Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:47 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB (i.e. Educational Talk):

"PUPPETS, PEARLS AND PALAVER"

FEBRUARY 1, 2007

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and today it is February 1st, 2007.

"Everybody Wants To Rule the World"

By Tears for Fears

 

Welcome to your life
There's no turning back
Even while we sleep
We will find you
Acting on your best behavior
Turn your back on mother nature
Everybody wants to rule the world

It's my own design
It's my own remorse
Help me to decide
Help me make the most
Of freedom and of pleasure
Nothing ever lasts forever
Everybody wants to rule the world

There's a room where the light won't find you
Holding hands while the walls come tumbling down
When they do I'll be right behind you

So glad we've almost made it
So sad they had to fade it
Everybody wants to rule the world

I thought I would kick off this talk with a speech, or parts of a speech, that Richard Perle gave at Oxford University in 2006, June 7th.  This can be found on various sites, but globalresearch.ca has parts of it up, and you can take your pick. I'm sure each one has selected parts from his whole speech, but with Perle, he doesn't hold too many punches, so it doesn't matter what version you read. This particular column kicks off with a quote from Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Now remember how these guys play so many roles.  Zbigniew Brzezinski was on television. He was the first guy on TV after 9/11, claiming that al-Qaeda—Bin Laden residing in Afghanistan—had brought down the towers, and he said this before the dust had settled. The same man, remember, who amongst the myriad of books he's put out there on global policies, released "The Grand Chessboard" a few years before 9/11, with the need to go into the Middle East and take over oil and so on, all that kind of stuff. He is a Council on Foreign Relations guy, Trilateral Commission, and a whole host of other organizations, a big player.

This is a quote from him:

"I think of war with Iran as the ending of America's present role in the world. Iraq may have been a preview of that, but it's still redeemable if we get out fast. In a cold war with Iran, we'll get dragged down for 20 or 30 years. The world will condemn us. We will lose our position in the world."  (That was in Vanity Fair 2006.)

He speaks truth here, and these guys will often speak truth, as they play different sides and swap back and forth to confuse the public, or stir up the public even, because this man wanted this war.  The organizations he belongs to have talked about the coming war, for years, and the necessity for having it.

It reminds me of when Benjamin Franklin (the high Mason that he was) came out of the Conventional Meeting for the Constitution, and spoke to the “lowly people,” the public, who are barred from getting in, while the Masons put it together for them.  When he was asked, “what kind of government have you given us?” he said, "a republic if you can keep it."  I'm sure he said it with a little smile on his face; because he was well aware of the real role that America was deemed to play.  It’s the same thing with Brzezinski, as he talks out of two sides of his mouth.

To continue with the article on Richard Perle, it goes on to say:

             "One US carrier task force is already in position in the Persian Gulf. Two more task forces are moving swiftly to take up their positions in the Iranian theatre. The controversial neo-conservative American bureaucrat, Richard Perle, visited Britain on the eve of the papal audience between Prime Minister Tony Blair and Pope Benedict XVI. Earlier in the same week, the Iranian Nobel Laureate for Peace, Dr. Shirin Ebadi, was in Britain to voice her concerns about a confrontation between the west and Iran. In London, Metropolitan Police swooped down on two suspected Islamist terrorists believed to be in the process of building a chemical bomb. Summertime tensions are building."

 

Alan:  There are always these little things, supposedly happening, when these meetings are going on. At least we're told this, to get the tension raised. It gives more credence to the meetings about terrorism.

             "In bland remarks delivered to a small audience of students at the Oxford Union, Richard Perle outlined the Bush administration’s response to the crisis of 9/11 and the neo-conservative doctrines of pre-emptive war."

 

Alan:  Pre-emptive war is taking the right to attack a people on the suspicion that they might bode ill will towards you, in the near future.

             "In a droning monotone designed to anaesthetize his keen academic audience, Perle explained the need for an invincible American military apparatus and a foreign policy predicated on the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive war permitting direct and simultaneous interventions into multiple theatres."

Alan:  “Multiple theatres.”  Really, it's not just different techniques of waging the war, which it does—that's part of it, but it's also multiple fronts if need be.  We know the history of those who have taken on more than one or two fronts at the most.  It's no surprise to find you overextend yourself and ultimately you're vanquished.

             "While Perle stated his hope that the need for military interventions would be minimal, he left the impression that his definition of excessive use of military power might well differ from that of the average American or European citizen. Perle is on the public record advocating pre-emptive strikes against North Korea, Syria, Iran and a list of other countries. Some of his critics accuse Perle of darkly malignant machinations."  (That was reported in Sourcewatch)

Alan:  Continuing.

             "Citing Iraq as a glowing example of an obvious need for direct intervention, Perle admitted that he had long advocated military solutions for regime change in that theatre. In his talk, he reminded us that President Bush had launched the invasion on the basis of several triggering factors, including Nigerian yellow cake…"

 

Alan:  I guess that's some kind of poison of some kind.

             "WMDs, terrorist connections, democracy-building and humanitarian issues."

Alan:  I love that humanitarian one, where we're going to blow people up for humanitarian reasons.

             "Thus, Perle was finally reduced to justifying the Iraq War as a humanitarian crusade – a theme that struck hollow in the midst of reports of civil war, torture and US war crimes against innocent civilians in Haditha.  Questioned by a largely supportive audience of admiring students willing to attend a late lecture on a Friday night, Perle touched upon the diplomacy between the West and Iran in the most insipid terms he could muster. Taking into account the latest diplomatic developments, he gave his Oxford audience the impression that the outcome remains obscure in spite of the fact that he is one of the principle architects – and the sternest - of the Iran negotiations. Perle emphasized that President Ahmadinejad holds fanatical religious beliefs involving the necessity for an Armageddonite conflict to trigger the return of the Hidden Imam at the end of the world, in the Shiite tradition for the Last Judgement and the Islamic Apocalypse."

Alan:  Once again, they dig up the old stuff, which you can find in every religion, and bring it to the surface, and paint the followers as raging fanatics. That can be done with every, every religion.

             "Perle singled out the fanaticism of Islamic terrorism as the most serious threat to international security, and he praised the Israeli air-strike against Saddam’s nuclear reactor in 1981 as a model of pre-emptive military intervention. In his view, the threat of precision air-strikes against the nuclear infrastructure of Iran constitute the best negotiating option."

Alan:  This makes me wonder; because this is all about the nuclear reactors that Iran has been working on. It's so interesting to watch how India was allowed to get atomic weapons. Their archenemy, supposedly, Pakistan was also allowed to have it, but for some reason Iran can't, because they're trying to bring on the Apocalypse.  What's even more amazing, precision air strikes against a nuclear reactor is going to cause incredible leakage all over. Goodness knows what size of an area; it might go around the world, in fact—if you remember the Chernobyl nuclear reactor meltdown.  So how can you possibly have an air strike against a nuclear reactor, safely?  It's impossible.  It looks to me like Perle, this Perle of wisdom here, would rather bring on the Armageddon.  Then again, it could all be theater to terrify the whole planet into going along to a new way of living.

Continuing:

             "An Iranian student asked Perle whether he considered the Mearsheimer and Walt paper, “The Israel Lobby,” to be, “anti-Semitic.” Castigating the eighty-five page paper as, “bad scholarship,” Perle admitted that he did not know what he was talking about when he confessed that he had not read it in its entirety. This question put Perle on the defensive, and he asserted that there was no secret agenda amongst America’s plethora of, “Jewish groups,” that sought to place the national security of Israel above that of the United States. 

 

In the limited time available, no one was able to follow up Perle’s pregnant point about the non-existence of a secret agenda with a question about the Israeli spy scandal that shook his own office at the Pentagon, when Larry Franklin was discovered to be the conduit between the Office of Special Plans and two Israeli officials, who were later identified as espionage agents assigned to the embassy. Neither was he questioned about the incident that took place in 1970, when an FBI wiretap revealed that Perle discussed classified intelligence with an official at the Israeli embassy. Washington insiders have long considered Perle to be, “an Israeli agent of influence.  Another fact fuels these suspicions swirling around Perle, since he serves as a director of Hollinger International which owns the Jerusalem Post."

Alan:  That was Conrad Black's newspaper. Conrad Black of Canada, who was subsequently made Lord Conrad Black by the Queen.

             "Perle has been paid millions for his “work” for Hollinger even though he is the only ‘outside’ director on the Executive Committee. Perle’s complicated business dealings have brought him under suspicion for conflicts of interest, and the charge that he is attempting to profit from wars that he was strenuously working to create and implement, through his official capacity in the Department of Defense. In 2004, Perle’s conflicts of interest resulted in his resignation from the Defense Policy Board.

 

             When a perceptive student asked about his preferences for the next president of the United States, Perle made some riveting remarks. He immediately stated his hope that Senator Joseph Lieberman would be the Democratic candidate. Failing that miracle, Perle hopes former Governor Mark Warner will win the Democratic nomination. Perle warmly praised both right-leaning Democrats who are doyens of the Democratic Leadership Council. Richard Giuliani is Perle’s favourite Republican. When asked about potential presidential candidates who would cause him concern, Perle swiftly reeled off a long list of Democrats led by Governor Howard Dean, followed closely by Senator John Kerry, former Vice President Al Gore, former Senator John Edwards, and he finished his list of neo-conservative hate figures with a revealing comment about Senator Hillary Clinton."

Alan:  I don't what could be more revealing than what's already been revealed.

             "It is hardly secret that Senator Clinton has attempted to appeal to the Israeli right. When she visited Israel, she condemned the Palestinians, but Perle was not impressed. Quite the contrary, Perle said that while she had made some smart moves in her attempt to appeal to the right, the left did not believe her."

Alan:  That gives impetus to “not let your left hand know what you're right hand is doing.”

             "This comment gave the clear impression that Perle did not believe her, either. Criticizing other Democrats, Perle said that Senator John Kerry, “did not understand power,” and was not able to perform the duties of the president of America. In his form of damnation by faint praise, Perle said that Howard Dean was a much nicer man off the podium than on it – and he gave him pride of place at the top of his most worrisome Democratic politicians. 

 

The love affair between Perle’s base in Likud on the hard line Israeli right and the neo-conservatives of both US political parties is alive and kicking. Perle has long been associated with Likud that has been reduced to a weak rump huddling around Benjamin Netanyahu in the new Knesset. As a close associate of Netanyahu, Perle is seen as Likud’s top-ranking advocate in Europe and America, with his tentacles into both political parties, the Bush White House, the Pentagon and many other leading institutions. Next year, it would not be surprising to find Perle’s name on contributors lists to Giuliani, Lieberman and Warner."

Alan:  The man should get a prize for having so many disguises and faces. He's outdone Brahma with his amount of faces, this man.  Who does he really, really work for?  One thing is sure. It will never be the obvious. That's why it's being made obvious.

             "The morning after his Oxford talk, Perle appeared on the very influential BBC radio programme, ‘Today,’ where he was interviewed by John Humphries, the ranking heavyweight commentator in Britain. Admitting President Bush’s political weakness, Perle made a revealing comment when Humphries pressed him on US plans to bomb Iran. When Humphries pointed out that a unilateral US bombardment of Iran would be greeted with global howls of derision, Perle said,

“No American president who believes that there is a last opportunity to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear weapons state is going to be deterred by derision. He will do what he believes to be in the best interests of the protection of those who might come under attack from an Iranian nuclear weapon, including the United States.” (That was on ‘Today,’ BBC4, 3^rd June 2006)

"When Humphries pressed him harder by pointing out that the former British Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw…"

Alan:  You know the straw man.

             "… had termed the US bombing of Iran, “inconceivable,” Perle shot back with a revealing retort. “Well, it’s no longer conceivable that he’s the Foreign Secretary.” Humphries then asked whether Straw had been sacked over his offence, putting Perle on the spot by asking, “You think there’s a link there?” Perle replied,

“I don’t know. He was expressing a view that the government had not concluded yet in a way that diminished the leverage to produce a political result, a diplomatic result. That’s obviously unwise.”

"This response left the clear impression that Straw had been removed specifically because he had ridiculed Washington’s negotiating position, and that Perle had been intimately involved in ordering and engineering the surprise sacking.  While Perle was undergoing his public interrogation before six million listeners on the BBC, Tony Blair was entering the Vatican for his long-awaited audience…"

Alan:  I was going to say "sentence" there.

             "…audience with Pope Benedict XVI. Blair’s last papal audience occurred in early 2003 shortly before the launch of the Iraq War, when he pleaded with the late pontiff. John Paul II, to support the Crusade…"

Alan:  A crusade, again.

             "…against Islamist terrorism."

 

Alan:  Oh, a crusade, a Holy Crusade. It's interesting terminology coming to the fore.  Tony Blair, remember, has been in every other religion. He's been into see voodoo priests and everything else. So I don't see what seeing the pope does. I guess he has to play all the tunes for all the different peoples.

             "The German Pope has been a strident critic of, “fundamentalist terror…”

Alan:  This is the Vatican, talking about fundamentalist terror—what a history.

             "…the Vatican’s code term for Islamism. According to the published accounts, Blair and the pope discussed the current negotiations with Iran. The Sunday Times reported, “Pope Benedict XVI pressed Tony Blair to find a diplomatic resolution to the Iran nuclear crisis.” The Pope is more than well aware of the escalation of the military planning on both sides. There can be little serious doubt that George Bush had given Tony Blair his marching orders"

Alan:  This thing continues with a lot of speculation and little bits and pieces, and it's intended to heighten the tensions in the world. Perle is no dummy, and Perle can only say what he's told he can say to the world, because these characters were set up long ago as a separate organization, almost a separate people, really.  They don't go by Judaism, although they'll play all sides. At the top they'll play all sides. The old saying "when in Rome" applies here.  Perle and all these characters that created the New American Century club, got permission to do it, by Britain, because the U.S. was meant to take over from Britain, and it has been doing that since really World War I.  That was the intent and it has the blessings of Britain.  That's the special relationship that different prime ministers keep talking about between the U.S. and Britain, this "special relationship."

This is an ongoing agenda, a very old one. They must get the crowds, all different sects of crowds, following them, so they make sure they give us the leaders to follow.  Then the people will condemn—every mob condemns the other mob, and then you have chaos stirred up.  When you have enough bloodshed, chaos, fear and terror, you come out with the solutions.

It's interesting to see that around the late 1800’s, Revelations in the New Testament suddenly took different twists. Something, which was really, almost a second class or third class bunch of scripture, came to the forefront, deliberately so, with the creation of the authorized British Israeli or British Israel movement. This was the doctrine that the British people were really the lost tribes, or comprised some of the lost tribes. All this stuff came out of secret service committees, on how to control the empire and even expand the empire into a global empire.  They found that by reinterpreting Revelations, they could convince followers.  At that time, there were quite a lot of people who believed in their given religions. You could convince the followers that this was a natural thing, that Britain's empire taking over the world.  Then they've got their branches set up in America, because America they knew would have to take over, because of more manpower, more industry, more space and could put up more factories, and they would become the policemen of the world.

We have the admissions of people at the top, who went into Lebanon after World War I, such as  [Storr], who said, "we have created an ouster in a hostile country,” talking about putting a new Israel in amongst the Arabs.  Now who is “we”?  Because [Storr] was talking on behalf of the Crown, the Empire.

Looking back over history, this is nothing new, this ploy of putting in a people into a territory as either a buffer, or to stir up tensions down the road, whereby you could use as an excuse for going in to save somebody, one or the other side or whoever.

In ancient times, whole peoples were moved off their land at times. Not so much ancient, either, when we look at places like the Highland clearances of Scotland from the 1700’s into the 1800s.  Millions of people were just pushed off the land, put in boats and dumped overseas, by orders of the Crown.  That which they make very obvious will ensure the hate will build up, and that's what it's intended to do.

The reasons that we can be fooled, over and over, by the same techniques, are because we are so well conditioned, and so well understood, by those who have access to tremendous sciences of human nature.  The representatives we see near the top in the public view, may dawn prayer shawls or they may bow down to popes, or like Mr. Blair, pop in to see voodoo priests.  It's all a charade, because those people at the top, on all sides, don't believe in the myths of the old religions.  They all belong to their own religion. Every person at the top of every side belongs to a single religion. That's why they plan the future. That's why they never retire. That's why they're just as fanatical at 80 years of age, as they were when they were 25.  They also are brought up to their own stature, and power or sphere of influence, by pre-existent authorities.

You don't make your way up through the world by blasting a hole through the ozone layer of society and money and power.  If you are not allowed up, you wouldn’t get up. You'd be shot down, halfway up. That's the reality of the world we live in.  The players we see are carefully chosen to play their parts on the world stage, because it's the masses they must fool.  It's not each other they must fool.  They're all very high ranking Freemasons, way above the nonsense you'll read about on your local bookstore shelves, put out as PR about freemasonry, way above that. These are true believers, true believers in a very old esoteric religion, and that's why they never retire.  It's the only time you'll see such dedication, on all supposed sides, from the old men at the top.  The only time you'll see that is in a religion, and it's not the religions for the exoteric masses.

Unfortunately, the masses have accepted the identity they've been born with, the culture they've been born into.  Then they've had their indoctrinations to make them blend into the mass—they’re assigned the mass; and because of that they could be counted on to behave exactly as the elite want them to behave, at certain times, when they press the button.  This bunch is off to kill that bunch et cetera, et cetera.  It's the same arguments, over and over, until it’s monotonous.

Religion has never given the opportunity to allow an individual to find their true potential in this world, or who they are. The function of religion is to control the minds of the followers.  That's why they’re "authorized religions."  The conflicts will go on and on, until this great work is achieved.

Albert Pike, who wrote "Morals & Dogma," which was considered to be the Bible of Freemasonry, said it himself, he said, “We could just as easily have taken the writings of Xerxes or some other ancient builder.” The reason they took the Old Testament as a form of foundation, was simply because most people in the west were Christianized. They could relate to some of the stories, but they could have picked any ancient builder, or a Persian king, and he admits that.

This religion pre-existed most of our given history. When the pharaohs, for instance, were very young, the priests would educate them in how to maintain and hold power over the people, over the masses.  These were sciences which were known thousands of years ago, and it's based on the understanding of human behavior, especially mass human behavior, and because of that they can bring on conflict at any time they wish. It's a simple formula.

In pre-Christian Rome, the Romans, who taxed every country that they went into—they robbed it, they pillaged it and really did drain the countries—to keep Rome itself living in an incredible luxury and style so advanced, compared to the countries they conquered and looted. Yet their own historians tongue-and-cheek would let slip little bits and pieces, being "authorized historians."  No different from today. They'd tell you that they were looting the countries that they went into, under the guise of bringing civilization to them.  “Civilization,” and here's Perle using similar terminology today.  Just simple formulas, where you demonize a people you want to take over, and bring this strange odd thing called "democracy" to them.  The people are fighting over democracy, with their left wings and their right wings, and their left foots and right foots, and their left eye and right eyes. It's very, very schizophrenic, indeed; but they can't figure it out.

When I was really small, I noticed, by simply reading from the adult libraries, that the organizations such as the Royal Institute of International Affairs were predicting the future, in their own publications.  As I grew up, I noticed that regardless of what wing they put in, left wing or a chicken wing, this agenda, sure enough, carried forth, this bringing of democracy to the world.  You cannot get people to change their culture or traditional lifestyle, quickly, without violence.  It's obvious these characters, who are forcing this agenda, are going on a "business plan."  It's a business plan, you see, with times, dates, money spent, time spent on certain parts of their project, the Great Builders.  They want to bring this “humanitarian” war to a close, and we'll have the same standardized system worldwide—how monotonous.

There's nothing perfect in any culture, since if we look back at the cultures and their systems, that they all have so much in common to do with beginnings.  One family, that's maybe a bit taller or more aggressive than the rest, simply conquer their neighbors and take them over, and before you know it they own a county. They own an area, and then they own, ultimately, a country through violence. The aggressive ones, they end up being after one or two generations of ritual and propaganda, they end up being set in the mind-set of the people as somehow portraying their tribe. The pinnacle of your tribe, in fact, forgetting how they started off through mass slaughter, murder and stealing.  Therefore, their gang gets to be the one on top.

Down through history they have other gangs come along, and sometimes a new gang will take over, and they become accepted by the people, after a couple of generations, as though they'd always been there, and we watch pageantry and ritual.  What you're looking at now is a battle of gangs, and there's no doubt about it.  All cultures have their top elite gang on top that run the whole show, so naturally they're not going to like it too much if someone wants to take away their takings, the place where they get their takings from—their lifestyle, their prominence, their power, their status, their income.

It always struck me as odd that, that which you could see in a playground at schools, between competitive gangs, wasn't seen in the supposed acceptable forms of leading families, pre-eminent families, very wealthy families, because that's how they got their beginnings. That's how they held on to their power, by being completely and utterly ruthless.  The deviants are in control and have been, down through the centuries.  Money made it much, much more easy for them to take over, money.  Rome did it too.  They forced the people they conquered to accept money, and then they taxed it back from them, and then paid them back in money, to build for them and work for them.  It's a merry-go-round.  It's a concept, a strange concept, which most folk accept, but never understand.

I'm surprised that some of the biggest betting shops in England are not, and they might actually be doing it, because they do put bets on the wars and so on, to see which gang wins, THE GANG OF THE WORLD.  They'll recruit thousands of professors and writers to convince us, very quickly, how naturally it all is, how natural the gang is in place, and how much better off we are.  The ancient kings were very good at that kind of thing. How they “builded cities,” as they said, using slave labor.  However, without the participation of the brainwashed on all factions, who are willing to kill each other for people they will never ever see, except on television, the ones that tell us to go off and do this, and do that, and kill.

WITHOUT OUR PARTICIPATION, NONE OF THIS WOULD BE POSSIBLE.  Once again, the understanding of human nature is used.

You'll notice that at least 20 years pass between major wars, and that is because by that time, those that were crippled or often dead from the last war, the new generations have forgotten all about it.  The ones growing up to be recruited, for the next war, know nothing about it. They think it's all glory and wonder, and each one wants to be the hero of his tribe.  When he puts on that uniform, he'll be just like Rambo, when he can go off and slaughter millions and just yell as he's got that big machine gun hanging there—something that weighs about half a ton, around his neck.  The fantasy of it all, the tribal nature, which is utilized and understood to the full, works over and over again.

Have you ever noticed, that as you watch these conflicts being manipulated, and how the peoples naturally withdraw into their own group, as if on queue, a natural response, again?  Have you ever noticed, as they quote God, and all sides quote God, you see, that God is very quiet in the matter?  We need the people to tell us what God is thinking, and they do. They tell us what God is thinking or what God wants.  God is a generic term.  Every ancient god in the past was called "God," and that's no coincidence.  That's the general term that's used.  Yes, we know that certain religions have their own secret word for God, deriving from the ancient times in the Arabian lands, because knowing the name of a god meant the god had to serve you, you had the power over the genie.  The genie came out of the bottle, and I often think the guys must have drunk the bottle first, before they saw the genie. Yet we have all these people, with all their fancy dresses on, telling us what God wants. God's on our side, eh?

The irony of war after war after war, and masses of slaughter, manipulated by very clever people, who all coerced together to bring these things around, and how the public respond like robots when the tribal button is pushed.  People who would never, in ordinary life, without conflict, they'd never think of going and killing somebody, suddenly wanting to do it.  The young men want to do it.  The older ones don't.  That's why they don't recruit older people for the military.  They go after the young people around 18, very immature, you see.  They don't know any better.  The movies have had tremendous effects on their minds.  They think they're indestructible.

And to top it off, we have the admissions, down through the years, of the chemical tampering that's going on with troops to make them more aggressive.  The new anti-malarial drugs that were given, even to Canadian troops, and some of which caused hallucinations, while they were on duty in Somalia, and there's a CBC documentary on that. The one guy said it was just like walking through rainbows, and at one time he pulled a gun out to a child's head and pointed it, just for the fun of it.  It seemed very funny at the time.

When they don that uniform they belong privately. They've sold themselves. That's why they can be experimented on.  That's why the cultures that had the elders, which gave wisdom and kept the balance between the very young and the other age groups.  That's why the elderly have been discredited, and the families destroyed, because they certainly did not want older people to have input into a young person's mind.  They might just put them off putting on a military uniform and going off to kill, for reasons they don't even question.  That's another sad part of it.  They're not interested in political strategies.  They're not even interested in their long term political goals, or who benefits, and which families benefit through the financial scams that we see going on, because war is very, very profitable.

The average mercenary trooper—and all peacetime soldiers are mercenaries—doesn't concern himself with that. He wants to be a hero. He wants to be accepted by his peer group, with honor, and get little tin badges and little ribbons, because deep down he suspects that in his life when he goes back to city streets, he's not going to get any respect at all. He’ll probably get a low-pay job, and have nothing but repetitive boring stories to tell people.

I've watched the people at Remembrance Day (some call it Veteran's Day) in Canada and Britain, with these old codgers that dress up with their blazers, their blue blazers or black blazers, and their little berets on, and try and march along (the old guys from World War II and Korea).  They all cry when they tell their stories, and so on and so on. However, because of the bonding they felt under the threat of their lives—you're talking about an increased bonding, because of a survival instinct that was pressed to the full—they feel like they have never lived after the particular war they were in.  Their mind, in a sense, stopped right there. The rest of their life has been anti-climax of basic drudgery, and that's a sad statement, and yet they'll encourage the young, those guys will encourage the young to go off and do the same.

The abused always seem to go to the abuser for help, in this particular system, the value system. The value system of what?—Where a few hundred families on the planet, down through the ages, with various titles and honors and so on, can control the rest?

THE REASON THEY CAN CONTROL THE REST IS THAT MOST PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF RISK-TAKING.

They conform, CON-FORM - the priest’s form.  They're CON-FORMED, SHAPED.  They're scared to go against the grain, because the other robots will look at them strangely.  That's where people are until they wake up and have that spark to find out what's going on.  That spark has to flare up into a real flame, and get through all the nonsense that's there to trap you, and all the finger pointing with traditional enemies to mislead you.

THE REASON FAMILIES HAVE NEVER LOST POWER, DOWN THROUGH THE MANY, MANY CENTURIES, IS BECAUSE THEY'VE ALWAYS GOT SOMEONE ELSE TO BE THE SCAPEGOAT, ALWAYS.

The public, who don't think too far ahead, will jump always on the offered scapegoat—a sad commentary on the world. Those with memory will remember all of the snippets of information from the "covert wars," as they were called, going on all over the world, Latin America and elsewhere, where everyone's involved, the special forces of all the western powers.

The quiet killings—quiet that is, for those who were living pretty well in Europe and North America, who didn't hear the screams as their tax money pounded and slaughtered, often from the air.  Being told about it doesn't impact most people.  They have no empathy for anyone outside their own family.  That's a sad state of affairs, but that's what we have today.  There's no cohesiveness and natural bonding between peoples.  Divide and conquer, right down to the individual, and that's when the State reigns supreme, when everyone is conquered and separated.

I'll leave you tonight with a Canadian singer, who wrote this song after visiting some Latin American countries, and how he expressed what he felt about what was happening, the promotion of wars, by the big military powers, on peasantry.

For myself and Hamish, it's good night, and please, take your gods with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:48 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB
"SIMPLE SIMONS, SECRET SERVICES
AND
SOCIETAL ATROPHY"
February 2, 2007

Hi, I'm Alan Watt and today is February 2, 2007.  This is cuttingthroughthematrix.com with another spontaneous blurb, which generally are just thoughts that flicker through my mind as the day progresses or come out just before I talk, things come to the surface sometimes.

