Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:35 pm

Neil:  Welcome to Reality Bytes Radio on the 14^th of August 2014.  And we have our regular monthly guest Alan Watt on the line.  And I think we’ll just fire straight into it Alan because we’re going to go through your first three volumes of your writings.  And going back to 1999, the first one.  The second one I think was 1999 and the third volume was 2003.  And I suppose that the logical question to ask is what inspired you to write this, these three volumes, to start with?

Alan:  Well I used to listen to different shows at night, radio shows mainly and somehow or another I ended up getting on one because I listened to people being sort of bewildered as to what was happening in the world.  And they went into all areas of how long has this system existed, what is this system, all kinds of answers to it and so on, but they didn’t know the histories.  And so, someone said why don’t you write that, rather than just going on the radio and talk about it, why don’t you just put it in some book form?  And so I did and had given basic stuff basically, for me it’s basic anyway.  And it gives them a leg up as to what this, this whole reality that we take for granted, what it really is, how it came to be.  The processes and techniques behind it that condition us all, in all ages, to accept the system we’re living in as being quite normal and regardless of the conditions.  And that’s really how it started me off on that line of thinking and so on.

And then after I got them out too other shows asked me on and then it just steamrolled from there.  I really just thought it was time as well that since I’ve studied for basically my whole life; I studied in the libraries because I was always asking the questions that other children weren’t asking at school.  I thought I’ll find out for myself and when I realized that the material was there, the knowledge was there, but it’s like H.G. Wells called it, "The Open Conspiracy" you might say.  And then when I got into the sciences behind it, psychology, behaviorism, all the teams and think tanks that the governments all hire to manage our lives for us and the culture industry and how far back that went it’s not such a mystery after all.  You don’t have to go looking out for aliens to do it.  You know it’s all here.  And the human brain hasn’t really changed for an awful long time.  Even in ancient times to the present it’s been the same, the same brain, the same nature, power, wealth, and this odd thing called money dictates the system that you will live in and be trained to believe is quite natural.

Neil:  Yeah so I mean okay let’s start on Volume I, "The Androgynous (Hermaphroditic) Agenda".

Alan:  Yeah, well that to me was interesting because in ancient times it sort of tied in with the present because the present sciences are working towards this.  They have books out on it now and they’re doing tests with embryos and stem cells to see if they can create a hermaphrodite as a human being.  Technically, what they say, it will be the end of all conflict.  That’s always been used as an excuse to further a particular very clever agenda that recently...  That’s why you’ve got the rise of the feminist movement; it didn’t come from the women themselves, it came from the big money boys that ran the system at the time.  They even financed these organizations into being to try to end what they call marriage and conflict and things like that.

But you go back into ancient times and you’ll find that behind all the gods you’ll find the same story that God himself or it’s Brahma or whoever fertilized himself and gave birth, you see, to what became his daughter – wife, etcetera.  It’s the same kind of story you’ll find that Plato talked about when he talked about the ancient gods or ancient humans that were the golden race that had a male appearance when they walked towards you, but a female appearance from behind.  To the mystery religions of his day he was talking about the hermaphrodite person you see.  It took different transformations through Hinduism, into basically left brain, right brain, male-female, the perfect human being that was a balance of emotion and logic.  And that held sway right up even through the western cultures through Darwinism up to the present time basically.  So it’s always been a hidden, you might say, manifestation of the agenda that comes out in cryptic terms, in terminology.

NASA also a few years back did a two-hour documentary special on space travel and they touched on that too that it may be very difficult for long-term space travel for humans because of the time it would take to get to planets and so on.  And generations would get born and die, etcetera.  But they also talked about the conflict on board that they could have.  So what they came up with was an idea that eggs could be fertilized artificially by machinery and computers in the ship or the craft just before it gets to its destination.  So it would be frozen all that time and then they would create a hermaphroditic being which would therefore create no conflict between the male and female crew.

So it’s quite amazing to see science pick up on all of this.  But it goes back again even to the eunuch idea.  Eunuchs were pretty common across the Middle East and they were used as trusted servants, high servants for Pashas and so on, and Caliphs.  And you find the reason was is because they said that they could concentrate on their work and their business and so on.  And they wouldn’t be swayed off by various passions or lusts, etcetera.

So the hermaphrodite basically would be either a neutered creature all together but it wouldn’t have the same sexual urge or attraction to copulate with other beings basically.  That was part of it.  Such a creature they claim would be a better worker, not distracted, and get more done, less conflict, etcetera.  In other words better behaved, easier to control on behalf of the masters who would not change themselves.

Neil:  Well that’s funny that you should say that.  We were sitting in a restaurant the other day and we looked across at a table of young lads who were out for I don’t know some school reunion or something and there wasn’t a set of shoulders between them.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  You know they all had long hair and they were all as thin as rakes but they must have been 18 years old and not a bit of muscle on them.

Alan:  Well here’s the key to that.  If you go into that you’ll find that even professor Carroll Quigley when he wrote "Tragedy and Hope", near the beginning of his book he mentions the fact that in the 60’s suddenly, suddenly they noticed in the medical profession, that women were having, the young, that one generation that was coming up about eighteen, twenty, literally had much narrower hips.  And they didn’t have the pelvic structure and that’s when cesarean section really took off.

But also too of course as you say there was a change in the male structure.  We know the xeno or artificial estrogens that we’re fed in everything today had been applied since the late 50’s onwards.  And mind you they knew what these xenoestrogens did, Bisphenol A and so on, they knew that in the late 1800’s in Germany that was.  So they knew the effect it would have on the male and on the female.  But that’s when they brought in a lot of stuff in the plastics and all the rest of it.  And they even started to add it to baby food by the way.  I think it’s still in the baby food.  They managed to get the FDA to reclassify it as a protein even though it’s actually a plastic waste.

So we’re really full of this stuff and I think too bioengineering has been going on with the inoculation agenda as well; after all, these big boys do not want volunteers.  They know we wouldn’t be, that nobody would be...  Well maybe some today would volunteer for it but the rest would not want to volunteer to be changed in any way at all.  And it’s been done covertly obviously.  Our immune systems are shot.  We have about one third of the resistance to bacteria and viruses that the generation prior to 1950 had.  And it was right up to the Polio virus and the rest of the inoculations that came, the vaccinations, that our immune systems started to show it.  In the 1960’s for the first time ever we had total immune syndrome problems like the bubble boy, etcetera.  He had been kept in a bubble and any bacterium, a common bacterium, could kill him.  That was unknown, unheard of before.

So we’re being bioengineered all along the way here.  It doesn’t only affect you physically and hormonally which it definitely does.  And by the way a good book to read on this part of the agenda is by Charles Galton Darwin, who’s a relative of Charles Darwin of course, a descendent, and the Galton family.  A eugenicist, Charles Galton Darwin, said that in his book, "The Next Million Years", on how the elite, the very super elite, would dominate the world for another million years.  He said, We shall have to alter the hormonal makeup of the male to take away his aggression and the female too, but mainly the male.  They could alter them physically, it might show, etcetera, but they’d have to.  They could by propaganda purposes and the fact that most folk will never mention what’s obviously right in front of their face unless others are talking about what’s been on the media.  If the media doesn’t mention it they won’t see it, they won’t notice it either.  They won’t say anything about it.  So even with the changes the people wouldn’t complain as it became more and more obvious that the people are being bioengineered.  They said we can either put it in the food, the vaccinations, or the water, or all three.  Well they’ve done the lot.

Neil:  Well this is certainly in the lot and it’s fairly obvious as you point out the changes in the physiology of people.  You use, I think particularly in the first section, you use a lot of symbolism and explain what it actually means, the numerology involved.  And I’ve heard you say many times, I’ve only read this book once, I’ve read the whole thing once and really I need to read it again.  But you explain, you break down words into the kind of distinctive parts and explain the combination of words and what they mean.  Could you go into that kind of thing and the relation to the symbolism?

Alan:  Well what put me onto it really was a book by Albert Pike, and "The Encyclopedia of Freemasonry" by Mackey.  And they both mentioned the fact that they never speak, Masons never, high Masons that is, not what they call the common ones at the bottom, the blue lodge, the outer portico, the cover of Masonry.  The ones who think they know it all but they’re not, they don’t know much at all.  He’s talking about the higher degrees and especially in "Morals and Dogma" by Pike.  It was for the 32^nd degree and upwards.  And he said that we never speak more plainly than we do when we speak together but in public.  In other words the public could be standing around them and even listening to the conversation.  You would hear one thing being said while they themselves would understand the inner meanings of the words they were using, etcetera.  This is a very old idea, it goes back, even in ancient times.  We tend to forget in the West that in the Middle East, and it’s in still today in some religions like Judaism, that you have numbers that are also letters, you see, so that you can transpose one to the other and have a code if you like.  And they used the Chaldeans in ancient times invading armies, they’d hire Chaldeans who also did this and that’s really where it all came from.  And they would use them as runners to carry messages between generals and they would do markings of numbers and different things on these sticks and the other guy at the other end would read it and know what the message was when he transposed it into language, cryptology in other words.  It’s very, very big amongst all of these secret societies.

But they also used as I say words themselves.  The English language as we know it today really came out around the time of Shakespeare.  And Shakespeare was given the credit for putting thousands of words into the English language which became common usage to the present time.  It isn’t until you break them down that you start to see words within words.  And that’s the purpose, that’s what he means by "we never speak so plainly".  When they say a term or a certain word it can have two or three meanings all comprised in that particular word itself.  A listener would never even think of that.  So it’s a cryptology in a sense.  And even in ancient times they said that words remember in hieroglyphic form are simply symbols.  A picture of a man kneeling or whatever is a symbol.  A man being circumcised that you’ll see often in the steles and the steles in Egypt there, because they were all circumcised Egyptians, you’ll see that that’s a symbol with different meanings hidden within that particular symbol as to what they mean.  But they’re picture symbols.  And those same symbols in a kind of Art Nouveau form can take, they can even be transposed into say triangles for a pyramid and things like that.  So symbols are really a big language of all of what they’re talking about too.

If you look at the corporate logos of the international corporations that run all your energy, your food, everything you need for being.  It’s one big gang at the top you see and they all belong to it.  They use these particular logos that are very ancient a lot of them and highly symbolic of their function of what they’re all about.  The pyramid can mean the mountain, you get three 1’s as well, you can get the Jachin and Boaz, the two pillars of Masonry when you get the letter "M", the capital letter "M" because you have two peaks there you see.  So they stand for the two peaks power.  Sometimes they will say male and female, they will control the mind and the logic of everything.  These are all very ancient symbols used for that purpose right to the present day with the corporate boys at the top.

Neil:  Yeah.  I think what shocked me about, you’ve often mentioned it, you know the alphabet itself is a series of symbols.  And when I first went to Eastern Europe and had to learn Cyrillic, and I’ll look at that and I’ll go oh that’s a bit strange.  And then once you get into it, particularly the small letters, what we call the small letters, many of them are exactly the same as English letters but they’re a different letter.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  Which is, you know I mean that makes it hard for English people to learn that language but once you know it it’s there.  But I mean those kind of, I suppose as you go further east the symbolism gets a bit more abstract I think.

Alan:  It can.  Well again too even modern cryptologists that are involved in all of this kind of thing admit that a lot of the very, very ancient symbology has been lost and changed through time.  Including even the customs within high, very high, Freemasonry itself as they have been lost, the rituals, etcetera, through time as they’ve changed them and changed them.  They claim it’s absolutely ancient although it really broke out in the U.K. as Freemasonry as we know it today around the 1700’s, others claim 1500’s, but it’s all debatable you know.

But it’s always been here in some form or another.  And it came in with the money boys because they were already…  We forget that most of Europe was still bartering and living very simply until the Roman invasion and in with the invasion came the money lenders.  They always went along with the army.  And they acted as quartermasters.  They took inventory of the supplies to feed that army, etcetera, and what they got in return was the right to introduce money into conquered lands which hadn’t used money before.  And then they had the right to tax it back.  And they would tax back money with goods as well.  That really hasn’t changed till the present time.  So it’s a very ancient system, this money system that gives a leisure class the time to have the leisure which gives them time to then hire good minds that can then study society as we do today like the psychologists and behaviorists and so on, and neuroscientists as we have today.  And then they control the populations on behalf of those at the very, very top who have the whole commercial system sewn up.  They own the trade routes, they own the caravans that used to go back across the Middle East; today it’s all the trade routes.  They own the ships, etcetera.  They don’t work them themselves, they simply finance it all and own it all.

So that hasn’t changed for thousands and thousands of years.  But they came into countries which at one time lived very simply in communal settings where everyone was important in their little tribe and they had their own systems of making sure everyone was supplied with their basic needs and so on.

We take today this whole thing of the consumer society for granted because we’ve been trained in it.  We have an education system which trains us that it’s quite natural.  In fact they train us to go out and get that carrot you know that you never quite reach.  It’s not meant that you reach it because the carrot is getting smaller all the time because of inflation because it got built-in inflation of the economy.  It’s always been here.  And of course only one person can get a job at the top and the rest of you don’t even get a piece of that carrot.  So we’re chasing a fantasy that we take as reality and we think eventually that’s the only system that could possibly be here simply because it exists as such.  It’s quite fascinating to see this how it all works.

The understanding of human nature is absolutely ancient.  And power and these understandings are never lost through time even when armies come in and conquer civilizations as they call them, they always make sure that they recruit all the bureaucrats in all ages onboard who ran that system, including the religions too.

Neil:  You kind of answered this question but as you said the symbolism and stuff changed through time.  But I mean have you noticed any kind of modern manifestations of ancient symbolism coming back into vogue as it were?  And would the likes of Bertrand Russell who traveled east understand the symbols he saw along the way without any difficulty in it?

Alan:  Oh yeah.  There is no doubt about it.  When the British army went in, it was in India in the 17-1800’s, a lot of their recruits wrote home and of course they had the traveling lodge with them.  The British army always had a Masonic lodge, traveling lodge, with them, generally the orange lodge by the way.  And they were astonished to find that all over the cities and so on throughout India when they first went in they already had Masonic lodges there.  So they didn’t know that.  The people didn’t know that.

Neil:  Yeah.  We’ll go onto the 2^nd book.  First we’ll go onto a piece of music and then we’ll go onto the 2^nd volume, "A Glimpse into the Great Work".

I’m not sure what tune Steve’s got lined up tonight but whatever he wants to throw on will do.

{Break ♫}

Neil:  Okay.  Welcome back to Reality Bytes Radio on the 14^th of August 2014.  We’ve still got our guest Alan Watt with us for the next half hour.

Alright, moving on to Volume II, Alan, "A Glimpse into the Great Work", and you start off with the symbol of the pyramid which is conspicuous on the dollar bill.  Do you want to start off on this chapter?

Alan:  The pyramid again goes back into ancient mythology.  The writings in it and Enoch mentions it and all this kind of thing.  They’re really into the books of Enoch and so on about the three types of pyramids that they tried to make sure that knowledge is preserved.  This is the whole key that they claim as I say this idea that’s had many, many names down through the ages of rulership and domination by what they call the intelligentsia.  It’s been called many names including illuminati, which is a bit overblown.  But the power of controlling millions of people was never lost, even pre-flood they built supposedly three different kinds of pyramids to store the knowledge to survive.  And there was a wooden one, and another one, and then there was the one made by stone, etcetera, to survive the flood.

So the pyramids always had this connotation of mystery and power of an elite form.  And we know too that they didn’t simply start in Egypt proper; there were pyramids in other places too, the ziggurats, the so-called earlier kinds of stepped pyramid, the ziggurat type too at Ur and so on.

So it’s always been a symbol of the ancient powerful elite.  They also had gone even further back into the Sumerian lands too where the king had his form of pyramid and a little chamber on top at the pyramid where supposedly the God, the God of the Kingu, that’s where the word king comes from, Kingu.  And Kane also comes from the same name.  But he would come down and impregnate a virgin that was chosen to carry on royal lineages, etcetera, and that was added to the Kingu’s lineage.  So they had all these mystical things that really would be impressive to primitive peoples who were kept illiterate by a literate class.  Nothing really changed down through time.

We know also the ancients were fascinated by the sky.  Mathematics was really born and came out of the stars, and geometry, etcetera.  And so what they tried to do is recreate heaven on earth.  Which is awfully interesting because even in Christianity you get these relations between trying to emulate the powers of heaven from God and the archangels all the way down of rulership, and then an inverted pyramid down to the Pope and then the strata of priests, and the ranks of priests down to the bottom basically reflecting the powers of heaven.  It’s an ancient idea right to the present time.

So the pyramids, even the ones at Giza, were built to emulate Orion which is the constellation, the hunter.  And we call it Orion.  It has other names too in other cultures.  The belt of the pyramid is actually the three pyramids you’ll see there.  And so they’re trying to copy the star patterns and have the same power as the gods themselves putting it on Earth.  And the pharaoh was in charge, he was the high priest or Pope you might call it, who owned and ruled everything that flew, crawled, moved and dug into the earth and all the rest of it, and swam in the sea.  So everything, all power is granted to this supreme character, this being in a human form, because he had the spirit of the God within him and he emulated the God’s kingdom on Earth you see.  So that was really a part of it.

The pyramids, actually building them is no mystery at all, we know how it’s done.  If you want to get awfully rich by the way you can churn out the books and fascinate people by mysteries and that’s what a lot of folk do.  But we know how they were built and they were built basically from the ground up and that way it was quite easy to put different chambers inside them as you’re building different parts and floors to it, etcetera.  Then you put the cap on the top and that’s it.

We also know how they got the big stones upwards to them because they built huge ramps, you can see it from photographs from the sky.  Long, long ramps that could be a quarter of a mile long or longer and it gave you a long slope to drag these big stones up, etcetera.

So, but anyway it was the power of the king and that’s what it showed you.  It was a representation that he also ruled the stars now on Earth you know.  So the God, the God that was the invisible God that created everything and brought light to the universe and light to the world, ruled the heavens and gave this power to his, you might say his brother or his son, who was the pharaoh who then ruled it in the same fashion on Earth.

It was very mystical.  The people were brought up to believe in all of this, the peasantry, etcetera, and they took it for granted that this was all true, magnificent things which are so far out of the ordinary and unfortunately impressed very poor people.  That hasn’t changed today especially in a system again of wealth and money where people are paid.  You couldn’t be a king for instance and have all this luxury and attendants and so on unless you had something to pay them with.  So first you must introduce money and wages and then you’ve got your slave drivers and all the rest of it and your armies underneath you.

Without that money system you couldn’t get this.  And this is what we call civilization.  And the leisure class that goes with it and they then become scribes, take the histories, alter the cultures, alter the religions when necessary too, to add things to them or subtract them or whatever to suit the rulership of that particular time.  So money, civilization, etcetera, what they call progress by the way is a very ancient system that’s been unbroken right down to the present time.

Neil:  Now I have not been to Egypt but I’ve been to Mexico and have been to some of the sites there that everybody goes to, Chichen Itza, and I’ve been there, and I went to Coba and another place which was right in the, I think it was Coba actually in the jungle, and it was so vast that you had to get on a bike to go around it.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  And they just unveiled one monument there and you were still allowed to climb up them.  I don’t know if you still are now.  But I went up on the top of this pyramid and they had this slab on the top where they did the sacrifices and all that stuff.  And you looked out across the jungle and you could see these mountains, as far as you can see you could see mountains, and there was a tour guide up there and I said are these other pyramids out there?  He said, oh yeah, it’s everywhere.  It was vast.  It was like, you know, it was like the size of London or something.  It was huge.  And then he said they won’t last when they uncover this stuff.  He said this can’t last when they uncover this stuff.  And when you look at it, the amount of work that must have gone into it, it’s vast.  The amount of people that must have been there you know.

Alan:  Oh it’s a whole economy.  It’s a whole economy even in ancient Egypt they had unions you know for the stone masons and the workers, and their spokespeople who would go to the pharaoh and plead their case sometimes for increased wages and so on and conditions.  It was a form of socialist economy which they ran upon and the moneylenders who at that time, who came in with, actually they used to weigh the gold out, they’d come in from the main commerce countries or commercial countries.  Merchant bankers as we know them, who would bring the goods in and the money supply and they would weigh it out and give it to the pharaohs in return for whatever.  And they’d also get the pharaoh’s armies to wage wars on their behalf at times too and they would get the conquered ones out of that.  They would become slaves who were then sold on the slave market.

So all of this comes together with the money system, without that you couldn’t even get slaves because you’d have no money to pay people or give them a cabbage or turnip.  I don’t think they would want to be a slave master for very long.  They’d go home you know.  So that’s really how the system works that we take for granted.  And also what was fascinating too from ancient times to the present where those who lead what’s called the economic centers of that time to the present day you’ll get incredible cities, incredible cities with some of the most incredible wealthy people living in them surrounded by the class, what we call classes, the working classes, and then down to all the homeless and the prostitutes and even drugs by the way, in ancient times to the present, at the bottom.  This whole system is ancient.  And it’s always the same M.O. down through the ages.

Neil:  Yeah.  I watched "Apocalypto", Mel Gibson’s movie a few times and the scene where they captured the warriors and brought them into the city.  That seems pretty realistic to me.  You’ve got all the, as you say, slaves on the outskirts of the city all digging up the limestone and covered in you know this white dust, and as they go further and further into the city where the main pyramid is you have the real wealthy people and they have different cultures as well, not just that indigenous culture but cultures which assimilated from all different parts of the world.

