Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:30 pm

Feb. 23, 2014 (#1426)

"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)

"Reports of My Death have been Greatly Exaggerated"

 

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 23^rd 2014.  Sorry for the long hiatus but I’ve been very busy. This has been the worst winter, the worst winter I’ve experienced here in Canada. Some of the old-timers in the area say that it’s the worst one they’ve seen since the 60s. It was fairly normal, this weather, lots and lots of snow, very low, subzero temperatures in the winter, and it’s back again for a little while at least. But this year has been incredibly cold, way too much snow.  If I was doing the shows every night in fact I couldn’t have done it all because there was so much shoveling, daily shoveling; it’s still going on by the way.  Incredible amounts of snow and drifts and storms blowing snow, whiteouts, that kind of thing, and sometimes down to -35°, -40° Centigrade at night; -42° actually.

So this has been the kind of weather I’ve been putting up with and if I was doing the show at the same time there’s no way I could have done it all. It’s bad enough just clearing the road.  This isn’t just a pathway I have out to a main road; I’ve got a few hundred feet to shovel including over a railroad track so it’s a lot of work and it’s a full-time job. So rather than have a break this winter, as I hoped, I’ve been working harder than ever but it’s been mainly manual labor and trying to keep warm in a system which is very, very cold.

So I’ve been doing a lot of thinking naturally. I’ve been working on different books. I’ve also been thinking about the format because I don’t like to go along with mainstream.  I even classify a lot of patriot radio as mainstream radio today, or TV; it’s all the same thing, with the same formats, the same scrolling items beneath whoever’s talking on the screen, etc. It’s all copied straight from mainstream. Because you’re conditioned to watch mainstream, that’s why it works.  But everyone’s really repeating the news. I’ve always said that.

What I’ve done in the past is try to give you the news, tie it together with other articles to show you that things are really related. There’s clusters of news items that all come from the same sources. Because information is the way that your mind is formed – it’s IN-FORMING, it’s IN-FORMATION.  It forms your mind, your thoughts, your opinions.  And of course propaganda has always gone after news, therefore, whatever you give the public by a dominant minority is what becomes their reality. They all chat about it. They give them emotive topics to fight about and argue about. But it’s really irrelevant, that kind of thing.  The rest of it is often done to prepare you for big changes which the elite have already planned.

Now, it’s been out in the open for well over a hundred years, there is an elite, for goodness sake. This democracy thing never really existed; it was a placebo. Democracy now, supposedly, is rights for special interest groups or people on the fringes.  As opposed to the big changes that affect the whole world, and affect all of us individually as well, with the planned changes into austerity, expert management from birth to death, all of that kind of stuff, talked about a long, long time ago, before we were born, and even into the 1800s, published in various articles by big combinations, as they called them, or cartels, special interest foundations that were set up. I’ve gone through that in fairly good detail over the past years. And everything ties together.

I often refer to HG Wells who came out with The Open Conspiracy.  In other words, there’s always a conspiracy. History is full of conspiracies.  That’s what you got taught at school in Europe, about the Kings and Queens that plotted to take over other countries, even their cousins’ countries, and that was the standard thing; and you would be ordered off to war and that was it. Very simple stuff. But plotting always went on, that’s why they had the Gunpowder Plot, a conspiracy, things like this, and different factions fighting for power, either religious, political, often combined together type of thing. Because you cannot separate, unfortunately, in Western cultures especially, you can’t separate the economic factors from the religious factors to an extent; they all go together.

One tells you to obey the system and concentrate on the spiritual, which makes sense as well because it’s very, very true that even in very old times with dominant minorities, powerful, wealthy people, you always had the underdogs, which were often the many, as opposed to the minority. It’s never really been any different. The camouflage of the system has often changed because it prevents big revolutions.  This is what they learned in the Middle Ages, that they could waylay or divert or even stop rebellions from forming if you always pretended to give them a new system.

But even as a very young boy – it’s interesting to see that others have even copied my bio in some senses.  But when I was a wee boy I just tried to figure all this out. Because looking around me nothing made much sense, as to why folk accepted the situations, or the system they were living in, in poverty. And Britain back then was a fixed system. It was a fixed system where you had the same schooling system basically, but there was one private and one public.  Again, even to mislead the general public across the world, they called the public schools in Britain public, but they were actually private.  The other system is comprehensives basically for the general public.  So two different systems and one would go into the managerial class for the system from the private schools and one went into basically the laboring classes, mining and all that kind of thing. But most people in Britain back then were taught to be employees. That was very rigorous through all the schools:  employees, employees. It wasn’t until you got into the private schools you found out they actually advocated the systems of private businesses and how to participate in them.

So when you go up higher and higher, and I realized that very young too, with a pretty well fixed income, with the experts once again who take, they used to call it, time and motion studies where they would go into factories and watch how people would work, move this from here to here, the time it took, that kind of thing.  Now they have different names for it today but it’s basically the same kind of thing, efficiency studies, etc. etc, where they try to match man with the machine, you see. The machines would be made to go faster and faster with technology but man was expected to keep up too, for big profits.

Things haven’t really changed, to an extent.  It’s more competitive today even in the private sectors or in big businesses, or people who are employed in big businesses, there’s always that competitiveness. There’s less and less in bureaucracy and that’s why so many folk from the middle classes, the wealthy middle classes go into it, often intergenerationally, because it’s a great job.  The servants of the public always get more than the public as a paycheck and more perks, etc. and it’s almost impossible to get fired.   There’s no high stress and massive deadlines to meet as you would think of them. And they keep the system going on behalf of the dominant minority. There’s always a dominant minority.

I laugh even watching this whole nonsense on the TransPacific Partnership deal that’s going on right now. It takes a few days or a week for their photo-ops, the Three Amigos again, as they go to the next step from NAFTA into all the Trans partnerships of trading blocs. This goes back to the 1800s, this plan, with Lord Milner and the groups who set up the idea for a unified Europe, the Americas, and a Far-Eastern/Pacific-Rim region as well, and they have followed this plan ever since.  That’s so well documented it cannot be denied, especially when the same organizations which morphed from the Milner/Cecil Rhodes foundation, etc, and others, big banking fraternity, they merged together into the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  So they have the big economic boys at the top who own the world’s money supply and they also have the top politicians as members of the CFR in America, and it’s the Royal Institute of International Affairs for Britain, and it’s often CFR across the whole world for other countries as well. Once in a while they change their names when they’re being talked about too much, and people forget what it is – one of the branches in Canada is CIGI, you know, for global governance basically.

They will deny, of course, it would be a conspiracy because you can find the data, if you look for it, therefore it’s out there; so they are very legalistic in a sense. If you ever question what they’re up to, etc. at the top, why are these things happening globally, why are these resource wars going on?  They are not for nations, by the way.  The nations will pay for the wars, etc. but the money tends to go to the private international corporations who then utilize it. They don’t bring oil back to your countries; they’re basically selling it across the whole world, and selling it to China even, so private business has always used nationhood and the nations for its own ends. Collectively we are the business, you understand. The big boys look at nations as a collective business. That’s why you have gross domestic product, for instance; you are all factored into it, the gross domestic product.

And nations are very profitable sometimes to buy over. We see that with the top boys like Soros and so on.  You have a few families at the top slushing around billions and billions of dollars every day on the stock market and they can sink countries or raise them up, at will. This is nothing new actually. You’ll see the same thing down through history as the dominant financial elite move from country to country, raising up empires, using them, and then crashing them behind them as they all took the money out and left to the next Empire.  Now you have the final Empire which is global, you see. It’s always been their goal.

I’ve mentioned before how they use all the parties. They use all groups:  working class, middle class, upper class.  You get used along the way... thinking you’re going to bring in some utopia and each one sees it from their own perspective.  I’ve mentioned about the Club of Rome quite a few times and how they said themselves how the new system would turn out to be, A NONDEMOCRATIC AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM – and luckily many other hosts have picked that up and they’re running with it now and pushing it and getting the word out there. Because they said themselves THERE ARE TOO MANY CONFLICTING SELF-INTERESTED PARTIES TO HAVE ANY AGENDA WHICH COULD GO FORWARD WITH ANY PARTICULAR PLAN, even for the good of any particular country, nation or region etc, too many, so THEREFORE IT’S AUTHORITARIAN.

Now getting back to the TransPacific Partnership.  You have the Sherpas. I’ve mentioned Sherpas – if you go into the archives at cuttingthroughthematrix.com,  you’ll see that the Sherpas are sent out in advance by the involved countries. These are top-level ex-bureaucrats generally; some have never been, really they’ve worked with governments but never been part of government, think tanks, etc, they’re specialists in their area. They are kind of like high-level diplomats who are unfettered by government restrictions and they go across the different nations that are going to come together and sign these pacts and treaties for integration, years in advance. Between every annual signatory to this thing, where they integrate us even further, starting with the Free Trade agreement for the American union, and NAFTA, and now it’s into the TransPacific Partnership.  They do all the legwork and go back and forth with all the papers, for drafting, for working out other details, then going back and forward again and again and again. So when the Three Amigos meet they simply go there for their photo-ops, for their little very superficial and often very misleading press releases, and then they sign it; it’s a done deal. It was a done deal a year before they even come to sign it when the Sherpas are sent out.

So you’re living in an agenda.  It’s interesting, too, to watch those at the top of the system, and the ones beneath them, the hard workers, the ones who run around getting paid awfully well, getting an awful lot of perks and privileges that other people can’t get, but living on blind faith that those above them know what they’re doing. It’s kind of a religion you might say. But self-interest definitely comes into it. Everyone likes a peer group and the very ambitious types want to get into the upper peer group. That’s what Julian Huxley talked about many years ago when he was up at UNESCO. He said that MANY WILL THINK THEY DESERVE TO COME IN AND THAT THEY’VE GOT THE RIGHT TO COME INTO THIS NEW ORDER THEY’RE BRINGING IN, this new system. And he was talking about a complete eugenical, scientifically led, or run, system. He said THEY WILL BE IN FOR A GREAT DISAPPOINTMENT, MANY OF THEM. These are the ones who see themselves in the middle and maybe even upper middle level, and they’re going to be DENIED ENTRY into this, all the top favors, perks and so on.

So I always was fascinated by the dynamics of the group and how they are utilized, so perfectly understood by those who have been studying them for thousands of years. Because archives of power are never thrown away; you never throw away power. Dominant elites always collect the histories and techniques of power down through the ages, it’s just not taught at the average university, or even the better ones for that matter; it’s higher than that. So you have a terrific history of manipulation of dominant minorities using all possible methods of controlling the populaces, and getting them to work for them because... And Marx was right on this, and I’m certainly not a Marxist. But Marx was right on the fact, because many people knew it before him, all the economists knew of his day, that WE LIVE IN A PARASITICAL SYSTEM AND THOSE WHO ARE THE WEALTHIEST LIVE OFF THE PEOPLE BENEATH THEM. The feudal system in a sense is alive and well.

We’re all serfs basically serving this system and we have no say in the matter. The serfs didn’t have the cash so they lived on food and bartering. But the Lords who owned the land took a big chunk off them, generally 40%, in a time of non-intensive farming; they didn’t have all the chemicals and so on, they had to leave fields fallow, etc. for a few years sometimes. You find that the greatest part of their produce was taken from them by the Lords who would give it off to the guys who lent money to the Lords who lived high on the hog. The middlemen who then owned the food supply would often export it abroad, even in the Middle Ages. So everyone lives off the guy who produces from the bottom level and that’s just the way it is. It’s always been the way that those who manage those beneath them, through law basically, and taxation, live in a far, far higher standard than those who do the actual production and the physical labor, etc.

In fact, it’s frowned upon, physical labor.  Even Kings and Queens, right down to some of the pharaohs, despised the scribes who did all their writing for them and sent their tablets off across to their empires and so on, because they were workers. Anyone who had to work had to learn things. That also gave rise to the literate class, who became dominant; they could keep the King in the dark. They could lie to the King and the King wouldn’t know any better; he was arrogant and silly and you had to pamper him and he was quite happy with you. So that did happen as well. So you had the rise of the intelligentsia and brotherhoods forming, including the priesthoods of ancient Egypt; they were brotherhoods. So whenever you have a collective who have privileged positions, who live better than the peasantry that they are lording over, you always have brotherhoods and cartels, call them what you want.

Today we have foundations and NGOs (non-governmental organizations) even, working for what they think is the greater good, some of them. Other ones know darn well what it is. It’s the Bernard Shaw type of socialism, which again Julian Huxley talked about too. YOU WILL HAVE TO GO TO THEM TO TELL THEM WHY THEY SHOULD KEEP YOU ALIVE, in this big system. No dead weight as they call it.  If you don’t pull your weight and do the production for them you simply won’t live. That was also the basis, really, of the communist system. In the communist system they always boasted to the West, there was no unemployment. Because if you weren’t employed, you simply didn’t eat; there was no welfare for you. You had to serve the system. It’s amazing too, to some people that is, that when the Berlin Wall went down – it was all pre-planned long before that – that, oh, thousands and thousands of multimillionaires, some billionaires, flooded out of the Soviet Union, who were managing the whole system all along.  So everything is a façade.

Academia of course is a big part of it, because you always must bring in a new working middle class who will work for the system, again, on blind faith and self-reward, and must believe to an extent in the nonsense that they’re pushing. You’ll find too, that psychopaths have an even better capacity to self-justify whatever they do.  Even if they’re caught in the act of something horrendous they will rationalize it in the most absurd way, not to make you believe them but they must protect their own ego, because they will never see themselves as a bad person. That’s why horrors happen in the world, over and over. People like to feel good about themselves and it’s much better when you belong to a system which is pushing and changing, which is going to cause incredible fallout, and you can rationalize it. Well, it’s for the greater good, and the long-term good, the end justifies the means and so on, regardless of the casualties or even slaughters on the way.

That’s what the wars are, of resource wars. It’s not for the nations who pay for all these wars and pick up the tab and supply the cannon fodder. It’s for the big corporations, the international corporations that get all the deals. Nothing new in it, there’s nothing new at all. The British Empire built, the taxpayers built railroads all across India to unite India into a country, remember. The big boys, even the Rothschilds had relatives, if you look through the Lieutenant Governors of India and so on you’ll find the Rothschilds were some of them. They were in charge of all the trade then, and the railroads, which were built for free, including the exports out of the country to these private businesses, which they ran. So everything works cozily for the dominant minority. Because no one has ever figured out a new system for finance.

A long time ago, when I was about 12 I think, I read a science fiction book where some people land on a planet.  They crash there, they need some power thing to get off the planet again so they went looking for local people, natives, and they couldn’t figure out what these natives were saying. Because if they asked them for help in any way at all the native would say, what obs are there? In other words, what obligations do I have to help you?  That was their commercial system, it was based on obligations, you see. Someone helped you, you’re obliged to help them. But if someone hadn’t helped you, you had no reason to help them, etc. etc. Well, that is the financial system again too.

We live in a time of course for total control where experts are to run the world, from everything that you need just to basically survive. International corporations are buying up the world’s freshwater supply.  The energy supply for other big corporations, and power, all the rest of it.  Food of course, a big cartel for food.  And they’ve got you where they want you then. You’re back into complete serfdom and even the produce that you make will be taken from you and they will make a profit off it and they will sell it back to you at an incredibly high price, if you want to live in the system. So that’s control. Everything boils down to control.

Now, what is true, as the Club of Rome said about the conflicting parties – THERE’S SO MANY CONFLICTING PARTIES AND COMPETING PARTIES TODAY AND SELF-INTEREST GROUPS, YOU COULDN’T HAVE ANY PARTICULAR DEMOCRATIC WAY OF WORKING THROUGH THINGS AND GET ANYTHING AT ALL DONE.  They would do nothing but argue and demand as each group wants grants and benefits for themselves, always at the expense of someone else.  So they said they’d have AN AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM. Now, to get an authoritarian system through, apart from owning all the things you need to live by and on, and resources, etc., they also want to train your children, which they’ve already done, not to participate and even be aware, or care, what’s happening around them. Not just in the world, but in their own immediate environment.  They are taught to be egocentric, which they are.

Again, I’ve gone through the history of the philosophers who said and were given charge of bringing in this new culture, in the 1960s and 50s and 40s.  They were given charge of creating a new culture, separating initially one generation from the parents, which they did very successfully through the 60s, and then the state would give them their new moralities. Bertrand Russell said WE’LL MAKE THEM EGOCENTRIC AND NARCISSISTIC. Well, we have all of that today. So in other words, they’re not involved with what’s happening around them, or really to others, as long as they are okay... I’m alright Jack, everything’s fine.

This is the dilemma that we’re in today, where we have the society taken down step by step in every particular area, END OF THE FAMILY UNIT, everything that was alternative to the family had to be promoted. They said that back in 1910; here we are. It’s all been accomplished, all these things have been pretty well accomplished. THE DEVALUATION OF LIFE HAD TO BE DONE, according to Julian Huxley, too. That’s been very successfully completed.  Starting with supposedly emergency abortions, and then rape abortions, and now it’s just commonplace; it’s just a nuisance. Then they turn for the elderly, and oh, the cost of taking care of the elderly is too much.

In other words, we’re completely looking at, we are being taught... WE are being taught, near the bottom level, to look at life in an economic fashion.  Not in a human fashion, but purely on the basis of economics. Is it worthwhile keeping these people alive? What value do they have to the system? Because you see, today, and they’ve even trained the public into this term over the last 15 to 20 years, we’re all human capital. We’re capital, human capital. What’s your earning potential? What’s your taxable base going to be for the governments and so on.  And even the corporations that get all the grants from the government, what value you are to them. That’s what you are. You’re an economic unit. Human capital. That’s what human is now.

So we’ve gone through a lot of the big changes. We’ve got more to come. The crashes that they had in 2008 across the world were planned that way. They knew it was coming, years before that; it was all exposed even in the mainstream press over the last few years.  The big boys lost nothing at all, whatsoever. But it’s training us that we can’t go on like this, you see. It’s training us. That’s what it’s for too, to train us to get ready for managed changes where you’ve got to give up any last rights that you have, for the greater good, etc., into austerity, communal living, communitarianism, The Great Society as Cameron called it, all planned a long time ago.

This is the final merging of the more advanced form of where communism was supposed to go with capitalism, you see.  You’ll be run on a socialistic basis as I say, which is really communistic, collectivistic, for the greater good. They’ll still have the dominant minority taking care of all the world’s finances and the dishing out to countries, of basically rationing the goods, at very high prices.  And you’ve got the scientific and academic group on board with them, because Julian Huxley went through the system in his talks. He said that HE HIMSELF AND HIS FAMILY LINEAGE BELONGED TO THE SCIENTIFIC GROUP. Not the high economic dominant minority, but the scientific dominant minority, that helps create the new society, through psychology, training, education, etc. etc. It’s all been pretty well done.

And you don’t have to simply get it all from academia. Academia works with the culture creators that give you your entertainment, which is always pretty well weaponized. Lots of articles are out about that over the years. One great one from, I think it was in Argentina or Brazil where they said that they were USING SOAP OPERAS TO GET CULTURAL VALUE CHANGES, INCLUDING ABORTION, things like that, through drama, you see. It works better than telling folk to do this or do that or don’t do that. Drama is better. Plato said the same thing. So nothing is new at all. There’s nothing new under the sun. These techniques have always been used, including music of course, because Plato talked about LICENSING MUSICIANS at the time, and actors, etc. because THEY COULD HAVE SUCH A REVOLUTIONARY EFFECT ON THE YOUTH, in the wrong hands, in other words by those who had an agenda. Well of course, it’s always been the same.

Anyway, that’s a summary basically of what’s been going on. There’s no point panicking about it, you see. Remember too, that we’re all studied, minutely, individually, from birth to death by the way. Even before the times that you thought they had computers we’ve been studied from school onwards.  Now of course they have their rectifiers, I call them rectifiers, these advocates for children that the government appoints to every newborn in Scotland and England – different names for the same system – and other parts of Europe are bringing it in. Therefore they can start testing babies basically from the age of two months onwards, and that advocate, as that child grows up, will always go through their development. Anything that needs tweaked or cut out of their way of thinking, has to be attended to. Then they’ll create their perfect society. In other words, total, complete scientific social engineering. And we call this the new freedom. So we know all this.

Remember too, that because we are studied minutely, and the crowd and the masses are studied minutely, you can’t do anything in this without understanding behaviorism and crowd dynamics and individual dynamics and group dynamics.  Then, like Cass Sunstein said, you know, EVEN WHAT SEEMS TO BE THE OPPOSITION, YOU CAN DISARM, AND ACTUALLY YOU COULD USE, YOU CAN USE OPPOSITION, OFTEN WILLINGLY, AND SOMETIMES UNWILLINGLY. By giving them certain information, encouraging them, apart from putting plants in amongst them, also encouraging them to put out high-power fear mode information, rapid, knowing that the average person can only handle maybe one or two crises at the same time, simultaneously; any more than that they break down, they become neurotic and break down. So information overload, especially in diverse topics, especially topics where you have no control whatsoever, is weaponized.  It’s weaponized information.

I’ve always said the people must think for themselves. You’ve got to think for yourself. You have a mind to use. You have your own world experiences to use. You will definitely be contaminated – that’s the term that’s used even by the communist system. Yuri Bezmenov and other writers talked about THE CONTAMINATION OF THEIR INDOCTRINATION. You will believe, especially if you go through university and college, in all the social causes, and global warming, and anthropogenic global warming, it’s man-made global warming, too many people, TOO MANY OF THE WRONG KIND OF PEOPLE as George Bernard Shaw said.  And you will believe it all because it’s presented with the omission of any other parts of any particular story. That’s how you lie to people, from the top. Not by just basically lying, but by omission and then you will be led to a conclusion that was preplanned by those who gave you that limited one-sided information. And yet they come out of college and university thinking they know all there is to know, taught by the best professors, who are part of the act of course. Because some of the top professors that teach all this stuff are members of the same organization, the CFR/Royal Institute of International Affairs and various other names for the umbrella group. So they know what they’re doing.  They, again, will say it’s okay to deceive the people, and the students, for the greater good.

They often say that man is a political animal. Technically it’s true. And if you are you can easily be used... easily be used. And Yuri Bezmenov said too, THE CONTAMINATION MEANS THAT THEIR INDOCTRINATION HAS BEEN SO PERFECTED THAT IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU SAY TO THEM, YOU’RE TALKING TO A BRICK WALL BASICALLY.  And liberals, as they love to call them, and Khrushchev called them that too. He said, IN AMERICA WE DON’T CALL THEM COMMUNISTS, WE CALL THEM LIBERALS. But Bezmenov said, YOU COULD TAKE THESE PEOPLE OVER TO THE SOVIET UNION, when it was the Soviet Union, AND IF YOU TOOK THEM TO A PRISON CAMP AND A GULAG THEY’D REFUSE TO EVEN SEE IT, EVEN IF THEY’RE STANDING IN FRONT OF THE WIRE. They wouldn’t believe it until the boot hit them in the rear end and basically knocked them in. That’s the perfection of indoctrination, through idealism, selected, very selective information, brainwashed into them until they believe it all, like a religion, a fanatical religion.  Again, against all odds.

Because the Club of Rome, as I said, says THERE ARE TOO MANY CONFLICTING PARTIES YOU COULD NEVER HAVE HARMONY ON ANYTHING. And that’s why Margaret Thatcher also said the same thing when she was in. Actually when she retired from so-called politics she said, NOW I BELONG TO BASICALLY A SUPER ELITE OF EX-HEADS OF STATE WHO KNOW EACH OTHER AND CAN WORK WITH THE OTHER EX’S, AND EVEN PREVIOUS GENERATIONS’ HEADS OF STATE THAT ARE STILL ALIVE, TO CONTINUE THIS AGENDA, BEHIND THE SCENES AND NOT BE RESPONSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC, to get the big world system complete. That’s how it’s really done. That’s how it’s done.

You’ll notice too that they’re keeping politicians, top politicians, or the head ones you might say, out of the news as much as they can now. This is also part of the new technique of weaning the public away from even trying to follow the nonsense we’re given and get them to accept, and lots have. There’s a massive majority that already accept not to participate in any way possible, just leave it to the experts, go and play. And that’s happened. That really has happened. They’re constantly studying us individually and en masse and that’s pretty well been done. That’s why all their different statistics departments for governments are so vital to them, to keep their tabs on how things are working, what needs tweaked, what’s gone overboard perhaps and they have to tune it back a little bit, things like that. That’s how scientifically we are run. It’s good to see others, too, talking about the scientific dictatorship that I came out with a long time ago, using Aldous Huxley’s works again. So we’re there. And Bertrand Russell’s as well. Russell said... Remember that he was given the scenarios to bring in this new system and he said, IF THERE IS TO BE A DICTATORSHIP THEN I HOPE IT WILL BE A SCIENTIFIC ONE, scientifically run from birth to death, every individual, except those who are doing the manipulation, pulling the strings.

So we live through massive changes, preplanned changes, that’s why it’s so darned boring. It really is boring. Reading the news is boring because you know what’s coming next and next and how they’re going to… And you see how they’re presenting it to the public. You know how things to come will be presented to the public before they happen too, because these are standard techniques that they’re using. Sad, isn’t it? Therefore you’re left with what? I always tell people, don’t follow, if you follow you’re going to be used. And because people say the right things along what’s happening, I mean, the right things but in a panic mode, and in big business, don’t fall for that either. Don’t become neurotic, cave-in and want to go and bury your head in the sand, you know.  See, the elite have already thought of that too, as they hammer you with the bad news and expectant catastrophes to come. And they give you massive fantasies.  There’s never been an entertainment system throwing out and dishing out so many fantasies for you to escape into an unreality as today.  All well discussed long ago.  Well discussed, long, long ago.

Control has to do ongoing studies on massive scales to maintain control. And do you think any dominant minority is going to hand it over one day? because they get a change of heart or something? Once again, POWER NEVER GIVES ITSELF UP, never gives itself up voluntarily.  And if you want to overthrow them, which some folks do, the far left is still on the go, the really radical ones still haven’t caught on down below.  The guys who run them know, but those who follow don’t. You just end up with a different tyranny. Tyranny is tyranny, it doesn’t matter what brand they give themselves. And because of all this rationalization and studying all of this kind of thing the elite who use academia have academia telling the students this, that basically the problem is within man, therefore man must be altered. Man must be altered. That’s why they have these advocates appointed by government for every newborn child in countries like Scotland. That’s the idea behind it.

And here it is, something they talked about a hundred years ago and everybody says, no darned way will that ever happen. Here it is. It’s done. Because the cultural values, the family values, everything that made a reality back then, is all completely reversed now. That’s how long it took to work on the public to get them to a stage where, oh well, you know, it’s oh well, what can you do…  I often think of the Rolling Stones song, the one that’s Tribute To The Devil I think it was, and Time is on My Side, that was part of that; that was Satan of course. Basically that’s the technique, Fabian, you see.  Fabian style, like the other branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs that run the left wing through the Fabian Society, after the General Fabian, as you know, who took long-term strategies to defeat an enemy, many different kinds, including undermining their confidence, creating fear amongst them, and that way often you didn’t even have to have a battle; they’d capitulate long before anything happened, using psychology.

Others have gone too, that belong to the big think tanks, talking about the reason for the think tanks. The think tanks are intergenerational. They recruit, they use their employees, their employees retire, new ones come in, and therefore you can set the goals 100, 200 years in advance if you wish to, and those foundations continue to move towards all their resolute goals. And they can accomplish them regardless of the time factor. We think in a very short-term span, for instant rewards, close rewards, etc; women are better at long-term planning than men. But the men that came up with long-term planning through foundations had the right idea.  The workers for these big foundations are paid incredibly great salaries, and they know they’ll never see the end, up until about now I’d say, of a lot of the things they’ve worked towards. It’s incremental, incrementalistic changes.

Now, the elite academia which pushes group involvement, and uses the groups of course, trains them, gets them ready for groups, especially in the left wing, green parties, all the different groups that they’ve put out there...  Whatever you think you belong to mentally or socially they’ve got a group ready-made for you to join. Generally through whatever schools you go to, they’ll direct you into that particular group and that becomes your way of thinking, for the rest of your life, therefore you’re not a threat at all. You’re working towards a goal you don’t even understand, you think you do, and you’ll be lied to, copiously. But the fact is, you’re being used.

The idea, too, is to stop you thinking as an individual.  I noticed especially in the left wing, and you’ll get the same in the right wing with their particular spin on the agenda.  The left wing with their networking brings in ALL disaffected fringe groups, people who can’t fit in because their lifestyles are so bizarre or whatever to the majority. They bring them all in. And when you join it you must go along with all these almost Stalinist type quotes they’ll give you to learn, these almost ritualistic formulas of what to say. You must be for each thing 100 percent, even if you don’t participate in that thing that those folk are into, whatever it happens to be. What kind of choice is that? How come you have to swallow all the poison pills to get the good part of the benefit of that particular formula?  How come? Why is that? Think about it.

You see, the idea is to get you working collectively and to eradicate the individualistic quality that you have.  You will only grow through being an individual. You will only get wise or some wisdom by being an individual and pondering everything for yourself, not by anybody else’s. And you don’t have to go into the philosophers, that are quoted like gods, and that was the purpose of them, especially in the 1800s and so on. They were all put out there and funded by special interest groups, generally often just one at the time, to eradicate the old order of things where the old religions, as they call them, had run the world for a long time, and to replace them with the scientific elite, you see, those who are logical, rational and all the rest of it, etc. etc.

That’s why we had the communist slaughter of about 80-odd million people, and even Trotsky boasted, WE’VE WIPED OUT AN ENTIRE CLASS; very proudly he said that. And then of course we had the same thing in Germany as they wrapped Darwinism together with the writings of Fichte and others, and Nietzsche, etc., to bring in existentialism and so on, for the super elite, that MAN COULD BECOME SUPERMAN, ETC. THROUGH SCIENCE.  And of course eugenics is all part of it today, it’s alive and well, and it’s never changed, you see.

So large groups are always used for someone else’s purpose, to the detriment of those who could possibly still come along, and may not come along because of the damage done by these massive groups; so an individual can think for himself. And if you worship philosophers... and you worship them for what? For being an individual? Well, why don’t you be one yourself?  without quoting them or following what they said? and go along with their form of existentialism, where you come to your own conclusions by your own observations and what’s happening to you, your own life experiences. Why don’t you do that rather than have to quote them and quote them like they’re some kind of gods?

Because after all, life is about yourself, isn’t it? And if you understand some of that you can cooperate better with other people around you. You can also shun those who are detrimental to you. Any other animal species would do the same, for its own survival. But to swallow a whole bunch of stuff you might not want to, that actually makes you feel uncomfortable, to get the one purpose across, what crazy person are you? You’ve lost your brain. I always remember Lenin saying, WE SHALL WIN BY SLOGANS. And slogans are also used in critical theory and so on in examination where you say something or you try to say something and they simply use one slogan to smear you, in a category that they’ve trained the public to hate, even though you don’t belong to it. Everything is weaponized. Everything is weaponized.  Everything.

Everyone knows if you want to get on well in academia and get your little gold stars and your little scroll, you just repeat back to them what they’ve told you.  Even the professors will tell you eventually what to put down for your thesis; they’ll guide you into it. That’s why they all go to see the professor, and he’s telling you what’s the okay thing to go along with, guaranteeing you to get through.  That’s your quality approval stamp. They have now dumbed you down enough to work for them in their system. You’re no threat.

I’ve mentioned before, and again, other hosts now have picked it up and run with it – they never mention where they got it, mind you. But the fact is, Charles Galton Darwin said the same thing. Sir Charles Galton Darwin in The Next Million Years he said, WE MUST REMAIN THE WILD MEN AT THE TOP, WHO ARE NOT CONDITIONED, WHO CAN THINK FOR THEMSELVES, WHO ARE TAUGHT TO USE THEIR OWN THOUGHT PROCESSES, TO COME TO THEIR OWN CONCLUSIONS, BECAUSE THEY WILL BE STEERING PLANET EARTH. The rest of us, you see, will not. We’ll be serving them. For the greater good, you understand.

Now I also know all of the academic arguments that they have to do with promoting collectivistic action, societies, etc., opposed to, say, the individualistic approach. I know all of their arguments there too. Part of it of course is naturally valid, you can’t throw out everything, and that’s why it’s hard for the average person to figure things out. It’s hard for the average person to see that the people who they often worship are multimillionaires, or even billionaires, or very successful actors and actresses...  They didn’t get there by being sweet and nice. It doesn’t happen that way. Technically many of them could be put into the category of the individual which would destroy everything for their own existence and betterment. That’s one of the arguments they use in academia to promote collectivistic thought for all of you, while those at the top can work in a form of individualistic fashion, BUT they also come from different societies, very old societies, some of them, that are collectivist in a sense, that they can work together as a people; that’s the origins, you see.

They can work together very, very well collectively to make sure they collectively survive, but they have a balance too of becoming extremely wealthy through their associations, working together with their own kind of people, and they thrive that way too, to the detriment sometimes of others. History is full of this kind of thing going on. A lot of the aristocrats in Britain basically became aristocrats and nobility because when the Catholic Church was being destroyed, from Henry VIII onwards, and then back again, Queen Elizabeth the 1st’s time, thousands of Catholics lost their property and they were plundered by these up-and-coming minor nobles or aristocrats who became awfully, awfully wealthy with massive estates from the churches and the church’s lands that they were confiscating, you see. So collectively different folks can work together for their own betterment, to the detriment of others.

Again, once they come into power they give you a tradition. You always have founding mythologies, good Queen Bess and all the rest of it.  And yet even the Stasi were taught the history of spying during Queen Elizabeth the 1st’s reign.  There was never such a spy network that existed before. It was set up during her time, as Catholic institutions were vying to get back into Britain, etc., and across different parts of Europe. They set up the greatest spy agency, that’s never gone away, and Britain was used as an example as they trained these people in power structures on how to manage nations, etc., and spy networks especially.  It’s quite amazing to see what goes on. I think it was Sir William Cecil, often pronounced Cècil, he was the guy who was first given charge of starting this whole spy network up. 30,000 Catholics were put in prison, a lot of them died. All quiet in the history books, the general books, but you get taught that in Oxford, etc, if you go into the older parts of libraries and so on. So nothing has really changed for dominant minorities who can work together collectively, for their own dominance and preservation of their dominance.

Now, I’ve been scattered across the place. I didn’t intend to do this tonight.  I meant to come on and tell you what I’ve been doing [Alan chuckles.] but there I go again, eh. I have to thank lots of people too that have been keeping in touch this past while. Some of them even asked if I was dead. I thought, well, I’ve always wanted to use that Mark Twain quote, THE REPORTS OF MY DEATH HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED. Mind you, it’s been close to it with all the shoveling and sometimes you wondered if you’d ever get out at all when you open the back door and there’s no sky, there’s just a wall of snow there. That’s how bad it’s been.

But I hope to come back and, as I say, take a route where I can go into information which will help. I find that most things that are out there don’t help, they destroy. They destroy by creating anger, animosity to other groups as well, and often it’s done for self... well, tremendous profit for some of course. Remember too that marketing looks at every field where there’s a gap but a big audience that’s waiting to be filled, to be buying things and every technique is used, unfortunately. That’s the economic system and we’re all trained into it, because we’re given no alternative.  It’s all money based and fear driven. If you don’t have money, you die. Very simple. And it shouldn’t be this way at all.

No one will tackle that. The guys who run the system will never tackle that because they use this system to dominate all of you. You see. They have no problem knowing and being taught in their higher courses, and I mean the higher courses that are outside universities, they do exist, that slavery is a normal feature.  As Charles Galton Darwin said, THERE’S ALWAYS BEEN SLAVERY IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER AND WE’RE SIMPLY IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING A NEW MORE EFFICIENT FORM OF SLAVERY. It’s a form of slavery that most folk don’t even know they are slaves. They’re quite content; you can buy a lot of cheap junk, that will keep you in LaLa land forever entertainment wise, but you’re disabled then, you see. You’re out of the picture. You’re no problem to anybody, and you’ll never be a problem. And what you are getting downloaded with is weaponized, to again, bend your opinions to conform to those that your master wants you to have. And, fear, fear, fear, fear, fear, will collapse you. Collapse you.

Spies during the Cold War, for MI6 and MI5, literally had departments right up until the laptop computer types were running, or the desktop.  They cut out newspaper articles from across the world, all the different papers, foreign papers, domestic, and they would find patterns to find out who was doing what and so on and the reasons behind things. Today of course it’s all computerized. They have instant access to all your data, everyone’s data, except of course the elite that are blocked from that; they have their own network, different, you’ve never even heard of it. So everyone is studied minutely. We’re all studied minutely, categorized. People say, why don’t they kill you? Well, you’re really a curiosity to them; they’re not worried about you. It would take more than one person to say something. You see. They’re curious as to why you ended up like that, that’s all. They study you minutely, more so in fact because you’re a curiosity to them; that’s all. That’s all you are.  It would be different of course if you were in one of their own divisions, as we found out from various whistleblowers that had untimely deaths in different countries during the Cold War up to the present, because they have something from the establishment to show the public, you see, and that’s rather taboo.

The Soviets did disclose, and of course don’t forget… You understand, if one side discloses how their technique was run, it means the other side was run on a duplicate fashion. It still is actually. So the most studied people in the Cold War were those who worked for the governmental system. That’s why George Orwell had that in his 1984. They weren’t studying the proletariat, the proles as he called them.  As he said throughout the book, THEY DON’T COUNT. It doesn’t matter, because they’re dumb, stupid, they’re kept happy and singing little songs turned out by the machine of the culture industry. That’s where they’ll stay. They believe what they’re told. We’re at war with whoever they’re told we’re at war with and they go along with it.  Because why would the media want to lie to you? Why would your favorite newscaster, who’s almost falling off his chair he’s so old, that’s why they keep them there, you grow up with them like daddy or granddad. You trust them. Everything is psychology. That’s why they keep them there. Why change a formula when it will always work? Because they understand human nature so well.  We are formulistic types of societies and peoples.

Anyway, this is just a little blurb to let you know that I’m still kicking. I’ve been wondering and pondering whether to just do the full-time thing; I’ve got offers to do full-time radio. But I’ll tell you, if you’re doing it yourself it will destroy you trying to keep up, as I say, as a substitute for old cutting out of newspapers; now you’re doing it all on the Internet, searching the world for stories, to connect the things that are relevant, and to show you that these things that seem dispersed over the world are all guided from a common source.  Once you know that why keep doing it? It’s not going to change. And to go into deeper things because people are collapsing with fear these days.  As I say, fear disables you.  That’s the purpose of creating fear. Fear is used as a strategy in psychological warfare. Overwhelm them with fear topics which they’re completely helpless to stop, and that’s that, they’re goners. Very simple techniques.

So think for yourself. Don’t be terrified, because it’s going to happen anyway. Whatever happens that’s planned will happen.  Because these massive movements, as explained by professors down through history, cannot be stopped. They’re all encompassing from a thousand or more sources, all working together, in tandem.  Every facet of society you could possibly imagine is under one control, towards the common goal. And nothing could possibly change if you got the same con of money going on anyway, backed by nothing, run by privateers, and collectivist privateers at that, some of them working together across the planet.  How can you possibly have any kind of equality? Not this gay rights or whatever they give you. These are all side, emotive topics to take you off what’s going to happen to everybody, including them, at the mercy of the elite  ...to divert you from the integration of the planet under a government that none of the public are going to get to vote for, or even vote in. That’s more important, isn’t it?

And don’t worry, once they advocate a social worker for every child born in America – which will happen, it will come; it’s almost already there with a lot of single mums and so on – where the children, and some people have written to me, from the ex-dads or whatever, if they visit, their children are on first-name terms with, they call the social workers, their best pals.  It’s already there, implemented in many ways. Their job will be to guide that child into the correct kind of citizen as they grow up. It wouldn’t matter what their inclinations this way or that are. In the future we’ll all be one.  Whatever they have decided for us all, that will be the way it will be.

So don’t get lost in emotive topics that are meant to get you arguing and fighting and angry, you see. Even the churches are all compromised, unfortunately. Because that was at least one way out for some people, in all times, with the idea the world’s always going to be pretty evil and therefore look after the spiritual side of things; that’s all you’ve got left. And of course, in some churches they say that’s all there is anyway. Technically they are right. Because I think the only time people had freedom was probably in the Stone Age. You’d find a cave for yourself, there was no taxman to come in there and measure it. You had a big club there and that was it, you know. You didn’t know language as such so he couldn’t talk you out of it and con you as to why you should pay him money. You know. Once language came in we languish in language, our thought processes are conned so easily by conology, the art of conology.

Anyway, this is to keep you up-to-date on the fact that I’m still alive and kicking. As I say, full-time, I’m thinking about it, but I’d have to take staff on if that was the case, because it kills you. From eight in the morning till 2 AM the next morning you’re stuck at the computer and then you’re running off to post offices or God knows what, or the mail, which is not next to the house, believe you me; I have to travel 2 or 3 miles to get to it. Things like that. And you’re eating like a crazy person, stuffing it down, and then back to work. There’s no breaks in it at all. It’s deadly, very deadly. Then you’re going by someone else’s deadline all the time, not your own. So you either have more staff or else you do it, and maybe in a more effective way, by cutting through all “here’s the updates on what’s happening today.” If you want the news for the day you’ve got a billion sites to find it on, including all the mainstream, where most of it is culled from anyway.  Then you get the different interested parties that will give you their particular take or spin on it, which only reinforces the fact that everything is rather overwhelming, isn’t it?

So understand the techniques, of course, that are used. And when you understand techniques you’re not fooled by them anymore. It also means you might be isolated from other people because they can’t understand how you come to these conclusions, how you know this stuff. Because they’re still so well-conditioned – it’s called perfect conditioning – that the thought of being lied to by their favorite newscaster is absurd. It’s like telling them their daddy is an evil person. That’s perfect conditioning. And most folk have had it. We’ve all gone through the same process. A few were unscathed by it, very few. But yeah, you’re isolated to an extent because most folk cannot communicate with you. And you can’t get through to them either. So you learn to play the game with them and when they talk about whatever it is they’re talking about, you smile and go along, and quip a little word in here and there, and then they accept you. But as soon as you open your mouth about something else that matters, the eyes glaze over.  That’s how the world is.

Everyone’s caught up in their little bubble, as they term it at the top. They give you a bubble and inside that bubble you have your circle of influence. That’s who you know, this is what you do, here’s who you communicate to, here’s your friends, what do your friends and you do? That’s how you value your life and the purpose of life and you value those around you, in your little bubble. You’re running, you’re scurrying to get through work, a job you often hate as an employee because there’s no meaning to it often, shuffling papers around or whatever. And then you either get drunk or party or get stoned, a lot of people get stoned.  They’re pushing stoning too because you’re going into the Huxlian phase now of Soma, where big Pharma’s already got a lot of folk drugged, and the rest comes as stress increases, through legalizing various kinds of drugs. Because they use both sides.  I’ve always said, you understand, the same people run the illegal and legal sides of everything. It’s the end that matters, you see.

So stay tuned to the website. I’ll probably give a couple of talks at least this week, maybe more. And keep in touch. And don’t get down and depressed like crazy, because you have to live, you have to survive. You mustn’t mentally collapse with everything. And start thinking again for yourselves, because there’s a pleasure in understanding things.  That’s one thing you have.  It’s one thing you actually have. You’ve got to understand something for yourself.  Don’t just parrot someone else’s stuff or get caught up in the tactic or whatever they’re pushing. Think for yourself. Because there’s a bit of a lie in, the truth shall make you free. It can free your mind. It’s a double story actually, it’s got a truth and a lie involved there. It doesn’t make you free from all this hell that we’re pushed through at times, and economic depressions and wars and all the rest of it that we have nothing to do with generally. But it does free up your mind to understand it all; it’s the one thing you’re left with. That’s the freedom that you have. That’s what you’re left with.

So I hope you’re all doing pretty well out there and surviving. We know there are tough times to come, that’s how it is. And you have to find something worth living for, of course. That’s very, very important. And don’t devalue yourself as an individual, whatever you do. Because that’s what we are, we’re individuals. We have certain things in common with each other but we all have specific aspects to our personalities and our thought processes that are different from other people too, and you can’t let them take that away from you... and make us all conform into conformity.

And by the way, Hamish is doing okay, the doggie. Tough, though, he hasn’t had the same kind of walks with this deep, deep snow. But who knows? It depends how the Masters that be, that manipulate everything including weather of course in this day and age with all the aerial chemical spraying that’s going on.  And it’s no conspiracy theory. There’s too much documentation out that’s been declassified over the years, up to the present time by the way, on this.  That’s another thing to always consider, that nothing, nothing just happens today by chance. Nothing would destroy this system or change it except something outside their control altogether, that doesn’t come from humanity. That’s why they’re always churning out these asteroid movies. Mind you, FEMA always comes in and saves the world, or they send Bruce Willis off to space to destroy it. This is the nonsense we’re fed of course. Because the elite actually worry about these things, because they are control freaks. Things that they couldn’t control terrify them.

So from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, where it’s still awfully cold and snowy, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:30 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March the 2nd, 2014. I’ve been battling the weather, as I’m sure you all have in North America here, at least this part of it and further South too even. Because we’re having incredibly cold temperatures, right into March; it’s still going on. It really started in November, really deep, deep, low temperatures, sometimes 40 below up where I am here near Sudbury. Even on, I think it was Thursday night, it dropped down to about 40 below. That’s pretty well on both scales, Fahrenheit and Centigrade, that’s where they kind of meet up together. Last night it was about 20-odd below, 25 below, perhaps more, and it’s to continue apparently with these new vortexes and winter blasts and all the rest of the nonsense they tell us, as they heavily manipulate the weather.

 

It’s amazing, the world we live in today because outside of the standard news, which is meant to keep you in a box, where you parrot all the proper, authorized talks, etc., the reality, when you go deep within the scientific systems and communities, they’ve been working on the weather for an awful, awful long time. And I laugh at all these geoengineering conferences where they’re always talking about, when they get the authority to start geoengineering, and then they go through all the possible side effects, the chronic bronchitis, pneumonias – because of irritation with all these chemicals they’re putting in – they’ve been doing it all along. And that’s how the world is really run.

 

You see, there’s different levels of reality, all meant to keep you conned. They’re always have been, really, but it’s more perfected today. WE LIVE IN A MORE SOPHISTICATED FORM OF SLAVERY, as Charles Galton Darwin said in the 1950s. So we’re definitely in it, you see. That’s why they give you major publications in science and so on to make you believe that you’re on the cutting edge of all the knowledge that’s out there, there’s nothing else to be had. And you’ve got all these magazines, Popular Science, etc., lots of them, which create that illusion of course. But nothing’s further from the truth.