I was thinking about the crisis we live through all through our lives, one after the other.  That's crisis, not lives I'm talking about, and how the average person not only can't really keep up with it all, all the real things that happen, the real fears and the crisis which are manipulated, the possible crisis coming up.  All the things that keep us on edge, fearful and obedient and obedience is the real technique.  That is, it comes out of fear mongering, obedience, the technique of creating it.

Tribal nature makes most people who are followers look to the leader for the answers to solve their problems.  That's why you have a Santa Claus, the good daddy who a child thinks or has been taught to think brings all the freebies to them, the greatest con for commercialization ever devised.  That's why people turn towards their deity, whatever one they've been given, to solve their problems for them.  That's why the child looks towards the parent.  At least they used to in the old days.  Now they don't really have to.  They've got guidance counselors at school, who often do in this day and age have more contact and exchange more information, have more conversations with the children than the parents do.

You have to look back to see how the plans that were laid down for the centuries were to culminate in a New World Order for the Age of Aquarius.  This is the age where many of the helpers, the workers towards this at the low levels thought they were going to bring in the Age of Peace and happiness, the infantile dream of having no worry, just living a perpetual childhood.

They gave them the "hippy movement" as they called it and broke out an updated form of music, which had been experimented with in the 1920's.  The music was to be accompanied with drugs and miniskirts and different fashion designs, aimed specifically at a younger generation.  It's always a young generation you must capture if you want to move things in a big way and move the agenda forward.

In the 1920's when they brought out the Charleston and the miniskirts and the free love and made booze a very naughty thing to have, which guaranteed that booze cans sprung up all over the place and the young would go to them, and they also brought in drugs too.  Cocaine was being thrown around in a heavy way back in the '20, the Roaring '20's.

The problem with the free love and the cocaine and the drugs and the booze was that they didn't have the pill at that time.  They didn't have all the abortion clinics up and running, and so they had a tremendous fallout from pregnancies and certainly back street abortionists sprung up all over the place.  I mean that's a whole different story in itself.  The homes, the orphanages, which we know today the big ones sprung up to take care of all the unwanted children that came out of that era.  They didn't have the welfare state and all that.  What happened was the big planners of culture went back to the drawing board with what they learned and revamped it all and suddenly in the '60's it burst out all over with the pop music – so father, the pop, was followed by the rock you see and drugs.

Britain, the BBC was one of the biggest pushers for the drugs because they got these groups that suddenly appeared out of nowhere and we know from exposure since that they were trained by professionals to appear on the scene.  They came out of nowhere at the time and were being pushed on "Top of the Pops", that was a BBC one where they come on and they'd mime their song.  Then the next bunch would come on and mime their song.  They had to mime because they didn't even give them time to plug anything in or set up their gear.  It's impossible, but most of the viewers never noticed that.  They thought they were playing and the parents did too that watched this, and it all seemed very innocent at the beginning except when they would bring on certain leaders of the groups for interviews and they were always stoned out of their minds.  Some of them fell off the chairs and the interviewers rather than be taken aback or the television cutting that part, the interviewer would turn to the camera and give this naughty wink, like ha, ha, aren't we naughty.  This was all to encourage the whole drug movement.  An idea as I said that they tried before on a more limited scale under prohibition, which made it really exciting to get into booze cans where the drugs were too.

They coupled this with the advent of the pill for unwanted pregnancies to stop that, at least for the ones who took it.  They had tremendous fallout for a lot of the women who came down with blood clots and strokes and so on, but that was all kind of hushed up at the time.  We definitely saw tremendous changes and the newspapers began to also rant on about this exciting period of change and hippy communes were being sponsored to go off and try and live in the woods.  These little communes were awful like the habitat areas – a preliminary habitat area of the United Nations, which they're promoting at the moment and shortly will be pushed into effect.  Nothing happens by chance in culture.  It's promoted to the public who simply go along thinking it's actually theirs and nothing works greater than conning a young generation into telling them that this is their culture.

The youngsters have no reason to disbelieve this.  They thought it was their culture because all the magazines suddenly appeared, youth magazines, teenage magazines hyping it up, but it wasn't designed by teenagers.  It was designed by very old people who knew the business of culture creation.

THE DRUGS TIED IN WITH THE BREAKING DOWN OF SOCIETY. It was one of the reasons which would be pushed for creating massive internal armies of police and special drug squads, a whole buildup of officialdom that would eventually control a future population.  That's partly the reason they had to have the drugs there and also to literally create such disruption within society that the old customs, the old way, the culture (your cult, culture), your cult would be broken down; and it wasn't yours anyway because the previous one had been designed as well for them.  It definitely separated the generations.  That was the encouragement of it.

TO BREAK A GENERATION FROM ADOPTING THE WAYS OF THE PREVIOUS ONE – that's really why it was pushed.

 

Out of the blue came these eccentric talkers, talkers on stage, widely publicized, like Dr. Timothy Leary who would often go on the stage with his white coat of the scientists, the new priests you see, and exemplify and glorify drugs to make the youth think it's so exciting.  Alternate experiences, the Aldous Huxlian technique of mind control, really; because if you're not in charge of your mind, who is?  Why would hand it over to someone else? – which lots of people do.

We know now that Timothy Leary worked for the CIA.  That is no surprise and it wasn't even a surprise to me when I was small watching all this stuff happening and watching adults' reactions to it or watching older children's reactions to it and how they adopted the outfits – the gene theory.  That's the gene theory, the blue jeans, the Blue Lodge, the similarity of the uniforms in China and also the miniskirts and the free love attitude.  However, they never talked about the sexually transmitted diseases which went rampant as well and that begins another story.

However, Timothy Leary, it's an interesting name, Timothy, because if you speak it out you've got "time of the leary" you see and "the leary" in old Europe and in England was the man who went around with the long pole with the light on the end, the burning light, to light the street lamps which were gas in the 1800's into the early 1900's.  There's no coincidence there with his name.

Looking at history can be comical at times because some things are put right out there so obviously for certain people to understand, but the rest of the masses don't.  They will speak of these things and be very serious about them without knowing what it even means.

A lot of countries had their own versions of Leary, promoting this stuff to students.  You'll find in the behavioral sciences back in the '60, definitely in the '70's, they came out with a wired up motorcycle helmet which produced a mild magnetic field on a certain frequency and this would give you altered states, the same types of altered states in fact as certain of the drugs do, the hallucinogenic drugs.

"Purple Haze"
By Jimi Hendrix

Purple Haze all in my brain,
lately things don't seem the same,
actin' funny but I don't know why
'scuse me while I kiss the sky.

Purple Haze all around,
don't know if I'm coming up or down.
Am I happy or in misery?
Whatever it is, that girl put a spell on me.

Help me
Help me

A form of EMP (electromagnetic pulsations) can also alter your reality, make you see things which aren't there, yet in the behavioral sciences it's well understood that they can give you the exact same experiences with this helmet as the drugs they use in Latin America, Peru and so on for their experiences and you'll see the same things.  You have the Lilliputian ones where you see small people and it's caused by alterations in the temporal lobe of the brain.  You can also stretch it further into the HAARP technology which also beams out EMP and that could control, at least as we know in theory, whole nations of people.  Altering the temporal lobe will make you highly excited or placid depending on the slight variations of the frequency.

The reality we live in is a manufactured reality, scientifically put together, so complex because it's your entire reality. It's all the facets that control it, manipulated from a single head you might say, the capstone, and drugs were thrown over university walls at some points out of limos in garbage bags to get the whole ball rolling, free.

Prior to that, we can look into all of the medicines that suddenly came out in the 1800's by the Bayer Company in England. The Bayer is the family name or Bower of Rothschild.  They still have the Bayer patent.  They run Bayer that makes aspirin today.  That's one of their family businesses.  They're always involved in drugs on the one hand and money on the other and the running of countries.  In the 1800's, they came out with all these medicines which had opiates in them, so no matter what your problem was they would have brand a medicine with an opiate in it, which also could produce these experiences. It drug people down, made them compliant and made them manageable.  However, it was highly addictive so they'd lose certain functioning abilities.

They really tried that on the population of Britain, but luckily Britain at that time had a healthy pub industry and the people preferred to go to the pubs where they'd socialize and chat about politics and all that kind of stuff and pass on local and regional and international news.  The pubs in a sense defeated the opium industry when they tried to bring it into the population of Britain and other parts of Europe.

At that time, there was no prescription needed.  You could buy it over-the-counter.  The same people, the same families in fact that had forced the opium into China in the opium wars are still running the show today.  You see the same family names and then in the U.S. they still go to Yale.  It's hereditary.

And you wonder why the drugs proliferate always into the poorest areas.  The crimes develop because people must get their fix.  Police forces constantly recruit and up their quotas for more and more manpower to deal with this problem and yet it's a rigged problem.  Both sides are run by the same capstone as I say.

Back in 1996, an article was put out in "Everybody's News" which was a Cincinnati alternative paper and it was called "The Jeff Lynch Story", so I'm going to read a little bit of this tonight.  It's an interesting story to see an average person with an American culture joining the military and his experiences, when at every stage of the game he thought he was doing the right thing.

Alan:  This was on page 8 of "Everybody's News", November 29th to December 5th, 1996.

The story was put out by Randy Katz, K-A-T-Z.

These days, 34-year-old Cincinnati native Jeffrey Lynch deals in antiques, applies his skill as an artist and photographer, paints houses and does other odd jobs to support himself while he pursues his dream of producing documentary films.

In the early 1980's, however, Jeff Lynch had very different aspirations.  He was committed to a career in the U.S. military and in 1982 became one of only a handful of a group of 300 recruits to complete the U.S. Army's intensive and harrowing two-year courses in "Special Forces Airborne Tactics and Medical Training" at Fort Benning in Georgia and Fort Sam Houston in Texas.

Lynch subsequently opted for the service in the Coast Guard and saw duty as a Quarter Master aboard the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter, Steadfast. In that capacity and the words of an official unit commendation, he gave meritorious service in helping to carry out the Coast Guard's primary mission in the Caribbean to disrupt maritime and air smuggling of marijuana and cocaine into the United States.

But while Lynch and his shipmates made some sizeable high-seas busts of marijuana shipments, he said he never saw or interdicted an ounce of cocaine.  Though Lynch didn't see any U.S. bound shipments of cocaine, he did hear about some.  Lynch's information came from an unexpected but authoritative source.

While on shore leave in Honduras, Lynch ran into an old Special Forces buddy, one of the men who had finished a medical course along with him at Fort Sam Houston.  The man, however, was not in uniform.  In the course of their conversation in an out of the way bar in the Honduran coastal city of Puerto Cortés, Lynch said his buddy told him he was an active undercover duty carrying out covert operations for the CIA's program in support of the contras.

Alan:  Remember the Iran-Contra scandal for drugs.  It's amazing how much has happened, huge things really, and we skip over them and that's a whole field in itself for those who want to look into it.  With Ollie North who wanted to have – he wanted a team to bring in martial law over the whole country.

Lynch said his friend also told him that he had seen a plane load of cocaine cleared for takeoff from a CIA maintained airstrip in Honduran jungle and that the plane was bound for a U.S. Military Base in this country.  The plane's pilot, Lynch friend told him, was supplied by the CIA with codes that would allow him to clear U.S. Customs Air Surveillance. The contents of the plane his friend made clear were destined for sale on the streets of America to help fund the CIA's covert support of the contra war against Nicaragua. In that moment Jeff Lynch's ideas about his relationship to this country's military agenda changed forever.  This is his story.

I enlisted in the Special Forces, the Green Berets when I was 18 in September of '81 Lynch recalls.  I had the idea that this would be my rite of passage to manhood.  I've seen John Wayne in the "Green Beret" (that's the movie) and the hormones were raging.

Lynch never knew his natural father.  His mother's marriage to his stepfather broke up when Lynch was 12 and thereafter he was raised in St. Petersburg, Florida by his grandparents.  His grandfather had also been in the military, but he was less than thrilled about his grandson's decision.

He told me I was crazy for enlisting in Special Forces, Lynch recalls.  Shortly after beginning training, Lynch began to think his grandfather was right.  Looking back, I don't know how I made it.  I was in the Army Reserve on active duty for two years training.  Of the roughly 300 recruits, people from all over the Army who started out with us at Fort Bragg, only 14 completed the stress training at Fort Benning and were sent to the medical training course at Fort Sam Houston.

The pace and intensity of the Special Forces training, says Lynch, were designed to weed out most people.  It wasn't only physical hardship; it was also psychological stress.  We - those who survived the entire training course were very tight because we went through a lot together.

Alan:  That's the bonding that's forced in.  There's a lot of psychological bonding goes on, which is intensified through scientific methods of training.

One of the most harrowing and effective training procedures at Fort Sam Houston was the poetically designated "goat lab," Lynch says.  It was an experience he'll never forget.

They would take a full M-16 clip and empty it into a herd of goats.  Then, as surreal as it sounds, an instructor in a white smock would stand over us while we went to work.  We tried to simulate a battlefield and our job was to do everything we could to try and save these goats.  It sounds cruel, but it was an effective training. You can read in a book over and over how they stopped arterial hemorrhaging, but when that artery is spurting blood in your face and you take that clamp with your hand on it and the bleeding stops, it gives you a high level of confidence.

Alan:  It also would help to further dehumanize you with natural feelings. That's also part of the procedure, to abuse then help, you see.

Lynch also received intensive training in the most sophisticated surgical techniques, some of which are not taught to civilian physicians until their surgical residencies after medical school and in addition to saving lives Lynch was taught how to take them.

They taught us how to kill people and to make it look like someone else did it, says Lynch. They taught us how to kill a person and make it look like it was suicide.

He understood the rational for that paradoxical element in his training course, but he was never comfortable with it.  He was also concerned about the impact active duty and the Special Forces would have on his young marriage. By the end of his training, Lynch's concept of Special Forces active duty no longer was based on fantasies about John Wayne. The reality spending two or six to nine months of the year in third-world countries training indigenous rebel forces to overthrow governments the U.S. considered undesirable didn't seem to him worth wrecking his marriage for.

He opted instead for active duty in the Coast Guard.  He went to the Navy's Quarter Master School and received a posting out of his adopted hometown of St. Petersburg on the medium endurance Coast Guard Cutter Steadfast.

Lynch served aboard the Steadfast from 1984 through '87 as the ship's crew focused on nabbing elicit vessels in and around the Caribbean, choke points such as Yucatan passage and the windward passage of Cuba. In those three years he estimates he was involved in seizing several tons of marijuana on the high seas, though not one drop of cocaine.

The drug shipment that made the most lasting impact on Lynch, however, was the one his captain let go free.  It was off the Yucatan Peninsula early one morning, Lynch says.  I was on a watch with a young inexperienced ensign.  It was my job as Quarter Master to keep track of where the ship was and to keep the official log, which was used in court whenever we brought people to justice.

Alan:  That's why you log on to the computer.  It's a legality; it's being used as a record, which one day will be used against you.

It was really important to be very neat and precise so I would keep a rough log then go back and enter the information in the official log.  What happened that morning, however, would never become an official entry in the Steadfast's log.

We had picked up a radar contact, Lynch recalls.  It was a good sized craft running darkened ship, that is with no lights, as if attempting to avoid detection.  We came up on it and hit it with a spotlight.  It was a Columbian fishing trawler converted; it was loaded with dope.  There was even marijuana stacked on the decks.  You could smell it.

Lynch says he advised an ensign to alert the ship's operations officer, as called for by Coast Guard procedures, shortly after making radar contact with the suspected vessel.  The officers were asleep in their cabins, however, and the ensign hesitated to wake them up before making sight contact with the Columbian vessel.

Shortly after the sighting had been made, though, everyone on board the Steadfast was wide awake.  We'd sometimes go weeks without seeing anything illegal, says Lynch.  This was a big bust.  The captain comes up and he's elated, as we all are, then the operations officer turns to me and says, "Quarter Master Lynch, where's the EPIC check?"  E-P-I-C, EPIC is the acronym for the Coast Guard's El Paso Information Center, which is electronically linked to Washington based military and government authorities.

Alan:  I like the name El Paso – like you pass it, passago.

All Coast Guard ships are required to obtain EPIC clearance before taking action against any foreign vessel in international waters.  In this case, however, the ensign had failed to inform EPIC of their action, even though a boarding party from the Steadfast was already steering towards the Columbian trawler.  The captain gets on the radio and orders the boarding party to return to the ship, Lynch says.  They send the name and location of the trawler to EPIC and the word comes back that is a Category One vessel.

Category One, Lynch explains, is a code that automatically instructs all Coast Guard personnel that they are not to interfere with or even contact any vessels so designated.  These dirt bags had been claiming "no speak English" when we tried to make radio contact, Lynch says.  Now the captain gets on the radio and tells them, "sorry to have interrupted your voyage. We've been diverted to an emergency search and rescue mission 100 miles east of here. You have a pleasant voyage north." Then we turned and steamed away full throttle.  The bridge of the Steadfast fell silent, Lynch says, while he struggled to control his own rage.

By this time my marriage was on the rocks, due to the long separations caused by his sea duty. I'm writing everything down in my rough log and saying under my breath, "this is bullshit, this is bullshit." And the captain sees me writing this and comes over to me and says, Petty Officer Lynch, you don't need to put all that stuff in your official log.

Lynch says the captain instructed him to enter only the time and place of the interception and to note that that the encounter was determined not to be of law enforcement value.  I was angry, says Lynch.  I said, sir, no disrespect, but this is bullshit.  Meanwhile my duty officer was looking at me as if to say you are nuts because you just don't say that to the captain.  In fact, Lynch's actions could have lead to a serious charge against him had his captain been so inclined.

Fortunately for Lynch, he wasn't.  Instead Captain F.J. Schmidt summoned Lynch to his cabin and after issuing a stern warning about the consequences of any further behavior such as Lynch had exhibited on the bridge that morning, he explained to him the real nature of a Category One vessel designation.  He told me that designation is set up to protect undercover informants.  We would have had an undercover DEA agent aboard that boat and if we had boarded them we could have gotten our people killed; and I felt terrible.

That experience off the Yucatan Peninsula wasn't the only time that Lynch found himself felling terrible as a result of conflict between the demands of his duty and the dictates of his own conscience.  While helping carrying out another aspect of the Coast Guard's mission in the Caribbean, he took the photo of Haitian refugees sprawling on the deck of the Steadfast that appears on the cover of this week's EN.

We had intercepted them in the windward passage of Cuba, Lynch says.  In the middle of the photo you can see two of the male Haitians looking sadly at something.  They were watching their boat sink after our gunners had fired on it.  Part of the refugees' inconsolable sadness undoubtedly stemmed from what they knew lay ahead for them.  Our orders were to return these people to Haiti.  It was still during the Devali regime.

When we docked there the Haitian police drove paddy wagons right out onto the loading docks.  They would beat the refugees savagely right in front of our eyes as they came off the ship.  Then they loaded them up and took them away.  Lynch's most distressing and disillusioning encounter, however, came not at sea but on land while helping to train Honduran navy personnel in the techniques of drug interdiction.

The Steadfast dropped anchor off Puerto Cortés and Lynch and some of his shipmates were granted 12-hour shore leave.  Lynch rambled off on his own and eventually happened on a little bar where he stopped in for a drink and a sandwich before returning to his ship.  There he says he ran across a former acquaintance whom he had never expected to see again, let alone in a seedy Honduran bar.  The man was a fellow American, one of that handful who had completed Special Forces training with Lynch at Fort Sam Houston.

I didn't recognize him at first, said Lynch.  First of all, you don't expect to see other Americans in a place like that and here he is with long hair and an earring sitting in civilian clothes.  Lynch will not divulge the name of the former Special Forces comrade out of concern and in doing so he placed a man's life in danger.  However, Lynch says he had no trouble recognizing his fellow goat lab veteran once he spotted him.

He says, Lynch what the hell are you doing here?  Then he says the former comrades swapped stories for about an hour but he asked his buddy, what's with the hair?  Lynch said his friend informed him he was working covert down here.  We're not supposed to be here.  Lynch said his friend told him the cover was necessary because Congress had cut off funds for the contras.  He was on active duty A-team out of Fort Bragg, said Lynch, working covertly undercover for the CIA in support of the contras.

He was a Green Beret, a non-commissioned officer, still an enlisted man receiving active duty pay and working covertly for the agency, but if he was caught he had to lie and say he was a mercenary acting on his own.  He told me he was in Puerto Cortés to meet a shipment of arms and to be escorted along with several other CIA subcontractors, none of whom was present among the five or six other people in the bar where Lynch said he met his friend to a contra camp in the mountains near the Nicaraguan border several hours away.

Lynch says that when his friend heard what he was doing in Honduras training the Hondurans to board ships and seize drug shipments in accordance with international law, it struck the undercover Special Forces solider as funny.  He said, you guys are down here trying to stop the cocaine?  We’re sending it back to the states I said.  You're kidding.  What do you mean?  He said, I've seen them loading it on the planes, tons of the stuff, pure cocaine.  They, Lynch says, were the contras – people working with the Nicaraguan resistance forces and he's telling me he's seen tons of the stuff being loaded on planes and it's being flown back to the states and sold in America to finance the freedom fighters.

At one point Lynch says, his friend responded to his expressions of disgust and disbelief by saying the drug shipments were a small price to pay for freedom.

Alan:  That's how it's rationalized.

It blew my mind, said Lynch.  Here vice president George Bush had come on board the Steadfast on the previous New Year's Day in the Bahamas, shook the hand of every member of the crew and gave us a rah-rah speech about what a great job we were doing as soldiers on the front lines of the war on drugs.  Reagan, Bush, North, I know they knew what was going on.

Lynch said his friend told him about one plane in particular that he'd seen with his own eyes loaded with cocaine to be flown from Honduras to an Air Force base in Texas.  There, Lynch says, his friend told him the cocaine was offloaded and allowed to be sold in the streets of America.  I said, whoa, what happens when these guys hit U.S. airspace and get confronted by customs?  He told me that the pilot has a special designation code that they give customs and customs lets them right in.

Alan:  The same thing as they were doing with the ships.

Lynch said most of what his friend told him, he presented to me in the form of a joke. He thought it was funny that I was trying like hell to stop drugs getting back to America and he was helping to get them in. It may have been like a joke but Lynch said he is certain his friend was not kidding and Lynch certainly wasn't laughing.

Lynch had given his Special Forces comrade his word that he would not let the information imparted that afternoon in a little bar in Puerto Cortés go any further. For years he kept the secret even when high school friends taunted him when he came home during leave. They'd say, what the hell are you doing out there? You have so much coke around here you must not be doing your job. It really bothered me. Even after his military discharge in 1987, Lynch mentioned the conversation to no one except his wife and close family. His marriage, however, did not long survive the strain that his military service placed on it.

A second marriage ended up when the failure of the war on drugs came home to Lynch in a very direct way. His wife succumbed to heroin addiction. Meanwhile, Lynch used his veterans' benefits to attend film schools at the Ohio State University where he once managed using a handheld camera to interview Ollie North and asked him pointed questions about contra drug operations. Eager to corroborate his own information and to satisfy his own conscience, Lynch sought out any and all public disclosures regarding the CIA contra drug connection.

He closely followed, as most of the media did not, the Congressional hearings chaired 10 years ago by Senator Bob Kerrey which looked into a broad range of CIA complicity in worldwide drug operations and other illicit activities in support of friendly governments. He clipped and saved the 1993 New York Times that seemed to bear his own experience aboard the Steadfast when the crew was ordered to let the trawler full of marijuana go free. The Times and 60 Minutes both did stories about a covert CIA drug sting operation that went awry and resulted in a ton of nearly pure cocaine reaching the United States courtesy of the agency's anti-drug program in Venezuela.

Then last August, the San Jose Mercury News published an in-depth series of articles by a reporter Gary Webb which purported to prove the direct legacy of the American government's covert support for the Nicaraguan guerrillas was the crack cocaine epidemic afflicting America's inner cities, particularly Los Angeles--

Alan:  Well, you always dope the angels first, eh?

Hearing about the series now with its own website on Internet, Lynch wrote to the paper and obtained a copy. When he read it he felt as if he had been awakened from a long nightmare. I said, thank God, after more than 10 years the truth has finally come out about what was going on down there. Others, however, weren't so sure. Many in the mainstream press pooh-poohed the Mercury News series and criticized Webb for making overly broad inferences about the CIA levels of involvement in the drug shipments.

On November 15th, Jeff Lynch managed to get through as a caller to C-Span's The Washington Journal whose guest that day were Los Angeles Times op-ed page contributing editor, Susan Garment, and Boston Globe columnist, Thomas Oliphant. Lynch asked why the mainstream press seemed to have blown off the Mercury News series, attempted to discredit Webb and had largely ignored the Kerry Commission's report. He also tried to provide a basis for his questions by referring to his own Coast Guard experience in the Caribbean. The C-Span host cut him off.

Alan:  You'll find all through the news media a lot of the top people are actually working for the CIA. That's not a secret.

With news organizations and individual journalists throughout the country lining up on one side or the other of the San Jose Mercury News debate, many have accused that paper of irresponsibility suggesting that the CIA had a direct involvement in illegal shipments of cocaine to Los Angeles and other American cities. Jeff Lynch's story bears directly on that controversy.

EN…

Alan:  I guess it's EN or N – it's like ON actually in French.

…has independently verified Lynch's service.

Alan:  This is actually this paper here, Everybody's News.

Everybody's News has independently verified Lynch's service record with the Coast Guard and has copies of Lynch's training diplomas, commendation letters, certificates of honorable discharge and other records.

In our estimation, Jeffrey Lynch's accounts of his Coast Guard experience appears both accurate and credible and if his former Special Forces training buddy was telling Lynch the truth about seeing a plane loaded with cocaine take off for the U.S. from the CIA maintained airfield in Honduras, it may be history's eventual judgment that the only thing irresponsible about the assertions made in the San Jose Mercury News series was that they didn't go far enough.

And this is old stuff you see because we're being bypassed or it's been bypassed with all the other crisis have come down the pike since then, and it's well called the pike.

This is the world we live in, where that which you think exists for a certain purpose does the opposite. It's really the matrix you live in. Not only that, they've trained populations. Every country's done this to their own people. They've trained their populations to perceive things the way they're taught to perceive things and never to question what's really going on.

We see it even within the churches down through the centuries, where when a priest is caught interfering with little boys who also believed in – I think it was Al Gore's assertions that no child left behind – well, with the church it was no child's behind left. And yet the followers didn't want to believe it because they've been trained to see these upright people as the most honest beings on the planet, regardless of the evidence; and even today when people are caught in the act, so many of them can't believe it's true. They will not believe it's true – the alteration of perception through conditioning.

The fallout on society, all societies, of the drug scene has been tremendous. It's also created large amounts of money for covert "black operations" as they call them and it's also created a huge military force of police within countries who are supposed to combat it; and I have no doubt, too, they're told who to attack and who to let go, who to ignore. The same as every other institution is with their codes and so on.

 

THE WAR HAS BEEN ON THE PUBLIC. The public are the ones who suffer for this agenda and that's okay for the big boys to decide because it's their world as far as they're concerned. THIS WAR IS ON THE PUBLIC.