Alan:  Well this is a fascinating part Neil because I’ll tell you Britain really copied that same system, or those who came into Britain and took it over copied that system or already had it because the British Empire...  We forget that the British went into other countries using the domestic peoples initially as troops, and all the people of the country to finance those armies through taxation and so on.  But then they created the empire and then in each country where they had an empire they had troops, native troops and regiments, formed as well which they would use either on that people’s own people or into other countries once again.  This idea of World Empire is very ancient.  And the Egyptians did the same thing too.

Neil:  Would you know much about the Bosnian pyramids?  Because it’s somewhere that I’ve wanted to go when I go over to that part of the world.  I’m actually not too far away from there when I’m over there.  And it’s not something that’s advertised.  You would think that a country that’s relatively poor would be advertising this stuff and getting tourism going but it’s being kept very, very quiet.  Would you have any background knowledge on why that would be the case?

Alan:  Yeah we do know and yet there is more to be discovered there yet, but we do know that pyramids go all the way back, all the way back in a lot of countries, you’ll find off the islands off the west coast of Africa for instance.  They’re still uncovering them yet.  And in fact Thor Heyerdahl’s son, that did the Kon-Tiki expedition, he was uncovering one near Bahrain I think it was.  And they tried to keep that out of the papers but it got in because they were trying to put a highway through it, that’s how they came across it.

But you’ll find that in parts of Europe yeah as well because even ancient Egyptians, we knew there was a trade route and a luxury area for an upper class that traveled all the way from Egypt and then eventually Greece, when you had the Greco-Egyptian Empire, and they traveled all the way to the Black Sea.  That was a favorite resort of even the Romans.  And it was thought that it was brought in even from the Egyptian elite long before that and then the Greeks took it over and then the Romans made their luxury resort there too.  It was always a favorite resort to go to for the elite.  Interesting enough too the Black Sea area was the main resort used by the Soviet Union for all their residents who were guaranteed a holiday every year, the workers, and they would take them to the Black Sea area as well.

Neil:  Well that’s actually funny because people in Bulgaria that’s where they all gravitate to.  It doesn’t matter what part of Bulgaria they are from they all head there for holidays and it seems to be the only place.

Alan:  It is very, very old and also I mean the Black Sea too in mythology, or it’s hard to tell sometimes what is history and mythology when it’s so far back because a lot of old history comes from myths actually, word of mouth, stories.  But the Black Sea in ancient times, especially in the religions of India of all places, and believe you me they were traveling around too an awful lot in ancient times.  But in India, in fact they were the main buyers and purchasers for the Sumerian people 5,000-odd years ago or longer.  So you’ll find that the Black Sea is a bit of a mystery to a lot of scientists because they put a submarine down there in National Geographic a few years back to see, because there were myths that there used to be people living in that valley where the sea is and they found different, very different levels of strata.  There were definitely old buildings down there that had been sunk thousands of years ago.

And if you go into the Hindu religions they say because they claim to have seven periods of great catastrophes and so on.  Ages of you know flooding and fire and so on and then water, the old fire and water thing.  And anyway they said that, that area was used as an experimental basin by the Gods.  Now you would take scientists in all ages by the way if you were a primitive person, you would call them a god, like a pharaoh was a god too.  People who were educated were technically gods.  And even the class of Greeks were all descended from the gods, the upper class, and the same with the Romans.  So you’ll go off into mysticism when they mention gods.

But they said that they experimented with different kinds of humans and animals in that valley.  And eventually these creatures that were created from humans and animals started to eat each other so they flooded the valley to destroy them all.  That was the ancient myth that comes from the religions of India.  So it was quite fascinating that they had the history of something being there at least buildings or whatever or people.  And then National Geographic uncovered it with their submarine that time about ten years ago or more.

Neil:  Yeah we’re all set on that with, "The Island of Dr. Moreau".  But there is a similar kind of place like that in Bulgaria where they’ve got these huge kind of red rocks that go up the way and they form all curious shapes.  And at every level of these rocks you’ve got tiny pebbles.  The whole area was a sea at one time and it’s nowhere near the sea.  It’s in the center of the country and it’s not too far from the Danube.  And I think the deepest freshwater lake in Eastern Europe is there.  And the whole area was under hundreds of feet of water.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  And you can’t see where it came from.  You can’t see where it went.  {Laughs}

Alan:  We know there have been great upheavals in the Earth; there is no doubt about it.  It still goes on too.  But we have upheavals, and even in South America, in Chile and different places, you’ll find that if you climb some of their hills or mountains even, you will find levels of beaches and seashells in them, thousands of feet above the sea level that at one time were down at the sea level but they got pushed up down through time with upheavals in the earth, and earthquakes, etcetera.  Earthquakes don’t just sink things, they also push things up.  And that’s happened across Europe in ancient times as well.

Neil:  Okay.  We’ve got about fifteen minutes left.  We’ll move on to Part III.  You’ve got three volumes here and people really need to get a hold of it and go through it more than once as I have only done.  But the third part is "Esoteric Unveiled and the Meaning of Revelations in the High Masonic Tradition", and that was 2003 that you completed that one.  So do you want to take us through that briefly?

Alan:  Yeah well I always wondered about, in all ages of the Christian era, really it started around the 6^th or 7^th century, "Revelation" wasn’t included in the bible initially by the way.  It was added on at a convention much, much later.  Many other books were either included or excluded from the bible according to the political climate of that era you know.  So but eventually they brought it in and then took it out again a few centuries later and then put it back in again.  But and it’s not in to this day in a lot of the apocryphas, it’s called, it’s only contained within say the Catholic version of the bible.

But "Revelation" can be used really in all ages.  Revelation is, there are many ways to look at something, and this is why I found it fascinating even in the Chaldean, then the Judaic religions, and so on which were all kind of from the same source and sources.  You’ll find that when they talk about something that happened in a mystical form, very mystical language, they’re actually telling you about something that can be made to happen in the future not by chance but by direction.  They were not talking about God’s direction, but of an elite’s direction.

You can create culture.  They knew that back then.  You can direct the people to do anything and behave in any way you want if you knew how to apply the techniques of psychology.  And today it’s PR and marketing propaganda and the culture industry.  So you can direct them to be a certain way or go off and fight down the road someone else and conquer them and so on because it’s your right to rule the world or whatever it happens to be.  You can always use people for your own ends in other words.  So when they talk about something that’s going to happen by chance it’s not chance at all.

In all eras "Revelation" can be used because this commercial moneyed system, money owned privately by a few, at least the right to create it and count it you might say and lend it and collect it, is the ultimate power of this whole planet and this whole structure of all reality as we know it today.  So "Revelation" is the consequences of that power all down through the ages and yet to come until you have world government.  The beast, etcetera, is a system.  And it’s a system that eventually leads to total world control by an elite you see.  That’s what it really means, a system.

It also means that humanity as we know it, even humanity between ourselves, as natural human beings not psychopathic, would be completely altered by various means to alter us.  It’s not just a making the beast in his image sort of thing, it’s making all of us the beast in that image.  Today it’s taken for granted, it’s through transhumanism, altering humanity itself with artificial insemination, manipulating genes, etcetera.  The creating of a new servant class, that’s all part of "Revelation".  In other words it’s always an ongoing plan.

When you look back at the history of Britain for instance you’ve had no peace in Britain for centuries and centuries and centuries.  There is not one generation being born that had complete peace in its lifetime.  And it’s getting to this so-called progression or progressive society, what they call progressive.  It would get less and less freedom and peace in every generation, even less and less.  You see it’s either an economic fear we’re living under, loss of jobs, income, inflation, or it is war or it’s both.  But these two techniques are used down through the ages always.

And you have an international elite today who are definitely international who are running the whole world.  All the international corporations truly have become the new feudal overlords like professor Carroll Quigley said and he was a part of this organization that was leading towards, working towards, this world government run by an elite.

They did not believe in equality.  They did believe they would use, like a carrot again, the idea of equality and democracy for the people to fight for them and claim this world for them, the ones at the top, but they didn’t believe that democracy would ever work at all.  They believed in a super elite and a form of socialism which would be a top-heavy government bureaucracy and government agencies running man from birth to death basically.  Today you have the scientific elite heavily involved in this and well employed by the same foundations and international corporations and governments all working towards the same goal of perfecting man.

Jumping back to Charles Galton Darwin’s book, "The Next Million Years", he said basically the same thing that you wouldn’t need your mind to make decisions for you, your own abilities to make decisions, because the government and agencies would be making all the decisions for you.  That’s the perfect system for you but he says for us, for our class, he said, he said that We shall remain unchanged.  We shall remain the wild man.  The wild man must be animalistic.  He must take action.  He is an action man.  He is not bound by moral rules, etcetera, or laws of the state or the land.  He creates it for the rest of you but not for himself because the wild man will be steering the ship, the planet Earth basically, and must be able to make vital decisions for survival purposes.  But the ordinary people will make no decisions for themselves.

Look around you today with how they have adapted to the electronics systems that they have been given.  And how they’re walking around like zombies staring at their silly phones all day long and so on.  They can’t even make eye contact now with each other.  It’s working very, very well as the people adapt into different stages of this particular plan.  You’re being changed.  When you look at any particular story on the internet you’re being nudged to go and look at this other story.  In other words the formation of an idea has been guided by professionals who have already predetermined the conclusions that they want you to follow and come to.  And that’s all called "nudging" by the neuroscientists that work with those who design the programs for the computers.  All of this is combined.

So "Revelations" is an ongoing program, wars, rumors of wars, pestilence.  We get nothing but fear of pestilence and so on, the idea of squalor, poverty, yada-yada-ya, are eternal in this one particular system.  They must go use all of these techniques to achieve their end, their goals.  And that’s what we’re going through today as they, as they see...  Remember that’s why they call this, the 21^st century, is both the "New American Century", but it’s also the "Century of Change".  And all academia used that term, the Century of Change which to the few at the top who really knew what they were talking about like Quigley, the 21^st century was to be the century where all that was normal, all that was will be passed, and all that should be and will be, will come into being.  A completely new system, a new way of living, a new humanity, you might call it that too.  That’s all to take place in this century and we’re rolling along with it being forced along with continuous wars and the Pentagon’s, the military’s own papers, magazines, I’ve read the articles on the air from their own magazines where the intelligence officer wrote one about perpetual war.  And he said from now on it’s going to be perpetual war.  There will be no peace for the people because through perpetual war you can get instant change, fast change, people don’t question what they have to do and what they have to put up with in times of war.  And it said the war on terror is a great guise to rush everything through into a post consumerist society where you’re run by government in a communistic fashion and with a super elite of the wealthy people at the top.  That’s all to be achieved this century and they’re really running towards it.

Neil:  I mean I’ve noticed particularly over the last, well I suppose since 9/11, real chaos and you’ve mentioned chaos many times in your radio broadcast.  I mean it really is getting way, way, way beyond anything I’ve experienced when I was younger.  It’s just, I should say it’s perpetual, and it’s coming from all angles.  We’ve now got Ebola; apparently we’re going to be killed with a plague you know.  And I think that myself.  That’s a move toward mandatory vaccinations and to stop you traveling I think.  That’s what I think at this point.

Alan:  Well that’s one thing too plus the people are dying off by the way with massive respiratory problems because of the massive chem spraying that we have been having since 1998.  I mean our whole weather is designed for us now.  They’ve got the drought areas under control, they make sure there’s got to be constant drought and of the areas of the bread baskets are constantly under rain and cold weather.  I haven’t seen no summer here in Canada at all, about five days of it, you know.  I’ve had the wood stove on at nights in June, a lot of nights in June, July, August, and last night I had it on again, I had it on a lot all week.  It was only a few degrees above freezing at night here.

Neil:  Yeah.  Well we’ve had horrendous weather this year for some reason.  And well they sprayed us, one because the chemtrailing has been horrendous over the past few months.  But there is a quote in the first section of your book and I think it’s absolutely right.  It says:  "Most people who claim to seek the truth really only want confirmation of those things which they already believe.  Truth would require that they abandon their “comfort zones” and do something concrete – to make real changes in their lives."  And I think it’s about time they got off their backsides and actually started doing something about it because if they don’t they can forget any future for their children and grandchildren.  I mean I’ve got a new grandson being born next month and I really do fear for the future for any children being born now because we know where it’s going you know.  We know how bad this is likely to get.  I mean what do you say to grandchildren and children you know and their parents.

Alan:  Well I’ll tell you a long time ago through experimental schools, run in Britain by Bertrand Russell in the 1920’s, he got permission to do things to children that other folk would have been hung for doing, even promoting pre-pubertal sex amongst them to see if it would work so that they’d have lots of partners and never get married.  He got the right to do that in the 1920’s by a charter from the crown, permission.  So he through all their studies, he says, we used to think we’d have to take the children from their parents to indoctrinate the children in the proper way to obey the state, you know, and that would be contaminated by the values of the parents.  He says, but now we’ve found with intensive scientific indoctrination if you get the children early enough even through kindergarten, etcetera, or preschool, into school and through the scientific technique, he says, the parents, it would be much cheaper to let the parents raise the child, be solely responsible for the economic welfare of the child in this because this technique is so perfect that when the child goes home it doesn’t matter what the parents will say.  All of their new culture will be given to them by an authorized, the state basically.  Their authorized culture will be given by the state, the new values, and they will not be contaminated, they won’t listen to their parents.  And that’s been the mantra by the way since the 60’s; don’t listen to anybody over thirty, then twenty, and so on.  That’s why by the way they also have younger and younger teachers all the time.  They don’t want older folk teaching the children.  So you can’t really fight this.

In Sudbury there are a few Mennonites around you know and one day at the bus station I noticed a woman in there dressed in a garb and the son there too and they were waiting for I guess the husband to come back off the train, and this child I don’t think had ever seen a television before.  And there was one out, just outside of kind of a covered waiting, it had a roof for a covered waiting place and it had a little television there.  And this guy he couldn’t take his eyes off the TV.  He was utterly mesmerized by it.  You can’t fight the technologies which are being used today to make sure the child’s mind is grabbed by using scientific techniques by the way which the parents cannot put across to them.  It overrides the parental input all together.

Neil:  Yeah.  Well my son actually stood up to the medical people when the Swine Flu thing was around and refused to have his daughter vaccinated for that.  And I’ve spoken to him since and he’s having a hell of a time persuading his wife.  He’s quite happy not to vaccinate but it’s always the women you have to get onboard and I don’t know where that’s going to go but hopefully they can work it out and not go down that road.

But I was onto the health words because they were trying to cite that "non-vaccination is a form of neglect".  But I sent a few FYIs off to them and you could get a different answer out of anybody but they did say that nothing was mandatory; it was all consensual, blah, blah, blah.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  So at least I’ve got that in writing.

Alan:  Well I’ll tell you I do know a lot of people who have had families and then the later children they did not get vaccinated.  Every single one of them said that none of them, the ones who did not get vaccinated, none of them had what was called the normal childhood problems and illnesses of the runny nose, the earaches, etcetera.  None of them had that problem at all.  You see even the so-called normal childhood illnesses are actually also induced by the vaccination.  That’s how devious this whole system is.

Neil:  Yeah, yep.  Okay Alan, well we’ve reached the hour again.  It just flies in.  Just to finish off here I believe you’re in the process of writing a new book.

Alan:  I’ve got a few actually here.

Neil:  Okay, when can we expect to see them?

Alan:  Oh it will be the next month or two, a couple of months I’d say.  I’ve got a lot on the go right now.  I’ve been just thrown off my feet with literally crisis after crisis after crisis, even economic and you know vehicles and all the rest of it, but it should be fairly soon.  There is so much to say and I don’t want to simply speak to the crowd.  I want to try to get people...  I try to write it with a process of breaking through the conditioning, that’s how I do it, that you’re born into and your conditioning from birth.  I try to break through that to get you thinking for yourselves for the first time and stop following people too.  You have to start using your own brain.

Neil:  That includes a lot of people in this so-called truth movement as well.

Alan:  Absolutely.  You’re given your heroes to follow.  Nothing has been missed here.  Yeah, absolutely.

Neil:  Okay.  Well we’ll speak to you again next month.  I’ll be possibly on the other side of the pond at that point.  So yeah.  It’s good to talk to you again.

Alan:  Okay.  It’s been a pleasure.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:36 pm

Neil:  Welcome to Reality Bytes Radio on the 16^th of October, twenty past three Eastern Time, twenty past eight in the UK.  Sorry about the delay there were technical issues with the system again.  Let’s welcome Alan Watt to the broadcast again and I was talking to Alan off the air about the use of fear as a weapon if you like to control the masses and how it was used in ancient times, how it’s used in modern times, and then comes the Ebola thing that’s going on.  And I mean how far back does this actually go Alan?  I mean I don’t know but I’ve discussed the aspects of how they induce eclipses or things like that to instill fear in the population claiming that they have control of the sun and they could block it anytime they wanted to, to punish the people if you like.

Alan:  Yes.  You also have it in the Middle Eastern countries as well with Zoroastrianism, things like that where you had the sun priest as well basically too and various cults and religions.  Initially you see to start off to get a powerful system going which we today call government you must, it starts off generally with families that slaughter other families and take over lands.  And then you have the problem of maintaining the hold over the people and so in comes the intelligentsia, the hired intelligentsia who then know instinctively, intuitively, how to put across fear to get the people to obey.  It’s much better to rule people by having them comply with your obeyance and be obedient to the system rather than fight you all the time or rebel.  And so this is a very ancient technique.  And you’ll find even today in the modern times so much money, all through the 20^th century up to the present time, has been in sociology, etcetera, and behaviorism, has been into the study of all the histories of this plus into human nature itself because the one thing that’s on ruler’s minds, it doesn’t matter what kind of ruler you want to believe or rulership you are in, whether it’s democracy or whether it’s fascism, or communism, whatever it happens to be, they all used the same systems and they are all really front systems for the moneyed elite above them in all systems, even in the communist system.  And therefore the same systems that work will always be used.  They are all formula as Plata said even in his day.  And therefore fear they found is the best way to have people to comply.

We find in the Green Party in Britain for instance only about three or four years ago the women who was ahead at that time came out on the news and said that if only we could get the public into a war mode as they were during the Blitz in London, World War II, because everybody when the whistles went off and the sirens went off they ran into their shelters.  They were crammed into those shelters.  They were already on incredible rationing you know in Britain that lasted about ten years or eleven years.  People don’t realize that rationing cards were still issued up until 1951 and but the people all complied because they were all believing that if they didn’t comply they’d all perish and so fear is the greatest motivation of all to get people to simply comply and be obedient.

Now the studies on behaviorism, and here’s the thing because it’s really interesting, the experts today in behaviorism and neuroscience understand the fear mechanism perfectly well and they’ve also done extensive surveys into what worked in ancient times all through history to the present and including when a country was under attack from maybe three or four sources or they could have a plague ongoing, be at war with a foreign government, being threatened with invasion and so on.  And they found that people can only logically think, even the average individual, if you have no more than two major crises on the go simultaneously at the same time.  If you have any more than that you begin to break down and you look for answers from what you think are people who know.  So someone who comes along and says I’m an expert obey me, don’t worry and they are very quiet and complacent and so on, you will trust them and you will give all your obedience to that person.  That’s the system we are under today, yeah.

Neil:  And... "Neither a man nor a coward nor a nation can be trusted to act humanely or to think sanely under the influence of a great fear."

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  It’s an emotional argument about any subject.  And of course fear is one of the greatest emotions. 

Alan:  It is.

Neil:  And then they are not thinking rationally or sanely.

Alan:  Yes it’s a primitive, primal, emotion because it’s to do with survivalism.  If you don’t comply you will perish.  That’s the simple statement that’s put out whether it’s for an inoculation that rakes in millions or even billions for the Big Pharma companies like the Swine Flu vaccine that they had to stop dishing out eventually because it was killing too many people.  But things like that and we are seeing the same thing with the Ebola scare.

Since 9/11, here’s the key, since 9/11, that was the unrolling of the whole new sociological system of control over populations of many, many countries and they hope eventually the whole world for compliance under the new world state they have been pushing for, for years.  And they said when 9/11 happened, I think it was Cheney that came out or one of the guys came out at the top and said nothing will ever be the same again.  And that night on the air, it was on WWCR, I said, "The hardest thing to hold on to from now on...", from now on, and I meant it because I read all of their previous stuff building up to this, "...would be to hold on to your sanity as we go through this."  And we’ve had nothing but crashes with the banks, the stock markets.  You’ve seen your currencies deliberately devalued all the time.  Your taxes have gone way up.  They brought in the Austerity Doctrine and I said at the time that the Austerity Doctrine really means that all of your spending money will go to bare essentials in the future.  That’s the big agenda because this stuff is an open secret as H.G. Wells said.  They publish at the top and through the United Nations in all the different treaties they sign where they are taking you.  And at the same time we’ve got Ebola on the go, fear of your lives, crashes, oh Al-Qaeda, now it’s ISIS and a whole bunch of other things.  It’s the same group, but the average person can’t cope with all of these fear mechanisms.

But I’ll tell you the best place to find the techniques of fear and how they are used today, and it’s actually through marketing.  Marketers work with governments, the top ones do, the big corporations.  And they’ve done the most extensive studies of how to use fear to get folk to buy things for instance even right down to if you don’t use this toothpaste your teeth are going to fall out, etcetera, etcetera.  It’s all to do with, it’s not just vanity, it’s actually fear that you are going to be the odd ball out here and look ugly, etcetera.  Or you’ve got the little car there that has rust on it, small car, and here’s the big car passing you by and you feel that you’re a loser.  And that’s pushed in the advertising.