 

It’s the same with politics and everything else too of course. Have you noticed that all the news you get today is generally over there somewhere? It’s been like that for an awful long time. Over there… like the old song, eh. Again, from Hollywood, naturally. And you’re kept focused across the world with the color revolutions; we all know what those things are too. Again, there’s nothing new in color revolutions because if you go into the history of Britain, regular history books, you’ll find that Britain was doing the same thing in, for instance, India in the early 1800s as they were getting tribes to fight each other so they could come in, to keep the peace you understand, stabilization they call it – they don’t go to war, they always go to stabilize countries. Or today it’s bringing them democracies. And it’s all very wonderful isn’t it? This is how they push it across to us. But meanwhile they foment the problem in the first place and they get peoples who haven’t been fighting together for maybe a thousand years, to fight each other, and then they go in and get what they want. And they always want something. Generally it’s pretty well everything, but they want something. And it’s control over not just the resources but also it’s control over the minds of the public, so they are as brainwashed as you are.

 

They want a world standard education system for everyone so that everyone gets the same brainwashing. So if you go to Tokyo or somewhere else you get the same pat replies to the reasons why things are happening. And then of course no one can then think outside the box. That’s the idea. It’s rather clever, really.

 

But most folk are trained, we’re all trained actually, to believe what we’re told. Because after all, why would anybody want to lie to you? This comes from the old idea, especially in Christianity, to be trusting... to be trusting. And of course, Christianity was used, especially, in the 20th century, big time, by the powers in the big foundations that planned to run the world and eventually take over from governments as we know them. And they’ve had their articles out in the papers saying it’s time for them to step in, from websites such as the Council on Foreign Relations, IT’S TIME FOR THE BIG PHILANTHROPIES TO MOVE IN AND TAKE THEIR RIGHTFUL PLACE, AS CO-RULERS AND PLANNERS in a system which is non-democratic in a sense. So we’re being prepared for it.

 

We hear NGO leaders all the time on the news, and so-called charitable foundations are behind them funding it all. And of course the history is all out there with old John D Rockefeller and all the things that he got up to too. He also was a Darwinist as well, as you know, a social Darwinist who believed in social planning, where the elite, the intelligentsia would plan the lives for everyone else. And today you get The Big Society in Britain, The Great Society of Cameron, which is communitarianism. This very old plan is all coming to fruition as we live of course. The US is getting put into it gradually. And eventually they’ll tax you off the road, or price you off the road with your vehicles. They don’t like to ban you; they like to make it impossible for you to function anymore. That’s their way of coercing you into something, so they can write their own history books, because they always do, and say, the people accepted this. Well, you have to accept it when you have no option, you see. So that’s how history is written, we’re coerced into things. They don’t forbid you to do things, they simply make it impossible to function unless you join them and you do what you’re told. That’s as simple as that.

 

So I’m cutting through a lot of stuff in a short space of time because I don’t like to go over all the stuff that you should all know anyway. The problem too, even with the patriot movement – as they want to call it, still, I don’t know why, but they call it the patriot movement – is that they keep you focused, simply parroting what the mainstream news is telling you to look at. So everybody’s looking at the color revolutions, which are going on of course over in the Ukraine and other places too, always, always ongoing, as they take down country after country, put in their puppets, which are all ready to be installed, and trained for their parts, and bring in this unified world of a planned society, you see. Which is awfully lucrative to those involved in it because for all their charitable works, etc., the big foundations believe in massive profits for their own high members. But they do believe in a world where you’ll have big international corporations with all their chains of stores and chains of everything and chains of factories and chains of farms, and the super farm stuff that they have, these big Agri-food businesses. They’ll run the world for you, you see; no small private business is to be allowed in the future. And they bring you into this gradually.

 

Now, the reason that the big movements, which came out of… they were visible even in the French revolution. Again, it’s a long history, which is never told actually; some of it can’t be told today. But there’s a long history, as the forces behind these revolutions got into action and got underway to make all this happen. You even find in this overdone thing called Weishaupt, Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati stuff; they were one small group by the way, all working –there’s many of the same groups across the world. And Weishaupt was a bit big for his boots and couldn’t keep his mouth shut. But the fact is, they’re on the go still today. The idea was to bring in a planned society, again. It’s always the same thing, a planned society, the intelligentsia rule. Those who prove they are intelligentsia, not just through academia but also from acquiring massive wealth and holding onto it for a few generations, is the proof, that’s your entry for the children into the next generation of rulership. That’s what it’s all about.

 

And they have the scientists on board with them. They actually have their categories of those who run industry for the world, and those who are the scientific helpers. In fact, Julian Huxley went through that in one of his talks, that he and his family, his family lineage, were HEREDITARY MEMBERS OF THE SCIENTIFIC ELITE WHO HELPED TO MANIPULATE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC to go along with all of this too. So you’re living through a planned agenda, which is awfully boring at times, of repetition. And they say, hell is repetition. But to keep parroting on and parroting on what they’re doing today is a technique to destabilize your psyche and bring you down, crashing to the ground. When I was doing so many talks every week, going over the news, the purpose wasn’t to terrify you, as you know. The purpose was to explain why these things were happening and filling in all the blank bits that the media conveniently left out. It’s not difficult to understand once you see the process at play.

 

Now, the US was to be used as the big battering ram to bring the rest of the world into this global system, the planned economy, the planned society, from who should get born, who should not get born, and the social Darwinistic theory that they brought into it. Rockefeller of course was all on board with that, the social Darwinism idea, where he himself certainly had his ideas of how the people should be run, who should order their lives, how to order their lives, and eugenics of course is a big part of it too. The Rockefellers funded the Cold Spring Harbor experiments and so on in eugenics and started the award system, for the American Family of the Month awards way back in the 20s I think it was.

 

So it’s interesting to see that every group, you see, that you belong to – if you belong to anything at all – whether it’s a religious group or whatever, it was taken over an awful long time ago. In fact, the history of the US is fascinating when it comes to religion because you get the standard, authorized version – cleaned up of course; that’s the authorized version – of all the untidy stuff they don’t want you to know. There were a lot of groups that came into the US, many, many groups who were subversive. They weren’t just getting persecuted because of religion or something. It was because they were subversive and revolutionary in their thinking. Many of them came in with Marxist ideas in fact in the late 1800s and were very, very powerful, very vocal, in the early 1900s, 1920s, especially in places like New York. Mass meetings in the streets, lots of old newspapers out at the time with their speeches.

 

They weren’t the only group. Even before that you had communities coming in that joined, and created, certain Christian sects, or a guise of Christian sects in fact. It was all for social change, particular types of change. When you look at them all it’s always the same kind of change they’re after. Once again, social Darwinistic management of the public from birth to death, who should live, who should die, would they need you down the road to work in their system. Just like George Bernard Shaw said. He said, YOU’LL HAVE TO COME TO US EVENTUALLY TO SEE IF WE SHOULD LET YOU LIVE OR DIE; WHY SHOULD WE KEEP YOU ALIVE? In other words, what use are you to us. That was the purpose of it all. You had to have purpose in order to be fed and kept alive, or even to be born.

 

We’re getting to that stage now, the completion of it all. Because you see, it’s intergenerational brainwashing of acceptance by pushing the envelope, always pushing the envelope a little bit more, until not just… When it comes to the sexual thing – that’s just one part of it. Not just… The parents will sit with the child now and let certain things go in comedy shows that perhaps they shouldn’t, because the parents themselves have been contaminated in their turn, and their parents before them as well. So you can have three or four generations sitting on the same couch watching television and they’ve all been contaminated till everything on television is pretty gross, and the same repetitive type of grossness as well, which also dehumanizes the public into another animal. You laugh at that because you’re laughing at yourselves, as animals, you see. And with animals you can do what you want.

 

Then you have all the economic specialists telling you about, oh this great science of economics, which no one apparently understands because we keep getting plundered twice a century by the big bankers, you see. And they tell you how they’ve got to cut back on everything, including treatment for healthcare, etc., which is well underway in Britain. That’s the flagship for the US because the US actually copied the British system, according to the RAND Corporation which was employed to do the surveys on the best system for them to adopt, according to what they wanted to do, and they said, THE BRITISH SYSTEM IS THE ONE THEY’D ADOPT. So everything works together.

 

Democracy doesn’t ever come into the picture on anything actually, because the public never have a say in all the big important events that are planned for their lifetimes. And when you understand and you read so many of the big boys involved in pushing all of this stuff, you find you’re just living through a script. And it’s awfully boring, terribly boring. So why should you get all hot and bothered when they fulfill a certain part of it? After all, if you’re expecting it, and they told you about it years ago, expect it to happen, because that’s what you’re living through. It’s a planned agenda, with time tables for certain implementations of different parts of it, you see.

 

Now I’m sure all of you have friends out there who’ll parrot the stuff from television. They’ll come up with certain topics, or even arguments, which they’ve adopted from ‘the experts’. You know, that class of experts that they give you to believe in. They’ll say, well I guess they have to ration health care, and it’s so expensive, and we’re going into austerity… But they never complain about the cost of wars. I mean, wars go on all the time for the big boys. The Army, in fact the whole country is just their private business, really. We’re all part of their private enterprise. But they use your money to pay for all the wars, which they use for personal gain naturally, since they have to be in control of all resources across the world. It’s personal gain for them. And they’re awfully good at propaganda, they’re doing it all to save you from disaster. Once they have the resources in those countries, it’s not to…

 

You see, how it used to work, the people would say, well we need the oil, you know. So in other words, you are starting to rationalize plunder. But of course it’s not going to you. The oil is then sold to other countries like China; that’s where the big boys arranged to sell it to when they took over Iraq. The big boys are in there, the Shell and BP and all the rest of them, because Tony Blair, it came out afterwards that he’d had meetings with all these companies before the Iraqi war where they AGREED TO DIVVY IT UP amongst those boys. The taxpayer would fund all the operations for war, pay for the cleanup, and even build them new refineries. That’s awfully nice of us isn’t it? Well, that’s democracy, you see.

 

So try not to allow yourself to be panicked by the constant hype and repetition of things that they’re telling you to be outraged about. After all, there’s nothing that you can do about it. There’s nothing. What are you going to do? ...Please stop putting missiles around Russia and scaring the public with retaliation. ... Please stop putting color revolutions into Ukraine, or the next country after that, or the whole bunch of countries you’re doing it to at the same time. Please stop it, thank you very much. So what are you going to do, get ulcers griping over it? You see, we don’t have democracy, as I say.

 

You’ll never hear the politicians bring up NAFTA, the TransPacific Partnership agreements, all these free trade deals, which is not free trade at all. It’s selected trade for big corporations and the elimination of any competition; that’s what it is. And we have to pay those third world countries, the emerging nations – we’re still paying China by the way – to rise up to first world status; we pay them to do that, we build their hospitals. Once we sign these agreements we give them all this cash. It’s a one-way street. Because it’s a big, big plan and it’s nothing to do with benefiting you.

 

I can remember when they pushed the EU for complete integration and they gave the folk the choice to vote yes or no. They said to every country the same hype; massive marketing campaigns with the top marketing companies, advertising companies to brainwash the public and terrify them. OH, IF YOU DON’T JOIN YOU’LL BE LEFT BEHIND… IF YOU DO JOIN THERE’LL BE JOBS, JOBS, JOBS AND UTOPIA. Well, bingo, where are they now in Europe? You see, you’re always getting lied to, because there’s always a different agenda behind it all. Very, very clever agenda, with lots of groups all working in this pyramid structure and taking command from the guy at the top. That’s how it works. But meanwhile you get one or two targets to pick and yell at and what does it do? Nothing at all. If it wasn’t that guy they’d use someone else to do it. So these guys are just front men in a sense, who know their role, just like a politician. Or, top politicians know their role and their role is to be unpopular and to have tomatoes thrown at them. Then they give you another target after that. It’s a very simple technique, very old too, isn’t it? Very, very old, boring, boring technique.

 

So you’re living through an agenda. Don’t get outraged over things because it doesn’t… Outrage doesn’t win anything. It never has anything changed. Oh, I’m outraged, stop that, thank you. It doesn’t work. So you have to get other methods of doing it. Again too, you’ve got to say to yourself, why do those who have the power and the following who are pushing outrage, not get something organized to really combat something, in a sphere with enough political clout to do something, to actually where they can’t ignore you? It doesn’t happen. Have you ever asked yourself why it doesn’t happen? It’s up to you to figure that out.

 

Again too, remember what Edward Bernays said. He said in his own writings, IF YOU WANT TO TAKE SOMETHING OVER – even monopolize something, whatever it happens to be, and you’re starting from scratch – he said, DON’T TRY TO START THINGS LITERALLY FROM SCRATCH, LOOK FOR EXISTING ORGANIZATIONS. IF YOU DON’T HAVE ONE YOU CREATE THEM, BUT YOU PRETEND YOU’RE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THEM. AND THEN THE PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW THEM BECAUSE THEY’LL BECOME THE LEADERS, you see. But existing organizations you would use to the maximum, including all the churches; they’re fantastic for that. He said, YOU HAVE TO GO AND APPROACH THE LEADERS OF THESE PEOPLE. It doesn’t matter about the followers, or as George Orwell called them the proles, THE PROLES DON’T COUNT, he said. They are just trained seals who are the yea-yea crowd, rah-rah-rah for their leaders. So that’s how they manage the general population.

 

That’s why they have all these NGOs, non-governmental organizations out there, all paid for, very handsomely for their leaders by the way, not for the followers but the leaders, from the big foundations. And the foundations have an incredible history, very well organized, coordinated on a massive scale, often thought to be communist in fact according to the Reece Commission from the 1950s because their goals and their social Darwinism are the same. They are the same. Because they want a planned society, birth to death monitoring by government, at every stage of your life, every day of your life in fact, and school-to-work of course where they simply test you for a few abilities when you’re very young and they’ll say, he’ll be a good plumber, a good electrician or whatever, and that’s all that you’ll be trained in. You don’t need geography, history or anything else. That’s the plan for the future. And it’s already being implemented too. And as I say, you have no say in any of it at all.

 

Because what you’re fighting is a complete system with literally maybe thousands of think tanks, thousands of them, full-time, very intelligently selected guys in it, think tanks, lots of them who have nothing to do but work on each simple problem of their big agenda on how to get the public, and to coerce and manipulate and nudge the public along with the big plan, in every possible aspect of life. So each one is specialized in a specific part of it and many think tanks are working on the second, or third, or fourth, or fifth stage after the present, as the present ones are still working on the present, if you understand what I’m saying. That’s what you’re up against.

 

How can you possibly combat that, by being outraged with things that are happening this very moment? which will be gone tomorrow or the next week or whatever, as they turn your attention onto the next crisis, real or possible or fake, whatever. I’ve often said the main thing you have to do is to, yeah, educate yourself, by yourself. All the information is out there if you’re guided towards it. Something will guide you towards it, or drive you – I call it driving you – towards something. If it’s so important to you you’ll be driven, sometimes in a crazy way in fact until it will take over your life, as you’re driven to find out the whys. And once you understand the whys then you understand what’s coming. When you understand what’s coming you don’t panic. You don’t panic. It’s expected to happen.

 

So don’t let others manipulate you into the fear mode, which actually disables you. Unfortunately there’s a lot of people who exploit you as well and sell you all kinds of things for the sky is falling scenarios, because they make an awful lot of money at it. There’s a lot of people in this world, and we live in this materialistic system, that can be so easily exploited by the unscrupulous, or even psychopathic types as well. Because the psychopath smells which way the wind is going for opportunities and he’ll be there. He’ll be there where there’s an opportunity for him to parrot everyone else’s stuff too. Once he gets the mantras right, the people will listen, and then they exploit you, you see. There’s lots of groups out there doing that kind of thing too. The same thing happens with the NGOs, only they are taught what they’re doing. They know what they’re doing at the top in the big think tanks, they know how to manipulate you. Create the crisis, create the fear, or the impression or the techniques of fear. I call them techniques of fear. You don’t need a crisis fear state to come upon you.

 

And here’s a little secret here too for those who don’t know. Many moons ago the behaviorists got into studying fear, fear itself as a method of total control, for compliance amongst the public. Every country was involved. In fact, during the Cold War all the top scientists, by the way, shared everything to their so-called enemies; it was all nonsense. They said, how can we create fear? For instance, here’s an example, if you’re faced with a tiger in the jungle you’re going to have sudden fear, with all the responses that fear brings, you see. The fight or flight syndrome, the parasympathetic nervous system kicks in all of that; you might empty your bladder or even worse in some people. Then you vamoose as fast as you can. Or you become frozen and you get eaten. You see, there’s different responses of different people as to how they’ll react to it. But they noted all the different sensations which come with the state of total fear, where you’re faced with imminent death, for instance.

 

It was interesting, from those who ran Russia... I always say those who ran it because a lot of them didn’t come from Russia. But the fact is, those who ran Russia, they did a lot of experiments which they couldn’t… well at least they couldn’t openly so much do in the West... Because when you’re killing your subjects, like humans, it’s not too popular. Again, you might get that outrage thing that goes nowhere. They found that if they could simulate, simulate the symptoms, which generally comes secondarily to the actual instigator, the motive, the object that terrifies you, you had all these symptoms that kick in where your pupils will dilate, more light comes in for fight and flight, blood pressure changes, your heart goes up, adrenaline gets shot in and so on. If they could make these things happen through other techniques, even electronically, then you would go into the same state of fear as though you were facing a tiger, without a tiger being present. This is a well understood science.

 

I could yap on for an awful long time, days and weeks maybe, about all the studies that were done. However, it’s used on you today, through television, through the computer, through, I’m certain, as Brzezinski was talking about, about THIS TECHNIQUE WHERE THEY COULD LITERALLY GO ACROSS THE WHOLE CONTINENT WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES ETC., HAARP TECHNOLOGIES YOU MIGHT CALL THEM, WI-FI’S INCLUDED IN THAT, AND CREATE THESE SAME SIDE EFFECTS WHICH WOULD MAKE THE WHOLE NATION ANXIOUS, OR VERY DEPRESSED, OR EVEN MAKE YOU SO RELAXED WHEN YOU SHOULDN’T BE RELAXED PERHAPS, AND MANIPULATE THE PUBLIC. These are warfare techniques.

 

We live in an age of advanced science. Even during the Cold War the front guys would tell you, THOSE WHO WIN THIS WAR WILL BE THE LEADERS IN VERY ADVANCED SCIENCES. Well, it hasn’t stopped, folks. And all those experiments they used during the Cold War, they’re all being used on you today. You see, from the simple techniques of just hype... I could hit you with a thousand stories a day until you’re quivering under your kitchen table in total breakdown and panic, but I don’t because that disables you. That’s a warfare technique. I keep saying it over and over, the average person, the average… well, even a person who has got more stamina, could perhaps handle two major crises at one time, maybe a third a little bit, without cracking, as long as they’re not prolonged. But more than that you crack up. So if I were to tell you to worry about this, this, this, this, this, this, this today, just for today’s news, you’re going to go into a panic mode, fear mode. You’ll sound like a loony to your friends, you’ll look like a loony to your friends, and you get nothing done. In fact, you won’t even get your basic essential daily living done; you’ll start to fall and break down. So don’t go there. It’s a weaponized system.

 

As I say too, with Wi-Fi, etc., it’s still ongoing. So much money, even the top universities are still experimenting with these Wi-Fi waves and electromagnetic energy pulses, etc. The unified field as they want to call it too; Persinger is into that at Laurentian University in Canada here. He thinks it’s wonderful, when WE’LL ALL FEEL THE PAIN OF SOMEONE IN AFRICA WHO IS STARVING. Well, who gives him the right to make us all feel a pain of somebody in Africa? And why Africa? You understand? When they have the ability to change your mood, emotion and so on, without your consent either – I mean, who’s going to consent to being manipulated by someone else? – the game’s over. It’s over, folks. You won’t know whose thoughts you have, who gave them to you, reinforced again by the propaganda media, by an invisible energy that’s all around you, where again an elite are saying, we’ll make them feel this, feel that and so on, and they’ll couple that with the news that you’re hearing. You see. This is their goal for a peaceful planet.

 

I always think of the fake communist system. And I say fake because a lot of real communists beneath… Followers are always real, generally, you see; they’re fanatics. But the leaders always know what they’re doing. And how they kept going over this, this future utopia – that never arrived in the Soviet Union; it wasn’t meant to arrive in the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was just one generation really, a 70-odd year generation as Lenin said, IT WOULD MERGE WITH THE WEST, AND THE SYSTEM WOULD BECOME NOT QUITE CAPITALIST AND NOT QUITE COMMUNIST. They now call it socialist, but it’s a social Darwinism run by the elite. Because the foundations were behind all of these movements, for centuries by the way.

 

Now, a foundation can set a goal. Supposing you have a smaller foundation with only a few billion to throw around every year – that’s a small one – and that’s got one task, to change, supposing it was to change all of us into women or something, all men into women, just as a topic here, you know. They could say, well this might take three generations. So they can employ, hire, retire, and employ, hire, retire, and fire and all the rest of it, but keep on the same agenda for generations, as they change society’s mores, morals and everything else, and viewpoints, until they get what they want, so that one thing can be achieved. It doesn’t change. It’s there regardless of political parties, regardless of wars, or anything else you think might interfere, but they don’t interfere, and they get the job done. Then you have the big, big foundations with trillions to slush around on all these pressure groups, all fighting for whatever that’s going to destroy the old to bring in the new. And then many of these foundations fund hundreds and hundreds of other foundations; they just put the money out there, you see, tax-exempt too of course.

 

So we’re going through this, as I say, and people still think they can go and vote and somehow it’s going to change something. Your politician is not going to mention the NAFTA morphing into the TransPacific Partnership when it’s election time. Your local one won’t do it either. So what’s the point? They’ll talk about jobs, unemployment, because everybody’s worried about surviving, education. Of course now they’re bringing in different rights for different minority groups and so on, or they’ll create new minority groups that didn’t know they were one. That’s how they do things. They keep you focused on other things. But they never ever talk about the big, big plans they have for you down the road. They’re often not even implemented by them so to speak. They’re implemented by bureaucracies that are functioning as almost separate governments today; they create policies, not laws but policies, and then it’s implemented and that’s that.

 

You’re also prompted to change your opinions on things, by very careful psychologically prepared documentaries and very repetitive ones all similar to it, to change the way that you see something. And the way to do it is simply by the omission of another side of any story. That’s how you bring someone to the desired conclusions. Then when your peer group starts parroting it... They’ve even done all the studies, naturally, as to what classes adopt it quickest and they found that the ones who have the most education are quicker to adopt new policies and new ways of being, behaving, condemning or whatever it happens to be. We are the most studies species on the planet. It’s incredible. Incredible! And the public are kept so busy or worrying and scurrying that they don’t even know that most of what they think is their mind is not theirs at all. Their opinions are not theirs. Their behavior isn’t even theirs. Even their hobbies often aren’t theirs either; they’re approved and pushed.

 

Stuff that was known thousands of years ago comes from a small elite who understand these sciences. Because sciences like this, to do with manipulation of the human being, are never lost. They are so valuable. They are more precious than anything else on the planet. Once you have that under wraps you can get all the people working for you like slaves, and you can take most of their income from them and live higher than they will ever, ever imagine. That’s what it’s about.

 

Now, those at the top, as Albert Pike said, MAKE NO APOLOGIES FOR NATURE. By that they mean social Darwinism to an extent, where they are clever, cunning, and in the laws of nature, the jungle, they end up at the top because they are ruthless and cunning and intelligent. They know how to manipulate people, sway the crowds, get them to follow, even into wars and all the rest of it. Actually, I shouldn’t say follow because these big boys who plan it all never go to war themselves; they just reap in the benefits.

 

In fact, you know I’ve mentioned all the different quotes from people like Kissinger and so on who said that, AMERICAN SOLDIERS ARE DUMB STUPID ANIMALS WHO ARE USED FOR FOREIGN POLICY. Now I’ll tell you something, though, I don’t disagree with what he said actually. Because they’re certainly dumb and stupid, because they get the most basic propaganda as to why they should go off and kill people they don’t know. Very basic stuff. They never know the full agenda. Unfortunately they don’t even care about what the real agenda is. Because they’re very young guys. One soldier told me that it seemed to him, he was brought up in Britain but he said, it was like one day he was running around the trees with his pals playing cowboys and Indians and before you know it there they are with the real thing, and the weapons and all that, being more macho, like the movie stars – all, again, emulating fiction, you see. That’s why they pick young guys.

 

During World War I at one point when they had the big lines of trenches across the country in Europe there was a stalemate. So many had died; they were just throwing in hoards of people, wave after wave, on both sides until they were getting mowed down with machine guns—that had come online basically just in time for that war by Mister Vickers; he had been made Lord Vickers for that contribution to slaughter. And his counterpart too, he had a counterpart who helped, I think he lived in Switzerland and they made them in Switzerland, and sold them to both sides, Henry Maxim. So they sold a version for the British and the French and another version for the Germans. I could go on with all these stories too but I won’t bother. But the fact is, they found that it came to a stalemate in the trenches for about a year or so.

 

Now, they did their surveys. In came the early behaviorists and they did their surveys to find out why weren’t they still jumping into their trenches and doing heroics and slaughtering people, and getting killed. They found that the guys who were mainly left in the trenches, after regiment after regiment were getting slaughtered, were a bit older, a few years older. In other words, they were a bit wiser, and their propaganda and their childhood mentality was disappearing. They realized that bullets, unlike even the early movies and the black and white silents, didn’t miss the good-looking guys and didn’t miss guys who were nice. No, they killed anybody at all, so the hero didn’t matter. There were no heroes with a bullet heading towards you. It doesn’t happen that way in reality. Young guys were still full of, again, their heroes and all the novels and stage plays that they’d seen, and if you were brave and all that and very gallant, bullets always miss you. So what they did, they spent about six months training new recruits in Canada and they fed them the most horrific stories about the Germans bayoneting babies and all that stuff, which they always rehash every so often. They tried that with the Iraqis too, later on too with Kuwait. Anyway, sure enough, they trained them and these young guys were given tremendous brainwashing and stories about heroism. They came in and sure enough they put them in the trenches and they ran off by the herds to get slaughtered, again too, and get the whole killing thing going again. That’s how perfect this system is. That’s how perfect it is.

 

If you’re looking for honor and that, don’t look to the guys who are above you manipulating it all, because there’s no honor at all. None whatsoever. And we are the proles. Like George Orwell said, THE PROLES DON’T COUNT. Because the proles don’t know reality. They really don’t know reality. And young guys having a tribal instinct, naturally, want to be warriors, so they always pick the young guys to go and do all the slaughtering, so the old guys can reap the benefits. And the taxpayer pays for the cost of it.

 

That’s the real world we live in, in geopolitics and everything else, always on the go. Always on the go. And believe you me, when they bring in their world system and there’s no more foreign enemies to fight, they always have to have terrorism all throughout the system. The same with the Soviet Union, once the borders were all closed in the Soviet system then they had to get an enemy at home to justify the massive police state that they had, an authoritarian system and keep the people terrified. So you had counterrevolutionaries at home. Today in the West it’s terrorists everywhere, apparently. Old, old techniques. Repetition. Repetition. Repetition.

 

Now, sorry to prattle on like this but I don’t prepare my talks as you all know. I like to just spout off the top of my head about things and say how things really are, without getting you all panicked and terrified and focusing you on, oh look here in the world today and be very, very afraid, folks, or look there and be terrified. What does that achieve? What does that accomplish? ...apart from disabling you. You have to find out who you are. It’s a difficult job for a lot of people who have never clued in till later. Because you almost have to dismiss everything you ever believed in; certainly the way that you believed in things has to be looked at again. Absolutely. Because there’s not an organization out there that isn’t used. Many, knowingly, and other ones unwittingly. Because to be a follower you can be set up to be a patsy. Just being conned itself means you’re all patsies, if you just follow, follow, follow and never question.

 

I’ve never known a country, or this system, or this agenda to falter by guys just yelling their outrage at something. It doesn’t happen. It does not happen. It’s maybe a minor safety valve to blow off steam but that’s all it accomplishes. Yeah, we told them, we told them, yeah... So what? Like they don’t know? What do you do in this system? Well, can you be in the system? You have no option but to be in the system so at least you can come to the understanding of the forces behind it all, how tremendous work goes into manipulating you on a daily basis, tremendous work, and making you conform to the general herd, as they say; awfully important.

 

That’s why everyone’s spied on. I keep telling people who give me the pat answer, well I don’t care if they’re looking at me, I’ve got nothing to hide. Well, the fact is, even that person is of awful great interest to all the statisticians out there that are constantly running tests on us all, and quantifying this group and that group, and who will belong to… How can you put this person in any group at all, blah-blah-blah... These ones are safe, these ones are on the border, at the line, yada-yada-ya. It’s, oh, incredible.

 

And all of academia is on board with this, getting huge grants from the big foundations, again, to do all these studies. And your government goes along to allow all this information from the NSA to be handed over to them, the high professors and so on. They’re making a fortune at this... to make sure that you stay, you know, safe and pretty stupid, and predictable. You can’t run a world unless you’re all incredibly predictable. Even the Joe Blow that says, I don’t care and blah-blah-blah, I’m doing nothing wrong. If he does something out of the ordinary, they want to know why. Why is he suddenly looking at this? Why is he suddenly reading these articles? Why, you see. Because that gets added to your personality profile, updated, and they want to know. And it’s so easy for them today because they look at your cluster of friends and all these sockpuppets that you yap to, and they see where it’s all going, with you. They’ve got to know where it’s going with you. YOU must be predictable and if you’re not they want to know why.

 

Down the road you will have mandatory psychiatric visits, either to a place you’re told to go to or they will come to you. They talked about this almost a hundred years ago in George Bernard Shaw’s day when they started up the Fabian Society. There’s nothing new under the sun. There really is nothing new under the sun. What is maybe newer is the more perfected system of information gathering on you, observation. And the techniques employed are literally so… it’s instantaneous across the world. They’re all getting the same news, authorized news, the same prattle, getting their minds shaped to correct, to believe everything in the proper way, the ones authorized.

 

At the moment you’ve got some dissent here and there but you have no real opposition to anything. Because opposition, as the communists always knew, had to be organized. That was their big scream at one time, when they went into a new place, organize, organize, and they’d organize them. And when they joined that system, you joined a communist system, you had to go along with every part of their agenda, even the stuff that made you uncomfortable or you didn’t agree with. You had to learn all the slogans. And you listen to all these commies and they just parrot the slogans. They can’t argue with you on things, they just parrot slogans at you. And they jump into critical theory and smear you. Because they can’t answer you. And they won’t. It’s a religion, you see. But they did know how to organize, incredibly well, because it’s a very old system, even before you heard the term communism or even Lenin for that matter, all worked out long before that.

 

All these techniques are used by what you think are sides, all sides, because all sides at the top work in common to the same goal. Most are oblivious of it. Many folk are happy with... I said many years ago that many people will love socialism, this Darwinistic socialism because they won’t have to plan anything, really, in their lives. Maybe what coffee to drink or what program to watch tonight to laugh at or whatever porn movie they’re going to see, but that’s going to be it. The big decisions are going to be made by experts in governmental departments and social workers and psychologists and so on, if they have any big problems at all. Then the rest of their time is theirs to go and play.

 

And it won’t end there. Because they want to bring down the population. They are already getting people conditioned. Ordinary folk, you’ll hear them parroting this stuff, well you know there are too many people in the world. And they’ll parrot all the stuff they’ve been brainwashed to believe in. Oh there’s not enough food in the world to feed everybody, which is nonsense too. And, well, people should, if they get sick, maybe, you know, if they don’t have much of a job or anything, well they should be at the bottom of the list for helping. These are ordinary people parroting this stuff off now because they’re watching documentary after documentary that are churned out by the big establishment and they cannot think for themselves. Of course the ones who are telling you all this are pretty fit and healthy when they’re talking about it. It doesn’t occur to them that they’re going to be on the bottom list either, for, you know, termination... for economic factors, that is. That’s where they’ll take us eventually.

 

You start with abortion, then you step up to post-term abortion, postpartum abortion. And then you’ll go into the next step too of killing off the elderly; that’s already been done in some countries. Now I think it’s Belgium that has passed a law too, you can actually terminate children who are terminally ill. And the folk again, the general public will say, well yeah they showed us an awful documentary and this child looked in pain. Well yeah, they can make the child look in pain if they don’t want to give him any painkillers. It’s quite simple, folks. Everything you see should be analyzed from every possible angle. And unfortunately you should be able to do that, naturally, without being told. Most folk can’t anymore. They’ve been disabled and they don’t know it. And they will argue with you that they are perfectly sane, because they really believe they are. And their peer group is much the same as themselves, and that’s how you judge your sanity. They’ll prattle about the same topics with the same answers, conclusions as you have, because they’re all given the same downloads, scientific downloads, which guide you to the conclusion.

 

Newscasting at one time used to be simply reporting on the facts; the conclusions were up to you. That’s the ideal news system. We haven’t had that for, probably ever actually. There have been some that would do that at one time, some papers would do that, but now they’re all the same. They’re all big consortiums and they guide you to the conclusion, the approved conclusion that you’re supposed to have. They’re awfully devious too. They will admit omission guides you naturally to the proper conclusion by omitting other facts, the other side of any story. Very simple.

 

Now, I’m not going to prattle on and prattle on here. As I say, I’m just keeping my face in right now to let you know I’m still kicking here. It’s still snow shoveling and deep, deep freeze. That’s been like that since November. Yeah, November, I was hitting the 40 belows and it’s traveled on and off, quite frequently, right up into the present. If I get 10 below at night, 15 below, that’s been a good day. I mean during the day as well.

 

So we’re going through big, big changes, planned changes. There’s all kinds of sciences at work right now, at play. We have HAARP; you can pick up a shortwave radio, go through the bands, you’ll hear the HAARP frequencies banging away. They’re the loudest sounds on the shortwave; you’ll hear them on umpteen different frequencies today. That’s part of the unified field idea of manipulation of the brain. Because HAARP, when they disclosed it, even from the military’s point of view, the declassified stuff, they can send a secondary signal, the carrier signal brings a secondary signal, and the secondary signal can actually manipulate your brain functions, quite easily, proven a long, long time ago.

 

And in the past, if you go into the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com you’ll find talks I’ve given and links I’ve put up from some of the scientists involved, who are still involved in it by the way, who talk about this field technique of manipulation of the mind. So you have all kinds of techniques used, apart from the simple persuasive techniques of propaganda. Repetition is the most important thing of all. Just keep saying it over and over and you’ll start to doubt yourself. Well, if they’re all saying the same thing then I must be wrong. That’s how it works.

 

So be careful out there. I’ve said so many times, the mind has no firewall. You have to decide what comes in; you are the gatekeeper there. Because what you can bring into your mind can be weaponized, and often is. It just sits there like a little virus and then it starts working on you. But don’t become disabled with fear. Think for yourselves. And don’t panic when these overwhelming foundational groups and so on and color revolutions, and all the different associations that are funded by your tax money, are across the planet causing mayhem in other people’s countries. What can you do about it? As a say, write a nice letter and say, please stop, thank you very much. That’s going to do a lot, right? And take care of yourselves. But start thinking for yourself. Start thinking for yourself.

 

There’s hardly an item out there that’s real as far as the way it’s presented to you. Stop taking the world as it’s being presented to you. You’ve got the functioning brain, use it. If you have lost it along the way, find it again. You still got an attachment, find your own mind, because it’s so important. No one else is going to do it for you. Don’t hand it over to anybody else. Unless you do like socialism, and hand it over. Hand over the part of your mind that takes care of problems and let the experts deal with the problems. They’ll make sure you’re the happy little contented person who will be taken care of all your life by getting the bare minimum, and they’ll keep you immature forever, you’ll never grow up. You’ll end up, as many have today, with the television generations, ending up in old folks homes who literally have nothing, no wisdom to pass on to anybody else. And that’s a sad state of affairs. They can talk about all the TV programs they’ve watched since, I don’t know, in the 50s or whatever to the present, their favorite shows and actors and who married who. But they don’t know anything else. They had a mind that was kept in fantasy all their lives. That’s terrifying to me.

 

It’s terrifying to me that people get up in the morning and the radio’s blaring, generally with the news. They drive to work, people drive to work listening to the same stuff. They go to their work and they’re caught up in the rush and the worry and the scurry, and often there’s background music too in a lot of places. Then they come home, the same thing, blaring away. And then they come in and they’re zonked out and they get more brainwashing through the news media on television and all the rest of it. How come all of your time has been so carefully catered to? And you’ve been taught that this is all normal.

 

Do you understand, the reason for it all is that no group can bring in this new system, can’t be done, if folk are in control of their own minds, and they decide what they’re going to listen to, or not listen to anything at all. And unfortunately people today are, they’re terrified. Look at them. They’re fiddling with their phones wherever they go and texting and all the rest of it. People sit in restaurants and cafés with their friends, and no one’s talking anymore. Do you realize how important it is to keep you from communicating real thoughts, self-thoughts, your own thoughts?

 

Do you realize, that’s the most terrifying thing to those who say that they are controlling it all? That’s the most terrifying thing, if it’s not working on you. Why isn’t it working on you? If too many folk are affected and it’s not working on them anymore, and they’re stopping and thinking for themselves, in silence – you know, that odd thing, that rare thing called silence today – that could be dangerous. They’d have to try and stop that. Or create an instant crisis so that you’re wrapped up thinking you’re fighting for your life or something. And they would do that too. But still, you’ve got to go on and do it.

 

Start thinking for yourselves. Turn everything off once in a while and really sit and think. Sit and think. An odd thing these days, but sit and think for yourself. Stop thinking that the person on television, or this professor or that professor, knows more than you do and he’s more important. Oh, I’m only small so my thoughts aren’t important at all... Stop thinking that way. Stop it... and see what happens. That’s freedom for you. Understanding is freedom. Understanding… and not being collapsed by bad news or impending doom.

 

The studies that were done during the Cold War on the public, of both nations, you know, the Soviet system group and the Western one. The studies on the fear of being annihilated by nuclear war were so intensely studied, it was so important to find the same techniques and use other reasons for terrifying the public. That’s where it all started, you know. I used to be amazed when the top scientists from Britain and the US and so on would go over to Russia every year for their annual science meetings, meeting the same scientists, their opposition over there, working on the same things. Do you really think that was a Cold War? when they said that the top sciences of any country – those were the ones with the top sciences, pure sciences – would defeat the other? Well, how would they be letting their top scientists share all this information? It was a joke, folks. The goal was always for a world governmental system. The Soviets were for it and so was the West, the top capitalists were for it. And here we are, it’s all been done, pretty well, eh.

 

And they’ve got you stampeding again with this and that; you don’t get a minute to breathe here. When you think something is finished over in that country, bingo, they’re hitting another one. Oh, that’s all you’ll hear. And when you’re completely absorbed with all that, look at all the laws they are ramming down, which take away all the pretense of freedom and rights. So by thinking at least you can free yourself from it, and keep your sanity. Keep your sanity. You’ve got to keep your sanity, there’s nothing else out there. Nothing else out there.

 

And keep warm, by the way, those that are freezing, because it’s one heck of a winter here for sure. And I know for a fact this winter, with the heavy manipulation and the heavy chemical spraying in the skies, that are still going on during all these deep freezes and heavy snowstorms, they’ll turn it into perpetual rain come the spring here, I guarantee you, and it’s going to be flooding. So you’ve got another crisis on the go. Then they’ll say, it’s global warming. You know this is going to happen, oh it’s because we’re destroying the atmosphere. And we’ve got to pay massive, massive carbon taxes. And they’ll really hype it up. It’s probably already written up, including all the presentations recorded in advance and they’ll just let it all go at once. And they’ll guide us into the right conclusion… Well, we can’t keep driving on the roads, for goodness sake. Before you know it, you are into Agenda 21 with no private vehicles getting owned anymore except for the very wealthy who can afford all the incredibly high taxes and penalties and carbon taxes and so on, and CO2, etc, etc., etc.

 

It’s rather boring, isn’t it, living in this life when you know what’s coming down the pike? It really is. But at least you don’t go into shock when the next thing happens; you know it’s going to come down the pike. So as I say, sorry for ranting on here but I’ve been busy this week shoveling and all the rest of it and trying to keep warm. It’s bad enough trying to get out of my driveway; it’s an awful, awful long driveway with constant snow coming down. And the roads, too, aren’t plowed right to the ground. They always have a sheet of ice left at the end of it and you’ve got to crawl over that sometimes. So I’ve been awfully, awfully busy doing a lot of things too. And I hope you’re all keeping well and keeping your own sanity, and finding yourselves… finding yourselves as well, and thinking for yourselves.

 

So from Hamish – who is my wonderful pooch, who is fed up with winter too by the way – it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

 

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:30 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, in a blurb form of course, on March the 9th, 2014. I’ve mentioned many times in the past about the art of conology. Conology really is a science, a tremendous science on how to manage masses of people, not just individuals, by a form of mental trickery and linguistic trickery, etc. Plus the need of behaviorists and psychologists and anthropologists, even zoologists, all working together to find out what works with all animals, or higher mammals, which will obviously work with humans too. And unfortunately they do.

 

So it’s well studied of course and all governments have been using experts in these fields, big batteries of experts all along to manage all of us. So do all the associate industries, or institutions as they like to call them, which are essential to governance, such as, not just the banking system but also the entertainment industry, the political industry. All these industries are institutions which we take for granted as being sort of independent and there to either benefit us or help us or even make us laugh. But they all work together, very much so. That’s why you’ll find all of these institutions get common money from the common people through taxations via the Pentagon or whatever it happens to be to make movies and so on. So the art is tremendous, tremendous, of managing millions and millions of people.

 

Now the United Nations of course, with all the treaties they sign too, and all their batteries of think tanks and experts and behaviorists and psychologists and neurologists and neuroscientists, etc., we’re all being managed perfectly well, with being nudged, or made to feel guilty about something we shouldn’t be, all for big, big purposes which those who feel guilty don’t even understand at times. We’re being prompted and guided all along. I’d love to spend hours and hours talking about just that aspect of it but along with this comes the agenda. There’s only one agenda. There’s only ever been one agenda for hundreds of years actually.

 

I’ve gone through the histories, for instance, of how the revolutions came along, especially the French Revolution is well noted because of the similarity of the later Communist or Soviet Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution where basically an entire class of people were slaughtered. In fact, I think it was Trotsky who boasted about that, WE’VE ELIMINATED A WHOLE CLASS OF PEOPLE, and of course they replaced it with their own; that’s what he was referring to. So revolutions are very, very important. And we are conditioned to think of bloody slaughters as revolutions. But most revolutions, as I say, are bloodless. They are social revolutions, cultural revolutions, which are well planned by the same techniques, often by the same think tanks behind them, the same money powers behind them to change our behavior and modify us all along the same paths of thinking in a form of political correctness or whatever it happens to be at that time.

 

We’re lied to all the time naturally. We’re lied to as children are lied to; in fact, it’s the same technique. The noble lie is used, which means it’s done for a good purpose. That’s how the psychopaths can always rationalize whatever they do. It was for a good purpose… The victim is always blamed, you see, for the indoctrination they’re getting. So that’s where we are today. We are wild animals supposedly. We’re too stupid to think for ourselves and therefore an elite have to do all the thinking for us, because we can’t be trusted to do the right thing. In fact, pretty well, Sunstein himself, one of the science czars in the US, said that in one of his own books, that THE PEOPLE CAN’T BE TRUSTED TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISIONS, so he put out the book called Nudge. He’s put out other ones too. Very, very shallow books because they don’t want the public knowing the real in-depth science of mass management of your minds.

 

The revolutions of course were to also alter the society of their day into a common guidance, into a new system where they would, again, be conditioned, partly through fear and terror – which is the reign of terror they always have. And with the bloodless revolutions there’s always the threat eventually, if you don’t conform to the political correctness, of even imprisonment, you know. First it’s, you can’t say this or even ask a question, and then it comes down to mass condemnation as the public themselves are trained to turn against you in a Pavlovian style. It’s a very simple technique to do. I’ve gone through it all before in talks and it’s been well copied by many talkshow hosts; which is good, it’s got it across the world, on how behaviorism is so well understood by those at the top, and conditioning processes as well.

 

Because the guys, two guys in fact that I mentioned years ago, who the United Nations World Health Organization employed to start the antismoking campaign, said that THEY WOULD CREATE SOCIAL DISAPPROVAL AND THEY WOULD START IN THE SCHOOLS, AND THEY’D ALSO HAVE MASS ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS ON TELEVISION as well. Plus they would get their MASSIVE LOBBYING GROUPS TO LOBBY GOVERNMENTS TO SIGN TREATIES INTO LAW SO THAT EVERY YEAR THEY’D UP THE ANTISMOKING LAWS, you can’t smoke here, you can’t smoke there, etc. etc. etc. Until you’ll be in your own little pad, your own little room or house or whatever, and eventually you can’t smoke there either. And if you smoke outside, they conditioned people years ago to start coughing when they saw you with a cigarette 50 yards away basically; that’s how they conditioned the children. Social disapproval coupled with Pavlovian training, you see, it works very, very well. And it has worked very well. So well in fact that the two guys who were employed to do that said a few years ago that they planned to be USING THIS IN OTHER SPHERES OF SOCIETY for training the public on other ways of social approval and disapproval.

 

So when you think your opinions are yours, they’re not yours at all. I’ve mentioned this many, many times. You go along with the herd, the common herd. It’s taboo actually to think really as an individual and you’re not allowed to have your own opinions, really, unless you just keep them to yourself in your own thoughts. Outside your thoughts then the crowd will, just like that movie, that strange movie they put out years ago, about the people who turned into pods, these aliens copied them and you saw them all turning and pointing to the ones who were still original people, and making strange sounds but all pointing to you. Well that’s how they condition the public, if you don’t go along with something that’s politically correct and you don’t parrot the PC terminology and phrases that they give you to parrot.

 

Most folk want to belong to their peer group. They don’t want to risk dissension. They don’t want finger-pointing. They want to be included in the group, not excluded in the group. So just like The Body Snatchers, I think it was called, that’s how they’ve conditioned the general public. It’s really taught initially in school, through groupthink, where everyone must eventually agree on the same outcome of any particular topic given to them, guided by the teacher naturally, or you get socially excluded.

 

In many talks in the past I’ve mentioned about how you’re trained to join groups, especially through university and college. You’ll find a lot of people go into what they think are radical groups, especially if they want to be avant-garde they join the radical group, you see, the cutting edge, for change. It’s drummed into them by the selected professors in the social sciences, who are put there for that very purpose in fact, and they churn them out. So they come out with these causes, you see, across the world; they’re all standardized, you see. And it never dawns on those who are being used, why would the system be approving turning out what you would claim is a radical, you see? If you’re so radical and the system has approved you, you can’t be radical at all, in a sense, otherwise you’d be fighting the system, the very people who put you out there and gave you good marks in all your different areas that you were studying, including revolutions and changing society and culture and everything else. These are approved objectives by those at the top. They’re all approved, you see. So you’re being used by someone for a purpose you don’t understand... you don’t understand. Not only that, you’re not going to be very happy because you’re going to go through life with a chip on your shoulder. You’ve been given the chip and you like it now. You will get certain friends of the same ilk all radically pushing towards what they think is some kind of fairness or justice or whatever, without asking, why is this being pushed by the system at the top? Who benefits from this ultimately?

