Transcripts 2008
Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 8:04 pmHi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on July the 21st, 2008. Newcomers should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as much of the talks as you can handle. Go through them and you'll put a lot of pieces together, which will give you shortcuts to the big agenda, the big agenda that rules the world, and it really is an agenda, from many, many different sides and organizations all working together towards the same goal, and it can only be pulled off if the majority of the public are kept completely in the dark. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download in the various languages of Europe.
Now people can look into my site, as I say, and they can order a few things from the site; that keeps me going, that keeps me running here, and there are costs here, big costs. There's also ways to donate as well on the site, so for those who want to keep it going and get a lot out of it, you can help out by donating or buying some stuff. Even if you have it, you can buy more and pass it out to your friends.
We really are on such an amazing roll since 2001 towards this Brave New World Scenario, so much so, that many people cannot handle all of the facets which are working on them at the same time, around the clock, from all kinds of media, apparently unrelated articles; but they are related because behind all of this movement is the big eugenic movement that started long ago. It was on the go long before Charles Darwin came along to give it some credence and with pseudoscientific terminology, that's what they tended to do, was give it credence. It's much like psychiatry, you give it lots and lots of terms and labels, try to mix in some medicine with it to give it legitimacy; it's much the same sort of technique they used with Darwin, because the elite had always looked upon the masses as their servants and they saw the time coming when there would be too many of the servants and those servants might demand change. They might demand some of the goodies that they've been supplying the elite with for centuries and centuries. They might demand better housing and so on. Therefore they had to get a legitimate sort of counter to the religious organizations which were still followed by the majority of the public. The counter was a form of atheistic new religion, because it is a religion, even though it's atheistic in a sense, it's non-Christian for sure, but it's based on nature worship of a type. In other words, we exist – I think, therefore I am. With that philosophy, they went on from there.
Anything which couldn't be proven empirically by testing, over and over, was of no use whatsoever. Not a new idea, the ancient Greek philosophers had various schools and some of them specialized along that type of logic. What they thought was, if they could convince the public that we just come from amoebas and somehow gained intelligence with each leap – even though they never found any transformation from one species to the next. We still see all the cons that are out today. These people believe (at least tell us they believe) in evolution. Every science that runs our lives today is taught this right off the bat to the students when they come in to universities – evolution. You need a lot of faith to believe in evolution, an awful lot of faith. I'll be back with more after this break
Hi, I'm Alan Watt and this Cutting Through the Matrix, just prefacing an article I'm going to read, which takes us along the Darwinian route, something that has been drummed into our heads as inevitable by countless movies, books and little talks from television on science and technology and so on, conditioning us all towards this "progress" idea, we're progressing towards something. That's something you must do with a herd, you see, you make them think we're actually all going along the same road because we choose to; and nothing is further from the truth.
Back in the 50's and 60's, futurist societies were pumping authors who went round universities and promoted certain ideas. Arthur C. Clarke was one of them, with his predictive programming. These characters got awards for predicting certain things would come, scientifically, around the corner, to the public. They got awards for this and it wasn't because they were geniuses, it was because they were let in on the fact this technology was already worked on or they had it already. Whatever's given to the public is technically obsolete. When it's announced to the public as just being invented, it's technically obsolete. That's how you hold on to power. When we're told about something, they're already light years ahead of it by the time we hear about it, with genetics or anything else for that matter.
These futurists who belong to the futurist society are given, these authors are given stories to put out novels, movies and so on, to the public and they're given a lot of facts to wrap around it. It's the facts that become imbedded in our heads it's inevitable, so something that seems familiar to us doesn't seem so scary, even though we haven't thought it through or reasoned it through on a conscious level; that's why it works so well. This didn't start in the 19th or 20th century, it started in the 1800's when a Rothschild foundation started sponsoring novelists to write about science, wrap science into fiction, and we came up with science fiction. Youngsters whose minds are wide open to that—we love being tantalized by tremendous stories about the future—they themselves were having predictive programming put into their minds.
There are a thousand ways humankind could go, remember, as Lenin said this; and he was taught by the best bankers on the planet. However, we're taught we can only go one way, and that's "evolution." Someone obviously plans that way and it's promoted through universities, it's promoted through CEO meetings, international meetings of corporate business leaders, until it becomes the norm, like it's the only place to go, the only way to go; that's how it's done. As I say, behind this, remember, behind the Darwinistic concept of evolution, "survival of the fittest," and literally the euthanasia of the lesser types of humans—as they must do, according to their own particular religion here. They hope to go through into a Brave New World with purpose-made humans to serve them. That's really what it's for, and I'm amazed how the average person on the street thinks they're all going to be given immortality one day and better health. They still think they'll retain their independent thinking, if they have any, but nothing is further from the truth. They want perfect slaves at the top.
This is from CNN. I can't even find the date on this particular article, but I think it's recent anyway.
Scientists: Humans and machines will merge in future
Nick Bostrom says technology will let humans manipulate their own biology
Ray Kurzweil predicts humans will be mostly non-biological by around 2030
Alan: That's about the time, remember, after the 30 years or so of riots we have to go through as they cut back all the things we need to live.
Biotechnology, nanotechnology, robotics could merge mankind with machines
Alan: The Borg, that's what the Borg was all about. You will be assimilated, right?
By Lara Farrar
LONDON, England (CNN) -- A group of experts from around the world will hold a first of its kind conference Thursday on global catastrophic risks.
Alan: Now everything is under "catastrophic risks," remember.
Dr. Nick Bostrom says superintelligent beings could pose an existential risk to human life.
Some experts say humans will merge with machines before the end of this century.
They will discuss what should be done to prevent these risks from becoming realities that could lead to the end of human life on Earth as we know it.
Alan: That's a sort of doublespeak; they're going to do it but they're going to preserve it. It's like progressive conservatives, you progress and you conserve, same thing.
Speakers at the four-day event at Oxford University in Britain will talk about topics including nuclear terrorism and what to do if a large asteroid were to be on a collision course with our planet.
Alan: "…or if the prime minister slips on a banana peel" – I added the last part.
On the final day of the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference, experts will focus on what could be the unintended consequences of new technologies, such as superintelligent machines that, if ill-conceived, might cause the demise of Homo sapiens.
Alan: I always get a laugh at the "sap" part, we're all "saps." You've got an ape in there as well.
"Any entity which is radically smarter than human beings would also be very powerful," said Dr. Nick Bostrom, director of Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, host of the symposium. "If we get something wrong, you could imagine the consequences would involve the extinction of the human species."
Bostrom is a philosopher…
Alan: Now they always have philosophers involved with these big, real government movements – I'm talking about the world government movements. Arnold Toynbee and many others were historians-philosophers who could guide the meetings along this futurist-type scenario by using the past and projecting it into the future, regarding behavioural reactions to certain events and changes.
He's a philosopher:
… and a leading thinker of transhumanism, …
Alan: Now that's the whole – they've got so many new names for eugenics. Eugenics got a bad name because of what happened in Natzi Germany during World War II, so they came out later with bioethics committees – bioethics. These are the ones who decide about how far they can go or what they should do next with the human gene. It's the same organization. Another part of the same organization is called Transhumanism. Now that they've got everything really vague now, everything's vague as to what normalcy is, whether it's men, females or anything else and all the ones in-between. Now they're pushing – and that was the real reason for it, they don't care if you're homosexual, lesbian or anything else. They just simply use movements to "fuzz" and completely give a kind of hazy idea of what any kind of normalcy is—any kind of normalcy. Once you have everything in flux and there's no normalcy of any kind, and you've degenerated the world as far as you can take it, then you can get in to the next phase, you can really push into where you really want to go. This is a scientific technique and everyone is used along the way.
…a movement that advocates not only the study of the potential threats and promises that future technologies could pose to human life but also the ways in which emergent technologies could be used to make the very act of living better.
Alan: Now that little statement means that someone's defined what they mean by "living better." We better understand how they talk to us in eugenic societies.
"We want to preserve the best of what it is to be human…
Alan: Remember that part, too, that means those that are deemed "not the best" will not be preserved.
…and maybe even amplify that," Bostrom said.
Alan: Obedience.
Transhumanists, according to Bostrom, anticipate an era in which biotechnology, molecular nanotechnologies, artificial intelligence and other new types of cognitive tools will be used to amplify our intellectual capacity, improve our physical capabilities and even enhance our emotional well-being.
Alan: That last part there, "enhance our emotional well-being," remember the eugenics societies along with the psychiatric institutions of the world are hand-in-glove, they have the same agenda, because they're based on the same premise that everyone in the world who hasn't made it to the top either has a "poverty gene" in them or you're just simply inferior or too emotional. Emotion is bad, emotion makes you too poor a worker; they want to eradicate emotion, remember, so that you're like Mr. Spock without his salary.
The end result would be a new form of "posthuman" life with beings that possess qualities and skills so exceedingly advanced they no longer can be classified simply as humans.
Alan: I was talking about this years ago and people simply rolled their eyes, and here it is right in your face. I talked about the hermaphroditic society because I read the books from the 60's of the American Psychiatric Institute and their big, long meetings and what came out of it in the book when they talked about creating a world of hermaphroditic creatures; they'd be very peaceful, well-behaved and more efficient. Now it's out in Australia, they're looking at this seriously, in mainstream papers.
"We will begin to use science and technology not just to manage the world around us but to manage our own human biology as well,"…
Alan: "manage our own human biology" – what do you think they mean by that? Again, you're back to reproduction
… Bostrom said. "The changes will be faster and more profound than the very, very slow changes that would occur over tens of thousands of years as a result of natural selection and biological evolution."
Alan: There's their religion again. These are the guys that must destroy all other religions to bring in their own; and guess what? They've succeeded.
Bostrom declined to predict an exact time frame when this revolutionary biotechnological metamorphosis might occur.
Alan: Which is a joke; he knows.
"Maybe it will take eight years or 200 years," he said. "It is very hard to predict."
Alan: Which is nonsense because he already said by 2030.
Other experts are already getting ready for what they say could be a radical transformation of the human race in as little as two decades.
"This will happen faster than people realize," said Dr. Ray Kurzweil, an inventor and futurist who calculates technology trends using what he calls the law of accelerating returns, a mathematical concept that measures the exponential growth of technological evolution.
Alan: I'll continue with this very good part about "eve" and "lution" after the following break.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this Cutting Through the Matrix, going through an article from CNN on the futurist society's main spokesman here, Kurzweil, who's also one of the leaders of the Transhumanist association, which is a massive organization funded to the hilt by all the big foundations and institutions, and they get governmental money too, lots of it, so this is the agenda.
Now, Kurzweil is predicting the arrival of something called the Singularity,…
Alan: There's all your oneness thing again.
…which he defines in his book on the subject as "the culmination of the merger of our biological thinking and existence with our technology, resulting in a world that is still human but that transcends our biological roots."
"There will be no distinction, post-Singularity, between human and machine or between physical and virtual reality," he writes.
Alan: No distinction – you won't know if you're really awake and walking around or you're in the matrix of virtual reality, that's what he's telling you here.
I read a document a while back from the Pentagon where they talked about having a duplicate of every person in a computer network system, with all your traits, your personality, your daily routines, going through all those daily routines on a daily basis as you. Every part of the new data that they get from you that you put up on the net and so on, through your emails, they add to it – a virtual reality with one of you, every one of you, in it. You think they're not kidding? You think they can't do this? Do you think they can't make society go along? They won't have to make them; they'll allure you into it and people will pay to get into it.
Singularity will approach at an accelerating rate as human-created technologies become exponentially smaller and increasingly powerful and as fields such as biology and medicine are understood more and more in terms of information processes that can be simulated with computers.
By the 2030s, Kurzweil said, humans will become more non-biological than biological, capable of uploading our minds onto the Internet, living in various virtual worlds and even avoiding aging and evading death.
Alan: Now there's your problem right there, if everyone's still living, then you will end up with an overpopulation problem, so that all has to be argued out—and it has been, long before this article appeared. Remember what Charles Galton Darwin said in his book "The Next Million Years" (quite the boast), he said that the elite themselves would not alter their own brains, everyone else down below them will have their brains altered because you don't need your ability to critically think and solve problems when the state is making all your decisions for you. He didn't mention computers programming you, but that's what it is. The elite, remember, will still be guiding the ship of planet Earth and they must retain their survival capabilities; you won't need them.
Do you really think these boys at the top are going to do all this to help Joe Average at the bottom? Let you play forever? I don't think so. You see, there'll be no more you. You'll be a robot basically, programmable, self-healing—that's why they like the human body, it's a tremendous machine—and you'll be very efficient.
In the 2040s, Kurzweil predicts that non-biological intelligence will be billions of times better than the biological intelligence humans have today, possibly rendering our present brains obsolete.
Alan: Therefore, technically, we're obsolete already. Remember you're living in an economic system. They don't mention economics here, like what you'll be doing; if there's no purpose for you, will they allow you to live? If you're alive, will you even know it?
"Our brains are a million times slower than electronics," Kurzweil said. "We will increasingly become software entities if you go out enough decades."
This movement towards the merger of man and machine, according to Kurzweil, is already starting to happen and is most visible in the field of biotechnology.
Alan: We've got to remember all the feeding we've had from fiction, like "Artificial Intelligence" and all those other movies they put out there just to get the idea implanted, to make us kind of stand in awe of what's to come.
As scientists gain deeper insights into the genetic processes that underlie life, they are able to effectively reprogram human biology through the development of new forms of gene therapies and medications capable of turning on or off enzymes and RNA interference, or gene silencing.
Alan: They can silence genes. This was mentioned quite a few years ago on national television in Canada by a geneticist who does all the nature programs for the green boys, David Suzuki, and he said they had, then, capability of turning off the aging gene and making you live for five-hundred years if they wanted to. This is old stuff. It's amazing, too, that people will look upon this kind of article without thinking of the little phrases that are used, thinking that these benevolent people at the top, these altruists, just sweat nightmares over maybe they've missed something to help you. They never look into the foundations that fund them and look into their histories, like the Rockefeller foundation or any of them, and the whole plan and process of eugenics, never. It never dawns on them because most people are technically dead already, they're not conscious; to be conscious is alive. They'll transform into the next step quite easily. Back with more after the following messages.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this Cutting Through the Matrix, going through some of the amazing farce that's presented to the public as fact. I say farce because it's all deception and techniques are used to con the public to go along with these agendas. It is a farce in a sense, because a farce is kind of comedy they used to do on stage, very blatant, awful nasty stuff, it was all called "tits and bums" as they used to call it in Britain; it was very, very common on the stages back in the 1800's and early 1900's. You couldn't miss the point, but this stuff is done the same way, it's done the same way to the public. The problem is the public today cannot think for themselves. They've been trained not to reason and they've been trained, like Brzezinski said, that the media is there to do all their reasoning for them. That's a sad thing, but it's a very effective weapon that's been used against them and they can't think for themselves. They have been trained to believe that these people are somehow "altruistic," they have their best interests at heart. They don't see them as private corporations or government-run stations; they really see them as some kind of vague, special priesthood that does all their thinking and warning for them. They warn them.
Before I go onto the callers, here's an article that has to be mentioned because it shows you the massive conflict you get into if you mention all the contrary evidence to do with the global warming scam and what comes against you if you do so. This is about a documentary that was put on television and what happened to them. This is from the BBC news, Monday, 21st of July, 2008.
Climate documentary 'broke rules'
By Richard Black, Environment correspondent, BBC News website
The Great Global Warming Swindle, a controversial Channel 4 film, broke Ofcom rules,…
Alan: Ofcom must be some of the standards or something to do with the BBC.
… the media regulator says.
In a long-awaited judgement, Ofcom says Channel 4 did not fulfil obligations to be impartial and to reflect a range of views on controversial issues.
Alan: Now what a joke that is, because the whole point of, for instance, the BBC, it was set up to be a propaganda tool of the British government for policy and foreign policy. This is how they use rules they'd never put against themselves when someone else comes in and is not playing the game with them.
The film also treated interviewees unfairly, but did not mislead audiences "so as to cause harm or offence".
Plaintiffs say the Ofcom judgement is "inconsistent" and "lets Channel 4 off the hook on a technicality."
The film's key contentions were that the increase in atmospheric temperatures observed since the 1970s was not primarily caused by emissions of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels, and that the modern focus on climate change is based in politics…
Alan: They're right on with that.
…rather than science.
Alan: Now, I've already talked about "The First Global Revolution" and how they claimed they took a claim for coming up with this con of global warming and blaming man for it. This greening system is to rule our lives in a miniscule manner, every one of us. That's why you're going to get attacked when you come out and tell the truth about this thing. This is a must-be; this whole greening scam is a must-be to control us all.
It is seen in some "climate sceptic" circles as a counter to Al Gore's movie…
Alan: I call him "Allegory."
… An Inconvenient Truth, and credited with influencing public perception of climate science.
It has reportedly been sold to 21 countries and distributed on DVD.
"It's very disappointing that Ofcom hasn't come up with a stronger statement about being misled," said Sir John Houghton, a former head of the UK Met Office…
Alan: That's Meteorological office.
…and chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)…
Alan: That's the guys with the political interests in it, this IPCC. He works for them. He gets his money for the global warming scam.
"I know hundreds of people, literally hundreds, who were misled by it - they saw it, it was a well-produced programme and they imagined it had some truth behind it, so they were misled and it seems Ofcom didn't care about that," he told BBC News.
Alan: Here's a born liar getting his payoff to lie to the public to go along with this Club of Rome scam that we're causing global warming.
Ofcom defines a misleading programme as one by which the audience is "materially misled so as to cause harm or offence", and that Swindle does not meet this "high test".
"The programme has been let off the hook on a highly questionable technicality," said Bob Ward, former head of media at the Royal Society, who played a prominent role in co-ordinating objections to the film.
Alan: The Royal Society was set up as the first Freemasonic scientific institution with a royal charter in Britain. The Royal Society, these are the guys who funded and were behind Darwin and all the rest of them down through the ages, and who pulled many, many scams on the public.
"The ruling noted that Channel 4 had admitted errors in the graphs and data used in the programme, yet decided that this did not cause harm or offence to the audience."
Alan: Charles Galton, who was the cousin of Darwin, not to be confused with Charles Galton Darwin (who the grandson of Charles Darwin) – they always keep the same names in the family because they're all "gods," you see, they worship each other. They were using graphs and cons since the days of Malthus; he used a lot of graphs too. Technically, by Galton's rules, we should all be living ten feet deep right now on top each other, but nothing comes back on that.
Plaintiffs accused the programme of containing myriad factual inaccuracies, but Ofcom says it was "impractical and inappropriate for it to examine in detail all of the multifarious alleged examples... set out in the complaints."
Alan: That's how they all come against you, especially this big political body that pretends it's scientists – they're politicians and scientists, the scientists back up the politicians, and the scientists are living on grants from governments to do this. It's a must-be, as I say. (Now I'm going to try to get to the phones, but the server keeps kicking out here and I'll see if I can pull it up again.) Scam after scam goes on, but it depends who you are; you see they don't want any other opinion given out to the public, especially on a large scale.
We've got Ryan from New York. Are you there, Ryan?
Ryan: Hey, it's always good to hear you've survived a few more days.
Alan: Isn't it though? I'm quite happy for that myself.
Ryan: They're programming us quite well for the credits that you can't save up at the end of the week, because it takes a full day of work to pay for gas, a full day of work to pay for food for the week, and then the other three days you've got to pay for the bills, the minimum payments that everyone's enslaved with.
Alan: These guys, as I say, don't make mistakes. Remember that the panels for the integration of Europe were set up in 1948 to work quietly, and in the late 1990's, after it was all complete and they had their European Parliament, they admitted then and released the documentation saying that the truth was to be kept from all of the publics of Europe until it was completed. It's the same in the Americas. They set up negotiation teams in the state department and in the department of foreign affairs for Canada back at the same era for the integration of the Americas. They also knew that China was to be built up as the manufacturer and would be given different courses. Nothing happens by chance, including the slide of the dollar and all the rest of it. They don't make these kinds of mistakes in their projections, so nothing is happening by mistake. The dollar is falling apart and it's meant to, and that's going to be part of the reason they're going to use to rush the complete amalgamation of the Americas through, much quicker than Europe at the end.
Ryan: Most people probably want it because they don't even know any better.
Alan: They don't know any better. In fact, I talked to one person that first denied it, then almost subconsciously, she spoke aloud and said "it doesn't matter anyway, we all have the same culture, watch the same TV and buy the same things," that was it.
Ryan: They're all dancing in the zombie jamboree.
Alan: They are. They definitely are. Most people, as I say, are not conscious their entire lives. They can be nice people, they follow the culture norms, even though they're changing, they follow them and adapt to them quickly, they're polite to you, but they're not with it at all, they are not really conscious.
Ryan: I recently saw "The Man Who Would be King," the movie, I didn't read the book, but shocking. Rudyard Kipling is a character in that movie.
Alan: He puts himself in as the top reporter for the newspaper.
Ryan: The Northern Star. What I found funny was how once he became king and it started getting to his head, he thought he was going to be called cousin by the queen and become Order of the Garter. I was pretty shocked at that, and even the whole helping out the widow's son in the beginning, I was shocked that they went that far with it. When you show it to people they don't care, but I found it myself to be very interesting.
Alan: And the fact that even in the movie, fellow masons had to help and honour each other, regardless of the mess they were in, legally.
Ryan: Okay, it's good talking to you.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Now I've got Dave from California. Is Dave there?
Dave: I subscribe to Kurzweil's weekly newsletter, it's got all this technology stuff in it, because I've got a science background. I noticed last week one of the groups that was reporting that they had assembled a strand of self-replicating DNA from scratch. I was thinking back about 20 years ago during the rule of terror when Theodore [Kaczinski] was sending bombs through the mail to all these people who were pushing technology further and further. I read his "Unabomber Manifesto," he was actually a boy genius and was in Harvard at 16 and to make extra money he hooked up with a doctor who was doing mind control out of Harvard, a real famous one, spent two years attacking his core beliefs, and after that [Kaczinki] moved into the woods and got his little cabin and started sending out bombs because he thought technology was going to destroy the world. I can't really agree with his methods, but I'm beginning to wonder if he wasn't right about the technology thing.
Alan: It makes you wonder, too, was he programmed to make anyone fall into the same category in the minds of the public if they also speak out about – see, that's the way of it, he went to the most drastic levels or methods to get this out, he's labelled a "wacko," and so the message becomes discredited as well; and so those who come out with the same message or warnings are now put in the same category.
Dave: I hadn't thought of that. Well thanks for talking to me, Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Now we've got Heinz from New Brunswick on the line.
Heinz: I was watching a documentary recently, "How Much is Your Dead Body Worth?" Now apparently there is a very large network existing throughout the world of, not ghouls, but body snatchers, modern day, where they, under the guise of running a legitimate – a place where you give your relative's body to be embalmed or cremated – what do we call those people that provide that service?
Alan: Undertakers.
Heinz: Undertakers, they're selling the bodies to the medical profession that are dissecting, dividing the body up into parts and they can turn the body parts into a million dollars; a million dollars of parts which are given to the medical profession to install into living people. This is all ready; we're very, very far, very advanced in that area apparently.
Alan: They're making a killing.
Heinz: If you can afford it you can live forever, as you said earlier. If we can afford it we can live forever. In New Brunswick and all over North America and the world, this year in September we'll be having our military urban terrorist tactical exchange program running throughout the world. In Canada in New Brunswick the Germans will be in our area; our boys are going to exchange with them in Germany. Why? Obviously because my cousin who is in the military is not going to knock on my door and take me away, is he? when the time comes. Someone who doesn't speak English who doesn't know me couldn't care well, so they're coming here to map our cities.
Alan: What you've got to understand is how ancient that technique is, though. The Romans when they took over Gaul, they recruited the Gauls, also Germanic Troops, and they made armies of them and they were turned on the Roman people when they rebelled towards the end as well. All the rural folk were rebelling, so once again they brought foreign troops in, although technically they were under the Roman rule. It's the same thing down through history. The British Empire was famous for going into countries, recruiting people, giving them their own uniform, working for the Raj, for instance, and then turning them on the people. They used the people from the north of India to attack those in the south. We saw the same at Tiananmen Square, where the Chinese brought in the troops from the north, almost Mongolia area, and they had nothing in common with the average Chinese and they just laid into them because they didn't see them as the same race.
Heinz: Okay, so that's my contribution and thank you for a wonderful show, sir.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Heinz: Thank you.
Alan: Now we've got Tim in British Columbia. Are you there, Tim?
Tim: I have two questions. You know how you say that – well, we all now that they've got the [dumbs], right? And you say that the guys in the parallel government will end up being taken to a safe place. Will that also like small time politicians like the guys in the senate and just all those kind of guys, will they end up getting saved too when the poop really hits the fan? Then, also, I just wanted to ask, what are your opinions on an early strike this fall with the United States or Israel on Iran, just in regards to how the U.S. has told Iran that they've got two weeks before for isolation.
Alan: We know in the mainstream papers they've already had reports out in the U.S. papers that Bush had given the order for covert actions to begin now. That means all the way to assassinations within Iran, so they're already doing this kind of stuff within Iran itself. I know that there are people in Iran now hunkering down, families waiting to get bombed, as they have been for a while now. This is the agenda, there's no doubt about it, anyone who won't simply join the new democratic world system is going to get bombed into the ether.
I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix and we're talking to Tim from B.C. To answer his question about the other politicians, I don't think they all will – I think they all believe they'll get in for continuity of government. However, it would be a completely new system; they wouldn't need all these people that are used really just to con the public and have mass followings. If they're killing off the masses on the surface, for instance, you won't need these characters to keep the masses in line because the masses have been wiped out. These guys will be technically ineffectual and there'll be a priority list, regardless, of some other ability, if they're saved at all, that they must have. The scientific elite and even the bureaucracy that will run this system internally will be more important.
We do know the elite get promises of even medical treatment that Canadians can't get; that started in the days of Prime Minister Manning when every politician—and that was across the whole British Empire, by the way—they were all promised they and their families will get priority treatment in special army medical facilities for certain problems. They also get the real inoculations for real diseases, as opposed to the stuff that ends up giving us cancers and making us very sick. They get a lot of perks and they all think, I'm sure, that if they play the game they'll be served. Again, a lot of them think it will never happen in their lifetime, "I'll just take the money, guide the public, do what I'm told and retire," but some of them now, I think, will be getting edgy as they see this real. You see, there's no real need once we're all standardized, there's no more real need for this con-game of politics and left and right, and so on. They're coming out with the iron fist and the velvet glove is off, and we're all going to obey by brute force. They have a timetable and they're in a hurry; they're in a big hurry now and they can't slacken up, because once you get fear instilled in the public to obey, obey, obey, if you slacken up you start grazing again and we don't like getting moved once again. They're on a roll now, and through anxiety, fear of all kinds, economic, threats of all things under the sun, they want to accomplish this mission into their Brave New World.
Tim: Do you think that some of the higher-up guys like whatever politicians are starting to get nervous in everything that's happening right now?
Alan: They know they've got quite a few years left. This is going to go on to the merger of the Americas, and after the merger, in fact, they'll still be in place as they make this transition period. We know already that senior bureaucrats in Ottawa after the last signing, or the 2005 signing, for the integration of the Americas by the Prime Minister and the President, senior bureaucrats can apply for the equivalent jobs in Washington D.C. and vice versa, already; so they're already amalgamating the bureaucracies, which are far more important than the front men we have as politicians. The bureaucracies have their agendas. The guys work their whole lives there and retire from there. They know what they must do, and we don't vote them in.
Tim: I really appreciate that.
Alan: That's where really they go after is the bureaucrats because they're efficient, more efficient, they work along and do what they're told, but they know what their part in the agenda is; as opposed to the politicians that can get moved around all kinds of cabinet positions. You're the health minister one day, you're the minister of finances the next; they just pass them around and they wear masks, like the old Greek tragedies.
Well, that's it for tonight, from Hamish my dog and myself, in Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight and may your god or your gods go with you.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on July the 21st, 2008. Newcomers should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as much of the talks as you can handle. Go through them and you'll put a lot of pieces together, which will give you shortcuts to the big agenda, the big agenda that rules the world, and it really is an agenda, from many, many different sides and organizations all working together towards the same goal, and it can only be pulled off if the majority of the public are kept completely in the dark. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download in the various languages of Europe.
Now people can look into my site, as I say, and they can order a few things from the site; that keeps me going, that keeps me running here, and there are costs here, big costs. There's also ways to donate as well on the site, so for those who want to keep it going and get a lot out of it, you can help out by donating or buying some stuff. Even if you have it, you can buy more and pass it out to your friends.
