and governments immediately put new laws into the school for education to make sure the children are brainwashed in a political agenda.
It’s never been any different when you go into the past, down through history and they gave you famous players and raise them up to the top, the famous players that come out as top scientists, and they are BUILT UP by the media before they even appear to the public for the first time. They are built up into genius status by repetition and claims. So if they appear they are immediately treated like a God by the audience. That truly is how simple it is. We go into the Royal Society, for instance, in England, and the Masons admit this themselves in their own books and documentaries. It was a Masonic institution; it still is. Its core was to lead the world and guide the world by SCIENCES, what sciences should be available to the general population and to governments. In other words, it came out of the old alchemists schools, as they call them, where alchemists were graded. They always have the ones who are into real chemistry at the top, and exploration of science. Then they have all the wanna-bes down below who are not IN on the true acts, who practice mixing eye of toads and newts and making funny smoke and casting spells. Just like today, you have all the new agers trying to do the same thing through communication of oneness with each other and all that stuff and tapping in to the ALL, the universal consciousness and all that kind of stuff. They are trying to do what the boys at the top are doing by plugging brains in to computers. It’s the same thing, you see.
The reality is that the high echelons of the Royal Society HAVE GUIDED THE WORLD, really, on what was to be made available because one thing in the real alchemists, not the phonies all down below, the real guys were a BROTHERHOOD and they knew their secrets of chemistry and all the rest of it. Their discoveries were powerful. They knew the weaponry they could create back then too. Then knew that Kings, Queens and governments would come to THEM for the power that they could give to the governments and that hasn’t changed today either. We forget, it’s not just that knowledge is power, it is particular kinds of knowledge that are very, very powerful indeed. They also decided that it was time to go into their Age of Reason. They gave us, again, the heroes for the Age of Reason and prior to that as well. They built them up into superstar status, the idea being that they would eradicate the old religions and bring in their OWN religion basically, a form or secular humanism but once again, where the scientists now would get risen to the top AS the new priesthood.
Well, it’s quite astonishing since this political agenda, not the scientific cover that it’s got, this political agenda of global warming has risen THOUSANDS of scientists up to superstar status with incredible salaries and grants, money thrown at them, and it’s all a scam. So they certainly are benefiting from it. Luckily, enough scientists have refused to join the IPCC, the phony group at the United Nations OR they have joined it and left when they found out that they were not using science at all. It was PURELY A POLITICAL AGENDA, once again, to control the direction of the world according to the beliefs of this particular political group. That’s how it’s done. As I say, Al Gore is a great example. It’s the same in the past. You’ll find that all the major players they give you, especially from Britain because Britain was set to lead the world, right, so you have to make sure that all the main inventors are obviously British. When you go into the reports of what they were discovering back in the 1500s and 1600s from the Royal Society members, it was all coming from much older texts that they were copying directly from the Moslem countries.
It is astonishing. We don’t even realize that right up into the beginnings of the 20th century all medicine practiced in the Western world had been taken from Medieval times from Moslems, ALL MEDICINE. It was the same with all astronomy, ALL astronomy. There is a very good series that was on TV recently. It was about the written word and how language developed through writing. It goes into the era where the Moslem nations were so into sending people across the whole planet to gather ALL knowledge. Very rich and wealthy leaders in those countries literally spent years and years and years building incredible libraries up, with handwritten books by the people who went out to gather the information on EVERY branch of what we today call science… all kinds of medicines, all kinds of theories, all religions, astronomy, real sciences too, as well. They were into dissecting the colors of the crystal, the light in other words, of the rainbow into its true colors, prisms; all the stuff that they were doing hundreds of years later with Isaac Newton and others.
Again, it’s amazing how you can squash a country or a people that you put down into a third world status often, which is wrong again because many of them are not at all, especially people like the Iranians. You don’t want to believe that they could have been way ahead. It doesn’t look good when they are way ahead of the up-and-coming superpower… and they were way ahead HUNDREDS of years ago. Pretty well all of the philosophers that we know today, all the writings were lost to the Western world and they all came through the Moslem countries in, again, the Age of Translations, as they called it. They went out and they got copies of all the ancient philosophers; they kept them. We got them back around the 10th century from the Moslems. What’s astonishing to me is the more you read, the more you realize that even the top astronomers who came out in Britain literally took the Arabic writings and translated them right into their own and claimed it as their own basically. Amazing. The proof is there, from the original writings of the Moslems. Astonishing.
So they created superstars again to lead the world saying we are the greatest; we are the people; we are the greatest. That’s how you build up a superpower by saying, yeah, we rule the world; we run it; we are the inventors of everything, you see. Now it’s the US’s turn, same idea. They give you people like Al Gore; build him into a superstar and what is this hack politician anyway? What is he other than that? Really? Yet he is a GOD. He is a literal God to children around the age of 8 or 9 years of age, who stand in awe of this guy that was Vice president. That’s all you have to say is ‘vice president’ and they stand in awe as this guy prattles on about the green agenda and how they are going to live in the future and how they will cut back on the lifestyles that their nasty, rotten parents had, another myth as well by the way. That’s how the children are brainwashed. Everything is political today. EVERYTHING is political.
We watched the rise of the superstars. Pachauri, another one at the IPCC for the United Nations. What was he before he came into that position? Here he is making all these POLITICAL statements. That’s what they are because they really want to decimate the planet so that the elite, the intelligentsia as they think of themselves, will survive. That’s as simple as that. They also cannot stand the fact that you might be living in a fairly comfortable life and eating well and using up what they call THEIR RESOURCES. In the Darwinian scale of things, the inferiors must die off so’s that the superiors can go ahead and live. And here you are, eating, chomping away with your French fries. That just cannot be done, you know. THAT’S WHAT THEY MEAN BY UNSUSTAINABLE, as they jet across the world polluting all over the place and that’s okay. I’ve even read articles about that; about his private limo and all the rest of it. He can’t even walk a mile to his work, from his £5 million house, one of them, as he writes his porno novels to pass the time.
These are the characters that they raise up as heroes. It’s just incredible. When they are doing it today and you are living through it and you see how it’s done and you KNOW it – and out there the listeners to this show certainly do know it – it was exactly the same in the past when they gave us the heroes and the top scientists and all the rest of it, and the Darwin’s and long before them… POLITICAL reasons.
I used to laugh when Benjamin Franklin, at the time when he was a Mason, and that’s in his own diaries. He tells you when he was admitted to the different lodges and the English Rite and so on, and the York Rite and the blah, blah, blah, all the other Rites. Eventually he was a Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris. He initiated Voltaire into them; that’s also in his own letters and writings in the Franklin Institute, so read it for yourself. He wanted to go down – like all Masons at that time because they thought of themselves as scientists first and men of reason – as an inventor. He made an awful stove that leached smoke. They still sell them today or you’ll find a few old ones. But then they said, we’ll make you, Benjamin, discoverer of the lightning conductor; you’ll go down in history as that… even though the Romans had it 2,000 years ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, dispelling the myths of the past and present. It’s rather astonishing, as I say, how we create these giants in our minds, or the media does at least for us. Big money certainly does it because you spend a lot of money promoting someone up to the top and creating the myth. We’ve been given real sciences eventually from real scientists but what I’m saying is, when they create BIG, IMPORTANT people who end up immediately discussing politics and saying how the world should go, you know that there is something else going on. You’ll always find the other scientists that generally did the real work were displaced and put to the bottom or suppressed and often they simply were eliminated and their work was taken by the political groups. That’s another fact of history and the same is true today. You’d be surprised how many of the Freemasons especially wanted to go down in history as scientists that brought something to the world.
With Franklin, he’s the perfect example. He wrote about it, that he was practicing with electricity with batteries. Everybody in those days was doing it, at the top. He also was given, supposedly he was the inventor of the lightning rod. They had to give him something for a sign. But as I say, the ancient Roman temples had these things on top of them too, with these copper wires coming down into the temples and you can read about them in the history books. Sometimes in some of the temples, like the Temple of Jupiter, they’d have the thing wired to the main God and if the lightning struck the temple, the lightning rod, the thing sort of glowed and sparked and it was quite the sight to see. There is even a record where about 5 priests that were all touching the idol and touching each other, were electrocuted; that was quite the sacrifice, quite the show. They enjoyed that. This is how they recycle various sciences and give us stars who are risen to the top and then put onto political agendas… and nothing has changed. Big bucks go into it.
With Al Gore and so on, the myth-making machine went to extraordinary lengths to create him from a nobody into a somebody and make him some sort of top scientist. It’s amazing how people have this fugue state where the propaganda takes over and they start to see him as a real scientist and so on and they forget this guy is a politician. That’s pretty well all he is, and not a very good one at that either. But he is well connected and he was mentored by Armand Hammer. He was a very interesting character who was able to not only be a multi millionaire, not only the very fact that his father renamed him Arm-and-Hammer, for the arm and hammer of the Soviet flag, the communist flag, which is also, by the way, the British Freemasons’ one; they actually have the arm and the hammer inside the compass. That’s what he had. He was the next-door neighbor, he was given an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin. He crossed, all through the Cold War, back and forth with impunity from anybody, no CIA, no whatever. BIG politics are behind the political agenda and the direction that the world is not destined to go, but planned to go by very, very, very rich people working in combination.
Here is an article about the latest scandal from the IPCC at the United Nations. Remember, everything at the United Nations, I don’t care what department, they have a political agenda. You should read your history on it. This one is from the Telegraph.
African crops yield another catastrophe for the IPCC
One more alarming claim in the IPCC’s 2007 report is disintegrating under closer examination, says Christopher Booker
By Christopher Booker / 13 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
Ever more question marks have been raised in recent weeks over the reputations of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and of its chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri. But the latest example to emerge is arguably the most bizarre and scandalous of all. It centres on a very specific scare story which was included in the IPCC’s 2007 report, although it was completely at odds with the scientific evidence (Alan: Like everything else that they do.)– including that produced by the British expert in charge of the relevant section of the report. Even more tellingly, however, this particular claim has repeatedly been championed by Dr Pachauri himself.
Only last week Dr Pachauri was specifically denying that the appearance of this claim in two IPCC reports, including one of which he was the editor, was an error. Yet it has now come to light that the IPCC, ignoring the evidence of its own experts, deliberately published the claim for propaganda purposes. (A: That means POLITICAL purposes, folks.)
One of the most widely quoted and most alarmist passages in the main 2007 report was a warning that, by 2020, global warming could reduce crop yields in some countries in Africa by 50 per cent. Dr Pachauri not only allowed this claim to be included in the short Synthesis Report, of which he was co-editor, but has publicly repeated it many times since.
The origin of this claim was a report written for a Canadian advocacy group (A: That’s a political greening group.) by Ali Agoumi, a Moroccan academic who draws part of his current income from advising on how to make applications for “carbon credits”. (A: He’s an opportunist. You understand what an opportunist is?) As his primary sources he cited reports for three North African governments. But none of these remotely supported what he wrote. The nearest any got to providing evidence for his claim was one for the Moroccan government, which said that in serious drought years, cereal yields might be reduced by 50 per cent. The report for the Algerian government, on the other hand, predicted that, on current projections, “agricultural production will more than double by 2020”. Yet it was Agoumi’s claim that climate change could cut yields by 50 per cent that was headlined in the IPCC’s Working Group II report in 2007. (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the cons and the deception and the political agenda within the IPCC where they’re still prattling on about false reports and claiming they’re true, even though it’s been admitted elsewhere they are packs of lies basically. He was on about this particular report from the Telegraph.
What made this even odder, however, was that the group’s co-chairman was a British agricultural expert, Dr Martin Parry, whose consultancy group, Martin Parry Associates, had been paid £75,000 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for two reports which had come to totally different conclusions. Specifically designed to inform the IPCC’s 2007 report, these predicted that by 2020 any changes were likely to be insignificant. (A: That was the report that Pachauri was handed and yet he lied and went the opposite way with it.) The worst case they could come up with was that by 2080 climate change might decrease crop yields by “up to 30 per cent”. (A: That’s like if some oddball thing happened that wasn’t predicted.)
British taxpayers poured out money for the section of the IPCC report for which Dr Parry was responsible. Defra paid £2.5 million through the Met Office, plus £330,000 for Dr Parry’s salary as co-chairman, and a further £75,000 to his consultancy for two more reports on the impact of global warming on world food supplies. Yet when it came to the impact on Africa, all this peer-reviewed work – including further expert reports by Britain’s Dr Mike Hulme and Dutch and German teams – was ignored in favour of a prediction from one Moroccan activist at odds with his own cited sources. (A: In other words, a guy who lied through his teeth, which I read at the beginning of this particular article.)
Fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud, fraud. I’m just wondering if the myth-making machine that created the IPCC and the UN, these holy men at the top, these guys who literally are all out, they sacrifice their lives to help the world, you know. I wonder if that myth will overcome this data here. We’ll find out won’t we?
The Mail on Sunday had this about the same thing.
The professor’s amazing climate change retreat
13th February 2010 / Mail Online
Untold billions of pounds have been spent on turning the world green and also on financing the dubious trade in carbon credits.
Countless gallons of aviation fuel have been consumed carrying experts, lobbyists and politicians to apocalyptic conferences on global warming.
Every government on Earth has changed its policy, hundreds of academic institutions, entire school curricula and the priorities of broadcasters and newspapers all over the world have been altered – all to serve the new doctrine that man is overheating the planet and must undertake heroic and costly changes to save the world from drowning as the icecaps melt.
You might have thought that all this was based upon well-founded, highly competent research and that those involved had good reason for their blazing, hot-eyed certainty and their fierce intolerance of dissent.
But, thanks to the row over leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit, we now learn that this body’s director, Phil Jones, works in a disorganised fashion amid chaos and mess.
(A: Then he goes through the different things about how his record keeping is; it’s just absolute mayhem. He doesn’t need it because he makes things up as he goes. But here is Jones, after all those leaked emails came out where he’s telling people to destroy evidence of global cooling and all the rest of it. It says…)
Even more strikingly, he (A: Jones) also sounds much less ebullient about the basic theory (A: of global warming.), admitting that there is little difference between global warming rates in the Nineties and in two previous periods since 1860 and accepting that from 1995 to now there has been no statistically significant warming. (A: Isn’t that a complete turnaround? We’ve all to change our lives for these utter liars that have been caught out.)
He also leaves open the possibility, long resisted by climate change activists, that the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ from 800 to 1300 AD, and thought by many experts to be warmer than the present period, could have encompassed the entire globe. (A: Well, I tell you, isn’t that an about-face, eh?)
This is an amazing retreat, since if it was both global and warmer, the green movement’s argument that our current position is ‘unprecedented’ would collapse.
And it better collapse because if you understand the hell they have planned for you, this political agenda, you’d make sure it collapsed right now. You’d make sure that all this INDOCTRINATION at school was thrown out the window as well. You would make sure that ALL these green journalists, and this is true. There is a whole section, a NEW category of journalism. Every newspaper has a green journalist; that’s his specialty. He’s a POLITICAL journalist; this is how he is activated to promote the propaganda. They have to get thrown out. They have to get thrown out. You cannot have people who are biased, and media, putting out these reports as if they were absolutely true and factual, these GOSPELS that they have, these new gospels, when they have a political agenda. You cannot have truth, it doesn’t happen when you have a political agenda. Amazing. So this is the Mail Online and I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show, if XplorNet graces me with enough speed to put it up there even tough I’ve been paying for high speed and they take the money. I’ll put up all the links on my site for your perusal.
It’s so interesting too, how everything is politics. Everything is politics and we don’t really get it. We don’t understand, really, what’s going on with us as we get taxed to death and put under. I’m looking for a particular article here and it’s from The Economist. Very interesting article because this guy, this is in the green.view column; this is the journalist whose job it is to push his religion under the pretense he is a journalist.
Conflict conservation
Biodiversity down the barrel of a gun
Feb 8th 2010 / From Economist.com
THERE was a time when conservation meant keeping people away from nature. America’s system of national parks, a model for similar set-ups around the world, was based on the idea of limiting human presence to passing visits, rather than permanent habitation.
In recent years this way of doing things has come under suspicion. To fence off large areas of parkland is often impractical and can also be immoral. (A: Here is what he goes through now, how conservation areas are now created. It’s through perpetual war. War is good he says, really. We need perpetual war because in between the strips like North Korea, South Korea, places like that, nature thrives in these no-go zones. And it also kills off the human population, these wars, and it helps nature and animals and the birdies and stuff like that. So this pretended journalist is actually a fanatic with a cause, getting paid as a journalist for his green page and is promoting perpetual war for human depopulation and to allow the animals and the fungi and the ferns and so on to grow. Quite something. He goes through the different instances in the world today where this is happening because of conflict and war. Quite something. So his last paragraph says…)
Military conflict and the preparations that surround it are not, in themselves, good for the environment: far from it. Animals big enough to be eaten, or with body parts that can be sold for a profit, are well advised to stay out of war zones. It is depopulation that matters. (A: He’s talking about PEOPLE here, by the way.) Armed conflict and its knock-on effects simply happen to be one of the few forces on the planet that can cause quick and thorough depopulation. (A: Wars, get wars going.) These areas struggle to survive when peace arrives. (A: He’s talking about the animals now.) The nasty truth is that the likelihood of random and violent death is the cheapest form of conservation yet invented.
It’s time we got all these so-called green journalists out in the trash heap because THEY MEAN IT. These are the worst fanatics and you can imagine if they get ahead with this green agenda. If you think the Soviet system or the Nazi system was bad, YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
Politics, politics, everything is politics. The BBC. This is not new to me because I’ve known how the scriptwriters, especially in Canada, so openly propagandize. They copied stuff right from the Soviet system. You can’t watch any entertainment without getting your ‘consciousness raised’ in certain areas, you understand, about this and ‘sensitivity’ and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It’s so bad in Canada but it’s always been that way. The BBC is a bit more subtle, at least it used to be, but they’ve gotten pretty coarse about it now. The US do the better ones; they give you movies you get INVOLVED in and you lose yourself and then you get brainwashed really good at the end. The BBC, it says here…
BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who (A: A series.) to bring down Margaret Thatcher
By Tom Kelly / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online
She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.
Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a ‘Tardis revolution’ by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.
In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.
Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners’ strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
The revelations appear to confirm claims that the 1980s BBC opposed Mrs Thatcher’s government, with the then Tory chairman Norman Tebbit claiming it was in the hands of a ‘Marxist mafia’. (A: Well, he was absolutely true on that; it was. You know what’s amazing to me, the BBC, which is run by the government and funded by the tax payers through the government and is owned by the government, the CBC in Canada and the other British Commonwealth countries that all have their versions, same base, owned by the government, are all staffed by Marxists. There is nothing new in that. One of the communists who defected from the Soviet Union, a KGB guy, went to work with the CBC and he said the he met more communists, true communists, in the CBC working there, than he ever did in the Soviet Union. Back to this article…)
Sylvester McCoy, the actor who played the Doctor from 1987 to 1989, said: ‘Our feeling was that Margaret Thatcher was far more terrifying than any monster the Doctor had encountered.
This is nothing new though. I’ve got articles here where the writers who put together a lot of stuff for Walt Disney slipped so much in it, in the songs too. They actually had Marxist meanings and were meant to hit people subliminally as well. They admit about the time it took to get just the right word for a particular line; it might take them weeks to decide on the proper word for IMPACT. That’s quite something.
You cannot get entertainment today where there is no propaganda. That Avatar movie is something else. It’s training the children to plug in. The whole idea is you plug in to the net and get lost in this new Peter Pan Disneyland where everything is wonderful, you are all one with the planet, the plants are connected with you and you use this sort of tail you’ve got to hook yourself into them. Well, that’s like plugging in; the same with The Matrix movie isn’t it. Everything is propaganda. everything was ONE and Mother Nature ruled. Mother Nature ruled, keeping the balance, you know the Cabalistic balance of everything. A fairly land, absolute fairly land of fantasy. You know something? The worse they make it is this world to survive, with all the things that are coming down, the more youngsters will want to escape into this fake reality. Not just youngsters, by the way; apparently adults are hooked with the virtual reality world as well, some of them. EVERYTHING in that movie, EVERYTHING was the new agey, conservation propaganda to a tee. Quite something.
The world they are bringing in and they discussed this an awful, awful long time ago, even before they called themselves the Royal Institute of International Affairs and we can go back further to the Milner Group, the Cecil Rhodes Society and again, you had the Royal Society there too with its umbrella organizations going back for hundreds of years. They planned the sort of future world that they envisaged should come in and they could make it happen, these very powerful and rich people. Eventually they wanted a world where everyone in that world would be run like a beehive, in what they called ‘a perfect social order’. This was articulated by HG Wells, the heads of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It’s been said again recently at some of their meetings. They are bringing in a world of SERVICE where you’ll all be born, if they need you to be born, to serve them. It will be a world of service to the world society, to the state, the world state.
If you don’t like that, you’re anti-social; the same technique they used in China. You cannot have individuality and free choice in these totalitarian systems. And the greatest thing is, they can camouflage it so well that the people don’t even see it for a totalitarian system. It’s that incredible, the psychology they can use? This article here is about how they are going to tax you literally, a pre-death tax now. Britain, Canada, and the Commonwealth countries are the most highly taxed countries on the planet. In Canada it’s a general sales tax and various other hidden taxes galore on everything that you purchase. In all the European countries, it’s a Value Added Tax that started off only, supposedly, for things you don’t need, like binoculars. Eventually it spread onto everything. Well, that’s going up by the way, to 20% now on every purchase. You can tack on 20% on EVERY purchase. This article is about ANOTHER TAX they are going to hit you with. Well, one day you might need health care as you are dying, so we are going to make you pay £20,000 in advance for that care. How’s that? How is that?
Council chiefs back ‘death tax’
By Nick Triggle / Health reporter, BBC News / 11 Feb 2010
Pressure is growing on the government to clarify its position over the so-called “death tax” after social care chiefs and charities backed the levy. (A: What do charities have to do with this? Well, this is their living, by the way, then they call themselves a charity.)
Ministers in England are considering introducing a compulsory fee, possibly up to £20,000, to pay for social care. (A: They already pay for social care; that’s what the National Health system was created FOR. It’s been funded to the hilt, but you’re supposed to forget that of course.)
The government said it would be making an announcement soon.
John Jackson, from ADASS, (A: It should be called S-A-D, SADASS.) which represents social service chiefs working for councils, said extra funding was “much needed”. (A: But they’re not going to make it a voluntary scheme either. It’s going to become compulsory. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. This article that I’m reading from the BBC is about a new tax they want to bring in where you’re going to have to pay in advance for care you might get when you’re dying, even though the National Health Service is robbing people blind to provide all these cares already.
The problem – they don’t mention it here – is with the government expanding its wars along with the US across the world and buying all these drones too from the US, they’ve got to take the money from the needy to get all the weaponry and stuff. It’s a lot of dough for these big bangs they put up there, to get the latest gizmos. They got to cut back from the usual places so they’re just going to keep taxing the people for more and more and more and giving them less service. Here are people who have lost their homes, probably millions and millions – because of the last crash and the same con as they were using in the US with all these pyramid schemes for mortgages – and taxed to the gunnels, lack of jobs, overrun with… the immigrants are complaining there are too many immigrants. They can’t get work; there are too many immigrants. It’s getting flooded and that’s Labour’s policy to eradiate what was the British culture. That’s what the article I read from Tony Blair and his best buddies said that in the paper last week. I quoted it a few times and it’s on the web site from the mainstream. But here they are hitting them with another one, £20,000 in case you one day have to get treatment as you are dying, even though you are already paying for it, your whole life long, with your taxes into the National Health Service. Quite something, eh? Quite something.
From the CBC Canada; I love the new normals. I call them ‘new normals’ when everything is one way, like 1 in sort of 150,000 children might show the signs of autism. That’s how it was right up until the 60s and then bang, it started going up like a rocket until it’s like 1 in 4 who’s got autism and that’s the new normal now. We’re not supposed to equate the inoculations and stuff with it of course; that’s just not allowed… even though they darn well know it. The CBC has an article here on the new asthma. Remember about 2 years ago – I think I read it on the air here; it’s in my archives section – how allergies had gone up 60-odd percent, 65% in the last 5 years… a new normal. No money was put into finding out why… because they know what causes it. It’s in your food too, by the way. That’s what causes it. It changed with GMO food. They are well aware of what causes it.
1 in 3 chance of developing asthma: study
By CBC News / February 15, 2010
One in three people can expect to be diagnosed with asthma in their lifetimes, Ontario research suggests. (A: I like how they ‘suggest’ things.)
Asthma is more likely to develop in childhood, but can also occur in adults (A: Which is a brand new thing.), with a 33 per cent risk over a lifetime, Ontario research suggests.
Researchers followed the medical histories of more than nine million Ontarians for 16 years, between April 1991 and March 2007. A study of the data found the lifetime risk of developing asthma was 33.9 per cent.
What I’m telling you here is that this is a NEW NORMAL. They are spraying the bejesus out of us every day in the sky and have been steadily, steadily since 1998. Before that it was occasionally as they were testing stuff, but STEADILY though from 1998. Big spraying in Ontario because as the jet stream comes up here, they spray at one end, Michigan, and they spray it where I am up here in Sudbury and it’s carried all the way down to New York state, BIG COVERAGE AREA. That’s why we have the asthma now, by the way… and they know this too.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 16th 2010. For newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. I always suggest you bookmark all the other sites you’ll see on that front page because the big ones go down once in a while, either that or I can’t upload the recent shows to them. So if you have all these other ones bookmarked you can pull down the latest shows. [Official sites listed above.] The tin can moment is always very brief; I always put it at the beginning which is rather silly. If I was a salesman I’d keep scattering it throughout the show so you’d have to listen rather than just skip over it. But the fact is you bring me to you, you the audience. The ads you hear on the show are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN to pay for the air time, their bills, equipment, the broadcast of the show, and their staff, board ops, etc. So it’s up to you to keep ME going and you can do so by buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on the web sites or you can donate to me. There are a lot of disks up there and some of them have 50 shows or more on them and they are cheap as far as the prices today go for so many different shows. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. It is important that people do donate because it’s generally the same regular people, the few, who just trickle me over, as I say. I trickle over; I don’t rush like a big river, just a trickle over. This is not a business, but at the same time I don’t want to be eating the worst food in the world, which I pretty well am anyway; that’s almost all you can get. So keep me going and donate or purchase and we will go for a while yet, especially during this time when the world is changing SO fast.
There are so many front groups out there you can’t count them all. They get their writings in the newspapers, big media papers, put in there. Every single day there is a new organization, sounding very official, but in reality they are PRIVATE foundations, PRIVATE think tanks, all funded by the same MAIN 5 foundations who really run the parallel governments of the world. That’s exactly what Carroll Quigley said and he should know since he was the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations. That’s how the world is run, by VERY rich men who generally own the world banks. They are international money lenders, as well as national ones. They own goodness knows how many international corporations across the planet, but they also own the foundations; therefore, they fund the NGOs into existence to run your lives. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s interesting how the Western countries think we are so advanced, really. So advanced compared to certain other countries; they call them third world countries. Really, it goes along with the fallacy that we are somehow, we’ve got more checks on things, more safety checks and different levels of securities to make sure that everything is fine in your food supply, stuff like that. Of course nothing really is further from the truth. That’s the greatest cover you could have isn’t it? That of ‘respectability.’
We are trained to view governments as being somehow part of us, like coming from us and truly interwoven with us, like ordinary people and because of that we really don’t question what they say to us very much at all, or even what they do to us. I can remember when it broke out in Canada that Canadians were the test rats basically for the GM food products and had been for 10 years and we didn’t know it. It broke out because of a controversy in Britain where Tony Blair was going to pass the same thing over there for them to eat and the people didn’t want it. Some group over there found out that Canada had been the guinea pig for all this. That’s how we found out in Canada, otherwise we would have never known. Then the Canadian government rushed out the biggies to reassure us that it was okay. They even put silly little things on the CBC News on it, maybe a 2-minute interview with a girl next to the road selling corn and asking what does she think of the corn; any difference at all? Of course she said, no, eh, and that was it. And that’s the standard stuff, making a JOKE out of something.
I could tell what the difference was because the GM corn, apart from having hundreds of different genes from different species in it – insects, plants, animals, goodness knows what else, maybe even humans for all we know – it was also created to be resistant to INCREDIBLY HEAVY PESTICIDES, much, much more volatile, nasty stuff than they had been using before. That was the difference. Now you were taking in highly carcinogenic material under the guise of food.
The Canadian government DID ADMIT in the newspapers at the time that they had made a SECRET DEAL… a secret deal. Government, this respectable government, made a secret deal with Monsanto and another company to grow and test these foods out on Canadians. Isn’t that amazing? And yet we think we are so advanced with all these checks and safeties and all the other nonsense. Mind you, if you want to depopulate the planet and that IS your part of your agenda – and all these Fabianists certainly are; that is part of their agenda – then you would go ahead with that. You’ll bring up the death rate with cancers and allergies of course are incredibly well associated with the chemicals, etc and asthma, all of that kind of stuff which is breaking out. Well, it’s common sense. It’s common sense. But we’re not supposed to use common sense. We’re supposed to put it to the side and listen to the sponsored scientists that come out to reassure us, like David Suzuki. That’s who they pulled out when we found out we were the guinea pigs. David Suzuki, the environmentalist/geneticist who equated people with maggots and that lecture, that little talk that he gave to his pals at the time is up on YouTube where he says it. Another Fabian/Socialist/Marxist.
Here is India. This is from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
India halts GM eggplant plan
Wed Feb 10, 2010 / ABC.net.au
Banned: the GM eggplants received approval from Indian government scientists last October.
India has decided to stop the release of its first genetically modified (GM) food crop because of health concerns.
One of India’s largest seed companies, Maiko, had developed a GM eggplant which it said was modified to be pest-resistant. (Alan: That’s means it can stand up to incredibly high doses of these highly carcinogenic pesticides which get IN to all the cells of the plant and then you go and eat it.)
But after weeks of heated debate on whether the GM eggplants should be grown on farms for commercial use, the Indian government says it wants more time to study the issue.
The GM vegetable has undergone field trials since 2008 and received approval from government scientists last October. (A: Who, I’m sure, were well paid by the corporations.)
But state governments across India, as well as politicians, environmentalists and farmers, have opposed its production, saying there are serious health and safety issues associated with it.
Now the environment minister says not enough is known about the effects of the GM crop on humans. (A: Well, that’s not true. You can look at the Canadian health and how it is plummeting, and other countries too that are using it.)
India allowed the use of genetically modified seeds for cotton in 2002.
There you are. India has enough common sense and the people have enough common sense to complain and put a halt on it. Mind you, it will go the same way as every other government once the money starts flowing under the table to the right politicians. That’s how the world works. Sad isn’t it? Sad, but it’s true.
Everybody knows what happened with the big collapse last time with all these bubbles that were created where, really, nonsensical stocks were blown out of proportion for increased value as they bought and sold these stocks all over the planet. Everybody who bought them thought they were going to get more than the last guy and more than the last guy, until it was just one massive balloon; one area after another including the housing market. This article is from Raw Story.
Wall Street wants to do to life insurance what it did to housing
Posted By Daniel Tencer / On September 5, 2009 / Rawstory.com
The “securitization” of mortgages — bundling mortgage policies and selling them on to investors — is considered to be one of the major reasons for last year’s financial collapse.
Now, Wall Street banks want to do it all again — but this time, with life insurance policies instead of real estate.
The New York Times reports that large investment banks are lining up to begin securitizing “life settlements,” life insurance policies that ill and elderly people sell so that they can get cash before they die. (A: Probably to pay for all their medications.)
According to the Times:
[Banks] plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die. (A: What a world we live in. Really, what a world. It’s like a big casino where they are gambling on when you are going to die.)
The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return — though if people live longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money. (A: That’s the same con they are using with the health and the pension industries in the British Commonwealth countries. They keep talking about upping the retirement age. That’s with the hope that you will die before you can claim the money. That’s the reason. That IS the reason for it. They just want the money. They don’t want to pay anything back to you, they just want the cash, because they’ve got lots of wars to fight and stuff like that, you see.)
Life settlement companies — companies that buy life insurance policies and cash in when the original policy holder dies — have been around for some time, but this would mark the first time that life insurance policies are turned into big business on Wall Street.
THE FASTER YOU DIE, THE MORE INVESTORS MAKE
One of the principal dangers in this plan is that it creates an incentive to see ill people die quickly. (A: Well, sure.) The investors who buy life insurance policies have to pay the premiums on those policies in order to collect when the original holder dies. So the faster an ill person dies, the fewer premiums have to be paid, and the higher the profit. (A: This could only come out of civilized countries, you understand.)
Conversely, life insurance securitization would create a disincentive for finding cures for diseases. (A: Well, that’s already there; pharma makes sure of that. They want to treat you for your whole life but they don’t want to cure you because then they can’t have you buying pills for the rest of your life, right.) If a person sells their life insurance policy and then their illness is cured, the investor who bought their policy loses money.
As the Times points out:
In addition to fraud, there is another potential risk for investors: that some people could live far longer than expected. (A: That will really tick them off.)
It is not just a hypothetical risk. That is what happened in the 1980s, when new treatments prolonged the life of AIDS patients. (A: Yeah. They were gambling on them dying, you see.) Investors who bought their policies on the expectation that the most victims would die within two years ended up losing money. (A: Again, only in civilized countries could you have these kinds of shark con men, these con men that can see this. I always remember Rothschild when he was asked, when is the best time to make money? He says, when the blood is flowing in the streets. It means that during incredible crisis or catastrophe that’s where you can see an ANGLE. These guys, they’re like sharks; they sniff it immediately. They know where it is. You and I would never even see it; we’d walk over it, a thousand times, but they see the angle right away. It’s like the Council on Foreign Relations, with anything that happens in their favor, they always say, we can use this disaster to our advantage. They immediate see it and use it. These are psychopaths, you see. Only psychopaths can think that way and see the angle that they can exploit. Amazing isn’t it. These are the guys that rise to the top… in progressive, civilized nations.)
LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS WILL GO UP
A certain percentage of life insurance policies is never paid out by insurance companies. This is because some policy-holders stop paying their premiums, either because they no longer need the additional financial security or because the premiums have become too expensive.
But if life insurance policies are packaged and sold to investors, those investors will invariably pay the premium until the original policy holder dies. Insurance companies calculate their premiums on the expectation that some policies will lapse. If fewer policies lapse, the insurance industry will have to raise insurance premiums.
“This defeats the idea of what life insurance is supposed to be,” Steven Weisbart, chief economist for the Insurance Information Institute, told the Times. “It’s not an investment product, [it’s] a gambling product.” (A: I’ll be back with more of this wonderful world after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the trading, the big business in trading insurance, life insurance and how Wall Street is moving in big time. It says here…
WHO’S INVOLVED?
The Times names two companies that it evidently believes to be heading up the effort to securitize life insurance. One is the Swiss bank Credit Suisse, and the other is investment bank Goldman Sachs. (A: Of course, of course it is. The Credit Suisse is an amazing bank because I’ve got stuff here too, on the different characters that work for them. They really helped lead the charge for the buying and selling of carbon credits. Every con there is they are in to. They get governments to legitimize the con, like carbon credits. You know what carbon credits are? Do you know what they are really? It’s like an old religion and you’re trading sacks of sins, because there is nothing in it. There is nothing IN the sack really, except your belief. So you are trading sacks of sin and say, well, okay, we’re swapping these sins here for credits because this came from Canada. This is Canada’s sins here. Here are the sins of the US. So they give you these empty sacks and you look in there. You’ve got to be politically correct and say, yep, oh my goodness it’s full of them; it’s full of sins here. Well, that’s what carbon credits are and all the shysters, these shysters that run the world today, and they’re intent on dreaming up con after con until we are in the worst kind of slavery the world had ever seen, they are on a roll. There is nothing stopping them because they OWN the governments. They can buy anybody off. Believe you me, the psychopathic politicians that creep up into government are so up to their eyes in debt anyway. When you look through their records, all their bankruptcies they go through, on the way up, these guys are all happy to take the cash. By the way, they are all incredibly blackmailable because of their lifestyles. That’s why they like these guys in politics. Of course, Goldman Sachs is in on it as well.)
Some financial firms are moving to outpace their rivals. Credit Suisse, for example, is in effect building a financial assembly line to buy large numbers of life insurance policies, package and resell them — just as Wall Street firms did with subprime securities.
The bank bought a company that originates life settlements, and it has set up a group dedicated to structuring deals and one to sell the products.
Goldman Sachs has developed a tradable index of life settlements, (A: It should really be death settlements; isn’t it?) enabling investors to bet on whether people will live longer than expected or die sooner than planned. (A: What a world! This is great civilization, fantastic civilization. We are on the cutting edge you know, progress… That’s what they keep telling you.) The index is similar to tradable stock market indices that allow investors to bet on the overall direction of the market without buying stocks.
According to the Economist, the life-settlement market in existence today is worth about $18 billion to $19 billion, meaning that about that amount of life insurance policies is bought and sold every year. The Times estimates that a securitized market for life insurance policies could be worth about $500 billion.
That’s where the sharks go, where the blood is. Psychopaths everywhere. What a wonderful world, eh? What a wonderful world.
This article is also about the wonderful world of big pharma because these are all… It’s amazing how they are all interconnected when you really go into the big stock holders of pharma and the ones that are into all these other cons and scams and military-industrial complex who encourage governments to use as many drones and bombs as they can. They all have to get replaced once they are done; they just keep making new ones and they get more cash. Everything is a racket in this world. And all the lefties are no different, with their rackets. Everybody wants to rule the world don’t they? They just don’t want to do any work. But they want YOU to do all the work for them, preferably for free. This article is from the Mail Online about pharma as well, and how they are getting to the young girls that they want to give the various Gardasil and so-called anti-HPV vaccines to. They are BRIBING them now with money.
£45 shops ‘bribe’ for cervical cancer jab for teenage girls
By Mail On Sunday Reporter / 14th February 2010
Teenage girls are being rewarded with shopping vouchers (A: Look for the weak spot and the age groups and go for it, right. That’s Madison Avenue.) for having the cervical cancer jab. (A: Even that is worded wrong because they don’t even know if it’s going to do anything about it. In fact, even the person who worked… I read the article from the main scientist who worked on these injections, this vaccine. He said it would do no good at all and it only covers 2 or 3 of the viruses when there are dozens and dozens and dozens of them.)
Girls aged 16 to 18 are being given £45 of vouchers if they complete an inoculation course against the HPV virus, the sexually transmitted infection that causes 70 per cent of cervical tumours. (A: Even that’s misleading. But then again, reporters are not in the business of finding out if they’re telling you all the truth or not.)
A national campaign to vaccinate girls aged 12 to 18 has been criticised over fears it may encourage promiscuity and raise pregnancy rates, and uptake has been low among girls aged 16 to 18. (A: No. The reason is because they found out some girls have been dropping dead after getting it. That’s the real reason, not because of this nonsense here.)
Now, the £22,500 pilot scheme gives young women Love2shop vouchers if they have three injections. No parental consent is needed.
Bosses at NHS Birmingham East and North, which is carrying out the pilot, said it has ‘real benefits for health’. The project could be rolled out across the country. But campaigners claim the scheme amounts to bribery. (A: Oh, no kidding eh? It’s just Pavlovian: Do you want this? Take this little shot. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. There are a couple of callers on the line so I’ll go to Zac from New England. Are you there Zac?