 

You find that they all tie in with the same old revolutionary causes that have been going on for hundreds of years. Do you really think that an establishment, that’s all powerful – which it is by the way, only because we accept it as it is, and we are conned so well, and trained to accept it. Do you really think they would risk anything that wasn’t in their particular interest? Do you? I’ve gone through HG Wells’s stuff and many other propagandists for this particular institution that seems to be behind most of it, at least the coordination of it, and you find that he said that, THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY UNIT WAS OF PRIME IMPORTANCE… prime importance. It was the last vestige of a tribe, and a tribe will stand up for each other if they’re attacked by any authority. IT WOULD BE MUCH EASIER, said Wells, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT CAN SPEAK RIGHT DOWN TO YOU, DIRECTLY, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND THERE’S NO ONE, THERE’S NO FAMILY TO STAND UP FOR YOU, no tribe, no cousins or anything else. All those links are broken and you’re on your own. It’s far, far easier isn’t it?

 

Today of course we’re all sitting... most folk watch TV, many on their own, or they’re completely absorbed in their electronic gadgets, that are given, which monitor them and profile them constantly with any change in their personalities or interests. They know everything about you. Even the radicals are stamped as being safe, because they know exactly what they are and they are doing the approved things. Most folk never figure this out. Even when you’re looking to protest something, even against radicals, there are ready-made groups for you to join, which never get anywhere, never seem to get anywhere either, you go around in circles. If you start them yourself from the grassroots they will be infiltrated so quickly with people who come in, very nice and sociable – they’re psychopaths actually, trained by government, they have thousands of them; because this is nothing new, even long before the Internet they were doing this kind of thing – and they will cause disruption eventually. Before you know it you’ll be either falling apart, breaking up, or else they’ll have you turned 180 degrees until you’re championing “save mother earth” or something. This actually happened, I know this, to a couple of big groups.

 

So everything is taken care of, naturally. Power doesn’t let itself be attacked. Power doesn’t even let itself get attacked in the future. They act now and they nip things in the bud before anything can get off the ground that could be of any nuisance to them in any possible way. There are ready-made groups for you to join. Ready-made, tailor-made and you walk in and there’s a suit there to suit you, it will fit you, you can slip right into it. Your doctrine is all set out for you, your catchphrases, your slogans, all these things are made for you and you’ll know the ropes. If you’re a good psychopath you can do well in these organizations because you’ll learn all the slogans. You’ll have no problem about having to adopt a whole bunch of things you don’t agree with to get the one thing you agree with through. Because that’s how they work in, say, the far left wing.

 

It’s actually impossible for a normal person to be for every single thing in a doctrine. So when you hear it all spouted then you know for a fact this is scientifically designed, run by a much higher authority than you think. And those who go along with it, believe you me, will be ruthless, utterly ruthless. If there’s any point, or any networking for instance, with any weird group that’s out there, or another weird group that they don’t agree with, you will be out. They’re ruthless. And sometimes, like we saw in the Soviet system, if they come to power they are bloodthirsty, I mean ruthlessly bloodthirsty. Don’t forget that ever.

 

So when you see a religious type belief to a political cause, like the far-far left, then you’re dealing with the same thing over and over again. But it’s authorized from the top, what you think is probably the capitalist system. Because we know the capitalist system, the ones who rule all of that – and they have rulers by the way – gave you the communist system, the dialectic, to get a better society they can control, you know, under the fake guise of a one for all and all for one idea, this socialism they like to call it today. It’s the same system. The same system. It’s the reemergence of the Soviet system but it’s actually the more improved, advanced Soviet merged with the West completely. Massive management by government agencies and authorities right down to the individual, right down to the birth of the child actually with its advocate given to them by the state in some countries like Scotland and England and Wales and other European countries, to make sure as that child is growing up they can constantly give them psychological tests, lots of chats with them, and readjust them. Adjust them if they have any self-thoughts, as Orwell would say, own-thoughts. If they don’t just spout slogans and are happy with everything around them, then they’ll be adjusted, and medicated too no doubt as well.

 

This is an old idea. It’s happening today, as we live through it. I’ve always said, when you have the old agenda you don’t have to toss it out the window because they had the whole future planned in the old agenda. And it’s a long-term agenda. Most men, remember… Men are short-term planners and thinkers. Women are much longer term planners... longer, way, way, way further than the guys. The guys like to plan things and build it right away. Women can work on something for a long time in the future. So the feminine technique was copied and used by those at the top. They’ve studied us, as I say, for eons for goodness sake, and that’s awfully good. INTERGENERATIONAL changes, the Fabian technique is the best. And by using wars and various crises, because we’re ruled by crisis and worry, naturally. The threat of a war, real, cold or terroristic, or economical crashes, whatever it happens to be, keeping you in a state of fear and terror gives government more power, you see, through the appearance of all these crises, which mainly are bogus and fake.

 

Remember too, that the bulk of the population governing all of us, and there’s an awful lot of them today, and lots and lots of bureaucrats, millions of bureaucrats, and their families too, all getting awfully well looked after by the state. It all comes from you at the bottom. They don’t want to toss it out the window. If they get rid of all of you, I mean where are their paychecks going to come from? They’re living higher off the hog than you are. They have way more benefits than you’ll ever have, they call them privileges, because they’re working for government. But all wealth comes from labor. All wealth comes from the bottom. So you are basically their food supply. And their lifestyle supply. And they have trained you to live lower than they do, even though they call themselves servants, public servants. So conology, remember, uses a lot of trickery through words and word associations, etc. etc.

 

But getting back to the groups... You think of all the different groups out there, and sometimes I get asked to speak at different groups, with their own particular cause. That’s all they see is their own particular cause, generally straight out of university and they’ve been given their cause by the professors. So they’ve stuck, okay this is going to be my cause for life and so on and so on. They think they’re radical, as I say, but they’re approved. And what you’ll find with most of these groups is, again, to destroy the old system, which they see as the old system of traditionalism, of any kind at all, any kind whatsoever, traditional. They’re all for government intervention into people’s mindsets, children’s mindsets, through different techniques. They’re very angry with any opposition whatsoever, I mean furiously angry. Furiously, as I say, it’s always on the edge of the mass slaughter techniques that the Bolsheviks used. And never ever forget that. But it’s approved by government. In fact, many of them get government grants to exist. Their meeting houses are often paid for. Their leaders are tax exempt, often, foundations; that’s what they come from. And government is quite happy with them. So they are working for government whether they know it or not, and a big agenda, a world agenda, which they think they understand but they don’t in actual fact.

 

Now, radical people like that, what they want, what they really want is not freedom for people at all. It’s the opposite. Now, logic must be used in philosophy for instance, and reason. Logic and reason. Something which is logic and reason, using those techniques, must be consistent. It must be. So if they’re really pushing for freedom they’d have to accept that other people see freedom in a different light than they do. But they don’t. The radicals don’t see that. They hate anybody with any differing opinions. Under the guise of liberalism, for instance, they are the most intolerant people of all. Completely. They won’t stand for any alternate opinion. So how can they spout on about freedom? They want to destroy their enemies and eliminate enemies. Some people belonged to radical, what they call… what they call radical, and that’s such a joke. As I say, if it’s authorized from university, how can it be radical? Do you think government wouldn’t step in if it was any kind of threat whatsoever to a system that they run? Do you really think so? Of course they wouldn’t. But it benefits somebody and it’s not the ones pushing it.

 

But supposing you went into radical feminism, and you’ve been filled with hatred by giving partial stories, selective stories, throughout your histories etc.; that’s how it’s done, not all inclusive. And lots of these women think that every guy in the past went off to the pub every day and lived a life of luxury, dressed in lace and silk stockings and three-cornered hats. And nothing was further from the truth. Because up until really, really up until the 20th century, in lots of European countries, most folk were still regarded as serfs. And serfs really had no rights or property or anything else. And the guys died early because of the workload. And their diets were terrible for themselves and their families. They couldn’t afford proper protein and so on; they were stunted growth. They did not have a life of luxury at all. It’s complete fiction.

 

You ever wondered that there’s no movies made about peasants, anywhere? Histories are always about the famous and those who are dressed in lace and all the rest of it. This is what history is about. You don’t count, the proles don’t count. They never have counted. Even today they don’t; THE PROLES DON’T COUNT, you see, as Orwell said. But when you’re teaching people to be radical you give them a completely fake view of history, you see. And the radicals, what they really want is to impose their will and have their system imposed on everybody else, without exception... without exception. They’re not for freedom at all. They can’t coexist with any alternate way, just their way. That’s the truth of it, you see.

 

So you’re not using logic or reason here. If you were, just be radical and say, yeah we can’t exist with you here. Don’t go off using freedom and blah-blah-blah-blah-blah, freedom for all. And don’t go off into being offended. If you want to be offended about anything, well, let all of your opponents, that you see as opponents, use the same techniques on you, and they can be offended at whatever you’re doing. Quite simple. If you’re all for freedom and equality then let it be across the whole board. But they won’t, you see. They won’t.

 

I think Albert Pike mentioned that too, and Mazzini did as well, that they would eventually unleash… EVENTUALLY UNLEASH THE RADICALS AND THE ATHEISTS, THE NIHILISTS AND THE ATHEISTS, TO ACCOMPLISH THE REST OF THE WORK, which really was to be fairly, fairly bloodless, mainly, again, through social changes, cultural changes and so on. That’s where we are today as they’re all being used. They’re all being used.

 

At the very, very top of course, the same guys who run the international corporations aren’t bothered by them at all. They actually donate money to a lot of these groups, and the environmentalists and all the rest of it. Because they want laws passed, which are never what you think they are. You’re not going to have the time to read through 10,000, 20,000 pages for a law. But their lawyers can do it all. And they benefit from all the laws that get passed, that restrict everybody else from living and by their own means at all, right down to a common person, until eventually they can’t even collect firewood anymore to heat themselves. They’ve got to be made totally dependent on a system for everything they need to live for. And the far lefties are all for that too, you see.

 

It’s wonderful how things really are. I mean, I think it’s fascinating, really. So I tell people, never follow leaders because the big boys will train them, give them fantastic training, set them up to be your leaders, before they make the move where that leader is even necessary to appear, rather than let your own leaders pop out of nowhere from the grassroots that they can’t control. That’s standard technique. Standard, standard, standard, you see. But people never catch on.

 

Selected political leaders are put out there of course to carefully use these ready-made groups, authorized by the system, for ends, again, for their own ends naturally, but also for the new system. The same system is the new system; the new system has the same boys running it as they always did. Big power elites, etc., megacorporations, the ultra-ultra-ultra rich, and you think they’re going to let you destroy their system? Of course they’re not. But you’re certainly getting used to destroy all the rest of the people who maybe are against parts of the system. So you’ll neutralize them. And you’ll also divert them off having to oppose you, as you try to destroy their way of life for whatever it happens to be. Quite simple, isn’t it? Very old technique and it works every time. Because people are emotive creatures as opposed to reasoning creatures, you see. That’s why it’s always emotive topics that they hit you with.

 

Now, those who do the reasoning, such as, say, Charles Galton Darwin... very interesting group of people, the Darwins. Because they’re also intermarried with the Huxleys, if you go into their genealogies. Sir Thomas Huxley was the champion of Darwinism when Darwin died. He was the best pal of Darwin. He was called Darwin’s bulldog. So intergenerationally these families, they classify themselves as the scientific elite working with the super-rich elite. They constantly, down through the generations, work on the same topics, same agendas, etc. It’s very interesting. Interesting too, when you go into the history of the Darwins and you find that from Charles onward they were completely intermarried for generations with one family. They were already selectively breeding with the Wedgwood family. The Wedgwood family also includes the Benn, Tony Wedgwood Benn, a politician in Britain. I think his daughter’s taken over from him; and they’re pushing the same agendas, what appears to be the far left causes, you see. But it’s not really far left. It’s complete socialistic control of every individual in society; that’s what it really is. And it appears to be the same as communism.

 

That’s why professor Carroll Quigley, who was all for this, who worked for the Council on Foreign Relations, also called the Royal Institute of International Affairs in Britain. He said that HE WORKED FOR THEM, HE WAS THE HISTORIAN FOR THEM, AND THEY ARE OFTEN MISTAKEN FOR COMMUNISM BECAUSE THEIR GOALS ARE REALLY THE SAME. Well, if they’re the same, they ARE the same, folks, you see. The capitalists, using also the scientific elite, work towards the same agenda as what you would think is communism, for total social control through multi layers of government, and condition children from school, from birth right on through school etc. Conditioning, conditioning, conditioning. It makes it easier for the top capitalists to run the world when you’re all under total control, when you’re all predictable.

 

Now, talking about Charles Galton Darwin, who was the physicist of the family, he worked on the Manhattan Project. But he was also an incredible eugenicist who was still pushing eugenics and eugenic control of the population after World War II when the eugenicists retreated for a while because of the racial purity laws of Germany, Nazi Germany, what happened in Germany. They don’t want to mention of course what happened in the Soviet Union who were doing this kind of thing long before them. Because the Soviet system is protected by the darlings of the left. But this is what he said in his own book, Charles Galton Darwin, who actually made a lot of money making weapons of mass destruction because they love humanity so much. But he said here that:

 

(The Next Million Years by Charles Galton Darwin, 1952 edition.)

The restraint of the breeding of the feebleminded is important and it must never be neglected... (Alan: Now, remember these guys will put something on the books, they love to put things on the books by law and of course then they stretch it and stretch it and stretch it to be all inclusive of certain other areas. It says...) ...it must never be neglected but it cannot be regarded as a really effective way of improving the human race. If by analogy one wished to improve the breed of racehorses one might accomplish a little by always slaughtering the horse that finished last in every race. But it would be a much slower process than the actual one of sending the winner to the stud farm. (Alan: This guy also wanted to make it a law, if they could make it a law, kind of a wish list, so that women could only breed with those who were already stinking rich, wealthy and aristocrats, you see.)

Conscious of this criticism, eugenists have often attempted to define what are the good characteristics which should be positively encouraged, instead of only the negative ones that must be discouraged, but the results are disappointing. Lists of meritorious qualities such as good health, good physique, high intelligence, good family history, are compiled, and those possessing them are told that they should breed, but the statements lead nowhere in practice, for no one can be expected to assess his own merits and demerits in a balanced way. (Alan: Now doesn’t that really take you back to, say, the GIRFEC program in Scotland, and they have one for England under a different name, and one for Wales, where the government has already, last year, given a state-appointed guardian or whatever to every child born in the country, that must assess them consistently from the age of about two months onwards. You see, it’s already here, all that stuff. So here you have it. So in other words, you can’t really assess yourself, you wouldn’t be honest enough, or you would have a different view of yourself than others, especially the elite, so it’s going to be done for you, you see, by experts, naturally. So he says here…)

How, for example, is a man to weigh his own good health or good ability against a heredity made dubious, say, by an uncle who was insane, or again how is he to strike a balance between considerable artistic gifts—as he thinks—together with a good family record, but quite bad health. It is clearly beyond anyone to decide these things for himself, and even then the matter is only half settled, since similar judgments are needed for both partners to the marriage. However helpful the literature may be which can be consulted, it is evident that subjective judgments on such matters are too difficult; with the best will in the world they would very often be made wrongly, because, however sincerely he tries, no man can be a good judge in his own case. (Alan: He should really clarify that because I mean, Charles Galton Darwin believed HE was a very suitable candidate to continue down through the ages with lots of offspring, etc. etc.)

The only imaginable way of overcoming these difficulties would be to set up a class of consultants who would prescribe what marriages were eugenically admissible and how large the consequent families should be. But this does not solve the difficulty; it only pushes it back a stage, for it leaves unanswered the question who are to be the consultants, and what principles are to guide them in settling the values of the different qualities of mankind. It comes back to just the difficulty I described in my fable, that a tame animal must have a master, and that therefore though it might conceivably be possible to tame the majority of mankind, this could only be done by leaving untamed a minority of the population. Moreover, this minority would have to be the group possessing the most superior qualities of all. (Alan: In other words, he’s talking about the master race, which he believed he belonged to, you see. I’ve mentioned all this years ago if you go into the archives at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. I put all these books out years ago too. Lots of people have copied them. Lots of hosts have used them. And that’s good because it gets the word out about what’s really happening. But he says here…)

These examples suggest the impossibility of taming mankind as a whole, but before accepting the principle fully, it is proper to examine a case where the exact contrary has happened; this is in the insect civilizations of the ants or termites. In applying the same term, civilization, to both ants and men, it is hardly necessary to say that I am drawing an analogy between things which are really of a very different quality. All species of ants (Alan: ...he says...) live in cities, and some species have developed agriculture, others animal husbandry; but all these practices are purely instinctive and individual to each species. On the other hand human civilization is an acquired character, based on education, (Alan: and so he goes on to say here...) and so is not inherent in man's nature. (Alan: In other words, this thing called civilization is based on education. Remember, education means indoctrination. See, your indoctrination gives you what they call civilization, it’s not a natural thing. So the admission that it’s not a natural thing. So the elite know this, that it’s not a natural thing, this civilization. Neither is this thing, obviously, they call progress. What is progress? Progress is the continuing agenda, the planned agenda of their system, this thing called civilization. So it goes on to say here…)

Nevertheless it may be worth while to follow out the analogy a little further. Admitting the different sense of the words, it may be said that all species of ants have made the third revolution (Alan: ...interesting eh...), the invention of cities, that some have made the second, agriculture, none the first or fourth, fire and science; but they have all added another revolution of their own, the complete control of the problem of sex. (Alan: It’s always been so important to these guys, control of all of that, you see.) The ants' nest has no rulers at all, for the queen is hardly more than an egg-laying mechanism, and they seem to get on perfectly well without civil servants or lawyers or captains of industry.

Why cannot man set up a community like an ants' nest? This would be the ideal of the anarchist, and hitherto it has held no promise at all of success, but with the help of recent and probable future biological discoveries, some sort of imitation by man of the ants' nest cannot be quite excluded from consideration. Thus the control of the numbers of the two sexes may become possible, and with the knowledge of the various sexual hormones it might also become possible to free the majority of mankind from the urgency of sexual impulse, so that they could live contented celibate lives, instead of the unsatisfied celibate lives that are the compulsory lot of such a large fraction of the present population of the world. (Alan: That was back in the 1950s of course. They used the sexual revolution to alter that one.) If these discoveries should be made—and this is really by no means impossible—man would be able to carry out the sex revolution which is the typical characteristic of the insect civilizations. The detail would of course have to be quite different, for instead of one queen there would have to be large numbers of fertile women to renew the population, whereas there might be one king, literally the father of his country. Also it is probable that on account of their greater physical strength, it would be the men who would be the workers.

Such an organization is certainly repellently unattractive to most of us—perhaps excepting some of the autocrats of the present world—but it is not this that excludes the possibility of it. There is no danger whatever of its happening, because of the inherent difference between vertebrate and insect, for the vertebrate is so very much more flexible than the insect in its behaviour. Most insects simply die if placed on an unfamiliar food plant, whereas the vertebrate will always try experiments if its normal diet fails. An insect can be used to prey on and destroy another one that has become a pest, and, when it has done so, the predator will die of starvation; in the same role a vertebrate predator would not die, but would start to destroy some other, perhaps beneficent, species. Now of all vertebrates man is preeminent in his willingness to try experiments, so that it is inconceivable that he should settle down into the inflexible unquestioning course of life that is typical of an insect. It would call for a quite radical change in his whole nature. It would not be a mere change into a new species of homo that would be needed, nor even a change into a new genus or family or order of the mammals. It would have to be a fundamental change into a new phylum of the animal kingdom, and that would not take a mere million years, but many hundreds of millions of years. (Alan: ...except for, unless, he says...)

There is no prospect of man's nature imitating an insect's, but it is much more nearly imaginable that his development should go, like that of the dogs, into a set of breeds each specialized for a particular purpose.

Now, in the book too, The Next Million Years, he goes into “we”, meaning the elite themselves, could use hormones to alter the behavior of men and women. Well, we have all the bisphenol As and the xenoestrogens, all these artificial mimickers basically of estrogens, getting pumped into our bodies all the time, in our foods and from all the plastics that have been known since the 1890s contain this stuff. And also too, I’ve gone through the lectures where it hits the male fetus in the womb at the age of about 8 to 12 weeks, very important, if the mother’s on a high dose of this stuff, then he’s not going to have his proper accoutrements in the proper order, or at least in the proper dimensions you might say, that they should have developed into. They know all of this stuff too. These techniques are being used. He also mentioned using it, putting it into the water supply or putting it into inoculations and various other techniques for altering the behavior of men and women. He also knew too of course, that too much of this would affect the women and make them more aggressive actually. So, it’s very interesting.

Now, a little secret about these books that go out there by these people, whenever they say something, like it’s going to be like the future that all this will happen, they’re already doing it. They’ve always been this way. It’s the same now with geoengineering; they’ve been doing it since 1998 solidly across the world, on a regular basis. But they keep having these meetings pretending, they’re discussing what would the effects be if they ever should do it. This is the standard technique of keeping you in a different reality of what’s happening. He says…

 

At every turn the argument leads back to this question of the master breed. Nothing can be done in the way of changing man from a wild into a tame animal without first creating such a breed, but most people are entirely inconsistent in their ideas of what they want created. On the one hand they feel that all the world's problems would be solved if only there were a wise and good man who would tell everybody what to do, but on the other hand they bitterly resent being themselves told what to do. As to which of these motives would prevail, it seems at least probable that it would be the resentment, so that if the breed should arise in any manner, it would be extirpated before it could ever become well established. It is, however, imaginable, that there might be a part of the world in which the breed was accepted, and that this part should gain a superiority over the rest of the world, because it could develop various suitable breeds of specialists under the control and direction of the master breed, and by the exercise of the skills of these specialists it might overcome the other nations. So it is appropriate to look a little further into the matter. (Alan: ...he says. Later on, lower down that page it says, and that’s page 131, the 1952 edition, he says…)

 

These would be of great value, but they would not be the master breed, and the question arises of a more precise prescription for what the qualities of the master breed are to be.

 

It is usually best to build on what one already has, rather than to start from nothing. So the natural procedure would be to begin with existing rulers, since these have already established themselves as acceptable to at least a good many of their fellow creatures. One would collect together, say, a hundred of the most important present rulers—among them of course should be included a good many who exert secret influence without holding any overt office (Alan: ...that’s your Bill Gates, your Rockefellers, etc. etc. that he’s talking about.) —and tell them to get on with the business of settling what the master breed should be. It is impossible to believe that any such body of men would ever reach agreement on any subject whatever; so this plan fails. (Alan: That’s actually been very successful today.) In the search for the qualities of the master breed the next idea might be to appeal to the wisdom of our forefathers. Plato in his Republic devotes much attention to this very subject. Why not then find a Plato, give him his group of recruits, and let him educate them for thirty years according to his prescription— though perhaps fortifying it by the findings of modern educational theory; the result should be the master breed. But this will not do either, for Plato was not educating the master breed, he was educating the civil servant breed. It is not about these that there is any difficulty; it is the finding of someone to fill the role of Plato himself. It all comes back to the point that we do not know in the remotest degree what we want; for I do not count as an answer the one that would usually be proposed, which would be that the type required should be good and wise, while at the same time showing a special favour for the particular enthusiasms of the proposer. The reason for the impossibility of making a prescription for the master breed is that it is not a breed at all; to call it so is to change the sense of the word. Breeds are specialized for particular purposes, (Alan: Actually, the Bureaucrat is a breed. He is specialized for particular purposes.) but the essence of masters is that they must not be specialized. (Alan: He’s talking about the wild man.) They have to be able to deal with totally unforeseen conditions, and this is a quality of wild, not of tame, life. No prescription for the master breed is possible. (Alan: You can’t put any impositions or restrictions on him.)

 

In these considerations I have been assuming the licence of supposing that we might be able really to change human nature in a heritable manner, and this is far beyond all probability. Returning now to more practical considerations, there seems no likelihood whatever of a master breed arising. (Alan: Well since then it apparently has.)

 

Of all animals man is the most ready to try experiments and there are always candidates—far too many candidates—who regard themselves as fit members for the master breed. This quality is a characteristic of a wild animal, and it will always prevent man from domesticating himself. He will always prevent the creation of the master breed, through which alone the rest of man could be domesticated. The evolution of the human race will not be accomplished in the ten thousand years of tame animals, but in the million years of wild animals, because man is and will always continue to be a wild animal.

 

Now, the big organizations, that some of his cousins attended, world conferences and so on, working on this very problem, came up with the idea of literally going ahead, and not through just simply persuasion to change societies across the planet, but by literally using chemicals, hormones, inoculations and so on to dumb down lots of the public already deemed to be inferior, which are the common proles, and to alter their sexual behavior, in many ways, not just through social changes which are promoted and encouraged and advertised and really pushed, but also through altering the makeup of your endocrine system basically, and your hormonal levels. In other words, you become fairly sterile. And too much estrogen in the male has obvious consequences as well, which are self-evident today. So it’s been done. It’s already been done. It’s interesting, the Doublespeak throughout the books these guys put out because you’ll find in other chapters little hints that these things were already being worked on and implemented in his day. Very interesting, as I say.

 

Don’t you understand, this whole myth of democracy, this placebo we are given, this safety valve to blow off steam, is a joke? It’s a joke, folks. I mean, why do you bother voting for your country when your country is already internationally run, by international corporations, too, involved for their own benefit and not for your benefit? Where organizations like the United Nations set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, a private organization, CFR, which also set up the IMF and run that, which also set up the Bank for International Settlements and run that, all private organizations, why bother voting under this pretense of democracy when private organizations have set up the whole system that you’re voting for? Why? We’re privately run. The world is privately run. Quite simple.

 

But now you’ll see why these pressure groups of radicalized students are churned out of universities with their own particular causes; they think it’s theirs but it’s not of course. They will never figure out the end goal of all of this. And even if they could achieve their end goal, whatever chip that’s on their shoulder won’t be removed. It won’t be removed because the chip really is there and under the guise of their cause. The chip’s got something else wrong with the person, generally, when they’re really radical and angry and furious. But they’re used and they’re created and they’re authorized and they’re churned out in every generation, and they’ll never figure it out of course. Every one of them wants special status. Not equal status, special status, you see. So how can you have equality when some people are getting special status? How can you have equality?

 

So why go along with the pretense that you have it in the first place, of democracy, or any kind of freedom? If you had freedom no topic can be taboo. None. Zilch. None. Even if it’s topics you don’t like, or you’re afraid of, it shouldn’t be taboo. If people want to discuss it, let them discuss it or ask the questions. And if you think that some topic sounds nutty or crazy, well don’t worry about it. There should be a lot of other people too who will say, well it’s nutty or crazy; just don’t make laws to impose it on everybody else, that’s all.

 

Now, most folk, as I say, unfortunately, will never figure out the system. They get caught up in… Even after this talk and the many talks I’ve given over the years, with the next day’s news they’ll listen to, whatever they listen to, be scared stiff and go back into emotive responses to things. That’s how you’re all controlled, through fear and emotion. A lot of people use the fear, fear, fear, fear, and at the end of an hour’s talk they’ll sell you something for five minutes which is the antidote to the fear. It’s always awfully expensive, mind you. So apparently money will allay fear, you can buy things to allay fear, etc. etc. etc. And I have no time for that kind of thing at all. It’s disgusting. It’s a disgusting technique to create that kind of thing. It’s legal but it’s disgusting. It tells you all you need to know about the person using it. It really does.

 

It would be like a salesman coming into your house trying to sell a vacuum cleaner. And you’ve had vacuum cleaners over the years, different kinds of vacuum cleaners, and he gives you his sales pitch. And he sums up this person may buy one and may not. They know right away; they know within 30 seconds if you’re going to buy. And they have all these techniques which are used from psychology, that politicians also use on you, etc. And you follow into it. Anyway, if he’s not getting what he wants from you, which is a sale, he can then use the next dirty trick, which is, oh, you know I’ve got a little video here I can pop in your computer and let you see it, and it will show you all the hidden mites and things that can seriously damage your health. And then he pops this thing in there and by God, there’s a child with asthma dying on a bed there, wheezing, and you say, oh my God this is awful. Yeah, and look at it, the house looks nice and clean. Generally they’ve got it picked as a house that’s so darn tidy, you know, it’s been done with a whole professional crew and not your vacuum cleaner. But anyway, it doesn’t matter. The whole point is to say, well look at this incredibly tidy house, and look at these mites under the microscope, everyone’s got them apparently. And then it goes into, there’s some doctor, some guy in a white coat – they always wear the stethoscopes hanging around their neck; that’s a badge of approval, you know, and I don’t know why, trying to run with a stethoscope around your neck is not easy; they always fall off. But the fact is, this is the rubbish they condition the public with. So here comes the standard doctor with his badge of approval hanging around his neck and he says, oh yes, he says, and he goes in to give you a bit of anatomy and physiology and some of the biology. And he tells you of how it destroys the cells in the lungs and so on, the cilia, oh my God, they won’t work properly. And you see these blowups of damaged lung tissue, you know, generally from someone that’s been through World War I with being gassed with mustard gas, but they don’t tell you that. Anyway, it has its effect. And by the time he’s finished you’re ready to buy his vacuum cleaner. Simple techniques.

 

Therefore, when you listen to something like that, fear driven, and here’s the antidote, what does that tell you about the person pushing it? Is that a person with integrity? Is it? That’s up to you to decide. Now, some folk get addicted to fear. I’ve known people who have bought underground shelters in the past, when that was getting pushed back in the 90s, because they thought there was going to be a nuclear war. And they thought that if it wasn’t going to be a nuclear war, then that’s also when all the plague movies came out, like virus and blah-blah-blah, terrifying folk, you see. And the Masters who utilize fear get in on the act and they’re selling these things like mini submarines that they bury under the garden, with a big, big backhoe and it costs you a fortune and all the rest of it. One guy I know even uses it now as a root cellar because of course he’s never had to use it. So this is how it goes.

 

Think before you get panicked. Don’t get panicked. If somebody’s trying to panic you there’s always an ulterior motive. Government runs the same way. It’s always, as I say, war, real war which they create, or the threat of a war, or a cold war which is fantastic because the R&D money and the taxation goes up and you don’t complain because they’re protecting you from a potential war. We’re just used, folks, I’m sorry to say. Or financial crisis… Oh there’s going to be a financial crisis blah-blah-blah. Or the country is in debt. What do you mean the country is in debt? Why is the country borrowing money in the first place? ...look at all the taxes they bring in.

 

And this democracy is wonderful. Do you see in any charter of any country that they can’t borrow money? Of course it’s not there. Who runs them? The banks do, the ones who lend to them, the big international bankers. But people keep voting for the same system, that’s never worked. And every time, twice a century at least they have the two big crashes where they plunder you; the banks never lose a damn thing. They gain a lot, because we always bail them out. And you keep voting for the same system. I’m just tossing ideas out there; I’m not advocating something else. I’m just telling you how it is.

 

It’s conology. It’s just conology. But I’m trying to get you to think for yourselves at least and question things. That’s a start. That’s a start, folks. But you’re run by sciences which most folk haven’t got a clue exist. Haven’t got a clue. A simple part of conology, as I say, is the weather. Never mind the fact that they’re spraying you, they’re manipulating the weather, have been for years, and using HAARP along with it too apart from the spray. I’ve gone through all the talks that Mr Teller did back in the 1950s talking about spraying the skies with metallic particles and then hitting it with magnetic frequency waves and pulse waves, altering weather. Old techniques, so nothing’s new. And it’s been done.

 

I’ve been keeping my own records of these cold temperatures here and it’s March and last Wednesday night into Thursday morning it was back down to almost 40 below again at night; when it gets 40 below it’s almost the same in both Celsius and Fahrenheit. It was about 25 or 30 below last night. But you look into the government stations and they’ve only got it down about 2 to 6 below. They never change it all night long, nor the next day. Why is that? It’s because, you see, very few folk, I’m one of the oddballs that still has outside thermometers; I like to check things myself. Most folk don’t have them. Brzezinski said in the 70s in his book Between Two Ages, MOST FOLK EVENTUALLY WILL BE UNABLE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES, THEY WILL EXPECT THE MEDIA TO DO THEIR REASONING FOR THEM. So you tune into the media, the news channel, whatever, and they tell you something. And it must be true, why would they be lying to you? It’s so simple. It doesn’t fit in with global warming, you see. And you’ve got all these new carbon taxes flooding in like crazy. It doesn’t fit in.

 

We are conned on every level out there. The TV is just the con box, and an indoctrination box, because there’s not a darn thing out there from a comedy to a drama to a movie that doesn’t have, convey with it… See, it’s the conveying mechanism to download you with something, either hypersexualize you, or to update you with your PC stuff, or to instill guilts into you for things you’ve never done, to give special statuses to different kinds of people and so on and so on and so on. That’s how it’s done, folks. It’s the delivery system, it’s weaponized. It’s the delivery system. The story in any movie or drama or thriller is the delivery system, the hook to make you follow it through all the sex and all the rest of it, the sex and violence and blah-blah-blah-blah-blah; it’s the delivery system. Especially teenage horror movies, tits and bum movies I call them. The little bit of story is simply to keep you watching it, and say okay I should really turn it off but I want to find out how it ends, the story, the thriller part of it. And you watch all the rest of it on the way, and you’re contaminated. It’s very simple. Old techniques, eh. Nothing new under the sun.

 

Well, from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:31 pm

i folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, a blurb that is, and it’s March the 16th, 2014. I’ve been awfully busy; I’d like to put more blurbs out in the meantime. I’ve got more interviews coming up on other shows. I do have the opportunity to go back on regular shows but I don’t want to get caught up in that too quickly because it’s a full-time job basically trying to go over all the world’s problems. And the problems will keep coming because they’re manufactured for us to follow, in fact. That’s how you direct the future, by those who already own it basically, and own the past. So I’ve been awfully, awfully busy. Even last night into today I’ve been working on the water pump here because that packed in about 3 o’clock in the morning. The problem is, outside you can’t get into the well because it’s under about 6 feet of snow. So I’m stumbling along here as you have to do some times when nothing else is working properly.

 

Tonight I was wanting to talk about this age we’re living in, the age, which is well directed; every age is well directed by those in power. I’ve gone into the history of the creation of systems. And everything is a system, a complete system worked out by not only those who rule over it but all their helpers. From the ancient times you had priesthoods, advisers; they were the advisers. They decided who pharaohs would see and wouldn’t see in fact; they had a lot of power. Then the other religions took over from that down through time. Then we have a thing called democracy where we’ve got not just kings and queens to keep supported in a lifestyle we can never imagine, but all their offspring and thousands and thousands of bureaucrats as well, who must live higher on the hog than you’ll ever, ever see. That’s the problem we have today.

 

But those in power and those who manage the power structure on behalf of the owners of the system make sure you’re given a complete system to believe in. All your reality, in fact, is manufactured for you. Even the memes that you’ll see and the themes that you’ll see that are put out there, where you have different topics, often related to each other, across the world, are in fact just that. They’re related to each other to get you gossiping, yapping, thinking about things that they’re telling you to think about. They can be minor things, fairly minor, or the ooh and aah stories that we always get. But you also get an awful lot of preparation for the future: austerity, Agenda 21, also called the Millennium Project and many other names, sustainability, etc. etc. We’re all being trained into this new system on behalf of those who manage it, way above us of course. Most of them you’ll never even know their names, of all the thousands and thousands of guys working in think tanks, men and women, and working as advisers for presidents and prime ministers, on behalf of the Masters who own the system basically. And those who run the money always own the system. They always do. Money is power in this system. They made sure of that, you see. That’s why they have the money. That’s why a small clique always keeps control of the distribution and creation of money across the planet, this elastic thing called money that’s backed by nothing generally except massive debt. But that’s okay because you’ll always pay off the debt in real goods and sweat and all the rest of it. Remember, there’s many forms of slavery. Many, many forms of slavery.

 

I’ve mentioned so many times about Charles Galton Darwin talking on behalf of the elite in the 1950s when he said, WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT FORM OF SLAVERY. It’s one, in other words, which you’ll never figure out. You’ll never figure it out. You’ll get the ones down below to attack. You’ll have politicians to attack, throw tomatoes at, and go “boo”. Prime ministers and presidents, they come and go, then the next one is just as bad as the last one and the same agendas go on, you see. So you’re given these Punch and Judy shows to distract you, and to give you hope that once you get this guy out the next one might be better. It never is of course because there’s only one agenda.

 

Remember, you can be taxed to death. Tax means ‘to labor’. The original idea of democracy had it written, well, talked about, put it that way, because the British Constitution is one of these verbal ones where they can, it’s very, very flexible for lawyers to use; it’s intentionally so. But the idea is that you couldn’t tax labor, because that’s a form of slavery. That’s what laboring is. It’s a form of slavery. You tax your body, you tax your muscles, you tax your energy. So they brought in the income tax of course. So it’s a very sneaky way of getting your income off of you. In other words, the fruits of your own labor are taken from you and they disguise slavery under different reasons for doing so. It’s always for the greater good, of those who rule you and all their helpers who live so high on the hog.

 

However, getting back to the main thing here, they always keep control of the future. I’ve mentioned over the many years here about the culture industry. That’s where you get your opinions from, your feelings, your emotions from, your tears from, your laughter from. You’re even taught what to laugh at today. In fact, it’s a whole science of getting people to laugh. It’s basically Pavlovian. The canned laughter that the US came out with back in the 1950s, maybe even before that for radio, was a stimulus response. You get the stimulus of hearing people laughing and you’ll laugh along with it. There’s even a term in Hollywood, it’s called ‘like a joke’. There’s a formula to a joke and you come to the punchline and people are so trained in it they’ll laugh at the punchline, even though it’s technically not funny at all. So you’re trained in so many ways you’re not even aware of.

 

In the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com I’ve gone through, over the years, various articles, some from the US intelligence for the military where they’ve published in their own magazines, articles like The Mind Has No Firewall and Perpetual War and things like that. It’s very Orwellian, because remember, wars are not meant to be won; it’s meant to be continued under many guises. Many reasons for that too. It keeps you subservient to the state who’s going to protect you. And you don’t mind getting taxed so much again because the research and development must mean we get better and better weapons to keep you safe, right? That’s the whole con behind it.

 

In Perpetual War they talked about the techniques they were using. That particular article was so interesting because it talked about the use of the same culture industry that they had used against Americans, and the world, to be used against the whole world step by step, including the Muslim countries too. The guy in it obviously was an intelligence officer and he says, WE’LL GIVE THEM ALL THE DEGRADING STUFF THAT WE’VE MADE SO POPULAR IN THE US, NOT JUST VIOLENCE AND NUDITY AND ALL THE REST OF IT, BUT AS FAR AS THEY CAN POSSIBLY TAKE IT, TO DESTROY THE CULTURES THAT ARE STILL FIRMLY HELD TOGETHER BY THEIR OWN MORAL RULES, etc. etc. People who are moral can’t be taken over. It’s very easy to bring people around to immoral acts basically, or immoral thinking until it’s standard fare on your television, so much so that you’ll laugh at things that technically perhaps you shouldn’t even be laughing at, including grizzly stuff as well.

 

It’s so bad today that, and I’ve mentioned this many times too, you are going to see shortly the next step that the big boys talked about, after they won the homosexual battle for it to be shown on television and so on. THE NEXT STEP, they said, WOULD BE BESTIALITY, things like that. AND INTERGENERATIONAL SEX, DOING AWAY WITH THE GENDER THING ALTOGETHER, AND UNDERAGE STUFF, DOING AWAY. In fact, there’s a Lord in Britain apparently just under fire right now because he stood up for one of these groups, many times, that wanted to bring down the age of consent to about four years of age. Believe it or not. Now that doesn’t cause outrage today because people are so contaminated with watching their daily fare of corruption from television, because it’s standard entertainment today that there’s no outrage at all. There will be even less outrage when they go to the next step and the next step. That’s how you do it, by the Fabian style, step by step. Give them time to absorb this and then go the next step. And we accept it very easily. It’s very easy to do, isn’t it? It’s very easy to do.

 

I’ve talked before about the guy who was sent out to catch the wild boars in the US; some parts of the US have wild boar problems, apart from Washington DC. You find that these boars were very wild, and had all their senses there. They tried everything to catch them. A guy came in he said I’ll catch them for you. He’d come in every day with his half-ton truck. The first day he’d drive and stop about a quarter of a mile away. They’d watch him and he’d dump off some feed for them and then drive away about another quarter of a mile and watch them. He kept doing that for about a week or so. Then each time he’d dropped off the food he’d get closer, he wouldn’t drive so far away, and they’d get used to him. Eventually they’d come right up to the truck over the weeks. And he put the stakes in, then he put the fencing in. Eventually they came in one day and he closed the fence. That’s how you do it with the public too.

 

Granny has been contaminated gradually in her era; she will sit with her daughter and watch stuff that is pushing the envelope, and so she doesn’t turn off the TV. So the daughter or the son watches it along with them. When they grow up and have children they’re more and more contaminated so they can go to the next step and the next step and the next step. Until, as I’ve said before, you’ll have live sex on television as standard fare, even in comedies it will be live sex, you see. Because you see, YOU CAN BE CONTAMINATED SO EASILY, like Bezmenov said. Yuri Bezmenov said that THEY WERE SO SURPRISED, the KGB, when they saw the US in the 70s when they visited it, TO SEE JUST HOW WELL THEIR AGENDA HAD WORKED SINCE THE 1960S, TO DESTROY THE CULTURE. Now, by that I mean destroying morality, common values that were shared, and how people would be outraged at certain things, that’s all gone. That was gone then, actually, and it’s really down in the pits today. Nothing bothers most folk at all, except their pocketbook; that’s about it.

 

But I’d like to also touch on the effects it’s having on the general public. Professor Quigley and many other people – professors teach this kind of thing – to do with histories and the rise and fall of empires, which they also call ages, between ages. You’ll find that before it falls – let’s presume it was falling naturally, which is another story altogether – then certain things happen. The people lose their traditional values. The elite, and everyone copies the elite’s behavior by the way, it’s mimicry, because you are taught to worship them, and you do. You’re always in awe in the presence of power and lots of cash; you behave differently in their presence. You find that the debauchery starts, of course, the scandals break out, until it’s normal. The general public copy the same behavior because the media and their culture industry teaches them so. In ancient times they used drama plays and so on to do it, to get people to mimic, especially the young to mimic what they saw. And eventually the people are nonfunctional, really, and they’re degenerate, and they become rather stupid in many ways. There’s many things they could prattle about, like all the television they have watched their entire life, and all the stars’ names but anything else is out of the picture; they don’t know. That’s how successful it’s been in this age.

 

Remember, these things have been done through the ages, intentionally, to destroy cultures. Just like, as I say, in Perpetual War, the article from the US war college, in their magazine. They said they would use the degeneracy that they put on Americans to basically do the same thing across the world. And they know it will work because you’ve got all your behaviorists and think tanks working together, and the neuroscientists, to find ways to make it more effective, even anthropologists, very important, anthropologists; they bring them into Iraq with them and all those countries that they’ve taken out and taken the oil. They work with the troops and so on to find the Achilles’ heel in different cultures so they can destroy it all the more quicker. Sex is a great thing, and especially when there’s natural restrictions on sex, sexual behavior. Sex always wins because the youth go gaga since their hormones are skyrocketing at the time. That’s part of the weaponization of it all.

 

So those at the top know what they’re doing, because only when you’re degenerate can they bring in the new system where you’re even more subjugated than the last system. It’s very simple. That’s the whole agenda, behind Agenda 21 and all of these things, to bring you into a state where you have to be told what to do by experts. And the big boys who helped design this part of the system have written their books about it. They’ve done it all. It’s been completed. Most folk can’t think without an expert... and they’ll parrot automatically any expert that comes along. It could be any actor on television saying they’re an expert and they’d believe it.

 

As I say, I’ve watched the thermometers here every night all through this winter. It’s been the coldest winter I’ve ever seen in Canada. The official weather forecasts from even the government stations are about 20, sometimes 30 degrees above the real temperatures outside at night. Now, why is that? Why don’t they adjust it throughout the night? They don’t. They don’t say, oh we’re surprised by last night’s temperature drop. Nope. So that goes down in the books as that’s what it was. When they say five below, it was actually 35 below. Amazing stuff going on. And because you’re trained not to even look or check anything for yourself, why should you check anything for yourself? Why would they lie to you? Well, it doesn’t fit in with Agenda 21, global warming, and all the carbon pollution and so on, and taxes they want to make you pay. So it doesn’t fit in, so it doesn’t exist, you see. And it will do with most folk. Most folk will say, well I feel rather freezing but it must just be me. You see, we make excuses for it because it never dawns on them that they’re getting lied to. It never dawns on them at all.

 

But here’s the thing too, you must destroy the existing religions, especially when there’s a lot of people in the same religion or from the culture that spawned off from the religion. You must attack and destroy those and bring in a humanistic type society, in the intermediate stage, before they bring in the earth worship of course, which Gorbachev talked about that they would bring a form of earth worship in. And that can be done. Like a science fiction, they can teach the young that mother earth is alive and a creature and it’s the one soul of the world and all this new age stuff that they’re getting prattled on about. And that’s one of the biggest techniques of course that they can really, really brainwash the young with.

 

You look at what’s happening today, just with fiction and the Internet too. You’ve got vampire cults. There’s one today where they’re into the fantasy play acting and it gets out of hand of course. One of them is talking about a vampire-obsessed truck driver. He kept sex slaves locked up in his semi-trailer near Twilight Express for months at a time, and abused while wearing fake fangs. He even filed down their teeth, made them wear false teeth. He kidnapped them.

 

Vampire-obsessed trucker who 'kept sex slaves locked in his semi' had arrest warrant for domestic abuse in Florida

dailymail.co.uk

 

Where do you think all that started? Remember Buffy the Vampire Slayer? And all the hordes of vampire movies afterwards? And these folk got into it. The sadomasochists always jump into these things. That’s why you were given Buffy the Vampire Slayer and all the other ones that came afterwards. That’s why you were given it, folks. I can remember at the time even in Toronto there were articles in the paper where people in Toronto, they found youngsters drinking each other’s blood in back alleys and things like that. That’s the effect it can have on lots of people. Then with all the sadomasochism, it’s only a step from doing that and kidnapping people and going the whole way with it until you end up with death and all the rest of it.

 

But there’s no doubt about it, this guy, it says...