We really are on such an amazing roll since 2001 towards this Brave New World Scenario, so much so, that many people cannot handle all of the facets which are working on them at the same time, around the clock, from all kinds of media, apparently unrelated articles; but they are related because behind all of this movement is the big eugenic movement that started long ago. It was on the go long before Charles Darwin came along to give it some credence and with pseudoscientific terminology, that's what they tended to do, was give it credence. It's much like psychiatry, you give it lots and lots of terms and labels, try to mix in some medicine with it to give it legitimacy; it's much the same sort of technique they used with Darwin, because the elite had always looked upon the masses as their servants and they saw the time coming when there would be too many of the servants and those servants might demand change. They might demand some of the goodies that they've been supplying the elite with for centuries and centuries. They might demand better housing and so on. Therefore they had to get a legitimate sort of counter to the religious organizations which were still followed by the majority of the public. The counter was a form of atheistic new religion, because it is a religion, even though it's atheistic in a sense, it's non-Christian for sure, but it's based on nature worship of a type. In other words, we exist – I think, therefore I am. With that philosophy, they went on from there.
Anything which couldn't be proven empirically by testing, over and over, was of no use whatsoever. Not a new idea, the ancient Greek philosophers had various schools and some of them specialized along that type of logic. What they thought was, if they could convince the public that we just come from amoebas and somehow gained intelligence with each leap – even though they never found any transformation from one species to the next. We still see all the cons that are out today. These people believe (at least tell us they believe) in evolution. Every science that runs our lives today is taught this right off the bat to the students when they come in to universities – evolution. You need a lot of faith to believe in evolution, an awful lot of faith. I'll be back with more after this break
Hi, I'm Alan Watt and this Cutting Through the Matrix, just prefacing an article I'm going to read, which takes us along the Darwinian route, something that has been drummed into our heads as inevitable by countless movies, books and little talks from television on science and technology and so on, conditioning us all towards this "progress" idea, we're progressing towards something. That's something you must do with a herd, you see, you make them think we're actually all going along the same road because we choose to; and nothing is further from the truth.
Back in the 50's and 60's, futurist societies were pumping authors who went round universities and promoted certain ideas. Arthur C. Clarke was one of them, with his predictive programming. These characters got awards for predicting certain things would come, scientifically, around the corner, to the public. They got awards for this and it wasn't because they were geniuses, it was because they were let in on the fact this technology was already worked on or they had it already. Whatever's given to the public is technically obsolete. When it's announced to the public as just being invented, it's technically obsolete. That's how you hold on to power. When we're told about something, they're already light years ahead of it by the time we hear about it, with genetics or anything else for that matter.
These futurists who belong to the futurist society are given, these authors are given stories to put out novels, movies and so on, to the public and they're given a lot of facts to wrap around it. It's the facts that become imbedded in our heads it's inevitable, so something that seems familiar to us doesn't seem so scary, even though we haven't thought it through or reasoned it through on a conscious level; that's why it works so well. This didn't start in the 19th or 20th century, it started in the 1800's when a Rothschild foundation started sponsoring novelists to write about science, wrap science into fiction, and we came up with science fiction. Youngsters whose minds are wide open to that—we love being tantalized by tremendous stories about the future—they themselves were having predictive programming put into their minds.
There are a thousand ways humankind could go, remember, as Lenin said this; and he was taught by the best bankers on the planet. However, we're taught we can only go one way, and that's "evolution." Someone obviously plans that way and it's promoted through universities, it's promoted through CEO meetings, international meetings of corporate business leaders, until it becomes the norm, like it's the only place to go, the only way to go; that's how it's done. As I say, behind this, remember, behind the Darwinistic concept of evolution, "survival of the fittest," and literally the euthanasia of the lesser types of humans—as they must do, according to their own particular religion here. They hope to go through into a Brave New World with purpose-made humans to serve them. That's really what it's for, and I'm amazed how the average person on the street thinks they're all going to be given immortality one day and better health. They still think they'll retain their independent thinking, if they have any, but nothing is further from the truth. They want perfect slaves at the top.
This is from CNN. I can't even find the date on this particular article, but I think it's recent anyway.
Scientists: Humans and machines will merge in future
Nick Bostrom says technology will let humans manipulate their own biology
Ray Kurzweil predicts humans will be mostly non-biological by around 2030
Alan: That's about the time, remember, after the 30 years or so of riots we have to go through as they cut back all the things we need to live.
Biotechnology, nanotechnology, robotics could merge mankind with machines
Alan: The Borg, that's what the Borg was all about. You will be assimilated, right?
By Lara Farrar
LONDON, England (CNN) -- A group of experts from around the world will hold a first of its kind conference Thursday on global catastrophic risks.
Alan: Now everything is under "catastrophic risks," remember.
Dr. Nick Bostrom says superintelligent beings could pose an existential risk to human life.
Some experts say humans will merge with machines before the end of this century.
They will discuss what should be done to prevent these risks from becoming realities that could lead to the end of human life on Earth as we know it.
Alan: That's a sort of doublespeak; they're going to do it but they're going to preserve it. It's like progressive conservatives, you progress and you conserve, same thing.
Speakers at the four-day event at Oxford University in Britain will talk about topics including nuclear terrorism and what to do if a large asteroid were to be on a collision course with our planet.
Alan: "…or if the prime minister slips on a banana peel" – I added the last part.
On the final day of the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference, experts will focus on what could be the unintended consequences of new technologies, such as superintelligent machines that, if ill-conceived, might cause the demise of Homo sapiens.
Alan: I always get a laugh at the "sap" part, we're all "saps." You've got an ape in there as well.
"Any entity which is radically smarter than human beings would also be very powerful," said Dr. Nick Bostrom, director of Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, host of the symposium. "If we get something wrong, you could imagine the consequences would involve the extinction of the human species."
Bostrom is a philosopher…
Alan: Now they always have philosophers involved with these big, real government movements – I'm talking about the world government movements. Arnold Toynbee and many others were historians-philosophers who could guide the meetings along this futurist-type scenario by using the past and projecting it into the future, regarding behavioural reactions to certain events and changes.
He's a philosopher:
… and a leading thinker of transhumanism, …
Alan: Now that's the whole – they've got so many new names for eugenics. Eugenics got a bad name because of what happened in Natzi Germany during World War II, so they came out later with bioethics committees – bioethics. These are the ones who decide about how far they can go or what they should do next with the human gene. It's the same organization. Another part of the same organization is called Transhumanism. Now that they've got everything really vague now, everything's vague as to what normalcy is, whether it's men, females or anything else and all the ones in-between. Now they're pushing – and that was the real reason for it, they don't care if you're homosexual, lesbian or anything else. They just simply use movements to "fuzz" and completely give a kind of hazy idea of what any kind of normalcy is—any kind of normalcy. Once you have everything in flux and there's no normalcy of any kind, and you've degenerated the world as far as you can take it, then you can get in to the next phase, you can really push into where you really want to go. This is a scientific technique and everyone is used along the way.
…a movement that advocates not only the study of the potential threats and promises that future technologies could pose to human life but also the ways in which emergent technologies could be used to make the very act of living better.
Alan: Now that little statement means that someone's defined what they mean by "living better." We better understand how they talk to us in eugenic societies.
"We want to preserve the best of what it is to be human…
Alan: Remember that part, too, that means those that are deemed "not the best" will not be preserved.
…and maybe even amplify that," Bostrom said.
Alan: Obedience.
Transhumanists, according to Bostrom, anticipate an era in which biotechnology, molecular nanotechnologies, artificial intelligence and other new types of cognitive tools will be used to amplify our intellectual capacity, improve our physical capabilities and even enhance our emotional well-being.
Alan: That last part there, "enhance our emotional well-being," remember the eugenics societies along with the psychiatric institutions of the world are hand-in-glove, they have the same agenda, because they're based on the same premise that everyone in the world who hasn't made it to the top either has a "poverty gene" in them or you're just simply inferior or too emotional. Emotion is bad, emotion makes you too poor a worker; they want to eradicate emotion, remember, so that you're like Mr. Spock without his salary.
The end result would be a new form of "posthuman" life with beings that possess qualities and skills so exceedingly advanced they no longer can be classified simply as humans.
Alan: I was talking about this years ago and people simply rolled their eyes, and here it is right in your face. I talked about the hermaphroditic society because I read the books from the 60's of the American Psychiatric Institute and their big, long meetings and what came out of it in the book when they talked about creating a world of hermaphroditic creatures; they'd be very peaceful, well-behaved and more efficient. Now it's out in Australia, they're looking at this seriously, in mainstream papers.
"We will begin to use science and technology not just to manage the world around us but to manage our own human biology as well,"…
Alan: "manage our own human biology" – what do you think they mean by that? Again, you're back to reproduction
… Bostrom said. "The changes will be faster and more profound than the very, very slow changes that would occur over tens of thousands of years as a result of natural selection and biological evolution."
Alan: There's their religion again. These are the guys that must destroy all other religions to bring in their own; and guess what? They've succeeded.
Bostrom declined to predict an exact time frame when this revolutionary biotechnological metamorphosis might occur.
Alan: Which is a joke; he knows.
"Maybe it will take eight years or 200 years," he said. "It is very hard to predict."
Alan: Which is nonsense because he already said by 2030.
Other experts are already getting ready for what they say could be a radical transformation of the human race in as little as two decades.
"This will happen faster than people realize," said Dr. Ray Kurzweil, an inventor and futurist who calculates technology trends using what he calls the law of accelerating returns, a mathematical concept that measures the exponential growth of technological evolution.
Alan: I'll continue with this very good part about "eve" and "lution" after the following break.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this Cutting Through the Matrix, going through an article from CNN on the futurist society's main spokesman here, Kurzweil, who's also one of the leaders of the Transhumanist association, which is a massive organization funded to the hilt by all the big foundations and institutions, and they get governmental money too, lots of it, so this is the agenda.
Now, Kurzweil is predicting the arrival of something called the Singularity,…
Alan: There's all your oneness thing again.
…which he defines in his book on the subject as "the culmination of the merger of our biological thinking and existence with our technology, resulting in a world that is still human but that transcends our biological roots."
"There will be no distinction, post-Singularity, between human and machine or between physical and virtual reality," he writes.
Alan: No distinction – you won't know if you're really awake and walking around or you're in the matrix of virtual reality, that's what he's telling you here.
I read a document a while back from the Pentagon where they talked about having a duplicate of every person in a computer network system, with all your traits, your personality, your daily routines, going through all those daily routines on a daily basis as you. Every part of the new data that they get from you that you put up on the net and so on, through your emails, they add to it – a virtual reality with one of you, every one of you, in it. You think they're not kidding? You think they can't do this? Do you think they can't make society go along? They won't have to make them; they'll allure you into it and people will pay to get into it.
Singularity will approach at an accelerating rate as human-created technologies become exponentially smaller and increasingly powerful and as fields such as biology and medicine are understood more and more in terms of information processes that can be simulated with computers.
By the 2030s, Kurzweil said, humans will become more non-biological than biological, capable of uploading our minds onto the Internet, living in various virtual worlds and even avoiding aging and evading death.
Alan: Now there's your problem right there, if everyone's still living, then you will end up with an overpopulation problem, so that all has to be argued out—and it has been, long before this article appeared. Remember what Charles Galton Darwin said in his book "The Next Million Years" (quite the boast), he said that the elite themselves would not alter their own brains, everyone else down below them will have their brains altered because you don't need your ability to critically think and solve problems when the state is making all your decisions for you. He didn't mention computers programming you, but that's what it is. The elite, remember, will still be guiding the ship of planet Earth and they must retain their survival capabilities; you won't need them.
Do you really think these boys at the top are going to do all this to help Joe Average at the bottom? Let you play forever? I don't think so. You see, there'll be no more you. You'll be a robot basically, programmable, self-healing—that's why they like the human body, it's a tremendous machine—and you'll be very efficient.
In the 2040s, Kurzweil predicts that non-biological intelligence will be billions of times better than the biological intelligence humans have today, possibly rendering our present brains obsolete.
Alan: Therefore, technically, we're obsolete already. Remember you're living in an economic system. They don't mention economics here, like what you'll be doing; if there's no purpose for you, will they allow you to live? If you're alive, will you even know it?
"Our brains are a million times slower than electronics," Kurzweil said. "We will increasingly become software entities if you go out enough decades."
This movement towards the merger of man and machine, according to Kurzweil, is already starting to happen and is most visible in the field of biotechnology.
Alan: We've got to remember all the feeding we've had from fiction, like "Artificial Intelligence" and all those other movies they put out there just to get the idea implanted, to make us kind of stand in awe of what's to come.
As scientists gain deeper insights into the genetic processes that underlie life, they are able to effectively reprogram human biology through the development of new forms of gene therapies and medications capable of turning on or off enzymes and RNA interference, or gene silencing.
Alan: They can silence genes. This was mentioned quite a few years ago on national television in Canada by a geneticist who does all the nature programs for the green boys, David Suzuki, and he said they had, then, capability of turning off the aging gene and making you live for five-hundred years if they wanted to. This is old stuff. It's amazing, too, that people will look upon this kind of article without thinking of the little phrases that are used, thinking that these benevolent people at the top, these altruists, just sweat nightmares over maybe they've missed something to help you. They never look into the foundations that fund them and look into their histories, like the Rockefeller foundation or any of them, and the whole plan and process of eugenics, never. It never dawns on them because most people are technically dead already, they're not conscious; to be conscious is alive. They'll transform into the next step quite easily. Back with more after the following messages.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this Cutting Through the Matrix, going through some of the amazing farce that's presented to the public as fact. I say farce because it's all deception and techniques are used to con the public to go along with these agendas. It is a farce in a sense, because a farce is kind of comedy they used to do on stage, very blatant, awful nasty stuff, it was all called "tits and bums" as they used to call it in Britain; it was very, very common on the stages back in the 1800's and early 1900's. You couldn't miss the point, but this stuff is done the same way, it's done the same way to the public. The problem is the public today cannot think for themselves. They've been trained not to reason and they've been trained, like Brzezinski said, that the media is there to do all their reasoning for them. That's a sad thing, but it's a very effective weapon that's been used against them and they can't think for themselves. They have been trained to believe that these people are somehow "altruistic," they have their best interests at heart. They don't see them as private corporations or government-run stations; they really see them as some kind of vague, special priesthood that does all their thinking and warning for them. They warn them.
Before I go onto the callers, here's an article that has to be mentioned because it shows you the massive conflict you get into if you mention all the contrary evidence to do with the global warming scam and what comes against you if you do so. This is about a documentary that was put on television and what happened to them. This is from the BBC news, Monday, 21st of July, 2008.
Climate documentary 'broke rules'
By Richard Black, Environment correspondent, BBC News website
The Great Global Warming Swindle, a controversial Channel 4 film, broke Ofcom rules,…
Alan: Ofcom must be some of the standards or something to do with the BBC.
… the media regulator says.
In a long-awaited judgement, Ofcom says Channel 4 did not fulfil obligations to be impartial and to reflect a range of views on controversial issues.
Alan: Now what a joke that is, because the whole point of, for instance, the BBC, it was set up to be a propaganda tool of the British government for policy and foreign policy. This is how they use rules they'd never put against themselves when someone else comes in and is not playing the game with them.
The film also treated interviewees unfairly, but did not mislead audiences "so as to cause harm or offence".
Plaintiffs say the Ofcom judgement is "inconsistent" and "lets Channel 4 off the hook on a technicality."
The film's key contentions were that the increase in atmospheric temperatures observed since the 1970s was not primarily caused by emissions of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels, and that the modern focus on climate change is based in politics…
Alan: They're right on with that.
…rather than science.
Alan: Now, I've already talked about "The First Global Revolution" and how they claimed they took a claim for coming up with this con of global warming and blaming man for it. This greening system is to rule our lives in a miniscule manner, every one of us. That's why you're going to get attacked when you come out and tell the truth about this thing. This is a must-be; this whole greening scam is a must-be to control us all.
It is seen in some "climate sceptic" circles as a counter to Al Gore's movie…
Alan: I call him "Allegory."
… An Inconvenient Truth, and credited with influencing public perception of climate science.
It has reportedly been sold to 21 countries and distributed on DVD.
"It's very disappointing that Ofcom hasn't come up with a stronger statement about being misled," said Sir John Houghton, a former head of the UK Met Office…
Alan: That's Meteorological office.
…and chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)…
Alan: That's the guys with the political interests in it, this IPCC. He works for them. He gets his money for the global warming scam.
"I know hundreds of people, literally hundreds, who were misled by it - they saw it, it was a well-produced programme and they imagined it had some truth behind it, so they were misled and it seems Ofcom didn't care about that," he told BBC News.
Alan: Here's a born liar getting his payoff to lie to the public to go along with this Club of Rome scam that we're causing global warming.
Ofcom defines a misleading programme as one by which the audience is "materially misled so as to cause harm or offence", and that Swindle does not meet this "high test".
"The programme has been let off the hook on a highly questionable technicality," said Bob Ward, former head of media at the Royal Society, who played a prominent role in co-ordinating objections to the film.
Alan: The Royal Society was set up as the first Freemasonic scientific institution with a royal charter in Britain. The Royal Society, these are the guys who funded and were behind Darwin and all the rest of them down through the ages, and who pulled many, many scams on the public.
"The ruling noted that Channel 4 had admitted errors in the graphs and data used in the programme, yet decided that this did not cause harm or offence to the audience."
Alan: Charles Galton, who was the cousin of Darwin, not to be confused with Charles Galton Darwin (who the grandson of Charles Darwin) – they always keep the same names in the family because they're all "gods," you see, they worship each other. They were using graphs and cons since the days of Malthus; he used a lot of graphs too. Technically, by Galton's rules, we should all be living ten feet deep right now on top each other, but nothing comes back on that.
Plaintiffs accused the programme of containing myriad factual inaccuracies, but Ofcom says it was "impractical and inappropriate for it to examine in detail all of the multifarious alleged examples... set out in the complaints."
Alan: That's how they all come against you, especially this big political body that pretends it's scientists – they're politicians and scientists, the scientists back up the politicians, and the scientists are living on grants from governments to do this. It's a must-be, as I say. (Now I'm going to try to get to the phones, but the server keeps kicking out here and I'll see if I can pull it up again.) Scam after scam goes on, but it depends who you are; you see they don't want any other opinion given out to the public, especially on a large scale.
We've got Ryan from New York. Are you there, Ryan?
Ryan: Hey, it's always good to hear you've survived a few more days.
Alan: Isn't it though? I'm quite happy for that myself.
Ryan: They're programming us quite well for the credits that you can't save up at the end of the week, because it takes a full day of work to pay for gas, a full day of work to pay for food for the week, and then the other three days you've got to pay for the bills, the minimum payments that everyone's enslaved with.
Alan: These guys, as I say, don't make mistakes. Remember that the panels for the integration of Europe were set up in 1948 to work quietly, and in the late 1990's, after it was all complete and they had their European Parliament, they admitted then and released the documentation saying that the truth was to be kept from all of the publics of Europe until it was completed. It's the same in the Americas. They set up negotiation teams in the state department and in the department of foreign affairs for Canada back at the same era for the integration of the Americas. They also knew that China was to be built up as the manufacturer and would be given different courses. Nothing happens by chance, including the slide of the dollar and all the rest of it. They don't make these kinds of mistakes in their projections, so nothing is happening by mistake. The dollar is falling apart and it's meant to, and that's going to be part of the reason they're going to use to rush the complete amalgamation of the Americas through, much quicker than Europe at the end.
Ryan: Most people probably want it because they don't even know any better.
Alan: They don't know any better. In fact, I talked to one person that first denied it, then almost subconsciously, she spoke aloud and said "it doesn't matter anyway, we all have the same culture, watch the same TV and buy the same things," that was it.
Ryan: They're all dancing in the zombie jamboree.
Alan: They are. They definitely are. Most people, as I say, are not conscious their entire lives. They can be nice people, they follow the culture norms, even though they're changing, they follow them and adapt to them quickly, they're polite to you, but they're not with it at all, they are not really conscious.
Ryan: I recently saw "The Man Who Would be King," the movie, I didn't read the book, but shocking. Rudyard Kipling is a character in that movie.
Alan: He puts himself in as the top reporter for the newspaper.
Ryan: The Northern Star. What I found funny was how once he became king and it started getting to his head, he thought he was going to be called cousin by the queen and become Order of the Garter. I was pretty shocked at that, and even the whole helping out the widow's son in the beginning, I was shocked that they went that far with it. When you show it to people they don't care, but I found it myself to be very interesting.
Alan: And the fact that even in the movie, fellow masons had to help and honour each other, regardless of the mess they were in, legally.
Ryan: Okay, it's good talking to you.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Now I've got Dave from California. Is Dave there?
Dave: I subscribe to Kurzweil's weekly newsletter, it's got all this technology stuff in it, because I've got a science background. I noticed last week one of the groups that was reporting that they had assembled a strand of self-replicating DNA from scratch. I was thinking back about 20 years ago during the rule of terror when Theodore [Kaczinski] was sending bombs through the mail to all these people who were pushing technology further and further. I read his "Unabomber Manifesto," he was actually a boy genius and was in Harvard at 16 and to make extra money he hooked up with a doctor who was doing mind control out of Harvard, a real famous one, spent two years attacking his core beliefs, and after that [Kaczinki] moved into the woods and got his little cabin and started sending out bombs because he thought technology was going to destroy the world. I can't really agree with his methods, but I'm beginning to wonder if he wasn't right about the technology thing.
Alan: It makes you wonder, too, was he programmed to make anyone fall into the same category in the minds of the public if they also speak out about – see, that's the way of it, he went to the most drastic levels or methods to get this out, he's labelled a "wacko," and so the message becomes discredited as well; and so those who come out with the same message or warnings are now put in the same category.
Dave: I hadn't thought of that. Well thanks for talking to me, Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Now we've got Heinz from New Brunswick on the line.
Heinz: I was watching a documentary recently, "How Much is Your Dead Body Worth?" Now apparently there is a very large network existing throughout the world of, not ghouls, but body snatchers, modern day, where they, under the guise of running a legitimate – a place where you give your relative's body to be embalmed or cremated – what do we call those people that provide that service?
Alan: Undertakers.
Heinz: Undertakers, they're selling the bodies to the medical profession that are dissecting, dividing the body up into parts and they can turn the body parts into a million dollars; a million dollars of parts which are given to the medical profession to install into living people. This is all ready; we're very, very far, very advanced in that area apparently.
Alan: They're making a killing.
Heinz: If you can afford it you can live forever, as you said earlier. If we can afford it we can live forever. In New Brunswick and all over North America and the world, this year in September we'll be having our military urban terrorist tactical exchange program running throughout the world. In Canada in New Brunswick the Germans will be in our area; our boys are going to exchange with them in Germany. Why? Obviously because my cousin who is in the military is not going to knock on my door and take me away, is he? when the time comes. Someone who doesn't speak English who doesn't know me couldn't care well, so they're coming here to map our cities.
Alan: What you've got to understand is how ancient that technique is, though. The Romans when they took over Gaul, they recruited the Gauls, also Germanic Troops, and they made armies of them and they were turned on the Roman people when they rebelled towards the end as well. All the rural folk were rebelling, so once again they brought foreign troops in, although technically they were under the Roman rule. It's the same thing down through history. The British Empire was famous for going into countries, recruiting people, giving them their own uniform, working for the Raj, for instance, and then turning them on the people. They used the people from the north of India to attack those in the south. We saw the same at Tiananmen Square, where the Chinese brought in the troops from the north, almost Mongolia area, and they had nothing in common with the average Chinese and they just laid into them because they didn't see them as the same race.
Heinz: Okay, so that's my contribution and thank you for a wonderful show, sir.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Heinz: Thank you.
Alan: Now we've got Tim in British Columbia. Are you there, Tim?
Tim: I have two questions. You know how you say that – well, we all now that they've got the [dumbs], right? And you say that the guys in the parallel government will end up being taken to a safe place. Will that also like small time politicians like the guys in the senate and just all those kind of guys, will they end up getting saved too when the poop really hits the fan? Then, also, I just wanted to ask, what are your opinions on an early strike this fall with the United States or Israel on Iran, just in regards to how the U.S. has told Iran that they've got two weeks before for isolation.
Alan: We know in the mainstream papers they've already had reports out in the U.S. papers that Bush had given the order for covert actions to begin now. That means all the way to assassinations within Iran, so they're already doing this kind of stuff within Iran itself. I know that there are people in Iran now hunkering down, families waiting to get bombed, as they have been for a while now. This is the agenda, there's no doubt about it, anyone who won't simply join the new democratic world system is going to get bombed into the ether.
I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix and we're talking to Tim from B.C. To answer his question about the other politicians, I don't think they all will – I think they all believe they'll get in for continuity of government. However, it would be a completely new system; they wouldn't need all these people that are used really just to con the public and have mass followings. If they're killing off the masses on the surface, for instance, you won't need these characters to keep the masses in line because the masses have been wiped out. These guys will be technically ineffectual and there'll be a priority list, regardless, of some other ability, if they're saved at all, that they must have. The scientific elite and even the bureaucracy that will run this system internally will be more important.
We do know the elite get promises of even medical treatment that Canadians can't get; that started in the days of Prime Minister Manning when every politician—and that was across the whole British Empire, by the way—they were all promised they and their families will get priority treatment in special army medical facilities for certain problems. They also get the real inoculations for real diseases, as opposed to the stuff that ends up giving us cancers and making us very sick. They get a lot of perks and they all think, I'm sure, that if they play the game they'll be served. Again, a lot of them think it will never happen in their lifetime, "I'll just take the money, guide the public, do what I'm told and retire," but some of them now, I think, will be getting edgy as they see this real. You see, there's no real need once we're all standardized, there's no more real need for this con-game of politics and left and right, and so on. They're coming out with the iron fist and the velvet glove is off, and we're all going to obey by brute force. They have a timetable and they're in a hurry; they're in a big hurry now and they can't slacken up, because once you get fear instilled in the public to obey, obey, obey, if you slacken up you start grazing again and we don't like getting moved once again. They're on a roll now, and through anxiety, fear of all kinds, economic, threats of all things under the sun, they want to accomplish this mission into their Brave New World.
Tim: Do you think that some of the higher-up guys like whatever politicians are starting to get nervous in everything that's happening right now?
Alan: They know they've got quite a few years left. This is going to go on to the merger of the Americas, and after the merger, in fact, they'll still be in place as they make this transition period. We know already that senior bureaucrats in Ottawa after the last signing, or the 2005 signing, for the integration of the Americas by the Prime Minister and the President, senior bureaucrats can apply for the equivalent jobs in Washington D.C. and vice versa, already; so they're already amalgamating the bureaucracies, which are far more important than the front men we have as politicians. The bureaucracies have their agendas. The guys work their whole lives there and retire from there. They know what they must do, and we don't vote them in.
Tim: I really appreciate that.
Alan: That's where really they go after is the bureaucrats because they're efficient, more efficient, they work along and do what they're told, but they know what their part in the agenda is; as opposed to the politicians that can get moved around all kinds of cabinet positions. You're the health minister one day, you're the minister of finances the next; they just pass them around and they wear masks, like the old Greek tragedies.
Well, that's it for tonight, from Hamish my dog and myself, in Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight and may your god or your gods go with you.
Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 8:05 pmHi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on Friday the 26th of September, 2008. Newcomers look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site where you can download as many of the talks I’ve given in the past as you can possibly want. There’s a big, big wish list there of information. Remember that there are no other sites out there where I authorize my books to be sold. It’s on www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com so look it up. Also look in to www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download and print up in the various languages of Europe.
Talking about the web site, I spend TIME here chasing down people who sell my books unabashedly, unashamedly and rake in the cash that keeps me going here. They cut it from underneath my feet. They take the bread out of your mouth. I just found another one that goes under the 9/11 Truth Movement where he’s selling my books. This guy’s selling my books so Alfonso if you’re listening down in Toledo, Ohio and I’ve got the photographs of your homes, by the way, you’ll know what to do. You’d better get them pulled very quickly and reimburse the loot that you’ve stolen from me. Okay?
Now, everyone’s getting rushed and worried about this big banking crisis but this had to come. It’s planned to come. They don’t make mistakes at the top. This goes back to something that was said by Senator Barry Goldwater in 1979 talking about the Trilateral Commission. Now, the Trilateral Commission is an ARM, a big arm, a more powerful arm, a more specialized arm of the Council on Foreign Relations. He said, “The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multi-national consolidation of the commercial and banking interests BY seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power, political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical, with no apologies.” That was Barry Goldwater in 1979.
What you’re seeing today is just the big machine in action as the people get screwed again by the robber barons. Nothing new in that at all. Read your history about the robber barons back in the 1800s and how the big boys and Morgan and Gould and all the rest of them literally looted the United States with all their pension funds THREE TIMES IN A ROW. Three depressions in a row. That’s before the Great Depression of the 1920s and 1930s. It’s a common theme with them. They build up stuff and then they just simply LOOT the country.