Zac: Yes. I just wanted to share with you today, I turned on the local news to get the weather forecast for tomorrow and I caught a segment that was tied into national news about a dog show that’s on at Westminster. They started off the story talking about, before the break, like a segway into the show. They talked about a dog that was stolen in New York City and then there was a commercial break. They cut back to their show and there was this whole big thing saying, when the family got home from this camp where they were at, they lost their dog and they checked their answering machine. There was a message saying that they found their dog or something and they asked how much money they wanted for the dog. The owner said, well they would be willing to give up $50 and then they hung up. Then all of a sudden they cut into the dog show and they talked about security for the dogs and stuff. Of course, they mentioned, off hand, about how the dogs are chipped. I just thought it was interesting. It kind of made me wonder whether or not the original story about the dog was even real; whether or not there was a dog that was lost or stolen or if it was just conveniently used so they could talk about the microchip for snob appeal, like you mentioned before. I have another quick quote for you too. I happened to watch the opening Olympic ceremonies and I thought it went along with predictive programming. It was John Furlong; it’s real quick. He said in his little opening remarks, “The Olympic flame has touched many millions and prompted spontaneous, peaceful celebration reminding us all that those values that unite and inspire the best in us we must never abandon. As the Olympic caldron is lit, the unique magic of the Olympic games will be released upon us, magic so rare that they cannot be controlled by borders.” There was a pause and it made me think, jeeze, they are kind of getting into peoples’ psyches preparing us for the take down of the borders in 2010. It’s kind of a clever way to do it. I can see how pretty much all this is predictive programming.
Alan: Well, it is; even the rings, the 5 continents and all that, interwoven, interlinked. On EVERY Olympics they have ever had, if you look at the symbology, especially the closing one, the opening and the closing, you always see the 2 pillars at the back somewhere. There are always 2 pillars and the fire and all the rest of it, and all the usual occultic symbolism. It’s interesting they talk about how it brings us all together and yet these athletes would kill each other to get the gold. I’m not kidding about that. They chop each other, if they know someone else is taking drugs they’ll set them up or they’ll make sure the inspector walks in at the wrong moment when the injection is being given. That’s how mean they are towards each other to get to the top. Everything is propaganda.
Zac: [inaudible] was that right there… in ’94.
Alan: That’s right. Oh, that was on all the time. I think Adolf Hitler said when he went to the Olympics in ’33 or whenever it was; he says, Sports is just the peacetime form of warfare, and that’s exactly what it is.
Zac: I want to thank you too for your Friday’s poem. I had that in the back of my mind when I went to the Boston Museum of Science on Saturday. Kind of funny. Anyway, thanks for all you do and I’ll let you go.
Alan: Thanks for calling. There is David in Washington on the line. Is David there?
David: Yeah. Hi Alan. Just to back up to the beginning of your program, you were talking about GMO and corn. It brought to mind something that happened here where I live. I feed the birds and I was over on the mainland a few years ago and went to one of their stores. They had a 50-pound bag of cracked corn for about $3-4. I thought wow what a deal; I’ll just feed the ducks and the birds and put a can of it in my van. I go down to the ferry landing and feed them. So I took it and loaded it up. I put some on my back porch and the birds, crows even, would come up there and land but they wouldn’t eat this stuff. It was genetically modified corn. I took it and threw it all over the place down here at the ferry landing and usually the gulls and crows will come around and that stuff will be gone before you can turn around and look again. They wouldn’t touch this stuff. It just sat there until it rotted.
Alan: Yes. They know all this stuff too. Even the bees were dying with it. Back about 10-12 years ago the bees in Ontario were dying from it. I knew the chief beekeeper who was the head of the Ontario Beekeepers, the Federation. I used to go into his yard and all the bees coming in from the north were coming back in a drugged state and then they would just slowly die. He inquired from the Ministry of Agriculture, the government, if they had any GM crops and where were they planted. They send him the map back of where it was. They were very reluctant to give it to him, of these test beds, but they were right to the north of where his bees that were going northwards were. So they were taking the pollen from this stuff and of course, they were getting soaked in pesticide, they were getting poisoned pollen and it was killing them. So they know darned well what’s causing this. It was the same thing when they blamed it on West Nile virus. It was a bad year for all animals, a bad winter. Even the crows eventually were eating the GM seed and they were dying off. They learned though, crows are very intelligent and they learned. They won’t touch them now, so you’re quite right. But they blamed it on West Nile virus at the time.
David: They had some sort of an innate sense that turned them right away from it. I don’t know if they could… what they detected in it but they just wouldn’t eat.
Alan: It’s the same with the deer. The deer, I’ve seen them come down to fields when I lived just a bit further south and they’d always go into the non-GM corn fields and they would leave the ones that were GM modified, right next to it and they’d leave that alone. They just would go into the natural stuff.
David: If people don’t hold to, or get the understanding or the knowledge of what’s going on, they are making themselves sick, all sorts of intestinal disorders and things, eating this.
Alan: It is. You’re right enough. It’s bioengineering us. People are coming down with far more cancers than before, which is only natural when you are taking SO much pesticide, incredibly strong pesticide. Monsanto pesticide is 10 times stronger than any other type. You are taking that IN with the food because the plants, remember, live off moisture. They soak up the moisture through capillary action, in their cells, and that sucks up the poisons with it too. So it’s all throughout the plant. You can’t just wash it off; it’s in the plant too. It gets into your stomach and it is altering the DNA structure and then you end up with cancers.
David: I might mention also, something you said reminded me of a web site at The University of Calgary. There is a video on their web site showing, it’s a microscopic view and a video of it, the mercury destroying the synapses. It actually shows it curling up and wrinkling up and what it looks like and they find in Alzheimer’s disease.
Alan: That’s correct. I’ve seen that one in fact. I think one news station broadcast it on television at one time. Yes, it does; it literally destroys the synapses by damaging the dendrites at the end of the nerves themselves. You’re quite right. That’s what they put into the inoculations. Now they’re telling us mercury is good for you. They tell you it’s bad if you break a thermometer; don’t clean it up yourself, get in the disposal guys. It’s the same if you break one of these new light bulbs with the mercury vapor in it; don’t breathe it in, don’t clean it up yourself, it’s poisonous. But it’s okay to inject it right into you; it’s safe when they… See, what they do is they say a prayer over it in the pharma where they make it. They say a prayer and NOW it’s HOLY mercury and it’s okay for you.
David: Yeah. People should take a look at that so they can see for themselves. The evidence there is, well, it’s convincing.
Alan: It is convincing. That’s empirical. In other words, you test it, you see what happens. That’s proof there, right there.
David: They are getting it. Okay Alan, thanks very much. Good program and I enjoy it very much. Nice to speak with you again.
Alan: You take care.
David: Thank you. Bye.
That’s the world that we live in, as I say. It’s like the government, here they are selling your sins, you know these carbon credits, empty sacks but when you pull out the mouth, you see it’s now full; it looks kind of full when you open the mouth. It opens up and now it’s full of carbon, you see. That’s your CO2 that you are breathing out and that’s your sins. It’s the same con there too but the world is RUN by cons. The most amazing thing is, with using Bernays techniques and mass propaganda, with the ability of mass media to get it through to you, they’ve gone so much further than any governments in previous times could possibly ever imagine and it works so well doesn’t it. It really does.
Now, as the world really goes along this predetermined path, financial amalgamation, everything into this so-called “new world order.” Tony Blair called it that at the big G20 meeting and many others called it that too; so did Mr. Brown that took over for him. They’re both Fabians, they go to the same club and they are members of the Fabian Society that SWORE TO DEPOPULATE the world on behalf of pretending that they were for the working people. That’s why they have their image; it’s the wolf, the wolf in sheep’s clothing IS their motto, you know. They pretend they are there to help the working class but remember, George Bernard Shaw is up on that movie, The Soviet Story. You’ll see an old, rare clip of him, a co-founder of the Fabian Society, talking about it and he says, you’ll have to come to us and justify why we should keep you live. Because you must work for the state, you SERVE the system. George Bernard Shaw also asked the scientists of Britain back then to come up with a nice odorless, tasteless, efficient, quick-acting gas that would kill the people painlessly, he said, humanely… because he wanted to kill off all the useless eaters. No kidding. These are the characters that are in power all over now, the Fabian Society.
Part of the process they’re going through now too, is to use cash, this thing that we’re all made to use and of course we’re all stuck on it so they can do what they want. Now it’s time to rope in the actual paper money. They want to go all-electronic but they also want to limit your transactions. Not for corporations, just for YOU, the little guy. This article is about Greece.
Greece to Make All Large Cash Transactions Illegal
By Rocky Vega / DailyReckoning.com / 02/16/10
Stockholm, Sweden – Talk about making a currency less attractive. Given all the concern about weaknesses in the structure of the euro under strong economic headwinds, and its foundation in the perhaps too loosely-aligned euro area, it seems like a bad time to make using large quantities of euro cash illegal. And yet, that is exactly what Greece is going. (A: See, the IMF came down on Greece and they are running the show.)
Embroiled in its debt crisis and looking for any avenue to bolster tax receipts it has done the unthinkable – it has made its own “legal tender” illegal for transactions over 1,500 euros. Of course, larger credit- or debit-based electronic transactions over 1,500 will still be denominated in euros. However, electronic transactions clearly require infrastructure and limit personal freedom.
From Reuters:
“From 1. Jan. 2011, every transaction above 1,500 euros between natural persons (A: I like the legalities here, ‘natural persons’…) and businesses (A: Which are artificial entities, but then so are YOU, if you are all CAPITALS. That’s why you get block letters when the government sends you any mail. They have to turn you into a corporate person, a fiction.), or between businesses, will not be considered legal if it is done in cash. Transactions will have to be done through debit or credit cards”
It seems wrong for the Greek state to dictate how cash euros can be used. In fact, it’s surprising that the EU-endorsed plan would allow Greece to control euro usage at that level. Several other primarily tax-related measures are included in the same plan:
* “Deposits in banks outside Greece are exempted from audits of their origin if they are repatriated within six months of the passing of the tax bill and are taxed with a 5 percent rate” (A: This is to be a prototype for the whole of Europe.)
* “[in a] new tax scale, there is a shift of the burden from low and middle income to high incomes.
* “tax relief for incomes up to 40,000 (euros)”
* “Taxable income based on the new scales will include capital gains from the short-term trading of stocks”
* “Every autonomous taxation … for special professions, like engineers, architects, taxis, gas station owners and kiosks is abolished”
Despite the fact that the reform bill is a piece of an approved EU plan to help improve Greek tax revenue and reduce deficit, it seems to go too far in curtailing personal liberty. A 1,500 euro limit for cash transactions seems unreasonable on its face and it begs the question of what enforcement of the law would engender. (A: Supposing you were wanting to give 1,500 euros to your daughter or your son or something and you gave them cash… it’s an illegal act right there.) Basically, how much is a government willing to punish its own citizens for using “too much” of their own legal tender in an otherwise legal transaction?
In fact, any cash limit other than those naturally imposed by the sheer inconvenience of carrying suitcases filled with money has a draconian feel to it. It’s especially true when combined with the obligatory repatriation of deposits described above. At some level Greece is steering its own citizens toward being excluded from participation in a market-based society unless they keep plenty of transaction-ready funds stored in Greek bank accounts.
But that’s to be a prototype for the rest of Europe. You see, Greece had other ways to get out of this but they were all illegal under the new EU laws. You have to do what the EU laws dictate that you do and this is the way that the EU is giving them to try to get out of it. Punish the populace as always. It’s always the populace that’s gets punished. Isn’t that something? Not the big guys that trade the market stocks and the bubbles and all that, it’s always YOU. It’s always you at the bottom. The more things change, the more they stay the same eh? Quite something… quite something.
Here is a good article about the sins, you know the sacks of sins they call the carbon taxes. That’s all it is. It’s just a fantasy, somebody’s imagination. This is from the Council on Foreign Relations own web site. It says…
Carbon Markets March On
Interviewee: Joelle Chassard, Manager, World Bank Carbon Finance Unit
Interviewer: Toni Johnson, Staff Writer, CFR.org / February 5, 2010
The UN’s December Copenhagen meeting on climate change ended with draft text of an agreement that left many provisions undecided. The subsequent uncertainty about the future of international action on climate change suggested that interest in carbon trading and carbon financing could be depressed (FT). But Joelle Chassard, manager of the World Bank’s Carbon Finance unit, sees hopeful signs in the February 1 submissions by more than fifty countries (A: This is what your countries really did there.) on their voluntary emissions reduction actions (A: There is a PDF you can get and download it from this site. I’ll put all these articles up on my site at the end of the show for you to download.) (PDF) under the Copenhagen Accord. (A: I’ll read this when I come back from this break. Back in a moment.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Council on Foreign Relations which is really all about money, the money they hope to rake in and everybody at the top is going to rake in. It’s all that money, all this carbon stuff, not about the nonsense they are telling us. It’s a great con isn’t it? It’s a great CON, really, going through complicated mathematical computations to transfer energy into what it could be if they were carbon. That’s how they are working out this nonsense and your sin taxes, how you are going to pay sacks of nothingness. They pass empty sacks with each other but you’ve got to BELIEVE there is a lot of carbon in there. That’s the whole thing. It’s in the air; it’s in your imagination in fact. It’s not even in the air; it’s only a very small percentage of the air, that CO2, BUT you’ve got to believe it’s massive, it’s massive. It says here….
The UN’s December Copenhagen meeting on climate change ended with draft text of an agreement that left many provisions undecided. The subsequent uncertainty about the future of international action on climate change suggested that interest in carbon trading and carbon financing could be depressed (FT). But Joelle Chassard, manager of the World Bank’s Carbon Finance unit, sees hopeful signs in the February 1 submissions by more than fifty countries on their voluntary emissions reduction actions (PDF) under the Copenhagen Accord. (A: Which actually is the 10th. The Copenhagen Accord is the 10th treaty under the Kyoto. This is a CONTINUATION with more to go until we have nothing left. You’ll be living in an igloo if you’re lucky; if it’s deemed to be thermally efficient you might get to live in an igloo.) “We feel quite encouraged, but from an outsider’s perspective, it may not be as meaningful because there still is so much work to be done to translate that political commitment into the nitty-gritty of implementation,” Chassard says, arguing the overall demand for carbon trading will continue to rise. (A: You see, it’s all about CASH, plundering the public as always, PLUNDER THE PUBLIC.) “[If] you talk to companies, all the economic actors working on future development, it’s almost now a given that you have to take into account the impacts of climate change.” (A: Which has just been demolished with all the scams that have been exposed, that they got up to, to pull this con off of climate change. Even Jones, one of the guys at the centers of ONE of the main scandals, out of the many, has done a u-turn on that and says it’s actually been cooling for the last 15 years. Complete u-turn. He was the professor that led the East Anglia group on this climate change for the IPCC.) She notes that movement on a U.S. carbon market is also playing a role in improving the outlook for global carbon markets. (A: Money, money, money, money. It’s not enough that they take your pensions away from you. It’s not enough that they’re actually trading on you living or dying with insurance policies. Here they’re out to take every last DIME off of you under this, well, you’re breathing too much; You’re destroying OUR planet so you have to really tighten your waist a bit and cough up more cash to us. This is what it’s all about. MASTER AND SLAVE… master and slave….) “We do hope if there is a legislation adopted by the U.S., it will include some sort of cap-and-trade scheme,” she says. “That will create a lot of demand for emissions-reducing projects in developing countries.”
Utter nonsense. In fact, a lot of the far lefties have left the far lefties because they say why shouldn’t these countries like Africa have the right to decide for themselves how they want to get power to power their own energy for their own possible industry that’s coming up and all the rest of it? This stuff at this Copenhagen Accord is putting Africa into a position where it will be UNABLE to do that. If you put up a couple of solar panels you’re lucky to light a flashlight bulb never mind run a plant. So it’s going to keep them in a primitive state but that’s what they want at the top. That’s what they want.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 17th 2010. For the newcomers out there, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. On the front page you’ll see the other sites I have listed. These are the ONLY official sites I have [listed above]. The tin can moment is very brief; I don’t bore you with pleas for help. If I don’t get help, I just won’t be here. It’s as simple as that. I’ll just say goodbye one night and that’s that. So it’s up to you to keep me going. No one else backs me up here except the audience. I’m not plugging various products. I’m not backed by the companies that generally back the host; I could be but I prefer to go it alone. The ads on this show that you hear are paid by the advertisers and go straight to RBN to pay for this air time and their equipment, staff and bills and for the transmission. So you can help me by going into my web site. You’ll see the things I have for sale, my books, CDs and DVDs. You can purchase those or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] I do need your donations to keep me ticking along here. It is very expensive. This is not just a one-hour show. I deal with so much during the day to do with this and people too that are in trouble and the different things I have to deal with and get back to them; it’s a full-time occupation. I don’t call it a job because if it was a job I would be raking the cash in… and I would be working a lot less too. This is 7 days a week, no breaks and no holidays. We are going through such amazing changes, it’s time we have to get out there and at least share the knowledge before we all go down the tubes. For those who get the CDs burned and passed to them to play on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
There is one thing about the post office, at least in the US and Canada, they are still working pretty efficiently. I’ve never really had problems with them. But make sure if you do write to me or send a check or an order or whatever, that you do put on the postal code properly. With one letter out, they just get totally bamboozled and send it back. That’s the music coming in and I’ll be back with more and some stories after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I talked at length before on previous talks about the parallel government that really runs the world. The parallel one is really the real one; it’s the real government that runs the world. It was set up a long time ago on behalf of very rich people who decided that the world that they knew and the world that they wanted to become in the future, or the one that they wanted their children to grow up in, would be overcrowded with all the wrong types of people. They came out in the 1800s en mass, at least with a lot of front groups, to do with eugenics. They even put out the magazines in the early 1900s by the Rockefellers and others, with the perfect American families, with the right size skulls, the right kind of noses and teeth and IQ and all the rest of it. Meaning, that the rest of the people out there were of the wrong kind of families, the low breeders, the useless eaters as they call them. We tend to take this with a pinch of salt because we cannot believe, as ordinary people, that monsters live in our midst. It’s okay to see the low-grade monster down below, the serial rapist, or whatever, or murder, or the guy who ends up in prison because he smashes the windows of jeweler’s shops, but we don’t realize that we have the same thing at the very, very top.
At the very top remember, you have INBRED people; wealthy families that have really scraped their way to the top, killed their way to the top, by every means possible actually and destroyed many in the process to GET up there. That’s what power is and that’s what the insatiable desire for POWER happens to be. Psychopathic people with intelligence go for these kinds of things. They get right to the top. They know how to manipulate everybody else around them to do their work for them. They are very charming people. So when the ones at the top – the ones who are ultra rich in this world, who own the food supplies of the world, they own the international monetary system of the world, they shift around BILLIONS of dollars each per day on the stock market – they can sink countries or raise countries up overnight. When they form a government, a parallel government, with many branches of it specializing in different areas of society, you’d better take them seriously because they mean what they say.
They set up all these big clubs, as they called them – initially they were called clubs – to PLAN the future to decide what kind of future would come into play, not just in one country but across EVERY country in the world. Depopulation was one of their main targets because they decided that the lesser types would outbreed the better types. No one said it better in one of his books than Charles Galton Darwin in the 1950s, a descendant of Charles Darwin. He talked about the need to get rid of all these fast-breeding, useless eaters basically. Well, they don’t say these things without MEANING it. They don’t just go to the Club of Rome and other specialized clubs and foundations that they set up to plan the world to come up with the ideas without the IMPLEMENTATION of these ideas. How do they get these ideas implemented? They set up clinics across the planet under different guises and names, often under the term ‘family’ and ‘family planning’ and so on. The real idea is to abort and sterilize across the world, as much as possible. This all comes under ‘sustainable development.’ That’s what they mean by sustainable development; bring down the population using war, famine, plague, etc. This has been discussed, using plague and famine, to make it happen if the public couldn’t be trained to have less children.
Well the reality is, in the Western world the countries listened since the early 20th century onwards and their populations plummeted in fact. The only reason there is mass immigration into all the Western countries is because the politicians say there is not enough children from those countries who will grow up to work and pay off the national debt. I’m not kidding about that. Margaret Thatcher said that. That’s the reason they give to us for wide-open immigration policies. So we listened to what they said. We took their advice and had less children. Then they bring in the massive multicultural society which really is intended also to break existing cultures and end up with this NEW, politically correct culture which the government is introducing through the schools and to sustainable development, the greening and all the rest of it.
The world really is just one big chess board. The only thing wrong with it is, most folk don’t know they are on it. But those who designed it are the master players. They LITERALLY plan the future with 50 and 100 year plans, 200 year plans and all the rest of it. The Club of Rome is one of the specialized branches. They were given the task of finding a way to unite the world against a common threat and they discussed ALL means to do so. You can go back into the writings of John Dewey, who was the guy responsible for setting up the American, if you want to call it, education system. John Dewey in 1917 greeted the Japanese delegation to the US and he gave a speech there where he talked about, if only we had an invasion from outer space – this is the first time this was used publicly that we know of – then the whole world would have to come together to fight this common problem. So even then they were finding ways to fool the public and con them into coming together, giving up national sovereignty, everyone giving up individual rights so that the elite, the better type, the academic crew, would rule our lives for us under a socialist system.
That saying was repeated by many other players in this game, Ronald Regan, Lester B Pearson of Canada… the same speech basically, threats from outer space, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Of course now it’s the threat, from the Club of Rome, from their own book printed in the 90s, The First Global Revolution, the two founders said that when looking for this reason for uniting the world under a common threat, we HIT UPON THE IDEA that global warming, famine, plague and the like WOULD FIT THE BILL. That’s what they actually said. So when they say things like that, they actually MAKE IT HAPPEN. They put it IN to the agendas of schooling. It’s in movies; it’s in novels. Sustainability, global warming, all the rest of it is to make us really behave and yield our right to self determination and put our hands in government agencies and specialists who will eventually decide who will breed and who will not breed. We are almost to that stage now. A very good plan, it took a long time to pull it off but they’ve pulled off longer plans than this. They came up with that one in the 1970s.
These guys really do hate the ordinary people. They do hate them with a passion. They needed them in times of production for war, as they are building UP, especially the US. They needed production, heavy equipment, lots of workers in factories, and they needed it to supply the world with a world army to make the rest of the countries come under this so-called world of democracy, as they keep calling it; which seems to appear ever evident that democracy today means giving up all your rights and freedoms. They still call the US, Canada and Britain democracies.
You have to go into the histories of these characters and these fanatics. They are all appointees; all these big players are appointees. The hard fanatics are appointees to every government in the Western world now. These guys were all in the Communist League not so long ago. They are still ardent Marxists, thinking the world should be based on basic sciences, like the Marxist sciences and theories. This article is from CNSNews.com.
Top Obama Adviser Urged a ‘World of Zero Net Physical Growth’ in 1995 World Bank Publication
Wednesday, August 5, 2009 / CNSNews.com / By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief
(CNSNews.com) – A top White House adviser to President Barack Obama argued that mankind eventually must face up to the need for a “world of zero net physical growth” and “population limitation” in an essay he co-authored that was included in a 1995 book on environmentally “sustainable” economic activity published by the World Bank. (Alan: See, here are the United Nations and the World Bank and all these strange institutions that run our lives and tell governments what to do. They have more power than governments, more say in world affairs. This is the real parallel government that Professor Carroll Quigley was talking about, with all its members being Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs and so on, the guys who SET UP the World Bank and the United Nations.)
John P. Holdren, who is now director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, co-authored the essay with Paul Ehrlich and Gretchen Daily of the Center for Conservation Biology at Stanford. Ehrlich has been a well-known population control advocate since he authored the 1968 bestseller, “The Population Bomb,” in which he advocated zero population growth. At the time the 1995 essay was published, Holdren was a professor at the University of California.
Back in the 50s, by the way, the Pentagon said they would bring academics on board; all academia would come on board with the planning of this future sustainable society. So they are PART of the warfare department, if you like it or not. Holdren, remember too, was the co-author with Ehrlich of EcoScience where he literally mandated mandatory sterilization of different peoples. Of course it was all to do with your necessity TO society, in other words, EUGENICS. If you had good genes and a good IQ you might get to mate with someone of equal IQ and genes and have intelligent offspring who could serve them, as the ruling class over the lessers. Paul Ehrlich, by the way, his co-author in all this stuff, has been an utter fanatic on DECIMATING the population. Paul Ehrlich’s wife helped write the books too and she was a member of the Club of Rome. You always find these clubs, the World Bank and all the other ones, tied in together because they ARE just ARMS of the same big octopus. That’s the music coming in and I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from CNSNews.com to do with the Club of Rome, John Holdren who is now advising Obama. It’s amazing how all these guys are now on the government level, all appointees as the science specialists to advise policy on all the sciences. By that they mean sustainability, depopulation, sterilization and all the rest of it. That literally IS the agenda. In Britain you have the Optimum Population Trust telling Mr Brown and before that Mr Blair what polices to put in there regarding population. To go on with this article, it says here…
The essay—“The Meaning of Sustainability: Biogeophysical Aspects”—was published in the first chapter of “Defining and Measuring Sustainability: The Biogeophysical Foundations,” a book published in 1995 by the World Bank. The book is available as a PDF on the World Bank’s Web site. (A: I’ll put the link up for the PDF at the end of the show on my web site along with all the links to all the other articles that I read tonight.)
“We know for certain, for example, that: No form of material growth (including population growth) other than asymptotic growth, is sustainable,” wrote Holdren and his co-authors. “Many of the practices inadequately supporting today’s population of 5.5 billion people are unsustainable; and [a]t the sustainability limit, there will be a tradeoff between population and energy-matter throughput per person, hence, ultimately, between economic activity per person and well-being per person.
Now as I say, again, remember, these characters had no problem going ahead with their agenda, quietly planning what they would do in a post World War II era. They kept quiet and to themselves because they NEEDED a large population of happy slaves that would go off and fight the wars for them, that helped to eventually unite Europe because, yep, that’s why Europe is united today. It was agreed to unite Europe under the Eisenhower Plan and the Lend-Lease Project. Then the Americas were eventually to be amalgamated afterwards as well and they would be the POLICEMAN OF THE WORLD. As we were doing that, we were to have the industry pulled from under our feet at home, so you get massive unemployment. Once you are finishing the job, both will really teeter off at the right time, we’ll be unsustainable and that way we can’t keep up the cost of troops abroad and at the same time, we can all go back to the caves back home. That’s really the plan while these big boys have their Super Cities built across the planet to sustain themselves in very high tech, highly weaponized, sustainable cities for the academic elite and the very wealthy families who fund them. And I’m not kidding about that.
“This is enough,” Holdren and his co-authors continue, “to say quite a lot about what needs to be faced up to eventually (a world of zero net physical growth), what should be done now (change unsustainable practices, reduce excessive material consumption, slow down population growth), and what the penalty will be for postponing attention to population limitation (lower well-being per person).”
You’d better tie this in with the dry quotes that the UN gives out every year, with their statistics because when they tell you that the Western males’ sperm count is down almost 85% now, and what’s left is immotile – that means it can’t find its target – they mean it. When they say they have to bring the populations down, if we won’t simply listen to them and say right daddy, then they make it happen. These guys work for monsters who are so rich they run the pharma industries, they run the military-industrial complex and they find ways to sterilize you.
If you wonder why the cancer rate has SKYROCKETED over the last 20 years, it’s because they’ve been tampering with your food for one thing, lacing it HEAVILY with cancer-producing toxins and pesticides. They’ve also been giving you SHOTS that are incredible. Even Dr Salk, this great hero that gave us the polio vaccine, before he was the hero for that he was one of the heads of the British and American EUGENICS movement. He wrote papers on the need to depopulate. Suddenly he comes out as the hero that gave us the polio vaccine and now it comes out that he had the Simian 40 virus in there which is actually a simian virus, a monkey virus. They grew the viruses on chimpanzee kidneys and he said the only function of this particular Simian 40 virus was to CAUSE CANCERS.
I say this and the people still really will throw it out of their heads because they can’t believe that people would actually go ahead and do this. What do you think all these BIG foundations and think tanks are doing all the time? What do you think the Department for Populations is doing at the United Nations? It’s actually Population Control. They don’t make wish lists and put it up the chimney to Santa. THEY MAKE IT HAPPEN. They find ways to make it happen and since the public are the target and the public have a natural sex drive, then it’s up to them, they believe it’s up to them to take care of it for us. And they have been doing it. They mean what they say. These guys now have their own men appointed to every government in the Western world. Read their books. Read what they’ve said before. Holdren literally would have been a great aide to Adolf Hitler or a Lenin or a Stalin. They are quite BLATANT about the methods that they would employ if they have to, which they have. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s hard for people to believe that such people exist at the top. They are very rich, powerful people. We have enough from the Rockefellers alone, just their foundation and there’s even videos up on YouTube and elsewhere with an aged Mr Rockefeller jet-setting across the world giving lectures about the need to drastically reduce the populations. He’s been doing this his whole life. His foundation founds THOUSANDS of other NGO groups, non-governmental organizations, which they use as a LAND ARMY, that’s what they call it, an EARTH ARMY. That was first mentioned out of NASA back in the 70s, that they would create an earth army and everyone wondered what it meant. It meant an environmentalist movement with thousands of branches all pushing to change the culture, which they’d planned in advance.
The Club of Rome is only one of the many premier think tanks that has a special purpose, a selective area that it works on. They have many, many more. The Club of Rome is interesting because they are interconnected with Greenpeace and the climate modelers, the IPCC, and so on and so on. Here are some quotes here from those who are bringing us into a sustainable future, to do with climate change and all the rest of it.
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” (A: The computer models they had specially made to give them the answers they want.)
– Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“The models are convenient fictions the provide something very useful.”
– Dr. David Frame, Climate Modeler, Oxford University.
“It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true.”
– Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace.
“Unless we announce disasters, no one will listen.”
– Sir John Houghton, First Chairman of the IPCC, United Nations
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony, climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
– Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment (A: The socialist.)
(A: And what did the Club of Rome say when they came up with the purpose, the means to unite the planet, when they were looking for it back in the 70s? From their own book, The First Global Revolution, this is what the founders came up with and this is what they wrote.
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.”
“All the dangers are caused by human intervention and it’s only through changed attitudes and behavior that these can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
– Alexander King, co-founder Club of Rome
(A: So they declared war of humanity. They themselves are above humanity, you understand. They are more evolved, obviously, as far as they themselves are concerned.
You know something? It doesn’t matter how much you tell people, they still can’t believe it IS happening. They still fall back into the daily newspapers that never mention the Club of Rome, they never mention the Council on Foreign Relations, they never mention the Royal Institute of International Affairs. They just tell you what your local politicians are all screaming about and keep you earth-bound, in a sense, on some little area while they rush on with these big, global treaties that they are always signing which become LAW; they are signed into law in your country and affect every single one of you. Quite amazing how it’s done isn’t it? Quite amazing how it’s done. The people will never, ever really catch on to it.
It’s coming out now about the flu jabs. Isn’t it great how the media keep quite through it, apart from creating the crisis and quoting all the doctors that were screaming murder, murder, the flu is coming, you’ve got to get the flu jab. And once it’s all over and it’s officially been announced that it’s over, by the way; I thought you’d like to know the official announcement was made, not that it was ever really there. This article is from the Mail Online.
£115m annual flu jab cost ‘may be a waste of money’
(A: Ha, after the fact! As they tell us all to tighten our belts and become sustainable and economically sustainable, the government throws the money at their big pals, 115 million POUNDS, annual flu jab may be a waste of money!)
Daily Mail / By Jenny Hope / 17th February 2010
(A: It goes through all the different studies and so on and so on and it says…)
The flu jab does not provide the expected health benefits to the elderly, new research shows. (A: It’s amazing how they get it out just after they’ve given it all to them.)
The researchers – whose findings are published today in The Cochrane Library – could identify only one ‘gold standard’ clinical trial where the results revealed if having a jab prevented an attack of the flu or mitigated complications.
The remainder looked at outcomes such as producing antibodies to flu viruses in the blood.
Lead researcher Dr Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration in Rome, Italy, said limited reliable evidence suggested flu vaccination has only ‘modest’ effectiveness. (A: Which means it’s pretty well useless.)
He said: ‘Our estimates are consistently below those usually quoted by economists and in decision making. (A: Meaning the PR guys and the salesmen that sell it to government.)
‘But until we have all available evidence, it is hard to reach any clear conclusions about the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in older people.
‘As the evidence is so scarce at the moment, we should be looking at other strategies to complement vaccinations. (A: So we get the vaccinations and something else along with it… as we are broke, the governments are all broke. That’s what they’re telling us. That’s why they have to put up taxes by 20% and all that kind of stuff. Quite something isn’t it?)
In a similar study in 2008, Dr Jefferson said there was little evidence to show the flu jab had any impact on the length of hospital stays, time off work and death rates in healthy adults. (A: In other words, it made no difference at all.)
In the most recent study, co-authored by Dr Jefferson, he looked at four trials on the efficacy of flu vaccines in healthcare staff who work with the elderly.
Researchers found the results were ‘inconclusive’ (A: The means it doesn’t work folks when they say ‘inconclusive’ because they’d find out if it was conclusive or not.), with each trial being of inadequate quality and reaching implausible conclusions so it was impossible to ascertain whether vaccinating workers cut deaths and prevented symptoms in people over 60.
Professor David Salisbury, director of immunisation for the Department of Health, said: ‘This review does not provide any new evidence. (A: Well, that’s odd because the same characters were telling us it was the greatest thing since sliced bread, it would save all our lives when they were selling the stuff to us and pushing it like drug pushers.)
The flu jab’s co-inventor, biochemist Graeme Laver, (A: I read that on the air, from Graeme Laver who invented the flu injection.) told the Daily Mail in 2007 that the jab did not guarantee protection.
Dr Laver, who died in 2008, said: ‘I have never been very impressed with its efficacy.
‘It is better than nothing and I wouldn’t want to advise people not to take it, but you can’t rely on it doing any good.’ [Alan laughing.] (A: This is from the INVENTOR.)
Did you hear any of that when they said, you’ve got to get it; it will save lives, and the governments were throwing billions of money, pounds and dollars, at these big pharma guys, the big fat boys? Well, what were they REALLY doing? Let’s stop for a minute. Is it just about money? Go back to the previous articles I read on DEPOPULATION and perhaps you should start – yeah – really, really start getting over that little hurdle that you don’t want to go over and say well maybe they are actually doing it. Maybe they are actually sterilizing you. Maybe they are ensuring you are going to have the cancers down the road. Do you know what they grow them on now? …your flu injections? FAST ACTING CANCERS! No kidding. They are called ‘the immortal cancers’ from one of the original people. They all took specimens from one woman way back in the 50s and they keep the cancer going in Petri dishes. Every lab across the planet has got samples of it. They say it’s the most aggressive cancer they’d ever seen. This is what they are using for fast breeding the viruses on and then they are injecting it into your veins after mushing it up in a blender. You’d better start thinking and putting things together for yourselves. You’d better… because no one else is going to do it for you. You are the one that’s going to say yes or no in the end. Con after con, eh?
Everybody knows about the stimulus packages that Obama… I hate even saying Obama because we know they are just front men for the boys we’ve been talking about already, the big foundations above them, the parallel government that Carroll Quigley called them. Stimulus packages, well, where are the jobs going for these stimulus packages? Here is an article from ABC News.
Food Stamps Create Jobs… in India
Several States With High Unemployment Are Outsourcing Food Stamp Services
By SCOTT MAYEROWITZ / ABC NEWS Business Unit / April 29, 2009
Michele Brown has seen Americans’ struggles with jobs first hand. She lives in hard-hit Florida, spent 20 years in the real estate business and recently had her days as a nanny cut back after her boss had his own hours reduced.
But nothing prepared her for what happened one day when she called a toll-free line to inquire about her food stamps.
“The woman who answered the phone — it’s not like she wasn’t nice or anything — but it was kind of evident that she wasn’t in the States,” Brown said. (A: Where did the jobs go for the stimulus packages, food stamps and all that, when they revamped it?)
It turns out the woman was at a JP Morgan Chase call center in India. (A: That’s where the money went!)
“That really put me over the edge,” said Brown, 52, of Jupiter, Fla. “It’s not right because we need the work here. People are in a bad way here.”
Americans have never liked the idea of jobs going overseas. But for many, it’s more offensive when taxpayer dollars — including those in the federal stimulus plan — go to create those jobs. And when those jobs deal with food stamps, unemployment insurance and other public benefits, well forgot irony, to many it’s just downright plain insulting. (A: Because they are putting all these utilities over there in India.)
Unemployment in Florida is now 9.7 percent.
“Why is the state of Florida sending these jobs away?” Brown asked. “The thing that really iced it for me, I knew that JP Morgan had gotten bailout funds.”
So she called her local politicians and then she reached out to her local newspaper, the Palm Beach Post. The paper did a story two weeks ago about the $50 million Florida paid JP Morgan in the last three years to administer the food stamps distribution. (A: And how did they do it? By getting cheap labor and setting up their centers in India.)
Those services include 24-hour customer-service call centers. Some of those calls were answered in Bangalore and Gurgaon, India. Others were taken at two U.S. call centers.
The next day the head of the state’s Department of Children and Families said something needed to change.
“I don’t want any calls going to India,” he said. “We need to take care of this.” (A: Then it goes on about the other companies that got bailout funds that also have organizations over in India. Did you know that the American Census data is all sorted out in India? Did you know that Canadians are the same and have been for 10 years? That’s where your taxes go, by the way, your income tax, the things that you file out and so on from America and in Canada. For 10 years they’ve been sent to India. That’s where they do them all. And you think you are still nations and that your governments are keeping privacy all to themselves. It’s safe with us, safe as houses.)
I’ll go to the phones and there is Dan from California there. Are you there Dan?
Dan: I’ve got a question. I don’t mean to divert from your usual topic here but I have a question about the movie Eyes Wide Shut. The name ‘Nightingale’ and the individual that leads the main character to the people that are performing this ritual at that big mansion house, is there anything regarding the name connecting to what he actually is doing? The gentleman named ‘Nightingale’ in that movie, does his name have any significance?’
Alan: A nightingale is a song bird. We used to get them in London especially. There is a song about it too, A Nightingale Sang in Barkley Square. It was a symbol of how sweetness can bring you into a bad situation because you could follow the sweetness. They also called the prostitutes at times nightingales because they’d sing out to the passers by and you could go into a back alley and get murdered by the gang that was waiting to get you.
Dan: I kind of knew it had to be attached to his name because he leads him to this place where they tell him, don’t put your nose in any deeper than you already are in or we warn you. That’s one question. I have another one, in his new book, Jacques Attali says that the brain chip or even any kind of chip, because America is so heavily Christian, that they will fight it. He actually says he doesn’t believe it will take in the Americas. What do you think about that?
Alan: They go after the majority. The majority are the youngsters. That’s who they go after. That’s why they are training… they’ve already trained the youngsters to WANT it. The movies they put out, Avatar, all this stuff, plug in, you’re all one. It’s the same with the Matrix movies, you plug in and all be one. So it’s already there with the youngsters. They’ve had heavy conditioning towards the acceptance of all this kind of stuff. It’s going to be made to be FUN. That’s how they’ll see it, as being FUN. What they won’t tell them is that once you’re plugged in your brain is no longer yours. Whoever programs that whole system is in control of you. You are the Borg. The Christians, you’ve got to remember, every group has its appointed leader, the false shepherd. I can remember when Billy Graham, telling them that even the barcode and so on was not the mark of the beast, etc. If Christians have to go to a leader to ask if this is the mark of the beast, I think they’ve had it anyway. They should decide for themselves individually. Individual ones certainly won’t take it but others that are more middle class and want to go along with the rest and use it like a social club really, they’ll go for it as well because they won’t want to be ‘left behind,’ as they say.