 

• Timothy Jay Vafeades, 54, is accused of kidnapping at least two women and holding them in his semitrailer while he traveled the country

 

• A 19-year-old victim, who is also a relative, says he filed down her teeth and forced her to wear dentures while he wore a pair of his own with fangs

 

• Another adult victim says she agreed to go to dinner with him but ended up captive in his truck for three months

 

They were beaten a lot, almost choked to death. And this guy who did it obviously is also into child pornography; it says that they found lots of child porn on his stuff. They should use that same technique with all the British politicians; I mean a real investigation, not the fake ones you get. But anyway, this is what you’ve got there.

 

That put me in mind of all the New Age. The New Age movement came out of Freemasonry, by the way. The official monthly magazine of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry – which isn’t Scottish by the way – the name of the magazine was called The New Age. They said in their magazine that THEY WERE GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING IN THE NEW AGE. You see. Now, the New Age has within it the perennial religions which they bring out at this time when they’re taking a culture down. The perennial religions being all vague kinds of spirituality, gurus galore, mystic meanings that you’ll have to find out if you want to get to higher heaven, vibrating at higher frequencies, color-coded frequencies, to vibrate out of this world… yada-yada-ya, the oneness of us all, they say, the world soul... blah-blah-blah-blah-blah, all the airy fairy stuff, that works awfully well.

 

Because you see, you can always take people out of their religion, you see, but you can’t take the religion out of the people. When you take something away they will try and fill it with something else in order to get meaning from life. And the more pressures and chaos you put on people, the more terrified you make them, the more desperate they are to find a meaning of life. Because you see, they can’t deal with all the masses of problems... Oh we’re going to have a financial collapse. We get this all the time because we’re kept terrified of wars, or the threat of wars, or financial collapse, and all the rest of it, by those who own the system. That’s how they keep you under control. Which makes it kind of weird because why would you want to keep the same system going that’s never worked for you? And you think you can vote and change it. Oh gee....

 

Well anyway, that was the vampire-obsessed trucker, right. Then you had the Heaven’s Gate. Remember in the 90s you had the Heaven’s Gate cult, so called a religious group. In the 90s they followed this guru who brought in UFO religions, millennialism, they brought in all the New Age thing, the oneness, and plus evolution too, so your body and soul were going to evolve to the next ET kind of thing. People flocked to this character, who was a nutcase fanatic, but he had deeper problems than just that. He was also homosexual, it seems, and this is how he... a lot of them, including himself, were castrated actually in his cult.

 

What these guys will do, the techniques are very simple and always the same whether it’s a Jim Jones or anything else. You can start going into what you think is occult teachings, and it’s very popular, this kind of thing, especially, as I say, when people have lost their basic religions, their guidelines and they’re desperate for meaning in life. Because they feel helpless and they can’t fight all the problems of the world which they’re bombarded with all the time. So they join the cults hoping to find… If I can just find the secrets of what this means and that means then I’ll be godlike, I’ll be free from worry, I’ll be free from threats of any kind, because I’ll be super, like a Superman, or godlike, you see. So out come the gurus. A lot of them are supplied to you by the CIA, because you’ll find the same CIA research going on within all these cults before they end up killing themselves. That’s always there.

 

Because you see, they can use that on a bigger scale on the general population, and this is what’s coming about today. That’s why you’ve got so many talk shows out there now pretending to know secrets. Now, I enjoy deciphering old Masonic codes and things. I never forget for a minute that whatever you can decode, whatever man can decode was put together by man, not some supernatural being. Secret societies down through the ages have always used codes so as no one would find out what they were talking about or conversing about amongst themselves. There were hand codes and everything, a whole language. Even the early monks in Christianity, when they took their vows of silence they developed a system that became worldwide for all their groups of various hand signals and gestures because it was forbidden to speak, you see, in some of these groups. So there’s always an answer for it which a person can decipher.

 

We know too that some cultures have had, and do have, alphabets which the letters are also numbers. We know the Romans, for instance, and even the Greeks used the Chaldeans, and you could actually use the Hebrew as well because it was also a number. If they were scrambled into numbers they could mark it on sticks. The messenger ran with a stick to the other part of the Army and another person there could decode it, you see. Very simple cryptology. But you’ll find the same thing with the terms they’ll use, say, in Freemasonry. And you can spend your life reading it, and having a good laugh because when you know what things are you often do laugh, you understand of how they communicate to each other. But things go deeper with some people too. These are the ones who are scared stiff of life. Mind you, this system, it means to try and scare you of life altogether.

 

The best war to have, even in ancient times to the present, is psychological warfare on the public. You destroy them with psychology and fear and they aren’t going to fight like virile angry men. It’s not going to happen; they’re already conquered. Very simple. So you can all be conquered so easily by those who understand the formulas. And believe you me, you have literally thousands of think tanks across the world all using these techniques to make you follow them, on behalf of the big boys themselves. Making you follow… even the things that sound good, green this, green that, because they need you to protest for the very laws to get passed that they want themselves, so as they can have everybody off the land and they can drill there or get gas out of it or whatever else they happen to want to do. They want to own all the resources of the planet. And they use what they call useful idiots, well-meaning people but useful idiots. The ones who lead them know exactly what they’re there for. They’re getting well paid for it.

 

But getting back to the Heaven’s Gate cult... It’s very interesting to watch the videos up there about it. You get an idea of how these things actually work. They’re all very, very similar, where they bring you in, with little secrets, with a guru who knows the secrets. And they give you forms of hypnosis that go on, even in a general conversation. Because there’s different ways that you think. There’s different levels that you think on and reflect on, as opposed to the one that you would use for driving a racing car, where you must be on the ball, split-second. And there’s another level beneath that where it’s meditative, you’re contemplative about things. So these bring you into a contemplative state and a hypnotic state and you start to… Your total logic part for survival gets submerged into the subconscious state, and you’re under hypnosis, and easily managed, to believe things you should never ever… things you should actually scoff at. So you had the Order of the Solar Temple. You had the Heaven’s Gate group. You had the Jones group too, Jim Jones Cult that all killed themselves, mass suicide. And CIA involvement definitely, it was known about that one too, all along. Because these are being studied. They can be used on a mass scale, mass scale. So be very, very careful of these groups and people who pretend to know secrets.

 

As I say, I could sit and teach you secrets all the time, but simply by decoding stuff. That’s all it is. And as I say, what man decodes, man put together, not some God or some supernatural deity. Very, very simple stuff, you see. It’s just to keep it secret from the public. That’s the only reason it’s secret. Not because there’s some magic involved in there. So be very careful of folk who come out as gurus and tell you about their own personal experiences. And you hope if you catch a hold of their robe that somehow this person’s closer to the great all, call it what you want, the great all, the oneness, than you are. That’s a standard way of human behavior. Where, at one time the people would touch the cloak of a King; they believed it had curative powers. Even in the times of King James. They were regarded as holy, closer to God than you, the same with priests and so on. Because you never have enough faith in yourself. You don’t have the confidence that these people seem to portray to you, to do the same thing. You see. So you fall for all these groups and the con men who make a killing off you; let’s hope it’s just a financial killing. Who come out and say, yep, and they rehash all the old Theosophy stuff, all the old Rosicrucian stuff. They don’t have to write new books, they just take it in whole chapters from previous ones over 150 years. It’s all been done before, you see.

 

But there’s no end of folk who want to believe it. Because they have nothing to believe in now and they’re desperate, absolutely desperate. And as you get more and more afraid of everything, and all this news is bashing you, oh my God there’s a thousand things, and you can’t deal with them all. You can’t deal with more than two major crises in your life at a time or you crack up. And when you’re in that stage of almost cracking up along comes the gurus. And they tell you they had a wonderful experience. And they tell you that maybe they took drugs with it or maybe not. And the great all came through them on a hilltop or whatever, and their whole body vibrated, and they could have left the world you know… They could’ve left the world. Because you see, you’re all base, they tell you, because you’re in a lower density of vibration. You’re not high enough, you see. Of course there’s many ways to get high. But that’s what you’re told, and people fall for it in swarms. And they throw money at gurus just like priests, because they think they’ve got the answer. They are closer to the great all than I am… And they’ll pay big money for the next bit of the code and the next bit of the code.

 

And here’s the key to it with cults, here’s the key to it. And con men, here’s the key, folks. Eventually these leaders, after taking you on this big ride, this crazy ride, you see, that you followed step by step, waiting to get to the ultimate oneness in knowledge and so on, they can’t take you any further except… out of the world. Out of the world. And the psychology, their own psychology that’s working on them as the leader makes them commit suicide. Some of them don’t do that, they get you to commit suicide and they bugger off somewhere else. Because there’s nowhere else they can take you.

 

I can remember Bill Cooper talking years ago about this too. He said, THEY ALWAYS TELL YOU THERE’S AN ULTIMATE SECRET, AN ULTIMATE SECRET, and he says, GUESS WHAT, THERE IS NO ULTIMATE SECRET. THAT’S THE SECRET. [Alan laughing.] And that’s it, you see, folks. So be very, very, very careful of these groups. As I say, look up these stories, Order of the Solar Temple, Heaven’s Gate religious group which is really a cult, and the vampire-obsessed trucker, and also the one with the werewolf that they had recently in the States, a guy dressed like a werewolf playing a fantasy game, he got young 14-year-old girls to come and meet him, to get into the fantasy. People are so screwed up now they can’t tell the difference between fantasy and fiction. AND IT’S VERY DANGEROUS.

 

Because with all the slasher movies which people are gobbling up like crazy, it’s always mixed with sex and violence. That’s a great technique for conquering the mind, you know. Sex and violence, very primitive, you see, both parts of it very primitive. And some directors and producers know this technique perfectly well because they themselves are very warped, believe you me. And here’s the werewolf one, it’s in the Mail Online, it says…

 

Werewolf enthusiast, 44 years old, groomed 14-year-old girl for sex and went on the run after recruiting teens online to join his fantasy weapon games.

 

And you see him standing there with his black outfit on, and his leather strapping on, and the werewolf head, and a rifle in one hand and a pistol in the other. And there’s all these young bimbos around him, that flocked to him because they’re getting right into all these games. I’ve mentioned before, these games were all designed by the military, you know. Why do you think the military would be designing children’s games? Why do you think they’ve got so many behaviorists involved in creating these games? And psychologists and so on? Just to sell games you think? Do you think that? But he’s 44 years old, this guy, and eventually he ran off with one of them who is 14 years old. Quite something. And this is all the rage now, you see. People cannot switch off from fantasy into reality. Luckily they got this guy right now but I mean, what’s his past been like? How far has he gone in the past? There’s a thing they might never find out. I mean, werewolves can’t talk, eh; they only bark.

 

Anyway, this is the kind of thing, as I say, to be very, very careful of because we’re living in weaponized times. Even news is weaponized. Even the disclosure of what you think you’re fighting, the news in a sense, or exposing the news that’s given to you, you can overwhelm people by hitting them with 50,000 things at the same time. You can handle two crises at a time… Why do you think it’s used, bombarding people with bad news, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, till you’re under the kitchen table quivering in fear? So don’t be terrified. Don’t get petrified and made immobile by a weaponized system.

 

Your culture is weaponized. Your entertainment is completely weaponized. I mean, they’ve got amazing brutal sadomasochistic sex in almost every movie, and the scenes in a lot of these awful movies are just stuck in there to get the sex in, because they have nothing to do with the story. And the youngsters’ ones that they’re watching, all these slasher movies and so on – supposedly under the guise of horror, it’s the same thing – whatever little hook of a story is meant to make you watch it right through hoping to find... Because you see, you’re a curious person, you want to find out who done it, that kind of thing, and how does it end. But it’s just a vehicle. The horror thing is just a vehicle for all the sadomasochism that goes on in between it. That’s what it’s for. It’s a delivery vehicle, for delivering the weapon part of it, into your brain. The mind has no firewall.

 

Today you don’t have the traditional family anymore. It’s been under attack as well. That had to go first. So there’s no one to tell the children, you know, best not to watch that, I’ll tell you why. And then you do tell them why. This is weaponized to hit you and to make you behave in a certain way, and a way that you’ll often regret, and you might get into danger as well. There’s no one to tell them anymore. Because you see, a long, long time ago, not just Bertrand Russell and others that worked with the big global society to bring in this present culture, he said that, that IT DOESN’T MATTER IF THE PARENT OR PARENTS RAISE THE CHILD, THE TECHNIQUE OF SOCIAL INDOCTRINATION FOR THE CULTURE TO BE GIVEN TO THE CHILDREN, IS GIVEN BY THE STATE NOW. They’ve already put the parents, or the parent, out of the picture until the child has more respect for, say, a youngish teacher than their parent, their stickler of the parent. Parents are always portrayed as stupid in the movies and all the sitcoms and so on. It’s been very successful. What do you know? You’re just my dad… You’re just my dad. And that’s how it is in today’s society.

 

But it won’t stop because people need, they have a craving for entertainment. That’s one of their big weaknesses. That’s why it’s always been used against you. Down through the ages, even in the days of Plato he talks about the possibility of licensing the playwrights; I think they already were actually. But he wanted to license musicians as well because they could, even then, sing songs that could lead to revolution if the youngsters would follow them. You’ll find down in the times of Shakespeare and even other countries too with their own versions of things, plays were often put out as a way of communicating some injustice to the general public, very common. Still today you’re given the same techniques by those who run the system. But they want you to change a certain part of it. They actually use you to demand that they change a certain part of it, which has nothing to do with the outcome that you’re actually expecting to see.

 

All these big national parks they created, that you can’t go on anymore, all the zoned areas, the corridor areas under Agenda 21, where there’s human corridors and animal corridors, and you believe it all? No. But you’ll find clauses in there where the big corporations can get rights, licensing rights to drill, frack and everything else on those lands. First they get the people off. And they got most of them off by doing in the farms by big Agri farm business. Because everything is corporate today, international corporations. The next part too, is using heavy taxation to get folk off the land, or simply closing down a road and you can’t get access to where you live. So many ways to do it. Or bring in the agencies that do the eco-testing and stuff, oh you can’t live here anymore, this is contaminated. Many ways to get you off the land. And we’ve watched this since at least the 60s escalating. And all the big groups of course get heavy funding by big foundations, that we don’t elect, the richest foundations on the planet, some of them worth trillions of dollars. Often their leaders are also the head bankers; I’m talking about the international money lenders, not the ones that just have a bank on the corner. Old stuff, isn’t it? But it’s true. Biospheres for the UN… Biospheres…

 

So the first thing you have to do is try and reclaim your brain. That’s quite an objective you know. Because you’ll find that almost everything you think about is given to you to think about. The opinions you come to are ones you’ve been guided to come to, mainly by the omission of another side of a story. I used to laugh at Walt Disney when I was small because I knew that rabbits didn’t really talk to deer and things like that. But in the Disney movies they gave you all this complete fiction. They would even show you sometimes where the carnivores would talk to the herbivores, which doesn’t happen in real life; carnivores tend to eat the herbivores. But you were given a complete fiction to prepare folk for all the guises they were going to use to steal all the land off you.

 

In the old days it was much easier, the King just came into the country like the Normans did, you know, and set up their warlords like satrapies for the King, they were overlords for them, and all the people became serfs, which is a nice way of saying slave. Because you couldn’t move from the land and you weren’t paid for it. You simply forked out most of your crops to the lord and you supplied him with excesses that he could sell. You supplied him, too, with even your body; if he wanted it for warfare purposes he would just take it. And if you didn’t go he burned you down or killed you. That was, you know, democracy in the old times that was so wonderful, knights were bold and all that. But that’s the reality of it.

 

Today it’s a disguised system where you’re far better behaved actually because you think you’re living in something called democracy and that we all have rights. And you do have rights. You have the rights not to go outside the boundaries of everyday talk or speech. There’s authorized speech today, you see. And you have committees sitting deciding what’s authorized and what isn’t. They don’t have to even have an argument anymore, let’s have a discourse about something. No, if you say something they’ll try and find that you’re a hater or they’ll give you a slur name or something like that, which shuts you up completely, Pavlovian style, because everyone’s been brainwashed into what these words mean, even though it’s got nothing to do with the present situation on any particular topic you’re talking about. It’s just outside the box, they don’t want you to go there. You can’t go out there. You’ll find just how much freedom that you have then if you do.

 

This technique can be spread to many other areas. Because I remember reading about the two guys, I think they were two guys from New York that were employed from a big top marketing company by the World Health Organization to bring in a system to get people to stop smoking. The guys used big think tanks and lots of money went into it, your tax money of course, to get you to stop smoking. The whole idea was to create social approval for things that they wanted you to do and social disapproval for things that they didn’t want you to do. They started with the children at school until if someone lit up a cigarette 500 yards away the children would choke, they’d start coughing and choking even though they were about half a mile away from you. And that’s a Pavlovian response. Then they spread it into the general society. Then step by step, it’s always incremental, well people working in offices could smoke outside the office. Then you stop that; oh they can’t smoke in the street now. And step by step…

 

Now, the two guys said in an article that they wrote about how successful they’d been at changing the behavior of people. It’s behavior modification. They said, WE CAN USE THIS ON ANY OTHER THING WE CHOOSE, the same techniques, AND IT WILL WORK JUST AS WELL. Incrementally, give it a few years, step by step, and you can vilify any group you want to. Whether it be obese people or whatever it happens to be, or even meat eaters, say, whatever they choose will be vilified with the same techniques. And you always get the youngsters, too, at school, you get local authorities to ban it in workplaces or around workplaces, until they’re made to conform, or they’re fined out of existence, or into prison.

 

Now getting back to what I was talking about with the New Age and so on. Be very, very careful before you give your brain away to any con man. I mean, there’s even late-night talk shows that do nothing but talk about this stuff, knowing they’re conning the people, and knowing that it could cause harm to different ones too. But again, they always say it’s not our problem. It’s amazing how you can always justify it when your paycheck is pretty fat, and it’s not your problem, isn’t it. But there you go. If some guy comes along and says I’ve got the answer, or he comes out with stars all over his suit or something and tells you about his experiences, or he’s another guru of some kind, or even a famous person, like the reincarnation of Jesus or Gandhi or whoever it happens to be, if you fall for that, folks, something’s really seriously wrong in your life and your mind.

 

And they tell you, oh yeah you’ve got to go way up to violet, get the violet colors going, you’ll vibrate higher in the violet colors, you know. And you can vibrate right out of this world into a high astral plane. Safe… See, it’s a promise of safety in a fearful world. It always happens at the end of an age. This age was planned to end by those in control. And they bring in their new system and you’re even better slaves than you were before. That’s what it’s all about. But don’t just follow people blindly because they give out tantalizing little bits of information. As I say, if you just buy a pile of old Rosicrucian books you’ll see it’s all in there, just rehashing the same. They don’t have to make up new stuff, just rehash it all, generations of stuff, going way back, always promising you… the next lure, you see.

 

Some of them even give you classes on conology. That’s what I call it, conology; that’s the art of conning people. And they give them classes on it, and they promise them if you just get to the next step you’ll be higher and higher in your understanding… And when you get to a stage when you understand it all you have these super godlike powers. But they can never take you there, you see, unless they tell the whole cult to commit suicide. Or they might just say they’ve got enough in their bank account now and pack it in. But there’s no end, no end of people who’ve had since the 1960s especially this alternate, they call it perennial religion. They always pull it out of the hat at times of the end of an age, the same perennial religion. The Reincarnation thing, the whole idea of hidden Masters… Hidden Masters. And often the guys will present themselves as Masters. He has to be a hidden master who is now out in the open, right? Otherwise how would he know this stuff? What man can decipher man put together in the first place.

 

And I very much doubt he was vibrating above, you know, the kitchen table when he was doing it. And it’s so easy to tell people, and we like telling people about our odd experiences. We all have them, odd experiences. But there’s never any answer or meaning that we’re left with. Once in a blue moon there might be something, but it generally doesn’t repeat itself over and over. When they tell you that they do have all the answers, you’re dealing with someone that PT Barnum would advocate, like a student of his, when he says, THERE’S A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE. Ancient techniques... Ancient techniques. But it’s very lucrative for those who want to exploit people. I generally put the information out for free. That’s all. Here’s what it means. This is how they communicate to each other. Here’s the degreed system, just like a military system from private all the way up to general, same idea. And lots of people think they’re superior. Lots of them do.

 

The ones who really are superior are only superior because they understand the art of keeping the masses in a different reality from themselves. And picking their sons and daughters wives for them, that’s standard down through the ages with the wealthy elite. They tell you to marry for love. They marry wealth. Wealth and their offspring, that’s why they live through their offspring, their progeny. Be careful. Don’t give your brain away.

 

When they tell you they can always have the same experience, this high, high spiritual experience, tell them to prove it. They can’t prove it to you. Everything has to be taken on belief, your gullibility, you see. They can’t. You can’t fool animals the same way, mammals like chimps and things; you can’t do it with them. Because they don’t understand language as you know it. The art of conning human beings is done through persuasion, where you start with a common agreed idea and then someone with a good vocabulary and an intellect can warp it off into Lala land, and have you follow it and agreeing all the way, nodding your head. That’s the dialectic process. Like a salesman uses, they start off with, it’s a nice day, you nod your head. Nice house you’ve got here, you nod your head. You’re saying yes, yes, yes, you see. And then along to the sales pitch, this is a nice vacuum. Yes. It’s all psychology, folks.

 

Read Plato. Read all the other philosophers. Same thing. They start off with a premise, which you can all say, yeah, we stand on the ground, don’t we? Oh yeah, we all stand on the ground. Before you know it this guy is telling you, you can vibrate higher and higher, if you just pay him the money he’ll give you the secrets. And there’s techniques to make you believe it. The perennial religion… as though understanding is going to cause something to happen. Amazing isn’t it? So be very, very careful.

 

And watch out for the cults. If you’ve got children, if you got children that are just obsessed with their technologies, they can’t talk to anybody face-to-face anymore, and they’re maybe talking to all kinds of weirdoes because they don’t know who is on the other end of that phone, and they’re texting too, and all the sockpuppets put out by government agencies and foundations and experiments run on them even by the universities like MIT, they don’t even know it’s happening. But it’s all carefully monitored to see what’s working. This is the big laboratory. As we live day by day there’s another experiment going on. There’s many experiments going on to find out what will work on the mass of the people, the bulk of the population. Be careful.

 

Now, I got to get back to trying fixing this water pump here, if it’s possible to do, which I’m not really sure it is until the summer. As I say, I’ve never seen so much snow as we’ve had this year in Canada. The temperature’s still plummeting at night, way below zero, and during the day too. It still isn’t getting above the freezing mark. And stacks and stacks of snow to go; it’s going to be murder trying to move once that snow starts to melt and freeze, melt and freeze day by day, whenever that starts. And it floods into the road and freezes and you can’t, it’s like a skating rink of course. There will be flooding this year too, as they play up the chaos, you see, that’s caused.

 

By the way, I meant to mention there are articles out there from a few years ago, I’ve read them before, where it was found out that agreements had been reached through all the different states in the US and parts of Canada to hold back the sluice gates, rather than release a little water at a time from big dams and things for runoff, and let it all go at once. Why do you think you’re getting all the flooding here and there over the last few years? That was the reason, folks. What you don’t know can con you. And what you don’t know can make you suffer too.

 

Anyway, from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:31 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on May the 4th, 2014. I never prepare talks, because we shouldn’t have to prepare talks. The whole idea of being yourself is that you can chat about things whenever you want to chat and let the spontaneity of things come to you. Because that’s where creativity lies, you see. When you’re simply repeating stuff that’s been put out there by the big boys for you to repeat, then you’re not thinking for yourselves, are you?

 

A few minutes ago I was thinking about weather, of course. Because in Canada, where I am anyway, in Ontario, we’ve had about six months of winter, it’s still ongoing to an extent because we seldom see the sun anymore, and it went to rain. I knew it was going to go straight from snow into rain. Because this is the new agenda with all the aerial spraying, with the chemtrails and the geoengineering, as they want to call it at the top, and so on. I remember reading years ago how, from geoengineering sites and the big meetings they were having, about the loading doses, how many years it would take to load the stratosphere, etc. with particulates to stop sunlight coming in, or to prevent it, to reduce it. And it’s interesting too, they have succeeded because when they started it off NASA immediately put up articles about global dimming. Global dimming, you can look it up yourself from NASA and how it’s increasing every year. Well, it’s due to the particulates in the atmosphere, which of course are being sprayed by the aircraft.

 

We’re living in a totally controlled environment in this day and age, for those who don’t quite know that. But most of your reality is like that. It’s so hyper managed in advance that you’re living, technically with what we’re told at the bottom, we are at the early Middle Ages in knowledge compared to where they really are today. We really are. Forget all the science books they put out, all the blurbs they put out on television about the latest thing they’re investigating. Whatever they are telling you about was done years ago and they’re on to something else. So we get fed obsolete information.

 

That led me on to thinking about all the rain we’re getting, of course, and how that of course was well discussed during World War II and afterwards. And big Pentagon projects went into action; Canada was heavily involved too, with ways to bring down enemies in different countries by using bacteria, viruses, but also weather modification. Where you could cause massive droughts and starve people out – because the crops would all fail, animals would die – or you could flood them and have the same effect basically. So we watch all this going on, at the same time as the big, big boys who have the futures market and have all your food dumped on the world stock market and the futures market, and they can put bets on where crops are going to fail. It’s so much of a coincidence that that came out at the same time as they really went ahead with the geoengineering. Because the big boys know of course who’s going to get the droughts, who’s going to get flooded, because it’s all made to be that way. It’s planned weather we have. It’s as simple as that.

 

That brought me onto another thought too, of Arthur C Clarke. Now, Arthur C Clarke, the science fiction fella, who was in with the big boys of course, and he was an elitist himself. It’s not unusual for the big boys to employ what they call futurists, guys who are into science fiction, who would put out ideas and analogies too, through their stories, to do with what they’re really up to, etc. But when you go into the different statements that he also made himself about the elite RULING IN THE PROPER SCIENTIFIC FASHION IN THE FUTURE, etc., etc., you start to get the picture. But he also said that ADVANCED SCIENCE – what he meant was secret, advanced science – WOULD APPEAR – the effects of it would appear – TO THE GENERAL POPULATION – and he referred to primitive people, and that’s how they refer to you by the way; he wasn’t talking about a thousand years ago – he said, IT WOULD APPEAR AS MAGIC TO THE PUBLIC – because they’d never think about it as being caused by man-made forces. It’s so easy, isn’t it, to trick people?

 

And you have no idea of all of the sciences of the mind and all of the different disciplines, as they like to call it, or doctrines, involved, and big think tanks working for governments and so on and private industries at the top that really run everything, to make sure you are kept in a little box, and to train you to have a good ego and believe that you know everything there is to know. It’s beautiful, isn’t it?

 

And these are the people you meet every day. You meet them every day, with that stare, the polite smile, but the eyebrows are down or lifted. Just like you saw in Brave New World in the movie versions, where the primitive, as he’s called, the guy who had humanity in him, love and compassion and so on, talked to these people who were artificially made, where even their intellect was designed for them, how much they could understand, and all the information they were given was designed for them by those above them, the Alpha Pluses, etc. And it didn’t bother them in the least that everything that they knew and their whole culture was given to them. Because they had that little bit of pleasure, you see, etc and they had the Soma drugs, mainly again for the lower... Because the division of labor went down all the way, who was going to do all the dirty work, etc., and lots of Soma and drugs. In other words, pharma to keep them happy. We’re in that today for those who haven’t figured it out. It’s all been done.

 

And the next step is to train you through all the different kinds of inter-gender types that they’re trying to make you believe in. It’s nothing to do with, we care about these folk, at all. It’s to get you used to the fact that nothing can be really said as to be normal, so they can bring forward their basic new clones in the future, and that’s what they’re all working towards of course. And these guys work in generations; they don’t have to do it all at one go. That’s where you get tripped up because you’re thinking, as a natural human being thinks, I’d have to get it done right away. No, no. These guys work in generations. It took generations to get you from family-orientated society to abortion, single-parent mothers, and multiple partners now and all kinds of things today. It didn’t take that long at all, really. But for you, you’d be impatient if you were planning it. Not these boys. They know how, from past experience in history, how long it takes to gear up the population, indoctrinate them in the proper ways, so as they’ll accept the next step and the next step and the next step. It’s very easy. It’s very, very easy.

 

And the world is a very, very old place and knowledge is never forgotten, folks, and mistakes are always remedied the next time they go around, hence the need for the step-by-step process. If they miss one step it can go awry, so they’ve got to go through the process and they are well aware of this. That’s why it takes a bit of time.

 

When you see how society has been completely turned upside down, 180 degrees actually, from all its value system, everything, up until the 1960s, say, and then onwards, the revolution came in, and boompf, it was all done. Planned that way, introduced and planned, and well-organized and well-funded, until here we are today, dysfunctional. And yet the folk at the end of it think it’s normal, the way that they’re living today, is normal.

 

Anything can be made to be normal to the proles, as Orwell called them. Given time, given the right indoctrination, given enough documentary specials with half the facts removed so you don’t get the whole picture, to bring you to the desired conclusions. Add a bit of emotion and personal experience shows to it and that’s you, you’re gone, folks. It’s so simple to do. Plus they use the entertainment industry to get the emotion in there and to show you terrible things to bring you to certain opinions, you see. Very easy to do. You can create guilt amongst everyone, who’s done nothing, so easily, by these techniques. And even your enemies who want to do you in, can use these techniques against you, and make you feel sorry for them as they are doing you in. It’s fantastic. It works awfully well.

 

That’s why you have an authorized view of history. And you also get an authorized view of the present, where no one is trying to do you in, except maybe the latest enemy the government tells you that they have. At one time it was suddenly the Arabs, according to Bush Junior, hated you. You hadn’t a clue they did that, but he told you they hated you, you see. And before that you’ve had all these different presidents and prime ministers – that are always in an alliance, because they are all owned by the same big bankers – telling them what to say to the public to get them ready for the next war, wherever it happens to be. We’re never told the facts of the war at the time. And sometimes after the fact, it doesn’t matter if some of the real reasons for it come out, like grabbing oil and minerals and things like that, you see, for big private corporations. And it doesn’t matter when the job is done. It really doesn’t matter. That’s just how the world is really run.

 

Your present is given to you by a routine format, very simple format, with the same newscasters. They hang onto these anchor people for, oh, their whole life if they can because that way, you know, God knows how many millions of people have been brought up, with one or two generations watching them from childhood, and daddy wouldn’t lie to you, would he? And they give you the authorized view of the present, you see, where everything’s happy and they give you little stories about communities in rural areas and things like that, that are completely irrelevant and often off key to the truth. It doesn’t matter. Truth doesn’t matter when it comes to creating reality, for control, you see. So folk go through their lives thinking, ah well it’s just the economy, folks, it’s just tough times and we’ve got to pull together. They have no idea that nothing happens on large scales without massive planning, massive meetings, and the techniques and the plans to bring it all into action, going back and forth between different bureaucratic divisions, until they’ve got it all ironed out, before they even introduce it. Nothing happens by chance. Otherwise, you see, they could lose control at the top. They are paranoid about losing control. So everything is minutely discussed.

 

Like the free trade thing, which ended up with NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), and at the same time the World Trade Organization, all set up by the one institution, by the way, which is private, by the big foundations behind them, for the whole world, to regulate the world’s economy, for their own sake, for those who own it all. And we were kept out of the picture completely. Back in the 1980s they knew that when they brought China in on the free trade deals that they were going to give all the work to China, they were going to transfer all the factories abroad. They knew they were going to give you a service economy. And a service economy is like putting a dog in a swimming pool, and it can only paddle and paddle and paddle until it tires out, and it can’t get out and it drowns. Economists talked about this in the 70s in Britain when they first mentioned, oh if we ever get into a really EU, a European integration system, IF we ever... It was all planned that way right along. But, if we ever get into it we’ll have a service economy. And they explained all this too. So there’s nothing new under the sun. There’s no news at all when it comes to why we’re in the mess we’re in.

 

Because the producing countries are the ones who survive. You’ve got to manufacture things. Everything else is a spin-off of manufacture, you see. Importing is not; that’s just service. You buy it in, you pass it around, the middlemen get all the cash, pretty well, not the manufacturer and so on, or even the store sometimes. It’s the middlemen that do it all, and they are all managed by the big banking boys themselves; they have big groups that mass-purchase things and so on. And then they get government departments in their pocket to make sure that they have the rights to decide on the prices for imports, etc. and all this kind of stuff. It’s all done above our heads. It’s kept out of the news, because you’re not supposed to worry about such lofty things.

 

Now, for those who think they get, really, all the news there is because there’s so many new stations, supposedly... but they all get the news from the same sources, two sources, across the whole planet now. So we have regulated, authorized news, you see. And if you notice, all the news you’re getting is pretty well some other foreign country, over yonder somewhere. That’s very good because it just keeps you distracted from what’s happening in your own backyard. They don’t want you to know what’s happening in your own backyard. In fact, if you notice, since the Leveson inquiry and bill went through in Britain – all for muzzling journalists; and you had the Finkelstein one done in Australia at the same time – these are British Commonwealth countries, remember, Britain and the Commonwealth. Canada had to have done it too because, literally, there’s no independent real journalism on anything. There was a bit of leeway before. All their bosses were part of the same global society but some of the journalists were given a bit of leeway to express opinions on different characters and politicians and deals that were going on. They can’t do that anymore. That’s why you’re getting literally, it’s like the old Soviet Union, it was all just dished out from the top. And we know that’s how it really works in all the so-called first world countries now. It’s dished out from the top, authorized, and mainly for stuff that is way across the sea somewhere, that means sweet dick all to us. It means nothing to us. Nothing at all. Because we should be worried about what’s happening here, folks, your own future. You see. It’s all meant to distract you from your own future, and from all the stores closing down across the US and Canada and everywhere else; they’re all boarded up, going out of business, or are out of business, and the economy is flat, absolutely flat.

 

You get it from all kinds of sources. I do anyway. Because so many folk get in touch with me I get a good picture of what’s happening across Britain, the whole of Britain and the UK, Europe, Australia, Canada, the States, etc. Because I get all the stories coming in, and I can make my own mind up and it’s rather evident what’s going on of course. We are being brought down... in a long-term game of course, long-term game. I’ve read the reports from the facility, or group, that does the projections for the future for the military for NATO and Britain and so on. They said EVENTUALLY THEY’D BREAK UP COUNTRIES. They would eventually have chaos and riots by people who get unemployed, during this whole process of getting to where they want to go. They’re ready for all the riots of course in the States; it’s the most militarized police state in the world right now. And that’s why they always try to distract you to things that are happening abroad, while they’re ready to clout you at home, you see.

 

The thing is, this is all part of the game, the long-term strategy for bringing you down into big city-states, independent city-states, as they eventually dissolve the nation systems. And those who run the city-states will be the high corporate elitists, with their technocratic control beneath them that manages the people, etc., etc. It’s quite interesting. I’d love to get my hands on the real, all the details, the nitty-gritties of it all, but they don’t publish that for the general public. The stuff they do for the military, they don’t publish it for the public, or even for the general troops for that matter; they’re not supposed to know either. So you just get the general outlines of flashmobs and unemployment and riots, and how they must be contained as we go through all these long processes up to the year 2050, maybe beyond, etc, into the big city-states. They won’t tell you what’s to happen to the ones that are not in the big city-states, the few that are left standing in place of countries and nations.

 

But in the meantime of course they’ve got other dominoes to knock down and resources to grab for the corporations around the world, and hence the wars that are going on. That’s why they keep pushing you towards, oh the Ukraine and Russia and all that stuff. Russia has the same guys running it as the States does, by the way. That’s who runs Russia. The same big magnates that became multibillionaires overnight when all the people’s stock was handed over to them, remember, when the so-called walls went down and suddenly they were no longer communist, planned years in advance of course as to who was going to grab all the stock and became instant multimillionaires.

 

The same across the Ukraine, by the way, the old Soviet bloc countries, the same handfuls of in-the-crowd people; the same bunch, actually, that are often related to each other, run all the stuff over there. So they’ve got to get to an agreement, to their cousins that run the States, so that they can work out how this future is going to go, you see. It’s already planned but they must work out the nitty-gritty and who gets what and all the rest of it, etc. Meanwhile they’ve been surrounding Russia, since the Cold War supposedly ended, and they’ve been surrounding them with more and more missile bases across all these ex-Warsaw Pact countries, the ones that let them in. So naturally if you were getting surrounded by all these missiles you wouldn’t be too happy yourselves. Never mind all the fomenting with the color revolutions and the multimillions the West is sending in to get riots started up, to demand things, etc., to suit the big corporate boys that pay all these rioters over there their big salaries. Because they are paid to do these riots, by the way; they are taught and trained and all the rest of it. But again, that’s another story.

 

But back home, if you notice, nothing’s happening back home, supposedly. Back home, nope, nope, they keep pointing over there, the next war or the next threat, you see, to keep you terrified so as that you shut your face, you see. Shut your face and you listen to the leaders, oh, lambasting these nasty countries over there somewhere. And that takes up your time. Rather than say, what the hell is happening here? What’s happening here? Apart from the stagnation of the economy, what’s happening here? And where’s it supposed to go? from here? for us, you see. No one asks the pertinent questions. Because we’re supposed to go down the tubes, you see. We’re supposed to go down the tubes.

 

It’s not because the big boys are losing control. Don’t ever believe that for a second. These boys have all the think tanks always planning their future to make sure they implement each stage of their future and control; it’ll be completely, vastly different for all you at the bottom in the next stage. It’s the same bunch running it all, coming through it, you see, afterwards, the same bunch. You have no idea how scientifically controlled we are. None at all. There’s hardly an opinion in your head that hasn’t been given to you. Like the Alphas and the Betas and so on in Brave New World, there’s hardly a thought that’s been authorized for you to have. The thing is, you think it’s your own opinion. And because you’re stuck in this way of thinking, you see, this programmed, linear way of thinking – deliberately so, it’s a scientific technique, very simple to do and implement – you can’t figure your way outside the box.

 

So what you do is you jump on the ones who are yapping about it, never questioning what they might be saying or why they’re saying it, or who’s maybe behind that. The whole idea that I go on about is to try to get you to think for yourselves and ask the right questions for yourselves. That’s what’s important. You don’t have to have folk agreeing with you. And it’s not often even necessary to even say anything to anybody. You can tell… I can tell by going into a little group, just listen to their chitchat, if there’s anything worth saying at all to them. And if there isn’t I won’t. Why get frustrated? Why get them frustrated?

 

Because you are like the primitive in Brave New World talking to them. He’s trying to tell them about humanity and life and love and all this and beauty, to people who are listening to him awfully politely. Because they’re just so advanced, they think, and they know it all, and here’s a primitive. So it’s a kind of quaint thing to have a primitive telling you about love and beauty, meanwhile they are promiscuous and so on, and they have different partners every night, by law, and everything they know has been authorized by their superiors, and they are quite happy with this stuck graded system, from Alphas all the way down. They’re quite happy with it, you see. That’s their normality. You can’t tell them anything. It’s impossible to tell them, well look at this another way, any part of their system. It’s impossible to get through to them. And that’s what you’re experiencing with most people, you see.

 

I keep telling people, I have done from the start, don’t knock yourself out trying to persuade people who don’t want to hear you. Most of them can’t hear you; their indoctrination is too perfect. They don’t know it. The ones they knock around with, their pals, will have the same opinions, exactly the same as theirs, and so they think they’re normal. That’s how you bounce off your ideas from folk to think you’re normal. You think I’m normal, I believe in this and this and this? Oh sure, yeah, yeah. And most of their talk is about TVs and shows and movies and the news, that they’re supposed to parrot, which they do. And therefore that’s them normal, you see.

 

They never ask themselves, what got them to this stage of what they believe is normalcy and why they accept it so readily. They think they’re evolving, you see. Society is just evolving; it’s like a willy-nilly thing; it just happens that way. Believe you me, if it was outside the realms of planning by the elite it would never get off the ground. Anything that’s happened for change was authorized and pushed from the top. No matter what pressure groups you thought at the bottom were pushing it, they were all paid by the big foundations, the front groups that employ thousands of armies of NGOs, [non-governmental organizations], to push for the changes that are desired by those at the top.

 

But the trick is to make you believe it’s all your changes. Oh yeah, we want that, yeah. But there’s other little truisms to do with humanity that you don’t know. It isn’t just indoctrination. The big think tanks that have been on the go all through the 20th century, and before that too by the way, studying all of us, and going over all of history, and bringing up the top professors to talk to the world meetings and so on, to find out how we ticked in the past, and do we change. Of course Plato said it too, FORMULA – it’s all formula – WHATEVER WORKED IN THE PAST, IF YOU BRING IT IN, IN THE PROPER SEQUENCE AND FORMULA THAT WAS INTRODUCED BEFORE, IT WILL WORK ON THE GENERAL POPULATION AGAIN. You see. And it does. It does.

 

And it will work on any culture; that’s another thing too they found out in the 1800s. At one time even the revolutionary forces of, say, Freemasonry, like the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, which wasn’t Scottish at all. But Albert Pike said it too. He said, WE USED TO GEAR OUR PROPAGANDA, information, WE USED TO GEAR IT, ONE FOR THE MALE AND ONE FOR THE FEMALE. He said, WE HAVE FOUND THAT THE FEMALE WANTS, NEEDS AND DESIRES, FANTASIES, ETC., ARE THE SAME IN ALL CULTURES. So what worked for the West will work for them all across the world. You see that happening today. We’ve been so minutely studied, so minutely… That’s why Bernays said it too. He says, WE CAN MAKE THE CHANGES THROUGH THE FEMALE; SHE’S THE QUICKEST ONE TO LISTEN TO EXPERTS AND CHANGE HER BEHAVIOR ACCORDING TO THE EXPERTS. That’s why they aim 90% of the magazines, all through the 20th century, at women, you see. Expert says blah-blah-blah, and there they go. So minutely studied.

 

Of course they know all about men as well, and the more powerless they make them, the more sports they give them so they can vicariously live out their life on the field, which they couldn’t even run on because they’ll get no wind, you see, they’re too fat. So anyway, everything is micromanaged. Micromanaged. Every cartoon the children watch and are brought up on is filled with messages and programming. Every single one. By the way, they always were; it isn’t just a recent phenomenon.

 

So there’s another thing too I want to mention about humans. It isn’t just that they can’t understand you people. It isn’t just that they don’t want to understand you or hear you. You understand, they do get upset when you kind of... you are bursting their bubble. You’re kind of getting to a stage of bursting their bubble and they can turn on you viciously, when the fantasies that they want to believe in, that keeps them what they think is sane, if you’re going to pop that fantasy they’ll turn on you, viciously too. So be awfully careful about what you do.

 

Never offer it unless a person wants it. And they might only want a little bit of it, so stop right there and move on. But there’s another thing too that you’ve got to understand about general humanity, it’s been perfectly conditioned. When you try to tell them about all the evil that’s going on, the corruption through politics and business and so on, and it’s in your face today. But when you want to point out it all, see, what you’re trying really to do is to pass on your indignation about it, to them. And what really upsets you is that they’re not getting indignant. And when you point out why the wars really happened and so on, up to the present time, you can’t make them indignant either. Because here’s a little secret. See, most folk don’t care. Get that through your heads. Most folk don’t care who your troops are going to go slaughter today or tomorrow. They don’t care. It’s just that simple. It really honestly is that simple, folks. And that’s why they’re not indignant. They don’t care. They’re not getting slaughtered, right now. In a way they feel happier that someone else is. That means that your troops aren’t slaughtering you, yet.

 

So stop thinking you can just change the world by a throwing the information out there and having people respond to it. That’s the first thing that people who think they’re just – I hate this term – waking up. It’s like born again; I was born on 9/11, they’ll say. I say, what do you mean you were born on 9/11? ...reborn, like a born-again experience. That’s reacting to things that might affect you. That’s reaction; that’s what that is. Most folk don’t start to think about things until it affects them personally, through their pocket, unemployment, something like that. The rest go on as usual. They don’t care. They don’t want to know... Don’t tell me that… They want to be happy. They have been trained to be egosyntonic, egocentric. Egocentric. They have been taught, as all the experts said in the 40s and 50s at the big think tanks, they’d train them through the schools, through the culture industry and so on, to be narcissistic and egocentric. And they will shun pain, all kinds of pain, mental pain, whatever; unpleasantness is pain, you see, and they will seek pleasure. And that’s what they do, most of them. And when they’re doing that they’re kept in an infantile stage.

 

In fact, they’re taught to always try to be happy, like being perpetually happy is a normal thing. Which it is not, by the way. That all came out of the Freudian school, that was meant to change the world. It was a political movement, folks, the Freudian school, for those who don’t know it. Look at all the members of it; there was a particular reason it was even founded. They brought forth the whole idea, as well, you work in a system, you crack down under the pressure, in the system, which is crazy. You’re doing some kind of rotten work that you hate. You’re stuck in it. You’ve got either rent to pay or a mortgage to pay or something, responsibilities, and you hate what you do every day. Because it’s meaningless. Passing paper around an office is meaningless. It’s not a natural function. Offices aren’t natural. In fact, cities aren’t even natural. That’s all been well documented by the anthropologists. But they give us a little financial reward thing, you see, and you get stuck in it. Most of the money goes back out to pay for everything, mind you, and in taxes as well. But you’re taught that you’re respectable because you’re working.

 

And then you crack up. Now, what happens when you crack up? They send you off to a therapist. And what does the therapist do, the psychiatrist do? All they do today, they don’t sit and say well, let’s get to the bottom of this problem, sonny. They don’t say that anymore; they know it doesn’t work, you see. So what he does is find some pill to put you on, that stops your higher functioning to an extent. You’ll float through life... so that you can get back into the workplace. And that’s what they’ll say to you, these are the questions a psychiatrist will ask you; they all ask the same questions. What are you doing now? Oh, I’m working again. Oh yeah, that’s good. And what do you do in your spare time? Oh I go shopping and I buy things. And then they’ll say, are you having sex? Oh yeah, I’m having sex now; I go to parties. And that’s their new version of being normal. It’s not worrying about the things that made you crack up in the first place, so the problems haven’t gone away, it’s just that your senses are now dulled enough, and you are euphoric enough on the drugs, they don’t bother you the same way. That’s the answer to it, you see.

 

Big boys talked about that. That’s why they brought in the Soma idea in the 1930s in Huxley’s Brave New World. They were going to use pharma. They said that, eventually everyone will be on Pharma. And if they can create and invent diseases that don’t exist, in children, they can get them started young on Pharma, till it’s a normal thing to be on Pharma, psychoactive drugs. It’s all happened in your lifetime, and you don’t even know it, or why. But I won’t ask you to be indignant, because most of you won’t care. You can’t make people care, folks. I’m all right, Jack. I’m egocentric. I shun the unpleasant, I watch comedies. I don’t want to hear bad news. And I seek pleasure. There it is, right there. That’s how it goes. That’s how they work, folks.