It was declared a long time ago. A long time ago and through agencies like Special Forces or the SAS in Britain, they have compartmentalized agencies within them that don't even know what the other hand's doing. They can all go into training together and never know there's a section over there doing the opposite of what you're trained to do or supposed to do with your job. The same in the CIA. The same in the Mossad. The same in MI6 et cetera right through across the whole planet.

It's a double game going on because it's all designed, just like the Cold War was manufactured and designed and financed from the beginning by the same bankers that run the world and the same goal of world government run from Britain. The whole thing was designed to create a huge technological, scientific control of the public through scientific means. That's what it was all heading towards during the Cold War. They said it was going to be won by a war of science.

As they said that those with the most advanced sciences would win that war, they were having annual meetings, international meetings in Moscow with world science organizations where the top scientists of every country that was supposedly opposed to the Soviet regime were allowed to go and attend. Something you would never really do if this was a war which would be won by your scientists, you wouldn't let them go and meet your enemy; and the reason for that being is it was a joke you see.

It was to get every country to finance their government, to be taxed to the hilt in research and development, to protect you, which had nothing to do with the Cold War. It was to do with this present stage we're at now and the age shortly to appear, where we're all totally controlled through scientific technology. That's what it was all about. The two hands work together – the left, the right.

EVERYTHING HAS A DIFFERENT MEANING FROM THE ONE YOU'VE BEEN TAUGHT TO PERCEIVE.

When you look at the old books written in the 1800's and the early 1900's from the big foundations, they were quite blatant about the society they were going to bring under way. A world government. A trained well-behaved society and the eugenics sides of it, of course, went in to the types of people who'd be allowed to live and be allowed to procreate and the ones who would die. That goes even back into the 1800's. You find the beginnings of it openly discussed in Darwin's time, because in the high occult system Darwin's family were part of is partially based on eugenics.

 

The sad part is young men are always recruited to do the dirty jobs elsewhere and on their own people. They go through conditioning themselves, which help them to accept what they're doing. It can always be rationalized and justified with enough conditioning no matter what they're doing and the fallout on the public is phenomenal, as drugs for instance have rampaged through society. Rampaged through society, the fallout is incredible and it's still going on.

There's been a youth culture created and promoted through the "culture creators," the industry of culture creation, to help destroy the old and a lot of people in the age, regardless of how old they actually are, to bring in a new age where partially drugs will control their minds – authorized prescribed drugs which you'll have to take. It will be mandatory to take them since the various psychiatric associations have deemed that no one is perfectly sane except themselves and to get peace they have to radically alter the brain chemistry of the populations.

 

It's not that I like to bring you bad news. You see, this isn't bad news, it's just news. It's always been this way. A war has always been waged on the people by a hidden religion, an oligarchy that understands this religion and their agenda and they know where they're taking the world. Meanwhile, they give us fads to go through, distractions with the pop stars and the media stars and the rap stars and that's what occupies people's minds – trivia.

They go through their life in a haze of trivia and they're taught through ego-syntonic techniques to ignore the unpleasant, "do not look at the unpleasant," and people who don't look at the unpleasant are sitting ducks and that's what they want you to be when you're rolled over.

Well, it's snowing here. I'm sure they’ll give us a few good storms to hype up now that they given us actual snow. They'll hype it up in a few storms before spring because they've got to get this global warming agenda on track. They've got to get us convinced we've got to give up every right we thought we ever had and go into a new scientifically designed system of living where everything will be done and chosen for us. That's the real world we're living in, just an agenda.

However, I don't mind the snow. Albeit, they brought a lot of it on with the spraying, too, a different kind of spray they use then. Weather control is old stuff.

I'd love to answer more mail. I get so much written mail, I can't – literally, I don't have time in a day to even answer them. The email I try to get through, there's so many people to, and I flag pretty well every one of them to remind me to answer, but as I'm doing it more and more is coming in. This particular talk, even though it's one hour, all in all by the time it's uploaded into the main site and then the podcast and so on and the mirror site, is going to take five hours out of the day.

So I hope you forgive my rush when I do this. This is a natural rush, not the high of the drugs you see. It's a natural speed and we'll talk to you again. From myself and Hamish, who loves the snow—he's got the hair to cope with that without a problem, nature has made him very, very well indeed—it's good night and may your god or gods or whatever you worship go with you.

 

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:49 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB (i.e. Educational Talk):

"NASTY SODS, SPOOKS AND SPYWARE"

February 7, 2007

Hi folks.  I'm Alan Watt and it is cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  February 7, 2007.

What a time it's been indeed, for me anyway, these last few days, beginning Saturday morning.  It appears as though someone didn't like the last blurb, and Yahoo pulled the .net site on Saturday morning.  The .com site, I couldn't even get it up, until you went through the whole procedure of punching in the http et cetera, which normally you don't have to do. Calls to Yahoo took me in circles, getting passed from one person to the next, and no solutions found.  Of course, the guy at Yahoo told me he could punch up the site fine there, even though I got about 100 emails from other people, proved to the contrary.

Someone obviously put a "word in."  That's what the Masons word is. They put a "word in" to Yahoo, probably from the "seeing eye of America," because of the last blurb, which was to do with how the drugs come in, and the quantities acquired to supply all the created addicts in North America.  A period in the '90’s that they'd all rather forget, when it was exposed the CIA, using Special Forces and a whole slew of special agencies, were involved in bringing the drugs in and selling them on the streets of America, for money which they used for arms and different other nefarious black budget purposes.

The whole weekend was spent with Yahoo, right up into Monday, and it appears that both sites are working now. I had asked for mirror sites, for those who could help.  I haven't even caught up with the emails, because the computer here was bombarded with downloaders and spyware of all kinds, over the weekend.  I had to reset the computer from scratch, and what a job that is—getting rid of all these viruses and everything.  It takes a lot of disinfectant, but, “by God, that computer sparks like crazy when you use a couple of gallons of good stuff!”  Don't anybody else try it, unless you're well prepared.

However, this is what you expect when you're not "toeing the line," as the Brotherhood says, and you're saying something that still matters, and is touchy.  There is no such thing as a free society, and there's no such thing as free speech.  You'll pay for it, in one way or the other.  These are little warning signs of this total emergency management, which we're one-third of the way into, worldwide.  An event triggered it, even though Brzezinski and others had planned it and written about it, in their own books, their necessity of taking over certain countries.  They wrote about that back in the '90’s. The "New American Century" club had in their own website, the countries in the order they'd like to take over in the Middle East, and why it must be done, and the fact that they said “there's always been an empire,” and they were taking over the next phase.

They were quite right, because that's designed that way. That's what the U.S. was designed to do, to bring in the New World Order, from the New World, the Americas—NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM.   People who have been brainwashed into the patriot business, and listen to the modern myths, and watch the old black and white Hollywood movies, will never understand their country was created to do exactly as it's doing today.  Conditioning does that to you.  You can't see the truth.  You can't see the forest for the trees, even though the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with its American branch, The Council on Foreign Relations, discussed all of this, the U.S. taking the lead. Taking over to bring in the world system from Britain.  Britain was exhausted, financially, at least the people were, with one war after another.

In fact, in the late 1980’s, it was admitted from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that they hadn't even paid off the debt incurred from World War I, nor could it ever be paid off, in fact. That's what perpetual slavery is all about.  You get people into perpetual slavery by creating usury (interest) and then you compound the interest that's owed.

The Rule Book is the Old Testament.  The rules are in there, of a system much, much older than what we're told—not run by those that people would like to blame.  It's far, far older.  It was a complete system over two-and-a-half thousand years ago, and even older than that.  The understanding of how to create and take over nations and create slavery with compounding interest was understood a long, long time ago, even before they coined money.  We're all going through it now, the consequences of this part of it, this New World Order as compared to the Old World Order.  The Old World Order was a basic feudalism, in Europe, with very thinly disguised forms of government called "democracies," which paid allegiance to kings and queens and "the establishment," as it's called.

The New World was to give the semblance of the champion of a different system—a system that was going to be a champion for the peoples of the world, the poor peoples.  It certainly is a champion, in a sense, but it's not for those who support it.  It's a totalitarian system.  Even to colonize the Americas, it took the creation of wars in Europe to drive the people out.  It took depressions to drive the people out to the Americas.  It took clearances, like the Highland clearances of Scotland, which again, interestingly enough, were promulgated, initiated, by a rebellion when they sent Charles Stuart back over to the Highlands.  With a few clans, not the whole of Scotland, just a handful of clans, he went all the way down into England and almost took over the Parliament, and changed his mind for some reason, even when London was being evacuated.

He came all the way back up to Scotland, and took them up to the most remote area you could possibly imagine, had them exhausted, and they simply stood there and waited for the British Army coming in, with all their cannons, to wipe them out.  They used that as an excuse to clear ALL of the Highlands out.  That was the 9/11 of the day.  Terrorism within, you see, the oldest trick in the book.  That's why George Orwell could write about it in "1984," where everything is terrorism.  Even your thoughts could be terroristic.  So they cleared the Highlands, and different places, to get “the Americas,” as it was called then, occupied, staffed by the workers—the ones who were rugged enough to clear the swamps and get farms established.

"Dance Called America"

By Runrig

The landlords came
The peasant trials
To sacrifice of men
Through the past and that quite darkly
The presence once again
In the name of capital
Establishment
Improvers, its a name
The hidden truths
The hidden lies
That once nailed you
To the pain

They did a dance
Called America
They danced it round
And waited at the turns
For America
They danced their ladies round

To the candles
Of enlightenment
Once lit they say don't burn
To turn the darkest room of suffering
To a greater state of pain
Don't tell me that's behind you now
Don't greet me
Don't meet your dying blind
It's our very last stand together
So lets sever
No regrets

(Chorus)

There were days
That once held confidence
Strength of will and mind
The camouflage that once washed your fathers
Your sons and daughters time

Another Tongue
My love, my island
You've gone international
With all the praying men of God
Who stood
And watched it all go on

(Chorus)

(Chorus)

As it is right now, I'm so far behind with mail.  I'm being very careful with the email now, because of this attack with the spyware, et cetera, that I'm not going to be accepting attachments.  Here's the problem today as well.  It's part of the problem.  So many people with the blogs simply pass all this stuff around, and virus pools on top of virus, until you end up receiving it. It's like multiplying itself each time people pass these blogs around.   It's not just the blogs.  People create the spyware.  Those who create the spyware must have the same kind of knowledge as those who give you out the programs to combat it. That's the knowledge it takes to create it.

We also have the government agencies with the ability to crash our computers at anytime they wish, as people have found out in the past. The computer is similar to the way we live our lives today. We can walk from here to there. We can take the bus, drive the car and usually we can get to where we're going without a hassle, by any authority.  Really, you're living in a cage. You're being watched. They have cameras everywhere. We're in the Orwellian age. It's here. The computer is the same, because you can go surfing all over the place, and I don't. I don't look all over the Internet for anything. In fact, I really don't have any interest in it. The only reason I use a computer is to do what I've decided to do, rather than teach people in small groups or individually.

I knew the time was closing in, where there were people throughout the world scattered, who were isolated and had broken through this matrix, and it was time to get in touch with them, before this system crashes. Otherwise, I wouldn't be using a computer at all.  Whatever is given to us is for an alternative purpose.

When Bell was authorized with the patent for the telephone systems, they were listening into conversations from the very beginning of telephone.  It's no different even with your written mail. There's nothing new in opening letters, resealing them in new envelopes, shoving stamps on them and passing them back to you.  We've never lived in a free society. A powerful system doesn't even allow the chance of that happening –any sort of breakthrough. They do their best to cover all bases.

Brzezinski said himself, in one of his books, that shortly a system would be given to the public, of communication, that would unite the whole world and create a common understanding.  He's talking about common indoctrination.  That's why the mandate is that every child must have a computer, worldwide, just like the television was a fantastic tool for conditioning people. The computer takes over.  In its present form it's only here for a short time. It's a step-by-step program to train us to go along to the next step, to the next step and the next step.

You have the “iPods.” They've already told you that they have the ability to make things smaller. Small isn't the problem. The problem is, literally, in making it small and still keeping it utilitarian, when it's so small you need pins to punch buttons, the obvious step is an implant, that's the next step.  They had this all planned many, many years ago, because the sciences are so far ahead of your Popular Science magazine on the shelves, or Popular Mechanics, or any talking head they bring on television to make you believe you're on the cutting edge of everything.

I will be getting back to those who offered assistance with mirror sites, because it's imperative, obviously, after this last show, how easy it is to “switch off the lights,” you might say, and pull the plugs. That's how easy this free society is to be shut down. It’s nothing you could ever prove in any court of law, because apart from being their system anyway—in those courts of law, those Masonic temples—you can never pin them down on any actual nefarious intentions, even though you know it.

Thanks to all those, and I've had so much pouring in from so many people with offers to assist, in some way or another, with mirror sites, even with the knowledge of how its all done. I'll be getting back to different people, see what we can do.  It is tremendous to see that there are people out there who put themselves forward, in these times. That in itself is encouraging, at a time when people are living in fear and most people won't even admit to that. They simply live it. They want to be accepted by all those who are also pretending that everything's quite normal, but it's only pretense. They sense something coming. They sense what's happening.

I talked on the phone to a fellow yesterday. He's down in [Missouri]. They had the ice storm. They were out of power for over a week and he takes care of his wife. They're both very elderly. His wife is in bed (bedridden).  The military were going door-to-door, often on the advice of neighbors, who drew up lists of the elderly, thinking they'll get the military to help them. “Good intentions,” because they believe in the system.  This fellow, who's elderly, has been on radio before, talking about this very system that's coming in now, so that would be a great opportunity for them to whisk him off somewhere, and state that he wasn't capable of looking after himself or his wife.  You know when the military come to your door, in full combat gear, armed to the teeth, and we think that's normal and they say "we're here to help you," something's happened to the people who accept that as normal.

The history of Europe was one of the military being feared, because every so often it was turned upon their own people. That was tradition. That's why the United States, to get the people "onboard" as the pirates say, told them that they wouldn’t have a standing army. It was a big, big argument of point to have a standing army. They knew what standing armies did. They were turned on their own people.  Therefore, they claimed, “we would not have that, that people would have their militias et cetera, to keep the public safe, the citizenry safe.” However, what they used to get in that standing army was with the Second Convention.  They used the excuse that American ships and sailors were being kidnapped, off the Bahrain Coast—read your history—and so they would need to get some kind of Navy together.  With the Navy, they would need some kind of soldiers onboard, too, like the British Marines, and so they created the regiment of marines, the Marine Corps.

They side-stepped their previous constitution by the changing of terminology.  That's how they got the start of a standing army. Now those armies come around your doors with machine guns when the lights go off, or you get a bit of a freeze that shouldn't have caused any problems and they say that they want to “help you.” “Is there anything we can do?” and the people are being trained with this as the "new norm."  Most of them, you know, don't think twice about it.  That's odd to me. That's very odd to me.

The times we're living in are changing rapidly to a goal, a predetermined goal, worldwide. It's happening in every country now, to the end of even a conversation with someone you know, expressing your ideas or opinions will be thought crimes. They already are, actually. The entire Sovietized system of experimentation is implemented worldwide now.  In the Soviet Union they used psychiatry and created terminology and diagnosis to lock people up who were dissenting, in one way or another, to the system they lived within.  One of the greatest terms they slapped on them was "inflexibility of opinion."  That was a diagnosis, an official psychiatric diagnosis, to lock you up for life, if need be.

We know that B.B. (you know, the little B.B.) wanted to put a bill through. I don't know if he did.  It would have every child, adolescent and teenager evaluated by psychologists, every year, and eventually it would spread into the adult population, and people think it's all still normal. What do you think all of that trend is?

We've gone so far in a short space of time, because those who control society and update society (like a program being updated) were well aware through all the studies and the continuous daily ongoing poll taking that the minds of the public have been taken over effectively. They're programmed from school through adult life by media, television, and the computer today.  Therefore, they were well aware they could bring all this forward, without any probable backlash of any kind. All, supposedly, because of a guy in a cave, a “cave-man” supposedly brought on the collapse of Jachin and Boaz, the Twin Towers, all by himself. His little brain did it all (and a little help from his friends).  All the farce we go through with the stories we're told of how it was done.  Why even go that route and even discuss that?  It was so ridiculous, all this stuff they've told us about that particular day.

All I have to remember is they wrote about their agenda in the '90’s. We're simply watching it happen.  Carroll Quigley, the Professor, who wrote "Tragedy & Hope" and an even better book in some ways, "The Anglo-American Establishment," talked about how wars take over the distribution of goods. It was called "rationing" in previous wars.  The creation of new bureaucracies to deal with and manage the public, even the public opinion, that's called "propaganda departments."  Their social services and so on could literally advance their agendas. They could get 50 years crammed into 5 years of war.  Fifty years of peace, it would take to do it any other way, through massive propaganda. They could do all that in five years of war.  That's the primary purpose of war.

War on terror—it's a pity it's phonetically the same as my name, W-O-T.  Or is that another coincidence or synchronicity?  But really, what's it all about, eh?  We know what it’s all about. It's to change society and bring in this utopia of theirs, a utopia that will get rid of all those who dreamed of the utopia. The ones down below, who helped them, because they will no longer be necessary, and they'll never really be included in the grand final act. You don't need all these people anymore. This world will be run on efficiency.

We won't need entertainment. We won't need even training for work. You'll be programmed so easily and quickly, and even altering your programs, whenever it suits your masters. You'll be more like an insect. If you watch ants or bees, you know an ant is just a wingless bee. One lives in a colony; one lives in the hive. The ant is programmed, in its genes, for its task. It doesn't have to watch mommy and daddy, even if it could find either. Even it could think to look for either, and it's terribly efficient.  We can look around us at all of nature, all these wonderful nature programs they show us all time, into the mammals and the higher mammals, to realize that it seems our goal is to work all the way to where we are now—to have the ability of communication, language, memory, abstract thought, emotions, all of those higher things, just to get rid of it all—and become a worker bee.  What a goal, eh?  What a goal.

The rest of them started that way, programmed through their genes. No, we work towards it, into a stage of "non-think," "non-me," "non-you," just numbers, like Seven-of-Nine (from Star Trek). What a goal to work towards!  They call it progress.  When the brain chip is offered and marketed to the public, we'll be all under such stress of, “oh my goodness, impending terrors, fears, plagues, earthquakes, wars, famines,” all the old recycled stuff—fear of poverty, the economy, terrible relationships.  We’ll be offered this thing that is going to make everything “just nice.” “All the pain will go away.”  That will be the pressure that's built up to bring that point around.

I've had it from people, working in the inside, who have told me they've had think tanks working on this for quite a few years, how to even market “snob appeal” into the chip.  “What type do you have?  What class of chip do you have?”  Platinum, gold, silver, bronze or copper maybe. At least, copper's up these days, the price of it. They've already trained the public to be walking billboards, to advertise the makes of whatever they've bought. You buy the item, whether it's a running shirt, pants, a cap or whatever, and you advertise the company that made it; but you buy it. They used to hire people, to wear billboards on the street, to do this kind of thing.

Now they’ve given it snob appeal. People are terrified to go out, within their own peer group, without wearing it. They might be looked down upon. That's how bad it's become. They are totally conditioned, totally trained—no individuality there.  Everyone is terrified of being an individual. What a sad way to be. That's not living. That's following your program, the one that's been authorized as acceptable, by the establishment above you.

I was on the Vyzygoth Radio this morning, The Grassy Knoll, and I don't know if he's got it up yet on his site, because I just got word that he's now being slammed with viruses and problems with his computer. It seems like, as I start going around, they're trying to scare the people off, who are in contact, or the other shows that will put me on as a guest. Maybe that's because I never got my flu shot; I'm passing it everywhere. However, this is the whole thing though, they terrify those and try to isolate people through fear and intimidation.

In the mid-'90’s, BILLS were passed in both Canada and the U.S., and I'm sure in every other country, which stated that EVERY COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE, from telephone, fax, computers, MUST HAVE A BUILT-IN CHIP which ALLOWS ACCESS by ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY.  THAT'S LAW.

 

I've often said, “Since they want us so desperately to have the computer”—and I've said this, even with the television set, long, long ago—“they should give us it for free. Just hand it out for free,” but if they did that it would be kind of suspicious. When we buy things, we think it's ours. That's why they gave it the name "personal."  It's your personal “whatever.” This is the conditioning process that everyone's gone through.

We're given obsolete technology, always, because power could never maintain power and share the latest of anything, with anyone else, and still retain power. Whatever you’re given is obsolete and made as a tool, which is a two-way street, for them to use on you.  However, it still shouldn't scare people off, when at least they're still using standard methods of intimidation, as opposed to what’s coming down or compared to what's coming down the road.

I have no doubt you will, like the Soviet system, have a whole slew of diagnosis for every politically incorrect opinion you might have, which will probably warrant lobotomy or a special chip or something.  Generation-by-generation we've been conditioned to do all this, but we've also accepted it. We've ACQUIESCED by our SILENCE, as specialized NGO (Non-Governmental Organizations) supposedly championed different rights, for the silent masses, which were intended to dehumanize us all. They put the value of life down, beginning with abortion.

You can't knock the pillars away that hold up your roof, because the first one weakens all the rest. Now they've got the extra burden, until after a few pillars, the whole lot comes down anyway. You cannot allow yourself, but most have done it—through nature programs, science, Darwinism, all the massive propaganda—you've been dehumanized into just a “higher animal.” Once you accept that, then they can do with you as they please; and they have been.

In Ontario, in Canada (I'm sure it's similar in many other places), they fly in teams if you happen to end up in hospital, with what they say is a particular slim chance of pulling through.  They're after your organs. They fly in a team of specially trained negotiators to talk to the relatives, who make the decisions then, whether to let them harvest you while you're still alive. You see, when everything's dead and the blood stops flowing, there's always a little bit of necrosis, et cetera, death, tissue which causes problems.  When they start, it's always the same story, innocently, in a sense, or “for good reasons.”  “It's helped so-and-so” or “this saved their life,” and we all say, “Oh isn't that nice. A life that was gone saved another.” Now they're not waiting until you're dead. They want you to still be breathing when they remove the organs.

We've watched what once was sacred being trashed. Many people have participated in it. Many people adopted those opinions, because they parrot the propaganda, and they can't think through things critically, with logic, for themselves, until we're at the stage where we're at today, where they want to chip you in the head with a little injection.  The injection itself, no matter how little it is, is going to destroy tissue. The old saying is that "the road to hell is paved with good intentions."

We always see the most tragic cases, flashed across the television at news time, with someone who needs an organ here or there. You have the emotional story, and the mother is always there and very concerned, and there's a nice little child. Who would have thought that a good part of this is a dehumanization process, where we're cannibalizing each other for body parts?   Some guys will relate to this, with what I'm about to say. Those who have put together their own engines and kept them going, their old cars or old vehicles, when men used to do that sort of stuff, went to the scrap heap for parts, where you'd cannibalize them. Well, we've all been turned into the human scrap heap.  Now when you end up in certain hospitals, and certain places like Ontario, you're put down as a “potential donor,” should anything happen.

If you're lying there in the bed, do you now trust that doctor or that surgeon?  Is he going help you or kill you?  Think about it. Where does his profit lay? —His personal profit?  Where does your value, to society, come into play here?  In the United Kingdom, and I'm sure it's in many other European countries, too, with the National Health Service for many years they had a system of categorization of your worth to society, for resuscitative purposes. So if a couple of guys had repetitive heart attacks (coronaries) in the hospital ward, you'd go for this particular person first, not the other, according to their status.  Literally, it was a written system.

If we're all born equal, I'll tell you, it doesn't last long, not in this system.  Certainly, certain topics are taboo completely, for almost verbatim, today. At one time we heard the term, although it didn't really mean much, and they said that they were “public servants.”  Which ANTS do they serve?  They don't tend to use that term anymore. They're “officials.”

Policemen are not "peace officers" or "peace men" anymore. They're "enforcement officers,"  “EN,” which comes from the French, a play on "ON." ON is a symbol of the obelisk and the Ben-Ben (“the big one” as the Egyptians called it), in the City of ON, Heliopolis, where they had thousands of them—the force of ON.  Every cop knows to become a Mason, if he wants to "be covered."  That's an extra insurance policy, should any lawsuits come in for wrongdoing.

This is the real world we live in. There are levels of secrecy upon levels of secrecy, compartmentalized, right down to the social level, where the public are supposed to think trivia and go through their abnormal lives, with all of its chaos, because it's not a normal life. That's why you have the chaos. That's why you have the faulty relationships, the dysfunctional systems, the dysfunctional societies and families. It's all part of this dysfunctional created and planned system we live in.

The individuals who go through it must stop blaming themselves when everything seems to fall apart. The ideal, that's been marketed to them, is that the best citizen is a good hard working citizen, living in a standardized home, wearing the standardized clothes and saying the standardized things. That's the ideal they sell you, a complete fiction. Those who have been programmed to accept that are the last ones to admit it, until they have troubles and really try and confide, for the first time, in others.  Most people put a show on, all the time, and couples do the same thing.

The system, in fact, doesn’t allow you to have peace. It's not meant to give you peace. PEACE MEANS THAT THOSE WHO CONTROL THE SYSTEM LOSE CONTROL. When you have peace it's hard to make you do something.  When you're used to grazing in the same area, it's hard to get you moving into a new direction.  When you're kept stampeded throughout your life, then stampeding cattle don't see where they are going; they just follow those in front.  We know they're lead by the front, by the nose, as they say.

To those who follow conspiracy theories as a hobby, I tell them to go to the other sites that deal with theories, and they can let their imagination roam forever, like some strange little quirk you're into that excites you. THE ELITE GAVE OUT THE TERM "CONSPIRACY THEORY." Many of them involved in checking out the truth have adopted the term quite naturally, thinking it's natural. Well they've just signed themselves out, to be taken with any form of credulity.

To those who have broken through, individually, and come to the realization they're living in a mental prison, a social prison, I tell them, “Don't panic. I know it's difficult to find people who understand, but they are out there.” They are definitely scattered all across the whole planet, and so you're never really alone.

The war isn't really on the general public.  Those who have never thought for themselves are of no problem to the elite—the general public. It's always the thinking ones who are the problem, in the present era and past eras.  It's always the same thing. The energy that can be put out by a single thinking person is phenomenal.  I'm sure, those who have woken up, and broken through the different layers, have experienced the synchronicities that begin to happen in life.  There's a process that people go through, and you cannot do it for others. You don't get tied up with all the theories anymore, and all the stuff that's put out to distract you, and make it a new kind of hobby, like looking for reptiles under your bed, or Big-Foot, or any of that kind of stuff.  There are realities behind and beyond the realities we're given.

Once again, before I sign out tonight, I'd like to thank all of those people who've emailed, showing their concern at getting yanked from Yahoo.  Yahoo—the term used by Jonathan Swift in his novel, "Gulliver's Travels."  The “yahoos,” of course, were the basest form of human. I wonder if that's what the message is, to all those who subscribe. However, if you choose any competitor, a major one, you'll find the same thing.

We're living in a fixed system of occult control, and it is occult. It's a hidden control, which manifests itself through symbols, all around you. You've been brought up with them. The symbology is very important, because the symbols are a language.  In every era of totalitarianism, symbols accompany the dictator.  The face of the dictator and the symbols (and badges are just symbols, remember), are meant to intimidate and cause fear. They're all related. They're all the same. They're all one, eventually. They're all variations of the same system, and we respond to those symbols, because it is a language, which our subconscious and definitely the unconscious mind [understands].  The unconscious is where you keep all knowledge, stuff that doesn't even come into your conscious head, except perhaps through dreams. However, it definitely understands the symbology and you can be programmed through the symbols, which you think are natural, simply because they're all around you. An occultic religion above all the other authorized religions is running the show, above what's known at Freemasonry, much higher, which runs everything beneath it.