Dan: Yeah. The terminology that they used, do you think they are too emasculated to even try to even stop it? I mean, I’m not looking for the Christians to stop it because it’s within each of us to say no. They are hoping but then again, they are kind of hoping for something to happen in the end for them, you know. It’s kind of sad.
Alan: What they do though, how they do these things is interesting. They don’t just pass a law and say, you must. What they generally do is put something in there, start withdrawing all the alternatives to that until you can’t get anything done. You can’t buy; you can’t sell unless you’ve got it. So literally that’s how they can do it. They won’t say no, we’re making you take this. You’ll have options available around you for a certain amount of time until they take away, gradually, those options. Then simply to survive you’re going to have to go along and take the chip. It’s up you. Personally I’d find other ways to survive.
Dan: Jacques Attali also talks about Hollywood and how it’s going to be hyper; it’s going to be like Super Hollywood.
Alan: It already is. All over the world, it’s the biggest export of the US, apart from missiles and bombs and armies. It’s the biggest export, literally movies from Hollywood.
Dan: Thanks for your time, Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling. I’ll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ve got another caller there, Kevin from Ontario, are you there Kevin?
Kevin: No, I’m not all there but I’m still here.
Alan: That’s good enough for me.
Kevin: You know, one thing I’ve been following and it’s one thing that these elitists love to use especially to get control of the people. They love using false flag terror. They use it all the time and it’s not just bombs going off either. They’ll use viruses. They’ll use attacks on Presidents and attacks on politicians and all this stuff. There are a few people out there that have been saying that we are RIPE for another false flag and I don’t think we here in Canada are going to be immune to it either, especially if you’ve been following Mark Steinbaugh and his constantly updated warning signs what might be going down in Vancouver.
Alan: I’m not so worried about Vancouver but I do know that 2010, and I’ve got an article here about it, where the Mexican, the top vice President of Mexico has come out and again talked about the complete North American Union. You know yourself they started this openly in 2005, signing every year with the present Prime Minister. 2010 is the last signatory on it and then we’re supposed to be integrated completely with the US. They already have done it with the intelligence, a lot of taxation, customs and so on; even the bureaucrats in Ottawa can get jobs equivalent to theirs in Washington DC now and vice versa and it’s been like that for a few years. So they need something now to happen to then further the integration quickly into the North American alliance. They admitted themselves and it was in the papers at the time in Canada, remember, when they called it Fortress America. This is speeding up the process of integration, our natural combined security works with each other, so we have to integrate all the faster. Then you had the economic crash which helped it again. The CFR came out and said yeah, this is going to help us integrate quicker, but we need something else to happen and then it’s DONE basically. So something this year will probably happen. Again, it might be another economic crash, part 2, something like that.
Kevin: I think we are going to see a bunch of different things happening at once, just by looking at it. The warning signs about Vancouver, I honestly think, I don’t want anything to happen to Vancouver but the warning signs are just getting too much to just ignore. Also, when I questioned the commander Alexander Grant about the American militarization of the Northwest Passage, I asked him, is that all part of the combining of our military for the North American union and to use the protection against Russia and Iran AS a pretext for all of this stuff. He didn’t like that question.
Alan: No he wouldn’t. He wouldn’t, but again, if you go back into the Globe and Mail 2005 and read the article called…
‘Fortress America’ sparks new fears
Critics fear loss of resource control
TIM HARPER / WASHINGTON BUREAU / Mar. 15, 2005
There are 2 whole pages on it there. The total integration of the Americas, combine security completely, eventually integrated military. They already had by then integrated the Canadian intelligence services with the FBI, CIA and all the rest of it. So, we’re pretty well there now. It’s a gradual process. 2010 was definitely their mandate. That vice President of Mexico actually said that too, that 2010 was their mandate for it. That’s what they’d hoped for. That’s what they shot for in the first place. Thanks for calling.
That’s the music coming in for tonight. It’s been a very fast show as always, there is so much to say and never the time to say it all. I’ll put these links up on my sites, go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 18th 2010. For the newcomers out there and there are always new ones coming in, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have up there. That way if you ever find sticking on downloading, try these alternate sites and you should get through much easier. Everyone uses the .com site the following morning after the talk has been broadcast and apart from that sometimes I can’t upload to the main sites because even though I’m on unlimited disk space, somehow they don’t always get it automatically put up when it has to. The official sites are [listed above].
The quick tin can moment is when I rattle that tin can there. You don’t hear anything because there is nothing in it. But it’s up to you to keep me going because I’m probably the only host who does not front, in a sense, for advertising companies who generally sponsor you. They pay you directly if you mention who they are or bring them on as guests. Other ones are just financed by even bookselling clubs and some stuff like that. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and seeing what I have for sale – the books, CDs and DVDs – or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Those who get the disks burned and passed to them at meetings – who shy away from computers because they’ve got common sense – and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
A while ago I said it doesn’t matter when the big boys make their decisions for their long-term plans, their far-reaching plans… it doesn’t matter what happens, they carry on regardless. I said before too, it wouldn’t matter if you are up to your ears in snow, they’ll still harp on about global warming. If you notice in the news articles that are sneaking out, amongst all the incredible scandals that are bursting about the climate change nonsense, they are still prattling on because they have no other big plan made. This is all part of population reduction, altering our way of living until we are ALL third world country status, taking away Medicare, all that kind of stuff, gradually, across the world, for those who are in the masses, and sickness and death, disease and famine even will start killing us off. It’s a FAR-reaching plan because that’s what the socialists dreamed up when they first set up the Fabian Society. Look into it. Listen to the speeches by George Bernard Shaw, the co-founder of the Fabian Society. Remember, that’s just ONE BRANCH of the Royal Institute for International Affairs. It’s fascinating study when you get into it. The music is coming in so I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and what a matrix it is, isn’t it, as we are given our realities and our perceptions are distorted and altered and directed for us. The big boys make long-term plans, long-term goals, 50 years, sometimes 100 year plans. The Fabians themselves said it might take them 100 years to control the world through their international affiliations. Well, we’re pretty well there. You’ll find every government across the planet seems to be Fabian, regardless of the party symbol they use because the same plans are put into place through treaties, through the United Nations, exactly as the Fabians and the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR wanted to happen. That’s why they set up the United Nations in the first place, not as a debating table but as the embryo really that would grow into a world governing body.
The IPCC, this Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the United Nations has, has really been exposed. It’s incredible they’re still there. They should be disbanded. It’s disgusting the lies they’ve told and have been exposed for telling, and all the cohorts they had from the professors across the world who were getting millions of pounds and dollars and grants thrown at them to “save the world.” That’s what you do to priests who terrify you and say the sun won’t come up tomorrow, you’ve got pay them and they’ll pray and do their voodoo and then voila, up it comes. It’s the same sort of idea.
This article is one of the latest scandals and it’s from Fox News.
The Next Climate-gate?
Updated February 10, 2010 / By John Lott – FOXNews.com
(Alan: It’s interesting how they first preface this. It’s misleading. They GIVE you how you are going to think about something and they leave you in a double-think. So this first little paragraph is to leave you in double-think.)
A new report points to a sharp reduction of weather stations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (A: That’s NOAA, they call it.) in cooler locations around the world since 1990. (A: So they’ve been closing down these weather stations in cooler parts around the world since 1990. Now, listen to what they say…) Could that be why global temps have seen a steady rise over the last 20 years? (A: In other words, there hasn’t been a steady rise, if you understand what I’m saying. When you close down all of these different stations, across Russia alone after the Soviet Union fell apart, or was dismantled, I think there were over 1,000 of them that were closed down, all across Siberia and everything. That wasn’t taken into consideration for the real temperature of the world, you see. He goes on to say here…)
The global warming scandal keeps getting worse. Revelations over the few weeks show that many important assertions in the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were based on misquotes and false claims from environmental groups, not on published academic research as it was originally presented. This is on top of the recent mess regarding data, where the three most relied-on data series used by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007 assessment report still have not been released. Other data simply never seem to have existed or cannot be provided to other scientists.
But probably the most damaging report has come from Joseph D’Aleo, the first Director of Meteorology and co-founder of the Weather Channel, and Anthony Watts, a meteorologist and founder of SurfaceStations.org.
In a January 29 report, they find that starting in 1990, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) began systematically eliminating climate measuring stations in cooler locations around the world. Yes, that’s right. They began eliminating stations that tended to record cooler temperatures and drove up the average measured temperature. The eliminated stations had been in higher latitudes and altitudes, inland areas away from the sea, as well as more rural locations. The drop in the number of weather stations was dramatic, declining from more than 6,000 stations (A: See how they fiddle everything.) to fewer than 1,500.
D’Aleo and Watts show that the jumps in measured global temperature occur just when the number of weather stations is cut. But there is another bias that this change to more urban stations also exacerbates. Recorded temperatures in more urban areas rise over time simply because more densely populated areas produce more heat. Combining the greater share of weather stations in more urban areas over time with this urban heat effect also tends to increase the rate that recorded temperatures tend to rise over time. (A: They were eliminating them across fields and forests and stuff like that, or hillsides and putting them in the cemented, concrete jungles of the cities. So of course they got what they expected to get.)
Their report provides examples of how the systematic elimination of stations and unexplained adjustments in temperature data caused measured temperatures to rise for Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. Many adjustments change what would have been a drop in temperatures into an increase. (A: So they reversed the reality.) Take New Zealand, where D’Aleo and Watts note: “About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming.”
D’Aleo and Watts also criticize how these data adjustments are often unexplained or poorly documented. In one case involving James Hansen at NASA a Freedom of Information Act request has been unanswered for over two years.
The report details other fascinating temperature biases. For example, Siberia has experienced one the greatest increases in recorded warming. A large drop in the number of stations and the some missing data can explain part of the change, but apparently during the Soviet-era areas with lower recorded temperatures received more fuel and money, creating a real incentive for weather stations to lie.
The D’Aleo and Watts’ report also helps answer some puzzling questions about the report. One of the major ones questions has been the divergence in temperature data recorded by satellites in space and down here on the ground. That difference was very small when satellites first started being used during the 1980s but has grown over time, with ground observations showing a rise in temperature relative to the satellite data. The urban warming effect may not only explain this, but also why land warming has been so much greater than ocean warming.
All three terrestrial global-temperature datasets (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/ National Climatic Data Center, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and University of East Anglia) really rely on the same measures of surface temperatures. These three sources do not provide independent measures of how the world’s temperatures have changed over time. The relatively small differences that do arise from these three institutions result from how they adjust the raw data. (A: And by God, do they do some adjusting, and fiddling, and exaggerating as well.)
Flawed data leads to flawed conclusions.
But, it’s in line with the agenda and it really won’t matter much because all the socialists are truly on board, across the world, and they’ve got their governments to sign on and be goody-two-shoes to outdo each other to show they’re all on board to save the world and all the rest of it. Apart from that, about 5-6 years ago they were already trading carbon. It’s a done deal with the multi trillionaires that run the world and so they’ve already got this carbon thing. I call it the ‘sin taxes’ because it’s like collecting sacks of sins. You open it up and there is nothing in it, but that’s how it is. It’s absolute nonsense. It will take something like oil or the manufacturing of something and we can convert that into carbon that was used to create it and they make this GUESSTIMATION, big guesstimations, then they come up with, really, what the carbon output would be if you burned it, which you are not going to do. It’s an absolute BOGUS SCAM but it’s this scam that all the big boys have planned to rule our lives with. Really. They don’t even need the sacks to gather the sins, you know, the CO2. They just have to claim it’s there and work it out on paper, or build a special computer that you feed in fake data, just like they do at the IPCC, and you’ll get what you want. It’s great. There is no outlay. There’s no outlay, you don’t have to buy the sacks to contain the CO2 that you can’t see. When you fold them up anyway there’s nothing in it right. But that’s the cons that go on in the world and this is to rule our lives.
There are articles coming out now on climate change and how they are going to have to put it through and some governments are already doing it, with the far, far, left – left of Marx in fact – politicians that are on board. I’ll put a link up on my web sites to show you the one that’s been introduced for Ireland to sign. It’s a voluntary thing but it’s totalitarian. It was done on the 28th of October 2009.
Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate Change and Energy Security
Climate Change law necessary for Ireland to demonstrate its commitment to become low carbon economy
Oireachtas.com / 28 October 2009
That will give you an idea of what’s to come here including the setting up of law forces to enforce it on the ordinary people who are not IN the carbon trading business. In other words, punishment crews. They’re going to rake in lots of money off you if there’s a little draft coming through your window, believe you me. This is a whole new area of infringement of your rights and lack of privacy and all the rest of it. And they’re going to give themselves, of course, more rights to come into your home because they’ve been teaching us for years now that’s it’s not yours anyway. You have no privacy and you don’t DESERVE privacy. Privacy is a sort of privilege, if you obey all the laws, pay all the fees and licenses and all the rest of it, and let every agency come into your home when you demand it. This is the Fabian way and I kid you not. I kid you not, that’s what it is.
Politicians are just low-level psychopaths that are picked by the big boys to front for them. They get funded IN to government. I watched one on Cameron recently, for Britain, who was pretending he was a conservative, going around getting fund raising from EVERYBODY you can imagine, even from Israel, the Israel lobby. He’s promising them everything if they just back him financially. Every group that’s out there, he’s saying, I’m your man; I’m YOUR man. The left are even worse. The program I watched – it was a disk that was sent to me – showed you the different politicians and the Labour bunch going around doing the same thing. They’re just low-level con men that will say whatever they are told to say to get IN to power and have a good time. That’s how they are, low-level psychopaths; but they don’t run the world, the ones above them do. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, these politicians that are SELECTED are just yes-men to whoever backs them and they’ve got terrible records in their personal lives when you look into them, of how many of them are on charges for one thing or another, lots of drunk driving charges, personal bankruptcies, credit cards run to the limit and over, all that kind of stuff. These are the guys who generally get into politics. The psychopaths smell which way the wind is blowing basically, and they suddenly become an advocate of whatever is popular. They are so immature; I think it’s because of all the booze they take all the time, at least the British Parliament. Here is an article to do with what they are all about.
Ministers (A: That’s politicians. They call them ministers over there.) lavished £9m (A: Of the taxpayer money, right.) on climate change stunts… but public opinion is left cold by global warming ‘propaganda’
By Steve Doughty / 18th February 2010 / Mail Online
A disastrous series of failed climate change publicity stunts cost taxpayers £9million, it emerged yesterday.
The projects paid for by the Government’s Climate Challenge Fund did next to nothing to change public opinion, a Whitehall report found.
It said the initiatives were almost entirely preaching to the converted and that trying to drum up interest through sensationalism only put people off.
Schemes included a £40,000 DVD (A: That’s quite a lot. You can make a hit record with that.) in which schoolchildren explained that in ten years everyone will have to wear sunglasses all the time, because the sun will be shining more. (A: These are the kind of stupid things they do.)
A tent set up in shopping centres and labelled an ‘experiential climate dome’ was subsidised by Whitehall (A: That’s the taxpayers’ money again.) to the tune of nearly £400,000; a computer game cost £47 every time it was played; and a series of ‘ challenging pub quizzes’ about climate change cost more than £85,000.
Large grants went to councils, schools and youth groups for (A: Listen to this…) ‘attitude modification’ programmes and to assure the public that man-made global warming is an established scientific fact. (A: So, once you brainwash the children, they don’t have much of a chance to be honest with you because it’s a real indoctrination they get and lies. Quite interesting, ‘attitude modification’ programs, did you think that’s what your schools were about? Pavlov is alive and well!)
And £200,000 went to Oxford University to ‘take climate change into the community’. (A: To get it into the community, with little posters and little handouts and stuff. £200,000, that’s not bad work if you can get it, eh?)
Details of the projects and the report for Ed Miliband’s Department of Energy and Climate Change – which was never published – were unearthed by the TaxPayers’ Alliance through Freedom of Information requests.
Matthew Sinclair, the group’s research director, said: ‘The Government has clearly crossed the line from public information to propaganda on climate change.
‘Many of the Climate Challenge Fund projects are utterly bonkers (A: That means crazy.) and misleading, and come with a huge price tag.
‘Despite a fortune having been spent on these projects, the fund has failed even on its own spuripeopleous terms. It is infuriating for taxpayers to see their money squandered on attempts to scare and indoctrinate the public.’
The report by consultants Brook Lyndhurst said the projects largely failed to produce any changes in the opinions among their target audiences. It judged that ‘the aggregate picture is one of neutral or very modest positive shifts’.
Future programmes should ‘avoid sensationalist or shocking imagery in climate change messages, since respondents are likely to find this off-putting’, it said.
The report added that those attracted to the projects were ‘already interested in climate change’. (A: Meaning they’re already brainwashed.) It suggested that in many cases organisations viewed the funding as ‘a way to secure additional resources’ (A: Of course they do.), and said the running the projects often did not have ‘necessary skills’. (A: Of course they won’t. What do you need to lie? What skills does it take?)
The money was paid to public organisations and voluntary groups between 2006 and 2008.
Details emerged after several other high-profile climate change failures in recent months.
The Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (A: Which were getting millions of pounds in grants.), which received £16,000 from the Climate Challenge Fund (A: …as well, on top of that.), has come under fire over leaked emails which show scientists attempted to hide data from sceptics. (A: Professor Jones himself already admitted, and I read it yesterday from the paper, that the earth has actually been COOLING. And he goes for 15 years; he won’t go for 20 yet, but he’s getting better than he was.)
And the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been found to have made exaggerated and ill-informed claims, for example over the rate at which Himalayan glaciers are melting. Its chief, Rajendra Pachauri, has faced calls to resign. (A: But he’s too busy writing his pornographic novels. That’s a fact; that’s what he does to pass the time. Delusions of grandeur, isn’t it? Power goes to their little heads.)
There’s a caller from Alaska and it’s John. Are you there John?
John: How are you today?
Alan: I’m hanging on here.
John: I’ve heard you mention on a previous show on how they are creating this world culture that’s world government indoctrination and they are pushing it through schools.
Alan: Hold on and we’ll come back on that topic after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to John from Alaska about the school system. Carry on, John.
John: My journey to awakening to how they’ve been trying to create this world culture, I’ve come across UNESCO, its Purpose and its Philosophy written by Julian Huxley. I’m sure you are probably familiar with that.
Alan: I’ve read some of his stuff on the air, in fact, from his books.
John: Okay. Of course, you can get this for free online, if any of your listeners would like to look through this. Would you mind if I read a few of the quotes?
Alan: Sure, go ahead.
John: Okay. On page 57 it says here,
Not much remains to be said in conclusion, but what remains is important. It is that the task before UNESCO is necessary, is opportune, and, in spite of all multiplicity of detail, is single. That task is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose.
On page 13 he says,
The moral for UNESCO is clear. The task laid upon it of promoting peace and security can never be wholly realised through the means assigned to it-education, science and culture. It must envisage some form of world political unity, whether through a single world government or otherwise; & the only certain means for avoiding war.
Let me see, in closing here he has in interesting reference – this is on page 21 – to eugenics and how they were going to push eugenics through UNESCO. It says,
Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.
Alan: That’s right. What he was talking about there was terminating children, sterilizing the ones that they would claim were inferior. Remember too, UNESCO is the United Nations, again, Educational and Scientific organization. He was the first CEO for it. He was also the top character who helped run the Margaret Sanger abortion clinics across the world. He was all for reducing the inferior quality type of peoples. Carry on.
John: Yes. UNESCO was also investigated in California for being charged with pushing internationalism. A lot of people aren’t aware of that. There’s the United Nations right there pushing internationalism and world government and a world culture. From what I’ve seen Alan, it seems like they are pushing this hip-hop style culture on the entire planet. I’m up here in Alaska and when I got here I was astonished to see the Native Americans here with the sagging pants and the wild music and things like that. I figured I was getting away from that. But it seems like they are pushing that on the entire planet and they are using that to dumb down the language. They are using that to also break down the family.
Alan: There is no doubt about it. The content of the wording, when you can make out what the words are, what they are actually saying, or mumbling I should say… that’s intentional too. The parents, they close their heads off, they don’t listen, they can’t hear it. It’s intentional for the children to understand it and it’s to bypass the parents. If the parents knew some of the stuff they are actually chanting away there, it’s pretty grotesque stuff, you know.
John: Exactly. I just want to thank you for making me aware of how they push these things, the entertainment and things like that. You know, the entertainment is, like you say, it’s over a lot of people’s heads. It’s kind of under the radar and a lot of people don’t realize that they are BEING programmed, under the threshold of consciousness through the entertainment.
Alan: Absolutely.
John: It’s just amazing when you look into the little messages that they implant in this entertainment. I’ve put together a little forum. The address is thcforum.ning.com. We’ve just been trying to analyze this disgusting culture they are hitting us with. This entertainment, this music, it’s very sinister what they are pushing.
Alan: The thing is too, they really did come out in the culture industry and those at the top who control the culture industry – and it is controlled and it’s directed – as to where they were going to take it. Linguistic minimalism was one of their goals. This is from the big scientists at the top, they said, if we can reduce the vocabulary then eventually they will be unable to even exchange opinions or ideas and they would be obedient. Because if they were angry – you couldn’t get people stirred up to rebel or whatever – because you literally couldn’t express your feelings to them. That’s part of it. The other part was also to create a common culture, a youth culture that would be so separate, so different from their parents that they would be in complete control of those who led them through the culture industry and the educational authorities. This is not just happenstance.
Back in the 60s you had a variety of music to choose from. Varieties. You had all kinds of folk, traditional, old stuff, new stuff, you had classical playing too. You had jazz. You had the early pop music and so on. Gradually they eliminated everything until there is just THIS way and that’s Much-Music’s TV and that’s ALL you get now across the whole planet. It’s even in Africa; you’ll see the guys in Africa – they don’t even have shoes – but they’ve got the hat on backwards and they’ll try to even make their own baggy pants. Because everyone wants to be the same, as what they see as these stars. I’ve talked to a lot of the guys in the rap industry and some of them actually admitted to me that they go into the studio with a plain little kind of song and in would come the big boys and start changing this, changing that, until they are killing cops… It’s all about – I can’t even say – having relations with women any more; it’s beyond that. It’s what DOGS do in heat. They just use the words for it now and the parents can’t even hear this stuff. They don’t understand what the words are. It literally is debasing, debasing humans, both male and female, down to a lower status than animals. Animal breed when they have to. This is literally, it’s like teaching them to have a rutting season perpetually.
John: I don’t know if you heard, but one of the forerunners in the hip-hop community, his name is KRS-One and he’s actually what you could call a sort of a darling in the alternative news circuit. He’s actually created what’s called ‘The gospel of hip-hop.’ He said that hip-hop is actually divine. What he is doing, he’s released this sort of Bible and he’s actually turning hip-hop into a religion.
Alan: Well, he won’t be just the one that’s doing it. There will be bigger boys than him. All these guys at the bottom are puppets you know. They do as they are told, guided, directed. But the whole idea of just have sex at all time with anybody, blah, blah, blah, was to stop bonding because they don’t want people breeding and having families. That was what Julian Huxley at UNESCO himself said. He said that in that book you are reading, in fact. He said, we’ll find so many ways of contraceptives. We’ll alter the family way of life until there is no family at all. He says, the people could be living in very poor conditions, world wide, but at least they can have sex all day and all night long with no consequences, no offspring. That was the main thrust of it, but no bonding.
John: There isn’t… and you can chalk a lot of it up to also our dependence on the nanny state. I’m a black man and it’s sad what they’ve done to the black community and what we’ve allowed to be done to ourselves through this dependence on the nanny state. What they do is they offer them these child support, welfare benefits, and such. But what they do is they encourage the man not to be in the house. And with the child support, the government garnishes his checks. They take half of the money out of what the woman gets in the form of child support for themselves.
Alan: That’s right. See, they use those communities. First you make them dependent on the social service division. They have total control over you then. They love this. It’s a test group, you understand. It’s a test group and what works with one group will work with any group. They did a lot of experimentation in those communities once they have them dependent. You’re quite right.
John: So, the man is like well, is she trying to sleep with me so she can get child support money? Then the woman is like, well, is he just trying to sleep with me because he’s trying to be some rapper or something like that. You have these two people who are suspicious of each other and the family is going to break down before it even starts.
Alan: You’re right. That was the full intention of it. They’ve been awfully successful across the board. Very few people know how to bond anymore. And the next generation growing up, that are maybe 12 right now, are going to be worse because they’ve had far more scientific indoctrination. They think nothing of oral sex, when you look at all the studies in the newspapers and from the schools themselves. The teachers are even saying they come back on a Monday and they were used to how they used to chat about what they’d done. The children are all literally chatting, 12 year olds, of the partners that they had sexually. That’s standard now. However, they’ll never bond with anybody for their lives and THAT’S exactly why they introduced this kind of system.
John: Exactly. And people ask where the cervical cancer is coming from. When you actually look into it, where the cervical cancer is coming from, a lot of it is actually caused by chemicals in the condoms.
Alan: And also various anti-spermicides they are using as well.
John: Exactly. That’s what really blows your mind when you look into this because a lot of it just goes back to problem-reaction-solution and things like that, that the medical industry, the FDA, is profiting off of. The culture creationists themselves, they are profiting from this breakdown of the family.
Alan: You understand that this is literally is a SCIENTIFIC and it’s a MILITARY strategy plan to destroy all that was to bring in the new. That’s what they said themselves. The main target was to stop all bonding. Stop all bonding; create incredible promiscuity until no one is happy with anyone else except for one-night stands. Then there would be no offspring and plus it destroys the culture that held people together. There is strength in numbers. There is strength in the family. Even one person, just one person, your wife with you, gives you that extra strength in you with her. When you have nobody to stand up for you, the government then is in charge of you with all of its fear tactics.
John: Yep. Alan, I appreciate it. Thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Here’s a quote from Zbigniew Brzezinski and it’s from his book, Out of Control, Global Turmoil on the Eve of the 21st Century. He says, Television gives the young viewer a first glimpse of the outside world. It first defines and does so compellingly by combining the visual and audio impact, the meaning of the good life. In other words, it gives you FANTASY to follow. That’s all they see is these guys that have got diamonds and gold bracelets dangling off them. That’s wealth, eh? It sets the standard of what is to be considered achievement, fulfillment, good taste and proper conduct. Now, proper conduct can be debauchery nowadays; they’ve reversed it. It conditions desires… If you get nothing but girls dancing on TV that look like strippers, that’s what it’s intention is, if you are so dumb you don’t know that. That’s to stimulate desire and make you rather disgruntled with the person you are living with, your wife. It defines aspirations and expectations and draws the line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. With audiences around the world increasingly glued to television sets, there is nothing comparable either in the era of enforced religious orthodoxy or even at the high point of totalitarian indoctrination to the cultural and philosophical conditioning that television exercises on its viewers. Now, he’s a guy who should know. That was part of his job, was how to control the minds of millions of people and create this planned future that we are now in today.
It isn’t just that. You’ve got to understand, they go further in some countries than others. Britain is the spearhead for the rest of the world to follow. People are FLEEING Britain now. I read the report recently about a Scottish couple that had to FLEE to Ireland because the Child Services wanted to take her child from her. This is all part of the depopulation program, by the way. That was to raise up the so-called SERVICES into AUTHORITIES over the family and split up families until people wouldn’t want a family. They would be scared to have one. This article is from the Mail Online with another case.
Pregnant Briton who fled to Spain to prevent social services taking child, gives birth to son (A: while in Spain.)
By Andrew Levy / 18th February 2010 / Mail Online
A pregnant British woman who fled abroad to avoid her child being taken into care by social services was recovering last night after giving birth to a son.
The woman and her fiance secretly moved to Spain in December after their first child, a daughter, was taken away by social workers and put up for adoption. (A: There are your choices in a totalitarian state. Family is bad, family is bad, family is bad… that’s the message.)
Their case has been taken up by Tory MP Tim Yeo who accused Suffolk County Council of ‘child kidnap’ because the couple were declared unfit parents despite no evidence they would cause the girl physical or emotional abuse. (A: What do they mean by FIT? This is EUGENICS, folks. This is the terminology they use with eugenics.)
The mother originally came to the attention of social workers after her former husband successfully fought for custody of a son they had together. Mr Yeo said ‘spurious’ concerns had been concocted about her parenting skills. (A: ‘Spurious,’ that’s what they make up during lawsuits in court. Their lawyers tell them to lie.)
Speaking exclusively to the Daily Mail yesterday the couple – who cannot be identified for legal reasons but are referred to as Carissa and Jim – said their happiness at the birth in a hospital on the Costa Brava was tinged with sadness by being separated from their daughter.
Lorry driver (A: Truck driver.) Jim, 41, said: ‘We are over the moon about our son but it’s impossible to forget how these people have ruined our lives.
‘Throughout this process we have been thinking about how our daughter should have been with us to share our joy. (A: Before the authorities kidnapped the daughter.) Instead, we lost her and then had to escape here with hardly any money in our pockets.’
Mr Yeo used Parliamentary privilege in November to raise the issue at the House of Commons and accuse the council of ‘actively seeking opportunities to remove babies from their mothers’. (A: Back with more after this break.)
HI folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Just to end that article, it mentions that…
Carissa’s first child, he said, was taken away after her ex-husband’s girlfriend, who works for Essex Social Services, contacted a friend in Suffolk Social Services. (A: So you understand, they set it up through this little mafia, the social services organizations. That’s how they do each other favors. Quite amazing.)
Alan: There’s another caller on the line. That’s Dave from Arizona. Are you there Dave?
Dave: Just to continue and go along that line of predictive programming. There is something I’ve noticed. In the last, say the last 8 years, the horror genre is one of my favorite genres growing up. It’s just like the movies now and I’m talking about movies like Hustle and Saw are just garbage. They are just junk. You can tell that basically it’s just to remove humanity. It’s very impersonal. It’s not like a shark or it’s not like something from outer space. It’s like movies that highlight people who are sadistic and they like to torture and they like to murder.
Alan: You’re right. You see, the ones at the top who run the world, the psychopaths, they are deviant and they are sado-masochists and all power structures you find, really, are formed after the sado-masochistic tendencies. You find this with those who worshipped Lenin and still do. Those who worshipped Stalin, a guy who killed everyone close to him, people literally worshipped him. The people who worshipped Adolf Hitler, his close officers around about him, even at the trails and so on, had absolute glorification for him. Here is the thing with sado-masochists, they worship the one with more power above them but they hate and despise the weaker one beneath them, of a lower rank. The culture industry today is FULL, absolutely full of sado-masochism. Absolutely, you’re right.
Dave: Two more examples and I didn’t see this movie but I’ve seen this highlight. I mean, you couldn’t pay me to see this movie. There is a movie called Inglorious Bastards. They actually show some buy beating some guy’s brains out. You’ve got to ask yourself Alan, why exactly, why do we need to see that?
Alan: You know why you are seeing that? Because it’s a process of desensitization and the devaluation of human life and so are all those CSI programs on TV. Here’s another ‘stiff’ in and they start ripping the body apart like it was just a pound of meat, it’s not a person. You are being DESENSITIZED constantly, constantly, constantly… right down to our relationships between male and female. That’s been the biggest war of all. They can’t bond anymore. All the male is and all the female is, are sexual objects and they will discuss how good it was in the sack that night. That’s all it’s about today, not bonding at all. If bonding comes along, there is a power there with the two of them and then you have offspring. They DO NOT WANT OFFSPRING but they DO want us desensitized. That way too, when the big trouble starts and the riots start and you go through periods of chaos, when you see the brains at the side of the road that the cops just bashed out of somebody, it won’t effect you quite as much and you’ll go along like a robot and pass them by.
Dave: Right because it looks like the Western society is now a male-hating society.
Alan: It is absolutely a male-hating society. The main target was against the male. They’ve been very successful about it. Guys today don’t know what they really, truly are anymore. They can’t be a man anymore; they can’t stand up even for their wives sometimes.
Dave: Thanks a lot Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Sad but true; but this war has been long and vicious, subtle and scientifically organized and pushed from the top down, as always. We’ve got to fight back… it’s worth it.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 19th 2010. I always suggest that newcomers should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, bookmark all the other sites I have listed on that front page for future use because sometimes the big servers do go down and if you have them bookmarked you can still pull down the latest shows for free. The official sites I have are [listed above]. Remember too, how talk shows generally work is that the hosts are paid directly, often, by the advertisers. That means you’ve got to push advertising and so on and bring on guests, etc. There is very good money it in, however, I don’t do it that way. The ads you hear on this show go straight to RBN to broadcast this show. It pays for their air time, staff, equipment, and their bills. So it’s up to you, the audience, to help support me and keep me going. Lots of folk have tried this in the past and they’ve always plummeted because generally the public expect everything for free. That’s why all the biggies are out there and giving you it for free. It’s to get you used to the idea; it never occurs to you, you get a lot of false information in between as well. So, support me and you can do so by buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or you can donate to me; they are all listed on cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I read articles recently about data and how they know at the top that we are so overloaded with data today that it actually makes things EASIER, from the top, to control the public. We are so easily diverted from SO many different articles being released, across the whole planet now, at once, that we can’t really focus on any one particular thing. Plus, in between that, we have so much entertainment mixed up so that everything becomes kind of surrealistic and nothing is really real anymore. You don’t want to do anything about anything in a major way, become involved, because everything is so surrealistic. And because people like me are talking about things that really matter, it doesn’t mean you will act on them, unfortunately. It takes INVOLVEMENT from everybody, right down to the individual. It’s the individual that changes things. The groups, forget it. You give up your own brain when you join a group. Even if you start off with the best of intentions, it WILL be infiltrated immediately, within a few weeks, and steered off in some other direction or some topic that will grossly involve people and they will forget what the original intentions were. That’s the music coming so I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how we get overwhelmed with data. Data doesn’t have to be true or false or even neutral. It’s just data. It’s bits and bytes that we get downloaded with all the time and we parrot it generally in conversations for a day and then it’s forgotten because then the next day you are downloaded with more data.
If you notice today, everything is from ALL over the world. All over the world, which is also a technique in itself because in the old days they used to talk about how news was so localized, they’d keep you wrapped in your own national cocoon. Unless you had shortwave radio and you could listen to other countries, you didn’t really know what was going on. It was only those people who were interested in what was going on outside that had short wave radios. Today everyone is on the internet and we have an explosion of information from all over the planet. So much of it really is outside of any of our controls, basically. It’s too far away and what can you do? …and a lot of it is trivia as well, lots and lots and lots of trivia. Often funny little kinds of trivia or kind of fascinating bits but, again, soon forgotten as your memory becomes overloaded and you start deleting the last lot. FFFlllit… just gone, making room for the new.
We forget this is also a technique that’s used by those who still control the nations. They don’t want you concentrating on what’s happening back home. They keep saying we’re global, we’re global, we’re global… unless they want a war and suddenly they wave the flag and you’re national again to get the recruits in. Then you’re back to being global again. Just like the UN soldiers that are comprised of NATO and all the other countries, they wear the little green and black berets and red berets when they’re national, then they put on a blue one when they become UN for a few weeks, then back to the green one again. It’s such a joke really, when you really sit back and just look at the world and the way things are run.
Everybody runs to their own conditioning. The groups that you belong to will have its rules and regulations. It’s like the old churches; you left your brain at the door when you walked through. That’s what a lot of them demanded unfortunately. That’s also the reason a lot of them went down the tubes. You are supposed to use your brain to think. You must take experiences that you are told about and compare them with your own life’s experiences to see if you can go along with it or not. You can’t just take someone’s word for something and then just run with it. THAT’S how armies work really. You are given orders from the top. You must believe in what you are doing. The first thing you do in the military is to lose your individuality. You cannot be an individual when you’re part of THE team that depends on everybody else on the team.
I always try to keep track of the main events and what’s behind it, where it’s going and all that kind of stuff, and what the wars are for as well, as the world gets standardized under the one SOCIALIST system and it IS a socialist system. You really have to study. You cannot go into this area without studying Professor Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, and the Anglo-American Establishment. You cannot study it and understand and put it into context without doing that. You have to realize that men did sit and plan a century and beyond, of how the world would be run and integrated and the kind of society they wanted to bring into being. They not only planned it, they had the money, the ability and the political contacts – I hate even saying contacts because they PUT the politicians in. The big bankers were IN on it, you see. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is the British branch, the mother lodge you might say, for the Council on Foreign Relations, literally was formed with Lord Milner’s Group and the Cecil Rhodes Foundation. The Milner Group was comprised pretty well entirely of international bankers and their sons.
They planned the socialist society. To understand what socialism is, it’s like communism. There are 3 VERSIONS of communism according to the class that you are born into. At the bottom level, most people think well, social is a nice word, we’re social creatures and therefore socialism must mean it’s for the ordinary people; it’s good things for the ordinary people. They don’t know to go any further than that. Remember, the Fabian Society, another branch, a specialized branch of this octopus, under the CFR and all the rest of it. The Fabian motto, its actual logo had a WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING because they needed to use the masses to bring IN their new order of things. They needed to USE the laboring classes and therefore they gave spokesmen TO the laboring classes that would speak on their behalf and become the leaders. Of course, why is the wolf inside the sheep’s clothing? Well, the wolf, really, wanted to bring in a planned society. Once again, you have to see the movie, The Soviet Story. You’ve got to see it. It will show you how they can keep ALL that stuff, all that reality, all that stuff they always knew in your countries, from your knowledge for 60-odd, 70 years… and then show you it at the right time, when no one cares. But that’s socialism in action. Remember, communism is a socialist doctrine.
They wanted to bring in a controlled society, a planned population where each country would have just the right amount of people born to SERVE the system. It’s a world of SERVICE they were going to bring in. Eventually, by using money, they would bring it in and then by substituting money for credits, issued by the government, they could keep control over you and eventually you wouldn’t need the credits. This is what they believed. You could literally be born and be CONDITIONED to be happy to serve the state, the world state. You’ll see George Bernard Shaw on The Soviet Story saying that YOU, all of YOU will have to come to US to justify why we should keep you alive. See, no one would be unemployed in their system; that is true. Mind you, a lot of folk wouldn’t get born either because they wouldn’t need what they would call ‘the excess’ to serve their purposes. It’s a RUTHLESS organization… but they always use the bottom classes, the disaffected groups, the fringe groups to bring them into power AND THEN they come out with the IRON FIST and that’s where we are today with the iron fist. Mind you, we are distracted by all the stuff that’s going on all over the world and daily events.
I mentioned about how the European Union was the first amalgamation they were going to have. Remember that Karl Marx talked about this too, in the 1800s, the exact same thing. So obviously the Royal Institute of International Affairs was NOT a first-time organization. It CAME from a PRE-EXISTING organization and Marxism was one of them. They said that they’d bring in a North American Union AFTER the European Union. There would also be other unions but mainly a Far-Eastern Group, possibly even under the control of China, long before China ever got any factories up on the go. Everything is long-term planning, long-range planning.
The North American Union I’ve mentioned before. They did the first public signing, not the first signing but the first public signing in 2005. I’m going to put some links up on my web site, cuttingthroughthematrix.com tonight for you to look at yourself and for those that have forgotten all about it to go back and remember. The first one is just a simple Google search called Building A North American Community. That was the title of the Council on Foreign Relations’ agenda, which they PRESENTED to Congress and to the Canadian Parliament and the Mexican Parliament. The three leaders of the countries signed it, the first part, in 2005. They said that the final one would be done, one every year but the final one in 2010. That was their target initially for total integration. The CFR came out on Canadian television when the first signing was done in 2005, the Global Television and the CBC broadcast it. A couple of reporters stood up in the audience at the time and said, is this to be a duplicate of the European Union with its own Parliament and all the rest of it. Of course, they fudged and hedged about that but that IS the intention of it.
There is an article here that came out from The Raw Story initially and then Blacklisted News have it in their web site too.