But it also comes down to all forms of selling everything today including alternative media.  And I’ve watched alternative media for many, many years and when it comes to the SARS nonevent that happened in Canada a few years back to the present thing with Ebola, they all go into hyper drive selling all of their products with again under fear.  An hour of terrifying you and here’s the antidote, buy this.  And the poor suckers go and buy it all hoping that it’s going to save them possibly.  So they sell them legally, they actually sell them legally a form of hope, but not actual fact, you see, and it’s a very ancient technique.

Remember Rockefeller’s old man was a snake oil salesman and he used all of these techniques too.  So it’s on the go today and everyone goes into hyper drive when it comes to fear.

Neil:  Yeah I lived an hour west from the Behavioural Insights Team in the UK.  And they are actually working with the mainstream media here, the Behavioural Insights Team, to psychologically scare people.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  To scare them for taxes.

Alan:  Oh yeah.

Neil:  And that in itself is an assault surely.

Alan:  I read that yeah.  Uh-huh.

Neil:  Yeah and they also {inaudible}, they’ve been doing it for the last year anyway, organ transplant.  If it’s not fear, it’s guilt.  You know they make you feel guilty.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  And also separately the Big Pharma stuff.  I mean the pharma shops here, I don’t know what they are like over there.  But you don’t get {inaudible} in the shots here you get {inaudible}.

Alan:  That’s right, yeah.

Neil:  It’s constant.  I mean all of the signs in the {inaudible} to get a flu shot, get a shingles shot, get a pneumonia shot.  And I think I mentioned to you before that there was a big effigy of the Grim Reaper in the entranceway to the pharmacy for Halloween.

Alan:  Uh-huh.  {Laughs}

Neil:  Yeah.  I got a nice photograph of that one next to the free flu shot sign.  I mean fear is, I mean it takes on many aspects.  I mean even family life you know going back to the vaccinations, you have to get your children vaccinated or something terrible is going to happen to them.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  Or you have all the women’s magazines telling you that you’ve got to have this, you’ve got to have this, or the women pester the man can we have this big TV or whatever it is you know we better keep up with the Jones’s.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  I mean it takes many, many different forms.

Alan:  Oh what they do, here’s the key to it you see, in commercial systems where the big guys who get up there at the top, they form cartels.  They are big gangs at the top, big corporate gangs.  And they have cartels and conglomerates where they all work together.  You must in this day and age work together at the top.  They don’t really compete with each other at the top.  But the system itself forces everyone else to compete with each other even at the bottom.  That’s the key to it all.  As you say, you’d better keep up with the Jones’s, what will your neighbors say?  Oh your fence isn’t mended or your grass is too long, etcetera, etcetera.  I’d better get a new lawnmower.  All these things are meant to, these are external motivational factors that are placed upon you and forced upon you by the commercial system in which you actually live.

And so it’s all to do with conform, conform, which means really purchase, purchase and have all the latest stuff so you can cut your grass, so you can earn enough money to fix the fence and all of this kind of stuff.  So you don’t realize.  I mean I know people who are very elderly, very elderly, who went through the first Great Depression as they called it, and it wasn’t the first one really at all but we will call it that because it’s in the books.  And that was manipulated too of course by three guys at the top Gould and so on and J.P. Morgan.  But anyway some of their parents didn’t have to actually earn physical money in the U.S. because there were no taxes as such as we think of them today.  They didn’t have taxes on their property.  Many of them simply bartered.  If you wanted something from the dentist and you could do odd jobs or you could put in a new cupboard for them or something like that, that’s what they did.  And the rest of the time they simply sustained themselves.  They farmed their own land and sustained themselves.  But when FDR and all the rest of them came in and of course the big depression they were forced to start for the first time to get money to pay taxes.  And so the loophole was closed and now you are all forced to go along into the same corrupt system that we are in today and be a good taxpayer.  In fact it’s one of the definitions of being a good citizen is to be a good consumer and producer according to the United Nations and of course a good taxpayer as well.  So all this talk about freedom is nonsensical when the various options you had, had been taken away from you by law you know.

Neil:  Yeah it’s quite ironic that if you’re keeping up with the Jones’s then you are going out and spending money you don’t have.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  Then you start being fearful about not having any money.

Alan:  Exactly.  The biggest problem today physically, one of the biggest problems apart from the junk food we eat and GMO and pesticides and the vaccinations that cause cancers and all the rest of it, one of the biggest problems we have is anxiety.  And anxiety itself is definitely going to shorten your life and cause a lot of problems.  Yeah.  Never mind social problems and interpersonal relationships and all the rest of it too.

Neil:  Of course the interpersonal relationships I suppose is another aspect because you know women are trained to believe they have to have a certain figure, they have to look a certain way, they have to dress a certain way.

Alan:  Uh-huh.

Neil:  And now it’s gone full circle whereby you walk into the supermarket or whatever and now the men have got whole aisles to themselves as well with creams and ointments.

Alan:  Yeah.

Neil:  And all this garbage.  And then they might say oh well I must look good to a women or whatever or she will run off with somebody else and all this kind of paranoia.

Alan:  Yes.  And plus the fear factor of not earning enough money.  Because again if the feeling of security there, financial security is not there in a home, then of course it causes incredible problems and arguments and divorces, etcetera.

Neil:  And of course media, media plays the major role in this kind of thing by promoting it from the, well on all levels of society from the tabloid papers to the so called broadsheets which are all becoming one and the same these days as I can see.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  There was an article up here the other day about Ebola, and it’s not Ebola that you need to be scared of, it’s the flu.

Alan:  Uh-huh.  Uh-huh.

Neil:  And here we go, you know.

Alan:  Yeah.

Neil:  Some of the pictures have to be laughable and people, people buy into it.  I mean are people so kind of broken down and {inaudible} the amount of stuff that’s been bombarded down on them.

Alan:  We here’s the key to it.  Here’s the key to that because in the endless sociological studies on the general populations over well over 150 years now basically, they know that, and I liken it to a herd of cattle getting stampeded.  To get the cattle moving initially you have to instill some kind of fear and noises or gunshots like you’ll see in old westerns.  Or some attack by wolves, something to get them motivated because they are just like people.  We like to graze in the same area, it’s familiar, it’s our home, blah, blah, blah.

Once you get them starting to run the trick is to keep them running.  And all you have to do then is get a couple of riders up front there to make sure, and to the sides of them, that you can actually steer where you want them to go.  That’s why you call them a steer, the cow you know that you can guide where you want them to go.  And it’s all done through fear and if they want to go in a different direction you just fire more guns off at the side of them or whatever it is and they will move off away from it, very simplistically to get away from these nasty lethal sounds.  And so that’s how the general population is today.  The more fear you can hit them with incessantly and keep it up, don’t give them a chance to sit back and be comfortable for a while.  When we get comfortable we start to talk to each other rationally.  And when the government tries to push something we start to complain amongst each other initially and say well I don’t really want to go along with this.  I kind of like the way it is right now.

But what they have done since 9/11 is just one thing after another until you are petrified.  And that’s when they flood you with the experts, with expert opinions from economics to health, health, health, it’s all over television.  All the so-called experts that come out and all guide you along this path where you will never be your own master of your own thoughts.  That’s the key to it all, yeah.

Neil:  I mean they bombard you with whatever it is, Ebola, ISIS, ISO, whatever, and they come up with a new thing, and something that was supposedly deadly serious two weeks ago and then suddenly it disappears.  And there is another thing it’s constantly changing.

Alan:  Exactly.

Neil:  And I mean I’ve noticed this myself in terms of talking to politicians, when you change to subject to them you see they can’t think rationally either.

Alan:  Uh-huh.

Neil:  I mean there is almost a paradox in that.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  You get people with one thing just as they are kind of starting to get off of the initial fear, then something happens in its place.  As you say the public can’t be allowed to get kind of complacent about it.

Alan:  Yeah you have to keep them stampeding and guide them, always guide them by new experts in different fields, yeah.  And back in the 40’s and even the 30’s Bertrand Russell said the same thing, he said, we shall replace logic and reason amongst the general population by expert opinion on everything until they adopt expert opinion until a women can’t change a diaper without expert opinion.  And that’s all been done.  We’ve been trained since birth, our whole generation, to listen to experts even when we see the physical evidence or the realistic evidence that their expert opinion was wrong last time they still fall for it the next time you know.

Neil:  And they are never quite happy enough to put their names to things either.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  They are always unnamed.

Alan:  What you will find, that’s right, you see what they’ll do now, and I read the article about a year ago I think on the air, it was from the Pentagon and other places because it was to do in fact with handouts from government agencies in the U.S. especially.  But all governments are the same that they’d replace individual reporting with simply handouts and they wouldn’t sign from where it was from.  But it was all coming from the same ministries of information basically but under the guise of expert opinions.  And all the newspapers are putting in these big articles verbatim without question and so on.  They even did some open television interviews on some of the big stations a while back on that but it’s all forgotten now.  But that’s how most things are coming out today.  It’s just expert opinions and, it’s the same with the weather manipulators too and the geoengineering meetings they have all the time.  They actually smirk and laugh amongst themselves whenever they mention "one day we might do it", instead of admitting to the public yeah we’ve been doing it for years and here’s the outcome.

So we are living truly today in a kind of magic land of very high sciences all working at the same time, thousands of think tanks across the world working together to manipulate whole populations along the same path into a common world culture with a dominant minority at the top giving you your thoughts for the day for everyday of your life.

Neil:  It’s funny when you read any of these articles it says that, an expert says.  Well an expert of what?

Alan:  Yeah.

Neil:  I mean expert is just a word.  He might not even have experience on the subject he’s talking about.  They are just an expert you know.

Alan:  Uh-huh.

Neil:  Anyway.

Alan:  Sure and I’ve said you know, I’ve said for years how come at least twice a century the big banks plunder you, premeditated plunder.  They plunder whole countries and nations and continents twice a century at least and they get off with it.  And the laws are never changed to stop it happening again.  It’s because they want that loophole and they want it to stay the same so they can do it again.  We are living in a fake system and that’s the key to it.  If we have all of these fantastic experts going to the top economic schools and so on how come they never see anything coming?  We are supposed to believe this, this nonsense.  They never see it coming.  It’s all a joke, yeah.

Neil:  {Inaudible} It’s usually the politicians that {inaudible}.  We are always told that these are the best people that we can get.

Alan:  That’s right.  Yeah.  {Laughs}

Neil:  They’re all thinking about how much money they’ve got {inaudible}.  And they never will never do anything to get a decent job once they finish politics.  But if they are the best we can get then we might as well do it ourselves because they always mess it up.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  Every time.

Alan:  That’s the impression we are meant to have because the politicians themselves and it truly is, they are obsolete, and they have been obsolete for an awful long time.  I did shows years ago on that, from the big boys again and even back in the 60’s Quigley and other people, Professor Quigley said the same thing.  He said governments today are obsolete as they are projected to the public because the big corporate international corporation cartels who already ran the show back in the early 60’s and had been for long before that in fact.  And government goes to them for advice on everything.  So that’s how it’s been for a long time.  Politics is a Punch & Judy show for the general population.  And sometimes you’ll cheer Punch and sometimes Judy, and you’ll throw rotten tomatoes at one or the other, and this is the game that they present to the public as being actually true.  The Pentagon has more say in the U.S. along with the big corporations than the politicians do.  And every politician knows it because they are all dependent on the corporations to back them when they want to run for congress or the senate.

Neil:  So they are in fear as well.

Alan:  Oh yeah.  They are all paid off when they get massive donations by millions of dollars from corporations.  They have many meetings with the different corporate leaders.  It isn’t here’s a charitable donation, we believe in your cause and walk away.  No, here’s the deal, when you get in this is what you’ll do for us.  I mean it’s as simple as that, yeah.

Neil:  Yeah.  As we are on about the politicians there’s a great quote in one of the papers earlier in the week.  It’s on Brooks Newmark MP, American-born English MP.  He resigned because he was sending naked pictures of himself to various women across the world or something.

Alan:  Uh-huh.

Neil:   In online relationships.  And one of them, one of them said she was shocked because he was an MP and he wouldn’t tell a lie.

Alan:  {Laughs}

Neil:  That says it all.  That’s how naive people really are.

Alan:  Yeah.  These are the lemmings over the cliff, yeah.

Neil:  I was also speaking to somebody on {inaudible} talking about you know Obama is the better of the two evils.  I’m thinking, well why are you voting for evil at all?

Alan:  Exactly.

Neil:  Why?  You know.  And that {inaudible}.

Alan:  If a system doesn’t work regardless of the presentation that you are given to believe in, left wing, right wing, whatever it happens to be.  If the same agenda goes on regardless from the United Nations and treaties getting signed with deeper ties and binding, and no party ever comes in that changes it, then it’s the same agenda.  The party system is nonsensical.  They are both the same.  They are all getting money to run you know, each individual in those parties, from the same sources.

Neil:  Yeah and of course the public is basically in fear what’s coming next.  Oh my goodness that last one didn’t do very well.

Alan:  Exactly.

Neil:  We have to hope for the best.

Alan:  The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same things over and over expecting a different result when all you have seen in the past by doing the same things over and over is the same result.

Neil:  Yeah.  Okay we’ll stop there for a piece of music and then we’ll come back and perhaps talk a little bit about the current and past state of the truth movement.  And you’ve already brushed on how fear is used in that as well.

Alan:  Oh yes.

Neil:  We’ll go to a piece of music if Steve can throw something on and I’ll come back and discuss that.

{Break}

Neil:  Welcome back to Reality Bytes on the 16^th of October with our guest Alan Watt.  We were discussing fear before the break and that manifested itself in the truth movement as well and not just in you know the instilling of fear by people in the truth movement on people who are listening or watching them but there is a lot of fear within people, not myself I’m not worried at all, but I’ve heard broadcasters say I’d better not say this or I’d better not say that or you know I don’t like them putting my face in a TV picture or all this stuff in case the boys come to get me kind of thing.

Alan:  Yeah.

Neil:  And what would you say to that?  I mean it seems pretty pointless to me.  If you are going to stick your head above the bar of it, leave it there and just go for it you know.

Alan:  Yeah and I’ve told people before there is no point in getting paranoid about things because yeah they are monitoring everybody.  I mean the whole population even for people who are sitting and just watching pornography all day and being a good citizen by doing so by the way because that’s what they are pushing, is rubbish like that.

They know everything about every single person.  And so even if you think that I better not say this or I better not say that and keep myself clean, they still know what’s going on around you because you’ll have little comments out to your friends and so on.  You have no idea of how many ways you are spied upon, even when you are out walking in the town.  And it’s not just cameras they have up, they have little mikes, incredible great little mikes up too that can hear you talking in a doorway two hundred yards away automatically.

So I mean no, they know all about you by your chats and your texting and all the rest of it.  They know exactly what’s happening in your head.  So don’t be paranoid about it.  And by the way they are not worried about most folk anyway believe you me.  They are not worried at all.

But for the totalitarian system everyone must be utterly predictable.  And that’s why the average Joe is being completely monitored with all of their records of phone calls and all the rest of it too and yada, yada, yah, including what they watch on television, etcetera.  So forget that, there is no safety unless you become a hermit on top of a mountain somewhere you know.

Neil: I read a couple of articles from I think it was the Guardian last week and when the British government was stating that we needed more power to snoop on people because you know we just don’t know who is a terrorist anymore, blah, blah, blah.  And in the same paper was an article telling parents that they shouldn’t snoop on their children because they will feel untrusted.  I mean there’s the hypocrisy.  We can get spied on by the government but we have to trust the government.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  And it said that parents aren’t allowed to monitor their children’s behavior on the internet.

Alan:  I know but in the same token they are using the old technique that the Soviets first used or the Bolsheviks and Soviets and then the Nazis and other totalitarian systems that they are encouraging the children to spy on their parents.  I mean it’s beautiful, isn’t it?  It is hypocrisy of course but it’s an ancient technique, it’s even in the Old Testament in one place too how they would turn the children against their parents, etcetera.

And so this technique has been used down through many, many ages.  And it’s very easy to do in a totalitarian type system especially to children who really are, I don’t care what they say today, no, they are not just little adults, they are little children.  And they don’t have the wisdom and their brain hasn’t even stopped maturing and growing and so on.  So no, don’t pretend they are little equals to you.  This is a recent development.  Children need guidance and if you don’t give them guidance by the way that’s when the totalitarians step in because children automatically seek something that gives them security and it’s the very firm adamant, confident, type leader.  And that’s how totalitarian leaders get the followings.  You see all of these techniques are being used today, yep, even through the school systems.

Neil:  Yeah and now they are getting the children to sing the kind of, it’s not even the national anthem, it’s a song for the president or the song for the prime minister.

Alan:  Yeah it’s a form of worship.  And religions are used too where they are taught to pray for presidents and all the rest of it, etcetera.  So everything today truly is a joke in a sense.  It’s all a front and even the...  We haven’t know what a single person has been like, a politician has truly been like for about seventy years because public relations took over a long time ago through marketing and through photo ops and preplanned write-ups by script writers until the president or prime minister simply reads the lines written by someone else, a quick photo op and he’s gone again somewhere else.  It’s just a showpiece.  You might as well get a dummy, I mean that’s all they really are is a dummy you know.

Neil:  I was watching Cameron giving a speech the other day and you know they are supposed to speak from the heart and head and all the rest of it but the amount of time these guys actually have to look down and read off their piece of paper is incredible.  I mean they can’t seem to get through one sentence without having to look down and remember what they have to say.

Alan:  Well that’s the key because you see when they get off the script they make incredible gaffs, they slip up.  And they are constantly being told to stick to the script.  In fact when Ronald Regan was in, that was a really good example because he liked to chat away, and he’d get off the script and he’d start smiling and joking and so on and talking away and you could hear his wife in the background "Ronnie, Ronnie, read the script, read the script".  That was live.  Since then they’ve really stepped it up until they stick to the script.

Obama is perfect.  I mean he is trained in basic deportment you see.  And he knows the gestures.  He is shown what gestures to make, and that takes hours of training, I mean hundreds of hours of training in front of a mirror just like a singer, that’s what they do.  And to get the right gestures to match the part in the script and these are all professional teams that come in and all advise him and show him and step by step how to go through it.  That’s how everything is today, everywhere.

Neil:  Yeah it’s funny how there was a press conference held on Ebola there I think it was about a week ago, and you talk about getting off script, when they walked out of the door, through the door at the back of the kind of podium thing one of the guys still had his mike on and said we are screwed on this Ebola thing.  You know and that’s it.  They know that they are standing up and telling a pack of lies and if somebody can just get them to get off script then as you say they make mistakes and I know that for a fact because as I told you before when in the Irish parliament talking to a so called green minister and he just kept changing the subject as he got into his mantra and he basically after about fifteen minutes just stood up and said I can’t do this anymore I’ve got to leave.

Alan:  Yes.  In fact you know last year in the British papers there was an article, most of the papers carried it, that all MPs were given a grant by again their own government gives them a tax money grant to give them acting lessons.  Now part of it as a standard technique they have used for an awful long time since FDR’s day, when they are asked questions that kind of unseat or unnerve them they tell them don’t answer that question the way it’s presented, answer it the way you had liked to have been asked or about that question or even a similar type question but slightly slanted off.  In other words answer the question you wish they had asked you.  That’s why when you hear the reporter is asking questions they never get an answer that seems to coincide remotely close to what they have just been asked.  {Laughs}  And they all do that.

Neil:  Yeah I’ve seen them kind of redirect, it’s called redirecting or something, isn’t it?

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  And they come out with this spiel, I’m glad you asked that question.

Alan:  Yes.  {Laughs}

Neil:  And then they answer something completely different.

Alan:  Exactly, yeah.

Neil:  Yeah.

Alan:  So what’s the point in having them?  What’s the point in having politicians in?

Neil:  They are entertainment I guess.

Alan:  You see if you didn’t have the politicians there you would have to accept you are under a very clever, sophisticated, scientific form of total control.  And that’s what they don’t want you to know yet.

Neil:  Yeah I mean if you are listening to these guys long enough you realize that they are not intelligent people really.  I mean they are good at talking but there is nothing behind that kind of façade.  But I mean that façade is what keeps people in fear because they are pushing this as a genuine health scare or terrorist threat or whatever it is.  And they grab us with all the hand signals and they have this specific hand signal with the four fingers sticking out and the thumb is always up.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  And they are pushing it towards you and they all do it, they all do it.

Alan:  They all do it.  They are all taught the same deportment by the same professional teams.  Remember when Margaret Thatcher got in?  If you listened to her before, yeah when she ran initially and heard her name for the first time, her voice was high pitched, she talked very fast, her hair was completely different.  They sent Ronald Reagan’s PR team over to remake her image.  And they gave her the complete hairdo, it was in the papers at the time, and they gave her elocution lessons and how to speak much deeper and like a man and things like that, and so on.  And they completely gave her, completely, a complete makeover.  And that was whole teams of professionals in deportment and speech and so on and acting.  And that’s done with every single major politician.

Neil:  I kind of look at Hillary Clinton sometimes and think the way she is holding her head and everything, it’s kind of like Margaret Thatcher, while kind of looking down on people kind of a thing.  And I’ve gone across the board as well and Cameron to a lesser extent.  I don’t know if that’s just because he’s short or what, I don’t know.

But getting back to the fear thing somebody’s in the chat box talking about religion and politics and I mean religion in some countries more than others, religion is very heavily linked to politics and I lived in Ireland for a while so I saw it there and in terms of the Eastern countries where they have the religions over there and would those religions in those countries have the same kind of power in the political systems?