That gets me back to the people who do print my books up and sell them. See, psychopaths are psychopaths in all classes of society. It doesn’t matter if it’s the guy on the street, the con man, little fast-Jack type, who sees the angle in everything he see around him, every opportunity. Even the ones that are disasters. He SEES, like a shark going in to blood, he smells blood, he sees where he can get a profit made. He has no qualms because he doesn’t have empathy or emotion or compassion. The only difference between the guy on the street doing that or the guy stealing my stuff and printing it up, the only difference between him and the banker is that the banker is born into a more powerful, well-established family of psychopaths. So the problem isn’t just at the top. It goes all the way down to the bottom and it’s all throughout society… encouraged too, by today’s culture creation industry. I’ll be back with more after this following break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. On my web site in the archives section you’ll find links to the Department of Defence’s think tank for the UK. This is also the think tank for the NATO countries and they put out 90 pages of what they could foresee coming in the next 30-40 years with escalating riots and all of this stuff and how the military will be used ON the population. Well, the US has now come out with the same report basically. They’ve tidied it up a bit for the American public… not to scare them. They make you think that this is all for wars abroad. They do mention it’s for a youth, a youth society, that will be growing up in the future… with very unruly, unhappy youth. They’re talking about males really. This all ties in again with the depopulation agenda. There’s no doubt whatsoever. This came from the Irish Times.
US generals planning for resource wars
Monday, September 22, 2008
[emphasis added to article]
(Alan: This is how they’ve titled it here. It’s better camouflage. See, in Britain, they don’t bother camouflaging anything because the public are so beaten down with the scientific technique of propaganda and bureaucracies - there’s just bureaucracies for everything, constantly announcing things on the radio and television - that you’re made to be apathetic. That’s again, what Bertrand Russell said. ‘We shall create an apathetic society.’ Apathy is a very good tool to use in psychological warfare. But in the US because they have better script writers who work in Hollywood and so on and they do work with these guys and they work too with Madison Avenue to MARKET the ideas to the public, they get better write-ups, more camouflaged. But it says here…)
ANALYSIS: The US military sees the next 30 to 40 years as involving a state of continuous war against ideologically-motivated terrorists (A: Now, that’s a loaded term there because ideology can be anything at all. Having rights and freedom could be an ideology, you see. And it is an idea. Terrorism is now expanding to include even VERBAL terrorists. Speaking out can be terrorism. Definitely speaking out against the wars in the Middle-East has already been stated by Bush himself, that it is a form of terrorism.) and competing with Russia and China for natural resources and markets, writes Tom Clonan.
AS GENERAL Ray Odierno takes command of US forces in Baghdad from troop surge architect Gen David Petraeus, America has begun planning in earnest for its phased withdrawal. (A: Now, that ties right in with the troops being brought back home - the article I read last week - and how they’re deploying them to work alongside the police. Well, what do you think that’s all about? You’re watching the banks all go down, at the right times, mind you. They bring them home first and then collapse the banks. Everything is working to plan and schedule. Everything that happens on a major scale is done by plan an it’s always on schedule.)
The extra brigade combat teams - or battlegroups - deployed to Iraq by Petraeus have already withdrawn and a further 8,000 troops have been diverted to Afghanistan. (A: They have to protect the poppy harvest, you see.)
In January, the next president of the United States will conclude America's timetable for withdrawal in final negotiations with the Iraqi government.
(A: Then it goes on and down the actual page itself and you try to find what they’re really, really getting in to with the 90 page document and there’s also a PDF you can get with the whole thing on it, much deeper scope, more open about it too, rather than this handout they give to the media.)
Under the auspices of the US department of defence and department of the army, the US military have just published a document entitled (A: This is the PDF you get.) 2008 Army Modernization Strategy which makes for interesting reading against the current backdrop of deteriorating international fiscal, environmental, energy resource and security crises.
The 2008 modernisation strategy, written by Lieut Gen Stephen Speakes (A: How do they dream these guys’ names up? He‘s a speaker and he drafts up this thing.), deputy chief of staff of the US army, contains the first explicit and official acknowledgement that the US military is dangerously overstretched internationally. (A: Well, no kidding. They’ve been policing the world, all over the word, quietly from the general public that is, since World War II.) It states simply: "The army is engaged in the third-longest war in our nation's history and . . . the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) has caused the army to become out of balance with the demand for forces exceeding the sustainable supply."
Against this backdrop, the 90 page document sets out the future of international conflict for the next 30 to 40 years - as the US military sees it - and outlines the manner in which the military will sustain its current operations and prepare and "transform" itself for future "persistent" warfare. (A: Persistent warfare, ongoing warfare. Remember that phrase you heard at the beginning, right after 9/11 in 2001? ‘This is to be a hundred years war.’)
The document reveals a number of profoundly significant - and worrying - strategic positions (A: And I’ll try and cut to the chase here through all this nonsense actually. That’s just a lot of filler that they put in there.) that have been adopted as official doctrine by the US military. In its preamble, it predicts a post cold war future of "perpetual warfare".
According to its authors: "We have entered an era of persistent conflict . . . a security environment much more ambiguous and unpredictable than that faced during the cold war." (A: Which, again, was a farce.)
It then goes on to describe the key features of this dawning era (A: Dawning era. Masons love dawns, new dawns…) of continuous warfare. Some of the characteristics are familiar enough to a world audience accustomed to the rhetoric of the global war on terror.
"A key current threat is a radical, ideology-based, long-term terrorist threat bent on using any means available - to include weapons of mass destruction (A: Boy, you get bored hearing that one) - to achieve its political and ideological ends."
Relatively new, "emerging" features are also included in the document's rationale for future threats.
"We face a potential return to traditional security threats posed by emerging near-peers as we compete globally for depleting natural resources and overseas markets."
This thinly-veiled reference to Russia and China will, perhaps, come as little surprise given recent events in Ossetia and Abkhazia. The explicit reference in this context to future resource wars, however, will probably raise eyebrows among the international diplomatic community, who prefer to couch such conflicts as human rights-based or rooted in notions around freedom and democracy. (A: I like how they worded that. Which is very true. NOTIONS about freedom and democracy.)
The document, however, contains no such lofty pretences. (A: Their main enemy, it says here, for the US, the main enemy… Remember what Kissinger said back in the 70s, ‘The main enemy of the state’ and it’s parroted here, is ‘population growth’.) It goes on to list as a pre-eminent threat to the security of the US and its allies "population growth - especially (A: not conclusively) in less-developed countries - [which] will expose a resulting 'youth bulge'." (A: A youth bulge is what they’re calling their target.)
This youth bulge, the document goes on to state, will present the US with further "resource competition" in that these expanding populations in the developing world "will consume ever increasing amounts of food, water and energy".
The document goes on to describe in broad-strokes the manner in which its downsized military might ensure survival of the fittest for the US and its allies in future resource wars for water, food and energy.
As a consequence of identifying growing populations in the developed world as a threat in itself, the strategy document highlights a number of paradigm shifts in the way future wars are to be conducted.
(A: Now here is one of the main parts…)
It predicts that "21st Century operations will require soldiers to engage among populations and diverse cultures instead of avoiding them". (A: Do you realize what that means? This is TOTAL WAR. Total war means that the population are really the target. In World War II, Dowding who was in charge of the Royal Air Force for Britain, targeted most of the bombing in Germany ON THE WORKERS’ HOMES. That’s what was destroyed mainly. The workers homes so that they became fair game. It was called ‘total war’ meaning everyone in society was a target. The idea was that if you could kill off the workers, there’s no one left to work the factories, even if they spring up new ones.) It predicts that "21st Century operations will require soldiers to engage among populations and diverse cultures instead of avoiding them". (A: Now, the marines are already training - that was in the Army Times, I believe - guys, soldiers TO GO IN PLAIN CLOTHES AMONG CIVILIANS. It’s one of the biggest things going right now, training for that very, very thing.)
The document reveals that new US tactical doctrine provides a template by which air, naval and field commanders will no longer just secure traditional strategic targets such as airspace, seaports and bridgeheads, but will, of necessity, also deploy and fight amongst and against the target population itself to win wars. (A: Well, you’ve heard of ‘killing fields’, and that’s what they call them in the military, where the troops are sent in and anyone and anything who happens to be in front of them is ELIMINATED.)
The document refers to this euphemistically as "commanders employing offensive, defensive and stability or civil support operations simultaneously".
The remainder of the document is devoted to describing in detail how a downsized all volunteer (A: Meaning mercenary.) US military - numbering approximately one million soldiers, aircrew and sailors - could maintain an ever-present, international, offensive posture in many countries across many time-zones.
It describes how information communication technologies and digital technologies will create a new "networked" human soldier - the 'Future Force Warrior' (A: Oh boy, Future Force Warrior or FFW) - who will deploy among the target population and will operate simultaneously several remote, unmanned ground and air weapons systems. (A: Ground and air weapons systems. Remember, that also means what they’re calling ‘modular packages’ they’re giving the regiments back home in the US of non-lethal weaponry. They’re called ‘modular packages’. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Eugenics is all the topic today, the culling back of the population is coming from the United Nations and all other sources and all the NGO groups that are associated with the United Nations, all the well funded ones that are PAID big salaries by big foundations which comprise the parallel government. This is an article from Louisiana and it was also in, I think, The Associated Press.
Metairie legislator proposes sterilization for poor women
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Associated Press
State Representative John LaBruzzo of Metairie said many of his constituents are tired of paying for children from poor families and that is why he is considering proposing legislation that would pay women on government assistance $1,000 if they choose to be sterilized.
“You have these people (A: THESE people, you see.) who are just fed up with working their buns off to try to provide for their own family (A: That’s how they always bring this argument. You know, this bunch against that bunch.) and being forced by the government o provide for others’ families who just want to have unlimited kids,” he said. (A: That means children. They use animal terms for children to dehumanize them.)
(A: This is an old, old thing which the eugenicists pull up… that you’re paying for all that. But they don’t mention that you’re also bailing out the banks that are looting BILLIONS off of you or they don’t mention that the money that governments spend on their military campaigns and their big profiteering campaigns. That’s all government is for. It’s a front to profiteer by having wars and raiding other countries. They don’t mention these things. They always turn it on to their OTHER problem which is the general population. You know, those that might outbreed their betters as Russell and others said… and Charles Galton Darwin.)
LaBruzzo said he is studying voluntary sterilization for women whose sole financial support comes from the government in the form of welfare or other public assistance. His idea would be to give the women $1,000 if they had their tubes tied.
His proposal has come under harsh criticism by some civil rights groups.
The ACLU called it a misguided and mean-spirited attempt to eliminate poverty by eliminating the poor. (A: Well, of course that’s the policy. That’s how you get rid of poverty. Remember when Presidents have wars on things. They have WAR on poverty and WAR on drugs. That’s a legal statement. It’s a WAR on the poor, you see.)
LaBruzzo said his office has been flooded by emails, many supporting his position. (A: Of course he will.)
“We have more in favor, saying, ‘good job, keep it going.’” he said. “Of course we have a lot saying you’re going in the wrong direction.”
LaBruzzo said that in addition to the sterilization of women, he would consider vasectomies for welfare dads and tax incentives for higher income families with children in private schools.
So there you go with the same old stuff all over again. Always to make you feel that you’re really gouged big time to pay for all the welfare people. They never mention either, the culture industry that’s given you a constant feed, from the 60s onwards, stream of ‘just do it’, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex. They never mention that at all. Never ever, ever. No, they blame the effects of things but they don’t mention the CAUSES AND THOSE THINGS WHICH PROMOTE THEM. Isn’t that rather odd, wouldn’t you think? Because it’s nothing to do with the wealthier supporting the poor. That’s not the thing. They don’t WANT the poor there. They’ve already stated that they don’t need them anymore. The jobs they used to fill are all gone. The factories are gone. Now they’re simply cleaning up what’s left. THE HUMAN COLLATERAL… as they often call it.
Just before I go to the callers, here’s an item that’s interesting. I always tell you that for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. We always hear about, ‘you can do your own thing’ but there’s no effect left in society. Yet, we never really ponder the problems or what’s behind the ideals that guide policy. Remember, there are big, powerful foundations like The Council on Foreign Relations which draft out policy AND GIVE IT TO GOVERNMENTS TO FOLLOW. The Club of Rome states that itself, as well. That’s part of what they do. We don’t elect these people. These big foundations are set up to be the REAL government. They bypass any ideas of democracy. THAT IS THEIR PURPOSE.
Eugenics has to get society to accept the killing of people. I’ve said this. It’s not popular. I hear the standard slogans that have been downloaded into people, through repetition, over and over and over again when I speak about these things. You see, it stared with abortion. Once we have no more horror about abortion, they’re now moving in to the elderly. I read that article last week from that rather aristocratic, old, I’ll hesitate to call her ‘woman’ in Britain. I read off what she stated about the elderly: wanting governments to have the POWER to kill them off. So there are effects. Individually, there are effects that ripple all THROUGH society for our own actions and we all suffer the consequences. I’m going to read this article after the following break.
I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Before the break I was talking about how there are consequences to everything in society. It’s very, very true. This society does not LIKE children terribly much. They’re a hindrance and a bother. Read Charles Galton Darwin’s book, The Next Million Years, and he talks about going through this technique and strategy of how to basically download into people the fact that they wouldn’t want children; they prefer to buy material things and go for the material things in life rather than being tied to children. It’s been very successful because the first step in getting the public to ACCEPT the killing off of the public is to always have a big, emotional topic to debate. It’s never done by the public themselves. They watch experts debate it for them on television and choose one side or the other, but that’s not the point. The point is, this is the eugenics plan and everyone is being used in this big plan. EVERYONE IS USED. Because, this is an economic system and they don’t like anyone who is not a good producer and consumer. So they don’t tolerate young moms with children very well. However, they do encourage all the sex - there’s such a stream of since about the 1960s onwards - and encourage all the behavior. You can’t turn on Much Music without seeing it right in your face. It’s everywhere… aimed right at young children. Quite amazing. And we all tolerate this and think nothing about it. The Mail Online:
One baby in 30 left alive after medical termination
by FIONA MACRAE
20 April 2007
[emphasis added]
(A: There’s a picture there of Gianna Jessen who was born after a failed abortion. That was 30 years ago. She’s still alive today.)
One in 30 babies aborted for medical reasons (A: Now, that’s the term they use for pretty well ALL of them, psychological or medical. The mother might have a nervous breakdown and so that does fine, it goes under medicine.) is born alive, a study has found.
They lived for an average of 80 minutes - although in some cases foetuses (A: Babies.) survived for over six hours.
Most of the babies were born between 20 and 24 weeks of pregnancy, but some had been in the womb for as little as 17 weeks.
The figures, based on a study of West Midlands hospitals, has reignited the abortion debate (A: There’s no debate, by the way. It‘s a ‘must be’ by the elite.), with pro-life campaigners demanding the time limit for terminations be cut.
Researchers looked at the outcome of 3,189 abortions performed on seriously handicapped foetuses at 20 hospitals between 1995 and 2004.
It showed that 102 - or around one in 30 - aborted for reasons such as Down's Syndrome and heart defects, were born alive. (A: By the way, that’s not quite true either, because a lot of these tests have a lot of false positives and false negatives. I’ve got another article on that… which I don’t have time to read tonight. But the mother is advised to have an abortion anyway.)
Abortions are allowed to be carried out if the pregnancy is shown to have an adverse effect on the mental health and wellbeing of the mother up until the 24th week of pregnancy.
Beyond this point, the procedure is only sanctioned if the baby has a severe disability or if the mother's life is at risk.
The latest study, carried out by experts from the West Midlands Perinatal Institute and published in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, showed that three per cent of aborted disabled babies were born alive.
Most of the abortions studied were medical abortions. These involve a women being given a series of pills, taken in two doses two days apart.
The first dose, a single tablet of mifepristone, blocks the pregnancy hormones that normally ensure the womb's lining holds on to the fertilised egg. The second dose, of four tablets containing hormone-like prostaglandins, triggers contractions and a miscarriage.
The death of the baby is a result of the trauma of the early birth, rather than the tablets itself, meaning, in rare occasions, some babies may survive the process.
(A: Here’s how they get around this now. It’s quite amazing when we think of all… I think of Jacques Ellul when I read these articles when he talked about ALL fiction being propaganda. Hospital series and dramas, all fictional, all how they’re in the emergency room and they’re SO professional and how they can bring everybody back from the dead. That’s all they worry about. But it’s a complete cover. It’s propaganda to alter perceptions. They must alter perceptions in psychological warfare. Here’s how they’re going to get around this. He says….)
From 22 weeks, the tablets should be preceded by a lethal injection into the baby's heart to ensure the baby is dead before the procedure goes any further. (A: Guys get paid to do this… and they sleep well.)
If these babies are born alive, it suggests they weren't given the heart-stopping injection (A: You know, we go on and on about Adolf Hitler as though he was the first and last criminal of his type and yet we accept this in society. Now there are corpses on display in art galleries, hanging on wires. That’s how debased and degraded we all are. That’s where it really starts. It starts from this and leads on to all of that.)- perhaps because the doctor thought it would have been too traumatic for the mother. The figures follow several studies which show that babies born at 23 and 24 weeks are capable of surviving.
While there is no suggestion that any of the babies documented in the West Midlands study lived for more than a few hours, doctors in Norwich are currently treating a toddler born (A: They’re currently treating… that’s double-speak right away.) at 24 weeks after three botched terminations. (A: THREE times they tried to kill this toddler.)
He was born three years ago and is still alive. (A: You know, they used to hang people for MURDER and so on. If you didn’t die the first time they dropped you through the trap door, they’d often let you go free. Here they go at this three times to try and kill a toddler, by giving a LETHAL injection in the heart. This is not a convicted criminal here. And the toddler’s still alive after three years.)
Campaigners said it was likely the Midlands figures were just the tip of the iceberg (A: You bet they will be.) as the region only accounts for around a tenth of the babies born in the country each year.
In addition, the study only looked at babies whose lives were ended because of disability. (A: And they haven’t proven the disability yet either. You should actually see this because a lot of these children are diagnosed and misdiagnosed and I think it’s on purpose too. They have to get a legal clause somewhere on the certificate to do the abortion.)
As I say, now we’ve degraded in to ‘let’s go for the elderly’. You always go for the weak, you see, those who can’t stand up for themselves. Then you go for the elderly. Then you start working on those in between. And because society’s been trained that it’s all quite natural to kill each other off and we’ve had this massive propaganda of ‘there’s just too many of us walking the planet’, we accept this. We’re degraded and degraded and degraded until we can not SURVIVE. We can not defend ourselves anymore from the elite who have all this down pat as the plan of their agenda. Quite something. Quite something. The world we live in… is disgusting.
Here’s a point I’d like to make too, before I go on to the callers, a point which is important. The elite KNOW they’ve brought us ALL to this degraded society. They know they can’t keep us all going much longer, but to allow the next phase to come in, they had to degrade us. Because a degraded society won’t stand up for each other. THEY DON’T CARE about each other. They’re easy targets, easy meat. They also know that you’ve accepted DEATH as a part of life. Not natural death, EUTHANASIA. Overpopulation is being used as an excuse and all the rest of it. You accept that. Once you do that, you’re destroyed. That was the INTENT of this movement many, many years ago. Nothing to do with the rights of the woman. It was the elite who sponsored and funded this. LOOK at the foundations who paid for it all.
Alan: Now, we’ll go to Steve from Denver. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Oh yes. Yes. I’m here. Thank you for taking my call, Alan. Just let me get my question out of the way. You’ve mentioned very infrequently about this 360° Masonic situation. Please tell me if you know of ANY 360° Masons and if so who are they?
Alan: There is an organization at the top that uses different terms. Prince Charles used it a couple of times. He called them ‘the Olympians’. It’s a very prestigious, high-level group of VERY wealthy, old families. Of course, they do the circle, as it’s called, Completion. You’ll see it too on a lot of the symbols put out there. Even in theosophy they’ll give you an exoteric meaning for the general public, including the members at the low orders.
Steve: Could you just name one individual? Are you saying Prince Charles is a 360° Olympian?
Alan: I wouldn’t say he would be because I saw him when he hit his 40th, I think it was his 40th, birthday and he went on stage in front of all the Lords of Britain who all wore there robes and so on. He had a glass of Champagne in one hand and then he did his little angled degree with his right arm, then put it straight out from him. So he’s up there, for sure, but he doesn’t have the brains to be in the higher levels.
Steve: Could you name a 360° Olympian?
Alan: You can’t name them. You can only get the names of their organizations.
Steve: Okay. So you don’t know anyone personally that you could put a name on so we can take a look at them and see how…
Alan: I certainly could but I won’t.
Steve: Oh, could but won’t. Okay.
Alan: I’m talking about people I’ve met.
Steve: I’m going to make a quick statement and that is that we are witnessing the end game. They are buying up the assets at pennies on the dollar. They way they’ve always done at the shearing of the sheep time and it’s sheering of the sheep time. We could sing that along with the Christian ‘Bringing in the Sheep’ only it’s ‘shearing UP the sheep’.
Alan: That’s right.
Steve: At any rate, lastly, your opinion on the elections. What’s going on with the elections and the debate tonight? They’re on the red carpet. That normally means that the royal family connected. What’s the connection, Alan?
Alan: The connection is widely known. That the US basically went over to Britain at the Treaty of Paris and most folk, again, don’t want to read that treaty but they should. It was basically an amalgamation. The elite and the aristocracy, and there is an aristocracy IN the United States, that became part of and parcel of the British Empire AND their agenda. We find that when they set up the Round Table societies, under Lord Milner and they also had the Cecil Rhodes Society, that was the group that merged IN to the Council on Foreign Relations for the United States. THAT was the final merger. That is why they went along with the same policies as Britain. Margaret Thatcher referred to it as ‘our special relationship’. Other politicians referred to it as ‘their special relationship’ all along. Also, the same bankers that run the British system sent Jacob Schiff and others along to running the US economy back in the 1800s. Of course, Schiff was brought up in the Rothschild’s home, probably as another child of maybe another Rothschild wife but not his official one, but he did have official Rothschild backing and given the respect of a full-blown Rothschild. So the US was merged in to this system long ago.
Steve: Why won’t you name an Olympian?
Alan: Because I know a couple and it’s good to know a couple if you want information.
Steve: Oh. Okay. Alright. Well, thank you and have a nice evening. Thank you, sir.
Alan: You too. That’s the whole thing. There are people who definitely run this world. They’ve always run this world. They give religions a time to run the system as they did in the past. You were taught the religion, the only religions you would ever know. They would be the religions which gave you a meaning for life. It’s the only meaning for life you’d have. You’d know nothing about any kind of science whatsoever. However, today, they’ve given us a new scientific priesthood but they’re also merging it with a world religion. This world religion is based on sustainability, greening, the whole new age phenomena where you’ll worship mother earth and all the rest of it - it’s right out in the open - and the culling off of ‘the unwashed masses’. They don’t want them around much longer.
However, I’ve had a chat with a couple I’ve met in my travels across the world. You bump into them in odd places, on board ships if you’re moving and stuff like that. If you get to know them, they let little things out of the bag… with a little sparkle in their eye, you might say. Whenever they talk about something, it’s self-assuredly. There’s no hesitation. There’s no guesswork involved. They just tell you about a specific topic and this is what’s going to happen. They might not explain the whys or how they’re going to do it but they just say, this is how it’s going to be.
To be honest with you, all of that stuff is mainstream now. You can look at that newspapers any day and they tell you what’s coming up. It’s just that the public really can’t believe it. They can not believe it. It’s TOO BIG to comprehend that their entire existence has been completely managed, that they have left no loopholes for you to escape to. And you’re at their mercy everywhere you look. That’s why they don’t want to believe it. People are taught there must be a way out of things. In the movies, there’s generally a happy ending. The bad guys get killed and the good guys win, but that’s not real life. But they still look for the hope, you see. They always look for the hope from SOMEONE ELSE, never from themselves because THEY’RE not going to do anything about it. As long as you’re willing to sit back and let others do it for you and not participate, you’re doomed. It’s as simple as that. These guys have given you your leaders down through centuries to follow. FOR EVERY TYPE OF PERSONALITY OUT THERE IN SOCIETY, THEY HAVE A LEADER OUT THERE AND A GROUP FOR YOU TO JOIN. You go around in circles forever and ever as you go down the whirlpool and go down the drain. YOU ARE YOUR OWN CHAMPION. No one else. You are your own champion and you’ve got to reclaim the right to say yes or no… and you mean it when you say one or the other. Yes or no. If you have no convictions about right or wrong, then you’re doomed. Simple as that.
Alan: There’s Eric from North Carolina. Are you there Eric?
Eric: Alan, thanks for all your help. Speaking on the big lie, are you familiar with Project Blue Beam?
Alan: Yes.
Eric: Research by a [inaudible] who coincidentally died of a heart attack and I was just curious if their agenda doesn’t go as planned that that would be a nice ace in the hole and quicken things up. I was just thinking on that plan, they do the invasion, kill a billion or two and….
Alan: Hold on and I’ll go into that after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and to answer Eric from North Carolina. It’s true the Blue Beam Project was a form of holography. Holographs which were projected into the sky and they were thinking of using this and even using religious themes and give you sky pictures at night. Pictures which would convince many people, it wouldn’t take much today with the new age and all the rest of it, that this was REAL. Because religion’s always been used down through the ages. Look at ex-Prime Minister Blair from Britain who’s leading this movement to bring ALL religions back together in to this NEW religion where they’re all equal and no one’s especially right over the other. So, they use religion. They’re using science as well and they did think also of giving UFO invading and all this kind of stuff. All different ideas that might be used on the public, if necessary, to get us to rush along in a panic into this brave new world and religious themes certainly were thought of as being used.
Alan: Now, there’s Nicole in Manitoba. Are you there Nicole?
Nicole: Hello? Hi Alan.
Alan: Hi.
Nicole: It’s good to talk to you. Thank you so much for taking my call. I just wanted to say that your books are really good. I ordered them and I also liked the DVDs that came with it. It was really, really interesting. Anybody out there who hasn’t ordered it, I highly recommend it. I’m planning on ordering your new book and your new DVDs too. I hope everything in Ontario is going okay. Are you getting sprayed a lot there recently?
Alan: They sprayed incredibly this morning. There was this like spider-webby stuff that came down. It was all over the clothing I had hanging up to dry. Like short fibers an inch long, most of them, just covered all over these sheets I had hanging up.
Nicole: In Manitoba last week, we really, really got doused for about 5 or 6 days straight. Today there seems to be a bit of a break. I just wanted to ask you about Foucault. When I hear you talking sometimes, you remind me almost of Foucault. I was just wondering if you’ve read his works or if he influenced you in some way or….
Alan: I haven’t to be honest with you.
Nicole: Because he talks about power and knowledge and the power/knowledge couplet and…
Alan: I think he’s on the right journey. Whenever you’re on the right journey, you’ll always go through the same thinking mode, as you do your searching, and hopefully you come to the same conclusions, which leads you to a form of integrity for yourself. You realize you’ve got to have it for yourself above everything else. That’s how you win all battles individually and collectively. Society today has been made to be apathetic and they’ll actually cheat on each other in many, many different ways in this rat race system. So, the regaining of integrity and morality - morality isn’t the cultural morality that’s fed to you in any era - there’s a natural morality and they also call that a LAW of nature. It’s quite simple to see that if you break the laws of nature, you have chaos. Those who understand this can also use those laws of nature and break them for you or HELP YOU to break them by encouraging certain behaviors. Then we all end up suffering. They use these techniques. So, on your searches for meaning and purpose, you generally will end up along the same path, if you’re on the right path, you’ll end up on that same path that others have trod before. Thanks for calling.
Nicole: Thank you Alan.
Alan: From Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada where they’re spraying the blazes out of the sky right now, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
"US generals planning for resource wars" by Tom Clonan, Irish Times - Sept. 22, 2008.
"The 2008 Army Modernization Strategy" (army.mil).
"Metairie legislator proposes sterilization for poor women" Associated Press (at current.com).
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on Friday the 26th of September, 2008. Newcomers look into http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site where you can download as many of the talks I’ve given in the past as you can possibly want. There’s a big, big wish list there of information. Remember that there are no other sites out there where I authorize my books to be sold. It’s on http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com so look it up. Also look in to http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download and print up in the various languages of Europe.
Talking about the web site, I spend TIME here chasing down people who sell my books unabashedly, unashamedly and rake in the cash that keeps me going here. They cut it from underneath my feet. They take the bread out of your mouth. I just found another one that goes under the 9/11 Truth Movement where he’s selling my books. This guy’s selling my books so Alfonso if you’re listening down in Toledo, Ohio and I’ve got the photographs of your homes, by the way, you’ll know what to do. You’d better get them pulled very quickly and reimburse the loot that you’ve stolen from me. Okay?
Now, everyone’s getting rushed and worried about this big banking crisis but this had to come. It’s planned to come. They don’t make mistakes at the top. This goes back to something that was said by Senator Barry Goldwater in 1979 talking about the Trilateral Commission. Now, the Trilateral Commission is an ARM, a big arm, a more powerful arm, a more specialized arm of the Council on Foreign Relations. He said, “The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multi-national consolidation of the commercial and banking interests BY seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power, political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical, with no apologies.” That was Barry Goldwater in 1979.