Former Mexican foreign minister calls for ‘North American union’, unified currency
By Stephen C. Webster / Tuesday, February 16th, 2010 / rawstory.com
Prolific Mexican politician and intellectual Jorge Castañeda believes that a greater North American community — a “North American Union” — with economies tied together under a European Union-style system, complete with open borders and a unified currency, is the wave of the future. (Alan: This is a top CFR member too, remember.)
In a new interview with Web site BigThink.com, Castañeda, Mexico’s foreign minister from 2000-2003 and a global distinguished professor of politics at New York University, said that with nearly 11 percent of Mexicans living in the United States, he has stopped seeing his nation as a Latin American country.
“Well, my sense is that we’re moving closer and closer to forms of economic integration with the United States and Canada and conceivably Central America and Caribbean could become part of that in the coming years,” he said. (A: Well, he knows that, you see. When they did the Free Trade negotiations back in the 80s and into the early 90s – and I have documents from that and from the newspapers – they discussed that THEN. That’s why, from the Caribbean in fact, they didn’t need passports to come into Canada, etc. They were already grouped under this new union. So they were already putting it ahead back in the 80s, for those who didn’t know.) “I don’t see Mexico as a Latin American country. Too much of trade, investment, tourism, immigration, remittances, absolutely everything is concentrated exclusively with the United States. So, Mexico has to be part of a North American community, a North American union, which at some point probably should include some type of monetary union along European lines with a free flow of labor, with energy being on the table, etc.” (A: I’ll be back with more on this union that most of you don’t realize is already happening, after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, keeping our eyes on the targets because when you’re DELUGED with info and data you’ve got to really understand the agenda that doesn’t break up and get forgotten for years, it carries on regardless and you’ll find so many, well, almost all of the big journalists, the big TV presenters, all these people, are members of the Council on Foreign Relations who drafted up the agreements. They admitted that on Canadian television. The CFR drafted up these gradual integrated agreements FOR the governments and they did sign them into law, by they way. Every year they do it; this year is the last year for the last one to be signed and that’s still to come.
Often demonized as some type of “conspiracy theory” in mainstream American press, the so-called North American Union proposals have actually existed for some time. In May of 2005, the Council on Foreign Relations released a document entitled “Building a North American Community” in which it calls for an EU-like (A: Economic Union.) integration (A: A European type) of Canada, the United States and Mexico.
While the document does not specifically call for the ceding of sovereignty between the three nations (A: And they never did with the Union either until it was done.) — as some vocal opponents of the idea have suggested — it does recommend the formation of a North American Advisory Council and a multinational inter-parliamentary group to facilitate mutual cooperation. Though the group originally set out to achieve this goal by 2010, few in mainstream America are even aware of it today.
I’ll stop there and go back to the Free Trade Negotiations because when they were doing them, with Brian Mulroney and so on involved in it for Canada, they actually said in McClain’s Magazine at the time, that Mr Salinas, that was the president of Mexico at the time, was the man for the job, to be at the head of the North American Advisory Council which they said at the time was a sort of an embryonic, parliamentary system, like the Economic Union. It was so comical because the President of the US also backed this man to be the head. What happened was, about a month later, it was in all the media and most folk have forgot about it, Mr Salinas and his family just disappeared taking the treasury of Mexico with them [Alan laughing] and he was gone.
It was amazing because the US and Canada had to bail them out. I can’t remember if it was $55 million or billion dollars to refill the coffers of the Mexican government but that’s what we did. We bailed them out. It turned out afterwards that Mr Salinas was living in Montreal, of all places, and no one arrested him for that. That was on CBC News Canada. Then when it came out on the news, he was quiet for a while and turned up in Dublin where he is living happily untouched. They even did a documentary showing the people in Switzerland, the police there who take charge of corruption with the banks, and he said they had been working on trying to find this thread of money, billions of bucks getting taken out of Mexico by this ONE major mafia family that happened to have their guy as the President of Mexico. Mr Salinas, the man for the job. That’s what they said in McClain’s magazine. Mr Salinas is the man for the job; the right man… and he ran off with the treasury.
The CFR’s full proposal is available online. [PDF link] (A: Which I don’t think works. It will take you to the CFR site but I’ve noticed now that it will either download and say corrupted or you’ve got to buy it. However, if you do a search you will find it elsewhere for download for free. It’s amazing the little tricks and games they play isn’t it? This is supposed to be the publicly available version, not the internal members’ version. There are always 2 versions of everything, you see.)
“Economic and social citizenship in North America implies the ability of citizens to exert pressure for the implementation of an inclusive economic policy at home and to be engaged in the international economy,” wrote CFR member Carlos Heredia. “To the extent that citizens of the three partner countries see that North American integration brings concrete benefits, a new constituency will be galvanized to support these efforts in the years to come.”
“How far away are we from that?” Castañeda asked, rhetorically. “Quite far, but so did it seem back in Europe in the 1950’s (A: When they were lying to all the public there, that it was nothing to do with integration.) and very little time later they came around and understood that that was [where] their future lay. My sense is that the Mexican society is voting with its feet. We have a higher share of Mexicans living in the United States than we have ever had in our history. One out of every nine Mexicans, Mexican citizens, people born in Mexico, live in the United States today.” (A: So that’s another link I’ll put up on my web site at the end of the show.)
There is also, you’ll see on the Google search, one by the Texas Eagle Forum.
CFR’s Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada
by Phyllis Schlafly, July 13, 2005 / EagleForum.org
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what’s really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan (A: That’s what I said, starting in 2005.) for the “establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community” with a common “outer security perimeter.” (A: That was also in the Canadian newspapers under Fortress America.)
“Community” means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. “Common perimeter” means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
“Community” is sometimes called “space” but the CFR goal is clear: “a common economic space … for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely.” (A: That’s the British, Royal Institute of International Affairs trade agreements: “free flow of capital and goods and labor.”) The CFR’s “integrated” strategy calls for “a more open border for the movement of goods and people.” (Back after this.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading about the North American Union, something that they keep really out of the mainstream media. I’ve mentioned before, it goes all the way back to the 80s with the Free Trade Negotiations. That was the first part of it. It’s almost like a preamble to everything that comes from the NAFTA Negotiations. You’ve got to read the early stuff to understand what they were really getting at and where they were going with it. But this article is from the Texas Eagle Forum. No one had heard about it in the States until I played the audio from the CBC and Global Television Canada of what was said at the meeting when the reporters were actually allowed to question the President of the US and the two Prime Ministers that were there. That was completely blacked out from the US, from ALL news services in the US. What they showed you was just a little meeting for a talk at Waco, the ranch, and playing golf but in Canada they showed you a lot more. They also came out in Canada with the Council on Foreign Relations own 10-15 minute spot, for the first time AS the Council on Foreign Relations, not as advisors, and they said that THEY had drafted up these documents. It was their idea; they drafted it up and presented it to the governments to be signed into law. And you think… Do you vote for the CFR? No. You’ll never see a vote for the CFR. That’s the real world. That’s the PARALLEL GOVERNMENT that Carroll Quigley and Margaret Thatcher talked about. It says here…
This CFR document, called “Building a North American Community,” (A: That’s from the CFR.) asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin “committed their governments” to this goal when they met at Bush’s ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” and assigned “working groups” to fill in the details. (A: That was also in all the media here, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North American.)
It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet “vigilantes” on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona. (A: Because they were the only ones stopping the floods coming up from Latin America.)
A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that “we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders.” The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report “represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership.”
The CFR document calls for creating a “North American preference” so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages. (A: The same tactic that was used in Europe and across Europe.)
The CFR document lays “the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America.” The “common security perimeter” (A: That was also in the papers here. They called it Fortress America. That was the big headlines in the media in Canada.) will require us to “harmonize visa and asylum regulations” (A: They’ve already done that since 2005.) with Mexico and Canada, “harmonize entry screening,” (A: They’ve also done that too because Canada and the US and the FBI and CSIS use the same computers now and share fully all the data.) and “fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals.”
There is a PDF as well. I’ll see if I can put it up for you, from the Council on Foreign Relations itself that was supposed to be made public for free. They have their own internal versions, since they are the workers of this grand new world order, socialist system of a planned society. Quite the stuff that goes on.
We get lost, as I say, when you lose track of what’s happening, you get bombarded with all this data. A lot of it, really, is irrelevant. You’ve got to keep your eyes on the target and see where it’s moving. Then you get an idea. Then you know what the wars are for. That’s when you know why the US and Canada went straight in with Britain. They all went into it together, against the Middle East to standardize the Middle East into the same so-called democratic system, which is anything but democratic. That’s what they mean by democratic, bringing in this private group that runs the world, the parallel government.
Since 2001 and since they first came out right after 2001 on the mainstream asking this question, are you willing to give up your personal freedoms for safety and security. And odd thing to say, I thought, at the time, when every major television station went into action with the so-called man on the street, with the same question. That was all planned obviously; they all went into action at the same time with that question. That was the plan, you see. How do you get the public to go along with anything? You declare a form of martial law and they use force and fear. Plus, remember, going back to the Club of Rome where they say, how do you united the planet? We must use warfare techniques; people give up their rights and freedoms to work towards a common cause and that’s what they chose back in the 70s. That’s what they said themselves in their book, The First Global Revolution, the big think tank for the UN.
They are using this, you see, to ram all the stuff through. Oh, we’ve got to integrate for ‘security’ reasons, for goodness sake… AS they are standardizing the Middle East and CAUSING all the problems, they cause all the problems back home. Great strategy isn’t it? Just warfare strategy, long-term planning and strategy, geopolitics.
We go further and further with loss of privacy and no one cares. I think lots of the youngsters don’t really care. They used to going through being patted down, going through the schools and then they brought in the electronic gates that scan you going through. Then they were doing locker raids, etc, etc and zero tolerance. You couldn’t even take a nail file with you or nail clippers and so on and so on, for “weapons.” You couldn’t even take any pills in for migraines because, oh, that was drugs. We’ve heard all these ridiculous things that have happened since, you know. You are being TRAINED. You are being trained that the only way that you can live in this world is to have no freedoms whatsoever. You must let Big Brother know EVERYTHING about you 24 hours a day and he has got the right now to do it. That’s how you must believe and you must think. What a change around in a few years. What a change around, isn’t it?
For centuries people fought for something called freedom, which they often couldn’t define except as something better than what they had. And here we are giving everything up because of a very clever group of people who are international bankers who move billions across the stock market across the world on a daily basis. Raising countries up, sinking others, running their parallel government, using the world like a doll’s house and we are just the little dolls they move around inside of it. And we still go through this farce of voting when they put their own guys in, IN EVERY COUNTRY. Carroll Quigley said that the people at the top of all parties belong to the Council on Foreign Relations. They can’t lose.
Here is how far it’s going now too. Now you’ve got all your other governmental affiliated organizations – this semi public/private deal – even with the school systems, going to incredible lengths to spy on people. This article is from the Mail Online. It’s in other newspapers too.
U.S. school used secret laptop webcams to spy on pupils and parents at home
By Mail Foreign Service / 19th February 2010
A U.S. school district used laptop webcams to spy on students at home, potentially catching them and their families in compromising situations.
Officials in Philadelphia can activate webcams on the computers without students’ knowledge or permission, a lawsuit alleges. (A: At least they’ve got a lawsuit in.)
Plaintiffs Michael and Holly Robbins suspect the cameras captured students from Harriton High School and family members as they undressed and in other embarrassing situations, it has been alleged.
Harriton High School in Bryn Mawr: A family alleges that the suburban Philadelphia school district used school-issued laptop webcams to spy on students at home. (A: So they GAVE them the laptops. See, here it’s free, it’s free… because we love you. You see? And the students take them home with them, as they’re supposed to do.)
Lower Merion School District officials said the laptops ‘contain a security feature intended to track lost, stolen and missing laptops,’ (A: That’s the excuse they dreamed up.) and that the feature was deactivated yesterday.
‘We can categorically state that we are and have always been committed to protecting the privacy of our students,’ he said. (A: They lied; that’s obviously what it is, after they tried this out.)
Tom Halpern, a 15-year-old from Wynnewood, said students are ‘pretty disgusted’ and have started putting masking tape over their computer webcams and microphones. (A: That’s why they’re in there folks. The big boys admitted YEARS ago that they’d been using laptops from the beginning with built-in mikes to listen to you, now they’ve got the cameras in and they activate them remotely.)
‘This is just bogus,’ Halpern said. ‘I just think it’s really despicable that they have the ability to just watch me all the time.’
The accusations amount to potentially illegal electronic wiretapping, said Witold J. Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which is not involved in the case.
The Robbinses only learned of the alleged webcam images when an assistant high school principal told them their son that school officials thought he had engaged in improper behaviour at home. (A: Here they are. How many others were they watching… and taping… and laughing over… and doing all kinds of, perhaps, obscene things with, as they voyeured into the homes and private lives of all these people?)
‘School officials cannot, any more than police, enter into the home either electronically or physically without an invitation or a warrant,’ Walczak said. (A: Well, I don’t care what they’ve got in the books. As I’ve said before and I’ve read stuff in the years gone by where they government admitted they worked with the laptop makers. Most laptops are not made by the brand; it’s made on an island off China. I think 70% of them are made in this ONE big factory; all the different brands that you see… one factory. They put these things in with activation codes for governments.)
A school district statement released late yesterday said the tracking feature would not be reactivated ‘without express written notification to all students and families.’ (A: Like they didn’t do before, right.)
The affluent district prides itself on its technology initiatives, which include giving laptops to each of the approximately 2,300 students at its two high schools. (A: I wonder if they were spying and how long they’ve been spying on these 2,300 students and their families? Hmm?)
That’s you’re brave new world; we’re all here. Mind you, a lot of folk won’t mind, oh, well, it’s just like, you know, a reality show and you dance in front of the computer naked or whatever else you’re supposed to do, as you emulate these little fools they put out FOR you to emulate and it works very well. Monkey see, monkey do. Very simple isn’t it? Every child now wants to be a star and cavort in front of the camera. Why do you think they GAVE you these reality shows? What’s the message in them? I think we all know.
You’ve got to understand socialism too. I remember seeing an old documentary from Germany, pre World War II Germany about socialism and about how they were building all these houses for the factory workers. The exact same row housing as they had in Britain. Then they showed you how at school they were going through these intense physical exercises – and this was the day when eugenics was out in the open and they discussed making Superman, an idea that Hitler got from George Bernard Shaw and the Fabian Society and all the other eugenicists – you saw the children in fields, soccer fields, doing the in-out stuff and the X’es as they jumped up and down all in unison. They love unison; they love everybody working together and moving together, you see, these totalitarian types. Then it flashed to one in Britain; how is Britain coping in the 30s with all the unemployment? Well, they were doing the same thing. They were building more socialist houses, all joined together. Then they showed you the children in Britain doing the same exercises and the same soccer fields. I realized that this is obviously socialism at work. It doesn’t matter if it’s Britain or Germany, this is socialism.
It doesn’t stop there, just having you all jump up and down together. I remember a definition, when they gave the definition of China being the model state for the world. It was at some special exhibition in Beijing and the UN was there talking and that’s when they branded it the model state that we’ve all to copy, with one child family policy and total state intrusion and all that kind of stuff… and take it as normal. They talked about how they all moved together, as all these Chinese dancers made a sort of spiral pyramid on top of each other, these acrobats and all that. They love this unison and everybody working together like a beehive, bees in the beehive. That’s what totalitarian freaks love. That’s what they want. That’s what they want under this worldwide socialist state, us all doing exercised in the fields together and going back to our tiny little houses that we’re supposed to be privileged to have, as we pay through the nose for the taxes for them and so on and the rents.
Here is an article of the next step to it; Britain is the flagship for this, remember. This is where the Royal Institute of International Affairs was BORN. This is where their Masonic Royal Society has every famous player that will then guide your thoughts along the road to sciences.
Mother’s fury as nanny state brands her healthy daughter, 5, ‘fat and at risk of heart disease’
By Jaya Narain / 18th February 2010 / Mail Online
Sports mad, always full of energy and certainly not fat, five-year-old Lucy Davies’ parents had no concern about her health. (A: Now, I’ve read an article before about a previous one that this has happened to. This is just another one.)
But when she was examined at school as part of a Government initiative to turn the rising tide of obesity, they were shocked to be told that she was ‘overweight and unhealthy.’
They said Lucy may have an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure and cancer as her body mass index (BMI) was outside recommended guidelines by just one per cent. (A: Remember that last one I read. I was about a 2-year-old boy I think and he was 1 pound over the recommended limit, even though he had a big frame and all the rest of it. You can’t HAVE different sizes. You’ve got to be standard, you understand, in the new Superman. Remember the Superman idea; we’re all Supermen, building the new Superman. The new Soviet Man or the new Superman, it depends on how you want to take the so-called Nazi or Sovietized views, which are both socialists, by the way. I wonder if they still measure their skull index and stuff?)
Lucy is 3ft 9ins tall (A: A 5 year old, right.) and weighs 3stone 9lbs – which is itself within the recommended healthy range for a five-year-old child.
Her mother, Susan Davies, 38, said she was shocked by the letter she and husband Tony were sent about their daughter’s weight. (A: An official reprimand sort of idea.)
‘I couldn’t believe what I was reading,’ she said.
Lucy is five-years-old and not fat in the slightest. She shouldn’t even be thinking about her weight at her age.
‘I want her to be running around playing and having fun, not worrying about what she looks like.’
National Child Measurement Programme (A: National Child Measurement Programme, EUGENICS.) is being carried out in schools across the UK and results are calculated by taking into account height, weight and age. (A: Bureaucrats, bureaucrats, bureaucrats, eh?)
Mrs Davies, a mother-of-four from Poole, Dorset, received the letter which said: ‘The results suggest your child is overweight.’
It added that this can have ‘implications on health and wellbeing’ and listed a catalogue of serious medical conditions her daughter may later suffer from. (A: …later on. So, here we are. Can’t you understand, ONE GROUP RUNS THE WORLD and they’ve all planned it, a socialist totalitarianism. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just pointing out that the socialism they push is not the one that most folk think of. It’s not there to serve you. It certainly takes enough money back from taxes and gives very little back in return. There is a caller from Ireland there, Derek. Is Derek on the line?
Derek: Hi. I would just like to say I’ll get a donation out next week and I’m looking forward to getting your Cutting Through books. My question is, you know getting information out to people, you can do it through documentaries or you could do it through satire.
Alan: Yes. Satire is good.
Derek: I noticed in the last month especially, with the Superbowl ad on the green police and they are showing you the police state and are in your face showing you what’s going to happen with all these climate crimes. Now, a year ago I would have thought that that would have been good, but I seen the reaction from my brother and he wouldn’t have a clue about it, he thought it was funny. So in doing satire, you have to be careful in the way that it’s done, that wouldn’t have the opposite effect of almost pacifying the people you are trying to inform.
Alan: It’s unfortunate too because a person who is totally conditioned and accepts the reality that’s being downloaded into them, sometimes satire is the only way to break through, without blows, without coming to blows. Satire at least can cross that and get a bit of a laugh and maybe get a topic mentioned. I’ve seen people try to get their topic across straight off the bat with information and they almost come to blows because you are touching someone else’s conditioned reality. They become defensive and they’ll really stand up and try to defend it thinking that all their thoughts and their ideas and opinions are actually their own.
Derek: There is definitely a knowledge but I notice that sometimes that the elite use satire that I would’ve thought would be a good way of waking people up but they have this spin in their own way, that the people watching it think it’s funny; they think the police state is funny, because of the way the elite have used the satire themselves. So if you are doing it, it’s a kind of a thin line that you have to be careful of, not having the opposite effect you’re looking for.
Alan: That’s right. You do. People are very touchy. People truly will defend their indoctrinations and they’ll become very, very defensive but sometimes a little bit of humor is a good way to test someone out, just touching on something. Most folk won’t respond unless – I’m not kidding, unfortunately – the taxation, the laws or something is really infringing on their own freedoms themselves and they are feeling the pinch themselves. That’s when they become interested; it’s almost when it’s too late to do anything about it. I know exactly what you mean. It’s tough going out to the ‘unconverted,’ you might say, and starting from scratch.
Derek: I think at this stage I was going to work on a documentary but if you are tying to get to the people who are unaware and basically asleep, the only real way seems to be satire but it would have to done in a way that they not defend themselves but somehow it makes them realize that you’re basically talking of them being the idiots or them being imbeciles… of the story.
Alan: That’s true. It’s all techniques. Eventually you get practice in it, the more you do approach people. Eventually, you can almost suss out their particular conditioning and apply different techniques according to the individual, making it more personal, down to their level where it’s going to affect them personally. That’s the way to do it. Satire can certainly get through if we don’t overdo it with satire. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 22nd 2010. For the newcomers out there, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. I say this at the beginning of every show to remind people that I’ve got a whole bunch of sites up there. So if you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and bookmark the rest of the sites I have up, that way you can always download the latest shows when I’m unable to upload to some of the top sites that I use. [Official sites listed above.] Sometimes, for some reason, which they can’t explain, they don’t automatically increase my bandwidth when I’m uploading. The tin can moment is very brief here. I don’t blow my own horn or rattle it too much, just keep my modesty you might say, or self-respect. Some people have none. I need you, the listeners, to back me up. Buy the things I have for sale on the web sites – books, CDs, and DVDs – or donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Some people just send cash and that comes through just as well. It’s very important that you do this. Most hosts get paid by the advertisers. That’s how they survive. In fact when they move to the other stations they take those advertisers with them often, so they are head-hunted by the different companies. I have nothing to do with the advertisers, that way I don’t have to bring them on and help plug their stuff. That gives me a free hand. The advertisers that you hear on this show pay RBN directly for the time. They pay for their bills, staff, board ops and their equipment which is always, of course, like mine too, is always needing renewed or fixed at the very least. It’s very expensive broadcasting from radio stations. So you have to help ME keep going. You can do so by donating or purchasing the things I have for sale. Those who get the disks burned and passed around to them can get in touch with me at [address above].
Most folk skip the first 5 minutes and if I was a salesman I’d really pester you; pester the heck out of you every 10 minutes by plugging the same stuff, as most of them do, but I’m not here because this is a job. It’s worse than any kind of job, believe you me. It’s more than any vocation. It’s something that has to be done. I’m not building a business enterprise by any means whatsoever. If I was I would be getting paid by the advertisers and make quite a lot of loot in that kind of area. This gives me a free hand to do what I want to do. I think perhaps, hopefully, it gives a little bit more credibility to what I’m saying; there is no ulterior purpose except just to tell the people what reality is and show them how to try and get at least a little bit sane if nothing else. Here is the music coming in and I’ll come back with tonight’s stories after these messages.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Reality is a favorite topic of mine because it’s the hardest thing to find. I think John Lennon sang, give me the truth, all I want is the truth. Well, that goes along in the same category but it starts with reality.
Many LEVELS of what we think is reality will give you what they claim is the truth but the more you study into things you realize you truly are in a scientific type of dictatorship, the type that Aldous Huxley talked about. It’s very precise. It starts at birth really. You’re downloaded from your parents. You watch cartoons. You’re downloaded with a thousand messages there, about the environment and all the rest of it, and things your parents don’t even notice. You then go into school where, again, through scientific indoctrination, you are programmed.
It’s interesting to look at teachers’, what they call ‘Toolboxes’ that they put up for special courses. How to PRESENT certain topics to the children and how to present it in such a way, it’s a formula, that it will stop the child from really questioning what you are presenting to them by the FORMULA in which it’s presented and by even emotive words interjected with the things you are talking about. It’s actually a formula. It’s not up to the teacher; that’s why they give them what they call ‘toolboxes.’ On some of these teachers’ web sites, they’ll let you see some of these toolboxes. Most of them you have to pay for; that’s to keep the general public out. They don’t want you to know that they are using scientific types of indoctrination, which is indoctrination NOT education, to program children so they’re all ONE in their thinking. They all think they’re quite natural and they’re given their own Plato’s Cave, so that whatever topics that they bring up in the playground will be understood by all the rest in the cave. It’s all familiar to them. Anything outside the cave, they’ll ridicule and probably give someone a hard time. That’s how it really, really does work.
I was thinking back, from an article I’m reading here from the Guardian. The Guardian UK, really, its job is to just to take the left wing idea. That’s what they do; they always give you right wing papers and left wing papers and you’re supposed to choose one or the other, just like you do in politics. ALL newspapers today have an environmental correspondent, which really means they are failed journalists that go the easy route. Pravda, under the Soviet regime, would have been proud to have them because they just spout off whatever is the politically correct theme that they are designated to write about. In the Guardian especially, they have all their greenie ones, especially Jeffrey Sachs, for instance. Jeffrey Sachs said the ‘climate skeptics are recycled critics of controls on tobacco and acid rain.’ Well, Mr Jeffrey Sachs, what happened to your hole in the ozone and what happened to your coming ice age and what happened to your lakes that were going to be dead lakes all over the world because of acid rain? What happen to all that, Mr Sachs… now that you’re spouting the next roasting, frying period and all that rubbish? See, these people are just little prostitutes. They truly are prostitutes that take whatever is politically correct. They smell the wind when they’re young and they go with it for their career’s sake.
It would be the same if they became a bureaucrat. Bureaucrats allow horrible things to be done to the public because the public are to be reduced to numbers. They are not people any more, they’re impersonal. They type of character that would go into that is Jeffrey Sachs. That’s how Hitler could, AND, by the way, he copied it from the Soviet Union. As I say, watch The Soviet Story. That’s how both of those countries, which are socialist remember, the same as we are all now. That’s how Hitler could install the campaign to efficiently kill people, which he learned from the Soviets who had been doing it long before he came along. They used a very, very specialized TECHNIQUE, as they call it, technique, again, within bureaucracy to reduce people to inhumane, actually NON-human status; just numbers and categories. They just write them off the top. They are given a list of numbers. These numbers have to be eliminated, do it next Wednesday at so and so and that’s how they did it, very, very efficient. So I’ve no time for prostitutes that truly are in it for their own benefit and they are fanatical. When you get down to the bottom of what’s inside them, they really do hate humanity. They hate it so much that they’ll take any recent lie that’s put from the top and RUN with it. They just run with it no matter how ludicrous it happens to be and just name-call everyone that comes up with evidence to the contrary.
In the Guardian newspaper, with a different author here but it’s still the Guardian of course, it says…
Yvo de Boer’s resignation compounds sense of gathering climate crisis
Despite his steady hands at the helm of climate talks, de Boer was losing his touch and navigated into rancorous territory
Mark Lynas guardian.co.uk, Thursday 18 February 2010
(Alan: So they’re all worried about de Boer. See, the UN right now is chopping out some of its top people, just to give them a temporary fall. They won’t be out of the UN; they’re out of that position. They’ll replace them with someone else’s name that we haven’t heard of yet, who’s a bit more keen perhaps, or been taught the latest techniques of lying.)
De Boer steps down as climate chief. (A: He was the climate chief. They’ve got so many chiefs there eh? It just makes you astonished because you’ve also got Pachauri, the IPCC climate chief for that one. So they’re getting rid of them just to throw a little sacrifice to their people below them, all their workers that are bit annoyed that things have gone wrong.)
UN climate chief Yvo de Boer at a news conference on the eve of the Copenhagen conference which ultimately ended in disappointment.
How can everything have gone so wrong so quickly? A year ago, the prospects for successful climate change regulation were bright: a new US president promised positive re-engagement with the international community on the issue (A: I wonder where this international community is? I’ve always wondered about that.), civil society everywhere was enthusiastically mobilising (A: Did you realize that all throughout your society, your civil society because that’s what you are, you are all mobilizing….) to demand that world leaders “seal the deal” at Copenhagen, and the climate denial crowd (A: I like how they word it, ‘denial crowd’. Like ‘holocaust deniers,’ you see. The terminology is very important in psycholinguistics.) had been reduced to an embarrassing rump lurking in the darker corners of the internet.
Now there seems to have been a complete reversal. Obama is held hostage (A: Oh, he’s not changing his mind. No. He’s held hostage…) by a deadlocked Senate, which will agree to neither domestic climate legislation nor US participation in a new legally binding treaty. Copenhagen was a disaster from start to finish, and even the face-saving Copenhagen accord is winning at best lukewarm support even from the countries that helped draw it up. To add to the sense of crisis, the climate denial lobby is suddenly resurgent, (A: I love their words, I really do.) and the conspiracy theories (A: ooohhh.) that underlie the hacked climate emails controversy are in danger of becoming popular received wisdom.
Then they go on bewailing the loss of this great, high-level prostitute because the whole climate thing is nonsense and bogus and it’s been exposed as a POLITICAL AGENDA. Everything at the United Nations is a POLITICAL AGENDA. That’s what the UN was set up to BE, one big socialist world agenda, PURE POLITICS, in every direction and every facet of human life comes from the United Nations.
Here is another article. This is from the Telegraph.
£60m bill for the CO2 of our political class
We pay billions of dollars to Asian countries for the right to continue emitting CO2 here in the West , says Christopher Booker.
By Christopher Booker / 20 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
One could not want a better vignette of the gulf that has opened up between our “political class” and the rest of us than a bizarre little item which emerged last week on an obscure part of the European Commission’s website. The British Government, as revealed by the EU’s (A: That is their Parliament over there.) Official Journal, has allocated £60 million of taxpayers’ money to be spent on buying carbon credits from the Third World for the use of government buildings and other official purposes – so that our civil servants can continue to benefit from the CO2 emissions needed to keep their offices warm and lit. (A: Do you see where this is going? This is how they do everything. They start with the government departments, they go along with it. Then it comes down to YOU folks and they are going to take the last penny off you… for all this carbon nonsense. This is to get you all used to it. But this is what they are spending, just for London’s civil service, £60 million! … to buy nothings, nothings… bags of nothings. Not even the bags. You’ve got visualize the sack, empty sacks full of carbon, all folded up neatly but when you open them up there’s obviously carbon inside it, OBVIOUSLY, because they are labeled ‘carbon credits,’ you see. Utter rubbish! This is the best scam they’ve had in history, from all religions. This IS a religion too that they’ve created for the lower classes to believe in, all their helping classes. In the old days it was just sins, bags of sins and stuff that you had to pay for. Now it’s bags of rubbish, something that’s there naturally. In fact we’d all be dead without it, so would all the plants.)
The Government has contracted to buy these credits, mainly available from China and India, through 10 British and foreign companies, including (A: of course…) Barclays Bank and a branch of J P Morgan rather oddly situated in a back street in Oxford.
Our entire Government machine – politicians and civil servants alike – is now obsessively dedicated to the proposition that we must drastically cut our “carbon emissions” to save the planet, at virtually unlimited cost. But when it comes to the officials and politicians themselves having to make sacrifices, as our own fuel bills soar, they have quietly arranged for the rest of us to shell out £60 million to allow them to carry on much as before. (A: Turning up their thermostats and all the rest of it.)
The story then becomes even more bizarre. The contracts with Barclays, J P Morgan and co – who will retain up to £9 million in commissions (A: Not a bad deal. Oh… lawyers and banks. Lawyers and banks run the world. Don’t they? They can’t lose no matter what they do. Ah, a new form of slavery.) – will be used to buy Certified Emissions Reduction (CER) credits under the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) set up under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Telegraph about the con games as they sell this fiction back and forth that we’re all going to be having to pay for, for you own breathing, etc, very shortly. It’s a whole political scam to bring in a brave new world. That’s what it’s all about, AS the big boys, of course, make masses of bucks off it and all the prostitutes that jump on board and there are lots of them, believe you me, in society. Lots of them will jump on board. That’s why the Soviet era worked for a long time. That’s why any totalitarian regime works for a long time. There are so many people that get on board, learn the handbook and the political speech and the correctness and away they go. They are fanatics, you see, especially when they are filling their own pockets.
The largest and easily the most lucrative component of the CDM market (A: That’s the carbon trading market.), administered under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (A: Again, the United Nations, this strange entity that none of us vote for.), is a peculiar racket centred on the manufacture of CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons), classified under Kyoto as greenhouse gases infinitely more potent than CO2. The way the racket works is that Chinese and Indian firms are permitted to carry on producing the refrigerant gas known as HCFC-22 until 2030. But a by-product of this process is HCFC-23, 11,700 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than CO2. The firms can then destroy the HCFC-23, claiming allocations of carbon credits worth billions for doing so (A: Not bad eh? They make the darn stuff, they profit off it, then they can destroy the byproduct and get paid for doing it… BY US. Isn’t that a deal? Boy, you know the mafia couldn’t dream up this stuff. This is more wily then them; it’s beautiful. Only the bankers could do this and the lawyers.) (while much of the useful HCFC-22 is then sold on to the international black market). (A: Isn’t that something?)
According to the UN Environment Programme – a body set up in 1972 by a Canadian businessman, Maurice Strong, (A: He’s not a business man. He’s one of these… He’s just a gopher; he’s a technocrat for the Rockefellers who picked him up. He never even went to college and they just put him right into the oil industry and other places to get the hang of things and then stuck him into the United Nations so they could run it basically.) who was its first chairman and also father of the UNFCCC – destruction of CFCs as of last year accounted for more than half the CDM credits issued, in a market which will eventually be worth an estimated $17 billion. (A: Not bad. It’s like when they came up with the scam for getting rid of fluoride, a byproduct of the aluminum industry. The Bronfman’s in Canada and another group in the States worked together to get it lobbied and passed through governments AND the dental professions to tell you that it was good for your teeth. So that we started to buy their WASTE PRODUCT and they told us that it was good for us. That’s how they did it. Now they’re doing the same thing with this HCFC 23, a byproduct of their very lucrative business. They destroy the byproduct and we pay them for doing it, billions of bucks. This is something else, eh.) Less than 1 per cent of the 1,390 CDM projects so far approved accounts for 36 per cent of their total value.
Thus we pay billions of dollars to the Asian countries for the right to continue emitting CO2 and other greenhouse gases here in the West, including the £60 million contributed by British taxpayers to keep our civil servants warm. As a result we enrich a small number of people in China and India, including Maurice Strong, who now lives in exile in Beijing, (A: He’s got a UN building there; that’s where they put him. Mind you, he’s very near, I think it was his aunt who was buried there. She was an advisor and friend of the Revolutionary Mao Tse Tung. There was a documentary on TV where he went to visit the grave yard. See, they’re lifelong revolutionaries and lefties, these guys.) having been caught out in 2005 for illicitly receiving $1 million from Saddam Hussein in the “Oil for Food” scandal. (A: That’s Mr Maurice Strong for you. They CARE about people, these guys that fill their pockets all the time. They really care.) He played a key part in setting up China’s carbon exchange, to buy and sell the CDM credits administered by the UNFCCC – of which Strong himself was the chief architect. (A: Oh, I tell you, I tell you. They are still making money. They are still making movies about Al Capone and stuff like that. Here’s the real stuff here. This is the real stuff. Ah, beautiful. I’m thinking about starting a company where I can just get bags that will sort of hold shape with nothing in it and sell it off as pollution holders. At least you’ll see something. These guys won’t even see anything. It’s all bogus… pie in the sky.)
Propaganda is astonishing. ALL movies are propagandic movies. They are EMBEDDED with messages all the time, preparing the mind, mainly of the young, for what’s to come without them even knowing it. It makes certain topics familiar with them and even might give them a sequence of working through it until you agree with it IN the movie by following the heroes and then it becomes your opinion, so that nothing shocks you later on when it actually happens; you are familiarized with it.
Here is the Economic Union, the Parliament, this great super parliament, this dictatorial system that runs Europe, the precursor of the North American parliament that we will have here. It says here…
EU superheroes solve a humanitarian crisis caused by an earthquake…
in a comic that’s costing the taxpayer £200,000
By Daily Mail Reporter / 22nd February 2010
(A: That’s almost $400,000! for a novel …to elevate them as heroes… for the children. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Mail Online to do with how the Parliamentarians now, this Super Parliament running the whole of Europe, this non-democratic institution where they actually make laws IN SECRECY at the top. That’s been in the newspapers. They are now churning out novels about themselves, how wonderful they are, they’re humanitarian and how they’re really saviors. It says…
A comic book portraying two fictional European Commission bureaucrats as humanitarian heroes battling to save the world is being sent to schools (A: Of course, get to the children first, brainwash them.) and homes at a cost of £200,000 to the taxpayer.
More than 300,000 copies of Hidden Disaster, which is printed in five languages, are being dispersed across the UK and mainland Europe.
The hardback graphic novel was written by Belgian author Erik Bongers. (A: I was going to say Bonkers for a minute.)
It follows Zana and Max, two employees at the European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid Department – or ECHO – as they try and raise money for Borduvia, a fictional state that has been devastated by an earthquake.
Beautiful aid worker Zana, who wears a safari jacket with a patch depicting the European Union flag on it, is sent to Borduvia to manage the humanitarian crisis.
There she meets up with local charity worker Tesjang who takes her to the worst-hit region of Kellow, an area in the Urgi mountains that is run by rebels. (A: Ooooh.)
Tesjang takes her to meet the rebel leader who at first refuses her offer of European Commission aid. (A: So they didn’t get bought off I guess.)
But determined Zana delivers a spirited response that is sure to leave children across Europe enraptured.
She says: ‘In tragedies like this, international solidarity is normal. (A: ‘Solidarity,’ where we have heard that before? I wonder.)
So here you are, writing novels, utter fiction and propaganda and taking your tax money to brainwash your children. There is nothing new in this actually, to be honest with you. There is nothing really new in this, at all.
I’ve mentioned before about music and how there are sequences and every writer knows how there is actually sequencing in music and where you put your hook or your chorus type hook in there and so on and how long it must last. They dictate at the top how long an album must last or a record must last. It’s the same in the movies because scientists, because of its propaganda value, have been at this for an AWFUL long time with movies. There is hardly a movie every churned out that is not meant to alter culture. That’s the real purpose of them. In Hollywood, those involved call themselves The Culture Creators, not followers, not reflecting or mirroring society, but actually CREATING SOCIETY. You see, like Plato said, monkey see, monkey do… and we do. We copy what we see. We dress the way they dress and we behave the way we think they behave. So this article, it’s actually from Science and Technology News.
Hollywood movies follow a mathematical formula
February 19th, 2010 in Other Sciences / Mathematics / PhysOrg.com
(PhysOrg.com) — Hollywood movies have found a mathematical formula that lets them match the effects of their shots to the attention spans of their audiences.
Psychologist Professor James Cutting and his team from Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, analyzed 150 high-grossing Hollywood films released from 1935 to 2005 and discovered the shot lengths in the more recent movies followed the same mathematical pattern that describes the human attention span. The pattern was derived by scientists at the University of Texas in Austin in the 1990s who studied the attention spans of subjects performing hundreds of trials. The team then converted the measurements of their attention spans into wave forms using a mathematical technique known as the Fourier transform.
They found that the magnitude of the waves increased as their frequency decreased, a pattern known as pink noise, or 1/f fluctuation, which means that attention spans of the same lengths recurred at regular intervals. (A: Did you know that? That your attention spans literally come in cycles?) The same pattern has been found by Benoit Mandelbrot (the chaos theorist) in the annual flood levels of the Nile, and has been seen by others in air turbulence, and also in music. (A: I love how they… even the name, it’s like Mr Dandelion is the guy who comes to mow your lawn. Cutting, a cutter is someone that you use when you’re making movies; they cut the movies and paste them together. It’s almost like they’re laughing at us.)
Cutting made his discovery by measuring the length of every shot in 150 comedy, drama and action films, and then converted the measurements into waves for every movie. He found that the more recent the films were, the more likely they were to obey the 1/f fluctuation, and this did not just apply to fast action movies. Cutting said the significant thing is that shots of similar lengths recur in a regular pattern through the film.