Thanks for listening tonight. Thanks for the concern, and I will get back to those people who have mailed me and expressed their concern. For myself and Hamish the dog (who's doing just dandy), it's good night and may your god go with you.

"They Call it Democracy"

By Bruce Cockburn

(Tribute to the International Monetary Fund)

 

Padded with power here they come
International loan sharks backed by the guns
Of market hungry military profiteers
Whose word is a swamp and whose brow is smeared
With the blood of the poor

Who rob life of its quality
Who render rage a necessity
By turning countries into labor camps
Modern slavers in drag as champions of freedom

Sinister cynical instrument
Who makes the gun into a sacrament --
The only response to the deification
Of tyranny by so-called "developed" nations'
Idolatry of ideology

North South East West
Kill the best and buy the rest
It's just spend a buck to make a buck
You don't really give a flying fuck
About the people in misery

IMF dirty MF
Takes away everything it can get
Always making certain that there's one thing left
Keep them on the hook with insupportable debt

See the paid-off local bottom feeders
Passing themselves off as leaders
Kiss the ladies, shake hands with the fellows
Open for business like a cheap bordello

And they call it democracy
And they call it democracy
And they call it democracy
And they call it democracy

See the loaded eyes of the children too
Trying to make the best of it the way kids do
One day you're going to rise from your habitual feast
To find yourself staring down the throat of the beast
They call the revolution

IMF dirty MF
Takes away everything it can get
Always making certain that there's one thing left
Keep them on the hook with insupportable debt

 

And they call it democracy
And they call it democracy
And they call it democracy
And they call it democracy

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:54 pm

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:55 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB

"PUBLIC-PRIVATE-PIRATE ENTERPRISES/

SUN, STARS AND SPRAY"

February 14, 2007

Hi. I'm Alan Watt and this is cuttingthroughthematrix.com and .net at the moment. I guess that's common to the net. I'm in the process of adding mirror sites which will enable me to hopefully stay up there should any of the other ones be pulled, which can happen at any time in our wonderful free society where we soon find out the price of free speech depending on what we say.

This is February 14, 2007. Please watch the site for more mirrors as I hopefully add them to them or add to them. I've been terribly busy here with emails and I can't really cope with so many of them, never mind just getting through the average doing the things you have to do, which everyone has to do. It certainly adds up and I had no idea when I began all of this really how far it would go. In fact, I wasn't even certain if there were so many people out there who would be interested in what I had to say.

We're living in a punch-drunk society, a society where we've been conditioned in an almost schizophrenic fashion, bombarded with techniques of mind control, trained still in the old-fashioned system which served the purpose for an elite during the industrial age. We're trained through the same training, even though we're almost post-technological, never mind post-industrial, since most of the technology has been passed out to countries like China, by design. Yet we're still trained in little black and yellow school buses, the bees to be carted off from your little mini-hive, your cell, off to school and school is taken from a school of fish.

Fish all move at the same time you'll notice when you watch minnows and little groups of them. They all seem to move at the same time, all coordinated like an orchestra conducted by the conductor and that's how you're trained and you're taught to compete at school, competition, and it's all training you to get out into a workforce and compete and grab your share by any means possible and just don't go too far breaking laws.

It's much more easy to be crafty and devious. If you're very devious and crafty and you join the right associations, you can get on in life. That's what all secret societies have always been involved in, regardless of the particular reason for starting them, even if it's for oppression at times, they end up corrupt and they're always started off by freemasonry, as they just create new branches to deal with this part of society or this time in history.

They admit it themselves that they eventually become corrupt and we see the corruption everywhere. Little clubs that are formed at universities, little associations that you're initiated into if you're dumb enough to do it and you give your word and your bond and then you're tied to secrecy; and if you keep your mouth shut you'll benefit and you get on in life and you get all the contracts and business or you get up the ladder of the legal system, which is tremendously lucrative. It's a business and ultimately you know all money comes from work, from labor, which in turn, as the big boys know, since they have us Karl Marx, labor is where all produce comes from. You produce through labor, work, and governments collect that into a big pool, a big honey pot and they help themselves to it, so it's the biggest bank in the world really, government.

It can also sign whole generations who are yet unborn down as guarantors of future payments on a present day loan. Thomas Jefferson, being no dummy and being a member of the high lodges in France and in America, said the same thing. They can tell you a truth without giving you their verdict on it and he said that "a generation born in with the bondage of paying off a debt incurred by previous generations is therefore a slave generation," and that's true if you're born into a debt.

How can you be born free and be put down as a guarantor of a debt that was incurred 150 years ago or longer or even in the previous generation? You had nothing to do with it. That's where the legal side of the fiction breaks down because they will pretend through voting that you vote them in. However, if you haven't been born yet you couldn't have voted them in and they'll never answer that question. However, it's in the Old Lodge Book. The lodge book uses their Masonic bible with the Old Testament with all the rules in it and slavery is quite acceptable in the Old Testament.

You can sell yourself into bondage and your children and your children's children to pay off a debt, supposedly, all to please this wonderful deity that liked his breakfast burned in the morning and he couldn't get enough of it, and that ran the world for an awful long time. How many countless generations were downloaded with this preaching and then indoctrination and that was their whole reality for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years? "THE LAW" they called it.  The Law is a WALL.

I liked the "Devil's Advocate," the movie where Al Pacino is supposedly the devil. It's a good story. It's got a lot of allegories in there, too, and he owns the largest lawyer corporation in New York and he tells his son, who doesn't know he is his son yet, that the way the world is being taken over is through lawyers and law. He says armies of them are being produced every year all over the world. Armies of lawyers and this is where we are today because we cannot say that the world system is illegal. They have made everything which they do legal. It's just simply immoral you see. It's morally bankrupt and that's the difference.

Those who’ve studied societies and all societies and all religions can see the phases that we go through and they'll also realize that the elite of any age or period or country don't perish. They move on to the next transitional phase, always running it from behind the scenes with a similar system, which must be based on something which we think is a unit of exchange, for instance, money, in order to keep control of it. Even though you can keep idiots believing that they're in control of it by telling them they're free. This is the trick that's used to get masses to work for them and never know what's really going on. There's no system in fact you could go into that hasn't been tried before, like circles or cycles of them, and much of it is hidden within the religions if you really understand what you're reading.

There are three paths always – the exoteric, the esoteric and then a deeper inner path that's not quite one or the other. It's another way. It takes data from both and formulates another way, the third way.

If you look at ancient China you'll find that every system which today we call "fascism" or "communism" and "capitalism" and all the 'isms' had been tried in ancient times for long periods and observed and noted by the experts of that day and archived for future use. The times of Confucius you had—and I call it 'confuse us' because it's quite interesting the way it's written—Confucius supposedly, apart from all the mythology of his birth and how righteous he was, was a man who wanted to simply help the world and so he's made to almost walk on water, meaning he's an illumined one, because the sun can be seen to walk on water at sunset if you live near the coast before it sets.  Confucius just wanted to get up there and he couldn't get a high position, supposedly, in an administrative capacity because he was so darned honest and the people who ran that system were so dishonest, so he got petty positions supposedly.

On the one hand he gave all the right way to live, the right way for a social functioning to work. All the dos and don'ts, which they always do, we always get these given to us and every country has had their version of it and their founding mythological hero to get the public to go along, the masses to go along, with the agenda run by very wise men at the top.

Now the public always think of a permanence, a stability of a system because our lives are so short and whatever data is fed into us like history tends to keep you that way. They don't give you a continuity of long eons of time. That's reserved for a select few within every nation. If you understand the eons or ages of time, you can understand how you can use people until things don't work anymore, everything is so corrupt; because as the king goes, so do the people since we mimic what we see at the top. It comes to a stage where everything is so corrupt it doesn't work.

The Soviet Union got like that eventually, where I know people who visited countries like Poland while they were under the rule to visit relatives who were in hospital and they had to bribe the staff to change the linen of their relatives who could be lying in urine and so on. That's the stage that you reach when you can't go any further with it, nothing really works. All this had been tried thousands of years ago as I say with China. It had also been tried with those who gave the ideals of Brahma in India who kept the records of the ages and they give an exoteric for the public, even still today, and an esoteric for those who want to follow the paths, but as I say there's a third way and you have to understand both to see it.

People react throughout their lives to situations, mainly because on a conscious level we don't plan them. They adopt patterns of behavior. They adopt modes of behavior and tradition. Tradition when it's changing to a new tradition is a dysfunctional period where people try to emulate the old and they can't fathom out why it doesn't work. The data is there as to why it doesn't work and all the indoctrinations that have made individuals dysfunctional is also out there too, and that's why you have incredible growth in those who pretend to handle the dysfunctions, all the therapists and professionals and counselors. All the Dr. Phil's who can solve your problem in one hour on television, and again, television is fiction but it's more real to many people today than reality.

They say there's nothing new under the sun and there truly isn't. Public-private initiatives, as they're called today, is a very old technique. There's nothing new really in it at all. It's where the pubic put in their labor in forms of money that's taken from them to build large building projects. The Masons love building projects. That's what it's all about, is always building new and bigger and better and building bridges between countries and peoples and all that stuff, and sometimes they build real bridges, at least pay their cronies to design them, and the public do. They pay, that is, and then it's handed over to a private corporation because they tell you "well, it's going to cost so much to maintain," so in the public-private partnership deals it's written to the new owners who buy the new bridge or whatever for a song, a token, that the public will maintain it.

The public pay the costs of maintenance. They also pay tolls all the time, even though their tax money built the bridge in the first place, and this is called "a better way" and it is a better way for those who own the bridges. It's much more convenient not having to put out some of your profit to maintain something, this public-private business, and we're told that this is a better hive, the hive for the bees, than the previous one, but it's really always been there.

In Europe especially in Britain, which still goes under the Crown. This nefarious, odd, obscure definition, where on the one hand you're told the Crown really has no power anymore in a democratic society. It's a titular head which can make suggestions, but truly it can't make any decisions. That's what we're told and yet every person who works for government and especially those guys with a Masonic chessboard on their helmets called the police, and who are all Freemasons, can hit you on the head and make you do something or else lock you up in prison if you don't follow the rules of the Crown because they've sworn allegiance to the Crown, this obscure thing that doesn't exist or sort of exists and has no real power. Then if you go into the Commonwealth countries, that's Australia, New Zealand, Canada and so on, you'll find that the land which is part land and all the rest of it comes under the Crown. It's Crown land. This obscure term which doesn't apply today, as I say, because they're just a figurehead of a system and the real power is in the democratic institutions.

However, this same Crown knights those who serve the democratic institutions, whether they're politicians or high-level bureaucrats or very exceptional police chiefs or something like that. It seems to mean a lot to them and no one's ever voted in the Crown. We've never had a vote on that.

Recently, I've read about one of the projects, I knew about it quite a few years ago in fact, but someone sent it in and it's from "The Telegraph News" 2003, I believe, June 4th and a little article was put in there about a public-private partnership deal, where the judges who were trying the case of a civil rights campaigner were asked by the campaigner if they were Freemasons. This is the little story that was written by Auslan Cramb, I believe his name is.

This is a little example of the corruption we have, but it's not really corruption. It's moral corruption, you see, but it's legal because there's no laws against it, I suppose. It could be speculative if that were the case.

             "Three judges yesterday refused to reveal whether they were Freemasons after being challenged by a veteran human rights campaigner."

Now this campaigner goes under a pseudonym called "Robbie the Pict". A Pict, that's P-I-C-T. This isn't in the paper but I'll explain what a Pict is. A Pict or the Picti were the people who inhabited Scotland and parts of what's now northern England. When the Scots came in, the Scots were the Gaels who came in through Ireland from the west, so that was a western gale you might say. They intermarried with the Picts, who used to paint themselves with pictures, and when you saw them moving around in the Highlands you'll realize that Scotland invented moving pictures long before Hollywood ever got the idea, and these were talkies, too.  However, this campaigner under his pseudonym is called "Robbie the Pict".

             "Robbie the Pict put the question to judges hearing his complaint that a "secret society" of senior figures in the Scottish establishment is undermining the impartiality of the judicial system. He believes that judges who are members of the Speculative Society could have influenced cases against him during his long-running campaign against tolls on the privately operated Isle of Skye bridge."

They're into the building huge bridges you see. They made one in Canada on the eastern coast of Canada. It's miles long, to an island, Prince Edward Island, and that's also a public-private and they pay tolls on that too. They're doing this all over the place. It's very lucrative and Robbie here is talking about the Speculative Society. Now the Speculative Society is a Masonic Society, which I think goes back to the University of Edinburgh, where the old school tie comes into play, where they all meet each other and become initiated into Masonry and they have many different branches or sub-branches you can then go into. In Freemasonry you have "operative Masons" and you have "speculative Masons". That's what they're called by Masons. The speculative part of it has taken on a new meaning – or maybe it’s not so new, because they speculate where they can get the best bang for their bucks for investments et cetera. They help each other out with the old school tie. Once again, it isn't illegal at the moment, this conflict of interest.

Here's this guy being tried by judges who are a member of the Speculative Society of Freemasons who are charging him and trying his case against having to pay tolls on this bridge.

             "The campaigner said that Sir Iain Noble, chairman of the Skye Bridge Company, was a member of the same organisation, and also suggested that the 250-year-old debating club"--

That's what they used to call them.

             "had Masonic connections."

There's no suggestion about that at all.

             "Appearing at the Court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday before Lords Gill, Kirkwood and Wheatley."

These are all lords, this old feudal system from the Norman system. Lord Gill, Kirkwood and Wheatley. There's a trinity for you.

             "he demanded to know whether they were Freemasons."

This is what he asked.

             "Have you ever taken the oath for the purpose of entering into Masonic association?"

That was Robbie.

             "After a few moments of silence, Lord Gill, the Lord Justice Clerk"

This is a bigwig.

             "asked him to continue reading his speech, and said: "We are certainly not going to answer that question right now."

 

Which is the right Masonic response actually. Either that or they're supposed to get up and walk away, but it's harder for a judge to do that when he's trying a case.

             "The protester replied: "That is as much as I wish to upset your lordships, the rest is downhill."

 

Because he knew where it would go from there. A clique is going to try you and they're going to get their way with you.

 

"Pirate King" from Pirates of Penzance (Opera)

 

But I’ll be true to the song I sing,
And live and die a Pirate King.
For I am a Pirate King!
And it is, it is a glorious thing
To be a Pirate King!
For I am a Pirate King!

You are!
Hurrah for our Pirate King!

And it is, it is a glorious thing
To be a Pirate King.

It is! Hurrah for our Pirate King!

Hurrah for the/our Pirate King!

             "The latest case follows his conviction in 1998 for failing to pay bridge tolls. He claims the collectors of the toll do not have proper authority and is arguing that no cases involving the bridge should be heard by society members. He wants membership of the group considered against the background of a dozen failed appeals in his anti-toll campaign. Raymond Doherty, QC"

QC in the Commonwealth countries means "Queen's Counsel". That's a lawyer who's done business for the Crown at some time or another, legal business.

So Raymond Doherty, QC advocate depute"

Another little title there.

             "produced a list of members from an internet site to show the "Spec" was not a secret society."

That's the Speculative Society.

             "The society's own literature describes it as a "secret brotherhood bound by intangible ties of shared loyalty and common tradition".

Then it goes on to say: "A judgment will be issued at a later date."

Now you can go into links from this particular site, "The Telegraph," which will actually give you the list of members I think from 2004 onwards and they're all bigwigs and lords and judges and top lawyers. In other words, the top system and people who get knighted for being terribly good, that kind of thing.

However, there's nothing new in this you see. Here you are in a system riddled by Freemasonry, which has been clever enough to disguise itself with many different little branches connected to the main lodge to try and keep the people steering clear of the main lodge, the fact that they're all Freemasons, and they help themselves. They run the justice system. JUST-US system. That's what they run and if you go against them they'll put you "on ice," JUST-ICE. That cools you off. That's why they call it "the cooler", the prison.

There's nothing new in corruption you see to do with the affairs of humanity in a system which has broken down into many systems from tribal systems and the new systems are based on money and profit, which allay the fears of poverty. It allays the fears of starvation and if you're able to afford healthcare. That kind of stuff. Money is the key because the system is run on fear. Fear, unfortunately, is the motivating force for the corruption that we see all around us. That's why when people are terribly afraid they're prone to be used by dictators who will say everything, they'll voice all of your concerns for you, things which you have been thinking and discussing with others, they will voice them very clearly, succinctly and you'll follow them. Then you give allegiance to them, only to find out that the persons and the people at the top are so full of fear themselves, fear of being overthrown eventually, that they come down on you and they always benefit themselves. They'll plunder the country in fact at your expense. This is also just history.

We find this going right back to a very old ancient system which introduced money. From money came standing armies. You can't have a standing army without money. It doesn't matter what form it takes. You need money to tax it from the people to pay and keep and train to hold a standing army. It's hard to get a volunteer militia, where everybody in the country is a member, to leave their homes and go and fight for something they don't quite understand halfway across the world. However, you can do anything with a standing army because a standing army in peacetime they're mercenaries. They're still little boys who run around forests going bang, bang you're dead with toy guns, which is a tribal thing to play these types of games.

However, very old men are allowed to manipulate the feelings of very young men and if they can grab you early enough they will get you into a uniform – the "one form," "uni," one form – and you'll do their bidding for them, never knowing who's really benefiting and most folk don't ask the questions. Then you can run around amongst the trees with uniforms on with real guns going bang, bang you're dead. It's been able to grab an immature phase in every man early enough before he matures and gets wiser. That's why old men create wars for young men to fight. The old men benefit and their offspring and families and dynasties benefit. Nothing new in it at all.  Then official historians are hired to write the histories on behalf of the victor. Nothing new in that either. As I say, "there's nothing new under the sun."

The techniques as I say can be traced back and tried and tested in different countries like India and China who tried them all, and they went to see how far each type of system could last before it was so corrupt that nothing worked and so even that is down to a fine art. They know they must always keep appearing to change it to the next system and they work on it to get the public to accept the new system.

It's very much like if you imagine time being railroad tracks and they set off a locomotive hauling a huge long train, like the China Express that passes me every day. Tremendous force to get that train moving with two or more engines in front and once they get it moving they have to judge when to apply the brakes long before their stop and that's kind of like the systems we live through over the eons of time.  Very clever people with histories and archives of histories, as opposed to public libraries, and who are really a priesthood in themselves, have access to all this information and they can decide when to plunder a society for a while under some guise until the public catch on and things don't work. Well rather than wait until the end until they lose control, they set up the next phase, the next system and sell that to the public and for a while that will work too as it builds up momentum and then they start applying the brakes, so they must always have the next system ready and working as they're starting to apply the brakes. That's how it works. If they let it go to the very end and start all over again they'd lose control of it. It would take forever to get it moving again.

That is the system. The great builders of ancient times. The standing army. The taxation of the city-city states. The "artificial systems," as Plato called them "the beehive city-states," where once you have people within those walls and you train a generation, you can make them believe anything and make them believe anything is normal and they generally will never question it, and we see it today. We've all been brought up the same way really. However, within those artificial systems, once you get them from a real system, which is either Nomadic or Agrarian, settled, scattered families or tribes, part of really a greater tribe, you can make the city, the artificial people who must have money to live because they can't grow anything. They can't even feed themselves on their own and to produce anything they must use money to pay for it, anything they need made, building.

That's why Nimrod is glorified by all mystery religions as the "big builder," and once you have a monied system and a taxation system, you can then carry on your big building projects through conquering peoples with your standing army, filling your coffers with nine-tenths for me and one for the state. That's how they do it and then they go on to the next country and plunder and they call it "empire building," until you reach the stage which we're pretty well at now, the "global empire." The big honey pot where everybody and everybody's child is down as collateral forever because it can't be paid off with compound interest, all the debts incurred. It's a numbers racket, as they used to call the gambling.

Carefully designed with the full knowledge that parents, single or two parent families, are so caught up in the world and trying to get through, they'll never figure it out themselves. They don't have time. They're so stressed out they just want to be hypnotized by television when they come home and they want the state to take care of their child for them, through daycare and schooling, and then they wonder why they can't recognize the child anymore when it has these strange opinions and values, all given to them by the state. Exactly as Bertrand Russell said in his book written after he experimented with his own schools by permission of the Crown. His book was called, "Education and the Good Life".

It's a term they often use for their system. The public think they mean themselves. We're all going to have the good life, but it never did because Russell never ever considered the average person anywhere as his own equal. None of them do.

Now for a little talk on the chemtrails, the new phenomena which we're being acclimatized to as being the "new normal." Those who still retain some memory might remember prior to about '95, even further back in fact in the U.S. because they were testing there before everybody else. Definitely in '98 in Canada when they signed the "Open Skies Treaty."  All the countries which signed it are being sprayed like crazy and those who didn't sign it are being left alone and you can do searches on which countries signed it. It's a very vague document meant to be intentionally vague because we're not supposed to really know what it's all about.

You'll sometimes see for instance the spraying in the skies where they're spraying at 30,000 feet or so and you'll see smaller aircraft much, much lower coming along. They're testing the air to test the mix, to see if they have the right mix in the atmosphere, constant feedback to this global system – this global Air Force, the Freemasons of the air, the scientific elite that would run the world according to H.G. Wells in "Shape of Things to Come."  Well it's here and they had to be making this stuff for many, many years with all the big familiar names, the chemical companies involved to store it all to spray it on such a massive basis.

It brings me back to John Dewey who was the first one to talk about "if only there was a threat from out there," meaning outer space, at least that's what the people were made to think at the time, the world would have to come together to fight a common enemy; and the UFO thing was pushed big time to get everybody into that. Oh, invasions from outer space and all these sci-fi programs and movies and series on television, which got everybody thinking, "oh it's aliens, my goodness and they could invade us all," and they put tremendous movies on this kind of thing, how we'd have to come under a global government because we're too stupid and primitive to handle our sciences. Our intellect had run away with our ability to perceive and control and do the right thing. We were still too primitive in nature.

Like the old Hindu expression that "we're victims of our own intelligence."  Well we certainly are victims, but what the question is, is it our own intelligence? because we're like computers who are programmed. You ask a programmer of a computer a particular question and if he knows the language of that computer and he programmed its logic, he should be able to tell you the conclusion the computer must arrive at and we're no different. We think along the same ways. This is understood, always has been, long before we were given electronic computers.

We come at conclusions which are preordained through our logic and what we're taught. This tremendous spraying is the threat from out there that Ronald Reagan and others prattled on about many times, the same Dewey type speech. It's global warming. It's the sun. It's ultraviolet rays and since maybe the '60's and speeding up from then, you had the slow rising drumbeat of skin cancer being hyped by the medical professions worldwide. To the average person living in their own little life, which is a short span of time, where you can be stampeded into panic quite easily because we think everything's always been this way and it hasn't.

Many ice ages have come and gone and you have warming periods between them, otherwise you'd have one continuous ice age. This is understood. It was taught in junior schoolbooks when I was at school, that you couldn't expect the climates ever to remain static as we're taught nowadays. It's supposed to be static, you see, as though it was a clockwork mechanism, even though we don't go around in a perfect circle around the sun or even really in the same path every year. It's always changing a little bit, different influences of gravities in the long procession.

This is also understood, but how our sciences can start taking away knowledge, too, and then confusing you for nefarious ends. We see the threat now with "oh my goodness, people are getting skin cancers."  Well, prior to definitely the Hollywood era, people did not go to beaches and burn themselves to crisps by sunbathing. That's a fairly recent phenomena. If you look at the fashions of periods just before that, you'll find the same thing. People did not dress and expose much skin to the sun. They had more common sense. They didn't go buy the same fashions when they were living all around the country and in the country. They were practical people and they wore big hats to shade themselves from the sun. The whole burning yourself to get a suntan has been a commercially-created phenomena and hyped up through glamour and magazines and movies to make the public emulate the stars et cetera.

It used to be quite funny to watch people who had bought, especially in Britain where you have so much rain and clouds, they'd buy these infrared lamps and ultraviolet lamps and they'd sit in front of them with their little glasses on and they'd have these owl faces with the white skin around the eyes and the red faces, and then later on they wonder why they were developing the skin cancers. Then the sun tanning facilities came out, the clubs you could join and you could go and bake yourself in there; and then lo and behold, you have skin cancers and everyone's forgotten that eventually they had to put warnings and come out and admit, yes, it's causing skin cancer, all these sun tanning facilities.

However, it doesn't affect the young because the young still want to copy what they see, never realizing that what they see on television is fake. They want to look like this hero or new idol that come and go all the time. You can't keep up with them because you can't keep them very long in a stage where you want to always concentrate on the young. They're always going for the next group and the next group of the young to indoctrinate them. They bypass the elderly. They don't care about them. They've been effectively put out of the picture as far as power and input go.

We're seeing the chemtrails you see and the few people who are aware of them because they actually look up. Most people you'll find, and it's scary to find this, but most people have never looked up and that's why they think you're talking nonsense when you point out these aircraft with their crisscrossing of the sky and that amazing mushy stuff that's left behind, and then you have red eyes and itching or burning in your eyes, depending on the mix that day. It's a multipurpose function I'm sure to do with HAARP, control and maybe even sedating the public. Sometimes during heavy spraying everyone's just tired, very tired. And we will never be told the whole truth of what's going on.

This little article, because I've mentioned this before, that the children are being taught in school and that NASA had put out a documentary I think that was being shown to try and make the children think this was a normal phenomena, all this crisscrossing of the skies, so that they'd grow up always thinking it was normal. That tells you that this is to be an ongoing intergenerational operation, which is interesting too in another point of view, because in ancient histories or mythologies of the Middle East and even in old Judaism, they talked about a time when the sun could never be seen. That the earth was enveloped within a massive cloud and there could be a link there somewhere to the old story that "nothing is new under the sun."

This little report I'm going to read was put out by "Sanity For Sale" at Wordpress.com. Some of their information is all right. Other stuff is – well, it’s just not verifiable or it's got a spin on it for agendas and this was put out January 31, 2007 and it's called:

 

"Chemtrail Sunscreen Taught in US Schools.

A is for Apple.
B is for Boy.
C is for Chemtrails.

At least this is what one American father found while paging through his child’s science book. SmT was astonished to find seventh graders being taught about chemtrails. And geoengineering their home planet. Anyone with question about the “spray programs” he now says, “should perhaps just ask their kids.”

He says "kids". It should be children because kids are young goats. The dehumanizing process that Lenin talked about by the use of words.

             "The chemtrails section is found in the Centre Point Learning Science I Essential Interactions science book."

Now I haven't checked that out.

             "Under “Solutions for Global Warming”, section 5.19 features a photo of a big multi-engine jet sporting a familiar orange/red paint scheme. The caption reads: “Figure 1- Jet engines running on richer fuel would add particles to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen”. The logo on the plane says: “Particle Air”.

PA.

             “I kid you not,” SmT insists. “Why did I spend all of that time doing research when I could have just asked my children?”