What you’re seeing today is just the big machine in action as the people get screwed again by the robber barons. Nothing new in that at all. Read your history about the robber barons back in the 1800s and how the big boys and Morgan and Gould and all the rest of them literally looted the United States with all their pension funds THREE TIMES IN A ROW. Three depressions in a row. That’s before the Great Depression of the 1920s and 1930s. It’s a common theme with them. They build up stuff and then they just simply LOOT the country.
That gets me back to the people who do print my books up and sell them. See, psychopaths are psychopaths in all classes of society. It doesn’t matter if it’s the guy on the street, the con man, little fast-Jack type, who sees the angle in everything he see around him, every opportunity. Even the ones that are disasters. He SEES, like a shark going in to blood, he smells blood, he sees where he can get a profit made. He has no qualms because he doesn’t have empathy or emotion or compassion. The only difference between the guy on the street doing that or the guy stealing my stuff and printing it up, the only difference between him and the banker is that the banker is born into a more powerful, well-established family of psychopaths. So the problem isn’t just at the top. It goes all the way down to the bottom and it’s all throughout society… encouraged too, by today’s culture creation industry. I’ll be back with more after this following break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. On my web site in the archives section you’ll find links to the Department of Defence’s think tank for the UK. This is also the think tank for the NATO countries and they put out 90 pages of what they could foresee coming in the next 30-40 years with escalating riots and all of this stuff and how the military will be used ON the population. Well, the US has now come out with the same report basically. They’ve tidied it up a bit for the American public… not to scare them. They make you think that this is all for wars abroad. They do mention it’s for a youth, a youth society, that will be growing up in the future… with very unruly, unhappy youth. They’re talking about males really. This all ties in again with the depopulation agenda. There’s no doubt whatsoever. This came from the Irish Times.
US generals planning for resource wars
Monday, September 22, 2008
[emphasis added to article]
(Alan: This is how they’ve titled it here. It’s better camouflage. See, in Britain, they don’t bother camouflaging anything because the public are so beaten down with the scientific technique of propaganda and bureaucracies - there’s just bureaucracies for everything, constantly announcing things on the radio and television - that you’re made to be apathetic. That’s again, what Bertrand Russell said. ‘We shall create an apathetic society.’ Apathy is a very good tool to use in psychological warfare. But in the US because they have better script writers who work in Hollywood and so on and they do work with these guys and they work too with Madison Avenue to MARKET the ideas to the public, they get better write-ups, more camouflaged. But it says here…)
ANALYSIS: The US military sees the next 30 to 40 years as involving a state of continuous war against ideologically-motivated terrorists (A: Now, that’s a loaded term there because ideology can be anything at all. Having rights and freedom could be an ideology, you see. And it is an idea. Terrorism is now expanding to include even VERBAL terrorists. Speaking out can be terrorism. Definitely speaking out against the wars in the Middle-East has already been stated by Bush himself, that it is a form of terrorism.) and competing with Russia and China for natural resources and markets, writes Tom Clonan.
AS GENERAL Ray Odierno takes command of US forces in Baghdad from troop surge architect Gen David Petraeus, America has begun planning in earnest for its phased withdrawal. (A: Now, that ties right in with the troops being brought back home - the article I read last week - and how they’re deploying them to work alongside the police. Well, what do you think that’s all about? You’re watching the banks all go down, at the right times, mind you. They bring them home first and then collapse the banks. Everything is working to plan and schedule. Everything that happens on a major scale is done by plan an it’s always on schedule.)
The extra brigade combat teams - or battlegroups - deployed to Iraq by Petraeus have already withdrawn and a further 8,000 troops have been diverted to Afghanistan. (A: They have to protect the poppy harvest, you see.)
In January, the next president of the United States will conclude America's timetable for withdrawal in final negotiations with the Iraqi government.
(A: Then it goes on and down the actual page itself and you try to find what they’re really, really getting in to with the 90 page document and there’s also a PDF you can get with the whole thing on it, much deeper scope, more open about it too, rather than this handout they give to the media.)
Under the auspices of the US department of defence and department of the army, the US military have just published a document entitled (A: This is the PDF you get.) 2008 Army Modernization Strategy which makes for interesting reading against the current backdrop of deteriorating international fiscal, environmental, energy resource and security crises.
The 2008 modernisation strategy, written by Lieut Gen Stephen Speakes (A: How do they dream these guys’ names up? He‘s a speaker and he drafts up this thing.), deputy chief of staff of the US army, contains the first explicit and official acknowledgement that the US military is dangerously overstretched internationally. (A: Well, no kidding. They’ve been policing the world, all over the word, quietly from the general public that is, since World War II.) It states simply: "The army is engaged in the third-longest war in our nation's history and . . . the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) has caused the army to become out of balance with the demand for forces exceeding the sustainable supply."
Against this backdrop, the 90 page document sets out the future of international conflict for the next 30 to 40 years - as the US military sees it - and outlines the manner in which the military will sustain its current operations and prepare and "transform" itself for future "persistent" warfare. (A: Persistent warfare, ongoing warfare. Remember that phrase you heard at the beginning, right after 9/11 in 2001? ‘This is to be a hundred years war.’)
The document reveals a number of profoundly significant - and worrying - strategic positions (A: And I’ll try and cut to the chase here through all this nonsense actually. That’s just a lot of filler that they put in there.) that have been adopted as official doctrine by the US military. In its preamble, it predicts a post cold war future of "perpetual warfare".
According to its authors: "We have entered an era of persistent conflict . . . a security environment much more ambiguous and unpredictable than that faced during the cold war." (A: Which, again, was a farce.)
It then goes on to describe the key features of this dawning era (A: Dawning era. Masons love dawns, new dawns…) of continuous warfare. Some of the characteristics are familiar enough to a world audience accustomed to the rhetoric of the global war on terror.
"A key current threat is a radical, ideology-based, long-term terrorist threat bent on using any means available - to include weapons of mass destruction (A: Boy, you get bored hearing that one) - to achieve its political and ideological ends."
Relatively new, "emerging" features are also included in the document's rationale for future threats.
"We face a potential return to traditional security threats posed by emerging near-peers as we compete globally for depleting natural resources and overseas markets."
This thinly-veiled reference to Russia and China will, perhaps, come as little surprise given recent events in Ossetia and Abkhazia. The explicit reference in this context to future resource wars, however, will probably raise eyebrows among the international diplomatic community, who prefer to couch such conflicts as human rights-based or rooted in notions around freedom and democracy. (A: I like how they worded that. Which is very true. NOTIONS about freedom and democracy.)
The document, however, contains no such lofty pretences. (A: Their main enemy, it says here, for the US, the main enemy… Remember what Kissinger said back in the 70s, ‘The main enemy of the state’ and it’s parroted here, is ‘population growth’.) It goes on to list as a pre-eminent threat to the security of the US and its allies "population growth - especially (A: not conclusively) in less-developed countries - [which] will expose a resulting 'youth bulge'." (A: A youth bulge is what they’re calling their target.)
This youth bulge, the document goes on to state, will present the US with further "resource competition" in that these expanding populations in the developing world "will consume ever increasing amounts of food, water and energy".
The document goes on to describe in broad-strokes the manner in which its downsized military might ensure survival of the fittest for the US and its allies in future resource wars for water, food and energy.
As a consequence of identifying growing populations in the developed world as a threat in itself, the strategy document highlights a number of paradigm shifts in the way future wars are to be conducted.
(A: Now here is one of the main parts…)
It predicts that "21st Century operations will require soldiers to engage among populations and diverse cultures instead of avoiding them". (A: Do you realize what that means? This is TOTAL WAR. Total war means that the population are really the target. In World War II, Dowding who was in charge of the Royal Air Force for Britain, targeted most of the bombing in Germany ON THE WORKERS’ HOMES. That’s what was destroyed mainly. The workers homes so that they became fair game. It was called ‘total war’ meaning everyone in society was a target. The idea was that if you could kill off the workers, there’s no one left to work the factories, even if they spring up new ones.) It predicts that "21st Century operations will require soldiers to engage among populations and diverse cultures instead of avoiding them". (A: Now, the marines are already training - that was in the Army Times, I believe - guys, soldiers TO GO IN PLAIN CLOTHES AMONG CIVILIANS. It’s one of the biggest things going right now, training for that very, very thing.)
The document reveals that new US tactical doctrine provides a template by which air, naval and field commanders will no longer just secure traditional strategic targets such as airspace, seaports and bridgeheads, but will, of necessity, also deploy and fight amongst and against the target population itself to win wars. (A: Well, you’ve heard of ‘killing fields’, and that’s what they call them in the military, where the troops are sent in and anyone and anything who happens to be in front of them is ELIMINATED.)
The document refers to this euphemistically as "commanders employing offensive, defensive and stability or civil support operations simultaneously".
The remainder of the document is devoted to describing in detail how a downsized all volunteer (A: Meaning mercenary.) US military - numbering approximately one million soldiers, aircrew and sailors - could maintain an ever-present, international, offensive posture in many countries across many time-zones.
It describes how information communication technologies and digital technologies will create a new "networked" human soldier - the 'Future Force Warrior' (A: Oh boy, Future Force Warrior or FFW) - who will deploy among the target population and will operate simultaneously several remote, unmanned ground and air weapons systems. (A: Ground and air weapons systems. Remember, that also means what they’re calling ‘modular packages’ they’re giving the regiments back home in the US of non-lethal weaponry. They’re called ‘modular packages’. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Eugenics is all the topic today, the culling back of the population is coming from the United Nations and all other sources and all the NGO groups that are associated with the United Nations, all the well funded ones that are PAID big salaries by big foundations which comprise the parallel government. This is an article from Louisiana and it was also in, I think, The Associated Press.
Metairie legislator proposes sterilization for poor women
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Associated Press
State Representative John LaBruzzo of Metairie said many of his constituents are tired of paying for children from poor families and that is why he is considering proposing legislation that would pay women on government assistance $1,000 if they choose to be sterilized.
“You have these people (A: THESE people, you see.) who are just fed up with working their buns off to try to provide for their own family (A: That’s how they always bring this argument. You know, this bunch against that bunch.) and being forced by the government o provide for others’ families who just want to have unlimited kids,” he said. (A: That means children. They use animal terms for children to dehumanize them.)
(A: This is an old, old thing which the eugenicists pull up… that you’re paying for all that. But they don’t mention that you’re also bailing out the banks that are looting BILLIONS off of you or they don’t mention that the money that governments spend on their military campaigns and their big profiteering campaigns. That’s all government is for. It’s a front to profiteer by having wars and raiding other countries. They don’t mention these things. They always turn it on to their OTHER problem which is the general population. You know, those that might outbreed their betters as Russell and others said… and Charles Galton Darwin.)
LaBruzzo said he is studying voluntary sterilization for women whose sole financial support comes from the government in the form of welfare or other public assistance. His idea would be to give the women $1,000 if they had their tubes tied.
His proposal has come under harsh criticism by some civil rights groups.
The ACLU called it a misguided and mean-spirited attempt to eliminate poverty by eliminating the poor. (A: Well, of course that’s the policy. That’s how you get rid of poverty. Remember when Presidents have wars on things. They have WAR on poverty and WAR on drugs. That’s a legal statement. It’s a WAR on the poor, you see.)
LaBruzzo said his office has been flooded by emails, many supporting his position. (A: Of course he will.)
“We have more in favor, saying, ‘good job, keep it going.’” he said. “Of course we have a lot saying you’re going in the wrong direction.”
LaBruzzo said that in addition to the sterilization of women, he would consider vasectomies for welfare dads and tax incentives for higher income families with children in private schools.
So there you go with the same old stuff all over again. Always to make you feel that you’re really gouged big time to pay for all the welfare people. They never mention either, the culture industry that’s given you a constant feed, from the 60s onwards, stream of ‘just do it’, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex. They never mention that at all. Never ever, ever. No, they blame the effects of things but they don’t mention the CAUSES AND THOSE THINGS WHICH PROMOTE THEM. Isn’t that rather odd, wouldn’t you think? Because it’s nothing to do with the wealthier supporting the poor. That’s not the thing. They don’t WANT the poor there. They’ve already stated that they don’t need them anymore. The jobs they used to fill are all gone. The factories are gone. Now they’re simply cleaning up what’s left. THE HUMAN COLLATERAL… as they often call it.
Just before I go to the callers, here’s an item that’s interesting. I always tell you that for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. We always hear about, ‘you can do your own thing’ but there’s no effect left in society. Yet, we never really ponder the problems or what’s behind the ideals that guide policy. Remember, there are big, powerful foundations like The Council on Foreign Relations which draft out policy AND GIVE IT TO GOVERNMENTS TO FOLLOW. The Club of Rome states that itself, as well. That’s part of what they do. We don’t elect these people. These big foundations are set up to be the REAL government. They bypass any ideas of democracy. THAT IS THEIR PURPOSE.
Eugenics has to get society to accept the killing of people. I’ve said this. It’s not popular. I hear the standard slogans that have been downloaded into people, through repetition, over and over and over again when I speak about these things. You see, it stared with abortion. Once we have no more horror about abortion, they’re now moving in to the elderly. I read that article last week from that rather aristocratic, old, I’ll hesitate to call her ‘woman’ in Britain. I read off what she stated about the elderly: wanting governments to have the POWER to kill them off. So there are effects. Individually, there are effects that ripple all THROUGH society for our own actions and we all suffer the consequences. I’m going to read this article after the following break.
I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Before the break I was talking about how there are consequences to everything in society. It’s very, very true. This society does not LIKE children terribly much. They’re a hindrance and a bother. Read Charles Galton Darwin’s book, The Next Million Years, and he talks about going through this technique and strategy of how to basically download into people the fact that they wouldn’t want children; they prefer to buy material things and go for the material things in life rather than being tied to children. It’s been very successful because the first step in getting the public to ACCEPT the killing off of the public is to always have a big, emotional topic to debate. It’s never done by the public themselves. They watch experts debate it for them on television and choose one side or the other, but that’s not the point. The point is, this is the eugenics plan and everyone is being used in this big plan. EVERYONE IS USED. Because, this is an economic system and they don’t like anyone who is not a good producer and consumer. So they don’t tolerate young moms with children very well. However, they do encourage all the sex - there’s such a stream of since about the 1960s onwards - and encourage all the behavior. You can’t turn on Much Music without seeing it right in your face. It’s everywhere… aimed right at young children. Quite amazing. And we all tolerate this and think nothing about it. The Mail Online:
One baby in 30 left alive after medical termination
by FIONA MACRAE
20 April 2007
[emphasis added]
(A: There’s a picture there of Gianna Jessen who was born after a failed abortion. That was 30 years ago. She’s still alive today.)
One in 30 babies aborted for medical reasons (A: Now, that’s the term they use for pretty well ALL of them, psychological or medical. The mother might have a nervous breakdown and so that does fine, it goes under medicine.) is born alive, a study has found.
They lived for an average of 80 minutes - although in some cases foetuses (A: Babies.) survived for over six hours.
Most of the babies were born between 20 and 24 weeks of pregnancy, but some had been in the womb for as little as 17 weeks.
The figures, based on a study of West Midlands hospitals, has reignited the abortion debate (A: There’s no debate, by the way. It‘s a ‘must be’ by the elite.), with pro-life campaigners demanding the time limit for terminations be cut.
Researchers looked at the outcome of 3,189 abortions performed on seriously handicapped foetuses at 20 hospitals between 1995 and 2004.
It showed that 102 - or around one in 30 - aborted for reasons such as Down's Syndrome and heart defects, were born alive. (A: By the way, that’s not quite true either, because a lot of these tests have a lot of false positives and false negatives. I’ve got another article on that… which I don’t have time to read tonight. But the mother is advised to have an abortion anyway.)
Abortions are allowed to be carried out if the pregnancy is shown to have an adverse effect on the mental health and wellbeing of the mother up until the 24th week of pregnancy.
Beyond this point, the procedure is only sanctioned if the baby has a severe disability or if the mother's life is at risk.
The latest study, carried out by experts from the West Midlands Perinatal Institute and published in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, showed that three per cent of aborted disabled babies were born alive.
Most of the abortions studied were medical abortions. These involve a women being given a series of pills, taken in two doses two days apart.
The first dose, a single tablet of mifepristone, blocks the pregnancy hormones that normally ensure the womb's lining holds on to the fertilised egg. The second dose, of four tablets containing hormone-like prostaglandins, triggers contractions and a miscarriage.
The death of the baby is a result of the trauma of the early birth, rather than the tablets itself, meaning, in rare occasions, some babies may survive the process.
(A: Here’s how they get around this now. It’s quite amazing when we think of all… I think of Jacques Ellul when I read these articles when he talked about ALL fiction being propaganda. Hospital series and dramas, all fictional, all how they’re in the emergency room and they’re SO professional and how they can bring everybody back from the dead. That’s all they worry about. But it’s a complete cover. It’s propaganda to alter perceptions. They must alter perceptions in psychological warfare. Here’s how they’re going to get around this. He says….)
From 22 weeks, the tablets should be preceded by a lethal injection into the baby's heart to ensure the baby is dead before the procedure goes any further. (A: Guys get paid to do this… and they sleep well.)
If these babies are born alive, it suggests they weren't given the heart-stopping injection (A: You know, we go on and on about Adolf Hitler as though he was the first and last criminal of his type and yet we accept this in society. Now there are corpses on display in art galleries, hanging on wires. That’s how debased and degraded we all are. That’s where it really starts. It starts from this and leads on to all of that.)- perhaps because the doctor thought it would have been too traumatic for the mother. The figures follow several studies which show that babies born at 23 and 24 weeks are capable of surviving.
While there is no suggestion that any of the babies documented in the West Midlands study lived for more than a few hours, doctors in Norwich are currently treating a toddler born (A: They’re currently treating… that’s double-speak right away.) at 24 weeks after three botched terminations. (A: THREE times they tried to kill this toddler.)
He was born three years ago and is still alive. (A: You know, they used to hang people for MURDER and so on. If you didn’t die the first time they dropped you through the trap door, they’d often let you go free. Here they go at this three times to try and kill a toddler, by giving a LETHAL injection in the heart. This is not a convicted criminal here. And the toddler’s still alive after three years.)
Campaigners said it was likely the Midlands figures were just the tip of the iceberg (A: You bet they will be.) as the region only accounts for around a tenth of the babies born in the country each year.
In addition, the study only looked at babies whose lives were ended because of disability. (A: And they haven’t proven the disability yet either. You should actually see this because a lot of these children are diagnosed and misdiagnosed and I think it’s on purpose too. They have to get a legal clause somewhere on the certificate to do the abortion.)
As I say, now we’ve degraded in to ‘let’s go for the elderly’. You always go for the weak, you see, those who can’t stand up for themselves. Then you go for the elderly. Then you start working on those in between. And because society’s been trained that it’s all quite natural to kill each other off and we’ve had this massive propaganda of ‘there’s just too many of us walking the planet’, we accept this. We’re degraded and degraded and degraded until we can not SURVIVE. We can not defend ourselves anymore from the elite who have all this down pat as the plan of their agenda. Quite something. Quite something. The world we live in… is disgusting.
Here’s a point I’d like to make too, before I go on to the callers, a point which is important. The elite KNOW they’ve brought us ALL to this degraded society. They know they can’t keep us all going much longer, but to allow the next phase to come in, they had to degrade us. Because a degraded society won’t stand up for each other. THEY DON’T CARE about each other. They’re easy targets, easy meat. They also know that you’ve accepted DEATH as a part of life. Not natural death, EUTHANASIA. Overpopulation is being used as an excuse and all the rest of it. You accept that. Once you do that, you’re destroyed. That was the INTENT of this movement many, many years ago. Nothing to do with the rights of the woman. It was the elite who sponsored and funded this. LOOK at the foundations who paid for it all.
Alan: Now, we’ll go to Steve from Denver. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Oh yes. Yes. I’m here. Thank you for taking my call, Alan. Just let me get my question out of the way. You’ve mentioned very infrequently about this 360° Masonic situation. Please tell me if you know of ANY 360° Masons and if so who are they?
Alan: There is an organization at the top that uses different terms. Prince Charles used it a couple of times. He called them ‘the Olympians’. It’s a very prestigious, high-level group of VERY wealthy, old families. Of course, they do the circle, as it’s called, Completion. You’ll see it too on a lot of the symbols put out there. Even in theosophy they’ll give you an exoteric meaning for the general public, including the members at the low orders.
Steve: Could you just name one individual? Are you saying Prince Charles is a 360° Olympian?
Alan: I wouldn’t say he would be because I saw him when he hit his 40th, I think it was his 40th, birthday and he went on stage in front of all the Lords of Britain who all wore there robes and so on. He had a glass of Champagne in one hand and then he did his little angled degree with his right arm, then put it straight out from him. So he’s up there, for sure, but he doesn’t have the brains to be in the higher levels.
Steve: Could you name a 360° Olympian?
Alan: You can’t name them. You can only get the names of their organizations.
Steve: Okay. So you don’t know anyone personally that you could put a name on so we can take a look at them and see how…
Alan: I certainly could but I won’t.
Steve: Oh, could but won’t. Okay.
Alan: I’m talking about people I’ve met.
Steve: I’m going to make a quick statement and that is that we are witnessing the end game. They are buying up the assets at pennies on the dollar. They way they’ve always done at the shearing of the sheep time and it’s sheering of the sheep time. We could sing that along with the Christian ‘Bringing in the Sheep’ only it’s ‘shearing UP the sheep’.
Alan: That’s right.
Steve: At any rate, lastly, your opinion on the elections. What’s going on with the elections and the debate tonight? They’re on the red carpet. That normally means that the royal family connected. What’s the connection, Alan?
Alan: The connection is widely known. That the US basically went over to Britain at the Treaty of Paris and most folk, again, don’t want to read that treaty but they should. It was basically an amalgamation. The elite and the aristocracy, and there is an aristocracy IN the United States, that became part of and parcel of the British Empire AND their agenda. We find that when they set up the Round Table societies, under Lord Milner and they also had the Cecil Rhodes Society, that was the group that merged IN to the Council on Foreign Relations for the United States. THAT was the final merger. That is why they went along with the same policies as Britain. Margaret Thatcher referred to it as ‘our special relationship’. Other politicians referred to it as ‘their special relationship’ all along. Also, the same bankers that run the British system sent Jacob Schiff and others along to running the US economy back in the 1800s. Of course, Schiff was brought up in the Rothschild’s home, probably as another child of maybe another Rothschild wife but not his official one, but he did have official Rothschild backing and given the respect of a full-blown Rothschild. So the US was merged in to this system long ago.
Steve: Why won’t you name an Olympian?
Alan: Because I know a couple and it’s good to know a couple if you want information.
Steve: Oh. Okay. Alright. Well, thank you and have a nice evening. Thank you, sir.
Alan: You too. That’s the whole thing. There are people who definitely run this world. They’ve always run this world. They give religions a time to run the system as they did in the past. You were taught the religion, the only religions you would ever know. They would be the religions which gave you a meaning for life. It’s the only meaning for life you’d have. You’d know nothing about any kind of science whatsoever. However, today, they’ve given us a new scientific priesthood but they’re also merging it with a world religion. This world religion is based on sustainability, greening, the whole new age phenomena where you’ll worship mother earth and all the rest of it - it’s right out in the open - and the culling off of ‘the unwashed masses’. They don’t want them around much longer.
However, I’ve had a chat with a couple I’ve met in my travels across the world. You bump into them in odd places, on board ships if you’re moving and stuff like that. If you get to know them, they let little things out of the bag… with a little sparkle in their eye, you might say. Whenever they talk about something, it’s self-assuredly. There’s no hesitation. There’s no guesswork involved. They just tell you about a specific topic and this is what’s going to happen. They might not explain the whys or how they’re going to do it but they just say, this is how it’s going to be.
To be honest with you, all of that stuff is mainstream now. You can look at that newspapers any day and they tell you what’s coming up. It’s just that the public really can’t believe it. They can not believe it. It’s TOO BIG to comprehend that their entire existence has been completely managed, that they have left no loopholes for you to escape to. And you’re at their mercy everywhere you look. That’s why they don’t want to believe it. People are taught there must be a way out of things. In the movies, there’s generally a happy ending. The bad guys get killed and the good guys win, but that’s not real life. But they still look for the hope, you see. They always look for the hope from SOMEONE ELSE, never from themselves because THEY’RE not going to do anything about it. As long as you’re willing to sit back and let others do it for you and not participate, you’re doomed. It’s as simple as that. These guys have given you your leaders down through centuries to follow. FOR EVERY TYPE OF PERSONALITY OUT THERE IN SOCIETY, THEY HAVE A LEADER OUT THERE AND A GROUP FOR YOU TO JOIN. You go around in circles forever and ever as you go down the whirlpool and go down the drain. YOU ARE YOUR OWN CHAMPION. No one else. You are your own champion and you’ve got to reclaim the right to say yes or no… and you mean it when you say one or the other. Yes or no. If you have no convictions about right or wrong, then you’re doomed. Simple as that.
Alan: There’s Eric from North Carolina. Are you there Eric?
Eric: Alan, thanks for all your help. Speaking on the big lie, are you familiar with Project Blue Beam?
Alan: Yes.
Eric: Research by a [inaudible] who coincidentally died of a heart attack and I was just curious if their agenda doesn’t go as planned that that would be a nice ace in the hole and quicken things up. I was just thinking on that plan, they do the invasion, kill a billion or two and….
Alan: Hold on and I’ll go into that after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and to answer Eric from North Carolina. It’s true the Blue Beam Project was a form of holography. Holographs which were projected into the sky and they were thinking of using this and even using religious themes and give you sky pictures at night. Pictures which would convince many people, it wouldn’t take much today with the new age and all the rest of it, that this was REAL. Because religion’s always been used down through the ages. Look at ex-Prime Minister Blair from Britain who’s leading this movement to bring ALL religions back together in to this NEW religion where they’re all equal and no one’s especially right over the other. So, they use religion. They’re using science as well and they did think also of giving UFO invading and all this kind of stuff. All different ideas that might be used on the public, if necessary, to get us to rush along in a panic into this brave new world and religious themes certainly were thought of as being used.
Alan: Now, there’s Nicole in Manitoba. Are you there Nicole?
Nicole: Hello? Hi Alan.
Alan: Hi.
Nicole: It’s good to talk to you. Thank you so much for taking my call. I just wanted to say that your books are really good. I ordered them and I also liked the DVDs that came with it. It was really, really interesting. Anybody out there who hasn’t ordered it, I highly recommend it. I’m planning on ordering your new book and your new DVDs too. I hope everything in Ontario is going okay. Are you getting sprayed a lot there recently?
Alan: They sprayed incredibly this morning. There was this like spider-webby stuff that came down. It was all over the clothing I had hanging up to dry. Like short fibers an inch long, most of them, just covered all over these sheets I had hanging up.
Nicole: In Manitoba last week, we really, really got doused for about 5 or 6 days straight. Today there seems to be a bit of a break. I just wanted to ask you about Foucault. When I hear you talking sometimes, you remind me almost of Foucault. I was just wondering if you’ve read his works or if he influenced you in some way or….
Alan: I haven’t to be honest with you.
Nicole: Because he talks about power and knowledge and the power/knowledge couplet and…
Alan: I think he’s on the right journey. Whenever you’re on the right journey, you’ll always go through the same thinking mode, as you do your searching, and hopefully you come to the same conclusions, which leads you to a form of integrity for yourself. You realize you’ve got to have it for yourself above everything else. That’s how you win all battles individually and collectively. Society today has been made to be apathetic and they’ll actually cheat on each other in many, many different ways in this rat race system. So, the regaining of integrity and morality - morality isn’t the cultural morality that’s fed to you in any era - there’s a natural morality and they also call that a LAW of nature. It’s quite simple to see that if you break the laws of nature, you have chaos. Those who understand this can also use those laws of nature and break them for you or HELP YOU to break them by encouraging certain behaviors. Then we all end up suffering. They use these techniques. So, on your searches for meaning and purpose, you generally will end up along the same path, if you’re on the right path, you’ll end up on that same path that others have trod before. Thanks for calling.
Nicole: Thank you Alan.
Alan: From Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada where they’re spraying the blazes out of the sky right now, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
"US generals planning for resource wars" by Tom Clonan, Irish Times - Sept. 22, 2008.
"The 2008 Army Modernization Strategy" (army.mil).
"Metairie legislator proposes sterilization for poor women" Associated Press (at current.com).
Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 8:14 pm
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 5th of November, 2008. Newcomers look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the web site you’ll see lots of previous talks I’ve given where I try to tie a lot of the machinery together that creates this big system that we live in. I try and show you how we’re guided down through time by those who do the planning. After all, if we don’t plan our own future, someone else will. That’s the history, really, of what they call civilization. Civilization itself is not just a progress towards something, no one defines progress at the lower levels. We think it’s to do with technology and toys that are given to us. It’s much bigger than that. It’s progress towards a particular ending, a planned society under a single world type system. I try to tie them together by showing you the big players that are involved, the big think tanks that create public policy and your governments that SIGN these policies basically into their format and their laws… which effect all of us. Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download written in the various languages of Europe.