Cutting believes obeying the 1/f law makes films “resonate with the rhythm of human attention spans,” and this makes them more gripping. (A: Actually, I find that it’s all like canned peas. Every pea looks the same now, the movies, if you notice, because they’re using these kind of formulas and they become utterly boring, to me anyway.) Films edited in this way would then tend to be more successful and the style of shooting and editing more likely to be copied. (A: What he is not telling you here is that they already did this through cartoons for 20-30 years and studied the effects on children. So he is not the discoverer of this whatsoever and they’ve been using it in the movies for an awful long time as well.) Films of Cutting’s own favorite genre, the Film Noir, do not generally follow the 1/f law, with shot lengths tending to be more random. (A: That’s the old-fashioned black and white.) By contrast The Empire Strikes Back (1980) and the 2005 blockbuster movie Star Wars Episode III (which Cutting considers to be “just dreadful”) both follow 1/f rigidly.
The researchers concluded that over the next few decades film makers may take more care to follow the 1/f law to try to boost audience engagement.
More information: Attention and the Evolution of Hollywood Film; James E. Cutting, Jordan E. DeLong and Christine E. Nothelfer, Psychological Science published online 5 February 2010. DOI:10.1177/0956797610361679 . Full text of the paper is available here.
I’ll put these articles up at the end of the night on my web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can look for yourself. There is much, much more to all this than what they tell us, of course. They always have been at it longer, ALWAYS, then they ever tell us.
There is John from Alaska there, I’ll try and pop him in before I forget. Are you there John?
John: I’m here. How are you tonight?
Alan: No so bad.
John: I began listening to your show around 2007 and I have to say it’s been quite a journey. The entire time I listened I was pretty much writing down the items that you mention, the names you mention and it’s connected a lot of dots to me. Then reading your books, listened to your CDs and it’s really helped me learn an appreciation for real history. It’s cool to know 9/11 was in inside job but if you don’t know your history you are still going to end up basically being a useful idiot serving one of the UN’s agencies basically because, of course, all roads lead to the UN. Now, one of the biggest obstacle you find when you try to mention these things to other people is the belief that people have where they think, you know, I’m educated so I know all there is to know. The problem with that is that they leave out, in the public school system, they leave out the most notorious and the most destructive scientific movement in history… namely eugenics. I’ve heard you mention this a lot of times but basically if you don’t know about eugenics you don’t know anything. You don’t know anything. The reason they don’t mention eugenics is because then they have to tell us about how the British and American eugenics ideology was copied by the Nazis. America had their forced sterilization laws in effect at that time. These were copied by the Nazis and these were implemented in a kind of one-upmanship that the Nazis were trying to show the American eugenicists. I have a quick article here if you don’t mind me reading parts of it.
Alan: Sure, go ahead.
John: This one is from The New York Times, August 2nd 1933. It’s very interesting. It’s titled,
Reich Opens Race Study.
How university course said to be based on American models.
Halle, Germany / August 1st 1933
The first lecture course on race hygiene for physicians to be given in any German institution of higher learning was opened in Halle University today. Doctor Kerner who was in charge, told his auditor he followed the American pathfinders Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard. He also regarded alleged race legislation in the United States as a model but the more drastic measures other nations have only proposed, the new Germany was actually carrying out.
If you look into the Nuremberg Trials, you find that the Germans or the Nazis who were on trail, they mentioned Madison Grant to pretty much show how we are not the only county who has had this ideology.
Alan: That’s right.
John: Of course, they pretty much swept that under the rug.
Alan: I’ve still got a clip of that; some of the Nazi officers and Eichmann also brought that up in his defense. He said that we were only following what was already being promoted from countries like Britain and the United States of America.
John: Yeah. This whole idea of eugenics which was pretty much popularized by American and Britain, it’s been… I mean all roads leads to the United Nations and eugenics.
Alan: Absolutely. I tell you what happened too. Here is a very important thing to do with this and that is if you go into the book EcoScience with John Holdren writing an article in it for Paul Ehrlich. Now, Paul Ehrlich’s wife was a high-ranking member of the Club of Rome. The whole thing is about depopulation. What John Holdren himself, who is the Science Czar for the US right now, he said in the book that they could probably sterilize and bring down the population drastically in the third world countries because the people were uneducated and ignorant, therefore, they will come in for inoculations which will sterilize them. I’ve got stacks of stuff; they are still doing this with the tetanus shots, 5 tetanus shots they are telling people in the Philippines and they are sterilizing them. I’ve got all the articles here and it’s been admitted to, BY the UN actually when they did it in Africa and India. But, Holdren said, we’ll have to use a different tact in the US and the Western hemisphere. He says, it will have to be done under some other guise. Well, guess what this other guise is? It’s called CLIMATE CHANGE, SUSTAINABILITY, etc, etc. THAT’S the method of depopulating the West. This is what all this carbon nonsense and stuff is ALL about. They had to use another tact then to simply say, come in and get these free shots; it will help you.
John: Yep. You just mentioned Paul Ehrlich. He’s a very interesting fellow in his own right. I’ve been looking into his name and I came upon this one document here. This one is from 1969 and I’m going to try to read some of this real quick. It is titled,
A Sterility Drug in Food is Hinted. This is right before they wrote the EcoScience book. It says…
A Sterility Drug in Food is Hinted.
San Francisco / November 24th, 1969.
A possibility that the government might have to put sterility drugs in reservoirs and in food shipped to foreign countries to limit human multiplication was envisaged today by leading crusader on population problems.
The crusader, Dr Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University, among a number of commentators who called attention to the population crisis, as the United States commission for UNESCO opened its 13th National Conference here today. UNESCO is the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, the 100 member commission appointed by then Secretary of State.
That’s pretty much the gist of it but there is Paul Ehrlich again. Like I said, that was right before they wrote the EcoScience book and here he is spreading this ideology and he is speaking before UNESCO and the United Nations.
Alan: That’s correct. Not only that, I’ve got articles here too from the United Nations where they have produced crops and tested them out on the third world countries which have the unexpected, they said, but very fortunate effects of actually reducing offspring. They’re actually giving this stuff to the so-called third world in certain areas. I think we’re getting it here too, by the way.
John: I know you brought up soy several times and how they are putting the soy in the food and how that lowers the sperm count. Me and my wife, we were walking through the grocery store the other day and we went to the organic section. I’m just looking at the different products they have there and lo and behold, I discover a product that’s called esterol soy plus. This is a product that they carry in most organic sections in the grocery store but it’s called esterol soy plus. It’s a medicine, organic medicine made out of nothing but soy and it’s actually a menopause medicine for women. It’s made from fermented soy. A lot of people will say, well, you know soy itself isn’t bad it’s just that unfermented type, but here is a medicine that’s pretty much a estrogen replacement therapy for women and it’s made out of fermented soy.
Alan: We get high levels of estrogen, bisphenol A and all the rest of it in the foods, even the processed foods. That goes right along with… from the early days where Holdren and even guys before him questioned how could they do it. Holdren and Julian Huxley both said, and Julian Huxley was the first CEO of UNESCO, Julian said, we can do it; our only problem is should we put it in the water or in the food or in the inoculations? That’s what he said.
John: And they are doing all 3.
Alan: That’s correct.
John: Now, like you say, you got John Holdren, he is the Science Czar the Obama administration. He’s got people like Paul Ehrlich in his rolodex, on speed dial. Like I say, you have these educated idiots; they don’t know anything about eugenics and they live in these cities so they view everything as being overpopulated.
Alan: That’s correct.
John: You know, we have to eliminate some of these people but they don’t realize that they are down as one of the people to be eliminated.
Alan: Exactly. Exactly. In fact, Julian Huxley said, we can sterilize them without their knowledge and at the same time break down – because one of the other things they had to do was to break down – the bonding of male and female so they wouldn’t have children anyway. But they’d be allowed to have as much sexual promiscuity as they wanted to because they would be basically sterile. That has happened. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. That was a good caller there, John. You should look into, John, if you’re still listening, to do a scour of the Google Videos up there and look for Adam Curtis. He did a documentary that’s never been shown, the parts of it, on Nuremberg and also how they brought Hollywood people in. It was all worked out in advance. They wanted a show trial to make it seem like the worst villains in earth were being prosecuted to take you away from the fact that everybody else was doing much the same kind of stuff. It truly was directed and ran and set up, the whole idea, even where it would be, by producers from Hollywood that did movies. They had to paint Germany as the only bad character on the planet and in true Western fashion, the black hat and the white hat and all that stuff. They had to vilify them to say that now that this is over, we’re in a pure society now; and nothing was further from the truth. It was the same old agenda, same old agenda. Because eugenics got a bad name, they then called it BIOETHICS. Every university churns them out now, bioethicists and they are actually eugenicists. Same bunch. Same bunch. They are the ones who are now on panels in every country that advise governments on the next step and the next step and the next step and how far to go and if the public is READY to go the next step in fact; that’s really what they are about.
We live in this new interconnected, supposedly, global community and it’s Marxist in tone, exactly what they found out at the Reece Committee when Senator Dodd in the inquiry about the foundations funding all the left wing organizations because they couldn’t understand why the multi billionaires that had the international corporations put out these foundations under charity and actually funded thousands of radical Marxist groups. They were told by the heads of those foundations that their job was to blend the Sovietized system with that of the West so that we could come together completely with a mixture of the two. That was the dialectical process that was set up before they gave us the Soviet system in fact. They knew exactly what they were going to do, how long it would last, and bring it together towards the end of the millennium, which is exactly what happened.
Now it’s Marxism for the masses with the state running you with an elite FEUDAL system, basically, on top. That’s really what it is. Again, all based on eugenics and Darwinism. The best of the best of the bunch are the ones who have clawed to the top, got the money by the wiles of their cunning and they deserve to rule the rest of the lesser types. That’s really what it’s based on.
Here is how it’s going in schools now too. This is from the Mail Online.
Schools should not force girls to wear skirts – it discriminates against transsexuals, warns watchdog
By Arthur Martin / 22nd February 2010 / Mail Online
(A: I think it’s time this watchdog was put down. Don’t you think? I think it’s going a bit senile or something.)
Schools which force girls to wear skirts (A: I think girls really generally WANT to wear skirts at a certain age and the guys like to look at them and that’s why the girls wear them.) may be breaking the law – because the policy apparently discriminates against transsexuals.
Official guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission says the dress code may breach the rights of girls who feel compelled to live as boys.
In a 68-page report on the human rights of transsexuals, the watchdog says that ‘requiring pupils to wear gender-specific clothes is potentially unlawful’.
I guess they’re going to give us all these boiler suits, these blue boiler suits all the Maoists had to wear, male and female, eh? That will do away with the fashion industry; they won’t be too pleased in Hollywood. I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show if I’m graced with enough speed by XplorNet which cuts me back all the time.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 23rd 2010. I always suggest to the newcomers to look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have up there, all the other official sites. That way, when the big ones go down which they sometimes do, you can download the latest shows from these other sties. [Official sites listed above.] Remember, that you are the audience that brings me to you. I could certainly get paid for doing what I’m doing through advertisers and so on, but I prefer to do it my own. The advertising you hear on this show is paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN for the air time and for broadcasting this and satellite, internet and so on. So it’s up to you to keep me going. The advertisers pay for the air time, the staff, the equipment, and the bills at RBN and it is very expensive to broadcast, especially on satellite these days. You can help out by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and seeing what I have for sale – the books, CDs and DVDs – and you can purchase them or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Cash is good as well, that gets through. Actually the bank takes a little chunk out of it but it saves some … It’s amazing how much they charge just to wire money from one country to another. The cut they take out is just incredible but the banks are very greedy and we all know that. Those who get the disks burned and passed around to them can get in touch with me at [address above].
I like to talk about reality because it’s the hardest thing to find in a system that you are born into that has been established for an awful long time. This has happened across the world regardless of what system you think you are born into. When the state becomes all powerful then you are basically in a totalitarian system that has one job and that’s to perpetuate itself. It must defend itself and look after itself, first and foremost over anything else. It doesn’t matter if it’s communist, capitalist or whatever they want to call it; it’s really all the same thing. It’s a minority ruling over the majority and that’s what previous revolutions really were supposed to eliminate. But it doesn’t happen does it? The state is all powerful. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I just mentioned before the break how revolutions were supposed to, at one time, alter and bring in a new type of system of running ourselves. The Soviets tried it of course, but the first thing that they broke was one of the major tenets of Marx and that was that they would do away with the state; it would eventually whither away into some sort of utopia where everyone is self-disciplined and just works with everyone else. That never really happened.
The idea for revolutions from the French Revolution onwards was to basically do that. What it really ended up doing was to create a more powerful totalitarian state which ran the lives of everyone else. The so-called Capitalist countries came out of revolutions in a sense, with the English Revolution and the rise of the merchant classes. That became the basis for the modern Capitalist system. Since then they’ve gone through what appear to be changes to the general public. They even use the word ‘revolution,’ the sexual revolution, all the different revolutions they had planned to take down society and to make them easier to manage, fromthe governments. Now, how can the established government be in charge of revolutions? People don’t really think about that, except those in academia who know it quite well. The revolutions that they talk about are actually PLANNED CHANGES from the top in society that will suit the powerful state in a more easy to control fashion. That’s why they design and allow it and promote it from the top. The same thing about separating the generations; it was part of that too, until the state becomes all powerful and in charge of classifications of the generations right to the elderly where they just pop them off into elderly homes. They confiscate their homes, sell them off for their care and then give them their various drugs that kill them off rather quickly and they are left with all the cash. This is actually the world that we live in.
If you read the books by Jacques Attali and others who talked about the Millennium – that was one of his books. Jacques Attali, being one of the guys involved and the architecture for the European Union. He also was an advisor to different French presidents. I think now he is at the United Nations. He laid out what the course for America – that really was planned, the one that was planned – the takedown of America, you might say, with the period of merging with Latin America, South America. He said eventually, in the global society that they are bringing in, the crème-de-la-crème of academia, who come out of academia will travel across the world looking for jobs. They would be the new nomadic class but they will be jetting across the world from job to job, very high-paid specialist type jobs, while the rest are left within the countries and they will eventually take to the boat and become the next boat people looking for work elsewhere.
It’s a takedown. It’s a planned takedown and it was planned an awful long time ago and written about by various foundations like the Fabian Society that works with the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations. The same group that professor Carroll Quigley, the historian for the same group, mentioned in his two books, Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment. He even said that the public don’t know that ONE group has been behind all of the wars for the last 100-odd years, all of them. He didn’t say most of them; he said all of them… for geo-political purposes. Quigley and others, other historians and philosophers have written books about the takedown of societies in the past. How societies go through certain declines as they are being taken down. Part of it is when the money people, the people who run the money system, even in ancient times, moved out. Everything collapses behind them. Not immediately of course, because the powerful state still taxes everything so they can still try to keep a standard of living for themselves at the top by high taxations and then confiscation of other people’s property, farming, all that kind of stuff, and land; they accumulate land. As they are doing this, a debauched society is PROMOTED by even the ancient entertainment industry, you can read about that from Plato’s Republic. He talks about the entertainment industry THOUSANDS of years ago and how people emulate it. They promote sexual promiscuity and all kinds of deviancies and that happens at the end of a civilization as well.
Therefore, when you have these things happening, if you want to take down a society, you must introduce the same formulas, because these are formulas, you understand, to take down societies. Those at the top in the various societies like the Fabians and Royal Institute of International Affairs who are all really branches of the same group specializing in their own area, these groups planned to reduce the population for the coming world society they WANTED to have. They said it well over 100 years ago. They foresaw, at that time, the post-industrial era where they would have too many people to serve THEIR purposes. They wouldn’t have the factories for them to work in. They had already taken them off of the land that they used to live on so they couldn’t go back to farming. Apart from that, the agri-food businesses, big corporations were to take over farming, as the UN said itself at one of its meetings that farming was too important to be left to farmers.
So here you have all these people crowded into these cities. These are the human jungles, as they’re called, because it is unnatural for people to be put into cities. Even Plato talked about the rising of the beehive cities and that’s how they would bring in their future because those within a city are living in an artificial environment and ALL, ALL dependent on money. You can’t just barter your way through a city. You’ve got to have money to pay your rent, etc, and to get around and to buy your food. Therefore, they have been very successful with that. Plus they also know in every psychological association and university who deals with psychology knows that in cities, just like the rats in a cage, they are fine until they hit a certain number but because of the cramped living conditions, the crowded streets, etc, they end up promoting all kinds of deviant behavior. Even rats can be very sociable with their own little bits of territory and they can get along until a magic number is reached and then they start to bite each other and fight with each other and then sexual deviancy breaks out as well. It is the same thing with humanity; therefore, those at the top actually promote it.
The reason you are seeing this totalitarian police state across the world, immediately formed at the same time by sheer chance, we’re supposed to believe, although it took many years to plan in advance, it was to deal with this phase in the takedown, the depopulation. As I’ve said before, in the plan to take down the populations, part of it was to do with the third world countries. They would be easily managed, as Mr Holdren himself said in the book he helped co-author with other environmental nutcases basically and human haters – they were human haters – Paul Ehrlich and his wife who belonged to the Club of Rome. EcoScience was the book that he helped write. He said because the people in the third world countries were ignorant, they believed that if medicine and medical aid from the West was going to help them, they would welcome them in not realizing the injections they were getting were actually sterilizing them. That’s proven by the way; they were giving them all free tetanus shots that were laced with a particular chemical and a bacterium too. So that was for the third world countries.
For the West, they would need another way around it because there was more education in the West, we would be more suspicious, we ask questions and they would have to find another way. ENVIRONMENTALISM was the key. Too many people, the planet was going to kill us all off or we would kill the planet, and therefore we’d have to start taking away the industries, the work situations, bring in poverty, disease and so on, slowly under the guise of we can’t sustain this any more; we’re just broke, etc, so you would have to have a financial takedown as well. Then we’d start to die off as time went on. Again, that’s what we’re going through RIGHT NOW. It’s the same scenario, planned a long time ago. However, to the general public, promoted by the media, all these ideas are meant to be SCATTERED and just one-off things, all happening by chance, one day after another. They’re all completely connected, COMPLETELY CONNECTED.
There’s an article from Business Week. It’s called ‘The Lost Generation.’ I can remember when they went through the yuppies and then there was something after that and then there was generation X they can write off… that’s what it meant, the written off generation. Now they’re just calling them the lost generation.
The Lost Generation
The continuing job crisis is hitting young people especially hard—damaging both their future and the economy
Cover Story October 8, 2009 / By Peter Coy / businessweek.com
Bright, eager—and unwanted. While unemployment is ravaging just about every part of the global workforce, the most enduring harm is being done to young people who can’t grab onto the first rung of the career ladder.
Affected are a range of young people, from high school dropouts, to college grads, to newly minted lawyers and MBAs across the developed world from Britain to Japan. (Alan: Remember I talked about the crème-de-la-crème that will travel across the world, as Attali said, and the rest, well, tough luck. If you can’t get a burger-tossing job, you might sweep the streets. They’ll be even fighting for those jobs shortly.) One indication: In the U.S., the unemployment rate for 16- to 24-year-olds has climbed to more than 18%, from 13% a year ago.
For people just starting their careers, the damage may be deep and long-lasting, potentially creating a kind of “lost generation.” Studies suggest that an extended period of youthful joblessness can significantly depress lifetime income as people get stuck in jobs that are beneath their capabilities, or come to be seen by employers as damaged goods.
Equally important, employers are likely to suffer from the scarring of a generation. The freshness and vitality young people bring to the workplace is missing. Tomorrow’s would-be star employees are on the sidelines, deprived of experience and losing motivation. In Japan, which has been down this road since the early 1990s, workers who started their careers a decade or more ago and are now in their 30s account for 6 in 10 reported cases of depression, stress, and work-related mental disabilities, according to the Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development. (A: There is the music. I’ll be back with more on this after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just going through a system, a technique, planned long ago and test in other countries in the past to bring down societies for a purpose and we’re living through it right now under various guises and excuses. The whole greening movement and sustainability is simply part of this whole movement that was decided an awful long time ago and reiterated by different authors down through the last 70-80 odd years by people like Paul Ehrlich and Mr John Holdren who is now the Science Czar for the US; a strange time to put him in there unless it’s the RIGHT time and isn’t that so.
Here is another article to show you what I’m getting at here.
Domesday Book 2010: Strip clubs soaring, libraries disappearing… the figures which lay bare life in modern Britain
By Jason Groves / 22nd February 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
(A: Remember what I said at the start, this is how you take countries down. You emulate what’s happened in the past. It’s not that you just follow that road as you go down; it’s the fact that it’s all pushed and promoted from the top. That’s why. Believe you me, if they wanted some 1950s society or morality, you would be getting it. You would be getting it and Madonna would come out with plastic surgery and be the virgin again. I’m not kidding. They would start promoting all that stuff. They really, really would and they CAN do that. They can do anything in the culture industry because WE EMULATE WHAT WE SEE. But this is the one they’ve given us, the opposite way, you see.)
The changing face of Britain under Labour has been laid bare in a modern Domesday Book.
It shows how traditional pubs (A: That’s your taverns.), post offices and libraries have gone by the wayside.
In their place bookmakers (A: That’s the guys that take the bets for horses and greyhound dogs and so on.), nightclubs and supermarket chains have flourished. (A: This is actually what happened in pre-Nazi Germany in Berlin and these countries. If you want to see the [CBC] documentary about that on Sin Cities, Berlin was one of them. It really goes through this whole formula that I’m talking about right there.)
Figures produced by the Government paint a striking picture of the way in which the country has changed since 1997.
They reveal a sharp decline in many of the traditional businesses and services which once sustained community life.
The Tories (A: Conservatives.) said the statistics show how Labour has failed to protect vital services on which millions rely. (A: Now, forget who says what because we know the parties are all working in cahoots. They all get funded by the same organizations to get into power.)
The number of police stations has fallen by 160, (A: They actually expanded, as we well know, their number of men.) the number of hospitals and clinics is down by 580, (A: That’s your socialized medicine getting cut, deep, deep, deep until there is nothing left.) while the number of schools has dropped by a staggering 2,380. (A: That’s socialism for you.)
Other big fallers include post offices, with the number of branches down by 39 per cent, from 19,000 in 1997 to 11,500 today.
Almost 200 public libraries have been axed, while the number of traditional sports and social clubs has slumped by more than half, with 11,680 closing since 1997.
During the same period 3,460 traditional pubs have closed. (A: Pubs, these were like community meeting places, everybody knew each other in the towns, etc. They’ve closed 3,460 of them.)
Businesses that have done well out of the Labour government include a number of less wholesome ones.
They include bookmakers (A: That’s the guys who take the bets.), with branch numbers up by 39 per cent, from 3,270 to 4,540, and casinos, whose numbers have jumped by 27 per cent.
The first lapdancing clubs appeared in Britain in 1995 and there are thought to have been about 24 by 1997.
Now there are an estimated 300 (A: That’s the lap-dancing clubs, they actually have prostitution too, of course, when no one is looking.), their numbers boosted by a change in the licensing laws which made it far easier to gain planning permission.
Traditional grocers and local shops have been hit by the rising number of large supermarkets, which have soared by 49 per cent. (A: The totalitarian system MUST monopolize everything. Again, that’s what they did in pre-Nazi Germany. They closed all the mom-and-pop stores down; the big chains were pushing them all out.)
Tory communities spokesman Justine Greening likened the survey to a modern- day Domesday Book, the survey of land and livestock ownership in England completed in 1086 for William the Conqueror.
Miss Greening said it showed ministers (A: That’s the politicians.) had failed to protect key services on which a large percentage of the population rely.
She added: ‘Labour has presided over the decline of traditional Britain and watched as our local communities are damaged.
‘Thanks to a decade of Labour (A: government), local neighbourhoods have lost access to essential local services and facilities.’
She added: ‘Rural communities have been hit the hardest by Labour politicians who need an A to Z to leave central London.’
The figures were produced by the Valuation Office Agency as part of the latest revaluation of business rates. (A: That was what it was done for.)
Mick McGlasham, generalsecretary of the Working Men’s Club and Institute Union, said the closure of social clubs was ‘tearing the heart out of communities’ across the country and blamed Government legislation.
He said: ‘I just wish the Government and people of all political parties would understand the role our clubs play in the communities where they are based. When you lose a club you tear the heart out of a community.’ (A: But what you also get too, is that no one meets and actually talks face to face and discusses things and start active associations… to DEMAND THINGS. That’s why they did it. Now you’re watching TV at home. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading how the planned takedown of the Western culture has been really well done over quite a long period of time. Believe you me, it would never have happened without it being promoted from the top down. It did not happen from the bottom up. Nothing every really does. The rest of this article, it says…
Mick McGlasham, generalsecretary of the Working Men’s Club and Institute Union, said the closure of social clubs was ‘tearing the heart out of communities’ across the country and blamed Government legislation. (A: This is where, as I say, they all met on the weekends, there was dancing and all that kind of stuff, social functions, weddings, receptions were taking place in them. All that kind of local stuff and people would get together and discuss things that really mattered to their community and often demand from the politicians what should be done about it. That’s why they’ve closed them all down.)
He said: ‘I just wish the Government and people of all political parties would understand the role our clubs play in the communities where they are based. When you lose a club you tear the heart out of a community.’
Chris Gorman, of the Forum of Private Businesses, said the figures reflected a ‘sad and worrying trend’.
He said many traditional businesses had been driven out by soaring costs to be replaced by chain stores and charity shops, which enjoy subsidised business rates.
A spokesman for the Department for Communities (A: This is the present government spokesman.) and Local Government insisted that the figures did not paint a full picture of community life. (A: So this is how the government is coming back at this and objecting about this report. This PR spokesman from the government said…)
He said Government-funded opinion surveys suggested most people were happy with their communities. (A: That’s his full retaliation. That’s all he’s going to say about it obviously, right.)
What was it Bertrand Russell said about that in The Scientific Outlook? He says, diet, injections and injunctions will combine from a very early age to produce a sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE – you can’t even criticize them eventually with all this stuff in you – even if all are miserable – just like that last government response there – all will believe themselves happy because the government will TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE so. There you are; you’re happy. You just, you’ve got it all mixed up. Just reverse it all. You’re really happy. That’s what Bertrand Russell said would happen and there was a darn good example that I just read.
Now, as I say, you bring down society and you must destroy, the main thing of course was breeding. They didn’t want people to breed. Remember what Charles Galton Darwin said in his book, The Next Million Years, that’s the next million years that they were going to evolve and run the world. You know, the elite that he belonged to. He said, they’d have to, again, use different techniques to dumb the people down, sterilize them, etc. Exactly the same thing as John Holdren and Paul Ehrlich said in their book as well. What you also do is promote PROMISCUITY. Remember Julian Huxley who was the CEO of UNESCO said? They will sterilize the people but at the same time promote promiscuity so there will not be bonding between male and female. There is no bonding when they are half sloshed and they are in the sack for 5 minutes with a total stranger. I mean, that literally is what the modern society has got and been promoted down to them from the top, through every movie and so on that they watch.
This site here is interesting. It’s from savethemales.ca. Some of the stuff at the top of the page is actually about the porn industry. I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show if XplorNet, that is always penalizing me for using their service even though I’m paying for high speed, give me my double dial-up speed again but I will try to get them up at the end of the night. It says…
Porn — Watching Bruised, Drugged Prostitutes
February 22, 2010 / by David Richards / (for HenryMakow.com)
WARNING!! DISTURBING MATERIAL
Shelley Lubben believed she was ready to shoot her first porn film. She was in for a shock: ‘When I walked in, it’s like a dark satanic anointing just fell on me. It was creepy, it was dark, it was eerie, and it was nothing like prostitution. I knew I was in the devil’s territory; this was the final frontier of Satan.’ (A: This is a prostitute that went into the porn industry.)
During the little satanic ritual that followed she hit rock bottom: (A: These are all little rituals they go through in pornography. She hit rock bottom.) ‘I sold what was left of my heart, mind and femininity to the porn industry and the woman and person in me died completely on set.’
Then something remarkable began to happen; Shelley’s survival instincts kicked in and she re-connected with the Christian God of her childhood and, after taking a long and slow period of rehab to recover from her ordeal, she started on a crusade to expose the reality of porn. (A: She managed to get her survival instincts going, SHE went to Christianity and I think now she is a sort of TV evangelist. I am not for TV evangelists, it’s such a racket. I’m afraid I’ve seen too much of Hollywood in it. But this is one who got out of it. This article goes on about what is really involved in the pornographic industry.)
Porn stars rarely get started out of a free-willed love of sexual exhibitionism. Along with poverty and broken families, childhood abuse is very common.
Shelley said: ‘Many actresses admit they’ve experienced sexual abuse, physical abuse, verbal abuse and neglect by parents. Some were raped by relatives and molested by neighbors. When we were little girls, we wanted to play with dollies and be mummies, not have big scary men get on top of us. So we were taught at a young age that sex made us valuable.’ (A: We must remember too, how even 20 years ago, from the 60s onwards, ALL this was starting to get promoted and 2 generations have passed since then.)
Often they are teenage runaways picked up by pimps. They only escape one circle of abuse by entering another; they can’t run from the pain so they go towards it. Fast forward a few years and they find themselves in a zombified state, drunk and drugged on a porn set as they re-live the same abuse they experienced growing up. (A: She goes on and on, pretty graphic stuff here of what happens in the porn industry and how really, even the guys in the porn industry are actually homosexual and all the drugs that they use and so on and tricks that they play, etc. It’s really disgusting.)
Brutality
(A: The brutality that’s involved as well is just amazing. It’s just amazing the drugs that are used and the guys too, on steroids and so on, they are very violent. They don’t see what happens behind the scenes or when the cameras are off. And the disease…)
Disease
It should be no surprise that sexual diseases are at pandemic level in the porn industry.
With chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and herpes being passed from performer to performer there is a backdrop of sickness to a porn set. In fact, they often act as laboratories for the creation of whole new sexual diseases, such as the novel herpes of the throat.
When disease is added to the already traumatic nature of being a porn actress, it can all get too much, as Tamra Toryn found out: (A: She talks about what happened to her and so on and so on.)
There is an article at the bottom of this page. It’s well worth reading because I’m talking about the takedown of society, deliberate takedown of society by what you think of as traditional entertainment industry but it’s the same industry, mind you, and all the same guys that work the cameras and that, that do these porn stuff at night as well. And everyone at the top KNOWS it; it’s promoted.
Here is the article from the bottom of this one, from a British fellow.
David is a 22 year old British man. He writes: “My generation have been conditioned to accept porn from a young age…. In primary school I even remember my classmates having soft porn material and phoning sex lines. (A: This is before you are 12, right.) Then, growing up watching porn online was sort of 15, 16 onwards all the way through university was normal for all the guys my age.
This was all normal to me. What set alarm bells ringing was that I went to a college in university with a diverse range of foreign students and met girls form India, Kenya, China, Japan, Ghana and so on and they were very different. They were warmer, more gentle and caring than English girls and thought English guys acted like sexual animals. So I had to figure out why we were like that and porn is the main reason. I dated a Chinese girl, she was caring and presumed we would always be together, for my English generation that’s dinosaur thinking, but when with her I suddenly felt tremendous stability for the first time in my life. She would care and love me no matter what and I felt free to focus on my two main passions, politics and music. I then realised how much pornography and lack of stable relationships were making men too obsessed with sex to focus on anything important. So I came to the conclusion porn was an attack on us.”
It was an attack on us. RIGHT ON. That’s exactly what it is actually because you see, any drive, instinctive drive can be made very deviant, whether it is eating or whatever else it is, and it’s the same with the sexual drive. Those scientists at the top that deal with all this knew that an awful long time ago. It’s nothing new. They’ve done it in previous civilizations. The information is all there in universities and it’s being pushed again and we are living through the results. It’s the takedown of society. When you cannot bond with a person you see everyone as a sexual object. By the way, the women are the same who have been brought up in the West; they see guys the same way. One woman told me in New York that in the summer you cannot tell who the hookers are and who the average women are. They’re all dressing the same. They’re copying what they see on Much Music… of all age groups too. And how can you pretend that YOU are the fantasy… because that’s all this stuff is. It’s fantasy. You cannot have a relationship with a fantasy… male or female. This is the takedown of society, very deliberate, very, very deliberate.
Talking about the takedown of society, here is Obit Magazine. I’ll put this link up too. Now, I talked about this a few months back when it was supposedly being talked about for the first time, this new chemical that they were going to use instead of cremating because it was GREENER. Make it a GREEN chemical, better than cremating people and adding pollution to the atmosphere. But you knew darn well it’s by the big chemical industries and the cartels behind them.
Coming Through the Lye
(A: There’s a little joke on it.)
by Natalie Pompilio / FEBRUARY 16, 2010 / obit-mag.com
For the fire phobic, there is now alkaline hydrolysis, which returns the body to its ashy state via a mixture of water, heat, pressure and potassium hydroxide, a compound often used to make liquid soaps. The process — now being marketed here and overseas under names like “bio-cremation,” “resomation” and “water resolution” – is already used by medical and veterinary schools. (A: They do that to get the skeleton there so they can put the skeleton up on a stand; it strips all the flesh off.)
It works like this: The corpse is placed in a stainless steel pressurized tube that is then filled with the key ingredients and heated to 330 degrees. After a few hours, all that remains is the skeleton – so soft that it can be ground into ash by hand – and a greenish-brown liquid composed of amino acids, sugars and salts.
The process’s biggest draw, supporters say, (A: Now, the supporters obviously are those who are the undertakers and so on that are going to make millions of bucks off this, and the chemical industry.) is the environmental impact: (A: See how they’re going to sell this? This is DISGUSTING. They’re going to use ENVIRONMENTALISM to make it a WONDERFUL thing. Listen to the wording in this.) The stainless steel cylinder that processes the body uses less energy to operate and produces far fewer pollutants than cremation by incineration. There’s no worry that embalming fluid will further harm the earth. Neither will harmful mercury fillings, (A: listen…) which can easily be plucked from teeth and disposed of in an environmentally safe way. (A: Once they’re done with your skeleton they’ll just pull them out of your mouth. That’s kind of like Auschwitz or something, you know.)
The process also encourages recycling: Any foreign substance in the body, like pacemakers, replacement joints and pins, will remain intact and could possibly be used again (A: I guess that will be for a socialized medical care, once we’re all on it, at the bottom, right.) (although that’s an entirely different discussion). And if you’re really dedicated, you can take home those liquid remains and use Grandma to fertilize your garden. (A: That’s the NEW comedy, you see, that the youngsters have as they’ve been dehumanized. That’s the normal comedy now. You can put Grandma to fertilize your garden. Isn’t that nice?)
(A: Here is how they sell it….) “This is trailblazing,” said Steven Schaal, the division manager of sales and marketing for Pittsburgh-based Matthews International, one of the companies selling the machines. “We’re getting a lot of inquiries from places like California, Oregon, Washington. They have an audience that is already environmentally aware. They already go to Whole Foods. They already drive hybrid cars.”
Schaal’s company calls the process “bio-cremation” although the machines it sells are built by a Scottish company that calls itself and the process “Resomation.” That’s a play on the Greek “resoma,” or rebirth of the body. (A: By the way, it’s interesting there is ‘soma’ in there isn’t it?) But the word also has a negative connotation, Schaal said, referring to the practice of disinterring a body, then reburying it elsewhere. The new name is more explanatory, he said, and “resonates better with customers.” [Alan laughing.]
Schaal said his company will install the first bio-cremation machine in a St. Petersburg, Fl., funeral home early this year. Although Matthews officially partnered with Resomation Ltd. in 2008, it’s not as easy as selling a machine and setting up shop. Every state has laws regulating the disposal of human bodies, and the new process must still be included by legislation.
That’s not as easy as it sounds. Currently, only Minnesota, Florida and Maine allow the process. Other states have either considered it and tabled it for later evaluation or are still debating. (A: And that means they are waiting for their pay off, when they are still debating.)
Why the hesitation? The potassium hydroxide is what usually stops people short.
That’s because the benign name hides the fact that it’s a form of lye, bringing to some people’s minds visions of bodies in barrels in a serial killer’s basement.
Indeed, when the New York state senate weighed a bill that would make alkaline hydrolysis available to the public, some called it “Hannibal Lecter’s bill.” Was that a play on sponsor Kemp Hannon’s name, as some attested, or an attempt to associate the entire practice with a psychopath?
When Minnesota was the first state to debate the practice, “the concerns were that the whole body was going down the drain,” (A: Literally!) said the Mayo Clinic’s Director of Anatomical Services Terry Regnier. He and other proponents were able to persuade legislators that wasn’t true.
Since 2002, Mayo (A: The Mayo Clinic.) has used alkaline hydrolysis to dispose of about 500 bodies that had been donated for medical research. (A: That’s how they get rid of what’s left of it.) Next of kin are given the option of choosing other means of disposal, he said, and only one family has asked for a more traditional cremation, by fire. (A: That’s because most of them, you see, have no relatives or it’s the guys off the street that end up there getting cut to pieces and their organs sold off and all the rest of it.)
“Our bodies are largely water anyway, (A: See, it’s just water.) and it’s kind of a natural process to turn us back into what we’re made of,” Regnier said. “The public is looking for a greener way to handle their final dispositions.” (A: Nice and green. This is the HORROR SHOW of the complete takedown of society and we are living at the end of it. We’ve still got a bit to go, mind you, but not too much. Not too much left to go through. NOT too much at all. Quite something.)
Then, before I go to the callers, there is Bloomberg with an article here on…
Harvard’s Rogoff Sees Sovereign Defaults, ‘Painful’ Austerity
By Aki Ito and Jason Clenfield
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) — Ballooning debt is likely to force several countries to default and the U.S. to cut spending, (A: He’s talking about drastic spending.) according to Harvard University Professor Kenneth Rogoff, who in 2008 predicted the failure of big American banks. (A: And by God, are they going to hit you. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just leaving this article from Bloomberg and this Harvard professor, of course the rest of us too that know the agenda. He just mentions that…
The U.S. is facing an unprecedented $1.6 trillion budget deficit in the year ending Sept. 30, the government has forecast. (A: $1.6 TRILLION budget deficit and they are going to slash like crazy and massive inflation is to follow.)
I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show. I’ll go to the phones and there is Stephen from Texas. Are you there Stephen?
Stephen: How are you doing Alan? I’ve been listening to your show now for 2 years and that’s about how long I’ve been, I guess the term you use is awake, or awaken. It seems like the more I think I know, I get hit with a right hook only to realize that I don’t know anything at all. Everything is really, has been deception and anything I look at, really, especially as it pertains to rap. They give us the gangster rappers who basically rap about nothing, dehumanization, misogynistic lyrics. Then when I say, well, okay I’m breaking away from this, I don’t want to listen to that kind of music, I listen to the so-called “conscious music” only to find out it’s sort of like politics. Both sides are equally funded by the same parties no matter which genre you go to.
Alan: You’ve got it.
Stephen: So it’s like crazy because I looked up to so many artists, like Noz, KRS-One, Dead Pres [?], only to realize, even Eric Badu, only to realize that these artists are just as controlled as the mainstream pop artists, the Jay-Z, the Riana, the Beyonce’s. They are just as part of, in the illuminati inner circle, as any other artist. It’s really heartbreaking because you realize it’s like you can’t really trust anyone in this society.
Alan: Once you get into the big business, you are managed completely by experts that just come right in there. They will change your whole image. They will have you singing stuff you’d never have dreamed of and, yeah, you might get wealthy, if you’ve got a brain and you don’t sign all their contracts and you make sure that you… Very few of them do that; they get ripped right off. BUT, you’re getting USED. That’s the whole idea is to USE you to, again, influence even younger children growing up, even a few years younger than yourself even, whatever, and to then brainwash them into more debauchery and dysfunction. Remember what Huxley said too, they’ve got to dehumanize the populations and bring down the sanctity of life. That’s all age groups including babies and unborn babies and everything.