Alan:  Absolutely.  Again too here’s a thing that’s never touched on amongst the general population but it’s well known with the ones at the top who study ethnology and anthropology and so on, if you look at China, China’s history is absolutely incredibly ancient.  And even three thousand years ago they had tried in different little areas or regions of China they tried communism, fascism, socialism, all the “isms” of today they tried it way back then.  And they found that with the particular mindset and mentality of the Chinese people for instance that Confucianism and devotion towards a common cause, which is all of us basically, is the best way to motivate them to obey and comply.  And teaching of shame because Chinese people are very family oriented basically, very, very strong.  And you’ll find that shame works the same with the family as it does to the nation.  And shame is always pushed on the person who lets the side down you might say.

So they have a form of religion to an extent but basically a form of you might call it philosophy, which is drummed into them.  And partially perhaps even genetic because you’ll find the studies, again we are the most studied species on the planet, over and over with the same studies.  And you’ll find that language itself dictates your reasoning to a great extent and your behavior.  And with Chinese people and even when you look at, different parts of their brains will light up when they are doing mathematics, from say westerners.  Or going through reading certain things in the hieroglyphic type writing, the old type writing, different parts of the brain light up compared to us reading our basic Arabic type and Greek scripts.

So we are affected by so many things that the general population are kept dumb about but language itself can really alter your reasoning power as well.  In fact you cannot, you couldn’t fool a caveman.  A caveman had his little cave, he’d have a wife and maybe a child or something and he’d be off hunting there with his big club and if a tax man came in, he could never convince that caveman to give up his home or to allow that cave to be measured so he could get taxed so the guy could take half his meat away from him.  The guy, the caveman, would bash him on the head.  In other words he couldn’t be fooled by language.  It wouldn’t work on them you know if they didn’t understand it.  It’s only when you start to understand a common language and that’s why it’s so important when you study language itself and grammar.  I used to wonder why the incredible science behind just basic grammar.  It’s because it was so important from the ancient times to the present.  The Greeks knew this.  It all dictated the way that you would think and how you’d be easily programmed to think about any particular topic put out to you in an expert way.  And that really decides our reasoning and our motivations and how we will behave in the future on any different particular topic.

So language itself is a form of programming, similar to a computer to an extent in that the way that words are strung together and again with the visual and everything else that goes along with it, presentation of fear or wonder or whatever it happens to be, they can put it across in such a way that they can guarantee you at the end of a one hour show we will have all pretty well the same opinion on a well-produced con no matter what the con happens to be.  But our reasoning will bring us to that because we are dependent upon the format of the language as it is presented to us to come to our reasoning decisions.

Neil:  Yeah and of course political correctness is the tool that’s used to make people fearful of saying the wrong thing.

Alan:  Absolutely.

Neil:  That’s what kind of got us to there.  There’s a quote from Aristotle as well just to finish off, "He who has overcome his fears would truly be free".  Would you say that’s a true statement Alan?

Alan:  Yes and in reality it is "The truth shall set you free".  The old ancient thing that was copied even into the bible from previous civilizations because it doesn’t mean it will make you physically free under any kind of system it simply means that the only freedom you truly have is in your own mind.  But at least it is yours.  If you can reclaim your mind as yours that’s the freedom that you have.  They can still go for you, they can tie you up, they can torture you, they can kill you, starve you to death, whatever it happens to be but at least you know what’s happening as opposed to the person like Winston in "1984" that eventually crumbles and believes he’s the cause of all his own misfortunes.  It’s not his misfortunes at all, he was trying to use reason, but he didn’t realize that the whole key is to hang on to your own reason and logic to the very end.  That’s the only freedom you have, yeah.

Neil:  Just to finish off there’s a question in the chat box here from Ross to do with music.  Is backmasking in music or subliminal messaging guaranteed to induce fear if that the intent of the message, if not what is the best antidote to it?

Alan:  Backmasking was a bit of a con when it was put out there.  The whole culture and media worked together as fashion magazines, write-ups on say pop, rock, whatever it happens to be, etcetera.  It all works together and to create an image that’s really fake about a group or person or whatever it happens to be.  But so they would put out their own occult stuff that guarantees youngsters will really look into it to see what the singer is up to or this band is up to.  It made them more popular.  It is still used today with some singers like Gaga and so on.  So there is nothing really intriguing to me about that.  I understand why they do it.  It’s just to make them more popular and different from the rest you see.  And youngsters like to be fascinated by scary stuff.  But you don’t need that to induce fear.  The studies that have been done on music and drama and all the rest of it and on fear creation is phenomenal.  And they know for instance if they want to induce the same feelings that fear brings on like sweating, you can have dilation of the pupils, fight and flight syndrome, you get the beat right, you match the average heart beat in a dance hall for instance, you start to steadily slowly increase that beat, your heart will start to keep up with it.  Your blood pressure goes up and you’ll get the same symptoms of fear even though you don’t see anything that literally terrifies you consciously.

So it can be induced simply through the music itself.  So this is a very old system and I’ve done talks before, they should go into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com archives and listen to some of the talks I’ve done on the big creators of this system that worked with the top behaviorists and sociologists.  In other words you can create any kind of feeling by stimulating the effects of the feeling one by one, give them the effects and then the actual feeling will come upon them as though there was a real thing to be afraid of.  Or it can make you horny or whatever as they know in the movie business.  They can affect all these things so simply by simply inducing the effects one by one until they all come together and then you’ll have the actual real experience as though something was scaring the hell out of you and you should start running.

Neil:  Yeah.  Okay just to finish off I suppose.  We are coming up to the Halloween season where people are actually now paying to be scared.  So there you go.  {Laughs}

Alan:  Yes.  Halloween, yeah.

Neil:  Or you get on these rides at the fairground and terrify yourself plummeting at sixty miles an hour on a couple of rails and then throw up at the bottom and wonder what’s wrong with you.

But anyway, okay.  Thanks again Alan for your time and sorry about the delays at the start it’s one of those things.  I think next month or very shortly we are going to move on to a different system and try it out.

Alan:  Yes.

Neil:  And get away from Skype all together.

Alan:  Okay.

Neil:  Okay.  I’ll talk to you again.  I think it was the 13^th of November if I remember right.  And we’ll talk to you again.

Alan:  Okay you take care now.

Neil:  Okay.  Thanks a lot.  Cheers.

Alan:  Bye now.

Neil:  Bye.

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:37 pm

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 23, 2014. Now, I’ve mentioned many times that you have to hang onto your sanity as we go through the big agenda, a huge massive agenda planned an awful long time ago, long before you were born, most of you in fact, even your parents and your grandparents for that matter. Because cabals of men way back in the 1800s, even before for some of them in fact, manifested themselves as clubs and organizations. Some of them used empires, like the ones in Britain.  The Alfred Milner group of course, it really took over a good part of Africa.  They merged eventually with the Cecil Rhodes group as well and formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the idea was to take over the world’s resources.

These were all banking families, really big banking families that were involved in doing this, but they were awfully active.  And their sons took part in a form of massive deception, massive deception, so that they could actually have the countries they wanted to take over appear to attack, and always actually do attack, but appear to attack British settlers, for instance, so that the British Army would go in and pay, the taxpayers would pay for it all of course, and they’d get the occupying group out of other countries and take over. That’s what they did in South Africa and Rhodesia and it’s well documented. It’s part of history. It’s not conspiracy as such, the guys who were involved obviously were conspirators at the time, but it is an open conspiracy because a lot of it was published, you see. HG Wells called it that, The Open Conspiracy, in one of his writings; that was the title.

But you’ll find Carroll Quigley, the professor of Georgetown University who was way up there teaching diplomats across the world how to work on the ethnic groups, and using anthropology, the study of their history, their cultures and so on, on how to take them over for this world governmental system. Because Quigley was an elitist and that’s why he was picked by his masters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the branch in America called the Council on Foreign Relations; it’s the same organization. He talked about the techniques that would be used to take over the world basically. It was just too untidy for people who want to dominate the world. Individualism, amongst the masses especially, simply could not be allowed because it caused problems when they wouldn’t go along with governmental policies, and the governments were serving the masters of the money. So you understand, you can’t have all these different masters and submasters down below, you’ve got have one organization running the world. They came up with this idea a long time ago through the Milner group that they would take it over by deception, the whole world, by warfare basically.  They would then send in their own boys, their own families that would take over the ownership of diamond mines, gold mines, and eventually oil, etc. etc. And that’s still going on today. They call it resource wars today, from the Pentagon and other places.  And Britain has been in partnership with the US on this policy for an awful long time… an awful long time actually.

They also hoped that world wars would, and they wrote about this too, if they had world wars then countries would be brought to their knees through the loss of life and property, incredible loss of life, etc, and the cost of it all too that would be passed again onto the taxpayer. So they fomented wars to get wars going and get people on their knees until they say, please stop all this, let’s have peace at any cost. Of course the price they wanted, at the top, the masters, was to amalgamate whole countries into big trading groups with one system, one political system, all based on the British system, and then they would have three main trading blocs in the world. They called it free trade.  It’s still ongoing today of course and the Middle East has been ravaged, and then into Asia, with the wars, ongoing wars since Gulf War one basically, it hasn’t stopped.

The big boys, and I’ve read all these articles from the mainstream on the air many times if you going to the archives section at CuttingThroughTheMatrix.com I won’t have to repeat it all. But those who have been following this know that they, Tony Blair for instance, had the top leaders of Shell and BP and all the big oil companies attending him before the West invaded Iraq.  They decided then to divvy up the oil production to these big corporations, and America was totally involved as well. The taxpayers of both countries would build brand-new refineries to make them more efficient, and we’ve been doing that of course as well.

Free-trade is awfully good for corporations because you’re living in the age, as Quigley said, where THE CEOS OF CORPORATIONS WOULD BE THE NEW FEUDAL OVERLORDS OF THIS NEW FEUDAL SYSTEM. And that’s what we are in. It uses democracy to get the public to sleepwalk through it all, thinking they have rights and freedoms, as they gradually take all your rights and freedoms away from you, into a managed scientific society, or scientifically managed you might say. That’s where we are today.

Now, we’ve all been brainwashed, I mean brainwashed through education, as they constantly rewrite history for instance, to believe what we’re told to believe in our own age for our generation, and it is updated all the time. Things go down the memory hole, as George Orwell said in his book 1984, and that’s where we are today. Articles just disappear as though they had never happened and major events that you are suspicious about, because you don’t get the answers from all the questions you put forward, when the answers you’re getting make no sense at all, you can’t get details on things. So major events to get conflicts going, or to take all your rights away through anti-terrorism or whatever, or even the World Trade Center, are really written in advance. In fact, your minds are prepared in advance for it, because the movies of Hollywood etc.

Through fiction you’re programmed to expect something to happen, so when it happens you immediately follow your cues, the cues have been laid out for you to follow. And people do follow them.  So we had the haranguing of the Arab countries from the 70s right through to 2001, and immediately, before the dust cleared, Kissinger’s voice and others and Brzezinski said, it’s Bin Laden who’s behind all of this. Just like that, you know, just… wonderful isn’t it, how they…  These guys really have good crystal balls. But that’s the policy, it’s written in stone now and you really have no rights and freedoms under a form of martial law. They don’t use the term martial law, but when you have no rights and freedoms that’s what you’ve got. It’s quite simple. You don’t need the term to be used to be living under it.

In fact, through the 70s and 80s and 90s what used to be called the old Communist techniques and party lines and so on had started to be used by the so-called democratic parties to do with multiculturalism, the massive inflow of people from abroad, etc., to destroy the native populations of Europe, etc. That was also part of the plan of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, through free trade they would basically bring in as much labor as they wanted to across borders, national boundaries. They would do away with national boundaries, etc., and even do away with the nation altogether. Von Rompuy at the EU talked about that about a year ago, IT WAS THE END OF THE NATION-STATE.

So we are simply living through a big plan, a well-documented plan actually, for those who care to read up on it. And you don’t really need to know the fine nitty-gritty of the day-by-day blows. That’s a caveat to an extent, or a canard because you are misled. Your minds can get fried trying to follow all the little nuances, etc. of this massive program. You simply need to know the outlines of the basic agenda for everything and make sense to you. And there is no guessing about it because as I say, it has been well written about by those involved at the very top. I’ve mentioned the different people involved many, many times. Aldous Huxley talked about it. His brother Julian at UNESCO talked about it even more in depth. They wanted a scientifically controlled society, for our own good because the average person at the bottom had really, wouldn’t evolve anymore. Evolution is a big part of this.

The elite said back in the 1800s that they had achieved their elitism and their status, their noble status, by special selective breeding, by marrying wealthy people to wealthy people who are successful, and holding onto their money for generations, therefore they were the natural leaders of the world. Then the banking profession had exactly the same thing.  Of course you have different ethnic groups involved in all this too. They came to a deal a long time ago that everyone at the top of the tree in every country, who had achieved wealth and power, were part of the global elite, so that you have a big, big happy family at the top now. But everyone below that are just simply defective genes that would not evolve. Once in a while you would have a throwback of a strange combination where you have someone who is really intelligent and they would have to be either brought into the fold to work for the system and the agenda, or eliminated, according to Lord Bertrand Russell. He said, IF WE CAN’T BRING THEM IN WE’LL HAVE TO ELIMINATE THEM. That’s the real world in which we live.

Because they don’t want people really communicating the real truth to people in a way they can understand quite simply. It’s a dangerous thing. As I say, Mao Tse Tung in China, he said HE WASN’T AFRAID OF ANYTHING, EVEN WEAPONS AND SO ON; HE WAS AFRAID OF A BIG IDEA. And that term, the big idea, it’s what’s used by the group who rule at the moment. They often call it, IT’S A BIG IDEA. George Bush senior called it, this global agenda, a big idea. You see. So these are code words and terms and phrases which they use amongst themselves, but they will say to the public who will never quite understand what they are going on about. Of course the media participate in this too, they don’t tell you either what they’re talking about. So you’re left… Most folk just dismiss it, you see. They have been legally told but they don’t really believe it, because there’s no one to explain to them, you had better take this seriously, they really mean what they say.

Remember, everything which is declared from what appears to be the heads of state and so on in countries, whenever they say something in public it’s a legal declaration and that’s lawful, you have been told.  And you basically go along with everything, you acquiesce and give up your freedoms because you don’t question and say, no I’m not having that, not for me. You must reclaim your mind. It’s yours, after all. It’s your birthright, to have a mind of your own and you must reclaim it and have it as your own. Even if you don’t agree with the policies or even the political correctnesses rammed down your throats today, you must keep a hold of your mind.  Even if you don’t voice what you know because you know you’re going to get stoned in one way or another by the mob, who have been brainwashed, and they will turn on you in fact if you have any opinions contrary to their own brainwashing.

And many of you also look for leaders, because you’ve been trained to always look for leaders. It’s also a tribal instinct where you would elect a chief at certain times of invasion, of pending invasion, to get you through hard times, things like that. You see it in all the Hollywood movies where someone is selected, in the sci-fi or whatever it happens to be, you’re the one, the one, the one.  And it’s always going to be done by the one, you see. So we are being trained to always look for saviors who do it all for us, and they never seem to materialize. It doesn’t stop you from wishing, of course, because you’re trained that way and it is instinctive too. But remember, that simply yapping about things or complaining about things, or isn’t that terrible what they’re doing to you, isn’t going to change anything. You must literally reclaim yourself and reclaim your dignity.  And have some dignity too by the way, because again that is your birthright.  You have the right to think what you want to think, it doesn’t matter how incorrect it is politically. After all, it’s your mind and not your controllers’ mind. Don’t have a controller. Think for yourselves.

And therefore you don’t have to follow the so-called daily battles. It’s not a battle at all by the way, of people who simply expose, expose, expose, or keep your mind trained as though you are in some kind of race and if you look away you’ll lose the race or you’ll die, it’s like a horror movie.   I’ve mentioned the amygdala and so on, how it’s activated during horror movies because you identify with the person who is running away from the monster, and if you look away your life might be in danger. Subconsciously that’s how it really works. That’s why folk watch even the most terrible horror movies to the very end, because your primitive part takes over, for survival. And the same technique is used on Patriot Radio and things like that too.

But the whole point of keeping your mind is to have some peace within your mind and you’re not going to get it when you’re being terrified every day. It’s not a battle as you think of it. It’s been an ongoing agenda, believe you me, and all the ones at the top are on board with this agenda, no one at the top is not in step with the agenda. Even when you’re given fake politicians, which are all fake as far as I’m concerned, who come out and say all the right things at election time and then do the opposite once they are in. That’s the standard technique that’s been used for way too long now of course. And there’s no recall for them when they don’t fulfill any promises. After all, why should you live on promises? And why should you look for other people to make things right for you? It’s not going to happen. I mean it really isn’t going to happen.

You have to reclaim your own ability, your own mind and your own rights for yourself, because you have the right to live. And you have the right to live the way that you want to live basically. It doesn’t mean you interfere with other people or make yourself a darn nuisance, like some psychopathic mogul on the way up. You have to be decent to people and reciprocate in-kind but at the same time you don’t get stood on as your neighbor eyes your property.

Now, property is a right and a necessity. Every creature in the world has somewhere it lives.  And creatures don’t pay taxes for that. They don’t have to get engineers coming in and doing eco-tests, environmental tests to see if you can live there or not. They make their homes where they want to make their home, somewhere they must make their homes, and that is their home and nothing else is going to go into that burrow, for instance, without getting its head bitten off. That’s the way of nature, and if we are all part of nature then you have the same rights.

When crashes come and the big boys at the stroke of a pen destroy the economy or crash your currency, whatever it happens to be, which is of course what they’ve done over and over through centuries – they plunder you in a major way at least twice a century, the rest of the time they are devaluating it because the con of money, today, is simply a printing press and someone who gives them the right to print it up, and you give payment to the one who gives you the right back, with compound interest. So every dollar or pound put into circulation already has an existing debt to it so the value of it is lowered all the time. That’s as simple as it is actually.  So therefore, you expect your silly little wage increase every year, that doesn’t take into account the actual real cost of living going up, but you are still trained to expect that. So the more numbers you have in your paycheck the more you think you’re doing okay. And it’s not true at all. If you had £50 a week or $50 a week in the US back in 1900 you were doing okay, believe you me, and you could buy an awful lot for 1 dollar or 1 pound back then, not a cup of coffee like today.

So-called built-in inflation, or as they like to call it now quantitative easing, but you definitely have the right of somewhere to live. Because when they crash economies, believe you me, the first ones who suffer are those who have ridiculous, incredibly ridiculous mortgages for their little home, and their burrow, and those also who are renting as well. Because the big boys who rent can make a killing during this time by getting rid of their tenants who can’t pay the exorbitant rents they are paying and out they go on the street, and then the big boys can then rent at a higher price. Everything is a racket in the system of money and the concept of money as we’ve had it for a long time, it’s completely corrupt and a complete con as well by the way. A complete, complete… complete con.

That’s the only way anything could change in that respect is if a completely new money system was brought in, not with the same characters who’ve been running it for centuries and centuries, and not by outside people, of government.  And even then if the government really took care of its own money, like Canada used to do, people would infiltrate into politics and eventually get appointed over them, and you get the cabal there, because that’s the way that money operates. It literally attracts the psychopath into the game, and he plays for keeps and he plays to win, and he’s utterly, utterly ruthless. But as I say, if you don’t have somewhere to live that’s yours you’re completely finished when things go really, really sour. And that will never change in the system unless the system itself somehow, and again I mean magically because I really don’t believe anything is going to change the system to be honest with you.  The big boys would never allow it, never allow anything to take away their incredible prosperity from total fraud. It won’t happen.

But you need somewhere to live and as I say, a rabbit has more rights than you have.  If you put your hand down a rabbit burrow and there’s young there, that mom is going to bite your hand off, believe you me. That’s the way things are. But not with people. You’ve been trained to be passive, to obey bailiffs and rules and laws, and your fear of course, and unfortunately your training overcomes your natural rights.

Now, getting back to this whole idea of free trade.  The idea goes way back in Britain to the days of John Dee. He coined the term the Brytish Empire; that was the language back then and you could pick the spelling you wanted to, it wasn’t standardized until much, much later.  He explained this to the royalty of his day and he talked about free trade being a pillar of it. THROUGH FREE TRADE THEY COULD basically force… – because free trade would never be free by the way; it was for those who already had power and wealth, incredible power and wealth and therefore he said that – EVENTUALLY THEY COULD PUT THE SAME POLITICAL SYSTEM ACROSS THE WORLD. Very interesting, in fact, very interesting concept, because they would gradually merge with it. Another way to do it, he mentioned, and this is elaborated on by Quigley, through free trade through the British Empire of that day and through the Cecil Rhodes foundation and the Alfred Milner group, these are all banking boys and the sons of banking boys like Curtis, etc. They said too, THROUGH SUBTERFUGE, TAKE OVER COUNTRIES, DOMINATE THEM THROUGH THE MILITARY, PUT IN YOUR SYSTEM OF WHAT WOULD BE CALLED EVENTUALLY DEMOCRACY – remember, the idea of democracy is relatively new, by the way; the young Winston Churchill mocked this idea of democracy. But anyway, they all use the term democracy when they want to go and invade, because they’re going to free people you see – everything is doublespeak, very Orwellian – and THEY WOULD TAKE OVER THE RESOURCES.