I’m sure everyone is probably happy to get the main election over and done with and the hoopla is over and all the PREWRITTEN, scripted speeches have been made. The public are ready to have another few years of another bunch coming in and DECIMATING THEIR PURSES as we move towards this Brave New World scenario. Now that the Fascist side has set up the machinery over the last few years for world total control, and also at home as well for total individual scrutiny and observation, we now have the other side coming in to complete it at HOME. That’s what’s going to happen now as they basically Sovietize the system in the U.S. Canada, of course, will follow suit because we’re part of the American conglomerate. We’re being amalgamated into the Americas once again. It wouldn’t matter if you had a Muppet put in there. I was thinking that today, that the cookie monster wasn’t bad. At least he could play the drums, he could do something of some use and he had some originality in him. Whereas the guys that we are given, are given to the public because of supposed backgrounds which are generally pretty well fictitious. They have as much in common with the working people as… well, the Queen does.
You’ll find that the policies that are being put in now have all been already written up long before this person has even been PICKED AND CHOSEN TO BE THE PRESIDENT and of course, not by the people. It’s sad to live so many years and watch the same GAME in every country across the world, with THIS party and THAT party, and how they play this TANDEM game of theirs, this ping-pong game to keep the public from having natural revolutions. It’s really something because growing up in Europe, I used to watch the Labour Party coming in – and they were basically the Democrats – and they’d always nationalize things. They’d run up massive bills, etc of public tax money and squander it. Then they’d say they’d have to privatize it when the conservatives would get in. They would then privatize it and basically sell it off to their buddies for peanuts after the tax payer with the previous bunch had renovated the whole system and paid for it. This went back and forth for my whole life time when I lived over in the U.K. The same thing is happening in America with public/private agreements. I’ll be back with more about this after the following break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and I’m talking about how the big game works. As I say, when one side is in they tend to nationalize things, pump public money into it, and put the tax payers on the hook for payers to big institutions. The institutions being railways, things that we really need to keep the system going of commerce and so on. How they basically sell it to their buddies when the next party comes in. This has been happening for over 100 years this way. In democracy or democratic countries, we tend to vote the last bunch OUT when we get so sick of them because we see through their arrogance. The average Joe on the street sees through their arrogance. We see the money they squander and it’s no coincidence that the big bubble in the financial sector was meant to BURST just before this election to make sure that the boy who was authorized to get in, DID get in.
It was also interesting to hear the Canadian press commentating on his speech. And these speeches at the end, of course, are written maybe a year ago, in case they win. It was interesting to hear, the commentator said, that there’s nothing that you can pin Obama down on because everything he says is basically emotion, it’s emotively based and there’s no real facts there. You get statements like The American Dream, so you’re going to have another dream for a few years and The New Dawn, of course, is mentioned, is very occultic and something about the LIGHT and all that, again, occultic coming in, religious terms as well, but nothing CONCRETE TO DO WITH ANY POLICIES. Therefore, we have very smart people at the top, as we KNOW, who will manage this man and bring him through into the next phase of the Sovietization AT HOME of the system. I haven’t heard him say that he’s going to take it down, all the security barriers within the U.S. that’s crippling people with their travel and their personal lives. I’ve heard none of that. In fact, if anything, he’s standing up for the military abroad and all the usual stuff. He’s a system’s man, and unfortunately all those who cried and did the Hollywood stuff for him last night will take a few years to find this out, but that’s tough cheese because the masses never really look too deeply into anything, anyway.
They want a savior. They want someone who’s a God, a big Santa Claus that’ll fix everything for them personally and very quickly. It reminds me too of the old biblical idea of an ancient Israel that could commune directly to its God. Everyone could commune directly to their God and they wanted a King, like all the other tribes around them, a representative ON EARTH. Of course, once they got the King in, then you’ve got to get him a big throne and get him fancy clothes and keep him in style and you go the way of the world, but it’s also human nature. You see, people want to worship humans.
Everything today is public relations. The whole image of those who supposedly run for candidacy is CREATED. IT’S A FICTION THAT’S PROJECTED TO THE PUBLIC. There’s nothing about these people or their lives - that we’re TOLD about, that is - that isn’t either fictional or very, very dressed up for public consumption. That’s how it is and as I say, it wouldn’t matter if you had a Muppet in because those behind the scenes will still run THIS part of the game as well… as they have in the past. That’s all I have to say about politics because I’ve never really got involved in politics in my life. I’ve watched them, I’ve analyzed them; I know the games.
When you go into really deep study to find out BIG think tanks, think tanks and organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, that have their men scattered throughout government and bureaucracy, they also have their men often IN POLITICS as well. They’re supposedly a non-political organization and yet everything they’ve ever published about what they’d like to happen in the world, JUST COMES ABOUT because they do create public policies FOR government, just like the RAND Corporation. Look at the big players in the RAND Corporation and it’s always advising governments on the future. You’ll find most of them are all CIA and FBI employees… That’s the reality of the world. Those who believe in democracy live in a total and complete fiction. Run by Hollywood, directed by Hollywood, speech written by Hollywood, for all its emotive content about dreams and so on, and that’s all you get is the dream OR generally IS THE NIGHTMARE. So help us all.
Now, what’s also happening in this world is something to do with the Middle East, I’ve been on about it for a long time, and that was the set up of Israel. I went through some of the history of Israel, not just starting with the old Zionist movement and the Rothschild days in the 1800s, where he financed Russian Jewish immigration into Palestine, as it was called then. And then the massive immigration that came with the building up of World War II and afterwards, but I’ve also gone in to the Colonial Powers and those who were given the JOB of directing Palestine on behalf of Britain and behalf of the Queen, actually, like Sir Ronald Storrs and what he wrote in his own books. One of them was called Orientations. He gives the history of the build up of this future state of Israel. It was no surprise to him in the ‘30s, that it was being built up to be a state and also an ARM OF BRITAIN because he called it A New Ulster, an Ulster to be set up in the Middle East. If you know the history of Ulster, they did the same thing from England, from London I should say, really, when they set up Ulster in Ireland, it would be a thorn in the side… for centuries. And yet this ties in with it too because from the Israel Today magazine,
Headline News
Friday, October 24, 2008
Israel Today Staff
Shimon Peres to be knighted by Queen Elizabeth
Israeli media reported this week that the Israeli Embassy in London and Buckingham Palace are close to an agreement on having Queen Elizabeth confer honorary knighthood on Israeli President Shimon Peres when he visits the UK next month.
The appointment would make Peres a Knight Commander in the Order of St. Michael and St. George, a title (Alan: Now, listen to this.) usually reserved for British colonial affairs officials, foreign-service officers and high-ranking diplomats in Commonwealth countries. (A: In Commonwealth countries. I’ll repeat that for the hard of thinking.)
However, the Queen has on numerous occasions appointed foreigners to the Order. Among some of the more famous are Bill Gates (A: Well, my, my, my, the self-made man. Ha. Ha. Ha. I love these self-made men stories. They’re so popular amongst the people.) and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
The honorary nature of the appointment means Peres would not be entitled to prefix "Sir" before his name. (A: But that’s not true. They can amongst each other of his peer group.)
Israeli Foreign Ministry sources cited by The Jerusalem Post warned that the Israeli media's focus on the story could prevent Peres from being knighted during his upcoming visit, as opponents of the move will now try to scuttle it.
So there you are. Why would the Queen be handing out all these Knighthoods? And what’s so important about getting a Knighthood? It’s obviously VERY important to a lot of people. Look at all the big players IN the Council on Foreign Relations, the U.S. branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs, that have been given TITLES and brought into the Knighthoods. Even Gorbachev was brought in as a Knight. It’s quite interesting. You’ll find even TOP GANGSTERS had on their wish list the wish to be KNIGHTED by the Queen, if they gave enough money to charity. Quite something, but people don’t ask the right questions do they? In fact, they don’t ask any questions at all. They like to listen to emotion and promises of dreams and all that kind of stuff.
We’re going into an age now where SERVICES and basically secular humanism can only go in one direction and that is into the world of madness. You see, secular humanism is based on the fact that man is just a malleable creature, that can be trained and remolded LIKE ANY OTHER ANIMAL. We have see the techniques and the multi millions of dollars that are being spent over the last 100 years in psychiatry and psychology and criminal rehabilitation, especially on the side of perverts and so on, where they found out after all this massive spending spree they’ve had and all these ideas and theories have been tested out, THEY CAN’T CHANGE THEIR BEHAVIOR. They can’t do it. What’s even more important is how authority has been taken away from PARENTS AND HANDED OVER, REALLY, TO SCHOOLS. I had an article given to me a couple of weeks ago, to do with the fact that they’d set up almost torture like chambers in some schools in Britain. It was an experiment based on some of the ideas of Guantanamo Bay for unruly pupils. Where they literally set them in a locked room – it was all darkened and the walls blackened – and they could only stare at a corner for hours on end. Yet if the parents were going to do that to their own children today, they’d be in jail. However, the teachers can get away with incredible things because you see the generation who’d brought those children, IN TURN, had been socialized or domesticated which means the same thing. They EXPECT the state to take care of their children. They now passively accept the fact that the STATE has more authority over their child than they do. Things are happening today which would have caused RIOTS in the past, RIOTS FROM PARENTS. Not today. Not with the domesticated parent generation.
Here’s one of the wacky ideas that is now getting put into effect in Britain, in the British schools. From the BBC,
BBC News
Monday, 3 November 2008
Foot massages calm unruly pupils
Disruptive schoolchildren in south London will be given foot massages by
(Alan: THE RAPIST, I like to call them THE RAPISTS, rather than therapists.)
therapists to help get their aggressiveness under control.
I’ll read more of this when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just discussing how the great secular humanists that run the world have now decided that the problem with young men who become unruly in school, is they need their feet massaged, apparently, and they’re going to spend big money to do so. Funny how they’re always discovering things, eh? I never, every caught on to that. I thought it was hormones that was kicking in with me at school. It never dawned on me that I needed to get my feet massaged. It says here,
Reflexologists will visit 74 primary and secondary schools in Lambeth and tend to children under 13. (A: This will come on all over the place. It will catch on like wild fire across the Western world. Now, primary school is from 5 years on and up.)
Lambeth Council has budgeted £90,000 next year for reflexologists from London-based charity Bud Umbrella.
The council said it makes "no apologies for using different and innovative methods" to tackle aggressive children. (A: See, parents were doing things wrong all along, all down through the centuries. They should have been tickling their feet. Mind you, not anyone can tickle it properly. You need A PROPERLY trained reflexologist, apparently, to get the proper, you know, yin and yang pressure points.)
Bud Umbrella's website says the therapy can calm aggressive feelings, improve listening skills and concentration as well as relieve anxiety and stress. (A: I wish I’d caught on to this when I was young.)
A spokeswoman for Lambeth Council said: "We make no apologies for using different and innovative methods, but this obviously won't replace more traditional ways of dealing with anti-social behaviour.
"We need to deal with the root causes (A: A little pun there, the root cause.) of young people's behavioural problems and nip them in the bud." (A: There’s another little pun there obviously to do with the charity that’s got the contract.)
The council said it had put an extra £2m into youth services and its programmes used traditional and innovative measures to tackle anti-social behaviour.
It said its programmes had led to a 50% increase in attendance and 60% decrease in exclusions among young people in the borough. (A: Which is a LIE because you see, they’re actually putting young offenders in institutions if they don’t go to school and threatening their parents if they don’t do the same with them… if they don’t send them to school. THAT’S why they’re going to school.)
Reflexologists apply pressure on specific points on the feet to treat a number of conditions.
Wow… Wow! So there you go. Things are going to get crazier and crazier. I said years ago, the hardest thing as you go through into this Brave New World, this New World Order, will be to hang on to your sanity as you go though it because you’ll have madness from all directions, at least what appears to be madness from ALL directions. Here’s another piece of nuttiness. We get lots of nuttiness because there’s so many stories out there to try and SPIN A TRUTH AWAY FROM THE FACTS AND THE TRUTH. Generally, when something’s exposed, it’s intended to cover up something else which is becoming known to the public, so it’s spun off in another direction. We know that autism has been SKYROCKETING since the ‘60s really, the ‘50s and ‘60s. We know that we had pretty well LOW levels of it BEFORE certain vaccinations were given to children. The new type of autism generally comes in within a week to two weeks after the child first being given it’s major 3 shots, the triple shots, at about 18 months of age and then suddenly the child deteriorates and stops saying mama, dada, and so on… and I want. It doesn’t say that again. Here’s what the experts have come up with.
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
BBC News
Rainfall autism theory suggested
(Alan: Rainfall, people are getting PAID to come up with these theories, you know.)
Increased rainfall, or something linked to it, may be connected to the development of autism, scientists say.
The theory is based on child health and weather records from three US states, but has been given an icy reception by UK experts. (A: That’s how the British humor is, an icy reception.)
The work appears in Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.
The rising rate of autism - up, by some measures, from one in 2,500 (A: That’s what it used to be… one child in two thousand five hundred and it’s now ONE IN A HUNDRED AND FIFTY CHILDREN. It’s amazing, see, this is what I mean, when something as drastic as this happens and there’s no crisis made about it, you can tell THERE’S SOMETHING ELSE BEHIND IT. It’s the same with the sperm count plummeting since the ‘50s in the males of the West. Every year, they give us the data, every year they tell us it’s lower and lower, we’re almost sterile… but there’s no crisis made about it. Same here. It used to be one child in 2,500 would get autism. Now it’s every child in 150... a child in 150.) to one in 150 - has been attributed mainly to improvements in the way doctors are able to recognise the disorder. (A: Which is utter rubbish because it’s easily recognizable.)
However, scientists from Cornell University say this does not exclude a factor which may be independently increasing the number of children growing up with the condition.
They calculated average annual rainfall for California, Oregon and Washington State between 1987 and 1999, then looked at autism prevalence rates in the children growing up during this period.
They found that rates could be linked to that amount of precipitation in their state between these dates.
They added: "Autism prevalence was higher for birth cohorts that experienced relatively heavy precipitation when they were younger than three years."
The reason for the link, if it exists, might not be directly related to rainfall, although the scientists said it was possible that the process of rainfall might affect the chemicals to which children were exposed. (A: Well, they’re spraying the hell out of the skies – have you looked up for the last 10 years? But this has been going on for a lot longer than 10 years.)
I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just going through some of the nuttiness of today on tonight’s show. The nuttiness will get worse and worse as the scientists get paid, of course, to dream up these theories and practice crazy things on the public. Here’s a SPIN on autism. They had to come up with something, you see, but what they don’t explain is the FACT that it’s always been raining, in the same countries and they didn’t have the autism before the rain. Maybe they should have started on that premise rather than catching a hold of this idea and running with it. It says here,
They also suggested that being forced to stay indoors for longer periods could affect development, perhaps by increased exposure to television (A: They’re all watching TV, you see, when they’re a year old, year and a half.), or to household chemicals, or even through a lack of vitamin D, produced by being out in sun. (A: Well, they’re not out there playing at that age much, you see.)
However, they made it clear that none of these was more than a theory, and called for further research to see if the link was a real one. (A: The real causes are staring them in the face but THEY WON’T GO THERE.)
Mark Lever, chief executive of The National Autistic Society said the latest theory would join a succession of others advanced about the condition and its origins.
He said: "In recent years autism has been linked to factors as varied as older aged fathers, early television viewing, vaccines, food allergies, heavy metal poisoning, and wireless technology, to name just a few.
"Some of these theories are little more than conjecture or have been discredited, others seem more promising and are in need of further study. (A: You’re darned right they are because they will NOT TOUCH THE INOCULATIONS. It’s very, very important to them, apparently, to keep this agenda going. Very important indeed!)
Here’s another article. I’ve mentioned in the past how we’re always given examples of helping the sick or infirmed or those who have terrible, debilitating diseases as the reason why they’re going ahead with CLONING. We’ve heard all that in the past but we haven’t seen anything come out of it except magic mice and Dolly the Sheep… so far. The fact that the Japanese, apparently, have brought a mouse back, well… they cloned a mouse that was put in cryogenics 16 years ago and they’re jumping from that to the possibility of bringing back a hairy mammoth, so that’s really going to help the sick. Getting back to the sick again, this is from CBS News.
Nov. 2, 2008
cbsnews.com
Harnessing The Power Of The Brain
Scott Pelley Reports How Brain Computer Interface May Help The Paralyzed In The Future
Cathy Hutchinson (CBS)
(Alan: Now, we know they really CARE about people who are sick. We can tell by the amounts of disability pensions they give them… just enough to SCRAPE through if they’re lucky, if they can go to food banks as well. They’re spending all these millions of dollars to IMPLANT certain people and test it out. Now we know DARPA came out with the first one, where they put a chip in a paralyzed victim, paraplegic, and connected him to a computer and through THOUGHT, apparently, he was able to send an occasional email. I say occasional because it didn’t work all the time. This is not the real purpose of course. They’re simply the MATERIAL TO BE USED. There’re so many of them, that are willing to try anything on an individual basis and they allow themselves to be experimented upon. The real reason is to get SOMETHING INTO THE PUBLIC in the future. Ebert, the guy who used to be in Siskel and Ebert, is on a YouTube video, I think it’s YouTube, where he’s talking to one of the big players, a big talk show host on television, about the coming BRAIN CHIP. It’s out in the open today and it’s nothing to do with helping paralyzed people. I’ll continue with this front story here.)
(CBS) Once in a while, we run across a science story that is hard to believe until you see it. That's how we felt about this story when we first saw human beings operating computers, writing e-mails, and driving wheelchairs with nothing but their thoughts.
Quietly in a number of laboratories, an astounding technology is developing that directly connects the human brain to a computer. It's like a sudden leap in human evolution (A: Here’s that sudden leap, again.) - a leap that could one day help paralyzed people to walk again and amputees to move bionic limbs. As correspondent Scott Pelley reports, the connection has already been made for a few people, and for them it has been life changing.
Scott Mackler was a husband, father and successful neuroscientist (A: Just the average Joe.) when he received perhaps the worst news imaginable. At the age of 40, he could run a marathon in three and a half hours, but it was about that time he discovered he had ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease. (A: It’s strange too, Lou Gehrig’s disease and all these other diseases that are chronically debilitating, are often associated with the inoculations that they get too. They even have warnings on some of the flu shots for things like this.)
"I know the future holds lot of love and joy and pride and that life goes on and I’ll be watching you along the way and I love you very much and I'll see ya," he said in a home video. (A: This is what he said after having his particular chip put in.)
Today, Scott Mackler's mind is sharp as ever, but his body has failed. Doctors call it "locked in" syndrome. Scott and his wife Lynn learned to communicate with about the only thing he has left, eye movement.
But recently Scott found a new voice. "Can everyone hear the PC? I apologize for the quality of the voice," he asked in writing.
Scott wrote these words, one letter at a time, with nothing but his thoughts and the help of what's called a brain computer interface or "BCI." He wears a cap that picks up the electrical activity of his brain and allows him to select letters simply by thinking about them. Then the computer turns his sentences into speech.
"I hate being helpless and when other people put words in my mouth," he wrote.
"Well, this is a very unusual interview for 60 Minutes. We've done something we never, ever do, and that is we've submitted the questions in advance because it takes Scott a little while to put the answers together using the BCI device," Pelley remarks.
And it goes on and on and on, but here’s how they introduce it to the public under almost a charitable reason and we accept that very, very simply. We’ve got to jump back in reality again and think, now, government has been going on a marathon itself to totalitarianism where they’ve admitted they’ve got to have ALL information, all information on EVERYONE in data computers, AT ALL TIMES. For a totally controlled society, everyone must be predictable; therefore, ALL information is gathered. The present project is called TOTAL INFORMATION NETWORK. TOTAL means total for those who don’t know. For those who don’t know, look it up in the dictionary. TOTAL INFORMATION NETWORK… that’s everything you say, do, whoever you communicate to, with whatever means you use. It also means all your banking, your income, your money going out, what you purchase, what you eat, EVERYTHING. TOTAL INFORMATION NETWORK. It also has your personal data information on your relationships, for the groups you attend, people you know and then what their relationships are as well. This is where the world is going and if you think they are going to give you these BRAIN CHIPS and these COMPUTER INTERFACES to help you, you’re up a gum tree.
Think of THE POWER. Think of THE POWER the governments will have when they have the ability to monitor every individual and not only a one-way monitoring, they can also put information BACK IN. In other words, SOMEONE IS PROGRAMMING YOU AND SOMETHING’S INTERFACING WITH YOU. That really is the goal because I’ve READ the documentation before from the first major science meetings at the Loyola University in Louisiana when the World Science Community got together, dealing with the brain chip and HOW they would get the public to accept it. It’s all ready to go, they said, IT’S ONLY A MATTER OF GETTING THE PUBLIC TO ACTUALLY ACCEPT IT. They said that this would be done mainly through FICTION, through movies and novels, science fiction and so on. And sure enough, the meeting was almost over, not quite over, and that movie came right out… to do with the brain chip, of the main character, in a world where everyone was brain chipped in the movie.
That’s how it’s done. The whole idea is to monitor people. They also said at that meeting that REGIONAL computers… now, regional is a term that’s used now for AREAS and countries that are grouped together but it also means CENTRALIZATION when you go into the documentation on regionalism, centralization. Centralized computers will be able to program YOU and everyone else in that area. They said that you won’t have your own voice in your head. You’ll have many whispers of many people as information goes back and forth from people to the central computers and data is FED to the people FROM the computers. You won’t have peace and quiet anymore. Now, all they have to do is get the people to ACCEPT IT.
That will come with the next big crisis that comes along. Now, when they can tell you, which they will, that they can calm you down by using your own chemicals in your body, your own brain chemicals, to tranquilize you… simply by stimulating a part of the brain through the help of these chips. That will be a side effect of it. People will LOVE IT. People will love it. For a very few people they’ll have to mandate and FORCE THEM because they won’t take it. Most people will take this technology… I can guarantee it. I’m not being pessimistic. I just watch the masses… and I talk to the masses, often.
We’ll go to the callers now, if I can get this page up again and see who’s on the line. Okay, is Judd from New York there?
Judd: Hello?
Alan: Hello.
Judd: Alan?
Alan: Yes.
Judd: How are you doing?
Alan: I’m hangin’ in here, as always.
Judd: You see any Chemtrails today?
Alan: I saw lots of them today.
Judd: I see them all the time over here too. I wanted to tell you… everybody’s talking about the election now. I don’t watch TV at all and it’s funny how even when you avoid the TV, you still get propaganda by the people who’re watching the TV.
Alan: I know. I know. They’ll even use the phrases that are downloaded into them BACK TO YOU.
Judd: Today at my job, somebody comes in. It’s a black guy. He gives me a high five and he’s like, “Yeah. We did it.” I’m looking at him like, what did we do and how, what’s that going to change? Then he looked at me and he thought about it and he came to his senses and he was like, you’re right.
Alan: That’s right. (Laughter.)
Judd: It reminds me of a quote I was reading in Jacques Ellul, can I read it? It’s a paragraph?
Alan: Yes.
Judd: He says, “Modern man can think only in terms of figures and the higher the figures, the greater the satisfaction. He looks for nothing beyond the marvelous escape mechanism that technique has allowed him to offset the very repercussions caused by the life technique forces him to lead. He is reduced in the process to a near nullity. Even if he is not a worker on the assembly line, his share of autonomy and his individual initiative becomes smaller and smaller. He is constrained and repressed and dark in action by an omnivorous reality which is essential to him and imposed upon him. He is no longer permitted to display any personal power. Then suddenly, he learns that the airplane his factory manufactures has flown at 700 mph. All his repressed power soars into flight in that figure; into that record speed, he sublimates everything that was repressed in himself. He has gone one step further toward fusion with the mob. For it is the mob as a whole that is moved by performance that incarnates its world to power. Every modern man expresses his will to power in records he has not established himself.”
Alan: That’s says it all. It does say it all. It’s true enough, when you see millions of people all expecting someone that they DON’T EVEN KNOW - all they have is the public relations PROJECTION they’ve been given, about an individual… in an age where they admit at the TOP that governments… there’s so many governmental departments, no one person can even get used to them all and count them all, there’s that many of them… never mind the President - but they expect one person, to make everything just better. It’s like a child, you know, who cuts his hand and he goes up to daddy or mummy and he says, kiss it better. Make it all better for me. THAT’S how they treat people, like deities. It’s just astonishing and more so in America because, once again, they’ve been brought up by Hollywood. And Hollywood truly has given them the lone gunman that can come in and clean up the dirty old town while everybody else just sits back and takes it easy. The got used to this image that someone’s going to do it all for them… but not themselves, of course. It’s astonishing to see paternalism come in, in this way, where a big daddy comes in and GROWN adults burst out in tears. It’s just astonishing to watch this.
Judd: Jacques Ellul also said that you can only stare and marvel at a system that can still poison AND give you the antidote.
Alan: This has been WELL taught, you see, well taught in the very schools that Obama and Cheney and all the rest of the crew at the top WENT THROUGH. They were taught this stuff, the stuff that Ellul’s talking about. They were TAUGHT the sciences and the mentality of the mass man and they’d never say anything off the cuff by themselves. They always read their speeches or they memorize their speeches. They’re just actors on the stage.
Judd: Thanks for taking my call Alan and I’ll call you in the future.
Alan: Okay. You hang in there.
Judd: You too.
Alan: That’s the key to it, really. If we truly can not stand up for ourselves, and mind you, I must admit it’s getting harder for people to do it in a society which is so restricted. We’re restricted in what we do. People are worrying and scurrying to keep jobs, to change jobs and try and get higher pay, in an economy which was PLANNED to go down the tubes when they signed the NAFTA and the GATT treaties and allowed all the factories, etc to move over to China. In fact, they PAID THEM to move over to China with YOUR tax money – that was part of the treaty – without replacing jobs for those people who are now out of work. People are really stressed out these days. They don’t want to go into HEAVY books when they come back home and find out what’s really going on. They switch on that television set which truly is the most amazing DRUG. It is a drug and it’s the best tool for indoctrination that’s EVER been developed. It keeps people passive and it keeps them in a hypnotic state. With children, it’s well understood in psychology, are in a natural hypnotic state. They drift in and out of it, every few minutes, in fact, from a dream world to what they’re doing as they play. They’ve managed to update this and bring ADULTS into it too. In fact, they’ve grown up, never coming out of the hypnotic state. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll see if Andrew from British Columbia is there. Are you there Andrew?
Andrew: Hi?
Alan: Hello.
Andrew: Hi. I was looking at a copy of America Under Attack, a Newsweek extra edition that came out after 9/11. And there’s and embed of a skull… giving us the finger.
Alan: (Laughs)
Andrew: Oh. You know that?
Alan: I’d heard that already. They do have their symbols all over the place, in plain view usually and the public never really catch on. They love their little… Disney is the same. I don’t know if you looked at Disney cartoons. They’ll have phallic symbols and penises in their background and stuff. There’s a whole bunch up on YouTube on that. They do love to put it in PLAIN VIEW and the public never, never seem to catch on. You know.
Andrew: Is it almost like they’re inviting us to catch on?
Alan: It’s taunting us. It’s TAUNTING us at the same time and again, it’s also saying well what are you going to do about it? You know.
Andrew: Maybe even hopefully asking us what we’re going to do about it?
Alan: You’d like to think so. I know a lot of the guys in the media, who belong to the Council on Foreign Relations, they’re allowed certain dissenting opinions on the main agenda, minor opinions, and sometimes they’ll put their little bit in there, even the cartoonists will do it. I don’t think people realize that even cartoonists belong to these societies as well. Anything that gives you public opinion, generally is controlled in our culture.
Andrew: Another thing about this Newsweek image, after 9/11, if you look at it, it’s the extra edition of America Under Attack, and it’s not a photo. It’s an artistic thing.
Alan: An artistic rendition.
Andrew: Exactly. And if you look at it, it’s a serpent attacking an unwitting sheep.
Alan: That’s right. Of course, on the occult side of it, they are the serpent and we are the sheep. (Laughs)
Andrew: For sure. And the attack is happening at the corner of the building. (Laughs)
Alan: I know. Anyone who’s watched all those videos coming down, has seen controlled demolitions, and there’s no doubt about it, THIS WAS PLANNED. As I say, they needed something to kick off 2001 and that was planned. I have no doubt about it whatsoever. To bring in… look what’s happened to the WORLD since 2001. Of course, everyone thought at the time, we have to fight OVER THERE, and it never dawned on them you’ll have totalitarianism back home as well. That’s really the object of it. That’s what came out of it, totalitarianism. It’s not just the U.S., it’s everywhere. All Western countries went into action at the same time with the same totalitarian laws and now we’re going into the GLOBAL society where we’re all to be chipped and monitored and… we’re to be GLOBAL citizens. That’s another thing that Barack Obama kept talking about in his speeches was GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP. The term that the Rockefellers, they use, because Rockefeller gives out the global citizenship awards. So here you have an internationalist voted in as a President in a national country. (laughs) It’s quite something. That’s the music coming in for the end of the show.