 

Another thing too you’ll notice, is that people you’ll know, maybe even relatives, might hear you out to an extent and then close down on you once again. Because if you go too fast they shut off from you. But you’ll notice from folk that you know, who do nothing but watch television, and that’s how they learn things. They don’t know they’re learning things when they watch television, and all their fiction as well by the way; they don’t know they’re learning things. They learn through, as Jacques Ellul said, PEOPLE LEARN THROUGH OSMOSIS. The general population, it kind of filters through from a thousand sources, bits and bytes of information, and then it kind of congeals in their brain somewhere. But they haven’t reasoned it through. They simply adopt the opinion it left in them.

 

And you’ll hear them saying, well yeah, the world is overpopulated. Well, it’s all coming from TV, you see, documentaries and David Suzuki and things like that. The fact that the Western world, the so-called first world countries, their own domestic population has been plummeting for years and years and years, as folk don’t have so many children, you see. But what they do is, through mass immigration – and Britain is a great example – they get the population up again, through mass immigration, which also fulfills the role of destabilizing any nationalistic tendencies. If you eradicate the nation’s people, they are no longer nationalistic; it’s multicultural, you see. So the big boys have got it easier to manage you then. Once that’s done you are multicultural, you see. You don’t have a tradition or a pride in the past. You don’t belong there, you didn’t come from there so it doesn’t matter. That goes out the window with the second generation. And that’s been done.

 

But the fact is, as I say, the native populations have been plummeting. And they give you the appearance of a world that’s overpopulated, because all the immigrants flood to the big cities; they always have. And they are encouraged to go there, you see, which were never meant to bring in millions of folk from overseas. But if the population had stayed without the immigration you’d have lots and lots of empty houses and lots and lots of empty apartments, in the big cities, because the native populations are declining. They’re not having children, you see. Everything is planned that way. Nothing happens, as I say, by itself, for itself’s sake. It has to be authorized, heavily debated, many, many times by the top leaders of industry, banking and so on, who plan all this and then they tell the politicians what to do and implement and so on. That’s how it works. Nothing happens by chance.

 

So you learn through osmosis. So you’re talking to people, as I say, they switch off, they don’t want to hear you. And they think they know everything because the TV tells them so. They think they live in the best country in the world, and as Bertrand Russell said, THEY WILL BELIEVE IT BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL KEEP TELLING THEM SO. And they will prattle all the, it doesn’t matter what country, they’ll keep prattling these same things off to you. It’s all the same scientific technique, you see. Repetition actually does work; it’s quite fantastic, isn’t it?

 

So people really don’t have minds of their own. They can be awfully pleasant people. You’ll find them in all occupations and professions as well, pleasant people, who can’t think outside their own profession or box that they’re in, but still be very pleasant to you. And to each other, they’re cordial, you see, so things just seem to flow along. Even when it’s really breaking down it still flows along to an extent. We’re so micromanaged that it’s just unbelievable.

 

Most folk, as I say, don’t want to know. They’ve been totally conditioned. They’re quite happy, they can go home at night, watch the sports, or watch dramas and comedies, and drink their beer or wine or whatever it happens to be, and zonk out for the rest of evening, and party at the weekend and have sex, and they think they’re getting somewhere. And then they go back to work from Monday to Friday and so on and so on. That’s their life, and they think it’s normal because everyone else is doing it too.

 

But don’t try and upset their little bubble. Because you’ll get signs, they’ll give you signs they don’t want it burst. And they will become vehement towards you at the threat of you even scratching their bubble, never mind bursting it. They really don’t care. Most folk don’t care, folks. That’s as simple as that. And they’ve done all the studies on these things too. Lots and lots, oh, thousands of studies, ongoing, about situations in psychology, how people behave in this situation, in that situation, all these situations, over and over and over again ad-nauseam. And most folk simply don’t care, as long as nothing happens to them. And as long as they have their little bubble, their little circle they can walk around in, and they have their friends they can call and their sockpuppets they can chat with on the Internet and things like that, that’s their fantasy. That’s their fantasy. When you tell them that most of their friends don’t exist, they’re actually sockpuppets by computers run by military and Pentagon and so on, it doesn’t faze them either. It doesn’t faze them at all. They don’t care.

 

And that’s why on many, many different levels that George Orwell said, THE PROLES DON’T COUNT. He had so much in that book of his, 1984. The title he wanted to put out was called The Last Man, meaning, the last sentient man that could think and question. But it was his publisher that wanted to call it 1984 because he was going to publish it in 1948; just changed the numbers. But on so many levels Orwell was telling you things, so many different levels. But the proles don’t count. Meaning the proles never have political power.

 

Don’t ever fall for all the left-wing nonsense, because everyone who leads the left wing and all the left-wing organizations are paid and put in by the big foundations, the biggest multibillionaires and trillionaires in the world; that’s who puts them in and runs them. So the proles don’t count; they’re powerless. It’s all about power. And at the very top of the pyramid money is power. Don’t ever forget that. And the ability to make and dispense money, and decide how much it’s worth today or tomorrow, is incredible power. And that’s what all, everything else falls into line underneath that, because they all use money. That’s how the world really is.

 

But as I say, Orwell tried to tell about the proles, the proles don’t count. He has that through the book in different places, and in the movie versions as well. The proles don’t count. The proles in 1984 were flooded with entertainment. Their music was all written by machines. Have you listened to the music today, folks? as they brought you down to this level, down and then ended up in the rap until you don’t even need musical instruments anymore, and then to where it is today, electronics. You can buy the programs; you don’t even need to make melodies up and so on. And machines and so on, even turned out the porno industry, because they must get porno into it big, big time, to keep them rutting like rabbits. If they’re rutting like rabbits they think they’re winning. Their egos are involved, he chose me that night because he really likes me, I’m better than the rest, and vice versa you see. Such simple, simple predatory behavior, that’s pushed to the maximum. So your basic instincts are used against you. And you don’t even know they’re being used against you, because you think you’re winning. It’s all psychology.

 

That’s the biggest war of all, is the war for your mind, folks. That’s what it all comes down to, the war for your mind. And you all think you’ve got them; you think your mind is your own. You’ll have strong opinions about things, that you’ve never investigated. Amazing, isn’t it? So be careful about all the information that comes out there, from all sources, even the ones pertaining to speak for you. Be very, very careful, folks. The big boys miss nothing. Nothing. You’re dealing with the most meticulous power-hungry freaks in the world, who miss nothing. They’re paranoid about missing things. Go through the biographies of all the big, big founding families of the US, for instance, the big magnates. Go through how meticulous and obsessional they were, not just with counting pennies and so on, and self-discipline, but in total control of everything in their sphere, as they kept expanding their spheres of influence and power. Look, read it, read it all. That’s if you care. Most folk don’t care.

 

That’s really the telling point, they won’t look at anything. It takes effort. Effort comes when something is motivating you. They used to call it the spirit; it motivates you to look for it. And remember too, everyone today has been taught to think in bits and bytes… Give me a quick answer. You hear that all the time, give me a quick answer. I’ve been on many, many radio shows and I understand how the people’s minds think, in ordinary decent folk and how they think and so on. But you’ll often get asked questions that will sound simplistic, and because they’ve been trained with talk radio, all their lives – across the world it’s all the same format, talk radio – that they’ll ask things, not knowing they’re asking something that’s really profound, which would take a longer answer, and sometimes an education, to get them to a level to give them the proper answer that they then could understand. If you gave it to them right off the bat without taking them through those learning phases it will be incomprehensible to them. You could say the most profound things to them and they’ll go onto the next question as though they hadn’t heard it, because it means nothing to them. They don’t know, they don’t know what they’ve just asked you. I find that all the time. And that’s the hardest thing for me, is to debate how much to tell them and what not to say to them. That’s how it really is.

 

As I say, we’re so well understood. We’ve all heard about all the stuff about the NSA and all the other big organizations that collect all your data. They’ve got you worked out, your personality profile, perfectly. They’ve got your whole life history. They’ve got your school; they’ve got everything on you. Everything on you. Every darn thing there is. And they compile it into a virtual you – I’ve gone through the article so many times from the Pentagon where they say that they have got EVERYONE IN A VIRTUAL REALITY GAME BASICALLY AND THEY RUN GAMES ON THE INDIVIDUAL. Every one of you has had games run on you, with your personality profile. They can predict how you’ll behave in every situation imaginable, and they’re pretty well almost 100% right. And people still think they’re free. They still think they’re individuals making their own decisions. If you’re so well understood, folks, you’d be radically, radically altering your behavior. But they don’t.

 

There’s a kind of comfort in sameness, isn’t there? Everything is the same, same, I’m the same. There’s a comfort there. It’s like being in a depression, some folk actually enjoy being in a depression. Apart from the attention they get and so on. But they actually enjoy being in that space of self-pity. It becomes addictive. And I really mean that, it can become addictive to them, to be in self-pity. And it’s familiar. The more it happens, the more it’s familiar to them, and they can go into their little world of self-pity and depression, abject depression, and get pills or whatever. But there’s much more to what happens to people than you think, or are being told, as to why, all the whys of things.

 

As I say, the war is on your mind, because someone else wants to control it. If you are not in charge of it somebody else will be. And the biggest temptation people have today is to follow some camp or another, because you see, that’s how humans are. So well studied. From the present to the ancient. What camp are you in? What do you believe? Oh, I’m a follower of so and so. Then they’ll parrot off to you everything that their leader says. Which means that leader has led all their way of thinking right along the way, you see. Not themselves; they parrot it all.

 

In ancient times, and all down through history, you always had hermits. There were even hermits in ancient Egypt, hung around out on the outskirts, who didn’t want to fall into this camp or that camp or whatever, you see, or one of the priests, or that priest who did whatever it happens to be. These are the few folk that thought for themselves. They’d had enough and off they went. In those days it wasn’t so bad because they didn’t have aerial drones photographing everywhere you went. You could get lost. When folk came to the early Americas they could get lost as well. When they brought civilization in and lawyers and churches, in came the townsfolk, oh let’s start organizing, and the next thing you know you’ve got a marshal and then you get a census department. Before that you could get lost, go into the bush and get lost. You could live the rest of your life if you wanted to and see nobody ever again. If you wanted to.

 

Now you’ve got passports and blah-blah-blah across the whole planet. Total observation. In a totally observed society, international, global, everyone must be predictable, for power to maintain itself. Everybody… That means every little amoeba there is. That’s all of us, folks. So in ancient times, as I say, and in the Middle Ages, folk would go off. And sometimes people would come and chat to them; you’ll find that in India for instance, some guy in a cave somewhere, and ancient Greece as well. They would ask them questions because sometimes what these guys would say was kind of profound, because it was outside the box. They were thinking for themselves. They weren’t getting the, here’s the news for the masses today, here’s what they’re going to prattle on and regurgitate. So they’d ask them questions and it was kind of fascinating. So sometimes they’d bring them food and things and that kept them alive. And if it got too much for the hermit he’d move on somewhere else and try to get lost for a while again.

 

Peace of mind. What some folk would give today to get peace of mind and that kind of privacy, eh? You can’t get it now can you? ...rules, regulations and red tape and all the rest of it. But that’s what hermits did. But the first thing people would ask them is, what do you believe in, what camp are you in, you know, what camp, this one or that one? And the hermit would, if he was very wise, which most of them were of course because they survived, if not the mob would kill them. But they’d say well, well... So they’d be very diplomatic in their answers to the mob. You don’t want to offend anybody who’s already in a camp, you see. That’s how the mob reacts, they get rather nasty if you were to tell them… especially if you burst their bubble, you know. But very few folk want that.

 

In fact, I remember, oh, many years ago when I was wee, reading a book on Canada. It was to do with, I think it was one of the Inuits – or Eskimos as they’re popularly called by the world – up in the north of Canada who needed an operation in hospital so they flew him down to Toronto. They had to sedate the guy the whole time he was in Toronto in the hospital because this guy was brought up in a bare tundra of snow and ice for a good part of the year. Pretty treeless as well, no trees. And suddenly he’s in a city where everything is incredible noise. Not only noise from the people and the honking of cars and sirens and all the rest of it and traffic, but also the noise that folk had on through radios and everything. Because his world was one of quietness and the only voices you hear were other people that would come up and chat to you, or the wind coming across the snow and so on, or the occasional animal. That was his normalcy. That’s how he thought and felt happy. That’s where he felt happy, in his own environment. Trees, they took him to see the trees, some forest, it freaked him out. Completely freaked him out because he felt utterly claustrophobic. He wasn’t used to trees where he came from. He knew they weren’t going to do him any harm, these trees, but it just freaked him out. It was outside his ken, his realm of knowing and understanding, you see. Freaked him out.

 

You find the studies, the sociological studies they’ve done, over and over and over again, with different peoples. And believe you me, every nation, every people in the world has been well understood. That’s what, often, the enemies of other folk do, is study, study, study, and sometimes we all have even one enemy. But you find that, they find that the Chinese are happiest when they are rubbing shoulders in the streets. They like crowds. They feel uncomfortable away from that; away from that is the abnormal to them. The solitude thing is abnormal. So they prefer being amongst themselves. It’s interesting to go through all the different studies that have been done on different people, over and over and over again. Any change in cultures, the controllers want to know. Because it has to be authorized by them or it doesn’t happen at all.

 

It’s the same with people with information. In the first world countries we have been overdosed since birth with information. Information isn’t truth, folks. It’s just information. It’s data. It can be lies. It can be complete fiction. In fact, most folk, their lives are spent more in fiction than reality. And even the fiction is weaponized, with all its PC updates and so on, and things, oh that’s terrible that happened to that person, why did they bash that person up and all that. And you’re getting your little guilt trips given on you, that you’ve never even participated in, but you take it nonetheless. It’s done scientifically. It’s perfect actually.

 

They’ve even done surveys; they always do surveys after these series are out where they’ve put all the PC updates in it, to see how it’s affecting people. Has it worked properly on them? Are their opinions changing, etc? ...through fiction. And yet if you ask all these folk, do you know how you got these ideas? Oh no, I just think it’s right. So they give you their opinions on things, which aren’t their opinions at all. It’s all been brainwashed into them. The best brainwashing is when you don’t even know you’ve been brainwashed. That’s what they say about people who are brainwashed, they don’t know they have been. That is perfect brainwashing.

 

So think about it. Who owns your brain, your mind? Who owns it? A lot of folk, if you tell them all this stuff, they don’t want to know. They don’t even want to know if someone else owns it. Or even if other ones have shares in it, you know, divvying it up into shares. They don’t want to know. It makes them uncomfortable. Again, egocentric and egosyntonic behavior, shun the unpleasant… shun it – oh, I don’t want to know that; oh that’s nasty; that makes me feel unhappy – and seek pleasure. That’s why at parties and things you can sit or stand and mingle and all that – it depends what kind of class of party you go to because in the upper classes you stand and you mingle, you know, and you sip your wine and champagne. But the topics are always the same; they’re irrelevant little happy topics. But totally irrelevant because it’s a cover, a smokescreen, you see, the little happy topics, because folk just want to be happy. Plus they want to be good predators, as they eye each other up, you see, for the genders and all the rest of it, who wants to be with whom and blah-blah-blah. Predatory behavior. But they don’t want anything serious. When they’re all happy and smiling they don’t want to hear anything... oh, that’s a downer, man. That’s how people are.

 

And what the mistake is too, being aware of things shouldn’t destroy you. It should make you more free than you are. Free, indeed, in your mind. It’s always meant that in the ancient religions and mystery religions too. It’s always meant the same meaning. It doesn’t free you physically, because you’re in the same system as everyone else. But at least you know what’s happening and your mind is your own. And there’s a pleasure in being able to think for yourself. It doesn’t mean you have to instantly go out and evangelize everybody either, you see. The only thing you can be sure of changing is yourself. That’s the only thing. And even then you can have a battle changing yourself, a real battle. Think about it. Because if you truly want truth, factual truth, you got to go out and seek it and do some work. That might take some self-discipline.

 

And don’t just jump after conspiracy sites because you don’t know who set them up in the first place. The big boys don’t miss anything. If they want control over everything, and even supplying all your NGOs for your left-wing and right-wing groups and so on, blah-blah-blah-blah-blah, don’t ever think that they’d miss what is mislabeled as the patriot movement; don’t think they missed it. Again, it’s what camp, what camp are you in? What camp are you in? [Alan laughing.] Then you got to give a diplomatic answer.

 

If you say, I think for myself, oh it’s a wise guy, eh, mm-hmm. Maybe they’ve said something that’s true for the first time in their life without even knowing it. Maybe you are a wise guy. So think for yourself. And don’t panic about everything. It is boring, mind you, because the more you know, nothing will surprise you as to what happens with the next step and the next step and the next step, and all the different plans that are ongoing at the same time. And don’t think your one little brain can keep up with it all. Don’t try. That will crack you up. You can’t look for world meetings on a daily basis and find, oh, about 2000 NGOs across all the world meeting that particular day on different things, if you can find the information even. You can’t keep up with all of that. Accept the fact that the big controllers at the top miss nothing. They have all the power and money in the world. And they have all these NGOs working under a massive bureaucratic centralized control, all working daily together with the think tanks and so on and the big money boys at the top. Always remember the pyramid structure.

 

Don’t let it freak you out. It didn’t just start in your lifetime, folks. Don’t think that either. It’s not like suddenly you just got cut today by something, I better dress that wound, it’s up to me. This cut started an awful long time ago. Back in the 1800s, go into the history of what used to be called time and motion studies, when they brought out the new experts in behavior to find ways of getting the laborers to work harder and faster and more efficiently, without paying them any more money. And take it from there. That’s how some of these sciences developed, you see. So don’t panic about things. Don’t just jump into camps and say, oh I’m a follower of this, I’m a follower of that. Think for yourself. Because there truly is nothing else except thinking for yourself.

 

And when enough folk think for themselves, maybe one day, whose knows when, who knows… things could gradually change. That’s why I always liked Orwell too; he was honest enough about it when he put it through an analogy in 1984. He said, when he was being tortured by O’Brien he says, WELL THE PROLES WILL DO SOMETHING OR THE WORD WILL GET OUT SORT OF THING. And O’Brien says, THAT’S RIDICULOUS, THE PROLES DON’T COUNT, ETC. and then he says, WELL MAYBE, MAYBE IN A THOUSAND YEARS. This is how the big boys look at things, could something become dangerous in a thousand years? Of course in our day and age they don’t plan to have anybody with any brain that isn’t authorized to be thinking in a thousand years. Never mind the kind of humans that will be around by then anyway, except for themselves, with longevity, etc., they’ll have all that. They have it now actually, for certain select ones of them. But they don’t plan on having the same old, old man and old woman type around anymore. They’ll create the perfect clones, the Brave New World type, you see, to serve them well. And the old type will go out quite happily, thinking it’s all quite normal. Because that’s how you present it to the public, bit by bit, and bit by bit, until they accept it all. Oh well I guess it had to become this way, yeah. That’s it, you see.

 

As I say, I started with the weather and just prattled on. But the fact is, when most folk don’t even know the weather is under complete control now... That’s what you can see. You can see the weather. You can see the spraying going on. You can see the aftereffects and the downpours and so on, the monsoons they give you now for instance. And the futures, juggling with the whole world’s food supply, and the big boys at the top know exactly who’s going to get flooded and exactly who’s going to get the crops in, so they can get into the crops and get the shares and make sure the prices go up in the right places etc. etc. That’s how perfect it is. That’s what you see.

 

Can you imagine the things you don’t see? the Technotronic warfare, etc. It’s happening to you all the time. Remember what Brzezinski said? Eventually THIS COULD GO ACROSS WHOLE CONTINENTS AND CONTROL THE MINDS OF THE PEOPLE. You think it isn’t happening too? Just look at the amount of sleeplessness there is now. Insomnia is just booming. Why? Well we’ve known from all the studies that have been done that even Wi-Fi, for instance, upsets your sleeping patterns, etc. etc. etc. Smart meters do it too. They all know this at the top. You think they’re just putting it in because it’s more convenient for them? Don’t be silly. When the big boys write about bringing in Technotronic warfare upon the whole populations of everyone, everyone’s nation, bathing whole continents in it, THEY MEAN IT. They mean it, folks. And when they mean it, THEY DO IT. Government can only exist by keeping what they do to the public secret. Otherwise the public would have to really do something about it. And they know that. They’ve always known that.

 

So you are kept in fantasy land. And for those who want to stay there, you have the options. You can go into all the… You’ve got a variety of fantasies you can go into today, escapes. Lots of them. Lots of escape out there. Just keep filling your head with useless, useless data. Or you can watch all the porn you want, or sports, or dramas, and so on and so on. Or you can go off into various kinds of escapism through trying to find the spirit, the spirit, the spirit, the spirit, you know, that can escape it all. Because you know within yourself that physically you can’t escape it, so you’re left with the thing called the spirit. So you’ve got all people making stacks of money selling all kinds of books, rehashing old stuff, and purely rehashed; some of them don’t even change the whole chapters they take out of very old books. Because it’s on big supply and demand today. Escape. When folk think they’ve had it they try and escape mentally. And the big boys supply all of those avenues as well, stacks of gurus out there like never before.

 

That’s why professor Carroll Quigley talked about the end of ages and the end of civilizations. All the things that happen, and that’s one of them, that’s one of them that arises. Today we call it the New Age. It’s also called the perennial religion. They always use that system at the end, promote it, as they take down societies. And folk try and escape that way.

 

It’s time people started calling what things really happen to be, by how they are. Stop all the political correctness as well, which is meant to silence you, through fear of retribution. In a free society any child should be able to come up and ask any question that’s popped into his mind. Anything at all. And if the authorities grab him because you’re not allowed to ask that question, or this question, or whatever, there’s something wrong. He’s too close to home, he doesn’t know it of course, of what or who is controlling. So that’s the first step into controlling society, is to stop them, of changing anything, is to stop you from being able to even ask questions, because it’s politically incorrect, by law.

 

Look at GIRFEC [Getting It Right For Every Child] in Scotland; they’ve got the same systems going across the world now. Mandated child advocates supplied by government to monitor every child throughout their childhood, from the age of a couple of months onwards. What do you think of this, Johnny? Well, well you know... Well, I better put you in for reconditioning, Johnny, we can’t have you starting to ask questions on that particular topic. Or this particular topic or this other one over here. Whatever it happens to be, you see, you have to get readjusted... to be uniform, the uniform society... the authorized citizen of the future. That way you’re easier to manage. And governments certainly do like things to be easy for themselves.

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:32 pm

Neil: Welcome to Reality Bytes Radio on the 15th of May 2014. I’ve been away for a couple of weeks on the Monday show particularly just because I’ve been a bit busy with other stuff but we are back on track again with Alan Watt for his regular monthly slot. Are you there Alan?

Alan: Yeah, I’m here.

Neil: I sent Alan an email about a little book I picked up a couple of weeks ago when I was down visiting my parents in Devin. But I tell you if anybody is looking for second-hand books, Devin is the place. There are certainly some nice little shops there and you can pick up some real bargains. I think we got twenty books for eighteen quids. They are all of this kind of ilk, 1940’s and you know stuff like that. So yeah, it’s well worth going down there.

But this little book I picked up is called "Above all Nations" and it’s basically a compilation of some of the actual letters that soldiers have sent home to their families and stuff from prisoner of war camps, from hospitals. There are some articles from the Times, the Express, all the mainstream media at the time in the UK from all fronts in the war, from the Japanese, the Pacific fronts, from Germany, from Italy, North Africa, all over the place.

But this is just a little one here just to kind of give people a sense of what it’s about and:

"The Firby..."

Neil: Which is a ship.

"...(4,869 tons), owned by the Ropner Shipping Company, Limited, was sunk in the Atlantic. The master Captain Prince has informed the owners that he and the crew of 40 all got away and had landed safely. Four, however, had been injured by shells. The chief officer Mr. James Woodruff, stated that the crew, after taking to the boats, pulled alongside the German submarine, the commander of which was most considerate. Members of his crew handed nine loaves of black bread to the sunken ship’s crew and three rolls of bandages for the injured men. Before they moved away the commander sent an S.O.S. to Mr. Churchill at the Admiralty giving the position where the sinking had occurred. After 13 hours in a heavy sea the men were rescued by a destroyer."

Neil: There are many other stories like this about airmen from both sides having shot each other down and remained over the site of the battle as it were to allow ships and other aircraft to locate their missing airmen in the sea at great risk to their lives obviously because some of them had actually run out of fuel and stuff when they had to ditch themselves.

But it struck me that this would never ever happen today, in today’s kind of modern warfare where people very rarely even see their enemy, never mind you know strike up a conversation with them or indeed taken prisoner for that matter. And we are about 75 years away from the start of the Second World War more or less, and there is a bit of an argument about the exact day it started but we are more or less there.

And you know I wanted to ask you Alan, what has happened in 75 years? Because I just can’t imagine this happening now. I can’t even imagine these kinds of letters or articles even appearing in the media because a lot has changed obviously not just in the psyche of the people themselves but in the whole of society whereby as I say I can’t imagine articles like this or even acts of bravery or compassion like this ever happening in the entire war in modern times.

Alan: It wouldn’t happen because it was no mistake in fact, this is only one little part of it, there is a whole bunch of different areas of this, but this one part was that even during the American Civil War they found that only about 15% of the soldiers who were dead on battlefields actually had fired their muskets. And from this the U.S. began studies to find out why. And of course what they found out is it’s not natural for folk to kill people they don’t know for no real reason, if it’s not an act of the moment in passion or something like that or hate or something. And therefore very few folk will actually go ahead and do it.

They carried these studies on until World War II and found that a lot of the troops were firing over the heads of their targets on all sides. And but before World War II they tried to up the ante a little bit by causing dehumanization with their propaganda in a fashion that would belittle the humanity or the human aspect of their enemy. In other words dehumanize your enemy. By World War II it was almost complete in some countries and certainly it’s all gone today in fact because you have a whole generation raised on video games that were actually meant to desensitize military personnel so they’d kill their target on sight which is what worked awfully, awfully well. But going back to before World War II, you’ll find quite often in World War I enemy pilots would land at the crash site, they’d follow a plane down that they had shot down and they’d land there and help the pilot out and take off again and things like that.

So by World War II it was getting a bit more vicious of course because the propaganda was really being stepped up and in World War II Britain had already given lectures at Sandhurst. I don’t know if that’s in the book or not but Sandhurst was, they had top scientific personnel who had worked on the human psyche, behaviorists in other words. And they came up with the concept in the 1930’s in Britain of "Total War", the next war would be total war where everybody was fair game, that was the people, the public, the factory workers, everything. And that’s what brought on the bombing of Dresden, the fire bombing, etcetera, and the cities that produced things so that the general population were being targeted as fair game which again dehumanized the whole aspect of war because when the troops or airmen would find out that their pilots were being, if the people at home were being bombed that worked in factories and stores and housing schemes then they’d hate the enemy even more and that helped to depersonalize them too. So a lot of psychology, and big, big units were developed in psychological warfare on how to make the personnel themselves, the fighting personnel, more apt to actually kill every target that came along their sight, and today it’s absolutely perfect.

We saw Fallujah, for instance, in Iraq. And it’s come out from many, many inquiries or trickled out eventually, that the free fire zones, or free kill zones, anybody who goes into that zone, it doesn’t matter, is fair game. If you shot them down it doesn’t matter if it is a man, woman, or child, whatever, of the local people there, nothing can be done against you legally at all. You have a free hand to kill whatever moves. And of course in Fallujah the order was to go out and make it an example. They were dragging out all the men that could be of military age, young guys who were fifteen, sixteen, and so on, anybody, and just shooting them. That’s what the U.S. troops were doing. And that’s part of the reason they’ve got them on so many drugs now today too is so that their higher emotional thinking and so on is countered by the aspect of the drugs knocking it out. They become blunted in affect they call it, and they kill everything that moves. But once they are out of the military it comes back to haunt them because they still stay on about seven up to nine drugs each for the rest of their lives after because the memories of what they have done conflict with their natural, your natural instincts to get along with your fellow human beings. To do that you must respect your human being.

Now remember too in World War I, if you look at the old black and white clips of the World War I troops of all sides and you always see them getting prayers, etcetera, before they go into battle. We know in World War I for instance, I think it was the Scots Greys and the German troops had a truce at Christmas time and it was an unofficial truce but they said what’s the point in killing during Christmas time and they went across into no man’s land and they both shared drinks and exchanged little presents and things until it was actually the English guns that opened up and started shooting at them again. I know that because my grandfather was one of them, he was there.

And anyway that was the natural humanity to man. That’s how you are really when you realize that you are all the same basically. You are all being ordered to go. If you decide not to kill people you will get shot as a traitor you see so what choice do you have in the matter? So they still try to bring the humanity in. But by World War II as I say in Sandhurst, in England, they were teaching the aspect of total war where everybody, everybody who lives in that land is a complete target, man, woman, child, it doesn’t matter, housing schemes, workers, it doesn’t matter whatsoever. And that was also taken to Germany in the 30’s by a colonel who became general, who taught the same stuff in the German side as well. But it all began from Sandhurst.

Today with the massive propaganda, twenty-odd years of video games, kill your enemy, kill your enemy, and the perfection, the perfection through mainly entertainment by the way, of dehumanization of enemies that you grew up with is perfected. The youngsters today just want to kill. We’ve seen that with the leaked videos that came out when you saw the U.S. gunships mowing down journalists by mistake, laughing at it, and they are excited as though they were shooting pigs in a barrel which almost they were you might say. So we’ve lost our human aspect.

But in World War I you saw them all praying before battles, in the Second World War there was a bit of that, that went on because they were throwing their old cultural values, that they all shared by the way, out the window and in this day and age it’s an atheistic society where we accept mass abortion, we accept in fact that most folk who have any mental problems, possibly Down Syndrome, should be aborted. Most folk accept that. So if you do that you actually dehumanize your own life actually and everybody else’s life, and now we are going into euthanasia for the elderly and all the rest of it. This was always the goal of the big boys who wrote about it in the early 1900’s all through and have achieved it pretty well. We don’t value life much at all today, except our own personal lives.

Neil: Yeah. It’s interesting what you were saying about the blitz in Dresden because there was actually a story in here about that as well. And they did a survey in Britain, in Coventry I think it was, and possibly I think it was Birmingham maybe and they asked the people there who had been victims of bombing if they’d like to you know perpetrate the same bombing on their “German enemies”. And the people who had been bombed said no. And they went to places that hadn’t been bombed and they said oh yeah, definitely, you know let’s go bomb them. Because they had no experience of it themselves and didn’t understand the horrors of it. It had just been a flick to them.

Alan: And not only that, the story came out of course eventually after the war that Churchill, because they had the Venona Code they called it, they cracked the German code. They knew that Germans were to bomb Coventry that night. They knew for a few days in advance and they did not evacuate. Rather than let the Germans then know that they obviously cracked the code, they allowed them to be sacrificed. And as you know Venona Code is actually Novena, they took it from the old Jesuits coding and so they called it Venona. But they had cracked the code and sacrificed Coventry. So as you say the people themselves become fair game, including pawns in the game, to keep secrecy intact.

Neil: Yep, and again you mentioned the propaganda. I suppose back in the First World War, in particular, and in the Second World War, they didn’t have the propagandist if you like. They didn’t have the benefit of television. And a lot of these young lads would have gone off at what seventeen, eighteen years old, who wouldn’t have seen that much propaganda so perhaps you know they maintained some of the humanity when they went off because they hadn’t been indoctrinated so much as the soldiers nowadays, who as you say, I mean it’s everywhere. It’s television, it’s video games, it’s you know...

Alan: Oh it’s every, every movie you get today. I can remember things were very, very symbolic and they come out for a reason in movies. And big smash hits are definitely highly symbolic because we know that the Pentagon funds an awful lot of them, completely in fact. And if you go back to the old "Star Wars" movie, and it was very, very telling because in Star Wars all of the main troops were all faceless guys. They were dressed up in all this heavy armor, but there were no faces to them. So it was completely depersonalized. You are killing things you see. And shortly after that out came the SWAT teams. And they had television series on SWAT and all the rest of it. And "NYPD Blue" and all these things to get you used to the idea of SWAT teams. And then the heavy armor came in, and then the heavy armor with the troops in the black uniforms which always signifies death. And this is always understood in the military psychological warfare, death, black scares people. It’s authority, it’s the hangman’s outfit you know the hood and the whole thing.

And so now in all the movies you see these guys coming in with facemasks on and black armor, covered in armor, looking very formidable. And these guys are really the Star Wars characters you are seeing there. They themselves are depersonalized but they are on the winning team because every one of these movies they put out with SWAT teams and all the different alphabet soup agencies that they have are all dressed the same. They even have ones for the environment here in the U.S. now by the way. They have their own big huge trucks and all the rest of it, and they are armed.

All of these agencies always win. They are the guys that win. So youngsters are growing up in an atheistic society where their old cultural values have gone, the things that gave you a common shared morality have all gone. Their morality now is winners and losers with the video games. And they want to become one of the winners. And the winners always either have a badge or they wear that black outfit covered in armor with the big gun and they come in swarms. They are never individuals. It’s not a one on one fight, you are with a swarm and there is safety in the swarm. And you are on the winning side, you always win. You come in with what they call an army, and the SWAT teams now, overwhelming force.

And so the message to the public watching that is, or youngsters especially, oh they are the winning team, they can’t lose. And the guy that they are after, the civilian, doesn’t have a chance in hell, which he doesn’t. That’s the overwhelming message. This is all deliberate, and it’s repetitive, repetitive through all these fictional things that you watch whether it’s a drama series or movies. This is all intentional to make you, to make you simply surrender, give up and do what you are told or die.

Neil: Yeah. I mean talking about the "Star Wars" movie interestingly enough the Darth Vader character was obviously all in black but all the soldiers were dressed in white. And it was like, there was an old movie, I think it was called "Shane" I think where the anti-hero was dressed in black and the good guy was dressed in... I’m sorry the bad guy was dressed in white or something. And it’s almost like it’s there to confuse you. They think oh they’re dressed in white, they must be the good guys you know. And the other one you see who’s dressed in black, is the head guy, he’s got super powers so you know he must be alright as well or that kind of thing.

Alan: That’s right.

Neil: But and everybody wants to be that guy. They want to be able to bend people to their will as it were.

Alan: That’s right. In the 90’s I can remember, I lived a bit further south in Ontario and in a little spud town, a potato town, literally that’s how it survived, it was surrounded by farms and they grew potatoes. And I can remember one day seeing four policemen, you never saw policemen in this place, who looked like models. And they were walking abreast going down the sidewalk in this town and for the first time they had changed from the blue and sky blue shirts that the cops used to wear here into this complete black outfit including black shirt, black tie, and the army boots on with the trousers tucked in the boots and I looked at them walking down there. They were all kind of jovial, unlike the general policeman you know, but who at least you could approach. They weren’t so formidable and intimidating looking. And then I saw it in the local paper and they wondered if anyone had noticed, if anybody had noticed these guys walking down because they were parading to familiarize the new uniform to the general public it said.

And I must admit when I saw them walking down the street I looked around to see if anybody else was watching and they were not. And I realized then they had already become acclimatized in seeing these kinds of outfits on SWAT teams in American movies and drama series, like NYPD Blue.

So it already worked on the public without this little demonstration. But from an observer’s point of view it worked awfully well because I’m sure that most of them didn’t give it a second thought. Most folk don’t reason through things today because they are already pre-programmed to decide what they are seeing. The programming is deciding what you are seeing before you actually reason your way through it. It’s all this copious stuff from universities and all this stuff, behaviorism, and how they have already conditioned the public for every step in advance of the actual events happening.

Neil: Yeah. After the war I mean they all obviously, now they come back and they are completely traumatized, that’s the way they’ve been back then. But after the war these young guys were to come back and they didn’t have the drugs available to them that they do now so I mean what happened to those guys? I mean I know a lot of them did stay in the army for a while but the ones that came out, I mean how were they treated?

Alan: The ones that came back they didn’t have so much of the same problems because they were not, even in World War II, told to simply exterminate people, the enemy. Today’s army is vastly different as I say you enter free fire zones and you go into whole villages, there’s Fallujah and about five other ones that they went in one after the other that were not fighting them and just round up young guys and shot them. It was execution style, that’s the difference. It’s going against something which is not normal to human nature. That’s why they have to be drugged today. In World War II you saw your enemy. They’re firing at you; you are firing at them, a clear distinction. But when they surrendered, you accepted their surrender you know.

Neil: Well I mean you don’t really hear about troops surrendering anymore because I don’t suppose there is anybody close by to take them prisoner.

Alan: They don’t want prisoners now. Actually back in the 90’s and even before that in various U.S. publications to do with the military they discussed creating, not just a robo kind of soldier, the Cyber Soldier, but also the one that was a Pharma Soldier. Lots of drugs to alter their normal responses to make them more efficient killers and the drugs they concentrated on as I say would blunt the affect, the normal emotional response, and to saving someone or helping or forgiving someone. And that way it’s much easier to kill people when you are walking around in a kind of fugue state. It’s just like a video game, you are in a fugue state, there’s the enemy, shot, bang, dead, and that’s that.

So a lot of neuroscientists have been working on this. There is massive money in it, massive amounts of money given to the top neuroscientists to dehumanize the public. And with using the behaviorists as well and with methods to basically make them go against natural instincts, in fact they completely obliterate natural instincts which are not to simply kill people unless your life is absolutely threatened you know. That’s all been successfully done.

Fiction was the greatest method of all because children soak it up like crazy. We know the x-boxes and all the rest of the stuff are completely addictive. I’ve read the articles on the air, on RBN, and even some before that on "Sweet Liberty", and other ones, I’ve read the articles out from the military discussing this very thing, how successful they were in basically bringing this type of technique to the youth who were growing up with it and who were already trained to kill without thinking.

Neil: Yeah I mean back in, back when I was young we had the, I think it was called "The Victor", the magazine, the comic, sorry, and publications like that. And we had our, you know, the plastic soldiers that came in a bag and there were about forty of them or something. And you would get ones that were different colors so there were opposing armies and you threw marbles at them and you knocked them over and that kind of thing, and that was as far as it went. There was no blood and gore, there was none of that and you grew out of it. You just, you know you had enough of that and you went on to something else.

But as you say the video games, they’ve started them at a younger and younger age. They and introducing the violence on a very basic level, maybe it’s Tom and Jerry type of stuff, but there are still people getting hit with hammers.

Alan: They still are but definitely when they brought in the video games, which are addictive, I read all the stuff from the Pentagon that said these were designed for the military and they were all for the public, the youngsters being trained in that. You see they wanted a generation around 1990 and onwards that would be brought up on video games who are already ready to go in and just kill when they were told to kill. And so they created it because they had all these wars to fight across the Middle East and in Asia and so on, so they had to prepare a generation for that which they did awfully successfully. And a lot of this came from their own writings by the way, from the Pentagon, you know admitting this.

Neil: Yeah. You know that’s quite amazing. When I was young I used to get fed up hearing my parents say you know when I was young it was never like this you know. And now I’m at that stage myself and I look back and I think how did this happen you know? And but having said that people around you, my own generation as it were, who have no idea what’s going on just can’t even remember what it used to be like.

Alan: They can’t remember. That was part of the conditioning process that’s been incredibly well done I must admit, that Bertrand Russell talked about and many others that worked full time to create the new Western culture, including mass promiscuity and so on. He also worked with the groups in the U.S., the Macy Group and the Frankfurt School, to bring in as I say massive promiscuity, separate the emotional bonding from the sexual act, which they have done awfully successfully too. But also to make people narcissistic so that their little world would revolve around them, they would think about themselves far, far more than other people. That’s been terribly successful. And he says when they are like that they will simply obey to keep all the goodies that they have and they wouldn’t risk losing them. So they will stay in their own little circle, their little bubble of happiness and they don’t want to know about the rest of the world and what’s happening, etcetera. Then the state moves in you understand.

Don’t forget that the state system was designed, all these services, even police services now are a police authority or force. Lenin said this, he said, the West will have all these agencies start up, these volunteer to start with a lot of agencies, that will become services, and eventually they will become authorities. And he mentioned the health service would become a health authority, mandate inoculations, etcetera. And eventually mandate sterilizations which they did in Britain and across the U.S. The U.S. was still sterilizing what they call mentally, subnormal, back and right up through the 1970’s.

And so eugenics was all a big, big part of this whole darn thing. And for the rest of the public they were to be dehumanized and not to come in to aid their fellow man because once you are narcissistic, living in your little bubble, you are disassociated from all your friends around about you. They are simply friends that you get something from or something like that but they are not real friends as such. This was the society they wanted to bring in. And going back to the 1920’s, H.G. Wells in a couple of his non-fictional books working for the Fabian Society, which is just a branch by the way to run the left wing on behalf of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, they run all sides of it. He said that, apart from the breaking the bonds, the emotional bonds and separating the sex and the bond from the act itself, he also said the same thing that eventually government’s goal, and he was all for that, was so that they could talk down to you, the individual, and no one will stand up to help you around you. They would all be afraid of their own little luxuries being taken away if they get involved, things like that. And so they won’t risk anything to come to your aid. You are on your own, there will be no family around you either that will stand up for you.

Today what you hear for instance, a person gets broke, they lose their job, their own family members will say oh go to the government services, go get welfare. They won’t help them out you see. They’ve all been trained. If the child has some kind of abnormality, oh let the government deal with that, put him in a home. So the services now become authorities. And they are so happy to take more responsibility because it gives them more authority over you. But they were all designed from the beginning to eventually become authorities including the police force by the way. Yeah, it’s all been achieved.

Neil: Yeah. I want to talk about, we’ll go to a piece of music first and come back and talk about the kind of, the enemy we have, the so-called enemy we’ve got now in the Muslim world because they still seem to have some humanity and they are still very tight knit in terms of family and relationships and all the rest of it. And I lived in Turkey for a while, many years ago, and I see what’s happening in Turkey now and I begin to wonder if that was set up a long time ago. They divided that country into east and west. They westernized the western seaboard there all the way around as far as Ankara really and the rest of it is basically a Vietnam going on there with, there is an incessant war going on there. But no, we’ll come back and talk about that and how propaganda’s been used to try to take away their humanity if you like. So we’ll go to a piece of music Steve and we’ll come back after that.

{Break ♫}

Neil: Welcome back to Reality Bytes Radio on the 15th of May, 2014. I’m with our guest Alan Watt. We were talking during the break about the way that our enemies are created for us and I spent a bit of time in Turkey and there was, well there still is a war going on there, on the eastern side of that country. And I used to see guys coming from Eastern Turkey to Western Turkey for work and they were a different people all together but even the ones from Western Turkey who actually were conscripted at that time and sent over to fight in what was called over there, the Turkish Vietnam. It was so horrific. They would come back in an awful state, they weren’t physically injured, but they were certainly mentally injured. I watched people in nightclubs basically biting through their own tongues, stuff like that. It was quite horrific. But what I did see there was the whole western culture being kind of forced on the Turkish people. And I’ve seen that again in Bulgaria where the banks have just moved in on mass. The local town close to where I normally visit had two banks ten years ago and now I think there are forty. Well close to forty. And not just different branches of the same bank, all different banks. All offering their mortgages, credit cards, you name it. But in Bulgaria I mean there is a lot of talk here about all these Bulgarians that are supposed to come to Britain which has never materialized because I think as I said a year ago or so it never would materialize because they can’t even afford the bus fare to the local town. Never mind getting over here. But they all own their houses. Every one of them owns their own home. They own a piece of land. And the banks have moved in and basically screwed them out of them by lending them money they knew well they couldn’t afford to pay back. And they are just repossessing the houses now.

Alan: Well what happened was also, you see I know a lot of people who did move to Britain from Bulgaria and it’s mainly young people. And they can’t get work there because since the collapse and all the rest of it, the money that the EU, all the millions and millions of euros that the EU had put into Bulgaria never reached the people to create work, it doesn’t happen. It goes into the old politburo bosses who still run the country. And they are in cahoots with the banks. But you also have a complicated factor, a lot of the big Russian mafia mobs, we’ll call them mafia to be safe, but the mobs at Russia that helped, they helped to collapse Cyprus and the bail-in came in and all that kind of stuff. They were putting the money there too. They also put it into the big banks. They were spreading the banks out, they were proliferating in Bulgaria for that purpose, sinking a lot through there thinking it would be safer because of the U.S. bases going in there and have gone in with the missiles that are aimed at Russia.

So there is a lot of finagling going on but in fact the problem is there is so much natural corruption there because it was corrupt all through the communist era where the politburo bosses lived like kings, a lot of them, and they are still in the same positions today under social democrats, etcetera. That’s the term they are using now. It’s the same bunch and the public don’t get to see the money. So there is no work for the young folk and as you know there are houses all over Bulgaria where they just walk away and leave them vacant because there is no way they can earn money to live and so they are moving out of course. Which again I think is part of the agenda as well, it’s deliberate.

Neil: They’re certainly killing the villages. I know we are getting off topic, but they are certainly killing the villages there. And by just that methodology, the young people are moving out on mass really. And I would say your average village has probably got about 25 to 30% of the homes empty.

Alan: That’s right, all over the country.

Neil: Yeah, and there are even whole villages that are empty. So anybody who wants to know about Agenda 21, it looks like it’s coming soon to a town near you. You know, that’s it. That’s the way it’s going. And I get a lot of young people over there who actually they are quite clued up. They are quite aware of what’s going on because they still have generations in their family who could warn them what it looks like.

Alan: That’s one thing that has struck through. We forget too a lot of the people who lived through that whole era, under the communist regimes, they were Orthodox Christians, Eastern Orthodox, a lot of them. And they, because I’m in touch with some today, and they kept their own little secret services, private services going you might say, for religious things in their own homes. Every town, it’s very much like total information awareness network we have across the West now. In fact they copied a lot of that from the Soviet system. So these folk who lived in Bulgaria and elsewhere, Czechoslovakia, had these private little meetings to celebrate their particular religion, because in every town and village there were private snoops that were working for the secret services that would shop them. The only difference was that most of the folk in Bulgarian villages knew who the particular one was in their village so they’d watch him as much as he’d watch them. So they could do these little things.

But along with it came their morality. They carried that natural old morality along with them too to help each other out and that was so vitally important. We forget that because we are not given that side of the story. But things were terrible there and starvation came along every so often in the Soviet systems often on purpose you saw them starving out Hungary, places like that, 6 or 7 million people died on deliberate policy of starving people out as Stalin sold the grain abroad at that time. We forget that’s been done across the whole Soviet system including China. Mao Tse-tung did the same thing there, deliberate policy. And folk that survived, often survived because they still had something that kept them bonded together, in other words a common culture. And we forget that too, most common cultures have some form of religion, it doesn’t matter what nation or type it is. They have something that holds them together and keeps their humanity intact so they can survive.