And with the picture, the usual criss-crossings. It’s rather good. It's knots and crosses, which I've seen. It says:

             "Helping habituate children to a life under lethal sunshine and “protective” spray planes, this trippy textbook urges young readers to “Use Sun Block”. But its authors are referring to a sunscreen spread across the sky.  “Could we deliberately add particles to the atmosphere?” asks the text, before helpfully suggesting that “Burning coal adds soot to the air.” You might be old enough to recoil at such a notion. But in a country where down is up and wrong is right, your kids could be learning that what used to be bad and a bummer is a now good thing!"

That's a little bit on that, but I know that NASA for instance was definitely putting out a sort of documentary to be shown in junior schools on this very thing. Intergenerational obviously. They're going to step up this program and I've noticed even here in the winter where the stars, and this is one of the joys of living and you can generally or you used to be able to generally find joy in all kinds of seasons. You could find tremendous joy even on the cold, cold nights outside looking up at a crystal clear sky with billions of diamond-like stars to inspire you and to get you beyond the religions of the world, which are so obviously man-made, into a sort of contact with something way beyond and much bigger. The awe that inspired, mind you, might challenge the state because it must be all powerful when it has no competition and it's pretty well thrown away all the religions it gave us before when it was useful.

Now, at night, even when it's supposed to be a clear sky it's not. You're only seeing one-third of the stars you should see, or even less, night after night. You've got this kind of haze. When the temperature drops to 20 to 30 below, that never happened before. You always had clarity because all the moisture comes down onto the ground and you're left with this clear, clear sky. Well not anymore. They haven't just mushed it up during the day. They have mushed it up pretty good at night too. Massive program. Massive program worldwide and we're not supposed to know about it. As I say, they bypass the adults and they indoctrinate the children who are going to grow up thinking this is all quite normal. The older ones will die off. This is how it's always been.

What a world we live in, indeed, where most of what really goes on is decided behind closed doors, all the important stuff. Always. Trivia is given to the media, the men in the middle, who peddle it to us and diversions and even exposés, so many diversions and you could chase them forever. And people think, "well, it's impossible to fool so many people. It must be an alien intelligence that's doing this." Well here's the thing. What man can unravel, that tells you right there, man can create. You don't need an alien intelligence. You do need what they call "the wisdom of the ages," which is incredible knowledge and specialists trained in that knowledge, and we have been run fairly openly under this kind of system for quite some time.

It used to astound people to find out that that which they fought for and even rebelled, which takes a lot to get people to rebel. What they rebelled against never came into fruition the way they envisaged it and that's no coincidence because it truly is the Grand Chessboard where you're used for "other purposes".  The initial move that you make is not the final intent of those who control the board, but they need the people to only see the next move and that, because of our short life spans, is why it works so effectively.

Plus, today, it's even more effective than it used to be because the age groups were deliberately segregated. There's no input of the elderly and even those who are becoming old have been so conditioned they have no wisdom to pass on, at least for most people anyway. They've believed that what they grew up in was quite natural and they went through their hectic lives and got stressed and burned et cetera doing so and didn't notice what was happening to their own children, so they were left tremendously confused. Most people don't question. They react as I say.

That's about the end of my time for tonight. I hope you're all doing well. Don't panic about things. You're up against a system which is incredibly old. You can't simply reverse something and you wouldn't want to simply reverse it. You must do something outside of that which you're expected to do and it takes time.

All the best from me and Hamish, and may your god or gods to with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:55 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB
"OPEN SKIES TREATY/EXOTERIC GOOD REASON
ESOTERIC REAL REASON"
February 16, 2007

Hello. I'm Alan Watt. This is cuttingthroughthematrix.com and .net and there's a few more sites to be added, this is February 16, 2007. Hopefully because of the troubles when you realize that your sites can be pulled so quickly and easily, we have no power legal or otherwise over the system which has temporarily been given to us and that's how it must be viewed, as a temporary thing.

Years ago, they talked about the information wars prior to giving the public the Internet. This was all planned long, long, long ago before Joe Public even knew that computers would be on sale eventually to them.  Brzezinski talked about this system of communication which would be made available to the public. Now if they made it compulsory to have a computer we'd be suspicious of their motives and it wouldn't be hard for people then to start thinking for themselves and they would come to conclude, wait a minute here, what do they want us to put on these computers?

Well, it's everything you have put on it, such as your banking, all your transactions, your purchases and most of your life in fact. Some people put their whole lives on the computer, their personal lives. A dream that tyrants down through history could never have imagined and yet it's being made available to us because we think it's somehow not quite free, but we purchase it so it's of value and that we have something to do with it because we have a choice to purchase it or not.  However, it's becoming evidentially clear, that apart from being a stepping-stone towards a much larger system and more nefarious system, we're going to be forced on computer. Governments have been pushing it and pushing it. It's mandatory almost. All children must have it or you're "leaving them behind" as they say, they won't get the same indoctrination as everyone else and it's imperative that they all get the same world indoctrination for a world society.

It's also extremely difficult and not so cost-effective to have to monitor everyone the old fashion way by collecting gossip through various institutions scattered throughout your society, all Masonically linked and going back to police stations where they gather all the gossip and trivia on everyone. It also takes a lot of manpower to monitor telephones as they've done in the past and even opening your mail was a big chore, and we know they did and they still do open mail in certain post office departments if your name is on a list your mail is diverted to a certain place where they can take it out, read it, reseal it in a brand new envelope and give it the stamp of any country they wish and the date. That was exposed by Peter Wright who worked for MI5 and MI6 in his book called, "Spy Catcher".

Therefore it's much, much easier when you get on the Internet and disclose everything, thinking that we're free and little old me wouldn't be watched because I'm very good. "Good" meaning, you follow every rule that's given to you. You don't question anything. You don't question the whys or why the rules are there or even who you are. You’re a composite. If you're very good, you'd have to be a composite of what you are supposed to be by the system's viewpoint, which is someone who just watches sports or passes the time reading magazines or watching soap operas or whatever else is dished out to you and your opinions are given to you. That's a good citizen and that's a well-managed being.

Prior to the setting of the League of Nations, which transformed into the United Nations – league itself should be explained. League is a measurement – it's a measurement. It's Masonic. It's a league. That's why they call them leagues. Prior to setting up the first League of Nations, which wasn't the first really itself, it transformed from the Concert of Vienna and different ones into the League of Nations promoted by the bigwigs of Europe. They wanted a system that would run this coming society, which they knew was coming since they were all working towards it. Plunderers always make sure that their offspring control the future. "He who controls the past controls the future and the present" and so they're always looking making sure that their offspring will be well taken care of and still in command of the ship of planet earth.

Therefore, they saw, they had huge conferences in the 1800's and they saw that eventually the plunderers, the pirates would get to a stage where they would have a world society. Borders would come down. Common currencies would come into view; they'd have the three trading blocks as Karl Marx talked about under a supreme world government; but they also planned to use the sciences to control vast populations of people. It was not news to them way back then that most people who are good people and do all that they're told and trained to do. It was no news to them that most generations float through their life reacting to the changes in their life that's outside of their control, but they never figure out what's causing it or the fact that they’re meant to be kept off balance. It doesn't dawn on them and they die not knowing.

There were always some in previous generations amongst the elderly that could pass on wisdom, but that sadly has declined drastically since the scientific techniques of indoctrinations, especially through starting with schooling took over and programmed them from birth basically, certainly from kindergarten.  A scientific technique which would give them fixed viewpoints on things so they would come to the conclusions if they ever tried to figure it out and they'd follow the paper chases that were laid out for them to follow, all the books and so on to try and get to the bottom of things, and they'd go round in circles because the paper chase is the oldest trick since education was given to the general public.

It was around the 1800's in industrialized Europe where because of the factories, which were blossoming at the time like weeds, they had to get a basic education so that those who worked within the factories could follow basic guidelines and follow their jobs and take note and write things down and all that kind of stuff, so they gave them a very basic type of education.  Prior to that, teachers were almost nomadic. They would travel through countries and individual families would hire them to teach their children. They certainly had a much, much better education because they were taught the classics and they were Latin and Greek so they could read original stuff going back for thousands of years in those languages and understand the nuances which are lost in translation. They could understand the ingenuity of ancient peoples as far as thought goes and philosophy went, because it's all to do ultimately not just with controlling an individual yourself, but it’s about controlling vast societies.

When they gave the standardized education—and Masons will boast—their books will boast how they championed international education to get this on the books and once that was done we got the lowest form of education possible. They then went into motion to lay false trails of information for those they knew would come along who would try to figure out the system in which they were born. Masses of books would appear especially in the 1800's onwards to do with the mysteries and it wasn't to expose those who control the mysteries, it was to fuzzy the trail and lead you off in a billion false directions, all fascinating, mind you.

People love to be fascinated and they had very good story tellers. That's called the paper chase. You can buy books and books, and books, and books and go round and round in circles and still never figure it out. That's intentional. To further ensure that the masses again, the common masses, the commoners – the commoners are those who marry in common. Their spouses are not picked for them for certain qualities of intellect or whatever or even aggression. The commoners meet someone, their hormones take over and in the old days they used to just get married when the obvious offspring would come along. That was standard; whereas the elite have their spouses picked for them, matched up by a priesthood who keeps very, very long genealogies and they mate them up for specific qualities.

When the League of Nations decided to use these scientific techniques of controlling minds of people, using mainly the behaviorist theories because within psychology there are different movements. There's a lot of psychology taught today and practiced today that's just New Age mixed with shamanism and they charge big bucks when everything else has failed. That's where you go.

However, the study of humanity is a different thing, it's sociology and repeated experimentation with the behavioral sciences; that's a different thing altogether. When you understand how an individual will react in a certain circumstance and the paths and steps he will take and follow after this particular experience, you can pretty well study the next one and the next one. If they all take the same path and go through the same emotions and they come to the same conclusions, then you can apply that to whole populations. It's a fairly exact science taken over long periods of study and then it's implemented on the public.

Honesty and openness was never ever going to be given in an upcoming system. In fact, the meetings that they had at the League of Nations viewed the populations of the world, the unenlightened masses and the profane, they viewed them almost like animals. Now remember, the League of Nations wasn't funded and put up there or elected by ordinary people. It was actually put up there to serve the interests of leading families who already owned countries. The same families who would have those countries warring with each other when need be to benefit themselves or further their agenda are the same families who ran the League of Nations which became the United Nations.

And being the hypocrites they are, they viewed the populations of the world, the commoners, as the problem. It's quite an amazing projection, how you can project the faults that you have onto other people. It's very psychopathic when it's taken to this extreme. So rather than say, we'll do away with all of these big families that cause the wars, they turned around and said, no, we'll manipulate the minds scientifically of all of the populations and they won't have all of these problems anymore. Science has been used with tremendous effect for mind control purposes and yet the mind control which people are under they think is the natural system, simply because everyone else is under it and they compare themselves with regards to normalcy by bouncing their opinions off their neighbors and their friends. When they get the same echoes back like a radar, they think "well I must be normal. I think the same things."

You could train people to believe the earth is a cube and you could give them a billion scientific reasons as to why and rationalize it and redefine gravity working on every side, and after a population or so, one generation of the population and propaganda and fake photographs, people would believe it. There's no big deal to lying to the public on a huge scale. In fact, it's easier than lying to a few people; when the general public believe they’re living in a reality and they think they have a functioning brain, it's much easier to fool them all.

H.G. Wells who was a real propagandist for the Crown of England, who hated the commoners himself—even though he technically was from them. He was from a fallen middle class family. His father was an alcoholic. His mother was a housemaid for an aristocratic family and he was brought up in the home where his mother worked. He had access to the books and the libraries. He liked the lifestyle and he craved that lifestyle so badly of the aristocracy, he sold completely out to try and become one.

World War I was necessary to kick off the whole globalist movement because for the first time they had a world war. Initially, they called it "The Great War" – grand, the great, it's all Masonic you see, like the Grand Lodge. Whenever you hear that word through a person like Alexander or a war, you know it's a freemasonic, much higher level freemasonic, part of a plan. Eventually, they changed it to the World War because they follow it with a second.

The Great War had propagandists on all sides working for it. What was unusual was that the King of England was really at war supposedly or apparently with his cousin in Germany. They looked almost identical when you see the old posters for recruitment, "Your Country Needs You" or "Your King Needs You."  Yet when you dig further back to the memoirs of the diplomats of that era, you'll find that some of them they disclosed the fact that the two kings got together at one point and talked about combining the peoples to take over the world – the Anglo-Saxon Germanic stuff you see. And in World War I, because the King of England's family still had a German name, because they were German and Prussian, their advisors thought it would be better to change their name to Windsor, the name of a castle and actually it goes back to a Tudor name which they adopted to make it more palatable to the public rather than have them off to fight the nasty Hun, as they said, and that was Kipling who used that title. He also worked for the British government as a propagandist along with Wells.

Kipling came up with the Hun, the nasty Hun, to dehumanize the enemy; while H.G. Wells tried to get the youth involved working towards a much bigger agenda which they would not understand and he called it the "war to end all wars." It sounded wonderful you see to the youth. Youth see things very simply in black and white. They don't know. They haven't lived long enough to experience the hypocrisy and the lies which governments indulge in all the time, and so they see justice and injustice and therefore they are so easily manipulated by very old people who understand these things.

There we have the nasty Hun from Kipling and we had the "war to end all wars," which is a big lie too. A whole bunch of stage theater came out to do with the military and military families and they used a white feather to show a coward you see who wouldn't go off and fight, and Wells and others encouraged the women to wear them in their hats if their fiancées or boyfriends refused to go off and march into battle standing up into hails of machine gun fire. It takes a lot of training to knock out the common sense in people to make them do that, but that's what military is for. It's a uni-form – one form. There is no more individuality once you put on a uniform. They drill it into you.

Deception was agreed upon, was a normal method of controlling and guiding vast populations. The elite saw nothing wrong with this; they never did. The people who helped manage them all, all their workers, see nothing wrong with it because they see the general population as children. They're just children and you tell children all they need to know.

Back to the information wars: There's no war going on with information, it's more of a rout; because prior to even the beginning of the Cold War agencies were set up to handle intelligence and counter-intelligence and propaganda to manage the minds of the public. To manage those who weren't quite happy with the reasons given for the way of things and who would start looking for answers, and so they were supplied by departments and sub-departments and compartmentalized departments of intelligence agencies.

Leaders are supplied to keep you busy and help you vent off steam. Venting off steam doesn't change anything. It gives the appearance of something happening, but it doesn't change anything. Ultimately, you're bombarded with information and disinformation and just like the mainstream media, most of it is really trivia because so much information has been made available to the public about bills and who's passing a bill or putting a bill in or introducing bills, bills, bills. Who is Bill anyway? Very popular guy. In other words, laws and it doesn't matter who's introducing what. Members of parliaments and governments are picked long before the public even hear their names. They're picked to be there. They're proven "worthy" as the Masons say. They can keep their mouth shut and do what they're told, and it wouldn't matter if this guy or that guy was picked to introduce any bill. Faces are irrelevant and so are the names. None of them would act by themselves, none of them. They would be brought down if they had an idea of their own, so they're told what to do.

You'll find you're bombarded with disinformation, some information and repetition of the mainstream on what claims to be opposition radios et cetera. This is what they meant by the information wars. People still think of wars like countries with flags and two sides facing each other. It's nothing like that at all. The war is within what you see as your own side. That's governed too. It's managed.

We have so much information made available to us, which can be verified, that the people of today who are trying to wake up or even think they've woken up will just come to the conclusion that they are the best informed slaves who ever existed. There's never been a time when you can find out so much information to bring you to that conclusion.

We're the best-informed slaves that ever existed.  I liken it to rats in a cage in a laboratory, where one day the rats get up early in the morning before the technicians come in and the white-coated scientists and they discuss "what are they going to do to us today? Are they going to stick these things in our brains and shock us? Will they snip bits out of our bodies? Will they drop us from great heights and weigh us and dissect us? What will they do?" and you see that's what the people are left with in the patriot movement. They vent steam off but it's just going around in circles, is what will they do to us next, until you're in a living nightmare of apprehension and you're brought to a complete standstill through fear and terror which is meant to immobilize you.

You can be immobilized and still walk through life. Your mind has been immobilized. That's what fear is meant to do. Counter-intelligence, apart from mixing fact with fiction to discredit the truth, the fact, is also designed to immobilize people, to render them harmless, to put them out of action so that there is no action. The standard old techniques used to the same extreme today; when you know you're being terrified constantly by someone you think you're following, you should question the motives.

There are also those who do not understand who think they're leading, but until they get clear as to what they're trying to keep and hold on to, then they won't know what they're fighting or why. You can't fight to keep a system that was not yours in the first place. It's a foreign alien system you might say. It didn't just develop down through the ages spontaneously willy-nilly. It was guided and predicted. That's why you know nothing happens by chance at the top. Anything happening by chance would mean that the elite would lose control and that's never been the case. They do not lose control because they don't leave things to chance. That's smart power.

Getting back to the information wars and now knowing that behind everything there's a very good reason which is given to the public and then there is the real reason, never forget that. Never forget that.

Before I start off this little reading part here, I'd like to say that I got up this morning and it was a nice, nice morning.

"Windy"
By Association

Who's peekin' out from
Under a stairway
Callin' a name
That's lighter than air?
Who's bendin' down to
Give me a rainbow?
Everyone knows it's Windy.

Who's trippin' down the
Streets of the city
Smilin' at
Everybody she sees?
Who's reachin' out to
Capture a moment?
Everyone knows it's Windy.

And Windy has stormy eyes
That flash at the sound of lies
And Windy has wings to fly
Above the clouds.
Above the clouds.

The sun was shining. It was getting warm in fact. It went above freezing and then as the morning rolled on, in came the aircraft and left all those chemical clouds, long trails, all kinds, which I'm giving names to now because there's different designs you'll notice. There's the little zig-zaggie ones that stretch across the sky like a drunken man's stagger. There's the herring-bone ones that go across with the spaced blobs coming down from the mainstream. Then you have the real polymer mushy ones that have no defined outline and this morning I saw them all; what a mess they made all across the sky and that's a real downer of course because you realize with the agendas as they are, in fact they have began to teach young children in school that this is the normal, you become to understand that this is intergenerational. They're going to keep this up.

Interesting enough, in the movies like "Blade Runner" in the background of most of the shots outside it was always raining. It was dull and always raining. Predictive programming can take many forms, often just with the background, to condition you to something.

What's behind this, apart from the rubbish about preventing global warming? We know when they're spraying the warming process speeds up. Just watching it for the last few years, personally, it can show you that. It was begun under – never mind the long term planning it took, officially it began with the Open Sky Treaty.

The Open Sky Treaty to the public, again a very good reason is presented, it was put forth as a way for other countries after the Cold War to monitor each other by observation flyovers. That's the good reason they give you. However, the reasons they go into don't make sense. For instance, to see if military establishments are being built, facilities to launch missiles et cetera and all of that stuff.

Now they have more hardware floating around in space than probably all the metals that were used in previous societies for all their wars. They have more satellites out there that can see the brand of chewing gum you're opening and not these fuzzy pictures they showed you during Gulf War I or II. They can pinpoint things exactly and cloud cover is nothing because they use infrared and different methods of seeing through all of this stuff. They can even see into the ground. Scientific papers in the past have boasted about this in detail. Yet they want flyovers, you see, so here's the good reason for the public, thinking this is to keep us safe, to make sure we're all (as the pirates and the Masons say) "above board," nothing is going on by subterfuge.  There's a whole bunch of legalities – you'd have to read it. It's so amazing to see the lawyer-speak, you know the lie-speak, that they go into and screeds and screeds of stuff where foreign pilots can come in and fly your aircraft even – military aircraft over your territory, and if they can't do it they can get some other country next to you to do it for them, and on and on it goes. Very, very important project, way too important in fact for simple observation, which, as I say, by aircraft is obsolete technically. They don't need it anymore. They have satellites to do all of that.

However, here's the very good reason they give us and this is from the U.S. government and from the Open Skies Consultative Commission. This is the shorter blurb, the non-legalistic blurb they give you. You can go into all the legal stuff if you're really interested and if you like all that kind of stuff. Personally, it bores me as the party to the first part and the second part agree to the third party et cetera, et cetera. All these parties all over the place, no wonder they get nothing done.

"The Open Skies Consultative Committee is supported by the Forum for Security Co-operation Support Unit in the OSCE Secretariat. The central focus of the Committee is to discuss all questions relating to compliance with the Treaty's provisions.

Treaty on Open Skies

The Treaty on Open Skies was signed on 24 March 1992 in Helsinki, Finland."

Alan:  Now, you can all go into the Helsinki agreement and all that kind of stuff. That's usually where most presidents and prime ministers go. It's the first big major meeting they head for is the Helsinki meeting that's held every year.

"It entered into force on 1 January 2002,"

Alan:  That's not true either. They've changed that because I have a memory. I remember them publishing this in the newspapers in Canada back in the '90's. It says:

"following ratification by 20 countries.

The Treaty, which is designed to promote openness and transparency in military activities, established a regime of observation flights over the territory of its signatories. Signatories are allowed to conduct observation flights, using unarmed--

Alan:  You could really play around forever today with "unarmed" because you'd have screeds of legalities just in there depending on how you define "arms" with high-tech et cetera.

"fixed-wing aircraft, to gather information about military forces and activities of other States Parties from Vancouver to Vladivostok. The Treaty also envisages--

Alan:  NOW THIS IS THE LITTLE CLAUSE THAT'S THE REAL REASON.  This is the little clause that is the REAL REASON, not the camouflage.

"The Treaty also envisages the possible extension of the Open Skies regime to additional areas--

Alan:  They always do, they get the law on the books then expand it you see to the real purpose.

"to additional areas, such as crisis management and protection of environment."

Alan:  That's the real reason. Now you can read all the rest of the additional stuff and legalities and yah, de yah de yah, all the nonsense, all the masses of camouflage because that little paragraph here is the REAL REASON. Not the very good reason, but the real reason for the Open Sky Treaty. The Treaty also envisages the possible extension – possible extension – envisage. Envisage is to see ahead, you see, the possible extension of the Open Skies regime, regime. Military term – regiment, regime,

"to additional areas, such as crisis management and protection of environment."

Alan:  Now that tells you. Why would something to do with military establishments and nuclear weaponry et cetera, why would they have to go into crisis management and protection of the environment? Protection, not observation but protection of environment and below it has treaty members. There are more joining all the time because this is happening on a world scale and when you see the amount of stuff that's sprayed daily pretty well over your own heads you realize this is drifting from hundreds and hundreds of miles and sometimes thousands of miles to other countries that ultimately no one can stay away from it.  However, these are the main treaty members and they will see the spraying over their heads, which is nothing to do obviously with observation.

These aren't contrails, condensation trails. Condensation trails as an aircraft comes across the horizon you'll see it, a few hand spans behind the craft, you'll see the tail of the condensation disappearing as moisture would have to. It can't sit there forever like a big ice cycle in the atmosphere, it dissipates into the dry air and disappears. The ones we see are not condensation. They're chemical and remember what I just read. The Treaty also envisages the possible extension of the Open Skies regime "to additional areas which as crisis management and protection of environment."

"The Treaty's thirty-five State Parties are: Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, the Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Several other states have declared their intent to accede."

The real intent of the Open Skies Treaty was simply to deal with a threat from out there, the environment, you see, but it's also to do with controlling people – crisis management. Remember, this is a United Nations effort and the World Health Organization that's part of the United Nations already years ago talked about lacing certain water supplies with tranquilizers to calm people who might just want to get rather nasty if their country was being taken over. That's on record.

People have been noticing the effects of the heavy spraying, sometimes on themselves and on people around them. In the summer you will see people who are like doped patients in a psychiatric hospital wandering in and out of stores, the same blank expression, slow. Even the owners of the stores or the people who work there, you ask for something simple and you'd think you just asked them to explain Euclid's theories on mathematics. It's beyond normal. It's beyond simply a hot summer's day, especially when they're inside.

I think they're using chemicals for multi-purposes here; but definitely if you understand how an elite work in their head space, you would use every weapon at your disposal on the general public if your plan is to take that same public through the biggest transition phase from one complete lifestyle to another. You don't want them thinking about things. You don't want their minds to be active. You want to avoid people complaining, forming groups and all that kind of stuff, so you would use everything in your arsenal to keep them dumb and stupid.

I know there are people out there who would never believe that that would be done to them by this group at the top, that they have been brought up to believe exist on some kind of totally selfless motivation to help others. That's why they're there, these unseen bureaucracies and levels of super government, they're all altruistic some how. They come out of different wombs than anyone else, therefore they don't have any nasty impulses. They're just there because they're servants of some kind. You don't elect any of them. They're just some kind of special servant that maybe god elects, I don't know, or appoints.  They'd never believe that this could be done to them. That's the conditioning, complete, complete conditioning, because to breakthrough into the realization that nothing is as it seems would probably take a nervous breakdown for most of them to come through that. Or at least a severe crash through the system where they find out that all of the social services, the safety nets, all the things they tell you are there to help you when you need them don’t really exist as such. At least it's a very different system altogether if you have to fall into the net.

Some people are born with the ability to see through, many are caught at school and stuck on drugs such as Ritalin, but most of the people who get hypnotized every night by television will never come to that conclusion. You can't live in both worlds and retain your clarity or your sanity. Television is the biggest tool they've ever given the public, apart from inoculations which certainly do attack the brain. You see that with all of the problems with autism and the subdivisions thereof.  We see it in today's people who have short-term memory. They have low concentration. We're definitely far, far weaker physically than people of even a couple of generations ago. We're being reengineered, which is another reason they went for the food and kept it secret from the public while they tested it on the public by agreements with governments such as Canada who admitted, yes, they made secret agreements with the big ones like Monsanto. Secret agreements with your food, the most basic thing you can have. You are what you eat, so they say.

It's certainly didn't make food any cheaper or better. So why did they use such immense brainpower and science and mix hundreds of genes together to make one brand new stock of corn? You'll be the last to know because the real world and the ones who run this world will never tell you truths. It's done by deception. In a sense it's done by a form of diplomacy. Diplomacy is a way of getting what you want often without the other person even figuring out how you give them – how that you give up what the other wants. It's a chess game.  Huge departments work just on the wording of documents to give the general public one view, which will be peddled to them by media, while the insiders committed another way. Therefore, legally they didn't lie to you. They just worded it in such a way you'll take the exoteric meaning and think no further, especially if some person on television that is very popular, some mainstream news anchor person, tells you what you're supposed to think. You won't question it any further. You won't check in yourself. That's how simply this stuff is peddled into our minds.

The Open Skies Treaty was decided generations ago. H.G. Wells talked about the police of the world, the new freemasonry of the air, scientists who would spray over hostile territories and gases and different things that would affect the minds of those below and render them silly and stupid and helpless in the "Shape of Things To Come." The new freemasonry of the air, the air police.  H.G. Wells was no genius. He simply was given files of info from professors at Oxford and Cambridge, predictive programming, and his job was to write stories around them, which would implant the intent in your mind through a fiction which you would enjoy and they certainly were enjoyable. He also belonged to the Fabian Society, a founding member, that was steeped in eugenics. A society that believed the sciences should have the right to dictate to public of the world how to live, what your purpose in life was, how many of you there should be. Your betters, your intellectual betters should decide for you. That's really was what's behind them.  They all believed they were superior and the Fabian was taken from Fabian the Roman, the General, who would plan strategies years and years ahead of actual events and by slow incremental implementation of certain things he would achieve his goal unnoticed by those who are being taken over the Fabian way. That's what's been happening and it wasn't invented by the Fabian Society. It was already on the go prior to that.