They would establish the same system of bureaucracy, primarily bureaucracy by the way.  Because you see, you don’t elect bureaucrats. They are in for life. They are interested in themselves and follow the rules that will make them get up the ladder, help them up the ladder, and to make sure that their income goes up and up and up and they can have more power. Adolf Hitler said the same thing in the early days. He said that THEY DIDN’T HAVE TO BOTHER ABOUT OTHER POLITICAL PARTIES, in the early days. He said, WE NEED THE BUREAUCRATS ON OUR SIDE, THAT’S WHAT YOU NEED. Absolutely, because those in charge of governmental departments, once they are told what the agenda is they will work their whole lives towards it, and all the staff underneath them. It’s quite simple. And that’s how it is today. Every bureaucrat in the federal governments of the world are on board pretty well with this global agenda. Because it’s going to serve them awfully well, or already has by the way.  It makes sure that their jobs are very secure because now they have made themselves more important, more necessary to get this global agenda through. They work tirelessly towards it. Plus so many of them belong to the big groups, the private groups of the Council on Foreign Relations, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Cecil Rhodes foundation and so on and they have had scholarships early on and picked by these big foundations to go into the bureaucratic positions. The doors are opened and they are put in there. That’s been going on for well over a century.

Now, to take the world over and rule it in this new scientific fashion, on behalf of those who decided long ago that they were the natural Darwinian elite, then you have to have an agenda which encompasses everything in human nature and human life and existence. That’s your minds, that’s what you do and work at and so on, do all of that, how you interact with other people, how you will behave with other people, and hence your indoctrination into political correctnesses, all the changes that are put forward that come into actuality.  So you’re living through a massive time of change. It’s called the age of change, the Century of Change actually, this 21^st century. It was called that in the last century by high levels of academia working in sociology departments, etc., for the big boys who gave them all the grants and put them in there in the first place as professors.

So everything has been covered basically, including the outlooks for those who think they are resisting. There’s many caveats out there, again, and the people who you might follow, but in reality nothing is being done by them at all except they are raking in a lot of money. Because every sector has been covered here. Every sector has been covered. I’m not saying just give up. I’m saying, this is how it really is, folks. That’s the hard news. You’re waking up into a system, hopefully you’re waking up, into a system, which is completely established already.  And those around you who are not waking up, as they say, or clued in, have had perfect indoctrination which has worked with them better than it has worked on perhaps you. So that’s how the system really, really is.

Individualism is the main enemy. It must be eradicated and that’s the whole purpose of things today. Groupthink… groupthink is in from the schools onward, as you all sit in a group, and you must all vote on certain understandings of things, and agree about the understandings, the authorized understandings, to get passing marks. That carries onto your whole life now, as those people around you who are brainwashed will turn on you if you say something that doesn’t make any sense at all. Because doublethink comes in to understanding. Doublethink is a term meaning you can hold TWO COMPLETELY OPPOSING VIEWS IN YOUR HEAD ON THE SAME TOPIC AT THE SAME TIME.  Again, that’s from George Orwell’s 1984.

Now, another big part of this agenda was also the grand finale of the banking system. Because remember, the Royal Institute of International Affairs was formed from the Alfred Milner group, that had all the top bankers in the City of London and New York, etc.  Because the CFR is simply a branch of the same group for America. They couldn’t call it Royal, it wouldn’t go down well in America, and now, I don’t really know, I don’t think they care much, but back then they couldn’t use Royal so they called it the Council on Foreign Relations.  So we’re going through a massive agenda. It’s been going on for generations now and they have the public really where they want them, where they don’t complain too much about big things that are happening, they don’t know how to organize properly, if they do organize they’re infiltrated and taken over, pretty well immediately, and definitely demonized, always.  So therefore they can’t really have any… Some of them even become mainstream as they are given the go-ahead to push things in a certain direction that are harmless to those in power and control.

So eventually the entire world’s money supply was to be ruled by the same bunches that take over all the countries and amalgamate trading blocs that used to consist of many independent nations. That’s what we’re living through today.  The Far East/Pacific Rim bloc, that encompasses Australia, New Zealand, China and a lot of other places. Of course the whole of Europe amalgamated under one major political Parliament system, the EU. And the North American Union for the continent of the Americas and that encompasses other countries in the Caribbean etc. So free trade, free flow of goods, which is only for keeping people out of course unless you’re a member of the club.  It’s not for everybody.  If you try to get your little company to ask for things they will hammer you to send mail and tax you like the blazes. But for the big boys themselves it’s a way of keeping everybody else out, to eliminate competition. That’s really what it’s about. Everything is done by deception, and that’s what it means.

A World Trade Organization was set up, another private organization which was set up by this Council on Foreign Relations /Royal Institute of International Affairs, the same group. They set up the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland, that is the big power today. They set up the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, a private organization belonging to the same group again, etc. etc., and all the central bank employees at the top all belong to it too. So they’ve pretty well already sewn up all the money system, but they’ve still got more to do with it and that’s why you’ll get more crashes as they amalgamate all the cash together and start devaluating some and bringing other ones up to par, to equalize them before the total amalgamation.

But you need bank crashes in the meantime and that’s what I’m about to touch on just now. It’s to do with the incredible amount of preparation they have put into the coming bail-ins, as they call it, where they rob your savings money actually and your RSPs, that will ultimately disappear as they crash the whole system, in order to bring in total power for the supreme rise of the supreme ruler for the Bank for International Settlements, the private organization at the top. That’s where we are today. Here are some articles I will just touch on tonight, that’s really going on and affects you all. Here’s an article and it says, it’s from Bloomberg of all places. Because remember too, it’s like Albert Mackey, he wrote The Encyclopedia of Freemasonry but he said, WE NEVER TALK SO HONESTLY AND OPENLY AS WE DO WHEN WE ARE IN PUBLIC. Because the brothers understand one thing and the public, they really don’t take much notice of it, they don’t quite get it.  But Bloomberg is coming out here, and here’s how it works you see. Because the old Alfred Milner group talked about the rise of their own banking system that would rule the politicians and rule governments and everything else, everything is dependent upon what they called their money, at the top, and their right to create it and do as they please. So it says here that…

AFL-CIO Asks Banks to Explain Payouts to Government-Job Takers

bloomberg.com / Madeline McMahon / Nov 20, 2014

(Alan: Now, here’s the open revolving door policy of banks to government, government to banks, of high-level employees.)

 

The AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest labor organization, called on seven Wall Street banks to explain why the firms pay additional compensation to some employees who leave for high-ranking government positions. (A:  That’s exactly what Quigley said they would do, and they had already been doing it back in his day in fact.)

Richard Trumka, the group’s president, sent letters to banks including Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup Inc. (C), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. that asked for more information on how shareholders benefit when banks reward executives for taking government jobs, the AFL-CIO said today in a statement.

The deal is a “golden parachute” for entering the public sector, Trumka said in the letters, copies of which were posted online. The AFL-CIO said it owns stock in all the banks and would consider submitting shareholder proposals at the firms’ annual meetings if it didn’t receive responses.

“Unless the position of these companies is that this is just a backdoor way to pay off a newly minted government official to act in Wall Street’s private interests rather than the public interest, it is very difficult to see how these policies promote long-term shareholder value,” Heather Slavkin Corzo, who runs the labor group’s investment office, said in the statement.

The AFL-CIO became interested in the issue after examining regulatory filings providing compensation details, Corzo said in a phone interview. “We know that there are folks out there who have these provisions in their contracts,” she said, declining to provide names.   (A:  No, they won’t tell you the names of them because you see, they are powerful people, although you have never heard their names, high-level bureaucrats who went straight into Wall Street, and down the road they go back from Wall Street into politics or bureaucracy again).

Some bankers’ contracts allow for stock awards, including restricted shares, to vest immediately or other incentives to be paid if they accept a high-level U.S. government position. U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew was asked at his Senate confirmation hearing about such a clause in his contract with Citigroup, where he worked as investment banker before returning to government employment, according to a transcript.

Trumka also wrote to Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co. and Lazard Ltd. (LAZ). A spokesman for Morgan Stanley didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, while spokesmen for the other banks declined to comment. (A:  Because they’ll do it in unison, they’ll get in touch with each other and say, what have you said? We said nothing.  That’s what they do.) The Wall Street Journal reported on the letters yesterday.

Some Democratic members of Congress have expressed reservations about Wall Street executives filling government positions. U.S. senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Dick Durbin of Illinois and Chuck Grassley of Iowa have said they’ll oppose the Obama administration’s nomination of Lazard investment banker Antonio Weiss to be Treasury’s top domestic finance official.

Tax Inversions

Warren, in an article published yesterday on the Huffington Post website, questioned Weiss’s fitness for the post, saying he lacked the experience and background to do the job. Durbin and Warren also have concerns about Lazard’s role in several tax-inversion deals, in which companies reduce their U.S. tax bills by moving their addresses overseas, people familiar with their views have said.

Well, nothing’s going to happen here, folks, because you see, no matter what you find out about the big boys at the top and their operations and how they work, they are all powerful, they are completely all-powerful and nothing will happen about it. Apart from that, the Congressional members and senators now can legally do insider trading, because they know about all the governmental deals and they can invest in stocks and so on of companies that have got contracts with the military or ones coming up.  So they made it legal for them to do it, but it is illegal for you to do it.  So they are not going to complain about this. They can’t, actually, complain about it; they are all bought and paid for.

Now, this other article is awfully interesting and important and this is from The Economist. It says…

New rules hemming in banks

will make it easier to let them fail—with luck

economist.com /  Nov 15th 2014

(A:  Now, it used to be bail-outs where they use your tax money to bail out their big corporate pals, their feudal overlords of course as Quigley said. The new term is to use bail-ins where they simply rob your money in the bank, but they must pay their shareholders. The shareholders are different, because they made it a worldwide policy, worldwide policy, in every country, that they MUST be cushioned and taken care of BEFORE anybody else. So those who simply deposit money in the bank will have it stolen, because they are not shareholders, they’re depositors. It’s all semantics really but that’s how the legal system works.)

 

WHEN big banks totter, taxpayers usually foot the bill. Given the chaos that would follow an outright failure—bank runs, frozen payment systems and so on—bail-outs have long been the least-bad option for governments. That might end under plans unveiled on November 10th by the Financial Stability Board (FSB), a group of international regulators, that should make it easier for banks to fail without recourse to the public purse.  (A:  These organizations, by the way, are all set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the same guys that drafted up, literally drafted up, themselves, for the amalgamation of the European countries into one system. And the same guys who openly said in Canada, the Council on Foreign Relations, that they drafted up the ones that were signed into law for the amalgamation of the Americas – Canada, the States, Mexico and all the Latin American countries. This is amazing, all private organizations. But they sound very official don’t they?)

Under the proposed new rule, the biggest banks will have to hold buffers, or “total loss-absorbing capacity” (TLAC), equivalent to 16-20% of their assets (the loans and investments they make)—vastly more than in the run-up to 2007. The bigger cushion comes in two main forms. First, banks must hold more equity (the money shareholders put into the business) relative to their assets. Second, bondholders, who put up much of the money banks go on to lend, will now be expected to shoulder losses after shareholders are wiped out.  (A:  So there you go.)

The principle of “bailing in” creditors is welcome. Though in theory many of them should have been hit in 2007-09 (A:  But they always have that, they always save their own investors.), in practice imposing losses on them proved legally difficult and so seemed foolhardy to attempt in the midst of a crisis. (A:  Amazing, really, when you think about it, a bank is a private business and so those who invest in that bank should take the loss like ANY private business. But no, they pass it on to the general public, through their gophers, the politicians.) Now, bonds are counted towards TLAC only if they explicitly bear losses when things go wrong. One such instrument, known as contingent-convertible bonds, or “cocos” (A:  [Alan laughing.] I guess that’s for the nuts.), is counted as debt in good times but automatically turns into equity if capital ratios drop below a certain level.

The TLAC rule, which comes into force in 2019, will apply only to 27 “systemically important” global banks such as HSBC and Citigroup. Smaller lenders are exempted, as are bigger ones in emerging markets. But they are widely expected to face similar rules soon.  (A:  Actually, they’ve already signed agreements for 2015, for those who don’t know it. January 1, 2015 they kick in for bailing-in banks, in your own countries. I read them on the air last year and this year.)

Mark Carney (A:  …who was the guy who ran the bank for Canada, although it is not really a bank as such. It’s really a group of politicians that make deals with the private lenders, that’s the new bank. The old one was a real bank.), the governor of the Bank of England (A:  That’s where they moved him to because they just rotate them around, because he’s-their-man sort of thing.) who also chairs the FSB (A:  [Alan chuckles.] The Financial Stability Board, eh.  It’s amazing who they put in.), has made clear TLAC is not designed to prevent individual banks going out of business. The aim is to limit the potential reverberations, making a bank failure more akin to that of an airline or a carmaker, say: painful, complicated, but ultimately not a threat to the wider economy.  (A:  Really?  Hey, the economy… Never mind you, the public… [Alan chuckles.])

That in turn should remove the implicit subsidy big banks have unfairly enjoyed. Because creditors have long assumed the banks were “too big to fail”, they also assumed they would be repaid even if things turned sour. The upshot was that big banks borrowed at rates that were in effect subsidised by taxpayers. (A:  …for those who didn’t know that.  We pay for everything. All big corporations get corporate welfare from us, we pay it all.)    Removing that subsidy will dent bank profits—and rightly so.

The TLAC proposals push in the same direction as four previous initiatives designed to make banks sturdier (see table). Bankers complain of a Rubik’s cube of rules: improve one ratio and you may find that another one deteriorates. They also fret that all this new rule-making is scaring away the investors whose money is needed to raise capital to the required level.

In theory, TLAC should be the last big global rule on capital. But regulators are still busy devising a system to ensure banks can be “resolved”, or wound down, should they go bust. (A:  That’s what they’re saying here. So it’s quite interesting going through the spiels we are given about what they’re doing to make sure that it’s harder for them to fail basically, which it’s not at all. It’s making it easier for them to steal all your money. That’s really what this whole lot is about, folks, and to devalue your money. You understand, when they bring in new currencies and things they always devalue your money by at least half, meaning the purchasing power of that pound or dollar or whatever it happens to be.) 

Whether “too big to fail” is indeed over will only become clear during the next crisis.  (A:  …so they know it’s coming, folks, that’s what this is all about. It’s the agenda, you see, to make sure that one group, the same group, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, rules the entire money system through their Bank for International Settlements, of the entire planet. That’s what it’s about.)  Imposing losses on investors such as pension funds or small-time punters is politically tricky. A recent bank failure in Portugal, Espírito Santo, resulted in a state-backed rescue which spared many bondholders. Hopefully next time will be different.  (A:  That’s the bondholders, not the depositors.)

And ha, this other article is awfully good and it’s from Reuters. It says…

European banks face up to 1trn capital hole

reuters.com / Helene Durand / Oct 24, 2014

LONDON, Oct 24 (IFR) - European banks could be forced to sell billions of euros of subordinated debt or completely reshape their corporate structures if global regulators go ahead with new rules seeking to stop banks being "too big to fail".

According to the most pessimistic estimates, the European banking sector as a whole could need to raise as much as 1 trillion of subordinated debt to meet new standards for Total Loss Absorption Capacity - or TLAC - that the Financial Stability Board is set to agree in November.  (A:  That’s happening right now, folks, for those who are missing out what’s really going on.)

The FSB is the international body (A:  …because it belongs to the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations group.)  that brings together the work of national financial authorities and wants banks to hold an additional safety buffer equivalent to 16% to 20% of their risk-weighted assets.

This potential supply comes on top of the up to 600bn European banks need to raise to meet the already demanding minimum capital requirements set by the Basel Committee and competing supply from banks in other regions that will have to meet the same requirements.

"If you were to add the numbers today for the Global Systemically Important Banks (GSIBs) (A:  This is what they’re calling them.) In Europe, they are 500bn short (A:  I guess that’s euros.) of TLAC in the right form or in the right place," said Simon McGeary, head of the new products group at Citigroup.

"The problem for many European banks is that they have senior but it tends to be at the operating company."

Analysts at BNP Paribas said in a recently published note that they expect the additional requirements to be met with a mix of Tier 2 debt, holdco senior debt and a reduction of risk-weighted assets. They estimate that for the European sector as a whole - that is, for the GSIBs and smaller institutions - TLAC could mean 1trn (A:  I guess that’s euros again.) of subordinated issuance.

So, when money becomes complicated, I mean, adding up things and subtracting them, it’s not difficult to do. When they make it supposedly into a science of economics, it means you’re conned, folks. When anything simple is made into some kind of science, with all fancy terms and names and so on, and lots of wonderful theories, which are guesses, and they are taught as fact, then there’s a con going on, and money has always been a con. Because you see, those at the very top make money off of you.  All labor, really, produces what they call money. It’s all labor. But those who deal with the money make more money than the ones who labor and actually create things, at the bottom. That’s the facts. Very simple isn’t it?

This article here, from the Financial Stability Board, the private organization that belongs to the same bunch. It’s only one group running the world, in the front positions that is.  It says…

FSB reports to G20 Brisbane Summit on Progress in Financial Regulatory Reforms (A:  …for Australia.)

financialstabilityboard.org / 14 November 2014

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published today the following documents delivered to G20 Leaders for the Brisbane Summit:

• a letter from the FSB Chair to the G20 Leaders, reporting on progress in financial reforms and highlighting the major issues for the attention of Leaders, with an attached dashboard summarising the status of implementation by FSB member jurisdictions on priority reform areas;

• a report to the G20 on the FSB’s review of the structure of its representation;

• a progress report setting out the FSB’s approach to transforming shadow banking into resilient market-based financing to date, and a roadmap for further work in 2015 that has been presented to the G20 for endorsement; and

• a comprehensive overview report on progress in the implementation of the financial reforms in order to strengthen financial stability.

(A:  These links I’m going to put up by the way for those who really care about what’s happening. Because this is the cons as they all maneuver together under their big pyramidal system to bring the money under total control of those who basically have ruled it by separate family members across the world for a long, long time now into one official system, you see.)

Financial Stability Board

financialstabilityboard.org

13 November 2014 – FSB publishes Standards and Processes for Global Securities Financing Data Collection and Aggregation.

The FSB is seeking comments on the proposed standards and processes for global data collection and aggregation on securities financing transactions.

(A:  So all data collection of all finances across the whole planet, global securities financing data collection is happening right now. They amalgamate all information together using all the governmental systems and everything else, and small business systems, all going into one system.)

12 November 2014 – FSB publishes update on the effects of reforms on emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs)

The FSB published a report which provides an update on the monitoring of the effects of financial regulatory reforms on EMDEs, following up on its previous reports on the subject.

(A:  So what they’re doing in other words is, it’s all to do with the developing economies. We pay for the developing economies, what we do is we give them huge massive grants from the overseas development corporations, that are private organizations tacked into your government from the United Nations, which again, was set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the same bunch again, the CFR.  So they’ve got it all sewn up basically. But for emerging nations, as they call them, Third World countries, we pay for, again, more factories to get moved into them and we build brand-new ones for the big international corporations that already run all factories across the world. It’s quite interesting really. Boring too but it’s interesting to know what’s going on.)

 

12 November 2014 – FSB reports to G20 on Progress in Reforming Resolution Regimes and Resolution Planning

The FSB published today its report to the G20 on progress in reform of resolution regimes and resolution planning for G-SIFIs (A:  They should turn out a whole dictionary for this stuff.) and reports the initial results from the launch of the resolvability assessment process, RAP.  (A:  …which is called rap [Alan laughing.] Resolvability assessment process, you get the rap, eh, you get a bad rap. But all rap is pretty bad anyway.)

11 November 2014 – FSB completes Peer Review of the Netherlands

The FSB published today the findings and conclusions of the peer review of the Netherlands.  (A:  So Holland is into it as well, and so on.)

10 November 2014 – FSB consults on proposal for a common international standard on Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) for global systemic banks

7 November 2014 – Reappointment of Chairman of the Financial Stability Board

(A:  Mark Carney is the boss of that now; he was the chosen one a long time ago by his bosses, which we are not going to name.)

So I’ll put this up tonight for those who want to follow it, and I’m sure many will be copying it tomorrow and putting it out all across the net, or getting their lackey employees to do it for them. But anyway, that’s the money system. Because that’s the big one to be used at the end, according to Quigley, to have total power over the whole globe and every person in the world basically.

And this article too, is from The Telegraph.

Goldman Sachs: Supermarket groups must close one in five stores

telegraph.co.uk / Graham Ruddick / Nov 2014

(A:  It’s amazing, Goldman Sachs is into everything. They were the guys who also were employed and paid by governments who wanted to join the EU and the European group. Greece employed them for it and Goldman Sachs overlooked certain things, deliberately, and got Greece into it, and set them up to fail in the first place. But they got paid anyway. And the Goldman Sachs group, believe you me, is the chosen front of the big international banking groups and families because they also own, you’d be surprised that they actually own the military-industrial complex in the US and Britain and elsewhere, through their various groups and companies which they own. And they actually own them. But here they are doing studies for stores now, the big supermarket chains.)

Store closures are 'only viable solution' for Tesco, Sainsbury's and Morrisons, say analysts

Britain’s biggest supermarket groups must close one in five shops in order to turn around their performance, analysts at Goldman Sachs have warned.

In a damning report on the grocery industry, the Goldman analysts (A:  I almost said anarchists there…) said closing stores is the “only viable solution” if the major food retailers are to grow profits again.  (A:  Well the reason they are not growing profits is because there already are chains owned by the big boys and they are gouging the public beyond belief today. In the last couple of years in fact the prices have just soared, again, with quantitative easing thanks to the global agenda, meaning inflation and devaluation of your currency.  The purchasing power of your currency is down so you need two bucks for the same thing that cost one buck; basically that’s the simple way of putting it.)