In the West we have lost all of that until it is dog eat dog. In fact in the West the guy who gets to the top by any means possible it doesn’t matter how vicious he has been, he is lauded and approved by the general population right down to the bottom level. They treat them like kings because they got so wealthy. That’s what the West worships, is wealth you know. That’s what they worship. And you might say the religion in the West, especially in the U.S., is actually politics.

Neil: Yeah well I mean over there, the people, and I’m talking about Bulgaria now again, the people are generally happy. They don’t have enough to get by half the time but they will still give you some.

Alan: It’s not just happiness, it’s a natural... The thing is you can be happier more; you are not so neurotic when you have a common culture that will help each other out. And you know that, it’s a safety net you see.

We don’t have it in the West anymore. Everything is left up to government agencies. And so they are the big boss for everything. But over in those countries the folk have had a common culture and their common decency came out in that culture where they really, really would help each other through in all the villages to keep folk alive you know.

Neil: Yeah, well I’ve actually seen that because I mean people in the U.K., you know when they hear about Bulgarians, Romanians, something in the national press here, just think of them all as scrounging parasites as it were. But if they spent you know a winter in a Bulgarian village they would soon find out what these guys have to put up with. I know one chap who died in his home, and he was only in his 60’s. He had no glass in his windows. I mean that’s how poor he was. He couldn’t afford a bed or anything. And there is no welfare system there. And we basically, you know people tried to help him out as much as they could but he was, you know, he had his pride and all the rest of it. And unfortunately that was the end of him. But people just don’t, they look at these pictures on the television and think oh that’s quaint. They’ve got chickens and some pigs and stuff. And they think it’s an easy life. And they have no idea.

Alan: They have no idea and they forget too there is also their own little mafia that’s run them all through the Soviet and into the present system as well. It still runs it today you know.

Neil: Absolutely.

Alan: And I know people today who have been attacked by these particular goons, who will come in if you have a few pigs sometimes and they will just grab them and off they go. And there is nothing you can do about it because you know who they are and they are monsters if they come after you.

Neil: Oh yeah. Well I’ve told you the little story off air there during the break and you don’t mess with some people and that’s it. But they have their own control system of course and you drive into a Gypsy encampment, it’s all enclosed, it’s almost like a concentration camp. And they’ve got a very large house at one end of it with a guy sitting outside with the shotguns. And that’s who runs it all.

Alan: That’s correct.

Neil: That’s the way it is. As I say we got a little off topic there. I mean do you think that there is any hope that people will actually get their humanity back? Or I mean is there any way of reversing what’s clearly happened?

Alan: We’ve got to remember that no countries have had so much war on the general populations as the Western Countries. This was the whole intention of the Frankfurt School that was given authority along with the Macy School, Russell was a member of both, Bertrand Russell, as well as UNESCO and so on. He was a member of all these groups. And he worked with all the behaviorists of the day to bring in a new... They were given authority these groups, working collectively to bring in a brand-new culture for the Western Countries. They had to get rid of their religious stance. That was one mandate. They had to become almost secular humanists. That was to be the new religion brought in by the United Nations. It still is by the way. And it’s been awfully, awfully successful today where folk are quite content in their world believing that if they ever needed that safety net, they don’t go to friends if they have any at all or family, they go to the government agency that they think is going to help them. Often they get an awful shock because it doesn’t work the way that they say it works.

But the government now is the total boss over every aspect of your life. That was part of it and the old family structures have been almost, almost eradicated you know, almost. There is still a remnant within some families of strong ties and good luck to them because you’ll really need them. The folk who don’t have that are literally on their own if anything nasty happens to them personally.

That was always the intention of this system to make the government the top boss. And that’s why George Orwell in his "1984" book had the screen in every home and the screen was attached, came right from Big Brother, all the bureaucrats, and even your mandatory keep-fit instructors came on every morning. They could talk right to you number so-and-so, Smith, you know. Stand up straight, touch your toes, blah, blah. That would be it. You couldn’t turn around to anybody to help you, friends, family, or anything. It was all gone. And that’s almost been achieved. You understand this was, they called it "Total War". Total meant the destruction of all that was to bring in the new. And that’s been very successfully done in the Western Countries.

Neil: Yeah, absolutely. I just reread "Fahrenheit 451" recently and of course you have the full wall television sets in that as well. And the status symbol was to have one on every wall.

Alan: And interactive as well.

Neil: Yeah, you were interactive. And they had soap operas before soap operas were even heard of and before television was even heard of. But yeah it really is hard to see how it can be reversed but I suppose we have got to hope for the best, that there are people coming through who don’t take the indoctrination. I mean I know that it’s almost impossible to avoid it.

Alan: It’s almost impossible today, in fact again you always go back to the masters who set up the present cultural system and changes in the cultural system that have yet to be implemented because they were doing it in stages. But most of them are dead now. These guys drafted up the whole era to come post World War II, the 60’s counter-revolution, etcetera, revolution, all the different revolutions. They planned the sexual revolution, the feminist revolutions, and so on all the way down including by the way they were completely integrated with the fashion industry believe it or not. Because you have to have all these, these are all part of culture and so on and the music industry to bring in a brand new culture where government would be in total control, experts. This was the Club of Rome by the way if you go into their writings. This is what they were working with too and they also worked with Bertrand Russell.

So they were to bring in this brand new culture where the state and all of its agencies would be the bosses from birth to death of every individual under their system. And that’s what GIRFEC is about in Scotland. They have other ones in England that are much similar. They brought one into the States that’s kind of similar. And so it’s to be a unified culture eventually across the whole wide world, a complete new system, a complete new system for the world. A world order means a world order. And that’s what they’ve been working with eventually. A common, common culture across the planet will come out of this eventually after all of the different riots of ethnic clashes.

And these guys work intergenerationally. They don’t say we have to get it done in our time; they can do it two, three, four, five generations down the road. That’s what the foundations were set up to do. And there is a great book out it’s called, "Foundations their Power and Influence". It was written about all what you think about as non-profit organizations of the big Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, and all the ones in Britain as well that were to be a parallel government and then be the government, because the ones who set up these foundations would be the bosses of international corporations, one and the same thing. That’s why Bill Gates who was never elected to anything has so much power in the world and over countries, and so on. That’s why those big boys in the Club of Rome have so much power in what they say and all their stuff gets used at the United Nations.

The United Nations is also the embryo for the centralization for World Government even though none of us have ever voted to get them set up and started on the go to begin with never mind a vote to see who gets in. It’s completely undemocratic you see. And the same with the trading blocks where eventually the CEOs of the corporations, who also run the big foundations that run all the NGOs and fund them all, shape the direction that the whole world’s traveling in. They give all the funding to universities, etcetera. And along with the funding comes the mandates what to teach and what not to teach. So they can direct the whole shape and future of the minds of all those who are growing up, and so they are prepared for their part in the world even if they don’t understand it until it happens. It’s a perfect scientifically organized system this, and this is the world they want to be run by experts from cradle to grave and it’s worked very well up until now.

What you see with the problems in society is simply the chaos and the clashes of old systems versus new systems. The old systems are always dropping off because they can’t fight it, they don’t have the finances even to fight it never mind the time. And the authorities make it quite plain that nothing is going to stand in their way, they are going to get what they want, again overwhelming force.

Overwhelming force doesn’t simply mean that police come at you with combat gear; it also means that all the legal departments of government and state will come against you and they’ll make you bankrupt and put you into poverty, etcetera, etcetera. They make life unbearable for you. That’s also part of overwhelming force, total war. So all these aspects are being used today to train the public into the ideal obedient citizen that they want for the present and the near future, definitely the near future.

Neil: Yeah, well what’s happening to Britain tomorrow is the first debate in parliament which just happens to coincide with the last day of the concession which they brought forward by a week. Just last week they decided to give themselves an extra week’s holiday. Is the National Service Bill, that’s getting debated in parliament tomorrow and nobody is going to have any right to reply on it I’m sure. But that coincides with a program that’s already in place called the National Citizens Service Program for 16 to 19 year olds. And one of my colleague’s son went on it, well as a volunteer, and to do a bit of research for his mom. And basically it’s a boot camp and they have Alsatian dogs come into the dormitory and sniff through all their belongings and their billets if you want to call it, in military terms anyway, everything is searched, their clothes are searched, their private baggage is searched, and that’s for 16 to 19 year olds, and the National Service Bill is for 19 to 25 year olds. So it’s all falling into place.

Alan: It’s falling into place and they keep pushing through the same bill in the U.S. It’s exactly the same bill for you to work abroad or at home to serve the country as they call it. But it’s also to train a generation. Out of the ones they train for this they will select the ones that really go for it, that really like it. And they’ll select them to be the new overseers in their little areas of communitarianism for the future. The big plan of course that Cameron keeps prattling on about because eventually you have to live in your little communitarian area with appointed, just like... What you are living in is the goal that the Soviet Union never reached, where Soviet means ruled by councils remember. But these councils were not elected, they were appointed. And the leaders were all appointed. And this is the new system, the great plan, the great work, the great society, all of the terms they are using in Britain are about. And so these people will be little fanatics, majordomos and they’ve gone through their little national service thing, they’ve been picked because they really like it. They adapt to authoritarianism very well. They like authoritarianism. They like to give out authority and these are the ones they’ll make your majordomos over you.

Neil: Yeah going back to Bulgaria the thing, that’s already happening actually there again. They are having these people in the villages kind of going around and exerting some kind of authority which they were never elected to do. But you know that’s, at least people there still recognize it for what it is and they are actually warning their children.

Alan: They do. They know exactly what it is, it’s just the West that are totally blinded, they don’t know what’s going on. Because they haven’t had that before. They haven’t had your neighbors being dragged off in the middle of the night by the goon squad you know.

Neil: Well talking about people being dragged off in the middle of the night, Robert Green is still in prison after what, three months now, on no charges really and he’s up for bail again tomorrow which is unlikely he’ll get it. But anybody who wants to write him, I’ve got his prison number and his address somewhere but I’ll post it up here possibly tomorrow or something. But yeah, I mean they are actually taking people off the street. I think there was another case yesterday. I was speaking to somebody, somebody who reported pedophilia, a mother and a daughter, and both of them were just taken away. So there you go.

Alan: Yes. It’s interesting too which stories they will publish to make sure you get a point, a point that sinks into our heads. And all this stuff that they will never publish of course you know because in reality government, they’ve gone to an awful lot of time and trouble through propaganda and indoctrination techniques and through schooling to give us all a fake impression of what government is all about. And this was well covered by Adam Curtis by the way, especially through the television, the BBC, etcetera, and how it operated, and why it operated the way that it did. He did also "The Power of Nightmares". It’s well worth watching that series where he used a lot of footage that’s never been shown to the public before of how they decided what was good for the public, bad for the public. But basically his series completely affirmed what Jacques Ellul, the philosopher in France, what he said about propaganda, he said all television shows to do with the state exercising force to keep the public order, the public good, all of that, he says all dramas and fiction are complete propaganda, a well understood technique amongst behaviorists.

Another one too is for the coming pharmacological control of the general population, gradually accepting them that taking pills is normal. They start them off at childhood, pick the brighter ones out at school and dumb them down to an extent until they are in a fugue state once again, they can’t operate properly and they go through life on pills. We know that a lot of these pills, especially the amphetamine types that they give them for children, prescribed ones, shrink their brain. We know that, it’s a physical effect and it’s well documented too. It can’t be, cannot be disproved. It’s not an iffy thing, it happens, and they take the brightest children that ask all the right questions and they attack them right there and then and that ties in with what Russell said about the bright children of the future, he said we’ll have to eliminate them. Well they’ve done it awfully successfully.

They also said that some children in previous years, before the 40’s, could slip through their nets, but not anymore at school because they give them so many tests and so much neuroscientists pour over all these little tests and their scores and so on. They know exactly what it means and they can give you a complete readout on this child’s personality. What he’ll go for, what he won’t go for, what he will go along with and what he will not go along with, etcetera. And they are all marked down precisely for scientific control of the population. This is what all of this is about folks. Most folk don’t reason, they do not reason the news out for themselves. They get downloaded with bits and bytes of it and repetition, repetition all the time, bits and bytes from this news station and that news station. And they don’t think through it but it sort of congeals and comes together in their head the way it’s intended. But they have never reasoned through things, they simply adopt the opinion that they have left them with. And it’s a scientific technique that works awfully, awfully well. You are left with your opinions that become yours, and so much so that you see the guys in the bars fighting over opinions that actually they have never reasoned through in their lives.

Neil: Yeah, it sort of shocked me that, that’s why the social services are now claiming that, not to vaccinate your child is a cause for neglect, and they are coming after them because if you can’t get the vaccines in them they might actually start thinking for themselves later on in life.

Alan: That’s right.

Neil: But that’s, and I think it was Jacques Ellul again in the book, "Propaganda", he said that all propaganda has to be from every source continuous, it can’t be allowed to stop. And if it stops then the chain will be broken.

Alan: Actually they’ve got a term for it. They have got a term for it and you’ll see it often in the treaties they sign up, from the Council on Foreign Relations, which is simply the American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. And these are the guys who drafted up, they were the guys put in charge and they drafted up, they put themselves in charge, they are an unelected private organization. They put themselves in charge and they drafted up all the treaties and the signatory stuff and the structure for the integration of the whole of Europe. They did the same thing for the NAFTA agreement for the integration of the Americas. And they came out on television in Canada, they had admitted it by the way for the first in 2005. They came out as the Council on Foreign Relations for Canada and the States and Mexico and admitted they drafted up the charter for all of these free trade agreements which means amalgamation of all your systems together down the road, incrementally.

But I noticed an article recently and what they said in it was now that free trade has been institutionalized, that’s the term they used where the repetition that you are talking about is everyday language, folk accept it without questioning it or even reasoning through it. It’s just there like gravity. It’s a normal thing. Now that we’ve got free trade rationalized and institutionalized in everyday business and conversation we’ll go the next step which is and not just the Pacific Rim Agreement, trading with the Pacific Rim and so on, Pacific countries, but also with the whole of Europe. Again tightening that bond with the trade with Europe which is an integration of all your economic policies which eventually leads to all your criminal and non-criminal policies and legalistic terms because that’s how countries are defined. You are defined by your economic system. When you go into law school that’s what they’ll teach you there. Your country and all of its laws is defined by your economic system of imports, exports, manufacturing, and so on. The value of human life comes down to what could this person that you murdered have produced in their life for this company and the taxes that they would have created for the government to collect. And that’s how your punishment comes along, that’s how it is decided upon, your financial value to the system. No kidding.

So once you start integrating all your trade agreements which eventually get systems built and to deal with a new economic branch dealing with nothing but trade in every country then they are dealing with each other then it broadens out into the wider society. That’s how the European Union and its new parliament came to be which the boys who set it up knew would be eventually anyway. {Laughs} It’s quite amazing.

So people have no idea how the world really works but again it’s done through propaganda. And you’ve lived through I’m sure all of the "should we vote for the European Union or not" for integration. You’ve seen it over and over and people said nobody wanted it but they got it regardless. And they kept telling you the same propaganda that they use in Canada and they are using in Mexico and they are using for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, etcetera. Oh if you don’t join you will be left behind. We’ve all seen that too. And look at the mess Europe is in with its massive, incredible financial debt because of it all. Look at the deindustrialization, all the factories have gone to China because that was all set up by the Royal Institute for International Affairs by the way. They set up the World Trade Organization, the IMF, and the Bank for International Settlements. These are all privately owned by this group.

So why do the people bother voting when non-governmental bodies dictate the policies including the treaties, all your trade agreements, and your integrations into trading blocks? Why do you bother voting for these politicians that spout jobs, jobs, jobs, education and healthcare at election time when these guys have got nothing to do with it?

Neil: And law and order of course. But yeah I mean we are supposed to vote for these creeps next Thursday for the European parliament again. A European parliament which costs us 55 million pounds a day and if we didn’t pay it for one year we wouldn’t have this bogus national debt in the first place.

Alan: If folk would just stop voting all together that would be a start.

Neil: Yeah exactly.

Alan: Why participate in the scam?

Neil: Well it’s actually illegal to pay taxes to a government which is illegally paying taxes to an organization which doesn’t produce accounts.

Alan: That’s right. It’s actually illegal to claim or demand taxes from a citizen from a corporate body that doesn’t have anybody’s signature on it.

Neil: Yeah, yeah. Well if only more people just step back and just stopped paying up the world might be a better place.

Alan: Well we know what we have to do or what folk have to do but the fact is nobody is going to do it because again they’ve done thousands of odd studies. They do thousands of them every year on all of us and all the different think tanks and they publish them in all these different institutes across the planet to see how many folk would stand up for this and stand up for this particular thing or that particular thing. And they know that they’ve got the society so fragmented. They know that the ones at the bottom always get hurt first naturally. When they stand up they either are totally ignored or they end up starting riots. Riots are easy to control.

The middle classes pretend that their little bubble is going to go on forever and they don’t squeal until they actually get hit personally and they can’t afford things etcetera, etcetera, that’s when they start squealing. And the ones that try to emulate the upper classes have nothing in common with them whatsoever. They see you as the same peasant as they see in China. They don’t care, all the peasants are the same to them and their reality is totally different than is portrayed on the fictional television, etcetera.

So they know that no one will stand up in unison for what should be done and has to be done if you are going to save anything at all in society or allow your children to literally be turned into pharmacological robots and maybe yourself as well down the road with your Soma to keep you happy. This is what it’s all about. This is the new system.

The Club of Rome in their book, it was called, "The First Global Revolution", it said in it that democracy doesn’t work however they’ve always used the term democracy from the United Nations and so on as they want to conquer other countries to bring them all into the same system. So you have a façade of what people think is democracy, and the façade of they think they have rights too, but in reality the Club of Rome said if there are too many factions all competing for power there could never be any harmony therefore an authoritarian system must be introduced, run scientifically. And they were simply reiterating H.G. Wells and many others before him on the same system.

What you are seeing now is the training into authoritarianism. And you’ll notice too, I’ve noticed this, the general news for instance since the Leveson Inquiry and the bill that went forward by Leveson, Lord Leveson in Britain, it kind of muzzled a lot of journalists. There is less speculation about and personal opinions by journalists now. You get more trivia churned out than ever before. At the same time you had the Finkelstein Inquiry in Australia who also turned out the big bill there, massive thousands of page bills, for it to cut, muzzle the media in Australia. I think Canada has done it too. So all the British Commonwealth countries went along with it at the same time.

And what you are seeing in the news now is nothing but absolute propaganda and trivia, trivia. And all the news you get is about over there somewhere but not what’s happening right in your own backyard. You may get it in a local paper, petty crime and things like that, but nothing major about what your governments are actually up to. And you’ll notice too there is less and less politicians coming out and saying things as they try to get you conditioned and they are doing it very well. This is through a conditioning process for the public to gradually accept the fact not to expect statements from the actual politicians that you think you elect. And what you get is announcements simply from governmental departments. This is the new authoritarian system they are training you into. For the future you will simply accept the fact there is a power structure above you that’s run by some kind of special experts out of special wombs. And you just go out and play and work hard and pay your taxes and be good and don’t concern yourself with it. That’s the system they are bringing in right now as we live and it’s very obvious.

Neil: Yeah. What I’ve noticed. We were down at parliament on budget day and trying to get some of these characters, and we went down the street and there wasn’t a politician anywhere. And even the police on the gate said this is highly unusual, this just doesn’t happen. They were obviously told to stay away. And as I say we have got this farce of an election next Thursday and I’ve yet to see anybody out in the street campaigning. They’ve just, they have disappeared.

Alan: Well we don’t really need them anymore. And again that’s training the public that it doesn’t matter. They’ll put their own boys in regardless and fake the numbers as they have done for an awful long time. Like Stalin says, I don’t care who votes, I only care about those that count the votes. And that’s all rigged so they’ll carry this system on for a little while more but they are training the public not to even be concerned about it, that to accept this new authoritarian system. They’ve already said by the way in the Pentagon and the publications of the CFR, accept it, antiterrorism is going to go on forever. So antiterrorism now covers every spectrum of law and order and even civil law and so on, everything. This is the new rule for the future for the rest of your lives and beyond. Yeah, that’s what they’ve said.

Neil: Well of course that was in “1984” as well you know, terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. Okay, well we’ve kind of gone over a bit on time but thanks very much again Alan for your insights and your knowledge.

Alan: It’s a pleasure.

Neil: And I’m sure we’ll have you back next month or so again.

Alan: Sure enough. It’s been a pleasure.

Neil: We have a few days to sort it out. Okay, we’ll go to a short piece of music and then we’ll be back with something on vaccines I think.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:33 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on May the 18th, 2014. I’d just like to say that many people have emailed from all over, the world really, about the weather changes. And of course the weather changes are all planned that way because geoengineering has been going on constantly, continuously, not experimentally, since 1998. That’s when it really started big time in Ontario at least and other countries too. Before of course, since even the 50s, they were doing lots of geoengineering experiments onwards over select areas to see the effects of weather modification.

 

I’ve gone through the history of weather modification and all the other effects they can produce too, with using electromagnetic energy, the HAARP technology, etc. And going back to even Teller who came up with the idea of the H-bomb. He talked about saturating the skies with metallic particles which make it more conductive to electrical impulses which could be controlled. Of course we even have Brzezinski talking about that [in his book, Between Two Ages, in the chapter] The Technotronic Era, where he talks about using these waves ACROSS WHOLE CONTINENTS TO PACIFY THE PEOPLE OR CHANGE THEIR MOODS and so on. They can actually make you anxious or depressed or simply placid, because we work on frequencies. Every cell in your body has its own frequency, every cell type that is, and by modifying that and getting close to it they can mimic it and then alter it slightly too. It works across the board with people.

 

But we’ve watched this geoengineering going on in concert with the global warming agenda, which is the big PR stunt to institutionalizing our way of talking and thinking and in conversations, the idea that we are causing all the problems on the planet, where in reality big scientific societies and agencies are working hard to give this impression. I’ve mentioned so many times, and I can’t stress it enough, that Arthur C Clarke talked about THE EFFECTS OF ADVANCED SCIENCE ON A PRIMITIVE POPULATION, and he said that, IT WOULD APPEAR AS MAGIC TO THE PEOPLE.

 

We think we are so advanced today, the average person, because of the Internet and so on; we think we know it all. And we don’t because we are way behind with all the techniques that are used, with all the scientific magazines which are low-level stuff, that’s research that’s been done, again, just starting basically on certain areas. Whereas the real searching was done a long time ago; and what you’re given for public consumption is obsolete to an extent too. So we believe what they tell us, a lot of people do believe what they’re told because they get repetition, propaganda also works by repetition, until the public themselves start parroting it in their conversations. I’ve gone through the history of this. Go into the archive section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you’ll find talks I’ve given on this and the history of it and so on. And the histories too of the non-governmental organizations which have tremendous power today, working under the United Nations umbrella. The United Nations of course is an organization set up by a private organization already in existence, which was the Lord Alfred Milner group which became the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations. They created all of these agencies, supranational agencies which are privately run. They set up the World Bank. They set up the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements; I’ve gone through the history of that before too. So the next step of course is to use the scientific technique to control all of society. It’s already been done, actually, and most folk don’t know it. They really don’t know that science rose up a long time ago, well-funded, well managed and organized and directed by the funders, the funders being an intelligentsia already in existence who came from very wealthy families. They hired the best minds they could find to create their organizations, like the CFR, Council on Foreign Relations. And they’ve done it awfully well.

 

They set up the idea of the trading blocs and eventually to amalgamate the three main blocs under a world governmental agency down the road, which is almost here pretty well. In fact, we are global. We’ve heard that prattle about globalism for an awful long time, until again, it becomes institutionalized, as they call it themselves in their own writings. Once we prattle on about it, in the public, in general conversations, on a superficial level because most folk will prattle on about these things without ever digging into it themselves. They’ve got bits and bytes of information and they simply prattle it off to each other in conversation and other folk think they know what it means too because they’ve heard the little bits and bytes as well, and they don’t go any deeper than that.

 

Anything done on a major scale is put out hypothetically to the public... If we were going to do this geoengineering what would the consequences be? That’s what they talk about at their big meetings. Of course the organizations they work for, the multitude of them, have already done all the research and they bring it together, and they also observe the effects as it happens, because it’s already been going on for a long time now. In other words, the major decisions are bypassed by the general public. We are told it’s in the future, and possibly, and maybe not at that, etc. etc., till it’s all very confusing. And because we are trained to parrot what comes across from the news and from famous people, etc. we ignore what we see with our own eyes. Most folk do. Even when they see it, they’ve been watching the spraying for years, they don’t want to say, well, this is not how it used to be.

 

People have very short term memories today. THEY EXPECT, like Brzezinski said, THE MEDIA TO DO THEIR REASONING FOR THEM. Therefore if no hassle and anxiety is drummed up by the media to be concerned about something, they will not be concerned. They will ignore their own conclusions or responses or even thinking or reasoning to do with what is happening above their heads, in fact, or why the weather is changing. It’s quite simple. And it’s quite astonishing too, that we’re so easy to manipulate in so many different ways; this is only one aspect of it.

 

So we have been told that the geoengineering, if they ever did it that is, it could have… once they noticed that we’re getting a lot of rain of course, they suddenly changed it, oh it could be lots of rain happening. Well, since November to April, the snow melted here in April in Ontario where I am, and since then it’s been raining. So from November till April the ground didn’t see any sun at all, pretty well; it was never bare because we didn’t have a big thaw like we usually have. So we had a massive blanket of snow, lots of snow, more snow than I’ve seen for years. Most folk here say that, the older guys say that they haven’t seen this since the early 1960s. So it’s back again, you see. But we see the spraying going on. Even with the short breaks in clouds that we see they’re still doing it. And sure enough, in the wintertime therefore you’re getting it coming down as snow and then it goes straight into rain. It’s rained here for about the last month pretty continuously, very little sunshine. And last night the temperature dropped right down to -3° Centigrade or about 29° Fahrenheit, round about that temperature. So we’re still in the freezing temperatures at night here and it’s cold during the day.

 

So the geoengineering is working awfully well. But eventually the public, the general public will get the message from the media to be concerned about the weather. Concern yourself about it... and then they will be concerned about it. Because the idea is to make you believe that you are the cause of it all. It’s so brilliant, isn’t it, how easy it is to manipulate millions or even billions of people by the information you receive. After all, why would anybody want to lie to you?

 

That’s how naïve we are. People didn’t used to be so naïve. I mean, up until just before TV came in folk distrusted governments. They distrusted them, across the world. Because they had a better education of the history of governments, and armies and standing armies and all these things and how a power elite could turn them against the people at any time they wish to, and they often did of course; that’s the history of the world. So eventually we will blame ourselves because that’s the intention. We’ll believe it because people will start to say, my God the weather is changing… They still won’t notice the spraying because it won’t be mentioned of course on the mainstream media. Then of course you’ll be taught that science has to rule us even more, and that old governments and politics are obsolete because they represent you and you are uneducated, you’re ignorant, etc., we need an advanced scientific group to run the world. It’s been like that for a long time actually, they just haven’t told you; and I’ll touch on that tonight.

 

But I have gone into the past quite a bit in different areas, about the organizations that were set up to bring in world government, who set it up, the big bankers of the day of course, and very wealthy intergenerational families which created the big groups. Of course in the US everyone knows the Rockefeller family that really helped to spearhead, at least that’s what you’re told; there were big groups behind them, mind you, the Rockefellers also took the heat but the Rockefellers belonged to the organization. In fact, the old man Rockefeller was set up and given a lot of help, put it this way, in acquiring his power and wealth by the organization that already existed. But they put him out as the front man for the Council on Foreign Relations. He already worked for it before they called it that of course, because as I say it’s a branch of the Milner group, and then they gave themselves the official titles later on to further confuse the general public.

 

The organization itself was so secretive according to Carroll Quigley that many folk in Parliament, including Winston Churchill at one point, didn’t know; they knew there was something going on by a group, but they had no name given out to the general public at the time. Now, most folk maybe know the term Council on Foreign Relations when they bring on a spokesperson to advise on foreign-policy etc. Private organizations, very old indeed. Anybody who’s anybody, and who’s been a so-called made-man, made by the organizations behind them that is, that opened up the doors, cut out the competition for them and made sure they were awfully wealthy... In other words, they’re bought and paid for completely, intergenerationally, they will carry on the agenda. So I’ve gone through that in the past too if you go into the archives again at cuttingthroughthematrix.com; you can find out lots of information on all of this. But the idea for this group, this very old group, was to create a world society, as I say. How to maintain power for their own corporations was awfully important of course. Because economics is the key to controlling everything. And those at the top of money and power want to keep it and ensure that the big corporations they also own don’t fail, the big, big ones. They amalgamate all the time of course, but really it’s all kind of in-the-family. You’ll find that many of the top corporations, in any particular area, are all owned by the same shareholders at the top, the select shareholders; these shares are not advertised to the public to buy.

 

Now, getting back to the idea of science controlling society, I’ll just touch on something, an old book by a very important man. Because again, they put out their own spokespeople to often write to each other, in a sense, by publishing books. The general public will get one message but the insiders get another message from what they read; that’s how a lot of things are written. Lord Bertrand Russell I’ve mentioned so many times was often accused of being a communist. And he wasn’t. Because you understand, this same group, the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations funded all sides. In fact, they created all sides that appear to be in conflict. And they made sure that we fed even opposing sides through Cold Wars, etc. Because to get change you must have at least two sides; one side where everyone’s content won’t fight and change for anything; why should they? So you create an opposing side and through the opposition, it’s the old Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis that you end up getting. This is the whole idea of strategy. All strategies are worked out that way, the Hegelian dialectic as they like to call it, but which existed long before Hegel came along. So to get change you need all the conflicts so you must control all sides. So only those at the top know the con, and even the real higher workers beneath them, still higher level but beneath them, are not in on the big joke you might say, the big, big joke. That’s why the bombs were never set off during the Cold War. That’s why the missiles were never fired. An organization that’s running the whole show would never, ever have a lack of failsafes to ensure that only those at the very top could press the buttons of course. And they were all working for the same group, always having international meetings together.

 

Now, the society they wanted to bring in was not democratic. I’ve mentioned this before. They would use the term democracy, the public had been already accustomed to the term in the 1800s, the idea of democracy, put it that way, but they had the intention of always controlling this thing called democracy, which disarms a lot of people mentally, and sometimes physically, to give up all personal power and do it for the greater good, we’re all in it together sort of thing. But the boys at the top always had a plan, and they said, DEMOCRACY WOULD NEVER WORK, in their own writings, private writings, AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO BRING IN A SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY.

 

Bertrand Russell of course was one of the top propagandists for them. He was also a very busy worker, working with groups who were given, again, the right to create new cultures by a private organization running it at the top. They even had presidential authority after World War II, in fact during World War II to help set up the postwar reconstruction, changing cultures, etc. etc. Now, here’s a book that Russell put out in 1931. It’s called The Scientific Outlook. This guy is often called a philosopher, a mathematician and so on. But he was also a propagandist and he worked with the Macy group, the Frankfort school and other doctrines, you might call them, clubs, that wanted to bring in this new socialist-appearing society. It had to always appear to be socialist, for the people, etc. That way they wouldn’t have any more revolutions, eventually, and the people would be conned into believing it really was all for them.

 

But their goal was always stressed by Russell, who couldn’t help but boast once in a while. He had a tremendous ego, this man. So much so, in fact, he kept going after other guys’ wives, very important people, just to win them over, to say I’m better than that guy, you see. Tremendous ego. Very pompous in private conversation at dinner tables, etc. Very arrogant. He loved to get arguments going and try and belittle other people. He fell out with Arthur Koestler on that topic because when a bunch of them were at the dinner table he tried, he was flirting, Russell was flirting heavily with Koestler’s wife and Koestler lost his top, which is exactly what Russell wanted to happen, you see, but a psychopathic personality, he enjoyed it.

 

So here’s a little thing he wrote in 1931, The Scientific Outlook. This is before World War II, remember. People think everything came as a surprise attack in World War II, especially for the US… Japan just happened to suddenly do a nasty sneaky thing and it was all a big surprise. Of course we know that FDR, and even before him, the US had been cutting off and taking over all the Pacific areas. Japan needs imports. It needs to bring in its energy supplies and so on, raw materials. And to stop any expansionism the big corporations in the US and Britain made sure that they had a complete hold on all of these islands and lands where they got the raw resources. They didn’t want Japan butting in. But they did want to bring in the world society. So what do you do? You’ve got to get a war going of course, is what you have to do to change culture. Remember what they said, and Quigley said this too, who worked for the same group remember. Quigley said that YOU CAN GET MORE DONE IN FIVE YEARS OF WAR THAN 50 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROPAGANDA; IT’S EASIER TO CHANGE SOCIETY. And he said, ALL SIDES IN THE CONFLICT HAVE THEIR CULTURE CHANGED.

 

Now, why would they want to change the culture? Well, to bring you into a new society, a world society, you must eliminate all the old cultures to bring in the new. It’s the old Nimrod idea, isn’t it, really, the old tower of Babel, and they all spoke as one language. The old thing… That’s why they have that old broken tower in so much of the Rosicrucian and Masonic literature of course. It’s to do with something for the future, the creation of this tower, if you want to call it that, and who knows, maybe it’s going to be a massive electrical tower. But anyway, the idea is power. A tower stands for power, one power running the world.

 

But here’s what he says…

 

In spite of the extraordinary success of Japanese policy (Alan: ...this is 1931...), there are certain unintended effects which are likely in time to cause serious difficulties. The sudden change of habits and of conscious opinions has induced a certain nervous strain, at any rate in the urban part of the population. This may produce a tendency to hysteria in time of national stress; indeed, such a tendency was shown in the massacres of Koreans that occurred after the earthquake of Tokio. What is more serious, the position of Japan demands the growth of both industrialism and armaments. Owing to the expense of the latter the industrial workers are poor; they tend, consequently, to acquire a rebellious mentality, and the circumstances of their work make it difficult for them to preserve that close family organization upon which Japanese society is built. If Japan should become engaged in an unsuccessful war, (A: This is coming from a guy, remember, who attended lots of world meetings, often which were kept quiet from the public, generally they were.) these circumstances might produce a revolution analogous to the Russian Revolution. The present social structure in Japan is likely therefore in time to become unstable, but it may be that the same skill which has rendered possible the triumphant career of Japan throughout the last seventy years will enable the Japanese to adapt themselves to changing circumstances gradually without any violent upheaval. The one thing that seems fairly certain is that, whether gradually or by revolution, the social structure in Japan will have to be profoundly modified. (A: Then he goes on to say…) Remarkable as it is, therefore, it is not a perfect example of scientific construction. (A: ...scientific construction, eh...) I do not mean by this that it could have been bettered at the time, but only that it is not in all respects a model for the future. (A: In other words, you need a war and massive change, that’s guided, which of course is what they did eventually after World War II. In fact, they planned it all before, during and after; they were still carrying out the changes for the hypothetical future of Japan which they had already worked on.)

 

The attempt at scientific construction which is being made by the Soviet Government (A: Now, this is why these boys created these big, they called them, experiments across the world, to use in the future. They’d find out all the problems that would arise through the system and they’d bring in another one later on, under a different name of course; we call it socialism or world government. And this is what you’re in today, it’s a perfected Soviet system.) is more ambitious than that which was carried through by the Japanese innovators in 1867; it aims at a much greater change in social institutions, and at the creation of a society far more different from anything previously known than is that of Japan. (A: So he’s lauding what happened in the Soviet Union, with its millions slaughtered and the whole thing.) The experiment is still in progress, (A: ...the experiment... is still in progress...) and only a rash man would venture to predict whether it will succeed or fail; (A: Remember, the CFR and the Royal Institute of International Affairs covered up the massacres and slaughters in the Soviet Union, and up until after World War II, well after it in fact.) the attitude both of friends and enemies towards it has been singularly unscientific. (A: ....unscientific attitude, right...)

 

For my part, I am not anxious to appraise the good or evil in the Soviet system, but merely to point out those elements of deliberate planning which make it so far the most complete example of a scientific society. (A: In other words, all of what they called superstition or religion was kicked out, of course; not all of it, there was actually some which was allowed. But he said, a scientific society, in other words, scientific experts organized, and NGOs too by the way. And remember, ‘Soviet’ means RULE BY COUNCILS, appointed councils, which is what we have today. Only we’ve got private NGOs all funded by big private foundations, most of them if not all of them are members of the CFR/Royal Institute of International Affairs, these big foundations. And they help bring in the environmental things, they’re at all the world meetings, they have a big, big major say in what happens. The public don’t count. THE PROLES DON’T COUNT, as George Orwell said.)

 

In the first place, all the major factors of production and distribution are controlled by the State (A: ...which Russell really thought was a great idea. And by the way, that’s why you have the World Trade Organization and the GATT Treaty etc., run by private organizations, which you think are all separate.);

 

in the second place, all education is designed to stimulate activity in support of the official experiment (A: ...massive propaganda, massive indoctrination. It’s quite easy to train the public in a Pavlovian style, and Pavlov had a lot to do with the schooling system across the whole Soviet system.);

 

in the third place, the State does what it can to substitute its religion for the various traditional beliefs which have existed within the territory of the U.S.S.R.;

 

in the forth place, literature and the Press are controlled by the Government, and are such as are thought likely to help it in its constructive purposes (A: That’s the same as we have today. We’ve had it for an awful long time. Because Quigley himself said, ALL THE MAJOR PRESS, ALL THE OWNERS, EDITORS AND SO ON, ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THE ONE ORGANIZATION, THE CFR/ROYAL INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS. And we get most of our news from Reuters and the API; and Reuters of course was set up by the Rothschilds.);

 

in the fifth place, the family, in so far as it represents a loyalty which competes with loyalty to the State, is being gradually weakened (A: That was the intention, the destruction of the family unit, remember, the abolition of it, under the communist system. And that’s what you have in the West under a different technique that they used, which is massive promiscuity and massive entertainment and heavy indoctrination in school to get younger and younger children all the time until they’re hypersexualized before they even get into puberty and they will never stay with one person for the rest of their lives and have families and children.);

 

in the sixth place, the Five Year Plan (A: ...which they love these 5, 10, 50 year plans, at the United Nations too by the way.) is bending the whole constructive energies of the nation to the realization of a certain economic balance and productive efficiency, by means of which it is hoped that a sufficient degree of material comfort will be secured for everyone. (A: Now, who decides what is sufficient? Well, the big boys do.) In every other society of the world there is enormously less central direction than under the Soviet Government. It is true that during the war (A: He’s talking about World War I, or The Great War as they called it then. Why they would call it ‘great’, well I’ve explained that before too.) the energies of the nations were, to a considerable extent, centrally organized, but everyone knew that this was temporary, and even at its height the organization was not so all-pervasive as it is in Russia. (A: ...because government comes in and takes over, almost through martial law during times of war. That’s why they’re using the anti-terrorism idea now for the next part of this agenda, today.) The Five Year Plan, as its name implies, is supposed to be temporary, and to belong to a time of stress not wholly unlike that of the Great War, but it is to be expected that if it succeeds, other plans will take its place (A: ...and that’s exactly what you have.), since the central organization of the vast nation's activities is too attractive to the organizers to be abandoned readily.

 

The Russian experiment may succeed or may fail, but even if it fails, (A: Now, here’s the important part…) it will be followed by others which will share its most interesting characteristic, namely, the unitary direction of a whole nation's activities. (A: This is so important if you understand what he’s saying here. This is a guy who attended all the world meetings. He was given the power along with other groups, a big organizer to alter the culture before World War II, after World War II, and even the changes that you’re going through in your own lifetime today. The groups in his generation planned the changes step by step with their 5, 10, 50 year plans, etc, minutely by the way. Education, steps of changes in education. Everything had to be done incrementally. So he’s talking about, they still admired, you see, this experiment, the Soviet Union, and you had it in China too. That’s why China, by the way, is the poster child of the United Nations today. Everyone obeys the state. The state is all-powerful. And because there are no opposing parties, they say, well, THEY CAN GET THINGS DONE. You see. Maggie Thatcher said the same thing. She said when she retired, SHE NOW BELONGS TO A HIGHER ORGANIZATION, the technocracy, unelected people working for an organization, BEHIND THE SCENES WITH OTHER EX-PREMIERS OF COUNTRIES ACROSS THE WORLD, and she said, WE CAN GET THINGS DONE WITHOUT THE SPOTLIGHT BEING ON US, and without the public knowing even what they’re doing so they can’t complain or demonstrate or anything else. So anyway...) ...the unitary direction of a whole nation's activities.

 

This was impossible in earlier days, since it depends upon the technique of propaganda, i.e., upon universal education (A: That’s why they had to have a universal education, and the UNICEF, etc at the United Nations. So a uniform education…), newspapers (A: ...too. In other words, all propaganda, all news articles must be the same in all media, newspapers...), the cinema (A: ...the movies...), and (A: ...at the time he said...) the wireless. (A: Remember, this was in 1931. Now you have TV as well.) The State had already been strengthened by railways and the telegraphy, which made possible the rapid transmission of news and concentration of troops.

 

In addition to modern methods of propaganda, modern methods of warfare have strengthened the State as against discontented elements (A: He’s talking about within. They now call them insurgents.); aeroplanes and poison gasses have made revolt difficult unless it obtains the support of aeronauts and chemists. (A: So in other words, you would have to, what he’s hinting at here too is that ALL chemists and those to do with biowarfare, etc. must all belong to the same organization, be uniform in their ideas, and their own tuition, going through universities. Remember, standardized education. So it would make revolt impossible down the road.) Any prudent Government will favour these two classes and take pains to secure their loyalty. (A: It’s already been done, you see.)

 

As the example of Russia has shown, it is now possible for men of energy and intelligence, if they once become possessed of the governmental machine, to retain power even though at first they may have to face the opposition of the majority of the population. (A: These are the guys… Remember, he belongs to the groups who actually funded, helped fund and plan the Bolshevik revolution. And we fed them. The West fed Russia right up until the so-called walls came down; they couldn’t even feed themselves. So he lauds the idea that total power is concentrated, you see, and a scientific intelligentsia are put in, you see, who are totally on board. We know that in the Soviet system any intelligentsia that was not on board were slaughtered. In fact, that was almost the whole intelligentsia, and a new one substituted; they were already brought in from the West by the way.)

 

We must therefore increasingly expect to see government falling into the hands of oligarchies (A: ...oligarchies...), not of birth but of opinion. (A: In other words, academia.) In countries long accustomed to democracy, the empire of these oligarchies may be concealed behind democratic forms, as was that of Augustus in Rome, (A: See, it’s an old idea. These boys… That’s why they pull in the Quigley’s and the historians and so on, to give big talks to these particular groups that do the work, to show them what worked in the past, you see.) But elsewhere their rule will be undisguised. (A: And since about the 60s especially you’ve had nothing but experts getting brought on television for every little thing, that they decide you should think about. And you’re given your opinion, you see, by experts. So you do have the idea that you have democracy, but you also have the ones who are undisguised, the experts, expert rules, intelligentsia, the educated intelligentsia, specialists.) If there is to be scientific experimentation in the construction of new kinds of societies, the rule of an oligarchy of opinion is essential. (A: Your opinions are all given to you, folks; they have been your whole lives long, and your parents before you, by the way.) It may be expected that there will be conflicts between different oligarchies, but that ultimately some one oligarchy will acquire world dominion, and will produce a worldwide organization as complete and elaborate as that now existing in the U.S.S.R.

 

(A: He then says…)

Such a state of affairs will have both merits and demerits; more important than either, however, is the fact that nothing less will enable a society imbued with scientific technique to survive. Scientific technique (A: And I’ve given lots of talks on scientific technique from Jacques Ellul and others too in the past.) demands organization (A: Now that’s an awfully important word. Because the Soviet system too, just like the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR and the NGOs and the foundations, use what’s called organization. Organization, remember, is a technique where you must have a set of tenets, rules, and those members who join it cannot break any of the rules for any private opinion. That’s how Chatham House, the headquarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, they call it Chatham House Rules. They’re only allowed to say select things to the public but the rest of it is to be quiet. And whenever they stand up for one thing, all the other things on the list they must also stand up for personally. Communism is exactly the same. So he says…) Scientific technique demands organization, and the more it becomes perfected, the larger are the organizations that it demands. (A: That’s also, by the way, where you have what you think of as the left. They’re all into the environmentalism. They’re all into socialism. Every group they can possibly find, or create, by the way, that they claim is on the fringes and neglected by society, is brought up to a standing position, you see, with extra privileges, etc, and you must go along with every single tenet. You’re allowed no private opinion on any particular one topic. That’s when you know that someone is working for one of these organizations. They’re like clones of each other when they spout off in public.)

 

The international organization of industrial production is being rendered necessary by the efficiency of modern methods. Modern industrial plants can easily supply, in many directions, much more than the total needs of the world. The result of this, which should be wealth, is in fact poverty, owing to competition. (A: ...competition…) In the absence of competition, the immensely enhanced productivity of labour would enable men to arrive at a just compromise between leisure and goods: they could choose whether they would work six hours a day and be rich, or four hours a day and enjoy only moderate comfort. The advantages of world-wide organization, both in preventing the waste of economic competition and in removing the danger of war, are so great as to be becoming an essential condition for the survival of societies possessing scientific technique.

 

(A: Now remember, he’s talking from being in-the-know, and he’s speaking on two different levels. On the inner level he’s telling, well we already have that; they’re run by scientific technique. Our propaganda is all run by it. Our education is run by it. Our thoughts, opinions are all unified by it. We have a standard opinion which is accepted by the public because they’re told what’s acceptable and what’s not. It’s all pretty well there, in fact. But he’s telling you, they want to go further with it, you see. And remember too, these are the same organizations behind the idea of free trade and the trading blocs, which are not free at all. They are there, like through the World Trade Organization and so on, they are there to eliminate competition, and the authorized biggies get through and that’s it, you see. So they have achieved, they have achieved in your lifetime what he’s talking about here.)

 

This argument is overwhelming in comparison with all counterarguments, and renders almost unimportant the question whether life in an organized world State will be more or less satisfactory than life at the present day. For it is only in the direction of an organized world State that the human race can develop unless it abandons scientific technique, and it will not do this except as the result of a cataclysm so severe as to lower the whole level of civilization. (A: In other words, the only thing that could stop it is something that is not under the control of those who rule the world and already did in his day.) The advantages to be derived from an organized world State are great and obvious. There will be, in the first place, security against war and a saving of almost the whole effort and expense now devoted to competitive armaments: there will be, one must suppose, a single, highly efficient fighting machine, employing mainly aeroplanes and chemical methods of warfare, which will be quite obviously irresistible (A: ...for governments to use), and will therefore not be resisted. The central government may be changed from time to time by a palace revolution (A: ...that’s a little phrase, like you might get it inside…), but this will only alter the personnel of the figure-heads (A: ...and he calls them figure-heads, because that’s what they are; they’re not the rulers.), not the essential organization of government. The central government will, of course, forbid the propaganda of nationalism (A: ...which is what you’ve had for... It was so amazing because before Gulf War One the world had heard nothing but globalism, globalism, globalism, and you never heard about nationalism. Once they needed a war going, you see, for the whole Middle East, suddenly you’re back to being American, you’re British and everybody is proud and blah-blah-blah, you see. And once it’s all finished you go back to globalism, globalism, you see. It’s so easy to do.), by means of which at present anarchy is maintained, and will put in its place a propaganda of loyalty to the world State."