Andrew: Okay. Thank you.
That’s the music coming in for the end of the show, and for a very heavily sprayed sky in Ontario, Canada, we’ve got heavy spraying here at the top of the jet stream, it’s good night, from Hamish and myself, and may your God and your Gods go with you.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 5th of November, 2008. Newcomers look into http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the web site you’ll see lots of previous talks I’ve given where I try to tie a lot of the machinery together that creates this big system that we live in. I try and show you how we’re guided down through time by those who do the planning. After all, if we don’t plan our own future, someone else will. That’s the history, really, of what they call civilization. Civilization itself is not just a progress towards something, no one defines progress at the lower levels. We think it’s to do with technology and toys that are given to us. It’s much bigger than that. It’s progress towards a particular ending, a planned society under a single world type system. I try to tie them together by showing you the big players that are involved, the big think tanks that create public policy and your governments that SIGN these policies basically into their format and their laws… which effect all of us. Also look into http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download written in the various languages of Europe.
I’m sure everyone is probably happy to get the main election over and done with and the hoopla is over and all the PREWRITTEN, scripted speeches have been made. The public are ready to have another few years of another bunch coming in and DECIMATING THEIR PURSES as we move towards this Brave New World scenario. Now that the Fascist side has set up the machinery over the last few years for world total control, and also at home as well for total individual scrutiny and observation, we now have the other side coming in to complete it at HOME. That’s what’s going to happen now as they basically Sovietize the system in the U.S. Canada, of course, will follow suit because we’re part of the American conglomerate. We’re being amalgamated into the Americas once again. It wouldn’t matter if you had a Muppet put in there. I was thinking that today, that the cookie monster wasn’t bad. At least he could play the drums, he could do something of some use and he had some originality in him. Whereas the guys that we are given, are given to the public because of supposed backgrounds which are generally pretty well fictitious. They have as much in common with the working people as… well, the Queen does.
You’ll find that the policies that are being put in now have all been already written up long before this person has even been PICKED AND CHOSEN TO BE THE PRESIDENT and of course, not by the people. It’s sad to live so many years and watch the same GAME in every country across the world, with THIS party and THAT party, and how they play this TANDEM game of theirs, this ping-pong game to keep the public from having natural revolutions. It’s really something because growing up in Europe, I used to watch the Labour Party coming in – and they were basically the Democrats – and they’d always nationalize things. They’d run up massive bills, etc of public tax money and squander it. Then they’d say they’d have to privatize it when the conservatives would get in. They would then privatize it and basically sell it off to their buddies for peanuts after the tax payer with the previous bunch had renovated the whole system and paid for it. This went back and forth for my whole life time when I lived over in the U.K. The same thing is happening in America with public/private agreements. I’ll be back with more about this after the following break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and I’m talking about how the big game works. As I say, when one side is in they tend to nationalize things, pump public money into it, and put the tax payers on the hook for payers to big institutions. The institutions being railways, things that we really need to keep the system going of commerce and so on. How they basically sell it to their buddies when the next party comes in. This has been happening for over 100 years this way. In democracy or democratic countries, we tend to vote the last bunch OUT when we get so sick of them because we see through their arrogance. The average Joe on the street sees through their arrogance. We see the money they squander and it’s no coincidence that the big bubble in the financial sector was meant to BURST just before this election to make sure that the boy who was authorized to get in, DID get in.
It was also interesting to hear the Canadian press commentating on his speech. And these speeches at the end, of course, are written maybe a year ago, in case they win. It was interesting to hear, the commentator said, that there’s nothing that you can pin Obama down on because everything he says is basically emotion, it’s emotively based and there’s no real facts there. You get statements like The American Dream, so you’re going to have another dream for a few years and The New Dawn, of course, is mentioned, is very occultic and something about the LIGHT and all that, again, occultic coming in, religious terms as well, but nothing CONCRETE TO DO WITH ANY POLICIES. Therefore, we have very smart people at the top, as we KNOW, who will manage this man and bring him through into the next phase of the Sovietization AT HOME of the system. I haven’t heard him say that he’s going to take it down, all the security barriers within the U.S. that’s crippling people with their travel and their personal lives. I’ve heard none of that. In fact, if anything, he’s standing up for the military abroad and all the usual stuff. He’s a system’s man, and unfortunately all those who cried and did the Hollywood stuff for him last night will take a few years to find this out, but that’s tough cheese because the masses never really look too deeply into anything, anyway.
They want a savior. They want someone who’s a God, a big Santa Claus that’ll fix everything for them personally and very quickly. It reminds me too of the old biblical idea of an ancient Israel that could commune directly to its God. Everyone could commune directly to their God and they wanted a King, like all the other tribes around them, a representative ON EARTH. Of course, once they got the King in, then you’ve got to get him a big throne and get him fancy clothes and keep him in style and you go the way of the world, but it’s also human nature. You see, people want to worship humans.
Everything today is public relations. The whole image of those who supposedly run for candidacy is CREATED. IT’S A FICTION THAT’S PROJECTED TO THE PUBLIC. There’s nothing about these people or their lives - that we’re TOLD about, that is - that isn’t either fictional or very, very dressed up for public consumption. That’s how it is and as I say, it wouldn’t matter if you had a Muppet in because those behind the scenes will still run THIS part of the game as well… as they have in the past. That’s all I have to say about politics because I’ve never really got involved in politics in my life. I’ve watched them, I’ve analyzed them; I know the games.
When you go into really deep study to find out BIG think tanks, think tanks and organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, that have their men scattered throughout government and bureaucracy, they also have their men often IN POLITICS as well. They’re supposedly a non-political organization and yet everything they’ve ever published about what they’d like to happen in the world, JUST COMES ABOUT because they do create public policies FOR government, just like the RAND Corporation. Look at the big players in the RAND Corporation and it’s always advising governments on the future. You’ll find most of them are all CIA and FBI employees… That’s the reality of the world. Those who believe in democracy live in a total and complete fiction. Run by Hollywood, directed by Hollywood, speech written by Hollywood, for all its emotive content about dreams and so on, and that’s all you get is the dream OR generally IS THE NIGHTMARE. So help us all.
Now, what’s also happening in this world is something to do with the Middle East, I’ve been on about it for a long time, and that was the set up of Israel. I went through some of the history of Israel, not just starting with the old Zionist movement and the Rothschild days in the 1800s, where he financed Russian Jewish immigration into Palestine, as it was called then. And then the massive immigration that came with the building up of World War II and afterwards, but I’ve also gone in to the Colonial Powers and those who were given the JOB of directing Palestine on behalf of Britain and behalf of the Queen, actually, like Sir Ronald Storrs and what he wrote in his own books. One of them was called Orientations. He gives the history of the build up of this future state of Israel. It was no surprise to him in the ‘30s, that it was being built up to be a state and also an ARM OF BRITAIN because he called it A New Ulster, an Ulster to be set up in the Middle East. If you know the history of Ulster, they did the same thing from England, from London I should say, really, when they set up Ulster in Ireland, it would be a thorn in the side… for centuries. And yet this ties in with it too because from the Israel Today magazine,
Headline News
Friday, October 24, 2008
Israel Today Staff
Shimon Peres to be knighted by Queen Elizabeth
Israeli media reported this week that the Israeli Embassy in London and Buckingham Palace are close to an agreement on having Queen Elizabeth confer honorary knighthood on Israeli President Shimon Peres when he visits the UK next month.
The appointment would make Peres a Knight Commander in the Order of St. Michael and St. George, a title (Alan: Now, listen to this.) usually reserved for British colonial affairs officials, foreign-service officers and high-ranking diplomats in Commonwealth countries. (A: In Commonwealth countries. I’ll repeat that for the hard of thinking.)
However, the Queen has on numerous occasions appointed foreigners to the Order. Among some of the more famous are Bill Gates (A: Well, my, my, my, the self-made man. Ha. Ha. Ha. I love these self-made men stories. They’re so popular amongst the people.) and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
The honorary nature of the appointment means Peres would not be entitled to prefix "Sir" before his name. (A: But that’s not true. They can amongst each other of his peer group.)
Israeli Foreign Ministry sources cited by The Jerusalem Post warned that the Israeli media's focus on the story could prevent Peres from being knighted during his upcoming visit, as opponents of the move will now try to scuttle it.
So there you are. Why would the Queen be handing out all these Knighthoods? And what’s so important about getting a Knighthood? It’s obviously VERY important to a lot of people. Look at all the big players IN the Council on Foreign Relations, the U.S. branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs, that have been given TITLES and brought into the Knighthoods. Even Gorbachev was brought in as a Knight. It’s quite interesting. You’ll find even TOP GANGSTERS had on their wish list the wish to be KNIGHTED by the Queen, if they gave enough money to charity. Quite something, but people don’t ask the right questions do they? In fact, they don’t ask any questions at all. They like to listen to emotion and promises of dreams and all that kind of stuff.
We’re going into an age now where SERVICES and basically secular humanism can only go in one direction and that is into the world of madness. You see, secular humanism is based on the fact that man is just a malleable creature, that can be trained and remolded LIKE ANY OTHER ANIMAL. We have see the techniques and the multi millions of dollars that are being spent over the last 100 years in psychiatry and psychology and criminal rehabilitation, especially on the side of perverts and so on, where they found out after all this massive spending spree they’ve had and all these ideas and theories have been tested out, THEY CAN’T CHANGE THEIR BEHAVIOR. They can’t do it. What’s even more important is how authority has been taken away from PARENTS AND HANDED OVER, REALLY, TO SCHOOLS. I had an article given to me a couple of weeks ago, to do with the fact that they’d set up almost torture like chambers in some schools in Britain. It was an experiment based on some of the ideas of Guantanamo Bay for unruly pupils. Where they literally set them in a locked room – it was all darkened and the walls blackened – and they could only stare at a corner for hours on end. Yet if the parents were going to do that to their own children today, they’d be in jail. However, the teachers can get away with incredible things because you see the generation who’d brought those children, IN TURN, had been socialized or domesticated which means the same thing. They EXPECT the state to take care of their children. They now passively accept the fact that the STATE has more authority over their child than they do. Things are happening today which would have caused RIOTS in the past, RIOTS FROM PARENTS. Not today. Not with the domesticated parent generation.
Here’s one of the wacky ideas that is now getting put into effect in Britain, in the British schools. From the BBC,
BBC News
Monday, 3 November 2008
Foot massages calm unruly pupils
Disruptive schoolchildren in south London will be given foot massages by
(Alan: THE RAPIST, I like to call them THE RAPISTS, rather than therapists.)
therapists to help get their aggressiveness under control.
I’ll read more of this when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just discussing how the great secular humanists that run the world have now decided that the problem with young men who become unruly in school, is they need their feet massaged, apparently, and they’re going to spend big money to do so. Funny how they’re always discovering things, eh? I never, every caught on to that. I thought it was hormones that was kicking in with me at school. It never dawned on me that I needed to get my feet massaged. It says here,
Reflexologists will visit 74 primary and secondary schools in Lambeth and tend to children under 13. (A: This will come on all over the place. It will catch on like wild fire across the Western world. Now, primary school is from 5 years on and up.)
Lambeth Council has budgeted £90,000 next year for reflexologists from London-based charity Bud Umbrella.
The council said it makes "no apologies for using different and innovative methods" to tackle aggressive children. (A: See, parents were doing things wrong all along, all down through the centuries. They should have been tickling their feet. Mind you, not anyone can tickle it properly. You need A PROPERLY trained reflexologist, apparently, to get the proper, you know, yin and yang pressure points.)
Bud Umbrella's website says the therapy can calm aggressive feelings, improve listening skills and concentration as well as relieve anxiety and stress. (A: I wish I’d caught on to this when I was young.)
A spokeswoman for Lambeth Council said: "We make no apologies for using different and innovative methods, but this obviously won't replace more traditional ways of dealing with anti-social behaviour.
"We need to deal with the root causes (A: A little pun there, the root cause.) of young people's behavioural problems and nip them in the bud." (A: There’s another little pun there obviously to do with the charity that’s got the contract.)
The council said it had put an extra £2m into youth services and its programmes used traditional and innovative measures to tackle anti-social behaviour.
It said its programmes had led to a 50% increase in attendance and 60% decrease in exclusions among young people in the borough. (A: Which is a LIE because you see, they’re actually putting young offenders in institutions if they don’t go to school and threatening their parents if they don’t do the same with them… if they don’t send them to school. THAT’S why they’re going to school.)
Reflexologists apply pressure on specific points on the feet to treat a number of conditions.
Wow… Wow! So there you go. Things are going to get crazier and crazier. I said years ago, the hardest thing as you go through into this Brave New World, this New World Order, will be to hang on to your sanity as you go though it because you’ll have madness from all directions, at least what appears to be madness from ALL directions. Here’s another piece of nuttiness. We get lots of nuttiness because there’s so many stories out there to try and SPIN A TRUTH AWAY FROM THE FACTS AND THE TRUTH. Generally, when something’s exposed, it’s intended to cover up something else which is becoming known to the public, so it’s spun off in another direction. We know that autism has been SKYROCKETING since the ‘60s really, the ‘50s and ‘60s. We know that we had pretty well LOW levels of it BEFORE certain vaccinations were given to children. The new type of autism generally comes in within a week to two weeks after the child first being given it’s major 3 shots, the triple shots, at about 18 months of age and then suddenly the child deteriorates and stops saying mama, dada, and so on… and I want. It doesn’t say that again. Here’s what the experts have come up with.
Tuesday, 4 November 2008
BBC News
Rainfall autism theory suggested
(Alan: Rainfall, people are getting PAID to come up with these theories, you know.)
Increased rainfall, or something linked to it, may be connected to the development of autism, scientists say.
The theory is based on child health and weather records from three US states, but has been given an icy reception by UK experts. (A: That’s how the British humor is, an icy reception.)
The work appears in Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.
The rising rate of autism - up, by some measures, from one in 2,500 (A: That’s what it used to be… one child in two thousand five hundred and it’s now ONE IN A HUNDRED AND FIFTY CHILDREN. It’s amazing, see, this is what I mean, when something as drastic as this happens and there’s no crisis made about it, you can tell THERE’S SOMETHING ELSE BEHIND IT. It’s the same with the sperm count plummeting since the ‘50s in the males of the West. Every year, they give us the data, every year they tell us it’s lower and lower, we’re almost sterile… but there’s no crisis made about it. Same here. It used to be one child in 2,500 would get autism. Now it’s every child in 150... a child in 150.) to one in 150 - has been attributed mainly to improvements in the way doctors are able to recognise the disorder. (A: Which is utter rubbish because it’s easily recognizable.)
However, scientists from Cornell University say this does not exclude a factor which may be independently increasing the number of children growing up with the condition.
They calculated average annual rainfall for California, Oregon and Washington State between 1987 and 1999, then looked at autism prevalence rates in the children growing up during this period.
They found that rates could be linked to that amount of precipitation in their state between these dates.
They added: "Autism prevalence was higher for birth cohorts that experienced relatively heavy precipitation when they were younger than three years."
The reason for the link, if it exists, might not be directly related to rainfall, although the scientists said it was possible that the process of rainfall might affect the chemicals to which children were exposed. (A: Well, they’re spraying the hell out of the skies – have you looked up for the last 10 years? But this has been going on for a lot longer than 10 years.)
I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just going through some of the nuttiness of today on tonight’s show. The nuttiness will get worse and worse as the scientists get paid, of course, to dream up these theories and practice crazy things on the public. Here’s a SPIN on autism. They had to come up with something, you see, but what they don’t explain is the FACT that it’s always been raining, in the same countries and they didn’t have the autism before the rain. Maybe they should have started on that premise rather than catching a hold of this idea and running with it. It says here,
They also suggested that being forced to stay indoors for longer periods could affect development, perhaps by increased exposure to television (A: They’re all watching TV, you see, when they’re a year old, year and a half.), or to household chemicals, or even through a lack of vitamin D, produced by being out in sun. (A: Well, they’re not out there playing at that age much, you see.)
However, they made it clear that none of these was more than a theory, and called for further research to see if the link was a real one. (A: The real causes are staring them in the face but THEY WON’T GO THERE.)
Mark Lever, chief executive of The National Autistic Society said the latest theory would join a succession of others advanced about the condition and its origins.
He said: "In recent years autism has been linked to factors as varied as older aged fathers, early television viewing, vaccines, food allergies, heavy metal poisoning, and wireless technology, to name just a few.
"Some of these theories are little more than conjecture or have been discredited, others seem more promising and are in need of further study. (A: You’re darned right they are because they will NOT TOUCH THE INOCULATIONS. It’s very, very important to them, apparently, to keep this agenda going. Very important indeed!)
Here’s another article. I’ve mentioned in the past how we’re always given examples of helping the sick or infirmed or those who have terrible, debilitating diseases as the reason why they’re going ahead with CLONING. We’ve heard all that in the past but we haven’t seen anything come out of it except magic mice and Dolly the Sheep… so far. The fact that the Japanese, apparently, have brought a mouse back, well… they cloned a mouse that was put in cryogenics 16 years ago and they’re jumping from that to the possibility of bringing back a hairy mammoth, so that’s really going to help the sick. Getting back to the sick again, this is from CBS News.
Nov. 2, 2008
cbsnews.com
Harnessing The Power Of The Brain
Scott Pelley Reports How Brain Computer Interface May Help The Paralyzed In The Future
Cathy Hutchinson (CBS)
(Alan: Now, we know they really CARE about people who are sick. We can tell by the amounts of disability pensions they give them… just enough to SCRAPE through if they’re lucky, if they can go to food banks as well. They’re spending all these millions of dollars to IMPLANT certain people and test it out. Now we know DARPA came out with the first one, where they put a chip in a paralyzed victim, paraplegic, and connected him to a computer and through THOUGHT, apparently, he was able to send an occasional email. I say occasional because it didn’t work all the time. This is not the real purpose of course. They’re simply the MATERIAL TO BE USED. There’re so many of them, that are willing to try anything on an individual basis and they allow themselves to be experimented upon. The real reason is to get SOMETHING INTO THE PUBLIC in the future. Ebert, the guy who used to be in Siskel and Ebert, is on a YouTube video, I think it’s YouTube, where he’s talking to one of the big players, a big talk show host on television, about the coming BRAIN CHIP. It’s out in the open today and it’s nothing to do with helping paralyzed people. I’ll continue with this front story here.)
(CBS) Once in a while, we run across a science story that is hard to believe until you see it. That's how we felt about this story when we first saw human beings operating computers, writing e-mails, and driving wheelchairs with nothing but their thoughts.
Quietly in a number of laboratories, an astounding technology is developing that directly connects the human brain to a computer. It's like a sudden leap in human evolution (A: Here’s that sudden leap, again.) - a leap that could one day help paralyzed people to walk again and amputees to move bionic limbs. As correspondent Scott Pelley reports, the connection has already been made for a few people, and for them it has been life changing.
Scott Mackler was a husband, father and successful neuroscientist (A: Just the average Joe.) when he received perhaps the worst news imaginable. At the age of 40, he could run a marathon in three and a half hours, but it was about that time he discovered he had ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease. (A: It’s strange too, Lou Gehrig’s disease and all these other diseases that are chronically debilitating, are often associated with the inoculations that they get too. They even have warnings on some of the flu shots for things like this.)
"I know the future holds lot of love and joy and pride and that life goes on and I’ll be watching you along the way and I love you very much and I'll see ya," he said in a home video. (A: This is what he said after having his particular chip put in.)
Today, Scott Mackler's mind is sharp as ever, but his body has failed. Doctors call it "locked in" syndrome. Scott and his wife Lynn learned to communicate with about the only thing he has left, eye movement.
But recently Scott found a new voice. "Can everyone hear the PC? I apologize for the quality of the voice," he asked in writing.
Scott wrote these words, one letter at a time, with nothing but his thoughts and the help of what's called a brain computer interface or "BCI." He wears a cap that picks up the electrical activity of his brain and allows him to select letters simply by thinking about them. Then the computer turns his sentences into speech.
"I hate being helpless and when other people put words in my mouth," he wrote.
"Well, this is a very unusual interview for 60 Minutes. We've done something we never, ever do, and that is we've submitted the questions in advance because it takes Scott a little while to put the answers together using the BCI device," Pelley remarks.
And it goes on and on and on, but here’s how they introduce it to the public under almost a charitable reason and we accept that very, very simply. We’ve got to jump back in reality again and think, now, government has been going on a marathon itself to totalitarianism where they’ve admitted they’ve got to have ALL information, all information on EVERYONE in data computers, AT ALL TIMES. For a totally controlled society, everyone must be predictable; therefore, ALL information is gathered. The present project is called TOTAL INFORMATION NETWORK. TOTAL means total for those who don’t know. For those who don’t know, look it up in the dictionary. TOTAL INFORMATION NETWORK… that’s everything you say, do, whoever you communicate to, with whatever means you use. It also means all your banking, your income, your money going out, what you purchase, what you eat, EVERYTHING. TOTAL INFORMATION NETWORK. It also has your personal data information on your relationships, for the groups you attend, people you know and then what their relationships are as well. This is where the world is going and if you think they are going to give you these BRAIN CHIPS and these COMPUTER INTERFACES to help you, you’re up a gum tree.
Think of THE POWER. Think of THE POWER the governments will have when they have the ability to monitor every individual and not only a one-way monitoring, they can also put information BACK IN. In other words, SOMEONE IS PROGRAMMING YOU AND SOMETHING’S INTERFACING WITH YOU. That really is the goal because I’ve READ the documentation before from the first major science meetings at the Loyola University in Louisiana when the World Science Community got together, dealing with the brain chip and HOW they would get the public to accept it. It’s all ready to go, they said, IT’S ONLY A MATTER OF GETTING THE PUBLIC TO ACTUALLY ACCEPT IT. They said that this would be done mainly through FICTION, through movies and novels, science fiction and so on. And sure enough, the meeting was almost over, not quite over, and that movie came right out… to do with the brain chip, of the main character, in a world where everyone was brain chipped in the movie.
That’s how it’s done. The whole idea is to monitor people. They also said at that meeting that REGIONAL computers… now, regional is a term that’s used now for AREAS and countries that are grouped together but it also means CENTRALIZATION when you go into the documentation on regionalism, centralization. Centralized computers will be able to program YOU and everyone else in that area. They said that you won’t have your own voice in your head. You’ll have many whispers of many people as information goes back and forth from people to the central computers and data is FED to the people FROM the computers. You won’t have peace and quiet anymore. Now, all they have to do is get the people to ACCEPT IT.
That will come with the next big crisis that comes along. Now, when they can tell you, which they will, that they can calm you down by using your own chemicals in your body, your own brain chemicals, to tranquilize you… simply by stimulating a part of the brain through the help of these chips. That will be a side effect of it. People will LOVE IT. People will love it. For a very few people they’ll have to mandate and FORCE THEM because they won’t take it. Most people will take this technology… I can guarantee it. I’m not being pessimistic. I just watch the masses… and I talk to the masses, often.
We’ll go to the callers now, if I can get this page up again and see who’s on the line. Okay, is Judd from New York there?
Judd: Hello?
Alan: Hello.
Judd: Alan?
Alan: Yes.
Judd: How are you doing?
Alan: I’m hangin’ in here, as always.
Judd: You see any Chemtrails today?
Alan: I saw lots of them today.
Judd: I see them all the time over here too. I wanted to tell you… everybody’s talking about the election now. I don’t watch TV at all and it’s funny how even when you avoid the TV, you still get propaganda by the people who’re watching the TV.
Alan: I know. I know. They’ll even use the phrases that are downloaded into them BACK TO YOU.
Judd: Today at my job, somebody comes in. It’s a black guy. He gives me a high five and he’s like, “Yeah. We did it.” I’m looking at him like, what did we do and how, what’s that going to change? Then he looked at me and he thought about it and he came to his senses and he was like, you’re right.
Alan: That’s right. (Laughter.)
Judd: It reminds me of a quote I was reading in Jacques Ellul, can I read it? It’s a paragraph?
Alan: Yes.
Judd: He says, “Modern man can think only in terms of figures and the higher the figures, the greater the satisfaction. He looks for nothing beyond the marvelous escape mechanism that technique has allowed him to offset the very repercussions caused by the life technique forces him to lead. He is reduced in the process to a near nullity. Even if he is not a worker on the assembly line, his share of autonomy and his individual initiative becomes smaller and smaller. He is constrained and repressed and dark in action by an omnivorous reality which is essential to him and imposed upon him. He is no longer permitted to display any personal power. Then suddenly, he learns that the airplane his factory manufactures has flown at 700 mph. All his repressed power soars into flight in that figure; into that record speed, he sublimates everything that was repressed in himself. He has gone one step further toward fusion with the mob. For it is the mob as a whole that is moved by performance that incarnates its world to power. Every modern man expresses his will to power in records he has not established himself.”
Alan: That’s says it all. It does say it all. It’s true enough, when you see millions of people all expecting someone that they DON’T EVEN KNOW - all they have is the public relations PROJECTION they’ve been given, about an individual… in an age where they admit at the TOP that governments… there’s so many governmental departments, no one person can even get used to them all and count them all, there’s that many of them… never mind the President - but they expect one person, to make everything just better. It’s like a child, you know, who cuts his hand and he goes up to daddy or mummy and he says, kiss it better. Make it all better for me. THAT’S how they treat people, like deities. It’s just astonishing and more so in America because, once again, they’ve been brought up by Hollywood. And Hollywood truly has given them the lone gunman that can come in and clean up the dirty old town while everybody else just sits back and takes it easy. The got used to this image that someone’s going to do it all for them… but not themselves, of course. It’s astonishing to see paternalism come in, in this way, where a big daddy comes in and GROWN adults burst out in tears. It’s just astonishing to watch this.
Judd: Jacques Ellul also said that you can only stare and marvel at a system that can still poison AND give you the antidote.
Alan: This has been WELL taught, you see, well taught in the very schools that Obama and Cheney and all the rest of the crew at the top WENT THROUGH. They were taught this stuff, the stuff that Ellul’s talking about. They were TAUGHT the sciences and the mentality of the mass man and they’d never say anything off the cuff by themselves. They always read their speeches or they memorize their speeches. They’re just actors on the stage.
Judd: Thanks for taking my call Alan and I’ll call you in the future.
Alan: Okay. You hang in there.
Judd: You too.
Alan: That’s the key to it, really. If we truly can not stand up for ourselves, and mind you, I must admit it’s getting harder for people to do it in a society which is so restricted. We’re restricted in what we do. People are worrying and scurrying to keep jobs, to change jobs and try and get higher pay, in an economy which was PLANNED to go down the tubes when they signed the NAFTA and the GATT treaties and allowed all the factories, etc to move over to China. In fact, they PAID THEM to move over to China with YOUR tax money – that was part of the treaty – without replacing jobs for those people who are now out of work. People are really stressed out these days. They don’t want to go into HEAVY books when they come back home and find out what’s really going on. They switch on that television set which truly is the most amazing DRUG. It is a drug and it’s the best tool for indoctrination that’s EVER been developed. It keeps people passive and it keeps them in a hypnotic state. With children, it’s well understood in psychology, are in a natural hypnotic state. They drift in and out of it, every few minutes, in fact, from a dream world to what they’re doing as they play. They’ve managed to update this and bring ADULTS into it too. In fact, they’ve grown up, never coming out of the hypnotic state. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ll see if Andrew from British Columbia is there. Are you there Andrew?
Andrew: Hi?
Alan: Hello.
Andrew: Hi. I was looking at a copy of America Under Attack, a Newsweek extra edition that came out after 9/11. And there’s and embed of a skull… giving us the finger.
Alan: (Laughs)
Andrew: Oh. You know that?
Alan: I’d heard that already. They do have their symbols all over the place, in plain view usually and the public never really catch on. They love their little… Disney is the same. I don’t know if you looked at Disney cartoons. They’ll have phallic symbols and penises in their background and stuff. There’s a whole bunch up on YouTube on that. They do love to put it in PLAIN VIEW and the public never, never seem to catch on. You know.
Andrew: Is it almost like they’re inviting us to catch on?
Alan: It’s taunting us. It’s TAUNTING us at the same time and again, it’s also saying well what are you going to do about it? You know.
Andrew: Maybe even hopefully asking us what we’re going to do about it?
Alan: You’d like to think so. I know a lot of the guys in the media, who belong to the Council on Foreign Relations, they’re allowed certain dissenting opinions on the main agenda, minor opinions, and sometimes they’ll put their little bit in there, even the cartoonists will do it. I don’t think people realize that even cartoonists belong to these societies as well. Anything that gives you public opinion, generally is controlled in our culture.