When you look at the main characters who alter our mindsets primarily through fiction, they sell way better than any dry factual book. Fiction appeals to the public. We have an imagination – the image is within – image, you see, and they supply the images which people then worship, and when you worship something you try and emulate it, predictive programming.

The world we live in is not a hallucination; it's an illusion, which is a distortion of reality. Distortion. It's not difficult to understand how it's being manipulated up until this point when you realize the sciences of human behavior were understood thousands of years ago and the knowledge was never lost. The milestones of life are understood and because of that you can be pretty well guaranteed that people 25 and under, or maybe even 30 and under, are definitely preoccupied with hormonal drives. It's prime in their minds, an instinct which they must obey, so they're out of the running. They're very easily used, of course, because they have more open minds they can put the image in, imagination. They use imagination more and you can predict that which will set there for their rest of their lives through fiction, ideas et cetera, which they will carry to their death never realizing how it got there, like a virus put in by a program on your computer. It works very well.

Wells wasn't the only one. In the '40's and '50's they gave us other authors, science fiction, who made us all excited about space travel. Even though an incredible tiny minority get to travel in space or ever would get to travel in space, and it certainly wouldn't be as exciting as Star Trek or any of the novels that people have gobbled up over their lifetimes.

We have a pioneering spirit within us for adventure and because of that, those who understand it supply and download into us the predictive programming. It never occurs to us why we should be spending billions of bucks throwing junk into space to begin with, when there's so much to be done on earth here and where the money that comes from our labor should go towards. We take for granted, though, it's a kind of norm. Yet NASA and these big companies, these highly secretive organizations whose real job is nothing to do with what they tell you, it's to do with putting up hardware which will ultimately monitor every individual worldwide and control them, but we don't question it. We're given the fascinating stuff that intrigues us and made to almost wish we were up there too, you see, doing exciting things. Although you'd be bored out of your mind cramped in a little place going round and round the earth and having to get out once in a while and fix some other piece of military hardware—which is the other function of the space shuttles, THE REAL PURPOSE, maintenance of these military machines.

All of that came into being with the farce of the Cold War, which they call the ARMS race. Great con it was, where governments in the West said, "oh look at that big nasty bear over there, the Russian. They're miles ahead of us." The same technique they used in World War II when they claimed that Britain had no aircraft and the Germans had thousands of them. Same con. Same con and it worked so well. "Oh, they're going to blow you up," and they showed you all these movies of U.S. nuclear weapons going off and houses getting blown away in the desert, at the same time telling you that hiding under your table would save you. There's you dialectic in motion, the helplessness of it all.

It's a wonderful con trick which works and so they kept saying, "oh gee whiz, these Russians have got all these missiles, way more than we've got," and then the governments taxed and taxed and taxed, and we said "well I guess they have to just keep us safe." All that stuff had nothing to do with weaponry as we thought it was. It was to do with the advancement of sciences which would be used down the road after they declared the Cold War was over—there was a thaw—and we'd all be monitored and controlled by high-tech. That's what the purpose was, research and development, unlimited financing. The scientists of the Soviet Union and the Western countries met every year, the top scientists, and discussed it. It was in the newspapers. Why would they do that if they said that the winner of the Cold War would be those who had the best and most advanced sciences? Well, you'd never allow them to mix, would you? Until you realize it's all a con and we're both sharing the same information.

The Russians worked because they had to work hard in research and development. Everybody worked towards something they believed in. That's how you con peoples and populations. The West simply used an excuse to get billions and billions and billions, trillions actually, of dollars into special projects which are now coming into fruition openly and being used, and a lot of it yet hasn't been used on the public. That's still to come. All that stuff had nothing to do with building all these weapons when we had enough weaponry supposedly to blow the world up hundreds of times over they declared.

The money went into a system, a worldwide network, that would be used to control the populations of the world because it was the populations of the planet, not the leaders, but the populations that had to be brought under a common system and controlled and that's what the real intent of the Cold War was.

I'll leave you all to do your homework on the Open Skies Treaty. Look into the OSCE, the OSCC and all the related documents and ask yourself if this makes sense to you. Compare it to what your eyes can see on most days if you look up, and as I said, remember, everything that's presented to the public, for everything there must be a very good reason and then there is the REAL REASON.

It's not for us to be given truths, just good excuses.

From me and Hamish, it's good night and may your god or gods go with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:56 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB

"MEANING, MENTORS AND MASTERS

(OR)

SEEKERS, SPEAKERS AND SOPHISTS"

February 21, 2007

Hi. I'm Alan Watt and this is cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  It is Wednesday the 21st of February 2007 and this month certainly is going in quick. That's good.

People have called me and asked if I am still teaching small classes and at the moment I'm not, because, to be honest with you, I'm just over my head with even these little blurbs. There's so much to do to get them up there and uploaded, especially when you're using dial-up, and the high-speed isn't in my area at the moment. It was supposed to come in, in February, but it's been postponed to some obscure later date and maybe never because there's no point for the big boys to run specific lines all the way to remote houses for one customer to pay and it doesn’t pay them. The alternative would be satellite, but satellite is extremely costly. I think it's around 800 or more dollars per year and they want two-year contracts, so it's all up in the air you might say. I'll just continue doing what I'm doing at the moment, so, yes, it takes a lot of time to upload to different sites and get it all ready. The talking part is no problem. It's all the things that come afterwards to get it up there and working. It takes hours, hours.

What I don't try and do is to teach a religion. There's lots out there for people who are seeking a religion to go to and pay their money. They'll find once they've done their circuits they're pretty well all the same, regardless of the avenue you first come in to, they end up going along the same road and regardless of what school or the country it seems to come from, it's all really the same.

Religion is to bind, to tie. That's what it means. You bind yourself to something. You're re-tied. Re-ligion, ligio. Everyone has been conditioned through their birth or their place of origin or whatever through the prevailing religion of their country to see the world in a specific way, even if you don't attend the religions or the churches in their countries, it's already in the culture. It's established – the mode of conduct, the behavior, all of that kind of stuff. The culture comes from what is or what has been the religion and it shapes your world view on things.

They say it's easy to get a person out of religion, but it's hard to get the religion out of the person; and that's probably very, very true. When you compare the different main religions in the world, you will see how each one would affect and shape the thoughts of you as a follower. They're all meant to create a form of social cohesion so that a system will work and it's also to teach obedience to the rulership of that system without question, either through punishments which will come from a deity or the forces which are out there, the yin and yang, that kind of thing.

There's bits of truth in everything. Bits of truth in everything. Cause and effect you might say. To bring people up to a higher truth out of their conditioning, whether it's religious or what they presume is cultural even, because your culture still is the same. It shapes a world view, how you will then see new information and then always go back to Plato's Cave to compare it to, and then if you can find it in the cave or something similar you'll think it's normal. That's what it really does to the individual person and we need something to believe in, something which we think is normal. Otherwise, you'd be flying all over space with no grounding at all, nothing to grab a hold of, so aspects of life and religions can also be tools or staging rockets to go higher into other understandings, if you have fully used them to their limit, it can help a person beyond.

Many people cannot leave traditional indoctrinations behind. They still will keep comparing what you're giving them as new concepts or ideas back to their old religion and back to Plato's Cave as I say. Some people are overly enthusiastic concerning where they are in their understanding. Someone recently had written in to say that they'd read Albert Pike's "Morals & Dogma" right through and he could understand it perfectly. He meant the language that was used at that time. Most people today, sure enough, can't get through it because it's more intricate a language than the simplistic form we use today. However, the fact of the statement was it showed me that, yes, you can read the exoteric straight through thinking that's it. If you'd understood the esoteric all through that, you would be astounded. It wouldn't be a matter of "well what's next?"

The world is full of schools of thought and you'll find that the students and pupils have spent their entire lives going from one school to the next just consuming information, often without understanding it. They're consumers.

Higher understanding will alter lives, your own life first and foremost, profoundly, without a set of dogmatic rules which you learn by rote. Rules and formula are for those who are seeking religions which compare to the old one, which have rules and formula; and why unshackle one chain to put on another?

Consumers of the vast movement which has been openly created since the times of Madame Blavatsky, has really pushed people into an endless seeking and searching and validation of what they learned previously in the previous schools. It's all to try to concretize something which they've done, they want to believe in but they just can't – deep down inside them, even though they say all the right things to their friends to make them think they still truly believe, they don't really, so they're on to the next thing looking for validation of what they've just learned elsewhere; rather than seeing that everything you learn is a staging rocket to the next level.

Many people get stuck in an experience and because of the experience, which can be induced in many ways, even scientifically. That's understood well in the behavioral sciences, but the experience seems so real and profound that they'll hang on to that for their entire lives and never go beyond that experience; rather than say, "is there something beyond this? Something more fulfilling on a mental level, a mind level, a level of meaning," and there's no question that you could ask in any time or in any era that hasn't been asked before over eons. The same questions will come up in every generation, regardless of the changes in the outward system; it's always the same basic questions.

It's a search for personal meaning. We live in a world where you can be surrounded with people, have a whole nation of people, a whole world of people and still be isolated within yourself. People have personas they project as they go around and talk to people. The persona you project is never the same as it's perceived by others, but that doesn't matter. You need this idea of this is who you seem to be to them. This is how they will see you and you try and act and live up to that, yet no one has gone through life, except maybe the occasional psychopath, who hasn't reflected on themselves personally when things seem to go wrong.

It's worse when you live in a system like today where we're given incessantly from birth, via media and movies and dramas, what's supposed to be normal. Even when they change the normal and we go along with it, it's bizarre because there's nothing normal about it. You're set an ideal life, an ideal standard of how things are supposed to be and they're simply not like that. There was a long running series a while back, a sitcom, which all took place in a bar and people watched that devotedly. I don't know how long it ran, maybe a couple of years, maybe longer, and every character in the bar was an independent character a scriptwriter had written, a composite for an individual and so everyone had their character and personality. A little bit in each you could identify with and that's the key to good writing and you go through little dramas as they all met in the bar after work.

However, the sad thing is, people who loved the characters whom they identified with didn't have any of that in their own life, their private life. That's why these comedies and dramas are so popular. They set an ideal where you think you belong, where you'd love to belong in a sense, in a fictionalized world of how it should be and how people really care about each other and you can't find it in your own life, because in your own life everybody's just as worried as you are about today and tomorrow and sometimes yesterday. Regret for the past, fear of the future and so you're being crucified today. That's the symbology of it, always was.

They're not really living at all. They're existing and getting through and putting a brave face on, perhaps, but they're not really living. You can't live when you anxious and terrified, and this world and this system certainly keeps that going, where the cost of anything can shoot up tomorrow and it's out of your hands and that makes us all obey and jump and pay attention. That's how it's set up and the only escape for many, many people is through fiction where they see the ideal settings, but it's a fiction which never existed.

I don't know if anyone out there ever read T.S. Elliot's "The Cocktail Party," because there's a character in there called Celia who’s gone through all these disillusioned love affairs and she goes to see a psychiatrist to try and get some help. She started her interview with the psychiatrist and I think she said, "I should really like to think there's something wrong with me, because if there isn't then there's something wrong with the world."

There's a truth in both parts. If you're emulating and trying to carry out a lifestyle where you've accepted the "fake norm" that's projected to you, this ideal standard that you're even bombarded with, with all the advertising telling you how you should look. How much you should weigh. What's going to make you happy with the youthful vigor?  It's all youthful, youthful, youthful and the kind of house you're supposed to have and the kind of car, and everything as I say is always happy, happy, happy.

"Don't Worry Be Happy"

By Bobby McFerrin

 

Don't worry be happy

Don't worry be happy

Don't worry be happy

Ain't got no place to lay your head
Somebody came and took your bed
Don't worry, be happy

The land lord say your rent is late
He may have to litigate
Don't worry, be happy

Look at me I am happy
Don't worry, be happy

If you follow that and really start to – or even let it get to you, then you will break down ultimately because it's nothing like reality. It's complete fake. It's projection. It's mass manipulation and it certainly isn't geared to bring you contentment.  If people in this system ever reached any level of contentment and stopped buying anything, you wouldn't need to buy anything and the system would collapse.  We have to keep the system going by allowing ourselves to be shown how discontented we are. Produce and consume. That's the definition of a "good citizen" by the United Nations standards, "a good producer-consumer."

Getting back to Celia, as I say she's been right on both counts. The world as she'd been taught is a fiction, the idealistic world that she wanted to believe in, but because she wanted to believe in it she expected it and the things of that world in her own personal life, so she was quite correct in concluding "there was something wrong with the world," but more so there was something wrong with her perception of the world.

If she started from there and started to figure out why she had been perceiving it that way, she would have come to many more answers in her own life.

Most people are terrified, and every generation is the same, of death. Eons ago that was understood and priesthoods formed to cast away demons that would take you off into the nether regions. Illness was also quite common. Child mortality especially in the old empires was awful because empires tended to have a rigid class or caste system, where those at the bottom got the least of everything, nourishment-wise, and often even scientifically they were given a particular type of diet which kept them able to work but not too bright, so offspring would suffer often in the early days or weeks after birth.  The lifespan too, of those below was often short too because of the conditions they had to live in.

In the old days storms were caused by nature. You could have your house blown away. You could have natural catastrophes in the old days. Now they can cause it through science, and so shamans, miracle workers, priests became important to try and confirm humankind's ability to defeat all of the bad things which could happen in life.  It was the collective belief that together you could defeat all of these ills. Unfortunately too, because everyone seeks something beyond themselves which they suspect is there, the priesthoods who caught on to this and who understood it very well began to supply the answers which became dogma, which became the systems, and so while seeking the answers you become imprisoned under the system to the benefit of those who rule it. Nothing new in that at all.

It's interesting to note that even in ancient times in different countries the people would come to those who'd left the civilizations of those periods to live on their own and think, because it's very difficult to work your way out of the "group mind" the "collective mind" and the system which runs the group. It's very difficult to do that when you're in amongst them.

Often people would go off on their own to try and find themselves and answers for themselves, and if they were at peace people would understand that they had a peace which they wanted and they'd want to find out how to attain that same peace, which meant that those who had gone off for peace and safety in the first place would go further and further away, because that person obviously had done without a lot of the world's things to get that peace of mind and the last thing he probably needed was the world coming to him.

Then there are the fakes who understand instinctively, intuitively what everyone's after. Their fear of death. Their need to believe in purpose. That part is true. You need purpose, but the charlatans would also clue into this and set themselves up as holy men and use the people for their own ends. It's happened up to the present day and it's allowable because you can't stop people from finding out for themselves.

Meaning and purpose is very important to going on in life, through all of its tragedies, upsets, heartaches, illnesses, deaths, and there's one thing we all have to accept – that in this life, at least for the majority of people, death will come. "You can't get out of this world alive," as they used to say, and no amount of money is going to alter that fact. Some people are terrified literally to the day they die of dying, utterly terrified. Others will take it more calmly, especially, although rarely today, if they've had a fulfilled life. Fulfilled meaning they've worked their way through for themselves all of the problems, personal and otherwise, of the world.

It's so rare today as I say because in a short period we've gone from a family orientated society with extended family, where everyone had purpose, where elderly had wisdom to pass on to the younger, to a commercially driven society which cast out all of the other groups and concentrated on the young; because it's always the young you're shaping and managing into the next phase. You always go for the young in long-term goals, always. Nothing new in that either.

Today it's more successful because the other parts of eliminating generational contact has been very successful. Something again written about by revolutionaries back in the 1800's. It has been accomplished and not only that, we don't have the reality of life because we don't experience the grandmother or the grandfather or great-grandfather living with the family who's dying, and that was common for everyone to help out and the young saw what death was; it was more real to them. It made them mature much quicker and have more of a concept of the value of life.

Today everything is like the meat you buy in a grocery store. It's prepackaged and shiny and very clean and hygienic looking. Well death is the same way. Strangers take care of great uncle so-and-so or great aunt or granny or whatever in places called hospitals and they take care of all the problems they go through, all the things which we don't want to see anymore, all the nasty little things, until they die; and so the children grow up just knowing so-and-so went to the hospital died. Another professional takes over, the undertaker, and dresses them up, makes them look as though they were alive and you might get a glimpse, and then he either goes up a chimney or else is put in a vault, but it’s all managed and taken care of. It's out of the family's hands and all of the experiences of those who go through death and taking care of them are also outside of the family's hands. Not only that, in today's society, because they ensured that women would also work and now you have the state rearing your children from kindergarten onwards in day school and all this stuff, the children don't participate and see all of what goes in to leaving this world and they don't have a conception of death or the value of life. If they had the understanding of the value of life, they would treat others around them differently.

We are where we are today because men like Darwin were put out to proclaim a new religion, a belief system, and Darwinism takes an awful lot of belief if you want to go along with it.  You also had Karl Marx who focused primarily on class struggles as though it were a science, the theory being that each generation has creative ones within at the bottom level who would fight and pull their way up to the top; and because it similarly or it was parallel to Darwinism, he wanted to dedicate I think the third or fourth edition to Darwin.

In fact, he said that Darwin validated the theory. They were all high Freemasons and I'm sure they were all in on the same little act, although apparently coming from different directions. They all coordinated together to create a new view of life, society and humanity and purpose, and in the process they devalued human life to an extent where once you have devalued it down to an animal's level, and since you don't have much regard for animals in the first place, those who are taught the sciences believe they can do with the human material that which they wish. We have been living through that, where I think beginning in or after World War II it was standard procedures to whip out tonsils and adenoids before the age of five in pretty well all British school children or children on the basis that these were appendages left over, sort of vestiges from a previous time and you don't need them anymore, and yet those were part of your immune system. You think that's an accident?

I've no doubt most doctors at the time and surgeons really believed their own indoctrination. That's the scary part about belief systems, how easy it is once it's on the go to train people to implement the next part of your belief system, which must follow by using that logic based on the belief system.

We've seen Nietzsche. We've seen all of the people including the founders of the Fabian Society write about man and superman and how they'd alter humanity and take the crème-de-la-crème and push them into the stature of gods basically; but along with that comes the other side of the coin.

As Bertrand Russell says: "What do you do with the useless eaters, the ones who have no function. The ones who haven't evolved enough, fast enough?"

We know that those that are trained to believe in this belief system will go the next step. It's logical for them to do so. We've had the eugenicists wreak havoc in the 20th century through the extermination of so-called "inferior species" and it wasn't just happening in Germany. It was happening throughout the United States with the great foundations backing them and sterilizing "the unfit" as they deemed them.  That is where the present belief system has got us, to the devaluation of human life and it must take the next step and the next step and the next step, as long as it has that belief system it will do so.

What was then unthinkable will be done, and worse. The sad part is many people at the bottom who will be the recipients of the techniques to be used also have been trained to believe in it. I've heard ordinary people talk about, "oh there's too many people in the world and in some of those third-world countries, my God how they breed," and yah de yah it goes on and on.

None of these systems could survive and work without individual cooperation and the acquiescence of the majority by their silence and sometimes even their applause. They used to say, "what goes around comes around," and it does because what you allow to be done to others will ultimately come around to your door; and how do you, personally, eugenically, measure up?

All of this again was discussed eons ago by other peoples and from them came out different schools of thought. You had the Cynics in Greece who realized that all forms of institutionalized religion were simply control mechanisms to keep a few in power and their offspring for as long as they could hold on to it. We had the Stoics who tried to use rationality for everything and cut out the emotion. You had the Atomists groups and schools who supposedly by their brain power understood that atoms were tiny parts of matter and everything revolved around them and nothing was solid. That wasn't dreamed up by them. That was inherited from previous ages. YOU CAN'T GUESS AT THAT KIND OF KNOWLEDGE.  Scientifically, knowledge is supposed to come from the next experiment, the next finding, which sets you off onto the next track. You can't jump whole massive areas of science and come down with the idea of atoms in ancient Greece.

In India, a complete social structure was instituted by a people who understood how to implement it and what they were after, where life could be so terrible for many people and you could still train them to believe that this was natural, nothing mattered, the world was composed of opposing forces in balance and sometimes one overtook the other for a little while and you'd either have prosperity or poverty, famine, plagues and warfare. You could make them almost punch drunk with this kind of idea and make them accept it.

The Chinese philosophy, yin and yang, was the same, the same idea. You had Pantheism in various stages, a form of believing that everything was inhabited by a spirit, even a stone. Eventually that could lead a person to distraction and terror because compulsive-obsessional behavior comes in there, where you must start to appease everything when you've a run of "bad luck."  You must appease the stone. You must appease the tree. You must appease the sky, the clouds, the storm clouds and appease the sun, and in comes sacrifice of some kind or another and much of sacrifice is ritual. Even time can be sacrifice, the time that you spend going through formula of appeasement, until you're tied up in bondage and you can't move because of "unseen forces" outside of your control.

The ancient Greeks had many gods. Ancient Babylon had many too, and you had to appease them all, all of them. Eventually, there were so many you couldn't keep up with them, but you had to try and appease them all because if you didn't there was always the fear that the gods would start fighting amongst themselves and there'd be chaos.

You find eventually that most religions are simple projections from the individual personality or the group personality outwards, until they personify their own faults and fears and apprehensions in something they try and make tangible and outside of themselves. They used to say that "if there was no devil, we'd have to invent him," because the alternative would be that you'd have to look into yourself and admit that you had the abilities to do all those things you could stone others to death for.

When I was small in Scotland there were remnants of the old clan system and the clans kept getting demolished and disintegrating and moved around and integrated into society over a long period of time, yet there were still stragglers that kept apart from the system. They called them "tinkers."  If you went up north into the highland areas, you'd often see these people with, they called them "prams," the go-chairs for children and they'd have all of their belongings in these things and they'd be pushing them along the streets – I'm talking about in the country, the roads, and they skirted the towns. Sometimes they'd go into the rubbish dumps and set up camp and scrounge for scrap, which they'd take to the scrap dealers, and somehow they survived separate from the system and alongside the system. Wherever they went they were called "tinkers" and they had derogatory terms for them. Yet to me, when I was really small, they looked tall and healthy, probably because they had no inoculations and such, and they could survive in the climates of winter and the hot of summer, and there'd be men and women and children.

The authorities went out full blast eventually to get them into the housing schemes, re-educate them, get their children into the system because they couldn't have that. In Ireland they still had gypsies, too, who traded primarily in horses in southern Ireland and they'd go around town to town. We had some of them, too, that would go door to door and I can remember them coming around to doors, the housing schemes, the units all sort of joined together, rows of houses, and they'd always come to the back door during the day and sell handmade clothespins and things. Very quiet, never obnoxious and yet I used to wonder why society had such a hatred for them, and it was because they were different ultimately and they wouldn't join the system.

You'll find that people will turn on you if you don't join the hell that they're already in and they hate difference, and no one would care when eventually the authorities were given teeth to go in and disband their camps and haul off children to Children's Aid and such. Yet to me they represented maybe the last vestige of a freedom which I knew I would never see.

I also know that when peoples come into your country (which you think is your country) and they look different, like the Mexicans are doing in the U.S. at the moment, and their customs are different because they're used to a third-world survival situation, how everyone suddenly looks down and "oh my goodness. They're so different. I can't live along side them."  And in comes the moral justification of why you think that way and the people are put down for having chickens and things we should all really have and stuff like that.  In fact, things which your fairly recent ancestors had themselves, and they remind me very much like the tinkers.

Countries don’t get risen up because people are really hard working or any harder working than anyone else. In the history books of economics they admit that countries are designed to come up and flourish and do so with the easy availability of credit and the absence of bureaucracies in all kinds of local and national laws. That's why they come up. Not because of any specialty on our part or because our god is better than your god or anything less or anything like that. It's completely different.  Understood again but not by those who come head on with the culture class, which is an upsetting time for everyone, and yet everything that's happening is designed to do so and planned and encouraged by those who own your culture and your nation. However, we shouldn't turn on those because they're the effect or side effect of the agenda.

It's also interesting that if you fight something long enough you hate it and that which you hate you become. You become until you lose that which you started to fight for in the first place. You become your enemy and the enemy is you.  You will see that in peoples who've been persecuted who become the persecutors and eventually all the moral justification sounds flat even to those who participate.

The bottom line is this world is run to a system that writes about their plans. They use professors and VIPs. They make sure that we know their names and they write boring books that most people don't want to read. They get the occasional quote maybe from a magazine once in a while and that's all they'll go into. Not the rest. And they hate and they don't want to admit that they're being controlled. They don't want to admit that to themselves, that we're born into a system which is all encompassing, which doesn’t want to lose control, that actually plans the future.  Orwell said it, "he who controls the past," et cetera, et cetera."   He knew because he'd been trained by those who ran this system, he'd been picked and chosen to participate in bringing it all around until he understood there was no sides. There was only one at the top, the capstone that had its own vision of where it was taking the world and the last people to really know were all those different groups that were fighting each other. They were helping bring it about, completely oblivious of it in fact. They only saw their short-term goal as a group, not all the side effects and ripples and how it would intermesh with all other parts of an agenda which would change the world into a different world than the one they had initially envisaged.

The simplest things said by wise people can be missed completely by people who are too impatient who want something more, something which has to knock them off their feet, something terribly profound which offers them a personal hope, and so that when you actually give them something that offers them hope but not in the way they expect it, it goes right over their heads. They don't see what you've given them. They have no appreciation. They can't fathom. In fact, it's discarded. It's like deleting something on your computer. It doesn’t even stay to be registered. People will phone me up asking me things and I always listen to see something, which is very important, because if they want to learn something I have to see if they listen. Many of them will do more talking than listening and you know that's how they would continue. When they do more talking than listening, it's because whatever you've said so far isn't good enough, and that's what extra talking and endless repetitive questions tell me.

Understanding anything is a process and you can't take shortcuts. The shortcuts are what religions promise for the exoteric masses. And some people also say to me, "aren't you ever afraid of reprisal or whatever, or the authorities, or speaking out about the agenda?" and the answer is "why live in fear? What can they do to you?"  They could cut off your arms. They could cut off your legs or cut out your tongue or – well, I'll let this song say it all.

For me and Hamish, it's good night and may your god or gods go with you.

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:58 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB

"IBM = EYE-BEE-M(A SON) = EYE-BEAM = I AM BEE.

BEE = CELL = CELL PHONE"

February 22, 2007

Hi. I'm Alan Watt and today is Thursday the 22nd of February 2007.

This month February is quite the in-between month for splitting winter into the next phase of this year. It's sometimes the coldest nights and it can shoot up much higher above freezing during the day occasionally. The nights are certainly getting longer and that's a good sign because winter can certainly drag on the people and their mentality the longer it goes on.

Tonight, I'd like to talk a little bit about the system which is coming in now to do with "virtual realities," but before I do, I'd like to mention that once in a while I get a very odd email from someone who's scouring the Internet that listens to five minutes of a talk that I've done and makes their instant judgments.

Today, I got one from a fellow who seems to think that I'm advocating an overthrow or a complete change of the system and he rounds it up by saying "you're like everyone else. You're just envious of those with money."  That's called "projection". He's projecting what he has onto me, you see, and he would rather have a gradual change in society towards I don't know what, some ideal maybe he doesn't mention, and that's what you get from someone who listens to part of a story and who has no patience to listen to the rest because their judgments come before their understandings.