 

(A: Now everyone was confused when George Bush Jr... The general public were confused, the media knew darn well what he was talking about; they wouldn’t explain it to the public. That’s part of the rules of Chatham House too. All the members are top reporters and editors and newspapers, all belong to the same propaganda machine. But George Bush Sr mentioned, THE NEW WORLD ORDER COMING INTO VIEW, THE THOUSAND POINTS OF LIGHT idea, the organizations all working towards it. He also mentioned after 9/11, George Bush Junior said, YOU’RE EITHER WITH US, meaning this agenda, which nobody understood because it’s so vague, OR YOU’RE WITH THE TERRORISTS. Right. That’s what he said. So getting back to what he just said…)

 

...and will put in its place a propaganda of loyalty to the world State.

 

It follows that such an organization, if it can subsist for a generation, will be stable. (A: Remember the New American Century group? That was where the US was to rule for another hundred years, as they bring in this total globalistic structure; complete it all, in other words. It’s already here, but to complete it, tidy up all the loose ends. So war is essential.) The gain from an economic point of view will be enormous: there will be no waste in competitive production (A: What are you getting taught? You’re post-consumerist… Austerity… Right.), no uncertainty as to employment, no poverty, no sudden alternations of good and bad times (A: This is still to come, when they bring in the new Soviet system, the perfected system. Remember what I said earlier where he said that even if the Soviet system failed, the USSR, the organization that would rule, that’s bringing this world government, would take the better things they had learned from the Soviet rule, how to control people, manage them and so on. It’s all been done. Eventually in the new system of course you’re to be appointed to your work from birth, that’s if they allow you to be born, remember. A very old plan. I’ve mentioned the video for those who should get it. It’s called The Soviet Story. You’ll see clips, very rare clips in it from people like George Bernard Shaw, from the Fabian Society that ran the left wing for the Royal Institute of International Affairs that gave you your left-wing and your right wing. He said, YOU’LL HAVE TO COME TO US AND TELL US WHY WE SHOULD KEEP YOU ALIVE. They want a planned system, a planned economy, a planned population, etc.)

 

The gain from an economic point of view will be enormous: there will be no waste in competitive production, no uncertainty as to employment, no poverty, no sudden alternations of good and bad times; every man willing to work will be kept in comfort, and every man unwilling to work will be kept in prison. (A: Again, go back and see The Soviet Story and listen to it and read the Fabian documents and so on.) When owing to any circumstances the work upon which a man has hitherto been employed is no longer required, he will be taught some new kind of work, and will be adequately maintained while he is learning his new trade. (A: Well that’s all gone now because they planned in subsequent years, after this, to give most of the production to China, as you know. The same organization planned that. If you think China’s a separate country, think again.) Economic motives will be employed to regulate population (A: ...there you go. What have you had since the 60s? Oh, it’s too expensive to have a child.), which will probably be kept stationary. Almost all that is tragic in human life will be eliminated, and even death will seldom come before old age. (A: Now, they were absolutely cocksure back then that they could. This is back then in the 30s, remember, the time of... And this guy knew him well, he knew Huxley awfully well, Brave New World written in the 30s too, about the scientific control of a perfected society. They all worked in the same organizations, you understand. And I’m certain what you have today, like all levels of reality, you have a much, much higher medicine than anything that’s taught in university for the general public to believe in.)

 

Almost all that is tragic in human life will be eliminated, and even death will seldom come before old age. Whether men will be happy in this Paradise I do not know. (A: Now, Huxley answered that in his Brave New World Revisited and in his talks he gave at Berkeley in the 60s; and you can get them on the Internet anywhere. Huxley talked about, THROUGH THE USE OF DRUGS, PHARMA, and they called it soma in his book, he said, WE CAN ACTUALLY DO IT THROUGH PHARMACOLOGY EVENTUALLY. Grab the children young, get them hooked on stuff, and drug people throughout their lives. So they would not know unhappiness, you see. So he says…)

 

Whether men will be happy in this Paradise I do not know. Perhaps biochemistry (A: ...here we go...) will show us how to make any man happy, provided he has the necessaries of life; perhaps dangerous sports will be organized for those whom boredom would otherwise turn into anarchists; perhaps sport will take over the cruelty which will have been banished from politics; perhaps football will be replaced by play battles in the air (A: He’s talking about soccer and football…) in which death will be the penalty of defeat. (A: That’s why they had the movies which you’ve already seen, and they came out much, much later, in the 70s and 80s and so on, about death sports in movies. See, everything had been looked at, every part of your behavior, and psychology, behaviorism, all these organizations have been working on us for an awful long time. But they knew this all way back then.) It may be that so long as men are allowed to seek death (A: ...to seek death...), they will not mind having to seek it in a trivial cause (A: And that’s why folk speed in their cars and so on, it’s the only time they feel power, personal power, is through speeding and beating the guy in front and overtaking him and so on.)

 

...they will not mind having to seek it in a trivial cause: to fall through the air before a million spectators may come to be thought a glorious death even if it has no purpose but the amusement of a holiday crowd. (A: Now, just put that into car racing. They’ve done all the studies on it. People don’t watch car racing to see the guy winning. They want to see the crashes. That’s why they show them with psychic driving, the technique that was used in racecar driving they eventually used for the 9/11 towers. Over and over, the same shots over and over, that’s psychic driving, to get it home, you see. Nothing you see on television happens by itself, and in the way it’s done too.)

 

It may be that in some such way a safety valve can be provided for the anarchic and violent forces in human nature (A: …meaning, opposition to their system that they’re bringing in.); or again, it may be that by wise education and suitable diet (A: ...a suitable diet… He’s talking about bioengineering, folks, if you don’t understand what these guys mean by diet. He explains it a bit more in other books he has written too, the same guy, and many others involved in the same organizations. GMO, the chemical mix that you eat from your vegetables now too, all the sprays and toxins. We’ve already seen it with of course the xenoestrogens, the artificial estrogens, synthetic ones, which have caused major changes in men, especially, and women too by the way, major changes. We know too, from so many experiments that they have done, they admit themselves if you go into the different university studies etc., and medical studies on a lot of these chemicals, it’s by the third-generation that you’re almost completely sterile as well, as well as being not masculine by the way. Anyway, it says a suitable diet...) men may be cured of all their unruly impulses (A: In other words, he’s agreeing with what Charles Galton Darwin said in The Next Million Years, his book that he wrote in the 1950s I think it was. Charles Galton Darwin said much later, because they were all in the same organization you understand, that THEY’D HAVE TO BRING DOWN THE POPULATION AND THEY COULD DO IT BY STERILIZATION, EVEN THROUGH THEIR FOOD OR INOCULATIONS AND VARIOUS OTHER MEANS, AND THE USE OF HORMONES, he said, IN THEIR DIET. Well, the xenoestrogens, the artificial synthetic estrogens and so on are all there and present in the pesticides, just coincidentally by the way, eh; that’s how you’ll always rationalize things.), and all life may become as quiet as a Sunday school. (A: Total control of the population for the ruling oligarchy.)

 

There will, of course, be a universal language, which will be either Esperanto (A: They tried to bring in Esperanto across… big money, the same organization pushed it, the CFR/Royal Institute of International Affairs. It didn’t take off. And then later on they said, okay, English has become the international business language of the present and the future.) or pidgin-English. The literature of the past will for the most part not be translated into this language, since its outlook and emotional background will be considered unsettling:

 

(A: Now, for those who haven’t read or seen the movie Fahrenheit 451, go and see it. These writers didn’t get the ideas from themselves of the future. They were given them, to put out there, by the way. Because indoctrination takes two forms, the overt type and what appears to be the exposure, or ‘revelation of the method,’ they call it, which also has a negative effect; it also makes it seem inevitable to the people who are soaking it up. Be very careful of what you soak up and how you translate it. Don’t let someone else translate it for you. And to add to the success of the Internet, from their point of view it’s phenomenal. Because I noticed back in the 70s and 80s they started to dump massive quantities of books from libraries across the Western world. You’d find them in garbage dumps. If you lived in the country you’d often take your garbage to the dump and you’d see them all just getting dumped. I realized right there and then it was a big, again, coordinated move. It wasn’t an individual library, oh we’ll just chuck these. No, no. This was a cleansing happening, of knowledge. And in came the Internet big time, more books were dumped, and then they’d say, well, we get them on the electronic version. Well, the electronic versions are all either going missing or simply eliminated altogether, or they’re heavily, heavily edited, and often completely changed by the way. So knowledge is always being changed. So he says here, this is it of course, they won’t translate lots of things which might unsettle people. It might give them ideas, in other words.)

 

...since its outlook and emotional background will be considered unsettling: Serious students of history will be able to obtain a permit from the Government to study such works as Hamlet and Othello, but the general public will be forbidden access to them on the ground that they glorify private murder; boys will not be allowed to read books about pirates or Red Indians; love themes will be discouraged on the ground that love, being anarchic, is silly, if not wicked. (A: And these guys don’t believe in any of these things but they push it on you as they push sex on you, you see, until you get confused between love and sex. And eventually they separate, like they said in their big articles from the United Nations, they would SEPARATE SEX FROM THE BONDING ACT AND THERE WOULD BE NO FAMILY. That’s been done awfully successfully. And of course through the school you have this complete zero-tolerance attitude, and they call it bullying, but it has many other motives, this bullying, because the effects of the hormones, the changes are very evident, of course. But also, you can’t even fight back if someone attacks you. Zero-tolerance.)

 

...boys will not be allowed to read books about pirates or Red Indians; love themes will be discouraged on the ground that love (A: And that’s why you have nothing but sex and encounters today; love doesn’t come into it. Because anarchic families stick together and stand up under common principles and common behavior and ideals, against OLIGARCHIES, folks. So he calls it, love is anarchic, is silly, if not in fact wicked.), being anarchic, is silly, if not wicked. All this will make life very pleasant for the virtuous. (A: ...an awfully important term, this virtuosity. They’re virtuous. You see that all through Masonry as well. All these organizations are connected of course. Old, old. An old organization is at the top of it. It’s very, very old indeed.) Science increases our power to do both good and harm, and therefore enhances the need for restraining destructive impulses. If a scientific world is to survive, it is therefore necessary that men should become tamer (A: ...tame the men...) than they have been. The splendid criminal must no longer be an ideal, and submissiveness must be more admired than it has been in the past. (A: So submissive heroes, you see, who work with THE system, THE system; there’s only one system.) In all this there will be both gain and loss, and it is not within human power to strike a balance between the two. (A: It is interesting too, isn’t it...) ...it is not within human power to strike a balance between the two.

 

(A: Now I’ll jump to another chapter here where he talks about scientific reproduction, a very old idea from the same group. In fact, written about long before even Russell was born and that was a long time ago. It says…)

 

SCIENCE, when it has once acquired a firm hold upon social organization, is hardly likely to stop short at those biological aspects of human life which have hitherto been left to the joint guidance of religion and instinct. (A: So in other words, they want to interject so that offspring won’t just happen and you have families etc.) We may, I think, assume that both the quantity and the quality of the population will be carefully regulated by the State (A: It’s always the State.), but that sexual intercourse apart from children will be regarded as a private matter so long as it is not allowed to interfere with work. (A: And so they give you your work and the whole bit, but they give you lots and lots of sex in your free time, don’t they?) As regards quantity, the State statisticians will determine as carefully as they can whether the population of the world at the moment is above or below the number which leads to the greatest material comfort per head. (A: Remember, this is before they set China up to be THE manufacturer for the world, which alters some of his findings.) They will also take account of all such changes of technique as can be foreseen. No doubt the usual rule will be to aim at a stationary population, but if some important invention, such as artificial food, should greatly cheapen the production of necessaries, an increase of population might for a time be thought wise. I shall, however, assume that, in normal times, the world government will decree a stationary population. (A: Well we know, since then, they want a vastly reduced population. But remember too, he was working on the particular doers and shakers and movers working for the same organization. We’re getting the hints from him as to what they would let out to the public at that time. And they knew already at that time, in the 1930s, that the public would not be ready to be told, TOLD and ordered to have fewer children, you see. He also says too…)

 

Scientific breeding, in any truly scientific form, would at present encounter insuperable obstacles both from religion and from sentiment. To carry it out scientifically it would be necessary, as among domestic animals (A: This is talking about you.), to employ only a small percentage of males for purposes of breeding. (A: What do you have now? Artificial insemination and you have sperm banks. You take all these things for granted but you don’t even say, well who authorizes those sperm donors? We’ve had rackets going on of course, where money is involved, always, and we’ve found doctors who put down that they’re employing all these sperm donors, and they put them on their taxes and so on. But the fact is, it comes all from the same quacks; they’re doing it themselves. But who’s authorizing this?) To carry it out scientifically it would be necessary, as among domestic animals, to employ only a small percentage of males for purposes of breeding.

 

It may be thought that religion and sentiment will always succeed in opposing an immovable veto to such a system. I wish I could think so. But I believe that sentiment is quite extraordinarily plastic (A: He’s talking about your sentimentality, your custom, your culture. He says it’s...) ...quite extraordinarily plastic and that the individualistic religion to which we have been accustomed is likely to be increasingly replaced by a religion of devotion to the State. Among Russian Communists this has already happened. In any case, what is demanded is scarcely as difficult a control of natural impulses as is involved in the celibacy of the Catholic priesthood. (A: Now, he lauded and they all lauded the fact that Russia, even in the later years of Russia, the Soviet Union, didn’t even bother with the birth control pill for most of the classes. And they had classes alright, they had the upper and middle and lower. And they used abortion. Some women had maybe 10 or more abortions, rather than give them the pill and so on. It was actually cheaper there because labor was dirt cheap, it was for free.)

 

Wherever remarkable achievements are possible and are at the same time such as to satisfy men's moral idealism, the love of power, is capable of swallowing up the instinctive life of the affections (A: In other words, ambition, career.), especially if an outlet is permitted to purely physical sexual impulses. Traditional religion, which has been violently dispossessed in Russia, will suffer a setback everywhere if the Russian experiment proves successful. (A: Remember what he said earlier? Even if it fails they would use the successful parts.) In any case its outlook is difficult to reconcile with that of industrialism and scientific technique. Traditional religion was based upon a sense of man's impotence in the face of natural forces, whereas scientific technique induces a sense of the impotence of natural forces in the face of man's intelligence. Combined with this sense of power, a certain degree of austerity in regard to the softer pleasures is quite natural. One sees it already in many of those who are creating the mechanistic society of the future. In America this austerity has taken the form of Protestant piety (A: See, they tried it already and you don’t even know it. If you belong to an organization they’re using you, I’m not kidding, even including the Protestant organizations too.), in Russia of devotion to Communism. (A: See, he’s talking about austerity, folks, in the 1930s, this would come eventually. We’re in it today; we’ve heard it prattled on to us. Post consumer, go into austerity, spending money will all go instead to basic essentials. Your electricity is going up everywhere, by consensus across the world, the world grid. Your food is sky high because it’s all centralized now, all the food is controlled in the world. And so on and so on.)

 

I think, therefore, that there is hardly any limit to the departures from traditional sentiment which science may introduce into the question of reproduction. If the simultaneous regulation of quantity and quality is taken seriously in the future, we may expect that in each generation some 25 per cent, of women and some 5 per cent, of men will be selected to be the parents of the next generation, (A: Who selects the sperm donors, folks? How many are there? Ever wondered? These guys have statistics on everything. That’s how they run it all. Knowledge is power.) while the remainder of the population will be sterilized, which will in no way interfere with their sexual pleasures (A: That’s what you’re seeing today, folks.), but will merely render these pleasures destitute of social importance. (A: Interesting, eh?) The women who are selected for breeding will have to have eight or nine children each (A: These are the ones who are selected, at the top.), but will not be expected to perform any other work except the suckling of the children for a suitable number of months. No obstacles will be placed upon their relations with sterile men, or upon the relations of sterile men and women with each other, but reproduction will be regarded as a matter which concerns the State, and will not be left to the free choice of the persons concerned. (A: Look at all the disincentives not to have children. Economic… oh it’s so expensive. You have Children’s Aid with mandatory home inspections coming in all over the place, which terrify the general public. They know this too. This is the intention of it. So those who haven’t got children yet, and those growing up, will say, oh, I don’t want to go through what my parents went through and so on, with all these visits and orders and so on. So many ways to put you off having children.)

 

But anyway, that’s all I have time for tonight, unfortunately. As I say, I’d like to go into it in much more detail. But I’ve given lots out in the past and many folk have put out lots of stuff in their own books and so on, without mentioning me of course, which is normal these days. But the whole point of this exercise, as I say, is to get through to the occasional individual who can actually start to understand what’s been happening. Even if they can’t communicate it to other people they really care about it. Because the indoctrination process, as I’ve said, was perfected a long time ago.

 

This is only one of many books that I have on all these topics, written by BIG movers and shakers, who helped plan the future which we’re in today. And the future still to come, by the way, was planned in the days of these guys. The cultural change, morality, it’s all been done, very successfully. And scientific dictatorship is here. It can be guised under, again, the State or department of whatever. It doesn’t matter what it’s called. It all achieves the objectives that were set out a long time ago. In fact, they’re disguised under so many different names, but they’ve achieved what they wanted, without the hassle from the public saying, oh, one group can’t do this. No, they’ve put it into so many different groups; some of them sound very, very nice. Environmentalism sounds nice, the environment; we all live in the environment. But you have no idea that this is an authority; they have vehicles in the States now that are like big cop cars, the environmental police, and we’ll see them all over the place shortly. Everything ends up being an authority. That’s its purpose, folks. And you are the targets. Because you see, you’re the proles, as George Orwell kept telling us.

 

The truth is hard to bear for most folk. They still, again, their bubble is very important to them. And they still love their soft porn comedies and all the rest of it. That’s how you get most porn and ideas and changes for ideas put across to you, in a laughable manner, you see. And they won’t give them up. So they constantly get updated without even knowing it, with the new political correctness… Obedience, the new obedience in this area, added to all the other areas, obedience to the State, THE authority.

 

Well I have to get on with it because as I say, I have to get the heating going in the house here because it’s going to be another freezing night tonight, or evening. It’s already cold now. It’s been cold all day, in fact. And it’s almost June. But that’s the new weather, you see, as it’s scientifically controlled as well. But remember, when they tell you it’s all your fault and they’re going to tax you with carbon taxes and all the rest of it too, it’s all part of the plan, folks. And remember, in a system of abuse it’s always your fault, right, it’s always your fault.

 

So from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:34 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on May the 25^th, 2014.  Tonight I’ll talk about another player, one of the many players, the big players, who profoundly helped the organization which runs the world, and who is dead now, who played a massive part, a massive part, along with other big players in the global agenda.  They all belong to the same global institutions. They networked with each other. They attended the same global meetings to decide the future of humanity, the future of how to handle and manage billions of people across the world in a global society, and under eventually a global government, on behalf of the elite that already owned the monied system and the commercial system of the time, and still do it by the way, their descendants do.

So you find if you go back into the writings, they put out copious writings at one time when the public were not so aware of what was going on; they were kept in the dark, on purpose of course. But they did publish a lot of books for their own kind to read, and anybody in the general public who was into what was really happening, why things were happening, why culture was managed and changing all the time.  Being directed to the changes, why it was happening because it’s only there that you find the answers as to why it’s happening.

Tonight I’ll touch on Arthur Koestler who wrote The Ghost In The Machine and many other books too. He belonged to the same institutions, as I say, as Bertrand Russell and many others, and Aldous Huxley, and they were all friends with each other. You’ll find that they all belonged to the intelligence services during World War II and often afterwards as well.  But they definitely all, afterwards, were into the global agenda, meeting at world meetings, the United Nations. They worked with university faculties in the study of behaviorism, for instance, and how to modify the human being to make them complacent, compliant citizenry that would basically be happy, as children are kept happy – you don’t tell them much of what’s really happening.  Keep them happy and that’s all that they’ll need basically, while they can be managed and exploited too.

I’ve touched on many of the big players down through the ages, right up to the present time in fact. But Koestler was important as well... because he had a tremendous ego. They all had tremendous egos, these characters, thinking they were part of the new scientific establishment that helped to run the world and shape the whole future.  Fashion, culture, even music and so on, they all touched on the same things.  So I’ll read a bit of one of his books called The Ghost In The Machine.  Now, I’ve touched on it before in the past if you go into the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can go through the old talks I’ve given years ago on some of these players.  If you don’t understand the past you won’t understand the present, because the past is still going on. Many of the agendas to do with step-by-step cultural changes towards a definite goal have already taken place in our lifetimes. These guys, as I say, many of them are long dead but it’s still going on.  Step by step, incrementally they knew how to do it.  And they have more to come yet, that was still devised, in the changes, devised in their age as well.

So he talks in The Ghost In The Machine on page 333 about even birth control and altering women’s behavior as well. I’ve mentioned this so many times because you see, biochemistry was to be very, very important in the future. It became that way, even before I was born, and right up to the present time.  There are ongoing researches into biochemistry and how it can alter human behavior. Not just physical appearance, which it does too by the way, but human behavior as well. I’ve mentioned that Charles Galton Darwin wrote a book called The Next Million Years where he goes into it too and talks about PUTTING HORMONES IN THE FOOD, THE WATER, AND VARIOUS OTHER METHODS OF INSERTING THESE HORMONAL CHANGES INTO SOCIETY, THAT WOULD AFFECT THEIR BEHAVIOR, MAKE MEN LESS AGGRESSIVE AND MAKE THEM BEHAVE THEMSELVES AND BE COMPLACENT. Or, as even Aldous Huxley said, PERHAPS AT TIMES WHEN THEY SHOULDN’T BE SO COMPLACENT AND AT PEACE, when they’re being used for instance, THEY WOULDN’T MIND.  Today we have masses of entertainment to keep you just like sucking a lollipop all day long. And people, that’s all they do now on their cell phones, etc., they are entertained to death, literally, in a sense.

But getting back to The Ghost In The Machine, at the top of the page Huxley touches on, after a long chapter on to alter the hormonal balance in women and so on, he says,

We may be able to prevent the demotic apocalypse by interfering with women’s estrous cycle. We cannot cure our paranoid disposition by putting additional wiring circuits into our brains (Alan:  They already were working, in Tavistock, by doing just that, by putting wiring into the brain; they were literally hardwired to various buttons and so on. But he says…) but we may be able to achieve a cure or at least significant improvements by directing research into the required channels.

 

Now, what’s the ‘cure’ he’s talking about? The cure for what is also important. Well, it’s the wild part in human nature. We’re all basically… We all have so-called animal instincts. These are primal drives of procreation to keep the species going, etc. Everyone is subject to it of course. He talks about the need to control population; big, big agenda. All of the big players mentioned heavily population control, because it’s always been on their minds. It really took on after Darwin came along. He was part of the same agenda to replace the old religions and so on with scientific dictatorship you might say, or oligarchy.  Aldous Huxley talks on that too where he said that he and his family members belonged, and Julian Huxley, his brother, said the same thing, they belonged to the scientific elite. He didn’t mean just in chemistry and so on. He meant the behavioral sciences, all of the sciences to manipulate society, manipulate them and give the culture which the people would unfortunately follow. That’s how easy it is to lead the people; by putting out stars in front of them they follow what the stars do and so on. The public have no idea that stars can be completely talentless, because the machinery of making a star through propaganda, massive publicity is all you would really need today. That’s all you really need and it’s been like that way for an awful long time. Talent comes down the ladder actually and why they pick some of the people, it’s up to you to decide, to make them stars. But you find that he goes into this whole thing too, of altering the estrous cycle in women by adding certain hormones which would interfere with other main hormones, etc. It would change behavior. It would change even the psychology you might say of the subjects as well, maybe even make them more aggressive. Well, we’ve seen that in women too. And men become a lot more passive, a lot of them. But anyway it says here…

 

Mutating into the future

(Alan:  ...in 1961. These are ongoing studies and meetings that they have.)

 

The University of California San Francisco Medical Center organized the symposium of control of the mind.  (Alan:  ...control of the mind.) At the first session professor Holger Hyden of Göteborg University made headlines in the San Francisco press, although the title of this highly technical paper was called Biochemical Aspects of Brain Activity, was hardly designed to appeal to the popular press.  (Alan:  That’s how they mislead the public too, and keep the press off their backs, by giving it a very amorphous title, really, something that’s very vague, and the people don’t turn up. But if they put down “control of the mind” it would’ve been a different story altogether.) The passage which created the sensation as quoted below and the reference to Koestler himself is explained by the fact that I was a participant of the symposium.  (Alan:  This is what came out, it did leak out into some of the press, even though they took precautions, as I say.)

In considering the problem of control of the mind, the data give rise to the following question: would it be possible to change the fundamentals of emotion by inducing molecular changes in the biologically active substances in the brain? The RNA, in particular, is the main target for such a speculation (Alan:  Now, they were already doing massive tests, they had been since even the early 50s, on all of these things. So they weren’t speculating as much as he made it out to be that they were.), since the molecular change of the RNA may lead to a change in the proteins being formed. One may phrase the question in different words to modify the emphasis: do the experimental data presented here provide means to modify the mental state by specifically induced chemical changes? Results pointing in that direction have been obtained; this work was carried out using a substance called tricyanoaminopropene (TRIAP)”.  (Alan:  And it goes on to say here in the article...)

 

Here at our disposal, to be used wisely or unwisely, is an increasing array of agents that manipulate human beings.  It is now possible to act directly on the individual to modify his behavior instead of, as in the past, indirectly through modification of the environment.  (Alan:  Now, modification of the environment has a tremendous impact. You can do that by creating social approval and social disapproval. It’s used heavily in universities. They tell you what not to talk about, what’s taboo.  And they can train the people so easily to turn on a person who just uses a word or asks a question about a certain topic that’s completely taboo and off-limits. We’re trained all the time by the environment in which you live or work and so on. It’s quite easy to institutionalize such taboos throughout society, and it’s done heavily today.  He goes on to say…) This then constitutes a part of what Aldous Huxley has called The Final Revolution.  (Alan:  So here’s chemical agents which can biologically manipulate human beings, you see.  He says…)

 

I must comment on the last paragraph in this quotation. Huxley was haunted by the fear that this Final Revolution brought about by the combined effects of drugs and the mass media. (Alan:  ...because they wanted to use pharmacology in a big, big way across the entire society; they’ve been pretty well successful.  Even grabbing the children when they’re young, creating diseases that don’t exist, to do with their mind, and drugging them too.) Within a generation or so for our entire society is a sort of painless concentration camp of the mind in which people will have lost their liberties and the enjoyment of a dictatorship without tears.  (Alan:  Now, the dictatorship Huxley was talking about of course was the scientific dictatorship that Bertrand Russell vastly promoted, greatly promoted. He was all for this scientific dictatorship, which Russell said, A SCIENTIFIC DICTATORSHIP WOULD BE INCREDIBLY CRUEL because it wouldn’t bother with human emotions or pity, etc. etc. Tremendously cruel.  And he was all for this whole thing. But getting back to the article here…)

...a painless concentration of the mind in which people have lost their liberties, and the enjoyment of a dictatorship without tears. In other words, the state of affairs described in Brave New World.  As an antidote (Alan:  ...this is interesting...) Huxley advocated the use of mescaline and other psychedelic drugs to guide us along the eightfold path towards cosmic consciousness, mystic enlightenment and artistic creativity.

Now, even though Koestler said he is disagreeing with Huxley on this point of using these drugs, don’t get him wrong. You understand, the big agencies that run the world are employed with the think tanks and all the laboratories etc., etc., controlled studies in behaviorism, on populations that don’t even know they are being studied, have been going on for an awful long time. What they will do at the top, they will take maybe five or six different ways that they think could possibly work in modifying people’s behavior.  And the ones who are all friends at the top, in these circles, are given massive grants to carry out experiments on the general population to see which ones work. They don’t necessarily agree with each other, and they are allowed to say so to each other, but they’re still all friends. So on the one hand you have Koestler with his idea of how it should work and you have also Huxley with his. Remember, there’s a lot of egos involved, as I said before, with these people who are the movers and shakers, and they spearhead investigation into controlling all humans in every possible way.

So he disagrees with him on using what became very popular at that time, was mescaline, the LSD, things like that, drop out, etc., and drop in and blah-blah-blah. All the stuff that came out with the hippy movement, it was all manufactured by associated think tanks, and CIA funding too of course, to create the hippy generation, the dropout generation and so on, which worked awfully well. A lot of folk dropped out of college, universities. Some didn’t even make it to college; they were already so far gone with their minds being blitzed with LSD that they were out of action for many, many years, some permanently. But they also found out that such a society could not be productive. Because when you’re stoned all the time you don’t care about going to work, you don’t worry about getting to work, you don’t worry about anything eventually, as long as you can get lots and lots of drugs.

You’ll find the same thing being instituted at the same time of course with big Pharmacology and the medical associations promoting all of these particular tranquilizers which they could drug the populations too. And they targeted mainly housewives initially in Britain and other countries too. I think back in the 70s at one time tranquilizers like Librium and Valium, they said, I think it was 70-odd percent of the women at that time either had taken it or were being prescribed it, for anxiety or depression or whatever. In other words, they felt life was passing them by, because the cultural blitz through all media at that time was that everyone should have a job, have a function, have a career, etc. If you were in the home you were a nobody, you were looked down upon, you were a third-class person and so on. You should be out having excitement, even having affairs, that was heavily promoted too, long before then of course; it was promoted even back in the late 1800s by HG Wells, and all through his life afterwards. So we’ve been experimented with for an awful long time. But he says here in his book…

I am an admirer of Huxley’s personality and work, but in the last years I profoundly disagreed with him and the points of disagreement will help clarify the issue. He said in Heaven and Hell, praising the benefits of mescaline, Huxley offered this advice to modern man in search of his soul. “Knowing as he does what are the chemical conditions of transcendental experience, the aspiring mystic should turn for technical help to the specialist in pharmacology and biochemistry, in physiology and neurology.”  (Alan:  That’s very interesting.)  Now this is precisely what I do not mean by the positive uses of psychopharmacology. In the first place, experimenting with mescaline or with LSD-25 does involve serious risks. But quite apart from this it is fundamentally wrong and naïve to expect that drugs can present the mind with gratis gifts, put into it something which is not already there. Neither mystic insight nor philosophic wisdom, nor creative power can be provided by pill or injection. The psychopharmacist cannot add to the faculties of the brain but he can at best eliminate obstructions and blockages which impede their proper use.

The key to all of this is that the big boys themselves, going along with the Darwinian school, claimed that man had gone wrong somewhere in his evolution. It’s interesting they didn’t want to change themselves at the top, including all the scientific elite. They wanted to REMAIN WILD MEN, as Charles Galton Darwin said quite plainly in his book The Next Million Years, BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE STEERING AND GUIDING THE PLANET EARTH, basically, the culture, everything, productivity and so on, TRAINING THE PUBLIC CONSTANTLY FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION, UPDATING THEM FOR CHANGES. BUT THEY THEMSELVES WOULD REMAIN WILD MEN SINCE THEY WERE THE CAPTAINS OF THE SHIP.  IT COULD INTERFERE WITH THEIR OWN FACULTIES OF REASONING, ETC; IN A CRISIS SITUATION THEY WOULD NEED THOSE FACULTIES. BUT THE GENERAL POPULATION, he said, WOULD HAVE THEIR DECISIONS MADE BY THE STATE. All decisions would be made by the state, hence the massive increase in social work departments, etc. etc. etc. They make all your decisions for you.  Koestler goes on to say in another page…

I’m aware that control of the mind and manipulating human beings have sinister undertones.  Who is to control the controls, manipulate the manipulators? Assuming that we succeed in synthesizing a hormone which acts as a mental stabilizer on the lines indicated, how are we to propagate its global use to induce the beneficial mutation?  Are we to ram it down people’s throats? Or put it into the tap water? The answer seems obvious. No legislation... (Alan:  ...this is important, because it ties in with your addiction to Internet, pornography, food, all kinds of addictions.  You might call them addictions if you want to, but really they’re something that makes people feel pleasant in an era of unpleasant happenings and so on.  It says...)

The answer seems obvious. No legislation, no compulsory measures were needed to persuade the Greeks and Romans to partake of the juice of the grape that gives joy and oblivion.  Sleeping pills, pep pills, tranquilizers have for better or worse spread across the world with a minimum of publicity or official encouragement.  (Alan:  It wasn’t really done officially through parliaments because parliaments are low on the totem pole, you understand. It was done by the agencies assigned by parliaments to do all this kind of stuff, and the special branches of secret services and so on.) 

 

They spread because people liked their effect and even accepted unpleasant or harmful aftereffects.

Not quite true. Because I’ve gone into the history of the drug introduction into society and how bags of LSD were thrown over university walls across Britain and other countries too, to get it all started. Many, many years afterwards – they can always tell you after the event because it’s achieved their effect – we find that top promoters of the use of LSD, for instance, like Timothy Leary, were actually on the payroll of the CIA. He traveled across the world’s universities promoting and encouraging this fantastic use of LSD. We also had the big culture creators for the rock bands, etc., heavily promoting the use of drugs through music and pop/rock, the revolution supposedly for the young, who really did believe it was their revolution, and they were managed all of the way.  In every single iota of it they were completely managed. They had no idea that the ideas, even the songs often, were done by much, much older people in a completely different class than they’d ever, ever see.  But it says here, basically, the people would like something.  Now, you’ll like a lot of things that will decrease misery, for instance, in a time of tremendous hardship. It’s interesting too, that in the Soviet Union, often, outside Moscow you would have lineups and queues for food when it was hard at times, bad harvest or whatever.  But you never had problems getting vodka, cheap, cheap vodka. The big boys understand this. Don’t forget the Soviet Union was part of the big experiment too, and well-funded by the West. So they’ve always used various kinds of drugs to pacify the public in times of incredible hardships and financial troubles, etc. etc. But it says here…

 

They spread because people liked their effect (Alan:  ...the drugs and so on...) and even accepted unpleasant or harmful aftereffects.  A mental stabilizer would produce neither euphoria, nor sleep, nor mescaline visions, nor cabbage-like equanimity. It would in fact have no noticeable specific effect except in promoting cerebral coordination and harmonizing thought and emotion. In other words, restore the integrity of the split hierarchy. Its use would spread because people like feeling healthy rather than unhealthy in body or mind.  It would spread as vaccination has spread, and contraception has spread, not by coercion but by enlightened self-interest.  (Alan:  And of course this is going into behaviorism and those who control behavior. Because you might think it’s your self-interest but you’re generally wrong, in all the things they promote. What they mean, too, by a stabilizer, is to subjugate basically your wild, your natural survival instincts into a cooperative placid society for the general public. That’s what he means by this too. These guys, remember, speak with, as the American Indians used to say, forked tongues. One for their own group and one for the outer group, the esoteric and the exoteric combined.)

The first noticeable result would perhaps be a sudden drop in the crime and the suicide rate in certain regions and social groups where the pill would become fashionable. (Alan:  ...the contraceptive pill.)  From here on the developments are as unpredictable as the consequences of James Watts’ or Pasteur’s discoveries had been. Some Swiss canton might decide after a public referendum to add a new substance to the chlorine in the water supply.  (Alan:  Well, we’ve got stacks of things; it’s not just fluoride. Fluoride is a big one that does affect stabilization, because it makes you pretty well dumb actually if you take too much of it. It shouldn’t be there at all. It’s used widely.  Studies are constantly going on, for the upper elite, which are never published for you to read, but we can see the fallout in society too. Anyway it says…)

For a trial period they could use another drug along with chlorine and other countries might follow their example. (Alan:  You see.  And it even says there might even be international fashions created amongst them, for the young, etc. etc. etc. But he says here on another page…)

 

But we are a mentally sick race (Alan:  ...mentally sick.  He calls the public mentally sick.) and as such deaf to persuasion. It has been tried from the age of the prophets to Albert Schweitzer and the results have been, as Swift said, that WE HAVE JUST ENOUGH RELIGION TO MAKE US HATE BUT NOT ENOUGH LOVE TO LOVE EACH OTHER. That applies to all religions, theistic or secular, whether taught by Moses or Marx or Mao Tse Tung.  And Swift’s anguished cry, NOT DIE HERE IN A RAGE LIKE A POISONED RAT IN A HOLE, has acquired an urgency as never before.  Nature has let us down, God seems to have left the receiver off the hook and time is running out.  To hope for salvation to be synthesized in a laboratory may seem materialistic, crankish or naïve, but to tell the truth there is a Jungian twist to it (Alan:  Carl Jung.)  for it reflects the ancient alchemist’s dream to concoct the elixir vitae.  What we expect from it however is not eternal life nor the transformation of base metals into gold, but the transformation of Homo Maniacus into Homo Sapiens. When man decides to take his fate into his own hands that possibility will be within reach.

In other words, total tranquilization and various methods all combined, behavioristic methods, etc., and persuasion, and neuroscientific prompting as they say, Pavlovian responses and conditioning. They are all being used against you, and have been your whole life long, all from early school all the way through education and into your workplace because the media gives you it in so many different ways. They tell you who to hate, who is wrong by saying something.  They tell you, tell you, tell you, and it sinks into you, that if you mention certain things and question certain things you’re a bad person.

Never discount the effects that you get through indoctrination through fiction. Never discount it because it’s incredibly effective. When you identify with the characters in a movie or whatever it happens to be, or drama, you will actually start to emulate what is said.  Children especially, they mimic what they hear and see, even the cuss words, etc; that’s why Hollywood put them in a long time ago. Remember, the Frankfurt School, for instance, were dedicated to destroying completely, completely the culture of the West, right down to promoting all modern arts, which are basically dehumanizing, they’re depressing to look at.  All beauty was to be destroyed.  All beauty. And that’s part of it too. Then again, when the experts keep telling you this is a great painting, you’re supposed to parrot it and say so. The ones who are easy, the real followers will say the same thing.  They want to be in the group that says it’s fantastic.

You find the same in music. You don’t really have to sell all the records to get a number one hit. What you do, first of all, is promote it and say it is number one, by the machinery that creates the whole industry, and you’ll believe it, and you’ll go and buy the record, just to be in with everybody else... oh, I’ve got that so I’m cool, you see.  So all of these things work awfully well. Never discount persuasion by your ability or your instinct to follow what you think are people, or even hero figures you might say, hero figures and role models. So never discount fiction because that’s when you really are wide open to suggestion. When they promote something and they tell you, this is a bad thing to say or think or even discuss, and they’ll make the character who does say those things or discuss them the most nastiest character of all, you see, and that’s how your behavior is modified, when you don’t question EVERYTHING.

If you can’t question everything you’ll never get to truth, obviously. But you see, the big boys don’t believe that you have the capacity to handle truth. You’re too primitive and emotional when you get truth, that’s what they say. What a fantastic way for an elitist group to criticize you for finding out what’s really going on, and hopefully to silence you in the process. None of these authors have self-doubt whatsoever as to THEIR particular primitive and base behavior. And some of them were the most foulest of people privately you could possibly ever meet, and still are. Very arrogant. Completely elitist. And they have no problems discussing amongst themselves things which they make taboo for you to discuss.

One of the big manipulators of the human mind, and psychology, who worked for private industry, the private foundations, the Rockefellers and many others, and helped to persuade the public to do certain things or buy certain things, and modify their behavior in the process, was Edward Bernays. I’ve gone through his history before and if you go into the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com you’ll find various talks I’ve given on Bernays and those who came after him, and also a bit of insight into who he was.  Because he didn’t just appear out of nowhere as The Pioneer, as he’s called, of Marketing. This was going on for a long, long time before Bernays, amongst a select group who studied the peoples and countries, to merchandise to them, and study their behavior, and also observe the modifications that even their fashions that they would implement to countries, how it would modify the behavior of the people in the public etc. etc.

There’s a book called The Fluoride Deception; it’s well worth reading. Christopher Bryson is the author. He does an awfully good book on fluoride. Now, fluoride, you’ll find, getting back to the last book I touched on with Arthur Koestler, fluoride was one of those agencies, those combination of chemicals, basically, they put into the water supply.  And it has nothing to do, as far as I’m concerned with the studies I’ve done, to helping to give you better teeth. In fact, it makes your bones brittle and there’s many other side effects physically, but there’s also the mental stage as well. Harvard University did one of the more recent studies on fluoride and they claimed that it lowered your IQ points at least 7%. So it also alters the way that you behave to an extent too. You’re not so, again, the wild instincts, the parts that keep you alive, your instinctive drives are certainly dulled. So it works awfully well.

There’s a chapter in this particular book, The Fluoride Deception, where the author goes into engineering consent, the term used by Bernays who didn’t just teach it to the marketing companies and so on and to the big industrialists of the time to sell their products. He is given credit of course, Bernays, for altering the behavior of Americans and giving them the ‘consumer society’. But he was involved in much more than that.  Behavior modification was one of them. He belonged to some very interesting groups indeed that’ve been on the go for many centuries. He also worked for what we think of as the Marxist organizations.  He was behind big movements of women’s liberation in America early on. And like all of them of course they will personally benefit as they change the behavior of the public. Because he worked for massive tobacco companies, the largest in the world at that time, and he made it sexy for women to smoke by getting basically more elitist females that were known in society, society women, young women, and making cigarette smoking sexy and rebellious etc., etc. So he did that. He did the same thing with drinks, alcohol and so on and so on. But he also altered the fashion industry too, to an extent as well.

He even had the US involved with wars in Latin America when the big corporations which ran, were US-based that ran Latin America – in fact, I think the Rockefellers was one of them – with the United Fruit Company.  He had them go in there and overthrow the democratically-elected president, claiming he was a communist, because he wanted a fair pay. All the produce was going out of the country, the people were getting paid peanuts of course for wages, for massive profit, and he wanted to change that, this particular elected president.  And they overthrew him under the guise of communism. So he even had the U.S. Army literally go to war, and of course the taxpayers paid for it all. And during that particular war for about a year in advance he set up, like the Pathe News company, very similar to Pathe News, a version which really played on communism, communism, communism in Latin America, in order to prepare the public to be all for it and not complain when the US invaded this particular little country.   Anyway, at the end of it all of course the fruit company was back in business and paying peanuts once more to their workers.

Anyway, Bernays, as I say he talked about engineering consent amongst the population. You think, and I’ve mentioned it so many times, you think you’re coming to your own decisions and you’re not. In most areas in fact you’re not. I used to study the techniques on television, when I was young, that were used on the public. I realized that after a Prime Minister or a President gave a speech you always had two experts, always experts, came on afterwards to explain what the Prime Minister or President had just said. One would give a different opinion than the other, and that’s the dialectical approach to things, you see. You’re given this or that opinion. They don’t really care which one you take because both of them will lead you up the garden path and mislead you as well.

But for those in-the-know, if you’re listening to them making speeches, everything that they say is very legalistic.  When the actual President or Prime Minister says it, it’s legalistic and they’re making massive decisions.  It’s like when George Bush Junior said he’s giving you the new freedom, and no expert questioned that on your behalf, you see.  The new freedom, what does he mean by the new freedom? as opposed to the old freedom? Well, he’s giving you a new deal – they like to call it these terms, like new deal.  Here’s the new freedom and the new freedom was turned out as basically a police state inside all Western countries, some worse than others at the moment but the US takes the lead in it at the moment along with part of England too.  So listen very carefully to that. Don’t listen to the experts afterwards, reinterpreting things. Listen to what the person says, legalistic terms said by the top honcho, supposedly, which has legalistic value, and something is going to get signed into law. Awfully important.  You acquiesce to this consent; you consent to what you hear by the speeches, by saying nothing. You say nothing and therefore it all becomes law, quite quickly, without any fuss.  Because the public generally don’t know what it really means. They don’t think deeply. They expect and wait for the media to give them their opinions on it. Their reasoning is done by the media. That’s what Brzezinski said in one of his books, they had trained the public so well.

Before the 1950s, for instance, even before that, the public were very skeptical of media. They knew the barons owned it who worked for the establishment. They knew what they were getting fed was for political purposes on behalf of the establishment, never for the public. They knew they were being conned and lied to and they said as much too in their own little low-level publications. But today very few folk question the official media. In fact, they have trained the public, through social approval and social disapproval, etc, to bypass those people, ignore those people, who are then called a conspiracy nut, conspiracy crazies, the nutters, because they have these strange opinions on things. Why don’t you be like the uniform opinion that we give you? that’s what it really means. And to muddy the water they give you enough cranks that they’ll promote out there for you to follow, that some people will follow, put it that way, that are utterly crazy.  It’s crazy like a fox, they’re put out there on purpose to make true information, the facts, be ridiculed by lumping it in with all kinds of wacko things. It works awfully well too. Everything out there is dangerous until you think for yourself.

Bernays as I say talked about engineering consent. He worked for all, oh, many, many presidents from the early 1900s onwards, by the way. He lived to a very ripe old age.   The author in The Fluoride Deception talks about meeting him to write the book on The Fluoride Deception. (By the way, I don’t get paid a penny for mentioning these books at all. It’s not me promoting something because I’m getting paid for anything.) But he does talk about Bernays, which is interesting. He talks about meeting him and how the old man at that time, well in his 90s; actually he met him on his hundredth birthday. You find the most evil people live an awful long time, because they don’t worry about things. But he said here, this guy, to paraphrase it he said that he was there at the treaty of Versailles being signed. He’s got photographs all over the place, his own house at that time, with Henry Ford, Eleanor Roosevelt, Edison, Eisenhower, Truman.  He worked with presidents his whole life long to influence public behavior and opinion. He worked with the top moguls, as I say, in the tobacco industries, car manufacturing industries, etc., etc and so on. But he also had people in the arts, the general arts. He understood perfectly well that the whole creation of the arts, that’s music, entertainment, of all kinds, paintings, dancing, fashion comes into it by the way. So he knew all the top players for all these things too.  He helped to guide it all as well for the culture they wanted to create.