Andrew: Another thing about this Newsweek image, after 9/11, if you look at it, it’s the extra edition of America Under Attack, and it’s not a photo. It’s an artistic thing.
Alan: An artistic rendition.
Andrew: Exactly. And if you look at it, it’s a serpent attacking an unwitting sheep.
Alan: That’s right. Of course, on the occult side of it, they are the serpent and we are the sheep. (Laughs)
Andrew: For sure. And the attack is happening at the corner of the building. (Laughs)
Alan: I know. Anyone who’s watched all those videos coming down, has seen controlled demolitions, and there’s no doubt about it, THIS WAS PLANNED. As I say, they needed something to kick off 2001 and that was planned. I have no doubt about it whatsoever. To bring in… look what’s happened to the WORLD since 2001. Of course, everyone thought at the time, we have to fight OVER THERE, and it never dawned on them you’ll have totalitarianism back home as well. That’s really the object of it. That’s what came out of it, totalitarianism. It’s not just the U.S., it’s everywhere. All Western countries went into action at the same time with the same totalitarian laws and now we’re going into the GLOBAL society where we’re all to be chipped and monitored and… we’re to be GLOBAL citizens. That’s another thing that Barack Obama kept talking about in his speeches was GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP. The term that the Rockefellers, they use, because Rockefeller gives out the global citizenship awards. So here you have an internationalist voted in as a President in a national country. (laughs) It’s quite something. That’s the music coming in for the end of the show.
Andrew: Okay. Thank you.
That’s the music coming in for the end of the show, and for a very heavily sprayed sky in Ontario, Canada, we’ve got heavy spraying here at the top of the jet stream, it’s good night, from Hamish and myself, and may your God and your Gods go with you.
Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 8:15 pm
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, on December the 26th 2008.
For newcomers, look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the website, you can take your pick of hundreds of hours of talks I've given over the past, where I try to give you a different perspective than the media has given you, and your education too, by showing you evidence of how the world is run, how it's really run and planned, planned by big Foundations, big Think Tanks, using all of the major academia, working together on common programmes of control, to bring in a New World Order, a new system. Something they have dreamed of in those circles for an awful long time. I give you the short-cuts, if that's possible, even the short-cuts contain so much data, it can be overwhelming for most people.
Download as much of the talks that you want, also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can download transcripts of these talks and these transcripts are written in the various languages of Europe.
We are really going into this big New World Order, it's coming together so perfectly, where organisations set up, mainly during and after World War Two, are coming to the fore now, to show you what they're all about, what their main purpose really is. Like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, big organisations, international organisations and we forget that most of the big major wars were to do with Internationalism, to bring in an international order of one type or another. Adolf Hitler wanted a united Europe; you find from the Memoirs really of Winston Churchill's Personal Secretary [John Colville] who wrote The Fringes of Power, he said that Winston Churchill's view, and his dream was to have a united Europe. Hitler and Winston Churchill both had the same dream and they both hoped that World War Two would bring it about. Behind that too, you had big banking organisations, which operated in neutral countries, financing all sides of this thing. They also had banks too within the warring countries, investing through IG Farben and keeping the war machine going in Germany in World War Two. You have this incredible loophole, which allows banks to, somehow, be untouchable and even those who do the trading too, the big corporations that formed IG Farben and other groups, to be almost untouchable. People don't know that the United States, backed by the Big Foundations, and the Rockefellers and big families, who helped fund IG Farben, sent dozens and dozens of top lawyers over to the trials (the Nuremberg Trials in Germany), to do with the prosecutions against people who had set up the war industry, the machinery for the Nazi Regime. Their job was to get them off and they were very-very successful.
Behind it all, as I say, is someone's idea of a global society, a world under domination, by a few. It's still run on an economic system that, to the person at the bottom, seems so tenuous, so elastic. Elastic can be stretched so much it can be broken it seems many times over and they never seem to fix it, the reason being that they want to pull the same stunts over and over and it's called the Depressions. That's why they never fixed it; and, I've been reading in the different articles, from the International Monetary Fund and EU and so on, where they want to use this crisis to further their agenda for integration. I'll be back with more, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I was just mentioning how these big organisations use crisis to bring in their agenda, which often makes you wonder if they have anything to do with planning the crisis in the first place. It takes me back to, I think it was Gary Hart that was photographed and filmed talking to the Council on Foreign Relations, after 9/11; and, he said that Bush Senior had mentioned a New World Order coming into view. He says: "We could use this crisis to our advantage, to make this happen"; and, it was never explained to the public, although it was shown on public television, these little clips they show you. The public are left sort of in La-La land, we don't know what it is; is this an official organisation? Is it part of government or whatever? They didn't bother to tell us that it’s a private organisation that's just the American branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs that really run the World, this parallel system. Therefore, when I read this article about Britain and the EU and the Pound, the British Pound, Pound Sterling, it took me back to that, because the head, the man who's in charge of the Euro currency for Europe at their main Parliament building in Brussels, said the same thing: he says we can use this crisis to forge ahead with the Euro, to replace all the currencies. See, Britain's being holding out, and, sure as can be, here's the Independent, the newspaper, 15th of December 2008. It says:
Pound to be left to its fate. Treasury says protecting the currency is 'not a first-order issue' as Euro readies to overtake sterling in markets for the first time. By Michael Savage. The plummeting pound will not be propped up by government intervention, ministers declared yesterday, as it emerged that they will simply hope Britain's beleaguered currency stabilises as broader measures to stimulate the economy begin to take effect. Sterling has fallen to a series of record lows against the euro in recent days, and looks set to reach parity with the single European currency for the first time. Its fall has hit holidaymakers as well as the thousands of Britons living on the Continent, who have seen the value of pensions and savings plummet.
Well, no kidding.
But ministers have made it clear no help will be forthcoming to stabilise sterling. The Europe minister, Caroline Flint,
Well named, skinflint.
confirmed the value of the pound was not a "first-order issue" and Yvette Cooper, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said bolstering the currency had never been the Government's aim. Senior government figures are wary of mistakes made in the lead-up to Black Wednesday in 1992, when attempts by John Major's government to prop up the pound failed and led to a bill thought to be more than £3bn. The growing possibility of deflation, now discussed as a possibility by the Treasury, is seen as a greater threat to the economy.
They're not going to prop the Pound up, why? Well the real reason is they want everyone to change to the Euro, euro currency and it'll be interesting to see how they deal with Canada, the States and Mexico, because we've had talks for years, by some of the big boys themselves, and they actually call this currency that's to come out the Amero and the only problem they had too was getting the people to accept it. That's how everything works in this system; they go to great lengths and big shows. See, we are the masses and the masses don't like to be moved from one field to another you see. We get kind of used to grazing where we are; and their whole idea is to get you in motion. They go to great lengths to get you in motion, psychologically, so that we eventually will accept everything that's pushed upon us as quite natural. And, I've no doubt about it, with Fortress America, that's what they're calling the whole Continent of the Americas, Fortress America and the integration of Canada, Mexico and the US. They will bring out a currency to deal with the present crisis.
That led me off to the International Monetary Fund, I want to know exactly what is the International Monetary Fund and it's so vague to people, you have to look at how it was set up and what it was set up to do, because the International Monetary Fund is being hailed as the big saviour that's going to take everything over and run the world, basically, financially. What is it? Well, it works with the World Bank and it also works with this other branch, they all seem to be integrated as the one system, this other branch for International Reconstruction and Settlement I think they call it. I do know when the International Monetary Fund comes in and takes over a country, they run the affairs of that country, they are an international body, they're a global body; and, they can tell you how much to inflate or deflate the money system, but they also demand their own big cuts of the proceeds as they run your economy. They have run many Third World countries into the ground, by forcing so-called High-Tech farming on these countries and it's totally depleted the soil; and, because the farmers have to reply these big loans to the IMF, they go bankrupt, generally, because they can't afford all of the chemicals they need to replenish the stuff they've taken out of it. The farmers used to allow fields to be fallow for few years and they would simply plough in weeds, even weeds, and bits of trees and leaves and all the rest of it, and grass back into the ground and leave it fallow and that replenished all the vitamins and the minerals you needed. Now it's all done away with, with this high-tech farming system that costs an awful lot of money. It really isn't cost-effective in the long run, it destroys the soil; and, it also, of course, with all the chemicals that are added, ends up killing off the people. So, for the IMF, it fulfils quite a few functions.
The IMF is to take over on all of this; now, the IMF is dedicated, in its own charter, to concentrating primarily on Third World countries. It also has been known to help negotiate money from First World countries to the Third World countries, acts like a mediator. It's not going to change its agenda, because the First World countries are now, basically, bankrupt, they still concentrate on the Third World countries.
We're in for a really rough time of it, I hate to say this before the beginning of the New Year; but that's the truth of it, it's planned this way, it's planned this way. That's why, as I've said before, this crash is allowed to happen. Looking into the books, apparently of the big boys, who had the Ponzi Schemes like Madoff, or made-off, he made off with the money. You find that the government had never gone in since they first registered as a corporation, they'd never gone in to check its books - and, yet, everyone knew, every other investor knew it was a Ponzi scheme, it was too good to be true - and now people have lost their shirts on it. This is pretty standard. How come? Why is it that all the propaganda in the world to do with cops and detectives and investigators are all to do with people at the bottom? The money they spend catching petty crime and petty criminals is astonishing and all the dramas on television and the movies, it's always about people at the bottom. Everyone knows, including the legal system itself, that the biggest crime of all is white-collared workers at the top; and, why do they get away with it? As long as they say there is no personal physical violence involved, that's how they justify these light sentences they get, when they get sent to the prisons with no walls and they have golf courses and so on. Because there's no real violence intended, therefore, if you rip people off for billions of dollars and create massive poverty everywhere, you didn't really intend any malice towards them and you didn't create any physical violence. In other words, as long as you do it cleverly and you wear a business suit and you have porters and doormen opening doors for you and bowing and scraping and lord mayors doing the same kind of thing to you, because you have so much money, then you get sent to a little rehab place, where you play golf.
That's the reality of the world that we live in, it's just so, so corrupt, so incredibly corrupt and as long as people worship Mammon; and, it's so true, as long as we worship people who are stinking rich, that we will get what we deserve over and over and over again. We just can't bend over enough for these guys.
I was reading a book about Rockefeller, the first one, who was basically a robber baron who did every dirty deed and tactic possible to get and acquire all of his oil conglomeration, stooping to nothing, including real violence, to do so. When he wiped out the miners, who were in protest at working for him, at one point, by using local militia, they brought in, as I say, a man called Gates - check his genealogy, it's quite interesting - to give him a total make-over and make him into a philanthropist, so this is murderer and robber would be a nice man, a philanthropist. The author of this particular book said that the sad thing was: when he went in and they'd made-over his imagery and promoted it through a PR specialist and so on (McKenzie King from Canada did the PR special stuff and he was made Prime Minister of Canada eventually, as a reward), it's said that the people, the working people rather than lynch old man Rockefeller, when he came round their houses, for what he'd done, sort of grovelled with their caps in hand and that's what the poor do in the presence of massive wealth. The whole system is geared towards this worship of massive wealth. You wouldn't find much interest in Hollywood and the bimbos they have there, if they got paid an ordinary working wage for the movies they make. It's the money; it's the lifestyle, that which is promoted as being the 'good life', to those at the bottom. That's what we worship, so, in a sense, we get what we deserve and we don't force the police, not that they'd ever worked for us, to investigate these big Ponzi characters either. I'll be back with more after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we've a couple of callers here, so we'll go to the phones now and I might do an article afterwards. Tom, in Massachusetts, are you there?
Tom: Alan, it's Tom. I got a question for you regarding the supreme court of the United States recent decision on the Second Amendment regarding the bearing of arms by the citizenry. If all this is to go down in the United States, all the trouble that we're going to have, the rioting and everything like that, how are they going to be able to, the elite, are going to be able to control the people. I mean, I'm under the impression there are millions of firearms that are out here in the hands of private citizens, how would they be able to make any inroads in controlling the masses, if these people are all going to be taking up arms and possibly fighting off the intervention by the military forces?
Alan: That may very well happen but they've already, and I've read the articles where they're bringing the military home on active duty. Now, these guys are trained and they have unlimited ammo and the best training and so on, and equipment, back up, logistics. You also have other articles I've read where they've got all these so-called non-lethal weapons and they're ordering them like crazy, and they have been for years, including the microwave ones which are mounted on Humvees.
I read an article a few weeks ago there about the one that can knock out a whole city, an entire city, if need be; and, so they have much of this equipment. They have planes, which they admit, they can spray right over a city and put you all completely unconscious, if they want to. These guys are not stupid at the top and you see, we tend to live in the past, we think in terms of firearms and I used to laugh when I saw that every war that comes along, they shove off the soldier with a new outfit, looking very, very modern, but basically, the firearm is an old, old type of weapon in today's scientific system and, so, when you compare it with what they really do have, I often wonder if that's why they even give the troops these kind of weapons, to make us think that's the best they have. Because, literally, they can knock out a continent, if they want to, just with arrays of satellites. So, I think, we'll see a lot of the non-lethal weaponry and all this non-lethal stuff is a misnomer, depending on the settings they put on it, they can certainly make it lethal quite simply. I was reading just today in fact, with the micro-pulse ones for the Humvees and they have used these over in the Middle East, Israel has used them too, you see bus loads of Lebanese that are just roasted, utterly roasted. It's the same technology that they're now bringing into the States big time, they're ordering like crazy and they're supposedly going to use the lowest setting. It gives you, I think, a 3 second burst and that's enough to cause fatigue, nauseas feelings, agitation and make the crowds disperse, but they do admit on a default setting during one of the testing phases, it defaulted back to its original setting, and it fried the man they were experimenting on who ended up with 3rd degree burns. These things can roast you; and they have all this technology sitting waiting in the wings.
Tom: The reason why I asked that is because some people, for example, those who have spoken out against the system more and who have - maybe people such as yourself who are taking a stand and informing the public worldwide as to what's happening, that possibly, you might be signalled out and maybe coming over your place to bring you in and at that point, that's what I'm wondering, these people aren't going to go gently into the 'good night' you know.
Alan: That's right, and these guys at the top expect it; but, I mentioned some videos, a series of videos, I think there was 12 of them about Taking Liberties in Britain and you see the cops, you see how they already have the bully mentality over there and you see how they're all so willing to get into fights and so on and scuffles and violence and I thought to myself, at the time, it's a shame that we at the bottom. One of the videos showed you one man who was a lone demonstrator and they burst into his home at 4am. That's what the Nazis did, that's what they did in the Soviet Union, the KGB would hit you at 3-4 in the morning, with heavy force, coming through you walls and your windows and so on; and, I thought it's already here, they're doing it already, they've been doing it actually for years, getting the public ready for what's coming. They will not give you a gentle knock on the door and ask you to come with them, that's gone, that kind of policing has far gone now. They'll come in using lethal force and they do want to use any excuse to use their toys on you, any excuse at all. And, I've got to admit that they're so corrupt, the fraternities of police and so on, are so corrupt, they stand and they fix their books to make sure they have all the lies together so it will sound good in court. We found that with the case where they shot the man in the head in London, England, the judge said, at the court case, that they did fix and rig their books before they went into court, to make sure they were all saying the same stuff. They didn't even give that man a warning; they just got on the bus, walked up to him and shot him in the head; that came out in the court. If they've marked you, in this day and age, they're going to kill you; that's the message. If they've marked you, when they're sent out, they know their job is to go and kill you; and they will use any excuse, they'll say that you rushed them or something ridiculous. It's like Bill Cooper, with Bill Cooper, you know what happened there, he went to investigate what he thought were drunks, it was actually under-cover guys dressed up and he went out in his truck, saw who they were, got back, jumped out, tried to run on an artificial leg and they said that he was running away from them, on an artificial leg, they halved him in two, with machine gun bullets. Be back with more after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and, just to finish what I was saying there to Tom: it takes me back to what I said earlier about Rockefeller, he said years ago, he said, "You can always employ half the poor to kill the other half". What you have at the bottom, are just these GI Joes from the same classes as the people they are going after; and, they'll be fighting the ones at the bottom while the guys at the top laugh up their sleeves and they're well out of harm's way, they're well-protected. That's been the same in every war we've ever had. It's a pity that we kill each other at the bottom level, to protect them at the top; and, we should find ways around that, it's pretty sad when you think about it.
I've got Amber from British Columbia, are you there Amber?
Amber: Hey Alan. Hey, nice to talk to you again. I have a question regarding family but family and co-workers kind of thing; but actually, first, hopefully, quickly, you can help me out with finding a book. Unfortunately I don't have, I have about zero cents to spend on any books right now, so I looked up some names at the local library, some names that I've heard you talk about like H.G. Wells and Aldous Huxley and stuff like that. They have like 27 H.G. Wells books actually, and like 22 Aldous Huxley books and I did hear you recommend a book called Children of the Dream. I can’t remember who the author is but unfortunately they don't have that. There was also a book called Millennium by Jack someone.
Alan: It was Jacques Attali.
Amber: Do you know how to spell that?
Alan: It's Attali.
Amber: Ok, I'm having trouble finding that with that title. From H.G. Wells he's pretty old school right? I thought I'd take your advice and go back, like, actually the first person I heard about New World Order stuff was from David Icke, but I've moved past that now, so I think it's a good idea to go back a little older.
Alan: If you go to H.G. Wells, the book that you want is called The Open Conspiracy.
Amber: The Open Conspiracy, ok. There's one called Things to Come; that sounds pretty interesting.
Alan: Things To Come is good; it's done in a fictionalised form. The Open Conspiracy: he tells you the whole world agenda and how it's outlined and how he, basically, is all for it, he worked for the people who were planning it and how they would use wars to bring it about and so on; and how they despised the common people at the bottom, it was very evident in his book. He also did two books on history, it’s called Outline of History, the original versions were Volume 1 and 2. The second edition they put it both into one volume. In Outline of History, he goes through the races that are going to be eliminated, because they won't fit into the New World Order and even the lower class types that won't make it as well. He actually has the same list that Hitler had, it's pretty well there. There was one main difference, in that Wells said that those people amongst Judaism who had risen to the top and acquired wealth over generations and held on to it, would be allowed in, because, by the Darwinian theory, they'd proved they were fit to survive. However, people who were considered, like the Irish for instance, more agrarian type people, who were always fighting tyranny and would not come in, he wanted them eliminated completely. He had a list of those who were to be eliminated.
Amber: Right, ok, so that was Outline of History. Actually, Things to Come I noticed was in the non-fiction section in the library.
Alan: Really? They've blurred the lines now between fiction and non-fiction.
Amber: I guess so, now that it's so long ago, they just put it wherever.
Alan: The old books are well worth going into and even Things To Come, he goes right through into a fictional scenario, a coming world war, with Germany, who would win eventually and the kind of society they hoped to bring out at the end of it, a universal world government. He even mentioned the spraying in the skies in his book, only it was to be done by the scientists of the air, the Freemasons of the air, he said the Brotherhood. They'd spray the people into submission. There's a lot of real stuff in that particular book that has all come true, because it was based on the agenda you see.
Amber: I made a side note about that actually when one of your other callers that talked about, something about Chemtrails in it. Right, thank you. My question with regards to family is just: like do you think there's a point, like I spend so much time at work and I don't really have much family in town, just my Mom and her husband; but, it feels like there's going to come a time where there's no turning back. Like, I'm beginning to tolerate less and less, you know, I'm just seeking out something else and I think I heard you talk about, on an old show I listened to with Jackie Patru, about how it's not worth alienating them because it is a choice.
Alan: It's a choice and what you are seeing are people who have made choices but they also are the end product of a lifetime of scientific indoctrination. It isn't that they just don't want to hear you; they're unable to hear you.
Amber: Is it, is that really it?
Alan: It's part of that, but I do think there are choices that they have made along the way that have made them that way too. That's a strange thing to say but I think it's true.
Amber: Yeah, I guess so. It's hard to know how to approach that because I guess I've always been - I've pretty much always been awake. I've always known there's something wrong, I've always been, I've always noticed that I think differently than pretty much everybody else, like since I was a kid. I don't know if it's just that people don't want to see or if it's just,
Alan: There is definitely denial, there’s no doubt,
Amber: I don't understand their way of thinking because I don't,
Alan: Denial, in a socialist system people have been trained to allow the big problems in life to be handled by people they never ever see, 'special people' they think and they're terrified if you say ‘look you have to make decisions as well’. That terrifies them, the thought that they might have to make decisions, so they live in denial.
Amber: Right, so it's easier to just blindly defend the system.
Alan: Yes, it is; right to the bitter end, right till they come for them; they'll still stand up for the system, until they're dragged out their home.
Amber: Right, and, at work, I have to become like almost a different person, just to save myself from, because like when I'm really myself, it's like I just feel ganged up on, like not physically but, you know.
Alan: It is, it's tremendously lonely. It's tremendously lonely and you pretend that you join in their little jokes they make just so they'll accept you and so on; but, you realise how everyone is acting, everyone wants to act through their life, rather than be serious and get to brass tacks about what's really happening and there's only so much you can generally handle, you can live in your head quite a bit, but it's much easier when you can make acquaintances on the same path as you are and discuss things without having to watch what you say or how you approach a topic or whatever. It's essential that you try and find people of your same kind.
Amber: You know I'll say something trivial and I like hear myself and I'm like embarrassed for myself that I have to sink to that.
Alan: Yes, I know.
Amber: We all have to be at the same place for like 8 / 9 hours a day. Let's do some planning here, or let's do; we're no on the same level so we can't get anything done, it’s just like wasting time!
Alan: I know.
Amber: Do you think it's best just to limit the contact and look for people?
Alan: Yes, look for people outside of work. It's probably safer that way too, because if the bosses get wind that you're talking about strange things, then they'll come down on you.
Amber: Exactly, so we have got to do what we have to do and get organised however we can, I guess.
Alan: It is, that's the key, is organised, you see we're up against the most organised system on the planet; and, I used to wonder when the Communists were making great strides. They called it 'organisation', they sent in specialists who got people together, who were trained in how to organise people, in every area of society. They had thousands of front groups that were well funded, we know now that Communism was funded by the very guys who were bringing in the world system because they owned both sides of it. However, they did train their members in organisational abilities and techniques and we have to use some of these techniques very quickly, to get organised, amongst ourselves, so that we stand up for each other.
Amber: Yeah, totally and I feel like I've been doing that all day actually, organising everything and trying to organise my thoughts as well! I feel like I need to be ready with information and food and just ready for anything.
Alan: Basic planning, absolutely. Ok.
Amber: Thanks so much Alan. Good night.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Take care. Now, we've got Sam from Sydney, are you there Sam?
Sam: Hi Alan, Merry Christmas, how are you?
Alan: I'm just hanging in here, I tell you, I had one pile of snow at Christmas - it was about two feet deep, on top of what I already had!
Sam: Alan, as I've said before: Australia mate, you'd love it here.
Alan: Yeah, I know, I'm thinking about that too!
Sam: Listen, it was interesting what Amber was just saying there, you know about finding it difficult to wake people up and, you know, it's - I mean, the amount of stuff that's out there that that sort of keeps people in line and to keep people asleep, there's so many of the world's resources that's being actually spent on it. In one way, it's not unnatural, they've just been so indoctrinated and there’s so many resources have been thrown at them. I don't know, I kind of feel like you can't blame them but, it's not to say that we shouldn't try. On the flip side of that, if you think about those of us that have woken up, the fact that these people have thrown the world's resources at us and we've somehow managed to wake up. And that's why I think it's been really important to, or it is really important to thank you Alan. And, what I'd like to say to all your listeners, all the people that download all your free podcasts and listen to Alan and stuff, I think then if you really want to do something to help contribute, I think before the New Year comes up, let's have a deadline before the New Year, let's think about how important it is to have people like Alan online and to actually donate, so that he can actually stay online. And, hopefully get a high-speed internet. I don't know if you've got that yet?
Alan: No, I don't, I try to watch videos and they keep breaking up before they start.
Sam: Right, just to have you better equipped, so that you can do your work of helping warn us about what's going on, is amazing. I've really got to thank you, it's been such an important year for me, because I now feel like I've fully woken up. So I've got to thank you and please, everyone out there: if think about it 10bucks, 20bucks, I think will make, if there's enough of us, we can make a big difference. And, hopefully, we can do that before the end of the year. Thanks again Alan.
Alan: Thank you very much, I'm glad you phoned there, I keep forgetting to mention it myself, even just the satellite service I've got; and I had to buy the satellite dish, it's costing a $100 a month, just for the dish that claims to give you high speed but it doesn't. The next one up, the next service up is $200 a month. That would give me the high speed and it's just too much money. I'm already spending money in all other directions too, doing what I do as well, so it does take a lot of cash to keep this kind of thing going.
It's true, if you can reach so many people and bond with them. You've got to bond with people, in order to teach them, that is happening and we've got to use the services that we have available at the moment and if I got even higher speed it would do an awful lot to help me save time because it takes even four hours to put all the stuff up at night, after the show, on the speed I have to the websites, so everything costs money. Thanks for calling.
We've got Dave from California, are you there Dave?
Dave: Hi Alan.
Alan: Hi.
Dave: You know, I like your poetry that you put up on Cutting Through The Matrix, I get a kick out of it, you must be able to get that stuff right off the top of your head pretty fast because every night you've got something new.
Alan: I do it after the show because I never know where I'm going to take the show, I don't like to organise things to that extent, I like to have an idea of where I'm going, but wherever my mind takes me during a talk, so after the show, I do it up then and pop it up.
Dave: Well, I admire your ability to do that; and, I've got a question for you, and that is: explain to me please, when people talk about the 80-85% sterility that we're seeing now, are they talking about the youngest generation and, if that's true, if the youngest generation in the West is now becoming sterile, at that rate of speed, or their sperm count is down to 80-85% below normal, then, in two generations, basically they've got their 80% population reduction, don't they?
Alan: They do and that did come from official US sources, where the universities they test males, they've been testing males for 50 years, every intake of males that comes into college; and, it's down now to 2 out of 10 males are able to produce sperm, at 18 years of age. Out of those 2 that can produce sperm, only 15% of that sperm has motility, that's what they've found, that's what they're finding everywhere.
Dave: So, that's a lot worse than 80%.
Alan: That's right and I have all the stats here, surveys done by the global societies and the military by the way, they're into this, keeping tracks on the population predictions for the next 50 years. I've got all their data here too that confirm all of this stuff of the studies.
Dave: So, from your study on that, what are we looking at, in the way of global population reduction, say over the next two or three generations?
Alan: It's pretty well over, they say that most countries that were White, in the Western World, are at the stage where they cannot make it back up again; some of them, in some countries are at the stage where if they could start to reproduce now, they might start to recover but most are beyond the level of recovery. China, people think about China, well, even China down in the Military's records there, because there's about two to three men for every one female in China today. Plus, in China today, they're drinking the same poisoned soft drinks, eating the same contaminated food and GMO food as we are, getting the same inoculations. Their males will start dropping off drastically by the year 2030. That's from their own records. Back with more, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we've got Derek from Philly on the line, are you there Derek?
Derek: Hey, this is Derek from Philadelphia. Hey, first, I'd like to say to Amber, I believe it was, she was asking about books that are interesting and I actually wrote to you about this, email form Alan: it was Hereditary Genius by Francis Galton which I found was very clear and concrete in its words. You know what they say about stuff but, anyway, I called to really ask you about the symbol of the dollar $ and the euro €. I know you're into symbology, surely, just whatever you want to say about that, I would love to listen.
Alan: The dollar and the euro?
Derek: Well, just the symbols that they use like the ‘S’ with the two bars and the 'C' with the two bars, whatever, or the E now they use or whatever, the C with the two bars of the Pound £ that would be great.
Alan: Yes, they do love bars, certainly! I know some of the first euros that came out had 12 stars on it and they always have 12 Wise men running it, now there's a Council, by the way, of 12 wise men for Europe that has just been announced. Even though they have more that 12 members, they said they'd never go beyond 12 stars on their flag or on their coins. They do not love the number 12. 12 also is 1 and 2 which is 3, the trinity, they always have a trinity, that's their magic number, 3. The symbol for the dollar is the 'S', it's of course the serpent, as you know; and, you also have the Jachin and Boaz and the serpent connects the two, male and female, meaning the Hermaphrodite. It's another way of doing the Hermaphroditic symbol, in the Occult system, in your face. I haven't seen any of the recent euro coinage, to have a look at it in fact.
Derek: Well, I just actually meant the text symbol, that's what I meant specifically, I should have been more clear about that, the text.