The comments came after Waitrose boss Mark Price told The Telegraph that the “Big Four” supermarkets could be forced to start closing shops as the industry faces its biggest transformation since the 1950s. (A:  Now, they should still have the mom and pop ones and the family-owned businesses and all the green grocers and so on.  If they had all of that the competition would keep prices low, you’d get a better quality and so on, instead of this gunk they call food today, which is mainly chemicals, prepackaged and so on and prepared. And the cons they do with vegetables, which are incredibly so overpriced, not by the farmer but by all the middlemen of course, that belong to these big organizations, the purchasers. The cons to keep them looking green in the store, they spray them with chemicals early in the morning before the public get in.  It’s just astonishing, folks, what you’re eating, and it has all been approved by your governments.)

Shares in Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Morrisons, the listed supermarket groups, have already fallen by 50 percent over the last year as their sales have slumped. (A:  Well, there you go.)

Now, the US, it’s interesting again. Jack Lew, the guy who, you know, from Wall Street to government and back and forth…

Jack Lew named Treasury secretary by US Senate

theguardian.com / Associated Press / 27 February 2013

Budget expert Jack Lew is to be the next Treasury secretary after the Senate voted 71-26 in favour of his nomination.

The US Senate has confirmed Jack Lew as Treasury secretary, affirming Barack Obama's choice of a budget expert at a time when Congress and the White House are at odds over sharp government spending cuts.  (A:  …except for people like Obama’s wife and that, who’s all over the planet on her special planes and stuff, buying stuff.)

The Senate voted 71-26 to support the nomination.

(A:  You know, Alexander Hamilton gets a bad rap in the US history because he had a different view of things than Jefferson and others. He actually applauded, unfortunately he applauded the great conquerors of the past, who made the changes you see, you know, the man, the man who did it and so on. But he did make some interesting comments too when the US was deciding, did they want a king, or whatever they wanted, or what kind of system they were going to bring in. He said, DO YOU REALLY WANT PEOPLE TO HAVE VOTES AND SO ON AND BIG GOVERNMENT? He said, IF YOU HAVE KINGS AND QUEENS THEN YOU MIGHT HAVE A DECENT ONE EVERY THREE FAMILIES OR SO, THREE GENERATIONS, BUT WITH GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AND THEIR FAMILIES, NOW YOU’VE GOT THOUSANDS OF THEM WHO WANT TO LIVE LIKE ROYALTY OFF OF THE PUBLIC. Well, he made an awfully good comment on that and I thought it was awfully good, and it’s awfully true today, isn’t it? Because they want to live like kings and queens, all of them, but the money they are raking in, I mean, they pretty well are. They’ve got all these cushions there so they don’t hit the street, believe you me. They got jobs for life and they are doing awfully well, off of you. As I say, those who handle and manage you and your cash live way better than you that actually make things at the bottom.)

Lew takes over just before automatic spending cuts are set to take effect. He is likely to take part in any negotiations to reverse the cuts and in key budget talks next month to continue funding the government.  (A:  [Alan laughing.] Why is any government borrowing money to start with, folks?  eh?  You think about it, think about it. Yeah.  And through the free trade deals, as they stop import taxes for incoming products from overseas and things like that, that difference has to be made up by you, the personal domestic tax payer, because they ain’t going to take those losses, you see. That’s all negotiated into these deals, WE’LL JUST PASS IT ON TO THE TAXPAYER WHAT WE ARE LOSING FROM IMPORT DUTIES.)

Lew began his government service in the 1980s as an aide to house speaker Tip O'Neill. He has also served two stints as White House budget director.  (A:  So there you go. Do you think Obama picked him? Of course he didn’t.)

Is Obama's 'Beast' too fast for Brisbane? President's people…

(A:  I don’t know if you realize that just like kings and queens, you see, and now you got thousands of them to support and make them live well.  But the president’s people, these are the groups who go around before kings and queens and so on to make sure that the route they take is all scenic and nice.  You know, during World War II Adolf Hitler’s group, when he lived in the bunker, for any little trips he took, for any of the staff who were in the bunker with him if they took trips outside, they would pick streets that were not bombed and so on so they’d look nice and neat and tidy, etc. But it’s not just… Where do you think Hitler got the idea from? The kings and queens down through history have always done the same thing.  I can remember when there was a scandal a long time ago in Scotland, I read about it many years later.  It was at the new University they set up in Stirling and the Queen was to open it I believe.  Oh, they hired people to do all the gardens and everything and so on, and many thousands and thousands and thousands of pounds were paid, by the taxpayer as always, to put all the selected plants and herbs and things from all over the world in this garden. And the Queen’s people who go around in advance of all the route, said, the Queen doesn’t like this color and that color and so on. So they had to uproot and throw away all of these imported heathers and everything from across the world. So you talk about the decadence… See, the richer folk at the top, especially those who think they are ruling, the decadence that they are into is just astronomical, and to them it’s a little whim, it’s no major thing, because they are not paying for any of it.  And then they had to paint, for the Queen coming to Stirling, they had to paint the whole railway station and all railroad stations that her special coach went through on the way to Stirling, and even cover up the ladies and gentleman’s toilet signs. It was unseemly… It may offend her little eyeballs, you know, things like that. Well, it’s no different from the president’s people, this article is about that, who went to Australia.)

 

Is Obama's 'Beast' too fast for Brisbane? President's people 'requested demolition of city ROUNDABOUT' (A:  …that’s the roads...) so his beefed-up Cadillac doesn't have to slow down at G20

dailymail.co.uk / Freya Noble / 13 November 2014

 

(A:  …we’ll just pass it on to the taxpayer, eh…)

Ahead of the G20 summit this weekend in Australia, Barack Obama's delegation made a request to have a major roundabout in Brisbane demolished.  (A:  …just like that.  To hell with the public that are being inconvenienced and all the rest of it, eh, and have to build it back up afterwards.)

The reason: So his enormous presidential car 'The Beast' will not have to slow down outside the University of Queensland, where the US President is due to give a speech on Saturday.  (A:  Of course his speeches are written by somebody else. These guys are just front men, folks. They’re awfully well rewarded though, they will put anything through that they are told to put through.)

However Queensland authorities apparently rejected the request to demolish and reconstruct the roundabout outside the university's St Lucia campus, The Australian reported.  (A:  So I’ll put this up tonight as well.) 

And then this article too…

Russell Napier Declares November 16, 2014 The Day Money Dies

zerohedge.com / 11/12/2014

It is with regret and sadness we announce the death of money on November 16th 2014 in Brisbane, Australia.  (A:  It opens with, from the actual cabaret called Money, this song money, money makes the world go around…)

‘A mark, a yen, a buck, or a pound

A buck or a pound

A buck or a pound

Is all that makes the world go 'round;

That clinking, clanking sound

Can make the world go 'round.’

      “Money” from Cabaret by Kander & Ebb

In the musical Cabaret, Sally Bowles and the Emcee sing about money from the perspective of those witnessing its collapse in value in real terms in the great German hyperinflation of 1923.

Less than a decade later, and a continent away, a young lawyer from Youngstown, Ohio noted on July 25th 1932 how money’s value could also fall in nominal terms:  (A:  Oh, he’s just noticed, eh.)

"A considerable traffic has grown up in Youngstown in purchase and sale at a discount of Pass-Books on the Dollar Bank, City Trust and Home Savings Banks. Prices vary from 60% to 70% cash. All of these banks are now open but are not paying out funds."  (A:  So in other words, cash in the hand is worth more than money deposited in the bank. It’s the same old story, you see.)

      The Great Depression - A Diary: Benjamin Roth (first published 2009)

In Youngstown the bank deposit, an asset previously referred to as "money" (A:  …and that’s what they used to call it, you’ve got money in the bank…), had fallen (A:  So what you had, money in the bank, had fallen…) by up to 40% relative to the value of cash (A:  …in the hand.). The G20 announcement in Brisbane on November 16th will formalize a "bail in" for large-scale depositors raising the spectre that their deposits are, as many were in 1932, worth less than banknotes. It will be very clear that the value of bank deposits can fall in nominal terms. (A:  And it goes on to talk about it too.)

Money has been a racket since… its invention. And all it is, is an idea, remember.  A price is an idea, used to come up with stuff that was hard to get a hold of. So the big boys who wanted to run the early money system in ancient times of course made it silver, and later gold as well, but silver was the main one because most folk would not get a hold of it, so they made sure that they ran the mines and they could manage the release of it.

Another article too…

Small step for G20, a leap for TBTF banks

afr.com / Mark Bayley  / 17 Nov 2014

(A:  Again, to do with Mark Carney…)

Mark Carney, BoE governor and chairman of the FSB, presented the findings of the FSB’s earlier release on ‘Adequacy of loss-absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution’.

This is the big, big one, folks.  And we saw what happened to Ireland, for instance. They wanted them on the IMF, because when the IMF comes in they run your policies in the country. They cut your welfare, they cut your healthcare, everything, to keep the profits and everything up.  But it’s also because then they can rule you. So, so much for your democracy when a foreign group comes in and rules you.  Literally rule you, that’s what they do.

And this article too, it’s also from Zero Hedge. It says that…

Wall Street Stunned As Iceland

Dares To Jail Banker Involved In 2008 Crash

zerohedge.com / Tyler Durden / 11/20/2014

Wall Street bankers are staring agog at headlines coming from Europe where, in Iceland, the former chief executive of one of the largest banks in the country which was involved in crashing the economy in 2008 has been sentenced to jail time. (A:  Yea!!!)  As Valuewalk reports, in receiving a one year prison sentence (A:  That’s awfully cheap, one year eh…), Sigurjon Arnason officially became the first bank executive to be convicted of manipulating the bank’s stock price and deceiving investors (A:  Well, they all do that. I mean, they’ve always done that.), creditors and the authorities between Sept. 29 and Oct. 3, 2008, as the bank’s fortunes unwound, crashing the economy with it. It appears he was as shocked by the verdict as Wall Street-ers are, "this sentence is a big surprise to me as I did nothing wrong." (A:  A good psychopath will always tell you that.)  It was likely all for the people's own good...  (A:  [Alan laughing.])

Some thought it would never happen. (A:  …and he goes on to it in a more detailed story here.)

What, me guilty? was the bank executive’s response upon learning of his fate. “This sentence is a big surprise to me as I did nothing wrong,” (A:  Well that’s what they all say, you see.) Arnason was quoted as saying in a Reuters article after he learned of his punishment.

Other Iceland bank executives also convicted

The Reykjavik District Court had lopped off nine months of Arnason’s sentence, saying they were suspended.  Other bank executives involved in the situation were convicted: Ivar Gudjonsson, the former director of proprietary trading at the bank, along with Julius Heidarsson, a former broker at the bank. They each received nine-month sentences and six of those nine months were immediately suspended by the court.

All pleaded innocent to the charges, as the fallout from the 2008 crisis continues to this day in the north Atlantic island and around the world.  As a sign of thawing in the crisis, Reuters reported that earlier in the week Landsbanki, the successor to the failed Landsbankinn, agreed to extend a deadline to restructure bonds to the end of the year. If a bond restructuring agreement is reached, it could help the government lift capital controls which were imposed due to the crisis.

So it’s quite funny, as I say, the cons that go on, forever, and in perpetuity… And when they pretend to fix things, it’s not; it’s so that they can plunder you more down the road, folks. That’s how it really works.  Because remember, it isn’t just cash they are after; they don’t need cash at the top. It’s total financial control, which runs every part of your life. It’s all finances, finances, finances. The power of the purse has more power than armies. In fact, when the power of the purse says to the armies, you can’t get any more money for weapons and so on, they simply collapse, folks.  The power of the purse is to kick in now, according to Quigley, and here we are going through it all, and it’s all been readied for us too under the guise of protecting you from further crisis, etc, etc, etc.  Isn’t it amazing?  But is it really?

You see, those who want power, the psychopathic types, and believe you me you can get a lot of inbred psychopaths in these wealthy families. They literally, they are not stupid people. Don’t think that for a minute that they are stupid. But they also employ awfully good intelligent people, well-trained to deceive you beneath them, who also have kind of psychopathic traits.  They’ve always been in the business of plundering economies, monopolizing markets and trade and everything else for themselves, cutting off materials for the companies that are not part of their takeover groups and then the companies go belly up because they can’t get the parts for it or the material or whatever. This is the standard operating system. You’ll hear folk who are even in certain other industries, including information, talking about, WELL THE BIG FISH EAT THE SMALL FISH, because they are in the business to wipe out everybody else. That’s unfortunately the way the system works and you’ll always have these kind of characters. And when you have amalgamations of these characters working together, how can they really fail?  You understand, how can they fail… when they are all working together for the same ends.  And they have covered every part of society, civilization as we call it, and your way of life and everything else is all encompassing the big war on the public. Because you see, you can’t be trusted, they say, and you cause problems because you won’t go along with big agendas, and you won’t keep forking up your income so they can take the money off you for their big international corporations, to supposedly keep the peace, etc. etc. etc.

Tyranny never comes out and says, yeah we’re tyrants. They did in ancient Rome because tyrant wasn’t a bad name at that time, it was something that was necessary every so often when corruption hit a particular zenith. But today a tyrant has a different meaning.  Tyrants will always come in and say, it’s for the good of all, etc. etc. etc. And they use, again, linguists, neuroscientists, psychologists, behaviorists, all of these people to educate you, meaning indoctrinate you and brainwash you into accepting everything, and even preparing you for it all too, including all of your politically correct updates through their big branch too of fiction, the fiction creators who also call themselves the cultural leaders in Hollywood, etc. IT ALL WORKS TOGETHER, as Plato said, THE MUSIC INDUSTRY, DRAMAS, which were plays back then in Plato’s day, today it’s movies and so on.  You are persuaded far more easily through emotion in what you watch than actual reality itself. It’s awfully well done.

Well, I hope you’re all surviving, folks.  I’m sure you’re all noticing the weather, because it’s time that you noticed the weather, you see. The big boys want to make sure that everybody knows the weather is kind of weird, as you have deep freezes in this part of Ontario for weeks now and then you have the sudden thaw, which used to come in January.  It was normal then, called the January thaw, but now they are giving you it a bit early to make sure you notice it.  After dumping lots of snow they want flooding in certain areas until folk will say, hey something is wrong, and then they will demand from the government through its, you know, selected spokespeople, government do something, do something.  And they will say, yeah well you’re causing all this weird weather, and you’re going to pay amazing carbon taxes and energy taxes and so on.  Because all of your money is to be taken away from you in this age of austerity, meaning plunder, and bring you down to poverty. And that’s just really the way it is, folks, you know.

I don’t bring you bad news, I just tell you it the way it is. That’s all. It’s up to you how you handle news. And it’s up to you what you want to do for yourself. And the first thing, as I say, is reclaim your mind. If you don’t have your mind then you’ve got nothing, you’ve got literally nothing. If you’re full of someone else’s ideas or they are telling you what to do about it, you are being fooled again and someone is fooling you generally for a massive profit. Think for yourselves. That’s an incredible goal, you know, thinking for yourself. And when you do think for yourself you are much happier. Because nothing surprises you, you know what’s going along, you know all the cons that are getting played, and your mind is prepared for things down the road. You know. That’s really how it is.  There’s so much to this, that’s many, many talks in itself.

But, I hope you’re getting something out of this and not panicking like crazy. Because I’m not in the business of terrifying the life out of you and then telling you what to do, so that I would get awfully rich. By the way, mentioning money, for those who enjoy what you’re hearing, and for those, I wish they would, who have grabbed the material and ran with it and published stuff and so on from it all, it would be nice to get an occasional donation, just to help me tick over. Because I just tick over.  I could go the total opposite way and be big business but I’m not going to do that because that’s not the goal of it.

I think if you’re involved in big business you get greedier and greedier and greedier, and you’ll use all kinds of dirty tricks to panic the public and sell things to them and stuff like that and that’s not what I’m really out to do.  But apart from that too, you get approached by the big boys, because whenever they sniff big money getting made too they want a cut of it, and then they can help you along and get it up even higher, as long as you give your cuts off to them. The world is totally corrupt.

And I think money is the key to promoting all kinds of corruption, unfortunately. Because everyone is terrified of the usual things, poverty, homelessness, disease, friendlessness, no friends, and things like that. Because these are basic requirements, food, shelter, clothing, all these things, and when you’re poor you know what it’s like, you don’t want to be down there, believe you me. So therefore you’re terrified of the basic things, and the big boys know it too, that’s why they’re always telling you to beware of the basic things, you might lose them all, you might lose them, and terrify you, and that’s so as you will work hard and stay in any rotten jobs, etc, as they fleece you with more taxes and everything else and devalue the currency. So you’re not going to win by even obeying them; it can’t happen. It won’t happen.  It’s not meant to happen. They’ve factored everything in.

But you can reclaim your mind and that’s a pleasure in itself. It doesn’t mean you’re going to be awfully full of friends across the world but you will have peace of mind within yourself. And once in a while you’ll meet someone who’s of an ilk, a similar ilk.  Plato said it himself, IF YOU MEET FOUR OR FIVE PEOPLE IN YOUR LIFETIME AND INFLUENCE THEM YOU’VE DONE AN INCREDIBLY GOOD JOB. And if you’ve got four or five friends throughout your life, that means you don’t have them all at the same time, generally, you’ve done awfully well too.

Today everyone’s been fooled by, you know, their friends on Facebook, and ‘friends’, all that nonsense. It’s all nonsense. It’s not real. It’s not real at all. Because in this system of corruption, when you are wiped out financially, you’re on your own. You’re on your own, folks. There are some groups that handle it better, because they saw this in the Middle Ages and so on, the Mennonites that came out of them and different ones like that.  They realized the cons that went on with cash and money and lobbyists getting Kings to put laws through so you have to buy all your tools for agriculture from one massive company, things like that. That happened, you know, and that’s why a lot of these groups formed.  They decided to make all of their own stuff themselves, be totally self-sufficient, and down through the ages they would always be able to survive and be self-sufficient.  There’s not enough of those particular types of groups. There’s really not.  Everybody else, though, who thinks they are free, and freer than the Mennonites, are actually over a barrel because everything they need comes to them, they have to buy it, through this thing called money, that’s never the same value one day to the next.  What a joke is that.

But as I say, you can help me out, folks, because I’ve got bills here myself and as long as I get my bills paid, I generally say I’m doing pretty good when I get them paid. And you can help me tick along, hopefully, because I’ve got all these sites to pay for. I’ve got a vehicle, as you well know what has happened with the transmission.  I’ve also got pump problems with the well, etc, all these different problems coming down. Plus I’ve got bills to pay like you all do and I don’t have probably as many types of bills because I don’t have cell phones and all this kind of thing and I’m not buying apps and all that kind of stuff either. I’m down to bare essentials almost, and that’s a good way to be as well by the way.

So I hope you’re all doing well and surviving and I hope that you will think for yourselves. Don’t just parrot me or someone else. Think for yourself. I can show you ways to do things but it’s up to you to think for yourself. Reclaim yourself, it’s your birthright.

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your gods go with you.

Topics of show covered in following links:

AFL-CIO Asks Banks to Explain Payouts to Government-Job Takers

New rules hemming in banks will make it easier to let them fail--with luck

European banks face up to 1 trillion capital hole

FSB reports to G20 Brisbane Summit on Progress in Financial Regulatory Reforms

Financial Stability Board

Progress and Next Steps Towards Ending "Too-Big-To-Fail" (TBTF)
Report of the Financial Stability Board to the G-20

Goldman Sachs: Supermarket groups must close one in five stores

Jack Lew named Treasury secretary by US Senate

Jack Lew's Grotesque Citi Employment Deal and the Institutionalization of Corruption

Obama's people 'request removal of ROUNDABOUT' to make way for The Beast

Russell Napier Declares November 16, 2014 The Day Money Dies

Small step for G20, a leap for TBTF banks

Wall Street Stunned As Iceland Dares To Jail Banker Involved In 2008 Crash

Quote from Hamish on March 12, 2021, 7:42 pm

 

 

Dec. 18, 2014 (#1478)
ALAN WATT
"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"
(GUEST ON REALITY BYTES RADIO WITH NEIL FOSTER)

realitybytesradio.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neil:  Welcome to Reality Bytes Radio on the 18^th of December, 2014.  It’s soon to be Christmas, this time next week, and people will be spending lots of money they don’t have again and paying for it for the rest of the year no doubt.  We’ve got Alan Watt on the line our regular monthly guest and this week we are going to talk about an article in "Cosmopolitan" magazine written by Lord Birkenhead in 1929.  It’s interesting that this article appeared in a women’s magazine when he’s talking about test tube babies and artificial wombs and things like that.  I don’t know how it went down with women of 1929 but it’s interesting on the front cover there is a picture of a lady reading a book and the title of the book is called "This Madness".  Welcome to the show again Alan.

Alan:  Yes, it’s a pleasure to be on.

Neil:  I suppose we’d better start off with exactly who Lord Birkenhead was, what his background was and who his family was.  Can you enlighten us on that?

Alan:  His name I think was Smith actually.  It’s actually Smith but they were well connected and of course he eventually was made Lord and he became really the crown prosecutor for Britain for the establishment you might say against big cases, etcetera.  So he was a big, big player.  He also became a member of parliament and then the House of Lords as well.  And he actually was involved in an awful lot of things that were happening at that particular era that had to do with not just the sciences and promoting different sciences and the early Royal Society but he was also involved in setting up the separation of part of Ireland for the independent free state of Southern Ireland and so on.  So he worked with Collins, Michael Collins on that and because of that at least there was a partial independence there.