"Nowhere Man"

By the Beatles

 

He's a real nowhere Man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?
Nowhere Man, please listen,
You don't know what you're missing,
Nowhere Man, the world is at your command.

He's as blind as he can be,
Just sees what he wants to see,
Nowhere Man can you see me at all?
Nowhere Man, don't worry,
Take your time, don't hurry,
Leave it all till somebody else
lends you a hand.

Personally, I don't care about having lots of money. It would just be a burden. I've had lots of money in the past and walked away from it. It doesn't bring what people think is happiness. What it does is take off the edge of the insecurities of this world, which is based on fear and poverty or all the things you have to pay for, all the "ifs" you might say, all the insurances against what might happen to you. That's what it's supposed to do.

That's why people crave it and run after it, and through an exaggeration, an anxious neurotic overcompensation, they try to accumulate as much as they can to stave off all these fears that they have of all the things which might happen. Those no doubt at the top get there and hold on to it by the same means and the same reasons and because it's an overcompensation they can't stop, because then they have an ideal of who they are. Your image of yourself keeps changing as you move from one strata of society to the next and that can be up or down, but the image changes as you go.

Those at the top have a new image once you've reached a certain through different phases and levels, and you've left all the different strata behind you that you met on the way up, and you feel that you've got to hold on to that position because you're terrified of going down; and sure enough, the further down you go, you sense, because you've been there, you sense the fear from people who live in an insecure world and insecure daily life. They have insecure employment, which is pretty well the standard today, has been for a while, and all the bombardment of healthcare and the costs of everything and on it goes. That's not what I advocate at all. I'm simply pointing out what is.

Part of the problems we have, apart from the fact that sometime in the past someone invented the whole thing of money and kept a hold of the control of it. Part of the problem is that it relies on human nature to perpetuate itself and along with perpetuation of itself, being one system based on fear, it brings along all the chaos with it, which makes it easier for those at the top to control everyone else and it depends on human nature.

It is true that many of those that complain about a wealthy elite all the time, and we saw this even in the communist Soviet system and the same in China, the ones who get into power supposedly opposing tyranny and oppression immediately set themselves up in the same standards of those they have just displaced, which is generally way above the lifestyle of the general population. Once again, human nature unfortunately takes over and shows itself because no movement which is simply based on the obvious materialistic oppressions can truly bring along a shift in moralistic nature. It can promote moralistic behavior through propaganda, repetition and exhortation, but it doesn't last forever.

When we look at all of the centuries and centuries of dry sermons coming from pulpits and churches, that's what they tried to do, was to exhort the people through reason and emotion into being good to each other to make a society which would function, albeit a hierarchy at the top and the strata all the way down, but it made society function. That was part of the exhortations, rather than have chaos ruling where everyone's fighting everyone else; but it doesn’t last for long. Once you're out of that church the message gets lost in the daily rush of life or the serious business of personal or family survival and it's no different from group think, the group.

Very few groups actually aim for what they begin and set up to do and stay there, stay within the confines of what they set up for. Because they form committees and it's in the nature again of humanity to once you form committees go into almost like think tank modes, where they must come up with new and new and better ways of doing things, until they have stratas of laws which are difficult to wade through and bureaucracies emerge, and then they end up in a totally different direction from that which they initially conceived.

I personally don't advocate a way of overthrowing a system at all and I don't have to advocate that because that's not how it's really working, and the five-minute scanner who emails me should listen to the rest of this talk since he won't listen to previous talks.

The ones who rule this system are changing the system themselves. That's the bottom line. They in a sense are overthrowing the present system because the present system, which they controlled and their predecessors controlled, has outlived its usefulness to them, as did the agricultural system prior to the industrial system. There was no revolt from the peasantry to get rid of agriculture when they were serfs and tenants, tenant farmers, serving the feudal system in Europe. They didn’t revolt to get an industrial system brought in. Those who controlled the feudal system brought in the industrial system, forced the people off the lands into the cities to work in the factories.

Today, we're post-industrial; it's taught in the early school system. No big secret there, except maybe to parents or grandparents. Now we're watching the move into the next phase, which is habitat areas, non-industrial, non-technological as far as any research and development goes, because the research and development is primarily offshore now. Money moves to the place where it can exist as cheaply as possible and is free from the laws they impose on the rest of the countries and the world.

They themselves are destroying what was the old building, the structure, because they have to move into a new phase and bring the people along with it. If there was such a thing as a revolution today it would go nowhere, since they wouldn't know where they were taking themselves in the first place. You can't destroy in order to go back to the previous system, since you never owned that system, planned it or had any say in it either. An elite owned it and they're bringing the world into the next phase. You can't save something which was never yours in the first place.

It's also ridiculous to think that a country could even try and overthrow its own government in this day and age and expect the United Nations to stand by and watch it happen. It would not stand by. Not only that, you'd find that the children you're trying to change the system for and save have been brought up differently from you. They don't have this great indoctrination that they had in the '50's and '60's in the United States to do with patriotism.  They look upon you as a stranger, but certainly the United Nations wouldn't stand by and you'd find your own sons and daughters wearing uniforms, forcing you to go along with whatever was said by the "dominant minority" in your own country.

This has been done before in previous times in old histories. That's why in holy books they can tell you that the children will turn against the parents and man against wife and wife against man because that's all been done before. It's just basic technique and long-term planning, implementation and then you pull it off; and as the ancient Greeks said, "if it’s been done before in society, regardless of the custom or tradition, it will work once again if you know the formula."

There are those who somehow think they have some kind of rights to do with where their country is going, yet anyone who wants to open the books and do their study, their work on the subject will find so many things that have been happening that they were completely unaware of their whole lives, with countless committees, countless foundations, countless non-governmental organizational groups funded by the foundations doing masses of work, weaving this whole New World Order together and it was happening before we were all born.

Only those who've been completely conditioned by television and television news, where they don't mention all of this, only those people will be oblivious to what's really going on and they'll be in shock because it hasn't been propagated over the main air stream or the media or in the magazines. Bits and pieces have been over the years but not much at a time, never giving the complete picture. Little bits of information which float around there with the ether with nothing to tie it to.

When you go into university level books, you'll find this has been going on for generations. There was a massive build up in the 1800's towards the system which is coming in, a global system, and screeds of books written about it for university level. Once in a while through the futuristic think tanks they're allowed to put blurbs out into the regular media to preprogram you for the changes to come, as though it were quite natural; and to the average person, even those who freak out when they realize things are kind of wrong, to the average person things are normal. The very quick changes that they personally experience don't seem to materialize so well.  They're slow gradual changes, yet when you realize how many new laws you've adopted and had to comply with over the last 10 years or so personally, that's when you start to catch on that "something's up". Something is up.

Brzezinski who deals with this kind of psychological warfare in his own book "Between Two Ages," a telling title, talked about this where the general public will be unable to think for themselves shortly. They'll only be able to repeat what they've heard on their previous night's news; and certainly in most work places, when people talk about anything at all, it's the latest from Hollywood on Entertainment Tonight or the news because it's all intertwined now until you can't tell them apart, along with sports. That part has already happened.

Which leads me to my blurb tonight, it's adaptation. The ancient philosophers talked about humanity being the easiest creature to manipulate into different ways of living because we are the most adaptable on the planet; and certainly when you look at all the places that humanity lives, from the hottest climates to the coldest, we certainly are adaptable and along with the adaptations we get cultures which grow to support the climate, which is a survival thing.

The thing that's taught now in universities along with behavioral sciences, which is a big powerful tool in all of this, this movement towards the driving the vast populations towards a certain road to where they want to take us, is the understanding of how we react to news. How we react to data on a daily basis, ongoing data and how we adapt to the changes which come our way. They know well in advance that we will adapt as long as it's processed properly into us. We automatically adapt because if you don't adapt you die and this is all part of the Darwinian school of thinking.

We're supposed to now combine with the world of science and microchips and cybernetics into a next type of human and adapt or die. We have to have a function in an economic system. It's taught in all the economics books that we have to have purpose in the system itself, the economic system, and you'll find in economics there's no real spare room anywhere to put those who don't fit into it and function effectively and productively. Again, all part of the combined Darwinian school of thought.

There's no room really for emotion, so you have this fight between logic and emotion, again, the sides of two hemispheres of the brain, often mistakenly called the male and female and promoted that way deliberately; and yet combined and working together, the logic and the emotion are both necessary for individual survival, because the emotional part also has the intuitive abilities and can cross-over those warnings to the supposed logical side of the brain. That may even be because within humanity itself there is a devious nature and so we have to be on guard against what appears to be logical, always, because if you're logical you're following a mathematical format where you'll come to a predetermined conclusion by simply adding up the numbers that are presented, never dawning sometimes that there could be a CON behind the person who put the quiz out in front of you knowing you'll go along until the end. It's the intuitive center that should kick in and warn the logic side to be careful in the last step of the journey.

This whole theory of how we must adapt to our own creations, interesting in itself, that to do with old religions and so on, where people long ago were well aware of the frailties within humanity, the defects which could be utilized by powerful people with wisdom to motivate the people along a certain way of thinking. Therefore, man in a sense is taught to adapt to that which he creates.

The Darwinian theory doesn’t always hold up because we didn't see them trying to put half humans joined to locomotive engines. All they could do at that time was train a driver to drive it. With cybernetics being able to interface electronics, silicone chips, with your nervous system, being able to adapt like "The Six Million Dollar Man", another predictive programming series on television a long time ago, they'll make you faster and better and all of that stuff, but they also want to adapt humanity to specific machines.

Without asking us is this a good thing, bad thing, do we want it. That doesn't matter to an elite who understand the sciences of the mind, because I kid you not, they can by massive indoctrinations, propaganda and especially through fiction and drama creating excitement, they can make us want whatever they wish.

A good example of this is just to look at the cell phone usage, and who would have predicted 10, 15 years ago it would have got to the height that it's got to today? The first thing you ask yourself is "how on earth did people manage without them in the past?"  When they first came out they were going to be promoted for businessmen on the move, instant access to information wherever they were and how wonderful it would be, but it spread out into the general society. You can hardly go in to even small towns and stand at the crossroads and watch the traffic and almost everyone you see passing you has got this thing stuck to their ear, the average person, chatting all the time. All the time, whatever they're doing.  When they're doing their shopping in a store they're walking around the aisles muttering to themselves until you see there's a cell phone there; and step by step, even though the data has all come out concerning the fact that they are tracking you wherever you go. They've had that in major newspapers, even when you switch it off the towers and all the connecting mini-towers monitor your tracks wherever you happen to be and people don't mind that now.

At one time, people had nothing to hide; it's just that they respected their privacy and their right to privacy. Now that doesn't even matter to them and the new types of cell phones are these types which are I guess cordless in a sense, that they have an earpiece sticking out from their ear, as though it was attached to their head, which is the intent of it. It's psychological as well. It's getting you used to it, sticking out there, and now the young ones have ones with blinking lights on them, just like the guys you had in Star Trek series, the Borg, getting you familiarized with this into the next phase, which will come shortly.

They could bypass even giving you an external attachment if they want to and go straight into your head with a chip, but they like to place different bases to see if they can acclimatize you, if one fails you might go for this one until you're ready for the next step. They say that timing is everything and it's very true.

I watched a program a few years ago on some of these games they had at the big places like Disney World. In Canada, there's a Water World, I think it is, where they have these machines you get strapped into and you put the mask on to give you a virtual reality, and very quickly you find in this, what you see, you're climbing up walls and across ceilings and doing impossible things. Now when you see the people strapped in there and their arms are going like a spider, to them it becomes real very quickly. What happens, and it's not because of chance, this was all done a long time ago, the brain will respond to this strange situation very quickly. It adapts very quickly and you'll find that pathways spring up and data is transferred and bypassed old ones and new ones are set up to help you cope with this climbing on the ceilings and up the walls and down the walls.

However, what they found with it was they had to make a law that you couldn't drive you vehicle for one or two hours after you came off this game, because they found that so many of them were getting into their cars and driving off into walls and things or other people's cars, because the brain had adapted so quickly to this "virtual world" and although it adapts quickly, it takes time to get back to the normal. It takes longer. That's how quickly the brain – it's almost as though the brain were set up in a sense for this to happen down the road, isn't it?  We have to admit that is odd, a little question mark there.

Yet all the movies and so on are always been on about virtual realities and how we can create a computerized world inside the Internet and live in it. They've had lots of movies out on that, very exciting, where you can have battles inside and the good guys always win, of course, just like the old stories, to make it appealing to the young.

Here's a news bulletin that came out of C-Net News.com written by Stefanie Olsen, January 23, 2007. It's about a virtual reality coming in to be the norm.

The title is:

             Meet Me In My Avatar's Office.

It comes out of California.

             "Employees of tomorrow will inhabit virtual worlds like Second Life to hold live weekly meetings with co-workers, catch up over lunch with financial advisers, and join friends on virtual shopping excursions after work. That's if IBM's vision pans out.

"Success (in the future) will depend on how well you play the game, literally," Doug McDavid, executive research consultant at IBM's Academy of Technology, said here Monday night at an SDForum event titled "Virtual Worlds: Ready, Fire, Aim."

"A generation (has) lived in these environments, and they'll bring that perspective into the workplace. How this plays out is in the integration of work with this playful perspective," McDavid said. He added: "This is an unstoppable phenomenon."

In other words, it’s a must-be.

 

             "IBM's McDavid and Dave Kamalsky of the IBM Almaden Research Center were the main presenters at the nonprofit SDForum's first meeting on the business of virtual worlds. IBM certainly has a growing stake in the future of those online spaces. Evidence of the software giant's commitment to R&D for virtual worlds came this week when it announced a new social-networking tool for the enterprise called Lotus Connections"--

Interesting term.

             "and expected out later this year, it aims to help people find colleagues of similar interests, among other things, in virtual worlds."

Now, I've explained before in previous talks about the meaning of "virtue" in freemasonry, at least on one level of it and what it means, and in virtual worlds the term "virtual reality" is highly significant if you understand what it's really saying, because all of the societies which are really all one, in the world of secrecy, that is, and odd ways of standing and flashing signs and talking, who go on and on about virtue and the virtues and what they are. They're taught and they take it for granted in their discussions with each other in their books that man will prefer being base rather than being good, and virtue is supposed to be a moral standard in the lowest sense of the meaning, a moral standard, a virtue, a standard agreed by others. However, when it comes into "virtual," it also retains the same previous meanings but it also means "almost the same." Almost, not quite, but almost virtual; so it's a moralistic thing, a training thing contained here in the term "virtual reality," "virtual world."  There's more going to happen to the person than they will know themselves as they get trained.

             "Still, audience members at Monday's event expressed doubts that the corporate world, or the general public for that matter, was ready for a virtual space in which co-workers' avatars, or digital self-representations, could be naked versions of themselves. "The only thing that matters is what consumers are ready for," one audience member said. To be sure, if corporations widely embrace virtual worlds for business and employee relations, issues like security and privacy will surface. For example, residents of Second Life can represent themselves as dragons, the opposite sex or nudists. "That alone is a very deep issue--"

I thought it was rather superficial.

             "does there need to be a code of conduct for employees?" asked IBM's Kamalsky. "We're looking at security and privacy, but obviously we can't control the servers at Linden Lab," he added. "But we try to disclose that up front in these service agreements."

Now there could be no privacy, obviously. There's none right now on any of this electronic media and interfacing.

             "Yet IBM envisions many businesses and nonprofits thriving in virtual worlds."--

There's the carrot there. You can thrive there you see.

             "Marketers can use the so-called metaverses to project a cool image of products"--

Metaverses. Meta – middle.

             "and retail outlets can use them to sell real-world goods."--

Real-world goods.

             "Lawyers, accountants and real estate agents could also set up shop in virtual worlds to meet with clients informally."--

Maybe they'll sell you a pretend house, or it looks completely different in your virtual world than the one you'll get in the real world.

             "Virtual employee meetings and business teleconferencing could also benefit from the fact that virtual-world avatars can express emotion and gestures, adding life to otherwise remote events. In fact, IBM's McDavid said virtual worlds could ultimately be more of an affront to the airline business than teleconference services like WebEx. "A lot of this is a change of mindset," he said.  McDavid compared the rapid evolution of virtual worlds to the early days of the Internet, considering that interactive virtual worlds have come from nowhere to draw interest from celebrity bands such as U2"--

U-2.

             "news agencies like Fox and CNET Networks (publisher of News.com), and academic institutions like Harvard University. "Virtual-world years are to Internet years what the Internet years were to real years. Things are happening so fast," he said."--

 

Well they're not really because they've had this technology and all this stuff for a long, long time. It's being dished out piece-meal when the public are ready for it, when they've been trained from the last place they've been in their head space to the next.

             "Interest from IBM, for example, has morphed from a handful of employees researching the sector in 2006 to the company owning more than 12 islands on "Second Life" and as many as 2,000 employees registered as participants.

 

Welcome to IBM Island+
Last April, the company started buying just a few islands in Second Life, and then developing those internally. In the summer, it launched its Forbidden City and Wimbledon islands, along with a digital community called 3D Jam, where employees could "jam" about ideas with family, partners or co-workers."--

Sounds kind of sweet but sticky.

             "In October, IBM unveiled its "Global Connections," giving IBMers a virtual island where they can interact with company alumni. A month later, it bought 12 islands, including one that's become a virtual test store for Circuit City. The store gives shoppers a lounge-like experience of the retailer, with displays for the iPod and couches for sitting and gauging the right proportions of a new TV. Shoppers' avatars"--

 

This is terrible because they don't put the periods et cetera where they should be.

             "of a new TV. Shopper's avatars can then click to buy products at Circuit City's real online store.  This month, IBM introduced a prototype store for Sears, as well as its own island, Lotussphere"--

Remember what the Lotus is and you'll find that in old mythology what it's supposed to do to you when you do an awful lot of sleeping.

             "where clients can interact with IBM employees about Lotus software. And next week, it will take the wraps off its Australian Open island, where onlookers can watch the trajectories of balls hit in the actual sporting event or choose to see the game from the vantage point of an individual player, according to IBM."

So I guess the couch potatoes can sit there and live in sports land for ever.

             "Why is IBM so interested in seeing the virtual world succeed? Because, McDavid said, the company wants to attract and keep talented employees. A generation of kids"--

Kids. This is all goats again.

             "reared in virtual worlds like Second Life or MTV's Laguna Beach are eventually bound for a work force that will need to cater to their experiences by creating virtual worlds for the corporate intranet."

Intra-net.

             "Economically, too, the world is migrating to a services economy, McDavid said"--

Well we're here.

             "and it's all about people working together in these open, collaborative ways. "The turning point has to do with the balance between individual"--

Here we go with the last bit is the most important, the old, old war.

             "between individual and social interests within capitalism," he said."

That's the given here you see. They're laying down the rules which are not going to change and so money is still to be the thing we all work for, regardless if it's something we haul around in a cart such as gold or silver, or something you stuff in your pants pockets like paper or coin, or it's blips on the screen, it's just a carrot you see.  How many numbers do you have?  How many numbers do you earn?  That's to be still used for a while. It won't be used forever. It will still be used as a tool.

             "so the balance between individual and social interests within capitalism," he said. "It is the swing of the pendulum"--

There's your Masonic statement right there because they always talk about the swinging pendulum goes from this to that, to this to that and extremes all the time, which is nonsense. They're planned that way.

             "from the extreme individual...to giving greater attention to collective well-being."

Borg. Now why is IBM talking about socialistic policies? It's supposedly a business corporation. Anyone who thinks these are independent businesses – the ancient Egyptians used to talk about and you'll see this on some of the better carvings on the rocks. Over in Egypt you'll see especially with the ones to do with Akhenaton. You'll see the sun's rays coming out and downwards to the people holding their hands up to clasp what the rays are giving them. They're like strings. Maybe that's where the expression came, "If you take this there are strings attached."

You'll see the ANKH on the end, the symbol of life. It was an anchor.  It literally was an anchor in the old ships. It was an anchor, so the idea being that this god, the creator could bestow benefits through the "illumined ones". That's what the symbol of the sun was for. They knew the sun was not the god. That was a representation of illumination.  They would see the hairs – sometimes they called them "hairs of the sun," it depends on the translation, but it was also called sometimes "the beam of the sun".

If you see the IBM (EYE-BEE-M) and you speak it, you'll see EYE-BEAM. EYE-BEAM, the beam of the eye, and that's often how they'd draw it in ancient Egypt. Nothing is by chance. And EYE-BEAM is not new – the monitoring of the public, the populations. They were used in Germany. They came up with a form of Cardex system to monitor and keep all the data of all the prisoners and their numbers. They're very good at numbers.

This technology is just being dished out at the right time when they're ready for the next step and they pretty well say that in there.  Towards the end, as I've said before, where they say it's for a people who have been brought up with it who are ready for the "next step."  Now this step coming up I'm sure was ready a long time ago, but they have to always prepare the ground work. They prepare the minds of those who will experience it so that they will accept it. That's why they say a generation of young goats or kids.

"reared in virtual worlds like Second Life or MTV's Laguna Beach are eventually bound for a work force that will need to cater to their experiences by creating virtual worlds for the corporate intranet."

 

You can check that all out at C-Net News.com. January 23, 2007.

What I mentioned earlier with the cell phones now that stick to their ears and have blinking lights, this is all part of that training you to the next step. It doesn’t seem so bad. It seems quite natural to the youngsters as they progress from one part to the next to the next to the next. They never think where it comes from or why this particular device is being promoted above all others. They simply think it's very cool. It's published as being cool. They see their stars on TV doing it in drama shows or movies and they mimic as Darwin and others said of humanity. "The young mimic what they see. What they like they mimic and copy."  Of course Darwin's only quoting the ancient philosophers of Greece who said the same thing, old sciences.

It would certainly give a new meaning when they say that your phone's not working, it's on the blink, but there you go. A step-by-step training program worked out long ago because sciences are so far ahead of anything we're told about, so far ahead that it's beyond most people's real imagination. It's even almost beyond some of the advanced science fiction movies the technology which is ready to go. There are those who will scoff thinking, no, no they're always just inventing things and going along and they get it on the shelves as fast as they can.

In a world of free competition between companies and international companies and massive companies, how come they all came out with the VCR at the same time working exactly the same way?

How come when they altered into the DVD they all came out within the exact same time?

There was no company that first put one on the market and the rest of them to catch up and find out how it worked and copy them. Just recently in Canada here they've come out with the Windows Vista computers instead of the old Windows, the old XP, and right up until the day the Vista appeared in the stores they were still selling the XP and then overnight they're off the shelves everywhere and there's the Vista and all the makes are there ready to go. That takes intra-company coordination and cooperation, I would say, on a "high level." The technology is dished out to them too, the advanced technology, and yet it's guided. It's not haphazard whatsoever.

They follow Revelations of the Bible as a business plan, where in the last days you couldn't buy or sell with the marks et cetera of the big beastie, but also there would be nothing hidden that wouldn't be shouted from the rooftops. Everything, all that was known, would be shouted from the rooftops, meaning you couldn't keep anything secret; and Revelations was written by a mystery school. That's why they use mystery language. That's why ministers of so many denominations are still fighting each other over the meanings. To them it's confusing; to those who understand the mystery language it's quite clear – exoteric/esoteric written together in the one.

To those who follow Christianity as it's been given, they obviously immediately will say, "well see, it's in the Bible, it's got to happen," so they’re already programmed predictability and will look forward to it in a sense, because to them that's getting to the end of the old nasty world where the brand new one will come, even though they don't think past the next part, which is you'll get brand new bodies. You'll be transformed in the wink of an eye. I guess that's when they activate your chip – the new you, the real total makeover. Yet this was designed a long time ago, an awful long time ago.

In ancient times it is true they had their slaves numbered and they did mark them and size them and tattoo them and brand them, yet they always knew that if they understood the secrets of nature (meaning sciences) they could get to a much higher level of doing it, so it's not impossible that they could plan that all that time ago. It's not impossible at all. And we certainly get the whiffs of all that through the philosophies preached openly since especially the 1700's of the problems of humankind, the problems of the individual human versus the collective security of society.

However, what they failed to mention and you see that makes sense because an individual can't say, "well I want to dominate the rest." The ones who run the world and who are talking about this are the ones who did all that in the past. They just don't want everyone else doing it and it's true no one should do it, dominate the rest; but humanity isn't perfect and people are born in every generation who want to do just that, to dominate the rest; yet this was all discussed in their philosophies, but they didn't stop at discussing.

They had the money, the power, the foundations to back them up and work towards a common goal. A planned society that started with Planned Parenthood, now it's going to be a planned society. Well understood at the top and the public are simply being trained step-by-step to go along with it.

I don't give advice to people because you can't stop people from going towards the bait. You can't do it. They'll think you're crazy. To them, it's a natural progression and sometime in the near future I'm sure and I've already seen it on one of the big popular shows where the woman promoted the chip for tracking purposes, for safety for children after giving a few horror stories. You'll see more of this being promoted by the stars whom people follow, as almost gods in fact, and if the big ones say it's fine then it's fine for me then, so-and-so said it was fine for me and that's what they adapt to. They don't think things through.

This is the biggest transition phase we're going through since the industrial revolution, which completely altered the way of life from the agrarian societies and the old feudal system into the next. Well this change we're going through is to be at least as dramatic, with far ranging consequences, into a way which has already been planned and that's the sad part you see. We’re not participating really. We don't get to participate and even going over all the problems that might incur, we get no participation at all. We’re trained. We're trained. The mass man is trained and kept terribly busy running and scurrying, so he doesn't have much time to think or if he can he'll switch on his television just to zonk out for a while and forget everything for a little while; while he's being programmed again while he's relaxing. Sad, isn't it?  It's quite the trap.

Maybe the good news is that generally in the past the big boys don't like simply to force everyone at once to do something. They go intergenerationally, they go with so many years for this part of the plan, so much for that part, five years here, 10 years there, 20 years there, because then the public would get suspicious if it was all mandated at once. They'd say "what's going on here? Why must we do this?" But if they make you want to buy things and adapt individually it seems quite natural to the average person and they're not suspicious. You're not suspicious when you buy your own computer, even though it's been mandated everyone's got to have a computer shortly. If they made that a law, a checkable law where they could come around and check if you had a computer and see if you were putting all your data online, if they made that law we'd all be suspicious; but because they don't, people put all their information online and make it free and readily available to them. That's a good technique.

I'm sure it would be the same probably with this chip coming up, unless they do something drastic and declare it's got to be done now for emergency purposes to make sure everyone gets their fair rationing and proportions and so on through this terrible crisis phase or whatever they tell us, but it's also possible they'll phase it in over 15 years or so.

This is the world we're being guided towards and have been already, just as our parents were guided to their part in it to accepting the cultural and value changes they went through.

For me, that's all I have to say tonight. Hope you're all doing well, keeping well and thinking for yourselves. From me and Hamish, it's good night and may your god or gods or your philosophy go with you.