Stephen: Right. It’s like it’s disheartening. I wanted to ask you a question, sort of like how rap is controlled by both sides. You have the gangster rappers side and control and you also have the conscious side being controlled by both parties. I think, as an African-American perspective, I believe we really lost out on our culture a long time ago, especially with integration, when we tried so hard to merge into this Anglo-American system and for what reason I really don’t have an understanding of to this day. Why do we try so hard to integrate into a system that never wanted us to begin with? Martin Luther King even said a quote, that I fear I’ve integrated my people into a burning house.
Alan: That’s right.
Stephen: That’s how it was though. I wanted to know, did you know anything really, as it pertains or in the past, have our civil rights leaders been co-opted and been led astray too, like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King? Do you know anything about that?
Alan: I do… but that’s actually the end of the show. What I should do is go into that in another show. You’re right on the right track, absolutely on the right track that you can’t force everybody to be the same. We are different and we should really be happy at that. These guys want a standardized society and a particular type they are creating for the future, like Jacques Attali said, the crème-de-la-crème, out of ALL groups. The rest would have to die off, all those who can’t quite make it. You’re quite right. Thanks for calling and call again. Also, we’ll do John in Alaska next time.
From myself and Hamish in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 24th 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there. These are the official sites: [Listed above.] In the future if the big ones go down you can always get the latest shows from these alternate sites. As always, I don’t plug myself all through the show, which I really should do. I start off by asking the people, the audience, to support me because I don’t ask for support from the advertisers. The advertisers generally pay the hosts directly for introducing their products and so on and some of the heads of the companies as guests. This way I sort of keep clear of politics, etc. The ads you hear on the show are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the air time, their board ops and their staff, bills and for transmitting this broadcast. So it’s up to you the listeners to keep me going and you can do so by looking into my web sites, buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and get them passed around to play on their CD players at home because they don’t like using computers, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. Anyone who is writing to me, make SURE that you get the postal code right. That’s all-important. Regardless of the address, generally they know exactly where you are and one letter off and they just can’t figure out for the life of them what to do about it. That’s the great advances we’ve made in technology today… where no one can think for themselves.
I’ve talked so much about this whole new system we are coming in to. We are actually IN it, well into it in fact. A system devised a long time ago which used the dialectical process of left, right and enemies to bring in a world system. I’ve mentioned so many times and I’ve lost count of, Professor Carroll Quigley who talked about those BEHIND the big plan to bring in a world system, a controlled society, planned society with a reduced population to serve the future scientific society. He called it the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how Professor Carroll Quigley in his own two books, Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment, laid out the big plan for the world and even trading blocs. He mentioned the groups that worked incessantly from the end of the 1800s in fact, through different names until they amalgamated into the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations and how they had been behind ALL of the major wars, and the little wars too, since the late 1800s, all to achieve a goal of a planned society.
This ties right in with Mr Rockefeller’s statements where he said that he much preferred a world run by intellectuals and bankers to that run by, basically, auto, self-determination by nations themselves. That’s really what they decided back in the 1800s in fact; same thing, a planned society as I’ve said, depopulation. This was all the rage back then and into the early 1900s. HG Wells, who was a propagandist for them via the Fabian Society and eventually the Royal Institute of International Affairs, wrote about this planned society. He wrote about it in his non-fiction works as well as his fictional works. People should read his non-fiction. He’s far more blatant about his eugenical racism, you might call it, because it’s class racism in a sense, of what he believed was superior types verses inferior types. This was reiterated in the book by Charles Galton Darwin in the 1950s, a descendant of Charles Darwin. He was a physicist, this man, and he said in The Next Million Years that they’d have to really eliminate the masses of useless eaters, basically, otherwise they would outbreed the superior types who must go on into the brave new world future that was planned. This is still going on today.
It’s the same agenda really, as the world emerges from what they thought was a Cold War of right wing, left wing, into the amalgamation of the two. We find the United Nations has taken on the role, completely, that the old Soviet Union used to do. Everything that the United Nations does is purely political in its agenda, purely political. They have massive umbrella groups of non-governmental organizations, the same thing as the old Soviet system which was ‘rule by council.’ That’s what ‘Soviet’ meant, unelected councils, all these NGOs, all funded by the big foundations which are, again, funded by the biggest industrials on the planet and the international banking system.
Those who initially funded the Cecil Rhodes Foundation and then the Lord Milner Group, in fact all those comprising the Lord Milner Group that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs were all top world bankers. That’s the group that Rockefeller was referring to when he said that, better to let the intelligentsia and bankers rule the world than to leave nations to their auto, self-determination. During the Reece Commission – I’ve mentioned it many times – Senator Normal Dodd went round the big foundations to ask them, on behalf of Congress, as to why they were funding what appeared to be communist front groups. He was told, blatantly, and you can find this in a book called Foundations: Their Power and Influence. He was told that their job was to alter so drastically and radically the culture and the systems of the Western world that they would eventually blend seamlessly with that of the Soviet Union. In other words, it was known all that time ago, back in the 50s, that the two systems would come together into a synthesis. That’s exactly what has happened.
The communist system was very important to bring that about because you’ve got to understand how they took down societies in the West through many left wing groups, NOT really to bring groups to the top for power; if they got power at all it was transient. It was to destroy the OLD system and to destroy the idealism of patriotism to a country and the things that YOU were taught that it stood for. Then they brought in a whole bunch of FAKE beliefs to do with equality of all kinds. They were not talking about the equality of different peoples; they were talking about putting everybody down to the same basic level under the same system of the Soviet Union. There were no special rights groups within the Soviet Union, although they were used in the West by them.
One thing that’s never mentioned is that psychiatry shot to the top as the Soviet Union was getting to the top and gaining power. It was also a major power behind the Nazi belief. It was also a major organization in the Fabian Society because psychiatry was founded on the basis of people being born with hereditary complexes. They had various names for it but they all thought that everything that happened in life was hereditary. Intelligence, behavior, all mental illnesses, as they claimed, criminology, all these things were hereditary. They really started off as a mixture of genetics in their belief system, hereditary diseases, and they also believed the only way to eliminate the ‘unfit’, as they called them, was to literally do just that… eliminate them completely.
There was a very good documentary put out by, of all people, the Scientologists who did it because they are in a sort of competition with psychiatry. It’s one of the best exposés of the psychiatric beginnings. You’ll see the top people in psychiatry in Britain, Germany and elsewhere talking about racial hygiene, racial purity, and all that kind of stuff. They have clips from the organizations within the Nazi system. They even show you clips in children’s school. It also shows you the farce of psychiatry as they try to validate themselves as an actual science, which is quite funny at times.
Psychiatry is based on the idea that mental illnesses can be not cured; they will admit that. They can’t cure them; they will say that they ‘treat’ them. In reality, psychiatry is a hit and miss thing. It’s a whole bunch of theories, none of which can actually be proven. They’ve jumped at so many different things: it’s a chemical imbalance, which is a theory ONLY among some of them. Other ones think it’s genetic and it goes on and on and on forever and you never get to the bottom of anything. There is an article to do with psychiatry in the Mail Online.
Psychiatrists want to call being angry a mental illness. How utterly mad!
By Jerome Burne / 15th February 2010 / Mail Online
(Alan: Getting back to what I’m saying, in the Nazi era you’d be surprised that almost the whole of the psychiatric profession became Nazis. They believed in it. They believed in superior types. This article is to tie in how they are getting power, right now, and they have been for a long time and doing the same thing across the Western countries.)
Do you live surrounded by clutter – ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys, articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?
If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from hoarding disorder. (A: They have their own book, it’s called The Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders and they ADD to it every year so many NEW disorders that there is hardly anything left of human behavior that’s not in there. They want the right to treat everybody, through themselves and the social services.)
‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’ bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its proper name.
Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge eating – which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese – and ‘cognitive tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and sluggishness).
There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming very angry suddenly. (A: I guess most of the police have that when they start beating people up on the road and don’t know they are being photographed.)
Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as (A: Listen to this one, because THINK about what I’m saying here…) ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by pornography’. (A: See how they changed EVERYTHING upside down? Everything that held society together is now under complete attack as ABNORMAL. This is being done under the guise of a profession. It’s a profession with a political and power purpose. Quite something really.)
It was also described as Whitehouse syndrome after the campaigner Mary Whitehouse, who objected to sexual content on TV.
The DSM is a large book that lists all psychiatric disorders and describes their symptoms. If a condition is in there, it means it’s considered a mental illness. (A: They even have restless leg syndrome. You know how you sit there as children – I’ve done it; I sometimes do it yet – and one leg starts to go as you rest on the ball of your foot and you start to shake it. It feels actually pretty good; you are getting rid of energy, especially when you’ve been sitting for a while. That’s now a mental illness.)
But some of the new entries are controversial, not least because of fears they will result in many more people being put on drugs (A: That’s exactly what they want to do.) that could be ineffective or dangerous.
The DSM is produced by the American Psychiatric Association and is hugely influential worldwide. (A: I should mention again that psychiatric documentary put out by Scientology even though, as I say, Scientology wants to get in the business of taking over with alternate medicines or treatments in the so-called mental illness area. They did an EXCELLENT job on showing you the power structures within psychiatry and showed you how they tried to define even attention deficit disorder and they couldn’t at their own meetings. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and before I go on with this article, Psychiatry: An Industry of Death – up on Google Video – is the Scientology exposé of the psychiatric industry. It gives the history of it too. It’s quite fascinating; disgusting at the same time as the so called SCIENCE pretty well had techniques of CURING people going back to the 1800s and early 1900s including trying to drown them. That was considered a science at one time. Now they’ve got big pharma behind them and just heavily sedate people. A very good exposé. Also, before I go on too, I’ll mention that there is a site called PsychRights.org. I’ll put all these things on my site at the end of the show and you can look them up for yourself. Psych Rights goes through a lot of the abuses of the psychiatric and pharma industry. There is a lot of compiled data there on the reality behind it all and the drugs they use and the BUSINESS that they run. So it’s well worth looking into. Getting back to this article…
But not everybody is so relaxed about including new disorders. In fact, every time the DSM gets updated there is a big row about what should be added and what shouldn’t. This time is no exception.
There have been three versions of the DSM since the first in 1952 and with each edition it has grown fatter. – DSM-IV is seven times larger than the original. Last week, a draft of DSM-V – due to be published in 2013 – was put on the web and is already proving contentious.
By the way, most of them who sit on the board who decide what’s now an illness all are getting paid directly, in fact all of them are getting paid directly by the big pharma industries. They get salaries from them and they go under the guise of being a science. Remember too, the power that governments can put to use, of this particular science over the public… which is happening. Remember too, that Julian and Aldous Huxley talked about the future and they certainly would be drugging the populations to make them more compliant along with massive indoctrination through various media and entertainment. That’s happened as well. We are here. We are there actually. I remember too, years ago getting a lecture from a top psychiatrist who, in front of the class, started cursing and swearing and using, it was all sexual terminology too, and everyone was shocked. He just came out with this tirade. Then he pointed to, there was so many in the class who had blushed and he said that you people are all inhibited, he said, that’s why you blushed. He said, no word, no action should make you embarrassed. That’s the philosophy that these creeps and weirdoes and, yes, deviants are preaching throughout society. That’s the norm today.
Deviancy, I was talking about that yesterday too. This is a sort of continuation from yesterday’s talk because HOW FAR DOES IT ALL GO? Well, the sky is the limit when nothing is taboo. It’s interesting too, when you listen to some of the articles or documentaries put out by the ex-KGB spies who defected like Bezmenov and different people. I’ve got the links up on my web site from that particular man who went through the stages of how they would destabilize the West, partly through the destruction of the idealism of your culture. That included all the things that hold your culture together like man, woman, family, and all that kind of stuff. Eventually, you have conflict within personalities and groups.
That’s the weaponization of conflict between peoples. They used all the different factions and groups AND the extreme feminist rights and all that to encourage all this stuff to come to the top and destroy all that was. That has happened as well. At the same time, just like that psychiatrist said many years ago, nothing is taboo. Of course Julian Huxley himself said they would encourage PRE-pubertal sex so that the children would never mate with a partner for life and that way they would not produce offspring. However, he said that contraception would be made available and so would abortion, so they could basically have far more sexual activity than before as long as they didn’t have offspring. That was okay. Plus they wouldn’t bond which meant they would never stand up against the tyranny of government or unfairness of any kind. You don’t do that when you are on your own. That’s what George Orwell showed you in 1984. When you are just a number, you have no friends, you have no partner and no family to fight for, you just cower when Big Brother turns his eyes on you.
Here is an article from the Globe and Mail, which is from Canada. It’s about teachers that are doing lap dances now for children in schools, if you want to know. I’ll put his up on my site too. It’s actually got a video of what these two teachers performed for the children. One of the children had a cell phone there and he filmed them doing this. If you are really kinky you can actually watch the video. I haven’t because I’m not that desperate and I can’t get the speed anyway because of XplorNet to watch anything movie wise. That’s why I appreciate when anyone has got a video to send me and so on, do so. Send me videos. I cannot get to the links and look at things because I’m cut back and cut back and getting penalized by deliberation and political reasons obviously. It says…
Teachers’ lap dance ‘a little too far’ for students
By Sarah Boesveld / February 23, 2010 / From Wednesday’s Globe and Mail
The kids are calling it “Two Teachers, One Chair,” and it has all the makings of a YouTube hit.
But school administrators and parents are hard pressed to find humour in a graphic lap dance caught on video between two teachers at a spirit rally (A: SPIRIT RALLY… isn’t that wonderful, this new religion and all that we’re all one stuff?) at Churchill High School in Winnipeg last week.
The two teachers, one of whom was identified by students as phys-ed instructor Chrystie Fitchner, have been sent home without pay after the spirit dance before 100 students as young as 13 years old. The identity of the male teacher could not be confirmed. Efforts to reach Ms. Fitchner Tuesday night were unsuccessful. (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article of just how far it’s going, maybe even further than we know. This is only something that broke into the news media. A lot of stuff is covered up too because powers-that-be within school systems defend themselves before they’ll tell the truth, like every other organization. It says here…
The two teachers, one of whom was identified by students as phys-ed instructor Chrystie Fitchner, have been sent home without pay after the spirit dance (A: Spirit dance, that must be scotch and vodka or something.) before 100 students as young as 13 years old. The identity of the male teacher could not be confirmed. (A: They will know who exactly who it is but he must be better connected.) Efforts to reach Ms. Fitchner Tuesday night were unsuccessful.
The whole routine has since been distributed on the Internet, thanks to the footage captured on a student’s cellphone camera. The Winnipeg School Division is investigating. (A: You’d better believe there is a lot of covering up going on there because this won’t be the first time.)
Fourteen-year-old Saigha Vincent was filming the teacher dance-off at the Gym Riot spirit assembly last Wednesday for Grade 9 to 12 students at the Winnipeg high school.
The routine began with the female teacher, sporting pigtails, seated on a chair, her legs spread, hips gyrating. Bumping beats played in the background and the male teacher approached between her legs, his hips swiveling to the beat. (A: Pachauri would love this; it’s like something that he would write. You know, the guy at the head of the IPCC that writes the porno novels and wants us to take him seriously.)
Less than five seconds into the routine, the Grade 9 student and her friends went from giggling to staring at their sometimes very strict instructors in disbelief.
“At first we were laughing and then it was like ‘Oh that’s a little too far.'” (A: CHILDREN know that before they start getting into the porno stuff that is blasted at them and start copying it.)
But it went even further.
The female teacher threw her head back and thrust her one leg out as the male teacher continued to dance over her. There was butt-slapping and further gyration. Then the man dipped his head down between her legs and simulated oral sex. (A: That’s what your children are getting in school now and it’s not just happening there, I’ll bet you anything. Quite something isn’t it? But then again, it doesn’t shock me at all. I saw all this coming years ago because I understand the agenda since I’ve studied it.)
Now, part of the agenda too was to take down societies by ECONOMIC warfare. Part of it was to do mass immigration to already overburdened countries and bring down their system of care for themselves that they paid into. Countries like Britain, most of the housing over there really was Council Housing paid for through the taxes of the public into building houses for themselves that they then rented generation after generation. You go on a list there when you get married – at least they used to get married – and you would wait maybe 4 or 5 years, maybe longer, before you could eventually get into one of these houses. The EU that is now this Super Parliament tells each country what to do, who to bring in and who to give houses to. This is to further aggravate the tension, the building up of tension between peoples and further destroy any idealism that you have to do with your country. You feel apathetic. That’s a very important thing to destroy nations, is apathy. Remember, Huxley said that himself and so did Bertrand Russell, a big player in the designing of this system, apathy was ESSENTIAL to this system. This article here is from the Mail Online.
Somali mother of four has no right to live here… (A: She’s an illegal alien.)
but we have to give her a council house
By Arthur Martin and Steve Doughty / 24th February 2010 / Mail Online
Standing proudly with her arm draped over her 36in television, this is the Somali woman who must be given a council house even though she has no right to live in Britain.
Nimco Hassan Ibrahim – who lives with her four children on benefit handouts (A: That’s welfare.) – was granted the right to the home by EU judges (A: Not the British judges, but the EU judges in Brussels.) yesterday because she was once married to a Danish citizen who briefly worked in this country.
The landmark judgment means the 34-year-old migrant and her children will soon be packing up their impressive collection of furniture and electrical equipment when they are given a new house.
Although Miss Ibrahim claims her income support payments were suspended during the legal action, she has somehow bought a Playstation 3 games console, computer and a high-quality speaker system.
Equally impressive is the enormous sofa from which she watches TV each night. Lying on the floor in her lounge are some of the latest film releases – including a pirate DVD copy of the sci-fi movie Avatar.
And although she lives in a temporary accommodation in Harrow, Middlesex – funded by the local council (A: That’s the taxpayer.) – she has managed to install a high-speed internet connection. (A: That’s better than I’m getting and I’m paying high speed too for it, although I’m getting twice the speed of dial-up thanks to XplorNet. Don’t ever use it please, XplorNet.)
Speaking to the Daily Mail last night, Mrs Ibrahim said: ‘I deserve to be given a proper house. This one is too small for all of us. (A: That’s how they are when they have been taught, abroad, that that is what you go there for. You’ve got all these rights, you see, and you deserve it. They’ve got to give you something. I know my rights. You know. And she is an illegal alien right.)
‘I don’t think it’s fair that the council has put us up in temporary accommodation. It’s not right that they have hounded us for four years. All these threats of eviction have made me feel very ill.
‘The law says that I can get a better house so I’m looking forward to a better life. (A: So there you go. That’s part of what I’m talking about. This is just ONE of MANY as they flood the countries and destroy all that was.)
Remember that Mr Blair himself and I’ve read the article on the air from the mainstream newspaper article where he had told his next in command that they would open the floodgates to immigration into an already flooded Britain, that was sinking. It couldn’t even cope with the health care going down the tubes… too many people flooding in. He said the reason was to destroy the culture of the face of Europe forever of that of the British culture and people. A war has been going on and most folk are utterly oblivious of it. They just live through it… and accept everything.
This is only one instance of thousands and thousand and thousands. As the country could never pay itself out of the debt it already owes. Who benefits? The boys who dreamed it up, the Royal Institute of International Affairs remember, the Milner Group that was comprised of the international bankers who want to control it because its better, as Mr Rockefeller said, that the intelligentsia and bankers rule the world and plan the world, than leave it up to nations and their self, auto determination. That is what it’s all about folks.
As we go down the tubes into this dehumanized system, we always hear about the Philippines and the poorer countries where the people are conned into giving up a kidney or whatever for cash rewards and end up spending what they are given – the pittance they are given for the cash reward to give kidneys to wealth people generally in the States and Canada – they end up spending the rest of it treating themselves for the fallout, with antibiotics and so on, of the pretty fast, rather disgusting operations that they are given. So we are used to the poor being exploited. We get used to it. In fact, we become inure to it. We become immune to it after many years of hearing the same kind of stuff. It is happening too in the so-called, SO-CALLED civilized countries as well.
Cash incentives offered for transplant organs
Laurie Nowell and Brigid O’Connell From: Sunday Herald Sun February 21, 2010
AUSTRALIA’S hospitals are being paid to harvest transplant organs from dead patients under a $17 million Federal program. (A: Remember, they say dead patients but they prefer to classify you clinically dead, that means brain dead. That’s what they are after because they prefer to take you in to the patient who is going to be a recipient while your heart is still beating. Then you’ve got a really fresh organ and it goes straight in to the patient. So remember, be careful about the wording.)
AUSTRALIA’S hospitals are being paid to harvest transplant organs from dead patients.
A controversial new “activity-based funding” (A: I love the terminology, all from Madison Avenue.) program administered by the federal Organ and Tissue Authority is telling hospitals they can receive up to $11,400 for each patient who becomes a donor, the Sunday Herald Sun reports. (A: It makes you wonder. You see, it already happens in Canada, in Ontario I should say, they signed a law that anyone ENTERING an Ontario hospital, if they die there, potentially is a donor. They fly in teams to try and hit their grieving relatives to have them sign the person, who is maybe in a coma or whatever, to give up their organs. They hit them when they are utterly vulnerable. ‘Flying teams’ they call them.)
The funding is aimed at securing consent from grieving families and encouraging hospitals to keep alive critically ill patients who would normally not be revived.
“The additional funding provided over the payment for donors identified in the ICU recognises the need for the organ donation team to establish a rapport with the potential donor’s family and facilitate family consent,” the program’s information notes say.
That’s exactly what Canada’s already been doing for I think 2 years now. When you get admitted into a hospital, you’ve got to understand that these surgeons get paid big bucks for this and when they look at you and your STATUS in society, then think of the benefit to themselves, which is straight forward included in their salary paycheck, or the cash they could get from allowing you to die and harvesting your organs… what do you think you might go with? Do you think they are really, truly are this TV image of scrupulous people that are somehow angelic and always do the right thing? Do you really still believe that nonsense? Do you really still believe that? I wonder. I wonder. Do you still believe that doctors are above it all? That doctors are PURE and CLEAN all the time, all the way back to the first propaganda whether it’s Dr Kildare and Marcus Welby MD and all the dramas and FICTION they’ve put on television about them to raise them up into a high profession where we bow down and do what we’re told?
There are stacks of articles out there on the corruption within the medical industry. It’s probably one of the most corrupt industries there is. It’s the most greediest ones there is. Here is one from the Philadelphia Regional Local News. I’ll put this link up too.
Frozen Fetuses Found During Doctor’s Office Raid
Feb 23, 2010 – CBS3.com
PHILADELPHIA (CBS 3) ― Sources say dozens of frozen fetuses were found inside a West Philadelphia doctor’s office during a search.
Philadelphia and federal authorities who raided a doctor’s office after allegations a woman died following an abortion made a shocking discovery: more than two dozen frozen fetuses.
For the second time in four days, Philadelphia Police, along with State Licensing officials and DEA agents, searched the West Philadelphia office of Dr. Kermit Gosnell on Monday.
Sources tell Eyewitness News that the search came after a patient reportedly died following an abortion on November 20.
According to the State Board of Medicine, Dr. Gosnell had an unlicensed staff member conduct vaginal exams and administer medication.
In the November 20 case, the state claims the staff member administered Demerol, Promethazine and Diazepam to the female patient.
After the doctor arrived at the clinic, the patient was given more medication. After the doctor performed an abortion, the patient started to have an arrhythmia and later died, state officials said. Autopsy results are pending.
Sources also told Eyewitness News that during the search, investigators recovered more than two dozen fetuses stored in a freezer, some dating back 30 years. (A: Doesn’t that kind of make you sick? You know one of the prime tenets, again, was DEHUMANIZATION. Remember Julian Huxley said, the head of UNESCO at the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural cooperation and all that rubbish, to bring in a common culture, a debauched culture that would serve them better, he says, we must reduce the human being from his pedestal of being special and dehumanize them. THAT HAS HAPPENED people. This is ONE doctor in ONE place. Some of these fetuses go back 30 YEARS. 30 years. Do you think this is an isolated incident?)
The fetuses are now being analyzed to reveal if illegal late-term abortions may have been performed.
Records indicate that back in 1995, Gosnell was publicly reprimanded by the State Licensing Board which found he ”employed a physician’s assistant that was not certified … saw at least one patient and treated him.” (A: So he’s been doing this all along. THAT’S what you live in today. That is what you are living in today.)
There is GlaxoSmithKline, one of the ones who I think got one of the biggest contracts for getting their non-effective flu shots, after they hyped up this nonsense by payoffs to people in the World Heath Organization and everywhere else and lots of other governments to make sure they got the contract, multibillion dollar contracts for this worthless flu shot that probably had nothing to do with the flu at all. This article is from Natural News.
GlaxoSmithKline deliberately hid evidence of Avandia harm, says Senate report
NaturalNews.com / February 23 2010 / by Mike Adams
(NaturalNews) GlaxoSmithKline, maker of the diabetes drug Avandia, knew the drug was linked to tens of thousands of heart attacks but went out of its way to hide this information from the public, says a 334-page report just released by the Senate Finance Committee.
This report also accuses the FDA of betraying the public trust, explaining that FDA bureaucrats intentionally dismissed safety concerns found by the agency’s own scientists. (A: Two weeks ago I put the link up there where the emails between the scientists of a drug company, it might have been the same one, and the FDA were conversing and the big company said we have seven members within the FDA who will vote in our favor. See, they are all paid off. But understand, this drug that they had pushed for years, for years, it said it has caused already confirmed…)
The document reveals some rather startling facts about the dangers of Avandia, including evidence from the FDA’s own scientists who concluded that Avandia was associated with 83,000 heart attacks. (A: …83,000 heart attacks in diabetics.)
Do you think companies that kill off people like that would have any qualms about killing off a lot of people through inoculations as well? Look at the extent they have gone to cover this up. They also did their old stuff too, they sent out heavies to threaten doctors who did their own studies and found out what it was doing and threatened them with bodily harm, dis-reputation, getting their licenses pulled, and all the usual dirty, stinking tricks that these big pharma mafias actually do. That’s the reality of the medical profession. Behind that lovely white coat there is an awful lot of dirt… an awful lot of dirt.
The other thing too is I mentioned it often before because I’ve studied the agenda, is the system we are to go into and sustainability is really one that was well thought out. Part of it was to use the old theories of Malthus and others to find ways of bringing the population down to a state where we will not have very much energy. You must start killing off those who are alive; not just killing off the ones who don’t get a chance to get born, but killing off those who are alive. Part of it was to bring down the food supply, feed them lots of rubbish food; stuff that would kill them but nothing that would nourish them. That has happened through GMO food and processed foods and all the rest of it. They are putting out the small farmers by deliberation.
It is also to go meatless because, you see, they studied all the ancient civilizations and those who were still successful as having the same ruling crowd ruling over them, like India; they thought that vegetarianism was the way to go too and they’ve been pushing it and pushing it. That’s why Alvin Toffler in his book, The Third Wave, the one that Newt Gingrich gave every Congressman, said in the book that the system we are bringing in will be a vegetarian society and it MUST be so. He didn’t say why but I’ve read their articles from previous people and it’s because they know that you are not too healthy, you are not to MENTALLY with-it at times if you are purely vegetarian, especially when they give you a limited choice of vegetables too. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and before I go to a caller, I’ll just mention that the New York Times actually put an article out on the coming vegetarian society starting with meat-free Monday. It’s a big national push funded by the foundations, heavily promoted. It says…
A Push to Start the School Week Without Meat
By BAO ONG / February 22, 2010 / New York Times
All these different US states have signed on to it, without, again, asking the parents, I’d imagine. I’ll put this link up and you can read it for yourself. It’s a nationwide thing, as I say, and it’s to start getting children indoctrinated, along with the lectures, about how BAD animals are for the planet as you grow them to eat meat and all the rest of it.
There is Lark in Texas on the phones. Are you there Lark?
Lark: How are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Lark: Well, I have to admit I was laughing when you were telling us the story of Miss Flitchner. I was reminded immediately of another name, the name Flecksner. I know you know who the Flecksner Brothers were.
Alan: Yes.
Lark: I was wondering if they were of the same family and or bloodline.
Alan: It would be interesting to definitely delve into it.
Lark: Anyway, whether true or not it doesn’t matter, there are so many opportunists and people that buy into this sophistic agenda nowadays just for a buck that it doesn’t even matter any more.
Alan: I know.
Lark: People will sell out any true value or a moral code for a buck, every time, and it’s been proven over and over again.
Alan: Absolutely and I’ve talked to teachers. When I was talking about that psychiatric diagnostic manual, I went through teachers’ manuals on what they are being taught on how to diagnose the children. It’s not just the psychiatrists that are diagnosing children to get them on drugs, it’s the teachers now who believe they are psychiatrists as well and the drug companies of course are putting lots of money into the teachers’ associations to encourage this because they are behind it as well. The teachers have no qualms about drugging little Johnny and shrinking his brain and they really truly believe that they know best.
Lark: Well, the first lie they bought into was this notion of credentialism and, you know, the guaranteed job for life and the retirement benefits and so, my goodness, we can’t sacrifice that.
Alan: I talked to one young girl; in fact it was one that was 25 years old and in another year or so she will be at $170,000 a year. I said, you know you are all prostitutes… to a bunch of them, these teachers I gave a talk to. They all put their heads down and none of them denied it. They are all prostitutes for the status, for the incredible salary that they are getting at that age. They are nothing but social prostitutes and social engineers to further degrade society, for their own personal benefit.
Lark: I was also reminded of Wilhelm Wundt, the so-called founder of experimental psychology and what a weasel this guy was. Then too, I was reminded of that ism, scientism and how easily we are misled by so-called empirical evidence these days and how we’ve elevated science to such a lofty status in our society without examining where that science came from.
Alan: And without even questioning that there was actually a political agenda behind it. Huxley said, science will be elevated ABOVE religion as they destroy religion and then we shall OBEY it. He said too, it would be a scientific tyranny but he preferred a scientific tyranny over any other kind. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish the dog and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your God GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 25th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down the front page and bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use because once in a while the big ones go down. The official sites are [listed above]. Remember, you are the audience that brings me to you because I don’t ask for cash from the advertisers. The ads on the show are paid directly by advertisers straight to RBN; it bypasses me completely and I have nothing to do with it. That pays for this air time. It pays for the staff at RBN and the broadcast through the satellite, etc and their bills and that is very, very important these days. So you can keep me going by buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can also donate to me. It is up to you if you spare a few pennies here and there. Most folk things are free today but there is nothing free. There is a big body of people behind the person who is pushing something, believe you me, and nothing is for free. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] They used to accept postal money orders from around the world at one time, just a few years ago, but they stopped all that after 9/11 except for the US to Canada because we are pretty well amalgamated under the North American Union. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, write to me at [address above].
Reality, reality, reality… everybody is clutching for some kind of reality. Well, not everybody is clutching for reality, they think they have it because it’s presented to them every day by their television and their radio and the movies that they’re watching. That IS their reality, to be honest with you, for most people, because the technique of indoctrination has been so well perfected with mass communication. Of course, you understand too, that all down through time money has gone towards a military-industrial complex of one form or another. Most folk don’t even know that a knight of the Middle Ages just didn’t have one horse, his lance, his spear and a squire to get him, and his little castle to live in, he had a string of horses. He didn’t have one horse. Even during the crusades they had about 5 or 6 horses each in the train. It cost the equivalent of a leer jet to keep them going. So somebody was making an awful lot of money off of the military and they always have done, since long before that even. The Phoenicians had basically the patent, you might say, because they had the secrets of where to get the materials to make the bronze for spears and swords and they kept that quiet for hundreds of years. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about reality and how it is projected TO us. Most folk don’t have much of a chance because you get brainwashed when you are born and your parents will download to YOU the reality that THEY were given because they haven’t questioned anything either. They complain about politics and this guy in politics or that guy, but they don’t really understand what’s going on. Why should they, because they truly believe the media is there to do their thinking for them. They honestly do.
Reality is such a hard, hard thing to grasp. I’ve talked about how the world is planned with different phases of the plan and some are 5-year plans, some are 10, some are 50, some 100, some 120-150 years. If you go into the United Nations and the various organizations they have and their agendas, they use the same technique of 5, up to 100-year plans for different parts of the world integrated socialist system. You’ll find that in the Economic Union of Europe, same idea from their parliament. So we are run by these plans and we are not supposed to know. We are supposed to play and work and have some fun and don’t think too much. Never before in history have we had such really cheap entertainment, such a mass of it, to keep our minds from thinking about anything and yet entertainment also does another function and that’s to download lots of messages for predictive programming into YOU. It gives you your opinions in pretty well every topic you can imagine.
I’ve mentioned before how at the beginning of the 20th century, the Fabians were talking about a post-industrial society, a world society run by a socialist system. Socialism means that the experts, those who are fittest to rule, should have the right to rule, all the intelligentsia and academia and people with the right kind of knowledge, you know. You just cannot manage your lives properly and so with this big system, with the masses… The term “the masses” broke out with the industrial era. You stopped being people anymore and you became the mass, the masses. It’s been the same right up until the present time. They still use that. Everything is based on mass management but it also means that every individual HAS TO be completely predictable and hence the need for complete surveillance on every single person and the internet and all the other toys we have were given to us for that purpose.
They also said at the beginning of the 20th century that eventually they would crowd everybody into Super Cities. In the 90s, the United Nations had a day for the opening, of their statement at least – they open a lot of things in the air – to do with the beginning of Super Cities. The projects were to go ahead. Not many people looked in to what they were talking about because it seemed kind of wishy-washy at the time, not very clear at all and we tend to ignore things that aren’t spelled out in, like, child-speak to us. It was the creation, first of all, of the amalgamation of existing main cities with all those smaller ones that had grown up around them, various townships as well. Then the push would be on to depopulate the rural areas; that’s always been a prime thing to do for socialist countries. They move the people from the country into the mega cities where they can be more properly managed, under many different pretexts of course, as well.
We’ve seen that happen in places like Canada and other countries across the world where they have amalgamated everything, CENTRALIZED them into the main city. All the taxation for your state, your province, comes from your MAIN Super City where it used to be basically spread out from the different ones. That’s why it’s so inefficient because you cannot have… the further away that your government goes from YOU, the less chance there is they are going to bothered about you; you are just another one of the many around them that they don’t really want to look at.
I also mentioned that I think it was Detroit that was going to be one of the first cities to be basically demolished around the urban area. Urban sprawl, as they call it, is a dirty thing. That’s why they called it ‘sprawl;’ it’s the linguistics they use. Obama talked about his projects that he’d taken from someone else that came forward, to talk about how they would demolish these old urban areas, where people live, and they’ve moved all the work or the factories out. This article shows you how they don’t just say something. Legally they have to tell you, in a sense. It doesn’t mean they have to explain it to you. They just have to tell you, make the statement or use the term like ‘new world order’ like Papa Bush and Mr Blair and then Brown at the different G20 meetings, as all the newspapers said. THEY MEAN WHAT THEY SAY and we tend to ignore it thinking it doesn’t really affect us. This article is from the Detroit News. It says…
Detroit Mayor Bing emphasizes need to shrink city
Detroit mayor Dave Bing says the city plans to encourage residents to move from some neighborhoods: “If they stay where they are I absolutely cannot give them all the services they require.”
Mayor says it’s not ‘an easy conversation,’ but people, services must be focused to save city
CHRISTINE MACDONALD / The Detroit News / February 25, 2010 / detnews.com
(Alan: As I say, they will use any excuse, you see, so it will be easier for THEM to have all your little walk-in clinics and different things, and social work departments, it’s less far to go for the Children’s Aid to go and steal your children from you when it’s all centralized and you are all squashed together like sardines living on top of each other.)
Detroit –Mayor Dave Bing said Wednesday he “absolutely” intends to relocate residents from desolate neighborhoods and is bracing for inevitable legal challenges when he unveils his downsizing plan. (A: That’s a clearance, by the way, not downsizing. It’s called CLEARANCES; they’ve done clearances all down through history and it is a clearance project.)
In his strongest statements about shrinking the city since taking office, Bing told WJR-760 AM the city is using internal and external data to decide “winners and losers.” (A: Winners and losers… that’s all you are.) The city plans to save some neighborhoods and encourage residents to move from others, he said. (A: ‘Encourage’… ha. What does encouragement mean, eh?)
“If we don’t do it, you know this whole city is going to go down. (A: Well no kidding. I thought it already had.) I’m hopeful people will understand that,” Bing said. “If we can incentivize (A: ‘Incentivize’… that’s a good one.) some of those folks that are in those desolate areas, they can get a better situation.” (A: Really?)
“If they stay where they are I absolutely cannot give them all the services they require.”
He said there’s no timeline, price tag or estimate on the number of people who would have to be moved, but said federal funding would be needed. (A: Well that’s already been pretty well put on the books.) Bing said he plans to focus on the neighborhoods in which Detroit Public Schools plans to build schools with $500.5 million in bonds voters approved last year. (A: So once again, it’s for the children. You understand, you’ve got to sacrifice for the children because in this society we love children so much, that’s why the abortion clinics are chomping out the smoke that no one complains about in that particular case.)
“You can’t support every neighborhood,” Bing told WJR’s Frank Beckmann. “You can’t support every community across this city. (A: Well, you see, something has happened because you shouldn’t have to support them at all. Is that what government is for? …to support you? Is that what government really is there for, to support you?) Those communities that are stable, we can’t allow them to go down the tubes. That’s not a good business decision from my vantage point.” (A: So your home and where you live is really a business.)
Bing acknowledged it won’t be “an easy conversation.” And he’s already facing opposition from activists such as Ron Scott, who said he is “adamantly opposed” and believes the business community is pushing Bing to get cheap access to large tracts of the city. (A: Of course, that’s also true as well. And you know the ones they pick on first, the ones that are at rock bottom, maybe behind in a few payments, and those are the ones that they pick on first, or the unemployed. It’s an old, old story; nothing new in it really at all, is it?)
I’ll put this link up on my site at the end of the show. I’ll also put up the one on the Mega Cities to show you just how ALREADY there are hundreds of NGOs, non-governmental organizations working with your governments, and have been for a while, getting paid by your government and the foundations to set up this system through academia and various other sources. It’s all across Europe as well because it’s a world organization. It’s from the United Nations who first mentioned the cramming in of all the people into the center, downtown areas. They will be building up the way until you have the shacks on top like they did in Hong Kong at one time. They literally had shacks on top of the skyscrapers for those at the bottom of the heap, only it was a reversal, you were at the top of the heap there.
Now, the EU, it’s interesting. I read an article recently where Hillary Clinton was addressing NATO and popping over to see her friend Madeline Albright, also as an adviser there. The woman who loves people and starves them to death like she did with Iraq and thought it was a good thing. Hillary mentioned that part of NATO’s job and this is true because I read from the book by one of the generals from NATO who wrote a book quite a few years back about, one of its functions was to INTEGRATE, totally integrate, COMPLETELY integrate Europe until it’s like ONE country. That’s been done, of course. Hillary reiterated that in her late speech that that was part, still a part of its ongoing function. Just when you think you’re integrated, no, you’ve got MORE integration to go and more and more and more until it’s just a mass of heaving peoples moving to and fro and most of them living not too well at all. This is from the BBC. It’s about the Economic Union President that was elected by, again, a very SECRETIVE COUNCIL that elects the President for this massive new Soviet bloc called the Economic Union. I’ll read this tirade that was put against this President in front of his face, after I come back from this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. This article is from the BBC to do with a tirade from a Member of the European Parliament towards the new President that no one had actually heard of before. So who elected him, no one really knows.