So he was involved in a lot of big world affairs on behalf of say the crown you might say or the establishment of Britain of his day.  He knew the top scientists of his day.  He also knew the different agencies or societies that were helping run Britain or actually ran Britain anyway on behalf of the establishment.  He knew the Rhodes Group for instance.  He knew the Milner Group.  And he was well aware of all the plans that they had for bringing in a form of world government based initially on the British system.  It had to do with free trade plus the adoption of the British system of supposedly parliamentary systems, massive bureaucracies and eventually they’d amalgamate all this into a kind of planetary system.  So he was well aware of the big agendas back in his day.

But back then too you have got to remember too that he was born in the late, in the 1800’s, and in the 1800’s were the advances of science during that time.  We can’t imagine today really how, it was like a blitz of science all at once from the steam engine that could take you across continents, etcetera, that were getting, engines were getting put into ships for the first time, all of this kind of thing.  Mass production like never before on a massive scale and they thought this would never end.  They could see with this optimism that science would push on, and push on, and push on.  But they also had, apart from this idea of a global type system, they never thought about equality for the people really, they wanted an obedient population, well trained.  Training was a big, big part of it too.  And early psychologists were involved and tried to find ways of creating the perfect culture.  Basically having obedient, hardworking peoples, etcetera, etcetera.  And when he wrote that in Cosmopolitan, and if you go through Harper Magazines and so on you’ll find a lot more articles very similar to this from other big players around the same period.  But they wanted this division of labor that even Karl Marx talked about and so on and how to, they discussed in their big meetings how they could breed people for the particular jobs that they would have to do and therefore for mundane repetitive jobs you wouldn’t want someone who would get driven crazy because their intellect wasn’t being used.  You’d literally breed them for the purpose.  And in 1929 remember that was just about three to four years before Aldous Huxley brought out his book, "Brave New World".  So he was in touch with all of these people who were all pushing this futuristic society including H.G. Wells.

So these weren’t just the little closet type meetings they had or after dinner meetings, these were big club establishment meetings they had with all the top players being brought together to run society in the way that they thought it should be run, not just talk about it, but how to implement it and how to use money to finance the different sciences that would be necessary, including genetics in fact, to make all of this happen.  Plus the psychologists, the early behaviorists, all of these people which we have today of course.

Neil:  Yeah, we’ll start off with the introduction to this.

It says:

"This is a startling, prophetic look into the future.  Its author is not a dreamer or a harebrained fanatic.  Lord Birkenhead is one of the foremost statesmen in England today.  Save this issue of Cosmopolitan.  You won’t be alive in 2029, but your children’s children will be, and it will be interesting for them to check the accuracy of the predictions here made by Lord Birkenhead."

Neil:  And the first one right off the bat is...

• "Babies will be produced by chemists in laboratories."

Neil:  Well we are well down the road to that.

Then it says:

• "The entire institution of marriage will be changed."

Neil:  Well that’s been done.

• "We will all live to be 150."

Neil:  Now I don’t know where we are with that one.

But:

• "No one will need to work more than two hours a day."

Alan:  Well the thing is too what they did, you’ll also find that they had already worked out the problems if they allowed people to live to that age, and be pretty virile and so on, they’d be overpopulated in no time at all.  And so at the same time they were discussing all of this back in the late 1920’s.  They were talking about ways of contraception, etcetera, and finding ways of contraception.  Now but the thing is too before they’d even discovered the gene, they talked about genes quite openly amongst themselves and in their own writings.  And it was another book from another person he knew, that Birkenhead knew, and that was Rutherford.  Rutherford was a top mathematician of his day with the Royal Society.  And in his own memoirs you’ll find that Rutherford talks about, for the last few years before he died, he wrote his book.  But he said I’ve been working on genetics.  This is before they could actually see in the genes and so on, on the chromosomes, etcetera.

And yet which means that really, yeah they had already discovered all this stuff a long time ago because you wouldn’t need a mathematician unless you had actually discovered where they are and so on and could use a mathematician in the process.  It would be pointless otherwise.  So these guys already knew that they could alter life itself way back then.  And there were high secret establishments obviously working on these projects.

Neil:  Yeah well I was going to come on to that later on, the beneficial aspects of the technology which obviously we are not going to get.  We will only get the technology that is going to be used to put the change on us basically.   And but again if there was good technology this prediction would probably come true that no one would need to work more than two hours a day and they would be allowed to get on and do the stuff that they really wanted to do.  But again we are not going to get the technology to allow that to happen.

But the next one is:

• "Agriculture will be abolished – except as a hobby – and all foodstuffs will be produced synthetically." 

Neil:  Well we are nearly there already with that one as well.

And:

• "Man will be able to alter the geography or climate of the world."

Neil:  Now they must have been trying this out back then.  They must have had all of this stuff back then because you couldn’t have possibly predicted this kind of thing without trying it.

Alan:  Well you can go back further, this is, the odd part of it too is that coincidence or not but the fact is and if you read "The New Atlantis" by Francis Bacon you’ll find that in that book he talks about a machine underground which could give off the light of the sun and control the weather.  I mean this has always been a fascination with these guys all down through the centuries is total control of the environment and everything in the environment including us.  And so you find that yeah he revived that same idea simply because of the scientific elite he was mixing with, Birkenhead.  And sure they always, they were putting so much of our tax money, this is the beauty of it too, they can use as much tax money as they want for all their quiet, secretive research, and actually start using it and so on.  So I think it’s been that way for an awful, awful long time.  If it can be done, and he said the same thing, it will be done.  If it can be done, it will be done.  No matter what it is you couldn’t stop science, he said, therefore they thought about the ways they could use these things for their own benefit.  Not for the general public necessarily but for their own benefit.

But the odd thing was, back in the 1960’s, there was a big spate again from this hurrah, hurrah thing from science and the BBC in England where they were putting all these articles out on the future, back in the early 60’s.  When they wanted the public to have their old system destroyed you might say to rebuild the new one, the hippie era, etcetera.  And in the 60’s they said the same things that eventually it would be a privilege to get a job.  You won’t need a job.  You would be well looked after your whole life.  But leisure would be your biggest problem, how would you pass your time?  No one would be poor; no one would be starving, etcetera.  So they keep giving you these carrots all the time to get the public onboard with this hurrah, hurrah, hurrah for science and the constant massive taxations for research and development for a future which you are never going to get yourself.  Life extension, I have no doubt whatsoever, actually exists.

Neil:  Yeah I was going to say that in the film from H.G. Wells’ book called "The Time Machine", you see all the people just lazing about all day and doing nothing whatsoever and that’s supposed to be the utopia we are all promised.  And I remember the scene where the lady falls into the river and nobody can even be bothered to get up and save her.  You know that’s it, she fell in the river, she was so stupid and so that’s that.

The life extension I mean you know we never see the likes of the Kissinger’s of this world or the Rockefeller’s ever getting ill or getting cancer or anything of that sort.  The royals they all live to you know over a hundred.  And I mean the basic human life is well capable of reaching a hundred years old if they get the right foods, you know nutrition, and they just stay healthy you know.  So in terms of life extension and technology how do you, I mean do you have any information on how that’s been done?

Alan:  Yeah.  I’m sure they are well into...  Disease itself you know is not a one-on-one thing per bacterium or per virus, etcetera.  What you have to see, what they did a long time ago was to see what all viruses have in common and what all bacterium will have in common with each other.  And they can simply eliminate the process as it divides and so on and multiplies, they can simply hit all bacteria at the same stage and kill it off immediately.  I’m sure there are real inoculations there that were developed a long, long time ago.  But Kissinger as you say, the Brzezinski’s are still trotting across the whole planet.  You’ve got Maurice Strong who is a good age now still running around the planet giving his speeches and given the royal carpet.  None of them suffer from what you call aging diseases such as Alzheimer’s, arthritis, any of those things, old David Rockefeller the same thing.

So you just cannot have that in a person, they have to have something wrong with them.  But these guys are literally, they are full of energy.  The energy they have could put a modern twenty-year-old to shame at times.  And the food they eat is the richest, best food, it’s not GM food.  It’s not soaked in pesticides and so on.  I’m sure they’ve never had any inoculations that we get and yet they go on and on.  So I’m sure that they are given life extension to do with literally what David Suzuki, another big top lefty world government character, David Suzuki said quite a few years ago on the CBC on national television in Canada, he said, and he’s a geneticist by profession actually and he’s the guy who also said to his students, it’s up there on YouTube, that people are just maggots.  You know there are different levels of maggots; some of the richest maggots simply poop on the ones beneath it and they live off the poop from the ones above.  That’s David Suzuki’s arrogant stance on these things.  But he said that we at present have the capability to stop the aging in your genetic make-up and make a person live to five hundred if we want to, you know.  And no one, there was no stir about that at all.

Neil:  Yeah.  Okay, now moving on to, well we’ve done the controlling the weather.

• "Coal-mining will be an extinct industry."

Neil:  Well that’s basically happened you know for all intents and purposes.  In the UK it’s completely gone regardless of the fact I think that we’ve got an estimated 300 years worth of the stuff still under the ground.

• "A forty-eight hour day will come into being by retarding the rotations of the Earth."

Neil:  Now I don’t know why they would want to do that but as you say these guys are, you can’t stop science, you’ve just got to try it out if you can do it just to try it you know.  It doesn’t matter how dangerous it is, let’s just do it to see what happens.

But one of the ones that everybody should recognize is...

• "Sitting in our homes we will see and hear events the world over."

Neil:  I mean this is before television was supposedly invented.  But here we are, we can at the click of a mouse, we can watch any news channel all over the world and be told apparently what’s going on in those countries.

I mean these, I don’t know how far back the invention of television goes but we are told it only happened you know around about the time of during the 1st World War, the 2^nd World War.  How far back do you think this kind of technology goes?

Alan:  Oh they were experimenting with television in the early 1900’s on small scales as far as we know, it could be on much bigger scales, but on small scales for sure.  And you’ll find from, depending in which country you are born into you get a different version of who invented what and when.  Every country claims to be the inventor of the TV, even Russia did that.  And things like that but we also saw about Marconi and his radio transmission, etcetera, other ones supposedly did it before him.  You’ll find there is so much conflicting data that you have to stand back and wonder how old the technologies actually are.  Don’t forget that in even the days of Benjamin Franklin everybody was experimenting with the Leyden jars, which they called batteries at the time, and electricity.

So scientific institutes have been experimenting quietly with this stuff for an awful, awful long time.  And it’s a quite natural progression when you look at the purpose of how government sees itself or the establishment that owns it all.  And how they see themselves is they rule, they must be protected, they want to take over resources, etcetera, in other countries under different guises.  It doesn’t matter what guise it is and you are always going in to liberate or free up or tame the wild savages kind of stuff as you plunder.  But the fact is, and warfare is the biggest, biggest power that they have therefore it would be fantastic to see what an enemy is doing.  And they speculated about having cameras in the sky back in his day, that kind of thing.  Now we have drones as well all over the place.  So it was a natural thing to put a lot of money in it, an investigation.  And unlimited funding from taxes, that’s the whole thing, into hiring lots of scientists to work incessantly on a problem which they’d eventually have to solve.  It would just simply happen throwing money at it, putting the minds behind it, lots of experimentation eventually you would get your product.

So what you are seeing is directed science.  The present society we live has actually been directed to be this way.  Not because they could have gone off in a thousand other directions, but because the establishment wanted these particular things for control purposes.

Neil:  Yeah that’s what I was going to go on to.  Basically the technology we are given is to fit in with the overall agenda.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  We are never going to get technology which is going to benefit us and anybody looking around can see that.  The only thing they have given us that’s supposedly to benefit us is the TV and the computer and the mobile phone.

Alan:  Well the TV is the biggest brainwashing tool there is.  {Laughs}

Neil:  Yeah of course.  {Laughs}  And that will convince people that all the technology that’s coming out is beneficial to them.  But I’ve heard you talk before, well you’ve mentioned the behaviorists involved in these kind of meetings as well.  And I mean back then were they studying the effects of bringing in this kind of surveillance society.  And did they know exactly that it could change people’s attitudes or behavior?

Alan:  They had experimental hospitals actually on the go in Russia, Soviet Russia, early Soviet Russia.  The Bolsheviks immediately went into experimenting on the human brain by really crude nasty methods of taking skulls off, wards, whole wards of patients.  You can actually see a little video of them with the skulls removed and doing the test probes of different parts of the brain.  They were also sharing the data with Tavistock in England and the Tavistock institution is where Aldous Huxley was in and out of all the time.  He was fascinated by the ability to insert basic electrodes or stimulate by simple electricity parts of the brain and have people turn right and left and be obedient and things like that.

So they were wired at the time, so we are told, they didn’t have the wireless we are told, but I don’t see why they couldn’t have had with the early remotes, etcetera, have eventually put in wireless remotes into the brain like Delgado did in the U.S.  And he worked with the CIA and FBI.  So this has always been a thing with them, is to map the whole human brain.

Pavlov was way into that thing, it wasn’t just dogs he was working on, it was humans too.  They had a captive population.  They could simply round up a thousand people overnight under any guise at all under ‘counterrevolutionary’ and bring them in and simply experiment on them and that was the last people ever saw of them.  They were used as human guinea pigs; so they had literally enclosed, little enclosed societies of experimentation.  In the West we know that Tavistock was heavily involved in this with patients again that no one would ever see again, the relatives either wouldn’t visit, or there were no relatives, they were even better to do all the electrical stimulation of the brain, etcetera.

But they also had experimental schools.  That was a big part of it too and Lord Bertrand Russell also, who also knew Birkenhead, Lord Bertrand Russell was also given permission to set up an experimental school in England for quite a few years, heavily, heavily funded, enclosed from the rest of society to bring children up under a completely different reality, all a very closed system.  And he said, if we want to we can tell them that snow is white and the sky during the day is black and things like that and they’d believe it because that’s their whole reality, the Plato’s cave kind of thing.

And he also tried to promote pre-pubertal sex.  He said the idea being that if we can hypersexualize children before puberty they would really be hypersexualized afterwards and they will never want to have a partner for the rest of their lives, so that would finish the institution of marriage for the general population.  So these things were all done way back in the 20’s and the 30’s, the 1920’s and 30’s, massive experiments.

Neil:  Yeah that was in one of his predictions, that marriage will be changed forever, so unfortunately it is nonexistent these days to any great extent.  He talks about in the first page of this about alternative energy and admits that the cheapness of this energy supposedly will destroy the lives of millions of people.  And then he talks about the cheap energy creating all kinds of acute social problems but he doesn’t actually state what they are apart from the fact that it is going to destroy the livelihoods of millions and millions of people.  But would you have any kind of opinion on that, what exactly he means by that?

Alan:  Well the livelihood really is that things will become computerized down the road.  Mechanical robots we could say would do most of the heavy work, etcetera.  You wouldn’t need the workforce as we know it today and remember too that Julian Huxley and Aldous Huxley, the two brothers, both talked about the same thing, about the same time, when they said that there’s a different strata of society that rules this system.  And he said at the top you have a dominant minority that have the power, the money, and so on.  That’s why they will never give up their hold on what we think of as money, that we think is normal, but it’s all a rigged system.  And to the elite they don’t need the money, it’s a system for control.  But they said under that they have a scientific elite.  He said we, I mean the Huxley’s, they belong to the scientific elite and along with their kind of sciences you had the social sciences coming in big time then, psychology, behaviorism, and so on.  And you also had the chemists coming in and so on and biologists, etcetera, that give you the inoculations, all of these kinds of things.

So they talked about the total control of society to try and alleviate the problems they’d have when they had a massive population which they wouldn’t need anymore.  But they didn’t want them to rebel either so they’d give them lots and lots of entertainment but at the same time they’d have to sterilize them quietly along the way.  And they mean quietly, in other words they wouldn’t come out and admit it.  The symptoms would obviously be there as they are today but they won’t come out and admit it that they’ve been doing it deliberately.  And eventually the worker type who hadn’t evolved, because evolution is a big part of this with their belief system, the working force that did the mundane jobs wouldn’t be needed, they’d be obsolete and they hadn’t evolved any higher and never could evolve any higher.  If they could evolve higher they would have done it already.  That was their whole stance on all of this class system at that particular time.  It hasn’t really changed by the way.

But so eventually if you go from book to book from the characters who all knew each other and discussed this in their big meetings you’ll find that H.G. Wells had in his book called, "A Modern Utopia", where he projected how the future would be, he said that we used to think we’d simply have to kill the excess population which were irrelevant nowadays for the future, he said, but we took the kinder way and simply sterilized those people so they couldn’t reproduce.  They could live their lives and then die off and there would be no other offspring to cause any problems.  So these, every part of the topics of how all of society works had been gone over by different little think tanks in his particular day.  It’s much, much, much bigger today of course naturally.

Neil:  Yeah getting back to the advent of television as he predicts.  He even actually uses the word television before television was invented.

It says here:

"During the next hundred years, applied physics will certainly develop wireless telephony and television beyond our present most imaginative expectations.  By 2029 it should be possible for any person sitting at home to be “present”..."

Neil:  He’s got that in inverted commas so it’s almost like a virtual reality he is talking about here.

"...at no matter what distant event.  Stereoscopic television in full natural colors, and perfected wireless telephony will enable him to see and hear any event which is broadcast as effectively as if he stood beside the transmitting apparatus."

Neil:  And then he goes on to say, you talked about it, propaganda and uses...

"Such developments must influence the future of politics; for by their aid it will be feasible once more to revive that form of democracy which flourished in the city-states of Ancient Greece."

Neil:  So there’s the plan laid out.  That’s where they want to go with it all, back to Ancient Greece where they could sit in their ivory towers and just throw bread and stuff to the peasants basically.

Alan:  That’s right and also that is what the think tank for the British military came up with back in 2008 I think it was.  It was the big 90-page report, "The DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme", which I put up on my website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  And remember this particular think tank is the Department of Defence’s think tank for Britain and NATO, all NATO countries, and they said that eventually by about 2050 or whatever they think that countries will simply be like Karl Marx said, they would wither away.  You can see why they both work together, these two systems, the dialectic.   And nation-states would survive, certain nation-states or city-states would survive.  And they actually mention some of the city-states that they wanted to keep and other ones which may or may not be allowed to go in.  The rest of the countries, what used to be countries, would become barbaric and wastelands as folk died off, etcetera.  And they would be privately run by the way and privately owned.

Neil:  Yeah so he carries on, on the political argument to advancing television.

And:

"By 2029 the chosen spokesman of each political party will be able to address every voter as effectively as he now can address the House of Commons.  And so the electorate itself, rather than its representatives, may decide each vital political issue.  After the spokesman of each party had had his (or her) say, the votes of the entire country could be recorded and counted by mechanism installed in the telephone exchanges.  Within twenty minutes from the end of the last speech, the will of a national jury on any subject could be ascertained and announced."

Neil:  Now that’s obviously pertaining to electronic voting from home, you don’t have to go out and put your X in the box anymore.  You just have to listen to this talking head on the television.  And it’s interesting he actually says "his (or her)".  I mean this was in the day when women were still in the kitchen and you know kind of weren’t really in the workforce as such.  But he’s clearly stated that there will be, the heads of parties will be women in the future as well.  And here we are.  You know it’s all been done.  And it is as you say it’s the most effective propaganda tool on the planet.  And when we see these guys getting up there pontificating on one issue or another people just buy it.

Alan:  They buy it and again what Birkenhead had said, he said that big decisions could then be more egalitarian.  In other words the people would decide.  That was the carrot that the writers of his particular era were putting out there, this wonderful future utopia.  They had to get the people to go along with all of this so you offer them the carrot, it’s going to be a wonderful life for you, etcetera.  Making them think that you are all going to be one of the chosen.  And even Julian Huxley said the same thing, he said, lots of the people who are working for our agenda think they are going to be chosen to come through and they are sadly mistaken.

So they must always use the masses to go along with their own demise.  That’s the technique that’s always used because they had no intention of ever letting the public decide anything.  And on the other hand too they also knew how decision making is made by the general public, it’s all to do with information.  They knew they could always guide the public into making the so-called correct decision or correct vote by putting the things across in the right manner to the pubic.  So they can count on the public to vote the way they want them to vote.  {Laughs}

Neil:  Yeah.  Well he goes from physics to chemistry.

And he starts off by saying:

"Applied chemistry has not affected human life in a manner comparable with the changes produced in physical research.  So far as the ordinary man is concerned, chemistry is only useful to him when it discovers new and desirable substances;"

Neil:  In other words drugs.

"...or discovers a means of synthesizing a material more cheaply that it is produced in nature.  In the past chemists have enriched the resources of humanity with new metals, dyes, drugs, explosives, and other substances useful in industry or in private life.  By 2029 thousands more such new substances will be available; aluminum will be cheaper than pig iron is today; malleable, unbreakable glass will be a commonplace of domestic life."

Neil:  And what he is talking about that is we hear a lot in the U.S. about, I’m sure it’s the same in Canada, about this drive to legalize cannabis.  And the young people I’ve spoken to here are all for it.  They are going to vote for this guy because he’s all for legalizing cannabis.  And I’m trying to say to them but it won’t be this cannabis you are buying now, it’s going to be the stuff that they produce for you.  And it isn’t going to be organic; it’s going to be synthetic and possibly genetically modified and you won’t know what you are smoking.  I mean is that....