 

"Zombie Jamboree"

By Harry Belafonte

It was a Zombie Jamboree
Took place in a New York cemetery
It was a Zombie Jamboree
Took place in a New York cemetery

Zombies from all parts of the Island
Some of them was a great Calypsonians
Although the season was Carnival
We get together in Bacchanal
And they're singing

Back to back, belly to belly
I don't give a damn, I done dead already
Oho back to back, belly to belly
At the Zombie Jamboree

I hear you talking

Back to back, belly to belly
I don't give a damn, I done dead already
Oho back to back, belly to belly
At the Zombie Jamboree

One female Zombie wouldn't behave
See how she jumping out of the grave
In one hand a quarter rum
In the other hand she knocking Congo drum
Believe singer start to make his rhyme
The Zombies are racking their bones in thyme
One bystander had this to say
It was a pleasure to see the Zombies break away

And they're singing

Back to back, belly to belly
I don't give a damn, I done dead already
Oho back to back, belly to belly
At the Zombie Jamboree

I goin' talk to Miss Brigit Bardot
And tell her miss Bardot take it slow
All the men think they're Casanova
When they see that she's bare foot all over
Even old men out in Topica
Find their hearts getting weaker and weaker
So I goin' to ask her for your sake and mine
At least to wear her earrings part of the time

And I'm singing

Back to back, belly to belly
I don't give a damn, I done dead already
Oho back to back, belly to belly
At the Zombie Jamboree

A lot of World leaders talkin' 'bout war
And I'm afraid they're going too far
So its up to us you and me
To put an end to Catastrophe
We must appeal to their goodness of heart
And ask them to pitch in and please do their part
Cause if this Atomic war begin
They won't even have a part to pitch in

And we'll be singing

Back to back, belly to belly-

I don't give a damn, I done dead already
Oho back to back, belly to belly
At the Zombie Jamboree

I hear you talking

Back to back, belly to belly-

I don't give a damn, I done dead already
Oho back to back, belly to belly
At the Zombie, Zombie Jamboree

Quote from Hamish on March 11, 2021, 5:58 pm

ALAN WATT    BLURB
"UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE,
UKRAINIAN ANTI-FREEMASONIC BILL"
February 23, 2007

Hi. I'm Alan Watt at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and .net and a few others which you'll see on the site.  Today is February 23, 2007. To finish off this week, I was thinking to talk about an event which happened in the 20th century, which was almost lost in the massive upheavals going round the world at the time, across Europe especially, and that was the famine in the Ukraine.

The Ukrainian people had an incredibly hard time, being whacked first by the communist system, the soviet system, and eventually became a battle field.  When the Soviets moved in World War II while the Natzis were also moving in in World War II and the people who lived primarily in rural areas were being butchered by both sides.  Horrible, horrible events occurred there which have been glossed over, as we tend to do in this wonderful world of ours, where we deny the nasty stuff and it eventually gets swept under the carpet of time.

We are so far removed in the so-called "civilized countries" from the horrors of war that they're now not even real to most people. People today can't tell the difference between fiction and reality. We’ve seen so many people blown up in movies, very realistic movies, that we can't tell the difference anymore. It means nothing and that's why horror can be repeated. It's easier to do it on an unsuspecting civilized public who go into a complete state of shock when it breaks out.

The Ukraine had vast farmlands with small peasant owners, owners who had lived there for generation upon generation, built their own houses, very self-sufficient and independent people. Rich culture, but to the Darwinists and the anthropologists that made up the Natzi and Soviet systems, these people were classed really as a stagnant population. They were not progressive and if you're not progressive they come down with a big stick on you to teach you a lesson or eliminate you. That's part of the Darwin theory. Those who can't adapt into this new system that's supposed to naturally evolve have to be eliminated and can't go forward into the new, an old Hindu philosophy really and since that's what Darwinism is based on and all Freemasonry is too.

This article comes from the moss.news.com, from I guess Moscow, created on the 27.11.2006.  This is what it says:

"Ukraine marks the 73rd Anniversary of Soviet-era Famine that Claimed 10 million Lives."

Alan:  When people ask me about monuments or social days towards holocausts, I've said over and over, I wish every country would put up memorials to government-created holocausts to their own peoples because they're all over the world.  This is what it says:

"Holding flickering candles and standing in perfect stillness, thousands of Ukrainians gathered on a fog-shrouded square to mourn 10 million compatriots who died of starvation during a man-made Soviet-era famine 73 years ago, The Associated Press reports.

During the height of the 1932-33 famine, known here as Holodomor, or Death by Hunger, 25,000 people died every day, devastating entire villages. Cases of cannibalism were widespread as desperation deepened. Those who resisted were shot or sent off to Siberia.

“I do not ask, I demand that the Ukrainian parliament recognize Holodomor as genocide,” President Viktor Yushchenko told the crowd gathered on Kiev’s Mykhaylivska Square on Saturday in a short address followed by a minute of silence and the tolling of bells.

Soviet dictator Josef Stalin provoked the famine in a campaign to force peasants to give up their private farms and join collectives."

Alan:  This collective stuff really gets to me you know. We’re all one. We all have to be one. Our new communitarianism, which is being propagated in the West, the same stuff. We’re all a big community and it's not a recent thing or phenomena. This has been going on since the Soviet system, this whole idea towards the collective, the hive.

"Authorities collectivized agriculture throughout the Soviet Union, but farmers in Ukraine — known as the breadbasket of the U.S.S.R. — fiercely resisted and bore the brunt of the man-made disaster.

Moscow has warned Kiev against using the term genocide, arguing that the issue should not be “politicized,” and some Ukrainian lawmakers agreed, proposing that it be termed a “tragedy” instead."

Alan:  It was a tragedy, yes. There's your legalisms at work again to try and take the nastiness out of what actually happened. It was just a tragedy. Real people just like you and I and mom and dad and granny and grandpa were starved to death and killed and shot.

"Russia argues that the orchestrated famine did not specifically target Ukrainians and also affected others, including Russians and Kazakhs. But historians say that the overwhelming majority of victims were Ukrainians, and the famine coincided with Stalin’s effort to quash growing Ukrainian nationalism."

Alan:  I hope people realize how Sovietization and the Western capital system are one and the same thing since their goal is exactly the same.  To end nationalism was the cry of Soviets, by creating a world empire of collectivization, specialization, bureaucracies, and no independent planning of your own life. It would all be planned for you by experts and that just happened to the same thing in the West.

"Yushchenko appealed to Russia to “stand by our side” and recognize the mass starvation as genocide. “With this high example, demonstrate the human empathy that is inherent to the Russian people,” he said.

“How can it be called anything but genocide,” said Kateryna Kryvenko, 78, who recalled crying at the feet of Soviet officials as they ransacked her family’s village home, carting off what little food her family had managed to hide under a floorboard. Authorities took everything, and Kryvenko’s father and three brothers and sisters died.

During the Soviet era, the mass starvation was a closely guarded state secret, but information trickled out over the years. Ten nations, including the United States, have recognized the famine as an act of genocide, defined as the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political or cultural group. Genocide is a crime under international law."

Alan:  But don't hold your breath. They won't take this any further.

"Ukraine’s Parliament Speaker Oleksandr Moroz said Saturday that he supports recognizing the mass starvation as genocide, and said the president’s bill would come before parliament this week. Some lawmakers from Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych’s Russia-leaning Party of Regions"

Alan:  They've got a Party of Regions.

"suggested watering it down, but party member Taras Chornovil predicted the president’s version would ultimately pass. Yanukovych joined Yushchenko in Saturday’s commemorations.

“Those who deny the Holodomor ... hate us, our spirit, our future,” Yushchenko told the crowd that gathered on the square after a silent procession in which marchers carried aloft white banners representing every Ukrainian region. Black ribbons were hung from the banners; black ribbons were also hung on Ukraine’s blue-and-yellow national flag Saturday.

“The tragedy is of such a scale that it is hard to even imagine,” said Oksana Yatsyuk, 18, as she held a flickering candle — one of 25,000 expected to be laid on two Kiev squares to honor the victims. “And to think that one man created all this terror, this genocide.”

Under Stalin, each village was ordered to provide the state with a quota of grain, but the demands typically exceeded crop yields."

Alan:  It's kind of like taxation from government. It always seems to exceed what you can afford.

"As village after village failed to meet the requirements, they were put on a blacklist. The government seized all food and residents were prohibited from leaving — effectively condemning them to starvation.

“On behalf of Ukraine, I will insist that the victims of Holodomor be recognized as martyrs of one of the biggest catastrophes in the history of mankind,” Yushchenko said."

Alan:  Perhaps instead of having children recite a national prayer to obey a system over which they have no control, they could recite the following in school and learn it by heart perhaps.

"The Box"
By John Denver

Once upon a time, in the land of Hushabye,
Round about the wondrous days of yore.
They came across a sort of box,
bound up with chains and locked with locks,
And labeled "Kindly Do Not Touch, It's War."

A decree was issued round about all with a flourish and a shout,
and a gaily colored mascot tripping lightly on the fore,
"Don't fiddle with this deadly box, or break the chains, or pick the locks,
And Please... don't ever play about with war."

Well, the children understood, children happen to be good,
and they were just as good around the time of yore.
They didn't try to pick the locks, or break into that deadly box,
they never tried to play about with war.

Mommies didn't either, Sisters, Aunts, Grannies neither,
'cause they were quiet and sweet and pretty in those wondrous days of yore.
Well very much the same as now, and not the ones to blame somehow,
for opening up that deadly box of war.

But someone did... someone battered in the lid,
and spilled the insides out across the floor.
A sort of bouncy bumpy ball, made up of guns
and flags and all the tears and horror and the death that goes with war.

It bounced right out and went bashing all about,
and bumping into everything in store.
And what was sad and most unfair is that it didn't really seem to care,
much who it bumped, or why, or what, or for.

It bumped the children mainly, and I'll tell you this quite plainly,
It bumps them everyday... and more... and more,
and leaves them dead and burned and dying, thousands of them sick and crying,
cause when it bumps... it's really very sore.

Now there's a way to stop the ball, it isn't difficult at all,
all it takes is wisdom.
I'm absolutely sure that we could get it back into the box...
and bind the chains and lock the locks.
But no one seems to want to save the children anymore.

Well, that's the way it all appears, cause it's been bouncing round for years and years
in spite of all the wisdom wizzed since those wondrous days of yore.
And the time they came across The Box, bound up with chains and locked
with locks and labeled "Kindly Do Not Touch, It's War."

Now while I'm on the Ukraine, I can tie this in from the same mosnews.com Ukrainian Parliamentary blurb here where they suggest jailing Freemasons.  This is from the 07.12.2004.

You see, Freemasonry under the guise of charity and just a good bunch of guys having a joke with each other, a little boy's club, is a help themselves organization which takes over any system into which it's introduced, with oaths of secrecy – blood oaths and death oaths and all the rest of it. You'd have to ask yourself why charitable organizations must take death oaths for charity's sake. Of course it's nothing to do with charity. The big charity is in their own pockets and they help each other to get contracts, special government contracts. They must swear to keep each other secret from the public and from everyone else, the profane as they say. It's a system that runs the systems in every country.

Once the Soviet Union came down, it was in the newspapers in the West that Freemasons from America and Britain were sending brothers off to reestablish Masonic lodges in these particular sovietized countries. They got in right away and you wonder why the corruption is going on and how these boys manage to keep all their little deals secret, these multimillion deals they end up getting. Well their brotherhood is alive and well, that's why.

This little blurb that goes like this.

"Ukrainian MP Taras Chornovil has suggested that the country’s parliament, the Supreme Rada, introduce criminal responsibility for Freemasonry, the MigNews web-site reported on Tuesday.

Taras Chornovil is the son of the late nationalist leader Vyacheslav Chornovil, and his appointment as an adviser to presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovich on West-Ukrainian affairs earlier this year provoked much criticism in nationalist circles. He will head Yanukovich’s campaign headquarters in the repeat of the controversial second round of Ukrainian presidential elections.

He has submitted to the Rada a bill entitled “On amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine”, according to which, membership of Freemason organizations, or any other organizations that require rituals and oaths of higher priority than the current law, must be punished by a jail sentence of up to three years.

The bill also reads that the members of Masonic organizations who are Ukrainian civil servants, law enforcers or military servicemen must be jailed for three to seven years."

Alan:  Now I doubt that they'll put this bill through.

"Ukraine’s president, members of parliament, civil servants of ministerial rank, military servicemen and law enforcers of the rank of major-general or higher, if discovered to be members of Freemason organizations, may face up to 10 years in prison.

If the membership in a Masonic organization causes deaths, a threat to Ukraine’s national integrity or its defense potential, members of the organization must be imprisoned for 10 to 15 years, the bill reads.

In February, the leader of Ukraine’s Socialist Party, Aleksander Moroz, said that about 300 of Ukraine’s top officials were members of the St. Stanislaus Order Masonic Lodge. Later, other left-wing parties and also the pro-Western bloc headed by Yulia Tymoshenko also called on the government to ban the St Stanislaus Order in Ukraine.

Alan:  You see these characters have their little clubs throughout all the countries, especially up in the realms which you take for granted, your police, your military, civil service, bureaucracy, politicians. Wherever the public money feeds them, that's where they are. The public produce the honey for the hive. That's your tax money. That's where the biggest money happens to be. It's in that big pot and they all want to get in there and take scoops of it out for themselves, so they put their boys in at the top to make sure that the honey trickles in the right direction. It's run on a criminal basis, basically, where they are an elitist group claiming to be enlightened and it's their duty really to use the profane. That's what the profane are there for according to them.

Other countries are having their problems with them and they're sworn to secrecy.  Well how can you be sworn to secrecy to serve a brotherhood first and foremost and help each other and lie on oath for each other if need be and serve your country too. It's impossible you see. This is through the entire world this system from the top to the bottom and many people live their lives completely oblivious of it.

They don't know why they can't get the right jobs. They don't know why they're passed over for promotions and so on, and it's because they don't have the right connections. That's why.

Now here is another country that's got its pretty big problems with freemasonry.  This is from the Observer-Guardian-UK with a Northern Ireland story, Saturday, July 27, 2003 from the Observer.

"The police service of Northern Ireland is to become the first in the Western world to make officers register their membership of secret societies such as the Masons. A Register of Interest will become mandatory for all policemen and women up to and including Chief Constable Hugh Orde within the next three weeks.

"And the register, which will reveal how many officers hold membership of the Orange Order, will also be handed over to Northern Ireland's Police Ombudsman, Nuala O'Loan. She will have the right to refer during investigations into alleged bias, maltreatment of suspects or the mishandling of police inquiries to any officer's membership of secret societies.

Alan:  You will see that Northern Ireland for instance where the Orange Order, probably one of the most militant Orders within Freemasonry which gives allegiance to the Queen, the Crown, and I know lots of them over in Scotland and Ireland. I've met them and these guys are fanatics. They're trained from childhood to be fanatics and to hate Catholics, to utterly hate them. And yet, you know this is one of the older orders of Freemasonry which the British government used very effectively in the armed forces as far back as the 1700's. The first "traveling lodges" as they called them were in the British regiments. They swore complete allegiance to the Crown; regardless of whatever they were told to do, they would do it. Even through the Americas these guys, wherever these regiments went, they would often leave a lodge behind them in towns, the Orange Order, going back to King Billie as they call him, King William of Orange.

The Orange Free State. The color of orange is very important in the present world system and certainly the Orange Free State is too. That's where The Hague happens to be. The Orange Order used to go through the towns in Ireland, I don't know if they still do, and the towns in Scotland as well with their Orange Day Parade. You'll see these characters with all their Masonic regalia and their banners and guys with swords drawn and clubs. They do these strange little jeering dances as they went down the road, down the street of their march, supposedly to commemorate the defeating of the Irish a long time ago.

The Catholics were made to watch this and feel as though they were second class or even lower citizens. This was encouraged and held up and authorized by the British Crown who kept turmoil going. They must keep turmoil going, chaos, to bring out the order. In freemasonry you'll find all the orders of the rainbow with their colors, all specialized in different parts and remember not just the primary colors, but the colors in between, even unknown to some of the Masons themselves. Specialized orders.

You'll find this in every country on the planet. A religion which encompasses all other religions and yet is seldom noticed by the people as they walk past these little lodges in their villages, towns and cities and they think it's just some sort of charitable boys club where they play themselves and get away from their wives for a little while. It's much, much deeper. You don't take these kind of oaths as an adult and accept the penalties for disclosing the information or the secrets as they call it. You don't take these kind of oaths lightly. These are taken with complete conviction because they're serious oaths and they must lie to everyone pretty well to protect a brother.

They also let freemasons off with petty things: fines, parking offenses, speeding offenses. They get deals on their property assessments. When they need loans from banks, they get them very quickly, generally the same day. They're automatically approved and passed and verified and vouched for. A system within a system. And the Masonic policeman that will stop you and give you the hard time, if you give him the right signs and passwords will let you go; and the guy behind you who doesn't know the right signs and passwords will have to pay up and pay up and pay up and take the consequences – and we call this a fair just system.

There's nothing fair and just about it, and even if you try to close them down they'll simply metamorph into another thing, another area, a different name, and carry on with more secrecy because the world is run by secrecy. Your secret services, intelligence services, are freemasonic as well. It's pretty well mandatory that you must be a Mason to be part of it because you've already learned how to keep your mouth shut and how to stand up in lie for each other if need be. That's quite the insurance policy for the secret service agents and people who could take the heat if they were ever found doing the nefarious things which they often do. It's an insurance policy.

Same in the police. When the police foul up and someone's head is on the block as they say, because he shot someone by mistake or whatever, the rest of them will stand up for this guy. They'll all sit and write the same story in their books, stand up in court and justify whatever ridiculous story they give to get their brother off the hook. There's nothing new in this at all. This kind of behavior encourages worse behavior each time they get away with it because that's human nature.

Not only the male lodges have to be watched carefully and scrutinized, so do the female ones because the female ones tend to go off onto the school boards and other charity events and they become directors and so on; and you wonder where all your policies locally are coming from and how we're becoming globalized and following international standards.  You've got to check out every single person who you have allowed to get up over your head and make laws which affect you.  You must demand to know what organizations they have sworn allegiance to, and some of them are very well camouflaged if you just read their names. Tremendously well camouflaged, not by chance.

And people say how do you stop this?  How do you divert it?  How do you deflect this agenda?  And I tell them, if you're going to play the game, and that's all it is, is playing a game of voting in pre-selected people, you better demand to know everything about that person that you're going to give your authority to who's going to pass laws which will affect you or your children.  You have the right to know everything which they have subscribed to, joined, sworn allegiance to, and then you better do your homework and find out what kind of strange religion is this that runs your world which you think is just a charitable institution?

The U.S. is probably the most openly freemasonic nation or even empire in the world.  It's throughout all of its symbols, emblems, parades.  You'll see presidents giving speeches.  Look at the flags behind them.  Look at the objects placed around them.  Everything is freemasonic openly. You're seeing freemasonic parades when you watch the military.  Look at all the clubs, your business organizations, the banking organizations, the medical.  Look at the symbols they use for the medical associations, the Chamber of Commerce and so on. And even the trade unions, which used to do marches through the streets with their banners, look at them very carefully because all of it and all of it is freemasonic.  It's quite incredible that populations can come and go. Generations can come and go and have no idea, even though it's all around them that they're being guided and run and ruled by a religion.

A religion that shows its symbols openly and you become used to them, taking it for granted it must be somehow normal to have the same symbols repeated as logos et cetera all around you. The one big religion which runs all the religions, and yes, you have ministers who are members. Some of the church organizations are worse than others. I think the Baptist church in the States openly admitted they have the most freemasonic members who are ministers and that was okay with them, but the other ones are the same too.

In fact in some of the Masonic books they take credit and tell you the names of the founders of the different sects of the religions, protestant sects, in the United States and they tell you what degree of freemasonry they happen to be. And the flocks, the sheep never know, never think to ask what is all of these strange symbols and why would their minister be a member of a club that keeps its secrets to itself?

Remember that when the Templars moved off from France with their fleet, which was never found, they didn't stop there. They went across to Scotland and made their base at the west coast at Argyllshire and metamorphed into another society which was allowed. Some of the members were allowed to marry and mix with the people, and who ran the banking system of the time?  Well the Templars did.  They never stopped.

Chameleons can come into any church and take over. With the money backing them they could start all the big branches of banking, business, the medical system; and knowing they'd have opposition as they plundered the public, they created the trade unions and managed that side as well. Of course, most people would prefer to believe because generally they have members who belong to it, low level members, that it's just a charitable organization, even though their flag – when the Templars used their sea flag you had the skull and bones of the pirates who plundered and sunk ships after they robbed them with all hands on board and all passengers too.  Plundering, plundering and plundering.

What was it Albert Pike said in "Morals & Dogma?"  To gain power by all means and every means including the stock market manipulation.  That's what he meant and become the masters over the masters of the world. Those who understand the rest of his book will understand the agenda that he was talking about and where they would take society through science and so on.

Worlds within worlds. Wheels within wheels. All around you and most of the people are oblivious or think they know what it is because Uncle Joe's a member and he comes home drunk once in a while from the club. That's a very good cover.

How can you have a society which declares on the one hand that it's open and demands your allegiance and your pay packet at times, and on the other hand the same politicians and bureaucrats with their own little secret signs and handshakes and stances and quips and words and their winks to each other can plunder you. You can't have both and expect any kind of just system.

This is from Manley P. Hall.  Manley P. Hall was a spokesperson for freemasonry put out to mystify the young through the writings, cause intrigue, promote mysteries, hint at solutions to attract the youth into these organizations. He was a 33rd degree freemason and probably much higher.

This is what he said about the craft of Masonry.

"All true Masons know that their work is not secret but they realized that it must remain unknown to all who do not live the true Masonic life. Yet of the so-called secrets of freemasonry, were shouted from the house tops, the fraternity would be absolutely safe for certain spiritual qualities are necessary before the real Masonic secrets can be understood by the brethren themselves. Hence it is that the alleged exposures of freemasonry printed by the thousands and tens of thousands in 1730 down to the present hour cannot injure the fraternity. They reveal merely the outward forms in ceremonies of freemasonry. Only those who have been weighed in the balance and found to be true, upright and square have prepared themselves by their own growth to appreciate the inner meanings of their craft.  To the rest of their brethren within or without the lodge their sacred rituals must remain as Shakespeare might have said words, words, words."

He is telling you right there that even the lower Masons don't know what it's all about either. They think they do. As Mr. Pike said, "They must believe that they think they know what all the symbols and ritualism means but it's not necessary that they actually really do comprehend what it means."

They're taking oaths to things which they don't understand and an agenda which they don't understand, in the hope really not to improve themselves personally, but improve themselves financially and status-wise within communities.  He uses the term "sacred" here, sacred rituals, because freemasonry is a religion. You can tell by its history of revolutions and so on that it's a very powerful religion. It's led revolutions. It has a goal.

Hall himself talks about Masons taking the oaths without comprehending the import of them. They're deadly serious. He also talks about evolution through the ages. He says, "a Mason cannot be ordained or elected by ballot. He is evolved through ages of self-purification and spiritual transmutation."  Here is part of the belief structure – through ages of purification, reincarnation and spiritual transmutation, the alteration of spirit itself.

He also talks about hidden masters the same as theosophy, which is just an ordained branch of freemasonry. There are many, many openly freemasonic organizations using different names and there are also a vast amount of other ones, probably more, with innocuous sounding names all working towards the same agenda and they're encouraged to go on to all kinds of societal boards like school boards, councils, that kind of thing, anything to do with social change and guidance, definitely in education big time.

They're also encouraged to accept brethren from all other faiths, which is fine, except that out of all that comes a more elitist group who believe that they've transcended all of that to join a high group, a group beyond religions, the supreme religion you might say. They would say. It's a supreme religion and they take it all on faith. They take it on faith from the top to the bottom that those above them who have more secrets and who give them orders know what they're doing, so it's a faith-based religion, to obey orders instantly without allowing your own personal opinion or emotion to become involved. That's quite the religion, faith-based.

The perfection of man, to perfect that which was left imperfect, is their goal supposedly, and sure enough, like all self-help groups you think well I guess it's just like a correspondence course from the California-based Rosicrucians where you're told how to better yourself and how to watch your words and watch your thoughts and emotions and so on; but it's much, much bigger than all of that because as you go up the reading process, the understanding process, you realize there is an incredible elitism involved at the top which believes in eugenics.

They believe in superior types of humanity and they also believe that we have evolved as far as we can go in this present state, therefore all of those at the top of the tree, the Darwinian tree you might say, deserve to be there, the crème-de-la-crème in all peoples, and they themselves constitute a new race all together. That's what they believe. They don't think that anything else can come up from the vast pool of the profane down below. The gene war is over as far as they're concerned at the top.

It's tremendously interesting. Underneath all of the allegories, which is really allegory piled upon allegory, they talk about perfecting man with little occasional hints at what they mean by perfection. Everyone's been taught, in the West, that is, since it was decided to give a particular version to the Western busy bees, that at first a deity created the perfect likeness of himself into Adam. If you read the original wording it does mean the perfect sameness, absolute sameness and the hint is that the fall of Adam was loneliness, therefore that which was also in Adam, which was female, was removed and made separate, which also meant that the deity itself was both male and female. How would you perfect that which was left un-perfect unless you put the male and female back together?

Who are these hidden masters they talk about that guide the higher worthy brethren, the same ones that theosophy talks about?  Why would a society which uses the garb of helping society through charity et cetera and makes a big thing of their charitable contributions to society, why would it have to take blood-curdling oaths for charity?  If that's all they were about of course they wouldn't need to. It's just that if society ever realized the ultimate intention of this worldwide religion which is within every religion. They guide every religion. If they knew the ultimate intent, if they knew the ultimate doctrine, they might not see it in the same way at all as a bunch of good old boys getting together and wearing fancy clothes and prancing around an altar.

Why can they themselves in all positions of authority forgive fellow Masons on certain things and yet slap the profane with penalties? Where is the equality in that?  Isn't that a tremendous class distinction?  We're looking at elitist organizations. Their training manuals are big into selecting the right mate or having them selected for you and the correct rearing of the young who will then themselves enter the craft.

You're looking at eugenics. You're looking at the judgment upon the commoners who don't have their mates picked for them. You're looking at the basis of a system which cannot help because of secrecy and obligations to each other but be corrupt. A Mason must lie to defend a fellow Mason on oath. You can find these lodges around the planet in small towns and villages and within cities.

You'll see the architecture in parliament buildings of this religion. Their architecture is everywhere. Their logos, their symbols are everywhere. They use a language of symbolism to evoke in those who understand a very understandable language, the universal religion. And Masons are allowed and encouraged to enter into active participation in the religions of their choice or those in which they were born and brought up, knowing that at all times that's all part of the Great Work to guide society in a faith-based mission believing that the superiors know what they're doing and that it must be for a good reason.

You can have no justice in a system where courts, lawyers, judges, and all the regalia of the courtroom is nothing more than a freemasonic temple. There can be no possible justice there. What is justice?  Is justice simply a battle between lawyers using their own terminology and wit to outdo the other, or does it have to do with right and wrong?  And it’s nothing to do with right and wrong.

Freemasonry in its present form in the West came through different organizations including Knights Templars, the Hospitallers, came through different sects of monks and what they all have in common are uniforms – uniform, one form, one shape. Part of their religion is the oneness of everything.  However, the oneness of everything does not include necessarily the capstone. That's for the elect, so for the masses it may be oneness for you. Kind of like one size fits all.

I'd like to go into a talk to do with perceptions on my next blurb to show you how sciences and conditioning have allowed us to live in a science fiction reality. A greater science fiction reality than any novel that was ever written, and show you the absurdity and criminality and the genius behind controlling our minds for such a long time so that we see things in a completely different way from that in which they are, through massive conditioning and indoctrination from birth.

That's all for me tonight, so from Hamish and me, it's a nice good snowy night and may your god or gods go with you.