UK MEP attacks new EU president
BBCNews.com / Wednesday, 24 February 2010
A British Eurosceptic (A: I like Euro-septic because it sounds nice and smelly.) MEP has unleashed a volley of insults against the President of the European Council.
Nigel Farage, who leads UK Independence Party (UKIP) MEPS in the European parliament, said Herman Van Rompuy had “the charisma of a damp rag”.
He compared the former Belgian prime minister to a “low-grade bank clerk” and said he came from a “non-country”.
The attack, which stunned the chamber, came as Mr Van Rompuy made his maiden appearance in parliament in Brussels.
“I don’t want to be rude,” Mr Farage began, before launching into a personal attack lasting several minutes.
“Who are you? I’d never heard of you, nobody in Europe had ever heard of you,” Mr Farage thundered, as noisy disapproval at his intervention in the chamber rose.
“Oh, I know democracy is not popular with you lot,” he said, addressing the members of parliament as they voiced their surprise. (A: And that’s true. That’s true. Everything is done in secret; this great Soviet bloc they call the European Union and the laws are all passed from the top. The Members of the European Parliament can suggest laws and they can suggest not putting the laws through but they have no power to block them, everything is in total secrecy… but that’s socialism for you.)
Mr Farage – known for his outspoken interventions – did, however, admit that he thought Mr Van Rompuy was “competent and capable”, adding that this made him “dangerous”. (A: Because he means capable for what? It’s socialism.)
“I have no doubt that your intention is to be the quiet assassin of European democracy and of European nation states,” he said. (A: That’s also true because the European Union is not democratic by ANY definition whatsoever. In fact, some of the dissidents from the old Soviet bloc have written screeds about this and said it’s really very much like the Soviet Union.)
Mr Farage’s party, UKIP, campaigns for the withdrawal of Britain from the European Union. It has 13 representatives in the European parliament.
“You seem to have a loathing for the very concept of the existence of nation states,” Mr Farage continued, adding: “Perhaps that’s because you come from Belgium, which is pretty much a non-country.”
Mr Van Rompuy, 62, was chosen unanimously by the governments of the EU’s 27 member states to take on the role of the first permanent European Council president. (A: In other words, it was the governments. This is what we are told, the governments chose this guy. The public didn’t get a vote on anything. This is the top guy to rule over all of them.)
Described as camera-shy and sometimes given the nickname the “grey mouse”, he is seen as a coalition builder, credited for steering linguistically divided Belgium out of crisis.
In a typically low-key response to the comments, Mr Van Rompuy said: “There was one contribution that I can only hold in contempt, but I’m not going to comment further.”
You see, he can’t deny it because his sole purpose, and that’s why he really was picked by a much higher authority than any leaders of the governments. He was picked because he is their boy. He will do exactly as he is told. Socialism is going hard and fast. In fact, Europe is gone to be honest with you. It’s pretty well gone. You can’t unravel it. I can remember when Bob Rae was put in as the Premier of Canada. Everybody was so fed up with the left and the right wings, they voted in the far left. This guy is further left than Karl Marx. Bob Rae shook up a lot of things. He left us with a massive debt in Ontario; we didn’t have any when he came in. He said that by the time he finished with Ontario, he and his party, the laws, interwoven laws that he put in would be impossible to unravel. Well, that’s exactly how they set up the European Union. In other words they are trying to tell us if we went through trying to unravel these laws legally it would take about 50 years to do so. Well, personally I know how you do it. You just get all that stuff and you throw it in… I’ve got a nice fire here; it’s quite nice and as big, this stove here. It holds quite a bit and it would burn them all pretty efficiently too because when it’s really hot you don’t see any smoke coming out. But that’s the reality of life we are living in. It’s a planned farce and has been for quite a few generations and the public are the last, it’s designed that the public are the last to know what it’s really all about.
Another laugh I got too, was the World Heath Organization, this great Dr WHO. From all the farces they’ve gone through, remember everything from the United Nations is a POLITICAL agency and every agency they have is for a political purpose in the big socialist plan. We’ve seen the farces they’ve had with the IPCC that they commandeered and all the other organizations that end up with scandals and scams. Here they’ve come out with…
A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population
Previous Volume 360:491-499 January 29, 2009 Number 5 / NEJM.org
I don’t know if you know it or not, your health services are all being amalgamated. That’s part of the globalist plan. You will have ONE authority over all medicine and medical authorities and everything comes down from the United Nations. Actually it already does go through the World Health Organization, but they are putting in a Surgical Safety Checklist for SURGEONS and for the staff and it’s the most basic stuff that I don’t even… I think even the nursing assistants probably get taught this stuff. They have to retell them again to count the swabs, make sure they are all out of the body, make sure that they have right patient and don’t remove the wrong breast. Back after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning this World Health Organization list they put out. This article is actually from the New England Journal of Medicine. I’ll put this up for your perusal too and another one next to it, to do with Canada’s safety checklist. We are so goody-two-shoes in Canada we’ve already implemented this to make sure the people go through this 32-point list and it’s to mandatory on April 1st. It says… [Alan laughing]. You’ve got to laugh at Canada too.
New safety checklist designed to prevent surgical errors
By Dave Waddell, The Windsor Star, February 24, 2010
The surgical safety checklist that was rolled out this week by the Ontario Ministry of Health (A: Which they don’t mention is from the World Health Organization.) is designed to prevent precisely the kind of mistakes that saw Dr. Barbara Heartwell perform two unnecessary mastectomies on a pair of local women, health officials said Wednesday. (A: And that is called, in medical parlance, oops. Someone else also, I do believe, removed a baby’s bladder by mistake. That’s an awful thing. You could see it in a comedy show and you would laugh your head off but in reality… this is real. They’re actually doing this kind of stuff.)
I can’t understand how it’s happening at all. I really, really can’t. I really, really, really can’t. Either the training has gone down the tubes to such an extent that you’ve got total incompetents in charge but I think part of it too, again, is the socialist system that runs the whole thing here. There are more chiefs than Indians. There are more bureaucrats running over these things than well-trained employees and that’s part of the problem. That’s also the same I think with Britain and other countries in Europe. The US is taking Britain for the example to follow under Obama’s health care plan. Don’t you believe for a second that it’s been shelved or they are still debating because I talk to enough medical professional in the US, frequently, who give me the scoop on what’s BEING implemented already, what was being implemented before Obama was brought in even, and where it is all going now. There are a lot of wards getting shut down. There are a lot of them that are getting rented out to private organizations. Right along with the plan that Obama had suggested, from the RAND Corporation of course, they are really cutting an awful lot of the care OUT all together.
I’ll put all these links up for you to peruse at the end of the show on cuttingthroughthematrix.com if XplorNet, that wonderful Hughes Satellite Company that gives it out to a few companies like XplorNet, GIVES ME or DEEMS to give me the speed that I need to get everything uploaded tonight, since I’m down to twice the speed of dial-up and I’m paying 3 times of what most of you are paying out there for your cable or high speed internet. Because I’m me, I guess. They just like me so much.
There is a caller on the line. I don’t know if its long distance but it’s from London. Is it Honey that is there?
Honey: Thank you for taking my call. I’ve only been listening to your show for a few months but you are doing a good work and you are waking people up. I just wanted to, it’s good you spend so much time talking about the EU and that’s what my little comment is about. A few weeks ago, when they were talking about Greece and the economy in the news, whether they were going to help them or not. Someone was being interviewed and I think he was based inside the European Parliament and behind him, on one of these sort of LCD screens, was the flag of the EU. There is the blue background and the circle of the 12 golden stars. Above the circle and underneath it were these 2 yellow semi circles. Basically, to me, it looks like an eye. I’ve never seen that symbol before and when I saw that I got quite disturbed by it. I tried finding that clip on the internet, you know a lot of them upload these into the internet, but I couldn’t find it anywhere. I’m just having a look on the EU web site now and it turns out that it’s a symbol of one of their sort of… one of their bodies. It’s a symbol of the Council. It’s something that I never saw before and it really, it just freaked me out and I wanted to call you about it and I haven’t had a chance to do so until now. It’s also interesting because when I was at school we were taught that the 12 stars are meant to symbolize the first 12 nations that signed onto the EU.
Alan: That’s what they told them.
Honey: But if you actually go on their own web site… Can I read something out? I’m on the web site now and it says, “The number of stars have nothing to do with the number of member states. There are 12 stars because the number 12 is traditionally the symbol of perfection, completeness and unity. The flag therefore remains unchanged regardless of EU enlargements.”
Alan: That’s right.
Honey: I know that you’ve mentioned in the past the UN actually means ‘one’ in French. Does the EU have something to do with ‘eye’ in other European languages? Does it mean ‘eye?’
Alan: It’s from an old Greek rendition and then into… it stayed in Greek actually. The precursor of dawn was also called ‘eua’ or often they will say ‘io’ and in the modern times but it used to be pronounced ‘eu.’ There is always someone who heralds the dawn, the new age, the new time. That’s why John the Baptist was put in; he is the heralder for a new system. That’s why in Freemasonry says that he is the heralder. That’s why they have Saint John’s lodges and all the rest of it. It’s the same thing here. There is always one who heralds the dawn coming in and really that’s what that’s stands for. They will often now say ‘io’ but it’s ‘eu.’
Honey: When that person was being interviewed, that eye in the background was the first thing that jumped out at me. I suppose I guess, once you’ve been listening to shows like yours, it changes your thinking. I was just thinking, other people that are watching the same interview at home, surely they are seeing this but, I guess obviously that they are not.
Alan: They don’t really. It’s the same with the American flag. Often you will see it with the gold fringe around it, which is really maritime law, because things are run by maritime law when it’s got a gold fringe round about it. But they don’t ask questions. They really believe the media will tell them everything that is important and of course the media’s job is not to tell you anything that’s important. What’s interesting too about the European Union one is if you look at the original American, the US war of independence flag, it did not have the lines of stars; it had a circle of stars in it on a blue background. Exactly the same. Benjamin Franklin explained that. He said, I hope this will be a confederation for a confederation of the world because the purpose of the 12 is for a guiding council, to run behind the scenes, of wise men and 12 wise men, he says, will rule the world. And that’s what it’s always meant in Cabalism, in esoteric Cabalism. It’s not the Parliament as you know and even the ones at the top tell you that all the decisions are done by secret panels at the top. Well, there is obviously a TOP secret panel and it will be 12 wise men.
Honey: It’s not every day that you get political organizations talking about perfect numbers and things like that and on their web site.
Alan: Exactly. Where is this in the… You only find this in Cabalism and that’s where it really comes from.
Honey: Thank you for taking my call.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
You’ll find in the Rosicrucian movement they used that number and that figure too and Rosicrucianism also had, it wasn’t just a Jewish Cabalism, they borrowed a lot of the Jewish concepts and brought it in. They actually called it Christian Cabalism at the time and that became one of their high symbols, the 12 stars. Of course, they always say there are 12 chairs laid out with an extra one that is not occupied so technically there are 13 chairs, 12 bodies, but one to come. That’s what they say. The eye is interesting; it’s always the same con job that’s going on. That means from even above the panels there is another body or person watching over it all. Some of them will say, oh it’s the grand architect of the universe and all that stuff but it’s much bigger than just that. They definitely have single bosses here and there looking over individual organizations.
It’s interesting, this article, to do with just how addicted people are today to their toys, that they were given. They are made very, very cheap, all the toys. The internet is cheap for most folk; even if you don’t have much money at all you can get a cheap, used computer and get a cheap deal… unless you live in the country like I do and you have to get satellite. They have their phones and all the rest of it. I’ve read articles before where they were already doing studies through academia and getting all the information given to them by the authorities of your phone calls, where you are, when you do it, to find out PATTERNS all about YOU and how it is fed to the Pentagon. I read the article FROM the Pentagon where they actually have a virtual reality world set up where there is one of EACH OF US in that… an avatar, if you like, in each one of these, from all countries, IN the Pentagon setup. The idea being, that by getting all of your daily data and information on where you travel with your cell phone – because they are tracking you all the time – getting your cluster of friends – they call them clusters – what you have in common with people, they fix out your personality profile and they can actually feed into it what you would do under certain circumstances, knowing your personality profile, and so you are UTTERLY PREDICTABLE. This article is just another one on the same kind of thing.
Struck in a rut?
That might be because our movements are 90% predictable
By Fiona Macrae / Daily Mail / 25th February 2010
Like to think of yourself as a spontaneous sort? You are so predictable.
We are such creatures of habit that scientists can accurately predict where we’ll go and when we’ll go there more than 90 per cent of the time.
Most of us can usually be found within one to three miles of our home.
Even those with a long commute generally do the same things at around the same time each day, the journal Science reports.
In other words, most of us are stuck in a rut.
Researcher Albert-Laszlo Barbasi said: ‘If you drive for one and a half hours to work and back, three hours of your day are taken away so you have little freedom to be spontaneous.
‘You are working, and travelling home and pretty much crashing and preparing for the next day.’
Globetrotters also follow a well-trodden path, tending to follow familiar routes, rather than visiting new places.
Professor Barbasi, of the respected Harvard Medical School in the U.S., analysed three months of mobile phone data from 50,000 people.
Logged by billing companies when they made or received calls and text, it allowed the researchers to pinpoint their location to within two miles.
The researchers used this information to build up a pattern of each person’s movements during the week and at weekends.
They found they could predict where a person would be at given time and get it right up to 93 per cent of the time.
Even the most spontaneous sorts were 80 per cent predictable.
Professor Barbasi said: ‘We are far more predictable than we actually think.
‘You have a regular schedule but think there are people out there who are less regular and are very spontaneous.
‘What we are finding is there aren’t those spontaneous people out there. Each of us are very regular and that regularity makes us very predictable.
I’ve told you before that in a totalitarian system EVERYONE must be completely predictable. In every totalitarian society – that have always been socialist by the way – under the names of Soviet or Nazi – Nazi was national socialism; communism or Sovietization was supposed to be international socialism – they had records on EVERY SINGLE INDIVIDUAL and all their habits and incredible amounts of data BEFORE they even had computers. So here they are going at it and this is only one professor getting this information shared to him that is supposed to be kept private and all the rest of it. He’s doing this data and I guarantee you this stuff will be going to the Pentagon too, from that previous article I read a few months ago, or maybe it was last summer even. Just to let you know that that’s the kind of world we are growing up into. Most folk don’t care because a lot of people WILL like socialism. They can be trained into liking Big Brother and believing that he is there to help them. A lot of folk will actually like that, believe it or not.
This article, “Will dummies buy the fed’s “smart meter” line?” – they are putting these smart meters in your electrical supply on your house all over Canada and a lot of places in the States. In Canada we don’t get the option; they just come and put it in. These meters have 2 methods it said, in a little brochure that is slipped under your door, to transmit the readings to their head office, once it’s up and running. They said that one is by, basically, FM radio and the other one is by a Wi-Fi system that connects somehow to the internet. So here is another spy thing in your house but not only that, they can actually read the signatures on any appliance you use in your house. When you buy any new items you can plug them in and it will automatically register that and send that back to them too. And if you go over a certain amount of usage you eventually will be penalized for doing so, as they bring in what they call ‘the age of austerity.’
The age of austerity, the cutbacks, training the animals to have less and less and less and the wonderful equality. That’s what they mean by equality in socialism, we are all dirt, equally poor at the bottom – that’s most of us – and you have the small elite at the top running the whole system, as I’ve explained many, many times before. Under the austerity, if you read the articles in the papers today, do a search, you’ll find that Greece is going through riots right now because their President or Prime Minister just declared he’s bringing in austerity and massive clamp-downs to pay off the national debt. Really he was ordered to do so by the Economic Union because you are no longer a sovereign nation anymore. In fact, you have less rights than a US state has to the federal government. You are more like a province of Britain basically and you do what you are told. So it says…
Privacy alert: Will dummies buy the fed’s “smart meter” line?
2010 February 25 / blastmagazine.com
The word “privacy” appears not once, in a 1,500-word request for public comment on the smart grid, released by the White House this week.
That’s because your individual privacy is the obstacle that the government, aided by the utility companies, hopes to overcome with so-called smart meters — devices that will reveal precisely how you are using the electricity you paid for.
Research into the smart grid, which includes the use of smart meters, has been paid for by hundreds of millions of your tax dollars. (A: That’s a fact. Our tax money FUNDS our chains. I keep telling you this. WE FUND OUR OWN CHAINS. Isn’t that amazing? We pay for all the research and development and the set-up of it and then they make us pay for it when they install it.)
So far, the only discernible benefits of the smart meters will go to the utility companies and government investigators. (No potential savings for consumers have been demonstrated.) (A: Your bills don’t go down.)
One question from the Office of Science and Technology does glance on the privacy issue:
“Who owns the home energy usage data? Should individual consumers and their authorized third-party service providers have the right to access energy usage data directly from the meter?”
Obviously, individual consumers own the juice they pay for, not the utilities. (A: Well that’s going to be obvious but it ain’t the facts. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and before leaving the smart meters, I should mention too that here in Canada they’ve been putting them in for a long time and they still haven’t set up the grid, they tell us. How they’ve been doing it before that even, was that they stopped sending it out to you because they privatized it. The taxpayer funded and built up the whole electrical system for Ontario and then they sold it for peanuts. Actually, Maurice Strong set it up, from the United Nations. He was the guy they sent over to sell it off, to his private buddies, and then they cut back on even meter readers.
So they give you an estimate of what they think it should be, according to last year or whatever, and believe you me, when they make a mistake it doesn’t matter how many times you phone them up, as I do every week, they go by that original mistake. These people you talk to are like computers themselves. You get overbilled by some times $300-400 in a bill and that can take up to 4 months to clear up with them, maybe 5 if you stick at it. I went through it last year, then they put in the smart meter. The girl who read the last meter, they actually sent her out to read it when they were installing the new one. She couldn’t read it because the bowl was all full of condensation so she guessed at it and I’m supposed to just pay up her big mistake, which is out by hundreds of bucks. So this is tacked on to every bill they give me ever since and even yet I’m still phoning in what the new meter says because they haven’t sent out someone to read it and they haven’t set up the system to read it remotely… so they tell me. That’s your con with smart meters but it will be a form of making you austere, teaching you and training you Pavlovian style by cutting you off, if necessary, according to how many people are in the house as to how much electricity you should be using. They will just cut you off and penalize you if you go above it. That’s what’s coming down. I read the early articles on it a few years back.
Freedom is a wonderful thing and I’m still looking to find someone who’s got it. I’ve read a lot about it and I’ve read a lot about people fighting for freedom but I truly haven’t met many people who’ve got it. Maybe in a few jungles here and there where folk make sure, like they are in some parts of the Amazon, they don’t let the people IN to spoil their country. Maybe they have freedom but if they do, they are the last.
We prattle on about it a lot because we are taught by the governments that we are free. I’ve read that quote often by Huxley and Russell and others who said we will all believe we are free because the government will tell us so. That’s really the freedom that we have today as we are trained, Pavlovian style, into this new socialist system that’s got a fair ways to go and it’s not pleasant whatsoever. It’s a global plantation, basically. Depopulation will come in to it as they claim there are less resources. It doesn’t matter if there are less resources, the fact is, they are allowing less resources to be used and given to us. That will eventually come to your food as well. Rationing will come down the pike. They’ve got to bring that in, they always do in a wartime scenario and this is a WAR ON THE PUBLIC they declared a long time ago by the Fabians and the Royal Society and the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations to basically train the public into the way we SHOULD live, according to the EXPERTS, those that know better, but don’t want to live like you. Some are more equal than others in such utopias, said Orwell.
I was going to read an article about a poor old woman of 61 who got arrested for standing and talking about arranging her funeral by a cop in Atlanta but I’ll leave that until tomorrow. From Hamish and myself from a VERY cold Canada – amongst all this global warming and there is a cold north wind blowing – it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 26th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have listed there and when the big ones go down in the future you can always download the latest shows by going into these alternate sites. Plus if you find sticking on download on the .com site try one of the other ones because everyone tends to go into the .com site at the same time and there are thousands that do it and it just jams up. [Official sites listed above.] The cuttingthrough.jenkness.com site is a very good site. That site is always up there even when some of the big ones go down.
You bring me to you; you are the listeners, the audience. I don’t go the way of most hosts. I certainly could do it, I’ve had all the offers and it would be very lucrative too and this is by having the advertisers come on your show, etc. You actually get paid for having them on as guests. But I don’t do it that way. The ads you hear on this show go right to the station RBN for the broadcast, to pay for their board ops and their equipment and their transmission of the show through satellite and so on and to pay their bills. So it’s up to YOU to keep me going. It gives me a free hand doing it this way. You can help support me by buy the things I have for sale – the books, CDs and DVDs – on the web sites or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those that get the disks burned and passed to them, who don’t use computers but they have them given to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I’ve talked about this big system of what’s called socialism. All big movements tend to move into socialism eventually and it’s backed by the bankers who PREFER a socialist society because it’s much more well organized for THEM, especially the international money lenders. It’s far better to have governments to demand money from its citizens to pay back to the money lenders, than the money lenders basically loaning out money individually to millions of people. They could never collect it all. They do it this way through TAXES, taxations and that’s why they favor and promoted, for over 100 years, the introduction of world socialism. A socialist society is a managed society from cradle to grave, is what they used to say. Cradle to grave, where experts run by the government and agencies will run your life including what you will do, what you will work at, and so on; in other words, a new soviet system on steroids. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about socialism basically and its many branches because the Fabian Society have hundreds of branches around the world and have had for 100 years or so, over 100 years in fact. Many of the politicians who are in power today and those behind them and lots of their bureaucrats too are members of the Fabian Society. As far as I can see, it’s really a branch, a specialized branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs which also has many other specialized branches into this globalized world system, the socialist system, a controlled society, planned society.
They want the so-called ‘free flow of goods’ through free trade, as they call it, which is RESTRICTED trade. It’s only the big boys, international corporations who can apply for free trade. Also the free flow of labor, supposedly, which we know at the moment, is way overdone because most of the immigrants flooding in to different parts of Europe are not really there because they are needed for work. They are really going there because it’s the last place on earth where they can get the welfare system and sometimes treatment as well, from a Health Service, which is also crashing their health services. That’s also to destroy the existing cultures and that was admitted by Tony Blair’s right-hand man. I read the article FROM the mainstream newspaper from Britain where Blair had ordered to open the floodgates wide to completely destroy the British way of life forever and it’s pretty well been accomplished. It’s nothing to do with colors, groups or whatever.
You’ve got to understand this is a warfare tactic that’s being used on peoples across the whole of Europe. There are also wars going across the world where a lot of these people are coming from. That’s always standard. People flee from these countries especially when they know it’s going to be a long haul war. These wars are now lasting 20-odd years. Remember, what we are seeing in Iraq right now is a continuation of Gulf War I, going on for many, many, many years. This is called PERPETUAL WAR, perpetual warfare technique. I’ve read articles from even the US military about this and how they do it and how they are going to keep doing it until everyone is STANDARDIZED under a common culture. A culture, really, that is socialist.
As we are all playing ourselves and thinking we are having the time of our lives, those that are young I should say, you have no idea of the system they are bringing in. Once they have got one they want, believe you me, all your rights, privileges and your fun will be taken away from you. See, control freaks can’t stand people really having fun. They also use that as a weapon against you at the moment. They’ve been doing that since the 1950s onwards really and speeding up it to destroy society. To conquer, as many of the top socialists have said even in the 1800s, you have to totally degrade the societies and then you come in to control them.
Part of the Fabian system was depopulation. It also was the abolition of private property and all property would be in the hands of the state. We have this strange deal of public/private partnerships. That’s the socialist way of having the means of production. They also have the means of distribution, which will come with rationing and so on for the NEW world order. I’ve got articles here FROM the UN explaining this new world order. As I say, the abolition of private property and even land itself is to be taken over by governments. So they are using global warming and land degradation, anything they can dream up is being used now and implemented. A war has been going on, on a HUGE scale financed by the biggest bankers on the planet and the biggest foundations, which they run, with hundreds of think tanks working for over 100 years with organizations and non-governmental organizations implementing, drafting all this legalese, bureaucrat-speak, for us all and it’s all being presented to governments and they are signing them in automatically as we live.
Part of it also was to do with the depopulation program AND as Julian Huxley himself said, who worked for the United Nations for UNESCO. He said we’ve got to take human being off their pedestals as the most advanced creation and dehumanize them. Put them down to the level of the animals with no more rights or specialities about them. That’s happened in many different ways until we accept things like organ harvesting from fetuses and putting fetuses in blenders for make-up and lipstick and all that stuff. Horrible stuff like that. You all know this stuff, those who listen to the show. You’ve heard it all before and I’ve read from the mainstream. I don’t guess at this stuff and I don’t use conspiracy sites. You don’t have to. It’s interesting. HG Wells called the organization he worked for and this plan of global conquest, he called it ‘The Open Conspiracy.’ He wrote about that in one of his books called The Open Conspiracy. You should read it yourselves. It’s all there for those that want to find it. We always publish what we do and what we plan… HG Wells knew that for most folk there is nothing exciting in it. There is no sex and violence and the chase and the thrill. It’s just dry, boring, bureaucratic reading. You can still find these books in the libraries.
The other part of it was depopulation by what they called the death rate, increasing the DEATH rate. Not just the birth rate, increasing the death rate. So you decrease the birth rate, increase the death rate of those who are alive through various means and cancers, etc that were one of the things that they talked about 50 years ago. We all see how it’s been introduced. We know it’s going rampant and everybody is just stunned at the bottom level of science as to what’s happening and apparently it’s no big deal; it’s no crisis even though 1 out of 2 are supposed to die of cancer now. They know what’s doing it because there is a higher level of science. Just like you have an FBI, you’ve got a CIA way above them and organizations even above them.
Euthanasia was also discussed and of course we know that George Bernard Shaw gave the talk back in the early 20s about, if you want to live, you must work, basically, and you must come to us – meaning those who will rule the socialist governments, the Fabians –and he said, you must justify your existence of why we should allow you to live. You will only be allowed to live if you SERVE THEIR SYSTEM and they NEED you to serve their system, otherwise they will kill you. You can hear that little talk he gave on The Soviet Story, an excellent, excellent documentary to see. It shows you what you are in for and they are using all those methods but they’ve also got more advanced, improved methods because, you see, they wanted to kill you more humanely. In other words, you wouldn’t know what was killing you. They don’t have to shoot you in the back of the head any more. They can put it into your inoculations and your food, which was also discussed. George Bernard Shaw also asked the scientists of the world, especially Britain, to come up with a gas that could painlessly kill the unwanted – the unwashed masses basically, those that they didn’t need – that would kill them in a humane fashion, painless. Well, we know who took up that idea. So don’t blame Germany for everything; they got all their ideas from Britain.
Here is an article from the Mail Online. [Article altered and changed as of March 3, 2010.]
‘Euthanasia by the back door’: Fears over ‘compassion’ loophole in new assisted suicide guidelines.
Mail Online / February 25, 2010
LONDON — New guidelines on assisted suicide could usher in euthanasia through the ‘back door’ and will increase the risk to the seriously ill and disabled, it was claimed today. (Alan: Well, that’s why it’s there. That’s why they’re putting it in actually.)
Critics immediately attacked the updated approach to people who help others to die, unveiled this morning by the Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer.
The final guidelines shifted the focus from the victims health to the suspects motivation making clear any one acting out of compassion would be unlikely to face prosecution. (A: Well, they had an organization, you know, in Germany from the Department of Hygiene, they called it, that was sent around to the different hospitals and anyone who was deemed to be on the way out or if they were called mentally feeble and so on were euthanized by these specialists. But they got their ideas from the Soviet Union, remember, and that’s also explained in The Soviet Story, stuff they have kept quiet for an awful long time.)
But some campaigners condemn the changes and Members of Parliament demanded a Commons debate claiming they are being denied the chance to discuss the controversial issue.
Torry Mark Pritchard said, “This is a real concern out in the community that this house is not having a say. People are very concerned that this is a new back door to euthanasia in the UK.
Of course it is and it’s really also to get what they call ‘raising public awareness.’ There are legalities in this system that we live and how the legalities work is they raise these topics and if we are silent we are giving consent. So this is a LEGAL DECLARATION, what I’m reading here to the public, like a notice you might say, legally accepted as a notice to the public. It doesn’t matter if they read it or not. But if they are silent on the decision then you have given your consent. That literally is how they work this big scheme of theirs. It’s quite something that’s going on but that’s only one area of this whole massive attack.
I’ve talked about the early experimental schools run by Lord Bertrand Russell and others that were given Royal Charters to run them and do things to children that would have gotten anyone else hung at the time. He was promoting pre-pubertal sex and so on to see if they children would have problems bonding later in life. If they didn’t bond, they would be less likely to have children. That was one of the main reasons. The other reason was to try techniques of SCIENTIFIC INDOCTRINATION that would be put through to the children so that their parents’ input, their parents’ moral values and so on, would be OVERRULED by the scientific indoctrination of the children. He explains some of this in a book called, Education and the Good Life and you can do your search from his other books where he puts in the other stuff.
It’s great how they scatter the knowledge in different books, you know. Unfortunately I get calls and emails from people who say, where can I find this, what book is it? Well, you know, you might have half a dozen books to go through to put it all together, books where the same person has either authored the whole lot of them or written parts in other books. Everybody just expects everything… it’s like a fast food hamburger; they expect it like a drive through, just give me what I want to know. It takes years to accumulate this kind of knowledge, but they want it all in a minute. That’s their patience today. When I get these people I just ignore them. I don’t answer them. The music is coming in and we’ll get into some very good topics tonight when I come back from these messages.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Bertrand Russell and others who very successfully had their schemes implemented through the National Educational authority systems across the world basically. Again, that’s the standardization process that the Fabians were obsessed about. Here is an article from the utter hypocrites that they are, the BBC. I really can’t stand the hypocrisy of the media because you should see some of the stuff, and people sometimes burn the occasional play or whatever that they are putting out today and if you want basic pornography, just watch this stuff. Here they are, the BBC…
Children ‘over exposed to sexual imagery’
(A: What a joke, eh?)
By Dominic Casciani / BBC News / February 26, 2010
Children are being increasingly exposed to sexual imagery and their parents have limited opportunities to stop it, a report for the Home Office warns.
The report calls for tougher regulation of sexual imagery in adverts and a ban on selling “lads’ mags” to under-16s.
It also recommends selling mobile phones and games consoles with parental controls automatically switched on.
Author Dr Linda Papadopoulos said there was a clear link between sexualised imagery and violence towards females. (A: She’s going the other way. Ha. So that’s why she’s getting the grant to do this obviously. That’s ALL socialist countries. Most of these authors LIVE on grants from the governments so they can put stuff out there for the NGOs that the government also helps to finance. A lot of people get abuse, believe you me. It isn’t just women. It’s not just adults or children. ALL get abused in this kind of disgusting society in which we live today.)
Her report said the material children were being exposed to included the growth of lads’ mags and pornography on mobile phones, through to big-name fashion brands using sexual imagery to advertise clothes targeted at young teenagers.
You know, the BBC have been churning out music stuff, shows and so on, since the 50s and right through they keep changing and changing and changing them. I can remember even Benny Hill used to be on and if you wanted stuff that was so near, so near to the target, that was the show to watch. Believe you me, the BBC helped to lead this whole charge into this new system that we are now into today and really suffering from as well. It’s just fascinating to watch the hypocrisy of really what’s getting pushed out there and listen to the media.
This article I mentioned a few nights ago where students in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, had the school teachers activating their laptops at home, remotely, and watching them and listening to them. Here is an article about ANOTHER incident that happened before that, that apparently was already on public broadcasting station, the PBS where a school administrator boasts to PBS about his laptop spying. It’s a documentary. This is from, it’s called, boingboing.net web site. I’ll put this up too at the end of the show; all these links will go up there IF XplorNet graces me with my double up dial up speed, it’s supposed to be high speed, to upload it.
School administrator boasts to PBS about his laptop spying
By Cory Doctorow February 25, 2010
A few weeks ago, Frontline premiered a documentary called “Digital Nation”. In one segment, the vice-principle of Intermediate School 339, Bronx, NY, Dan Ackerman, demonstrates how he “remotely monitors” the students’ laptops for “inappropriate use”. (his demonstration begins at 4:36)
He says “They don’t even realize we are watching,” “I always like to mess with them and take a picture,” and “9 times out of 10, THEY DUCK OUT OF THE WAY.” (A: That’s his little joke, I guess.)
He says the students “use it like it’s a mirror” and he watches. He says 6th and 7th graders have their cameras activated. (A: This is the article I read previously.) It looks like the same software used by the Pennsylvania school that is being investigated for covertly spying on students through their webcams.
The shocking thing about this is that the privacy concerns were not even mentioned in the Frontline documentary! (A: Well, you see, we are all so jaded now with watching all this rubbish on TV that what’s to shock you anymore? Really? What is there to shock you anymore?)
This is pretty amazing footage — especially (as Scott notes) the absence of any questions about student privacy from the interviewer. I keep trying to imagine what my education would have been like if all my conversations, reading, doodling, writing, etc, had been monitored, in real time, by my teachers. (A: Then he goes on to say how great his teachers were and so on and so on.)
Then, when you go into the other article… This article is from Newsolio. It says,
Students Spied on Via Laptop Computers by Lower Merion School District in Philadelphia, Claim
Thursday, February 18, 2010 / By Newsolio Editor
(A: This is the other one that I was talking about that broke out recently. I’ll put this link up too.)
Philadelphia, PA- Parents are outraged after a school district was accused of spying on students at home via their laptop computers in a legal case straight out of a technology nightmare.
It’s claimed that big brother was watching as students of Lower Merion School district schools went about their activities on their specially issued laptop computers.
A suit filed with a US court, Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District (PA) et al, claims that students were spied on at home via the laptop web cams.
The case claims that an assistant principal told a student the school district knew he “was engaged in improper behavior in his home, and cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam embedded in minor plaintiff’s personal laptop issued by the school district.”
Outraged families from the suburban Philadelphia Lower Merion School District said Webcam-equipped personal laptop computers were issued to 1,800 high school students at three high schools.
There is another link here tying in with this. It gives you the system that they are using to spy on these children and it’s from StrydeHax.blogspot.com. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’m giving out the link tonight, go into the web site at the end of the show and you’ll see this as well, all these sites will be linked there. StrydeHax is the guy who gives you the data that you need to know if you want to know if your laptop has this system installed in it that allows them to remotely access it. It’s called LANRev and it’s from StrydeHax. It says…
Network Fingerprint for LANRev Agent
Monday, February 22, 2010 / StrydeHax.blogspot.com
Analysis of the LANRev software used to spy at Harriton High continues; for now, I wanted to give everyone a way to detect if a machine has the software installed remotely; this won’t tell if its webcam features are active. You’ll need a Unix command line with the “netcat” utility installed. (A: He goes through all this stuff which you can read for yourself telling you how to use it. If you scroll down he tells you, really, who designed this system and it happens to be one of the teachers who is in charge of technology at one of the schools that is listed in the lawsuit. He was the guy who designed the spy network.)
This investigation into the remote spying allegedly being conducted against students at Lower Merion represents an attempt to find proof of spying and a look into the toolchain used to accomplish spying. Taking a look at the LMSD Staff List, Mike Perbix is listed as a Network Tech at LMSD. Mr. Perbix has a large online web forum footprint as well as a personal blog, and a lot of his posts, attributed to his role at Lower Merion, provide insight into the tools, methods, and capabilities deployed against students at LMSD. Of the three network techs employed at LMSD, Mr. Perbix appears to have been the mastermind behind a massive, highly effective digital panopticon.
PanoMasterMind
The primary piece of evidence, already being reported on by a Fox affiliate, is this amazing promotional webcast (A: And the link is here, you’ll see the promotional webcast for the spying gear that this teacher designed.) for a remote monitoring product named LANRev. In it, Mike Perbix identifies himself as a high school network tech, and then speaks at length about using the track-and-monitor features of LanRev to take surreptitious remote pictures through a high school laptop webcam. (A: So one of the perpetrators actually is boasting about how to do it on this promotional webcast.) A note of particular pride is evident in his voice when he talks about finding a way outside of LANRev to enable “curtain mode”, a special remote administration mode that makes remote control of a laptop invisible to the victim. Listen at 35:47, when he says:
“you’re controlling someone’s machine, you don’t want them to know what you’re doing”
-Mike Perbix
It isn’t until 37 minutes into the video till Perbix begins talking about the Theft Tracking feature, which causes the laptop to go into a mode where it beacons its location and silent webcam screenshots out to an Internet server controlled by the school. (A: Isn’t that just dandy for perverts? Isn’t that dandy for the perverts, eh? And you think there is not organized perverts out there? There certainly are. There have been lots of features in the newspaper articles over the years, a lot of them in high places too.)
The beacon feature appears to have been one of the primary methods for remote spying, however, network footprints abound over the details and architecture of the remote administration effort. In this post, Perbix discusses methods for remotely resetting the firmware lockout used to prevent jailbreaking of student laptops. A jailbreak would have allowed students to monitor their own webcam to determine if administrators were truly taking pictures or if, as the school administration claimed, the blinking webcams were just “a glitch.”
Perbix also maintains a prolific blog, where in this blog post he describes using the remote monitoring feature to locate a stolen laptop:
“As a prime example, we initially attempted to recover a stolen laptop that reported back to us its internet address and DNS name. The police went to the house and were befuddled to find out the people we knew had the laptop was not the family that lived there…well, we eventually found out that they were the neighboring house and were borrowing the unsecured WI-FI.” (A: Amazing, eh?)
In a September 2009 post that may come to haunt this investigation, Perbix posted a scripting method for remote enable/disable of the iSight camera in the laptops. This post makes a lot more sense when Perbix puts it in context on an admin newsgroup, (A: All these links are all in this article here for you to see by this particular teacher. That’s all I’ll say right now but it just shows you, nothing is for free. Here is your laptop, your school is giving you a laptop, thousands of them get laptops and here these characters have been spying on them for goodness knows how long. And by the way, they were giving courses in how to use this particular spyware to other teachers from outside the state, so this will be nationwide.)
What a world we live in eh? What a world. I’m also putting a link up that was leaked initially from the United Nations. I think it was FoxNews.com that came out with it. It’s very interesting. It’s their whole agenda for the green economy. It wasn’t supposed to be leaked to the public. I’ll put the link up tonight on my site to the PDF and you can download it yourself. It goes into how long they have been working on this and it says that global warming and so on – because it’s been hyped up, blah, blah, blah – basically will be the MEANS by which they will take over and bring in this new greening economy and how they can take advantage of all the crises, etc and weather, famines, all that kind of stuff, to bring all this about. This is from their own, supposedly, secret documentation right here. I’ll put that link up for you to see.
Now, let’s go back to the Club of Rome, the guys that dreamed up the idea for using global warming to get this about, back in the 1970s. This is from their book, The First Global Revolution, by the founders of the Club of Rome, the PREMIERE environmental think thank for the United Nations. They are the consultants to the United Nations on this. Alexander King, the co-founder that wrote in the book, published in 1991, that back in the 1970s they were given the job to find a way and to find reasons to bring the whole world together for a common cause, against a common enemy and he says…
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the IDEA that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would FIT THE BILL. (A: That would fit the bill. An IDEA would fit the bill.) All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
That’s what they presented to the United Nations and we’ve all seen the effects of it since. All the lies they’ve been spouting out there by all these paid-off scientists that work for the IPCC and we’ve seen all these scandals that broke out when their lies get exposed; however, it won’t make a bit of difference because this is the one AGENDA that they must stick with to get all of this carbon taxes, another way to pummel you into the ground through poverty and take your land from you, etc. They won’t change their mind. I don’t care if you are up to your eyeballs in snow, like I am here and Britain is too, they are still going to go ahead with this. They’ve got nothing else in the bag.