Even during World War II he worked for the US government along with the CIA, in the CIA actually, to alter opinions within the country of the US and outside the US. Britain was doing the same thing of course, we know that too.  Because George Orwell, or Blair as his name was, was working on the BBC at the time in the propaganda department, helping stabilize the news and keeping everybody in the right mode for war and putting up with suffering, and almost starvation in some parts with incredible rationing.  But anyway, Bernays was employed also to add fluoride to water; that was a part of it. This ties in, as I say, with the previous Arthur Koestler book I just mentioned, about what do you do, do you put the chemicals in the water, add it to the chlorine that was already there, etc. and so on. Bernays admitted to doing that too. How he did it was by a technique that he already understood very well, TO GET ANY IDEA ACCEPTED. He says, basically, YOU PUT ON EXPERTS. You put experts in front of the public through magazines, television or whatever it happens to be, radio, and you pay the experts, top dentists, big money to say it’s fantastic. In other words, you buy them off! It’s very simple, they buy them off.

Bernays was famous for putting up, in the early days of pharmacology, famous for setting up little offices. He’d advise their clients, set up an office somewhere, get one secretary in and she’ll answer the phone calls, send out the occasional letter, get a few top doctors’ names on it and the public will believe it. That’s your PR office basically.   Bernays basically said, IF DOCTORS ARE FOR SOMETHING THE PUBLIC ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT IT. He understood perfectly well the public follow because they can’t think for themselves. That’s how all advertising does work. It sells you a fantasy. It’s nothing to do with reality. I used to always wonder, the car ads on television always showed you one car, the car they were selling, flying along some road, with nobody else on it, with hills in the background and fields and so on, all happy, happy, happy. But it told you nothing about the car, the engine, guarantees, the workmanship, nothing at all. You’re sold a fantasy.

He also mentions, this author here, that Bernays used the medical sympathy to boost a play that he helped produce. Now, why was a guy like that helping produce plays? Why? You see, he was into the culture creation business, as his relatives were before him.  He understood it. The play was about, it was called Damaged Goods.  Damaged Goods was about, really, venereal disease, which they changed to sexually transmitted disease.  And now because we’re in a politically correct world it’s a social disease.   [Alan laughing.] You see. But he got around the censorship of that era, because there was a lot of censorship back then because people knew the groups behind cultural shifts at that time, especially the churches, mainly at that time the Catholic Church. They were watching the movements of certain peoples and what they were promoting to destroy their culture; they understood it back then and they wrote a lot on it in fact. You can’t find those articles, a lot of them, today, unless you’ve got the old stuff.

Anyway he basically got round it by, he created what was called a sociological committee.  On the committee he had doctors and well known New Yorkers who talked about the benefits of the sex education and to endorse the play. Now remember, the elite have always had, and it’s been mounting more and more and more, the idea of population control.  That was one part of it, so that was in there too, you see, to promote the whole idea of the fallout of casual sex, which they were promoting. Because casual sex would ensure that fewer folk got married. At the same time they were promoting careers for women as well. It all ties in together, you understand. It wasn’t all by chance that different things developed at the same time. It was all tied together and directed and produced and promulgated amongst the public by experts… experts on advertising and behaviorism.

Of course we find too that Bernays was well aware of behavior of the public and how to alter behavior by using behaviorists, early behaviorists and the social sciences.  All the way through his lifetime he used them for promoting all kinds of things to the general population. You’ll find too, if you really delve into him you’ll find his involvement in the music industry and promoting the whole 60s era as well, drugs, rock ’n roll, free love, etc., all that. But anyway, as I say, he’s a very, very prominent person. You should go and do your own digging into it and see. There’s so much on Bernays it’s just incredible. So much was kept from the public. It wasn’t just him himself, there was a whole coterie around him of similar people, very similar people in fact, who understood this and were working with him, on a large scale, well-funded. These guys did not work for peanuts. Not at all.

Bernays said, “THOSE WHO MANIPULATE THIS UNSEEN MECHANISM OF SOCIETY,” that’s the persuasion industry, “CONSTITUTE AN INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT, WHICH IS THE TRUE RULING POWER OF OUR COUNTRY.  . . .OUR MINDS ARE MOLDED, OUR TASTES FORMED,” I’ve told you about that before, your tastes on everything, “OUR IDEAS SUGGESTED, LARGELY BY MEN WE HAVE NEVER HEARD OF.”  Now, the author of this book on fluoride and Bernays basically, or Bernays is at least one part of it, one chapter in the book because he was such a major player in getting it promoted, you see, for the public acceptance and having it passed by law, into local authorities, into using this stuff on the general population. But it tells you the people who were there, who were the protesters against it, all the different organizations, prominent doctors and dentists and surgeons, everything.  Very good. Then he goes into the opposition to it and so on as well. He talks about the top dogs that were involved in pushing it.  And it’s no coincidence in fact, you find that Detlev Bronk of the Rockefeller foundation was there too, because they really ran, and still do, the American Medical Association; everything to do with medicine. And it’s awfully lucrative for them at the same time. Everything the Rockefellers touch, by the way, and all their philanthropy across the world, it also benefits their own private investments and interests, including Africa. I mean, they were into the Congo and different countries in Africa, and Nigeria, many, many, many moons ago to exploit the resources, under the guise of giving them work, etc. and helping improve their standard of living.

Anyway, during the campaign for fluoride Bernays did let some things out of the bag.  At the time nobody knew, but old letters he wrote to other people involved are very telling. He said in one letter, ALL THIS INTRIGUES ME TO NO END, and he was writing actually at the time to a Doctor Baumgartner to do with fluoridation. He says, BECAUSE IT PRESENTS A CHALLENGING SITUATION DEEPLY RELATED TO THE PUBLIC’S INTEREST, WHICH MAY BE SOLVED BY THE ENGINEERING OF CONSENT. What he was referring to was an essay that Bernays had written before on techniques of media manipulation and public relations, to get the public to alter their behavior or buy something or do something, whatever it happened to be. So he goes into the techniques of what to do to promote consent for fluoride amongst the general population, getting top people at NBC, CBS, etc. debating it and so on, and again, present what appears to be two sides. And actually, he referred to it this way too, USING THE DIALECTICAL PROCESS, Bernays, he says, IT’S LIKE PRESENTING TWO SIDES FOR ANTI-CATHOLICISM OR ANTI-SEMITISM.  He says, WHAT THEY SHOULD REALLY DO IS BRING PEOPLE ON TO ACT IN A SPECIFIC WAY BUT RATHER GENERICALLY, he said, AND IT’S A TECHNIQUE THAT’S USED IN PERSUASION ON MEDIA THAT GETS THE PUBLIC TO GO ALONG WITH IT BY THE WAY IT IS PRESENTED TO THEM. Very interesting indeed.

But they got it through of course, using mass persuasive techniques. I’m sure a lot of payoffs went on behind the scenes because it was just too important to get fluoride out to the general public, to dumb us down, make us complacent, etc., etc., etc., more manageable you might say. Now, most of you probably know that what they put in your drinking water is actually a waste product from the creation of aluminum and so on, and various other processes, and processes used for the atomic industry. That’s why they pushed it.  They had all this waste material at the end of World War II, etc., and right up to the present time. How do you get rid of a lot of this stuff? Well, the big boys are famous for getting you to either eat it or drink it. Even your beer contains more chemicals than actually anything that is natural, to make it brew faster, so they can get it bottled quickly and out to you, and canned and so on. So that’s how everything is done, through promotion, and stuff is often very, very lethal out there.

But you find that they knew what fluoride did an awful long time ago, an awful, awful long time ago in fact. In the 1940s they had disasters around certain chemical plants, there was the Donora Disaster, was one of them.  You find that it was poisoning the air, all the stuff going into the air from fluoride and so on; it was an offshoot of it all. There was a mass investigation of it and their legal responsibility for many deaths was put right on the smelters. You’ll find all around all smelters, actually, you’ll get the similar problems; Sudbury up here not far from me is one of them too. They found different ways to get rid of all of the waste products and that was one of them too.  You find that during the process of creation for uranium vast amounts of fluoride gas were needed by the atomic energy commission for enrichment of uranium at factories and so on too. So again, there’s a lot of uses they have for this and hence the rise of it, and the excess of it too. How do you get rid of it too, the excess of it?

But it’s just astonishing, as I say, to find out how much, how much was involved with fluoride and the movement to get it into your water supply, all contained in this book here, The Fluoride Deception. As I say, it’s a good book. You should maybe read it if you can. Get a copy and go through it for yourselves. Because there’s so much, packed with information on the history of fluoride, it’s really something else.  You can also read about how fluoride was well-known because of the factory fallout around the areas of the factories that produced stuff for the atomic industry, and even machinery and so on, making the machinery for big industry, had this stuff spewing out of their furnaces and how it poisoned large segments of the population with the fallout around these big, big plants. You’ll find that they knew it affected the central nervous system. One of its main effects is in the central nervous system, which goes all the way to your brain of course, which they already knew. But it was put down as an essential for ‘national security’, the production of all of this too.   And aluminum vastly increased the production of iron and steel and all these things by the different metallic compounds they could use, in the handling of the molten steels, etc., especially aluminum. So it’s quite fascinating to see how much importance was placed on that.

But they did know what it did to the human brain all along, of course, which ties in with the other groups that always, the very groups that say, WE CANNOT LET A GOOD CRISIS GO TO WASTE. They will use whatever they can if it fits in with their agenda, and dumbing down the population is certainly a big, big part of it. And it’s still going on across the world today. And still a big battle is raging when folk catch on to it and demand it be removed. But it doesn’t really matter because the big boys generally always get their way. If they can’t do it legally they’ll bypass it and get it in some other way and call it a different name or a different compound, or whatever. That’s the world we really live in, you understand. That’s how it really, really does work.

I always like George Orwell’s comment, his little statement that THE PROLES DON’T COUNT. Meaning, the general population, we don’t count, in anything. We’re given our front groups too, that manage us when we protest things, that get nowhere of course. We are given all of them, rather than get one started up yourself; even if you do, it will be infiltrated before you know it. So there’s a constant war, and I mean a total war going on on the general public all the time. It’s been awfully successful, awfully successful right up to this present time, with all of the different sciences involved, and behaviorism etc., etc.  It’s been going on for an awful long time. Tremendous it is in its antiquity. It’s tremendously old. And it’s still going on today.

But I keep stressing that big powerful foundations and the big moguls behind them, the families behind them are still involved in your politics, managing all of that.  Your geopolitics across the world for their own businesses using your armies, etc., all heavily working today on the same agenda. Being the elite they have the right to rule the world and shape it in their fashion, their likeness, to suit themselves. But you will never, ever, ever be allowed to graduate up to their level, because they do not believe in competition. That was a famous statement put out by the old man Rockefeller, John Rockefeller who said that COMPETITION IS A SIN. And they really mean it. When they give you free trade and all the rest of it, it’s to eliminate competition and to let their own front CEOs, and I mean front CEOs of their front organizations, take over all of commerce across the world, and economic power brings political power and legalistic power as well. That’s how we are really governed, I should say.

Now, there’s way too much, as I say, to go into all of this. You can do all your own research. There’s stacks of information out there. Go into all the university studies that back up the ill side effects of fluoride and many other things too. It’s not that long ago that the same big boys pushed for putting other medications in the water. These are medications, they’re drugs, remember. Because they’re given a different name and they don’t sell it across the pharmacy as a drug, it’s still a drug. These are all drugs.  Chemical compounds are drugs. And you can mix them together, say, in a vat or even in a water supply and you come out with a different drug, the one that you planned when you combine them all together. That’s how you make drugs, you combine things. But they won’t tell you they’re combining things. Oh, we’re only putting this one in here, and over there they’re putting that one in there. But combine the two together and you’ve got a new drug, which is psychoactive or whatever it happens to be. Or a sterilant; it can sterilize you.

So that’s the world we live in and to understand it all you have to do an awful lot of research. Don’t just parrot what other people say. Be very careful who you do want to parrot as well, I should say.  Because I really mean it, it’s a war out there and the big boys always put their strategists in place to be the champions and the leaders of all wars, on all sides.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods go with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:34 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on June the 1^st, 2014. I get many emails from all over the world, generally from people I’ve never heard from in fact, who ask me questions.  All they do is email for questions and answers and that’s the only time I ever hear from them.  But I don’t make myself a library for the public because I’d go into utter poverty altogether if I just sat here and did nothing but answer all the emails. Now, some of them I will respond to depending on the circumstances. But other ones simply want to know the beginnings of life. It’s amazing as things become more and more advanced in the changes, and the speed of change, and I use advances with caution of course, but we find that people retreat into the past to find a common cause for all of this, you see. And these same people generally don’t understand the present.

The present is bewildering to them. It’s frightening to them. Because we are in an era of planned change, massive, across the board.  In every facet of endeavor it’s planned change and this is done by people called technocrats and I’ll go into that later perhaps. But it was just going through my head today, all these thoughts were passing, that it’s amazing how people keep asking the same questions when they have no idea of the present and what’s really happening, and why the things are happening, why they’re reacting too, and the way that they react to all the changes, the planned changes. We are in a constant motion of planned change and we’ve been that way for an awful long time.

It really came to its explosive power, you might say, during the industrial revolution through machinery and then the adaptation of people to machines for the economy. The whole class structure of course was based around that too. It kind of broke away to an extent from the old feudal system where you were simply a serf and you knew it, and serfdom was common and normal for the people. They didn’t complain because their grandparents had been the same way before them; it’s the way things were. At one time, we’ve got to remember too, when they had rebellions, they wanted to put in an old deposed King and remove the present one, the interloper.  It was because the only concept they had of being ruled, was exactly that, being ruled by a King. Democracy hadn’t been taught to them in any possible shape or form. So they were limited in their thinking.

Nothing has really changed today. People are still very limited in the way they think, because they’re purposely kept in the dark. There are many reasons why they’re kept in the dark, of course, and power never shares all of its knowledge to the general public, never, ever. In any field whatsoever. Any field. And especially those fields, I’d say, where it’s imperative to keep the public in the dark.  Because the public are constantly being indoctrinated for the next stage of what they think is the present era, the next stage, the next stage. Because the future is always planned by technocrats. For your education, all the way through life you’re constantly adapting and being taught to adapt, because you see it through fiction and many other ways too, that adaptation is normal.  The Darwinian Theory, adapt or die basically.

Those people who think it’s something to do with the beginnings of mankind and are reacting to the present as opposed to understanding the present. Their idea of history and social history is awfully sketchy indeed. It generally comes from television, or even movies, where they think there were still free peoples a long time ago, who lived and read philosophy or something under trees. Nothing was further from the truth because we’ve always lived in a system where men are born that really seek power, men who go beyond the normal social confines and restraint of power, they want all power. Today it’s more acceptable to try and go for the top because it’s all part of the present culture. That’s why in America, especially, Hollywood glorifies the gangster era.  The guys who came from the street, they claim; there’s a lot more to it of course which they won’t tell you. But the fact is, as long as they got rich it didn’t matter how they got rich. Because then they’re part of the establishment, and their sons go to university, and daughters too, and they’re now respectable. So that’s the way things really go.

The same with all the big families that the US has. Because the US was based on a materialistic future. Of course everybody went for their goal, very few get to it. Once the people get into power of course in certain fields they monopolize everything to do with their particular special field and they keep everybody else out.  That goes all the way down to free trade today in fact. Free trade is not free trade. It's not for everybody. It's for the select corporations that are part of the plutocracy that run the US and the world, and Britain and every other country too.

We often hear about the rise of the middle class that came along, along with technological progress, as they call it, which basically was to do with the mechanization of society and industry etc., where a middle-class appeared, that was non-merchandising; there were still of course the merchants, etc.  But the non-merchandising classes were more intellectual. Many of them worked as accountants and so on, and actually they were the guys who would write the books on economics. Not the guys like the Rothschilds who owned fortunes across the planet. But the actual employees would actually go in and put out the theories of economics, etc.

But along with that you also had other guys who specialized in other areas, social organization was part of it too. Because people cannot imagine the incredible change of an industrial era from an agricultural society, which was the norm, based on a kind of feudalistic type system, and where landowning was really for the selected few and everybody else was renting. Tenant farmers, as they say. So therefore, when they brought in the mechanization, and of course it was helped along by people in the House of Lords, say, in England, for an example, where they passed the Corn Laws. Lord Rothschild himself put that law forth to allow foreigners to dump foreign grain on the British market, to get the farmers off the land and to get them into these newly constructed, or rundown, cities where the factories were.

They crammed them 20 or more in a room sometimes, and it was a hell on earth, literally, as they worked 16 hours a day; that was the normal. There was no relief. You generally died pretty young. You were kept on subsistence wages because it was a time of laissez-faire capitalism too, where it wasn’t their problem. Getting the profit was their problem but it wasn’t the problem of the bosses and the owners to do any social justice whatsoever.  And people were plentiful, just as they’re plentiful today in China. And human life was devalued extremely. That was also the beginnings of the nail in the coffin for religions, for Christianity and so on too, as people lived amongst this mass squalor, and the intelligentsia, the rising intelligentsia that were employed in this area of management grew and grew and grew. They became colder themselves as they studied societies with a very impersonal flavor.

Now remember that people hadn’t been geared in their makeup and their history, their genetic makeup even, genetic history, of how to cope with an artificial, a very artificial system. An analogy in fact I often think about, is, if you live in the country as I do sometimes you’ll find a deer coming onto the road in your headlights and you have to really slow right down and even stop. Because I’ve had experience with deer, sometimes they’ll run towards you; you think they’re turning away and they’ll run towards you. Because there’s nowhere in their genetic makeup that has prepared them for this weird massive light in the middle of night. It’s not in their ken, in their knowledge, and they can’t draw on how to deal with it so they can run in any direction and that’s the problem with it. Well, mankind is the same too. We don’t have the makeup, when the industrial era came along, to cope with all the massive changes that it brought with it.

People began to be treated the same way by the technocrats of the day, those who studied ‘time and motion’ as they called it for efficiency and tried to make more people more efficient. The people had nothing in their ken, how to cope with these massive changes, massive changes. Therefore, when we compare that experience, for instance, that understanding with the industrial revolution, millions of people were suddenly thrust off the land, to feed the factories like any material would feed the factories, like raw ore to go into metals and so on. And the public and the people were just the same; that’s what they were, raw material to feed the factories. There was nothing humane about it in any way at all. And all the old concepts of even local community were out the window because you were crammed together with other millions of people in these massive cities, and living in squalor often.  And the people didn’t have enough left for themselves to help feed their neighbors if times went bad, never mind themselves. All the old rules were cast off.

The key to technological progress, as it’s called, is that everything has to be efficient. That’s the whole key of technology and even the technological society, you might say, that we’re living in.  It’s on the go now, it’s here permanently in many ways, including the electronic fields too, of course. But it brings massive change to which you’re unprepared. Because everything that’s the normal will change in the system in which you live. Everything.

You’ll find during the late 1800s, for instance, education started to come in for the peasantry.  And they were still called peasants, quite openly, in all the old books, by the elite who ruled their countries and owned the factories, that decided which wars they were going to fight and how they were going to profit using their own factories.  All of that kind of thing comes into it. You find too, that they hired people who would come up in the middle classes, as I say, non-merchandising people especially who were taught to be intellectuals, to study things, dispassionately, and come to the conclusions to make things more efficient. How to make things more efficient, that was so important. So important.

It hasn’t changed to this present time. In fact, it’s worse, as we know, because we’re looked upon by governments as the mass. We are completely impersonalized to them. You’re not a human being as such. You’re a statistic, a social insurance number and they instantly categorize you the way that they do categorize you, and they think of you too, as your age, gender, fitness, health, all these things to do with your ability to perform and produce and consume, etc. That’s how we’re basically worked out today, your earning capacity, your tax-paying capacity, to keep the same system going.

The elite never want to lose power, naturally. They never, ever, ever do. They don’t wait for things to happen. They plan for the future. That’s why they hire the futurists too, that take all the present trends, where things are going, and they go off into tangents of the future, how it could possibly go, how negative things could happen that would make the power structure lose its control, and how to avoid that happening. So they plan the future and the culture, and the education system too. That’s why, really, they gave education, basic education, very minimalistic, to the general people in the 1800s onwards. Because they had to ensure they’d have the right concept, what their owners wanted them to believe, the concept of the country and the system they were part of. And they were taught that they were part of it, a much bigger part than they actually were of course.  Because power never shares itself, and it doesn’t ever intend to. And forget the panacea they give you, the placebo of democracy, it’s a cover, of course. Because the minority group at the top have always ruled and they intend to keep on going down through the future.

So therefore technocrats are very, very important to those who control. That’s why they have specialized fields in management of all kinds. Teachers today are, as they call them, change agents. Their job is to indoctrinate the intake of fresh students and give them the proper, the proper concept.  In other words, the authorized concept of how the world is and how they have to see their world and view their world and feel that they’re part of it.  That helps them to stay in the box, and have a form of sanity but in reality it’s very unreal as to true reality, to serve the elite you see. It’s never been any different.

In other areas of special technocrats are the Kissinger’s, the Brzezinski’s and many more like them that are churned out of specific universities, picked up very young and given further indoctrination into the sciences of managing the public, and geopolitical warfare, future planning strategies for raw resources and so on, for the big corporations that really wield the power, especially in this day and age.

For this talk too, I’ll liken this to altering society into a machine, a smooth, well oiled, working machine of efficiency. That’s what happens with technology, everything is transformed into a machine.  Think, as well, about the depersonalization of society as they’re pushed and trained and prodded, and nudged as they like to say – the neuroscientists like the word nudge – to make out what we think are our decisions. But people do follow these nudges without thinking why they’re following someone else’s prompt; they’re being prompted.  Of course you’re being led and guided by those who want to keep power, to ensure society is safe for those who rule and to guard against this terrible, terrible thing that they have at the top where anything outside their system they call anarchy, they don’t want anarchy to arise.  Meaning, the loss of their power completely. They always say that we’ll degenerate into barbarism, etc. etc. That’s why they’re so megalomaniacal to try and control the future always. And they really do, by the indoctrination.

The child of, say, 1960 has a different indoctrination from the child of today at school, vastly different. The ones today are taught that they’re on the cutting edge of all knowledge, which is a big lie, but most folk believe the lie and because of that they can’t figure things out.  They really believe they’d be told about nefarious things going on, that will affect them personally, by THE MEDIA THAT DOES THEIR THINKING AND THEIR REASONING FOR THEM, as Brzezinski touched on.  Social technocrats, therefore, have a very important job, and that’s to smooth out transitions and adaptations to this mechanization of all aspects of society, through technique.  That’s its role and it does it very, very well. It gives you things that come out of mechanization, and even today it’s robotics of course, which produce all of the electric toys that keep you amused, and again, through entertainment and so on reinforce the idea of a unified society, all working together towards some vague idea. And that’s as far as you can go with it, the vague idea, you see. And that’s all-important, that we all work towards the same system.

We find, as I say, depersonalization comes in when we’re all crammed together in these big cities, to feed either factories, which don’t exist, they’re all in China today, or the electronic communications media that runs all business today since we’re service economies, again, planned by people most of you have never heard of a long time ago.  All these stages are always planned long in advance, sometimes a lifetime in advance, before they implement them.

So depersonalization comes in and people feel kind of lost, for instance. Very lost.  That’s why all the self-help groups pop up. The biggest sellers you’ll often find are self-help books, in all kinds of areas and problems that at one time really didn’t exist. Because people in your community, your village or whatever, knew, were experts themselves, social experts through tradition on how to handle problems and get over them, etc. But today you’re taught to seek professional advice, expert advice. You’re trained not to believe anything unless it comes from what’s called a sanctioned, licensed expert.

There were large meetings in the late 1800s, early 1900s of factory owners, big powerful factory owners. Many of them never had visited the factories they owned.  They had monopolies over many of them, almost like holding companies today. And they employed the specialists to deal with all of these things, you see, including employment and worker unrest, etc. All of these things were of concern to the owners, to keep the profits going. So we find that they were worried at one time when all the social movements were developing because of the massive death rates in these cities of exhausted, fatigued and malnourished workers, daily in fact. Carts when round not just for plague, in later times, in the 1800s and 1900s they went round to collect the bodies that died in these factory cities; that was the standard normal. And people, as always, adapt and accept it. What choice do you have? That’s what they’d say, what choice do you have?

But social unrest was kind of growing. There was no leisure time and the people wanted leisure. Once the social movements started to get some power these big elitists got together and they published documents, many papers and books, about how to control the masses, the peasantry you might say. How do you control them? If they have leisure they’ll start to talk to each other, they’ll start to understand they’re being conned, fooled and treated worse than any animal is treated. They really were awfully worried about it.  That’s why they brought the police in; they created the police forces and things like that.  That was part of the structure, to keep the structure going, you see. And the spy systems went out too, to ensure that anything that would happen on a rebellious level was nipped in the bud before it started. Thousands of people were employed as spies in their own communities across countries. Thousands of them.  Sometimes in large cities they’d have over 1000 to 5000 spies, living in the streets, amongst neighbors, collecting all the data, gossip and so on.

Today that’s made obsolete almost because they have the electronic surveillance everywhere. Everyone’s using the specific tools they have given you, and you use them. You enjoy them. And you’re giving your data daily, updates daily on what you’re thinking, doing, to what you think are all your friends, all these invisible sockpuppets and all the rest of it out there, that collect all the data.  It’s fascinating too, because big meetings were done before you were given the computer, as to the effects of the computer. They said IT WOULD HAVE THE SAME EFFECT, on a massive scale of upheaval, AS THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, when they give this to the general public. Therefore they designed all of the computers, as you well know now, with backdoors in them so government agencies could always monitor you and what you’re up to and what you’re thinking and talking about, etc. They don’t need laws for this, folks. All this stuff about, oh they’ve broken the rules… It’s all nonsense. Power has never gone by rules. Never. They always break what you think are the rules.

Today you’ve been trained to think it’s quite normal to be spied upon. That’s what the big boys and the technocrats have said for years, the neurologists and neuroscientists that all work together with the behaviorists, etc.  How we tick, what makes us think, what makes us come to the conclusions, what makes unrest happen, unrest or dissatisfaction, all these people who are there to manage you, that’s what they monitor. And of course, it’s nipped in the bud, for the few who do. Now of course if you come out with anything contrary to the official statements or word on whatever it happens to be, any event, then you’re a conspiracy theorist. And they have their assassination squads throughout the media that will attack you and try and discredit you by all kinds of insulting terms; they have specific hitmen, you might say, on television for that purpose too. Because they know the general population will take the experts, and the familiar face they see on television, take their opinion first as opposed to someone else’s whom they don’t know.

I’ve read from some of the books in the past on some of these big workers, big, big players in shaping the future. Big players. Guys who helped design shifts through 30, 40, 50 year periods in advance of cultural changes. Gender differences, all of these things were all applied step-by-step, incrementally and have all come to pass. There’s more to come yet, which they wrote about 60, 70, even 80 years ago. They didn’t just write about it. They took part with other technocrats, the social managers, on how to implement these changes. That’s why they hire behaviorists, en masse.  Some think tanks are actually staffed by them – that’s all they do – working on all of us. They know what works, you see.

Bertrand Russell talked about the negative things, that would destroy your critical thinking abilities, which of course he was all in favor of, for a peaceful world, as they called it. That’s what the society always says at the top, they want to bring in a peaceful world. Peace to them means the absence of all opposition, critical thought, etc, the compliant society. He said too, WE COULD EVEN DUMB THEM DOWN, EVEN ALTER THEIR MASCULINITY BY USING HORMONES AND SO ON, AND THE NEEDLE, ETC. How do you get folk to take that? He says, THEY WILL LIKE IT; WE CAN CONVINCE THEM TO GO ALONG WITH IT. Inoculations are good for you. It’s good for you. GMO feeds the world. All these slogans you hear. Feeds the world… MARKETING DONE THE PROPER WAY, as Bernays said, CAN OVERCOME ANYTHING.  The hidden masters, the puppeteers, that are never elected, in any kind of government, to manage the populace and their thoughts and their direction and opinions.

Therefore, getting back to the analogy of the deer where a car’s headlight is not in his genetic makeup, his historical genetic makeup, he has nothing to refer to as to what to do in the situation. The same thing happened in the industrial revolution, and the chaos and misery it caused. And the same thing today with the electronic revolution, the information age as they call it, data collection, spying on the public, in an age of experts. It all alters how society works, how it sees itself.  You’re trained how to see yourself. Not in an accurate way, but in a way those who control it want you to perceive yourself, in relation to those around you and the common goals that a country will tell you that it has. But it also makes obsolete even the necessity of having what you think of as the country. That’s why you’re GOING GLOBAL. That’s why the big boys a long time ago, before the 20^th century had their big meetings, the top guys who ran the economic system, on behalf of their masters, and the organizations that still exist today, employed by their employers, to shape society into a future to make us adapt perhaps into a thing which we perhaps shouldn’t adapt into, and lose ourselves in the process.

In the past people wanted privacy. They knew too much government intrusion in those days, but it was a brutal kind of intrusion. We find that armed soldiers were still going around in the early 1800s, sometimes sent into an area to quell trouble or nip it in the bud. And they’d go door to door in their uniforms, and nothing could be done to stop it.  If you tried to stop it they’d kill you. Then they brought in the police forces of course. But it’s the same thing at work today, it’s the same function today. That’s what the police is there for. It’s not to serve the general public. It’s to serve the system that employs them, which is not owned by the public, or directed by the public either for that matter.

Force is force.  Coercion today and persuasion takes that place, a lot of that place, that force did.  And people want to be the same. They’ve been trained to all want to be the same, to be accepted by a peer group, have the same opinions as the peer group, and therefore you’re okay. I’m okay because they accept me and we all have the same opinions on everything. Well, the opinions, you’re guided to all the opinions that are given in society by those who control the system. Even when you think you’re joining the opposition, that’s controlled by the same guys who control everything else.

Now, part of using technique and what it must do, always, is to standardize everything that it touches. That’s what it’s about, organization, managing organization, planning the future.   Standardization is key to everything. As I say, that began, really, with what you saw, what we can read in history books of the onset of the industrial revolution. Everything was standardized. That’s when people became the mass and the masses, as they called it for the first time. So we are standardized to suit a system, always, that’s planned by others way above you, by the so-called experts that run and guide society. The new priesthood, really, because technique, you’ll find, standardizes everything and changes culture and so on. It basically is autonomous. It becomes a thing unto itself, and becomes more and more dispassionate when it’s dealing with larger volumes of people.  Not just nations but blocs of nations, like trading blocs and all this. Everything becomes standardized. Everyone is given a role, a purpose, an SIN number and you’re labeled according to your economic status, etc., etc.

We find too, that eugenicists are in there big time, or bioethics associations they call them today. These bioethics so-called specialists that are just eugenicists, have us all categorized as to our output for society and how much we can produce in our lifetime. Government bureaucracies also deal with the tax income that they’ll get from you in your lifetime. They work it out way in advance, according to what they plan to have in their coffers in 40, 50 years’ time. That’s how precise all of this is.

Now, as we progress down this path, and others of course who are all for it say up this path.  Regardless, as we go along this path we become depersonalized, as I say, and standardized as well. All of us. Therefore critical thinking and those with critical thinking become fewer and fewer and what they have to say is ignored by those who are conditioned, more perfectly conditioned. So therefore their voices become much, much weaker. We live in a day where we want everyone to be the same as ourselves.

I used to be astonished, for instance, at people who were completely ignorant of the system in which they lived. Really ignorant. They’d bought the world as it was portrayed and indoctrinated into them from schooling onwards; they bought that version.  And when someone, for instance, in a union, got more money they’d decry those people. Because they were envious of them; that’s the reason for it. Why should they get that kind of money when I only get this? They didn’t see the structure above everything, and the fact that the unions themselves came out of basically technological solutions of organization that enabled those folk to get more money. And rather than question the whole system that keeps you in poverty at the bottom, they’d rather blame those who get a bit more money.  Which of course suits the elite awfully well, you end up fighting at the bottom levels with each other.

The elite also talked about giving work to everyone, but they meant a minimum wage type of work, across whole countries. Eventually they changed their minds about it because they realized that creative people would not be happy being stuck in a fixed rigid system where they couldn’t get ahead financially or otherwise. That’s why communism was a big test bed for it too, to see if you could give a minimum wage to everyone across the country, basic necessities, etc.  And of course no one really worked hard. EVERYONE PRETENDED TO WORK AND THE STATE WOULD PRETEND TO PAY YOU; that was the big joke that they had over there. No one cared about and there was no pride involved in whatever you did so the goods were shoddy, etc. Inefficiency.

So the big boys looked at that of course and they learned the lessons from the Soviets as they watched them carefully and studied them carefully. They decided that rather than do the same in the West, keep them on a fixed minimum wage, the bulk of the population that is, they would bring in a welfare state and have a good majority of the public, or a particular… it used to be minorities, now it’s getting to be half-and-half of folk on welfare or government recipients, wage recipients of some kind of government money, which is all tax money anyway.   And the rest pay for it, you see. It stops the revolutions, as you say.

And it’s true too, as it was often pointed out by the elite of today, that even the poorest people in some countries, a few countries, very few, have basic material goods that stop revolution. Some of them have free cell phones and free cable for Internet and all this kind of thing, lots of entertainment, things to pass their time when they’re not thinking for themselves. Because psychology is used incredibly well through entertainment, media, and all kinds of media today in fact. It keeps you occupied with someone else’s thoughts or views rather than your own.  And of course too, studies were done, as I say, studying the Soviet system, they said, EVENTUALLY THE WHOLE IDEA OF A COMMUNIST REVOLUTION WOULD BE OBSOLETE.  Understand, the premise of communism came out of partly to and reaction to the heavy industrial revolution and dispossession of many of the people who lost little farms, little small holdings, traditional places and so on. And their landlords who owned many of the big massive areas of farmland in Europe sold it off for other purposes and they had to move into the cities, etc. to work in factories. So that was a reaction to it partially.

Today it’s been made pretty well obsolete... Straightforward revolution is pretty well obsolete.  What you might have in the future, and the big boys always plan way in advance, is when the economy goes down the hill as they bring in globalization and your tax money is going abroad to build factories for the international corporations that’ve set up across the world, and you’ll be getting poorer and poorer and poorer, they can stop rebellions and so on so easily by the massive internal army structure they’ve built up over a long period of time, many, many, many years, 20, 30 years in preparation for all of this. So you’ll have occasional spontaneous riots, like you’ve seen in England where they go looting through the stores and so on, but you won’t get organization. You won’t get two people agreeing on why they’re even rebelling, you see, it’s just complete dissatisfaction. Many of them can’t actually verbalize why they’re rebelling.

Now, power in the past was controlled to an extent by the geographical areas of the world, often separated through jungles and sea travel was dangerous at times too. So you couldn’t get...  And the communication system we have today certainly didn’t exist obviously. So therefore people had to travel to countries and study peoples, etc. The big boys would send out their emissaries to exploit ores and minerals and metals and all the rest of it to make themselves richer, etc. But they looked at the different civilizations, which coexisted, some were labeled primitive or arrested civilizations, as our progressive system likes to call them.  A so-called arrested or primitive society doesn’t have this technological and technocratic type of system running their lives for them. Things are very basic. They are historical; they traveled up from generation to time immemorial, generation to generation. And they’re unchanging, therefore there’s a security in the knowledge of what you’re doing as tradition.

In today’s global society the idea is to standardize the world. As I say, the technocratic type of society has to standardize everything.  Like the machine, everything is standardized towards the system. Hence the massive push by the technocrats in the so-called first world countries to ensure that no child is left behind, and every child must have a computer worldwide, or a cell phone or whatever it is. And they’re popping up cell towers across the world to ensure, through all of these means of course that they’re giving them, to standardize the cultures, the peoples, the thoughts, and their idea of culture and the past, their idea of what it is to exist, why are you existing, to give them a new vision, which is not theirs, of their future.  The so-called primitive societies often don’t have words in their vocabulary for work or labor. They do what they do.  Basic survival. They only work enough to support themselves. They don’t see hunting as work necessarily. And they are generally very happy people. But they’ve not to exist in that form in this standardized society we’re bringing forth of course.

Now, part of getting people to go along with a new technique, or a direction of a technique which already exists, the technique, that is, is coercion. The idea is to eliminate choices, and narrow the choices a person can take or make. Of course it’s done in so many different ways.  But the idea being that you always take the lesser of two evils and you will avoid the pain as much as possible of making the wrong choices. You’ll go along with the majority of the public, which is approved of by the government of course, the ruling elite.  Which is not the government really; the government is the front for that which does rule their country. This is how things are done so easily. You’re coerced into making the right decision, as they say.

In ancient times people could escape very easily from any system. Even in ancient Rome people could go off and become hermits, and evade taxes, conscription, all of these things, but to live a life that would satisfy them. Their basic needs were supplied and they lacked for nothing in actuality. Today that’s becoming more and more difficult. It’s not allowed nor approved of, of course, by this massive organizational ability of experts under the technological system we live under, specialists in certain areas to ensure that no one can really escape.   It’s this choice or that choice, it comes down to today. Very few choices are actually allowed.

From those who rule this makes sense for their system, because they don’t want differences in the general population. In times gone by, again, you’ll find some cultures were active conquerors, etc., warrior types. Even in Tibet they had a kind of a warrior society, they believed in magic and they were powerful to an extent too. When they adopted Buddhism, a religion in other words, they lost that; they became passive people.  So it can work that way very, very well.  And the elite take note of all these things of course, what’s worked in the past to make people more passive, and they know how to.  That’s why they also want to eliminate so many religions. You see, most religions have to be eliminated altogether, because differences outside their system frighten them. People who are in power and hold onto power are always afraid of losing that power.  They’re paranoid in fact.

You’ll find today societies that people could join, like Mennonites and so on, Amish folk, to escape the system and live a simpler life. It was more fulfilling as they saw it. The basic needs were supplied for them. There was security in the group because they helped each other out to a tremendous extent, more so than in general society. Of course that’s always a threat. Even though they’re a passive people they could always one day be a threat.  That’s how they’re viewed from the top. Differences are all threats to the ruling system of the establishment.

People often think that technology and the technological type of society we live in will always improve things and that business, as it used to be in the 19^th century for instance, will go along as usual; they’d invest in certain patents, things like that, and progress would come, progress of invention, etc. But the opposite happened.  You find that many, many patents are buried, on purpose, because they would force the investors, the owners basically, to always retool to update for the new type of invention, the improvement on whatever it is they’re making, and the cost would go up and up and up. So stagnation tends to set in. This has been overcome by what we call holding companies. These are massive, wealthy capitalists who invest en masse into a particular area, for instance, and take it all over. Again, monopolization is part of the modern society. Always monopolize, cut out competition, ELIMINATE COMPETITION BY ANY AND ALL MEANS POSSIBLE.  Then you have it all to yourselves and then you dictate the prices, etc., etc.

But what we find today is the holding companies and those who deal with them, the CEOs of big corporations, are the technological managing group for this new system where they can suppress, they can suppress patents at will, and decide through standardization what a particular product across the board will be.  That’s why all car manufacturers, for instance, that’s why your cars all look the same regardless of the makes that are churned out. They all look pretty well the same. This is the style for the year, or two years, and they all have the same improvements, as they’re called, the standardization of things, and all of the negative things that are standardized, like plastics in the engine compartment, which always melt and crack and all the rest of it, as I’m sure you know. So it impedes progress if you just leave it to business completely.  But they can get by with big profits, if you leave it to an expert managerial class to do the investing, en masse basically, rather than the sole owner of a corporation.

The idea of technology being used by technocracy is paramount to understand because it always takes away your freedom of choice.  Always.  Those at the top want,  they look at all the people, the things that they want themselves, but they want a controlled society and they do so by limiting, as I say, choices of all kinds. It’s made palatable to the public beneath them, where they say well we have to go along or what else can we do? For instance, the cashless society is one. And all the massive propaganda and marketing that’s used on you, is used to make you want to go cashless. It makes it so convenient. You give away your rights, freedom of choice and so on for convenience and saving a few bucks. The convenience cards are dished out at all the grocery stores and every supermarket across the world basically today, under the con that you’ll get air miles or points or you get something back, you see, or you’ll save on certain things that you buy in the store. A very simple thing of saving money and you give up certain freedoms and rights.  Because they want all your data. Once they have you in their databanks they know everything you’re purchasing, what your diet is, everything about you. But you give that up, to save a few bucks. You’re coerced into it. And those at the bottom level are coerced much quicker than those in the higher classes.

We also find too, that there are fewer and fewer bank branches out there to deal with real customers, with real tellers to work with them. They want you to simply use the machines, save money for the corporations. Once again your behavior is being altered. Who do you complain to on the spot? Well, there’s nobody on the spot to complain to when something goes wrong. And you have a devil of a time of course going through all the prerecorded tapes and so on if you try to phone the given numbers etc., etc. So it becomes futile, an exercise in futility to even complain. And people accept that.

Now, everything I’m talking about tonight, in a short talk, has been discussed, well discussed by the big, big think tanks long, long ago.  Because they understand technique. They’re all part of technique. And they have technicians in specialized departments that deal with all, all possible areas, economic, social, everything. Everything is interdependent, it affects everything else.  But it can’t exist, this so-called progress, and this is what they mean by progress towards a desired goal and result.  And when that goal is achieved and the result is achieved they’re onto the next part of progress.  That’s why there are always many NEW world orders. When the last part is accomplished you’re onto the next part of the new world order. It’s always being made anew. And this is what they call progress, their planned vision.  The very fact that they can think it out in advance, shape it along its routes, take into account all the alterations in societies that it will cause, and disturbances too, and then work out in advance the techniques to control those disturbances, to eliminate them and minimize their effects. But it can’t exist in a society where people are free.

Everyone must be predictable. That’s the key of standardization, predictability. The so-called reign of terror, as I like to call it, this anti-terrorism campaign – and I’ve read the articles, you’ll find them in cuttingthroughthematrix.com in the archives section; I’ve given lots of talks about what I’m talking about tonight too, and the fact that everyone must become predictable. And they can go ahead unimpeded under the guise of, it’s for your own safety, take all your freedoms away, spy on you like never before, to find out all about you and ensure that you’re predictable.  You’ll hear all this talk about, oh the lone gunman, the lone this, the introvert, etc.  You understand, in a standardized society everyone must be completely open and uniform in their character, their behavior and everything else, for safety, for those who control the system.

It will always standardize everything.  As it standardizes the automobiles, you’re standardized just the same. You’ll have the same opinions on everything.  You will believe everything you’re told by the authorities. And if you don’t fall into that category they’ll give you the opposition to give you the opposing points as well. And even when real opposition arises it’s completely infiltrated so quickly, people are also bought over very quickly too I should say, those who appoint themselves as leaders, and they’re brought into the system and all their followers follow them into it too. But predictability is of paramount importance for this utopia, for those who rule the world to come into being.

The ideal subject to standardize and the ideal way of telling if a person is standardized is that when you talk to them they don’t have much insight into themselves. They’re spontaneous but they don’t have insight into themselves. They’re not reflective as to why they think this, as to why they are this way and so on. The standardized person, like a bureaucrat, works almost unconsciously through his daily routine, his work and so on, and as I say, dispassionately without even thinking that he is dispassionate, about all these numbers which actually they represent people, vast amounts of people; he is standardized and adapted to the conditions created by technique alone, you see.

The goal of course is to standardize and to get everyone to go along in the same direction together without questioning why they’re all going along in this particular area or field or direction together. They do that by of course many other techniques as well that are brought into play. Psychological and behavioral techniques are used incessantly on us all, and through the electronic media especially. Of course they’ve even gone beyond that too. I’ve mentioned before ways of using low current pulses, low-voltage pulses basically, to alter the way our biometric systems actually work. They’re way ahead than anything they’ve ever told you about or admitted it from the top. It’s irresistible to governments, who are employed by their big bosses, not the public, to control societies and direct societies. The passive, compliant citizen, but who is active at work, is the desirable goal. The predictable worker.

Now remember, these techniques are always adaptable.  When something is working well they’ll push it further. When there’s a holdup somewhere they’ll find out the reasons why and fix the problems rather quickly, on society. That’s how it’s all, all done in fact.

They will always give you the illusion of liberty, choice and individuality. But when you realize the authorized choices are mass choices, they’re not individual at all.  That’s why it’s okay to chase the New Age movements and magic and things like that. These are safety valves which are authorized which never bring you into contact with what’s really going on. Because many people understand that something is happening but they put it down to almost magical reactions to things, which are magical in themselves, so by understanding magic you can fix it for yourself. And that’s promoted. That’s well promoted today, as never before in fact, as long as it’s not an organized religion as such. That’s why what we call the New Age gives you all these different kind of choices.  And so what’s right for one person is not always the same for another. They’ll have variations in what they’re really into, and what they believe. That’s okay, you see.

And don’t presume that people work on rationality. The big boys understand this perfectly well. That’s why the top brains in the world, in the fields of neurosciences and behaviorism are employed, constantly in massive think tanks, thousands of them across the world, to control you.  Because they understand how you work, how you tick and how you can persuade the mass man to go along with it. That’s why you must create the mass man, uniformity.  Individuality really must be knocked out of the way. As I say, the harmless illusions are fine; they’re pushed and promoted as safety valves. It works awfully, awfully well.

But make no mistake, everyone is under observation like never before.  Folk will often say, well little old me, I’ve got no consequence to governments and authorities and so on. Oh yes, you do. Because you might influence something, somebody with an offhand statement one day; you’ll never know the consequences, how it might affect that person. Or a young person might hear you and think along a certain tangent and come to conclusions; down the road they could become a problem to the authorities.

Mao Tse Tung said, HE WASN’T AFRAID OF ARMIES OR GUNS; HE WAS AFRAID OF SOMEONE WITH A BIG IDEA. And remember, those who control are always, always afraid. Always afraid. And they can rationalize the power they wield so easily. The geopoliticians that plan the wars in advance, sometimes generations in advance, have no conscience. They go to sleep very well at night, without thinking, my God, collateral damage is planned and so many thousands will die tonight. It doesn’t bother them at all. That’s necessity they call it, necessity. The communists called it historical necessity. THEY’RE MAKING HISTORY BY THINGS WHICH MUST BE DONE AND ARE HORRIBLE, they would say, BUT THAT’S HISTORICAL NECESSITY. The same with the geopoliticians for the capitalists; it’s just the same, the same techniques in fact, the same technicians in fact, running the show.  The fallout doesn’t matter. It’s dealt with. And people die off in generations.  We think so short term with our life. We plan short-term objectives. The elite run in generations, sometimes a hundred years in advance, sometimes more, for different parts of the projects.

Well that’s been a short talk tonight and scratching the surface of something that would take a lot of talks and lectures to give you. But I do this because I want those who can understand, and have the capacity to understand, to look into these things on a much deeper, deeper level. Because the way it’s going today we’re being turned into forms of machines. That’s how we’re viewed, of course, predictable machines. And the society that’s planned for us all is completely inhumane. It’s the direction put out by those who control technology of all kinds. They want to shape us to suit their view of the future.  It’s not a natural development or progression.

Now from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods go with you.