Alan: The actual writing: you have the 'E' of course is always the same, for your ear. The ‘E’ is a quarternity, and it also means three connected to one, a trinity connected to one, the capital letter E. The E on its side, when you turn it to its right side, is also the letter 'M' for Masonry as well. They have each letter, you can go through and you can give a description of it, what it actually stands for. It's interesting that even Row, they were pirates remember too, the Knights Templar became the first pirates and they had the first skull and bones flag, that was their flag. That was also the same sheet on which you were raised from the dead; they still use them in the Lodges yet, some of the Lodges. They said they were the sons of Saloman, which is a play on the 'salmon'. The salmon is a fish with red; red is the colour for revolution. They said they were the sons of Saloman, or Soloman, a play on Solomon, but they said Saloman; and, that's why you have the men in the little boats that came off the main ship, like seed, they come off and it's a row-boat. The roe is basically the spawn of Soloman. It's highly technical; it goes into lots of different areas, too much to say in a show like this, in any depth.
Derek: I appreciate it Alan; sorry, there was a delay on the phone. Anyway, so, take care.
Alan: You too.
That's it for tonight in a very cold Ontario Canada, where we can never really get through enough; an hour isn't long enough at all, when you have so much to cover.
So, from Hamish and myself in Ontario Canada, it's goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, on December the 26th 2008.
For newcomers, look into http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the website, you can take your pick of hundreds of hours of talks I've given over the past, where I try to give you a different perspective than the media has given you, and your education too, by showing you evidence of how the world is run, how it's really run and planned, planned by big Foundations, big Think Tanks, using all of the major academia, working together on common programmes of control, to bring in a New World Order, a new system. Something they have dreamed of in those circles for an awful long time. I give you the short-cuts, if that's possible, even the short-cuts contain so much data, it can be overwhelming for most people.
Download as much of the talks that you want, also look into http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can download transcripts of these talks and these transcripts are written in the various languages of Europe.
We are really going into this big New World Order, it's coming together so perfectly, where organisations set up, mainly during and after World War Two, are coming to the fore now, to show you what they're all about, what their main purpose really is. Like the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, big organisations, international organisations and we forget that most of the big major wars were to do with Internationalism, to bring in an international order of one type or another. Adolf Hitler wanted a united Europe; you find from the Memoirs really of Winston Churchill's Personal Secretary [John Colville] who wrote The Fringes of Power, he said that Winston Churchill's view, and his dream was to have a united Europe. Hitler and Winston Churchill both had the same dream and they both hoped that World War Two would bring it about. Behind that too, you had big banking organisations, which operated in neutral countries, financing all sides of this thing. They also had banks too within the warring countries, investing through IG Farben and keeping the war machine going in Germany in World War Two. You have this incredible loophole, which allows banks to, somehow, be untouchable and even those who do the trading too, the big corporations that formed IG Farben and other groups, to be almost untouchable. People don't know that the United States, backed by the Big Foundations, and the Rockefellers and big families, who helped fund IG Farben, sent dozens and dozens of top lawyers over to the trials (the Nuremberg Trials in Germany), to do with the prosecutions against people who had set up the war industry, the machinery for the Nazi Regime. Their job was to get them off and they were very-very successful.
Behind it all, as I say, is someone's idea of a global society, a world under domination, by a few. It's still run on an economic system that, to the person at the bottom, seems so tenuous, so elastic. Elastic can be stretched so much it can be broken it seems many times over and they never seem to fix it, the reason being that they want to pull the same stunts over and over and it's called the Depressions. That's why they never fixed it; and, I've been reading in the different articles, from the International Monetary Fund and EU and so on, where they want to use this crisis to further their agenda for integration. I'll be back with more, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I was just mentioning how these big organisations use crisis to bring in their agenda, which often makes you wonder if they have anything to do with planning the crisis in the first place. It takes me back to, I think it was Gary Hart that was photographed and filmed talking to the Council on Foreign Relations, after 9/11; and, he said that Bush Senior had mentioned a New World Order coming into view. He says: "We could use this crisis to our advantage, to make this happen"; and, it was never explained to the public, although it was shown on public television, these little clips they show you. The public are left sort of in La-La land, we don't know what it is; is this an official organisation? Is it part of government or whatever? They didn't bother to tell us that it’s a private organisation that's just the American branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs that really run the World, this parallel system. Therefore, when I read this article about Britain and the EU and the Pound, the British Pound, Pound Sterling, it took me back to that, because the head, the man who's in charge of the Euro currency for Europe at their main Parliament building in Brussels, said the same thing: he says we can use this crisis to forge ahead with the Euro, to replace all the currencies. See, Britain's being holding out, and, sure as can be, here's the Independent, the newspaper, 15th of December 2008. It says:
Pound to be left to its fate. Treasury says protecting the currency is 'not a first-order issue' as Euro readies to overtake sterling in markets for the first time. By Michael Savage. The plummeting pound will not be propped up by government intervention, ministers declared yesterday, as it emerged that they will simply hope Britain's beleaguered currency stabilises as broader measures to stimulate the economy begin to take effect. Sterling has fallen to a series of record lows against the euro in recent days, and looks set to reach parity with the single European currency for the first time. Its fall has hit holidaymakers as well as the thousands of Britons living on the Continent, who have seen the value of pensions and savings plummet.
Well, no kidding.
But ministers have made it clear no help will be forthcoming to stabilise sterling. The Europe minister, Caroline Flint,
Well named, skinflint.
confirmed the value of the pound was not a "first-order issue" and Yvette Cooper, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said bolstering the currency had never been the Government's aim. Senior government figures are wary of mistakes made in the lead-up to Black Wednesday in 1992, when attempts by John Major's government to prop up the pound failed and led to a bill thought to be more than £3bn. The growing possibility of deflation, now discussed as a possibility by the Treasury, is seen as a greater threat to the economy.
They're not going to prop the Pound up, why? Well the real reason is they want everyone to change to the Euro, euro currency and it'll be interesting to see how they deal with Canada, the States and Mexico, because we've had talks for years, by some of the big boys themselves, and they actually call this currency that's to come out the Amero and the only problem they had too was getting the people to accept it. That's how everything works in this system; they go to great lengths and big shows. See, we are the masses and the masses don't like to be moved from one field to another you see. We get kind of used to grazing where we are; and their whole idea is to get you in motion. They go to great lengths to get you in motion, psychologically, so that we eventually will accept everything that's pushed upon us as quite natural. And, I've no doubt about it, with Fortress America, that's what they're calling the whole Continent of the Americas, Fortress America and the integration of Canada, Mexico and the US. They will bring out a currency to deal with the present crisis.
That led me off to the International Monetary Fund, I want to know exactly what is the International Monetary Fund and it's so vague to people, you have to look at how it was set up and what it was set up to do, because the International Monetary Fund is being hailed as the big saviour that's going to take everything over and run the world, basically, financially. What is it? Well, it works with the World Bank and it also works with this other branch, they all seem to be integrated as the one system, this other branch for International Reconstruction and Settlement I think they call it. I do know when the International Monetary Fund comes in and takes over a country, they run the affairs of that country, they are an international body, they're a global body; and, they can tell you how much to inflate or deflate the money system, but they also demand their own big cuts of the proceeds as they run your economy. They have run many Third World countries into the ground, by forcing so-called High-Tech farming on these countries and it's totally depleted the soil; and, because the farmers have to reply these big loans to the IMF, they go bankrupt, generally, because they can't afford all of the chemicals they need to replenish the stuff they've taken out of it. The farmers used to allow fields to be fallow for few years and they would simply plough in weeds, even weeds, and bits of trees and leaves and all the rest of it, and grass back into the ground and leave it fallow and that replenished all the vitamins and the minerals you needed. Now it's all done away with, with this high-tech farming system that costs an awful lot of money. It really isn't cost-effective in the long run, it destroys the soil; and, it also, of course, with all the chemicals that are added, ends up killing off the people. So, for the IMF, it fulfils quite a few functions.
The IMF is to take over on all of this; now, the IMF is dedicated, in its own charter, to concentrating primarily on Third World countries. It also has been known to help negotiate money from First World countries to the Third World countries, acts like a mediator. It's not going to change its agenda, because the First World countries are now, basically, bankrupt, they still concentrate on the Third World countries.
We're in for a really rough time of it, I hate to say this before the beginning of the New Year; but that's the truth of it, it's planned this way, it's planned this way. That's why, as I've said before, this crash is allowed to happen. Looking into the books, apparently of the big boys, who had the Ponzi Schemes like Madoff, or made-off, he made off with the money. You find that the government had never gone in since they first registered as a corporation, they'd never gone in to check its books - and, yet, everyone knew, every other investor knew it was a Ponzi scheme, it was too good to be true - and now people have lost their shirts on it. This is pretty standard. How come? Why is it that all the propaganda in the world to do with cops and detectives and investigators are all to do with people at the bottom? The money they spend catching petty crime and petty criminals is astonishing and all the dramas on television and the movies, it's always about people at the bottom. Everyone knows, including the legal system itself, that the biggest crime of all is white-collared workers at the top; and, why do they get away with it? As long as they say there is no personal physical violence involved, that's how they justify these light sentences they get, when they get sent to the prisons with no walls and they have golf courses and so on. Because there's no real violence intended, therefore, if you rip people off for billions of dollars and create massive poverty everywhere, you didn't really intend any malice towards them and you didn't create any physical violence. In other words, as long as you do it cleverly and you wear a business suit and you have porters and doormen opening doors for you and bowing and scraping and lord mayors doing the same kind of thing to you, because you have so much money, then you get sent to a little rehab place, where you play golf.
That's the reality of the world that we live in, it's just so, so corrupt, so incredibly corrupt and as long as people worship Mammon; and, it's so true, as long as we worship people who are stinking rich, that we will get what we deserve over and over and over again. We just can't bend over enough for these guys.
I was reading a book about Rockefeller, the first one, who was basically a robber baron who did every dirty deed and tactic possible to get and acquire all of his oil conglomeration, stooping to nothing, including real violence, to do so. When he wiped out the miners, who were in protest at working for him, at one point, by using local militia, they brought in, as I say, a man called Gates - check his genealogy, it's quite interesting - to give him a total make-over and make him into a philanthropist, so this is murderer and robber would be a nice man, a philanthropist. The author of this particular book said that the sad thing was: when he went in and they'd made-over his imagery and promoted it through a PR specialist and so on (McKenzie King from Canada did the PR special stuff and he was made Prime Minister of Canada eventually, as a reward), it's said that the people, the working people rather than lynch old man Rockefeller, when he came round their houses, for what he'd done, sort of grovelled with their caps in hand and that's what the poor do in the presence of massive wealth. The whole system is geared towards this worship of massive wealth. You wouldn't find much interest in Hollywood and the bimbos they have there, if they got paid an ordinary working wage for the movies they make. It's the money; it's the lifestyle, that which is promoted as being the 'good life', to those at the bottom. That's what we worship, so, in a sense, we get what we deserve and we don't force the police, not that they'd ever worked for us, to investigate these big Ponzi characters either. I'll be back with more after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we've a couple of callers here, so we'll go to the phones now and I might do an article afterwards. Tom, in Massachusetts, are you there?
Tom: Alan, it's Tom. I got a question for you regarding the supreme court of the United States recent decision on the Second Amendment regarding the bearing of arms by the citizenry. If all this is to go down in the United States, all the trouble that we're going to have, the rioting and everything like that, how are they going to be able to, the elite, are going to be able to control the people. I mean, I'm under the impression there are millions of firearms that are out here in the hands of private citizens, how would they be able to make any inroads in controlling the masses, if these people are all going to be taking up arms and possibly fighting off the intervention by the military forces?
Alan: That may very well happen but they've already, and I've read the articles where they're bringing the military home on active duty. Now, these guys are trained and they have unlimited ammo and the best training and so on, and equipment, back up, logistics. You also have other articles I've read where they've got all these so-called non-lethal weapons and they're ordering them like crazy, and they have been for years, including the microwave ones which are mounted on Humvees.
I read an article a few weeks ago there about the one that can knock out a whole city, an entire city, if need be; and, so they have much of this equipment. They have planes, which they admit, they can spray right over a city and put you all completely unconscious, if they want to. These guys are not stupid at the top and you see, we tend to live in the past, we think in terms of firearms and I used to laugh when I saw that every war that comes along, they shove off the soldier with a new outfit, looking very, very modern, but basically, the firearm is an old, old type of weapon in today's scientific system and, so, when you compare it with what they really do have, I often wonder if that's why they even give the troops these kind of weapons, to make us think that's the best they have. Because, literally, they can knock out a continent, if they want to, just with arrays of satellites. So, I think, we'll see a lot of the non-lethal weaponry and all this non-lethal stuff is a misnomer, depending on the settings they put on it, they can certainly make it lethal quite simply. I was reading just today in fact, with the micro-pulse ones for the Humvees and they have used these over in the Middle East, Israel has used them too, you see bus loads of Lebanese that are just roasted, utterly roasted. It's the same technology that they're now bringing into the States big time, they're ordering like crazy and they're supposedly going to use the lowest setting. It gives you, I think, a 3 second burst and that's enough to cause fatigue, nauseas feelings, agitation and make the crowds disperse, but they do admit on a default setting during one of the testing phases, it defaulted back to its original setting, and it fried the man they were experimenting on who ended up with 3rd degree burns. These things can roast you; and they have all this technology sitting waiting in the wings.
Tom: The reason why I asked that is because some people, for example, those who have spoken out against the system more and who have - maybe people such as yourself who are taking a stand and informing the public worldwide as to what's happening, that possibly, you might be signalled out and maybe coming over your place to bring you in and at that point, that's what I'm wondering, these people aren't going to go gently into the 'good night' you know.
Alan: That's right, and these guys at the top expect it; but, I mentioned some videos, a series of videos, I think there was 12 of them about Taking Liberties in Britain and you see the cops, you see how they already have the bully mentality over there and you see how they're all so willing to get into fights and so on and scuffles and violence and I thought to myself, at the time, it's a shame that we at the bottom. One of the videos showed you one man who was a lone demonstrator and they burst into his home at 4am. That's what the Nazis did, that's what they did in the Soviet Union, the KGB would hit you at 3-4 in the morning, with heavy force, coming through you walls and your windows and so on; and, I thought it's already here, they're doing it already, they've been doing it actually for years, getting the public ready for what's coming. They will not give you a gentle knock on the door and ask you to come with them, that's gone, that kind of policing has far gone now. They'll come in using lethal force and they do want to use any excuse to use their toys on you, any excuse at all. And, I've got to admit that they're so corrupt, the fraternities of police and so on, are so corrupt, they stand and they fix their books to make sure they have all the lies together so it will sound good in court. We found that with the case where they shot the man in the head in London, England, the judge said, at the court case, that they did fix and rig their books before they went into court, to make sure they were all saying the same stuff. They didn't even give that man a warning; they just got on the bus, walked up to him and shot him in the head; that came out in the court. If they've marked you, in this day and age, they're going to kill you; that's the message. If they've marked you, when they're sent out, they know their job is to go and kill you; and they will use any excuse, they'll say that you rushed them or something ridiculous. It's like Bill Cooper, with Bill Cooper, you know what happened there, he went to investigate what he thought were drunks, it was actually under-cover guys dressed up and he went out in his truck, saw who they were, got back, jumped out, tried to run on an artificial leg and they said that he was running away from them, on an artificial leg, they halved him in two, with machine gun bullets. Be back with more after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and, just to finish what I was saying there to Tom: it takes me back to what I said earlier about Rockefeller, he said years ago, he said, "You can always employ half the poor to kill the other half". What you have at the bottom, are just these GI Joes from the same classes as the people they are going after; and, they'll be fighting the ones at the bottom while the guys at the top laugh up their sleeves and they're well out of harm's way, they're well-protected. That's been the same in every war we've ever had. It's a pity that we kill each other at the bottom level, to protect them at the top; and, we should find ways around that, it's pretty sad when you think about it.
I've got Amber from British Columbia, are you there Amber?
Amber: Hey Alan. Hey, nice to talk to you again. I have a question regarding family but family and co-workers kind of thing; but actually, first, hopefully, quickly, you can help me out with finding a book. Unfortunately I don't have, I have about zero cents to spend on any books right now, so I looked up some names at the local library, some names that I've heard you talk about like H.G. Wells and Aldous Huxley and stuff like that. They have like 27 H.G. Wells books actually, and like 22 Aldous Huxley books and I did hear you recommend a book called Children of the Dream. I can’t remember who the author is but unfortunately they don't have that. There was also a book called Millennium by Jack someone.
Alan: It was Jacques Attali.
Amber: Do you know how to spell that?
Alan: It's Attali.
Amber: Ok, I'm having trouble finding that with that title. From H.G. Wells he's pretty old school right? I thought I'd take your advice and go back, like, actually the first person I heard about New World Order stuff was from David Icke, but I've moved past that now, so I think it's a good idea to go back a little older.
Alan: If you go to H.G. Wells, the book that you want is called The Open Conspiracy.
Amber: The Open Conspiracy, ok. There's one called Things to Come; that sounds pretty interesting.
Alan: Things To Come is good; it's done in a fictionalised form. The Open Conspiracy: he tells you the whole world agenda and how it's outlined and how he, basically, is all for it, he worked for the people who were planning it and how they would use wars to bring it about and so on; and how they despised the common people at the bottom, it was very evident in his book. He also did two books on history, it’s called Outline of History, the original versions were Volume 1 and 2. The second edition they put it both into one volume. In Outline of History, he goes through the races that are going to be eliminated, because they won't fit into the New World Order and even the lower class types that won't make it as well. He actually has the same list that Hitler had, it's pretty well there. There was one main difference, in that Wells said that those people amongst Judaism who had risen to the top and acquired wealth over generations and held on to it, would be allowed in, because, by the Darwinian theory, they'd proved they were fit to survive. However, people who were considered, like the Irish for instance, more agrarian type people, who were always fighting tyranny and would not come in, he wanted them eliminated completely. He had a list of those who were to be eliminated.
Amber: Right, ok, so that was Outline of History. Actually, Things to Come I noticed was in the non-fiction section in the library.
Alan: Really? They've blurred the lines now between fiction and non-fiction.
Amber: I guess so, now that it's so long ago, they just put it wherever.
Alan: The old books are well worth going into and even Things To Come, he goes right through into a fictional scenario, a coming world war, with Germany, who would win eventually and the kind of society they hoped to bring out at the end of it, a universal world government. He even mentioned the spraying in the skies in his book, only it was to be done by the scientists of the air, the Freemasons of the air, he said the Brotherhood. They'd spray the people into submission. There's a lot of real stuff in that particular book that has all come true, because it was based on the agenda you see.
Amber: I made a side note about that actually when one of your other callers that talked about, something about Chemtrails in it. Right, thank you. My question with regards to family is just: like do you think there's a point, like I spend so much time at work and I don't really have much family in town, just my Mom and her husband; but, it feels like there's going to come a time where there's no turning back. Like, I'm beginning to tolerate less and less, you know, I'm just seeking out something else and I think I heard you talk about, on an old show I listened to with Jackie Patru, about how it's not worth alienating them because it is a choice.
Alan: It's a choice and what you are seeing are people who have made choices but they also are the end product of a lifetime of scientific indoctrination. It isn't that they just don't want to hear you; they're unable to hear you.
Amber: Is it, is that really it?
Alan: It's part of that, but I do think there are choices that they have made along the way that have made them that way too. That's a strange thing to say but I think it's true.
Amber: Yeah, I guess so. It's hard to know how to approach that because I guess I've always been - I've pretty much always been awake. I've always known there's something wrong, I've always been, I've always noticed that I think differently than pretty much everybody else, like since I was a kid. I don't know if it's just that people don't want to see or if it's just,
Alan: There is definitely denial, there’s no doubt,
Amber: I don't understand their way of thinking because I don't,
Alan: Denial, in a socialist system people have been trained to allow the big problems in life to be handled by people they never ever see, 'special people' they think and they're terrified if you say ‘look you have to make decisions as well’. That terrifies them, the thought that they might have to make decisions, so they live in denial.
Amber: Right, so it's easier to just blindly defend the system.
Alan: Yes, it is; right to the bitter end, right till they come for them; they'll still stand up for the system, until they're dragged out their home.
Amber: Right, and, at work, I have to become like almost a different person, just to save myself from, because like when I'm really myself, it's like I just feel ganged up on, like not physically but, you know.
Alan: It is, it's tremendously lonely. It's tremendously lonely and you pretend that you join in their little jokes they make just so they'll accept you and so on; but, you realise how everyone is acting, everyone wants to act through their life, rather than be serious and get to brass tacks about what's really happening and there's only so much you can generally handle, you can live in your head quite a bit, but it's much easier when you can make acquaintances on the same path as you are and discuss things without having to watch what you say or how you approach a topic or whatever. It's essential that you try and find people of your same kind.
Amber: You know I'll say something trivial and I like hear myself and I'm like embarrassed for myself that I have to sink to that.
Alan: Yes, I know.
Amber: We all have to be at the same place for like 8 / 9 hours a day. Let's do some planning here, or let's do; we're no on the same level so we can't get anything done, it’s just like wasting time!
Alan: I know.
Amber: Do you think it's best just to limit the contact and look for people?
Alan: Yes, look for people outside of work. It's probably safer that way too, because if the bosses get wind that you're talking about strange things, then they'll come down on you.
Amber: Exactly, so we have got to do what we have to do and get organised however we can, I guess.
Alan: It is, that's the key, is organised, you see we're up against the most organised system on the planet; and, I used to wonder when the Communists were making great strides. They called it 'organisation', they sent in specialists who got people together, who were trained in how to organise people, in every area of society. They had thousands of front groups that were well funded, we know now that Communism was funded by the very guys who were bringing in the world system because they owned both sides of it. However, they did train their members in organisational abilities and techniques and we have to use some of these techniques very quickly, to get organised, amongst ourselves, so that we stand up for each other.
Amber: Yeah, totally and I feel like I've been doing that all day actually, organising everything and trying to organise my thoughts as well! I feel like I need to be ready with information and food and just ready for anything.
Alan: Basic planning, absolutely. Ok.
Amber: Thanks so much Alan. Good night.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Take care. Now, we've got Sam from Sydney, are you there Sam?
Sam: Hi Alan, Merry Christmas, how are you?
Alan: I'm just hanging in here, I tell you, I had one pile of snow at Christmas - it was about two feet deep, on top of what I already had!
Sam: Alan, as I've said before: Australia mate, you'd love it here.
Alan: Yeah, I know, I'm thinking about that too!
Sam: Listen, it was interesting what Amber was just saying there, you know about finding it difficult to wake people up and, you know, it's - I mean, the amount of stuff that's out there that that sort of keeps people in line and to keep people asleep, there's so many of the world's resources that's being actually spent on it. In one way, it's not unnatural, they've just been so indoctrinated and there’s so many resources have been thrown at them. I don't know, I kind of feel like you can't blame them but, it's not to say that we shouldn't try. On the flip side of that, if you think about those of us that have woken up, the fact that these people have thrown the world's resources at us and we've somehow managed to wake up. And that's why I think it's been really important to, or it is really important to thank you Alan. And, what I'd like to say to all your listeners, all the people that download all your free podcasts and listen to Alan and stuff, I think then if you really want to do something to help contribute, I think before the New Year comes up, let's have a deadline before the New Year, let's think about how important it is to have people like Alan online and to actually donate, so that he can actually stay online. And, hopefully get a high-speed internet. I don't know if you've got that yet?
Alan: No, I don't, I try to watch videos and they keep breaking up before they start.
Sam: Right, just to have you better equipped, so that you can do your work of helping warn us about what's going on, is amazing. I've really got to thank you, it's been such an important year for me, because I now feel like I've fully woken up. So I've got to thank you and please, everyone out there: if think about it 10bucks, 20bucks, I think will make, if there's enough of us, we can make a big difference. And, hopefully, we can do that before the end of the year. Thanks again Alan.
Alan: Thank you very much, I'm glad you phoned there, I keep forgetting to mention it myself, even just the satellite service I've got; and I had to buy the satellite dish, it's costing a $100 a month, just for the dish that claims to give you high speed but it doesn't. The next one up, the next service up is $200 a month. That would give me the high speed and it's just too much money. I'm already spending money in all other directions too, doing what I do as well, so it does take a lot of cash to keep this kind of thing going.
It's true, if you can reach so many people and bond with them. You've got to bond with people, in order to teach them, that is happening and we've got to use the services that we have available at the moment and if I got even higher speed it would do an awful lot to help me save time because it takes even four hours to put all the stuff up at night, after the show, on the speed I have to the websites, so everything costs money. Thanks for calling.
We've got Dave from California, are you there Dave?
Dave: Hi Alan.
Alan: Hi.
Dave: You know, I like your poetry that you put up on Cutting Through The Matrix, I get a kick out of it, you must be able to get that stuff right off the top of your head pretty fast because every night you've got something new.
Alan: I do it after the show because I never know where I'm going to take the show, I don't like to organise things to that extent, I like to have an idea of where I'm going, but wherever my mind takes me during a talk, so after the show, I do it up then and pop it up.
Dave: Well, I admire your ability to do that; and, I've got a question for you, and that is: explain to me please, when people talk about the 80-85% sterility that we're seeing now, are they talking about the youngest generation and, if that's true, if the youngest generation in the West is now becoming sterile, at that rate of speed, or their sperm count is down to 80-85% below normal, then, in two generations, basically they've got their 80% population reduction, don't they?
Alan: They do and that did come from official US sources, where the universities they test males, they've been testing males for 50 years, every intake of males that comes into college; and, it's down now to 2 out of 10 males are able to produce sperm, at 18 years of age. Out of those 2 that can produce sperm, only 15% of that sperm has motility, that's what they've found, that's what they're finding everywhere.
Dave: So, that's a lot worse than 80%.
Alan: That's right and I have all the stats here, surveys done by the global societies and the military by the way, they're into this, keeping tracks on the population predictions for the next 50 years. I've got all their data here too that confirm all of this stuff of the studies.
Dave: So, from your study on that, what are we looking at, in the way of global population reduction, say over the next two or three generations?
Alan: It's pretty well over, they say that most countries that were White, in the Western World, are at the stage where they cannot make it back up again; some of them, in some countries are at the stage where if they could start to reproduce now, they might start to recover but most are beyond the level of recovery. China, people think about China, well, even China down in the Military's records there, because there's about two to three men for every one female in China today. Plus, in China today, they're drinking the same poisoned soft drinks, eating the same contaminated food and GMO food as we are, getting the same inoculations. Their males will start dropping off drastically by the year 2030. That's from their own records. Back with more, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we've got Derek from Philly on the line, are you there Derek?
Derek: Hey, this is Derek from Philadelphia. Hey, first, I'd like to say to Amber, I believe it was, she was asking about books that are interesting and I actually wrote to you about this, email form Alan: it was Hereditary Genius by Francis Galton which I found was very clear and concrete in its words. You know what they say about stuff but, anyway, I called to really ask you about the symbol of the dollar $ and the euro €. I know you're into symbology, surely, just whatever you want to say about that, I would love to listen.
Alan: The dollar and the euro?
Derek: Well, just the symbols that they use like the ‘S’ with the two bars and the 'C' with the two bars, whatever, or the E now they use or whatever, the C with the two bars of the Pound £ that would be great.
Alan: Yes, they do love bars, certainly! I know some of the first euros that came out had 12 stars on it and they always have 12 Wise men running it, now there's a Council, by the way, of 12 wise men for Europe that has just been announced. Even though they have more that 12 members, they said they'd never go beyond 12 stars on their flag or on their coins. They do not love the number 12. 12 also is 1 and 2 which is 3, the trinity, they always have a trinity, that's their magic number, 3. The symbol for the dollar is the 'S', it's of course the serpent, as you know; and, you also have the Jachin and Boaz and the serpent connects the two, male and female, meaning the Hermaphrodite. It's another way of doing the Hermaphroditic symbol, in the Occult system, in your face. I haven't seen any of the recent euro coinage, to have a look at it in fact.
Derek: Well, I just actually meant the text symbol, that's what I meant specifically, I should have been more clear about that, the text.
Alan: The actual writing: you have the 'E' of course is always the same, for your ear. The ‘E’ is a quarternity, and it also means three connected to one, a trinity connected to one, the capital letter E. The E on its side, when you turn it to its right side, is also the letter 'M' for Masonry as well. They have each letter, you can go through and you can give a description of it, what it actually stands for. It's interesting that even Row, they were pirates remember too, the Knights Templar became the first pirates and they had the first skull and bones flag, that was their flag. That was also the same sheet on which you were raised from the dead; they still use them in the Lodges yet, some of the Lodges. They said they were the sons of Saloman, which is a play on the 'salmon'. The salmon is a fish with red; red is the colour for revolution. They said they were the sons of Saloman, or Soloman, a play on Solomon, but they said Saloman; and, that's why you have the men in the little boats that came off the main ship, like seed, they come off and it's a row-boat. The roe is basically the spawn of Soloman. It's highly technical; it goes into lots of different areas, too much to say in a show like this, in any depth.
Derek: I appreciate it Alan; sorry, there was a delay on the phone. Anyway, so, take care.
Alan: You too.
That's it for tonight in a very cold Ontario Canada, where we can never really get through enough; an hour isn't long enough at all, when you have so much to cover.
So, from Hamish and myself in Ontario Canada, it's goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcribed by Bill Scott.