Just to get right back to how this ties in with land, I said at the beginning that the Fabian Society talked about basically how people wouldn’t have private property anymore. Now, there will still be the big mansions and so on for VIPs that run the world to live in and that means themselves, etc, and the scientists. We will maintain them for them, of course, they won’t have to pay anything, just like the Soviet system but technically no one would own anything. We’ll all be living in little green shacks, scattered about at the edge of the forest or something. It says here…
Land management in UK must change to cope with climate change
(A: So here they’re pushing now for the takeover of all the land, now that basically they’ve put most of the folks out of their houses, through the managed financial crisis.)
By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent / 26 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
Britain faces rising water bills, housing shortages and destruction of wildlife unless the way land is managed is completely reformed, scientists have warned. (A: SCIENTISTS again. Science is the new priesthood.)
Professor John Beddington, the Government’s chief scientific adviser, said sticking with “business as usual” was not an option in the face of pressures such as climate change and population increases over the next 50 years.
The Foresight report on the future of land use said addressing these major challenges would need a strategic and integrated approach, rather than the fragmented policies of the past.
Land is also likely to come under pressure from an increasingly wealthy population to provide more living space and recreation, and the need to produce food and green energy – from wind farms to fuels made from crops – to meet targets on renewables.
Pressure on land and the resources it provides is expected to be particularly acute in the South East, where population is expected to grow most but where water is most scarce and most of the best farmland is found. (A: Last night I read the article to do with the Mega Cities. You see, the real agenda is to have us all off the land and crammed on top of each other in these super Mega Cities. The United Nations are the boys, again, who deal with that. In fact, the United Nations deals with everything in your life whether you know it or not. That’s the reality of it. That’s the reality of it.)
So here they are talking about all the things that the Club of Rome dreamed up a long time ago and overpopulation being one of them. Now, overpopulation… This is a FORCED issue, remember, because the UN itself, when it reports its statistics every year says that the native populations of Europe and Britain have been FALLING for the last 40-50 years. They’re all good people, you see, Don’t have any more than 1.2 children per family, so they all complied. Margaret Thatcher turned around when she was in and says, we’ve got to open the flood gates to immigration because there are not enough British people giving birth to children to pay off the national debt. No kidding. See, it’s all worked out way in advance. So when you think you are pleasing your government, believe you me, you are just going along with a part of a plan to do you in completely, as Tony Blair proved in that article that I mentioned earlier where he says, they’d destroy the face of Britain forever. That was his agenda.
This article is from the Mail Online.
Two passports a minute are given to foreigners as 1.5m issued since Labour elected
By James Slack / 26th February 2010 / Mail Online
Passports were given to foreigners at the rate of two a minute last year.
Officials approved a record 203,865 citizenship applications, 58 per cent more than in 2008.
Another 190,000 immigrants were given the right to settle in the UK in 2009 – a rise of 30 per cent on the year before. (A: Remember, these immigrants are allowed, under international law, through the UN, to bring in their extended families as well and they then apply for them.)
Home Office figures show that 1.5million foreigners have become UK citizens since Labour (A: government) came to power.
In 1997, just 37,010 were granted the status.
Officials claim the massive rises during the past year may have been caused by migrants rushing to beat the supposedly tougher system of earned citizenship due to start next year.
From then, obtaining a passport will usually take between six and eight years from a migrant’s arrival in the UK – rather than the current five.
The figures also reflect the huge influx into Britain in the early part of the last decade.
This is how they encourage the thing. It wouldn’t happen, believe you me, unless they wanted it to happen. Then they turn around and say, my God, look, there’s too many people, there’s too many people. Do you understand, in the Western world if these immigration quotas hadn’t been massively pumped up by design they could never pull off this ‘too many people’ scam? It would never work. The populations were DECLINING, so it would never work. They had to pump them in and say, see, there’s too many of you and then the laws are passed on all of you.
This is a 100 year old plan. It’s actually older. It’s all coming into play now. In fact, Bertrand Russell said in the 1920s, about all these techniques that are being used and implemented at that time, would begin to become apparent at the end of the millennium and into the new. Lenin said the same thing about the West. You are seeing it all happening right now.
I’ll go to the phone calls now and there is Kevin from Ontario. Are you there Kevin?
Kevin: Alan, hello. Have you been to North Bay recently?
Alan: Not recently no.
Kevin: Around here they are throwing around a little shirt buttons everywhere that say, “Students for sustainability.” You know, UN’s Agenda 21 for ‘sustainable development.’ You know, the depopulation agenda, they are pushing the depopulation agenda here on the students saying the world is overpopulated, it needs to be depopulated. And you see, it’s a desensitization using words, right. If they said to people, we’ve got to kill 90% of the population that would turn people off, right.
Alan: That’s right.
Kevin: So they use the soft language so people, the masses of sleeping people out there will go along with the program: sure, we’ve got to depopulate, depopulate, depopulate.
Alan: This is a steady drumbeat for years and people don’t realize… Most folk out there are actually already programmed into believing it.
Kevin: It’s ridiculous. I think we spoke about this last time, a lot of people realize what’s going on. Some of them discretely look into the “conspiracies” and all that. There is really only one conspiracy and that’s for world government. They look into this but a lot of them just have a thing of apathy. They know the news is full of BS. They know that the independent media on the internet is the most truthful you are going to find, if anywhere, but there are not many that are really standing up and doing anything about it.
Alan: Part of the problem is they don’t know what they can do about it. I think they understand on a level that this is so huge… it’s massive… we are under the most massively, well-organized organization that has ever existed on this planet. That is coming from the United Nations and there are literally thousands of branches coming out of it into every country, going all through academia of course, with instant access to all international media. They get all their programs on TV all the time on overpopulation, pollution, weather change and so on. And we say to ourselves, well, what can we do? We cannot have access to any of this stuff. Money rules the world. That’s your key. The bankers who set up the Royal Institute of International Affairs were the international bankers who then put out the foundations that fund the thousands of NGOs. They also give grants to every university across the planet. Just look at the Rockefellers. Every university in Canada gets its list of things to talk about and push because they get the Rockefeller grants. This is how big this is and they always go for the youth. They always go for the up-and-coming generations because they get a bit more indoctrination than the previous bunch. Beria talked about this in the 1930s at the Comintern meeting, the International Communist Meeting. He said, it used to take 70 years to brainwash and change a population into a completely different way of looking at anything; now we can do it in 5 years and eventually we’ll be able to do it every 6 months to a year. And that’s happening now. Hold on and I’ll be back after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’re talking to Kevin from Ontario. You still there Kevin?
Kevin: Yes. Well, I’m not all there but I’m still here.
Alan: That’s good enough.
Kevin: You are talking about they are going after the kids first. Absolutely and I can tell that first hand with one of the professors I got at Canada College, the social issues, through a film professor and he is pushing socialism in his class.
Alan: Oh, they all are. This is the mandate for Canada.
Kevin: When he and I talked privately, we pretty much speak the same language about the fact that the multi-billion dollar corporations are, pretty much seem to be a totalitarian police state. Not only in this country, the United States and Britain and all the Western countries are, they are killing off our freedoms. They are setting up a socialist world government and he fully agreed with me. In front of the class, he’ll laugh, he’ll just call me a crazy person. When we were talking he said, yeah, absolutely. But he’s trying to say that it’s a good thing.
Alan: I know. I know they flog this idea and that’s what Bezmenov said, the ex-KGB defector in the video up there. If you search for him, Bezmenov, he gives the whole technique and he says, once we come into power, THEN all your rights are stripped off you. The first ones they go for are those ones who pushed what they thought was socialism because they will object when they find out it’s not the utopia they expected, and the new system will not tolerate them because they are the first ones to rebel, so they are eliminated right away.
Kevin: With this one professor, I’ve been telling a few of my classmates, who do listen to me, by the way. I try to wake up as many people as I can just by talking to people one on one. I’ll tell them how this new world order system affects them. I get into a conversation and tell them, you might want to watch this guy, he’s gonna speak our little language but then he’s going to start saying this world government is good. I tell them, watch out for this guy. I told one of my classmates, I’m going to invite Tom out for a beer one of the nights. He said, why would you do that, they guy’s one of your enemies. I say, keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
Alan: That’s right.
Kevin: Like, keep a good watch on this guy. This is going out to all the young people out there that are listening to this show that are going through the colleges, be careful, you might find some of these professors are going to start speaking your language but they are going to start saying this world government system is a good thing. I tell people that this world government system, the people who are running it, these people are not fit to run a McDonald’s, quite frankly.
Alan: No and believe you me, they are totalitarian and once they truly have all the power there, you’ll find out it’s not going to be a nice brave new world where you are doped on soma. You will be under the iron fist. That’s the way socialism runs because it is completely control freaks from start to finish. It’s an ordered life from cradle to grave. They tell you what to do. They order you what to do. Also, if you don’t work, you die. That was the Soviet motto too. They took that from the Old Testament. That will come in as well. There’s no such thing as the welfare state. Under their system, no one is unemployed, believe you me.
Kevin: I wonder when are they gonna finally implement this? I think, judging from what I’ve done research on, is that I think they are going to let mother nature run a few courses over the next couple of years and once mother nature decides… because you know, the infrastructure has been put in place for the global elite to survive some big cataclysm. They know what’s coming.
Alan: What they do is take your tax money and they prepare for ANY possibility their think tanks can come up with in order to maintain… See, the first thing in this totalitarian system is its OWN SELF-PRESERVATION. That’s the first thing that must come through any possible thing. The think tanks look at all these problems and try and find ways to survive FOR THEMSELVES, through every single one of them. Even the people starving and maybe rebelling, that’s all taken care of too. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 1st 2010. I start of the show by suggesting that the newcomers that come in, and there are lots that come in all the time, should go right to cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and bookmark all the other sites I have up. Once in a while the big ones go down or I can’t upload to them and with these alternate sites you can always get the latest shows for download for free. [Official sites listed above.] I always mention too, the tin can moment, this is where I rattle the tin can. You don’t hear anything because there is nothing in it, but it’s up to you to keep me going because you are the audience. I could be paid by advertisers and sponsors and so on but I don’t because you kind of compromise in some ways and some topics might come up that you can’t really answer truthfully. The ads on the show that you hear are paid by the advertisers directly to RBN for their broadcast time. It pays for their staff, their board ops, their equipment, bills, and the transmission of this particular show. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into the web sites, scroll down and look at the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation option listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and passed at meetings of the shows I do on RBN here, you can always get in touch with me at [address above].
Last week I was going on about reality and showing you the differences between what you’re told and what is actually happening and what IS… as I say, what IS, as opposed to the propaganda. I’m sure most of you out there now in this audience are well aware that there are different realities broadcast to the general public and different levels of classes… Back with more after these messages.
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Last week I mentioned about the IPCC and how they have been caught with so many of their lies and that it doesn’t matter because it’s a political agenda for a brave new world. We’ve all to be taught to parrot all the slogans that they have. They call it ‘consensus building’ and all that kind of stuff. They have all these organizations that are funded with trillions of bucks actually, and I mean TRILLIONS, all over the world to bring in a common culture in a socialist system where we obey, do what we are told to do and they bring down the populations by their nice Fabian socialist means, which means they don’t tell you. After all, you wouldn’t get many volunteers, I think – not quite yet anyway – if you asked for people to come forward and just walk into an extermination booth or to become sterilized. But the way it’s going, if they can depress us enough I guess they will have a lot more takers.
So they do it, what they call, ‘humanely’. It’s a ‘humane’ fashion. In other words, you don’t know that you’re being injected with diseases, you’re being sterilized, and you’ll come down with cancers and all the rest of it. You’ll just think it’s one of those things and it’s your tough luck. The medical associations are taught that the new normal is that everybody gets cancer. That’s how it’s all taken. Including the professions, they also get their propaganda with every class that gets churned out there to practice on the people, in medical practice. That, really, is how it’s done. Every LAYER is given its own propaganda. It’s so beautiful when you have standardized, centralized education in the professions. You can give them, across the world, updates and new theories at the same time and tell them, no, this is always been normal; everyone dies of cancer; they always have; inoculations are good and all the rest of it.
Everyone takes their indoctrination and they go along with it too, even if what they’ve been taught defies what they are seeing in practice. They eventually catch on to, wait a minute, I injected all these children last month and they have all these problems now with autism and this and that and the other. Eventually you start to clue in there is something wrong. Then you have a slight battle – I call it a slight battle – with your conscience. Should I go along with the medical journal and say everything is okay and keep my paycheck or do I QUESTION? Well, if you question you lose your license and you are out the door. That would be the right thing to do… if you had any integrity at all. But these characters, of course, don’t have any. That’s why they go into these jobs now, not because they want to really help people, it’s for the big bucks and the status. That’s really the idea of it. It’s the same in academia too.
I mentioned it wouldn’t matter how many scandals broke out with the United Nations IPCC fake propaganda arm for the climate change nonsense. If we were up to our eyes and our ears in snow, they will still tell you it’s global warming. And they are doing that now. There is a whole bunch. See, they’ve regrouped as they always do after one of these big organizations is found out, especially the United Nations. They come out with just a mass of denials and lies and tell you, once again, all the scientists are in consensus with this. There is still massive consensus, they say, for global warming over the long haul and that’s supposed to be good enough. You see, everything is banked, under the big plan, the great world order plan, on us believing this scam and stopping using so much fuel, stopping heating yourself by various means. In fact, living in igloos would make them happier I think, and still tell you it’s global warming as you’re living in them.
We’ve all to become very AUSTERE. When they say austerity is coming, they mean POVERTY. It’s a nice way of saying POVERTY is coming to the bulk of the populace. Now, of course, they’re crushing the old factory towns that are being torn down and the private homes that go with it in the suburbs because of ‘urban sprawl’; it’s just too untidy. Then governments step in, take over the land and flatten everything, sew grass and then they sell it all again to big corporations. The corporations today want campus size organizations for themselves. That’s happening all over the place. It has been, actually, for a long time.
What’s the fallout, as well, from those who are taking all this propaganda seriously? It’s scary what’s really, really happening when we look at what’s happening. Here is an article for instance, the Mail Online.
Baby girl survives after being shot in the chest in parents’ ‘global warming suicide pact’
By Gerard Couzens / 1st March 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
A seven-month-old baby girl survived three days alone with a bullet in her chest beside the bodies of her parents and toddler brother.
Argentines Francisco Lotero, 56, and Miriam Coletti, 23, shot their children before killing themselves after making an apparent suicide pact over fears about global warming. (Alan: In other words, they are taking everything literally and seeing this, and watching all the sci-fi’s no doubt. They are just churning them out there, with a devastated planet and barbarians roaming around and they believe it all. They cannot get it through their heads that they are being lied to on a grand scale by all these nice people on television.)
Their son Francisco, two, died instantly after being hit in the back.
But their unnamed daughter cheated death after the bullet from her dad’s handgun missed her vital organs.
Paramedics rushed her to hospital covered in blood when police alerted by worried neighbours discovered the massacre three days later.
The youngster is recovering in hospital in the town of Goya in the northern Argentine province of Corrientes, where doctors say she is out of danger.
Her parents said they feared the effects of global warming in a suicide note discovered by police.
So that’s probably one of many and that’s leaked out because it came from another country probably. That’s the sort of thing that’s happening all over the place. Remember, the oldest trick in the book is to terrify the public of a threat and then step in to save them all but in the process it’s going to COST you to be saved. Adolf Hitler did it. Everyone has done the same sort of tactic, all the totalitarian systems. And for those that don’t really get it, YOU ARE UNDER A TOTALITARIAN SYSTEM AND YOU HAVE BEEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW. It SHOULD be obvious to all of you. It should really be obvious to all of you. I really hope that it is. But that’s the sort of thing that fear drives people to when they really believe what they are being told. The future is hopeless, my God, we’re amongst the bottom level in poverty so what chance do we have, ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, ya. You see.
For those who still think they are free… and how bad it’s getting now with the police state, there is not a movie out there that doesn’t have these guys with the black combat gear on and the masks. I don’t know if you noticed, these helmets they wear are actually the old German helmets only they are made of polymer. I hope you know that. There was an article, about 12-13 years ago when one of the big wigs in the US, one of the guys that was on the mainstream news and was looked up to, had a little bit at the end – I think it was at the end of 60 Minutes – and they showed you this helmet at the end and he says, do you realize that the US government has looked around for the best helmet to give the most protection to the head and after spending so many millions and millions and millions of dollars on different types, they said they came up with this. Then they showed you the German one. He says, that’s what they modeled it on; they couldn’t improve on it. So it’s quite interesting to note that that’s what they’re really wearing, German Nazi helmets… and the black outfits.
Black signifies DEATH. The old blue uniforms of the cops, when they called them The Thin Blue Line, meant that it’s more above board; justice at least had to be SEEN, at least the appearance of it had to be seen to be done and they would come and go with the general public. Now, the black is for authoritarian only. That’s the hangman. That’s the guy who chops off the head. It means OBEY. It’s meant to make you fearful and it’s working very well. We are living in fear now. Everyone is fearful and if you get fearful, you turn to the government. I always tell you that those who are abused always turn to the abuser for help and that’s exactly the technique that is being used. Quite something. This article here, the Atlanta Journal, it says…
Woman, 61, arrested for asking ‘why’
By Rhonda Cook / The Atlanta Journal-Constitution –ajc.com / Thursday, February 18, 2010
Four women, two of them well into middle age, were discussing funeral plans for a friend when an Atlanta police officer told them to move.
Three did but one asked “why.” In answer to her question, Minnie Carey, then 61, was handcuffed, put into a police wagon and taken to jail, where she was held for nine hours.
The Citizen Review Board found that Atlanta Police officer Brandy Dolson had violated APD policies and had falsely arrested Carey. (A: I don’t know if you know, these young cops, they live on all the violent movies that are out there. They are IN to these movies where SWAT teams are storming places and so on and it’s a police state. Really, they act it out in real life. We’re all being trained by this, by the way. They are being trained to be more violent and they act just the way they see the characters on TV act, like Rambo’s. We are being taught to be more fearful and just obey.)
“I was blown away,” Carey told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “I had heard about people in the community being harassed by the police … It really didn’t shock me as much as it probably would have if I had not heard of people going to jail for no reason. I figured I was just another one.
“But I had the right to ask ‘why’ I had to move,” she said. (A: Well, she though she did. Maybe that was in the old days.)
The Citizen Review Board – resurrected after the 2006 fatal police shooting of 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston in her home (A: Another dangerous person, this 92 year old woman. They just shot her.) – voted in a recent meeting to sustain Carey’s false arrest claim and the allegation that the officer had violated the department’s arrest policies.
“This case will illustrate to the public how OPS [Office of Professional Standards] responds [to allegations of police misconduct] … There have been some concerns that OPS has not sustained complaints,” said Seth Kirschenbaum, an attorney who is vice-chairman of the board. (A: They investigate themselves. This is their token to the public to show you they are not always so bad and that their judgments can fall, once in a blue moon, on the side of the civilian, as we’re called. Now we’re called ‘civilians’, you see. Quite something, how the world has changed and they still say we’re free. I’ll be back with more after these messages.)
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I was going to put a link up and do a story too about a woman, who has political people backing her obviously, who is having her own abortion done with one of the pills, RU-486 or whatever. She’s doing it all on Facebook and Twitter as it happens and it’s pretty gruesome, I guess. I haven’t looked into it because I’m not inclined to fall for the tricks that they put out in front of us. As I say, I won’t put that link up but I just wanted to mention how degraded we are becoming and how it’s being pushed from the top down. This woman’s particular site is anti-theists. That in itself tells you she’s got thing about religion and the value of life and stuff like that. She says, apparently, that it’s no big deal, really; it wasn’t human anyway. Well, if your own child is not human and you were one of these babies in the womb, what are you? What are you? Hmm? But this is to get publicity and to further get other folk and to encourage them to go along with that. You know, people will do that kind of stuff. There are always certain people in the community that will catch on, wow, I’ll do that too and I’ll get my name out there and blah, blah, blah and they do crazy things. There are a lot of idiots out there but that’s what the big people rely upon are the idiots.
This gets me back to what I’ve mentioned many times. Julian Huxley, who was the first CEO of UNESCO, the wonderful United Nations educational society etc, to bring in a standardized, socialist world where we are all obeyed, just like lovely, happy Chinese people and work like a COMMUNE basically. He said that we must devalue life and bring it down from its pedestal as something special, human life. They’ve been at that steadily for an awful long time until a lot of people, of course, have taken the bait and they do devalue life. They truly believe all the propaganda, oh, there’s too many people, but they never stop to look at the immigration quotas and ask, why are governments doing this if you are so overcrowded and there is no work out there. Why would you be bringing in more and more and more? Well, that’s the agenda, TO MAKE IT APPEAR OVERCROWDED because the big cities now, the Super Cities are to be the only places on earth where the bulk of the ordinary folk are supposed to live, until we all die off, up to the year 2050 or so. That’s the agenda right now.
This stuff is getting pushed from different areas too. It’s from the Daily Record in Scotland.
Nurses bequeath skeletons to tourist attraction (A: A tourist attraction!)
to highlight shortage of bodies for trainee doctors
Feb 26 2010 / dailyrecord.co.uk
(A: To be honest with you, there are so many people that die in the hospital and autopsies are done pretty well on all the elderly that go through there, I don’t understand why there is a shortage, for a start. It’s actually LAW over there in Scotland that anyone who dies at home has to have an autopsy regardless, to satisfy the cops that there is no foul play, supposedly. That’s the excuse for it. Personally, I think it’s another money-making racket. They know darn well what the elderly have been dying of; they’ve been on umpteen pills for years for the same problems.)
TWO NHS nurses have bequeathed their skeletons to a dungeon visitor attraction to highlight the shortage of bodies donated to medical science, they said today. (A: I wonder if they will plasticize them as well, and hang up their loose flesh somewhere. Anyway…)
Once they die, the bodies of Andrew and Janine Leishman will go to Edinburgh University’s medical college, which will pass the skeletons to Edinburgh Dungeon when it has finished with them.
There, they will go on show as exhibits in the macabre attraction.
The couple, who both work at Bo’ness Hospital near Falkirk, said they agreed to the plan to help draw attention to the decline in the number of bodies donated for research and science.
Mrs Leishman, 45, said: “Being nurses we are both very much aware of the problem and we also wanted to do this to highlight the desperate shortage of organ donors. (A: You should just ask China. They will send you as much as you want, their prisons are full.)
“We’re also big fans of the dungeon and the idea of joining their exhibits after death quite appeals to us.” (A: I wonder what they do for fun, these people.)
Mr Leishman said their 18-year-old son and 16-year-old daughter think their parents are “weird” but have accepted the plan.
He and his wife, from Bo’ness, want to make a contribution after their death.
He said: “We’ve been to so many funerals and we find them to be soul-destroying affairs which we don’t want to inflict on our families.
In other words, let’s all make it a big fun thing, when we die. Death is fun, didn’t you know that? Death is really fun. There is no dignity there at all, it’s all just FUN, you know, when you croak your last and all the rest of it, so we should have a big party about it and just strip them and put their skeletons up, or, put the whole lot up and plasticize it and hang them on wires, like those ridiculous Frankenstein touring shows that are attracting a lot of weirdoes. That’s the only people who go and see it. So that’s what’s happening in the world.
This is also what’s getting pushed in mainline media. And these idiots here, as well, are also going to pay for the flesh to be stripped after it’s been autopsied and they’ve taken out what they want. They have to pay to get it stripped, the skeleton cleaned and then all the rest of it. So I guess they’ve got money to burn, literally. But that’s the kind of world we are living in today as we are dehumanized, dehumanized, and dehumanized.
I wish people would truly study the history of socialism and the theories and the beliefs that are pushed and rammed along with socialism. It’s to be a totally controlled society by those who are fittest to rule them, generally academia, politicians and bureaucrats. Back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about socialism and its policies and its mandates and all the rest of it. You have to go into the histories of it to do with depopulation. Depopulation was always first on their agenda. They always said, look at all the poor people, look at the poor people. Because of that they got all the working people behind them not realizing that one of their solutions, eventually, when they would rise and take over power would be to ELIMINATE the poor, then you couldn’t say there were too many poor people and too many unemployed. That literally is their agenda. That’s what you see on The Soviet Story when you hear one of the founders of the British Fabian Society talk about it. He says, you’ll have to come to us and say why we should allow you to live. In other words, what good are you to our system? You have to be of SERVICE in this new brave new world. SERVICE, SERVICE, SERVICE… that’s why they brought us into service economies and eventually we’ll simply be in service all together.
Part of it too, was to remove parents and children and bring up children separate. In fact, they actually wanted initially to remove the children completely at birth from all parents. That’s what Lord Bertrand Russell initially advocated until he tried his experimental schools to see if they could scientifically indoctrinate children from Kindergarten onwards. He found it’s much more economically feasible to do it this way. Let the parents pay for them but the state will have their minds. That has happened. That’s why you still have your children, but they still go ahead and take a lot of children away from their parents. This is from The Times.
Children taken from parents and adopted ‘to meet ministry targets’
(A: That’s the government targets.)
From The Times August 24, 2007 / Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
Record numbers of young children are being taken from their parents and adopted – sometimes unjustly – to meet government targets, it is claimed today.
Each year some 1,300 babies under a month old are placed in care before adoption, compared with 500 when the Government came to power, BBC Radio 4’s Face the Facts claims today. (A: Remember that Labour, or Fabianism, that’s what they are by the way, because both these Prime Ministers belong to the International Socialist… Socialist Internationale, they call it. They – Brown and Blair – also are members of The Fabian Society. If you look up the Fabian Society’s membership you will see their names on it. So here they are going along with their targets because this is what they do; everything is done to targets.)
The programme is told that there are now more than 100 cases of possible miscarriages of justice in which children have been forcibly or unjustly adopted. (A: There is an awful lot more than that.)
It says that the number of parents in England who have lost their children, despite insufficient evidence that they were causing them harm, has reached record levels.
One reason, according to social workers, is that they are under pressure to meet government adoption targets – in line with ministers’ (A: That’s the politicians.) policy for more children in care to be adopted.
At the same time, it is claimed, parents are not always given a proper chance to challenge adoptions because of the short time limit for appeals and the secrecy of the family courts. (A: I hope you understand, it’s not a normal court. There is a justice of the peace there, there’s the Children’s Aid advocates there and they are all pals, probably all go to the same Eastern Star Lodge and all the rest of it and it’s a done deal.) Lawyers say that hearings in private fuel parents’ sense of injustice and can in some cases breed bad practice (A: The parents are not allowed in, when they’re all yapping together.), preventing them from properly defending themselves. (A: …against whatever is being said about them.)
Sarah Harman, a family law solicitor, said: “Secrecy breeds bad practice, it breeds suspicion. It feeds parents’ sense of injustice when they have their children removed that they’re not able to talk about it. They’re not able to air their grievances. Children have been removed from their families unjustly. There’s no two ways about that.”
A social work manager with 25 years’ experience in child protection added that parents had little chance of getting a hearing and overturning a decision made by the authorities. (A: Get used to that because that is what you will hear from now on. You don’t even need names, just THE AUTHORITIES.)
The manager told the BBC: “People will find that their children have been removed and freed for adoption without them having had a proper chance to defend themselves and their families and their children.”
MPs (A: Members of Parliament, the politicians.) have also spoken out against the unfair adoption system and are campaigning for a public inquiry. (A: Well, they’ll do that when they’re in the office but they will carry on the same policies because I’ve never seen anything change in Britain. There is just one agenda and it’s been going on for 100 years or more and that’s how it really, really is.)
Before I take a caller, there is one article here and it’s called…
Unmade in the USA: Death of manufacturing in America
Chidanand Rajghatta, TOI Crest, Feb 27, 2010 / indiatimes.com
(A: You have to go to the Times of India to see it.)
Gary Larsen’s eyes light up when he talks of the glory days of American manufacturing. A retired Boeing worker in the Seattle area, Larsen is watching US industry go into coma before his very eyes. His callused hands ferret out a floor shop manual from his working days that he says would have been proprietary knowledge till a decade ago. “I’m not sure anyone cares now,” he shrugs, offering it for scrutiny of a bygone era. Another yellowing in-house journal he fishes out has a picture of him on the cover. “We took great pride in making things,” Larsen sighs, “Today’s kids can’t make a thing.” (A: And they can’t. They can’t. They don’t know what making things happens to be.)
The fact that he still has the printed handbooks in the electronic age, years after he retired, says something. Last week, Larsen drove into Seattle looking for motor parts for a small boat he is building at home. He likes to stay connected — to reality; not in the online social networking sense today’s generation is familiar with. In fact, Larsen does not own a cellphone and rarely goes on the computer. In his free time, he tinkers with his three automobiles in his garage and makes assorted gee-gaws.
A few miles from his home, his old company Boeing still manufactures one of the rare few things that come with a “Made in America” sticker — big airplanes . But even that prowess is diminishing. More and more of the plane, including designing and manufacturing, are being outsourced. After a severe downturn in the post-9 /11 years, and a brief upswing, Boeing is in another nosedive, with its much-vaunted 787 way behind schedule. Last week, the company announced 10,000 lay-offs, and there was barely a ripple anywhere.
Here are some numbers, something Americans are not very good at these days. In the year 2000, more than 17 million Americans were employed in manufacturing. By 2009, that number had dropped to fewer than 12 million. (A: See, they had done the GATT Treaty. Every government worked on bringing through the GATT Treaty for years and years and years, just like they brought in the EU, in secrecy. They were setting up China to BE the manufacturer for the whole planet… long before that and training them, by the way, in Canada, Britain, the US and elsewhere for factories at that time they didn’t have in China. They were all trained over here, all the engineers. The financing was all done through the GATT Treaty from your countries, with your tax money, to transport all your factories over to China. That’s how it was done. Your tax money transported them over. You tax money paid them for 10 years for any loses they incurred until they were set up and functioning and bringing in their proper profit. Under a treaty that most folk haven’t even heard of because they were too busy watching sports and having fun.) The loss ranged across industries, and few sectors reflected it more than automobiles, America’s pride and joy for decades. In 2000, more than 1.3 million Americans built automobiles. In 2009, fewer than 674,000 remained. Similarly, nearly 700,000 Americans were employed making furniture. By 2009 that had dropped to 390,000. (A: Because they were making them down south of the border in the Mexico corridor.) Clothes manufacturing jobs dropped two thirds, from 483,500 to 168,300.
The first signs of the manufacturing demise appeared several years back when Levi Strauss, virtually America’s clothiers for more than a century, shifted its last jeans manufacturing unit to Mexico (India is now a major jeans-maker ). (A: I watched a little documentary on that and these characters are getting the jeans for 20-25 CENTS made over there in China, and India is not far behind. Then they sell it to you over here for whatever you – those that are silly enough to pay for them.) Around the same time, in a move that sounded like a death rattle to Scrabble buffs, Hasbro, the company which made the game famous, outsourced the manufacture of the tiles (made of soft Vermont maple) to China and Malaysia. Today, American stores and supermarkets are filled with foreign-made goods. (A: That’s all you see.) NRIs visiting India have a tough time finding “Made in America” products for relatives.
As I say, that’s the agenda. That was the agenda when the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs was carried out with the Star Chamber who decided who would go where and they used the taxpayer’s money. It’s incredible. Every government that signed it agreed to use the taxpayers to up the plants, whole companies and firms and tooling and the whole lot, send it to China, rebuild it for them over there and pay them for 10 years until they started to show what they expected to for the right profits. They were taking all the jobs away BY DESIGN. Why? Because it was time to bring the Western countries and especially the US and Canada down, and down fast. Suddenly, everything was made in China. EVERYTHING was made in China. It was an agenda… which tells you that China is NOT an enemy. You would NOT give your tooling and your die ability to China if you needed to go to war with them one day. Believe you me, it would never happen. Never happen.
There’s Dave from Arizona on the line. Are you there Dave?
Dave: I’d just like to bring up one point that you made about the lady who was arrested for asking why. It’s literally to the point where you are told what to do and you’ll either do it or you’ll be reprimanded for it.
Alan: Or you’ll be tazered or shot.
Dave: It’s just ridiculous.
Alan: It will come to that, one day. If they allow you to. They are getting us trained now to be tazered in public for not immediately obeying whatever. I’m not kidding about that. I’m not kidding, with the speed it’s going. The cop will be like Judge Dredd; he’ll be the executioner as well and that will become the norm.
Dave: Which is why they’ve got to get rid of The Constitution because if you have freedom of speech obviously you can ask why.
Alan: Exactly. Obviously they are telling you too, that you don’t even have freedom of speech. You are getting arrested for asking a simple question.
Dave: Exactly. It’s just so out of control.
Alan: Well, this is the agenda. Believe you me, it’s far worse than even this one here. It’s far, far worse. They have literally raised a generation who look at winners and losers. That’s what it’s all about, winners and losers. They’ve raised a generation who played video games. The heroes are the guys who win. They guys wearing all the black combat gear, the ninjas, have the power. That’s what they see. It’s like joining the biggest gang in the world and that’s what they want to do. That’s what goes into the cops and once you are in it, it’s the same as the military. You are now a brother. You are part of the big gang. They’ll all look after each other. They become technically a law unto themselves and they KNOW THAT. A few years ago in the US and in Canada at the same time, when they started using hollow point bullets, it was passed as okay to use hollow point bullets on citizens. It’s banned by the United Nations treaties; they can’t use it in warfare against other countries but they can use them on their own citizens. Suddenly there was a spate of shootings, cop shootings, killing everybody because of all their targets, because hollow points kill pretty well; they leave an awful mess. There was no outcry about it. There was no big hoopla. That was the message that came out clear at the time, that the cops have been given new orders now to just go ahead and basically do it. That’s what’s been happening for years now.
Dave: That’s the mind control, is that people will sell people out to be on top, to be a hero or to be rich or to be… They are basically just paying people to sell people out.
Alan: You’re right. They will.
Dave: And it works, obviously.
Alan: It does work. It’s the same with academia. You get a lot of people in academia who know what’s right and wrong but they go along with what is wrong, although it’s politically correct, because their big paychecks in universities and their status and their tenures and all the rest of it. Humanity, unfortunately, can prostitute itself very, very well for survival and unfortunately, when there are tyrants in control then we are in big trouble, big trouble because academia, big money and big government are all working together on this. It’s all part of the military-industrial complex, including, by the way, academia.
Dave: Which goes along with the dehumanizing through the movies and through the TV and all that.
Alan: Yes it is. It’s the movies they are churning out now that are so dehumanized and so full of messages for the young to copy, to emulate. The old story was monkey see, money do, that’s what children do, that’s what they see and they will copy it. They keep showing you a future world where, yeah, there’s lots of promiscuity and all the rest of it and violence, the big guys always win. The toughest guys always win and don’t worry about it. Otherwise you’ll be, you know, scraping for food and living in back alleys and all the rest of it as we go down the tubes. They expect a world of violence because people are going to be crammed into these cities. Same experiments with the rats; the rats at a certain number in a big cage will treat each other cordially. They have little rules. Once they get to a certain number of too many crammed in, they start to bite each other; there is deviant behavior that breaks out. It’s the same with people and THEY KNOW THIS at the top. They know this. I’ve got articles here where the big boys have discussed it and that is why they’ve given us basically the black armies of ninja boys with their armaments to take care of us as we are all put into these cities for the big, big takedown, over many years.
Dave: They know it because they are going to make it happen.
Alan: That’s right. That’s the agenda. That is the agenda.
Dave: Unreal. It’s just sad because I think back to when I was a kid and I think things seemed a lot easier, a lot better and obviously, it’s like in the last, I would say 10 years, 8 years, it has just really gone down.
Alan: It’s on a roll, you see. All these organizations that work over the public take orders from higher and higher authorities. They don’t do anything on their own. When they are given the word, don’t worry, it’s time to put it up a notch and be a bit more hard on you, they just go ahead and do it. They are robots, basically, but once they get authority they will put it into action, happily because they enjoy the power. There’s no doubt about it, it’s been authorized from the very, very top, all the way down. There are very few policemen today that are ever reprimanded for very long; they might lay them off for a week or two after killing folk or whatever, or when the SWAT teams go in and kill the wrong people by mistake which happens pretty often. In their zeal to get it done they want to just kill folk and they go into the wrong houses; but when they do their investigations BY ex-cops, who work in an ex-cop fraternity, on cops… what do you expect to happen? They are not going to condemn their own. They get off with it. They get off with it and what a statement that is to the rest of the police, don’t worry, we get off with it.
Dave: They are above the law.
Alan: This IS the new law.
Dave: I think what’s going to happen, Alan, is – I think you are in your 50s, I’m in my 40s – that when our generation goes, nobody is even going to remember how it was.
Alan: They won’t remember because we adapt so quickly. That’s why they can even pull the cons with the climate change. Your life is short. It spins by you. Most folk have no memory of even 4 years ago, what the weather was like, so they can easily pull it off. Back after these messages.
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and there is Jeff from Massachusetts. Are you there Jeff?
Jeff: As far as what’s going on in America, this is my paranoid fantasy. That is, a long time ago, the leaders of Russian and China and the Middle East told our American leaders, look, we have you by the throat, we have enemy agents in your country, we can destroy your country through scalar weapons, and your country is basically screwed. You give up all your resources, you let us have cart blanche, you let us appoint our leaders into your office, do as you’re told and you get a perfectly good life and if you don’t you’re screwed. That’s my paranoid fantasy of why all this kookoo stuff is going on. I was just reading the Verona Papers which vindicated Joseph McCarthy from when Joseph McCarthy had the black list on communist infiltrators, the Verona Papers adjudicated him practically. I have a book called, American Sold Out, by Ray Hope and in one of the chapters it talks about the SPCA and they are being conditioned to kill people when the new world order finally arrives, when martial law is called. Human beings are going to be exterminated like dogs. I believe it will be done by foreign troops and people from these third world countries. They are going to be running this country.
Alan: There is no doubt, the army is almost international as it is. I don’t know if people realize their armies are directed THROUGH the United Nations. They have been for years. NATO goes through the United Nations. It’s interesting when they set up NATO and they set up the United Nations with their Director General in charge of their war-making facilities and so on, it’s always to be a Russian, by the way. Still in the treaty yet, there is always to be a Russian who is in charge. He was in charge during the Korean War. The US couldn’t make a move without telling him what they were going to do. He then told the communist side. He also ran the Warsaw Pact countries. So they weren’t just a referee at the United Nations, they had set up both NATO and its supposed opposition, the Warsaw Pact countries, to play this game together. The big folk at the top know this but they are also killing us and have been killing us off since the 50s through inoculations. I’ve got so much evidence here I could spend weeks just going on that. It’s the same thing with India and Africa and Latin America. It’s come up again about the free tetanus shots sterilizing all the women and aborting their children, once again. That first broke out when they first did that openly back in the early 90s and they are still at it today. The average IDIOT out there that goes for their shots today, whenever there’s another non-existent flu… don’t believe for an instant that they are not going to do it for YOU as well. There’s no difference between the peasant of China, India, Africa or Peru or Chile and YOU, as far as the elite are concerned.
Jeff: Exactly. You are absolutely right. You know, the founder of the United Nations was Alger Hiss who was a communist and he was listed in the Verona Papers.
Alan: He was also, he worked with a Canadian who worked with Lester B Pearson and the Canadian was Escott Reid. He wrote about it in a book called, A Canadian Diplomat at the United Nations. He became the Prime Minster of Canada, Pearson, and Escott Reid drafted it up with Hiss. Then Pearson afterward became head of the United Nations for a while after he was Prime Minister. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish any myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.