Alan:  The thing is too, yeah you will find that even Aldous Huxley came up with the same idea in his book, "Brave New World", from 1933 you know.  He came up with Soma.  Soma was given to the general public to keep them quiet and passive and in a state of ecstasy basically no matter what they had to work at or the miserable conditions they lived in.  And of course we know that the military for instance, some of the strongest marijuana they have out there was created by the military, genetically modified, etcetera.  And it’s no secret either for those who are working in the medical profession on post-mortem or autopsy, it’s no secret whatsoever that it does go in and it does start to enlarge the ventricles inside the brain, which destroys systems around that particular ventricle area, you produce less L-DOPA, things like that.

So it can make you very, very passive down the road regardless if you stop taking it or not.  It has a permanent effect eventually.

Neil:  Yeah.

He goes on:

"It has been suggested that chemical research will turn to the discovery of new physiologically pleasant substances."

Neil:  Again there is your Soma for you.

"At present civilized mankind has discovered and adopted only three such substances:  tobacco, alcohol and caffeine.  These certainly have added enormously to the amenities of existence; and Doctor J.B.S. Haldane has proposed that chemists should seriously consider a search for many more such additions to human enjoyment."

Neil:  Of course Haldane was a eugenicist I believe.

And:

"Most chemical substances are either disagreeable or dangerous in their physiological effects, though a small number, not more than a few thousands, are valuable to medicine.  Should chemistry in the next hundred years be able to discover a dozen substances as pleasant and harmless as tobacco, yet each producing a different effect on the consumer, it will have earned the thanks of every hard-worked man and woman in the world."

Neil:  {Laughs}  In other words you go to work, you have a really bad day, and then you come home and take your dose of drugs to make yourself feel better.  Like I suppose many people do with alcohol today.

Alan:  They do today with drugs and alcohol, yeah.  And don’t forget too a lot of the drugs today are prescribed by the doctors for all their depressions and so on and so on.  And there is nothing about getting to the bottom of depression or why you are depressed.  It might be the rotten job that you are doing and this monotonous existence that you are in.

So pharmacology has no intention of course of finding the problems.  Their whole point is to get you drugged so you don’t think about the problems and you drift through life in a kind of fog you know, a happy fog.  And most medications out there are prescribed by doctors.  Also even the prescription medications in some areas in the states especially, maybe elsewhere too, but there have been documentaries about it in the states in some areas they are just prescribing OxyContin for anything, any problem at all.  It doesn’t matter what it happens to be; until they’ve got whole parts of U.S. states hooked on this stuff.  And these are all prescribed by doctors and they are getting away with prescribing this stuff which means it is part of an agenda, it has to be.

Neil:  Yeah, Paula was talking to somebody earlier today or yesterday about a medication she is on and now this lady needs to go for a liver biopsy.  And Paula said afterwards the drugs that they are on are causing the liver problems, you need to get off them to start with.  I mean not just because the doctors told her that.  But this, it’s just one thing after another.  One side effect has got to be cured by another pill which will cause another side effect, and on and on it goes.

He moves on to, he starts talking about painkillers and anesthetics and immediately he relates it to painless childbirth.

And then he goes on to say:

"Biologists by 2029 will have learned the secrets of the living chemistry of the human body – or a least enough of it to achieve startling results.  Rejuvenation will be an ordinary and well-recognized matter of a few injections at appropriate intervals.

The desire to keep old age at bay has ever been one of the dreams of humanity; at last we can predict that it will be achieved.  “This mortal must put on immortality” by extending the length of his days of earth."

Neil:  He’s got that phrase there “This mortal must put on immortality”, is that a direct quote from somebody?  I don’t know if you know who that is but anyway...

"The attractions of such an idea, especially to women, who will no longer grow old quickly, is too clear to require emphasis."

Neil:  Now that we have seen, particularly in the likes of Cosmopolitan magazine itself, the promotion of you know women having to stay young.  They have to stay beautiful to get on in the world or to get the best jobs and all the rest of it.  Again we are talking about propaganda, like Stalin and Hitler, they knew that you had to target the women.  So here we are, we’ve got the women pressurized into doing this, to stay young, look young and all the rest of it.

And then he goes on to say:

"But the universal practice of rejuvenation will be accompanied by grave social problems, the least of which would be the immense increase in population."

Neil:  So he brings in population.

"Suppose it possible to guarantee one hundred and fifty years of life to every healthy child, how will youths of twenty be able to compete in the professions or in business against vigorous men, still in their prime at one hundred and twenty, with a century of experience on which to draw?  The benefits to humanity which will accrue if the lives of men of genius are so prolonged is obvious."

Neil:  So he is talking about themselves there.  We will all benefit if these guys are allowed to live to a hundred and fifty and their wealth of experience, but we are not going to get life extension because we are just not worthy enough.

Alan:  That’s right and also too the whole point was to create a person with a genius level through manipulation prior to again ectogenetics, etcetera.  And they would do it before, outside the womb basically.  They could literally piece a person together with different genes, etcetera, which they are doing by the way on the quiet and they have been doing it for years for women who are childless, where they get their ovum, etcetera, extracted, a whole bunch of them, and that’s the last the women will see of what’s actually happening.  But it isn’t simply matching it up with a spermatozoon somewhere, it’s actually, they are actually taking genes out and putting genes in and following the children who actually get born from these experiments, they are following them down through their lives to see how they react, behave, etcetera.  And they are being well studied without their knowledge actually.  So this has been going on for a long time.

Neil:  Yeah, he actually goes on to that in the next paragraph.

He says:

"Most probably by 2029 a clever young man will consider his fiancée’s hereditary complexion before proposing marriage; and the young woman of that day will refuse him because he has inherited a gene from his father which will predispose their children to quarrelsomeness.  By intelligent combinations of suitable genes, it will be possible to predict with reasonable certainty that truly brilliant children shall be born of a marriage.

It is possible however, that by 2029 the whole question of human heredity and eugenics will be swallowed up by the prospect of ectogenetic birth.

By this is meant the development of a child from a fertilized cell outside its mother’s body – in a glass vessel filled with serum on a laboratory bench."

Neil:  I was talking to someone a couple of weeks ago and there is a group called, I think it’s "23andMe", who will do a genetic test on you and they match you up with somebody to marry based on your genetic traits and your compatibility.  It’s nothing to do with attraction, nothing to do with emotion.  It’s just your genetics and to make sure you have the right kind of children.  So that’s happened.  And now we’ve got private agencies coming out and advertising their wares.

And it goes on to say:

 "Such a proceeding is neither incredible nor, indeed, impossibly remote.  The results of possibly much research show that the connection between a mother and her growing child are purely chemical; there is no valid reason why one day biologists should not be able perfectly to imitate that chemical connection in the laboratory."

Neil:  So again we are not humans with emotional attachments or physical attachments to the children we have, it’s just all chemical.  We shouldn’t really bother getting emotionally attached to the children because they are just a bunch of chemicals and that’s it.

"The possibility of ectogenetic children will naturally arouse the fiercest antagonism.  Religious bodies of many different creeds will rally their adherents to fight such a fundamental biological invention." 

Neil:  He just said it is all chemical, but now he is saying it’s biological, so there is a contradiction there surely.

"In fact the mere mention of its possibility here may strike many readers as gratuitously disgusting."

Neil:  It is.

"Nevertheless the thing is possible;"

Alan:  What’s interesting there is that you’ll find that..., remember the elite themselves have really many psychopathic traits developed over centuries of inbreeding with powerful people.  People who seek power are pretty ruthless, etcetera.  And they marry the daughters of successful ruthless other people who are very wealthy and so on.  So they have psychopathic traits and they send their own children off at a very early age.  I mean first of all a nanny will raise them.  And so the bonding doesn’t take place for the elite between the parent and the offspring.  They have more in common with their nanny actually for the rest of their lives than they do with the mother for instance.  Then they are sent off to boarding school, etcetera, etcetera.  And so they don’t develop what the normal folk have who raise their own families, etcetera.  But they do understand that normal folk do raise their own families so they are talking about themselves and projecting their own view of it onto everyone else at the same time.  But at the same time they do understand how the ordinary folk literally have their families grow up in their own households with them.

So you have to understand their point of view and the fact that what they did was the norm for their whole class, to send their children off and a stiff upper lip, don’t show emotion, etcetera, to your own family members.  So that’s why they were all for this idea it was chemically based, etcetera, rather than the fact that it was their actual class system and psychopathy that couldn’t let them bond even with their own children at times.

Neil:  Yeah and I mean it goes on again...

"Nevertheless the thing is possible;"

Neil:  Talking about ectogenetics.

"...and since it is possible, it is certain that scientists will be deterred by no persecution from straining after it."

Neil:  In other words no kind of morality or ethics is going to come into this.  They are just going to do it anyway regardless of any public outcry.

And he says:

"Should ectogenesis ever become an established part of human society, its effects will be shattering.  Primarily it will separate reproduction from marriage, and the latter institution will become wholly changed.  Further, the character of the future inhabitants of any state could be determined by the government which happened temporarily to enjoy power.  By regulating the choice of the ectogenetic parents of the next generation, the Cabinet of the future could breed a nation of industrious dullards, or leaven the population with fifty thousand charmingly irresponsible mural painters.

A further immediate consequence of ectogenesis would be a plea that society should be allowed to produce the human types it most needs, instead of being forced to absorb all the unsuitable types which happen to be born."

Neil:  So again we are right back to eugenics again.  The whole thing is about eugenics and nothing to do with bettering society.  Well not for the vast majority of society but certainly it is to benefit these guys.  And that’s all it’s about.

Alan:  That is all it’s about.

Neil:  It’s not about promoting science here.

 "Many of the arguments brought against slavery would be powerless..."

Neil:  Sorry, he is talking about breeding intelligent creatures...

"...to perform intricate drudgery yet lacking all ambition, what ruling class would resist the temptation?"

Neil:  So again there is no morality.  They are just going to go for it.

And it says:

"Many of the arguments brought against slavery would be powerless in such a case; for the ectogenetic slave of the future would not feel his bonds."

Neil:  And I think that’s where we are nowadays.  We are just going along day to day.

Alan:  Absolutely, we are.  You can make slavery as long as you don’t use the terms.  You can live in a communist society where you have all the trappings of communism but not call it communism.  You can call it the liberal party or the social party or whatever but it’s still the same thing.  As long as you don’t use actual terms the average person won’t relate it, that’s rather strange that.  But they won’t relate it to what actually exists.  And he’s talking about the same thing there.  Slavery can be made very enticing if you don’t call it slavery.  You simply say you have to get so much data to use this program or app or whatever it happens to be, but look at all the benefits you’ll have.  So you entice them into it, giving up voluntarily piece by piece until they are an actual slave to the whole system, including their cell phones.  In fact they are having breakdowns when they lose them now, a lot of young folk.  So it’s working very, very well.

People don’t realize you give up your freedoms for some other reward.  It’s very simplistic you see, they did it all with rats and other animals, which was nothing to do with to see if they could train an army of rats.  It was all to see if they can be used, all these experiments could be used eventually on humans.  Would you give up your own ability to survive independently or think independently for all of these rewards and unfortunately the answer seems to be yes.

Neil:  Yeah and he goes on talking about slavery.

"Every impulse which makes slavery degrading and irksome to ordinary humanity would be removed from his mental equipment.  His only happiness would be in his task; he would be the exact human counterpart of the worker bee.  Only the arguments of religion could be used to prevent his evolution."

Neil:  Again that’s why we are seeing the destruction of religion.

 "His emancipation could never be considered, for in freedom he would find only crushing boredom and misery."

Neil:  Well I think I’d rather have the crushing boredom and misery than be a slave to be honest.  I don’t see how slavery can be enjoyable but obviously again going back to "Brave New World" when they issued out the Soma.  These people were just mindless automatons and just did a specific task all day, they got their Soma, came back and did the same thing day after day after day, and they were all dressed the same in the uniformity of the uniform, the brown overalls or the dungarees.

And it carries on:

"It seems improbable, however, that the future developments of industry will call for such a being to tend its wheels.  Production will become so cheap, and, barring political or international upheavals, wealth will accumulate to such an extent, that the ectogenetic Robot will never be needed.  It is far more likely that men will work as machine-minders for one or two hours a day and be free to devote the rest of their energies to whatever form of activity they enjoy."

Neil:  So there’s the carrot that’s being put out to people.  Oh yeah we’ll only have to do work a couple of hours a day and then you’ll get to do what you want after that.  But if you already have been given all of these drugs to keep you happy, this is kind of a contradiction to that, to say if you had to work a forty-hour week you wouldn’t be happy.

Alan:  That’s right.

Neil:  So which is it?

Alan:  Again they said in the 60’s when they revived all this idea to get us to accept science as your new God you might say, a wonderful Santa Claus, that eventually you’d have this utopia and they even had huge displays in all the top magazines and the newspapers across Britain and the rest of the world of people walking about, drawings of folks walking about in togas, Roman togas for goodness sake all with smiles on their face. That was going to be the future that they depicted in the 1960’s.  And they got it all from previous agendas, actually the same agenda which had never stopped from even before Birkenhead’s time.  Now Birkenhead also knew Charles Galton Darwin and the Darwin family.  And remember too in, "The Next Million Years", written by Charles Galton Darwin, he says, he said, we are now in the process of creating a more sophisticated form of slavery.  And that was back in the 1950’s.  So you are simply living through an agenda.  I have always known this.  And all of these things that keep coming up in your own lifetime simply show you, that you are living to a time table in fact.

As I say science, all the sciences are directed by funding.  The funder tells them what they want them to look for or how to do something and they have to achieve that goal.  It’s not willy-nilly just finding out this for the purpose of inquiry and finding things out, they are actually all directed along this one agenda and we are living through it today.

Neil:  Just in the last few paragraphs of this thing it gives kind of a brief conclusion, very, very brief.

"I have assumed, therefore, that the rate of progress in applied physics, chemistry and biology during the next hundred years will be maintained approximately at its present level.  It may even be greatly accelerated by the ever increasing interest in scientific research on the part of industrialists and governments."

Neil:  So you have your corporations and your governments working together to do all this.

"Nevertheless, unless science is able to change our ideas no less rapidly than our environment, some of the developments at which I have hinted may not come to pass.  Unless for example, the ideas of Asiatic peoples are drastically changed, it will be impossible to stamp out epidemic disease from the world."

Neil:  So I don’t know what he is...  Is he hinting at the fact that the Asiatic peoples had their own kind of medicines and things like that and kind of went down the natural medicine route or is he just being racist?

Alan:  Well I think it was a hidden thing really in some ways because you see at that time the Western world was all under one kind of system starting from the Alfred Milner Group, Rhodes Society and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, CFR basically it’s called across the whole planet.  But it was the Royal Institute of International Affairs that was to run this global system but by that time it didn’t have China in on it.  And so unless you get all the vaccinations, that are once again there to help you, they couldn’t make all this happen because the vaccinations I’m pretty well certain are really not there to help you at all.  People are becoming incredibly sterile.  With every generation that passes it gets worse and worse.  If it isn’t the vaccinations, it’s also the food system they give you too.  They know all of this too of course and it’s well documented at the very, very top.  You can’t study their graphs as to population and demographics of people who are becoming more sterile in certain areas without looking at all the inoculations they’ve been given, what batches of inoculations and so on.

So it is working as they have said because one of their big problems was that they didn’t want too many folk around in a post-industrial society, which they have been talking about by the way since the beginning of the 1900’s.  They knew that they would eventually be a post-industrial society and you wouldn’t need all the labor and workers, etcetera.  So the best way to do it, like H.G. Wells said in "A Modern Utopia", is to quietly sterilize them and they will simply die off and they won’t procreate.  They might enjoy life to an extent and then they’ll die off.  So that’s actually happening today.

That’s also the excuse for the mass immigration into Britain for instance that Margaret Thatcher used; she said we must bring in mass immigration because the people aren’t having enough children.  It wasn’t just because they weren’t having enough children it’s because so many of them were becoming sterile.  And all the studies have shown that, in the males especially the sperm count is almost zilch today, active sperm.  And it’s the same in the U.S.  This is with eighteen-year-olds by the way.  They do these surveys every single year.  They all show an increasing sterilization.  And apparently it’s not a crisis.  Why isn’t it a crisis?  Because it is meant to be that way.

Neil:  Yeah absolutely.  It finishes off basically what we talked about earlier that science can be used for good or bad.

"But it is not self-evident that all applications of scientific discovery deserve the support of intelligent men and women."

Neil:  So in other words if it is something that’s going to benefit the masses, they are not going to support it.

"Because science has benefited humanity in the past, there is no reason why it always should do so in the future."

Neil:  And then he goes on to say but this might all change if somebody sets off an atomic bomb and just wipes us all out.  So his prediction would be meaningless.  But he probably knew that wasn’t going to happen either.  {Laughs}

But yeah he is clearly stating that the only science that is going to be supported is the science that they want that’s going to benefit them.  It’s not going to benefit humanity in the wider sense; it’s only going to benefit this smaller group at the top who is controlling it.

Alan:  Yes.  It’s always been that way really, you know.  It’s always been that way.  Yeah you will get some entertainment value, you’ll get entertainment value from the television and so on, but you are also being indoctrinated all the time with the TV as well with the new ideas and how to behave, what your marriage is or should be, or could be, or what promiscuity should be, etcetera, etcetera.  Or how correct the state should be and how much power the state should have with all their SWAT teams and dramas and so on.

Everything you see on television to do with police or the medical establishment done in a dramatic form, a drama form, a series or movie, is all propaganda as Jacques Ellul said you know, and he was a great philosopher.  It’s there for propaganda reasons to give you a false idea so that you will obey these what used to be services; police services were services.  You could also literally cancel the contract with them.  The same with the healthcare could be cancelled.  But Lenin said, and he was in on the same agenda too by the way using the Soviet System as a laboratory, that’s why the West set it up, the Soviet System.  Lenin said that they would win through slogans which would be put across, just repetitive slogans or phrases, etcetera.  Repetition works on the human mind and they would win that way.  The best way to do it of course is through radio, television, movies and so on.  And it’s all pretty well happened since these guys were on the go.

But Lenin also said that services, the West will proliferate with services, childcare services, police services, healthcare services, and these services which are voluntary if you wanted it or not you can say no, I don’t want that.  Now you can’t.  Now they are authorities.  And that’s what they said, their job is to turn and train the public that they are the authorities.  That’s what you have today.  So you are run by authorities from birth to death you see.

Neil:  Yeah.  Okay we’ve got a couple of minutes left.  That was Birkenhead predicting what was going to happen in 2029.  A quick prediction of what you think is going to be a hundred years down the line?

Alan:  I think they will pretty well achieve it because the public adapt all the time.  The whole theory as it came out of Darwinism with adaptation, etcetera, is very true and they are heavily sunk into the whole scientific revolutions and the funding to do with people managing, managing people.  This is the big, big job today through managing people, world managers, people managers, social managers, all of these managers.  And now you have managers basically appointed by the government and GIRFEC for Scotland appointed to every child that’s born basically to make sure they can tweak you before you get any self thoughts or own thoughts, thought from yourself.  No, they are going to make sure you will get the state’s authorized thoughts.

So, it’s all here.  Management from birth to death is already underway.  The GIRFEC program is called other names in other countries, all coming from the United Nations by the way.  It’s a treaty that all began in the United Nations under the Rights of the Child, who just had their big meeting there once again, the Rights of the Child, and all they talked about were the rights of children to be indoctrinated in the LGBT agenda, etcetera.

So the whole idea is to destroy all that was to bring in the new.  You must always destroy the old to bring in the new; that’s the thing I always repeat.  And that’s been awfully successful.  The think tank for the British Department of Defence also said the same thing that by 2050 they said the population would drastically, they show a drastic decrease in population.  And that included China.  It was already well underway in the West until people say in some, say the native Scots and so on, etcetera, were already under the numbers for reproduction and sustainability for themselves so they were assuming they’d just fade off the map actually, things like that.  This all came out from the top think tanks for the Department of Defence and NATO.  It’s well underway what they want plus their city-state idea.  The same thing as Birkenhead talked about for a manageable society of the proper kind of people in their city-state, all the specially-bred ones to serve the elite at the top.  And they said that future wars would be limited and more very high, high tech wars between occasional city-states until they all agree to be one again.  You know one governmental system worldwide.  So they are on their way to it.

Neil:  Yeah.  That was the way they’ve done it in China.

Alan:  Also, and I should mention too, I should mention too that the United Nations publishes every year too the IQ tests for the same countries over and over.  We have dropped about 5 to 7 points IQ in the last ten years or so.  That doesn’t happen by itself.

Neil:  Not at all.  Just to mention, I mean the whole point of China is they brought in the one-child policy.  They have a culture where infanticide is fine if it is a girl you are going to kill.  And it’s no wonder that the population is going to get down if there are hardly any women around.  It’s going to take its toll isn’t it?

Alan:  Yes.  But it has more of an effect too.  That’s also the reason they promote so much homosexuality to alleviate the actual sexual drives amongst just the men that are left you see, things like that.  So they have taken care of everything, they have thought of everything that they’d have to do you know.

Neil:  Okay.  We’ll leave it on that cheery note.  {Laughs}

Alan:  Yeah.  {Laughs}

Neil:  And we’ll talk again next month is it.  I believe I have January 15^th for next month.

Alan:  Okay.  Take care.

Neil:  Okay.  Thanks very much Alan.  Cheers.

Alan:  Cheers.

{♫ - Closing Music}